The overall application fields of this disclosure cover many areas including but not limited to solar photovoltaics, semiconductor microelectronics, micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), and optoelectronics. In the field of photovoltaics, this disclosure enables high-productivity fabrication of semiconductor-based sacrificial separation layers (made of porous semiconductors such as porous silicon), buried optical reflectors (made of multi-layer/multi-porosity porous semiconductors such as porous silicon), formation of porous semiconductor (such as porous silicon) for anti-reflection coatings, passivation layers, and multi-junction, multi-band gap solar cells (for instance, by forming a wider band gap porous silicon emitter on crystalline silicon thin film or wafer based solar cells). In the semiconductor field, it enables fabrication of sacrificial MEMS separation layers for die detachment, and shallow trench isolation (STI) porous silicon (using porous silicon formation with an optimal porosity and its subsequent oxidation). Other applications include the general fields of MEMS, including sensors and actuators, stand-alone, or integrated with integrated semiconductor microelectronics. Another range of applications pertains to high-surface area reaction test-vehicles for food and drug evaluation.
Crystalline silicon (including multi- and mono-crystalline silicon) is the most dominant absorber material for commercial solar photovoltaic (PV) applications, currently accounting for well over 80% of the solar PV market. There are different known methods of forming monocrystalline silicon film and releasing or transferring the grown semiconductor (e.g., monocrystalline silicon) layer. Regardless of the methods, a low cost epitaxial silicon deposition process accompanied by a high-volume, production-worthy low cost method of release layer formation are prerequisites for wider use of silicon solar cells.
Porous silicon (PS) formation is a fairly new field with an expanding application landscape. Porous silicon is created by the electrochemical etching of silicon wafers with appropriate doping in an electrolyte bath. The electrolyte for porous silicon is, for example: HF (49% in H2O typically), isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (and/or acetic acid), and deionized water (DI H2O). IPA (and/or acetic acid) serves as a surfactant and assists in the uniform creation of PS. Additional additives such as certain salts may be used to enhance the electrical conductivity of the electrolyte, thus reducing its heating and power consumption through ohmic losses.
Porous silicon has been used as a sacrificial layer in MEMS and related applications where there is a much higher tolerance for cost per unit area of the wafer and resulting product than solar PV. Typically porous silicon is produced on simpler and smaller single-wafer electrochemical process chambers with relatively low throughputs on smaller wafer footprints. Currently there is no commercially available porous silicon equipment that allows for a high throughput, cost effective porous silicon manufacturing. The viability of this technology in solar PV applications hinges on the ability to industrialize the process to large scale (at much lower cost), requiring development of very low cost-of-ownership, high-productivity porous silicon manufacturing equipment.
The present disclosure includes several embodiments for the batch processing of semiconductor (silicon in some embodiments) wafers to produce layers of porous semiconductor. Options for processing wafers of different shapes are presented, as well as different geometries advantageous for removing reaction gases, minimizing current leakage, and allowing for efficient wafer handling.
The features, nature, and advantages of the disclosed subject matter will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate like features and wherein:
Although the present disclosure is described with reference to specific embodiments, one skilled in the art could apply the principles discussed herein to other areas and/or embodiments without undue experimentation.
One novel aspect in the porous silicon system designs and processing methods of this disclosure lies in the batch parallel or multi-wafer processing architecture (batch stack architecture), similar to low-cost large batch wet chemical processing in benches or tanks. Presently available porous silicon tools rely on single wafer processing which characteristically burdens each wafer with high capital cost, serial cumulative processing times, relatively high electrical power consumption per wafer, and excessive wafer handling/sealing resulting in potential yield losses. The novel designs of this disclosure may reduce the capital cost by a factor approximately equal to or even greater than the number of wafers in each batch stack or array. Furthermore, the proposed design simplifies and reduces the capital cost of automation, reduces the tool footprint and enables downstream rinsing and drying.
The details about the individual components of the batch reactor are explained below.
Electrode Assembly/Electrode Chamber
The embodiment includes multiple architecture of the electrode assembly. The simple version is a solid electrode plate or a film etc. The inert electrode, such as diamond, graphite, platinum, or any other suitable material, does not corrode or etch during the electrochemical reaction. The second embodiment of the electrode assembly is a compartmentalized electrode chamber as shown in
Process Chamber
The process chamber holds the wafers and the electrolyte. The embodiment covers a wide range of process chamber dimensions to be able to create porous silicon on wafers of various geometries such as, but not limited to,. round, square, pseudo square(square with truncated corners) with rounder corners of varying degrees, as well as rectangular structures. Schematics of a 200 mm round and 165 mm square process chambers are shown in
The substrates involved may be essentially flat with varying degree of roughness or may be structured to form 3-dimensional patterns or structured with films that locally inhibit or enable porous silicon formation.
The process chambers are envisioned to be able to open in multiple sections, like a clam shell as shown in
Wafer Holders and Seal
A key requirement of the porous silicon process is to get substantially uniform porous silicon coverage on the full surface of the wafer, in some embodiments without any edge exclusions. This requires that no areas of wafer edge should be blocked or covered by any material that will prevent uniform electric field distribution and direct contact with the chemistry. One embodiment covers designs of mechanical features that can hold the wafer in place, but with zero to negligible contact points and blocking points on the wafer. As shown in
Another critical item is the choice of sealing material around the inner walls of the process chamber. The chamber walls will be lined with either a single layer of chemically inert (HF and organic resistant) insulating rubber or foam to provide a leak-free seal between the wafer edge and the chamber wall or the wafer holders. This is critical to prevent any chemical leak or electric field leakage in areas where the clam shell chamber walls lock.
Electric Field Optimization
The batch chamber design with the compartmentalized electrode chamber allows for electric modulation as well. The parameters such as electrode dimension, gap between electrode and closest wafer, gap from wafer to wafer, etc. can easily be modified to achieve the required uniformity for the electric field. Another key component is the spacers used to hold the membrane discussed above. The shape and patterns on the insulating spacer can also be modified to achieve the best electric field uniformity on the wafer. In circumstances where a varying electric field (thereby varying thickness or porosity of porous silicon) is required for the integrated process flow, the spacer design can be used to control the required electric field without changing the chamber design.
Fluid Flow and Hydrogen Vent
The chamber may be designed with fluid fill and vent ports 208 on the top of the chamber as shown in
One challenge with any porous silicon chamber is handling the hydrogen (H2) gas generated as a result of the anodic etch reaction. Hydrogen evolves from the surface of the wafer and each electrode. Since the bath is integral with electrical current transmission, H2 gas blocks current flow and supply of chemicals to the reaction surface, thus affecting porous silicon formation and continuity/uniformity. It is therefore critical to effectively and rapidly purge or sweep H2 byproducts from the surfaces of the wafer and electrodes. The wafer gap, fluid flow and design of the flow ports determine the effectiveness of the sweep. While sweeping H2 is fairly simple in terms of fluid mechanics, some consideration is warranted to mitigate the current loss from the fluid ports. Since the fluid lines are connected from wafer to wafer, depending on the geometry of the ports, line size and length, current can leak or bypass each wafer. Therefore, isolation of each port is advantageous. Also, for example, reducing the line diameter and increasing the length results in greater electrical resistance which reduces current losses or bypass losses. The current field lines are also influenced by the geometry adjacent to the wafer. So, large flow ports are less desirable compared to multiple small ports.
Bath in Bath Design
Typical wet chemical baths and process chambers use direct fluid fill/drain of the process chamber, wherein the chemical is directly pumped in the process chamber. This may require additional fill and drain times before the process can start and results in loss of productivity. This embodiment also covers a new design termed as “bath in bath” for the PS production as shown in
There are at least two embodiments of this bath in bath design:
a) Prefilled inner chamber that is immersed and lifted out completely into and from the bath; and,
b) Resident bath-in-bath with wafers being handled using auto loader that handles a batch of wafers and that places the batch into the lower holder part of the inside bath, then retreats.
In design a) the process chamber is pre-loaded with wafers and filled with the process chemicals. The entire assembly is then immersed into a larger bath which is pre-filled with the process chemical/electrolyte. The ports/vents on the top of the chamber allow for the electrolyte to fill the process chamber if and when the liquid level drops in the process chamber due to the reaction or other means of loss such as evaporation. Once the process is complete, the process chamber unlocks and is pulled out and the standby process chamber is immediately immersed in the larger bath minimizing loss in productivity due to wafer load/unload and chamber fill and drain. The larger bath is designed with its own pumping and recirculation system to maintain the required concentration and temperature. This methodology allows having multiple process chambers that can be introduced into the main bath without any loss in productivity.
In design b) the chamber is an integral part of the tool or the larger bath and always remains immersed in the main bath, but the chamber can open and close. It is envisioned that loading mechanisms such as robotic handlers can transfer a batch of n wafers into the base of the process chamber. After the wafer handlers have moved away from the process chamber, the outer walls of the process chamber close. This action not only secures the wafers, but also encloses the process chemicals in to the process chamber. The additional vents and ports allow the process chamber to be filled completely to the required level and maintain the same level throughout the process.
