This patent specification pertains to x-ray mammography and tomosynthesis, and more specifically to techniques and equipment for acquiring, processing, storing and displaying mammograms, tomosynthesis projection images, and tomosynthesis reconstructed images, and to medical image softcopy reading systems, to hanging protocols and to other medical image display features.
Mammography has long been used to screen for breast cancer and other abnormalities and for diagnostics. Traditionally, mammograms were formed on X-ray film, but more recently flat panel digital imagers have been introduced that acquire a mammogram in digital form and thereby facilitate analysis and storage and provide other benefits as well. Further, X-ray tomosynthesis of the breast has been proposed recently, as discussed in the earlier-filed applications identified above, and clinical testing has been carried out. The assignee of this patent specification, Hologic, Inc., has demonstrated at trade shows in this country a fused, multimode mammography/tomosynthesis system that takes either or both types of images, and either while the breast remains immobilized or in different compressions of the breast. Dedicated breast tomosynthesis systems also have been proposed.
Tomosynthesis as used in the systems and methods disclosed in this patent specification typically involves acquiring a plurality of tomosynthesis projection images Tp at respective angles relative to the breast, and reconstructing therefrom a plurality of tomosynthesis reconstructed images Tr representative of breast slices that have selective thicknesses. Proper display techniques are desirable to make the presentation of Tp and/or Tr images (collectively referred to here as T images) more effective and efficient for review by health professionals. When tomosynthesis projection images Tp are acquired along with conventional 2D mammograms Mp, improved display methods are desirable that facilitate the display of both T and Mp images. Effective display approaches also are desirable when tomosynthesis images Tp and/or Tr that are acquired at one time need to be compared to mammograms Mp and/or to tomosynthesis images Tp and/or Tr acquired at a different time. Effective displays also are desirable when only Tr and/or Tp images are being displayed. Another display issue relates to Computer Aided Detection (CAD) methods that use computer analysis of images to identify locations and possibly other characteristics of suspected abnormalities. CAD marks currently are placed on or are otherwise associated with mammogram images Mp, but it may be useful to place them at the appropriate location on Tr and/or Tp images o to otherwise associate them with Tr/Tp images. Conversely, it may be desirable to obtain CAD marks by processing Tp and/or Tr images, and place them at appropriate locations on Mp images. Here the notation Mp refers to a conventional mammogram, which is a two-dimensional projection image of a breast; the term Mp encompasses both a digital image as acquired by a flat panel detector or another imaging device and the image after conventional processing to prepare it for display to a health professional or for storage, e.g. in the PACS system of a hospital or another institution. Tp refers to an image that is similarly two-dimensional but is taken at a respective tomosynthesis angle between the breast and the origin of the imaging X-rays (typically the focal spot of an X-ray tube), and also encompasses the image as acquired as well as the image after being processed for display or for some other use. Tr refers to an image that is reconstructed from images Tp, for example in the manner described in said earlier-filed patent applications, and represents a slice of the breast as it would appear in a projection X-ray image of that slice at any desired angle, not only at an angle used for Tp or Mp images. The terms Tp, Tr and Mp also encompasses information, in whatever form, that is sufficient to describe such an image for display, further processing, or storage. The images Mp, Tp and Tr typically are in digital form before being displayed, and are defined by information identifying properties of each pixel in a two-dimensional array of pixels. The pixel values typically relate to respective measured or estimated or computed responses to X-rays of corresponding volumes in the breast (voxels or columns of tissue).
Yet another issue concerns the large storage requirements of tomosynthesis images Tp and/or Tr. Because the reconstructed datasets for Tr images are large, it may be better in some circumstances to store unreconstructed projections images Tp, which require less storage. Transmission times to the storage device, and from the storage device to the display workstation, can thus be reduced. The Tp images in this case can be reconstructed to Tr images just prior to viewing that requires a display of Tr images. Further, it may be desirable that images viewed on a workstation are the same or at least comparable to images viewed on a different workstation, or the same or at least comparable to previously viewed images of the same dataset, even if the software and/or hardware of the workstation or acquisition system or intermediate storage or processing systems, have changed.
Yet another issue concerns the processing time required to reconstruct tomosynthesis images Tr. Because of relatively long reconstruction times, one possible approach is to perform reconstructions at an acquisition console, and send the already-reconstructed images to display workstations. This can allow a greater reading throughput if there are several acquisition systems that are all pushing images to one or more display workstations. The system can be designed so that it can handle M acquisition consoles sending their images to all N display workstations.
In one non-limiting example disclosed in this patent specification, acquisition and display of x-ray images starts with acquiring x-ray mammography image data representative of projection mammography images Mp of patients' breasts and x-ray tomosynthesis image data representative of projection images Tp taken at different angles of at least a source of imaging x-rays relative to the patients' breasts (e.g., different angles of the focal spot in an X-ray tube relative an immobilized breast). This acquisition can be performed by a single unit, using a single X-ray tube and a single flat panel digital imager or some other imaging device, configured to selectively acquire one or both of the mammography and tomosynthesis image data, in the same compression of a patient's breast or in different compressions, and at the same imaging session or at different times. The disclosed system and method use at least a subset of the acquired Tp images to form reconstructed tomosynthesis images Tr representative of slices of the breasts that have selected orientations and thicknesses. The system and method display at least a selected subcombination of the Mp, Tr and Tp images, preferably for concurrent viewing or at least for viewing in a single session, and preferably but not necessarily while showing, at or near the displayed images, respective labeling symbols identifying them as Mp, Tr or Tp images and possible other information that facilitates detection/diagnosis of abnormalities, such as information indicative of the position and orientation of the slices represented by Tr images, the thicknesses of such slices, etc. The information can be in alphanumeric or non-numeric form such as in the form of graphics and/or icons.
