1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a semiconductor memory device and method of fabricating same. More particularly, the present invention relates to capacitor fabrication techniques applicable to dynamic random access memories (“DRAMs”) capable of achieving an improved degree of integration and a lower number of defects within the DRAM.
2. State of the Art
A widely-utilized DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) manufacturing process utilizes CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) technology to produce DRAM circuits which comprise an array of unit memory cells, each including one capacitor and one transistor, such as a field effect transistor (“FET”). In the most common circuit designs, one side of the transistor is connected to external circuit lines called the bit line and the word line, and thither side of the capacitor is connected to a reference voltage that is typically one-half the internal circuit voltage. In such memory cells, an electrical signal charge is stored in a storage node of the capacitor connected to the transistor which charges and discharges circuit lines of the capacitor.
Higher performance, lower cost, increased miniaturization of components, and greater packaging density of integrated circuits are ongoing goals of the computer industry. The advantages of increased miniaturization of components include: reduced-bulk electronic equipment, improved reliability by reducing the number of solder or plug connections, lower assembly and packaging costs, and improved circuit performance. In pursuit of increased miniaturization, DRAM chips have been continually redesigned to achieved ever-higher degrees of integration which has reduced the size of the DRAM. However, as the dimensions of the DRAM are reduced, the occupied area of each unit memory cell of the DRAM must be reduced. This reduction in occupied area necessarily results in a reduction of the dimensions of the capacitor, which, in turn, makes it difficult to ensure required storage capacitance for transmitting a desired signal without malfunction. However, the ability to densely pack the unit memory cells while maintaining required capacitance levels is a crucial requirement of semiconductor manufacturing technologies if future generations of DRAM devices are to be successfully manufactured.
In order to minimize such a decrease in storage capacitance caused by the reduced occupied area of the capacitor, the capacitor should have a relatively large surface area within the limited region defined on a semiconductor substrate. The drive to produce smaller DRAM circuits has given rise to a great deal of capacitor development. However, for reasons of available capacitance, reliability, and ease of fabrication, most capacitors are stacked capacitors in which the capacitor covers nearly the entire area of a cell and in which vertical portions of the capacitor contribute significantly to the total charge storage capacity. In such designs, the side of the capacitor connected to the transistor is generally called the “storage node” or “storage poly” since the material out of which it is formed is doped polysilicon, while the polysilicon layer defining the side of the capacitor connected to the reference voltage mentioned above is called the “cell poly.”
An article by J. H. Ahn et al., entitled “Micro Villus Patterning (MVP) Technology for 256 Mb DRAM Stack Cell,” 1992 IEEE, 1992 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 12–13, hereby incorporated herein by reference, discusses the use of MVP (Micro Villus Patterning) technology for forming a high surface area capacitor.
As shown in
Although the MVP technique greatly increases the surface area of the storage poly, a drawback of using the MVP technique is that it can result in splintering problems (or slivers) in the storage node cell poly. As illustrated in
In a 64M DRAM, for example, even if there was only one out of 100,000 cells that had a failure due to a splintered macro villus bar/pin shorting with an adjacent storage cell, it would result in 640 failures or shorts in the DRAM. Generally, there are a limited number of redundant memory cells (usually less than 640 in a 64 M DRAM) within a DRAM which are available for use in place of the shorted memory cell. Thus, if the number of failures exceeds the number of redundant memory cells within the DRAM, the DRAM would have to be scrapped.
Therefore, it would be desirable to increase storage cell capacitance by using a technology such as MVP while eliminating polysilicon storage node splintering problems.
The present invention relates to a method of forming a high surface area capacitor, generally used in DRAMs. The present invention takes an opposite approach from the prior art in forming capacitors. Rather than forming bars or pins to increase the surface area, the present invention forms the opposite by etching holes or voids into the storage poly to form a honeycomb or webbed structure. Such a honeycomb/webbed structure forms a high surface area capacitor without bars or pins which could splinter and short out an adjacent storage cells, as discussed above.
Numerous methods could be employed to achieve the honeycomb structure of the present invention. One such method is a reverse MVP technique wherein an HSG polysilicon layer is grown on the surface of the storage poly and a mask layer is deposited over the HSG polysilicon layer. An upper portion of the mask layer is then removed, forming micro openings to expose the uppermost portions of the HSG polysilicon layer. The exposed HSG polysilicon layer portions are then etched, which translates the pattern of the exposed HSG polysilicon layer portions (which is generally the reverse pattern of the bars or pins which would be formed by the prior art method) into the storage poly. The capacitor is completed by depositing a dielectric material layer over the storage poly layer and depositing a cell poly layer over the dielectric material layer.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming that which is regarded as the present invention, the advantages of this invention can be more readily ascertained from the following description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
An HSG (HemiSpherical-Grain) polysilicon layer 122 is grown on the surface of the storage poly 120, as shown in
A mask layer 124, preferably silicon dioxide with a thickness of about 350 angstroms, is deposited over the HSG polysilicon layer 122, as shown in
As shown in
The exposed uppermost HSG polysilicon layer portions 122 are then etched by a dry anisotropic etch, with an etchant which is highly selective to the mask layer 124, preferably selective at a ratio of about 70:1 or higher, as shown in progress in
The etching translates the pattern of the exposed uppermost HSG polysilicon layer portions 122 into the storage poly 120. Any remaining mask layer material 124 is then removed, preferably by a wet or in situ etch. The etching of the storage poly 120 results in an etched structure 132 having convoluted openings 134, shown with the convoluted openings 134 greatly exaggerated in
It is, of course, understood that the present invention is not limited to any single technique forming the memory cell capacitor. For example,
It is, of course, understood that a single barrier layer could be employed. However, a typical barrier configuration is a layer of TEOS over the transistor gate members 108 and the substrate 102 followed by a BPSG layer over the TEOS layer. The TEOS layer is applied to prevent dopant migration. The BPSG layer contains boron and phosphorus which can migrate into the source and drain regions formed on the substrate during inherent device fabrication heating steps. This migration of boron and phosphorus can change the dopant concentrations in the source and drain regions which can adversely affect the performance of the memory cell.
As shown in
An HSG polysilicon layer 122 is selectively grow on the surface of the silicon plugs 150, as shown in
A mask layer 124 is deposited over the HSG polysilicon layer 122. The upper portion of the mask layer 124 is then removed to expose the uppermost portions (micro openings 126) of the HSG polysilicon layer 122, as shown in
The method of the present invention results in a unique honeycomb storage poly structure such that the storage poly has a highly webbed structure rather than free standing micro villus bar/pin structures, as discussed above. This webbed structure is essentially a substantially continuous, convoluted, maze-like structure defined by a plurality of interconnected wells extending in various directions in the X-Y plane. In other words, the maze-like structure extends in the X, Y, and Z coordinates, rather than essentially only in the Z coordinate in which a freestanding micro villus bar/pin structure with limited extent in the X-Y plane would essentially only exist. An exemplary illustration of a typical pattern in the X-Y plane is shown in
The integrated/webbed structure of the storage poly 120 in the X and Z coordinate is shown in
Having thus described in detail preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is to be understood that the invention defined by the appended claims is not to be limited by particular details set forth in the above description as many apparent variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit or scope thereof.
This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/833,974, filed Apr. 11, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,066,539 issued May 23, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5061650 | Dennison et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5149676 | Kim et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5170233 | Liu et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5254503 | Kenney | Oct 1993 | A |
5256587 | Jun et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5278091 | Fazan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5292677 | Dennison | Mar 1994 | A |
5340763 | Dennison | Aug 1994 | A |
5340765 | Dennison et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342800 | Jun | Aug 1994 | A |
5358888 | Ahn et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362666 | Dennison | Nov 1994 | A |
5405799 | Woo et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5407534 | Thakur | Apr 1995 | A |
5447878 | Park et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457063 | Park | Oct 1995 | A |
5459094 | Jun | Oct 1995 | A |
5491356 | Dennison et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5508223 | Tseng | Apr 1996 | A |
5538592 | Chen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5608247 | Brown | Mar 1997 | A |
5612558 | Harshfield | Mar 1997 | A |
5616511 | Hirota | Apr 1997 | A |
5623243 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5658381 | Thakur et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5686747 | Jost et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5723373 | Chang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5744388 | Chen | Apr 1998 | A |
5814549 | Wu | Sep 1998 | A |
5886375 | Sun | Mar 1999 | A |
5959326 | Aiso et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6060355 | Batra et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066872 | Okada et al. | May 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08833974 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 09172553 | US |