In any case, the top of the vent ports may be outside of the liquid, such that an electrically connecting path outside of the inner bath is avoided. This embodiment is shown in
The embodiments of design a) and design b) can be combined into a hybrid utilizing the loading mechanism from design a) and the sealing mechanism from design b). In this hybrid design, the bottom section of the chamber remains in the outer bath. The wafers are pre-loaded into the top (and side) portion of the chamber, which acts both as a handling mechanism and a partial chamber. The preloaded wafers are then immersed in the outer bath until the wafers make contact with the lower portion of the chamber. The chamber walls are then closed tight with an actuator mechanism ensuring a leak-proof chamber.
The batch porous silicon equipment design embodiments described above can be used to form either single-layer or multi-layer porous silicon on one or both sides of the wafers in the batch. Porous silicon can be formed on only one side of the wafers by applying the electrical current flowing in only one direction without a change in the current polarity. On the other hand, porous silicon can be formed on both sides of the wafers by alternating the current flow direction at least once or multiple times. The electrical current density (in conjunction with the HF concentration) controls the layer porosity. Thus, the layer porosity can be increased by increasing the electrical current density and conversely can be reduced by reducing the electrical current density. Multi-layer porous silicon can be formed by modulating or changing the electrical current level in time during the porous silicon formation process. For instance, starting the porous silicon process with a lower current density followed by a higher current density results in formation of a lower porosity layer on top of a higher porosity buried layer. A graded porosity porous silicon layer can be formed by, for instance, linearly modulating or varying the electrical current density in time. One can use this approach to form any porous silicon structure with one to many porous silicon layers with one to many porosity values.
Those with ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the disclosed embodiments have relevance to a wide variety of areas in addition to those specific examples described above.
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the claimed subject matter. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without the use of the innovative faculty. Thus, the claimed subject matter is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages that are included within this description be within the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/386,318 filed Sep. 24, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/688,495, filed Jan. 15, 2010, now Pat. No. 8,926,803 issued Jan. 6, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/145,018 filed Jan. 15, 2009 and this application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/774,667 filed May 5, 2010 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/175,535 filed May 5, 2009, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4043894 | Gibbs | Aug 1977 | A |
4070206 | Kressel et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4082570 | House et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4165252 | Gibbs | Aug 1979 | A |
4249959 | Jebens | Feb 1981 | A |
4251679 | Zwan | Feb 1981 | A |
4348254 | Lindmayer | Sep 1982 | A |
4361950 | Amick | Dec 1982 | A |
4409423 | Holt | Oct 1983 | A |
4427839 | Hall | Jan 1984 | A |
4430519 | Young | Feb 1984 | A |
4461922 | Gay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4479847 | McCaldin et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4626613 | Wenham et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4661212 | Ehrfeld et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4672023 | Leung | Jun 1987 | A |
4922277 | Carlson | May 1990 | A |
5024953 | Uematsu et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5073230 | Maracas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5112453 | Behr et al. | May 1992 | A |
5208068 | Davis | May 1993 | A |
5248621 | Sano | Sep 1993 | A |
5316593 | Olson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5348618 | Canham et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358600 | Canham et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5397400 | Matsuno et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5458755 | Fujiyama et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459099 | Hsu | Oct 1995 | A |
5494832 | Lehmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5538564 | Kaschmitter | Jul 1996 | A |
5616185 | Kukulka | Apr 1997 | A |
5645684 | Keller | Jul 1997 | A |
5660680 | Keller | Aug 1997 | A |
5679233 | Van Anglen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681392 | Swain | Oct 1997 | A |
5689603 | Huth | Nov 1997 | A |
5704992 | Willeke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5882988 | Haberern et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899360 | Mack et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928438 | Salami et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5951833 | Yamagata | Sep 1999 | A |
5994640 | Bansemir et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6058945 | Fujiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091021 | Ruby | Jul 2000 | A |
6096229 | Shahid | Aug 2000 | A |
6114046 | Hanoka | Sep 2000 | A |
6127623 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143629 | Sato | Nov 2000 | A |
6197654 | Swanson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204443 | Kiso et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225193 | Simpson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235147 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254759 | Rasmussen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258244 | Ohmi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6294725 | Hirschberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331208 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6399143 | Sun | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416647 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417069 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428620 | Yamagata et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429037 | Wenham et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441297 | Keller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448155 | Iwasaki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461932 | Wang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6517697 | Yamagata | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524880 | Moon et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534336 | Iwane | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551908 | Ukiyo et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555443 | Artmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566235 | Nishida et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602760 | Poortmans et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602767 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613148 | Rasmussen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624009 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645833 | Brendel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649485 | Solanki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653722 | Blalock | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664169 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6726815 | Artmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6756289 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6818104 | Iwasaki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6881644 | Malik et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6946052 | Yanagita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964732 | Solanki | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7014748 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022585 | Solanki et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026237 | Lamb | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7309658 | Lazovsky et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7368756 | Bruhns et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7402523 | Nishimura | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7745313 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7786376 | Nag et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7999174 | Moslehi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8035027 | Moslehi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035028 | Moslehi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8053665 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084684 | Moslehi et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8129822 | Moslehi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8168465 | Wang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8193076 | Moslehi et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8241940 | Moslehi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020079290 | Holdermann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020106874 | Iwane et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020153039 | Moon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168592 | Vezenov | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179140 | Toyomura | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008473 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017712 | Brendel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039843 | Johnson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030121773 | Matsumura et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124761 | Baert | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040021062 | Zaidi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035532 | Jung | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040173790 | Yeo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175893 | Vatus et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192044 | Degertekin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217005 | Rosenfeld et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235406 | Duescher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256238 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259335 | Narayanan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265587 | Koyanagi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050092600 | Yoshioka et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050160970 | Niira | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172998 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176164 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177343 | Nagae | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199279 | Yoshimine et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274410 | Yuuki et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281982 | Li | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021565 | Zahler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043495 | Uno | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054212 | Fraas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070884 | Momoi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105492 | Veres et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105912 | Konle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060177988 | Shea et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196536 | Fujioka | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231031 | Dings et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266916 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270179 | Yang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283495 | Gibson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286775 | Singh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070077770 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082499 | Jung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070187257 | Noji et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070251817 | Kido | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080047601 | Nag et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080128641 | Henley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157283 | Moslehi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080210294 | Moslehi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080264477 | Moslehi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277885 | Duff et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289684 | Moslehi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295887 | Moslehi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090042320 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090107545 | Moslehi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151784 | Luan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199901 | Trassl et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090260685 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090301549 | Moslehi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022074 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100116316 | Moslehi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144080 | Ong | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148318 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148319 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154998 | Ong | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175752 | Wang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100203711 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100267186 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267245 | Kamian et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279494 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294333 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294356 | Parikh et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300518 | Moslehi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304521 | Seutter et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304522 | Rana et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014742 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030610 | Kamian et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110108098 | Kapur e tal. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120882 | Crafts et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124145 | Moslehi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110265867 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110272013 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284068 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120012160 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017971 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017988 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021560 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028399 | Moslehi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120085278 | Moslehi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120103408 | Moslehi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120122272 | Rana et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125256 | Kramer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138455 | Miyaji et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120145553 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167819 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171804 | Moslehi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174860 | Moslehi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174861 | Wang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120178203 | Moslehi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180867 | Moslehi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192789 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120225515 | Moslehi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130020206 | Wuebben et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1188820 | Jul 1998 | CN |