The method and system can further generate or otherwise obtain computer aided detection (CAD) marks for suspected abnormalities in said Mp images, and can display said marks at corresponding locations on or in association with Tr and/or Tp images that are related, e.g. by orientation or otherwise, with respective Mp images. In addition to location information, the CAD marks can provide information regarding, for example, the type of suspected abnormality and/or a confidence level that a mark points to an actual abnormality. CAD marks that are initially generated from or are otherwise related to some of the Tr, Tp or Mp images can be displayed at or in association with images from which they were not generated or with which they were not initially associated, at corresponding or at least related locations. Tp images can be stored together with version information indicative of at least one of an acquisition configuration used to acquire them and a reconstruction configuration used to reconstruct Tr images from said Tp images, to thereby enable later reconstruction of Tr images that match those reconstructed at an earlier time. Alternatively, or in addition, Tp images can be stored together with version information related to when they were acquired and can be later reconstructed into Tr images using a reconstruction configuration that matches the version information. A reconstruction configuration can be provided that has at least two different versions of reconstruction software, so that Tr images can be reconstructed using a version of the reconstruction software that matches the version information of the Tp images or earlier Tr images. Tr images can be reconstructed from only a subset of the acquired Tp images, which in an extreme case means reconstruction from a single Tp image to yield a Tr image that is equivalent of the Tp image. Tr images representative of at least two breast slices that differ in thickness can be formed, for example using MIP (Maximum Intensity Projection) methods or a summing method that may or may not use different weighting of the summed pixel data. The display can be toggled between Tr images representative of breast slices having different thicknesses, wherein the slices may or may not overlap in space. Through computer-processing, the volume of a lesion can be computed and displayed from information contained in the Mp, Tr and/or Tp images. The display can show concurrently, for example, Tr images reconstructed from a current acquisition of Tp images and at least one Mp image obtained from a previous acquisition involving a different breast compression. The concurrent display can be on the same or different display monitors, and can include at least Mp and/or Tr images, or at least Mp and/or Tp, images, or at least Tr and/or Tp images, or all three types of images, and can instead or additionally include 3D images formed from some or all of the acquired X-ray data, image data and/or from Mp, Tr and/or Tp images. Information indicative of status of loading Tr images for display can be shown as a part of the display. Different images can be displayed at different pixel sizes or fields of view or, alternatively, they can be selectively equalized by pixel size or field of view by selected types of interpolation or extrapolation, for example by up-converting to a smaller pixel size and thus a higher converted pixel count or by down-converting to a larger pixel size and thus a lower pixel count.
The display of Mp and T images such as Tr images can include displaying non-numeric indications of various properties of the displayed images. Such non-numeric indications can include indications of respective levels, spacing and slice thickness for displayed Tr images relative to a compressed breast imaged in an Mp image or relative to some other frame of reference, for example in the form of cross-lines on a bar related to the breast as displayed as an Mp image, wherein the height of the bar may relate to the thickness of the compressed breast, and/or non-numeric indications of respective thicknesses of breast slices represented by displayed Tr images, for example in the form of cross-bars of respective thickness on a bar related to Mp images, and/or non-numeric indications of the inclination angle of the slice or slices represented by one or more Tr images relative to a selected frame of reference such as the compressed breast that was imaged to generate the data from which the Tr images were reconstructed, and/or non-numeric indications of other parameters. Instead, or in addition to such non-numeric indications, numerical indications can be provided and displayed of the position of a slice image Tr relative to, e.g., a breast imaged in an image Mp, the thickness of the slice represented in a Tr image, and/or the orientation of that slice. Mp and T images such as Tr images can be shown overlaid on each other, and toggling can be allowed to switch between the image that is visible at the time and an image that is not, i.e. toggling between the 2D Mp image and the 3D Tr image or images. Similar toggling is available between different types of T images, of between different T images of the same type. In addition, other image display effects can be provided, such as, without limitation, fade-in/fade-out and blending two or more images at respective weightings, image overlays and masking, or other effeces, as commonly used in post-production of television images and in known image processing software such as Photoshop from Adobe.
T images such as Tr and/or Tp images can be displayed in ciné mode, with selective control over the speed of changing from one image to another, the order of images for display relative to an order in which they were reconstructed or acquired, the selection of the first and last images in the cine sequence, and/or other parameters. For example, at least two sets of Tr images, each set reconstructed from different acquisitions of Tp images, can be shown concurrently and scrolled through and/or displayed in cine mode in synchronism. For example, the two sets of Tr images can be synchronized such that the first and last slice images of each set can appear on the display at the same time, which may be implemented in different ways, such as by making the number of images the same (but possibly representing slices of one thickness in one set and slices of a different thickness in the other set), or by scrolling through images of one set faster than through images of the other set, or in some other way. Making the number of Tr images of one set match that of the other set may involve interpolating images of new slices to either reduce the number of images/slices in one set or increase it. The images in that case in one set of Tr images can be made to represent slices that are all the same thickness or slices that include some that are thicker or thinner than other slices.
