Patent Grant
10017827
This invention relates to the field of agriculture, particularly to herbicide-resistant sunflower plants that comprise two different herbicide-resistant alleles of the sunflower acetohydroxyacid synthase large subunit 1 (AHASL1) gene.
Acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS; EC 4.1.3.18, also known as acetolactate synthase or ALS), is the first enzyme that catalyzes the biochemical synthesis of the branched chain amino acids valine, leucine and isoleucine (Singh (1999) “Biosynthesis of valine, leucine and isoleucine,” in Plant Amino Acid, Singh, B. K., ed., Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, N.Y., pp. 227-247). AHAS is the site of action of five structurally diverse herbicide families including the sulfonylureas (Tan et al. (2005) Pest Manag. Sci. 61:246-57; Mallory-Smith and Retzinger (2003) Weed Technology 17:620-626; LaRossa and Falco (1984) Trends Biotechnol. 2:158-161), the imidazolinones (Shaner et al. (1984) Plant Physiol. 76:545-546), the triazolopyrimidines (Subramanian and Gerwick (1989) “Inhibition of acetolactate synthase by triazolopyrimidines,” in Biocatalysis in Agricultural Biotechnology, Whitaker, J. R. and Sonnet, P. E. eds., ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp. 277-288), the pyrimidinyloxybenzoates (Subramanian et al. (1990) Plant Physiol. 94: 239-244) and the sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinones (Tan et al. (2005) Pest Manag. Sci. 61:246-57; Mallory-Smith and Retzinger (2003) Weed Technology 17:620-626). Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides are widely used in modern agriculture due to their effectiveness at very low application rates and relative non-toxicity in animals. By inhibiting AHAS activity, these families of herbicides prevent further growth and development of susceptible plants including many weed species. Several examples of commercially available imidazolinone herbicides are PURSUIT® (imazethapyr), SCEPTER® (imazaquin) and ARSENAL® (imazapyr). Examples of sulfonylurea herbicides are chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron methyl, sulfometuron methyl, chlorimuron ethyl, thifensulfuron methyl, tribenuron methyl, bensulfuron methyl, nicosulfuron, ethametsulfuron methyl, rimsulfuron, triflusulfuron methyl, triasulfuron, primisulfuron methyl, cinosulfuron, amidosulfuron, flazasulfuron, imazosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron ethyl and halosulfuron.
Due to their high effectiveness and low-toxicity, imidazolinone herbicides are favored for application by spraying over the top of a wide area of vegetation. The ability to spray a herbicide over the top of a wide range of vegetation decreases the costs associated with plant establishment and maintenance, and decreases the need for site preparation prior to use of such chemicals. Spraying over the top of a desired tolerant species also results in the ability to achieve maximum yield potential of the desired species due to the absence of competitive species. However, the ability to use such spray-over techniques is dependent upon the presence of imidazolinone-resistant species of the desired vegetation in the spray over area.
Among the major agricultural crops, some leguminous species such as soybean are naturally resistant to imidazolinone herbicides due to their ability to rapidly metabolize the herbicide compounds (Shaner and Robinson (1985) Weed Sci. 33:469-471). Other crops such as corn (Newhouse et al. (1992) Plant Physiol. 100:882-886) and rice (Barrett et al. (1989) Crop Safeners for Herbicides, Academic Press, New York, pp. 195-220) are somewhat susceptible to imidazolinone herbicides. The differential sensitivity to the imidazolinone herbicides is dependent on the chemical nature of the particular herbicide and differential metabolism of the compound from a toxic to a non-toxic form in each plant (Shaner et al. (1984) Plant Physiol. 76:545-546; Brown et al., (1987) Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 27:24-29). Other plant physiological differences such as absorption and translocation also play an important role in sensitivity (Shaner and Robinson (1985) Weed Sci. 33:469-471).
Plants resistant to imidazolinones, sulfonylureas, triazolopyrimidines, and pyrimidinyloxybenzoates have been successfully produced using seed, microspore, pollen, and callus mutagenesis in Zea mays, Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica napus (i.e., canola) Glycine max, Nicotiana tabacum, sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) and Oryza sativa (Sebastian et al. (1989) Crop Sci. 29:1403-1408; Swanson et al., 1989 Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:525-530; Newhouse et al. (1991) Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:65-70; Sathasivan et al. (1991) Plant Physiol. 97:1044-1050; Mourand et al. (1993) J. Heredity 84:91-96; Wright and Penner (1998) Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:612-620; U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,822). In all cases, a single, partially dominant nuclear gene conferred resistance. Four imidazolinone resistant wheat plants were also previously isolated following seed mutagenesis of Triticum aestivum L. cv. Fidel (Newhouse et al. (1992) Plant Physiol. 100:882-886). Inheritance studies confirmed that a single, partially dominant gene conferred resistance. Based on allelic studies, the authors concluded that the mutations in the four identified lines were located at the same locus. One of the Fidel cultivar resistance genes was designated FS-4 (Newhouse et al. (1992) Plant Physiol. 100:882-886).
Naturally occurring plant populations that were discovered to be resistant to imidazolinone and/or sulfonylurea herbicides have also been used to develop herbicide-resistant sunflower breeding lines. Recently, two sunflower lines that are resistant to a sulfonylurea herbicide were developed using germplasm originating from a wild population of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) as the source of the herbicide-resistance trait (Miller and Al-Khatib (2004) Crop Sci. 44:1037-1038). Previously, White et al. ((2002) Weed Sci. 50:432-437) had reported that individuals from a wild population of common sunflower from South Dakota, U.S.A. were cross-resistant to an imidazolinone and a sulfonylurea herbicide. Analysis of a portion of the coding region of the acetohydroxyacid synthase large subunit (AHASL) genes of individuals from this population revealed a point mutation that results in an Ala-to-Val amino acid substitution in the sunflower AHASL protein that corresponds to Ala205 in the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL protein (White et al. (2003) Weed Sci. 51:845-853). Earlier, Al-Khatib and Miller ((2000) Crop Sci. 40:869) reported the production of four imidazolinone-resistant sunflower breeding lines.
Computer-based modeling of the three dimensional conformation of the AHAS-inhibitor complex predicts several amino acids in the proposed inhibitor binding pocket as sites where induced mutations would likely confer selective resistance to imidazolinones (Ott et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 263:359-368). Tobacco plants produced with some of these rationally designed mutations in the proposed binding sites of the AHAS enzyme have in fact exhibited specific resistance to a single class of herbicides (Ott et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 263:359-368).
Plant resistance to imidazolinone herbicides has also been reported in a number of patents. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,761,373, 5,331,107, 5,304,732, 6,211,438, 6,211,439 and 6,222,100 generally describe the use of an altered AHAS gene to elicit herbicide resistance in plants, and specifically discloses certain imidazolinone resistant corn lines. U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,659 discloses plants exhibiting herbicide resistance due to mutations in at least one amino acid in one or more conserved regions. The mutations described therein encode either cross-resistance for imidazolinones and sulfonylureas or sulfonylurea-specific resistance, but imidazolinone-specific resistance is not described. U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,180 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,767,361 discuss an isolated gene having a single amino acid substitution in a wild-type monocot AHAS amino acid sequence that results in imidazolinone-specific resistance. In addition, rice plants that are resistant to herbicides that interfere with AHAS have been developed by mutation breeding and also by the selection of herbicide-resistant plants from a pool of rice plants produced by anther culture. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,545,822, 5,736,629, 5,773,703, 5,773,704, 5,952,553 and 6,274,796.
In plants, as in all other organisms examined, the AHAS enzyme is comprised of two subunits: a large subunit (catalytic role) and a small subunit (regulatory role) (Duggleby and Pang (2000) J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 33:1-36). The AHAS large subunit (also referred to herein as AHASL) may be encoded by a single gene as in the case of Arabidopsis, and sugar beet or by multiple gene family members as in maize, canola, and cotton. Specific, single-nucleotide substitutions in the large subunit confer upon the enzyme a degree of insensitivity to one or more classes of herbicides (Chang and Duggleby (1998) Biochem J. 333:765-777).
For example, bread wheat, Triticum aestivum L., contains three homoeologous acetohydroxyacid synthase large subunit genes. Each of the genes exhibit significant expression based on herbicide response and biochemical data from mutants in each of the three genes (Ascenzi et al. (2003) International Society of Plant Molecular Biologists Congress, Barcelona, Spain, Ref. No. S10-17). The coding sequences of all three genes share extensive homology at the nucleotide level (WO 03/014357). Through sequencing the AHASL genes from several varieties of Triticum aestivum, the molecular basis of herbicide tolerance in most IMI-tolerant (imidazolinone-tolerant) lines was found to be the mutation S653(At)N, indicating a serine to asparagine substitution at a position equivalent to the serine at amino acid 653 in Arabidopsis thaliana (WO 03/01436; WO 03/014357). This mutation is due to a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the DNA sequence encoding the AHASL protein.
Multiple AHASL genes are also know to occur in dicotyledonous plants species. Recently, Kolkman et al. ((2004) Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1147-1159) reported the identification, cloning, and sequencing for three AHASL genes (AHASL1, AHASL2, and AHASL3) from herbicide-resistant and wild type genotypes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Kolkman et al. reported that the herbicide-resistance was due either to the Pro197Leu (using the Arabidopsis AHASL amino acid position nomenclature) substitution or the Ala205Val substitution in the AHASL1 protein and that each of these substitutions provided resistance to both imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides.
Given their high effectiveness and low-toxicity, imidazolinone herbicides are favored for agricultural use. However, the ability to use imidazolinone herbicides in a particular crop production system depends upon the availability of imidazolinone-resistant varieties of the crop plant of interest. To produce such imidazolinone-resistant varieties, plant breeders need to develop breeding lines with the imidazolinone-resistance trait. Thus, additional imidazolinone-resistant breeding lines and varieties of crop plants, as well as methods and compositions for the production and use of imidazolinone-resistant breeding lines and varieties, are needed.
The present invention provides novel, herbicide-resistant sunflower plants that comprise two different herbicide-resistant alleles of the sunflower acetohydroxyacid synthase large subunit 1 (AHASL1) gene. In particular, the sunflower plants of the invention have increased resistance to acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS)-inhibiting herbicides, when compared to a wild-type sunflower plant. The herbicide-resistant sunflower plants of the invention comprise a first AHASL1 allele and a second AHASL1 allele, wherein the first and second AHASL1 alleles encode a first and second herbicide-resistant sunflower AHASL1 protein, respectively. The first AHASL1 allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A122T amino acid substitution. The second AHASL1 allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A205V amino acid substitution or the P197L amino acid substitution. Also provided are sunflower plant parts, tissues, cells, and seeds that comprise the first and second AHASL1 alleles.
The present invention further provides a method for producing a hybrid sunflower plant that comprises resistance to at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. The method involves the cross-pollination of a first sunflower plant with a second sunflower plant so as to produce hybrid sunflower seeds that can be sown and allowed to grow into a hybrid sunflower plant, particularly an F1 hybrid sunflower plant. The first sunflower plant comprises in its genome at least one copy of a first allele of an AHASL1 gene, and the second sunflower plant comprises in its genome at least one copy of a second allele of an AHASL1 gene. Preferably, the first sunflower plant is homozygous for the first allele, and the second sunflower plant is homozygous for the second allele. The first allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A122T amino acid substitution. The second allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A205V amino acid substitution or the P197L amino acid substitution.
The present invention additionally provides methods for controlling weeds or undesired vegetation in the vicinity of a sunflower plant of the invention. One method comprises applying an effective amount of AHAS-inhibiting herbicide, particularly an imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicide, to the weeds and to the sunflower plant. Another method comprises contacting a sunflower seed of the present invention before sowing and/or after pregermination with an effective amount of an AHAS-inhibiting herbicide, particularly an imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicide. The present invention further provides the sunflower seeds of the present invention treated with an effective amount of an AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. The sunflower plants and seeds for use in these methods comprise in their genomes a first AHASL1 allele and a second AHASL1 allele. The first AHASL1 allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A122T amino acid substitution. The second AHASL1 allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A205V amino acid substitution or the P197L amino acid substitution.
The present invention further provides methods for controlling the parasitic weeds Orobanche cumana and Orobanche cernua, also know as broomrape, on infected sunflower plants. The method comprises applying an effective amount of an imidazolinone herbicide to the weeds and to the herbicide-resistant sunflower plant of the present invention, particularly a sunflower plant comprising two A122T alleles or a sunflower plant comprising one AHASL1 A122T allele and one A205V AHASL1 allele.
The present invention provides diagnostic methods for identifying the alleles of the AHASL1 gene in individual sunflower. Such diagnostic methods involve the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of specific regions of the sunflower AHASL1 gene using primers designed to anneal to specific sites within the sunflower AHASL1 gene such as, for example, sites at or in the vicinity of mutations in the AHASL1 gene. Additionally provided are the primers used in these methods and kits for performing the methods.
The Left Panel
The nucleic acid and amino acid sequences listed in the accompanying sequence listing are shown using standard letter abbreviations for nucleotide bases, and three-letter code for amino acids. The nucleic acid sequences follow the standard convention of beginning at the 5′ end of the sequence and proceeding forward (i.e., from left to right in each line) to the 3′ end. Only one strand of each nucleic acid sequence is shown, but the complementary strand is understood to be included by any reference to the displayed strand. The amino acid sequences follow the standard convention of beginning at the amino terminus of the sequence and proceeding forward (i.e., from left to right in each line) to the carboxy terminus.
SEQ ID NO: 1 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of p-AHAS18.
SEQ ID NO: 2 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of p-AHAS19.
SEQ ID NO: 3 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of p-AHAS NIDF.
SEQ ID NO: 4 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the AHAS 122 TWT.
SEQ ID NO: 5 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the AHAS 122 TMU.
SEQ ID NO: 6 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the portion of AHASL1 from sunflower haplotype 1 (Hap1) that is shown in
SEQ ID NO: 7 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the portion of AHASL1 from sunflower haplotype 2 (Hap2) that is shown in
SEQ ID NO: 8 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the portion of AHASL1 from sunflower haplotype 3 (Hap3) that is shown in
SEQ ID NO: 9 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the portion of AHASL1 from sunflower haplotype 4 (Hap4) that is shown in
SEQ ID NO: 10 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the portion of AHASL1 from sunflower haplotype 5 (Hap5) that is shown in
SEQ ID NO: 11 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the portion of AHASL1 from sunflower haplotype 6 (Hap6) that is shown in
SEQ ID NO: 12 sets forth the nucleotide sequence corresponding to the position of the primer p-AHAS NIDF within the AHASL1 nucleotide sequences shown in
SEQ ID NO: 13 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the annealing site of the primer AHAS 122 TWT within the AHASL1 nucleotide sequences of Hap1-Hap5 (SEQ ID NOS: 6-10, respectively) shown in
SEQ ID NO: 14 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of the annealing site of the primer AHAS 122 TMU within the AHASL1 nucleotide sequence of Hap6 (SEQ ID NO: 11) shown in
SEQ ID NO: 15 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of HA122CF.
SEQ ID NO: 16 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of HA122 wt.
SEQ ID NO: 17 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of HA122mut.
SEQ ID NO: 18 sets forth the nucleotide sequence of HA122CR.
SEQ ID NO: 19 sets forth a partial-length nucleotide sequence encoding a herbicide-resistant AHASL1 protein comprising the A122T amino acid substitution from the sunflower lines S4897 and GM40 as described in WO 2007005581. SEQ ID NO: 19 corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 1 of WO 2007005581.
SEQ ID NO: 20 sets forth a partial-length amino acid sequence of the herbicide-resistant AHASL1 protein encoded by the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 19. SEQ ID NO: 20 corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 2 of WO 2007005581.
SEQ ID NO: 21 sets forth the nucleotide sequence encoding a mature, herbicide-resistant AHASL1 protein comprising the P197L amino acid substitution from sunflower line MUT28 as described in WO 2006024351. SEQ ID NO: 21 corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 5 of WO 2006024351.
SEQ ID NO: 22 sets forth the amino acid sequence of the mature, herbicide-resistant AHASL1 protein encoded by the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 21. SEQ ID NO: 21 corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 6 of WO 2006024351.
SEQ ID NO: 23 sets forth the nucleotide sequence encoding a mature, herbicide-resistant AHASL1 protein comprising the A205V amino acid substitution from Helianthus annuus haplotype 5 as described in GenBank Accession No. AY541455 and Kolkman et al. (2004) Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1147-1159. SEQ ID NO: 23 corresponds to nucleotides 244-1959 of the nucleotide sequence of GenBank Accession No. AY541455.
SEQ ID NO: 24 sets forth the amino acid sequence of the mature, herbicide-resistant AHASL1 protein encoded by the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 23. SEQ ID NO: 24 corresponds to the amino acids 82-652 of the amino acid sequence encoded by the nucleotide sequence of GenBank Accession No. AY541455.
The present invention relates to herbicide-resistant sunflower plants comprising in their genomes two different alleles of the sunflower AHASL1 gene. Each of the two different alleles encode a sunflower AHASL1 protein that comprises an amino acid sequence that differs from the amino acid sequence of a wild-type sunflower AHASL1 by one or more amino acids. Each of the AHASL1 alleles of the present invention is known to confer on a sunflower plant increased resistance or tolerance to AHAS-inhibiting herbicides, particularly imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. The present invention further relates to methods of making these sunflower plants and to methods for controlling weeds or undesired vegetation growing in the vicinity of the sunflower plants of the present invention.
The present invention is based on the discovery that F1 hybrid sunflower plants that comprise a single copy of each of two different herbicide resistant alleles of the sunflower AHASL1 comprise commercially acceptable levels of resistance to AHAS-inhibiting herbicides. Thus, the present invention finds use in the production of hybrid sunflower plants by allowing a plant breeder to maintain, for example, a first sunflower line that is homozygous for a first herbicide resistant AHASL1 allele and a second sunflower line that is homozygous for a second herbicide resistant AHASL1 allele.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the methods involve the use of herbicide-tolerant or herbicide-resistant plants. By an “herbicide-tolerant” or “herbicide-resistant” plant, it is intended that a plant that is tolerant or resistant to at least one herbicide at a level that would normally kill, or inhibit the growth of, a normal or wild-type plant. In one embodiment of the invention, the herbicide-tolerant plants of the invention comprise a herbicide-tolerant or herbicide-resistant AHASL protein. By “herbicide-tolerant AHASL protein” or “herbicide-resistant AHASL protein”, it is intended that such an AHASL protein displays higher AHAS activity, relative to the AHAS activity of a wild-type AHASL protein, when in the presence of at least one herbicide that is known to interfere with AHAS activity and at a concentration or level of the herbicide that is to known to inhibit the AHAS activity of the wild-type AHASL protein. Furthermore, the AHAS activity of such a herbicide-tolerant or herbicide-resistant AHASL protein may be referred to herein as “herbicide-tolerant” or “herbicide-resistant” AHAS activity.
For the present invention, the terms “herbicide-tolerant” and “herbicide-resistant” are used interchangeably and are intended to have an equivalent meaning and an equivalent scope. Similarly, the terms “herbicide-tolerance” and “herbicide-resistance” are used interchangeably and are intended to have an equivalent meaning and an equivalent scope. Likewise, the terms “imidazolinone-resistant” and “imidazolinone-resistance” are used interchangeably and are intended to be of an equivalent meaning and an equivalent scope as the terms “imidazolinone-tolerant” and “imidazolinone-tolerance”, respectively.
The present invention provides plants, plant tissues, plant cells, and host cells with increased resistance or tolerance to at least one herbicide, particularly an imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicide. The preferred amount or concentration of the herbicide is an “effective amount” or “effective concentration.” By “effective amount” and “effective concentration” is intended an amount and concentration, respectively, that is sufficient to kill or inhibit the growth of a similar, wild-type plant, plant tissue, plant cell, or host cell, but that said amount does not kill or inhibit as severely the growth of the herbicide-resistant plants, plant tissues, plant cells, and host cells of the present invention. Typically, the effective amount or effective concentration of a herbicide is an amount or concentration that is routinely used in agricultural production systems to kill weeds of interest. Such an amount is known to, or can be easily be determined by, those of ordinary skill in the art.
In certain embodiments, the invention provides sunflower plants that comprise commercially acceptable levels of resistance or tolerance to an AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. Unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise obvious from the context, sunflower plants that comprise such a level of resistance or tolerance to an AHAS-inhibiting herbicide are resistant to or tolerant of an application of an effective amount or effective concentration of at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. As indicated above, the effective amount or concentration of a herbicide is an amount or concentration that is routinely used in agricultural production systems to kill a weed or weeds of interest and that such an amount is known to, or can be easily be determined by, those of ordinary skill in the art.
By “similar, wild-type, plant, plant tissue, plant cell or host cell” is intended a plant, plant tissue, plant cell, or host cell, respectively, that lacks the herbicide-resistance characteristics and/or particular polynucleotide of the invention that are disclosed herein. The use of the term “wild-type” is not, therefore, intended to imply that a plant, plant tissue, plant cell, or other host cell lacks recombinant DNA in its genome, and/or lacks herbicide-resistant characteristics that are different from those disclosed herein.
As used herein unless clearly indicated otherwise, the term “plant” is intended to mean a plant at any developmental stage, as well as any part or parts of a plant that may be attached to or separate from a whole intact plant. Such parts of a plant include, but are not limited to, organs, tissues, and cells of a plant. Examples of particular plant parts include a stem, a leaf, a root, an inflorescence, a flower, a floret, a fruit, a pedicle, a peduncle, a stamen, an anther, a stigma, a style, an ovary, a petal, a sepal, a carpel, a root tip, a root cap, a root hair, a leaf hair, a seed hair, a pollen grain, a microspore, a cotyledon, a hypocotyl, an epicotyl, xylem, phloem, parenchyma, endosperm, a companion cell, a guard cell, and any other known organs, tissues, and cells of a plant. Furthermore, it is recognized that a seed is a plant.
In one aspect, the invention provides sunflower plants comprising in its genome at least one copy of an AHASL1 A122T mutant allele and at least one copy of an AHASL1 A205T mutant allele. Such a sunflower plant comprises a commercially acceptable level of tolerance to at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide, particularly an imidazolinone herbicide. Such plants find use in agriculture, particularly in methods for controlling weeds involving the use of imidazolinone herbicides as described herein.
In another aspect, the invention provides sunflower plants comprising in its genome at least one copy of an AHASL1 A122T mutant allele and at least one copy of an AHASL1 P197L mutant allele. Such a sunflower plant comprises a commercially acceptable level of tolerance to at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide, particularly a sulfonylurea and/or an imidazolinone herbicide. Such plants find use in agriculture, particularly in methods for controlling weeds involving the use of imidazolinone and/or sulfonylurea herbicides as described herein.
The present invention involves the use of a sunflower plant comprising an AHASL1 gene that comprises the A122T mutation. Such an AHASL1 gene encodes an AHASL1 protein comprising the A122T amino acid substitution. The present invention does not depend on the use of a particular sunflower variety, line, or plant comprising an AHASL1 gene with the A122T mutation. Any sunflower plant comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the A122T mutation can be used in the methods disclosed herein. In one embodiment of the invention, the AHASL1 gene with the A122T mutation comprises a polynucleotide comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 19 or a nucleotide sequence encoding the amino acid the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 20.
An example of a sunflower line comprising at least one copy of the AHASL1 A122T mutant allele is GM40 (see, WO 2007005581 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/695,952; filed Jul. 1, 2005; both of which are herein incorporated by reference). A deposit of seeds of the GM40 sunflower was made under the Budapest Treaty with the Patent Depository of the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, Va. 20110 USA on May 17, 2005 and assigned ATCC Patent Deposit Number PTA-6716. The deposit of sunflower line GM40 was made for a term of at least 30 years and at least 5 years after the most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposit is received by the ATCC. Additionally, Applicants have satisfied all the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §§1.801-1.809, including providing an indication of the viability of the sample. Applicants impose no restrictions on the availability of the deposited material from the ATCC after the issuance of a patent from this application. However, Applicants have no authority to wave any restrictions imposed by law on the transfer of biological material or its transportation in commerce. Applicants do not waive any infringement of Applicants' rights granted under this patent.
Another example of a sunflower line comprising at least one copy of the AHASL1 A122T mutant allele is GM1606 (see, WO 2007005581). A deposit of seeds of the sunflower GM1606 was made under the Budapest Treaty with the Patent Depository of the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, Va. 20110 USA on May 19, 2006 and assigned ATCC Patent Deposit Number PTA-7606. The deposit of sunflower GM1606 was made for a term of at least 30 years and at least 5 years after the most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposit is received by the ATCC. Additionally, Applicants have satisfied all the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §§1.801-1.809, including providing an indication of the viability of the sample. Applicants impose no restrictions on the availability of the deposited material from the ATCC after the issuance of a patent from this application. However, Applicants have no authority to wave any restrictions imposed by law on the transfer of biological material or its transportation in commerce. Applicants do not waive any infringement of Applicants' rights granted under this patent.
The present invention involves the use of a sunflower plant comprising an AHASL1 gene that comprises the A205V mutation. Such an AHASL1 gene encodes an AHASL1 protein comprising the A205V amino acid substitution. The present invention does not depend on the use of a particular sunflower variety, line, or plant comprising an AHASL1 gene with the A205V mutation. Any sunflower plant comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the A205V mutation can be used in the methods disclosed herein. In one embodiment of the invention, the AHASL1 gene with the A205V mutation comprises a polynucleotide comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 23 or a nucleotide sequence encoding the amino acid the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 24.
Sunflower plants comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the A205V mutation are widely used in commercial sunflower production and are readily available. Any of such commercially availably sunflower plant varieties can be used in the methods disclosed herein. Such varieties are available from various commercial seed companies (e.g., Nidera S. A., Buenos Aires, Argentina; Dekalb Genetics Corporation, Dekalb, Ill., USA; Mycogen Seeds, Indianapolis, Ind., USA; Seeds 2000, Breckenridge, Minn., USA; Triumph Seed Company, Ralls, Tex., USA,) sources and include, but are not limited to, Paraíso 101CL, Paraíso 102CL, DKF38, -80CL, 8H429CL, 8H419CL, 8H386CL, 8H358CL, 629CL, 630,CL, 4682NS/CL, 4880NS/CL, Barracuda, Charger, Viper, 620CL, 650CL, and 660CL. In addition, seeds of sunflower plants comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the A205V mutation are maintained by the National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, Colo., and can be obtained as accession numbers PI 633749 and PI 633750.
The present invention involves the use of a sunflower plant comprising an AHASL1 gene that comprises the P197L mutation. Such an AHASL1 gene encodes an AHASL1 protein comprising the P197L amino acid substitution. The present invention does not depend on the use of a particular sunflower variety, line, or plant comprising an AHASL1 gene with the P197L mutation. Any sunflower plant comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the P197L mutation can be used in the methods disclosed herein. Sunflower plants comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the P197L mutation have been disclosed in WO 2006024351 and U.S. National Stage patent application Ser. No. 11/659,007, international filing date Jul. 29, 2005; both of which are herein incorporated by reference. In one embodiment of the invention, AHASL1 gene with the P197L mutation comprises a polynucleotide comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 21 or a nucleotide sequence encoding the amino acid the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 22.
Three sunflower lines comprising at least one allele of an AHASL1 gene with the P197L mutation have been publicly released by The United States Department of Agriculture Research Service. The three lines are HA 469, RHA 470, and RHA 471. Seeds of each of the three lines can be obtained from Seedstocks Project, Department of Plant Sciences, Loftsgard Hall, N. Dak. State University, Fargo, N. Dak. 58105, US.
The present invention involves sunflower plants with mutations in the sunflower AHASL1 gene. These mutations give rise to sunflower AHASL1 proteins that comprise specific amino acid substitutions in their amino acid sequences when compared to the amino acid sequences of a wild-type sunflower AHASL1 protein. Such amino acid substitutions include, for example, the A122T, A205V, and P197L. By “A122T” is intended the substitution of a threonine for the alanine at the position of the sunflower AHASL1 protein that corresponds to the amino acid position 122 in the Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL1 protein. By “A205V” is intended the substitution of a valine for the alanine at the position of the sunflower AHASL1 protein that corresponds to the amino acid position 205 in the Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL1 protein. By “P197L” is intended the substitution of a leucine for the proline at the position of the sunflower AHASL1 protein that corresponds to the amino acid position 197 in the Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL1 protein.
Unless indicated otherwise or obvious from the context, the amino acid positions in the sunflower AHASL1 protein that are referred to herein are the corresponding positions in the well-studied Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL1 protein. The amino acid positions in the sunflower AHASL1 protein that correspond to Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL1 amino acid positions 122, 197, and 205 are 107, 182, and 190, respectively. See, WO 2007005581 (Table 4 therein) for additional information on the positions of know amino acid substitutions that confer herbicide resistance to AHASL proteins and their corresponding positions in the sunflower and Arabidopsis thaliana AHASL1 proteins.
The present invention provides AHASL proteins with amino acid substitutions at particular amino acid positions within conserved regions of the sunflower AHASL1 proteins disclosed herein. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill will recognize that such amino acid positions can vary depending on whether amino acids are added or removed from, for example, the N-terminal end of an amino acid sequence. Thus, the invention encompasses the amino acid substitutions at the recited position or equivalent position. By “equivalent position” is intended to mean a position that is within the same conserved region as the exemplified amino acid position. Such conserved regions are know in the art (see Table 4 in WO 20070055581) or can be determined by multiple sequence alignments or by other methods known in the art.
The present invention further provides a method for producing a hybrid sunflower plant that comprises resistance to at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. The method involves the cross-pollination of a first sunflower plant with a second sunflower plant so as to produce hybrid sunflower seeds that can be sown and allowed to grow into a hybrid sunflower plant, particularly an F1 hybrid sunflower plant. The first sunflower plant comprises in its genome at least one copy of a first allele of an AHASL1 gene, and the second sunflower plant comprises in its genome at least one copy of a second allele of an AHASL1 gene. Preferably, the first sunflower plant is homozygous for the first allele, and the second sunflower plant is homozygous for the second allele. The first allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A122T amino acid substitution. The second allele encodes a sunflower AHASL1 protein comprising the A205V amino acid substitution or the P197L amino acid substitution.
The method for producing a hybrid sunflower plant can further involve harvesting a seed resulting from said crossing and selecting for at least one progeny sunflower plant from said crossing that comprises in its genome said first and said second alleles. Such a progeny can be selected by any method known in the art include PCR amplification of all or part of the AHASL1 gene to determine the alleles that are present in the plant. DNA for use in such a PCR amplification can be obtained from a portion of sunflower seed resulting from the crossing or a portion of a plant grown from such a seed. In Example 2 below, a preferred method of the invention for selecting the desired progeny plant that involves PCR amplification is provided. Alternatively, the progeny plant can be selected by evaluating the performance of the progeny plant in herbicide-resistance test under greenhouse or field conditions as described hereinbelow.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, a hybrid sunflower plant of the invention is produced by crossing a first sunflower plant that is homozygous for the A205V AHASL1 allele to a second sunflower plant that homozygous of the AHASL1 A122T allele. All of the resulting hybrid seeds and hybrid plants grown from such seed are expected to comprise in their genomes one A205V AHASL1 allele and one AHASL1 A122T allele. In this preferred embodiment, either the first or second sunflower can be the pollen donor for the crossing.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, a hybrid sunflower plant of the invention is produced by crossing a first sunflower plant that is homozygous for the P197L AHASL1 allele to a second sunflower plant that homozygous of the AHASL1 A122T allele. All of the resulting hybrid seeds and hybrid plants grown from such seed are expected to comprise in their genomes one P197L AHASL1 allele and one AHASL1 A122T allele. In this preferred embodiment, either the first or second sunflower can be the pollen donor for the crossing.
For the purposes of the present invention unless otherwise expressly indicated or apparent from the context, a “progeny plant” is any plant that is descended from at least one plant of the invention and includes, but is not limited to, first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, and tenth generation descendants of the plant of the invention. Preferably, such progeny or descendants comprise increased resistance to at least one imidazolinone herbicide when compared to a wild-type plant and such progeny or descendants further comprise at least one mutant AHASL1 allele selected from the group consisting of the A122T, A205V, and P197L alleles. Even more preferably, such progeny or descendants comprise increased resistance to at least one imidazolinone herbicide when compared to a wild-type plant and such progeny or descendants further comprise two different mutant AHASL1 alleles selected from the group consisting of the A122T, A205V, and P197L alleles.
In one embodiment of the invention, the sunflower plants of the invention comprise the A122T allele and produce seeds comprising an extractable seed oil that comprises at least 85% (w/w) oleic acid or 850 g of oleic acid/kg of oil.
Preferably, the % oleic acid content of sunflower seed oil of the present invention is determined by standard methods for the analysis of vegetable oils such as, for example, those methods described in Official Methods of Analysis of Association of the Official Analytical Chemists (1990) W. Horwitz, ed., 14th ed., Washington, D.C. and/or AOCS—American Oil Chemists' Society, Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists' Society (1998) 5th ed, Chicago, Ill.
The present invention provides methods for enhancing the tolerance or resistance of a plant, plant tissue, plant cell, or other host cell to at least one herbicide that interferes with the activity of the AHAS enzyme. Preferably, such a herbicide is an imidazolinone herbicide, a sulfonylurea herbicide, a triazolopyrimidine herbicide, a pyrimidinyloxybenzoate herbicide, a sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinone herbicide, or mixture thereof. More preferably, such a herbicide is an imidazolinone herbicide, a sulfonylurea herbicide, or mixture thereof. For the present invention, the imidazolinone herbicides include, but are not limited to, PURSUIT® (imazethapyr), CADRE® (imazapic), RAPTOR® (imazamox), SCEPTER® (imazaquin), ASSERT® (imazethabenz), ARSENAL® (imazapyr), a derivative of any of the aforementioned herbicides, and a mixture of two or more of the aforementioned herbicides, for example, imazapyr/imazamox (ODYSSEY®). More specifically, the imidazolinone herbicide can be selected from, but is not limited to, 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-nicotinic acid, 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid, 5-ethyl-2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-nicotinic acid, 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-5-(methoxymethyl)-nicotinic acid, 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-5-methylnicotinic acid, and a mixture of methyl 6-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-m-toluate, and methyl 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-p-toluate. The use of 5-ethyl-2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-nicotinic acid and 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-5-(methoxymethyl)-nicotinic acid is preferred. The use of 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-5-(methoxymethyl)-nicotinic acid is particularly preferred.
For the present invention, the sulfonylurea herbicides include, but are not limited to, chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron methyl, sulfometuron methyl, chlorimuron ethyl, thifensulfuron methyl, tribenuron methyl, bensulfuron methyl, nicosulfuron, ethametsulfuron methyl, rimsulfuron, triflusulfuron methyl, triasulfuron, primisulfuron methyl, cinosulfuron, amidosulfuron, flazasulfuron, imazosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron ethyl, halosulfuron, azimsulfuron, cyclosulfuron, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flupyrsulfuron methyl, foramsulfuron, iodosulfuron, oxasulfuron, mesosulfuron, prosulfuron, sulfosulfilron, trifloxysulfuron, tritosulfuron, a derivative of any of the aforementioned herbicides, and a mixture of two or more of the aforementioned herbicides. The triazolopyrimidine herbicides of the invention include, but are not limited to, cloransulam, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, and penoxsulam. The pyrimidinyloxybenzoate herbicides of the invention include, but are not limited to, bispyribac, pyrithiobac, pyriminobac, pyribenzoxim and pyriftalid. The sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinone herbicides include, but are not limited to, flucarbazone and propoxycarbazone.
It is recognized that pyrimidinyloxybenzoate herbicides are closely related to the pyrimidinylthiobenzoate herbicides and are generalized under the heading of the latter name by the Weed Science Society of America. Accordingly, the herbicides of the present invention further include pyrimidinylthiobenzoate herbicides, including, but not limited to, the pyrimidinyloxybenzoate herbicides described above.
The herbicide-resistant sunflower plants of the invention find use in methods for controlling weeds. Thus, the present invention further provides a method for controlling weeds in the vicinity of a herbicide-resistant sunflower plant of the invention. The method comprises applying an effective amount of a herbicide to the weeds and to the herbicide-resistant sunflower plant, wherein the plant has increased resistance to at least one herbicide, particularly an imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicide, when compared to a wild-type sunflower plant.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides methods for controlling the parasitic weeds known as broomrape (Orobanche spp.) on infected sunflower plants. Such Orobanche spp. include, for example, Orobanche cumana and Orobanche cernua. The method comprises applying an effective amount of an imidazolinone herbicide to the weeds and to the herbicide-resistant sunflower plant of the present invention, particularly a sunflower plant comprising two copies of the AHASL1 A122T allele or a sunflower plant comprising one copy of the AHASL1 A122T allele and one copy of the A205V AHASL1 allele. In a preferred embodiment, the imidazolinone herbicide is imazapyr. Preferably, the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide is applied at a later vegetative stage and/or early reproductive stage. More preferably, the herbicide is applied at an early reproductive stage. Most preferably, the herbicide is applied at growth stage R1.
Unless indicated otherwise, the sunflower growth states referred to herein are the growth stages as defined in Schneiter and Miller (1981) Crop Sci. 21:901-903.
By providing sunflower plants having increased resistance to herbicides, particularly imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides, a wide variety of formulations can be employed for protecting plants from weeds, so as to enhance plant growth and reduce competition for nutrients. A herbicide can be used by itself for pre-emergence, post-emergence, pre-planting and at planting control of weeds in areas surrounding the plants described herein or an imidazolinone herbicide formulation can be used that contains other additives. The herbicide can also be used as a seed treatment. Additives found in an imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicide formulation include other herbicides, detergents, adjuvants, spreading agents, sticking agents, stabilizing agents, or the like. The herbicide formulation can be a wet or dry preparation and can include, but is not limited to, flowable powders, emulsifiable concentrates and liquid concentrates. The herbicide and herbicide formulations can be applied in accordance with conventional methods, for example, by spraying, irrigation, dusting, or the like.
The present invention provides non-transgenic and transgenic seeds with increased tolerance to at least one herbicide, particularly an AHAS-inhibiting herbicide, more particularly imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. Such seeds include, for example, non-transgenic sunflower seeds comprising the herbicide-tolerance characteristics of the sunflower plant S4897, the sunflower plant GM40, the sunflower plant GM1606, the sunflower plant with ATCC Patent Deposit Number PTA-6716, or the sunflower plant with ATCC Patent Deposit Number PTA-7606, and transgenic seeds comprising a polynucleotide molecule of the invention that encodes a herbicide-resistant AHASL protein.
The present invention provides methods that involve the use of at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide selected from the group consisting of imidazolinone herbicides, sulfonylurea herbicides, triazolopyrimidine herbicides, pyrimidinyloxybenzoate herbicides, sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinone herbicides, and mixtures thereof. In these methods, the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide can be applied by any method known in the art including, but not limited to, seed treatment, soil treatment, and foliar treatment.
Prior to application, the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide can be converted into the customary formulations, for example solutions, emulsions, suspensions, dusts, powders, pastes and granules. The use form depends on the particular intended purpose; in each case, it should ensure a fine and even distribution of the compound according to the invention.
The formulations are prepared in a known manner (see e.g. for review U.S. Pat. No. 3,060,084, EP-A 707 445 (for liquid concentrates), Browning, “Agglomeration”, Chemical Engineering, Dec. 4, 1967, 147-48, Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963, pages 8-57 and et seq. WO 91/13546, U.S. Pat. No. 4,172,714, U.S. Pat. No. 4,144,050, U.S. Pat. No. 3,920,442, U.S. Pat. No. 5,180,587, U.S. Pat. No. 5,232,701, U.S. Pat. No. 5,208,030, GB 2,095,558, U.S. Pat. No. 3,299,566, Klingman, Weed Control as a Science, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, Hance et al., Weed Control Handbook, 8th Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1989 and Mollet, H., Grubemann, A., Formulation technology, Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim (Germany), 2001, 2. D. A. Knowles, Chemistry and Technology of Agrochemical Formulations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998 (ISBN 0-7514-0443-8), for example by extending the active compound with auxiliaries suitable for the formulation of agrochemicals, such as solvents and/or carriers, if desired emulsifiers, surfactants and dispersants, preservatives, antifoaming agents, anti-freezing agents, for seed treatment formulation also optionally colorants and/or binders and/or gelling agents.
Examples of suitable solvents are water, aromatic solvents (for example Solvesso products, xylene), paraffins (for example mineral oil fractions), alcohols (for example methanol, butanol, pentanol, benzyl alcohol), ketones (for example cyclohexanone, gamma-butyrolactone), pyrrolidones (NMP, NOP), acetates (glycol diacetate), glycols, fatty acid dimethylamides, fatty acids and fatty acid esters. In principle, solvent mixtures may also be used.
Examples of suitable carriers are ground natural minerals (for example kaolins, clays, talc, chalk) and ground synthetic minerals (for example highly disperse silica, silicates).
Suitable emulsifiers are nonionic and anionic emulsifiers (for example polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, alkylsulfonates and arylsulfonates).
Examples of dispersants are lignin-sulfite waste liquors and methylcellulose.
Suitable surfactants used are alkali metal, alkaline earth metal and ammonium salts of lignosulfonic acid, naphthalenesulfonic acid, phenolsulfonic acid, dibutylnaphthalenesulfonic acid, alkylarylsulfonates, alkyl sulfates, alkylsulfonates, fatty alcohol sulfates, fatty acids and sulfated fatty alcohol glycol ethers, furthermore condensates of sulfonated naphthalene and naphthalene derivatives with formaldehyde, condensates of naphthalene or of naphthalenesulfonic acid with phenol and formaldehyde, polyoxyethylene octylphenol ether, ethoxylated isooctylphenol, octylphenol, nonylphenol, alkylphenol polyglycol ethers, tributylphenyl polyglycol ether, tristearylphenyl polyglycol ether, alkylaryl polyether alcohols, alcohol and fatty alcohol ethylene oxide condensates, ethoxylated castor oil, polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, ethoxylated polyoxypropylene, lauryl alcohol polyglycol ether acetal, sorbitol esters, lignosulfite waste liquors and methylcellulose.
Substances which are suitable for the preparation of directly sprayable solutions, emulsions, pastes or oil dispersions are mineral oil fractions of medium to high boiling point, such as kerosene or diesel oil, furthermore coal tar oils and oils of vegetable or animal origin, aliphatic, cyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons, for example toluene, xylene, paraffin, tetrahydronaphthalene, alkylated naphthalenes or their derivatives, methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone, isophorone, highly polar solvents, for example dimethyl sulfoxide, N-methylpyrrolidone or water.
Also anti-freezing agents such as glycerin, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and bactericides such as can be added to the formulation.
Suitable antifoaming agents are for example antifoaming agents based on silicon or magnesium stearate.
Suitable preservatives are for example Dichlorophen and enzylalkoholhemiformal.
Seed Treatment formulations may additionally comprise binders and optionally colorants.
Binders can be added to improve the adhesion of the active materials on the seeds after treatment. Suitable binders are block copolymers EO/PO surfactants but also polyvinylalcohols, polyvinylpyrrolidones, polyacrylates, polymethacrylates, polybutenes, polyisobutylenes, polystyrene, polyethyleneamines, polyethyleneamides, polyethyleneimines (Lupasolt, Polymin®), polyethers, polyurethanes, polyvinylacetate, tylose and copolymers derived from these polymers.
Optionally, also colorants can be included in the formulation. Suitable colorants or dyes for seed treatment formulations are Rhodamin B, C.I. Pigment Red 112, C.I. Solvent Red 1, pigment blue 15:4, pigment blue 15:3, pigment blue 15:2, pigment blue 15:1, pigment blue 80, pigment yellow 1, pigment yellow 13, pigment red 112, pigment red 48:2, pigment red 48:1, pigment red 57:1, pigment red 53:1, pigment orange 43, pigment orange 34, pigment orange 5, pigment green 36, pigment green 7, pigment white 6, pigment brown 25, basic violet 10, basic violet 49, acid red 51, acid red 52, acid red 14, acid blue 9, acid yellow 23, basic red 10, basic red 108.
An example of a suitable gelling agent is carrageen (Satiagel®).
Powders, materials for spreading, and dustable products can be prepared by mixing or concomitantly grinding the active substances with a solid carrier.
Granules, for example coated granules, impregnated granules and homogeneous granules, can be prepared by binding the active compounds to solid carriers. Examples of solid carriers are mineral earths such as silica gels, silicates, talc, kaolin, attaclay, limestone, lime, chalk, bole, loess, clay, dolomite, diatomaceous earth, calcium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium oxide, ground synthetic materials, fertilizers, such as, for example, ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium nitrate, ureas, and products of vegetable origin, such as cereal meal, tree bark meal, wood meal and nutshell meal, cellulose powders and other solid carriers.
In general, the formulations comprise from 0.01 to 95% by weight, preferably from 0.1 to 90% by weight, of the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. In this case, the AHAS-inhibiting herbicides are employed in a purity of from 90% to 100% by weight, preferably 95% to 100% by weight (according to NMR spectrum). For seed treatment purposes, respective formulations can be diluted 2-10 fold leading to concentrations in the ready to use preparations of 0.01 to 60% by weight active compound by weight, preferably 0.1 to 40% by weight.
The AHAS-inhibiting herbicide can be used as such, in the form of their formulations or the use forms prepared therefrom, for example in the form of directly sprayable solutions, powders, suspensions or dispersions, emulsions, oil dispersions, pastes, dustable products, materials for spreading, or granules, by means of spraying, atomizing, dusting, spreading or pouring. The use forms depend entirely on the intended purposes; they are intended to ensure in each case the finest possible distribution of the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide according to the invention.
Aqueous use forms can be prepared from emulsion concentrates, pastes or wettable powders (sprayable powders, oil dispersions) by adding water. To prepare emulsions, pastes or oil dispersions, the substances, as such or dissolved in an oil or solvent, can be homogenized in water by means of a wetter, tackifier, dispersant or emulsifier. However, it is also possible to prepare concentrates composed of active substance, wetter, tackifier, dispersant or emulsifier and, if appropriate, solvent or oil, and such concentrates are suitable for dilution with water.
The active compound concentrations in the ready-to-use preparations can be varied within relatively wide ranges. In general, they are from 0.0001 to 10%, preferably from 0.01 to 1% per weight.
The AHAS-inhibiting herbicide may also be used successfully in the ultra-low-volume process (ULV), it being possible to apply formulations comprising over 95% by weight of active compound, or even to apply the active compound without additives.
The following are examples of formulations:
1. Products for dilution with water for foliar applications. For seed treatment purposes, such products may be applied to the seed diluted or undiluted.
2. Products to be applied undiluted for foliar applications. For seed treatment purposes, such products may be applied to the seed diluted.
Conventional seed treatment formulations include for example flowable concentrates FS, solutions LS, powders for dry treatment DS, water dispersible powders for slurry treatment WS, water-soluble powders SS and emulsion ES and EC and gel formulation GF. These formulations can be applied to the seed diluted or undiluted. Application to the seeds is carried out before sowing, either directly on the seeds.
In a preferred embodiment a FS formulation is used for seed treatment. Typically, a FS formulation may comprise 1-800 g/l of active ingredient, 1-200 g/l Surfactant, 0 to 200 g/l antifreezing agent, 0 to 400 g/l of binder, 0 to 200 g/l of a pigment and up to 1 liter of a solvent, preferably water.
For seed treatment, seeds of the herbicide resistant plants according of the present invention are treated with herbicides, preferably herbicides selected from the group consisting of AHAS-inhibiting herbicides such as amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, bensulfuron, chlorimuron, chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, cyclosulfamuron, ethametsulfuron, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flupyrsulfuron, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron, imazosulfuron, iodosulfuron, mesosulfuron, metsulfuron, nicosulfuron, oxasulfuron, primisulfuron, prosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, rimsulfuron, sulfometuron, sulfosulfuron, thifensulfuron, triasulfuron, tribenuron, trifloxysulfuron, triflusulfuron, tritosulfuron, imazamethabenz, imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr, cloransulam, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, penoxsulam, bispyribac, pyriminobac, propoxycarbazone, flucarbazone, pyribenzoxim, pyriftalid, pyrithiobac, and mixtures thereof, or with a formulation comprising a AHAS-inhibiting herbicide.
The term seed treatment comprises all suitable seed treatment techniques known in the art, such as seed dressing, seed coating, seed dusting, seed soaking, and seed pelleting.
In accordance with one variant of the present invention, a further subject of the invention is a method of treating soil by the application, in particular into the seed drill: either of a granular formulation containing the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide as a composition/formulation (e.g. a granular formulation, with optionally one or more solid or liquid, agriculturally acceptable carriers and/or optionally with one or more agriculturally acceptable surfactants. This method is advantageously employed, for example, in seedbeds of cereals, maize, cotton, and sunflower.
The present invention also comprises seeds coated with or containing with a seed treatment formulation comprising at least one AHAS-inhibiting herbicide selected from the group consisting of amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, bensulfuron, chlorimuron, chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, cyclosulfamuron, ethametsulfuron, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flupyrsulfuron, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron, imazosulfuron, iodosulfuron, mesosulfuron, metsulfuron, nicosulfuron, oxasulfuron, primisulfuron, prosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, rimsulfuron, sulfometuron, sulfosulfuron, thifensulfuron, triasulfuron, tribenuron, trifloxysulfuron, triflusulfuron, tritosulfuron, imazamethabenz, imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr, cloransulam, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, penoxsulam, bispyribac, pyriminobac, propoxycarbazone, flucarbazone, pyribenzoxim, pyriftalid and pyrithiobac.
The term seed embraces seeds and plant propagules of all kinds including but not limited to true seeds, seed pieces, suckers, corms, bulbs, fruit, tubers, grains, cuttings, cut shoots and the like and means in a preferred embodiment true seeds.
The term “coated with and/or containing” generally signifies that the active ingredient is for the most part on the surface of the propagation product at the time of application, although a greater or lesser part of the ingredient may penetrate into the propagation product, depending on the method of application. When the said propagation product is (re)planted, it may absorb the active ingredient.
The seed treatment application with the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide or with a formulation comprising the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide is carried out by spraying or dusting the seeds before sowing of the plants and before emergence of the plants.
In the treatment of seeds, the corresponding formulations are applied by treating the seeds with an effective amount of the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide or a formulation comprising the AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. Herein, the application rates are generally from 0.1 g to 10 kg of the a.i. (or of the mixture of a.i. or of the formulation) per 100 kg of seed, preferably from 1 g to 5 kg per 100 kg of seed, in particular from 1 g to 2.5 kg per 100 kg of seed. For specific crops such as lettuce the rate can be higher.
The present invention provides a method for combating undesired vegetation or controlling weeds comprising contacting the seeds of the resistant plants according to the present invention before sowing and/or after pregermination with an AHAS-inhibiting herbicide. The method can further comprise sowing the seeds, for example, in soil in a field or in a potting medium in greenhouse. The method finds particular use in combating undesired vegetation or controlling weeds in the immediate vicinity of the seed.
The control of undesired vegetation is understood as meaning the killing of weeds and/or otherwise retarding or inhibiting the normal growth of the weeds. Weeds, in the broadest sense, are understood as meaning all those plants which grow in locations where they are undesired.
The weeds of the present invention include, for example, dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous weeds. Dicotyledonous weeds include, but are not limited to, weeds of the genera: Sinapis, Lepidium, Galium, Stellaria, Matricaria, Anthemis, Galinsoga, Chenopodium, Urtica, Senecio, Amaranthus, Portulaca, Xanthium, Convolvulus, Ipomoea, Polygonum, Sesbania, Ambrosia, Cirsium, Carduus, Sonchus, Solanum, Rorippa, Rotala, Lindernia, Lamium, Veronica, Abutilon, Emex, Datura, Viola, Galeopsis, Papaver, Centaurea, Trifolium, Ranunculus, and Taraxacum. Monocotyledonous weeds include, but are not limited to, weeds of the genera: Echinochloa, Setaria, Panicum, Digitaria, Phleum, Poa, Festuca, Eleusine, Brachiaria, Lolium, Bromus, Avena, Cyperus, Sorghum, Agropyron, Cynodon, Monochoria, Fimbristyslis, Sagittaria, Eleocharis, Scirpus, Paspalum, Ischaemum, Sphenoclea, Dactyloctenium, Agrostis, Alopecurus, and Apera. Other dicotyledonous weeds include, but are not limited to, parasitic plants that infect sunflowers, particularly, Orobanche spp. (broomrape), such as, for example, Orobanche cumana and Orobanche cernua.
In addition, the weeds of the present invention can include, for example, crop plants that are growing in an undesired location. For example, a volunteer maize plant that is in a field that predominantly comprises soybean plants can be considered a weed, if the maize plant is undesired in the field of soybean plants.
The sunflower plants of the present invention can be transformed with one or more genes of interest. The genes of interest of the invention vary depending on the desired outcome. For example, various changes in phenotype can be of interest including modifying the fatty acid composition in a plant, altering the amino acid content of a plant, altering a plant's insect and/or pathogen defense mechanisms, and the like. These results can be achieved by providing expression of heterologous products or increased expression of endogenous products in plants. Alternatively, the results can be achieved by providing for a reduction of expression of one or more endogenous products, particularly enzymes or cofactors in the plant. These changes result in a change in phenotype of the transformed plant.
In one embodiment of the invention, the genes of interest include insect resistance genes such as, for example, Bacillus thuringiensis toxin protein genes (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,366,892; 5,747,450; 5,736,514; 5,723,756; 5,593,881; and Geiser et al. (1986) Gene 48:109).
The present invention provides diagnostic methods for identifying the alleles of the AHASL1 gene in individual sunflower. Such diagnostic methods, which are described below, find use in methods for breeding commercial sunflower cultivars with increased resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. The following terms used herein in the description of these methods are defined below.
A “primer” is a single-stranded oligonucleotide, having a 5′ end and a 3′ end, that is capable of annealing to an annealing site on a target DNA strand, and the primer serves as an initiation point for DNA synthesis by a DNA polymerase, particularly in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Such a primer may or may not be fully complementary to its annealing site on the target DNA.
An “annealing” site on a strand of a target DNA is the site to which a primer is capable of annealing in the methods of the present invention.
Generally for the amplification of a fragment of a gene by PCR, a pair of primers that anneal to opposite strands of a double-stranded DNA molecule are employed. By standard convention and used herein unless otherwise indicated or apparent from the context, the “forward primer” anneals to the non-coding strand of the gene and the “reverse primer” primer anneals to the coding strand.
Throughout the specification, the terms “mutant allele,” “mutant AHASL1 allele,” or “mutant AHASL1 gene.” Unless indicated otherwise herein or apparent from the context, these terms refer to a polynucleotide that encodes an imidazolinone-tolerant AHASL1 protein comprising a single amino acid substitution when compared to a wild-type AHASL1 protein. Such single amino acid substitutions include, for example, A122T, A205V, and P197L. Typically, such an amino acid substitution is the result of single nucleotide substitution in the AHASL1 coding sequence.
In contrast, unless indicated otherwise, the terms “wild-type allele,” “wild-type AHASL1 allele,” or “wild-type AHASL1 gene” allele refer to a polynucleotide that encodes an AHASL1 protein.
The invention involves the use of a number of primers for PCR amplification. These primers are described in detail below.
A “forward AHASL1 primer” is a primer that can be used in the methods of the invention involving the PCR amplification of a fragment of a sunflower AHASL1 allele, wherein the fragment extends in a 5′ direction from the site of the mutation that gives rise to the A122T amino acid substitution. Preferably, the complement of the annealing site of the “forward AHASL1 primer” is on the 5′ side of the (ACC)n repeat that is shown in
A “reverse wild-type AHASL1 primer” is a reverse primer that can be used in the methods involving the PCR amplification of a fragment of an AHASL1 allele that does not comprise the mutation that gives rise to the A122T amino acid substitution. The annealing site of the reverse primer is shown in
A “reverse mutant AHASL1 primer” is a reverse primer that can be used in the methods involving the PCR amplification of a fragment of a mutant AHASL1 allele comprising the mutation that gives rise to the A122T amino acid substitution. The annealing site of the reverse primer is shown in
The present invention provides methods for genotyping sunflower AHASL1. The method involves obtaining genomic DNA from a sunflower plant and using the genomic DNA or sample or portion thereof as a template for a first polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification comprising the genomic DNA, polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, a forward AHASL1 primer and a reverse wild-type AHASL1 primer. The reverse wild-type AHASL1 primer comprises a nucleic acid molecule that anneals to a nucleotide sequence comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 13, wherein the nucleotide that is at the 3′ end nucleotide of said reverse wild-type AHASL1 primer is the complement of the nucleotide that is at position 1 of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 13. The method further comprises using the genomic DNA or sample or portion thereof as a template for a second PCR amplification comprising said DNA, polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, said forward AHASL1 primer and a mutant reverse AHASL1 primer. The reverse mutant AHASL1 primer comprises a nucleic acid molecule that anneals to a nucleotide sequence comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 14, wherein the nucleotide that is at the 3′ end nucleotide of said reverse mutant AHASL1 primer is the complement of the nucleotide that is at position 1 of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 14. The method further comprises detecting the products of said first and said second PCR amplifications.
The reverse wild-type AHASL1 and the reverse mutant AHASL1 primers of the invention anneal to a nucleotide sequence comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 13 and 14, respectively, under conditions suitable for the PCR amplification of the portions of the AHASL1 genes or sunflower shown in
The methods for genotyping sunflower AHASL1 involve the use of a forward AHASL1 primer. Unlike the reverse wild-type AHASL1 and the reverse mutant AHASL1 primers that anneal at the site of the mutation that gives rise to the A122T amino acid substitution, the annealing site of the forward AHASL1 primer nucleotide corresponds to a region of the sunflower AHASL1 gene that is 5′ of the (ACC)n region shown in
The present invention further provides a method for identifying AHASL1 alleles in a sunflower plant. The method involves obtaining genomic DNA from a sunflower plant and using the genomic DNA or sample or portion thereof in at least one PCR amplification. The PCR amplification involves using the genomic DNA as a template for a polymerase chain reaction amplification comprising the genomic DNA, polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, a first forward primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15, a first reverse primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16, a second forward primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 17, and a second reverse primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18. The method further involves detecting the products of the PCR amplification.
Alternatively, two or even three separate PCR amplifications can be used in the methods of the invention. When two separate PCR amplifications are used, the first PCR amplification involves using the genomic DNA as a template for a first polymerase chain reaction amplification comprising the genomic DNA, polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, a first forward primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15, and a first reverse primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16. The second PCR amplification involves using the genomic DNA as a template for a second polymerase chain reaction amplification comprising the genomic DNA, polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, a second forward primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 17, and a second reverse primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18. The first PCR amplification can optionally comprise a third primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18, and the second PCR amplification can optionally comprise a third primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15. The addition of such an optional primer to either one or both of the first and second PCR amplifications allows for the production of a control band that is amplified by the pair of primers comprising the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 15 and 18. The method further involves detecting the products of the first and the second PCR amplifications.
When three separate PCR amplifications are used, the first and second PCR amplifications are the same as described above. The third PCR amplification involves using the genomic DNA as a template for a third polymerase chain reaction amplification comprising the genomic DNA, polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, the first forward primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15, and the second reverse primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18. The method further involves detecting the products of the first, the second, and the third PCR amplifications.
In one embodiment of the invention, the first forward primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting essentially of SEQ ID NO: 15, the first reverse primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting essentially of SEQ ID NO: 16, the second forward primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting essentially of SEQ ID NO: 17, and/or the second reverse primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting essentially of SEQ ID NO: 18. For the present invention, a primer “consisting essentially of” an exemplified sequence is intended to mean that the primer consists of the entire exemplified sequence but may additionally include nucleotides on the 5′ end of the primer. Such additional nucleotides may but are not required to be fully or partially complementary to the target gene for amplification. Because DNA synthesis is initiated from the 3′ end of a primer, such additional nucleotides do not change the start site for DNA synthesis when compared to a primer that is identical except for the additional nucleotides.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the first forward primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting of SEQ ID NO: 15, the first reverse primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting of SEQ ID NO: 16, the second forward primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting of SEQ ID NO: 17, and/or the second reverse primer has a nucleotide sequence consisting of SEQ ID NO: 18.
Unless otherwise indicated herein, “polymerase” refers to a DNA polymerase, particularly a DNA polymerase that is suitable for use in one or more of the PCR amplifications of the present invention.
In the methods of the invention, the results of PCR amplifications can be detected by, for example, agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products followed by ethidium-bromide staining of the DNA in the gel and visualization in the presence of UV light.
The methods of the invention involve the use of PCR for amplifying DNA. Oligonucleotide primers can be designed for use in PCR reactions to amplify corresponding DNA sequences from genomic DNA or cDNA extracted from any organism of interest. Methods for designing PCR primers are generally known in the art and are disclosed in Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.); herein incorporated by reference. See also, Innis et al., eds. (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Academic Press, New York); Innis and Gelfand, eds. (1995) PCR Strategies (Academic Press, New York); Innis and Gelfand, eds. (1999) PCR Methods Manual (Academic Press, New York); Dietmaier et al, eds. (2002) Rapid Cycle Real Time PCR—Methods and Applications, (Springer Verlag, New York); Theophilus and Raphley, eds. (2002) PCR Mutation Detection Protocols (Humana Press, New York); and Bartlett and Stirling, eds. (2003) PCR Protocols (Humana Press, New York); all of which are herein incorporated by reference. Other known methods of PCR that can be used in the methods of the invention include, but are not limited to, methods using paired primers, nested primers, single specific primers, degenerate primers, gene-specific primers, mixed DNA/RNA primers, vector-specific primers, partially-mismatched primers, and the like.
The use herein of the term “primer” “or “PCR primer” is not intended to limit the present invention to primers comprising DNA. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that such primers can be comprised of, for example, deoxyribonucleotides, ribonucleotides, and combinations thereof. Such deoxyribonucleotides and ribonucleotides include both naturally occurring molecules and synthetic analogues.
While the invention does not depend on PCR primers of any particular number of nucleotides, it is recognized that the portion of a PCR primer that anneals to its complementary target on the template DNA will generally be between about 10 and 50 contiguous nucleotides, preferably 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, or more contiguous nucleotides. However, a PCR primer of the invention can further comprise on its 5′ end additional nucleotides that are not intended to anneal to the target such as, for example, a DNA sequence comprising one or more restriction enzyme recognition sites.
The methods of the invention involve the use of DNA polymerases for PCR amplification of DNA. Any DNA polymerase known in the art that is capable of amplifying a target DNA by PCR may be used in the methods of the invention. The methods of the invention do not depend on a particular DNA polymerase for PCR amplification of DNA, only that such polymerases are capable of amplifying one or more of the plant AHASL genes or fragments thereof. Preferably, the DNA polymerases of the invention are thermostable DNA polymerases, including but not limited to: Taq polymerases; Pfu polymerases; thermostable DNA polymerases from Thermococcus gorgonarious which are also known as Tgo DNA polymerases; thermostable DNA polymerases from Thermococcus litoralis such as, for example, those that are known as Vent® DNA polymerases (Perler, F. et al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5577), thermostable DNA polymerases from Pyrococcus species GB-D such as, for example, those that are known as Deep Vent® DNA polymerases (Xu, M. et al. (1993) Cell 75, 1371-1377); and modified versions and mixtures thereof.
The methods of the invention involve the amplification of a target DNA sequence by PCR. In certain embodiments of the invention, the target DNA sequence will be amplified directly from a sample comprising genomic DNA isolated from at least one plant or part, organ, tissue, or cell thereof. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the amount or concentration of genomic DNA will depend on any number of factors including, but not limited to, the PCR conditions (e.g. annealing temperature, denaturation temperature, the number of cycles, primer concentrations, dNTP concentrations, and the like), the thermostable DNA polymerase, the sequence of the primers, and the sequence of the target. Typically, in the embodiments of the invention described herein, the concentration of genomic DNA is at least about 5 ng/μL to about 100 ng/μL.
