The present invention relates to high power lasers, e.g., gas discharge lasers, utilized for the purposes of providing a light source for a working tool, e.g., an integrated circuit manufacturing lithography tool, containing optical elements sensitive to sustained exposure of high energy density fluences, particularly in very short wavelength of the light provided by the light source, e.g., DUV and VUV light, i.e., below about 300 nm in wavelength.
With regard to energy density state of the art lasers, e.g., applicants' assignee's soon to be introduced 7010 series of single chambered gas discharge laser systems, e.g., ArF, KrF and also including molecular fluorine laser systems can have a beam size of, e.g., 2.4 mm×15.5 mm, with a nominal pulse energy of, e.g., 10 mJ and a measures or calculated energy density on the order of about 70 mJ/cm2 of more. It is also well known that for certain applications of output laser light pulses from such lasers, particularly as the output wavelength decreases further and further into the DUV and VUV ranges, such high energy densities, while desirable from a dose and throughput perspective may be undesirable, e.g., from a peak power standpoint. Efforts have been made to address these issues, e.g., with pulse stretching, as discussed in the above referenced co-pending patent applications of applicants' assignee, to expand the output laser light pulses temporally to obtain a better TIS and, therefore, reduced peak pulse energy and reduced energy density with time. But this in turn adds the problem that the pulse stretching optics themselves need to be protected from high fluence. Furthermore, as laser outputs go to 60W and more, the laser light output pulse energy density is not reduced enough even with pulse stretching. It is therefore necessary to reduce pulse energy from, e.g., the above noted exemplary 70 or more mJ/cm2 to almost half of that, e.g., 35-40 mJ/cm2. Aspects of embodiments of the present inventions disclosed in the present application are meant to address these issues.
Turning now to
The OC assembly may include sealed adjustment screws 50, 52 for tip and tilt alignment of the optic 26, a beam seal flange 54 (shown in
A high power gas discharge laser for and method of producing laser output light pulses of high energy density is disclosed which may comprise a laser output light pulse beam optical track having a plurality of modular components arranged in order from a laser light source to a laser system output port and defining a laser output light pulse beam path having a single centerline axis; a first optical module and a second optical module in series in the optical track; a flexible interface element intermediate the first and the second optical module and rigidly attached to each of the first and second optical modules; and an optical element having a fixed position in the output laser pulse beam path comprising a rigid attachment to the first optical module, and extending within the flexible interface element. The optical element may comprise a beam expander, which may comprise a lensed beam expander. The optical element may comprise at least a part of a telescoping lens set forming an optical beam expander and the at least a part of a telescoping lens set comprises the entire telescoping lens set forming the optical beam expander or the at least a part of a telescoping lens set may comprise a first part of the beam expander cooperating with at least a second part located in a subsequent optical module in the laser output pulse beam optical track along the same optical centerline axis. A plurality of aligning mechanisms may align the optical element to a first and a second axis of the laser output pulse beam, the first and second axes being generally orthogonal to each other and orthogonal to the optical centerline axis, and also along the optical centerline axis. The optical element may have as one component the output coupler optical element, which may be flat on one side and cylindrical convex on the other or cylindrical concave on the one side, facing the resonant cavity and cylindrical convex on the other side. The optical element may be variable, forming, e.g., a cylindrical “zooming” magnification optic which may be manually or electromechanically driven and therefore, capable of active control.