Tr images can be displayed in scroll or cine mode in different orders, such as by starting with the image representing the bottom of the breast (the breast side resting on a breast platform during imaging) toward to image representing the top of the breast (the breast side compressed by a compression paddle), or in reverse order, or by starting with a Tr image representing a selected intermediate slice and proceeding toward the top or the bottom of the breast, or in some other desired order. The initial image that is displayed can be the bottom image, the top image, or a selected intermediate image. In a scroll or cine mode, the display can show every image of a Tr set for a breast, or a selected subset, such as every other image or some other subset of all Tr images representing a breast. The display system can have a default mode for a new user in which it starts the scroll or cine display with the bottom image, but with provisions for this default to be changed to another display protocol for that user in which the starting image is another one of the Tr images. A selection of initial or default display modes can be provided relating to the order, speed, slice thickness and/or other parameters of display of images, and user selection among those modes can be allowed. Similar procedures are available in the case when the orientation of the Tr slices is not the same as that of the Mp or Tp slices.
Thus, information regarding image data acquisition, storage, reconstruction and/or other parameters can be selectively displayed. For example, Tr images can be identified on the display as such, thus providing an image type indication display, and additional identification can be displayed in association with a displayed image that identifies the position in the breast of the slice represented by the displayed Tr image, the thickness of the slice, the orientation of the slice, and/or some other property associated with the displayed Tr image. Corresponding or at least similar display of information can be associated with different types of displayed images, such as Tp and Mp images and displayed in association with the display of the images. In the alternative, images such as Tr, Tp, and/or Mp can be displayed in different combinations and/or sub-combinations that may include the same type of images displayed concurrently or toggled, or different types of images displayed concurrently or toggled, without providing some or any of the identifications discussed above. Tr images can be printed in an N×M format (where N and M are positive integers), and printing of any images displayed on one or more monitors in WISIWIG format can be provided.
Compression of Mp, Tp, and/or Tr images and/or of other image data can be selectively carried out prior to storing or archiving the images. The compression can be lossless, or it can be lossy to a selected degree. Reconstruction of Tr images can be selectively carried out from compressed Tp images, preferable after suitable decompression. Window/level controls can be provided for at least selected ones of the displayed Tr images, and the controls can be set by the user, or automatically, to control the window width and/or the window level of only one, or only selected ones, or all of the displayed images. Image regions can be magnified for display, and the window/level controls automatically applied to the magnified regions. The Tr, or the Tp, or both the Tr and Tp images, can be stored in PACS storage, and can be associated with related Mp images and/or with selected CAD information. The Tp images can be acquired by using coarser binning, e.g. in a direction of relative motion between the source of imaging x-rays and a breast during image acquisition, or in both directions. Alternatively, such binning can be done after the Tp images are acquired, to thereby reduce storage and further processing requirements. The Mp, Tr, and/or Tp images that are concurrently displayed can be based on image data acquired from the same breast of a patient while the breast remains immobilized under compression that can remain the same or change between the acquisition of Mp images and Tp images. Alternatively, the Mp and Tp images can come from different acquisitions at different times or different breast compressions. Image data for Tp images acquired at two or more acquisition units can be supplied to and reconstructed into Tr images at a single reconstruction unit, from which one or more data display units can acquire Tr, Tp, and/or Mp images for display, or image data for Tp images can be stored as such and only reconstructed into Tr images immediately prior to display thereof. Images with difference characteristics such as pixel size, brightness, gamma curves, etc. can be processed to make selected ones of their characteristics sufficiently similar to facilitate comparison.
An additional or alternative display approach uses the Tp and/or Tr images in stereoscopic display. For example, when any two Tp images taken at different angles to the breast are displayed concurrently and viewed such that each is seen by a different eye of the observer, depth information is visualized. Similarly, when any two Tr images are reconstructed such that their image planes are at an angle to each other, depth information can also be perceived.
Images of different types and from different sources can be displayed in desirable size and resolution. For example, an image can be displayed in (1) Fit To View Port mode, in which the size of the displayed image size is maximized such that the entire imaged breast tissue is visible, (2) True Size mode, in which a display pixel on the screen corresponds to a pixel of the image, or (3) Right Size mode, in which the size of a displayed image is adjusted so that it matches that of another image that is concurrently displayed or with which the displayed image is or can be toggled. For example, if two images of the same breast are taken and are not the same size or do not have the same special resolution, provisions are made to selectively zoom in or zoom out one of them, or zoom both, such that they appear to be the same size on the screen when they are concurrently displayed or the user toggles between them, to facilitate comparison or to otherwise facilitate detection/diagnosis. Known interpolation/extrapolation and weighting techniques can be used in such re-sizing, and known image processing technology can be used to make other characteristics of the displayed images similar in a way that facilitates detection/diagnosis.
