Embodiments relate generally to computer data systems, and more particularly, to methods, systems and computer readable media for replaying a time-period of historical data utilizing a computer system.
Historically, entities with large data production systems have maintained a test environment for running simulated real-time data or test data that is separate from a production environment for running production real-time data. Maintaining separate environments can prevent the contamination of current real-time data in the production system with historical data being used as real-time data in the test system. But maintaining two separate environments can increase system costs because hardware and software are replicated to build the simulation environment. There can also be additional staff costs for maintaining and synchronizing two separate environments. It is also unlikely that every user of the separate simulation system would want the same set of data or same configuration, requiring more staff time for setup and configuration. Also, because each user may desire a different simulation configuration, simulation resources would have to be reserved for each user. The core problem is that production and simulation systems typically require different code. A person is typically required to translate between the two systems. This process is error prone and leads to problems.
Embodiments were conceived in light of the above mentioned needs, problems and/or limitations, among other things.
Some implementation can include a computer system for executing query programs in a simulated mode comprising one or more processors, computer readable storage coupled to the one or more processors, the computer readable storage having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations. The operations can include establishing a digital connection between a query processor and a query client device. The operations can also include the query client device parsing a query program with one or more configuration instructions. The operations can further include receiving at the query processor, a query program with one or more configuration instructions from the query client device. The operations can include the query processor parsing the one or more configuration instructions. The operations can also include the query processor determining from the one or more configuration instructions from the query client device whether to initialize a simulation mode or a real-time mode. The operations can include when the query processor determines a simulation mode, initializing the computer system to operate in the simulated mode. The initializing can include extracting a simulation period from the one or more configuration instructions. The initializing can also include the query processor processing the query program with real-time code. The processing can also include requesting real-time data simulated from historical data.
The processing can include requesting non-action system generated historical data. The initializing can further include creating anti-look-ahead bias historical filters.
The processing can further include applying the anti-look-ahead bias historical data filters to the requested non-action system generated real-time data simulated from historical data.
The operations can include when a simulated real-time action system does not exist, constructing a simulated real-time action system. The operations can also include the query processor connecting to the simulated real-time action system. The operations can further include generating simulated real-time action system data.
The operations can include when a simulated real-time action system does not exist, constructing a simulated real-time action system. The operations can also include the query processor connecting to the simulated real-time action system. The operations can further include generating simulated real-time action system data.
The operations can include the query processor determining from the parsing of the one or more configuration instructions, a simulation clock cycle and a clock cycle speed. The operations can also include for each clock cycle for the simulation period, the query processor starting a simulated clock cycle, determining any data changes in the clock cycle, applying the data changes to an update propagation graph, and updating dynamic simulated real-time action system dynamic tables.
The operations can include wherein real-time data simulated from historical data includes sorting the data by sequence ID or by time stamp for only the current clock cycle prior to use.
Some implementations can include a method for initializing a computer system to execute query programs in a simulated mode comprising establishing a digital connection between a query processor and a query client device. The method can also include receiving at the query processor, a query program with one or more configuration instructions from the query client device. The method can further include the query processor parsing the one or more configuration instructions. The method can also include the query processor determining from the one or more configuration instructions from the query client device whether to initialize a simulation mode or a real-time mode. The method can include when the query processor determines a simulation mode, initializing the computer system to operate in the simulated mode. The initialization can include extracting the simulation period from the one or more configuration instructions. The initialization can also include the query processor processing the query program with real-time code. The processing can also include requesting real-time data simulated from historical data.
The processing can include requesting non-action system generated historical data. The initializing can further include creating anti-look-ahead bias historical filters.
The processing can also include applying the anti-look-ahead bias historical data filters to the requested non-action system generated real-time data simulated from historical data.
The method can further include when a simulated real-time action system does not exist, constructing a simulated real-time action system. The method can also include the query processor connecting to the simulated real-time action system. The method can include generating simulated real-time action system data.
The method can further include the query processor determining from the parsing of the one or more configuration instructions, a simulation clock cycle and a clock cycle speed. The method can also include for each clock cycle for the simulation period, the query processor starting a simulated clock cycle, determining any data changes in the clock cycle, applying the data changes to an update propagation graph, and updating dynamic simulated real-time action system dynamic tables.
The method can further include wherein real-time data simulated from historical data includes sorting the data by sequence ID or by time stamp for only the current clock cycle prior to use.
The method can also include replacing the simulated real-time action system with a second simulated real-time action system.
Some implementations can include a nontransitory computer readable medium having stored thereon software instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations. The operations can include establishing a digital connection between a query processor and a query client device. The operations can also include the query client device parsing a query program with one or more configuration instructions. The operations can further include receiving at the query processor, a query program with one or more configuration instructions from the query client device. The operations can also include the query processor parsing the one or more configuration instructions. The operations can include the query processor determining from the one or more configuration instructions from the query client device whether to initialize a simulation mode or a real-time mode. The operations can also include when the query processor determines a simulation mode, initializing the computer system to operate in the simulated mode. The initializing can include extracting a simulation period from the one or more configuration instructions. The initializing can also include the query processor processing the query program with real-time code. The processing can also include requesting real-time data simulated from historical data.
The processing can include requesting non-action system generated historical data. The initializing can further include creating anti-look-ahead bias historical filters.
The processing can also include applying the anti-look-ahead bias historical data filters to the requested non-action system generated real-time data simulated from historical data.
The operations can include when a simulated real-time action system does not exist, constructing a simulated real-time action system. The operations can also include the query processor connecting to the simulated real-time action system. The operations can further include generating simulated real-time action system data.
The operations can include when a simulated real-time action system does not exist, constructing a simulated real-time action system. The operations can also include the query processor connecting to the simulated real-time action system. The operations can further include generating simulated real-time action system data.
The operations can include the query processor determining from the parsing of the one or more configuration instructions, a simulation clock cycle and a clock cycle speed. The operation can also include for each clock cycle for the simulation period, the query processor starting a simulated clock cycle, determining any data changes in the clock cycle, applying the data changes to an update propagation graph, and updating dynamic simulated real-time action system dynamic tables.
Reference is made herein to the Java programming language, Java classes, Java bytecode and the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for purposes of illustrating example implementations. It will be appreciated that implementations can include other programming languages (e.g., groovy, Scala, R, Go, etc.), other programming language structures as an alternative to or in addition to Java classes (e.g., other language classes, objects, data structures, program units, code portions, script portions, etc.), other types of bytecode, object code and/or executable code, and/or other virtual machines or hardware implemented machines configured to execute a data system query.