41 41 083 | Jun 1993 | DE |
0 334 330 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0 597 428 | May 1994 | EP |
0 879 902 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1 024 523 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1 054 458 | Nov 2000 | EP |
01-026648 | Feb 1989 | JP |
H05-198558 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H06-151406 | May 1994 | JP |
06-260670 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H08-181103 | Jul 1996 | JP |
H10-275798 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H10-312990 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2002184709 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-299661 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2007-165844 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-324449 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008177563 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-300426 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO 9641368 | Dec 1996 | WO |
PCTEP1999008573 | May 2000 | WO |
WO02055760 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO2012040688 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2013126033 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alvin D. Compaan, Photovoltaics: Clean Power for the 21st Century, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2170-2180, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Berge, 150-mm Layer Transfer for Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3102-3107, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Oules et al, Silicon on Insulator Structures Obtained by Epitaxial Growth of Silicon over Porous Silicon, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1992, p. 3595, vol. 139, No. 12, Meylan Cedex, France. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Porous Silicon Layer Transfer Processes for Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2004, pp. 101-113, vol. 83, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Self-Standing Porous Silicon Films by One-Step Anodizing, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 2004, pp. C307-C314, vol. 151, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Leuven, Belgium. |
F.Duerinckx, et al, Reorganized Porous Silicon Bragg Reflectors for Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Oct. 2006, vol. 27, No. 10. |
Francois J. Henley, Layer-Transfer Quality Cleave Principles, SiGen, 2005, Jul. 8, pp. 1-6, The Silicon Genesis Corporation, San Jose, California. |
H.J.Kim, et al, Large-Area Thin-Film Free-Standing Monocrystalline Si Solar cells by Layer Transfer, Leuven, Belgium, IEEE. |
J.H.Werner et al, From Polycrystalline to Single Crystalline Silicon on Glass, Thin Solid Films, 2001, pp. 95-100, vol. 383, Issue 1-2, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
J.J. Schermer et al., Epitaxial Lift-Off for large area thin film III/V devices, phys. Stat. sol. (a) 202, No. 4, 501-508 (2005). |
Jianhua Zhao, et al, A 19.8% Efficient Honeycomb Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cell with Improved Light Trapping, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1999, vol. 46, No. 10. |
K. Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., Progress in epitaxial deposition on low-cost substrates for thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells at IMEC, Journal of Crystal Growth, 2006, pp. 438-441, vol. 287, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
K.L. Chopra et al., Thin-Film Solar Cells: An Overview, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, pp. 69-92, vol. 12, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Lammert et al., The Interdigitated Back Contact Solar Cell: A Silicon Solar Cell for Use in Concentrated Sunlight, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, pp. 337-342. |
MacDonald et al., “Design and Fabrication of Highly Topographic Nano-imprint Template for Dual Damascene Full 3-D Imprinting,” Dept. of Chemical Eng., University of Texas at Austin, Oct. 24, 2005. |
Martin A. Green, Consolidation of Thin-Film Photovoltaic Technology: The Coming Decade of Opportunity, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 383-392, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Martin A. Green, Silicon Photovoltaic Modules: A Brief History of the First 50 Years, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2005, pp. 447-455, vol. 13, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Nobuhiko Sato et al, Epitaxial Growth on Porous Si for a New Bond and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator, Journal of Electrochemical Society, Sep. 1995, vol. 142, No. 9, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Hiratsuka, Japan. |
P.J.Verlinden, et al, Sliver® Solar Cells: A New Thin-Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Technology, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3422-3430, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
P.R. Hageman et al., Large Area, Thin Film Epitaxial Lift Off III/V Solar Cells, 25th Pvsc, 1996, May 13-17, Washington D.C., IEEE. |
Photovoltaic Technology Research Advisory Council, A Vision for Photovoltaic Technology, 2005, pp. 1-41, European Commision Publications Office. |
Prometheus Institute, U.S. Solar Industry Year in Review: U.S. Solar Energy Industry Charging Ahead, (SEIA) The Solar Energy Industry Association. |
R.Brendel, et al, Sol-Gel Coatings for Light Trapping in Crystalline Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1997, pp. 391-394, vol. 218, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
Richard Auer et al, Simplified Transfer Process for High-Current Thin-Film Crystalline Si Solar Modules, 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, May 11-18, 2003, Osaka, Japan. |
Richard M. Swanson, A Vision for Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 443-453, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Rolf Brendel, A Novel Process for Ultrathin Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells on Glass, 14th European Photovolaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 1997, Barcelona, Spain. |
Rolf Brendel, Review of Layer Transfer Processes for Cystalline Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, The Japan Journal of Applied Physics, 2001, pp. 4431-4439, vol. 40, Part 1, No. 7, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, Japan. |
Rolf Brendel, Thin-Film Crystalline Silicone Mini-Modules Using Porous Si for Layer Transfer, Solar Energy, 2004, pp. 969-982, vol. 77, Elsevier Ltd., Germany. |
S. Hegedus, Thin Film Solar Modules: The Low Cost, High Throughput and Versatile Alternative to Si Wafers, Progress in Photvoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 393-411, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Takao Yonehara, et al, Epitaxial Layer Transfer by Bond and Etch Back of Porous Si, Applied Physics Letter 64, Apr. 18, 1994, vol. 16, American Institute of Physics. |
Toshiki Yagi, et al, Ray-Trace Simulation of Light Trapping in Silicon Solar Cell with Texture Structures, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2647-2656, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
R.B. Bergmann, Crystalline Si Thin-Film Solar Cells: a Review, 1999, pp. 187-194, vol. 69, Applied Physics A Materials Science and Processing, Springer-Verlag. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 27, 2012 issued in PCT/US2011/053183. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 26, 2013 issued in PCT/US2011/053183. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2013 issued in PCT/US2011/059177. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 10, 2013 issued in PCT/US2011/059177. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130180847 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61386318 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12688495 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 13244466 | US | |
Parent | 12774667 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 12688495 | US |