Selected hanging protocols are provided that are unique to the different types of images with which the disclosed system deals. As one example, the hanging protocols for 2D images (e.g. Mp images) and 3D images (e.g. Tr images) are linked so that when one type of image is displayed for a given breast the other type is displayed as well. For example, when the Mp image of a breast is displayed, a tile of the Tr images and/or of the Tp images is automatically displayed at the same time, with a desired hanging protocol that may involve scrolling or cine mode presentation, or may require user input so select a particular subset of the Tr and/or Tp images or a particular individual Tr/Tp image. Thus, a combined hanging protocol set can be provided for 2D and 3D images that are concurrently displayed or toggled such that only one type is displayed at one time. In addition, the combined hanging protocol can include provisions for linked display of CAD information associated with one or both of the 2D and 3D images involved in the hanging protocol. Alternatively, the hanging protocols for 2D images are made different from those for 3D images.
When CAD information is available that is associated with any of the images that can be displayed, linking can be provided such that CAD information derived from one of the types of displayed images can be automatically associated with corresponding locations on another displayed image. For example, if CAD information has been derived on the basis of an Mp image and the Mp image is displayed at the same time as, or is toggled with, Tr images, provisions are made to selectively display CAD information associated with the appropriate locations on Tr images. Alternatively, if CAD information is derived on the basis of Tr and/or Tp images, it can be automatically selectively displayed in association with an Mp image that is displayed at the same time or is toggled with the Tr/Tp images. In one example, an Mp image with CAD marks thereon remain displayed on the screen while Tr images of the same breast are scrolled or shown in cine mode on the screen, to facilitate identification and/or assessment of suspected abnormalities in the Tr images.
When Tr images are displayed, provisions are made to selectively adjust the thickness of the slice represented by any displayed Tr image. For example, if it is desired to display a Tr image of a slice (slab) of breast tissue that is 1 cm thick but the available Tr images represent 1 mm thick slices, 10 of those Tr images can be combined into a single new Tr image that represents the 1 cm slice, using for example a known MIP (maximum intensity projection) technique.
For storage, transmission to remote locations, and/or other purposes, the images can be formatted consistent with DICOM standards. For example, each raw or displayed projection image set or reconstructed slice image set for a single view is stored as a single Secondary Capture image instance according to DICOM. The image pixel data can be encoded in a selected compressed format (CODEC) that includes all projection or slice images
In describing preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure of this patent specification is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner.
Over time, there will likely be improvements to the acquisition systems and to the display systems, which may result in hardware and software upgrades and changes to reconstruction algorithms. This can create issues in viewing images taken previously. It may be important to be able to recall from storage and reconstruct an image that looks identical (or is at least comparable) to the way it looked when it was reconstructed and displayed in the past, or vice versa. Consider the example where an improvement in reconstruction algorithms improves image quality so as to allow detection of a cancerous lesion in an image where it was not visible using a previous version of the reconstruction algorithm and the then existing standard of care. While it could be useful to see older images processed with the newer algorithms, it may also be important to allow the re-display of images as they were viewed during an original detection/diagnosis. One way to accomplish this in accordance with the disclosure in this patent specification is to put a version number or some other information in the data for Tp images, which identifies the software and/or hardware versions of the Tp image data acquisition and/or Tr image reconstruction system at the time of acquisition, or to otherwise associate such information with the Tp images. During reconstruction at a later time, the reconstruction engine reads this version number or other similar information and reconstructs using the appropriate algorithm. Thus, system upgrades can maintain a library of older algorithms and/or hardware so as to be able to reconstruct using the proper technique.
An alternative design is illustrated in
An example of such a four-acquisition station system using the design of
The question of which system design will place a greater burden on the PACS storage of an institution will depend upon the sizes of the raw projections Tp and of the reconstructed images Tr. In general, if the raw projections Tp are smaller than the reconstructed images Tr, it might be desirable to save in PACS the raw or preliminarily processed data for Tp images and reconstruct the final Tr images on demand for display or other use. In all cases it may be desirable to keep both of these sizes as small as possible.
One way to reduce the size of an original dataset for a Tp image is to bin the projection Tp data to as large a pixel size as practical without reducing clinical efficacy of the final Tp or Tr images. It can be particularly useful to bin the pixel data asymmetrically, with a coarser bin in the direction of motion of a source of the imaging x-rays relative to the breast being imaged and a finer bin in the orthogonal direction, as described in at least one of said earlier-filed patent applications. The binning can be done as a part of the X-ray data acquisition process, in the course of reading out measurement data from a flat panel digital imager. Alternatively, it can be done after initial data acquisition. Compression of the projections using lossless or lossy compression algorithms can also serve to reduce the image size. There are different known ways to reduce the size of the reconstructed datasets such as those for Tr images, and this can be particularly important if the reconstructions are being saved in PACS, and if they are being transmitted through the hospital or other facility network. Data compression is one way to reduce dataset size. Another is to make the reconstructed pixel sizes as large as practical consistent with the clinical imaging task. It is believed that, as one non-limiting example, a pixel size of 140 microns×140 microns for the reconstructed slices is reasonable for many if not most viewing purposes. The display system can interpolate or extrapolate along either or both the image directions to a finer pixel size for display, and this can be useful when it is desired to conform to the pixel size of another image, such as a digital mammogram taken at a finer resolution than 140 microns. It is also faster to reconstruct into a coarser pixel size in either or both image directions and then perform display interpolation or extrapolation to a finer pixel size, and doing so may not affect clinical efficacy as long as the reconstructed pixel size is adequately fine.
The tomosynthesis acquisition system can be dedicated to Tp image acquisition, or it can be capable of acquiring either mammograms Mp or tomosynthesis images Tp (reconstructed into tomosynthesis images Tr) in separate imaging sessions, or both in a single imaging session, as described in said earlier-filed applications. Thus, a display system preferably should be able to display both Mp and Tr (and/or Tp) images concurrently or sequentially or in toggled mode. Similarly, the display system preferably should be able to display the current images as well as additional images taken at other times. The tomosynthesis acquisition can acquire mammograms and tomosynthesis images Tp in a single compression, as described in said earlier-filed applications. In such a case, because the breast geometry is essentially unchanged between the two image types, a location in an Mp or Tr image can be related to the same breast location in the other image. If correlative geometry exists, the two image types can be overlaid on top of each other, and the user can toggle back and forth between which image type is visible at a given time. Thus, in general, the display can simultaneously or sequentially or in toggled mode display mammograms and tomosynthesis images Tr (and/or Tp) from the current and previous studies. Tr slices can be reconstructed all to the same size, which can be the same as the size of an Mp image of the breast, or they can be initially reconstructed to sizes determined by the fan shape of the x-ray beam used in the acquisition and later converted to that same size by appropriate interpolation/extrapolation.
Methods of identifying which image corresponds to which image type in displays of Mp, Tr and/or Tp images are desirable. One example of such a method is illustrated in
The system described as a non-limiting example in this patent specification is capable of receiving and displaying selectively the tomosynthesis projection images Tp, the tomosynthesis reconstruction images Tr, and/or the mammogram images Mp, or a single type, or any subcombination of types. It can receive images stored uncompressed, losslessly compressed, and lossyly compressed. It can also include algorithms to decompress images sent in compressed format. The system has software to perform reconstruction of tomosynthesis image data for images Tp into images Tr. Further, it can include software to generate 3D display images from the tomosynthesis reconstructed images Tr using standard known methods such as MIP (Maximum Intensity Projection), summing, and/or weighted summing algorithms.
Referring to the tomosynthesis image Tr displayed on the right of
The selection of which Tr slice image should be displayed can be handled in a number of different ways. The user can click or drag the horizontal slider bar to the desired slice height, and the display would follow. Alternatively, the height could be selected using keyboard commands, mouse wheels or trackballs, or other such computer selection tools. The Tr slice image can be played in ciné mode, with the speed and direction controllable by the user. Tomosynthesis projection images Tp can also be displayed in ciné mode. If two sets of Tr images are displayed at the same time, for example a set from a current acquisition and a set from last year's acquisition for the same breast, it is possible that the thickness of the compressed breast changed, for example because the person's weight changed of because different compression was used. In such case, if each Tr image represents a breast slice of equal thickness, the number of images in one set may not be the same as that in the other. Several options are available for displaying the two sets concurrently in a scroll or cine mode. One is to move through the two sets at the same speed, in which case the end image of one set may remain on the screen while images from other set still change. Another is to move through the images at different speeds such that the end images of the two sets appear on the screen at the same time. Yet another is to change the images of one set (or both sets) such that the number of Tr images in each set is the same. This may involve interpolation/extrapolation that effectively changes the thickness of the slices in one or both sets, or omission of slices or repetition of the display of one or more slices. Similar synchronization or display mode selection is provided between scroll/cine displays of images for two breasts,
As noted above, if two or more sets of tomosynthesis images are displayed concurrently, for example Tr images from the same breast taken at different times, or Tr images of the two breasts taken at the same time, these two sets of images can be simultaneously displayed in cinë mode. The ciné displays can be synchronized, so that if these two datasets represent the same breast, the ciné display of both will traverse through each breast dataset at the same rate.
The display of the slice image Tr has, in addition to the display of the slice height, a graphical method of displaying the corresponding slice thickness. The width of the cross-bar shown in
These Tr images for thicker slices can be derived in several ways. One way is to sum together a number of the adjacent thinner Tr slice images. Another is to calculate a maximum intensity projection through the adjacent slices. Yet another way to change the slice thickness is to reconstruct the dataset using a subset of the projections Tp. If one uses fewer projections, this is equivalent to an acquisition over a shallower angle and consequently the reconstructed images Tr have a greater depth of field and thus represent thicker slices. For example, if only one projection is used to reconstruct, this represents a tomosynthesis acquisition over a 0° angular scan and the depth of field is infinite, i.e. the reconstructions are 2D, as in an Mp image of the same breast.