The application host 102 can include one or more application processes 112, one or more log files 114 (e.g., sequential, row-oriented log files), one or more data log tailers 116 and a multicast key-value publisher 118. The periodic data import host 104 can include a local table data server, direct or remote connection to a periodic table data store 122 (e.g., a column-oriented table data store) and a data import server 120. The query server host 106 can include a multicast key-value subscriber 126, a performance table logger 128, local table data store 130 and one or more remote query processors (132, 134) each accessing one or more respective tables (136, 138). The long-term file server 108 can include a long-term data store 140. The user data import host 110 can include a remote user table server 142 and a user table data store 144. Row-oriented log files and column-oriented table data stores are discussed herein for illustration purposes and are not intended to be limiting. It will be appreciated that log files and/or data stores may be configured in other ways. In general, any data stores discussed herein could be configured in a manner suitable for a contemplated implementation.
In operation, the input data application process 112 can be configured to receive input data from a source (e.g., a securities trading data source), apply schema-specified, generated code to format the logged data as it's being prepared for output to the log file 114 and store the received data in the sequential, row-oriented log file 114 via an optional data logging process. In some implementations, the data logging process can include a daemon, or background process task, that is configured to log raw input data received from the application process 112 to the sequential, row-oriented log files on disk and/or a shared memory queue (e.g., for sending data to the multicast publisher 118). Logging raw input data to log files can additionally serve to provide a backup copy of data that can be used in the event that downstream processing of the input data is halted or interrupted or otherwise becomes unreliable.
A data log tailer 116 can be configured to access the sequential, row-oriented log file(s) 114 to retrieve input data logged by the data logging process. In some implementations, the data log tailer 116 can be configured to perform strict byte reading and transmission (e.g., to the data import server 120). The data import server 120 can be configured to store the input data into one or more corresponding data stores such as the periodic table data store 122 in a column-oriented configuration. The periodic table data store 122 can be used to store data that is being received within a time period (e.g., a minute, an hour, a day, etc.) and which may be later processed and stored in a data store of the long-term file server 108. For example, the periodic table data store 122 can include a plurality of data servers configured to store periodic securities trading data according to one or more characteristics of the data (e.g., a data value such as security symbol, the data source such as a given trading exchange, etc.).
The data import server 120 can be configured to receive and store data into the periodic table data store 122 in such a way as to provide a consistent data presentation to other parts of the system. Providing/ensuring consistent data in this context can include, for example, recording logged data to a disk or memory, ensuring rows presented externally are available for consistent reading (e.g., to help ensure that if the system has part of a record, the system has all of the record without any errors), and preserving the order of records from a given data source. If data is presented to clients, such as a remote query processor (132, 134), then the data may be persisted in some fashion (e.g., written to disk).
The local table data server 124 can be configured to retrieve data stored in the periodic table data store 122 and provide the retrieved data to one or more remote query processors (132, 134) via an optional proxy.
The remote user table server (RUTS) 142 can include a centralized consistent data writer, as well as a data server that provides processors with consistent access to the data that it is responsible for managing. For example, users can provide input to the system by writing table data that is then consumed by query processors.
The remote query processors (132, 134) can use data from the data import server 120, local table data server 124 and/or from the long-term file server 108 to perform queries. The remote query processors (132, 134) can also receive data from the multicast key-value subscriber 126, which receives data from the multicast key-value publisher 118 in the application host 102. The performance table logger 128 can log performance information about each remote query processor and its respective queries into a local table data store 130. Further, the remote query processors can also read data from the RUTS, from local table data written by the performance logger, or from user table data read over NFS.
It will be appreciated that the configuration shown in
The production client host 202 can include a batch query application 212 (e.g., a query that is executed from a command line interface or the like) and a real time query data consumer process 214 (e.g., an application that connects to and listens to tables created from the execution of a separate query). The batch query application 212 and the real time query data consumer 214 can connect to a remote query dispatcher 222 and one or more remote query processors (224, 226) within the query server host 1208.
The controller host 204 can include a persistent query controller 216 configured to connect to a remote query dispatcher 232 and one or more remote query processors 228-230. In some implementations, the persistent query controller 216 can serve as the “primary client” for persistent queries and can request remote query processors from dispatchers, and send instructions to start persistent queries. For example, a user can submit a query to 216, and 216 starts and runs the query every day. In another example, a securities trading strategy could be a persistent query. The persistent query controller can start the trading strategy query every morning before the market open, for instance. It will be appreciated that 216 can work on times other than days. In some implementations, the controller may require its own clients to request that queries be started, stopped, etc. This can be done manually, or by scheduled (e.g., cron) jobs. Some implementations can include “advanced scheduling” (e.g., auto-start/stop/restart, time-based repeat, etc.) within the controller.
The GUI/host workstation can include a user console 218 and a user query application 220. The user console 218 can be configured to connect to the persistent query controller 216. The user query application 220 can be configured to connect to one or more remote query dispatchers (e.g., 232) and one or more remote query processors (228, 230).
In operation, the processor 302 may execute the application 310 stored in the memory 306. The application 310 can include software instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations for historical data replay operations in accordance with the present disclosure (e.g., performing one or more of 602-626, 702-716 described below).
The application program 310 can operate in conjunction with the data section 312 and the operating system 304.
Large data-dependent systems such as real-time stock trading systems can receive, parse, and analyze a continuous large stream of data that can be stored into large historical data stores for further analysis or replay. A user may desire to replay all, or a subset of a particular trading day's data at a later point to determine if better trades could have been made or if the user's queries being used to make trading decisions were optimal or whether a modification to the queries would have provided better decision making results and thus better trades. Setting up a separate simulation environment that replays historical trading data is difficult and error-prone. Moreover, an incorrectly-provisioned simulation environment may not accurately represent the state of the data at any given point in time. Beyond concerns relating to either the fidelity or ease-of-use of a simulation environment, when separate query code is employed in simulation and production, costly errors can be made when translating from one environment to another. The user would rather have the option to submit a simple command, well within a basic user's query writing skillset, and submit that command to the computer system, such as RunSimulation 2016 Mar. 3. A RunSimulation 2016 Mar. 3 command could alert the system that the user desires that the user's script be executed using the existing computer system but with data collected from 2016 Mar. 3 as simulated real-time input instead of current real-time data.
It will be appreciated that real-time data can be collected at different rates that can depend on the availability of data from the external real-time data source 401 and the real-time action system 404.
It will also be appreciated that the computer system can be a live production computer system or the computer system can be a separate system from the live production computer system that is running the same code. It will also be appreciated that the historical data 414 can be the same source for both types of systems.
It will be appreciated that the real-time data received from an external real-time data source 401 in
It will also be appreciated that a real-time action system 404 can be an external system that can communicate with a query processor 408 to carry out user requests. For example, a real-time action system 404 can be a stock trading entity that can receive buy or sell commands for a particular stock from the query processor 408 based on a user query script from a query client 410. The simulated real-time action system 504 can fill stock orders in a manner that is consistent with the observed behavior of the real-time action system, for example the user's simulated portfolio being modified in the same manner as the real-time action system.
It will further be appreciated that the query processor 408 can access a simulated results and state log 508 to provide a query with knowledge of how the query has impacted simulated reality. For example, changes in position data updates as a result of simulated trades.
At 604, the computer system can determine whether the query script designates a real-time or simulation mode. For example, a RunSimulation 2010 Apr. 15 2016 Mar. 3 myscript.extension can be interpreted as designating a simulation mode and a Run myscript.extension can be interpreted as designating a real-time mode. If a real-time mode is designated, processing continues to 606. If a simulation mode is designated, processing continues to 612. The 606 path is discussed first before returning to discuss the 612 path.
At 606, the computer system can connect to a real-time action system 606. Such a connection is shown in
At 608, a query processor 408 executes the received query script using the real-time system code. For example, if the query script contains t3=t1.where(“SYM=‘AAPL’”), the query processor 408 can build an update graph containing a t1 dynamic table object node, a where operation child node, and a resultant t3 dynamic table object child node. Processing continues to 610.
At 610, a query processor 408 retrieves the historical data 414 and real-time data 402 without modifying the data to complete the query script. For example, if the query script contains t3=t1.join(t2, “SYM”), and t1 is a table object with data based on historical data 414 and a t2 object is a dynamic table being updated every second with real-time data 402, the query processor 408 can retrieve data from real-time data 402 and historical data 414 to complete the join to create the dynamic t3 table object. In this example, the dynamic t3 table object will continue to be updated as new data is received from the real-time data 402 by listening for changes to the parent table t2. The discussion now returns to the simulation path from 604 to the processing at 612.
At 612, the query processor 408 parses the query script command submission in order to identify the time period to simulate. For example, a “RunSimulation 2010 Apr. 15 2016 Mar. 3 myscript.extension” can be parsed to obtain a period starting with 2010 Apr. 15 and ending with 2016 Mar. 3.
It will be appreciated that a client device can also parse a query script command prior to submission. Processing continues to 614.
At 614, the query processor 408 creates anti-look-ahead bias historical data filters. For example, if the simulation period is from 2010 Apr. 15 to 2016 Mar. 3, the filters can be created to keep the processing of data starting with 2010 Apr. 15 from looking ahead to data from a later time until that later time clock cycle has occurred.
It will be appreciated that an anti-look ahead bias filter can prevent access to historical data that has not yet occurred in the simulation and can operate on a gross time-period, for example, one day. Processing continues to 616.
At 616, the query processor 408 creates simulated real-time data historical filters for the real-time data simulated from historical data 502. The historical filters can be applied to each day of simulated time. For example, if the simulation period is from 2010 Apr. 15 to 2016 Mar. 3, a real-time data historical filter can be configured for each of the days from 2010 Apr. 15 to 2016 Mar. 3 to confine the retrieval of data from the historical data 414 to data date-timestamps for a particular time of the simulation between 2010 Apr. 14 and 2016 Mar. 4 in order to keep the user from accessing data from a point in time beyond the current simulated time, which would be future data in the simulation.
It will be appreciated that simulated real-time data historical filters can be more fine-grained than an anti-look ahead bias filter. For example, a simulated real-time data historical filter can be for a time-period within a particular day time-period for preventing a user from accessing data from a later time in a same simulation day (e.g., preventing access to a 4 o'clock exchange closing price on a stock when the current simulation time is at 9:30 a.m.). The simulated real-time historical filter can permit the system to trickle in data as the simulation clock advances. Processing continues to 618.
At 618, a query processor 408 constructs a simulated real-time action system 504 if one does not already exist. If a simulated real-time action system 504 already exists, the query processor 408 can connect to the simulated real-time action system 504.
It will be appreciated that a simulated real-time action system can be replaced by another simulated real-time action system that may have different characteristics. Processing continues to 620.
At 620, a query processor 408 executes the received query script using the production system code. For example, if the query script contains t3=t1.where(“SYM=‘AAPL’”), the query processor 408 can build an update graph containing a t1 dynamic table object node, a where operation node, and a resultant t3 dynamic table object node. The update graph is now set up to permit each table object to update as simulated new data is processed through the running of the simulation.
It will be appreciated that the query processor 408 is executing the same code in the simulation path from 604 as the query processor 408 uses in the execution of the query script in real-time mode in 608.
It will be appreciated that a difference is not found in the source of code being executed but instead in the source for real-time data during the simulation, and in the historical data in the sense that an anti-look-ahead filter can be applied. Processing continues to 622.
At 622, if a non-action system generated historical table is requested by a query processor 408 to execute the query script, the anti-look-ahead bias historical filters are applied before returning the query results. For example, if t1 is a table object populated with data from historical data 414 as part of the simulation, and the simulated time period is from 2010 Apr. 15 to 2016 Mar. 3 and the simulation clock is at 2010 Apr. 15, the anti-look-ahead bias historical filters are applied to keep any of the historical data 414 with a date-timestamp after 2010 Apr. 14 from being accessed as historical data because in the simulation the data after 2010 Apr. 14 does not yet exist. Processing continues to 624.
At 624, if a real-time table is requested by a query processor 408 to execute a query script, the simulated real-time data historical filter is applied to the historical data 414. The filtered historical data can then be converted into real-time data simulated from historical data 502 to be used in the simulation as real-time data. The retrieved data can be optionally sorted, for example, by sequence ID or time stamp in order to remedy any situations where the data was not stored in the same order it was generated in real-time. For example, if t2 is a dynamic table object populated with simulated real-time data as part of the simulation, the query processor 408 can update the t2 table object as the simulation ticks through the clock cycles with the corresponding slice of simulated real-time data from the historical data 414.
It will be appreciated that the optional sort can be performed on only the data that is necessary to perform the next clock cycle prior to the start of the clock cycle. Processing continues to 626.
