This application contains subject matter that is related to the subject matter of the following co-pending applications, each of which is assigned to the same assignee as this application, International Business Machines Corporation of Armonk, N.Y. Each of the below listed applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirely: Cache Late Select Circuit, Ser. No. 10/844,296 Filed May 12, 2004.
This invention relates to an improved set associative cache memory address comparator and more particularly to a pseudo dynamic address comparator.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, there art two paths in a set associative cache that are critical in terms of the time required to access the cache. One is the cache array access path and the other is the path that determines whether or not be memory address resides in the cache, the so-called hit logic path. For a red operation, in order to speed up the cache access, the hit logic operation and the cache array read operation are typically overlapped in times. That is, both operations are performed in parallel during the same clock cycle. As will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art, in a set associative cache, a tag memory stores at each addressable tag memory location the addresses of two or more (depending on the size of cache) blocks from main memory stored in the cache. A memory request address includes the cache tag memory address where the address of the requested data will reside in cache if it is in the cache. The addresses in the tag memory at that location are read out of the tag memory and compared with the memory request address. Static comparators and dynamic comparators have been proposed in the prior art for comparing die tag address with the requested address in set associative cache memories. However, the implementation of a fully static compare path is very complex and generally slow. Implementation of a fully dynamic compare path is complex both in circuit design and timing.
An object of this invention is the provision of a high performance address compare path in a set associative cache memory without the circuit complexity and timing complexity inherent in a dynamic address compare path.
Briefly, this invention contemplates the provision of a high performance pseudo dynamic address compare pa in which the address is divided into two or more address segments. Each segment is separately compared in a comparator comprised of static logic elements. The output of each of these static compares is then combined in a dynamic logic circuit to generate a dynamic late select output.
The subject matter that is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The invention will be explained in the context of a set associative cache with a 36-bit address. The advantages of the invention are particularly significant when implemented with a set associative cache with a large address, although the specific address size is not critical to its implementation. Referring now to
As illustrated in
More detail circuit function of
When the static inputs of din1, din2, and din3 are setup and become stable to be evaluated, clkl is turned active from a high to low level (i.e., clkl is active low). If all 3 din inputs are high, which designate a match of all the bits, the dynamic node “lat” will be pull low through the NFET stack. Output hit_out will then be driven high by the inverter/driver. If one or more of the din inputs are low, which designate non-matching of some of the bits, node “lat” will stay high and hit_out will remain in the standby low level. At the end of an active cycle, after the dynamic signal is properly captured by down stream logic, clkl is returned to high level again to reset the L2 latch and the hit_out output. The pulse width of the dynamic hit_out signal therefore is directly controllable by clkl timing.
The main critical path of the circuit is through din1-3. To provide alternative paths for ABIST (Array Built In Self Test) and LBIST (Logic Built In Self Test) testing, or for logic override (to generate a forced match disregarding the din inputs), a 3-way dynamic MUX is formed at node “lat” of the circuit. Input dmux is the logic override path which is controlled by the MUX select signal “sela”. If sela is high, node “lat” will be forced low when dmux input is asserted (by a high level). The third input path is the abist_ls leg used by ABIST/LBIST testing. During test mode operation, abist_ls is controlled by the ABIST/LBIST engine and can be used to generate a forced hit condition to verify down stream logic without going through the full compare function.
The high performance pseudo dynamic 36 bit compare topology as shown, or a variation of it, can be used in different logic applications.
At the beginning of the second cycle when clkg falls again, a local clock (clkl) is generated within the compare macro. It triggers the dynamic 3 way AND of din1-din3 (coming from the 3 12-bit segment comparators). If that is an address match (a hit), a late select signal (LS_out) is generated. This dynamic late select signal is sent over to the cache macro for a 1-out-of-n set output selection. The cache data output (cac_out) is available shortly after.
The key advantages of the pseudo dynamic comparator disclosed are two fold. First is its high speed performance. The total critical path delay from compare input to hit output, including a high power driver for driving large output loads, is only 5 inverter stages (3 stages in the 12-bit static segment compare, 2 stages in the final dynamic AND/latch/hit drive circuit). This is at least 2-3 stages shorter than a fully static implementation. Second is its circuit and timing simplicity. The first cycle operation is fully static. The second cycle uses a simple local clock (either a custom “clkl” or a modified C2 clock of a master-slave latch design) for triggering and controlling the dynamic circuit function. This clocking scheming is relatively simple when compared with a typical fully dynamic circuit implementation.
The capabilities of the present invention can be implemented in software, firmware, hardware or some combination thereof.
As one example, one or more aspects of the present invention can be included in an article of manufacture (e.g., one or more computer program products) having, for instance, computer usable media. The media has embodied therein, for instance, computer readable program code means for providing and facilitating the capabilities of the present invention. The article of manufacture can be included as a part of a computer system or sold separately.
Additionally, at least one program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying at least one program of instructions executable by the machine to perform the capabilities of the present invention can be provided.
The flow diagrams depicted herein are just examples. There may be many variations to these diagrams or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing orders or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a pan of the claimed invention.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention has been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall with the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4905188 | Chung et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4916696 | Funakubo | Apr 1990 | A |
5418922 | Liu et al. | May 1995 | A |
5499204 | Barrera et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515024 | Ghia et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535351 | Peng | Jul 1996 | A |
5584014 | Nayfeh et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588130 | Fujishima et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5680363 | Dosaka et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694362 | Zhang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699317 | Sartore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5740412 | Chan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765194 | McBride | Jun 1998 | A |
5778428 | Batson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802594 | Wong et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822338 | Lo | Oct 1998 | A |
5854943 | McBride et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6057709 | Hesley | May 2000 | A |
6076140 | Dhong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6226731 | Dhong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6317351 | Peng et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6356990 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6462998 | Proebsting | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507898 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512709 | Nakahara et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6928005 | Ramaraju et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6988164 | Wanzakhade et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7035127 | Adams et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7054184 | Chuang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7116569 | Hinojosa et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7447956 | Mamileti et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20030061446 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20070005891 | Campbell | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070090857 | Shau | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090063774 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |