1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains in general to MEMS device, and more specifically to an improved cantilever design for usage in a MEMS device
2. Description of the Related Art
Traditionally, many MEMS devices are actuated by simple, single-stage cantilevers, which are composed of a cantilever plate, a moveable contact and a stationary contact. When a typical metal-metal contact MEMS switch is turned on, the cantilever plate is actuated until the moveable contact and the stationary contact achieve closure, and this closure is typically achieved in a single stage of movement of the cantilever plate (e.g., a hinge on the device allows the plate to be lowered in one movement). When the device is turned off, the moveable and stationary contact interface is broken as these two contacts are separated, and the device reassumes the open state. MEMS switch devices are important for use in various types of applications. For example, they can be used in mobile phones for switching RF signals between transmit and receive modes and other related functions, micro-relays that can be used in automated test equipment (ATE), phased radar array, and other applications. MEMS switch configurations include but are not limited to SPST, SPDT, SP4T, DPDT, SP7T and SP8T. MEMS switches can be used for DC and RF applications.
For long-term reliability of switches such as contact switches and other MEMS cantilever devices, this “simple” cantilever structure does not adequately provide the actuation forces necessary to overcome stiction/adhesion forces, such as those caused by welding, electrical charging and device contamination. For many MEMS applications, especially those requiring a high quality interface between the contact surfaces, such as MEMS switches, this may be detrimental to reliability and device lifetime. Without a sufficiently strong force, the two contacts may never achieve full closure. Further, the single-stage cantilever design commonly only allows for a small gap between contacts before closure, thus resulting in inferior isolation.
In addition, the lifetime of a MEMS switch device can be greatly decreased due to the manner in which the two contacts are brought together and then pulled apart. If the first contact is brought down too rapidly and if it does not contact the other contact in a sufficiently gentle manner, this can result in damage to the device that over a period of time can reduce the overall life of the device. Similarly, if the contacts are pulled straight apart from each other and in a manner that is not sufficiently gentle, this can again cause unwanted damage to the contacts, decreasing the life of the device.
Another issue in single-stage cantilevers is the increase in resistance due to contaminant build-up and other particulates interfering with contact closure. Many single-stage cantilevers do not have any mechanism for removing this type of build-up on the contact surface. Single-stage cantilevers commonly also have low actuating forces, and so they may not have the adequate measures for removing the contamination or otherwise providing a mechanism for removal. Thus, again, these types of single-stage cantilever devices may suffer from shortened lifetimes.
Therefore, there is a need in the art to for a MEMS device with cantilever actuator that provides more long-term reliability, provides the higher actuation forces necessary to overcome stiction or adhesion forces, provides a sufficiently large gap for improved isolation, provides better interface quality that includes fewer contaminants, and provides a mechanism for more gentle, easier contact closure and separation.
The above need is met by a MEMS device with a two-stage cantilever design. The device includes a substrate with a stationary contact affixed thereto, an anchor affixed to the substrate, and a torsion arm affixed to the anchor by a first torsion hinge with a first axis. The device further includes a cantilever plate with a moveable contact affixed thereto in aligned confronting relation to the stationary contact. The cantilever plate is connected to the torsion arm by a second torsion hinge with a second axis. The first torsion hinge is adapted to rotate the cantilever plate about the first axis toward or away from the substrate in response to an actuating force and the second torsion hinge is adapted to rotate the cantilever plate about the second axis toward or away from the substrate in response to the actuating force. This two-stage rotation results in movement of the moveable contact into contact with the stationary contact or separation of the moveable contact from the stationary contact. In some embodiments, the natural spring restoration force of the cantilever plate material, about the first axis and the second axis, can be used to reduce the impact force of the movable contact on the stationary contact, reducing damage and stiction of the contacts. In some embodiments, the natural mechanical spring restoration force of the cantilever plate material, about the first axis and the second axis, can be used to peel apart the cantilever plate and the movable contact from the substrate and the stationary contacts, reducing contact stiction.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method for actuating a MEMS device described above. The method includes applying an actuating force to the MEMS device. Responsive to the actuating force, the cantilever plate is rotated about the first axis of the first torsion hinge toward the substrate. Also responsive to the actuating force, the cantilever plate is rotated about the second axis of the second torsion hinge toward the substrate. The rotation of the cantilever plate about the first and second axes moves the moveable contact into contact with the stationary contact.