In addition to PCR amplification, the methods of the invention can involve various techniques of molecular biology including, for example, DNA isolation, particularly genomic DNA isolation, digestion of DNA or PCR products by restriction enzymes and nucleases, DNA ligation, DNA sequencing, agarose gel electrophoresis, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, gel electrophoresis in any other suitable matrix for the electrophoretic separation of DNA, the detection of DNA by ethidium-bromide staining, and the like. Such techniques are generally known in the art and are disclosed, for example, in Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.).
The methods of the invention involve the use of genomic DNA isolated from a plant. The methods of the invention do not depend on genomic DNA isolated by any particular method. Any method known in the art for isolating, or purifying, from a plant, genomic DNA, which can be used a source of template DNA for the PCR amplifications described above, can be employed in the methods of the invention. See, for example, Stein et al. ((2001) Plant Breeding, 12:354-356); Clark, ed. ((1997) Plant Molecular Biology—A Laboratory Manual, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 3-15); Miller et al., ((1988) Nucleic Acids Research, 16:1215); all of which are herein incorporated by reference. Preferably, such methods for isolating plant genomic DNA are suited, or can be adapted by one of ordinary skill in the art, for the isolation of genomic DNA from relatively large numbers of tissue samples of plants. In an embodiment of the invention, genomic DNA is isolated from sunflower plants using a DNeasy® kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, Calif., USA). In another embodiment, genomic DNA is isolated from sunflower plants using a MagneSil® kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis., USA).
For the methods of the present invention, genomic DNA can be isolated from whole plants or any part, organ, tissue, or cell thereof. For example, genomic DNA can be isolated from seedlings, leaves, stems, roots, inflorescences, seeds, embryos, tillers, coleoptiles, anthers, stigmas, cultured cells, and the like. Furthermore, the invention does not depend on the isolation of genomic DNA from plants or parts, organs, tissues, or cells thereof that are of any particular developmental stage. The methods can employ genomic DNA that is isolated from, for example, seedlings or mature plants, or any part, organ, tissue or cell thereof. Furthermore, the invention does not depend on plants that are grown under any particular conditions. The plants can be grown, for example, under field conditions, in a greenhouse, or a growth chamber, in culture, or even hydroponically in a greenhouse or growth chamber. Typically, the plants will be grown in conditions of light, temperature, nutrients, and moisture that favor the growth and development of the plants.
The methods of invention involve detecting the products of the PCR amplifications. Typically, the PCR products are detected by first separating the products in a substrate on the basis of molecular weight and then detecting each of the separated PCR products in the substrate. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the PCR products are detected by agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products followed by ethidium-bromide staining of the DNA in the gel and visualization in the gel by florescence in the presence of UV light. However, any detection method suitable for separating polynucleotides can be used to detect the PCR products of the invention including, but not limited to, gel electrophoresis, high performance liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, and the like. Substrates for such methods include, for example, agarose, polyacrylamide, diethylaminoethyl cellulose, hydroxyalkyl cellulose, sepharose, polyoxyethylene, and the like. The PCR amplifications of the invention can involve the use of one or more primers that are labeled, for example, radioactively, or with a fluorescent dye, a luminescent label, a paramagnetic label, or any other label suitable for the detection of nucleic acids. When the PCR amplifications involve one or more of such a labeled primers, the detection step can include the detection of the radioactive, fluorescent, luminescent, paramagnetic, or other label by any methods known in the art for detecting such a label.
The present invention also provides kits for performing the methods for genotyping sunflower AHASL1 as described herein. Such kits comprise primers of the present invention, particularly a forward AHASL1 primer, a reverse wild-type AHASL1 primer, and a reverse mutant AHASL1 primer as described above. Preferably, the forward AHASL1 primer comprises a nucleotide sequence that corresponds to a region of the sunflower AHASL1 gene that is 5′ of the (ACC)n region shown in
The present invention further provides kits performing the methods for identifying AHASL1 alleles in a sunflower plant. Such kits comprise primers of the present invention, particularly a first forward primer, a first reverse primer, and a second forward primer and a second reverse primer as described above. The first forward primer comprises the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15, the first reverse primer comprises the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16, the second forward primer comprises the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 17, and the second reverse primer comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18. The kits can optionally comprise one or more of the following: a polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, and instructions for performing the method.
In addition, the invention provides the primers used in the methods involving PCR amplification described herein. Such primers comprise a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, and 18.
The articles “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. By way of example, “an element” means one or more elements.
As used herein, the word “comprise,” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising,” will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps.
The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
GM40 and GM1606 are mutation-derived lines of sunflower that show high levels of tolerance to imidazolinones due to a point mutation in codon 122 (Arabidopsis thaliana nomenclature) of AHASL1 (WO 2007005581 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/695,952; filed Jul. 1, 2005). It was demonstrated that the A122T mutation and derived lines and hybrids homozygous for this mutation show a better tolerance to imazamox than the already known, commercially available, Clearfield sunflowers homozygous for the A205V mutation at AHASL1 (WO 2007005581). Both mutants show incomplete dominance over the wild type, susceptible allele, as in many other examples in the literature. This present invention is based on the discovery that the A122T mutation presents near complete dominance for resistance to imidazolinones over A205V in a range of herbicide applications from 0.5× to 6× of the commercial dose. The present invention provides heterozygous A122T/A205V sunflower plants that show the same tolerance level and pattern of response to increased doses of imidazolinones as do homozygous A122T sunflower plants. Thus, a higher level of tolerance to imidazolinones can be obtained by allelic substitution of A205V by A122T in only one of the parental lines of a Clearfield sunflower, which in turn permits a more rapid deployment of this new allele in the sunflower crop.
To determine the phenotypic interactions of the resistance gene A122T and the Imr1 gene (A205V) already described in IMI-R sunflowers (HA425), F1, F2 and BC1F1 populations from the cross GM40 (A122T)/HA425 (A205V) were evaluated at two herbicide applications rates (80 and 320 g. a. i. Ha−1 of imazapyr). No susceptible plants were observed in the F2 and BC1F1 populations resulting from this cross when progeny were evaluated at the lower herbicide rate, indicating that the resistant genes in GM40 and HA425 are alleles of the same locus and that both of them show the same level of resistance to imidazolinones at 1× rate of herbicide application. When F2 and BC1F1 populations were scored at the higher herbicide rate (320 g. a. i. Ha-1), which discriminates both parents, segregation for susceptibility was observed. Only two phenotypic classes could be detected, a resistant class with plants without any injury or slight symptoms and a susceptible phenotype that was killed like the control line HA425. Observed segregation ratios over 450 F2 plants screened were not significantly different from a 3:1 segregation ratio. To confirm these results, F1 plants were backcrossed to HA425 and the resulting BC1F1 plants were screened at 320 g. a.i. ha−1 of imazapyr. Observed segregation ratios gave a good fit to a 1:1 R:S ratio, confirming that the resistant gene in GM40 showed complete dominance over the resistant gene in HA425 and that both of them are alleles of the same locus, AHASL1.
To further confirm these results, a molecular marker approach was used. The AHASL1 gene in sunflower presents a simple sequence repeat (SSR) polymorphism which discriminates lines carrying the Imr1 allele from any other sunflower genotype (Kolkman et al. (2004) Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1147-1159). PCR amplification of the AHASL1 gene fragment containing this SSR using the primers p-AHAS18 and p-AHAS19 yielded a product of 321 bp for GM40 and BTK47 (original mutagenesis line) and a fragment of 312 bp for HA425. This length variant polymorphism detected in GM40 and HA425 was exploited to investigate the segregation in the F2 and BC1F1 populations derived from crossing both lines. Eighty plants from the F2 population and 50 plants from the BC1F1 population were chosen at random, sampled for DNA isolation, challenged with an imazapyr application rate of 320 g. a. i. ha−1 and genotyped using this marker. In the F2 population, 22 plants were killed by the herbicide (S) and 58 showed no symptoms or a slight injury (R). The observed segregation ratio for resistance was not significantly different (P<0.61) from the expected segregation ratio for a completely dominant factor segregating in F2 (3R:1S). Observed segregation for the AHASL1 SSR marker (19 A/A: 39 A/B: 22 B/B) fits an expected segregation ratio for a codominant marker segregating in F2 (1:2:1, P<0.87). All the susceptible plants genotyped for the AHASL1 SSR were homozygous for the HA425 haplotype (B/B), whereas R-plants were either heterozygous (A/B) or homozygous for the GM40 haplotype (A/A) (Table 4,
These results confirm that the resistant gene in GM40 is different from the resistance gene in HA425, that both of them are allelic variants of the locus AHASL1 and, finally, that the gene present in GM40 is completely dominant over the Imr1 allele.
This experiment was conducted to quantify and contrast the imazapyr sensitivity of sunflower hybrids carrying the A122T and A205V mutations in homozygous (A122T/A122T or A205V/A205V) and heterozygous (A122T/A205V) states in different genetic backgrounds and at the whole plant level.
Materials
Seeds of the different sunflower lines (Table 1) were obtained under field conditions.
Lines L1 and L2 are male sterile and restorer breeding lines, respectively, which carry the A205V allele in homozygous condition. L5, BTK 47, is a maintainer line which was utilized as initial material to develop the GM40 line. GM40 is the original line which carries the A122T mutation in the homozygous state (ATCC Patent Deposit Number PTA-6716; see WO 2007005581). L4 is a BC2F4 restorer line derived from the cross R701*3/GM40 using marker assisted backcrossing to select the most similar plant to the recurrent parent in each backcross generation. R701 is a susceptible restorer line with good combining ability. After two generations of backcrossing the most similar plant to R701 was selfed and its progeny was selected for imazapyr resistance. Homozygous A122T plants were selected among the resistant progeny by using a molecular marker diagnostic of the A122T mutation that is described hereinbelow. CMS GM40 is the male sterile version of GM40 which was developed from the BC1F1 generation from the cross cmsBTK47/*2 GM40 using the same diagnostic marker to distinguish homo and heterozygous plants for the A122T allele.
Methods
Diagnostic Marker for the A122T Mutation
An allele-specific PCR assay is described for high-throughput genotyping of sunflower plants carrying the A122T mutation in AHASL1. The assay permits one: (1) to detect the individuals that carry the mutation; (2) to determine the zygosity of these individuals; and (3) to distinguish resistant plants that carry this mutation from plants that contain the A205V mutation.
PCR primers were taken from those provided by Kolkman et al. ((2004) Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1147-1159) to amplify a fragment of the sunflower AHASL1 sequence that includes the A122T mutation and an insertion-deletion polymorphism (“INDEL”) and that can be used to distinguish the sequence of A122T mutation from the sequence of the already known mutation A205V.
The names and sequences of these primers are:
The reaction mix was as follows: 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase, 70 ng genomic sunflower DNA, 25 μg BSA, and have a final concentration of 100 μM of each dNTP, 0.25 μM of each primer, 90 mM Tris-HCl pH8, 20 mM (NH4)2SO4 and 2.5 mM MgCl2. The PCR program consists in an initial denaturation step of 94° C. for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 30 sec at 94° C., 30 sec at 56° C. and 30 sec at 72° C., followed by a final elongation step at 72° C. for 10 min.
The predicted fragment size for BTK47 (or GM40) using the abovementioned primers is 321 bp and the predicted fragment size based on GenBank Accession No. AY541455 for the sunflower haplotype that carries the A205V mutation is 312 bp.
The amplified products were restricted and the resulting fragments were resolved in an agarose gel. Restriction reaction consists in 10 μl of the amplification product, BSA 1× (100 μg/ml), NEBuffer 3 1× (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ditiotreitol pH 7.9) and 2.5 U BmgB I. This mix was incubated at 37° C. for 3 hours. The predicted fragment size after restriction for wild type and A122T plants are the following:
The wild type will display fragments of 183+138 bp. GM40 (A122T): display fragments of 183+76+62 bp. Heterozygous individuals will display fragments of 183+138+76+62 bp.
Herbicide Treatments
Seeds were sown in Petri dishes and, after germination, plantlets were transplanted to pots of 10 cm of diameter in a potting media consisting of equal parts of vermiculite, soil and sand. Plants were grown in a greenhouse under natural light conditions supplemented with 400 W sodium halide lamps to provide a 16 hr daylength. Day/night temperatures were 25 and 20° C., respectively. At the V2-V4 stage (Schneiter & Miller (1981) Crop Sci. 21:901-903) 10 plants of each genotype were randomly assigned to each treatment consisting of eight imazapyr doses (0, 40, 80, 160, 240, 320, 400 and 480 g ai/ha, corresponding to untreated, 0.5×, 1×, 2×, 3×, 4×, 5× and 6×, respectively), and a zero-time biomass determination. Experiment was arranged as a randomized block design with a full factorial (sunflower line×treatment) arrangement of treatments and 10 replications.
On the day of herbicide application ten plants of each genotype were cut at the cotyledonal node and dried at 60° C. for 48 hrs for zero-time dried weight determination.
The remaining plants were maintained for 14 days after imazapyr treatment (DAT) and their height, Phytotoxicity Index (PI) and above ground dry biomass were determined. Height was determined as the distance between the cotyledonal node and the apex of each plant. Above ground biomass data from each line were converted to biomass accumulation after application by subtracting the appropriate average zero-time biomass from each sample. Dry biomass data were converted to percentages of the untreated control plants within each line to allow direct comparisons between groups. PI is a phenotypic scale from 0 to 9 that was assessed for each plant by visual inspection. Plants without any symptoms were recorded as “0”, increasing levels of stunting and chlorosis with respect to the untreated control plants were recorded as “1” to “4”, increasing levels of leaf abnormalities and leaf necrosis were recorded from “5” to “8”, and dead plants with total necrosis of the apex were recorded as “9”.
Results
Height
Height reduction of the susceptible line was 85% at the lower rate of imazapyr application (0.5×). From 1× to 6× height reduction in this line was approximately 85% of the untreated control plants. Height of the sunflower lines and hybrid carrying the A205V mutation in homozygous condition did not differ from the untreated controls when a rate of 0.5× or 1× of imazapyr was applied. From 2× to 6×, these lines showed a significant reduction in height which reached 69.6%+/−3.9 of the untreated controls (Table 2 and
The materials with both mutant alleles at AHASL1 (heterozygotes A122T/A205V) showed a height reduction from 0.6% to 38.2%+/−2.7 of the untreated controls for 0.5× to 6× rate of herbicide application. This reduction in height for heterozygous materials did not differ from the reduction observed for homozygotes A122T/A122T but was lesser than that recorded for homozygotes A205V/A205V (
Phytotoxicity Index
Both mutants in homozygous condition showed great differences in their response to the increase in herbicide rate from 0.5× to 6× (
Above Ground Dry Weight Biomass
Dose response curves for dry weight of mutants A122T and A205V are shown in
Conclusions
Heterozygous materials carrying both mutant alleles at the AHASL1 locus showed the same level of tolerance and pattern of response for plant height, phytotoxicity index and dry matter accumulation, to increasing rates of imazapyr application than homozygous A122T materials and this level of tolerance is better than that expressed by homozygous A205V materials.
This experiment was conducted to compare the herbicide tolerance of sunflower hybrids and lines in different genotypes carrying the A122T and A205V mutations in homozygous (A122T/A122T or A205V/A205V), heterozygous (A122T/− or A205V/−) and double stacked heterozygous (A122T/A205V) states under field conditions.
Materials
The sunflower materials that were used are listed in Table 5.
Methods
Seed from each entry in Table 5 were produced under optimum seed production conditions in South America during the 2005-2006 growing season. The field trial was conducted at one location in North Dakota, USA in 2006. The entries were organized in a randomized complete block using a split plot design consisting of 3 replications for each treatment combination. Factor A (Table 6) was the herbicide treatment, and factor B was the sunflower entry. The plot size was 4 rows×12 ft and the seeding rate was consistent with local agronomic practices.
Entry 15 (WT Maintainer line) was left unsprayed in all treatment blocks.
Phytotoxicity ratings were assessed at 7 and 21 days following herbicide application. Phytotoxicity was recorded as the amount of plant damage (in percent), where a rating of ‘0’ indicated no damage to the plants in the plot relative to the untreated plot. A rating of ‘100’ indicated complete necrosis (death) of the plants in the plot relative to the untreated plot.
