The invention generally relates to fluid disinfection, and more specifically to disinfection of water for hydrocarbon fracing.
Modern hydraulic fracturing technology (“fracing”) has made possible the economical extraction of gas and other hydrocarbons trapped in shale. Hydraulic fracturing is increasingly used for well stimulation of horizontally drilled oil & gas wells, requiring large quantities of water to be pumped down the well at high flow rates. The energy from the injection of a highly pressurized hydraulic fracturing fluid, usually including a significant amount of proppant such as sand suspended therein, creates new channels in the shale, which can increase the extraction rates and ultimate recovery of hydrocarbons. A fluid flow rate of 100 barrels per minute—that is, 4200 gallons (15,900 liters) per minute—may be required in order to perform fracing operations. This flow rate is equivalent to 189,000 gallons per hour, which is greater than typically envisioned for a village-sized or even a municipal-sized water disinfecting unit in many jurisdictions.
Bacteria in the fresh water and the produced water used for fracing need to be killed or inactivated to prevent souring of the well and/or corrosion of the carbon steel well pipe. Due to the high flow rate of fracing fluid, that fluid heats up, which causes bacteria and mold to multiply. Bacteria may also grow when water is kept in open ponds and tanks, especially in warm regions. “Souring” occurs when bacteria grow within the hydrocarbon-rich environment of the well, and has occurred when increasing quantities of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are observed in production fluids. Hydrogen sulfide may be toxic to workers at the drill site, and causes corrosion of the well pipe. Further, bacteria may inhibit the flow of gas from the well, which is known as plugging. In addition, bacteria can break down the gelling agent that surrounds the proppant, reducing its viscosity and therefore its ability to suspend the proppant. Consequently, fracing water is treated prior to injection into the well to kill most or all bacteria in the water, in order to prevent that water from introducing bacteria into the well that will cause souring. Current technologies for treating fracing water to kill bacteria include chemical biocides such as glutaraldehyde, THPS, DBNA, Dazomet, bromopol, and less toxic or “green” biocides, and oxidizers such as chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone. Effective biocides are by definition highly toxic, and require careful handling and disposal of large quantities of water treated with those biocides. Substances in the water such as hydrogen sulfide, iron sulfide, ammonia, and dissolved oxygen may inhibit biocide effectiveness. Indeed, the biocides are a primary driver for public opposition to fracing technology. Alternately, fracing can be performed with waterless methods such as liquefied-propane-based well stimulation, which eliminates the need for water or water treatment, but which is more expensive and potentially hazardous.
Oxidizers, while highly effective at killing bacteria, may have hazardous precursors, potentially exposing field personnel to risks of explosion or ingestion of toxic vapors. Oxidizers such as chlorine and possibly chlorine dioxide have the disadvantage that they are pH dependent, limiting the range of water they can treat. Some oxidizers have the further disadvantage that they require reactions to occur in tanks onsite, occupying more of the limited area available. Since ozone has limited solubility in water, it is possible for toxic concentrations of ozone gas to collect in the space above the water in closed frac tanks, presenting another hazard to field personnel. Oxidizers such as chlorine dioxide and chlorine and some biocides may interfere with, break down, or crosslink chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process such as guar and friction reducers. The present invention does not interfere with the fracing chemicals. Systems for treating well stimulation fluids with UVC light are currently commercially available. However, these systems are limited in application because they cannot effectively treat turbid water. Typically, a 99.99% or greater bacteria kill rate is required for well stimulation applications even with turbid waters. (Turbidity is the cloudiness or haziness of a fluid caused by individual particles (suspended solids) that are generally invisible to the naked eye, and often results from suspended solids or from the growth of algae.) A high rate of bacterial inactivation of the water is needed in order to prevent degradation of the well over time due to corrosion of the carbon steel well pipe or the production of hydrogen sulfide.
In accordance with the present invention, an enhanced apparatus and method of fluid purification is described, using ultraviolet C (UVC) light which illuminates the fluid in one or more chambers with a centrally located medium pressure ultraviolet lamp. The ultraviolet light breaks the guanine-cytosine bond in the DNA of the bacteria. The broken bond will bond to its nearest available bond, creating a dimer on the DNA strand, preventing the bacterium from replicating. UVC light from medium pressure ultraviolet lamps has been proven to prevent photoreactivation of the inactivated bacteria in the treated water in response to sunlight exposure after processing.
The apparatus and method according to the present invention has demonstrated >99.999993% bacterial inactivation in laboratory testing, as well as high bacteria kill rates during tests on both turbid fresh water and turbid produced water from the Anadarko Basin, Permian Basin and Marcellus Shale at flow rates exceeding 80 BBL/min. In an exemplary embodiment, onboard instrumentation and computer control ensure failsafe operation.
In hydraulic fracturing applications, the apparatus and method according to the present invention has been found to be highly effective at inactivating both aerobic bacteria and anaerobic bacteria such as acid producing bacteria (APB), sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB), and iron reducing bacteria (IRB). The system has been found to be highly effective even in highly algae-containing waters, produced waters with high salt content, and freshwater to a sufficiently high degree to eliminate or greatly reduce the need for chemical biocides during hydraulic fracturing. It is suitable for both gas shales and oil shale hydraulic fracturing.
Operating the system at a lower power level may reduce energy costs for produced water disinfection. The water produced from the apparatus and method according to the present invention has approximately 103 CFU/ml bacteria levels vs typical 105 CFU/ml bacteria levels in freshwater. Since the turbidity levels of the produced and fresh water were similar and the system has been able to completely eliminate bacteria from the higher bacteria count fresh water, it may be able to achieve the required bacteria inactivation rates with produced water at lamp power levels lower than described below.
Chemical biocides are inherently toxic and hazardous, creating hazards due to leaks and spills. Cemented joints along the well pipe can leak, possibly allowing biocides to seep from the well during fracturing. Reduction of chemical biocide use extends the number of reuse cycles possible from the produced fracing water, thereby reducing disposal costs. Unlike biocides and oxidants, fluid treated by the ultraviolet light does not break down the gelling agent nor crosslink the polyacrylamide-based friction reducers used in the fracing water. Transfer pumps and the electrical generator are the only consistently moving parts, thereby maximizing reliability.
The system may be preferably placed upstream of the blender (which is the device that adds proppant such as sand, and fracing chemicals or additives such as guar, to the disinfected water that is output by the system or upstream of a pump which transfers water to the frac pad) in hydraulic fracturing applications in order to keep pressure relatively low in the apparatus according to the present invention. A lined frac pond or frac tanks are the typical water source. Either produced water (which may have a high level of total dissolved solids (TDS)) or freshwater is typically used. Fresh water is usually pumped out of the ground or taken from a surface water source.
Optionally, according to one embodiment of the present invention, biocides may still be used in combination with the system, preferably as a residual disinfectant in the water to kill bacteria introduced after the water is disinfected by the system, instead of as a primary disinfectant. As currently utilized in the prior art, without water treatment according to the present invention, disinfection dosage levels for biocides are about 20 parts per million to about 100 parts per million or more. In contrast, when biocides are used for residual disinfection in conjunction with the apparatus and method of the present invention, dosages for such residual disinfection would be substantially lower, and would vary from about 0.25 parts per million or less to about 5 parts per million. Such a biocide may be graphene oxide, which may be used in conjunction with the system 2 as a residual disinfectant. According to another embodiment of the present invention, graphene oxide may be used as a biocide for fracing on its own, without utilizing the system 2.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a complete system may be formed with six parallel sets of ultraviolet chambers operating in combination, each flowing ⅙ of the total system flow rate. Alternately, more or fewer sets of chambers may be used. The parallel flow provides inherent redundancy which allows an operator to divert water flow from one of the six parallel sets of chambers by simply closing one valve. Alternately, one or more ultraviolet chambers may be arranged relative to one or more other ultraviolent chambers in a manner other than parallel. As another exemplary feature, an automated valve may be attached to, or attached in fluid communication with, an inlet to at least one ultraviolet chamber, where that automated valve diverts water from an ultraviolet chamber set in the unlikely event of a lamp failure or ground fault.
The system has a wide variety of applications in addition to fluid purification for well stimulation. These applications include disinfection of wastewater, drinking water, industrial process water, cooling system water, and other fluid purification processes including air purification. The system is also useful for purifying water used for well flooding for treating water injected into wells to enhance oil and gas recovery. In these and other applications, the system can inactivate a wide range of aerobic and anerobic bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, helminthes, yeast, and molds. The system is able to work with a wide range of fluid types including water and air and with a wide range of fluid pH levels and fluid compositions and impurity levels.
Advantages of the apparatus and method of the present invention include that the process is not temperature dependent nor pH dependent, except that fluids must be pumpable. The system can be rapidly set up at a well site or other location with a small footprint, and can be easily transported in a standard trailer. By using light rather than biocide to disinfect the fracing water, the apparatus and method according to the present invention eliminates the possibility of unwanted chemical reactions with the biocide, and does not interfere with the efficiency of chemicals used in the drilling/completion process.
The system is compact for the rate of fluid it purifies. The system is significantly smaller than the size of a conventional ultraviolet disinfection system for the same bacterial inactivation rate and liquid flow rate. The system provides greater bacterial inactivation power per watt than conventional single chamber ultraviolet disinfection systems. The compact size and greater energy efficiency are advantages that enable the system to be used on the typical small well pad while meeting the need for highly disinfected water for the fracing process.
One example of a fluid disinfection system includes a chamber through which fluid can flow, the chamber having an inlet through which fluid enters the chamber and an outlet through which fluid exits the chamber; a source for illuminating the chamber with ultraviolet light; and a plurality of baffles within the chamber for defining a multiplicity of subchambers within the chamber through which fluid to be purified flows from the inlet to the outlet; each subchamber being located to receive the ultraviolet light; where holes are defined through at least one baffle, and wherein those holes collectively define a fluid flow area that increases with the radial distance from the center of the baffle.
Another example of a fluid disinfection system includes chambers through which fluid can flow, each chamber having an inlet through which fluid enters the chamber and an outlet through which fluid exits the chamber; a source for illuminating each chamber with ultraviolet light; and baffles within each chamber for defining a multiplicity of subchambers within each chamber through which fluid to be purified flows from the inlet to the outlet; each subchamber being located to receive the ultraviolet light; where holes are defined through at least one baffle, and where the number of said holes increases with the radial distance from the center of the baffle; and further including at least one crossover tube, where at least two chambers are connected in series by at least one crossover tube, and where at least one crossover tube is located above the chambers connected by the crossover tube.
An example of a fluid disinfection method includes possessing a system that includes chambers through which fluid can flow, each chamber having an inlet through which fluid enters the chamber and an outlet through which fluid exits the chamber; a source for illuminating each chamber with ultraviolet light; and a plurality of baffles within each chamber for defining a multiplicity of subchambers within each chamber through which fluid to be purified flows from the inlet to the outlet; each subchamber being located to receive the ultraviolet light; where holes are defined through at least one baffle; and further including at least one crossover tube, where at least two chambers are connected in series by at least one crossover tube; passing fluid through the system at a flow rate of up to 100 barrels per minute; and disinfecting that fluid to a level of >99.9% bacterial inactivation with the ultraviolet light.
The use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
An ultraviolet water purification system suitable for purifying water for village or municipal use is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,862,728 to Yencho (“Yencho '728”), which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The apparatus and method described below disclose an exemplary ultraviolet water purification system that is optimized for further suitability in purification of water at a high flow rate suitable for hydraulic fracing.