In still another embodiment, the invention includes a method for separating contacts on the MEMS devices described above. The method includes reducing application of an actuating force applied to the MEMS device. Responsive to the reduced actuating force, the cantilever plate is rotated about the second axis of the second torsion hinge away from the substrate. Also responsive to the reduced actuating force, the cantilever plate is rotated about the first axis of the first torsion hinge away from the substrate. The rotation of the cantilever plate about the first and second axes separates the moveable contact from the stationary contact.
In yet another embodiment, the invention includes a MEMS device with a cantilever design, where the device comprises a first substrate with a stationary contact affixed thereto and a second substrate with an anchor affixed thereto. In this embodiment, the second substrate is in aligned confronting relation with the first substrate and the first and second substrates are bonded together. The device also includes a seal ring surrounding the bonded first and second substrates to hermetically seal the bonded substrates together to form a cavity between the bonded substrates. The device further includes at least one signal path that enters and exits the cavity formed between the bonded substrates using feedthroughs selected from a group consisting of: vias, lateral feedthroughs, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, said signal paths and said feedthroughs are laid out to minimize RF transmission losses. In addition, the device comprises a torsion arm affixed to the anchor by a first torsion hinge with a first axis and a cantilever plate with a moveable contact affixed thereto in aligned confronting relation to the stationary contact. The cantilever plate is connected to the torsion arm by a second torsion hinge with a second axis. In some embodiments, the torsion arm and cantilever plate are substantially formed from silicon. The first torsion hinge is adapted to rotate the cantilever plate about the first axis toward or away from the substrate in response to an actuating force. The second torsion hinge is adapted to rotate the cantilever plate about the second axis toward or away from the substrate in response to the actuating force moving the moveable contact into contact with the stationary contact or separating the moveable contact from the stationary contact. In some embodiments, more than one anchor can be used. In some embodiments, such as a see-saw configuration, an additional actuator can be added to pull the two contacts apart.
The features and advantages described in this disclosure and in the following detailed description are not all-inclusive, and particularly, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims hereof. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter, resort to the claims being necessary to determine such inventive subject matter.
a is a top view of the MEMS device of
b is a side view of the MEMS device of
a is a side view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in an open state, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
b is a side view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in an initial closure state, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
c is a side view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in a full contact or scrub state, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
d is a side view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in an unzipping state, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
e is a side view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever returned to the open state, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
a is a flow chart illustrating the operation of the MEMS device, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
b is a more detailed view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in during the unzipping process, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
a is a side view of another embodiment of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever including a horn contact in an open state.
b is a side view of another embodiment of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever including a horn contact in an initial closure state.
c is a side view of another embodiment of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever including a horn contact in a full contact or scrub state.
d is a side view of another embodiment of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever including a horn contact in an unzipping state.
e is a side view of another embodiment of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever including a horn contact returned to the open state.
The figures depict an embodiment of the present invention for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following description that alternative embodiments of the structures and methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles of the invention described herein.
The two-stage cantilever design disclosed herein improves the reliability of MEMS with cantilever actuators by using a cantilever structure with a high actuation force, a scrubbing contact motion, and an unzipping motion for contact separation. In most single stage cantilevers, to have a reasonable gap for isolation purposes, most of the cantilever structure must be relatively distant from the substrate area with the applied voltage. With the two stage design, a substantial portion of the cantilever plate that is rotated about the second axis of the second torsion hinge can positioned to be extremely close to the substrate area with an applied voltage, thus providing a much higher electrostatic force while maintain a large gap. The higher pull-on forces associated with this invention provide better electrical contact in switches and relays. For devices such as MEMS switches, this translates into lower resistances and lower insertion losses, as well as greater power handling. In addition, a larger gap between the stationary and movable contacts can be implemented, which increases RF isolation and stand-off voltage, and decreases problems with capacitive coupling. In some embodiments, the scrubbing motion (e.g., the “scrubbing” of the moveable contact across the surface of the stationary contact, as described in more detail below) can improve the interface quality between contacts by removing at least some of the contaminants. Each cycle provides a more “fresh” contact surface, which improves contact resistance. When contact is broken between the stationary and movable contact surfaces, the invention provides a mechanism that combines both normal separation force and rotation. This creates a stress concentration at the contact edge, making the contacts easier to separate (e.g., through an unzipping or peeling apart action to separate the contacts, rather than a direct pulling apart of the contacts).
Referring now to
Upon reduction or removal of the actuating force, the secondary torsion hinge 118 allows rotation of the cantilever plate 114 about the second axis away from the substrate 102 and the primary torsion hinge 112 allows rotation of the cantilever plate 114 about the first axis away from the substrate 102. Thus, the moveable contact 116 is separated from the stationary contact 106.
Other embodiments of the MEMS device 100 can include other structures beyond those shown in
With regard to fabrication of the MEMS device 100, the substrate 102 is preferably made of semiconductor or dielectric material, although one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize the different types of metals and various combinations of materials that can also be used, including but not limited to metals such as gold and nickel. The anchor 108, torsion arm 110, cantilever plate 114 and moveable contact 116 can be formed on the substrate 102. The stationary contact 106 is affixed to the substrate 102 preferably using standard semiconductor processes known to those of skill in the art (e.g., CMOS). The anchor 108, torsion arm 110, and cantilever plate 114 can be fabricated as a monolithic structure. In some embodiments, the cantilever parts such as the torsion arm 110 and cantilever plate 114 are patterned out of a single layer of material, such as the top single crystalline silicon layer of a silicon-on-insulator substrate etched by plasma etching or DRIE. In some embodiments, however, these structures are fabricated separately. The moveable contact 116 can also be fabricated using standard semiconductor processes known to those of skill in the art (e.g., CMOS). In some embodiments, the length, width, and thickness of the primary 112 and secondary torsion hinges 116 are chosen so that the latter is somewhat stiffer than the former, thus ensuring that the initial motion that moves the cantilever plate 114 toward the substrate 102 occurs at the primary torsion hinge 112. Various actuation means can be used, including but not limited to electrostatic, thermal, piezo, shape-memory, magnetic, and any combination. In an electrostatic actuation embodiment, the torsion hinge 112, 116 dimensions, along with the cantilever plate 114 area and actuation gap are chosen to provide the desired contact force and threshold potential. For example, electrostatic actuation voltage may range but is not limited to 10 volts to 200 volts. As another example, the torsion hinge, cantilever plate area may be sized to provide high actuation forces. Many current MEMS switches have up to several hundred micronewtons of actuation force. Ideally, greater pull-down and restoration forces are available, for example greater than 1 milli-newton, 5 milli-newton, etc.
Some standard fabrication processes that could be used with the present invention are discussed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/088,411, filed on Mar. 23, 2005, “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging,” which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,902, filed on Jun. 27, 2003, entitled “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/997,671, filed on Nov. 28, 2001, entitled “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging” (now abandoned) and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/253,851, filed on Nov. 29, 2000, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
The mechanical elements of device 100 (such as the anchor 108, torsion arm 110 and cantilever plate 114) are preferably fabricated out of silicon, and even more preferably out of the top single crystalline silicon layer of a silicon on insulator (SOI) substrate/wafer. However, other materials can also be used for these mechanical structures, including but not limited to polysilicon, doped silicon, silicon germanium, metals (such as gold and nickel), dielectrics, ceramic, and any combination thereof.
Contact materials used for moveable contact 116, stationary contact 106 and any other contacts included on device 100 include, but are not limited to, gold, harden gold, gold nickel alloys, gold-cobalt alloys, platinum family metals, such as ruthenium, platinum, iridium, rhodium, conductive metal oxides, such as ruthenium oxide, tungsten, rhenium, carbon, and various stacks, combinations and alloys. Contacts can also be made out of several layers, such as gold on ruthenium, gold-nickel (e.g., 1-5% nickel preferably 1.5-2% nickel), gold-nickel (e.g., 1-5% nickel preferably 1.5-2% nickel) on ruthenium, gold-cobalt (e.g. less than 2% cobalt) on ruthenium, ruthenium oxide on ruthenium (e.g., formed by oxidizing ruthenium surface or by deposition of Ruthenium oxide).