a and 11B show a perspective and a side view, respectively, of a beam expander to output coupler junction, including in
Applicants have evaluated various possible options for addressing the above noted issues including the utilization of beam expansion to, e.g., reduce the laser output light pulse energy density from about 92 mJ/cm2 to about 50 mJ/cm2. applicants have determined that Maximum energy density scales closely with the beam magnification. Applicants have also determined that a 2×beam magnification (expansion) can deliver the reduced energy density desired, e.g., to about 50 mJ/cm2. Various options present themselves to accomplish this result, however, applicants have determined that the optimum solution would involve as little change to existing components and interfaces as well as the interfaces and spacing of the various components, e.g., in the existing laser frames as well as the production of a field upgrade module that is most easily implemented in the field to also back-fit the aspects of embodiments of the present invention discussed in the present application. Applicants propose this 2×beam expansion occur in the horizontal plane, e.g., in present embodiments of applicants' assignee's laser systems the narrow dimension of the output laser light pulse beam. It will be understood that the terms horizontal and vertical and front and rear and the like as used in the present application are for the purpose of illustration only and conform to the illustrative views as shown in the figures, but that there orientations may not be the same in actual implementation, e.g., the beam could be rotated in certain applications to have the narrower dimension aligned in a vertical direction as vertical is illustrated in the drawings. An optimum choice is to accomplish such beam expansion by using the available volumes and spacing without moving modules or modifying the shutter module and/or moving out the shutter module bulkhead from its existing position in the laser frame. Also keeping the beam expander separate from the output coupler optic has been chosen as a currently implementable satisfactory embodiment.
Applicants therefore propose a solution implementing a beam expander utilizing, e.g., a telescoping lens set and, e.g., cylindrical lenses to limit the telescoping effect to the one axis, e.g., the horizontal axis of the laser output light pulse beam. Keeping the output coupler optic separate, i.e., not using a, e.g., 20% reflecting optic on the output of the resonator cavity as also the front lens (front meaning the first lens the output laser light pulse beam encounters in the optical train path) in the telescoping beam expander, removes, e.g., sensitivity of divergence to lens separation, sensitivity of beam pointing and divergence to OC beam steering and alignment, and profile distortion and higher than expected energy densities due to parasitic modes, along with more difficult OC and telescope alignment issues.
Applicants propose the use of anamorphic expansion, which can have an impact on existing components, e.g., the wavemeter, e.g., included as part of a wavelength stability module (“WSM”), e.g., due to profile dependencies, pointing dependencies, in the energy monitor, e.g., in regard to fluence dependencies in the power density meter, and profile and divergence issues with respect to the coarse wavelength circuit and component mountings and the like in the existing laser output light pulse optical train path, including the fine wavelength circuit, e.g., regarding degradation of beam homogenization and imaging the diffractive diffuser pattern. An advantage of expansion with lenses over prism expanders is the lack of a variation in the centerline of the optical path.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Using an R1 of −30.5 for lens 92 and an R2 of 76.3 for lens 94 with a separation of 97.8 mm only a modest increase in magnification to 2.5 is achieved.
Tables I and II are illustrative of optical properties of various possible configurations. for the above describes possible designs, the first can provide for minimal optical changes to the existing design at the expense of some optical performance and higher sensitivity to mechanical/alignment issues, with also some position adjustments needed. The latter can have lower sensitivity to mechanical/alignment issues and provide for a straight drop in field replacement, without position change requirements and also good optical performance.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Applicants have determined that a design with the beam expanding telescopic lenses between the output coupler and the wavemeter and with an R1 of −12.7 mm and an R2 of 25.4 mm and a separation of 27 mm, resulting in a magnification of 2.0, the optics of the beam expander 90 are less sensitive to, e.g., mechanical errors in general. Using a less powerful lens and longer separation, e.g., by straddling the beam splitter in the wavemeter, could gives a better optical performance in certain respects, but with the disadvantages of straddling the beam splitter. With respect to peak to valley optical path length difference (“P-V OPD”) (# of waves) and geometric spot size of the RMS in the Y axis in radians, and the Strehl ratio, the front lens decentering, x rotation and front and rear lens z rotation exhibit a moderate sensitivity. Similarly, each of these output parameters exhibit minimal sensitivity for rear lens decentering and rear lens x axis rotation, and strong sensitivity to separation, and to incoming divergence, whereas for the geometric spot size RMS in the x axis in radians, this output is generally insensitive to any of these inputs except for a moderate sensitivity to front and rear lens z axis rotation and a strong sensitivity to incoming divergence.
It is, therefore, apparent that system performance according to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention is dominated by the incoming divergence. The worse case scenario mechanical tolerance stack up has little effect on system performance in terms of wavefront properties and divergence. No position adjustment, or acceptably minimal position adjustment, is needed, therefore, for mechanical mounting of the beam expander assembly body 110.
Turning now to
The beam expander housing assembly 110 may also be formed to comprise a beam expander assembly body side wall 160, a beam expander assembly body top wall 162, and a beam expander assembly body rear wall 168. The beam expander assembly 110 may have formed in it a front optical element indexed and wedged receiving slot 164, e.g., not perpendicular to the beam propagation direction, e.g., oriented at a 0.5° vertical angle to reduce direct back reflections of the beam into the resonator cavity, and a rear optical element indexed and wedged in receiving slot 166.
The optic forming the front lens 92, i.e., where the beam enters the beam expander 90, may be wedged into the slot 164 with relatively tight tolerance as will be understood by those skilled in the art, for positioning the front optical element axially along the optical path and also for the prevention of x and y axis rotation. similarly the optic forming the rear lens 94 may also be indexed/retained relatively tightly in the receiving slot 166 in the beam expander assembly body 112. Spring clips 192, 192′ hold the respective lens 92, 94 vertically and 170, 170′ and 180, 180′ respectively, hold the optics forming lens 92 and 94 against horizontal movement in the Y axis and spring clips (not shown) hold the respective optics 92, 94 against movement in the z axis. The spring clips 170, 170′, 180, 180′ and 192, 192′ are tightened by tightening screws 190. The top spring clamps (not shown) and bottom spring clamps (not shown) holding the optics 92, 94 against z axis movement, are tightened in place by tightening screws 194 and 194′ respectively. These combinations of elements may serve to index the position of the front and rear optics 92, 94. The optic receiving slots 164, 166 may have a plurality of vertically extending gripping slots, for gripping the optics 92, 94, e.g., with tweezers or other tool, in inserting or removing the optic 92, 94 from the respective slot 164, 166. The optics 92, 94 may have indexed plano-surfaces facing, respectively, the front and rear of the beam expander assembly body 112, which are indexed by the alignment pins 210 aligning the assembly body 112.
The beam expander assembly body 112 may also have an aperture 200 formed in the rear wall 166, which is generally of the size of the expanded beam, e.g., about 5 mm×15 mm. An aperture 124 in the cylindrical mounting plate 120 may be generally of the size of the beam entering the front optic 92, e.g., 2.5 mm×15 mm.
The bellows 60 (which is shown in most views for simplicity without its spiraling coils, may also be attached to the wavemeter at the wavemeter end of the bellows 60 by a bellows wavemeter end mounting plate 100, which may have a slot (not shown) to engage a bellows mounting flange 222 as shown, e.g., in
As shown in
Mounting screws 152 inserted through mounting screw openings 150 in the beam expander optics mounting plate 120 may also serve to align and also to attach the cylindrical mounting plate 120 to the bellows mounting plate 106.
A pair of front bellows mounting plate alignment pins 212 may serve to align the bellows mounting plate 106 to the cover 70. A bellows tube interlock limit switch 220 may serve to indicate to presence or absence of an installed beam bellows, e.g., to a purge control system (not shown). mechanical errors and provides optical performance that is very acceptable. Divergence in other possible designs can, e.g., smear out some of the divergence improvement by a 2×horizontal beam expansion according to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention, which exhibits relatively little effect from divergence. That is to say, an advantage of aspects of embodiments of the present invention includes the fact that the telescoping lens set does not have any effect (or has a very minimal effect) on the divergence of the beam, even while magnifying it. according to aspects of embodiments of the present invention there is no added (or very little added) divergence to the already relatively large intrinsic divergence of gas discharge laser output beams in general.
According to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention with a 2×beam expansion design, performance improvement by fine tuning R1 and R2 for the given usable space of about 50 mm between existing modules without having to move, e.g., the shutter bulkhead is of minimal impact. Also according to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention for, e.g., the 2× magnification changing the optical design from that described in the present application has little impact on improving significantly the optical performance. Thus the monolithic design can minimize mechanical tolerance stack up and also eliminate the need for any position adjustment on the beam expander assembly body 110, with adjustments in the optics within the assembly body 110 prior to installation of the body assembly 110 being sufficient.
In operation according to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention the bellows 60 interface mechanism to the output coupler cover 79 remains essentially the same as in the prior art output coupler plate design and facilitates a simple field upgrade kit with essentially the same output coupler cover 70 to bellows 60 interface and the beam expander as part of the output coupler plate 24 and bellows 60 assembly as it exists in the prior art assembly, and also with no change to the bellows 60 to wavemeter 62 interface design as it also exists in the prior art. The bellows continues to perform its normal function without interference from the nested beam expander 90, and essentially no additional space is needed between the output coupler plate 24 and the wavemeter 62 for the insertion of both the beam expander 90 and the bellows 60.
Turning now to
As shown in
Turning now to
An illustrative and simplified schematic for a translation system 250 may include, e.g., a lens mounting bracket 252 threadedly engaging a worm gear 254. The translation mechanism may be controlled by a controller (not shown), e.g., in a feedback control loop, using, e.g., a beam profile monitor at a location within a lithography tool for which the laser system is a light source, e.g., to control the energy density of the dose of exposure light provided through a mask to an integrated circuit wafer for resist exposure during an integrated circuit fabrication step. The moveable lens 240 may, therefore, be positioned in a desired location and not thereafter adjusted during normal operation of the laser system or some time period of normal operation of the laser system, e.g., during the fabrication of a particular batch of wafers. Also shown in
Turning now to
The moveable lens(es) may thereafter be reset to another location for a different batch of wafers, e.g., to accommodate different desired parameters of the light delivered at the wafer. Alternatively, the moveable mirror may be actively controlled, e.g., to have different positions for different pulses within a burst of pulses during burst mode operation of the laser system, based upon feedback control responding to changes in laser light parameter requirements at the wafer during such a burst. It will be understood that as used in the present application this distinction is between one of the moveable lens being not actively controlled during normal operation of the laser system and being actively controlled during normal operation of the laser, i.e., one being controlled relatively infrequently, if at all, and in response to relatively infrequent parameter change necessities, e.g., from batch to batch in the manufacturing process, and one being changed relatively rapidly, essentially in real time, in response to relatively rapid parameter change necessities, e.g., for different pulses in a burst, and including pre-programmed changes, which may also be feedback controlled, but, e.g., changing from burst to burst, and directing preselected desired moveable mirror positions during a given burst.
Turning now to
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that aspects of embodiments of the present invention result in improvements over the prior art, e.g., in increasing the stability of beam pointing and direction and alignment, and also in decreasing the sensitivity of the laser output light parameters to misalignment and thermal variations and the like, as compared, e.g., to laser output light pulse beam expanders using, e.g., beam expanding prisms.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the above description of aspects of embodiments of the present invention are meant to be illustrative only and the present invention should be considered to be defined only by the scope of the appended claims and not limited to the aspects of embodiments disclosed in the present application. Many changes and modifications could be made to aspects of embodiments disclosed in the present application and still remain within the scope of the amended claims. For example, aspects of embodiments of the present invention could be implemented as shown in the illustrative aspects of the present invention with all of the beam expander optics mounted between the presently existing output coupler and wavemeter in certain of applicants assignee's laser products, i.e., without repositioning any of the existing components in the laser system output optical train path. Such an embodiment necessitates modifications to existing components only to the extent of the changes illustrated above to the external optics (output coupler) assembly, e.g., to accommodate mating