Patent Application
20240270688
The present invention relates to a method of determining the likely response of patients to administration of the S1P receptor modulator BAF312 (1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid). More specifically, the invention relates to identifying and selecting patients who may benefit from either a modified dosage regimen of BAF312 to that of other patients or identifying patients who may be less suited to treatment with BAF312. In addition, the invention relates to a method of determining when administration of drugs considered incompatible with BAF312 may be initiated following the end of a treatment period with BAF312.
BAF312 belongs to the class of S1P receptor modulators. These are compounds which signal as agonists at one or more sphingosine-1 phosphate receptors, for example, S1P1 to S1P8. The binding of an agonist to a S1P receptor may, for example, result in the dissociation of intracellular heterotrimeric G-proteins into Gα-GTP and Gβγ-GTP, and/or the increased phosphorylation of the agonist-occupied receptor, and/or the activation of downstream signaling pathways/kinases.
S1P receptor modulators or agonists are useful therapeutic compounds for the treatment of various conditions in mammals, especially in human beings. For example, the efficacy of S1P receptor modulators or agonists in the prevention of transplant rejection has been demonstrated in rat (skin, heart, liver, small bowel), dog (kidney), and monkey (kidney) models. In addition, due to their immune-modulating potency, S1P receptor modulators or agonists are also useful for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.
BAF312 is generally well tolerated in human patients but like some other S1P receptor modulators produces a negative chronotropic effect when first administered, the extent of which increases with increasing dose. In the case of BAF312, the negative chronotropic effect can be ameliorated by the use of a dose titration regimen as described in WO2010/072703. However, the effect of a given dose of BAF312 (including side effects such as the negative chronotropic effect or the duration of the washout period) may be different in some patients than in others, for example depending on how extensively the patient metabolises BAF312. It would therefore be desirable, in order to improve the risk benefit ratio for these patients, to be able to identify patients for whom these effects would be significantly different and adjust the treatment regimen accordingly.
In a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of assessing the appropriate therapeutic dose of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid to administer to a patient in need thereof, comprising the steps of:
In a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of initiating use of a drug recommended not to be used with 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, comprising the steps of:
In a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of treating a patient in need with 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, comprising the steps of:
In a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for the treatment of an autoimmune condition in a patient in need thereof, said patient having the poor metabolizer genotype, comprising administering 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to the patient in a daily amount in the range from 0.25-0.75 mg.
In a fifth aspect of the invention, there is provided 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient suffering from an autoimmune condition, said patient having the poor metabolizer genotype, said method comprising administering 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to the patient in a daily amount in the range from 0.25-0.75 mg.
In a sixth aspect of the invention, there is provided 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient suffering from an autoimmune condition, said method comprising the steps of:
In a seventh aspect of the invention, there is provided 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
In an eighth aspect of the invention, there is provided a pharmaceutical combination comprising (a) 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; and (b) a CYP2C9 metabolic activity promoter for simultaneous, separate or sequential use.
In a ninth aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of optimizing the daily dosage of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
In a tenth aspect of the invention, there is provided 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
In an eleventh aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of treating a patient in need with 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, comprising the steps of:
In a twelfth aspect of the invention, there is provided 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating an autoimmune condition, said method comprising the steps of:
In a thirteenth aspect of the invention there is provided 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of an autoimmune disease, said treatment being by a method according to any of the first to twelfth aspects above.
Further aspects and embodiments are provided in the detailed disclosure of the invention.
For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby stated that the information disclosed earlier in this specification under the heading “Background” is relevant to the invention and is to be read as part of the disclosure of the invention.
Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the words “comprise” and “contain” and variations of them mean “including but not limited to”, and they are not intended to (and do not) exclude other moieties, additives, components, integers or steps.
Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the singular encompasses the plural unless the context otherwise requires. In particular, where the indefinite article is used, the specification (which term encompasses both the description and the claims) is to be understood as contemplating plurality as well as singularity, unless the context requires otherwise.
Features, integers, characteristics, compounds, chemical moieties or groups described in conjunction with a particular aspect, embodiment or example of the invention are to be understood to be applicable to any other aspect, embodiment or example described herein unless incompatible therewith. All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of such features and/or steps are mutually exclusive. The invention is not restricted to the details of any foregoing embodiments. The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.
The term “treatment” includes: (1) preventing or delaying the appearance of clinical symptoms of the state, disorder or condition developing in an animal, particularly a mammal and especially a human, that may be afflicted with or predisposed to the state, disorder or condition but does not yet experience or display clinical or subclinical symptoms of the state, disorder or condition; (2) inhibiting the state, disorder or condition (e.g. arresting, reducing or delaying the development of the disease, or a relapse thereof in case of maintenance treatment, of at least one clinical or subclinical symptom thereof); and/or (3) relieving the condition (i.e. causing regression of the state, disorder or condition or at least one of its clinical or subclinical symptoms). The benefit to a patient to be treated is either statistically significant or at least perceptible to the patient or to the physician. However, it will be appreciated that when a medicament is administered to a patient to treat a disease, the outcome may not always be effective treatment.
Generally, the term “prodrug” refers to a compound that is administered as an inactive or less than fully active chemical derivative that is subsequently, preferably within the human body, converted to an active pharmacological agent. Prodrugs include drugs having a functional group which has been transformed into a reversible derivative thereof. Typically, such prodrugs are transformed into the active drug by hydrolysis. For example, reversible derivatives of a carboxylic acid may be an ester, including e.g. an alkyl and acyloxyalkyl ester, or an amide. Reversible derivatives of amines may be amides, carbamates, imines or enamines. In some cases, the prodrug may also be a salt form. Prodrugs also include compounds convertible to the active drug by an oxidative or reductive reaction. Examples comprise N- and O-dealkylation, oxidative deamination, N-oxidation, epoxidation, azo reduction, sulfoxide reduction, disulfide reduction, bioreductive alkylation, and nitro reduction.