Apparatus
Referring to
Referring also to
Referring also back to
The outlet from the last chamber 4 of each set 8 may be connected to an outlet tube 18, which in turn may be connected to an outlet manifold 20. The phrase “last chamber of a set” refers to the last chamber in the set 8 that receives water flowing in from outside the system 2. The outlet tubes 18 and outlet manifold 20 may have any suitable shape, size and/or internal diameter, and may be connected to each other and/or the last chamber 4 of each set 8 in any suitable manner, such as by welding or bolting. As one example, the outlet manifold 20 may be substantially cylindrical, and may be oriented substantially perpendicular to at least one chamber 4. As another example, at least one outlet tube 18 may be substantially L-shaped, may extend substantially laterally outward from the outlet manifold 20, then turn downward to extend to its connection to the chamber 4. The outlet tubes 18 and the inlet tubes 10 may have an outer diameter of substantially 8 inches. Alternately, at least one of the tubes 10, 18 may have a different outer diameter. Alternately, the outlet manifold 20 may be connected directly to the inlet of at least one chamber 4, without an intervening outlet tube 18. The outlet manifold 20 preferably is located above the level of the chambers 4 to allow air to escape from the chambers 4, and to constrain the water for maximum UVC irradiation inside each chamber 4. A bleed valve 23 may be connected to the outlet manifold 20, to allow for manual or automatic bleedoff prior to startup of air that has escaped from water held in the chambers 4 and/or the outlet manifold 20. Referring also to
Referring also to
The components described with regard to
Referring also to
Referring also to
Optionally, drain notches 57 may be made at the top and/or bottom of at least one baffle 42, along the edge. The drain notch 57 at the bottom of the baffle 42 allows for drainage of all subchambers 46 when the chamber 4 is drained for cleaning or for any other reason. The drain notch 57 at the top of the baffle 42 allows any air trapped in a subchamber 42 to escape and work its way toward either the inlet manifold 12 or the outlet manifold 20. The drain notches 57 are sized to be small enough such that only a minimal amount of water that passes through the chamber passes through those notches 57, and such that a jet effect of water through successive notches 57 in successive baffles 42 along the chamber 4 is avoided.
Referring also to
Aluminum has a high degree of UVC reflectivity, which is partially why aluminum is preferentially used for the chambers 4. Preferably, a 6061-T6 or 5052 aluminum alloy may be used, both of which have substantially higher reflectivity than stainless steel even when hard anodized. However, any other suitable aluminum alloy or material may be used to fabricate the chamber 4. Further, the chamber walls are coated or anodized to prevent corrosion, especially corrosion which is caused by high salinity produced water. The anodized chambers, while having less than perfect UVC reflectance, still exhibit a high degree of UVC reflectivity. The preferred coating is a thin hard anodized surface. Alternately, the chambers may be fabricated of stainless steel, low carbon steel, or another material.
UVC light from the lamp 62 at the center of the chamber 4 transmits through the fluid in the chamber 4 and reflects from the wall of the chamber 4. Since the level of irradiation of fluid in the chamber drops off as 1/r2 with distance from the outer surface of the quartz tube 60, more fluid should correspondingly flow through the center of the chamber 4 than the outer periphery of the chamber 4 in order to optimize the level of fluid irradiation in the chamber 4. A model was constructed which summed the incident radiation from the lamp 62 and the reflected radiation from the wall of the chamber 4 at each radial location in the chamber 4, including assumed losses of 50% of remaining light intensity at the point of reflection. UVC transmissivity data from field water samples was also used in the development of the chamber to so that accurate UVC fluid transmissivity levels were employed. Using this model, the baffle 42 was divided into radial zones and the sum of flow area for optimal irradiation was computed for each zone to maintain approximately the ratio of water flow to UV radiation from both lamp and wall on fluid elements passing through each zone to optimize chamber 4 efficiency. These computations produced generally the baffle hole pattern shown in
Referring also to
The inner holes 45 in each baffle 42 advantageously are larger than the outer holes, and may be shaped differently. As one example, at least one inner hole 45 may have two semicircular ends, with a rectangular segment in between as shown in
The outer holes 43 in each baffle 42 may have any suitable size and shape. For example, the outer holes 43 may be substantially circular, and may range from 20 mm to 40 mm in diameter in to control fluid motion and allow for large particles to pass through the chamber 4 without blocking the outer holes 43. As another example, the outer holes 43 may be substantially circular, and may have a larger or smaller diameter. As another example, the outer holes 43 may be any other suitable shape, such as an irregular or polygonal shape. As another example, the outer holes 43 need not all have the same shape and/or size, and at least one of the outer holes 43 may be shaped and/or sized differently from at least one of the others.
Generally, the pattern of holes 43, 45 in the baffle 42, and the sizes of those holes, are selected to promote fluid flow closer to the central aperture 54 and thus closer to the quartz tube 60, in order to expose a greater fraction of water to the more intense UV light closer to the quartz tube 60 and to allow that water to move faster, and in order to expose a lesser fraction of water to the less intense UV light further from the quartz tube 60, and restrict that water to moving slower. The holes 43, 45 in the baffle 42 may form two or more concentric rings 55 centered substantially on the central aperture 54. One of those rings 55 is shown on
The holes 43, 45 need not be organized into rings 55 around the central aperture 54, and indeed no hole 43, 45 need be at the same radial distance from the central aperture 54 as any other hole 43, 45. If so, the baffle 42 may be divided into an arbitrary number of concentric bands, each having an equal radial dimension. The collective hole area within each band thus may be no smaller than, and preferably larger than, the collective hole area in the ring 55 concentrically closer to the central aperture 54. Further, while the collective hole area in each band is preferentially larger than the collective hole area in the band concentrically closer to the central aperture 54, it is larger by a factor of less than the square of the collective hole area in the band concentrically closer to the central aperture 54. Indeed, preferably the collective hole area in each band is larger than the collective hole area in the band concentrically closer to the central aperture 54 by a linear, and not an exponential, factor.
As another example, more-random hole patterns may be utilized, in which the holes 43, 45 are not organized into rings 55 around the central aperture 54. If so, the baffle 42 may be divided into an arbitrary number of concentric bands, each having an equal radial dimension. The holes 43, 45 may be arranged such that the trend in collective hole area across the baffle 42 from the central aperture 54 out to the outer edge 49 is from smaller to larger, even though the collective hole area in a particular band may be smaller than the collective hole area in the ring 55 concentrically closer to the central aperture 54.
Referring also to
Referring also to
The computational flow models of
The pressure drop along a chamber 4, and along multiple chambers 4 connected in series, is relatively low: approximately 7 to 10 psi at a flow rate of 100 barrels per minute, as measured during testing. This is due to the relatively low pressure of the water or other fluid at the inlet of the system 2. If the fluid pressure at the inlet of the system 2 were high, the combination of that fluid pressure and the high flow rate through the system 2 would require the baffles 42 to be substantially thicker in order to withstand the force of the fluid passing therethrough. The quartz tube 60 would likely need to be thicker as well, which would reduce heat dissipation and therefore necessitate a reduced power output from the UV lamp 62, rendering it less effective. The walls of the chamber 4, as well as the walls of the other fluid-holding components of the system 2, would likely need to be thicker as well. Consequently, maintaining the inlet pressure at a relatively low level, and using the flow rate rather than pressure to drive fluid through the chambers 4, results in a lighter and more compact system 2. Due to the relatively low pressure drop across the system, the output manifold 20 may operate in a vacuum as the downstream transfer pump (which is not part of the system 2, and which is located downstream of the system 2) pulls water through the system 2. A transfer pump upstream of the system 2 may be needed to provide pressure at the system exit for proper performance of the downstream transfer pump to compensate for pressure losses in the system 2 and in the piping leading to and from the system 2.
Referring also to
Referring also to
The wiper system 120 includes a wiper body 122. The wiper body 122 preferentially has numerous openings 124 therethrough allowing for thermal and UVC radiation to pass through and also enabling convection cooling of the quartz tube 60 surface. The openings 124 may be laser cut in the wiper body 122 or may be otherwise fabricated. To maximize radiation transfer to the water and to minimize the heating of water trapped between the wiper body 122 and the quartz tube 60, the wiper body 122 is preferentially fabricated with thin struts or other thin metal components. The wiper body 122 is preferentially constructed of anodized aluminum or brass or other highly thermally conductive material to dissipate heat absorbed from the UV lamp 62 by radiation and by convection. The wiper body 122 may have chamfers 126 on each end to ease its passage through the central apertures 54 of the baffles 42. The wiper body 122 preferably has at least one circumferential elastomeric wiping element made from fluoroelastic polymer (FKM, FPM), Viton, or other fluoroelastomer. It may have a PTFE of other lubricious, UVC resistant bushing at the other end.
The wiper body 122 is preferably pulled along the quartz tube 60 by an FEP coated stainless steel multi-stranded cable 130. Alternately, any other suitable cable 130 may be used. The cable 130 preferentially is crimped or silver soldered or otherwise structurally connected to each end of the wiper body 122, but may be connected to the wiper body 122 in any other suitable manner. Only one cable 130 is needed on each end of the wiper to minimize shadowing of the water from the UV lamp 62. The cable 130 preferably passes through a guide tube 132 and past a rod seal 134, preferably of an x-ring or o-ring shape, and then exits to a motorized reel 136 which winds and unwinds the cable 130, pulling the wiper body 122 along the quartz tube 60. Alternately, the reel 136 is operated manually and is not motorized. Alternately, the reel 136 is omitted and the cable 130 is simply taken up by hand as it exits the rod seal 134. The other end of the cable 130 is preferentially attached to a spring reel or other mechanism that keeps the cable 130 in substantially constant tension at any location along the quartz tube 60. The wiper body 122 is preferentially parked at the end of the quartz tube 60 for system operation. It may be positioned within a central aperture 54 of a baffle 42 near the longitudinal center of the chamber 4 to stabilize and cushion the quartz tube 60 from impacts during transportation. A similar guide tube 132, rod seal 134, and motorized or unmotorized spring loaded reel 136 may be additionally provided at the opposite end of the chamber 4, in order to move the wiper body 122 in the opposite longitudinal direction along the quartz tube 60 during the next cleaning operation.
As another example of the system 2, thin wires or electrodes may be placed along the quartz tube 60 and pulsed with electrical current to lyse the bacteria to prevent buildup along the quartz tube 60. Alternately, the system 2 may employ electrical contacts spaced in the chamber 4 and/or along the quartz tube 60 which conduct electrical pulses to lyse the cell walls of the bacteria to prevent the build-up of bacteria and the exopolymer along the quartz tube 60. Such thin wires or electrodes may be placed in intervals between the rolled layers of reverse osmosis membranes in a reverse osmosis water disinfection or desalination system to prevent biofouling, which is responsible for a significant portion of the energy required for reverse osmosis, system operation.
Instead of or in addition to the UV lamp 62, an array of piezoelectric ultrasonic transmitters may be placed around the outside diameter of the chamber 4 to inactivate bacteria though sonolysis. In this embodiment, the chamber 4, regardless of the shape of the chamber 4, ultrasonic waves are transmitted to inactivate the bacteria or for periodic use in cleaning the chambers. The UV lamp 62 in the center of the chamber 4 may also be replaced with a stainless steel tube having an array of piezoelectric ultrasonic transmitters spaced along the inside diameter to generate ultrasonic waves to sonolyze the fluid passing through the chamber 4. In this embodiment, ultrasonic waves radiate from the center vibrating tube element.
Operation
Operation of the system 2 is straightforward. A water source is connected to one or more of the inlet ports 22. The butterfly valve 27 upstream of the inlet ports 22 may be opened, and water or other fluid then enters the inlet manifold 12 through the butterfly valve 27. The water continues to flow through the first chamber 4, the crossover tube 6, the second chamber 4, and then into the outlet manifold 20. The butterfly valve 27 or the water source may then be shut off. Optionally, the water may be allowed to continue to flow through the system 2 during startup, but if so, such water is not used for fracing operations as it is not disinfected by the system 2 if the system 2 is off. The bleed valves 14, 16 and 23 are then opened, to allow air or other entrained gas to escape that has collected into the inlet manifold 12, crossover tube or tubes 6, and outlet manifold 20, respectively. Optionally, the water in the system 2 may be allowed to sit for a period of time in order to outgas prior to opening the bleed valves 14, 23. After outgassing, the bleed valves 14, 23 are closed once again.
The UV lamp 62 may then be started. The UV lamp 62 in each chamber is connected to the corresponding ballast 90 in any suitable manner, if the UV lamp 62 is not hardwired to the ballast 90. The UV lamp 62 is brought up to its desired operating temperature, such as in the range of 600-800° C. A sensor (not shown) in the system 2 may be used to measure the voltage across the UV lamp 62, or an empirical relationship between time and temperature may be used to determine that the UV lamp 62 has reached its desired operating voltage after the passage of a known amount of time.
The butterfly valve 27 is then reopened, and/or the water source is turned back on. Water begins to flow through the system 2 along the same path described above, at a flow rate of up to approximately 100 barrels per minute. As the water flows through each chamber 4, it flows through successive subchambers 46. As the water enters each successive subchamber 46, it enters a cylindrical flow pattern within that subchamber 46 as a consequence of the flow rate and the hole pattern in the baffles 42, as described in greater detail above. As the water continues to traverse the chambers 4, the temperature of the quartz tube 60 in each chamber preferably is maintained at a temperature within 10° C. of the temperature of the water flowing within that chamber 4. As another example, the temperature of the quartz tube 60 may vary a greater or lesser amount relative to the temperature of the water flowing through the chamber 4. The water completes its traverse of the chambers 4, enters the outlet manifold 20, and from there is output from the system 2 through the outlet port or ports 25. When the water exits the system, greater than 99.9% of the bacteria that had been present in the water when that water entered the inlet ports 22 has been killed.
