1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to light emitting diode (LED) light extraction for opto-electronic applications. More precisely, the invention relates to the use of a structured emitting region suited for extraction of light usually trapped in the (Al,In,Ga)N thin film.
2. Description of the Related Art
(Note: This application references a number of different publications and patents as indicated throughout the specification by one or more reference numbers within brackets, e.g., [Ref. x]. A list of these different publications and patents ordered according to these reference numbers can be found below in the section entitled “References.” Each of these publications and patents is incorporated by reference herein.)
A number of publications and patents are devoted to the issue of light extraction from light-emitting semiconductor material. Light extraction can be achieved using geometrical optics effects, for example, using pyramids, outcoupling tapers or textured surfaces [8-14], or wave optics effects, for example, using microcavity resonances or photonic crystal extraction [15-18]. Special growth techniques such as pendeo or cantilever growths [19,20] or lateral epitaxial overgrowth [21,22] may also be used to achieve light extraction.
For more recent advances in the field of LED extraction, little is published. However, the concepts for light extraction using photonic crystal effects or Zinc Oxide (ZnO) pyramids are well-described in the applications listed in the Cross-Reference section above.
An efficient method for enhancing light extraction from an (Al,In,Ga)N LED consists in using photonic crystals to extract the light. Some proposals rely on the control of optical modes using a membrane system where most horizontal in-plane modes are suppressed by the photonic crystals, and the oblique modes do not radiate out of the membrane due to total internal reflection [23]. However, such structures suffer from two drawbacks: (1) the radiative emission rate is highly suppressed, requiring (2) emitting species with very high radiative efficiency, a property not easily achievable at room temperature.
Other implementations rely on using photonic crystals as a diffractive grating, positioned outside the emitting layer, as described in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/866,014; 60/802,993; and 60/741,935; and U.S. Utility application Ser. Nos. 11/067,957; 11/067,910; and 11/067,956; which applications are listed in the Cross-Reference section above.
However, in such implementations, the interaction between the structure's guided modes and the crystal is rather weak, requiring a rather long photonic crystal, and consequently a large device, in order to extract most of the guided light. It is therefore highly desirable to incorporate the photonic crystal within the emitting layer, in order to achieve maximum interaction. However, this leads to three problems.
First, possible diminished radiative efficiency due to the large free surface of the active region which is degraded when etching the photonic crystal structure. Nonetheless, high quality material can still be obtained, by using annealing steps following the etching, as described in [24]. Alternatively, high quality material can also be obtained by direct columnar growth of the structure.
Another problem results from the lower photonic density of states in the etched region, which is a natural consequence of the diminished average index of refraction.
Finally, another source of very diminished emission might be due to the emitting layer having a lower index than the surrounding layer, and thus not supporting guided or localized modes.
The present invention discloses a structured light emitting region within the LED including one or more active layers intermixed or embedded within a plurality of index modulation layers, wherein the index modulation layers are structrued as a photonic crystal. The LED also includes a p-type contact on the LED and an n-type contact on the LED, wherein a bias is applied across the contacts. The index modulation layers include a lower index layer and a higher index layer, and the active layer is positioned inside the lower index layer. The LED has an emission rate 60% to 80% of an emission rate for a non structured emitting region comprised of the higher index layer.
The p or n type contact may be a transparent electrode or a reflective contact. The transparent electrode may comprise zinc oxide, silicon carbide or indium tin oxide. The structured emitting region may comprise (Al,Ga,In)N.
The LED may further comprise a backside mirror positioned on the top or bottom surface of the LED. The LED may further comprise an intermediate GaN layer on top of the structured emitting region and/or a lateral epitaxial grown region on top of the structured emitting region.
The LED may also comprise materials filling holes in the photonic crystal, wherein the material filling the holes is dielectric, metal, semiconductor, or optically active such as light emitting polymers or dyes. The photonic crystal may have a regular or a non-regular pattern, or a pattern optimised for directional light emission.
The present invention also discloses a method for fabricating a light emitting diode having efficient light extraction, comprising forming a structured emitting region including one or more active layers embedded in a plurality of index modulation layers, wherein the index modulation layers are structured as a photonic crystal; and forming both a p-type contact and an n-type contact on the LED for applying a bias across the contacts.
The method may further comprise forming a reflective contact on top of the structured light emitting layers. Alternatively, the method may comprise forming a transparent contact by direct deposition or attachment of a thin conductive and transparent layer on top of the structured light emitting layers.
The method may further comprise removing the structured light emitting layers from a substrate and/or thinning the structured light emitting layers. The method may further comprise growing or regrowing GaN on top of the structured light emitting layers.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Technical Description
For conciseness throughout this disclosure, “(Al,Ga,In)N layer” will refer to an ensemble of layers deposited or grown by any technique, for example, by MBE (molecular beam epitaxy), MOCVD (metalorganic chemical vapour deposition) or VPE (vapour phase epitaxy), and usually comprising: a buffer layer grown on a substrate, one or more active layers such as quantum wells, quantum dots, barriers, or any other light emitting semiconductor layer, current blocking layers, contact layers, and other layers typically grown for a LED (light emitting diode) and well known in the state of the art. It is also well known in the art that these layers may be adapted for various specific implementations, in particular they may be adapted for each desired wavelength range being emitted by the LED.
The present invention discloses designs for structures which retain a high emission rate as well as high internal efficiency and extraction. Typically, the emission rate can be 60-80% of the value for a non-structured high index material.
The relative position of the active layer 110 within the (Al,In,Ga)N layer 104 is shown in
Preferably, the structured emitting region/active layer 206 includes one or more active layers embedded within a plurality of index modulation layers, wherein the index modulation layers are structured as a photonic crystal with an embedded active layer. Specifically, the index modulation layers comprise a lower index layer and a higher index layer, and the active layer is positioned inside the lower index layer. Moreover, the structured emitting region/active layer 206 may be structured by etching, according to the description found in [24]. Alternatively, the structured emitting region/active layer 206 may be structured by direct organized growth.
A transparent p contact layer 202 is placed on the structured emitting region/active layer 206, either by direct deposition, for example, pendeo or canteliver epitaxy, or by attachment of a thin material layer such as ZnO. Any type of bonding can be used as long as it leads to good electrical contact while preserving good optical properties. Since light is also emitted towards the substrate 212, it can prove advantageous to use a mirror 214 on the substrate 212 to reflect any light upwards that has been emitted downwards. Accordingly, light emission may be up or up and down in accordance with the invention.
A variant of the
Both the substrate 312, and first buffer layer 308 grown on the substrate 312, induce some loss. It can be useful to detach the (Al,In,Ga)N layer 304 from the substrate 312 using any substrate removal technique, for example, using laser lift off (LLO), dry etching or chemical etching, and then to thin down the buffer layer 308. Thus, in
In view of the above,
In order to improve optical and electrical performance further, it can be useful to grow a GaN layer on top of the structured emitting region/active layer, as illustrated in
Layer 616 can be grown during the same growth sequence as the structured emitting region/active layer(s) 606 of the device, by changing growth conditions from columnar growth to coalesced growth, once the structured emitting region/active layer 606 has been grown to a desired thickness. If the structured emitting region/active layer 606 is obtained by etching, then the contact GaN layer 616 is re-grown under conditions for coalescence in order to obturate the holes (e.g., from less than 100 nm to several microns). In other variants, light can be emitted upwards using a transparent top electrode 602 or up and down.
Similar to
Similarly,
Consequently, device performance can be improved by removing the substrate and thinning the buffer layer 808 and 908, again with the two possibilities of top or bottom emission through the choice of top contact, for example, a transparent contact 802, as shown in
The implementations of
Possible Modifications
The conductive transparent electrodes can be shaped to increase light extraction. Alternatively, the whole structure may be placed in an environment such as epoxy, which also provides for increased light extraction. This environment may also be shaped for optimal light extraction. The environment can be doped with species absorbing LED light and re-emitting at longer wavelengths, thus providing white light emission.
A preferred transparent electrode comprises ZnO. However, the ZnO can be replaced by another material having similar characteristics, namely good transmission properties, high refractive index for efficient light extraction, and good electrical properties. Examples of materials comprise, for instance, silicon carbide (SiC) or indium tin oxide (ITO).
The contacts used here can be made by any technique, for example, epitaxy, bonding, or sputtering. Eventually, in the case of bonding, it can be advantageous to use an ultrathin metal layer to improve the electrical characteristics. The transparent contact can be situated on either side of the device when there is no substrate.
The active layers can be comprised of one or several quantum wells, or one or several layers of other emitting species such as quantum dots. The vertical position of the emitting species is optimized to obtain the maximum emission outside the structure.
The design of the pattern within patterned regions 1212 can be optimized in order to obtain directional emission, due to the peculiar emission properties of patterned structures. Also, one can use the properties of patterned structures to obtain low threshold lasers and lasing emission in given directions.
Thus,
The shape, size and other parameters can be varied. For example, the crystal parameters of a photonic crystal used in a second light extractor can be varied along the structure in order to provide position-dependent light extraction behaviour.
The typical parameter for the structuring, i.e., the photonic crystal lattice period if one uses periodic patterning, is chosen to satisfy the first order diffraction condition of about 100 nanometer (nm) period, or up to higher orders, such as a few hundred periods. Less ordered structures can also be used, such as Archimedean tilings or quasi-periodic structures, or even disordered structures.
The concepts described herein for (Al,Ga,In)N based materials can be used for other materials, such as other inorganic materials such as semiconductors, or organic materials such as light-emitting small molecules or polymers.
The following publications are incorporated by reference herein:
This concludes the description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The foregoing description of one or more embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching, without fundamentally deviating from the essence of the present invention. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of the following co-pending and commonly-assigned U.S. patent applications: U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/866,015, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Aurelien J. F. David, Claude C. A. Weisbuch, Steven P. DenBaars and Stacia Keller, entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) WITH EMITTERS WITHIN STRUCTURED MATERIALS,” attorneys' docket number 30794.197-US-P1 (2007-113-1); which application is incorporated by reference herein. This application is related to the following co-pending and commonly-assigned applications: U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/581,940, filed on Jun. 7, 2006, by Tetsuo Fujii, Yan Gao, Evelyn. L. Hu, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “HIGHLY EFFICIENT GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED LIGHT EMITTING DIODES VIA SURFACE ROUGHENING,” attorney's docket number 30794.108-US-WO (2004-063), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 365(c) of PCT Application Serial No. US2003/03921, filed on Dec. 9, 2003, by Tetsuo Fujii, Yan Gao, Evelyn L. Hu, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “HIGHLY EFFICIENT GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED LIGHT EMITTING DIODES VIA SURFACE ROUGHENING,” attorney's docket number 30794.108-WO-01 (2004-063); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/054,271, filed on Feb. 9, 2005, by Rajat Sharma, P. Morgan Pattison, John F. Kaeding, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE,” attorney's docket number 30794.112-US-01 (2004-208); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/938,704, filed on Sep. 10, 2004, by Carole Schwach, Claude C. A. Weisbuch, Steven P. DenBaars, Henri Benisty and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “WHITE, SINGLE OR MULTICOLOR LED BY RECYCLING GUIDED MODES,” attorney's docket number 30794.115-US-01 (2004-064); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/175,761, filed on Jul. 6, 2005, by Akihiko Murai, Lee McCarthy, Umesh K. Mishra and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “METHOD FOR WAFER BONDING (Al, In, Ga)N and Zn(S, Se) FOR OPTOELECTRONICS APPLICATIONS,” attorney's docket number 30794.116-US-U1 (2004-455), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/585,673, filed Jul. 6, 2004, by Akihiko Murai, Lee McCarthy, Umesh K. Mishra and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “METHOD FOR WAFER BONDING (Al, In, Ga)N and Zn(S, Se) FOR OPTOELECTRONICS APPLICATIONS,” attorney's docket number 30794.116-US-P1 (2004-455-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/067,957, filed Feb. 28, 2005, by Claude C. A. Weisbuch, Aurelien J. F. David, James S. Speck and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “HORIZONTAL EMITTING, VERITCAL EMITTING, BEAM SHAPED, DISTRIBUTED FEEDBACK (DFB) LASERS BY GROWTH OVER A PATTERNED SUBSTRATE,” attorneys' docket number 30794.121-US-01 (2005-144-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/067,910, filed Feb. 28, 2005, by Claude C. A. Weisbuch, Aurelien J. F. David, James S. Speck and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “SINGLE OR MULTI-COLOR HIGH EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) BY GROWTH OVER A PATTERNED SUBSTRATE,” attorneys' docket number 30794.122-US-01 (2005-145-01); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/067,956, filed Feb. 28, 2005, by Aurelien J. F. David, Claude C. A Weisbuch and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) WITH OPTIMIZED PHOTONIC CRYSTAL EXTRACTOR,” attorneys' docket number 30794.126-US-01 (2005-198-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/403,624, filed Apr. 13, 2006, by James S. Speck, Troy J. Baker and Benjamin A. Haskell, entitled “WAFER SEPARATION TECHNIQUE FOR THE FABRICATION OF FREE-STANDING (AL, IN, GA)N WAFERS,” attorneys' docket number 30794.131-US-U1 (2005-482-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/670,810, filed Apr. 13, 2005, by James S. Speck, Troy J. Baker and Benjamin A. Haskell, entitled “WAFER SEPARATION TECHNIQUE FOR THE FABRICATION OF FREE-STANDING (AL, IN, GA)N WAFERS,” attorneys' docket number 30794.131-US-P1 (2005-482-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/403,288, filed Apr. 13, 2006, by James S. Speck, Benjamin A. Haskell, P. Morgan Pattison and Troy J. Baker, entitled “ETCHING TECHNIQUE FOR THE FABRICATION OF THIN (AL, IN, GA)N LAYERS,” attorneys' docket number 30794.132-US-U1 (2005-509-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/670,790, filed Apr. 13, 2005, by James S. Speck, Benjamin A. Haskell, P. Morgan Pattison and Troy J. Baker, entitled “ETCHING TECHNIQUE FOR THE FABRICATION OF THIN (AL, IN, GA)N LAYERS,” attorneys' docket number 30794.132-US-P1 (2005-509-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/454,691, filed on Jun. 16, 2006, by Akihiko Murai, Christina Ye Chen, Daniel B. Thompson, Lee S. McCarthy, Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “(Al,Ga,In)N AND ZnO DIRECT WAFER BONDING STRUCTURE FOR OPTOELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS AND ITS FABRICATION METHOD,” attorneys' docket number 30794.134-US-U1 (2005-536-4), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/691,710, filed on Jun. 17, 2005, by Akihiko Murai, Christina Ye Chen, Lee S. McCarthy, Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “(Al, Ga, In)N AND ZnO DIRECT WAFER BONDING STRUCTURE FOR OPTOELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS, AND ITS FABRICATION METHOD,” attorneys' docket number 30794.134-US-P1 (2005-536-1), U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/732,319, filed on Nov. 1, 2005, by Akihiko Murai, Christina Ye Chen, Daniel B. Thompson, Lee S. McCarthy, Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “(Al, Ga, In)N AND ZnO DIRECT WAFER BONDED STRUCTURE FOR OPTOELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS, AND ITS FABRICATION METHOD,” attorneys' docket number 30794.134-US-P2 (2005-536-2), and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/764,881, filed on Feb. 3, 2006, by Akihiko Murai, Christina Ye Chen, Daniel B. Thompson, Lee S. McCarthy, Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “(Al,Ga,In)N AND ZnO DIRECT WAFER BONDED STRUCTURE FOR OPTOELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS AND ITS FABRICATION METHOD,” attorneys' docket number 30794.134-US-P3 (2005-536-3); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/251,365 filed Oct. 14, 2005, by Frederic S. Diana, Aurelien J. F. David, Pierre M. Petroff, and Claude C. A. Weisbuch, entitled “PHOTONIC STRUCTURES FOR EFFICIENT LIGHT EXTRACTION AND CONVERSION IN MULTI-COLOR LIGHT EMITTING DEVICES,” attorneys' docket number 30794.142-US-01 (2005-534-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/633,148, filed Dec. 4, 2006, Claude C. A. Weisbuch and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “IMPROVED HORIZONTAL EMITTING, VERTICAL EMITTING, BEAM SHAPED, DISTRIBUTED FEEDBACK (DFB) LASERS FABRICATED BY GROWTH OVER A PATTERNED SUBSTRATE WITH MULTIPLE OVERGROWTH,” attorneys' docket number 30794.143-US-U1 (2005-721-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/741,935, filed Dec. 2, 2005, Claude C. A. Weisbuch and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “IMPROVED HORIZONTAL EMITTING, VERTICAL EMITTING, BEAM SHAPED, DFB LASERS FABRICATED BY GROWTH OVER PATTERNED SUBSTRATE WITH MULTIPLE OVERGROWTH,” attorneys' docket number 30794.143-US-P1 (2005-721-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/593,268, filed on Nov. 6, 2006, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura, Hisashi Masui, Natalie N. Fellows, and Akihiko Murai, entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED),” attorneys' docket number 30794.161-US-U1 (2006-271-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/734,040, filed on Nov. 4, 2005, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura, Hisashi Masui, Natalie N. Fellows, and Akihiko Murai, entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED),” attorneys' docket number 30794.161-US-P1 (2006-271-1); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/608,439, filed on Dec. 8, 2006, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and James S. Speck, entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED),” attorneys' docket number 30794.164-US-U1 (2006-318-3), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/748,480, filed on Dec. 8, 2005, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and James S. Speck, entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED),” attorneys' docket number 30794.164-US-P1 (2006-318-1), and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/764,975, filed on Feb. 3, 2006, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and James S. Speck, entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED),” attorneys' docket number 30794.164-US-P2 (2006-318-2); U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/676,999, filed on Feb. 20, 2007, by Hong Zhong, John F. Kaeding, Rajat Sharma, James S. Speck, Steven P. DenBaars and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR GROWTH OF SEMIPOLAR (Al,In,Ga,B)N OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES,” attorneys' docket number 30794.173-US-U1 (2006-422-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/774,467, filed on Feb. 17, 2006, by Hong Zhong, John F. Kaeding, Rajat Sharma, James S. Speck, Steven P. DenBaars and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR GROWTH OF SEMIPOLAR (Al,In,Ga,B)N OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES,” attorneys' docket number 30794.173-US-P1 (2006-422-1); U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Aurelien J. F. David, Claude C. A. Weisbuch and Steven P. DenBaars entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) THROUGH MULTIPLE EXTRACTORS,” attorney's docket number 30794. 191-US-U1 (2007-047-3), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,014, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Aurelien J. F. David, Claude C. A. Weisbuch and Steven P. DenBaars entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) THROUGH MULTIPLE EXTRACTORS,” attorney's docket number 30794. 191-US-P1 (2007-047-1), and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/883,977, filed on Jan. 8, 2007, by Aurelien J. F. David, Claude C. A. Weisbuch and Steven P. DenBaars entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) THROUGH MULTIPLE EXTRACTORS,” attorney's docket number 30794. 191-US-P2 (2007-047-2); U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Claude C. A. Weisbuch, James S. Speck and Steven P. DenBaars entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY WHITE, SINGLE OR MULTI-COLOUR LED BY INDEX MATCHING STRUCTURES,” attorney's docket number 30794. 196-US-U1 (2007-114-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,026, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Claude C. A. Weisbuch, James S. Speck and Steven P. DenBaars entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY WHITE, SINGLE OR MULTI-COLOUR LED BY INDEX MATCHING STRUCTURES,” attorney's docket number 30794. 196-US-P1 (2007-114-1); U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Evelyn L. Hu, Shuji Nakamura, Yong Seok Choi, Rajat Sharma and Chiou-Fu Wang, entitled “ION BEAM TREATMENT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF AIR-GAP III-NITRIDE DEVICES PRODUCED BY PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL (PEC) ETCHING,” attorney's docket number 30794.201-US-U1 (2007-161-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,027, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Evelyn L. Hu, Shuji Nakamura, Yong Seok Choi, Rajat Sharma and Chiou-Fu Wang, entitled “ION BEAM TREATMENT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF AIR-GAP III-NITRIDE DEVICES PRODUCED BY PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL (PEC) ETCHING,” attorney's docket number 30794.201-US-P1 (2007-161-1); U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Natalie N. Fellows, Steven P. DenBaars and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TEXTURED PHOSPHOR CONVERSION LAYER LIGHT EMITTING DIODE,” attorney's docket number 30794.203-US-U1 (2007-270-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,024, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Natalie N. Fellows, Steven P. DenBaars and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TEXTURED PHOSPHOR CONVERSION LAYER LIGHT EMITTING DIODE,” attorney's docket number 30794.203-US-P1 (2007-270-1); U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and Hisashi Masui, entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY SPHERE LED,” attorney's docket number 30794.204-US-U1 (2007-271-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,025, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and Hisashi Masui, entitled “HIGH LIGHT EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY SPHERE LED,” attorney's docket number 30794.204-US-P1 (2007-271-1); U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Shuji Nakamura and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “STANDING TRANSPARENT MIRROR-LESS (STML) LIGHT EMITTING DIODE,” attorney's docket number 30794.205-US-U1 (2007-272-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,017, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Shuji Nakamura and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “STANDING TRANSPARENT MIRROR-LESS (STML) LIGHT EMITTING DIODE,” attorney's docket number 30794.205-US-P1 (2007-272-1); and U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. ______, filed on Nov. 15, 2007, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and James S. Speck, entitled “TRANSPARENT MIRROR-LESS (TML) LIGHT EMITTING DIODE,” attorney's docket number 30794.206-US-U1 (2007-273-2), which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/866,023, filed on Nov. 15, 2006, by Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura and James S. Speck, entitled “TRANSPARENT MIRROR-LESS (TML) LIGHT EMITTING DIODE,” attorney's docket number 30794.206-US-P1 (2007-273-1); all of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60866015 | Nov 2006 | US |