“BAF312” as used herein is understood to comprise the compound of formula (I) as well as the pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, hydrates and/or prodrugs thereof.
The term “therapeutic dosage” means the daily maintenance dose of the drug which is administered to patients for treatment or prevention of the disease to be treated or prevented. This dosage may be selected to give the optimum balance of efficacy vs safety.
The therapeutic dosage may be administered at the start of the treatment period or following a titration regimen in which the dosage is increased from a level below the therapeutic dosage up to the therapeutic dose.
The term “poor metaboliser genotype” includes patients who experience a significantly higher exposure following BAF312 administration than normal patients at a given drug dose e.g. 2 mg once daily of BAF312. The poor metabolizer genotype may include the subtype(s) of the CYP2C9 genotype associated with poor metabolism of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid. The poor metabolizer genotype includes the CYP2C9*3*3 and CYP2C9*2*3 genotypes, for example the CYP2C9*3*3 genotype.
In a preferred embodiment, the poor metaboliser genotype is the CYP2C9*3*3 genotype.
The term “standard therapeutic dosage” means the therapeutic daily dosage for patients who do not have the poor metabolizer genotype. The standard therapeutic dose may be greater than or equal to 0.2 mg, for example greater than or equal to 0.4 mg, greater than or equal to 1.0 mg or greater than or equal to 1.5 mg. The standard therapeutic dose may be less than or equal to 8 mg, for example less than or equal to 5 mg, less then or equal to 4 mg or less than or equal to 2.5 mg.
In a preferred embodiment, the standard therapeutic dose is in the range from 1.5 to 2.5 mg, for example about 2 mg per day.
In the case of patients having the poor metaboliser genotype, the daily therapeutic dosage may be lower then the standard therapeutic dosage. For example the therapeutic dosage for this class of patients may be greater than or equal to 0.1 mg, such as greater than or equal to 0.25 mg or greater than or equal to 0.4 mg. The therapeutic dosage may be less than or equal to 1 mg such as less than or equal to 0.9 mg or less than or equal to 0.75 mg.
In a preferred embodiment, in the case of patients having the poor metabolizer genotype, the daily therapeutic dosage may be in the range from 0.25-0.75 mg, for example 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg or 0.75 mg, preferably 0.5 mg.
As used herein, an “amount”, “dose” or “dosage” of BAF312 as measured in milligrams refers to the milligrams of BAF312 (free form) present in a preparation, regardless of the form of the preparation. A “dose of 2 mg BAF312” means the amount of BAF312 (free form) in a preparation is 2 mg, regardless of the form of the preparation. Thus, when in the form of a salt, e.g. the BAF312 hemifumarate salt, the weight of the salt form necessary to provide a dose of 2 mg BAF312 would be greater than 2 mg due to the presence of the additional hemifumarate ion.
Patients in need of treatment with BAF312 include patients suffering from chronic longterm diseases, such as autoimmune diseases, e.g. multiple sclerosis, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, lupus nephritis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases or psoriasis. In an embodiment of the invention, patients in need of treatment are patients suffering from multiple sclerosis, for example relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with relapses (rSPMS), secondary progressive multiple sclerosis without relapses (SPMS) e.g. for patients suffering from rSPMS or SPMS.
In a preferred embodiment, the patient is suffering from multiple sclerosis, polymyositis or dermatomyositis.
In a preferred embodiment, the patient is suffering from multiple sclerosis e.g. secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with relapses (rSPMS) or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis without relapses (SPMS).
In an aspect, where the patient is identified as being a poor metabolizer type, the patient may not be administered 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid if the patient is considered to belong to a higher risk category. For example, 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid may not be administered to poor metabolizer patents at risk of cardiac side effects, for example patients at risk of heart failure, arrythmias, patients with high grade atrio-ventricular blocks or sick sinus syndrome, patients with a history of syncopal episodes, or patients requiring or under beta blockers, or patients requiring or under anti-arrhythmic treatment, such as patients under treatment with Class Ia (e.g. quinidine, procainamide) or Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., amiodarone, sotalol).
In the second aspect of the invention, the set period of step (ii) within which the patient who is not a poor metabolizer may initiate use of the incompatible drug, will depend on the degree of incompatibility of the dug with BAF312. The period of step (ii) may be a period greater than or equal to 3 or 4 days, for example greater than or equal to 5 days, for example greater than or equal to 6 days or 7 days following administration of the last dose of BAF312. The set period of step (ii) may also be greater than 10 days, for example greater than 12 days or greater than 14 days.
The set period of step (ii) may also be less than 21 days, for example less than 14 days or less than 10, 8 or 7 days.
In an aspect, the set period of step (ii) may be in the range from 3-14 days, for example 4-12 days or 5-10 days e.g 6, 7 or 8 days.
As mentioned in the second aspect, in step (iii) the patient who is a poor metabolizer may initiate use of the incompatible drug, within a period greater than the patient who is not a poor metabolizer. For example, the period of step (iii) may be a period greater than or equal to 14 days, for example greater than or equal to 21 days, for example greater than or equal to 28 day, 35 days or 42 days following administration of the last dose of BAF312.
The set period of step (iii) may also be less than 56 days, for example less than 49 or 42 days.
In an aspect, the set period of step (iii) may be in the range from 14-63 days, for example 14-56 days or 21-49 days or 28-42 days.
In the second aspect, or any related aspect, the incompatible drug may be any drug which could be classified as not recommended for administration with BAF312 e.g. a drug which, when administered with BAF312, could potentially cause an increased risk of an adverse effect in the patient or reduced efficacy of either BAF312 or the incompatible drug.
For example, the incompatible drug may be a drug sometimes described as prolonging the QT interval, for example carbamazepine. Alternatively, the incompatible drug may be one or more of Amphetamine, Phentermine, Metaproterenol, Clomipramine, Dolasetron, Chloroquine, Moxifloxacin, Diphenhydramine, Sotalol, Clarithromycin, Terbutaline, Ephedrine, Epinephrine, Vandetanib, Nicardipine, Quinidine, Citalopram, Fosphenytoin, Escitalopram, Ciprofloxacin, Clozapine, Cocaine, Methylphenidate, Amiodarone, Ibutilide, Perflutren lipid microspheres, Trazodone, Tolterodine, Amphetamine, Fluconazole or Dobutamine, Methadone, Isradipine, Erythromycin, Venlafaxine, Amitriptyline, Erythromycin, Lithium, Artenimol+piperaquine, Gemifloxacin, Iloperidone, Phentermine, Felbamate, Ofloxacin, Dexmethylphenidate, Foscarnet, Ziprasidone, Eribulin, Haloperidol, Halofantrine, Astemizole, Droperidol, Dopamine, Paliperidone, Isoproterenol, Telithromycin, Granisetron, Levofloxacin, Vardenafil, Norepinephrine, Probucol, Indapamide, Isoproterenol, Thioridazine, Sibutramine, Metaproterenol, Methadone, Domperidone, Dronedarone, Pentamidine, Phenylephrine, Ketoconazole, Chloral hydrate, Tamoxifen, Imipramine, Disopyramide, Ritonavir, Diphenhydramine, Pimozide, Levomethadyl, Nortriptyline, Paroxetine, Pseudoephedrine, Pentamidine, Famotidine, Desipramine, Oxytocin, Fenfluramine, Epinephrine, Midodrine, Procainamide, Tacrolimus, Procainamide, Cisapride, Albuterol, Fluoxetine, Quinine sulfate, Quinidine, Ranolazine, Mirtazapine, Galantamine, Ranolazine, Mirtazapine, Galantamine, Atazanavir, Risperidone, Methylphenidate, Roxithromycin, Ephedrine, Octreotide, Fluoxetine, Terfenadine, Trimethoprim-Sulfa, Sertindole, Mesoridazine, Salmeterol, Sertindole, Doxepin, Bedaquiline, Sevoflurane, Amisulpride, Itraconazole, Atomoxetine, Trimipramine, Sunitinib, Amantadine, Flecainide, Nilotinib, Gatifloxacin, Chlorpromazine, Dofetilide, Arsenic trioxide, Lapatinib, Sevoflurane, Moexipril/HCTZ, Alfuzosin, Bepridil, Solifenacin, Voriconazole, Protriptyline, Lisdexamfetamine, Levalbuterol, Ritodrine, Sparfloxacin, Tizanidine, Azithromycin, Ondansetron, Sertraline or Olanzapine.
In an embodiment, the incompatible drug may be a drug sometimes described as inducing a negative chronotropic effect. In this embodiment, the incompatible drug may be selected from beta blockers e.g. metoprolol, acetylcholine, digoxin or calcium channel blockers e.g. diltiazem and verapamil.
In an embodiment, the incompatible drug may be a drug which is a strong or moderate inhibitor of CYP2C9 activity. In this embodiment, the incompatible drug may be selected from amiodarone, fluconazole, miconazole or oxandrolone.
In an embodiment, for example in the case of patients who are poor metabolizer patients, the incompatible drug may be a strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor. In this embodiment, the incompatible drug may be selected from boceprevir, clarithromycin, conivaptan, grapefruit juice, indinavir, itraconozole, ketoconazole, lopinavir, mibefradil, nefazodone, nelfinavir, posaconazole, ritonavir, squinavir, telaprevir, telithromycon or voriconazole.
In an embodiment, for example in the case of patients who are not poor metabolizer patients, the incompatible drug may be a strong or moderate CYP2C9 inducer. In this embodiment, the incompatible drug may be selected from carbamazepine or rifampin.
A strong inhibitor for a specific CYP is defined as an inhibitor that increases the plasma AUC of a substrate for that CYP by equal to or more than 5-fold or causes a more than 80% decrease in clearance.
A moderate inhibitor for a specific CYP is defined as an inhibitor that increases the plasma AUC of a substrate for that CYP by less than 5-fold but equal to or more than 2-fold or causes 50-80% decrease in clearance.
In the third and any other relevant aspects (e.g. the seventh and eighth aspects), the CYP2C9 promoter may be any drug which increases the level of activity of CYP2C9 in the poor metabolizer patient, preferably to a level at which the patient metabolises BAF312 to a level comparable with a non-poor metabolizer patient e.g. within 30%, 20% or 10% of the level of the average non-poor metabolizer. The CYP2C9 promoter may also be any drug which increases the level of activity of CYP2C9 in the poor metabolizer patient to a level at which the same therapeutic dosage and/or dosage regimen (e.g. titration scheme) of BAF312 is considered medically appropriate for both poor metabolizer patients and non-poor metaboliser patient.
An example of a CYP2C9 promoter is rifampin or carbamezipine, which may be administered to poor metabolizer patients at a dosage such that CYP2C9 activity of the patient is adjusted to a level comparable to that of non-poor metabolisers e.g. within 30%, 20% or 10% of the level of the average non-poor metabolizer. In an embodiment, rifampin or carbamezipine may be administered to a poor metaboliser patient at a dosage at which the same therapeutic dosage and/or dosage regimen (e.g. titration scheme) of BAF312 is considered medically appropriate for both poor metabolizer patients and non-poor metaboliser patients.
In aspects where BAF312 is administered in combination with a CYP2C9 metabolic activity promotor, the administration may be separate, sequential or simultaneous.
Simultaneous administration includes administration of BAF312 and the CYP2C9 metabolic activity promotor (e.g. rifampin or carbamezipine) as a fixed dose combination or as two individual formulations. The invention therefore includes a fixed dose combination of BAF312 and a CYP2C9 metabolic activity promotor (e.g. rifampin or carbamezipine).
BAF312 is preferably administered at the standard therapeutic dosage. The CYP2C9 metabolic activity promotor is preferably administered at a dosage suitable to to upregulate CYP2C9 to a level where a reduced dosage of BAF312 is not considered clinically necessary.
BAF312 (with the INN Siponimod) has the chemical name 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid and has the structure of formula (I) below:
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid may be administered as a free base, as a pharmaceutically acceptable salt (including polymorphic forms of the salt) or as a prodrug.
Pharmaceuticaly acceptable salt forms include hydrochloride, malate, oxalate, tartrate and hemifumarate.
In a preferred aspect, 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid is administered as a hemifumarate salt.
Prodrug forms of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid include forms having a functional group which has been transformed into a reversible derivative thereof. Typically, such prodrugs are transformed to the active drug by hydrolysis. As examples may be mentioned esters of the carboxylic acid group.
As previously stated, the therapeutic dosage may be administered at the start of the treatment period or following a titration regimen in which the dosage is increased from a level below the therapeutic dosage up to the therapeutic dose in order to minimize the negative chronotropic effects and/or the heart effects possibly associated with S1P receptor modulator or agonist therapy.
Heart effects include AV blocks, which include first degree AV blocks (e.g. PR intervals greater then 0.2 seconds) and second degree AV blocks e.g. first degree AV blocks. Heart effects include heart pauses e.g. heart pauses greater than 2 seconds.
During the titration regimen the dosage is lower than the therapeutic dosage and is increased, optionally stepwise, until the therapeutic dosage is reached. Thereafter the treatment is preferably continued with the therapeutic dosage.
The duration of the titration regiment is the time period beginning on the day when the drug is first administered until and including the first day at which the drug is administered at the therapeutic dose.
Preferably during the titration regimen, the drug is administered in a dosage regimen such that daily decrease in heart rate (e.g. average or minimum daily heart rate) is acceptable or clinically not significant, or that the sinus rhythm of the patient is normal. For example, the daily decrease in heart rate (e.g. average or minimum daily heart rate) may be less than about 4 bpm, e.g. less than about 3 bpm or less than about 2 bpm.
The term “normal sinus rhythm” refers to the sinus rhythm of the patient when not undergoing treatment. The evaluation of normal sinus rhythm is within the ability of a physician. A normal sinus rhythm will generally give rise to a heart rate in the range from 60-100 bpm.
Preferably, the dosage of the drug is increased during the titration period stepwise in a defined incremental ratio up to the therapeutic dosage.
In an embodiment, the daily dosage during the titration period is governed by a Fibonacci series i.e. the dosage given on a specific day is the sum of the dosages on the previous two days. In an aspect of this embodiment, some variation in this scheme is permitted. For example, the dosage on a given day may be the sum of the dosages on the two previous days±40%, for example±30%, for example±20% or ±10%.
The exact titration regimen will depend on whether the therapeutic dosage to be reached is the standard therapeutic dosage or the lower therapeutic dosage to be administered to poor metabolizer patients.
For example in the case of poor metabolizer patients, where the therapeutic dosage is lower, the titration regimen may be e.g. 5 days or less, 4 or 3 days or less, for example 2 days or less. Generally, the titration stage for poor metabolizer patients will last at least 1 day and may last 2 days or 3 days. In a preferred aspect, the titration stage for poor metabolizer patients lasts 3 or 4 days, for example 3 days.
In an aspect, where the patient is a poor metabolizer patient, and the therapeutic dosage is 0.5 mg, the titration regimen may be day 1-0.25 mg; day 2-0.25 mg; day 3-0.5 mg (therapeutic dose).
In an aspect, where the patient is a poor metabolizer patient, and the therapeutic dosage is 0.75 mg, the titration regimen may be day 1-0.25 mg; day 2-0.25 mg; day 3-0.5 mg; day 4-0.75 mg (therapeutic dose).
In the case of patients that are not poor metabolisers, the titration stage may be 4 days, 5 days, 6 days or 7 days. In a preferred aspect, the titration stage for patients who are not poor metabolisers is 5-7 days, for example 6 days.
In an aspect, where the patient is not a poor metabolizer patient, and the therapeutic dosage is 2.0 mg, the titration regimen may be day 1-0.25 mg; day 2-0.25 mg; day 3-0.5 mg; day 4-0.75 mg; day 5-1.25 mg; day 6-2 mg (therapeutic dose).
In an aspect, the titration regimen of the present invention may be used to initiate treatment of patents at risk of cardiac side effects, for example patients at risk of heart failure, arrythmias, patients with high grade atrio-ventricular blocks or sick sinus syndrome, patients with a history of syncopal episodes, or patients requiring or under beta blockers, or patients requiring or under anti-arrhythmic treatment, such as patients under treatment with Class Ia (e.g. quinidine, procainamide) or Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., amiodarone, sotalol).
The above titration regimen may also be used to reinitiate treatment on patients (poor metabolizer or non-poor metabolizer patients) who have undergone an interruption or treatment holiday in the maintenance dosage regime e.g. a holiday of greater than 3 days or 4 days, greater than 6, 8, 10, 12 or 14 days.
In an embodiment, following the titration regimen or in cases where the titration regimen is not used, the effect of BAF312 on the patient lymphocyte count may be assessed following administration of BAF312 at the therapeutic dosage. In cases where the lymphocyte level is reduced below a level considered clinically optimal (for example to a level giving rise to an increased risk of opportunistic infection without increasing clinical benefit) following administration of BAF312 at the therapeutic dosage, the daily dosage may be reduced to a reduced dosage.
In this and related aspects (e.g the ninth and tenth aspects of the invention) the daily dosage reduction may take place over in a single step or in more than one step e.g. 2 or 3 steps. Preferably the dosage reduction takes place in a single step.
In an aspect, the dosage is reduced from a daily therapeutic dosage of 1.5-2.5 mg, for example from 2 mg.
In an aspect, the daily dosage is reduced to a dosage in the range from 0.5-1.5 mg, for example 1.0 mg.
In a preferred aspect, the daily dosage is reduced from 2 mg to 1 mg in a single step over subsequent days.