At 626, if a real-time table from the simulated real-time action system is requested by a query processor 408 to execute a query script, the relevant real-time table is retrieved from a location specified by the simulated real-time action system. For example, the location may be a handle to an in-memory table, a handle to an on disk table, etc. The simulated real-time action system tables typically contain state information for the simulated real-time action system such as current position sizes, current orders in the market, and the like. The tables are dynamic and can depend on the history of a particular real-time action system instance.
It will be appreciated that a role of the simulated real-time action system 504 can be to provide action system results to a user and accept user requests from the query script through interactions with a query processor 408. For example, if the real-time action system 404 is a stock trading system capable of accepting and acting on buy and sell orders, a user, who has an account with the stock trading system, can instruct the stock trading system through the query processor 408 to purchase a thousand shares of AAPL stock at limit price of $100 a share. If the conditions are met and the stock trading system completes the requested trade, the stock trading system adds the purchased stock shares to the user's portfolio that is maintained by the stock trading system and informs the user through the query processor 408 that the transaction has completed and reports the total number of shares (position) of AAPL that the user has in the portfolio. The position data can also be stored in the historical data 414 after being received as real-time data 402. During the simulation, the positions of the user can be rolled back to the positions at the start of the simulation time and then increased or decreased by actions taken by the user's query scripts during the simulation while at the same time stripping out the orders that were made and completed during the actual real-time period. The positions can also be set to zero or another arbitrary number to start the simulation.
At 702, the speed of the simulated clock cycle is determined by the query processor 408. For example, the user can submit a parameter with the RunSimulation program or GUI that specifies the clock cycle timing in relation to real time. The user can choose to run the simulation in slow motion or faster than one second of simulation per one second of measured time. The user can run the simulation as fast as the system can process the data cycles. Processing continues to 704.
At 704, the query processor 408 begins the simulated clock cycle. Processing continues to 706.
At 706, data of real-time data simulated from historical data 502 corresponding to the time parameters of the current simulated clock cycle is loaded into each simulated real-time data source. For example, if dynamic table objects t1, t2, and t3 are created from real-time data simulated from historical data 502, then a update propagation graph node representation is created for each of the table objects in a query processor memory. Then these table objects can be used to determine which data of real-time data simulated from historical data 502 are needed for the current simulated clock cycle.
It will be appreciated that each of the dynamic (real-time) table objects in existence at the time of the simulated time period can contain an index in the update propagation graph that can provide a mapping to the real-time data simulated from historical data 502 stores. Processing continues to 708.
At 708, each of the data loaded in 706 can be optionally sorted by a sequence ID or time stamp associated with each row of data.
It will be appreciated that sorting may not be needed if data was written to a historical data 414 store in the same order as it was created. The sorting can be applied for instances where data can be written to the historical data 414 out of order. Sorting may also not be required if a user script does not require the results to be sorted. Processing continues to 710.
At 710, the possibly ordered data for the clock cycle are processed through the update propagation graph as data changes. For example, if dynamic table objects t1, t2, and t3 are dynamic table objects represented in a update propagation graph with table object t2 being a child of table object t1 and table object t3 being a child of table object t2, the processing of the data through the update propagation graph starts with the parent table object node, t1. To further the example, table object t1 is a dynamic table object that can contain all the rows before the current simulation time from a real-time data source stored on a fileserver; table object t2 is a dynamic table object that can contain all of the rows from table object t1 that contain the AAPL stock symbol; and table object t3 is a dynamic table object that can contain all of the rows from t2 that have a stock price greater than $100. At the start of the clock cycle, all of the new rows from the data that were added to the stored data source can be added to the t1 table object because the t1 table object is a dynamic table that can be updated when its data source is updated. Because table object t2, a child table object of table object t1, can listen for updates to table object t1, when updates occur to table object t1, table object t2 can be updated. And because table object t3, a child object of table object t2, can listen for updates to table object t2, when updates occur to table object t2, table object t3 can be updated. Processing continues to 711.
At 711, update simulated real-time action system. Processing continues to 712.
At 712, results from simulated actions taken by a simulated real-time action system 504 in response to user's query scripts submitted to a query processor 408 and passed onto the simulated real-action system 504 can be written to simulated results and state logs 508. For example, if the query processor 408 determines the conditions from the query script are met for following a strategy for purchasing stock shares, a request with or without limitation instructions can be sent by the query processor 408 to a simulated real-time action system 504 to purchase the stock shares. The simulated real-time action system 504 can then look at the real-time simulated conditions at the simulation time of the request and determine if the request can be filled or not filled. The determination of the simulated real-time action system 504 can then be written to a simulated results and state logs 508 for further analysis as to why the trade was filled or why the trade was not filled. The results and state logs 508 can also be analyzed for the profitability of the decisions, and also provide feedback to the simulation query as it continues. Processing continues to 714.
At 714, dynamic position tables from a simulated real-time action system 504 can be updated with the outcome of a transaction. For example, if the simulated real-time action system is successful in purchasing a thousand shares of stock for the user, the user's portfolio is updated with the new position data.
It will be appreciated that simulated real-time action system tables derived from historical tables can be transformed according to instructions or specifications from the real time action system. Processing continues to 716.
At 716, if the clock cycle is still within the simulation time-period, the process proceeds to the next clock cycle and returns to step 704 to repeat steps 704 through 716. The loop can continue until the end of the simulation time-period is reached.
It will be appreciated that multiple period-centric loops can be implemented for a simulation time-period such as multiple day-centric loops that can extend over several days. For example, a 15-day simulation period can be broken down into 15 separate one-day simulations. It will also be appreciated breaking a simulation period into multiple separate simulations can affect a maintenance of continual state and feedback.
It will be appreciated that the modules, processes, systems, and sections described above can be implemented in hardware, hardware programmed by software, software instructions stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium or a combination of the above. A system as described above, for example, can include a processor configured to execute a sequence of programmed instructions stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium. For example, the processor can include, but not be limited to, a personal computer or workstation or other such computing system that includes a processor, microprocessor, microcontroller device, or is comprised of control logic including integrated circuits such as, for example, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), graphics processing unit (GPU), or the like. The instructions can be compiled from source code instructions provided in accordance with a programming language such as Java, C, C++, C#.net, assembly or the like. The instructions can also comprise code and data objects provided in accordance with, for example, the Visual Basic™ language, a specialized database query language, or another structured or object-oriented programming language. The sequence of programmed instructions, or programmable logic device configuration software, and data associated therewith can be stored in a nontransitory computer-readable medium such as a computer memory or storage device which may be any suitable memory apparatus, such as, but not limited to ROM, PROM, EEPROM, RAM, flash memory, disk drive and the like.
Furthermore, the modules, processes systems, and sections can be implemented as a single processor or as a distributed processor. Further, it should be appreciated that the steps mentioned above may be performed on a single or distributed processor (single and/or multi-core, or cloud computing system). Also, the processes, system components, modules, and sub-modules described in the various figures of and for embodiments above may be distributed across multiple computers or systems or may be co-located in a single processor or system. Example structural embodiment alternatives suitable for implementing the modules, sections, systems, means, or processes described herein are provided below.
The modules, processors or systems described above can be implemented as a programmed general purpose computer, an electronic device programmed with microcode, a hard-wired analog logic circuit, software stored on a computer-readable medium or signal, an optical computing device, a networked system of electronic and/or optical devices, a special purpose computing device, an integrated circuit device, a semiconductor chip, and/or a software module or object stored on a computer-readable medium or signal, for example.
Embodiments of the method and system (or their sub-components or modules), may be implemented on a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a programmed microprocessor or microcontroller and peripheral integrated circuit element, an ASIC or other integrated circuit, a digital signal processor, a hardwired electronic or logic circuit such as a discrete element circuit, a programmed logic circuit such as a PLD, PLA, FPGA, PAL, or the like. In general, any processor capable of implementing the functions or steps described herein can be used to implement embodiments of the method, system, or a computer program product (software program stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium).
Furthermore, embodiments of the disclosed method, system, and computer program product (or software instructions stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium) may be readily implemented, fully or partially, in software using, for example, object or object-oriented software development environments that provide portable source code that can be used on a variety of computer platforms. Alternatively, embodiments of the disclosed method, system, and computer program product can be implemented partially or fully in hardware using, for example, standard logic circuits or a VLSI design. Other hardware or software can be used to implement embodiments depending on the speed and/or efficiency requirements of the systems, the particular function, and/or particular software or hardware system, microprocessor, or microcomputer being utilized. Embodiments of the method, system, and computer program product can be implemented in hardware and/or software using any known or later developed systems or structures, devices and/or software by those of ordinary skill in the applicable art from the function description provided herein and with a general basic knowledge of the software engineering and computer networking arts.
Moreover, embodiments of the disclosed method, system, and computer readable media (or computer program product) can be implemented in software executed on a programmed general purpose computer, a special purpose computer, a microprocessor, or the like.
It is, therefore, apparent that there is provided, in accordance with the various embodiments disclosed herein, methods, systems and computer readable media for simulated replay of data using a computer system.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,974, entitled “DATA PARTITIONING AND ORDERING” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,975, entitled “COMPUTER DATA SYSTEM DATA SOURCE REFRESHING USING AN UPDATE PROPAGATION GRAPH” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,979, entitled “COMPUTER DATA SYSTEM POSITION-INDEX MAPPING” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,980, entitled “SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LOGGING OF COMPLEX REMOTE QUERY PROCESSOR QUERY OPERATIONS” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,983, entitled “DISTRIBUTED AND OPTIMIZED GARBAGE COLLECTION OF REMOTE AND EXPORTED TABLE HANDLE LINKS TO UPDATE PROPAGATION GRAPH NODES” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,984, entitled “COMPUTER DATA SYSTEM CURRENT ROW POSITION QUERY LANGUAGE CONSTRUCT AND ARRAY PROCESSING QUERY LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,985, entitled “PARSING AND COMPILING DATA SYSTEM QUERIES” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,987, entitled “DYNAMIC FILTER PROCESSING” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,988, entitled “DYNAMIC JOIN PROCESSING USING REAL-TIME MERGED NOTIFICATION LISTENER” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,990, entitled “DYNAMIC TABLE INDEX MAPPING” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,991, entitled “QUERY TASK PROCESSING BASED ON MEMORY ALLOCATION AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,993, entitled “A MEMORY-EFFICIENT COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC UPDATING OF JOIN PROCESSING” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,995, entitled “QUERY DISPATCH AND EXECUTION ARCHITECTURE” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,996, entitled “COMPUTER DATA DISTRIBUTION ARCHITECTURE” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,997, entitled “DYNAMIC UPDATING OF QUERY RESULT DISPLAYS” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,998, entitled “DYNAMIC CODE LOADING” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/154,999, entitled “IMPORTATION, PRESENTATION, AND PERSISTENT STORAGE OF DATA” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,001, entitled “COMPUTER DATA DISTRIBUTION ARCHITECTURE” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,005, entitled “PERSISTENT QUERY DISPATCH AND EXECUTION ARCHITECTURE” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,006, entitled “SINGLE INPUT GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE CONTROL ELEMENT AND METHOD” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,007, entitled “GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE DISPLAY EFFECTS FOR A COMPUTER DISPLAY SCREEN” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,009, entitled “COMPUTER ASSISTED COMPLETION OF HYPERLINK COMMAND SEGMENTS” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,010, entitled “HISTORICAL DATA REPLAY UTILIZING A COMPUTER SYSTEM” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,011, entitled “DATA STORE ACCESS PERMISSION SYSTEM WITH INTERLEAVED APPLICATION OF DEFERRED ACCESS CONTROL FILTERS” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/155,012, entitled “REMOTE DATA OBJECT PUBLISHING/SUBSCRIBING SYSTEM HAVING A MULTICAST KEY-VALUE PROTOCOL” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 14, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
While the disclosed subject matter has been described in conjunction with a number of embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations would be, or are, apparent to those of ordinary skill in the applicable arts. Accordingly, Applicants intend to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents and variations that are within the spirit and scope of the disclosed subject matter.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/161,813, entitled “Computer Data System” and filed on May 14, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5335202 | Manning et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5452434 | Macdonald | Sep 1995 | A |
5469567 | Okada | Nov 1995 | A |
5504885 | Alashqur | Apr 1996 | A |
5530939 | Mansfield et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568632 | Nelson | Oct 1996 | A |
5673369 | Kim | Sep 1997 | A |
5701461 | Dalal et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701467 | Freeston | Dec 1997 | A |
5764953 | Collins | Jun 1998 | A |
5787428 | Hart | Jul 1998 | A |
5806059 | Tsuchida et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5859972 | Subramaniam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875334 | Chow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878415 | Olds | Mar 1999 | A |
5890167 | Bridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899990 | Maritzen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920860 | Maheshwari et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943672 | Yoshida | Aug 1999 | A |
5960087 | Tribble et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991810 | Shapiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999918 | Williams | Dec 1999 | A |
6006220 | Haderle et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6032144 | Srivastava et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032148 | Wilkes | Feb 2000 | A |
6038563 | Bapat et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058394 | Bakow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061684 | Glasser et al. | May 2000 | A |
6138112 | Slutz | Oct 2000 | A |
6160548 | Lea et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6266669 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289357 | Parker | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304876 | Isip | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317728 | Kane | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327702 | Sauntry et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336114 | Garrison | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353819 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367068 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389414 | Delo et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389462 | Cohen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438537 | Netz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446069 | Yaung et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460037 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473750 | Petculescu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487552 | Lei et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496833 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505189 | Au et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505241 | Pitts | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510551 | Miller | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530075 | Beadle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538651 | Hayman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546402 | Beyer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553375 | Huang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584474 | Pereira | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6604104 | Smith | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618720 | Au et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631374 | Klein et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640234 | Coffen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6697880 | Dougherty | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701415 | Hendren | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714962 | Helland et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725243 | Snapp | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732100 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745332 | Wong et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748374 | Madan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748455 | Hinson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760719 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775660 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785668 | Polo et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795851 | Noy | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816855 | Hartel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820082 | Cook et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829620 | Michael et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832229 | Reed | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6851088 | Conner et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6882994 | Yoshimura et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6925472 | Kong | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934717 | James | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947928 | Dettinger et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6983291 | Cochrane et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6985895 | Witkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985899 | Chan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985904 | Kaluskar et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7020649 | Cochrane et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024414 | Sah et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031962 | Moses | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058657 | Berno | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7089228 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089245 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096216 | Anonsen | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099927 | Cudd et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103608 | Ozbutun et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110997 | Turkel et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7127462 | Hiraga et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146357 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149742 | Eastham et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7167870 | Avvari et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171469 | Ackaouy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174341 | Ghukasyan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181686 | Bahrs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188105 | Dettinger et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200620 | Gupta | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216115 | Walters et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7216116 | Nilsson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7219302 | O'Shaughnessy et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7225189 | McCormack et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7254808 | Trappen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257689 | Baird | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7272605 | Hinshaw et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7308580 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316003 | Dulepet et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7330969 | Harrison et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333941 | Choi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343585 | Lau et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7350237 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7380242 | Alaluf | May 2008 | B2 |
7401088 | Chintakayala et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426521 | Harter | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430549 | Zane et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433863 | Zane et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447865 | Uppala et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478094 | Ho et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7484096 | Garg et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7493311 | Cutsinger et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7506055 | McClain et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529734 | Dirisala | May 2009 | B2 |
7529750 | Bair | May 2009 | B2 |
7542958 | Warren et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552223 | Ackaouy et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7610351 | Gollapudi et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7620687 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624126 | Pizzo et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627603 | Rosenblum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7661141 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664778 | Yagoub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672275 | Yajnik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680782 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711716 | Stonecipher | May 2010 | B2 |
7711740 | Minore et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7747640 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761444 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7797356 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7827204 | Heinzel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827403 | Wong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827523 | Ahmed et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7882121 | Bruno et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882132 | Ghatare | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904487 | Ghatare | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908259 | Branscome et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908266 | Zeringue et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930412 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7966311 | Haase | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966312 | Nolan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966343 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970777 | Saxena et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979431 | Qazi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984043 | Waas | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8019795 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027293 | Spaur et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032525 | Bowers et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8037542 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046394 | Shatdal | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046749 | Owen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8055672 | Djugash et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060484 | Bandera et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8171018 | Zane et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180789 | Wasserman et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8196121 | Peshansky et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209356 | Roesler | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8286189 | Kukreja et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8321833 | Langworthy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8332435 | Ballard et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8359305 | Burke et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8375127 | Lita | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8380757 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8418142 | Ao et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433701 | Sargeant et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8458218 | Wildermuth | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473897 | Box et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478713 | Cotner et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515942 | Marum et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8543620 | Ching | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553028 | Urbach | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8555263 | Allen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560502 | Vora | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595151 | Hao et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601016 | Briggs et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8631034 | Peloski | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8650182 | Murthy | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8660869 | MacIntyre et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676863 | Connell et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683488 | Kukreja et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8713518 | Pointer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719252 | Miranker et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8725707 | Chen et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8726254 | Rohde et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8745014 | Travis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8745510 | D'Alo′ et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751823 | Myles et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768961 | Krishnamurthy | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788254 | Peloski | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793243 | Weyerhaeuser et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8805947 | Kuzkin et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8806133 | Hay et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812625 | Chitilian et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8838656 | Cheriton | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8855999 | Elliot | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8863156 | Lepanto et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8874512 | Jin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8880569 | Draper et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8880787 | Kimmel et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8881121 | Ali | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886631 | Abadi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903717 | Elliot | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8903842 | Bloesch et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8922579 | Mi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924384 | Driesen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930892 | Pointer et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954418 | Faerber et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959495 | Chafi et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8996864 | Maigne et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9031930 | Valentin | May 2015 | B2 |
9077611 | Cordray et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9122765 | Chen | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9195712 | Freedman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9298768 | Varakin et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9311357 | Ramesh et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9372671 | Balan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9384184 | Cervantes et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9612959 | Caudy et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9613018 | Zeldis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9613109 | Wright et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9619210 | Kent, IV et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633060 | Caudy et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9639570 | Wright et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9672238 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9679006 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9690821 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9710511 | Wright et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9760591 | Caudy et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9805084 | Wright et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9832068 | McSherry et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9836494 | Caudy et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9836495 | Wright | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9886469 | Kent, IV et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9898496 | Caudy et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9934266 | Wright et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10002153 | Teodorescu et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10002154 | Kent, IV et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10002155 | Caudy et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10003673 | Caudy et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10019138 | Zeldis et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10069943 | Teodorescu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
20020002576 | Wollrath et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020054587 | Baker et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065981 | Jenne et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020129168 | Kanai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156722 | Greenwood | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004952 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030061216 | Moses | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074400 | Brooks et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110416 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030167261 | Grust et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182261 | Patterson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208484 | Chang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208505 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233632 | Aigen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002961 | Dettinger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040076155 | Yajnik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111492 | Nakahara et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148630 | Choi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186813 | Tedesco et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040216150 | Scheifler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220923 | Nica | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254876 | Coval et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015490 | Saare et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060693 | Robison et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097447 | Serra et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102284 | Srinivasan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102636 | McKeon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131893 | Glan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132384 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138624 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165866 | Bohannon et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198001 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060059253 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074901 | Pirahesh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085490 | Baron et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100989 | Chinchwadkar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101019 | Nelson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116983 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116999 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136361 | Peri et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173693 | Arazi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195460 | Nori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212847 | Tarditi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218123 | Chowdhuri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218200 | Factor et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230016 