Modern light projectors include systems of cascaded and bulky glass optics for imaging with minimal aberrations. While these systems generate high quality images, the improved functionality comes at the cost of increased size and weight, limiting their use for a variety of applications in which such projectors may be used.
Spatial light modulators (SLMs) may be understood as light projectors. SLMs are devices for manipulating the wavefront of free-space light, with many applications including adaptive optics, deep tissue imaging, light detection and ranging, and computer-generated holography. In some cases, such SLMs include multiple sources of light (e.g., pixels) that are controlled either individually or in several groups. However, for a large number of pixels, achieving a required pixel refresh rate remains a challenge both with respect to properly routing and executing individual control mechanisms for the pixels and also with respect to power requirements for individual controls, which generally scale up with the number of individual sources of light. Furthermore, even assuming proper control of individual pixels of the SLM, obtaining a small higher order diffraction free image of required resolution remains a challenge. Accordingly, systems and methods for producing high quality images (i.e., wavefronts of light) are still required.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In some embodiments, the inventive systems and methods for spatial light modulation combine energy-efficient, controllable modulators in photonic integrated circuits (PICs) with meta-optical beam aggregators and small-scale gratings to achieve low-energy, highly controllable higher order diffraction free images at high resolution. This hybrid approach can significantly improve a space-bandwidth performance (SBP) of the spatial light modulation, theoretically up to 1013 Hz·pixel, which is several orders of magnitude higher than the conventional technology.
SBP is defined as the number of tunable pixels (N2, where N is a number of pixels in a row or column of the pixel matrix) times the refresh rate (fR). In principle, a fast modulation rate of a single pixel (fp) alone does not guarantee a fast refresh rate fR as a collective phase profile of the pixel array must be preserved all the time. In practice, either every pixel is controlled simultaneously, necessitating ˜O(N2) control signals, or pixels are controlled column-by-column using time-division-multiplexing technique, requiring ˜O(N) control signals, however, at the expense of an extra memory element at each pixel. Such memory can be intrinsic to the physical system itself, such as the inertia of liquid crystals (LCs), or provided by external components, such as an electronic latch under each pixel (active matrix). Nevertheless, fR=fp is true only when ˜O(N2) control signals are used; more often, fR=˜fp/N with ˜O(N) controls using the time-division multiplexing. For commercial LC-based SLMs, the SBP may be ˜108 Hz·pixel with ˜106 pixels and 100 Hz refresh speed. For digital micromirror devices, the SBP may be ˜1010 Hz·pixel with ˜106 pixels and 10 kHz refresh speed. However, for many applications, such as adaptive optics to image through dynamic disordered media, even higher SBP is required (ideally, >˜106 pixels and MHz to GHz refresh rate) to allow real-time operation.
There are multi-layered challenges in increasing the SBP. The power needed to operate an SLM is given by:
where Eo is the switching energy per pixel, and n is the fraction of the pixels that need to be changed between frames. From the above equation, decreasing Eo is necessary to ensure reasonable power consumption when increasing the SBP. Since optical modulation is a volume effect, the reduction of Eo requires lowering the volume of the pixels, which in turn necessitates a large change in the refractive index Δn to achieve a 2π phase shift. Even with unity-order index change (Δn˜O(1)), as is possible with non-volatile phase change materials or LCs, the propagation length still needs to be ˜λ, λ being the free-space wavelength of the light.
The need for sub-wavelength-scale pixels also comes from the field of view, given by λ2/Λ2 (where Λ is the pixel pitch), beyond which aliasing effects occur. To maintain a large field of view, the pixel pitch needs to be ˜λ. Therefore, the active volume of the pixel in a large SBP SLM becomes small, ˜λ3. Obviously, it is difficult to have ˜O(N2) controls for small pixel pitch. While a crossbar signal path geometry can provide independent control at the expense of a slower refresh rate, carrying high-speed electrical signals on closely placed interconnects would still incur severe heating and crosstalk issues for the tunable pixels that have very high refresh frequency (e.g., a refresh frequency that is orders of magnitude higher than a typical time-multiplexing display that requires electrical control signals of much lower frequency of about 60 Hz.
Furthermore, to obtain the final image, an aggregation of the individual sources of light (e.g., light beams) is needed. Such aggregation may be achieved by diffractive optical elements (DOEs), which mimic the functionality of refractive systems in a more compact form factor. Meta-optics may be suitable examples of such DOEs, in which quasiperiodic arrays of resonant subwavelength optical antennas impart spatially-varying changes on a wavefront. These elements are of wavelength-scale thickness, enabling highly compact systems, while the large number of degrees of freedom in designing the subwavelength resonators has enabled unprecedented functionalities and flat implementations of lenses, holographic plates, blazed gratings, and polarization optics.
Turning attention to the PIC part of the overall SLM assembly, a hybrid approach to high SBP is achievable by spatially separating/decoupling the plane of electrical modulation from that of the final optical output. This alleviates the routing complexity and reduces the pixel crosstalk. Furthermore, the electrical modulation may be based on an array of ultra-low energy (sub-fJ/bit) integrated photonic modulators, operating at moderate to high speed (about 10 MHz to about 1 GHz). The low power consumption may be enabled by the tight confinement of light in integrated photonic waveguides.
In some embodiments, an electronic integrated circuit (EIC) flip-chip bonded on top of the PIC chip can individually control the modulators. After modulation, light couples out of the chip through a backside-emitting grating coupler array, with each grating coupler functioning as a pixel of the SLM. Next, although these light beams are spaced relatively far apart from each other when being emitted from the grating coupler array of the PIC, the beams can be aggregated using static meta-optics to a much tighter effective pitch having a sub-wavelength spacing. Next, the meta-optics may further route the light beams onto an aperture array that includes a system of slots or holes to produce a final composite image. The modulated light beams then out-couple with a grating coupler array, which can produce either Gaussian or uniform beams of high quality. In some embodiments, amplitude and/or phase modulation may be achieved through appropriate controls of pixels of the PIC by exploiting refractive index modulation methods like thermo-optic effect, electro-optic effect, free-carrier plasma dispersion etc.
As a result, the benefits of PICs (ultra-low energy and high-speed modulation) and meta-optics (compact free-space control of light) are combined in one system, resulting in high resolution image being projected onto a target.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of the claimed subject matter will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Disclosed herein are spatial light modulators (SLMs) that are configured for manipulating the wavefront of free-space light. The inventive SLMs reduce power consumption, mutual crosstalk, and complexity of control signal wiring, while producing sharp wavefront with high resolution. In some embodiments, the SLMs combine energy-efficient modulators in (PICs) with a meta-optical beam aggregator.
In some embodiments, the meta-optic 400 modifies the incoming light beams into wavefronts 405 that are further directed to the optical grating 500. Light beams 410 produced by the meta-optic 400 constitute a second waveform 411 at a surface of the meta-optic 400. Next, light beams 410 are focused-onto and aggregated-over a smaller area of the optical grating 500, thus increasing density of the light beams 410 as they propagate toward the optical grating 500. This is manifested as the wavefronts 505 on the aperture array 500 being more aggregated or denser than the corresponding wavefronts 405 on the meta-optic 400, while preserving the initial resolution of the image. In some embodiments, the aperture array 500 may include metallic apertures that are distributed as holes or slots 510 over a transparent substrate. A person of ordinary skill would know how to select a size of the aperture as a function of the wavelength of the light. The aperture array 500 further direct wavefronts 505 (which are now more densely aggregated than the corresponding wavefronts 405) into a composite waveform 520 (also referred to as a third waveform) that may be an image used for, for example, light detection and ranging (LIDAR) systems, holograms, or other applications that require high resolution, high dynamic image over small area.