The anchor 108, torsion arm 110, and cantilever plate 114 may be fabricated on the substrate 102 shown in
A two-substrate design as shown in
If the MEMS device 100 is fabricated by bonding at least two substrates 102, 202 together, seal rings can also be provided around the device(s) to provide sealing of the devices to prevent contamination, moisture, etc. from contacting the device and hindering its functioning. A seal ring 204 is illustrated on either side of the cantilever design in the embodiment shown in
There are various feedthroughs for signal paths into and out of the sealed cavities including thru wafer vias through either substrate, lateral feedthroughs with electrically-insulating layers between one substrate and its sealing layer, or any combination. In one embodiment, one substrate is thinned from hundreds of microns in thickness to between 1 micron to 50 micron in thickness to improve RF performance and reduce size. Examples of various feedthroughs, such as vias or lateral feedthroughs, are described in detail and illustrated in the figures of the above-stated patents, including in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/088,411, filed on Mar. 23, 2005, “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,902, filed on Jun. 27, 2003, entitled “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging,” each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
In another embodiment of the device 100, the device 100 includes a particularly thick cantilever or high aspect cantilever for high force actuators. The thick/high-aspect structures can handle high forces without breaking or significantly flexing. These types of thick/high-aspect cantilevers are preferably made from silicon, or single crystalline silicon, such as that of the top silicon layer of a SOI wafer. These thick cantilevers can be fabricated out of other materials, such as other semiconducting materials, polysilicon, epi-polysilicon, silicon germanium, single crystal materials, polycrystalline materials, metals, ceramics, alloys, or combinations thereof. Thick cantilevers are preferably at least 5 microns thick, or at least 10 microns thick.
Referring now to
With regard to actuating the MEMS device 100, the method includes applying 402 an actuating force to the MEMS device. The preferable mechanism for actuation of the device 100 is electrostatic actuation. However, other actuation mechanisms include, but are not limited to, electromagnetic (such as the Magfusion RF MEMS switch), thermal, electrothermal, shape memory alloy, piezo and any combination thereof. Some of these other actuation mechanisms may be combined with latching mechanisms, such as an electrostatic latch and also a mechanical latch. Examples of mechanisms for applying an actuating force, including figures illustrating an actuator associated with a micro-switch device, are described in detail in the above-stated patents, including in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/088,411, filed on Mar. 23, 2005, “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,902, filed on Jun. 27, 2003, entitled “MEMS Device with Integral Packaging,” each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes. For example, contact(s) can be arranged so that they are in electrical contact with a signal path (e.g., a metal trace or strip that serves as a path for signals propagating through the micro-switch), so that when the actuator is activated by being supplied with a drive voltage to establish a field (e.g., electric or magnetic field), the field provides a force that pulls the cantilever plate 114 downward toward the substrate 102 to close the gap between the contacts 116, 106. In this “activated” state, a signal launched into the signal path can propagate through the micro-switch due to the bridged gap provided by the contacts 116, 106 that are no longer separated. This process is illustrated in more detail in the figures of the above-stated patents that are incorporated by reference. In another embodiment, the switch can be configured as a capacitive switch or a shunt switch by for example, but not limited to, reconfiguring, adding appropriate dielectric layers, or some combination.
a includes a side view of the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in an open state. Initially the stationary 106 and moveable 116 contacts are separated (see gap 302), and the base plate or cantilever plate 114 is in a generally horizontal position and is generally parallel to the substrate 102. The gap 302 between the moveable contact 116 and the stationary contact 106 during this open state may be submicron to many microns.
b shows the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in an initial closure state. Responsive to the application 400 of an actuating force (such as the forces described above), the cantilever plate 114 is rotated 404 about the first axis of the primary torsion hinge 112 toward the substrate 102. In some embodiments, when it is desired to bring the stationary 106 and moveable 116 contacts together, the electric potential of the cantilever plate 114 is raised, relative to the substrate 102. As the potential is raised, the cantilever plate 114 will rotate 404 downward about the axis of the primary torsion hinge 112, as shown in
c shows the actuating mechanism of the cantilever in a full contact or “scrub” state. Responsive to the application 400 of the actuating force, the cantilever plate 114 is rotated 406 about the second axis of the secondary torsion hinge 118 toward the substrate 102. The actuating force that causes this second stage of rotation 404 may be the same actuating force that caused the first stage of rotation 402 (e.g., rotation about the first axis) or a different actuating force (or even a different type of force). In some embodiments, the same actuating force causes both stages of the rotation 402, 404. In some embodiments, the force is increased during the second stage of the rotation 404. For example, in some embodiments, the electrical potential of the cantilever plate 114 relative to the substrate 1.02 is raised (as described above) to cause the rotation 402 about the first axis. Then, the electric potential of the cantilever plate 114 relative to the substrate 102 is further raised to rotate 404 the cantilever plate 114 downward about the second axis of the secondary torsion hinge 118. In some embodiments, the cantilever plate 114 is again generally parallel to the substrate 102, as in
In some embodiments, the second stage of rotation 404 that brings the contacts 106, 116 into a state of full contact induces a scrubbing motion of the moveable contact 116 across the stationary contact 106, as shown in
This two-stage rotation design can allow the device 100 to have a larger gap 302 initially since the plate 114 can rotate down to the substrate 102 in two stages, rather than just relying on the rotation of the first stage to bring the contacts 106, 116 together. This provides high isolation for cell phones and other wireless applications and high voltage applications. With the two stage rotation, the plate 114 can also be brought down more gently rather than being slammed down in one movement. This may lengthen the lifetime of the device and minimizing contact 106, 116 damage. In some embodiments, the actuation force that can be applied can be stronger overall (e.g., increased by factor of four relative to single-stage cantilevers), since the device 100 can be actuated in two stages and the cantilever plate and other cantilever sections can be lowered closer to the substrate 102, increasing actuation force. In addition, the two-stage design can allow the device 100 to be turned on and off more quickly and easily. In one embodiment, larger forces are applied to quickly close the switch. The impact force can be greatly reduced with the two-stage design. This approach can take advantage of squeeze film damping effects that are greatly dependent upon the gap. As those skilled in the art are aware, the squeeze film damping effect can be further increased by reducing the gap. Some embodiments reduce the gap by adding one or more structures on the cantilever or the substrate.
d shows the actuating mechanism of the cantilever embodiment in an unzipping state. To separate the contacts 106, 116, the application of the actuating force applied to the MEMS device is reduced or removed 406. For example, the electric potential of the cantilever plate 114 relative to the substrate 102 can be lowered. Responsive to the reduced 406 actuating force, the cantilever plate 114 is rotated 408 about the second axis of the secondary torsion hinge 118 upward and away from the substrate 102 (e.g., in a first stage of rotation to move to cantilever plate 114 upward). The cantilever plate 114 is thus returned to a sloped position relative to the substrate 102, similar to the position shown in
e shows the actuating mechanism of the cantilever embodiment returned to an open state. Responsive to the reduced 406 actuating force, the cantilever plate 114 is rotated 410 about the first axis of the primary torsion hinge 112 away from the substrate 102, wherein the rotation of the cantilever plate 114 about the first and second axes separates the moveable contact 116 from the stationary contact 106. In some embodiments, this second stage of rotation 410 to move the cantilever plate 114 upward occurs as the electric potential of the cantilever plate relative to the substrate is further reduced (e.g., beyond the reduction that occurred for the first stage of rotation). The cantilever plate 114 and torsion arm 110 come back to a generally parallel alignment with the substrate 102 and the contacts 106, 116 are again in the open state.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that other actuation designs can be used to replace the electrostatic actuation design. For example, it is possible to include other appropriate materials in the device 100, such as NiFe for some magnetic actuated switches, piezo materials for piezo switches, bimorphs or other more complex designs for thermal switches, and shape memory alloys for shape memory alloy based switches, to modify the actuation method. In addition, the device can be modified in various ways. For example, the contacts can be shaped differently than those shown in the Figures (e.g., cylindrical-shaped, square-shaped, circular, etc.) As another example, an additional mechanical, non-electrical contact (or multiple additional contacts) may be added to the cantilever plate 114, adjacent to the moveable contact 116 (e.g., located on the cantilever plate 114 on the inside of the moveable contact 116 in between the moveable contact 116 and the primary torsion hinges 112, but nearest to the moveable contact 116). This additional contact can help to prevent direct contact between the cantilever plate 114 and the substrate 102, thus helping to prevent a short circuit. For example, the additional contact can be sufficiently long (e.g., longer than the moveable contact 116, or possibly as long as the moveable contact 116 plus the stationary 106 contact) to contact the substrate 102 to stabilize the cantilever plate 114 before the plate 114 would have a chance to touch the substrate 102. In addition, the additional contact can help to maintain at least an approximately parallel gap between the cantilever plate 114 and the substrate 102 when the plate 114 is in the fully lowered position (