The data was subjected to an ANOVA analysis and the means from the 3 repetitions are presented in Table 7 (phytotoxicity at 7 days post-treatment) and Table 8 (phytotoxicity at 21 days post-treatment).
Results
At 160 g ai/ha of imazapyr there were no significant differences in phytotoxicity between the A205V/A122T double heterozygous entries and the homozygous A205V and A122T entries both at 7 days and 21 days after treatment (DAT). The phytotoxicity in the heterozygous A205V entries was significantly higher than the double heterozygous A205V/A122T and the homozygous entries for both the 7 and 21 DAT ratings (in the range of 20-43% for the heterozygous A205V entries for 21 DAT). The phytotoxicity in the heterozygous entries also increased from the time the 7 DAT evaluation was taken to the time the 21 DAT was taken. There was no significant increase in phytotoxicity from 7 DAT to 21 DAT for the A205V/A122T double heterozygous and A122T/A122T and A205V/A205V homozygous entries.
Three levels of imazamox, 50 g ai, 100 g ai and 200 g ai/ha, were tested on all entries (except entry 15). At 200 g ai/ha of imazamox, the heterozygous A205V/A122T lines (2-3% phytotoxicity at 21 DAT) demonstrated significantly less phytotoxicity than the homozygous A205V/A205V lines (15-22% phytotoxicity at 21 DAT) and equivalent phytotoxicity to the homozygous A122T/A122T lines (3-5% phytotoxicity at 21 DAT).
Discussion
The double heterozygous A205V/A122T entries demonstrated equivalent herbicide tolerance to the homozygous A122T/A122T entries and superior herbicide tolerance to the homozygous A205V/A205V entries, as demonstrated by the highest imazamox treatment level (200 g ai/ha).
The single treatment level of imazapyr, 160 g ai/ha, was not high enough to show significant differences in phytotoxicity between the double heterozygous A205V/A122T entries and the homozygous entries, yet it was sufficient to illustrate the higher tolerance obtained by stacking the two heterozygous A205V/A122T mutations together versus each heterozygous mutation on its own.
Based on the imazamox treatment data, the A122T mutation when stacked with the A205V mutation in the heterozygous state, provides stronger herbicide tolerance than the A205V mutation in the homozygous state.
The experiment described above disclose the interactions between two allele mutants of AHASL1 in sunflower. The mutation in codon 122 has significantly greater herbicide tolerance than any previously reported AHAS mutations in sunflower, whereas the mutation in codon 205 confers intermediate levels of resistance. As the allele 122 shows dominance over its allele 205, heterozygote genotypes carrying both mutants have the same level of tolerance as the homozygous 122.
Due to the increased herbicide tolerance, the present invention provides methods that allow for the development of new and highly efficacious herbicide products for sunflower production. Since the present invention provides sunflower plants with commercial levels of herbicide tolerance produced by making a single gene substitution in the present day Clearfield sunflower hybrids, which are A205V/A205V, the present invention finds use in increasing the breeding efficiency for the production of herbicide tolerant sunflower hybrids and also provides for a more rapid deployment of the A122T mutation in commercial sunflower hybrids.
Orobanche cumana and Orobanche cernua (broomrape) are two parasitic plants that infect sunflowers in many production areas of the world. Both species infect sunflower plants sequentially from V6 to the flowering (R5) stage. It has been proposed to use an imidazolinone herbicide, such as imazethapyr, to control broomrape by applying the herbicide to A205-containing sunflower plants at the V10 to R1 stage of development (WO 1999065312). Using this approach, Orobanche control was successful and phytotoxicity was negligible.
Here we demonstrate that the tolerance of A122T/A122T or A122T/A205V hybrids is better than the tolerance of A205V homozygous plants when an imidazolinone herbicide, such as imazapyr, is applied at a 2× application rate during the early reproductive stages of development (R1). In this report, we demonstrate the usefulness of A122T/A122T and A122T/A205V for Orobanche control in sunflowers.
Materials
The lines H1, H2 and H3 are as described in Table 9. The hybrid H5 is an F1 originating from a cross between L3×R701, and the hybrid H6 is an F1 originating from a cross between L1×R701.
Methods
Seeds from each entry were produced under optimum seed production conditions in Laguna Blanca (Formosa, Argentina) in 2005. The field trial was conducted at one location in Venado Tuerto (Santa Fe, Argentina) in 2006. The entries were organized in a randomized complete block design consisting of 3 replications for each treatment combination. Factor A was the ontogenetic stage of sunflower development (V8 and R1) and factor B was the sunflower entry. The plot size was 5 rows×6 meters, with plants distributed every 25 cm within each row. At the V8 or R1 stage, 160 g ai/ha imazapyr+0.25% (v/v) NIS was applied with a spray volume of 100 liters/ha using a backpack sprayer.
Phytotoxicity ratings were assessed at 14 days and 21 days after herbicide application. Phytotoxicity was recorded as the amount of plant damage, where a rating of “0” indicated no damage to the plants in the plot relative to the untreated control plots. A rating of 1 to 15 indicated an increasing level of chlorosis in the plot, where “15” indicated a generalized yellowish of the plot. Ratings of “20” to “49” indicated an increasing level of stunting, deformations and necrosis. A rating of “50”, indicated death (complete necrosis) of the plants.
The data were subjected to an ANOVA analysis. Means of each entry were compared using the LSD test at the 0.01 probability level.
Results
The mean Phytotoxicity Index (PI) scored at 14 and 21 days after treatment (DAT) is presented in Tables 9 and 10.
Nearly all of the hybrids showed slight symptoms of chlorosis when sprayed at the V8 stage of plant development. The only exception was the heterozygous 122/WT hybrid which demonstrated a complete yellowing at 14 DAT (Table 9). This yellowing disappeared at 21 DAT (Table 10). Also, at 21 DAT, there were no differences between the lines with respect to PI (Table 10).
On the other hand, when the hybrids were sprayed at the R1 stage of plant development and assessed at 14 DAT, two well defined groups of materials were recognized. One group only showed chlorosis symptoms (PI less than 11.7) while the second group showed chlorosis symptoms along with stunting and deformation (PI greater than 35). The first group was composed of lines carrying at least one allele A122T (i.e.: hybrids A122T/A122T, A122T/A205V and A122/WT), and the second group consisted of hybrids carrying the A205V mutation event in both the homozygous and heterozygous state (A205V/A205V, A205V/WT). Differences in PI between both groups were highly significant (p<0.01; Table 9). At 21 DAT, however, the A122/WT hybrid increased its PI score (from 11.7 to 23.3), while, the A122T/A122T and A122T/A205V hybrids decreased their PI scores from 2.3-4.3 to 1.7-0.7. Differences between these last two hybrids and the A122T/WT hybrid were highly significant at 21 DAT (Table 10). The lines containing A205/A205V and A205V/WT also showed very high PI scores with many plants showing symptoms of apex burn and damage to the growing points (Table 10).
Conclusion
The results indicate that the hybrids A205V/A205V or A205V/WT cannot be sprayed with imazapyr after V8 because they showed increased phytotoxicity and severe damage after application. The hybrids A122T/A122T and A122T/A205V showed only slight symptoms of chlorosis after imazapyr application. This confirmed that the A122T/A122T and A122T/A205V sunflower plants demonstrated a better level of tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides when applied at the R1 stage, than the A205V/A205V or A205V/WT material. In summary, lines containing the A122T/A122T and A122T/A205V stack can be used to control Orobanche with imazapyr by applying the herbicide at the R1 (late vegetative or early reproductive) stage of plant development.
Resistance to sulphonylureas in sunflower was discovered in wild Helianthus populations from Kansas (USA, (Al-Khatib et al. (1998) Weed Sci. 46:403-407). The gene for resistance (Ar-kan) has been introgressed from a wild population into elite inbred lines for the purpose of developing and deploying herbicide resistant cultivars and hybrids (Al-Khatib and Miller (2000) Crop Sci. 40:869; Miller and Al-Khatib (2002) 42:988-989; Miller and Al-Khatib (2004) Crop Sci. 44:1037-1038). It has been demonstrated that AHASL1 from sulphonylurea resistant genotypes harbors a C-to-T mutation in codon 197 that leads to a change from Pro to Leu at this position (Kolkman et al. (2004) Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1147-1159).
Metsulfuron methyl (Methyl 2 E[C[(4-Methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-Triazifl-2-yl)aminolcarbonyl]amino]sulfonyl.]benzoate]) is a sulfonylurea herbicide registered for use on wheat and barley and on non-cropland sites such as right of way (EPA Pesticide Fact Sheet Metsulfuron methyl (1986) Collection of pesticide chemistry, US Government Printing Office 461-221/24041).
The objective of this study was to quantify and contrast the metsulfuron sensitivity of sunflower hybrids carrying the A122T and P197L mutations in homozygous (A122T/A122T or P197L/P197L) and heterozygous (A122T/P197L) states at the whole plant level under greenhouse conditions.
Materials
The following materials were used: B770, GM1606, GM40, L4, cms GM40×L4, cms GM40×BTSu-R1 and BTSu-R1. B770 is a susceptible sunflower line that was used as the parental source for the mutagenesis line GM1606. GM1606 is homozygous for the A122T mutation, and GM1606 and B770 are isolines which only differ at the AHASL1 locus. GM40, L4, and cmsGM40×L4 were described above. BTSu-R1 is a restorer line developed in our lab and obtained by pedigree selection from the composite population SURES-2, that was released by Miller and Al-Khatib (2004) Crop Sci. 44:1037-1038.
Methods
Seeds were sown in Petri dishes and, after germination, plantlets were transplanted into 10 cm pots containing potting media consisting of equal parts of vermiculite, soil, and sand. Plants were grown in the greenhouse under natural light conditions supplemented with 400 W sodium halide lamps to provide a 16 hr daylength. Day/night temperatures were 25 and 20° C., respectively. At the V2-V4 stage (Schneiter & Miller, 1981) 20 plants of each genotype were randomly assigned to each treatment consisting of three metsulfuron methyl doses (0 or no treatment, 5 g ai/ha or a 1× rate, and 10 g ai/ha or a 2× rate). A zero-time biomass determination was also conducted. The experiment was arranged as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with a full factorial arrangement of treatments and 20 replications (sunflower line×treatment).
For the zero-time dried weight determination, ten plants of each genotype were cut at the cotyledonal node on the day of herbicide application and dried at 60° C. for 48 hr. The rest of the plants were maintained for 14 days after herbicide treatment (DAT) and their height, Phytotoxicity Index (PI) and above ground dry biomass were recorded. Height was determined as the distance between the cotyledonal node and the apex of each plant. The above ground biomass data for each line was converted to biomass accumulation after application by subtracting the appropriate average zero-time biomass from each sample. Height and dry biomass were converted to a percentage of the untreated control for each line to allow direct comparisons between groups. PI is a phenotypic scale from 0 to 9 that assesses phytotoxicity for each plant by visual inspection. Plants without any symptoms were recorded as “0”. Increasing levels of stunting and chlorosis, with respect to the untreated control plants, were recorded in the range of “1 to 4”. Increasing levels of leaf abnormalities and leaf necrosis were recorded in the range of'S to 8″. Dead plants with total necrosis of the apex were recorded as a “9”.
The data was subjected to an ANOVA and the means were compared by an LSD test.
Results
Height, dry matter accumulation, and PI of the wild type and A122/A122T homozygous plants reflected the great sensitivity of conventional sunflower and the mutant event A122T to sulphonylureas at both application rates (Table 11). In contrast, the mutation event P197L presented a greater level of tolerance, with nearly 80% of the height of the untreated controls at both herbicide rates. Likewise, dry matter accumulation for this event was 88% and 77% at 1× and 2× metsulfuron rates, respectively. Finally, PI of the P197L/P197L homozygous line was 0 and 0.1 at both herbicide rates, reflecting that plants had virtually no phytotoxic symptoms (Table 11).
The stacked hybrid A122T/P197L showed the same pattern of tolerance as the homozygous P197 line and presented a better performance than all of the homozygous A122T materials for all variables analyzed (Table 11). To illustrate this, the A122T/P197L line, when treated with 1× metsulfuron, showed the same PI and height reduction as the homozygous P197L resistant line. At the 2× metsulfuron rate, A122T/P197L demonstrated the same accumulation of dry matter as the P197L homozygous line. The heterozygous P197L/A122T hybrid differed significantly from the resistant line P197L for the following parameters: DMA at 1× (74.4 vs 88.1, respectively), PH (62 vs 80.9%), and PI at 2× (1 vs 0.1). However, the magnitude of these differences was very low when compared to the differences observed between the A122T/P197L heterozygous material and all of the homozygous A122T and wild type lines.
Conclusion
Based on these results, the double heterozygous A122T/P197L demonstrated superior metsulfuron resistance than the homozygous A122T/A122T and wild type materials, and almost the same level of tolerance as the P197L/P197L homozygous line.
A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay is provided for high-throughput genotyping of sunflower plants carrying the AHASL1 sunflower mutation described herein above and in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/695,952, filed Jul. 1, 2005). The assay permits (1) the detection of individuals carrying the A122T mutation, (2) the determination of zygosity of the A122T mutation in these individuals, and (3) in the case of heterozygosis, the detection of both the A122T mutation along with other stacked AHAS resistant allele(s) (A205V or P197L) which are present in the plant.
1) PCR Primers and Amplification Conditions
PCR primers were developed based on the DNA sequences disclosed herein and in the abovementioned patent application. The name and sequences of these primers are as follows:
The reaction mix was as follows: 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase (Biotools, 10.047), 70 ng genomic sunflower DNA, 25 micrograms BSA, and have a final concentration of 100 μM of each dNTP, 0.25 μM of each primer p-AHAS NIDF/AHAS122TWT or p-AHAS NIDF/AHAS 122 TMU, 90 mM Tris-HCl pH8, 20 mM (NH4)2SO4 and 2.5 mM MgCl2.
The PCR program consists in an initial denaturation step of 94° C. for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of 30 sec at 94° C., 30 sec at 55° C. and 30 sec at 72° C., followed by a final elongation step at 72° C. for 10 min.
2) Detecting Plants Carrying the A122T Mutation and their Zygosity
In order to detect the individuals that carry the described mutation, p-AHAS NIDF/AHAS 122 TMU primer combination were used. Individuals having at least one copy (i.e., homo and heterozygote individuals) of the A122T allele yield a fragment of 195 bp. Wild-type individuals, or individuals having any other haplotypes for AHASL1 yield no fragment with this primer combination (see
The primer combination p-AHAS NIDF/AHAS 122 TWT was used (a) to confirm the specificity of the previous result, because the A122T allele should not produce an amplification product with this primer combination, and (b) to determine which is the other allele present in each plant (if different from A122T) (see
When the primer combination p-AHAS NIDF/AHAS 122 TWT was used, wild-type individuals, A205V and P197L mutants yielded a specific fragment (Table 12); whereas A122T homozygotes yielded no amplification product.
The products amplified in 1) are resolved in a 4% agarose gel (Methaphor Agarose).
The expected size of PCR products from various sunflower haplotypes (Hap) at the AHAHL1 gene are provided in Table 12. An alignment of the sequences of Hap1-Hap6 is provided in
1Haplotypes (Hap) 1 to 5 correspond to those provided in Kolkman et al. (2004) Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1147-1159).
2Type of AHASL1 mutation, if any, noted in parenthesis.