In the most general case, the display screens will contain a mixture of mammogram Mp, tomosynthesis Tr and/or Tp, and combination (Mp+Tp/Tr) images. One example of this is illustrated in
When more than one image is displayed, it can be convenient to have the images all be displayed at the same pixel spacing, using known interpolation or extrapolation methods applied to digital images. This can facilitate image comparison. As an example, if the prior mammogram was acquired on a system using 100 micron pixel spacing, but the current mammogram was acquired on a system using 70 micron pixel spacing, the display can map the images so the pixel spacings are identical. This pixel spacing adjustment can also be used for Mp and Tr/Tp images. In a preferred embodiment, the Mp and Tr/Tp images are displayed at the same pixel size. This is especially useful in performing overlaid or toggled image display, with the Mp and Tr/Tp images on top of each other. Thus, an object in a Tr image will appear at the same place as in the corresponding Mp image. If the two images are not at the same pixel size, toggling between them may show a distracting change due to the difference in pixel size. Matching the pixel spacings for all images on the display is only one possibility. A capability to change the pixel spacings of any image or sets of images, such as would occur when one zoomed a region of a breast, can also be included.
Zooming can be done on any of the images on the display. For example, in a combo overlay display mode, the zoomed area will zoom both the Mp and the Tr slice images as they are toggled. In other words, no matter what image type is displayed, it will be zoomed. Window/level can be independently, or jointly, applied to any combination of images on the display. In particular, for the Tr images the window/level can be applied to just the single displayed Tr slice image, or all the Tr slice images. If there is a magnified region of an image, window/level can be selectively applied just to the magnified region or to the entire image.
A compressed breast is frequently about 50 mm thick, and if the reconstructed slice pitch or separation is 1 mm then the examination will consist of 50 slices. The time it takes to load this study into display might be significant. Because of this, it can be useful for the display to indicate the status of the display if the image is currently being loaded. This can take the form of a message such as “image loading” or an icon indicating the same, or information providing more detail regarding loading status such as, without limitation, remaining time for completed display.
The sequence of displaying Tr images can be controlled to select either the first, last, or middle, or some other Tr slice image, as the initial slice to display. This control also defines the starting slice thickness to display.
CAD algorithms are commonly used to analyze mammograms. CAD can also be applied to Tr and/or Tr images. It can be useful to display CAD marks that are derived from or are otherwise associated with the Tr/Tp images, at or for the appropriate locations on the Mp images. For example, when a Tr slice image is displayed that contains one or more CAD marks, the x,y location of the CAD mark on the Tr slice image is used to compute the corresponding x,y location on the Mp image that represents the same breast location. The mark can then be placed on one or both of the Mp and Tr images at the same locations. Similarly, it can be useful to display CAD marks that are derived from or are otherwise associated with the Mp images on the appropriate locations on the Tr slice images. For example, the x,y location from the Mp CAD mark is used to compute the corresponding x,y location on the Tr slice image that represents the same breast location, and the mark is placed on the Tr slice.
One method of displaying CAD information is illustrated in
Another display method for use with Tr images that have Tr CAD data is to restrict the display of Tr slice images that do not have CAD marks on them. For example, if only Tr slice images 10 and 20 had CAD marks, then only those two slice images would be displayed. This allows the speedup of image review, because there can be 50 or more Tr slices that need to be displayed. The image display could jump from one CAD-marked slice image Tr to another quickly. There can also be an override method so that all the slice images Tr could be reviewed if desired.
In addition to CAD information display, the unit can display patient demographic and acquisition information relevant to the acquisition and reconstruction of Tp/Tr images.
There also are different methods of printing Tr/Tp images. Because there are many slice images Tr, it may not be desirable to print out each individual slice image on separate sheets. In this case, the system can support printing of the Tr images in an N×M film layout format. In addition, printing can be allowed in a screen capture WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) format, or for only selected ones of the images, for example images that have CAD marks associated with them.
A common method of reviewing digital mammography and tomosynthesis images Mp, Tp, and Tr is by using one or more monitors, and looking at the images in an essentially monoscopic mode—the same image is viewed by both of the viewer's eyes. Researchers have proposed using stereo viewing systems, whereby different images are presented to the left and right eyes. This method of viewing is known as stereoscopic, and can offer distance or depth cues similarly to what is normally seen by human eyes in regular vision tasks. Stereoscopic viewing offers potential benefits in viewing radiological images, because relative spatial relationships between objects in the body might be more apparent. One such stereoscopic system, for use in medical displays, is proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,565 issued on Feb. 29, 2000 and involves taking two radiographic images of a body from different angles. The display of these two images provides depth information.
Tomosynthesis images offer new opportunities for improved stereoscopic viewing, at least in part because it provides a richer dataset than just a stereo pair to be displayed, it provides many possible combinations of image pairs, and provides for scrolling through different displayed sets of images.
One method of display using pairs of images from the tomographic projection dataset Tp is illustrates in
Another method of display uses a variant of the reconstructed dataset Tr and is illustrated in
The examples described above are only illustrative and that other examples also are encompassed within the scope of the appended claims. It should also be clear that, as noted above, techniques from known image processing and display methods such as post-production of TV images and picture manipulation by software such as Photoshop from Adobe, can be used to implement details of the processes described above. The above specific embodiments are illustrative, and many variations can be introduced on these embodiments without departing from the spirit of the disclosure or from the scope of the appended claims. For example, elements and/or features of different illustrative embodiments may be combined with each other and/or substituted for each other within the scope of this disclosure and appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/593,719, filed Jan. 9, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,851,888; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/646,317, filed Oct. 5, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,042,612; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/027,771, filed Feb. 15, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,285,020; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,460, filed Aug. 11, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,916,915; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/827,909, filed Jul. 13, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,616,801; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/604,069, filed Nov. 24, 2006, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/271,050, filed Nov. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,577,282; which claims the benefit of provisional applications Nos. 60/628,516 and 60/631,296 filed respectively on Nov. 15 and 26, 2004, and incorporates herein by reference the entire contents of each of said earlier-filed patent applications. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/604,069, filed Nov. 24, 2006, now abandoned, is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,486, filed Nov. 26, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296; and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/305,480, filed Nov. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. To the extent appropriate, a claim of priority is made to the above applications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3365575 | Strax | Jan 1968 | A |
3502878 | Stewart | Mar 1970 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4160906 | Daniels et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4310766 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4380086 | Vagi | Apr 1983 | A |
4496557 | Malen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4513433 | Weiss et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4542521 | Hahn et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4662379 | Macovski | May 1987 | A |
4706269 | Reina et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4721856 | Saotome et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4744099 | Huettenrauch et al. | May 1988 | A |
4752948 | MacMahon | Jun 1988 | A |
4760589 | Siczek | Jul 1988 | A |
4773086 | Fujita et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4773087 | Plewes | Sep 1988 | A |
4819258 | Kleinman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821727 | Levene et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4969174 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | May 1991 | E |
5018176 | Romeas et al. | May 1991 | A |
5029193 | Saffer | Jul 1991 | A |
5051904 | Griffith | Sep 1991 | A |
5078142 | Siczek et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5163075 | Lubinsky et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5164976 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5212637 | Saxena | May 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5256370 | Slattery et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5289520 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291539 | Thumann et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5359637 | Webber | Oct 1994 | A |
5365562 | Toker | Nov 1994 | A |
5415169 | Siczek et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426685 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452367 | Bick et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526394 | Siczek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539797 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
5594769 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596200 | Sharma et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598454 | Franetzke et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609152 | Pellegrino et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
5657362 | Giger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668844 | Webber | Sep 1997 | A |
5668889 | Hara | Sep 1997 | A |
5706327 | Adamkowski et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719952 | Rooks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803912 | Siczek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818898 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828722 | Ploetz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844965 | Galkin | Dec 1998 | A |
5872828 | Niklason et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878104 | Ploetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5896437 | Ploetz | Apr 1999 | A |
5941832 | Tumey et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970118 | Sokolov | Oct 1999 | A |
5983123 | Shmulewitz | Nov 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999836 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005907 | Ploetz | Dec 1999 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091841 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6137527 | Abdel-Malek et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141398 | He et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175117 | Komardin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196715 | Nambu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207958 | Giakos | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233473 | Shepherd et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243441 | Zur | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244507 | Garland | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256370 | Yavuz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272207 | Tang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289235 | Webber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292530 | Yavus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341156 | Baetz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345194 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375352 | Hewes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411836 | Patel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415015 | Nicolas et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6442288 | Haerer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459925 | Nields et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480565 | Ning | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490476 | Townsend et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501819 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6556655 | Chichereau et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574304 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574629 | Cooke, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597762 | Ferrant et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611575 | Alyassin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620111 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633674 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647092 | Eberhard | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6744848 | Stanton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748044 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751285 | Eberhard | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813334 | Koppe et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6882700 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885724 | Li et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6909790 | Tomey et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909792 | Carrott et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912319 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940943 | Claus et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957099 | Arnone et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6970531 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978040 | Berestov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987831 | Ning | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999554 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7110490 | Eberhard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110502 | Tsuji | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123684 | Jing et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127091 | Op De Beek et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142633 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7245694 | Jing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7302031 | Hjarn et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315607 | Ramsauer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319735 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323692 | Rowlands et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7430272 | Jing et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443949 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7577282 | Gkanatsios et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583786 | Jing et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609806 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616801 | Gkanatsios et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630531 | Chui | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7688940 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697660 | Ning | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702142 | Ren et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7760853 | Jing et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760924 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792245 | Hitzke et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831296 | Defreitas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869563 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881428 | Jing et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894646 | Shirahata et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7916915 | Gkanatsios et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949091 | Jing et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7986765 | Defreitas et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991106 | Ren et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8131049 | Ruth et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8155421 | Ren et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170320 | Smith et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175219 | Defreitas et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8285020 | Gkanatsios et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8416915 | Jing et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452379 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8559595 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565372 | Stein et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565374 | DeFreitas et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571289 | Ruth et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8712127 | Ren et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8831171 | Jing et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9042612 