Patent Grant
7527903
This application relates to copending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/262,401, filed Oct. 28. 2005, entitled “Imaging Members”, the disclosure of which is totally incorporated herein by reference.
This disclosure relates, in various embodiments, to electrophotographic imaging members. The imaging members described herein can be used as photosensitive members, photoreceptors or photoconductors useful in electrophotographic systems, including printers, copiers, other reproductive devices, and digital apparatuses. More particularly, the imaging members of this disclosure do not require an anti-curl back coating to maintain flatness, etc., and comprise at least a flexible substrate and a layer comprising a charge transport material having certain characteristics. The disclosure also relates to methods of imaging utilizing such imaging members.
Electrophotographic imaging members, such as photoreceptors or photoconductors, typically include a photoconductive layer formed on an electrically conductive substrate or formed on layers between the substrate and photoconductive layer. The photoconductive layer is an insulator in the dark, so that during machine imaging processes, electric charges are retained on its surface. Upon exposure to light, the charge is dissipated, and an image can be formed thereon, developed using a developer material, transferred to a copy substrate, and fused thereto to form a copy or print. Electrophotographic imaging members are typically in either a flexible belt configuration or rigid drum form. Flexible imaging member belts may either be seamed or seamless belts. However, for reasons of simplicity, the disclosure hereinafter will focus only on electrophotographic imaging members in a flexible belt configuration.
For typical negatively-charged flexible electrophotographic imaging member belts, the outermost exposed photoconductive layer is a charge transport layer. Therefore, under normal machine service conditions, the charge transport layer is repeatedly subjected to various machine subsystems mechanical interactions and constantly exposed to corona effluents (emitted from a charging device) and other volatile organic compound (VOC) species/contaminants. Mechanical interactions against imaging member cause the charge transport layer to develop wear, abrasion, and scratch. Wear reduces the charge transport layer thickness, effectively changing the charging field strength. Scratches manifest themselves as printout defects. Exposure to corona effluents and chemical contaminants gives rise to charge transport layer material degradation and lateral charge migration (LCM) problems. Charge transport layer material degradation facilitates the premature onset of layer cracking and LCM. All of these physical and mechanical failures impact copy image quality and cut short the intended functional life of an electrophotographic imaging member belt, requiring frequent and costly belt replacement.
In a service environment, a flexible imaging member belt, mounted on a belt supporting module, is exposed to repetitive electrophotographic image cycling which subjects the outer-most charge transport layer to mechanical fatigue as the imaging member belt bends and flexes over the belt drive roller and all other belt module support rollers, as well as sliding bend contact above each backer bar's curving surface. This repetitive imaging member belt cycling leads to a gradual deterioration in the physical and mechanical integrity of the exposed outer charge transport layer leading to premature onset of fatigue charge transport layer cracking. The cracks developed in the charge transport layer as a result of dynamic belt fatiguing manifest themselves as copy printout defects which adversely affect image quality. In essence, the appearance of charge transport cracking cuts short the imaging member belt's intended functional life.
Many advanced imaging systems are based on the use of a flexible imaging member belt mounted over and around a belt support module design employing small diameter belt rollers. Although small diameter for belt module support rollers are used to provide easy paper self-stripping, the benefit of easy paper copy stripping negated by the large charge transport layer bending strain induced during dynamic fatigue belt flexing/bending motions over the small belt module support roller during image member belt machine functioning. The large bending strain induced by each small belt support module roller aggravates the mechanical problems that lead to early onset of charge transport layer cracking. Moreover, charge transport layer cracking frequently occurs at those belt segments parked over the support rollers during prolonged machine idling or overnight/weekend shut off periods as a result of exposure to residual corona effluents and airborne chemical contaminants. The early onset of charge transport layer cracking is a serious issue that impacts copy printout quality.
For typical negatively-charged imaging member belts, such as flexible photoreceptor belt designs, there are multiple layers comprised of a flexible supporting substrate, a conductive ground plane, a charge blocking layer, an optional adhesive layer, a charge generating layer, and an outermost exposed charge transport layer. The charge transport layer is usually the last layer to be coated and is applied by solution coating followed by drying at elevated temperatures, then cooling to ambient room temperature. When a production web stock of several thousand feet of coated multilayered photoreceptor material is obtained after finishing the charge transport layer coating and drying/cooling process, upward curling of the multilayered photoreceptor is observed.
This upward curling has been determined to be the consequence of thermal contraction mismatch between the applied charge transport layer and the substrate support. Because the charge transport layer in a typical conventional photoreceptor device, using polycarbonate as binder, has a coefficient of thermal contraction approximately 3.7 times greater than that of the flexible substrate support (usually a polyethylene naphthalate or a polyethylene terephthalate), the charge transport layer has a greater dimensional contraction than that of the substrate support as it cools down to ambient room temperature. The resulting internal tension strain in the charge transport layer causes the photoreceptor to exhibit upward curling. If unrestrained, the photoreceptor would spontaneously curl upwardly into a tube. To offset this curl and keep the photoreceptor web stock flat, an anti-curl back coating (ACBC) is applied to the backside of the flexible substrate support, opposite to the side having the charge transport layer.
Although an ACBC is required to keep the photoreceptor flat, its application represents more than just an additional coating step. It increases the labor and material cost and also decreases daily photoreceptor production through-put by about 25%. Moreover, the ACBC coating application frequently results in photoreceptor production yield lost due to web stock scratching damage caused by handling. In addition, the use of an ACBC has also been determined to cause an internal built-in strain of about 0.28% in the charge transport layer. This internal strain is cumulatively added onto each photoreceptor bending induced strain as the photoreceptor belt flexes over a variety of belt module support rollers during dynamic belt cycling function within a machine. Consequently, this internal built-in strain compounds and exacerbates the fatigue bending strain in the charge transport layer, causing early onset of charge transport layer cracking.