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253311 | Yin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277162 | Smith | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011211 | Reeves et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027884 | Heger et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033518 | Kenna et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073765 | Chen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070101252 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116287 | Rasizade et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169003 | Branda et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070256060 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258508 | Werb et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271280 | Chandasekaran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299822 | Jopp et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022136 | Mattsson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033907 | Woehler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034084 | Pandya | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046804 | Rui et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072150 | Chan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120283 | Liu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080155565 | Poduri | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168135 | Redlich et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080235238 | Jalobeanu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080263179 | Buttner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276241 | Bajpai et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319951 | Ueno et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090019029 | Tommaney et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022095 | Spaur et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024615 | Pedro et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037391 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055370 | Dagum et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083215 | Burger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089312 | Chi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090248902 | Blue | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254516 | Meiyyappan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271472 | Scheifler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300770 | Rowney et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319058 | Rovaglio | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319484 | Golbandi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327242 | Brown et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036801 | Pirvali et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042587 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047760 | Best et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049715 | Jacobsen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100161555 | Nica et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186082 | Ladki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199161 | Aureglia et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205017 | Sichelman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205351 | Wiener et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100281005 | Carlin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281071 | Ben-Zvi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110126110 | Vilke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126154 | Boehler et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153603 | Adiba et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161378 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167020 | Yang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178984 | Talius et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194563 | Shen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219020 | Oks et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110314019 | Peris | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120110030 | Pomponio | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144234 | Clark et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159303 | Friedrich et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191446 | Binsztok et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192096 | Bowman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197868 | Fauser et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209886 | Henderson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215741 | Poole et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221528 | Renkes | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246052 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254143 | Varma et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259759 | Crist | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296846 | Teeter | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130041946 | Joel et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130080514 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086107 | Genochio et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130166556 | Baeumges et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173667 | Soderberg et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179460 | Cervantes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185619 | Ludwig | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191370 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198232 | Shamgunov et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226959 | Dittrich et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246560 | Feng et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263123 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290243 | Hazel et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304725 | Nee et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304744 | McSherry et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311352 | Kayanuma | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311488 | Erdogan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318129 | Vingralek et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130346365 | Kan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140019494 | Tang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040203 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046638 | Peloski | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059646 | Hannel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140082724 | Pearson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140136521 | Pappas | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143123 | Banke et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149997 | Kukreja et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156618 | Castellano | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173023 | Vamey et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181036 | Dhamankar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181081 | Veldhuizen | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188924 | Ma et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195558 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201194 | Reddy et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215446 | Araya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222768 | Rambo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229506 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229874 | Strauss | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244687 | Shmueli et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140279810 | Mann et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280522 | Waite | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282227 | Nixon | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282444 | Araya et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282540 | Bonnet et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292765 | Maruyama et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297611 | Abbour et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317084 | Chaudhry et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324821 | Meiyyappan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330700 | Studnitzer et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330807 | Weyerhaeuser et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344186 | Nadler | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344391 | Varney et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359574 | Beckwith et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372482 | Martin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140380051 | Edward et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150019516 | Wein et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026155 | Martin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067640 | Booker et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074066 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082218 | Affoneh et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088894 | Czarlinska et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095381 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120261 | Giannacopoulos et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127599 | Schiebeler | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154262 | Yang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172117 | Dolinsky et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188778 | Asayag et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205588 | Bates et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205589 | Dally | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150254298 | Bourbonnais et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304182 | Brodsky et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317359 | Tran et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150356157 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026442 | Chhaparia | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160065670 | Kimmel et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092599 | Barsness et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160125018 | Tomoda et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160171070 | Hrle et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179754 | Borza et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253294 | Allen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160316038 | Jolfaei | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160335281 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335304 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335317 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335323 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335330 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335361 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170161514 | Dellinger et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177677 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185385 | Kent, IV et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192910 | Wright et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206229 | Caudy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206256 | Tsirogiannis et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170235794 | Wright et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235798 | Wright et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170249350 | Wright et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170270150 | Wright et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170316046 | Caudy et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170359415 | Venkatraman et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180004796 | Kent, IV et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180011891 | Wright et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180052879 | Wright | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180137175 | Teodorescu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2309462 | Dec 2000 | CA |
1406463 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1198769 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2199961 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2423816 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2743839 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2421798 | Jun 2011 | RU |
2000000879 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2001079964 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2011120161 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012136627 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2014026220 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014143208 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2016183563 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“IBM Informix TimeSeries data management”, dated Jan. 18, 2016. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160118072141/http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/informix/timeseries/. |
“IBM—What is HBase?”, dated Sep. 6, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150906022050/http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/infosphere/hadoop/hbase/. |
“SAP HANA Administration Guide”, dated Mar. 29, 2016, pp. 290-294. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160417053656/http://help.sap.com/hana/SAP_HANA_Administration_Guide_en.pdf. |
“Oracle Big Data Appliance—Perfect Balance Java API”, dated Sep. 20, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20131220040005/http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E41604_01/doc.22/e41667/toc.htm. |