with and alignment with the beam expander assembly housing body and the interface with the wavemeter end of the bellows and thus also the wavelength stabilization module (“WSM”) interface. In addition, however, aspects of embodiments of the present invention could be implemented with the beam expander optics between the output coupler cover and the bellows, with consequent modifications to optical paths and surrounding components or with the front end lens in, e.g., a beam expander assembly housing as illustrated above and the real lens on the opposite side of the wavemeter beam splitter, e.g., as an output window to the wavemeter or intermediate the wavemeter and the shutter, with another set of consequent changes. These latter two options at the current time are believed less attractive by applicants due to the necessity for the changes noted in the present application as well as changes to the WSM mounting bulkhead and the shutter assembly. In addition, the utilization of a single field upgrade swap out change package, e.g., as illustrated in
In addition, the above aspects of embodiments of the present invention have been described in relation to expansion of the beam in one axis only. However, applications may present themselves where it is desirable to expand the beam in both axes in which event, e.g., added cylindrical lenses for such expansion may be employed. It will also be understood that rigidly mounted as used in the present application is meant to mean rigidly in the sense of any optical device or instrument in which optical elements are held in place, e.g., by slot tolerances and spring clips and like spring retaining devices, so that the optic in normal use is likely not to move, but the optic for many reasons is not intended to be so rigidly mounted or retained as to never, e.g., be removable for cleaning, repair or replacement. Other elements describes as rigidly attached, also are so attached during normal operation, or at least designed to be, but are not so rigidly attached as not to be removable and in fact are often designed to be removable for maintenance and repair reasons. Flexible as used in the present application will also be understood to mean, e.g., in the case of a bellows, the type of flexibility exhibited by the respective flexible element, e.g., a bellows being relatively more flexible in the longitudinal axis as the bellows expands and contracts, but also allowing through such expansion and contraction for some flexibility in axes, e.g., orthogonal to the longitudinal axis. It will also be understood by those skilled in the art that a fixed position in the optical path, as used in the present application is intended to mean fixed to the degree attainable by the tolerances of manufacturing of elements, including mounting and retaining elements such that the element is in a position that is determinable within some expected tolerances and remains relatively in the same position during proper operation and within the given tolerances. Extending within an element as used in the present application is intended to mean, as will be similarly understood, to occupy at least some available open volume within another element. It will also be understood that lensed as used in the present application means having at least one lens and expanding the beam while retaining a single optical centerline axis for the beam within the beam expander itself. Also, as used in the present application, telescoping lens set is intended to mean a lens set of any number of lenses that adds magnification to the beam and thus expands the beam size in at least one axis of the beam orthogonal to the optical path of the beam. It will also be understood by those skilled in the art that expanding the beam spatially or geometrically is intended to mean changing the shape and/or size of the beam in one or more axes and expanding the beam temporally is meant to indicate extending the duration of the effective portion of the pulses in the beam, e.g., to increase TIS as is well known in the art.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/384,967, filed on Mar. 8, 2003, Published on Nov. 27, 2003, Publication No. 2003/0219056, entitled HIGH POWER DEEP ULTRAVIOLET LASER WITH LONG LIFE OPTICS, Attorney Docket No. 2003-0005-02, and 10/631,349, filed on Jul. 30, 2003, Published on Mar. 25, 2004, Pub. No. 2004/0057489, entitled CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A TWO CHAMBER GAS DISCHARGE LASER, Attorney Docket No. 2003-0025-02, 10/425,361, filed on Apr. 29, 2003, published on Feb. 5, 2004, Pub. No. 2004/0022291, entitled LITHOGRAPHY LASER WITH BEAM DELIVERY AND BEAM POINTING CONTROL, Attorney Docket No. 2003-0040-01, and 10/000,991, filed on Nov. 14, 2001, entitled GAS DISCHARGE LASER WITH IMPROVED BEAM PATH, Attorney Docket No. 2001-0077-01, and is related U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,082, entitled VERY NARROW BAND LASER, issued to Ershov on Oct. 19, 1999, based on an Application Ser. No. 9/886,715, filed on Jul. 1, 1997, each of which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10384967 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10925746 | Aug 2004 | US |
Parent | 10631349 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10925746 | Aug 2004 | US |
Parent | 10425361 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 10925746 | Aug 2004 | US |
Parent | 10000991 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 10925746 | Aug 2004 | US |