Seamed flexible photoreceptor belts are fabricated from sheets cut from an electrophotographic imaging member web stock having anti-curl back coating. The cut sheets are generally rectangular in shape. All edges may be of the same length or one pair of parallel edges may be longer than the other pair of parallel edges. The sheet is formed into a belt by joining the overlapping opposite marginal end regions of the sheet. A seam is typically produced in the overlapping opposite marginal end regions at the point of joining. Joining may be effected by means such as welding (including ultrasonic processes), gluing, taping, or pressure/heat fusing. However, ultrasonic seam welding is generally the preferred method of joining because it is rapid, clean (no application of solvents) and produces a thin and narrow seam. The ultrasonic seam welding process involves a mechanical pounding action of a welding horn which generates a sufficient amount of heat energy at the contiguous overlapping marginal end regions of the imaging member sheet to maximize melting of one or more layers therein. A typical ultrasonic welding process is carried out by pressing down the overlapping ends of the flexible imaging member sheet onto a flat anvil and guiding the flat end of the ultrasonic vibrating horn transversely across the width of the sheet and directly over the overlapped junction to form a welded seam having two adjacent seam splashings consisting of the molten mass of the imaging member layers ejected to either side of the welded overlapped seam.
These seam splashings of the ejected molten mass comprise about 40% by weight of the anti-curl back coating material. Seam splashings are undesirable projection features because they interfere with cleaning blade action, causing blade damage and wear which leads to premature loss of cleaning efficiency. The seam splashing present at the back side of the photoreceptor belt has also been found to physically interact with the belt support module roller, affecting the photoreceptor belt's delicate motion/cycling speed during an imaging process and impacting toner image formation as reflected in the copy printout quality.
Another disadvantage of an ACBC is that the ACBC is in constant mechanical interaction with the machine belt support rollers and backer bars; this causes substantial wear of the ACBC. The ACBC may also be susceptible to degradation by ozone attack, which also accelerates wear. ACBC wear generates dust inside the machine cavity and reduces the thickness of the anti-curl layer, diminishing its ability to keep the photoreceptor belt flat. This upward belt curling, caused by loss of ACBC thickness, produces significant surface distance variation between the photoreceptor belt surface and the machine charging device; this variation causes non-uniform charging density over the photoreceptor belt surface, degrading copy printout quality.
In addition, photoreceptor belt upward curling under dynamic belt functioning conditions causes the belt to physically interact/interfere with the xerographic subsystems, particularly in those machines employing a hybrid scavengeless development (HSD) or hybrid jumping development (HJD) subsystem. This interaction leads causes undesirable artifacts which manifest themselves as printout defects.
With the noted undesirable traits described above, it is clear that flexible seamed photoreceptor belts which do not require an ACBC can reduce the belt unit manufacturing cost, increase belt yield and daily production throughput, provide extended service life, and suppress of early onset of charge transport layer cracking by eliminating internal strain.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,089,369 to R. Yu, issued on Feb. 18, 1992, the disclosure of which is fully incorporated herein by reference, an electrophotographic imaging member having a supporting substrate and a charge generating layer, the supporting substrate material having a thermal contraction coefficient which is about the same as that of the charge generating layer, is disclosed. Substrate materials that have a thermal contraction coefficient value from about 5.0×10−5/° C. to about 9.0×10−5/° C. are used in combination with a benzimidazole perylene charge generating layer.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,987 to R. Yu, issued on Dec. 1, 1992, discloses a process for fabricating an electrostatographic imaging member including providing a flexible substrate comprising a solid thermoplastic polymer, forming an imaging layer coating including a film forming polymer on the substrate, heating the coating and substrate, cooling the coating and substrate, and applying sufficient predetermined biaxial tensions to the substrate while the imaging layer coating and substrate are at a temperature greater than the Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) of the imaging layer coating to substantially compensate for all dimensional thermal contraction mismatches between the substrate and the imaging layer coating during cooling of the imaging layer coating and the substrate, removing application of the biaxial tensions to the substrate, and cooling the substrate whereby the final hardened and cooled imaging layer coating and substrate are free of internal stress and strain. The disclosure of the '987 patent is also fully incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,983,481 to R. Yu, issued on Jan. 8, 1991, discloses an imaging member without an anti-curl backing layer having improved resistance to curling. The imaging member comprises a flexible supporting substrate layer, an electrically conductive layer, an optional adhesive layer, a charge generating layer, and a charge transport layer, the supporting substrate layer having a thermal contraction coefficient substantially identical to the thermal contraction coefficient of the charge transport layer. The supporting substrate may be a flexible biaxially oriented layer. The disclosure of this patent is further fully incorporated herein by reference.
While the above mentioned curl-free flexible imaging members having no ACBC may be useful for their intended purpose of resolving specific problems, resolution of one problem has often been found to create new ones. For example, the selection of a supporting substrate having thermal contraction matching that of the charge transport layer has been observed to be susceptible to attack and damage by solvents used in the charge transport layer coating solution, rendering the imaging member useless. Other substrate supports have good thermal contraction matching properties but also have inherently low glass transition temperatures (Tg) which are not suitable for imaging member fabrication. Applying biaxial tensioning stress onto imaging members maintained at a temperature slightly above the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the charge transport layer is a costly and cumbersome batch process.