“Oracle Big Data Appliance—X5-2”, dated Sep. 6, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150906185409/http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/bigdata-appliance/overview/bigdataappliance-datasheet-1883358.pdf. |
“Sophia Database—Architecture”, dated Jan. 18, 2016. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160118052919/http://sphia.org/architecture.html. |
“Google Protocol RPC Library Overview”, dated Apr. 27, 2016. Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/protorpc/ (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
“Maximize Data Value with Very Large Database Management by SAP® Sybase® IQ”, dated 2013. Retrieved from http://www.sap.com/bin/sapcom/en_us/downloadasset.2013-06-jun-11-11.maximize-data-value-with-very-large-database-management-by-sap-sybase-iq-pdf.html. |
“Microsoft Azure—Managing Access Control Lists (ACLs) for Endpoints by using PowerShell”, dated Nov. 12, 2014. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150110170715/http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn376543.aspx. |
“IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 3.0.0—Importing data from and exporting data to DB2 by using Sqoop”, dated Jan. 15, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150115034058/http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSPT3X_3.0.0/com.ibm.swg.im.infosphere.biginsights.import.doc/doc/data_warehouse_sqoop.html. |
“GNU Emacs Manual”, dated Apr. 15, 2016, pp. 43-47. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160415175915/http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/emacs.html. |
“Oracle® Big Data Appliance—Software User's Guide”, dated Feb. 2015. Retrieved from https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E55905_01/doc.40/e55814.pdf. |
“About Entering Commands in the Command Window”, dated Dec. 16, 2015. Retrieved from https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2016/ENU/AutoCAD-Core/files/GUID-BB0C3E79-66AF-4557-9140-D31B4CF3C9CF-htm.html (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
“Use Formula AutoComplete”, dated 2010. Retrieved from https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Use-Formula-AutoComplete-c7c46fa6-3a94-4150-a2f7-34140c1ee4d9 (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Mariyappan, Balakrishnan. “10 Useful Linux Bash_Completion Complete Command Examples (Bash Command Line Completion on Steroids)”, dated Dec. 2, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2013/12/bash-completion-complete/ (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Cheusheva, Svetlana. “How to change the row color based on a cell's value in Excel”, dated Oct. 29, 2013. Retrieved from https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2013/10/29/excel-change-row-background-color/ (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Jellema, Lucas. “Implementing Cell Highlighting in JSF-based Rich Enterprise Apps (Part 1)”, dated Nov. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/adf/jellema-adfcellhighlighting-087850.html (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Adelfio et al. “Schema Extraction for Tabular Data on the Web”, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 6, No. 6. Apr. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.cs.umd.edu/˜hjs/pubs/spreadsheets-vldb13.pdf. |
“Change Data Capture”, Oracle Database Online Documentation 11g Release 1 (11.1), dated Apr. 5, 2016. Retreived from https://web.archive.org/web/20160405032625/http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28313/cdc.htm. |
“Chapter 24. Query access plans”, Tuning Database Performance, DB2 Version 9.5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows, pp. 301-462, dated Dec. 2010. Retreived from http://public.dhe.ibm.com/ps/products/db2/info/vr95/pdf/en_US/DB2PerfTuneTroubleshoot-db2d3e953.pdf. |
“Tracking Data Changes”, SQL Server 2008 R2, dated Sep. 22, 2015. Retreived from https://web.archive.org/web/20150922000614/https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb933994(v=sql.105).aspx. |
Borror, Jefferey A. “Q for Mortals 2.0”, dated Nov. 1, 2011. Retreived from http://code.kx.com/wiki/JB:QforMortals2/contents. |
Gai, Lei et al. “An Efficient Summary Graph Driven Method for RDF Query Processing”, dated Oct. 27, 2015. Retreived from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.07749.pdf. |
Lou, Yuan. “A Multi-Agent Decision Support System for Stock Trading”, IEEE Network, Jan./Feb. 2002. Retreived from http://www.reading.ac.uk/AcaDepts/si/sisweb13/ais/papers/journal12-A%20multi-agent%20Framework.pdf. |
Palpanas, Themistoklis et al. “Incremental Maintenance for Non-Distributive Aggregate Functions”, Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference, 2002. Retreived from http://www.vldb.org/conf/2002/S22P04.pdf. |
Wu, Buwen et al. “Scalable SPARQL Querying using Path Partitioning”, 31st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2015), Seoul, Korea, Apr. 13-17, 2015. Retreived from http://imada.sdu.dk/˜zhou/papers/icde2015.pdf. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action mailed Aug. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032582 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032584 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032588 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032593 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032597 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032599 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032605 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032590 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032592 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 4, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032581 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032586 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032587 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032589 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032596 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032598 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032601 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032602 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032607 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032591 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032594 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032600 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 29, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032595 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 29, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032606 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032603 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032604 filed May 14, 2016. |
Mallet, “Relational Database Support for Spatia-Temporal Data”, Technical Report TR 04-21, Sep. 2004, Jniversity of Alberta, Department of Computing Science. |
Murray, Derek G. et al. “Naiad: a timely dataflow system.” SOSP '13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. pp. 439-455. Nov. 2013. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,001. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,991. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,981. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,985. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,009. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,006. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,998. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,979. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,011. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,988. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,987. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,990. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,975. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,001. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 22, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,011. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,985. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,988. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 30, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,987. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,991. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,983. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,007. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,007. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 21, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
PowerShell Team, Intellisense in Windows PowerShell ISE 3.0, dated Jun. 12, 2012, Windows PowerShell Blog, pp. 1-6 Retrieved: https://biogs.msdn.microsoft.com/powershell/2012/06/12/intellisense-in-windows-powershell-ise-3-0/. |
Smith, Ian. “Guide to Using SQL: Computed and Automatic Columns.” Rdb Jornal, dated Sep. 2008, retrieved Aug. 15, 2016, retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/products/rdb/automatic-columns-132042.pdf>. |
Wes McKinney & PyData Development Team. “pandas: powerful Python data analysis toolkit, Release 0.16.1” Dated May 11, 2015. Retrieved from: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.16.1/index.html. |
Wes McKinney & PyData Development Team. “pandas: powerful Python data analysis toolkit, Release 0.18.1” Dated May 3, 2016. Retrieved from: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.18.1/index.html. |
Advisory Action daed Apr. 19, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 20, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 6, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Advisory Action dated Dec. 21, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Advisory Action dated Mar. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Advisory Action dated May 3, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Breitbart, Update Propagation Protocols for Replicated Databases, SIGMOD '99 Philadelphia PA, 1999, pp. 97-108. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 9, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,979. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 26, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/610,162. |
Decision on Pre-Appeal Conference Request mailed Nov. 20, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,006. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,974. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,975. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Final Office Action dated May 4, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,009. |
Kramer, The Combining DAG: A Technique for Parallel Data Flow Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 5, No. 8, Aug. 1994, pp. 805-813. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,974. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,314. |
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/608,963. |
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,230. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/466,836. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,112. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,119. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,777. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Non-final Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Non-final Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,006. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,461. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,145. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 12, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,142. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,979. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 26, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,145. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,990. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,009. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 19, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,975. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 1, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,314. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 2, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,998. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,998. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,988. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/610,162. |
Sobell, Mark G. “A Practical Guide to Linux, Commands, Editors and Shell Programming.” Third Edition, dated Sep. 14, 2012. Retrieved from: http://techbus.safaribooksonline.com/book/operating-systems-and-server-administration/linux/9780133085129. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,230. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,119. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Final Office Action dated May 18, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,461. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,127. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/004,578. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,974. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2018, in U.S. Appl. 15/452,574. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 30, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 11, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,547. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 11, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/608,963. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160335361 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62161813 | May 2015 | US |