Applications for the MEMS device 100 include, but are not limited to, phase shifters, reconfigurable antenna, tunable filters, antenna switches, reconfigurable circuits, variable capacitors, variable capacitor banks, switch matrices, DSL switch matrices for facilitating DSL provisioning. These components are important for many systems, including but not limited to cell phone, WLAN, satellite communications, satellite communication antenna, DSL (particularly provisioning and testing), radar, military radios, relays for Automated Test Equipment, and high-power relays.
Referring now to
a shows the device embodiment in an open state. When the cantilever is actuated 400, contact is achieved between the horn contact 502 and the substrate 102 (
To separate the contacts 106, 116, the actuating force is reduced/removed 406 (e.g., the potential is lowered), rotating the cantilever plate 114 upward about the axis of the secondary torsion hinge 118 back to at least approximate parallel alignment with the torsion arm 110 (
As will be understood by those familiar with the art, the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. Likewise, the particular naming and division of the components of the device, methodologies for use, and other aspects are not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the invention or its features may have different names, divisions and/or formats. In addition, the components of the device can be modified in shape, size, composition materials, fabrication techniques, etc., and more components of different or the same type can be added. Furthermore, as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art, the components of the device, methodologies for use, and other aspects of the invention can be implemented in a number of different types of MEMS devices or different designs. From the above description, many variations will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that would yet be encompassed by the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/679,817, filed on May 12, 2005, entitled “MEMS device,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. FA9453-04-C-0030 awarded by the U.S. Air Force, an AFRL Contract No. F33615-03-1-7002, and also under Subcontract 560500P412486 with Northeastern University. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4893172 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5258591 | Buck | Nov 1993 | A |
5367136 | Buck | Nov 1994 | A |
5430421 | Bornand et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5472539 | Saia et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476211 | Khandros | Dec 1995 | A |
5578869 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578976 | Yao | Nov 1996 | A |
5600071 | Sooriakumar et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5629918 | Ho et al. | May 1997 | A |
5659195 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5731636 | Chun | Mar 1998 | A |
5744752 | McHerron et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5778513 | Miu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5821161 | Covell, II et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832601 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5874675 | Edmans et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5917707 | Khandros et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5938956 | Hembree et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949655 | Glenn | Sep 1999 | A |
5955932 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5995688 | Aksyuk et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000280 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025767 | Kellam et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6049976 | Khandros | Apr 2000 | A |
6066515 | Schoenfeld | May 2000 | A |
6117694 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124650 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137184 | Ikegami | Oct 2000 | A |
6142358 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158283 | Shinogi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177730 | Kira et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184053 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6265246 | Ruby et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287894 | Sawin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303992 | Van Pham et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6346742 | Bryzek et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6384353 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6426484 | Hembree et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429511 | Ruby et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6469602 | Ruan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6566745 | Beyne et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6596117 | Hays et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6614110 | Pace | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621616 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624003 | Rice | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633212 | Ruan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6794964 | Sood et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6841839 | Sridhar et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6872902 | Cohn et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876482 | DeReus | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7242273 | Isobe et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020171144 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0183910 | Jan 1989 | EP |
57-121255 | Jul 1982 | JP |
61110441 | May 1986 | JP |
WO9809312 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9917322 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9921204 | Apr 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60679817 | May 2005 | US |