Advantageously, the system 2 is fabricated to withstand a full vacuum and at least +70 PSI maximum operating pressure, preferably with at least a design safety factor of 1.5. The inlet manifold 12 and outlet manifold 20 are preferably hardened to safely handle high pressures. The high pressure rating enables easier operation in the field with less concern about overpressurizing the unit due to pump operator mistakes, or due to valves inadvertently being closed downstream of the unit if the water transfer pump operator over-revs the feeder pump or mistakenly closes downstream valves while the feeder pump is running at high speed. The feeder pump is located outside of the system 2, and is a standard apparatus in the fracing art that is known by those of ordinary skill in the art.
Downstream from the system 2, proppant (typically, but not limited to, sand) is added to the disinfected water by the blender, which is a standard apparatus in the fracing art and which is known by those of ordinary skill in the art. The proppant may be laden with bacterial contaminants, particularly if it is wet and if it has been extracted from a wet local source. Optionally, a pulsed high potential electric field is applied to the proppant before, or while, the proppant is added to the disinfected water. In this way, re-contamination of the disinfected water with bacteria from the proppant is avoided.
Periodically, the system 2 may be shut down for cleaning. If so, the UV lamp 62 is turned off, and the butterfly valve 27 is closed and/or the water source is disconnected from the inlet ports 22. The inlet ports 22 and outlet ports 25 are opened, and water is allowed to drain. One or more cleaning valves (not shown) may be opened to facilitate drainage of the water out of the chamber 4. Then, the ports 22, 25 and any cleaning valves are closed, and the chambers 4 may be filled with an aqueous cleaning agent to remove deposits on chamber walls and quartz tubes. The chambers 4 may be filled via the inlet ports 22, in which case the inlet ports 22 are opened to allow the cleaning agent to be pumped into the system. Alternately, the cleaning agent may be introduced into the chambers 4 and/or into the system as a whole by any other suitable method. A wide variety of cleaners may be used, such as ozone, hydrogen peroxide, sodium ferrate or chlorine dioxide or other oxidizer or mixed oxidants. Acids may also be used. Nontoxic cleaners such as citrus oil and surfactant may be used to lyse and clean bacteria the exopolymer produced by bacteria as well as algae stains from the chambers.
Other Disinfecting Applications Using System
While the present system 2 has been described in terms of its use in hydraulic fracing, the system 2 has a wide variety of applications in addition to fluid purification for well stimulation. These applications include disinfection of wastewater, drinking water, industrial process water, cooling system water, and other fluid purification processes. These fluid purification processes are not limited to liquids, and include fluids in a gaseous state, such as air; this system 2 may be used for gas treatment, including air purification. The system 2 is also useful for purifying water used for well flooding, and for treating water injected into wells to enhance oil and gas recovery. In these and other applications, the system 2 can inactivate a wide range of aerobic and anerobic bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, helminthes, yeast, and molds. The system 2 is able to work with a wide range of fluid types including water and air and with a wide range of fluid pH levels and fluid compositions and impurity levels. While the structure and operation of the system 2 has been described in terms of water disinfection, that same description applies to the structure and operation of the system 2 for disinfection of other fluids, whether liquid or gas.
While the invention has been described in detail, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made and equivalents employed, without departing from the present invention. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the details of construction, the arrangements of components, and/or the method set forth in the above description or illustrated in the drawings. Statements in the abstract of this document, and any summary statements in this document, are merely exemplary; they are not, and cannot be interpreted as, limiting the scope of the claims. Further, the figures are merely exemplary and not limiting. Topical headings and subheadings are for the convenience of the reader only. They should not and cannot be construed to have any substantive significance, meaning or interpretation, and should not and cannot be deemed to indicate that all of the information relating to any particular topic is to be found under or limited to any particular heading or subheading. Therefore, the invention is not to be restricted or limited except in accordance with the following claims and their legal equivalents.