The present invention generally relates to the field of imaging objects entrained in a flow of fluid, and more specifically, relates to imaging objects such as individual nanoparticles that are entrained in a flow of fluid to obtain surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectra corresponding to the objects.
SPR is the resonant excitation of oscillating free charges at the interface of a metal and a dielectric. When SPR spectra are generated and collected, they can be used to determine specificity, kinetics, affinity, and concentration with respect to the interactions between two or more molecules, where one of the molecules is attached to a solid sensing surface. Reaction kinetics correspond to both an association and a dissociation rate at which an analyte interacts with the bound detection molecule. Affinity refers to the strength with which an analyte binds to the detecting molecule. Specificity refers to the propensity of a molecule to bind to the detecting molecule to the exclusion of other molecules. SPR spectra have been used in studies involving many types of molecules including proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and low molecular weight substances (e.g., hormones and pharmaceuticals).
One analytical technique, known as SPR based bio-sensing, has been developed to enable direct measurements of the association of ligands with receptors, without the use of indirect labels, such as fluorescent markers and radioactive molecular tags. This label free direct sensing technique reduces the time and workload required to perform assays, and minimizes the risk of producing misleading results caused by molecular changes induced by the use of indirect labels. Another important aspect of the bio-sensing technique is that SPR based bio-sensing enables bio-molecular interactions to be measured continuously and in real-time, thereby enabling the determination of association and dissociation kinetic data in contrast to traditional “end point” analytical methods.
The utility and acceptance of SPR based bio-sensing is evident from the over 2,500 peer-reviewed scientific papers that have been published, which cite the use of SPR technology. To date, there is an estimated installed base of 1,500 research grade SPR analytical instruments in basic and applied research laboratories at universities, national research centers, and major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies around the world. The diversity of recently published articles relating to bio-molecular interaction analysis include such applications as drug discovery (lead identification and target validation), ligand fishing, comparative binding specificity, mutation studies, cell signaling, multi-molecular complexes, immune regulation, immunoassays, vaccine development, and chromatographic development. Such SPR based research tools are of great value to researchers involved in basic and applied life sciences who are studying the function of molecules in biological systems.
Over the past decade, interest in the unique optical properties of metallic and semiconductor nanoparticles has increased considerably with respect to the use of suspensions and films incorporating these nanoparticles for the purposes of exciting surface plasmons to enable the detection of SPR spectra. In addition, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for infrared absorbance spectral information and surface enhanced fluorescence for enhanced fluorescence stimulation can also be detected. Nanoparticles are particles that are less than 100 nanometers in diameter. They display large absorbance bands in the visible wavelength spectrum yielding colorful colloidal suspensions. The physical origin of the light absorbance is due to incident light energy coupling to a coherent oscillation of the conduction band electrons on the metallic nanoparticle. This coupling of incident light is unique to discrete nanoparticles and films formed of nanoparticles (referred to as metallic island films). Achieving SPR with ordinary bulk materials requires the use of a prism, grating, or optical fiber to increase the horizontal component of the incident light wave vector (i.e., to achieve the required coupling).
Historically, gold nanoparticles have been used as a pigment in stained glass as early as 350 years ago. Chemist and physicist Michael Faraday first recognized that the color of this stained glass was a result of the metallic gold being in a colloidal form, and Gustaf Mie explained this phenomenon theoretically in 1908, by solving Maxwell's equation for absorption and scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a spherical particle.
Recently, sensor devices have been developed in the known art to exploit the unique optical properties of these nanoparticles. SPR measurements have been made using gold nanoparticle suspensions to detect biomolecular interactions in real time by monitoring the absorbance of colloidal suspensions. Similarly, SPR has been excited using polystyrene and silica beads with silver and gold island films and hollow gold nanoshells. However, to date, all such measurements have been performed primarily on bulk homogeneous suspensions of nanoparticles, due to the challenge of individually addressing and detecting these small objects.
For example,
This bio-sensing technique was first reported in 1983, and first commercialized in 1990. Since then many different optical geometries have been explored including: (i) the Otto configuration, which utilizes an air gap between the optical coupling prism and the SPR supporting metal; (ii) the Kretschmann configuration, which eliminates the need for an air gap in favor of the metal film directly deposited upon the prism base; (iii) the use of a diffraction grating to excite SPR; (iv) an optical fiber configuration, wherein metal is deposited cylindrically around the fiber core; (v) planar/channel waveguide configurations with retro-reflective elements; (vi) microstructure systems that have an integrated light source, detector, and guiding optics, including a capillary configuration in which SPR is excited in the interior capillary walls; (vi) use of gold island films; and (vii) two-dimensional (2D) imaging techniques for SPR array-based sensing.
Referring once again to
In
In
In
where V is the spherical nanoparticle volume, c is the speed of light, ω is the angular frequency of the incident light, εb is the permittivity of the surrounding bulk dielectric medium (assumed to be relatively independent of the frequency of light), ε1(ω)) and ε2(ω) denote the real and imaginary parts of the metal permittivity, or more specifically, (ε(ω)=ε1(ω)+iε2(ω)).
For nanoparticle SPR measurements, the maximum absorbance wavelength, λspr (SPR coupling wavelength) dependence on refractive index is not as sensitive as the bulk thin film SPR measurements. Sensitivity of a 75 nanometer shift in the SPR coupling wavelength per refractive index unit (RIU) is reported, as compared to 3000 nanometer shift per RIU for bulk film SPR devices. Thus, gold nanoparticle SPR measurement based methods are 40 times less sensitive. However, additional geometries, including gold/silver alloy nanoparticles, ellipsoidal nanoparticles, triangular nanoparticles, and hollow nanoshells have been reported as having increased sensitivities up to six fold (400 nm wavelength shift per RIU).
Although bulk SPR devices exhibit increased sensitivity to refractive index over SPR nanoparticle devices, the nanoparticles have an advantage with respect to the sensitivity of adsorption of molecules to the gold surface. Specifically, the decay length of the electric field extending from the gold/chemical sample interface is approximately 20 times shorter for that of nanoparticle colloidal gold versus bulk thin gold film. Therefore, because nanoparticles have more energy confined closer to the gold surface, these particles are more surface sensitive and will yield a larger signal during receptor/ligand interactions.
However, the above mentioned prior art techniques are currently limited by throughput, mass transport diffusion, and depletion of small concentrations of analytes. Commercial SPR biosensors are currently limited to four-channel detection. This fact, and the relatively high degree of training necessary to operate these instruments and analyze the results, currently limit SPR analytical use in the laboratory. In contrast, other bio-molecular analytical methods, such as immunological assays, and spectroscopic techniques (absorption, fluorescence spectroscopy, and fluorescent polarization) have kept up with increased analytical demands by making available instruments having, for example, 96, 384, and 1,536 micro-wells. It should be noted that there are several publications directed towards multi-spot or 2D array SPR sensors. However, most if not all of these approaches are directed toward optical configurations that can only detect a single angle or single wavelength intensity. Therefore, changes in the association or dissociation of bio-molecules are detected as an intensity change, which has limited sensitivity and limited dynamic range compared to full spectral SPR data, where the entire angular or wavelength spectrum is measured, enabling a high precision measurement of the coupling angle or wavelength.
Current commercial SPR instrumentation uses a fixed sensor having a gold layer capable of supporting SPR, such as the traditional SPR bulk optic prism based sensor shown in
Finally, current commercial SPR instrumentation uses sensors that have relatively large areas (e.g., four, twelve, and a hundred square millimeters). Because the SPR signal is proportional to the density of binding, having a large sensor area limits the analyte sensitivity, since low concentration analyte binding serves to deplete the analyte concentration near the surface.