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9066706 | Defreitas et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9460508 | Gkanatsios et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9498175 | Stein et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9549709 | DeFreitas et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9851888 | Gkanatsios et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsujii | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048343 | Launay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020050986 | Inoue et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070970 | Wood et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075997 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090055 | Zur et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122533 | Marie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030007598 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018272 | Treado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026386 | Tang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030072409 | Kaufhold et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072417 | Kaufhold et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073895 | Nields et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095624 | Eberhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097055 | Yanof et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030169847 | Karellas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194050 | Eberhard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194051 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194121 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210254 | Doan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212327 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215120 | Uppaluri et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008809 | Webber | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040066882 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066884 | Hermann Claus et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066904 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070582 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094167 | Brady et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101095 | Jing et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109529 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146221 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171986 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063509 | DeFreitas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078797 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105679 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129172 | Mertelmeier | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135555 | Claus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135664 | Kaufhold et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050226375 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074288 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098855 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129062 | Nicoson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155209 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060269041 | Mertelmeier | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291618 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030949 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036265 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076844 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078335 | Horn | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140419 | Souchay | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070223651 | Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242800 | Jing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080019581 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045833 | Defreitas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080101537 | Sendai | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112534 | Defreitas | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130979 | Ren | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080212861 | Durgan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090003519 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010384 | Jing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080594 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080602 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135997 | Defreitas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141859 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090213987 | Stein et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090238424 | Arakita et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090268865 | Ren et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296882 | Gkanatsios | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304147 | Jing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034450 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054400 | Ren | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086188 | Ruth | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150306 | Defreitas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195882 | Ren | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226475 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290585 | Eliasson | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110069809 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110178389 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234630 | Batman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120051502 | Ohta et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120238870 | Smith | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130028374 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130272494 | DeFreitas et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140044230 | Stein et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140044231 | Defreitas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140086471 | Ruth et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098935 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140232752 | Ren et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140376690 | Jing et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150049859 | DeFreitas et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150160848 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150310611 | Gkanatsios et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160270742 | Stein et al. | Sep 2016 | A9 |
20170024113 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170128028 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135650 | Stein et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180177476 | Jing et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180289347 | DeFreitas et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004051401 | May 2006 | DE |
0775467 | May 1997 | EP |
0982001 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1428473 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1759637 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1569556 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2602743 | Nov 2014 | EP |
53151381 | Nov 1978 | JP |
2001-346786 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002219124 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2006-231054 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-50264 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-521911 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007229269 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008-67933 | Mar 2008 | JP |
200886471 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009500048 | Jan 2009 | JP |
WO 9005485 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9816903 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0051484 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 03020114 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03037046 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2003057564 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004043535 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005051197 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006055830 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Essentials for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography system”, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-EN-US, 2006, 12 pgs. |
“Filtered Back Projection,” (NYGREN) published May 8, 2007; URL:http://web.archive.org/web19991010131715/http://owlnet.rice.edu/edu/-.about.e1ec539/Projects97/cult/node2.html., 2pgs. |
“Lorad Selenia” Document B-BI-SEO US/Intl (May 2006) copyright Hologic 2006, 12 pgs. |
ACRIN website, located at https://www.acrin.org/PATIENTS/ABOUTIMAGINGEXAMSANDAGENTS/ABOUTMAMMOGRAPHYANDTOMOSYNTHESIS.aspx, “About Mammography and Tomosnythesis”, obtained online on Dec. 8, 2015, 5 pgs. |
American College of Radiology website, located at http://www.acr.org/FAQs/DBT-FAQ, “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis FAQ for Insurers”, obtained online on Dec. 8, 2015, 2 pages. |
Aslund, Magnus, “Digital Mammography with a Photon Counting Detector in a Scanned Multislit Geometry”, Doctoral Thesis, Dept of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, Apr. 2007, 51 pages. |
Chan, Heang-Ping et al., “ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005, 7 pgs. |
Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Scale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005. |
Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98-5493, Nov. 1998, 8 pgs. |
Mammographic Accreditation Phantom, http://www.cirsinc.com/pdfs/015cp.pdf. (2006), 2 pgs. |
Niklason, Loren T. et al., “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging”, Radiology, Nov. 1997, vol. 205, No. 2, pp. 399-406. |
Pisano, Etta D., “Digital Mammography”, Radiology, vol. 234, No. 2, Feb. 2005, pp. 353-362. |
Senographe 700 & 800T (GE); 2-page download on Jun. 22, 2006 from www.gehealthcare.com/inen/rad/whe/products/mswh800t.html.; Figures 1-7 on 4 sheets re lateral shift compression paddle, 2 pgs. |
Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008, 8 pgs. |
Smith, Andrew, PhD, “Full Field Breast Tomosynthesis”, Hologic White Paper, Oct. 2004, 6 pgs. |
Wheeler F. W., et al. “Micro-Calcification Detection in Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, Conf-Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Dec. 11, 2001 to Dec. 15, 2001, Delhi, SPIE, US, vol. 6144, Feb. 13, 2006, 12 pgs. |
Wu, Tao, et al. “Tomographic Mammography Using a Limited Number of Low-Dose Cone-Beam Projection Images” Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, vol. 30, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2003, p. 365-380. |
Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, Public Version, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C, Inv. No. 337-TA-1063, in the matter of Certain X-Ray Breast Imaging Devices and Components Thereof, dates Jul. 26, 2018, 299 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180188937 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60631296 | Nov 2004 | US | |
60628516 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14593719 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15848913 | US | |
Parent | 13646317 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14593719 | US | |
Parent | 13027771 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13646317 | US | |
Parent | 12539460 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13027771 | US | |
Parent | 11827909 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 12539460 | US | |
Parent | 11604069 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 11827909 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11271050 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11604069 | US | |
Parent | 10723486 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11271050 | US | |
Parent | 10305480 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10723486 | US |