In order to facilitate the breeding of CLEARFIELD sunflower, the following SNP assay for the detection of the sunflower AHASL1 A122T allele was developed. The IMI-tolerant varieties used for assay development and validation include numerous conventional and herbicide-tolerant varieties. This assay uses allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect and determine the zygosity of the sunflower AHASL1 A122T allele. A single round of amplification with four primers provides the products necessary to detect the three possible states of zygosity: wild-type, heterozygous, and mutant (A122T/A122T). Because AHASL1 and AHASL2 loci are identical in the region containing the mutation, a set of primers were designed to specifically amplify the AHASL1 locus (see below HA122CF and HA122CR). In addition, allele-specific primers were designed to anneal/extend specifically from the single nucleotide “G” to “A” responsible for the respective codon change from alanine to threonine. The wild-type allele specific primer is a reverse primer. Thus, the terminal base is “C” as depicted below. A 794 base pair control band formed by HA122CF and HA122CR, is produced regardless of base(s) at the mutation site and serves as a positive control (
The diagnostic band for the wild-type condition, formed by the amplification of primers HA122CF and HA122 wt, yields a fragment of 258 base pairs (
Sunflower plants were produced that express the AHASL1 A122T mutant allele (also know as the CLHA-plus trait), which confers high levels of resistance to imidazolinones herbicides on a sunflower plant, and that produce seeds comprising an extractable seed oil that comprises at least 85% oleic acid. These sunflower plants were obtained by conventional breeding methodologies, through crossing an IMI-resistant line derived from GM40 with a High Oleic (HO) line (VB141) and selecting for both traits in F2 and later generations of inbreeding using molecular markers. GM40 and another sunflower line comprising at least one copy of the AHASL1 A122T mutant allele, GM1606, are described above and in WO 2007005581. Seeds of GM40 and GM1606 have been deposited with the ATCC and assigned ATCC Patent Deposit Numbers PTA-6716 and PTA-7606, respectively.
Materials
Lines BTI-OL-M1511, BTI-OL-M1709 and BTI-OL-2201 are three experimental sunflower lines selected for their high oleic content and their tolerance to imidazolinones. VB141, HA445 and OB712 are high oleic lines, B770 and BTK112 are two conventional lines, and GM40 is a A122T conventional line.
Methods
Fatty acid composition of the seeds: all the plants were grown under field conditions in Laguna Blanca (Formosa, Argentina) following a Complete Randomized Block Design with 3 replications. Ten grams of seeds from each replication were used for the analysis. Fatty acid composition of each sample was determined by gas chromatography following standard procedures. Mean values across the 3 replications for each material are provided in Table 16.
Tolerance to imidazolinones: Seeds of the nine lines were sown in pots under greenhouse conditions. At least 20 plantlets of each line were sprayed at V4 stage (Schneiter & Miller, 1981) with Imazapyr at a dose of 160 gr/ha. Fourteen days after treatment each plant was scored phenotypically using a Phytotoxicity Index (PI). PI is a phenotypic scale from 0 to 9 that was assessed for each plant by visual inspection. Plants without any symptoms were recorded as “0”, increasing levels of stunting and yellowing with respect to the untreated control plants were recorded as “1” to “4”, increasing levels of leaf abnormalities and leaf necrosis were recorded from “5” to “8”, dead plants with total necrosis of the apex were recorded as “9”.
Results
High oleic lines showed a range of oleic acid content in the seeds from 85.79 to 88.97%, conventional materials, on the other hand, showed a much lesser content (range: 18.62 to 24.2%). Lines BTI-OL-M1511, BTI-OL-M1709 and BTI-OL-2201 showed a concentration of oleic acid in the seeds from 89.58 to 90.83, similar to that obtained for the HO lines (Table 16).
Lines HA445, VB141, OB712, B770 and BTK112 were killed by the herbicide treatment, whereas lines BTI-OL-M1511, BTI-OL-M1709 and BTI-OL-2201 showed a resistance level similar to that observed in the resistant line GM40 (Table 17).
In conclusion, lines BTI-OL-M1511, BTI-OL-M1709 and BTI-OL-2201 combine a high level of resistance to imidazolinones and a high level of oleic acid in their seeds.
Field evaluations were conducted across several locations to determine the relative imidazolinone tolerance levels of sunflower plants that are A122T/A122T, A122T/A205V, or A205V/A205V for the AHASL1 gene. Sunflower plants from each of the different genotypes were challenged with different doses of imazamox and imazapyr under a range of environmental conditions. In addition, in vitro AHAS activity was determined in the presence of increasing levels of herbicides for sunflower plants from each of the three sunflower genotypes.
Materials and Methods
A sunflower line, BTK47, specifically selected for lack of an E-factor (imr1 imr1/imr2 imr2) was subjected to EMS seed mutagenesis. An M2:4 line which survived imazapyr field selection, was selected for subsequent crossing and enzyme activity studies. This line was named GM40.
Field Evaluation of the A122T Trait
The A122T mutant allele was introgressed into different maintainer, restorer and sterile inbred lines. Homozygous A122T inbreds were crossed with either wild-type (WT) inbreds (containing no herbicide tolerance mutation), homozygous A122T inbreds, or homozygous A205V inbreds to produce different F1 mutant allele zygosity combinations (Table 18). These entries, along with several regionally adapted CLEARFIELD® A205V commercial variety checks, were field tested for imidazolinone tolerance at numerous locations in North America, South America and Europe from 2005 to 2008 (Table 19).
The entries at each location in 2007 and 2007/2008 were arranged in a randomized two factorial split plot design consisting of 3 replications for each treatment combination. Factor A was the herbicide treatment (Table 20), and factor B was the sunflower entry (Table 18). The plot size was 2 rows×7 m and the seeding rate was consistent with local agronomic practices. The herbicide treatment was applied at the 2-4 leaf stage with a tractor mounted boom (20 gallons/acre or 200 liters/ha). Treatment 2 was only applied at 2 locations in France.
Crop injury (% phytotoxicity) ratings were evaluated at 6-10 days after treatment and at 16-21 days after treatment. Percent phytotoxicity was recorded as the average amount of plant damage in a given plot, where a rating of ‘0%’ indicated no damage to plants relative to the untreated plot. A rating of 10% to 40% indicated increasing levels of chlorosis (where 40 would be complete yellowing of the leaves). A rating of 50% or higher indicated that the plants demonstrated complete yellowing as well as increasing levels of leaf necrosis. A rating of ‘100%’ indicated complete necrosis (death) of the plants.
The emergence, days to flower, days to end of flower and maturity were also assessed for each plot at each location (data not shown). The data were subjected to an ANOVA analysis.
Enzyme Assay for AHAS Activity
Twelve greenhouse grown sunflower plants from each of the lines depicted in Table 21 were bulked and subjected to an AHAS enzyme activity assay via the method of Singh et al. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 171:173-179. Each activity assay was repeated twice. Due to the large number of samples, the experiment was split into two sets (Table 21).
Young, actively growing leaves, from four week old plantlets, were ground in a mortar and pestle with liquid N2 and extracted with a buffer composed of 100 mM pyruvate, 200 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM thiamine pyrophosphate and 20 μM flavin adenine dinucleotide. Plant extracts were then spun through a 10 mL Zeba™ desalt spin column (Pierce #89893) as per the manufacturer's recommendation. The inhibition assay was performed as described by Singh et al. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 171:173-179. Assays were conducted in a 96-well format. Fifty μl of inhibitor was added to each well containing 50 μl of soluble protein extract to give final concentrations of 0.78, 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μM imazamox or 0.78, 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μM imazapyr. Zero herbicide controls were also included for each line. Reactions were processed as outlined by Singh et al. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 171:173-179. Absorbance was measured at 530 nm. AHAS activity, expressed as the mean of the absorbance values for each treatment, was presented as a percentage of the mean of the zero-herbicide controls.
Results and Discussion
In herbicide tolerant crops, the crop injury phenotype can be attributed to the interaction between genotype and environment (GxE). The environmental component for herbicide tolerance is a sum of abiotic (i.e. weather, soil) and biotic factors (i.e. insect, disease and weed pressure) coupled with the effect of the herbicide dose. An example of this environmental effect is seen in
To assess HT genes for their relative tolerance level, two approaches were used. The first approach measured herbicide injury under a range of environmental stringencies (locations and years in combination with different herbicide doses), and the second approach tested the target enzyme (in vitro) with increasing levels of herbicide. Using the first approach, we quantified the environmental factor associated with this trait, by calculating the mean phytotoxicity index (PI) of the current commercial, regionally adapted, A205V checks at 6-10 days after herbicide treatment. PI values for different hybrids carrying the A122T mutation were plotted against the mean PI values of the A205V checks to evaluate the relative resistance level of the new mutation across a range of environmental components (
The results obtained after imazamox treatments are shown in
The environmental stringencies with imazapyr treatment can be summarized by the regressions summarized in the legend for each genotype in
To substantiate the herbicide tolerance effect observed in the field, the same herbicide tolerance gene combinations were subjected to AHAS enzyme inhibition studies. These studies were conducted on the bulk of 12 individuals from each entry in Table 18. The mean of two replications are represented in
In the second set of data, the A205V homozygous hybrids performed almost identically to the A122T heterozygous hybrids (
Based on field and AHAS enzyme activity data, it was determined that the novel A122T mutation provides superior herbicide tolerance to imidazolinones versus the current A205V mutation. Commercial levels of herbicide resistance in A205V sunflowers require the combination of two genetic factors in a homozygous state due to the moderate level of resistance conferred by Imr1. In contrast, by using the A122T mutation alone, the Imr2 enhancer (or gene by genotype interaction) is no longer necessary to achieve commercial levels of tolerance. Most importantly, the results demonstrate that A122T can be used either as a homozygous single gene HT trait or as a heterozygous stack together with the A205V HT trait, providing enhanced levels of tolerance, greater flexibility in weed control and facilitating the deployment of this new mutation in the CLEARFIELD Production System.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/594,289, filed Oct. 1, 2009, which is a U.S. national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application PCT/US2008/059125, filed Apr. 2, 2008, which designates the U.S. and was published by the International Bureau in English as WO 2008/124431 on Oct. 16, 2008, and which claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/910,041, filed Apr. 4, 2007 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/029,737, filed Feb. 19, 2008; the contents of each which hereby are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4443971 | Chaleff | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4761373 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774381 | Chaleff et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 5013659 | Bedbrook et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5084082 | Sebastian | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5116402 | Dutka et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5141870 | Bedbrook et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5198599 | Thill | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5304732 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5331107 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5378824 | Bedbrook et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5478789 | Hattori et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5478798 | Mayer et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5488029 | Hamprecht et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5539092 | Haselkorn et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545822 | Croughan | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5595890 | Newton et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597717 | Guerireau et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5605011 | Bedbrook et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5633437 | Bernasconi et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633444 | Guerineau et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5643779 | Ehrlich et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| RE35661 | Thill | Nov 1997 | E |
| 5718079 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719046 | Guerieneau et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5731180 | Dietrich | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736629 | Croughan | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5767361 | Dietrich | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767366 | Sathasivan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5773702 | Penner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5773703 | Croughan | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5773704 | Croughan | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5821126 | Durzan | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5853973 | Kakefuda et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858652 | Laffler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5859348 | Penner et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5876932 | Fischer | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5928937 | Kakefuda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5952553 | Croughan | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6043196 | Mayer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6100030 | McCasky Feazel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114116 | Lemieux et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6175065 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6207425 | Liu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211438 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6211439 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222100 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225105 | Sathasivan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6274796 | Croughan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6339184 | Smith | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6348643 | Kakefuda et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6358686 | Lemieux et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6475736 | Stanton, Jr. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6492582 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6613963 | Gingera et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6627401 | Ralhan | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6696294 | Konzak | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6943280 | Croughan | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7109196 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7345221 | Croughan | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7399905 | Croughan | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7495153 | Croughan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7595177 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7754947 | Croughan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7786360 | Linscombe | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7807882 | Leon et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 20010044939 | Abell et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020120962 | Charne et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138866 | Gingera et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138881 | Charne et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030087272 | Kambara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096277 | Chen | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097692 | Jander et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138780 | Gill et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180929 | Kafefuda et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217381 | Croughan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040142353 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171027 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172729 | Moldenhauer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187178 | Slinkard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219675 | Sainz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237134 | Pozniak et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040244080 | Hucl | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050044597 | Konzak | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198705 | Croughan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208506 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283858 | Yao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010514 | Birk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095992 | Bowran et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070028318 | Livore et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033670 | Konzak et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118920 | Leon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080167186 | Croughan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276329 | Moldenhauer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025108 | Croughan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1335412 | Mar 1988 | CA |
| 2340282 | Oct 2001 | CA |
| 0154204 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 0257993 | Mar 1988 | EP |
| 0360750 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 0364580 | Apr 1990 | EP |
| 0375875 | Jul 1990 | EP |
| 0461355 | Dec 1991 | EP |
| 0502588 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0508161 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0525384 | Feb 1993 | EP |
| 1754786 | Apr 1996 | EP |
| 0730030 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 0965265 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1033405 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1061135 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 8214882 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 2001-057892 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2003-135098 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2005-245272 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2006-515982 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| WO9014000 | Nov 1990 | WO |
| WO9113159 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| WO9208794 | May 1992 | WO |
| WO9633270 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO9741218 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO9802526 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO9802527 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO9832706 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO9919493 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO9953081 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO9965292 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO9965314 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO0026390 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO0027182 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO0053763 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO0121821 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO0165922 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO0182685 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0183818 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0185970 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0192512 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO0200915 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO0208794 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO02092820 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO03012115 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03013225 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03014356 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03014357 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03076574 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO2004007691 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004011908 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO2004016073 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO2004022715 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO2004040012 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004106529 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO2005020673 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005093093 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO2006007373 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO2006024351 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO2006060634 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO2006094084 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO2007005581 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO2007032807 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO2007140451 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO2008124495 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO2009046334 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ellis, J.T., “Polymerase chain reaction approaches for the detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 28, pp. 1053-1060. (Year: 1998). |
| Al-Khatib, K., et al., “Survey of Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Resistance to ALS-inhibiting Herbicides in Northeast Kansas”. Proceedings of the 21st Sunflower Research Workshop. National Sunflower Association, pp. 210-215; Bismark, ND (Jan. 14-15, 1999). |
| Al-Khatib, K., et al., “Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus)” Weed Science, 46:403-407 (1998). |
| Avila, L. A., et al., “Assessment of Acetolactate Synthase (ALS) tolerance to Imazethapyr in Red Rice Ecotypes (Oryza spp) and Imidazolinone Tolerant/Resistant Rice (Oryza sativa) Varietites”. Pest Management Science, vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 171-178 (2005). |
| Ayyadevara, S., et al., “Discrimination of Primer 3′—Nucleotide Mismatch by Taq DNA Polymerase during Polymerase Chain Reaction”. Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 284, pp. 11-18 (2000); Academic Press. |
| Barbosa Filho, M.P., et al., “Upland Rice Production in Brazil,” Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 43-47, Special Supplement, May 2002. |
| Barrett, M., “Protection of Grass Crops from Sulfonylurea and Imidazolinone Toxicity”. Crop Safeners for Herbicides, pp. 195-220 (1990); Academic Press Inc. |
| Bennett, Full Complement of Clearfield rice varieties: 2009, Delta Farm Press, Feb. 25, 2008 [online]. [Retrieved on Jan. 3, 2010]. Retrieved from the internet: <URL:http://deltafarmpress.com/rice/clearfield-update-0225/> p. 1, paragraph 14, in 1. |
| Bernasconi, P., et al., “A Naturally Occurring Point Mutation Confers Broad Range Tolerance to Herbicides That Target Acetolactate Synthase”. Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, No. 29, pp. 17381-17385 (1995). |
| Boutsalis, P., et al., “Molecular Basis of Resistance to Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Herbicides in Sisymbrium Orientale and Bassica Tournefortii”. Pesticide Science, vol. 55, pp. 507-516 (1999). |
| Brown, M., et al., “Hydrolytic Activation versus Oxidative Degradation of Assert Herbicide, an Imidazolinone Aryl-carboxylate, in Susceptible Wild Oat versus Tolerant Corn and Wheat”. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 27, pp. 24-29 (1987); Academic Press Inc. |
| Buchheim, J., et al., “Maturation of Soybean Somatic Embryos and the Transition to Plantlet Growth”. Plant Physiol., vol. 89, pp. 768-775 (1989). |
| Chamovitz, D., et al., “The Molecular Basis of Resistance to the Herbicide Norflurazon”. Plant Moleculat Biology, vol. 16, pp. 967-974 (1991). |
| Chang, et al., “Herbicide-resistant forms of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase: characterization of the catalytic properties and sensitivity to inhibitors of four defined mutants”. Biochem. J., vol. 333, pp. 765-777 (1998). |
| Chong, C, et al., “Amino Acid Residues Conferring Herbicide Tolerance in Tobacco Acetolactate Synthase”. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 279, pp. 462-467 (2000); Academic Press Inc. |
| De Battista, Juan Jose. “Rice Management and Fertilization in Entre Rios Province”; Special Supplement Publication; Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 40-42 (May 2002). |
| Delrio-Lafreniere SA et al., “Simultaneous allele-specific amplification: a strategy using modified primer-template mismatches for SNP detection—application to prothrombin 20210A (factor II) and factor V Leiden (1691A) gene mutations”. Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 201-209 (2001). |
| Doberman, A., et al., “Rice Straw Management”, Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 7-11, Special Supplementa, May 2002. |
| Duggleby, R. G., et al., “Acetohydroxyacid Synthase”. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, KR, vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1-36 (Jan. 2000). |
| Duggleby, R., “Identification of an Acetolactate Synthase Small Subunit Gene in Two Eukaryotes”. Gene, vol. 190, pp. 245-249 (1997). |
| Fairhurst, et al., “Rice in the Global Food Supply,” Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 3-6, Special Supplement May 2002. |
| Finer, J., et al., “Apical Proliferation of Embryogenic Tissue of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]”. Plant Cell Reports, vol. 7, pp. 238-241(1988). |
| Finer, J.J., et al., “Development of an Embryogenic Suspension Culture of Soybean (Glycine maxMerill)”. Plant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture, vol. 15, pp. 125-146 (1988). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Netherlands. |
| Gallie, D. R., et al., “The Regulation of Gene Expression in Transformed Maize Aleurone and Endosperm Protoplasts: Analysis of Promoter Activity, Intron Enhancement, and mRNA Untranslated Regions on Expression”. Plant Physiol., vol. 106, pp. 929-939 (1994). |
| Gang, Pan et al., “Map-based cloning of a novel rice cytochrome P450 gene CYP81A6 that confers resistance to two different classes of herbicides”. Plant Molecular Biology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DO, vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 933-943 (Aug. 2006). |
| Hattori, J., et al., “An Acetohydroxyacid Synthase Mutant Reveals a Single Site Involved in Multiple Herbicide Resistance”. Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 246, pp. 419-425 (1995); Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. |
| Hattori, J., et al., “Multiple resistance to sulfonylureas and imidazolinones conferred by an acetohydroxyacid synthase gene with separate mutation for selective resistance”. Molecular Genetics, vol. 232, pp. 167-173 (1992). |
| Hershey, H., et al., “Cloning and Functional Expression of the Small Subunit of Acetolactate Synthase from Nicotiana plumbaginifolia”. Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 40, pp. 795-806 (1999); Kluwer Academic Publishers; Netherlands. |
| Inui, Hideyuki, et al., “Herbicide resistance in transgenic plants with mammalian P450 monooxygenase genes”. Pest Management Science, vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 286-291 (Mar. 2005). |
| Jacq, B., et al., “Efficient Production of Uniform Plants from Cotyledon Explants of Sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.)”. Plant Breeding, vol. 110, pp. 185-191 (1993). |
| Ji-Yun, J., et al., “Rice Production and Fertilization in China,” Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 26-29, Special Supplement, May 2002. |
| Kadaru, S., et al., “Development and application of allele-specific PCR assays for imazethapyr resistance in rice (Oryza sativa),” Euphytica, vol. 160, pp. 431-438, (2008). |
| Kaneda, Y., et al., Combination of Thidiazuron and Basal Media with Low Salt Concentrations Increases the Frequency of Shoot Organogenesis in Soybeans [Glycine max (I.) Merr.]. Plant Cell Reports, vol. 17, pp. 8-12 (1997). |
| Kolkman, J. M., et al., Acetohydroxyacid synthase mutations conferring resistance to imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicides in sunflower. Theor. Appl. Genet, vol. 109, pp. 1147-1159 (2004). |
| Koziel, M. G., et al., “Optimizing expression of transgenes with an emphasis on post-transcriptional events”. Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 32, pp. 393-405 (1996). |
| Kulshreshtha, S., et al., “Direct Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Mature Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) Zygotic Cotyledons”. Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 22, pp. 87-92 (1997). |
| Lai, F. M., et al., “Scale-up of Somatic Embryogenesis in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) I Subculture and Indirect Secondary Somatic Embryogenesis”. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 37, pp. 151-158 (1994). |
| Lee, I., et al., “Guidelines for incorporating non-perfectly matched oligonucleotides into target-specific hybridization probes for DNA microarray”. Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, pp. 681-690 (2004); Oxford University Press. |
| Lee, Y., et al., “Effect of Mutagenesis at Serine 653 of Arabidopsis thaliana Acetohydroxyacid Synthase on the Sensitivity to Imidazolinone and Sulfonylurea Herbicides”. FEBS Letters, vol. 452, pp. 341-345 (1999); Federation of European Biochemical Societies. |
| Lee, Y., et al., “Identification of the Regulatory Subunit of Arabidopsis thaliana Acetohydroxyacid Synthase and Reconstitution with its Catalytic Subunit”. Biochemistry, vol. 40, pp. 6836-6844 (2001). |
| Lenzner, S., et al., “Plant Regeneration form Protoplasts of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris)”. Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 94, pp. 342-350 (1995); Denmark. |
| Li D., et al., “A mutation at the Ala122 position of acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) located on chromosome 6D of wheat: improved resistance to imidazolinone and a faster assay for marker assisted selection”. Mol. Breeding, vol. 22, pp. 217-225 (2008). |
| Li, L.,. et al., “An improved rice transformation system using the biolistic method”. Plant Cell Reports, vol. 12, pp. 250-255 (1993). |
| Liu, W., et al., “Somatic Embryo Cycling: Evaluation of a Novel Transformation and Assay System for Seed-Specific Gene Expression in Soybean”. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 47, pp. 33-42 (1996). |
| Mazur, et al., “Isolation and Characterization of Plant Genes Coding for Acetolactate Synthase, the Target Enzyme for Two Classes of Herbicides”. Plant Physiol., vol. 85, pp. 1110-1117 (1987). |
| McGranahan, G. H., et al., “Improved Efficiency of the Walnut Somatic Embryo Gene Transfer System”. Plant Cell Reports, vol. 8, pp. 512-516 (1990). |
| Miki et al., “Transformation of Brassica napus canola cultivars with Arabidopsis thaliana Acetohydroxyacid Synthase Genes and Analysis of Herbicide Resistance”. Theor. Appl. Genet., vol. 80, pp. 449-458 (1990). |
| Miller, J.F., et al., “Registration of Two Oilseed Sunflower Genetic Stocks, SURES-1 and SURES-2 Resistant to Tribenuron Herbicide,” Crop Science Society of America, vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 1037-1038 (May 2004). |
| Milliman, L D., et al., “Characterization of two biotypes of imidazolinone-resistant eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum)”. Weed Science, vol. 51, pp. 139-144 (2003). |
| Moghaddam, B., et al., “The Effect of in Planta TIBA and Proline Treatment on Somatic Embryogenesis of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”. Euphytica, vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 151-156 (Jan. 2000). |
| Mutert, E., et al., “Developments in Rice Production in Southeast Asia”, Better Crops International, vol. 15, pp. 12-17, Special Supplement, May 2002. |
| Newhouse, K., et al., “Mutations in corn (Zea mays L.) Conferring Resistance to Imidazolinone Herbicides”. Theor. Appl. Genet., vol. 83, pp. 65-70 (1991); Springer-Verlag. |
| Newhouse, K., et al., “Tolerance to Imidazolinone Herbicides in Wheat”. Plant Physiology, vol. 100, pp. 882-886 (1992). |
| Nielsen, J. M., et al., “Synergism of Thidiazuron and Benzyladenine in Axillary Shoot Formation Depends on Sequence of Application in Miscanthus X ogiformis ‘Giganteus’”. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 41, pp. 165-170 (1995). |
| Odell, et al., “Comparision of Increased Expression of Wild-Type and Herbicide-Resistant Acetolactate Synthase Genes in Transgenic Plants, and Indication of Posttranscriptional Limitation on Enzyme Activity”. Plant Physiol., vol. 94, pp. 1647-1654 (1990). |
| Ott, K., et al., “Rational Molecular Design and Genetic Engineering of Herbicide Resistant Crops by Structure Modeling and Site-directed Mutagenesis of Acetohydroxyacid Synthase”. J. Mol. Biol., vol. 263, pp. 359-368 (1996); Academic Press Limited. |
| Owens, L. D., et al., “Sugarbeet Leaf Disc Culture: An Improved Procedure for Inducing Morphogenesis”. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 31, pp. 195-201 (1992). |
| Pettersson, M., et al., “Molecular haplotype determination using allele-specific PCR and Pyrosequencing technology”. Genomics, vol. 82, pp. 390-396 (2003); Reed Elsevier Science. |
| Pozniak, C. J., et al., “Physiological and Molecular Characterization of Mutation-Derived Imidazolinone Resistance in Spring Wheat”. Crop Science, vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 1434-1443 (2004). |
| Ray et al., “Mutant Acetolactate Synthase Gene is an Efficient in vitro Selectable Marker for the Genetic Transformation of Brassica Juncea (Oilseed Mustard)”. Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 161, pp. 1079-1083 (2004). |
| Repellin, et al., “Genetic Enrichment of Cereal Crops via Alien Gene Transfer: New Challenges”. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 64, pp. 159-183 (2001). |
| Roesler, K., et. al., “Targeting of the Arabidopsis homomeric acetyl-coenzyme a carboxylase to plastids of rapeseeds”. Plant Physiology, vol. 113, pp. 75-81 (1997). |
| Roussey, I., et al., “In Planta 2,3,5 Triiodobenzoic Acid Treatment Promotes High Frequency and Routine on Vitro Regeneration of Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) Plant”. Plant Cell Reports, vol. 16, pp. 142-146 (1996). |
| Rutledge, et al. Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 229, pp. 31-40 (1991). |
| Sathasivan, K., et al., “Molecular Basis of Imidazolinone Herbicide Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia”. Plant Physiology, vol. 97, pp. 1044-1050 (1991). |
| Sato, S., et al., “Stable Transformation Via Particle Bombardment in Two Different Soybean Regeneration Systems”. Plant Cell Reports, vol. 12, pp. 408-413 (1993). |
| Saxena et al., “Herbicide Resistance in Datura innoxia”. Plant Physiol., vol. 86, pp. 863-867 (1988). |
| Schmitzer, P. R., et al., “Lack of Cross-Resistance of Imazaquin-Resistant Xanthium strumarium Acetolactate Synthase to Flumetsulam and Chlorimuron”. Plant Physiol, vol. 103, pp. 281-283 (1993). |
| Sella, C., et al., “Subunit Association in Acetohydroxy Acid Synthase Isozyme III”. Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 175, No. 17, pp. 5339-5343 (Sep. 1993). |
| Sha, X.Y., “Field Evaluation of Imidazolinone-Tolerant Clearfield Rice (Oryza sativa L.) at Nine Louisiana Locations,” CropScience, vol. 47, pp. 1177-1185 (2007). |
| Shaner, D., et al., “Imidazolinones: Potent Inhibitors of Acetohydroxyacid Synthase”. Plant Physiol, vol. 76, pp. 545-546 (1984). |
| Shivrain, V.K., et al., “Gene flow between Clearfield™rice and red rice,” ScienceDirect, Crop Protection, vol. 26 pp. 349-356, (2007). |
| Snyder, C.S., et al., “Rice Production in the United States—An Overview,” Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 30-35, Special Supplement, May 2002. |
| Stein, N., et al., “A new DNA extraction method for high-throughput marker analysis in a large-genome species such as Triticum aestivum'”. Plant Breeding, vol. 120, pp. 354-356 (2001). |
| Swanson, E., et al., “Microspore Mutagenesis and Selection: Canola Plants with Field Tolerance to the Imidazolinones”. Theor Appl Genet, vol. 96, pp. 525-530 (1989); Springer-Verlag. |
| Tan et al., “Herbicidal Inhibitors of Amino Acid Biosynthesis and Herbicide-Tolerant Crops”. Amino Acids, vol. 30, pp. 195-204 (2006). |
| Tan, S., et al., “Imidazolinone-Tolerant Crops: History, Current Status and Future”. Pest Managament Science, vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 246-257 (2005). |
| Tenning, Paul, et al., “Somatic Embryo genesis from zygotic embryos of sugar beet Beta vulgaris”. Plant Science, vol. 81, pp. 103-109 (1992). |
| Tiwari, K.N., “Rice Production and Nutrient Management in India,” Better Crops International, vol. 16, pp. 18-22, Special Supplement, May 2002. |
| Tranel, P. J., et al., “Resistance of Weeds to ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides: What Have We Learned?”. Weed Science, Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL (US), vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 700-712 (Nov. 2002). |
| Wagner, J., et al., “Identification of ALS-inhibitor-resistant Amaranthus biotypes using polymerase chain reaction amplification of . . . ”. Weed Research, vol. 42, pp. 280-286 (2002). |
| Warner, Thomas G., “Sweet success with tethered enzyme catalysis”. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, pp. 720-721 (Aug. 1998). |
| Weinstock, et al., “Properties of Subcloned Subunits of Bacterial Acetohydroxy Acid Synthases”. Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, No. 17, pp. 5560-5556 (Sep. 1992); American Society for Microbiology. |
| Werck-Reichhart, D., et al., “Cytochromes P450 for engineering herbicide tolerance”. Trends in Plant Science, Elsevier Science, Oxford, GB, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 116-123 (Mar. 2000). |
| Werle E., et al., “Convenient single-step, one tube purification of PCR products for direct sequencing”. Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22, No. 20, pp. 4354-4355 (1994). |
| White, A. D., et al., “Common sunflower resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides”. Weed Science, vol. 50, pp. 432-437 (2002). |
| White, A.D., et al., “Isolation of Acetolactate Synthase Homologs in Common Sunflowers”. Weed Science, Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL, vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 845-853 (Nov. 6, 2003). |
| Wiersma, C., et al., “Isolation, Expression and Phylogenetic Inheiritance of an Acetolactate Synthase Gene from Brassica napus”. Mol. Gen. Genet., vol. 219, pp. 413-420 (1989). |
| Wright, M., et al., “A Simple Method for the Recovery of Multiple Fertile Plants from Individual Somatic Embryos of Soybean [Glycine max (L) Merrill]”. In Vitro Cell Dev Bio., vol. 27P, pp. 153-157 (Jul. 1991). Tissue Culture Association. |
| Wright, T. R., et al., “Cell Selection and Inheritance of Imidazolinone Resistance in Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris)”. Theor. Appl. Genet., vol. 96, pp. 612-620 (1998); Springer-Verlag. |
| Wu, D., et al., “Allele-specific enzymatic amplification of B-globin genomic DNA for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 86, pp. 2757-2760 (1989). |
| Yu Qin et al., “Tolerance to acetolactate synthase and acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides in Vulpia bromoides is conferred by two co-existing resistance mechanisms”. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 21-30 (Jan. 2004). |
| Zhang, W., et al., “Genetic and agronomic analyses of red rice-Clearfield hybrids and their progeny produced from natural and controlled crosses,” Euphytica, vol. 164, pp. 659-668 (2008). |
| Zhu et al., “Engineering herbicide-resistant maize using chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides”. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, pp. 555-558 (2000). |
| Zhu, X. L., “Computational simulations of the interactions between acetyl-coenzyme-A carboxylase and clodinafop: resistance mechanism due to active and nonactive site mutations.” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 49, pp. 1936-1843 (Jul. 13, 2009). |
| Garcia-Torres, et al., “Pre-emergence herbicides for the control of broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl.) in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)” Weed Research 34(6): 395-402 (Dec. 1994). |
| Tomlin, C.D.S., ed. The Pesticide Manual, 12th Ed, British Crop Protection Council (2000), pp. 526-535. |
| Rafael A. Massinga et al., “Gene flow from imidazolinone-resistant domesticated sunflower to wild relatives”, Weed Society of America, Weed Science, vol. 51: pp. 854-862 (2003). |
| Search Report dated Apr. 10, 2017, in Brazilian Patent App. No. PI0809473-0. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150147754 A1 | May 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60910041 | Apr 2007 | US | |
| 61029737 | Feb 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12594289 | US | |
| Child | 14087041 | US |