It would therefore be desirable to provide apparatus and a method that address and detect individual nanoparticles and particles, enabling high throughput and full spectrum SPR measurement, measuring the association of molecules free in solution via SPR emitted from nanoparticles and micro particles suspended in solution, employing a significantly reduced sensor area with improved analyte sensitivity, providing a label-free direct sensing approach that reduces time and workload needed to carryout assays, and measuring biomolecular interactions continuously and in real-time. The prior art does not teach or suggest a complete solution to the problems discussed above.
A first aspect of the invention is directed to an SPR biomolecular interaction method that uses flow imaging systems, which can combine the speed, sample handling, and cell sorting capabilities of flow cytometry with the imagery, sensitivity, and resolution of multiple forms of microscopy and full visible/near infrared spectral analysis of detector technology to collect and analyze SPR spectra from objects entrained in a flow of fluid that emit an SPR spectra. This method includes the steps of placing gold or silver nanoparticles or beads that have a detector molecule attached to them in a container, adding a solution of analyte or ligand molecules to the container, and introducing a portion of the sample into a flow imaging system. The flow imaging system provides up to a thousand-fold increase in signal collection over conventional SPR instrument designs and allows for maintaining particles in suspension to ensure optimal free solution conditions for association and dissociation of bio-molecular species. This approach is thus not severely mass transport limited, like planar embodiments. A peak absorbance wavelength can then be measured using detector technology. Since full spectral SPR data can be collected with this detector technology, the entire angular or wavelength spectrum is measured, providing a very precise measurement of the coupling angle or wavelength. In addition, this approach has the ability to measure libraries of different bead receptors. Also, this method includes repeating these steps on the portion of the sample that remains in the container. After centrifuging, removing the supernatant, and adding a buffer solution, this buffered portion of the remaining sample can be introduced into the flow imaging system, and disassociation rates can be studied. If desired, an optional step can be employed, wherein a low pH wash is used to remove the bound ligands from the receptors attached to the nanoparticles, and repeated measurements can then be made.
Corrections can be made to a nanoparticle response curve that exhibits a non-linear response. Specifically, larger nanoparticles may be used to increase the curve's linearity, and calibration corrections can be made for the non-linear response.
The preferred flow imaging systems can be used to analyze white light spectral scatter analysis of gold nanoparticles and nanoparticle-coated microbeads using prism dispersion. A prism or grating is employed to disperse laterally high resolution white light spectral scatter spectra of the nano or micro particles being analyzed.
Yet another step of this method involves collecting simultaneous imaging of absorbed, scattered, and fluorescent light from microbeads.
Furthermore, if the prism is removed from the preferred flow imaging system and a focusing spherical lens is replaced with a cylindrical lens, the high resolution scattered angular spatial intensity of the nano or micro particle can be measured under monochromatic side illumination.
Another aspect of this invention provides for multi-spectral darkfield scattering to analyze particles. For particles with sizes equal or smaller than the pixel size in the image plane, the size of such particle can be determined by measuring the relative light scattering intensity across multiple wavelengths. The ratio of the scattered light intensities at given wavelengths is a function of the size of the particle, based upon Raleigh scattering.
Furthermore, a holographic notch filter can be used with the preferred imaging system to filter out the excitation laser light signal to detect surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention encompasses a method of using flow imaging systems that can combine the speed, sample handling, and cell sorting capabilities of flow cytometry with the imagery, sensitivity, and resolution of multiple forms of microscopy and full visible/near infrared spectral analysis to collect and analyze SPR spectra from objects entrained in a flow of fluid that emit an SPR spectra. Conventional methods of collecting and analyzing SPR spectra either employ a fixed sensor that emits SPR spectra as a solution of particles interacts with a fixed sensor, or emits a combined spectra from a bulk solution of particles that individually emit SPR spectra. The fixed sensor embodiment is widely used, but has a limited throughput. The spectra collected from the bulk solution does not enable spectra from individual particles to be discerned. In contrast, the present invention enables SPR spectra from individual particles to be collected with a much greater throughput than achievable using the fixed sensor prior art techniques (discussed above in connection with
Before discussing the steps employed in a preferred method in accord with the present invention, it will be beneficial to review a flow imaging system that is preferably used to execute the method.
Referring now to
The majority of the light is passed to a spectral decomposition element 108. The decomposition element employs a fan-configuration of dichroic mirrors 110 to direct different spectral bands laterally onto different regions of a TDI detector 114. Thus, the imaging system is able to decompose the image of a single object 118 into multiple sub-images 120 across detector 114, each sub-image corresponding to a different spectral component. In this view, detector 114 has been enlarged and is shown separately to highlight its elements.
Spectral decomposition greatly facilitates the location, identification, and quantification of different fluorescence-labeled bio-molecules within a cell by isolating probe signals from each other, and from background auto-fluorescence. Spectral decomposition also enables simultaneous multimode imaging (brightfield, darkfield, etc.) using band-limited light in channels separate from those used for fluorescence.
Alternatively, the flow imaging system can employ a prism (as shown in
Turning now to
One primary advantage of TDI detection over other approaches is the greatly increased image integration period it provides. A preferred flow imaging system used in connection with the present invention includes a TDI detector that has 512 rows of pixels, giving rise to a commensurate 500× increase in signal integration time. This increase enables the detection of even faint fluorescent probes within cell images and intrinsic auto fluorescence of cells acquired at a high-throughput. When applied to nanoparticles in suspension in a cuvette 116, real-time triggering and isolation of certain nanoparticle receptor/ligand combinations for post capture analysis can be performed. For example, selective retrieval of proteins from a complex biological sample in real time can be monitored. By isolating the nanoparticle receptor/ligand combination, mass spectroscopy can be used for identity confirmation of the affinity retrained analyte via its unique molecular mass.
Furthermore, the use of a TDI detector increases measured signal intensities up to a thousand fold, representing over a 30 fold improvement in signal-to-noise ratio compared to other approaches in the prior art. This increased signal intensity enables individual particles to be optically addressed, providing high resolution measurement of either scattered spectral intensity of white light or scattered angular analysis of monochromatic light. The ability to optically address individual particles, without requiring a prism to be disposed immediately adjacent to a thin metal film significantly distinguishes the use of the preferred imaging system of
A flow imaging system used in the present invention can be configured for multi-spectral imaging and can operate with six spectral channels: DAPI fluorescence (400–460 nm), Darkfield (460–500 nm), FITC fluorescence (500–560 nm), PE fluorescence (560–595 nm), Brightfield (595–650 nm), and Deep Red (650–700 nm). The TDI detector can provide 10 bit digital resolution per pixel. The numeric aperture of the imaging system used with this invention is typically 0.75, with a pixel size of approximately 0.5 microns. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that this flow imaging system is neither limited to six spectral channels nor limited to either the stated aperture size or pixel size and resolution.
The SPR biomolecular interaction method of the present invention, which uses an imaging system (or a substantially similar imaging system), as described above, to image nanoparticles and larger particles having a metal film will now be described in detail. The method of the present invention benefits from the ability of this preferred flow imaging system to optically address and measure individual SPR spectra of nanoparticles and larger sized particles in flow, resulting in up to a thousand-fold increase in signal collection over conventional SPR instrument designs. The steps involved in this method are schematically illustrated in
Referring now to
Those skilled in the art will recognize that container 164 may be of any type and size capable of holding the solution, including but not limited to a beaker or test tube. Furthermore, it should be understood that
In a second step, schematically illustrated by
In a third step schematically illustrated by
In addition, the flow imaging system preferably employed uses hydrodynamic focusing (i.e., uses a sheath fluid) to confine a sample fluid (solution 180) to the central portion of a cuvette 116, as indicated in
As a result of employing the flow imaging system described above to practice the method of the present invention, the absorption and/or reflected spectra of individual nanoparticles is readily measured using the TDI detector technology described in connection with
The ability to measure a library of receptor beads requires a system to identify the bead. This identification can be done in one of the following two ways. First, a library set of nanoparticles having different SPR absorption spectra can be created. This step can be carried out by using alloy nanoparticles composed of silver and gold. By adjusting the mole fractions of the alloy, up to a 150 nm separation can be achieved. Given that the kinetic association and dissociation rates are continuous, this approach enables the encoding of nanoparticles that have relatively close absorbance spectra separation (e.g., about 5 nm), so that a library of 30 beads can readily be created. Secondly, by providing gold or silver island film deposition on micron beads, bead on bead labeling can be used to encode a bead library numbering in the millions, using multiple fluorescent channel imagery. In addition, the SPR spectrum can be measured in the angular domain by using spatial light scattering. Note, spectral data and darkfield image 190 shown in
It should also be understood that by using either nanoparticles or larger microbeads as SPR sensor surfaces, the sensor area can be significantly reduced, which as noted above, is advantageous over prior art SPR sensors having larger surface areas, since a large sensor area limits the analyte sensitivity, because the SPR signal is proportional to the density of binding. Specifically, if 2 micron polystyrene beads are used with an SPR supporting gold island film, a total of 180,000 beads would allow a bead library of 100 different receptor beads, and a sub-population of 1,800 beads per receptor. This preferred flow imaging system enables one bead to be read per second over a 30 minute association/dissociation observation period. These 180,000 beads would have a cumulative sensor surface area of 0.57 square millimeters. Furthermore, if instead of island coated microbeads, 100 nanometer nano-spheres were used, the accumulative surface area would be 1.4×10−3 square millimeters.
Referring now to
Immediately after buffer solution 194 is added to container 164, solution 195 is removed from container 164 and introduced into the flow imaging system discussed in detail above, as schematically illustrated in
Again, the flow imaging system generates absorption and/or reflected spectra data for each individual nanoparticles 168 in solution 195, generating spectral data as shown in
Next, an analyte to be studied is added to the functionalized gold nanoparticle solution in a block 202. Half of the sample is aspirated by the preferred flow imaging system's rotational suspension pump for kinetic association analysis in a block 204. It should be understood that either more or less than half of the solution can be used in this step; using about half of the solution ensures that some solution is left to study dissociation kinetics, as described above. Further, if desired, all of the solution can be used to study association kinetics, if no data are desired from disassociation kinetics measurements.
In a block 206, the preferred flow imaging system performs continuous spectral analysis of individual particles. It should be understood that modifications can be made to the preferred imaging system described in
In a block 208, the maximum absorbance wavelength versus time is plotted. While such a plot is useful, it should be understood that the method does not require the data be thus processed immediately. Instead, the raw data can be collected for review and processing at a later time.
In a block 210, the sample solution remaining in the container to which the analyte was added is concentrated, and an additional buffer solution is added (as discussed in relation to
In a block 212, the remaining concentrated sample and the buffer solution (see
A decision block 218 determines if the functionalized gold nanoparticles will be reused for further analysis of additional analytes. If so, the gold nanoparticles that have been analyzed by the flow imaging system are collected and rinsed with acid in a block 220 to remove any analyte molecules that remain bound to receptor molecules on the nanoparticles (see
While a linear response is generally preferred, the non-linearity and abbreviated dynamic range of nanoparticles response curve 236 should not be understood to mean that nanoparticle SPR spectra are not useful. Larger nanoparticles may be employed to increase the linearity of the curve, and calibration corrections can be made for the non-linear response. Significantly, most SPR sensorgrams do not utilize more than 40 nm in their response, but, as long as a generally linear response in that range is achieved, such spectra are useful.
The calculations employed to generate the response curves of
Turning now to
Specifically, monochromatic light 306 from a laser source 98 (
For nanoparticles that are small relative to the 0.25 micron pixel size of a flow imaging system, the image acts as a spatial noise filter, excluding the pixels outside the boundaries of the nanoparticles from integrated intensity calculations, thereby enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio. For example, assuming a pixel size of 0.25 μm, the measurement of absorbance intensity from a nanoparticle that spans three pixels in a fluorescence image will have approximately 100 times less background than a non-imaging system employing a 20 μm laser spot.
As discussed above, in addition to exciting and detecting SPR spectra from individual nanoparticles and nanoparticle film microbeads, nanoparticles have also been shown to enhance various other optical processes, including Raman scattering and fluorescence through the resonance conditions due to the localized SPR.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred form of practicing it and modifications thereto, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that many other modifications can be made to the present invention within the scope of the claims that follow. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the invention in any way be limited by the above description, but instead be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This application is based on a prior copending provisional application, Ser. No. 60/451,346, filed on Feb. 27, 2003, the benefit of the filing date of which is hereby claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e). This application is also a continuation-in-part application of a copending patent application Ser. No. 10/628,662, filed on Jul. 28, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,975,400, which itself is a continuation-in-part application of a copending patent application Ser. No. 09/976,257, filed on Oct. 12, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,682 (issued Aug. 19, 2003), which is a continuation-in-part application of a copending patent application Ser. No. 09/820,434, filed on Mar. 29, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,473,176 (issued Oct. 29, 2002), which is a continuation-in-part application of patent application Ser. No. 09/538,604, filed on Mar. 29, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,211,955 (issued Apr. 3, 2001), which itself is a continuation-in-part application of patent application Ser. No. 09/490,478, filed on Jan. 24, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,249,341 (issued Jun. 19, 2001), which is based on a provisional application Ser. No. 60/117,203, filed on Jan. 25, 1999, the benefit of the filing dates of which is hereby claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and 35 U.S.C. § 119(e). Copending patent application Ser. No. 09/967,257, noted above, is also based on provisional application Ser. No. 60/240,125, filed on Oct. 12, 2000, the benefit of the filing date of which is hereby claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3922069 | Kishikawa et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4770992 | Van den Engh et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4786165 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5096807 | Leaback | Mar 1992 | A |
5141609 | Sweedler et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5159397 | Kosaka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159398 | Maekawa et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159642 | Kosaka | Oct 1992 | A |
5247339 | Ogino | Sep 1993 | A |
5247340 | Ogino | Sep 1993 | A |
5272354 | Kosaka | Dec 1993 | A |
5422712 | Ogino | Jun 1995 | A |
5444527 | Kosaka | Aug 1995 | A |
5471294 | Ogino | Nov 1995 | A |
5548395 | Kosaka | Aug 1996 | A |
5596401 | Kusuzawa | Jan 1997 | A |
5633503 | Kosaka | May 1997 | A |
5644388 | Maekawa et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5674743 | Ulmer | Oct 1997 | A |
5695934 | Brenner | Dec 1997 | A |
5754291 | Kain | May 1998 | A |
5760899 | Eismann | Jun 1998 | A |
RE35868 | Kosaka | Aug 1998 | E |
5822073 | Yee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831723 | Kubota et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848123 | Strommer | Dec 1998 | A |
5855753 | Trau et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5929986 | Slater et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5959953 | Alon | Sep 1999 | A |
5991048 | Karlson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007994 | Ward et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014468 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6066459 | Garini et al. | May 2000 | A |
6116739 | Ishihara et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6156465 | Cao et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6210973 | Pettit | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211955 | Basiji et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249341 | Basiji et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256096 | Johnson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6330081 | Scholten | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6381363 | Murching et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6522781 | Norikane et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
20010006416 | Johnson | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020126275 | Johnson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10221335 | Jul 1998 | JP |
WO 0042412 | Jul 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040218184 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60451346 | Feb 2003 | US | |
60240125 | Oct 2000 | US | |
60117203 | Jan 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10628662 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10788971 | US | |
Parent | 09976257 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10628662 | US | |
Parent | 09820434 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 09976257 | US | |
Parent | 09538604 | Mar 2000 | US |
Child | 09820434 | US | |
Parent | 09490478 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 09538604 | US | |
Parent | 09967257 | US | |
Child | 09538604 | US |