Following dosage reduction, the reduced dosage may be subsequently increased or maintained. In a preferred aspect, the reduced dosage is maintained.
The blood lymphocyte level considered below the clinically optimal level may be assessed by the physician. For example this lymphocyte level may be a level at which further reduction is determined to give rise to an increased risk of opportunistic infection without increasing clinical benefit. For example, the lymphocyte level may be less than or equal to 1.0×10e9/L, such as less than or equal to 0.8.0×10e9/L, less than or equal to 0.6×10e9/L, less than or equal to 0.4×10e9/L or less than or equal to 0.2×10e9/L.
In an aspect, the blood lymphocyte level considered below the clinically optimal level is a blood lymphocyte level less than or equal to 0.2×10e9/L.
Blood lymphoyte level may be measured using any standard technique such as e.g. flow cytometry.
In a preferred aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of optimizing the daily dosage of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
In this aspect, the lymphocyte level considered below the clinically optimal level may be less than or equal to 1.0×10e9/L, such as less than or equal to 0.8.0×10e9/L, less than or equal to 0.6×10e9/L, less than or equal to 0.4×10e9/L or less than or equal to 0.2×10e9/L.
In a preferred embodiment of this aspect, the lymphocyte level considered below the clinically optimal level may be less than or equal to 0.2×10e9/L.
In vitro, CYP2C9 was identified as the major metabolizing enzyme in liver microsomes. Since this enzyme is genetically polymorphic, effects of genetic polymorphism to the oxidative metabolism was anticipated. In addition to classical enzyme phenotyping methods, the approach using individual microsomes from genotyped donors was designed to address this effect in vitro. Subsequent CYP2C9 genotype sensitivity analysis demonstrated substantial reduced metabolism activities in the liver microsomes of individual donors with special CYP2C9*2*2 and CYP2C9*3*3 genotypes as compared to the wild-type donors.
As is understood by the skilled person, the genotype of the patient plays an important role in determining the observed phenotype i.e. the observed capacity of the CYP2C9 enzyme to metabolise BAF312. In the case of the CYP2C9 enzyme, there is a close correlation between the measured CYP2C9 genotype and the observed poor metabolizer phenotype. Therefore the test of the genotype is a good predictor of the observed phenotype.
For the avoidance of doubt, in an aspect of the invention, the patient genotype (including whether or not the patient has the poor metabolizer genotype) may be tested by correlation with the observed phenotype.
The CYP2C9 phenotype may be tested by administering a probe substrate of CYP2C9 and calculation of the so called metabolic ratio (=plasma concentration of metabolite/parent compound).
Testing of the patient genotype for patients belonging to the poor metabolizer subclass may be carried out by any standard testing method e.g. by a standard genotyping method e.g. PCR screening. The patient genotype may be determined by an in vitro test method e.g. a genotyping method. For example, in vitro testing may be carried out by taking a body fluid (e.g. blood or saliva e.g. blood) or tissue sample from the patient and analyzing the sample by any standard testing method (e.g. PCR screening) to determine the patient genotype. In an embodiment, the patient genotype is determined by analysis of a blood, saliva or tissue sample taken from the patient. In a preferred embodiment, the patient genotype is determined by analysis of a blood sample taken from the patient.
The patient genotype may be tested in vivo by measuring the patient exposure to BAF312 following administration, and in cases where there is a good correlation between the observed metabolic behavior and a specific genotype, allocating the patient genotype on the basis of the observed phenotype behaviour.
In aspects of the invention where the level of patient monitoring by the medical practitioner following administration of BAF312 depends on the patient genotype e.g. the eleventh and other relevant aspects, the level of patient monitoring for patients without the poor metabolizer genotype may be either no monitoring or a low level of monitoring for a monitoring period e.g. remote monitoring without the patient visiting a medical facility e.g. remote monitoring using a heart monitor capable of measuring the patient's status and signaling in the case that an adverse event occurs.
Substantial patient monitoring includes continuous or periodic monitoring of the patient by a physician or other trained medical practitioner for adverse events e.g. in a medical facility such as a hospital or other treatment centre.
The monitoring period may be greater than or equal to 3 hours, for example greater than or equal to 6 hours or greater than or equal to 12 hours or greater than or equal to one day. The monitoring period may also be less than one week, for example less than 4 days or less than 2 days. In an embodiment, the monitoring period is at least 6 hours.
Adverse events include heart rate reduction to <45 bpm e.g. <40 bpm; new onset second degree atrioventricular block (AV block) or other events considered to require the attention of a medical practitioner until resolution.
The invention provides the following specific embodiments of the aspects of the invention:
A method of assessing the appropriate therapeutic dose of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid to administer to a patient in need thereof, comprising the steps of:
A method of initiating use of a drug recommended not to be used with 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, comprising the steps of:
A method of treating a patient in need with 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, comprising the steps of:
A method for the treatment of an autoimmune condition in a patient in need thereof, said patient having the CYP2C9*3*3 genotype, comprising administering 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to the patient in a daily amount in the range from 0.25-0.75 mg e.g. in a daily amount of about 0.5 mg.
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient suffering from an autoimmune condition, said patient having the CYP2C9*3*3 genotype, said method comprising administering 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to the patient in a daily amount in the range from 0.25-0.75 mg e.g. in a daily amount of about 0.5 mg.
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient suffering from an autoimmune condition, said method comprising the steps of:
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
A method of optimizing the daily dosage of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating a patient in need, said method comprising the steps of:
A method of treating a patient in need with 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, comprising the steps of:
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in a method of treating MS, said method comprising the steps of:
1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of an autoimmune disease, said treatment being by a method according to any of the preferred embodiments above.
In a preferred aspect for the above specific embodiments, the patient is a patient suffering from MS e.g. SPMS or rSPMS.
The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
Stock solutions of 5 mM [14C]BAF312 were prepared in 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4 containing 0.25% CHAPS (to increase solubility) and diluted appropriately for incubations in 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4.
Furafylline, quercetin, quinidine, sulfaphenazole, ketoconazole, CHAPS, TAO and tranylcypromine were purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA). DETC was purchased from Fluka AG (Buchs, Switzerland) and triethylenethiophosphoramide from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium)
Phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (100 mM) was prepared by mixing 60 mL of 100 mM KH2PO4 (Fluka AG, Buchs, Switzerland) solution and 470 mL 100 mM Na2HPO4·2H2O solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The pH was accurately adjusted to 7.4 with the 100 mM KH2PO4 solution. Distilled water (HPLC grade) was obtained from Fluka AG (Buchs, Switzerland). β-NADPH was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Tris buffer pH 7.4 (1 M) was purchased from Applichem (Darmstadt, Germany) and further diluted to 0.1 M with water (Fluka).
Irga Safe Plus was used as liquid scintillation counting cocktail (ref. 6013249, Packard Bioscience, Meriden, CT, USA). For the on-line radiodetection in HPLC analysis, the liquid scintillator Rialuma® (Lumac-LSC, Groningen, The Netherlands) was used. Following chemicals were used to prepare the HPLC solvents: trifluoro acetic acid (analytical grade, ref 97100, Fluka), formic acid (analytical grade, ref 00264, Merck), acetonitrile (gradient grade, ref 0030, Merck) and water (chromatography grade, ref. 94486, Fluka). Other reagents, chemicals and buffer salts were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) or Fluka AG (Buchs, Switzerland) and were of analytical grade quality.
A pool of liver microsomes prepared from 47 individual donors was obtained from BD Biosciences (Woburn, MA, USA, catalog N° 452161, Lot 26). Pathogenicity testing of each of the livers in the pool was performed using a PCR protocol. Each liver was found to be negative for HIV1&2, HTLV1&2, and hepatitis B&C. The total P450 content was 360 pmol/mg protein. Catalytic activities of enzymes were provided by the manufacturer (activities in pmol/(mg protein·min)): phenacetin O-deethylase (CYP1A2, 460), coumarin 7-hydroxylase (CYP2A6, 1300), (S)-mephenytoin N-demethylase (CYP2B6, 55), paclitaxel 6α-hydroxylase (CYP2C8, 190), diclofenac 4′-hydroxylase (CYP2C9, 2900), (S)-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylase (CYP2C19, 56), bufuralol 1′-hydroxylase (CYP2D6, 94), chlorozoxazone 6-hydroxylase (CYP2E1, 2000), testosterone 6β-hydroxylase (CYP3A4, 4300), lauric acid 12-hydroxylase (CYP4A11, 1400), methyl p-Tolyl sulfide oxidase (FMO, 2100), estradiol 3-glucuronidation (UGT1A1, 1200), trifluoperazine glucuronidation (UGT1A4, 490), propofol glucuronidation (UGT1A9, 4900) and cytochrome c reductase (410).
Microsomes prepared from baculovirus infected insect cells (BTI-TN-5B1-4) expressing the following human P450 enzymes and the insect cell membrane preparations (negative control) were obtained from BD Biosciences (Woburn, MA, USA).
a)pmol product /min/pmol protein (CYP1A1: 7-ethoxyresorufin deethylase, CYP1A2: phenacetin deethylase, CYP1B1: 7-ethoxyresorufin deethylase, CYP2A6: coumarin 7-hydroxylase, CYP2B6: 7-ethoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin deethylase, CYP2C8: paclytaxel 6α-hydroxylase, CYP2C9: diclofenac 4′-hydroxylase, CYP2C18 (lot 1): 7-ethoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin deethylase, CYP2C18 (lot 2 and 12): diclofenac 4′-hydroxylase, CYP2C19: (S)-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylase, CYP2D6*1 and 2D6*10: bufuralol 1′-hydroxylase, CYP2E1: p-nitrophenol hydroxylase, CYP2J2: terfenadine hydroxylase, CYP3A4: testosterone 6β-hydroxylase, CYP3A5: testosterone 6β-hydroxylase, CYP3A7: testosterone 6β-hydroxylase, CYP4A11: lauric acid ω-hydroxylase, CYP4F2: 20-hydroxy leukotriene B4, CYP 4F3A: 20-hydroxy leukotriene B4, CYP 4F3B: 20-hydroxy leukotriene B4, CYP4F12: terfenadine hydroxylase, CYP19: aromatase).
1.5 Incubation of [14C]BAF312 with Human Liver Microsomes and Recombinant Human CYPs
The incubations were carried out in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Typical incubations of 200 (or 400) μL total volume were prepared as follows: 10 μL of 100 mM MgCl2 (5 mM), stock solutions of CHAPS, substrate and microsomes or recombinant human cytochrome P450 isoenzymes were added to appropriate volume of the buffer. The detergent CHAPS was added to a final concentration of maximally 0.025% (w/v) into all incubation in order to increase the solubility of the test substance. Reaction was started by addition of 20 μL of a fresh 10 mM NADPH (1 mM). The final concentrations are given in parentheses. The final concentrations of organic solvent were maximally 0.5% (v/v). For some experiments, higher incubation volumes were prepared by keeping proportionally the quantity of all solutions. The samples were incubated at 37° C. in a thermomixer (Eppendorf 5355) with agitation at 500 rpm.
The incubation reactions were stopped and the protein was precipitated by addition of an equal volume of ice-cold 0.5% formic acid in acetonitrile. After 30 min at −80° C. (or overnight at −20° C.) the samples were centrifuged at 30,000×g for 15 min. The supernatant was withdrawn. Aliquots were analyzed by LSC (20 μL) and the supernatant was diluted appropriately with water to obtain a final solution containing less than 30% of acetonitrile. For samples with lower concentration in substrate, supernatants were evaporated to about the half of initial volumes under reduced pressure at 40° C. with SpeedVac® concentrator (model AES 2010, Savant Inc., Holbrook, NY, USA) then mixed with 0.5% formic acid in acetonitrile to obtain a final solution containing less 30% of acetonitrile. Sample solutions were analyzed by HPLC combined with radiodetection. (for HLPC method, see Section 1.6)
The residual pellet was rinsed twice with 0.5 mL mixture of 0.25% formic acid in water/acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) and dissolved (about one hour under shaking at 20° C.) in 0.5 mL of a mixture containing 50% (v/v) Soluene-350 (0.5 M in toluene) and 50% isopropanol (v/v). Radiometry of aliquots of the supernatant and of the total amount of dissolved pellet was performed on a liquid scintillation counter (Tri-Carb 2500 TR, Packard Canberra Instr. Co. Meriden, CT, USA) after mixing with 10 mL liquid scintillation counting cocktail.