There continues to be a need for improved imaging members, especially flexible imaging member belts, which do not have an ACBC, wherein the layer comprising the charge transport material has little or no internal built-in strain, is less susceptible to cracking induced by fatigue bending, and is less susceptible to material failure from exposure to corona effluents and airborne chemical contaminants.
Disclosed herein, in various embodiments, are photoconductive imaging members having a flexible substrate and at least a charge transport layer. The imaging members are configured in such a manner to avoid the usage of an anti-curl back coating layer. Also disclosed herein are methods of imaging utilizing such imaging members.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, an imaging member having the desired flatness without the use of an anti-curl back coating (ACBC) is provided. The imaging member comprises a substrate and a charge transport layer having little or no internal strain. The charge transport layer comprises a blend of two charge transport molecules and an acid molecularly dispersed or dissolved in a film forming polymer binder to form a thermoplastic solid solution. In other embodiments, the imaging member comprises a flexible substrate, a charge generating layer, and a charge transport layer having the characteristics noted above.
The first charge transport molecule is a biphenyl diamine, a terphenyl diamine, or a bis(triarylamine) stilbene. The biphenyl diamine is represented by Formula (I) below:
wherein X is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, hydroxyl, and halogen.
The terphenyl diamine is represented by Formula (II) below:
wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from alkyl, hydroxyl, and halogen. In a specific embodiment, R1 and R2 are methyl groups attached to the ortho position of each phenyl ring.
The bis(triarylamine) stilbene is represented by Formula (III) below:
wherein R1 through R6 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, halogen, alkyl having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, aryl having 6 to 10 carbon atoms, and cycloalkyl having 3 to 18 carbon atoms.
The second charge transport molecule is selected from the group consisting of a bis(triarylamine), tri-p-tolylamine, and triphenylmethane as shown in Formulas (IV) to (VII) below. The bis(triarylamine) is represented by Formula (IV) shown below:
wherein R1 through R6 are independently selected from alkyl having 1 to 3 carbon atoms and hydrogen; and wherein D is a divalent linkage selected from —O—, saturated or unsaturated alkyl having 1 to 8 carbon atoms, substituted alkyl having 1 to 8 carbon atoms, and cycloalkyl having 3 to 6 carbon atoms, wherein D is not phenyl.
In a specific embodiment, D is cyclohexane; R1 through R4 are methyl in the para position; and R5 and R6 are hydrogen. In this embodiment, the bis(triarylamine) of Formula (IV) is 1,1-bis(4-di-p-tolylaminophenyl) cyclohexane represented by Formula (V) below:
Tri-p-tolylamine is shown in Formula (VI) and triphenylmethane is shown in Formula (VII) below:
In other embodiments, the film-forming polycarbonate binder used in the charge transport layer is a poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl) carbonate represented by Formula (VIII) below,
or a poly(4,4′-diphenyl-1,1′-cyclohexane) carbonate represented by Formula (IX) below,
or a polyphthalate carbonate represented by Formula (X) below:
wherein x is an integer from about 1 to about 10, and n is the degree of polymerization.
In still another embodiment, the disclosure relates to an imaging member lacking an anti-curl back coating. The imaging member comprises a flexible substrate, wherein an electrically conductive layer is present when the substrate is not electrically conductive, a charge generating layer, and a charge transport layer. The charge transport layer comprises a film-forming polymer binder, an acid and the first and second charge transport molecules discussed above. The acid is present in an amount of from about 0 ppm to about 10,000 ppm. In other embodiments, trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) is present in an amount of from about 0 to about 300 ppm or from 10 ppm to 150 ppm. Also disclosed herein is a method of imaging which comprises generating an electrostatic latent image on the imaging member set forth above, developing the latent image and transferring the developed electrostatic image to a suitable substrate.
In a specific embodiment, the charge transport layer comprises a polycarbonate binder of poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl) carbonate, a first charge transport molecule of N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine (m-TBD), a second charge transport molecule of tri-p-tolylamine (TTA), and trifluoro acetic acid in the amount of from about 60 ppm to about 150 ppm.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, an image-forming apparatus for forming images on a recording medium is disclosed. The apparatus comprises a flexible electrophotographic imaging member having a charge retentive surface to receive an electrostatic latent image thereon, wherein the imaging member is as described herein. Also included is a development component to apply a developer material to the charge-retentive surface to develop the electrostatic latent image to form a developed image on the charge-retentive surface. Additionally, the apparatus comprises a transfer component for transferring the developed image from the charge-retentive surface to another member or a copy substrate and a fusing member to fuse the developed image to the copy substrate.
Further disclosed are methods of imaging utilizing one or more of the embodiments of an imaging member set forth herein.
These and other non-limiting features or characteristics of the present disclosure will be further described below.
The following is a brief description of the drawings, which are presented for the purposes of illustrating the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and not for the purposes of limiting the same.
A flexible imaging member which does not require the use of an anti-curl back coating is disclosed herein. The flexible imaging member has a layer comprising two charge transport molecules dispersed in a film-forming polymer binder. The first charge transport molecule is a biphenyl amine, terphenyl diamine, or bis(triarylamine) stilbene. The second charge transport molecule is a bis(triarylamine), tri-p-tolylamine, or triphenylamine. The weight ratio of second charge transport molecule to first charge transport molecule is from about 90:10 to about 67:33. An acid is also added to the layer containing the charge transport material.
The exemplary embodiments of this disclosure are more particularly described below with reference to the drawings. Although specific terms are used in the following description for clarity, these terms are intended to refer only to the particular structure of the various embodiments selected for illustration in the drawings and not to define or limit the scope of the disclosure. The same reference numerals are used to identify the same structure in different Figures unless specified otherwise. The structures in the Figures are not drawn according to their relative proportions and the drawings should not be interpreted as limiting the disclosure in size or location.