In some embodiments, pixels 320 are distributed over a transparent substrate 324. The incoming light signal couples with the pixels 320 at the top side 302 of the PIC, and the outgoing light beam 310 is emitted by a grating coupler 322 at the top side 302 of the PIC through the bottom side 304 of the PIC, as further explained with respect to
Propagation of light signal in the pixel 320 is symbolically marked with arrows. In some embodiments, the pixel 320 (also referred to as a ring resonator modulator) includes an optical conductor (fiber or optical waveguide) 330 for distributing the incoming light beam emitted by the source of light (e.g., by a laser or an LED). This incoming light beam in the optical conductor 330 couples with a modulating ring 326, and further with a grating coupler 322. The outgoing wavefront of light (e.g., the wavefront 305) is emitted by the grating coupler 322 toward the meta-optic 400. The illustrated pixel 320 should be understood as one possible embodiment of the light-emitting pixel, other designs of the pixels that receive an incoming signal from a source of light and propagate the signal toward the meta-optic also being possible. An embodiment of amplitude/phase modulation of the waveform at the pixel 320 is explained with respect to
In some embodiments, during the manufacturing of the meta-optic 400, a 600 nm layer of silicon nitride is first deposited via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) on a quartz substrate, followed by spin-coating with a high-performance positive electron beam resist (e.g., ZEP-520A). An 8 nm Au/Pd charge dissipation layer is then sputtered followed by subsequent exposure to an electron-beam lithography system (e.g., JEOL JBX6300FS). The Au/Pd layer may then be removed with a thin film etchant (e.g., type TFA gold etchant), and the samples may be developed in amyl acetate. In some embodiments, to form an etch mask, 50 nm of aluminum oxide is evaporated and lifted off via sonication in methylene chloride, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol. The samples are then dry etched using a CHF3 and SF6 chemistry and the aluminum oxide is removed by immersion in AD-10 photoresist developer.
The illustrated nanoposts 420 are characterized by a height “t” and diameter “d”. In some embodiments, the values of “d” may range from about 80 nm to about 300 nm. Generally, the value of “t” (height) is constant (within the limits of manufacturing tolerance) for all diameters “d” for a given meta-optic. In some embodiments, the values of “t” may range from about 500 nm to about 1.5 μm. The nanoposts (scatterers) may be polarization-insensitive cylindrical nanoposts 110 arranged in a square lattice on a quartz substrate 415. The phase shift mechanism of these nanoposts arises from an ensemble of oscillating modes within the nanoposts that couple amongst themselves at the top and bottom interfaces of the post. By adjusting the diameter “d” of the nanoposts, the modal composition varies, modifying the transmission amplitude and/or phase through the nanoposts.
The beam pattern shown in
A person of ordinary skill would understand that distances L1, L2, L3, etc., are provided as examples and other values are also possible, the important point being that the distances between the light beams after the meta-optic 400 is used (i.e., the case illustrated in
where x and y are coordinates on each lens,
is the wavenumber, θx and θy are the desired steering angles in the x and y directions, and f is the focal length. As a result, the PIC emits light where individual beams can be phase and amplitude controlled.
It should be noted that for purposes of this disclosure, terminology such as “upper,” “lower,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” “inwardly,” “outwardly,” “inner,” “outer,” “front,” “rear,” etc., should be construed as descriptive and not limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter. Further, the use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless limited otherwise, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” and “mounted” and variations thereof herein are used broadly and encompass direct and indirect connections, couplings, and mountings. The term “about” means plus or minus 5% of the stated value.
The principles, representative embodiments, and modes of operation of the present disclosure have been described in the foregoing description. However, aspects of the present disclosure which are intended to be protected are not to be construed as limited to the particular embodiments disclosed. Further, the embodiments described herein are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. It will be appreciated that variations and changes may be made by others, and equivalents employed, without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it is expressly intended that all such variations, changes, and equivalents fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, as claimed.
While illustrative embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 63/530,421, filed Aug. 2, 2023, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Grant No. DARPA-YFA Award, awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and Grant Nos. NSF-1640986 and NSF-2003509, awarded by the National Science Foundation and Grant No. ONR-YIP Award, awarded by the Office of Naval Research. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63530421 | Aug 2023 | US |