HLM from Single Donors with Different CPY2C9 Genotypes
Enzyme kinetic parameters Vmax and Km of the biotransformation by HLM and major metabolizing enzymes were calculated by using SigmaPlot Version 8.0 (S1), Enzyme Kinetics module Version 1.1 software (SPSS Science Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The intrinsic clearance was calculated by the equation: CLint=Vmax/Km.
Mean specific CYP enzyme concentrations in human liver microsomes were obtained from literature values (Rowland Yeo K, Rostami-Hodjegan A and Trucker G T (2004)] Abundance of cytochromes P450 in human liver: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Clinical Pharmacology; 57:687-688). For some recombinant human CYPs, the enzyme kinetic parameters were estimated by calculation assuming Michaelis-Menten type behavior for the two concentrations used, solving a linear equation system for 2 linear equations with 2 variables:
In an initial set of experiments, the linear range of the in vitro biotransformation of BAF312 with respect to incubation time was assessed. Incubations of 1 and 10 μM [14C]BAF312 with 0.3 mg/mL protein concentration of human liver microsomes were performed from 0 to 180 min and the disappearance of parent compound in the supernatant was determined by HPLC with radiodetection. As shown in
After establishing linear reaction conditions, enzyme kinetics parameters Km and Vmax were determined by incubating pooled human liver microsomes (0.1 mg/mL) with 15 substrate concentrations ranging from 1 to 300 UM for 90 min. (Table 1-1). Experimental data (rates of total metabolites formation) were analyzed by nonlinear regression analysis considering different kinetic models (Michaelis-Menten, Hill, isoenzyme, random substrate activation, substrate inhibition) as provided by the Enzyme Kinetics module, SigmaPlot (S1). Plotting the experimental data as Michaelis-Menten and Eadie-Hofstee plot (V vs. V/S) (see
Microsomes prepared from baculovirus infected insect cells (BTI-TN-5B1-4) expressing one single human cytochrome P450 isoenzyme were used to assess the involvement of specific enzymes in the biotransformation of [14C]BAF312. Incubation experiments with a panel of 21 recombinant human CYPs (CYP1A1, 1A2, 1B1, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9*1, 2C18, 2C19, 2D6*1, 2E1, 2J2, 3A4, 3A5, 3A7, 4A11, 4F2, 4F3A, 4F3B, 4F12 and CYP19) were conducted under similar conditions for each isoenzyme with 10 and 40 UM BAF312 incubation and 30 pmol CYP/mL for 30 min. At both concentrations (Table 1-2,
CYP2C9 was found to be the most efficient P450 isoenzyme for BAF312 metabolism.
CYP2C9 is subject to significant genetic polymorphism (CYP2C9*1, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3) which vary largely between different ethnic populations. Sulfaphenazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C9, both in vitro and in vivo.
Recombinant CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 were capable to metabolize BAF312 with low activity.
Enzyme kinetics parameters of the isoenzymes CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 for BAF312 metabolism were determined by incubating different concentrations of [14C]BAF312 with the isoenzyme. The kinetic profile with CYP2C9 and 3A4 are shown in
For other BAF312 metabolizing CYPs, kinetic constants Km and Vmax were estimated by solving 2 linear equations with 2 variables (Section 1.7), which allowed to estimate the enzymatic efficiency, or “intrinsic clearance” CLint for the various enzymes.
With regard to their importance in hepatic metabolic clearance of BAF312, an intrinsic clearance CLint relative to their abundance in human liver microsomes (Rowland Yeo, et al 2004) were calculated (Table 1-3). CYP2C9 contributed predominantly (79.2%) to the total intrinsic clearance in human liver microsomes. CYP3A (including 3A4 and 3A5) contribute for 18.5%. The contributions of other known drug-metabolizing enzymes (CYP2B6, 2C8, 2C19) were low.
In vitro experiments using selective chemical inhibitors (Newton, et al, 1995; Tucker, et al 2001) to attenuate the microsomal metabolism of BAF312 by specific CYP enzymes in human liver microsomes (Table 1-4) were carried out. The biotransformation of BAF312 was tested at 5 UM substrate concentration in the presence of the 8 individual chemical inhibitors. With 1 μM ketoconazole, the metabolism rates of BAF312 were inhibited by 25%. Significant strong inhibition was observed with 2 μM and 10 μM sulfaphenazole (65-77%), which is a specific inhibitor for CYP2C9. Quercetine exhibited slight inhibition (11-31%). Tranylcypromine showed also a slight inhibition (11-29%). Other chemical inhibitors tested did not substantially inhibit BAF312 metabolism (Table 1-4).
CYP2C9 is a polymorphic isoenzyme with variable metabolic capacity in different subjects. Since the biotransformation of BAF312 to its hydroxylated metabolites was mainly catalyzed by this isoenzyme, significant effect of genetic polymorphism of this isoenzyme to the metabolism can be anticipated. To further investigate this issue sensitivity analysis was carried out in vitro. The metabolism of [14C]BAF312 was studied in liver microsomes from individual donors with special genotypes (Table 1-5) for this enzyme.
CYP enzyme phenotyping are traditionally performed by three basic approaches (specific chemical inhibitors or inhibitory antibodies, recombinant cytochrome P450s and correlation analysis) documented in the scientific literature and recognized by FDA (Bjornsson et al., 2003; Ogilvie et al., 2008). Each of these approach has its advantages but also shortcomings and so, a combination of approaches is highly recommended (at least two should be used, provided the results of both methods are similar). For BAF312, the in vitro biotransformation in liver microsomes from individual donors with special CYP2C9 genotypes was investigated. Significant effect of genetic polymorphism of CYP2C9 was demonstrated. Results of this additional methods were in line with the data from two approaches (chemical inhibition and recombinant enzyme kinetics) as described and therefore provided further support and additional confidence to the conclusion of BAF312 enzyme phenotyping. Application of genotype sensitivity analysis using individual microsomes from genotyped donors provides an additional approach as an alternative method for the reaction phenotyping of xenobiotics, particularly when their metabolism is catalyzed predominantly by a genetic polymorphic enzyme.
Collectively, all the in vitro data obtained from three independent phenotyping approaches conclude that CYP2C9 contributes predominantly to the human liver microsomal biotransformation of [14C]BAF312 with partial contribution from CYP3A. Other CYP enzymes may also contribute to a minor extent.
79%
Athe CYP abundance values were from Rowland Yeo et al (2004) and Simcyp software;
Bfor CYP3A4, the abundance value of CYP3A was used.
As part of a larger trial, two CYP2C9*3*3 genotyped patients (poor metabolizer) were administered 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid and the resultant drug levels in the patient blood plasma samples measured and compared to those of CYP2C9*1*1 (normal metabolizer) patients.
The two CYP2C9*3*3 patients were found to experience an approximately 4-fold higher drug exposure than those of the CYP2C9*1*1 patients. This preliminary in vivo data confirmed previous Simcyp simulations, which predicted 4.1-fold mean AUC ratio in the groups of 45 virtual Simcyp populations based on the in vitro results as described in Example 1 (section 2.5).
A further investigation could be carried out for example as described in the study plan below.
A multi-center, open-label study in healthy volunteers with different CYP2C9 genotypes may be used to evaluate the effect of CYP2C9 sub-type on metabolism of 1-{4-[1-(4-cyclohexyl-3-trifluoromethyl-benzyloxyimino)-ethyl]-2-ethyl-benzyl}-azetidine-3-carboxylic acid.
The study may be divided into two parts: Part 1 and Part 2.
All subjects will complete Part 1, undergo a wash-out period of six weeks (42 days) before the end of study visit for subjects carrying CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype (EM) whereas subjects with *2/*3 and *3/*3 genotypes (PM) are expected to continue in Part 2. Replacement subjects for Part 2 do not need to undergo Part 1 prior to entering the study.
During Part 1, a total of up to 36 subjects will receive study drug:
The CYP2C9*1*1 subjects will be matched by body weight (+/−10%) to CYP2C9*2/*3 and *3/*3 subjects. During Part 2 a total of up to 18 subjects with CYP2C9 PM phenotype will receive study drug:
This study Part 1 will consist of a up to 41 day screening period, a baseline day (Day −1), a treatment day (Day 1), followed by a 6 week wash-out, PK assessment period up to Day 42 (corresponding to approx. 6 times the predicted T1/2 of 170 h in CYP2C9*3*3 carriers). PK assessments will be performed at the time-points shown in the Assessment Schedule. Subjects who meet the eligibility criteria at screening will be admitted to baseline evaluations. All baseline safety evaluation results must be available prior to dosing.
Subjects will be admitted to the study site in the morning of the day prior to dosing (Day −1) for baseline evaluations. The first day of dosing will occur on Day 1 when a single dose of 0.25 mg siponimod will be administered.
The completion evaluations for Part 1 will take place after a complete wash-out period (i.e. 6 weeks from dosing).
Safety assessments will include physical examinations, vital signs, standard clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology including lymphocyte count, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), 12-Lead ECG, on-line cardiac monitoring, Holter-ECG recording, adverse event, and serious adverse event monitoring.
Subjects will be confined to the study site from the morning of Day −1 until 48 hours after the drug administration and will be discharged from the site in the morning of Day 3. All other study visits will be ambulatory visits.
Part 2 will consist of an up to 41-day screening period, a baseline visit (Day −1), a treatment period of 3 days, followed by a follow-up period (21 days) and a Study Completion visit. Subjects who undergo both Part 1 and Part 2 have to undergo a wash-out period of six weeks prior to continue in Part 2 with the Baseline visit (i.e. minimum of six weeks between drug administration in part 1 and first drug administration in Part 2).
Eligibility will be assessed at screening and first baseline visit for any study subject including replacement subjects.
All baseline safety evaluation results must be available prior to dosing.
Subjects will be admitted to the study site in the morning of the day prior to dosing (Day −1) for baseline evaluations. The first day of dosing will occur on Day 1 when 0.25 mg siponimod will be administered. The same dose of 0.25 mg will be administered on Day 2, followed by 0.5 mg on Day 3. Following the last dosing on Day 3, pharmacokinetic assessments will be made for up to 24 hours post dose. Safety assessments will be made for up to 48 hours post dose.
Subjects will be confined to the study site from the morning of Day −1 until 48 hours after the last drug administration and will be discharged from the site in the morning of Day 5. Subjects will undergo End of Study visit starting from Day 25 up to Day 31 (visit window: up to +6 days).
Safety assessments will include physical examinations, vital signs, standard clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology including lymphocyte, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), 12-Lead ECG, on-line cardiac monitoring, Holter-ECG recording, adverse event, and serious adverse event monitoring.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61813380 | Apr 2013 | US | |
| 61811321 | Apr 2013 | US | |
| 61808406 | Apr 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16891898 | Jun 2020 | US |
| Child | 18630271 | US | |
| Parent | 16136630 | Sep 2018 | US |
| Child | 16891898 | US | |
| Parent | 15605277 | May 2017 | US |
| Child | 16136630 | US | |
| Parent | 14781922 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15605277 | US |