Referring to
The flexible imaging member sheet 10 may comprise multiple layers. If the flexible imaging member sheet is a negatively charged photoreceptor device, the flexible imaging member sheet may comprise a charge generating layer sandwiched between an electrically conductive substrate surface layer (coated over the flexible substrate support layer) and a charge transport layer. Alternatively, the flexible member sheet may comprise a charge transport layer sandwiched between a conductive surface layer and a charge generating layer to give a positively charged photoreceptor device.
The layers of the flexible imaging member sheet 10 can comprise numerous coating layers containing materials of suitable mechanical properties. Examples of typical layers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,570, U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,117 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,021,309, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. The cut sheet of flexible imaging member sheet 10 with overlapping ends shown in
The overlapping end marginal regions 12 and 14 can be joined by different means including ultrasonic welding, gluing, taping, stapling, and pressure and heat fusing to form a continuous imaging member seamed belt, sleeve, or cylinder. However, due to considerations such as ease of belt fabrication, short operation cycle time, and mechanical strength of the fabricated joint, the ultrasonic welding process is usually used to join the overlapping end marginal regions 12 and 14 of flexible imaging member sheet 10 into a seam 30 in the overlapping region, as illustrated in
When an ultrasonic welding process is employed to transform the sheet of flexible electrophotographic imaging member material into an imaging member seamed belt, the seam of the belt is created by the high frequency mechanical pounding action of a welding horn over the overlapped opposite end regions of the imaging member sheet to cause material fusion. In the ultrasonic seam welding process, ultrasonic energy generated by the welding horn action, in the form of heat is applied to the overlap region to melt layers such as the charge transport layer 16, charge generating layer 18, interface layer 20, blocking layer 22, conductive layer 24, a small part of the substrate support layer 26, and the anti-curl back coating 28 as well. Therefore, direct material fusing at the interface between the contacting surfaces of the two overlapping ends of the substrate support layer provides best adhesion bonding to give highest seam rupture strength.
Upon completion of welding of the overlapping region of the imaging member sheet into a seam 30 with the ultrasonic seam welding techniques, the overlapping ends are converted into an abutting region shown in
Large tension stresses will develop in the vicinity adjacent to the seam 30 due to the excessively large seam splashing size 68 and its material and geometrical discontinuity thereof. The detrimental effect of stress concentration compounded by the repeating cleaning blade striking/impact on the seam during imaging member belt cycling promotes the early development of a seam cracking/delamination failure site 80 as shown in
In addition to seam failure and debris spreading, the portion of the flexible imaging member seamed belt above the failure site 80 can act as a flap which moves upwardly. This flap can become an obstacle to the cleaning instrument as it travels across the surface of the seamed belt. When the cleaning instrument strikes the flap, great force is exerted on the cleaning instrument which can lead to damage, e.g., excessive wear, nicking, and tearing of the cleaning blade.
Besides damaging the cleaning blade, the striking of the flap by the cleaning instrument can cause unwanted vibration in the flexible imaging member seamed belt. This unwanted vibration adversely affects copy/print quality because imaging occurs on one part of the seamed belt simultaneously with the cleaning of another part of the seamed belt.
When the flexible imaging member seamed belt bends over the exterior surfaces of the rollers of a belt module within an electrophotographic imaging apparatus, the bottom surface 34 of the flexible imaging member seamed belt is compressed while the top surface 32 is stretched under tension. Compression stresses, such as those at the bottom belt surface 34, rarely cause seam failure. Tension stresses, such as that induced at the top belt surface 32, however, are a more serious problem. Tension stress is the cause of charge transport layer cracking; additionally, such cracks may propagate throughout the other layers of the imaging member. These fatigue-induced cracks manifest themselves into copy printout defects. Consequently, the usefulness and service life of a flexible imaging member seamed belt is shortened from about 105,000 belt cycles for an imaging member belt of the present disclosure to about 47,000 belt cycles for a control imaging belt member when dynamically tested in an imaging machine utilizing a belt support module equipped with two 19 millimeter diameter rollers.
Imaging members of the present disclosure may comprise a flexible supporting substrate 26, a conductive layer 24, an optional charge blocking layer 22, an optional adhesive layer 20, a charge generating layer 18, and a charge transport layer 16. However, the imaging member of the present disclosure does not contain an anti-curl back coating 28 of conventional prior art imaging member 10 as shown in
The substrate may be opaque or substantially transparent and may comprise numerous suitable materials having the required mechanical properties. When the substrate material is an electrically non-conductive material, the substrate may further be provided with an electrically conductive layer; i.e. the electrically conductive layer may be optional. Accordingly, the substrate may comprise a layer of an electrically non-conductive or conductive material such as an inorganic or organic composition. As electrically non-conducting materials, there may be employed various resins known for this purpose including polyesters, polycarbonates, polyamides, polyurethanes, and the like. The electrically insulating or conductive substrate may be flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid, and may have any number of different configurations such as, for example, a sheet, a scroll, an endless flexible belt, a cylinder, and the like. The substrate may be in the form of an endless flexible belt which comprises a commercially available biaxially oriented polyester known as MYLAR™, MELINEX™, and KALADEX® available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
The thickness of the substrate layer depends on numerous factors, including mechanical performance and economic considerations. The thickness of this layer, especially for a flexible imaging member belt, may range from about 50 micrometers to about 200 micrometers. The surface of the substrate layer is preferably cleaned prior to coating to promote greater adhesion of the deposited coating composition. Cleaning may be effected by, for example, exposing the surface of the substrate layer to plasma discharge, ion bombardment, and the like methods. However, in specific embodiments, the substrate has a thickness of from about 50 micrometers to about 125 micrometers, based on the considerations of optimum light energy transmission for effective back erase, adequate substrate flexibility, and cost impact. A substrate of polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) is also effectively used in embodiments of the present disclosure.
The conductive layer on the flexible substrate may vary in thickness over substantially wide ranges depending on the optical transparency and degree of flexibility desired for the electrophotographic member. Accordingly, for a flexible photoresponsive imaging device, the thickness of the conductive layer may be from about 20 angstrom units to about 750 angstrom units, and more preferably from about 100 Angstrom units to about 200 angstrom units for an optimum combination of electrical conductivity, flexibility and light transmission. The electrically conductive substrate surface layer may be an electrically conductive metal layer formed, for example, on the substrate by different coating technique, such as a vacuum depositing technique. Typical metals include aluminum, zirconium, niobium, tantalum, vanadium and hafnium, titanium, nickel, stainless steel, chromium, tungsten, molybdenum, and the like. Regardless of the technique employed to form the metal layer, a thin layer of metal oxide forms on the outer surface of most metals upon exposure to air. Thus, when other layers overlying the metal layer are characterized as “contiguous” layers, it is intended that these overlying contiguous layers may, in fact, contact a thin metal oxide layer that has formed on the outer surface of the oxidizable metal layer. In embodiments, for rear erase exposure, an electrically conductive substrate surface layer light transparency of at least about 15% is desirable. The electrically conductive substrate surface layer need not be limited to metals. Other examples of electrically conductive substrate surface layers may be combinations of materials such as conductive indium tin oxide as a transparent layer for light having a wavelength from about 4000 Angstroms to about 7000 Angstroms or a transparent copper iodide (CuI) or a conductive carbon black dispersed in a plastic binder as an opaque conductive layer.
An optional charge blocking layer may be applied to the electrically conductive substrate surface layer prior to or subsequent to application of the anti-curl backing layer to the opposite side of the substrate. Generally, electron blocking layers for positively charged photoreceptors allow holes from the imaging surface of the photoreceptor to migrate toward the conductive layer. Any blocking layer capable of forming an electronic barrier to holes between the adjacent photoconductive layer and the underlying conductive layer may be utilized. The blocking layer may be nitrogen containing siloxanes or nitrogen containing titanium compounds as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,338,387, U.S. Pat. No. 4,286,033 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,110, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. In embodiments, a preferred blocking layer comprises a reaction product between a hydrolyzed silane and the oxidized surface of a metal ground plane layer. The blocking layer may be applied by different techniques such as spraying, dip coating, draw bar coating, gravure coating, silk screening, air knife coating, reverse roll coating, vacuum deposition, chemical treatment and the like. For convenience in obtaining thin layers, the blocking layers in embodiments are preferably applied in the form of a dilute solution, with the solvent being removed after deposition of the coating by techniques such as by vacuum, heating and the like. The blocking layer should be continuous and have a thickness of less than about 0.2 micrometer. A greater thickness may lead to undesirably high residual voltage.
An optional adhesive layer may be applied to the hole blocking layer. Typical adhesive layer materials include, for example, polyesters, 49,000 (available from Rohm Haas), VITEL PE1200 (available from Bostik, Inc), Ardel polyarylate (available from Toyota Hsutsu Inc) and polyurethanes. In embodiments, satisfactory results may be achieved with an adhesive layer thickness from about 0.02 micrometer (200 Angstroms) to about 0.3 micrometer (3,000 Angstroms). Techniques for applying an adhesive layer coating mixture to the charge blocking layer include spraying, dip coating, roll coating, wire wound rod coating, gravure coating, bird applicator coating, and the like. Drying of the deposited coating may be effected by techniques such as oven drying, infrared radiation drying, air drying and the like.
A photogenerating layer or charge generating layer may be applied to the adhesive blocking layer which can then be overcoated with a contiguous charge transport layer as described hereinafter. Examples of photogenerating layers include inorganic photoconductive particles such as amorphous selenium, trigonal selenium, and selenium alloys comprising selenium-tellurium, selenium-tellurium-arsenic, selenium arsenide and mixtures thereof, and organic photoconductive particles including various phthalocyanine pigment such as the X-form of metal free phthalocyanine described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,357,989, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, metal phthalocyanines such as vanadyl phthalocyanine, hydroxygallium phthalocyanine, and copper phthalocyanine, dibromoanthanthrone, squarylium, quinacridones available from DuPont under the tradename MONASTRAL RED, MONASTRAL VIOLET, and MONASTRAL RED Y, VAT ORANGE 1 and VAT ORANGE 3 (tradenames for dibromo anthanthrone pigments), benzimidazole perylene, substituted 2,4-diamino-triazines disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,442,781, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, polynuclear aromatic quinones available from Allied Chemical Corporation under the tradenames INDOFAST DOUBLE SCARLET, INDOFAST VIOLET LAKE B, INDOFAST BRILLIANT SCARLET, and INDOFAST ORANGE, dispersed in a film forming polymeric binder. Multi-photogenerating layer compositions may be utilized where a photoconductive layer enhances or reduces the properties of the photogenerating layer. Examples of this type of configuration are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,415,639, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Other photogenerating materials known in the art may also be utilized. Charge generating binder layers comprising particles or layers of a photoconductive material such as vanadyl phthalocyanine, hydroxygallium phthalocyanine, metal free phthalocyanine, benzimidazole perylene, amorphous selenium, trigonal selenium, selenium alloys such as selenium-tellurium, selenium-tellurium-arsenic, selenium arsenide, and the like and mixtures thereof may be utilized because of their sensitivity to white light. Vanadyl phthalocyanine, metal-free phthalocyanine and tellurium alloys may also be incorporated because these materials provide sensitivity to infrared light.
A polymeric film forming binder material may be employed as the matrix in the photogenerating binder layer. Typical polymeric film forming materials include those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,121,006, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Organic polymeric film forming binders include thermoplastic and thermosetting resins including polystyrene-co-4 vinyl pyridine, polycarbonates, polyesters, polyamides, polyurethanes, polystyrenes, polyarylethers, polyarylsulfones, polybutadienes, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, polyethylenes, polypropylenes, polyimides, polymethylpentenes, polyphenylene sulfides, polyvinyl acetate, polysiloxanes, polyacrylates, polyvinyl acetals, polyamides, polyimides, amino resins, phenylene oxide resins, terephthalic acid resins, phenoxy resins, epoxy resins, phenolic resins, polystyrene and acrylonitrile copolymers, polyvinylchloride, vinylchloride and vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylate copolymers, alkyd resins, cellulosic film formers, poly(amideimide), styrene-butadiene copolymers, vinylidenechloridevinylchloride copolymers, vinylacetate-vinylidenechloride copolymers, styrene-alkyd resins, polyvinylcarbazole, and the like. These polymers may be block, random or alternating copolymers.
The photogenerating composition or pigment is present in the resinous binder composition in amounts, generally, of from about 5% by volume to about 90% by volume and is dispersed in from about 10% by volume to about 95% by volume of resinous binder, and in embodiments preferably from about 20% by volume to about 30% by volume of photogenerating pigment is dispersed in about 70% by volume to about 80% by volume of resinous binder composition. In one embodiment, about 8% by volume of photogenerating pigment is dispersed in about 92% by volume of resinous binder composition.
The photogenerating layer containing photoconductive compositions and/or pigments and the resinous binder material generally ranges in thickness of from about 0.1 micrometers to about 5 micrometers, and in embodiments has a thickness of from about 0.3 micrometers to about 3 micrometers. The photogenerating layer thickness is related to binder content. Higher binder content compositions generally require thicker layers for photogeneration.
Numerous techniques may be utilized to mix and thereafter apply the photogenerating layer coating mixture; these techniques include spraying, dip coating, roll coating, or wire wound rod coating. Drying of the deposited coating may be effected by different techniques such as oven drying, infra red radiation drying, air drying and the like.
The charge transport layer of the present disclosure comprises two charge transport molecules and an acid dispersed in a film-forming polymer resin binder. The charge transport molecules may be added to polymeric materials which are incapable of supporting the injection of photogenerated holes from the charge generating layer and incapable of allowing the transport of these holes. This converts the electrically inactive polymeric material to a material capable of supporting the injection of photogenerated holes from the charge generating layer and capable of allowing the transport of these holes through the active layer in order to discharge the surface charge on the active layer.
The first charge transport molecule is a biphenyl diamine, a terphenyl diamine, or a bis(triarylamine) stilbene. The biphenyl diamine is represented by Formula (I) below:
wherein X is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, hydroxyl, and halogen. Such diamines are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,265,990; U.S. Pat. No. 4,233,384; U.S. Pat. No. 4,306,008; U.S. Pat. No. 4,299,897; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,439,507; these disclosures are herein incorporated in their entirety for reference.
The terphenyl diamine is represented by Formula (II) below:
wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from alkyl, hydroxyl, and halogen. In a specific embodiment, R1 and R2 are methyl groups attached to the ortho position of each phenyl ring.
The bis(triarylamine) stilbene is represented by Formula (III) below:
wherein R1 through R6 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, halogen, alkyl having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, aryl having 6 to 10 carbon atoms, and cycloalkyl having 3 to 18 carbon atoms.
Examples of diamines suitable as the first charge transport molecule include, but are not limited to, N,N,N′,N′-tetra(o-methylphenyl)-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine; N,N′-bis(4-methylphenyl)-N,N′-bis[4-(1-butyl)-phenyl]-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine; N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-N,N′-bis[4-(1-butyl)-phenyl]-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine; N,N′-bis(4-t-butylphenyl)-N,N′-bis[4-(1-butyl)-phenyl]-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine; N,N,N′,N′-tetra[4-(1-butyl)-phenyl]-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine; N,N, N′,N′-tetra[4-t-butyl-phenyl]-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine; N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(4-methylphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine; N,N′-bis(4-methylphenyl)-N,N′-bis(4-ethylphenyl)-1,1′-(3,3′-dimethylbiphenyl)-4,4′-diamine; 4,4′-bis(diethylamino)-2,2′-dimethyltriphenylmethane; N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine (m-TBD); N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(alkyl-phenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine; and N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(chlorophenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine. Other suitable diamines include N,N′-bis(alkyl)-N,N′-bis(phenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine. In specific embodiments, the diamine is m-TBD or N,N,N′,N′-tetra(o-methylphenyl)-[p-terphenyl]-4,4′-diamine.
The second charge transport molecule is selected from the group consisting of a bis(triarylamine), tri-p-tolylamine, and triphenylmethane as shown in Formulas (IV) to (VII). The bis(triarylamine) is represented by Formula (IV) below:
wherein R1 through R6 are independently selected from alkyl having 1 to 3 carbon atoms and hydrogen; and wherein D is a divalent linkage selected from —O—, saturated or unsaturated alkyl having 1 to 8 carbon atoms, substituted alkyl having 1 to 8 carbon atoms, and cycloalkyl having 3 to 6 carbon atoms, wherein D is not phenyl.
The bis(triarylamine) of Formula (IV) will always be different from the biphenyl amine of Formula (I) because it contains a divalent linkage D between the two phenyl rings. The bis(triarylamine) of Formula (IV) will always be different from the terphenyl amine of Formula (II) because D cannot be phenyl.
In a specific embodiment, D is cyclohexane; R1 through R4 are methyl in the para position; and R5 and R6 are hydrogen. In this embodiment, the bis(triarylamine) of Formula (IV) is 1,1-bis(4-di-p-tolylaminophenyl) cyclohexane represented by Formula (V) below:
Tri-p-tolylamine is shown in Formula (VI) and triphenylmethane is shown in Formula (VII) below:
The combination of the given first and second charge transport molecules is critical. The first charge transport molecules have better photoelectrical properties than the second charge transport molecules. However, the first charge transport molecules also cause the charge transport layer to curl upward, whereas the second charge transport molecules do not. The second charge transport molecule acts as a plasticizer, increasing the flexibility of the charge transport layer and relaxing it so as to eliminate curl.
It has been found that as the weight ratio of second charge transport molecule to first charge transport molecule (second:first) increases in a charge transport layer, the degree of upward curling decreases. For example, when the charge transport layer contains only m-TBD, the photoreceptor will curl into a tube. However, when the second:first ratio is 67:33 by weight, the photoreceptor exhibits no upward curling and becomes flat. In specific embodiments, the second:first weight ratio is from about 90:10 to about 55:45. In other specific embodiments, the second:first weight ratio is from about 90:10 to about 60:40. In more specific embodiments, the second:first weight ratio is from about 90:10 to about 67:33. The second:first weight ratio is critical to obtaining a photoreceptor which exhibits no upward curling.
An acid is added to the charge transport layer to maintain the imaging member's photoelectrical integrity. The addition of the second charge transport molecule induces higher residual, residual cycle-up, and lower sensitivity in the charge transport layer. The acid dopes the layer and solves this problem. The amount of acid needed depends on the second:first ratio, but is required. Generally, any stable protonic acid or Lewis acid may be used. For example, methyl acrylic acid, dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid, acetic acid, benzoic acid, and trifluoro acetic acid are suitable acids. Acidic polymers such as UCARMAG 537 may also fulfill this function. U.S. Pat. No. 4,725,518, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes other suitable acids. The acid, which is required, may be present in an amount of from 0 ppm to about 10,000 ppm depending on the strength of the acid; in further embodiments, the acid is present in an amount of from 0 ppm to about 2,000 ppm or from about 60 ppm to about 150 ppm. Because an acid is required, these ranges should not be construed as including no acid at all. In specific embodiments, trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) is added to the charge transport layer in an amount of from about 60 ppm to about 150 ppm.
An inactive thermoplastic resin binder soluble in methylene chloride or other solvent may be employed to prepare the coating solution and form the thermoplastic polymer matrix of the charge transport layer of the imaging member. Typical inactive resin binders soluble in methylene chloride include polycarbonate resin, polyvinylcarbazole, polyester, polyarylate, polyacrylate, polyether, polysulfone, polystyrene, polyamide, and the like. Molecular weights can vary from about 20,000 to about 150,000. The film-forming binder is usually a polycarbonate resin.
In embodiments, the film-forming polycarbonate binder used in the charge transport layer is a poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl) carbonate (available from Bayer as MAKROLON) represented by Formula (VIII) below,
or a poly(4,4′-diphenyl-1,1′-cyclohexane) carbonate (PC-z 200, available from Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Corporation) represented by Formula (IX) below,
or a polyphthalate carbonate (available from General Electric Company as LEXAN PPC 4701) represented by Formula (X) below:
wherein x is an integer from about 1 to about 10; n is the degree of copolymerization, and n is a number of from about 50 to about 300. These polycarbonates are preferred because they are highly miscible with the selected charge transport molecules in a large range of weight ratios. They form a solid solution charge transport layer having good flexibility and mechanical strength suitable for a flexible belt application.
Polycarbonate resins having a weight average molecular weight Mw, of from about 20,000 to about 250,000 are suitable for use, and in embodiments from about 50,000 to about 120,000, may be used based on the ease of forming a coating solution having proper viscosity for application and on the mechanical strength of the resulting charge transport layer. The electrically inactive resin material may include poly(4,4′-dipropylidene-diphenylene carbonate) with a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of from about 35,000 to about 40,000, available as LEXAN 145 from General Electric Company; poly(4,4′-isopropylidene-diphenylene carbonate) with a molecular weight of from about 40,000 to about 45,000, available as LEXAN 141 from the General Electric Company; and a polycarbonate resin having a molecular weight of from about 20,000 to about 50,000 available as MERLON from Mobay Chemical Company. In specific embodiments, MAKROLON, available from Bayer Chemical Company, and having a molecular weight of from about 130,000 to about 200,000, is used. Methylene chloride is used as a solvent in the charge transport layer coating mixture for its low boiling point and the ability to dissolve charge transport layer coating mixture components to form a charge transport layer coating solution.
In embodiments, the charge transport layer of the present disclosure comprises from about 25 weight percent (wt %) to about 75 wt % of all charge transport molecules and from about 75% to about 25% by weight of the film-forming polymeric binder resin, both by total weight of the charge transport layer. In specific embodiments, the charge transport layer comprises from about 45 wt % to about 55 wt % of all charge transport molecules and from about 55 wt % to about 45 wt % of the film-forming polymeric binder resin.
Different techniques may be utilized to mix and thereafter apply the charge transport layer coating mixture to the charge transporting layer. Typical application techniques include spraying, dip coating, roll coating, wire wound rod coating, and the like. Drying of the deposited coating may be effected by different techniques such as oven drying, infra red radiation drying, air drying and the like.
Generally, the thickness of the charge transport layer is from about 10 to about 50 micrometers, but thicknesses outside this range can also be used. In general, the ratio of the thickness of the hole transport layer to the charge generating layer is in embodiments from about 2:1 to 200:1 and in some instances from about 2:1 to about 400:1. In specific embodiments, the charge transport layer is from about 14 micrometers to about 26 micrometers thick.
The imaging member may also contain a narrow electrically conductive ground strip (not shown) coated at one edge of the imaging member belt in contact with the charge transport layer, charge generating layer and the conductive layer to effect electrical continuity. Ground strip formulations are well known; they are typically comprised of conductive particles dispersed in a film forming binder.
Although the disclosure has been described with respect to exemplary embodiments, it is not intended to be limited thereto. Those skilled in the art will recognize that variations and modifications including equivalents, substantial equivalents, similar equivalents and the like may be made therein which are within the spirit of the disclosure and the scope of the claims. The development of the present disclosure will further be illustrated in the following non-limiting working examples, it being understood that these examples are intended to be illustrative only and that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the materials, conditions, process parameters and the like recited herein. All proportions are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
The effect of the second:first weight ratio on the curl was determined. m-TBD was used as the first charge transport molecule and TTA was used as the second charge transport molecule. They were mixed with MAKROLON 5705, a commercially available polycarbonate thermoplastic polymer. The polymer and charge transport molecules were mixed in a 1:1 weight ratio (i.e. 50 wt % each). This mixture was then dissolved in methylene chloride to form a coating solution.
TTA:m-TBD weight ratios of 0:100, 33:67, 50:50, 67:33, or 100:0 were used. The 0:100 served as the control. Coating solutions having these weight ratios were coated onto a charge generating layer and dried at 135° C. for 5 minutes to form a charge transport layer. Each charge transport layer was 20 micrometers thick. A 1″×5″ piece was cut from each coating and the amount of curl was measured as the final distance between the two ends. A measurement of five inches indicates no curl; i.e. the five-inch piece remained flat. The results thus obtained are listed in Table 1 below:
The data showed that as the TTA:m-TBD weight ratio increased, the degree of curling decreased. When the TTA:m-TBD weight ratio was 67:33, the imaging member had no upward curling and was absolutely flat.
The effect of using methylene chloride or chlorobenzene as the solvent on the curl of the charge transport layer was tested and found not to affect the amount of curl.
The effect of using MAKROLON 5705, MERLON M-50, PC-z 200, and PC-z 800 on the amount of curl was also tested and found not to affect the amount of curl.
Both of these tests were conducted using a TTA:m-TBD ratio of 67:33 and a charge transport layer thickness of 20 micrometers.
The effect of acid on electrical performance was tested on two different imaging member sets.
In the first set, the charge generating layer was composed of hydroxygallium phthalocyanine (OHGaPc) in polystyrene-4-co-vinyl pyridine copolymer. Over the charge generating layer were coated various charge transport layers as follows:
Each charge transport layer was 50 wt % MAKROLON 5705 and 50 wt % charge transport molecules. The charge transport molecules had a second:first weight ratio of 0:100, 50:50, 66:34, or 75:25. The charge transport layers also had trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) in amounts of 0 ppm, 66 ppm, or 167 ppm. From these variables, a total of 12 different charge transport layers were tested. The charge transport layer having a 0:100 weight ratio and 0 ppm TFA served as control. Four different electrical properties were measured for each charge transport layer.
The photoelectrical results obtained for the first set are given in Table 2 below.
In the second set, the charge generating layer was composed of benzimidazole perylene (BZP) in PC-z 200. Over the charge generating layer were coated various charge transport layers as follows:
Each charge transport layer was 50 wt % MAKROLON 5705 and 50 wt % charge transport molecules. The charge transport molecules had a second:first weight ratio of 0:100, 1:99, 5:95, 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 50:50, and 66:33. The charge transport layers also had trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) in amounts of 0 ppm or 167 ppm. From these variables, a total of 16 different charge transport layers were tested. The charge transport layer having a 0:100 weight ratio and 0 ppm TFA served as control. Four different electrical properties were measured for each charge transport layer.
The photoelectrical results obtained for the second set are given in Table 3 below.
The results in Tables 2 and 3 indicate that TFA doping in the charge transport layers successfully adjusted the photoelectrical properties of the fabricated imaging members of the present disclosure to produce properties equivalent to those of the control. The results also show that the addition of a small amount of TFA, in a range of from 66 to 167 ppm levels, to the CTL did not cause any negative impact to the flatness or curl control of the imaging members.
While particular embodiments have been described, alternatives, modifications, variations, improvements, and substantial equivalents that are or may be presently unforeseen may arise to applicants or others skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims as filed and as they may be amended are intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications variations, improvements, and substantial equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3121006 | Middleton et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3357989 | Byrne et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3442781 | Weinberger | May 1969 | A |
| 4233384 | Turner et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4265990 | Stolka et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4286033 | Neyhart et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4291110 | Lee | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4299897 | Stolka et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4306008 | Pai et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4338387 | Hewitt | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4415639 | Horgan | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4439507 | Pan et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4725518 | Carmichael et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4786570 | Yu et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4937117 | Yu | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4983481 | Yu | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5021309 | Yu | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5089369 | Yu | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5167987 | Yu | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5834080 | Mort et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6020096 | Fuller et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070172749 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |
