The present invention generally relates to binocular eyewear displays and more particularly to a method of aligning, without user interaction, the two images of a binocular eyewear display with respect to their vertical, horizontal, and rotational orientation, and with respect to magnification.
Binocular displays include head mounted displays such as glasses and helmet mounted displays wherein a virtual image is presented to each eye. The image, usually created by a microdisplay, for example an LCD screen, may be presented to the eye by means of refractive or reflective optics, for example, through a lens system. Ideally the virtual images presented to each eye are perfectly aligned and the user perceives a single image similar to their perception of real images. If the virtual images are misaligned, the user may experience discomfort, for example, eye strain, headache, and nausea.
Commercial binocular eyewear are aligned mechanically during manufacture and some misalignment is common. Furthermore, misalignment of binocular eyewear may occur during use due to physical shock or exposure to temperature or humidity. Although there are no widely accepted standards for alignment, there have been several studies to determine acceptable values of binocular image alignment. A compilation of the desired alignment tolerances to avoid user discomfort is as shown in the following table as disclosed in Melzer & Moffitt, Head Mounted Displays-Designing for the User, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997 (ISBN 0070418195).
Although vendors of commercial eyewear displays are aware of the need for binocular image alignment, products today are not shipped with any alignment specifications.
Systems have been disclosed wherein a user of the binocular eyewear may take corrective steps to bring the misalignment within certain tolerances. See for example, in US 2003/0184860, the user operates a device to move a dot until it is aligned with another dot, and in WO 2006/058188, the user adjusts first and second display panels until images of display panel indicia shown on the viewing screen are located relative to baseline indicia.
However, users of systems requiring user intervention to properly align the system may find it burdensome to perform such intervention, especially when it may be required each time the system is turned on.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a method of aligning, without user interaction, the two images of a binocular eyewear display with respect to their vertical, horizontal, and rotational orientation, and with respect to magnification. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and this background of the invention.
A method is provided for aligning, without user interaction, the two images of a binocular eyewear display with respect to their vertical, horizontal, and rotational orientation, and with respect to magnification. The method for aligning images comprise generating a signal from a display modification system based on stored values indicative of misalignment of the binocular eyewear display; and adjusting, in accordance with the signal, an image or images to be displayed by an optics system. The stored values may include values for a plurality of temperatures and humidity.
The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and
The following detailed description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or the application and uses of the invention. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any theory presented in the preceding background of the invention or the following detailed description of the invention.
Commercial binocular eyewear are aligned mechanically at manufacture and some misalignment is common. By measuring the optical misalignment, e.g., at the factory or subsequently at a sales or repair facility, and storing misalignment parameters such as vertical, horizontal, rotation, and magnification, in memory integral to the eyewear, correction may be made automatically without user interaction to bring the alignment within desired limits. A first image is presented to a first eye and a second image is presented to a second eye. A microcomputer may adjust at least one of the first and second images, e.g., by shifting or rotating pixels, in accordance with the stored parameters. Additionally, the optical misalignment may be measured at a plurality of temperatures and humidity with the misalignment at each temperature and humidity stored. Subsequently, the misalignment at a current temperature and/or humidity may be adjusted in accordance with the stored values.
Referring to
When an image, which typically would comprise a video stream, is received by the image receiving device 104, it is transmitted to the microcomputer 126 via first connector 132. The image is then transmitted to the display driver 130 via second connector 134, and to first and second microdrivers 112 and 116 via third connector 136 and fourth connector 138, respectively, for viewing.
When the binocular display device 100 is fabricated, misalignment parameters are stored in the memory 128. When an image is to be displayed, the microcomputer 126 retrieves these misalignment parameters from the memory 128 and instructs the display driver 130 as appropriate to modify the image for display by the first microdisplay 112 and/or the second microdisplay 116 to compensate for the misalignment of the binocular display device 100.
The illustration shown in
Mechanical means of alignment may involve mechanical adjustment of either the image source, for example a microdisplay, or by adjustment of optical components between the image source and the eye, for example a lens. Because of the very small image alignment tolerances, the required mechanical adjustment may be prohibitively expensive to execute during or after manufacture of the device. The mechanical precision required may be on the order of 1 micron to 1 mm depending on the mechanism used to make the adjustment. Utilizing only mechanical alignment has limitations. One limitation is that it can be difficult or expensive to realign the images after the device is manufactured because it may require disassembly and of the eyewear display and for some components to be debonded. Also, it is not possible to correct for misalignment that may result from changes in temperature at which the device operates.
Electronic image alignment can overcome some of the limitations of mechanical image alignment. Horizontal or vertical image alignment of the image presented to both eyes is accomplished by shifting pixels in one or both of the images presented by the display drivers 130. In the chart below, it is shown that by shifting an image by one pixel shifts results in an angular change of 1.5 to 3.75 minutes of arc for the selected resolutions. This enables the very tight vertical and horizontal image alignment tolerances to be met simply through the electronic image adjustment. This chart uses values for a typical eyewear display with a 25 degree diagonal field of view with a 4:3 aspect ratio for the image.
Although adjustments for vertical and horizontal image alignment can be accomplished by shifting the image on a microdisplay, obtaining proper alignment with respect to rotation and magnification may be more complex manipulation of the initial image. A microcomputer may be required to calculate the corrected image.
A flow chart of the steps implemented by the microcomputer 126 is shown in
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description of the invention, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it being understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described in an exemplary embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5739797 | Karasawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5886822 | Spitzer | Mar 1999 | A |
6023372 | Spitzer | Feb 2000 | A |
6091546 | Spitzer | Jul 2000 | A |
6191809 | Hori | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204974 | Spitzer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6327079 | Namii et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349001 | Spitzer | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356392 | Spitzer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384982 | Spitzer | May 2002 | B1 |
6396461 | Lewis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6618099 | Spitzer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6753828 | Tuceryan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6829095 | Amitai | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6879443 | Spitzer | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6880931 | Moliton | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20030184860 | Hakkinen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2004049736 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2006058188 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080024391 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |