The present invention relates generally to improved systems and methods for conducting direct sodium removal via infusion and removal of a no or low sodium solution administered into a patient's peritoneal cavity to remove sodium and fluid from patients afflicted with heart failure or cardio-renal disease.
Patients afflicted with diverse forms of heart failure and/or cardio-renal disease are prone to the accumulation of additional sodium in body tissues and increased fluid retention. For example, in congestive heart failure, due to dysfunction of the left side or right side of the heart, or both, the body is unable to pump blood with normal efficiency, leading to the reduction of blood pressure in systemic circulation. In an attempt to increase blood pressure, the body retains sodium (and water), which leads to stasis or pooling of blood or fluid in the lungs or liver, edema and/or cardiac hypertrophy.
Methods, systems and compositions for directly removing excess sodium and water using a no or low sodium infusate instilled into a patient's peritoneal cavity are described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 10,918,778, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. That patent describes a battery-powered pump, designed to be implanted subcutaneously, that includes an inlet catheter configured to be disposed within a patient's peritoneal cavity and an output catheter configured to be coupled to the patient's bladder. The pump is programmed to periodically actuate to move fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder, where the fluid may be voided during urination.
As described in the above-incorporated patent, Direct Sodium Removal (“DSR”) Therapy may be conducted periodically, e.g., daily or once weekly, to remove excess sodium and fluid from a patient to reduce fluid-overload, edema, and to reduce cardiac effort in patients with heart failure, such as Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (“HFrEF”). To conduct such therapy, a quantity, e.g., 0.5 to 1 liters, of a no or low sodium DSR solution is instilled into the patient's peritoneal cavity for a specified dwell period, such as two hours. Dwell time, however may be as long as 24 h, depending on type of DSR infusate used. During the dwell period, the DSR solution creates a sodium gradient that draws excess sodium from the patient's tissues and/or bloodstream into the peritoneal cavity, along with a corresponding volume of ultrafiltrate, e.g., water. At the conclusion of the dwell period, the implantable pump is actuated to move the now sodium-rich DSR solution and ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder. As observed in the above-incorporated patent and in initial human clinical testing, DSR therapy can reduce physiologically significant amounts of sodium and fluid from the patient, thereby reducing fluid overload and improving cardiac function.
One drawback of DSR therapy as described in the above patent is the use of a dwell period for the DSR solution in the patient's peritoneal cavity that is based on the physician's prior clinical experience and assessment of the patient's physiology. However, in view of the complexity and variability of human anatomy, it would be desirable to adapt the general DSR therapy to address the physiologic needs of specific patients. For example, some patients may have a high level of excess sodium stored in extravascular spaces, e.g., in interstitial spaces and tissues, whereas others may not. Consequently, using a predetermined dwell period for a DSR solution to remain in a patient's peritoneal cavity, e.g., 2 hours, may be suitable for one patient, too long for another, and too short for yet a different patient.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to equip the implantable pump used for DSR therapy with a feature that can assess the progress of the therapy, and actuate the pump to move the sodium rich DSR solution and ultrafiltrate to the patient's bladder after a predetermined goal or target is attained, independent of dwell time.
Further, it may be desirable to use conduct DSR therapy for a specific patient using DSR solutions having different compositions, e.g., concentrations of dextrose or dextrin, at different times. It therefore would be desirable to adapt the dwell time for DSR therapy to meet the specific physiologic needs and characteristics of a patient, as well as to account for different DSR solutions.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to develop systems and methods for conducting DSR therapy to remove sodium and fluid from a patient that permit titrating the treatment to the specific physiology of the patient and the DSR solution selected.
The present invention is directed to an implantable pump having features and programming adapted to conducting DSR therapy for patients suffering from fluid overload, e.g., heart failure patients and patients afflicted with cardio-renal disease. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the implantable pump is configured having an inlet catheter designed for placement in a patient's peritoneal cavity, an outlet catheter designed to be coupled to the patient's bladder, an analyte sensing feature, and programming configured to actuate the pump responsive to the detected level of analyte.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the implantable pump may include, within the pump housing, associated with the inlet or outlet catheter, or as a separate lead disposed in the peritoneal cavity, a sensor for measuring a concentration of an analyte, such as sodium. In addition, the analyte sensor could also detect a concentration of an infusate component, such as dextrose or icodextrin, or an osmotic pressure or gradient, which could be used to determine when an infusate becomes hypotonic and should be drained from the peritoneal cavity. The detected analyte level is monitored by a processor and programming located within or in communication with the pump, and may be used to control actuation of the pump to move fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the patient's bladder when the detected analyte level meets a target level and/or to stop the pump to cease pumping. Additionally, the analyte may be monitored continuously during pumping so that, in conjunction with the volume of fluid removed during a pump session recorded by the pump controller, an estimate of the amount of sodium removed during a specified pumping session or interval may be computed and reported to the patient and/or the patient's caretaker or physician. As a further alternative, the monitored analyte value may be transmitted to the patient, his or her caretaker or physician, who may issue commands to control actuation of the implantable pump.
More particularly, in the context of DSR therapy, a quantity of DSR solution is instilled into the peritoneal cavity of a patient suffering from fluid overload. As described in the above-incorporated patent, because the no or low sodium DSR solution creates a gradient, it draws excess sodium and fluid from the patient's tissue into the peritoneal cavity through one or both of ultrafiltration and/or diffusion down a steep concentration gradient. In contrast to previously known methods of conducting DSR therapy, rather than waiting for a predetermined dwell period to elapse, the implantable pump may be configured to monitor the sodium concentration in the peritoneal cavity via the sensor, or to monitor the total amount of sodium transferred with fluid moved to the patient's bladder. When the sodium concentration in the peritoneal cavity reaches a target level, e.g., determined by the clinician and implemented in the pump programming, the processor actuates the pump to move the now sodium rich DSR solution and ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder, where it is voided during urination. Preferably, the target sodium concentration that triggers pump actuation is selected to eliminate excess sodium and fluid from the body while maintaining a stable serum sodium concentration. In this manner, the inventive pump reduces hypervolemia while avoiding hyponatremia. In addition, because in a preferred embodiment the pump employs a positive displacement gear pump, the precise volume of fluid moved to the patient's bladder during a pumping session may be used, together with the analyte concentration, to estimate a value of the total amount of sodium removed during a specific pumping session, and/or to cease pumping fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder. This information also may be useful, for example, in determining the timing for a subsequent DSR treatment and/or to adjust the volume of DSR solution required for a subsequent treatment.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the processor also may be programmed to actuate the pump to move the DSR solution, sodium and ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder after expiration of a predetermined dwell time. Such programming may serve as a fail-safe in the event that monitored sodium concentration level in the patient's peritoneal cavity does not meet the predetermined target level, or if a fault arises in the analyte sensor or monitoring programming.
The implantable pump further may include programming that tracks the monitored analyte level to ensure completion of removal of the DSR solution and ultrafiltrate once the target analyte level is reached for a DSR therapy session. For example, if all fluid in the peritoneal cavity is not pumped to the bladder during a first pump actuation period, e.g., to give the pump motor a rest period or because the bladder is full, the pump is configured to monitor the pressure in the peritoneal cavity and resume moving fluid once the rest period ends or the bladder is voided. In this way, the system ensures that the analyte monitoring system cannot dither as sodium concentration decreases during pump activation, and ensures that each separate DSR therapy session concludes. Further, because in a preferred embodiment the implantable pump uses a positive displacement gear pump to move fluid, the total amount of analyte may be computed for each pumping session as the concentration multiplied by the volume of fluid transiting the pump.
The system and methods of the present invention are expected to greatly increase patient comfort during DSR therapy sessions, as well as patient safety. For example, if the analyte sensor detects that the targeted sodium level is attained prior to the expiration of a dwell period based on time alone, the implantable pump can complete the DSR therapy session sooner for a particular patient, thereby enhancing the patient's quality of life. In addition, by completing the session sooner than might be determined by awaiting expiration of a predetermined time period, the inventive system ensures that hyponatremia is avoided. Moreover, because the inventive system and methods respond to the detected analyte concentration, they should provide an additional level safety when the composition of the DSR solution is changed.
Other features of the inventive system and methods will be apparent with reference to the following description and figures.
The present invention is directed to system and methods for conducting direct sodium removal (“DSR”) therapy using compositions as described in above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 10,918,778. As described in that patent, DSR therapy may be used to treat fluid overload in various forms of heart failure, such as left heart or right heart dysfunction. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, improved systems and methods are provided for conducting DSR therapy in which an analyte sensor associated with an implantable pump is used to monitor an analyte concentration in the fluid in the peritoneal cavity and/or an amount of analyte removed by the implantable pump during a pumping session. Once the analyte concentration attains a target value programmed for that DSR therapy session, or a maximum dwell time is reached, the pump is actuated to move sodium-laden DSR solution and ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the patient's bladder. The output of the analyte sensor also may be used by the pump controller, together with the volume of fluid transferred to the bladder by the implantable pump, to determine an estimate of the volume of analyte removed from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder. In addition, the analyte sensor may be configured to measure a concentration of one or more components of the DSR fluid, e.g., dextrose or icodextrin concentration, to adjust the dwell time for the DSR therapy session.
As described in the above-incorporate patent, the no or low sodium concentration in the DSR solution causes sodium and fluid (osmotic ultrafiltrate) to pass from the patient's body into the peritoneal cavity. As used in this disclosure, a no or low sodium DSR solution has a sodium content of less than 120 meq/L, more preferably, less than 35 meq/L, and includes infusates having virtually zero concentration of sodium. Accordingly, the methods of the present invention specifically contemplate use of the inventive system to monitor the present of an analyte in the fluid accumulated in the peritoneal cavity, preferably sodium, and to trigger actuation of the pump to move the DSR solution/ultrafiltrate to the patient's bladder. That fluid then is voided via urination.
Exemplary DSR solution formulations presented in the incorporated patent include D-0.5 to D-50 solutions, i.e., from 0.5 to 50 grams of dextrose per 100 ml of aqueous solution; Icodextrin or dextrin solutions having from 0.5 to 50 grams of icodextrin/dextrin per 100 ml of aqueous solution; urea, and high molecular weight glucose polymer solutions (weight average molecular weight Da>10,000) having from 0.5 to 50 grams of high molecular weight glucose polymer per 100 ml of aqueous solution, and combinations thereof. The aqueous solution includes at least purified water, and may in addition include electrolytes such as low amounts of magnesium or calcium salts, preservatives, ingredients having antimicrobial or antifungal properties, or buffering materials to control pH of the infusate. Icodextrin, a high molecular weight glucose polymer, or other high molecular weight glucose polymer (weight average molecular weight, Da>10,000,) is preferable because it experiences a lower rate of uptake when employed in peritoneal dialysis, and thus lower impact on serum glucose concentrations compared to a dextrose-based solutions.
Referring to
Implantable device 20 comprises an electromechanical pump having housing 21 configured for subcutaneous implantation. Implantable device 20 may include an electrically-driven mechanical gear pump and connectors 22 and 24 configured to reduce the risk of improper installation and inadvertent disconnection. Bladder catheter 25 is coupled to pump housing 21 using connector 24. Peritoneal catheter 23 is coupled to pump housing 21 using connector 22. Peritoneal catheter 23 has a proximal end configured to be coupled to pump housing 21 and a distal end configured to be positioned in the peritoneal cavity. Bladder catheter 25 has a proximal end configured to be coupled to pump housing 21 and a distal end configured to be inserted through the wall of, and fixed within, a patient's bladder. In a preferred embodiment, both catheters are made of medical-grade silicone and include polyester cuffs at their distal ends (not shown) to maintain the catheters in position.
In a preferred embodiment, implantable device 20 includes pressure sensors that monitor pressure in one or both of the peritoneal cavity and the bladder. Implantable device 20 also preferably includes at least one analyte sensor for generating an output signal corresponding to concentration of a predetermined analyte, such as sodium, or a concentration of an infusate component, such as dextrose or icodextrin. In this manner, movement of sodium-laden DSR solution and ultrafiltrate fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder may be controlled in accordance with one or more target analyte concentrations determined by the physician. In addition, the output of the pressure sensors may cause pumping of fluid into the bladder to be disabled if the bladder pressure reaches a level indicating insufficient space for the bladder to accommodate additional fluid or if the pressure in the peritoneal cavity falls below preset threshold. For patient comfort, implantable device 20 optionally may be programmed not to pump at night or when an accelerometer included in the implantable device indicates that the patient is asleep (and thus unlikely to be able to void the bladder). Implantable device 20 preferably includes multiple separate fail-safe mechanisms, to ensure that urine cannot pass from the bladder to the peritoneal cavity through the pump, thereby reducing the risk of transmitting infection. On/off operation of implantable device so also may be actuated responsive to the additional analyte sensors, if present.
Still referring to
Handpiece 32 illustratively includes housing 33 having multi-function button 34, display 35, a plurality of light emitting diodes (LEDs, not shown) and inductive coil portion 36. Multi-function button 34 enables the patient to issue a limited number of commands to implantable device 20, while display 35 provides visible confirmation that a desired command has been input; it also may display battery status of implantable device 20. Inductive coil portion 36 houses an inductive coil that is used transfer energy from handpiece 32 to recharge the battery of implantable device 20. The LEDs, which are visible through the material of housing 33 when lit, may be arranged in three rows of two LEDs each, and are coupled to the control circuitry and inductive charging circuit contained within handpiece 32. The LEDs may be arranged to light up to reflect the degree of inductive coupling achieved between handpiece 32 and implantable device 20 during recharging of the latter. Alternatively, the LEDs may be omitted and an analog display provided on display 35 indicating the quality of inductive coupling.
Control circuitry contained within handpiece 32 is coupled to the inductive charging circuit, battery, LEDs and radio transceiver, and includes memory for storing information received from implantable device 20. Handpiece 32 also preferably includes a data port, such as a USB port, that permits the handpiece to be coupled to monitoring and control system 40 during visits by the patient to the physician's office. Alternatively, handpiece 32 may include a wireless chip, e.g., that conforms to the Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11 wireless standards, thereby enabling the handpiece to communicate wirelessly with monitoring and control system 40, either directly or via the Internet.
Monitoring and control system 40 is intended primarily for use by the physician and comprises software configured to run on a conventional computer, e.g., a laptop as illustrated in
System 40 also may be configured, for example, to send immediate commands to the implantable device to start or stop the pump, or to operate the pump in reverse or at high power to unblock the pump or associated catheters. The software of system 40 may be configured to download real-time data relating to pump operation, as well as event logs stored during operation of implantable device 20. Based on the downloaded data, e.g., based on measurements made of the patient's analyte concentration, intra-abdominal pressure, respiratory rate, and/or fluid accumulation, the software of system 40 optionally may be configured to alert the physician. Such alerts may include to a prediction or detection of heart failure decompensation or a change in the patient's health for which an adjustment to the flow rate, volume, time and/or frequency of pump operation may be required. Finally, system 40 optionally may be configured to remotely receive raw or filtered operational data from handpiece 32 over a secure Internet channel.
Turning now to
In
Optional DSR solution reservoir 45, which may consist of a sterile bag, is positioned outside of the body and has an outlet of catheter 46 disposed in the peritoneal cavity. Catheter 46 is coupled to reservoir 45 via connector 47 and preferably includes apertures 53′ that allow the DSR solution to flow into the peritoneal cavity 11 in a relatively diffuse manner. Optional external pump 48 may be configured to move DSR solution from reservoir 45 into the peritoneal cavity 11 at a desired rate. For example, reservoir 45 may be positioned on a belt (not shown) that is worn around the patient's waist and includes pump 48. Pump 48 may be configured to communicate wirelessly with implantable device 20 so as to coordinate delivery of DSR solution into the patient's peritoneal cavity. Alternatively, reservoir 45 may be positioned at a level above peritoneal cavity 11 such that gravity causes the DSR solution to flow from reservoir 45 into the peritoneum at a desired rate.
Referring to
More specifically, in the embodiment of
After the analyte concentration of the fluid in the peritoneal cavity reaches a predetermined target value, or if a maximum dwell is reached without attaining the target level, implantable device 20 is actuated to move sodium laden DSR solution and accumulated osmotic ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to patient bladder 13. This is accomplished by closing communication to catheter 46′ by actuating valve 49, opening communication to catheter 25 by actuating valve 49′, and transferring fluid into bladder 13 via catheters 23 and 25. It should be appreciated that the functionalities of valves 49 and 49′ may be provided by any desired number of valves disposed appropriately along catheters 23, 25, and 46′, which are controllably actuated by implantable device 20. In certain configurations, the use of one or more passive valves (not controlled by implantable device 20) may be used, e.g., valve 49′ may be a passive check valve disposed along catheter 25 that inhibits fluid to flow from the bladder to device 20.
Further details of selected components of the inventive system of
The Implantable Device
Referring now to
Processor 70 executes firmware stored in nonvolatile memory 71 which controls operation of motor 73 responsive to signals generated by motor 73, sensors 77-81 and 85, and commands received from transceiver 76. Processor 70 also controls reception and transmission of messages via transceiver 76 and operation of inductive circuit 75 to charge battery 74. In addition, processor 70 receives signals generated by Hall Effect sensors located within motor 73, which are used to compute direction and revolutions of the gears of the gear pump, and thus fluid volume transferred and the viscosity of that fluid, as described below. Processor 70 preferably includes a low-power mode of operation and includes an internal clock, such that the processor can be periodically awakened to handle pumping, pump tick mode, or communications and charging functions, and/or awakened to handle commands received by transceiver 76 from handpiece 32. In one embodiment, processor 70 comprises a member of the MSP430 family of microcontroller units available from Texas Instruments, Incorporated, Dallas, Tex., and may incorporate the nonvolatile memory, volatile memory, and radio transceiver components depicted in
Nonvolatile memory 71 preferably comprises flash memory or EEPROM, and stores a unique device identifier for implantable device 20, firmware to be executed on processor 70, configuration set point data relating to operation of the implantable device, and optionally, coding to be executed on transceiver 76 and/or inductive circuit 75, and a separate motor controller, if present. Firmware and set point data stored on nonvolatile memory 71 may be updated using new instructions provided by control and monitoring system 40 via charging and communication system 30. Volatile memory 72 is coupled to and supports operation of processor 70, and stores data and event log information gathered during operation of implantable device 20. Volatile memory 72 also serves as a buffer for communications sent to, and received from, charging and communication system 30.
Transceiver 76 preferably comprises a radio frequency transceiver and is configured for bi-directional communications via antenna 76 with a similar transceiver circuit disposed in handpiece 32 of charging and communication system 30. Transceiver 76 also may include a low power mode of operation, such that it periodically awakens to listen for incoming messages and responds only to those messages that include the unique device identifier assigned to that implantable device. Alternatively, because transceiver 76 communicates only with the corresponding transceiver in handpiece 32 of its associated charging and communication system 30, transceiver 76 may be configured to send or receive data only when inductive circuit 75 of the implantable device is active. Transceiver 76 may employ an encryption routine to ensure that messages sent from, or received by, the implantable device cannot be intercepted or forged.
Inductive circuit 75 is coupled to coil 84, and is configured to recharge battery 74 of the implantable device when exposed to a magnetic field applied by a corresponding inductive circuit within handpiece 32 of charging and communication system 30. In one embodiment, inductive circuit 75 is coupled to optional infrared LED 83 that emits an infrared signal when inductive circuit 75 is active. The infrared signal may be received by handpiece 32 to assist in locating the handpiece relative to the implantable device, thereby improving the magnetic coupling and energy transmission.
Inductive circuit 75 optionally may be configured not only to recharge battery 74, but to directly provide energy to motor 73 in a “boost” mode or jog/shake mode to unblock the pump. In particular, if processor 70 detects that motor 73 is stalled, e.g., due to a block created by fibrin or other debris in the peritoneal cavity, an alarm may be stored in memory. When implantable device 20 next communicates with charging and communication system 30, the alarm is reported to handpiece 32, and the patient may be given the option of depressing multifunction button 34 to apply an overvoltage to motor 73 from inductive circuit 75 for a predetermined time period to free the pump blockage. Alternatively, depressing the multi-function button may cause processor 70 to execute a set of commands by which motor 73 is jogged or shaken, e.g., by alternatingly running the motor in reverse and then forward, to disrupt the blockage. Because such modes of operation may employ higher energy consumption than expected during normal operation, it is advantageous to drive the motor during such procedures with energy supplied via inductive circuit 75.
Battery 74 preferably comprises a lithium ion or lithium polymer battery capable of long lasting operation, e.g., up to three years, when implanted in a human, so as to minimize the need for re-operations to replace implantable device 20. In one preferred embodiment, battery 74 supplies a nominal voltage of 3.6V, a capacity of 150 mAh when new, and a capacity of about 120 mAh after two years of use. Preferably, battery 74 is configured to supply a current of 280 mA to motor 73 when pumping; 25 mA when the transceiver is communicating with charging and communication system 30; 8 mA when processor 70 and related circuitry is active, but not pumping or communicating; and 0.3 mA when the implantable device is in low power mode. More preferably, battery 74 should be sized to permit a minimum current of at least 450 mAh for a period of 10 seconds and 1 A for 25 milliseconds during each charging cycle.
Motor 73 preferably is a brushless direct current or electronically commuted motor having a splined output shaft that drives a set of floating gears that operate as a gear pump, as described below. Motor 73 may include a dedicated motor controller, separate from processor 70, for controlling operation of the motor. Motor 73 may include a plurality of Hall Effect sensors, preferably two or more, for determining motor position and direction of rotation. Due to the high humidity that may be encountered in implantable device 20, processor 70 may include programming to operate motor 73, although with reduced accuracy, even if some or all of the Hall Effect sensors fail.
In a preferred embodiment, motor 73 is capable of driving the gear pump to generate a nominal flow rate of 150 ml/min and applying a torque of about 1 mNm against a pressure head of 30 cm water at 3000 RPM. In this embodiment, the motor preferably is selected to drive the gears at from 1000 to 5000 RPM, corresponding to flow rates of from 50 to 260 ml/min, respectively. The motor preferably has a stall torque of at least 3 mNm at 500 mA at 3 V, and more preferably 6 mNm in order to crush non-solid proteinaceous materials. As discussed above, the motor preferably also supports a boost mode of operation, e.g., at 5 V, when powered directly through inductive circuit 75. Motor 73 preferably also is capable of being driven in reverse as part of a jogging or shaking procedure to unblock the gear pump.
Processor 70 also may be programmed to automatically and periodically wake up and enter a pump tick mode. In this mode of operation, the gear pump is advanced slightly, e.g., about 120 degrees as measured by the Hall Effect sensors, before processor 70 returns to low power mode. Preferably, this interval is about every 20 minutes, although it may be adjusted by the physician using the monitoring and control system. Tick mode is expected to prevent the DSR solution and ultrafiltrate from partially solidifying and blocking the gear pump.
Processor 70 also may be programmed to enter a jog or shake mode when operating on battery power alone, to unblock the gear pump. Similar to the boost mode available when charging the implantable device with the handpiece of charging and communication system 30, the jog or shake mode causes the motor to rapidly alternate the gears between forward and reverse directions to crush or loosen any buildup of tissue or other debris in the gear pump or elsewhere in the fluid path. Specifically, in this mode of operation, if the motor does not start to turn within a certain time period after it is energized (e.g., 1 second), the direction of the motion is reversed for a short period of time and then reversed again to let the motor turn in the desired direction. If the motor does still not turn (e.g., because the gear pump is jammed) the direction is again reversed for a period of time (e.g., another 10 msec). If the motor still is unable to advance, the time interval between reversals of the motor direction is reduced to allow the motor to develop more power, resulting in a shaking motion of the gears. If the motor does not turn forward for more than 4 seconds, the jog mode of operation ceases, and an alarm is written to the event log. If the motor was unable to turn forward, processor 70 may introduce a backwards tick before the next scheduled fluid movement. A backward tick is the same as a tick (e.g., about 120 degrees forward movement of the motor shaft) but in a reverse direction, and is intended to force the motor backwards before turning forward, thus allowing the motor to gain momentum.
Sensors 77-81 continually monitor humidity, temperature, acceleration, pressure, and respiratory rate, and provide corresponding signals to processor 70 which stores the corresponding data in memory 71 for later transmission to monitoring and control system 40. In particular, humidity sensor 77 is arranged to measure humidity within the housing of the implantable device, to ensure that the components of implantable device are operated within expected operational limits. Humidity sensor 77 preferably is capable of sensing and reporting humidity within a range or 20% to 100% with high accuracy. One or more of temperature sensors 78 may be disposed within the housing and monitor the temperature of the implantable device, and in particular battery 74 to ensure that the battery does not overheat during charging, while another one or more of temperature sensors 78 may be disposed so as to contact fluid entering at inlet 62 and thus monitor the temperature of the fluid, e.g., for use in assessing the patient's health. Accelerometer 79 is arranged to measure acceleration of the implant, preferably along at least two axes, to detect periods of activity and inactivity, e.g., to determine whether the patient is sleeping or to determine whether and when the patient is active. This information is provided to processor 70 to ensure that the pump is not operated when the patient is indisposed to attend to voiding of the bladder.
Implantable device 20 preferably includes multiple pressure sensors 80, which are continually monitored during waking periods of the processor. As described below with respect to
Respiratory rate monitor 81 is configured to measure the patient's respiratory rate, e.g., for use in assessing the patient's health. Alternatively, the patient's respiratory rate may be measured based on the outputs of one or more of pressure sensors 80, e.g., based on changes in the ambient pressure or the pressure in the peritoneal cavity caused by the diaphragm periodically compressing that cavity during breathing.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, analyte sensor 85 may be a chemical or biochemical sensor configured to monitor a sodium concentration of sodium-laden DSR solution and ultrafiltrate instilled into and accumulated within the patient's peritoneal cavity. Analyte sensor 85 may in addition sense a concentration of a component, such as dextrose or icodextrin concentration, in the DSR solution present in the peritoneal cavity, and that information may be used by the processor of implantable device 20 to trigger starting or stopping of the pump. One exemplary in vivo sensor suitable for monitoring sodium ion concentration is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/033260, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Analyte sensor 85 may be disposed on catheter 23, on catheter 25, or may be disposed within the housing of implantable device 20 so as to contact fluid flowing through the device. Any desired number of additional sensors for measuring the health of the patient also may be provided in operable communication with processor 70 and may output recordable parameters for storage in memory 71 and transmission to monitoring and control system 40, that the physician may use to assess the patient's health.
In an exemplary embodiment, processor 70 may be programmed to monitor an output of analyte sensor 85, for example, indicative of a value of sodium concentration, and to compare that value to a target sodium concentration value selected by the physician at which implantable device 20 is activated to transfer fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the patient's bladder. Alternatively, or in addition, analyte sensor 85 could measure a concentration of an infusate component remaining in the peritoneal cavity. Processor 70 also may be programmed to activate implantable device 20 to move fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder after that fluid has dwelled in the peritoneal cavity a sufficient period that the measured analyte concentration exceeds or falls below a target value. In addition, fluid transfer may be initiated after infusate has dwelled in the peritoneal cavity for a predetermined maximal amount of time, which may be set by a physician. For this purpose, processor 70 may include a programmed timer that monitors the dwell time, e.g., elapsed time from when the DSR solution is first introduced into the patient's peritoneal cavity. As a further alternative, processor 70 may be programmed to compute an estimate of the amount of analyte transferred from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder as function of the measured concentration and the volume of fluid transferred, and to report that amount to the patient, physician or caretaker. Such information may, in turn, be used to determine when the next DSR therapy session should occur or be used in adjusting the volume of DSR solution to be employed during a subsequent DSR therapy session.
The volume of fluid transferred, and pump activation time and frequency may be selected to optimize sodium removal to maintain or improve the patient's health, to alleviate the fluid overload and to ensure a stable serum sodium level. These parameters may be selected based on the patient's symptoms, the activity and habits of the patient, the permeability of the peritoneal membrane and the osmotic characteristics of the DSR solution, and they may be static or changed by the physician on a session-by-session basis. For example, the physician may initially program processor 70 with a first sodium concentration level, amount of sodium to be removed, maximum dwell time, volume, or frequency based on his perception of the patient's health and habits, and later adjust that initial programming to vary those parameters based on his perception of changes in the patient's health, for example based on changes over time in parameters measured by implantable device 20 and relayed to the physician via monitoring and control software 40.
Processor 70 also may be programmed to monitor the sensors 77-81 and to generate an alert condition that is relayed to the clinician indicative of a potential decline in the patient's health. For example, processor 70 may monitor pressure sensors 80 to determine whether, over predetermined time intervals, there is an increase in pressure within the peritoneal cavity. Such pressure increases may be the result of an increase in the rate of accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity, which may in turn indicate heart failure decompensation. Such an alert may result in the patient being directed to seek immediate treatment.
Processor 70 further may be programmed to pump fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder only when the pressure in the peritoneal cavity exceeds a first predetermined value, and the pressure in the bladder is less than a second predetermined value, so that the bladder does not become overfull. To account for patient travel from a location at sea level to a higher altitude, the ambient pressure measurement may be used to calculate a differential value for the peritoneal pressure. In this way, the predetermined pressure at which the pump begins operation may be reduced, to account for lower atmospheric pressure. Likewise, the ambient pressure may be used to adjust the predetermined value for bladder pressure. In this way, the threshold pressure at which the pumping ceases may be reduced, because the patient may experience discomfort at a lower bladder pressure when at a high altitude location.
Further, processor 70 may be programmed to permit transfer of fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder to be interrupted, for example if the bladder pressure indicates that the bladder is full, and to resume transferring fluid once the bladder pressure sensor detects that the bladder has been voided. In this case, because the sodium concentration level may have fallen due to fluid transfer immediately before the bladder was detected to be full, the process may be programmed to resume fluid transfer once the sodium concentration level has reached the target level during a single DSR therapy session.
Optionally, implantable device 20 may include a UV lamp (not shown) disposed in operable communication with controller 70. The UV lamp may be configured to irradiate and thus kill pathogens in the DSR solution before is instilled into and/or after fluid is extracted from the peritoneal cavity. The UV lamp preferably generates light in the UV-C spectral range (about 200-280 nm), particularly in the range of about 250-265 nm, which is also referred to as the “germicidal spectrum” because light in that spectral range breaks down nucleic acids in the DNA of microorganisms. Low-pressure mercury lamps have an emission peak at approximately 253.7 nm, and may suitably be used for UV lamp 85. Alternatively, the UV lamp may be a UV light emitting diode (LED), which may be based on AlGaAs or GaN.
Still referring to
Referring now to
Housing 91 also may include features designed to reduce movement of the implantable pump once implanted within a patient, such as a suture hole to securely anchor the implantable device to the surrounding tissue. Housing 91 may in addition include a polyester ingrowth patch that facilitates attachment of the implantable device to the surrounding tissue following subcutaneous implantation.
Additionally, the implantable device optionally may incorporate anti-clogging agents, such enzyme eluting materials that specifically target the proteinaceous components of fluid from the peritoneal cavity, enzyme eluting materials that specifically target the proteinaceous and encrustation promoting components of urine, chemical eluting surfaces, coatings that prevent adhesion of proteinaceous compounds, and combinations thereof. Such agents, if provided, may be integrated within or coated upon the surfaces of the various components of the system.
Referring now to
Referring now also to
Manifold 105 preferably comprises a molded elastomeric component having two separate fluid channels (such channels designated 88 in
Motor 94 is coupled to gear pump housing 95 using mating threads 130, such that splined shaft 131 of motor 94 passes through bearing 132. The gear pump of the present invention comprises intermeshing gears 133 and 134 enclosed in gear pump housing 95 by O-ring seal 135 and plate 136. The gear pump is self-priming. Plate 136 includes openings 137 and 138 that mate with outlet 125 and inlet 126 of manifold 105, respectively. Splined shaft 131 of motor 94 extends into opening 139 of gear 133 to provide floating engagement with that gear.
Peritoneal and Bladder Catheters
Referring to
Inlet end 52 also may include a polyester cuff to promote adhesion of the catheter to an adjacent tissue wall, thereby ensuring that the inlet end of the catheter remains in position. Outlet end 54 also may include a connector for securing the outlet end of the peritoneal catheter to implantable device 20. In one preferred embodiment, the distal end of the peritoneal catheter, up to the ingrowth cuff, may be configured to pass through a conventional 16F peel-away sheath. In addition, the length of the peritoneal catheter may be selected to ensure that it lies along the bottom of the body cavity, and is sufficiently resistant to torsional motion so as not to become twisted or kinked during or after implantation.
With respect to
In a preferred embodiment, bladder catheter 60 is configured to pass through a conventional peel-away sheath. Bladder catheter 60 preferably is sufficiently resistant to torsional motion so as not to become twisted or kinked during or after implantation. In a preferred embodiment, peritoneal catheter 50 and bladder catheter 60 preferably are different colors, have different exterior shapes (e.g., square and round) or have different connection characteristics so that they cannot be inadvertently interchanged during connection to implantable device 20. Optionally, bladder catheter 60 may include an internal duckbill valve positioned midway between inlet 62 and outlet end 63 of the catheter to ensure that urine does not flow from the bladder into the peritoneal cavity if the bladder catheter is accidentally pulled free from the pump connector of implantable device 20.
In an alternative embodiment, the peritoneal and bladder catheters devices may incorporate one or several anti-infective agents to inhibit the spread of infection between body cavities. Examples of anti-infective agents which may be utilized may include, e.g., bacteriostatic materials, bactericidal materials, one or more antibiotic dispensers, antibiotic eluting materials, and coatings that prevent bacterial adhesion, and combinations thereof. Additionally, implantable device 20 may include a UV lamp configured to irradiate fluid in the peritoneal and/or bladder catheters so as to kill any pathogens that may be present and thus inhibit the development of infection.
Alternatively, rather than comprising separate catheters, peritoneal and bladder catheters 50, 60 may share a common wall, which may be convenient because the bladder and peritoneal cavity share a common wall, thereby facilitating insertion of a single dual-lumen tube. In addition, either or both of the peritoneal or bladder catheters may be reinforced along a portion of its length or along its entire length using ribbon or wire braiding or lengths of wire or ribbon embedded or integrated within or along the catheters. The braiding or wire may be fabricated from metals such as stainless steels, superelastic metals such as nitinol, or from a variety of suitable polymers. Such reinforcement may also be used for catheter 46 connected to optional reservoir 45.
With respect to
Malecot structure 66 preferably is constructed so that wings 67 deform to a substantially flattened configuration when a stylet is inserted through the lumen of the catheter. In this manner, bladder catheter 60′ may be loaded onto a stylet, and using a minimally invasive technique, outlet end 63′ and malecot structure 66 may be passed through the wall of a patient's bladder using the stylet. When the stylet is removed, wings 67 of the malecot structure return to the expanded shape shown in
The Charging and Communication System
Referring to
As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, handpiece 151 includes a device identifier stored in nonvolatile memory 153 that corresponds to the device identifier stored in nonvolatile memory 71 of the implantable device, such that handpiece 151 will communicate only with its corresponding implantable device 20. Optionally, a configurable handpiece for use in a physician's office may include the ability to interrogate an implantable device to request that device's unique device identifier, and then change the device identifier of the monitoring and control system 40 to that of the patient's implantable device, so as to mimic the patient's handpiece. In this way, a physician may adjust the configuration of the implantable device if the patient forgets to bring his handpiece 151 with him during a visit to the physician's office.
Controller 152 executes firmware stored in nonvolatile memory 153 that controls communications and charging of the implantable device. Controller 152 also is configured to transfer and store data, such as event logs, uploaded to handpiece 151 from the implantable device, for later retransmission to monitoring and control system 40 via port 162, during physician office visits. Alternatively, handpiece 151 may be configured to recognize a designated wireless access point within the physician's office, and to wirelessly communicate with monitoring and control system 40 during office visits. As a further alternative, base 31 may include telephone circuitry for automatically dialing and uploading information stored on handpiece 151 to a physician's website via a secure connection, such as alarm information.
Controller 152 preferably includes a low-power mode of operation and includes an internal clock, such that the controller periodically awakens to communicate with the implantable device to log data or to perform charging functions. Controller 152 preferably is configured to awaken when placed in proximity to the implantable device to perform communications and charging functions, and to transmit commands input using input device 164. Controller 152 further may include programming for evaluating information received from the implantable device, and generating an alarm message on display 159. Controller 152 also may include firmware for transmitting commands input using input device 164 to the implantable device, and monitoring operation of the implantable device during execution of such commands, for example, during boost or jogging/shaking operation of the gear pump to clear a blockage. In addition, controller 152 controls and monitors various power operations of handpiece 151, including operation of inductive circuit 156 during recharging of the implantable device, displaying the state of charge of battery 74, and controlling charging and display of state of charge information for battery 157.
Nonvolatile memory 153 preferably comprises flash memory or EEPROM, and stores the unique device identifier for its associated implantable device, firmware to be executed by controller 152, configuration set point, and optionally, coding to be executed on transceiver 155 and/or inductive circuit 156. Firmware and set point data stored on nonvolatile memory 153 may be updated using information supplied by control and monitoring system 40 via port 162. Volatile memory 154 is coupled to and supports operation of controller 152, and stores data and event log information uploaded from implantable device 20.
In addition, in a preferred embodiment, nonvolatile memory 153 stores programming that enables the charging and communication system to perform some initial start-up functions without communicating with the monitor and control system. In particular, memory 153 may include routines that make it possible to test the implantable device during implantation using the charging and communication system alone in a “self-prime mode” of operation. In this case, a button may be provided that allows the physician to manually start the pump, and display 159 is used to provide feedback whether the pumping session was successful or not. Display 159 of the charging and communication system also may be used to display error messages designed to assist the physician in adjusting the position of the implantable device or peritoneal or bladder catheters. These functions preferably are disabled after the initial implantation of the implantable device.
Transceiver 155 preferably comprises a radio frequency transceiver, e.g., conforming to the Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11 wireless standards, and is configured for bi-directional communications via antenna 160 with transceiver circuit 76 disposed in the implantable device. Transceiver 155 also may include a low power mode of operation, such that it periodically awakens to listen for incoming messages and responds only to those messages including the unique device identifier assigned to its associated implantable device. Transceiver 155 preferably employs an encryption routine to ensure that messages sent to, or received from, the implantable device cannot be intercepted or forged.
Inductive circuit 156 is coupled to coil 163, and is configured to inductively couple with coil 84 of the implantable device to recharge battery 74 of the implantable device. In one embodiment, inductive circuit 156 is coupled to indicator 158, preferably a plurality of LEDs that light to indicate the extent of magnetic coupling between coils 163 and 84 (and thus quality of charging), thereby assisting in positioning handpiece 151 relative to the implantable device. In one preferred embodiment, inductive coils 84 and 163 are capable of establishing good coupling through a gap of 35 mm, when operating at a frequency of 315 kHz or less. In an embodiment in which implantable device includes optional infrared LED 83, charging and communication system 30 may include an optional infrared sensor (not shown) which detects that infrared light emitted by LED 83 and further assists in positioning handpiece 151 to optimize magnetic coupling between coils 163 and 84, thereby improving the energy transmission to the implantable device.
Controller 152 also may be configured to periodically communicate with the implantable device to retrieve temperature data generated by temperature sensor 78 and stored in memory 72 during inductive charging of battery 74. Controller 152 may include firmware to analyze the battery temperature, and to adjust the charging power supplied to inductive circuit 163 to maintain the temperature of the implantable device below a predetermined threshold, e.g., less than 2 degrees C. above body temperature. That threshold may be set to reduce thermal expansion of the battery and surrounding electronic and mechanical components, for example, to reduce thermal expansion of motor and gear pump components and to reduce the thermal strain applied to the seal between lower portion 92 of housing and upper housing 93. In a preferred embodiment, power supplied to inductive coil 163 is cycled between high power (e.g., 120 mA) and low power (e.g., 40 mA) charging intervals responsive to the measured temperature within the implantable device.
As discussed above with respect to inductive circuit 75 of the implantable device, inductive circuit 156 optionally may be configured to transfer additional power to motor 73 of the implantable device, via inductive circuit 75 and battery 74, in a “boost” mode or jogging mode to unblock the gear pump. In particular, if an alarm is transmitted to controller 152 that motor 73 is stalled, e.g., due to a block created by viscous fluid, the patient may be given the option of using input device 164 to apply an overvoltage to motor 73 from inductive circuit 75 for a predetermined time period to free the blockage. Alternatively, activating input device 164 may cause controller 152 to command processor 70 to execute a routine to jog or shake the gear pump by rapidly operating motor 74 in reverse and forward directions to disrupt the blockage. Because such modes of operation may employ higher energy consumption than expected during normal operation, inductive circuits 156 and 75 may be configured to supply the additional energy for such motor operation directly from the energy stored in battery 157, instead of depleting battery 74 of the implantable device.
Battery 157 preferably comprises a lithium ion or lithium polymer battery capable of long lasting operation, e.g., up to three years. Battery 157 has sufficient capacity to supply power to handpiece 151 to operate controller 152, transceiver 155, inductive circuit 156 and the associated electronics while disconnected from base 31 and during charging of the implantable device. In a preferred embodiment, battery 157 has sufficient capacity to fully recharge battery 74 of the implantable device from a depleted state in a period of about 2-4 hours. Battery 157 also should be capable of recharging within about 2-4 hours. It is expected that for daily operation moving 700 ml of fluid, battery 157 and inductive circuit 156 should be able to transfer sufficient charge to battery 74 via inductive circuit 75 to recharge the battery within about 30 minutes. Battery capacity preferably is supervised by controller 152 using a charge accumulator algorithm.
Referring again to
LEDs 168 are visible through the material of housing 165 when lit, and preferably are arranged in three rows of two LEDs each. During charging, the LEDs light up to display the degree of magnetic coupling between inductive coils 163 and 84, e.g., as determined by energy loss from inductive circuit 156, and may be used by the patient to accurately position handpiece 151 relative to the implantable device. Thus, for example, a low degree of coupling may correspond to lighting of only two LEDs, an intermediate degree of coupling with lighting of four LEDs, and a preferred degree of coupling being reflected by lighting of all six LEDs. Using this information, the patient may adjust the position of handpiece 151 over the area where implantable device is located to obtain a preferred position for the handpiece, resulting in the shortest recharging time. In one preferred embodiment, LEDs 168 are replaced with an analog bar display on display 167, which indicates the quality of charge coupling.
Monitoring and Control System
Turning to
The computer running monitoring and control system software 180 preferably includes a data port, e.g., USB port or comparable wireless connection that permits handpiece 151 of the charging and communication system to be coupled via port 169. Alternatively, as discussed above, the computer may include a wireless card, e.g., conforming to the IEEE 802.11 standard, thereby enabling handpiece 151 to communicate wirelessly with the computer running software 180. As a further alternative, the charging and communication system may include telephony circuitry that automatically dials and uploads data, such as alarm data, from handpiece 151 to a secure website accessible by the patient's physician.
Main block 184 preferably consists of a main software routine that executes on the physician's computer, tablet or smartphone, and controls overall operation of the other functional blocks. Main block 184 enables the physician to download event data and alarm information stored on handpiece 151 to their computer, tablet or smartphone, and also permits control and monitoring software 180 to directly control operation of the implantable device when coupled to handpiece 151. Main block also enables the physician to upload firmware updates and configuration data to the implantable device.
Event Log block 182 is a record of operational data downloaded from the implantable device via the charging and communication system, and may include, for example, pump start and stop times, motor position, sensor data for the peritoneal cavity and bladder pressures, patient temperature, respiratory rate or fluid temperature, pump outlet pressure, humidity, pump temperature, battery current, battery voltage, battery status, and the like. The event log also may include the occurrence of events, such as pump blockage, operation in boost or jog modes, alarms or other abnormal conditions.
Data Download block 183 is a routine that handles communication with handpiece 151 to download data from volatile memory 154 after the handpiece is coupled to the computer running monitoring and control software 180. Data Download block 183 may initiates, either automatically or at the instigation of the physician via user interface block 185, downloading of data stored in the event log.
Configuration Setup block 184 is a routine that configures the parameters stored within nonvolatile memory 71 that control operation of the implantable device. The interval timing parameters may determine, e.g., how long the processor remains in sleep mode prior to being awakened to listen for radio communications or to control pump operation. The interval timing parameters may control, for example, the duration of pump operation to move fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder and the interval between periodic tick movements that inhibit blockage of the implantable device and peritoneal and bladder catheters. Interval timing settings transmitted to the implantable device from monitoring and control software 180 also may determine when and how often event data is written to nonvolatile memory 71, and to configure timing parameters used by the firmware executed by processor 152 of handpiece 151 of the charging and communication system. Block 184 also may be used by the physician to configure parameters stored within nonvolatile memory 71 relating to limit values on operation of processor 70 and motor 73, and to set target and threshold values. These values may include the sodium concentration detected in the peritoneal catheter at which fluid transfer to the bladder should be initiated, maximum DSR solution dwell time, minimum and maximum pressures at the peritoneal and bladder catheters, the maximum temperature differential during charging, times when the pump may and may not operate, etc. The limit values set by block 184 also configure parameters that control operation of processor 152 of handpiece 151.
Block 184 also may configure parameters store within nonvolatile memory 71 of the implantable device relating to control of operation of processor 70 and motor 73. These values may include target volumes of fluid to transport, volume of fluid to be transported per pumping session, motor speed and duration per pumping session. Block 184 also may specify the parameters of operation of motor 73 during boost mode of operation, when coupled to handpiece 151, and shake/jog modes of operation when the implantable device is run using battery 74 alone. Such parameters may include motor speed and voltage, duration/number of revolutions of the motor shaft when alternating between forward and reverse directions, etc.
User interface block 185 handles display of information retrieved from the monitoring and control system and implantable device via data download block 183, and presents that information in an intuitive, easily understood format for physician review. As described below with respect to
Alarm detection block 186 may include a routine for evaluating the data retrieved from the implantable device or charging and communication system, and flagging abnormal conditions for the physician's attention. For example, alarm detection block 186 may include health monitor block 191, which is configured to alert the physician to any changes in the patient's health that may warrant changing the volume, time, and/or frequency with which the DSR therapy is conducted.
Sensor calibration block 187 may include a routines for testing or measuring drift, of sensors 70, 78-81 and 85 employed in the implantable device, e.g., due to aging or change in humidity. Block 187 may then compute offset values for correcting measured data from the sensors, and transmit that information to the implantable device for storage in nonvolatile memory 71. For example, pressure sensors 104a-104d may experience drift due to aging or temperature changes. Block 187 accordingly may compute offset values that are then transmitted and stored in the implantable device to account for such drift.
Firmware upgrade block 188 may comprise a routine for checking the version numbers of the processor or motor controller firmware installed on the implantable device and/or processor firmware on charging and communication system, and identify whether upgraded firmware exists. If so, the routine may notify the physician and permit the physician to download revised firmware to the implantable device for storage in nonvolatile memory 71 or to download revised firmware to the charging and communication system for storage in nonvolatile memory 153.
Device identifier block 189 consists of a unique identifier for the implantable device that is stored in nonvolatile memory 71 and a routine for reading that data when the monitoring and control system is coupled to the implantable device via the charging and communication system. As described above, the device identifier is used by the implantable device to confirm that wireless communications received from a charging and communication system are intended for that specific implantable device. Likewise, this information is employed by handpiece 151 of the charging and communication system in determining whether a received message was generated by the implantable device associated with that handpiece. Finally, the device identifier information is employed by monitoring and control software 180 to confirm that the handpiece and implantable device constitute a matched set.
Status information block 190 comprises a routine for interrogating implantable device, when connected via handpiece 151, to retrieve current status date from the implantable device, and/or handpiece 151. Such information may include, for example, battery status, the date and time on the internal clocks of the implantable device and handpiece, version control information for the firmware and hardware currently in use, and sensor data.
Referring now to
In
Alarm condition window 204e displays any changes in parameters that may indicate a change in the patient's health, such as the possible development of heart failure decompensation or an improvement or worsening of the patient's health (Blocks 191 and 192 in
Methods of using the inventive implantable systems, such as illustrated in
In step 254, the analyte concentration in the patient's peritoneal cavity is monitored using the analyte sensor. The pressure in the patient's peritoneal cavity and bladder also are monitored. At step 256, the measured sodium concentration in the DSR solution and fluid accumulated in the peritoneal cavity is compared to a target value, e.g., a percentage of the patient's blood serum sodium level based on a blood sample taken before the DSR therapy session. Such a predetermined measured sodium level may be used to select a target value at which to initiate pumping because the sodium concentration in the peritoneal cavity will not exceed that value during the DSR therapy session. The target value may be downloaded to implantable device by the physician using software monitoring and control system 40 via external charging and communication system 30 prior to initiating the DSR therapy session (see
If at step 256 the detected analyte concentration is less than the target value (“No branch at step 256), the processor of implantable device 20 then will evaluate at step 258 whether the current dwell time for the DSR solution exceeds the maximum dwell time for that DSR therapy session. The maximum dwell time may be a static value that is programmed once, or a value that is set prior to each DSR therapy session as may be determined by the physician. If the current dwell time is less than the maximum value (“No” branch at step 258), the processor may internally set another time interval, e.g., 5 or 10 minutes, after which it will continue to monitor the analyte level at step 254 and evaluate whether the target has been attained at step 256. If however, the maximum dwell time has been exceeded at step 258, then the processor will activate the pump of implantable device 20 to begin transferring sodium-rich DSR solution and ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the patient's bladder, at step 260 (“Yes” branch at step 258). Referring back to the decision box at step 256, if the analyte concentration detected by analyte sensor 85 equals or exceeds the target value (the Yes branch at step 256), the processor also will activate the pump of implantable device 20 at step 260.
Once the pump of implantable device 20 is activated, it will transfer fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder via catheters 23 and 25. To ensure that the pump motor does not overheat from continuous operation, the pump may run for a predetermined specified interval, e.g., 5 or 10 minutes, then rest for a brief interval, e.g., 2-5 minutes, and then resume operation. If the pump is actuated periodically in this manner to complete removal of the DSR solution and accumulated ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity, for example, as determined by the pressure in the peritoneal cavity falling below a target value, the processor will no longer look for the analyte level to exceed the target level for that particular DSR therapy session. Accordingly, once the target analyte concentration is met or the dwell time exceeded for a particular DSR therapy session, the pump will be actuated intermittently until drainage of the peritoneal cavity is determined to be complete.
Apart from intermittent operation to permit brief periods for the pump to rest, as described above, the processor also monitors the patient's bladder pressure to ensure that transfer of fluid to the bladder is interrupted when the bladder is deemed to be full. Fullness may be determined by the physician receiving oral feedback of discomfort from the patient during initial set-up and programming of implantable device 20. Accordingly, at step 262, bladder pressure is monitored, particularly at times when fluid is being transferred to the bladder. If the bladder pressure is lower than the level associated with bladder fullness, as initially programmed (“No” branch at step 262, the processor next evaluates whether the pressure in the peritoneal cavity is greater than a predetermined target pressure at step 264. The target pressure at step 264 is a pressure determined to correspond to fluid accumulation in the patient's peritoneal cavity, which value may set during initial implantation and then periodically updated by the physician using monitoring and control system 40 during the course of multiple DSR therapy sessions. If at step 264 that peritoneal pressure indicates that peritoneal cavity still contains fluid to be transferred to the bladder, the pump of implantable device 20 will remain active (or if at rest, resume operation) to transfer fluid to the bladder (Yes branch at step 264). If the peritoneal cavity pressure is determined at step 264 to be less than target pressure (“No” branch at step 264), the processor will shut down the pump of the implantable device and store a record reflecting completion of that DSR therapy session in the non-volatile memory for eventual transmission to event log 182 (see
Referring again to step 262, if the processor of implantable device 20 detects that the pressure of fluid in the patient's bladder exceeds the target value (“Yes branch at step 262), the processor will shut down the pump, ceasing movement of fluid to the patient's bladder. The processor then will set a timer at step 266 during which implantable device 20 waits until the patient voids his bladder. Once the patient voids his bladder and the bladder pressure drops below the target level, the processor again activates the pump to transfer remaining fluid in the peritoneal cavity to the bladder.
As described above, actuation of the pump transfers sodium-laden DSR solution and ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder, thereby reducing the level of sodium in the body and causing elimination of excess fluid by i) enhancing normal kidney function through urination and ii) removal to the bladder of osmotic ultrafiltrate that accumulates in the peritoneal cavity. It is expected that by configuring to activate the pump responsive to the analyte level of the fluid in the peritoneal cavity, better control of serum sodium concentration may be maintained than could be achieved by basing the action of the DSR solution on dwell time alone.
Energy may be wirelessly transferred to the implantable device, and data received from the device, using charging and communication system 30 described above with reference to
While various illustrative embodiments of the invention are described above, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention. For example, the implantable device may be ordered differently and may include additional or fewer components of various sizes and composition. The appended claims are intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/174,855, filed Feb. 12, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/985,598, filed May 21, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,918,778, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/510,652, filed May 24, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3233610 | Charles et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3516410 | Hakim et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3540451 | Zeman et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3575158 | Summers | Apr 1971 | A |
3608088 | Dorman et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3626950 | Schulte | Dec 1971 | A |
3642004 | Osthagen et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3654932 | Newkirk et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3669116 | Heyer | Jun 1972 | A |
3810259 | Summers | May 1974 | A |
3910283 | Leveen | Oct 1975 | A |
4014346 | Brownlee et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4083786 | Tsuda et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4240434 | Newkirk | Dec 1980 | A |
4261341 | Hakim et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4347543 | Frister et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4354933 | Lester | Oct 1982 | A |
4368737 | Ash | Jan 1983 | A |
4398910 | Blake et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4416657 | Berglund | Nov 1983 | A |
4418693 | LeVeen et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4419094 | Patel | Dec 1983 | A |
4465481 | Blake | Aug 1984 | A |
4468219 | George et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475898 | Brodner et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4475899 | Muller | Oct 1984 | A |
4490137 | Moukheibir | Dec 1984 | A |
4553956 | Muller | Nov 1985 | A |
4557724 | Gregonis et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4584994 | Bamberger et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4594631 | Iwaki | Jun 1986 | A |
4595390 | Hakim et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4610625 | Bunn | Sep 1986 | A |
4610658 | Buchwald et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4615691 | Hakim et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4618343 | Polaschegg | Oct 1986 | A |
4632435 | Polyak | Dec 1986 | A |
4650463 | LeVeen et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4657530 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4687471 | Twardowski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4690673 | Bloomquist | Sep 1987 | A |
4725207 | Buchwald et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4772257 | Hakim et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4779614 | Moise | Oct 1988 | A |
4784638 | Ghajar et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4850955 | Newkirk | Jul 1989 | A |
D303840 | Weilbacher | Oct 1989 | S |
4880414 | Whipple | Nov 1989 | A |
4904236 | Redmond et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4950232 | Ruzicka et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4963129 | Rusch | Oct 1990 | A |
4963133 | Whipple | Oct 1990 | A |
4991594 | Angelchik | Feb 1991 | A |
5011472 | Aebischer et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5021048 | Buckholtz | Jun 1991 | A |
5037385 | O'Byrne | Aug 1991 | A |
5045057 | Van Driessche et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057075 | Moncrief et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071408 | Ahmed | Dec 1991 | A |
5078688 | Lobodzinski et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5141493 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5147281 | Thornton et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167615 | East et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5180387 | Ghajar et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5254084 | Geary | Oct 1993 | A |
5356386 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360414 | Yarger | Nov 1994 | A |
5385541 | Kirsch et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387188 | Watson | Feb 1995 | A |
5387192 | Glantz et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391143 | Kensey | Feb 1995 | A |
5395320 | Padda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5395350 | Summers | Mar 1995 | A |
5397354 | Wilk et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5431637 | Okada et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5472323 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474683 | Bryant et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489276 | Jamshidi | Feb 1996 | A |
5520632 | Leveen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5549579 | Batdorf et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575770 | Melsky et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589197 | Shockley et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593394 | Kanesaka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629025 | Shockley et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631025 | Shockley et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637083 | Bertrand et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5676670 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
5713864 | Verkaart | Feb 1998 | A |
5725506 | Freeman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5788468 | Dewa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830172 | Leveen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
5944684 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947911 | Wong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980478 | Gorsuch et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980480 | Rubenstein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989207 | Hughes | Nov 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6017355 | Hessel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
D420738 | Carter et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
6022333 | Kensey | Feb 2000 | A |
6027442 | Von Iderstein | Feb 2000 | A |
6099513 | Spehalski | Aug 2000 | A |
6132405 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132415 | Finch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146354 | Beil | Nov 2000 | A |
6162238 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162487 | Darouiche | Dec 2000 | A |
6193684 | Burbank et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214802 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245039 | Brugger et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248726 | Alsop et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254567 | Treu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264601 | Jassawalla et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264625 | Rubenstein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6417750 | Sohn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436087 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478789 | Spehalski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6533733 | Ericson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554822 | Holschneider et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585681 | Brugger et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6613095 | Levin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648906 | Lasheras et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656227 | Levin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6689085 | Rubenstein et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6814547 | Childers et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827682 | Bugge et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6846168 | Davis et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854467 | Boekstegers | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875192 | Saul et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6887214 | Levin et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6894456 | Tsukamoto et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905474 | Borgesen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911014 | Wentling et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921378 | O'Keefe et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926691 | Miethke | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939111 | Huitt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945949 | Wilk | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949080 | Wolf et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953481 | Phelps et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955655 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960179 | Gura | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964652 | Guiles et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966889 | Saab | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974445 | Stergiopulos | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976973 | Ruddell et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6979351 | Forsell et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981964 | Rioux et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986752 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994700 | Elkins et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011095 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017340 | Chicky | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025739 | Saul | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025742 | Rubenstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7063679 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128735 | Weston | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169303 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195608 | Burnett | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D558338 | Itoh | Dec 2007 | S |
D558341 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
D558342 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
7311690 | Burnett | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335179 | Burnett | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7419483 | Shehada | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7621886 | Burnett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7670332 | O'Keefe et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7909790 | Burnett | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8012118 | Curtin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8202248 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8241239 | Solomon et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8394048 | Burnett | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8398577 | Burnett | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8517973 | Burnett | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8585635 | Degen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8600517 | Forsell | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612013 | Forsell | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8641659 | Soykan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8704484 | Rosik et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8771221 | Burnett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8882699 | Burnett | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8961448 | Forsell | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965523 | Forsell | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8992456 | Powell | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9039652 | Degen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9138521 | Solomon et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138523 | Burnett et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9144660 | Degen | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149613 | Degen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
D743542 | Degen | Nov 2015 | S |
D743543 | Degen | Nov 2015 | S |
9339636 | Khan et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9381301 | Lattanzio et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9421347 | Burnett | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9577459 | Degen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9673527 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675327 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9694165 | Forsell | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9808634 | Forsell | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9913968 | Burnett | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9956336 | Degen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10252037 | Degen et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10398824 | Burnett et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10569003 | Degen et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10716922 | Degen et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10769244 | Degen et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10898631 | Inhaber et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
20010025170 | Paderni | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027289 | Treu et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020013545 | Soltanpour et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022793 | Bertrand et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020091352 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107467 | Levin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123715 | Sorenson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030114787 | Gura | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114898 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163079 | Burnett | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171710 | Bassuk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030217962 | Childers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220606 | Busby et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040018228 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049288 | Levin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098113 | Forsell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106205 | Stevenson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126775 | Altieri et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147871 | Burnett | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050096582 | Burnett | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131340 | Sorenson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050273034 | Burnett | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010014 | Brown | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024200 | Nishikiori et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036208 | Burnett | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058731 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060094984 | Wood et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070055197 | Shakir | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106205 | Connell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070208323 | Gregorich et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228071 | Kamen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233042 | Moehle et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255345 | Krause | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299317 | Hoyme et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024294 | Mazar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080108935 | Nyhart, Jr. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129486 | Jeckelmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154173 | Burnett | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080214983 | Mauge et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230450 | Burbank et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090054874 | Barron et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069642 | Gao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090171241 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198174 | Childers et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222065 | Dlugos, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090275805 | Lane et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090275924 | Lattanzio et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090318844 | Burnett | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010832 | Boute et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022902 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100114012 | Sandford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100185225 | Albrecht et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100215375 | Reams | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222846 | Goetz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234793 | Dacey, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249692 | Dacey, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270970 | Toya et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312163 | Forsell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312164 | Forsell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025261 | Bersenev | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110034986 | Chou et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110163714 | Ettes et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172545 | Grudic et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184339 | Tan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184340 | Tan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202041 | Forsell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110291613 | Rosik et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120032522 | Schatz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035255 | Fanelli et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041279 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120209085 | Degen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209165 | Degen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120235503 | Kesler et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235634 | Hall et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130187619 | Dunipace | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130199998 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211322 | Degen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130289334 | Badstibner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303971 | Budgett et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317476 | Searle et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140005743 | Giuffrida et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012180 | Levin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066841 | Degen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074180 | Heldman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098627 | Mochizuki et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121590 | Degen | May 2014 | A1 |
20140200481 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213966 | Ostapoff et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140266022 | Degen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275727 | Bonde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275827 | Gill et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150088090 | Macy, Jr. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160000984 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022971 | Degen et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160087687 | Kesler et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160151553 | Bonde | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183819 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160303313 | Burke et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331947 | Burnett | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170079760 | Newman et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170128654 | Feld | May 2017 | A1 |
20170136221 | Budgett et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170173262 | Veltz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170281848 | Axelsson et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304597 | Forsell | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180056050 | Degen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180060520 | Degen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180093081 | Forsell | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180243495 | Degen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180338914 | Inhaber et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180344917 | Inhaber et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190232029 | Degen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200054813 | Burnett et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101485683 | Jul 2009 | CN |
201930383 | Aug 2011 | CN |
0366389 | May 1990 | EP |
0980685 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1362605 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1517718 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1539294 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1517718 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2244662 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2244663 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2244667 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2244758 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2244759 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2244760 | Nov 2010 | EP |
1539294 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2676638 | Dec 2013 | EP |
2349473 | Dec 2016 | EP |
2676638 | Jul 2017 | EP |
3275505 | Jan 2018 | EP |
2054105 | Jul 2018 | EP |
2350794 | Dec 2000 | GB |
S63143074 | Jun 1988 | JP |
H04327857 | Nov 1992 | JP |
H0956810 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2000072658 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000510552 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2004513681 | May 2004 | JP |
2005171892 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005534400 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006507018 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2010527247 | Aug 2010 | JP |
WO-9741799 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9816171 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9934116 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-0207596 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-03072166 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2004012806 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2004105730 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005018708 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2006023589 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2008055248 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2009091267 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009096854 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2010077851 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2012078230 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012112664 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2013122580 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013166038 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO-2014140277 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2015108782 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2018037359 | Mar 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 17/174,855, filed Feb. 21, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/646,858, filed Jan. 3, 2022. |
Adamson et al., “Wireless Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring Guides Management to Reduce Decompensation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction,” Circ Heart Fail., 7:935-944 (2014). |
Aminde et al., “Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for Lutembacher syndrome: the pivotal role of echocardiography,” Cardiovasc Diagn Ther., 5(2):122-132 (2015). |
Ando, et al., Left ventricular decompression through a patent foramen ovale in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A case report, Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 2: 1-7 (2004). |
Baumgartner et al., “ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010)—The Task Force on the Management of Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC),” Eur Heart J., 31:2915-2957 (2010). |
Bellot, et al., Automated Low Flow Pump System for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites: A Multi-Center Safety and Efficacy Study, Journal of Hepatology, 58(5):922-927 (2013). |
Benza et al., “Monitoring Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using an Implantable Hemodynamic Sensor,” Chest, 156(6):1176-1186 (2019). |
Ciarka et al., “Atrial Septostomy Decreases Sympathetic Overactivity in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension,” Chest, 131(6):P1831-1837 (2007) (Abstract Only). |
Costanzo, et al., Early Ultrafiltration in Patients with Decompensated Heart Failure and Diuretic Resistance, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 46(11):2047-2051 (2005). |
Davies et al., “Abnormal left heart function after operation for atrial septal defect,” British Heart Journal, 32:747-753 (1970). |
Doty, et al., Effect of Increased Renal Venous Pressure on Renal Function, J. Trauma., 47(6):1000-1003 (1999). |
Extended European Search Report dated May 7, 2021 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. 20215794.7 (1531). |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 6, 2012 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP05786343.3, 6 pages (0330). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 18, 2019 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. 19172235.4 (0831). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 14, 2011 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP11172759.0, 6 pages (0231). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2011 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP07844792.7, 6 pages (0730). |
Francois, et al., Peritoneal Dialysis for Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, Blood Purif., 40(1):45-52 (2015). |
Fukuda, et al., Survivin, a Cancer Target with an Emerging Role in Normal Adult Tissues, Mol. Cancer Ther., 5(5):1087-1098 (2006). |
Greitz, et al., Pulsatile Brain Movement and Associated Hydrodynamics Studied by Magnetic Resonance Phase Imaging, Diagnostic Neuroradiology, 34(5): 370-380 (1992). |
Hecking, et al., Sodium Setpoint and Sodium Gradient: Influence on Plasma Sodium Change and Weight Gain, Am J. Nephrol, 33(1):39-48 (2011). |
Houlberg, et al., Terminal Right Heart Failure Due to Complex Congenital Cardiac Disease Successfully Managed by Home Peritoneal Drainage, Cardiol. Young, 13: 568-570 (2003). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jul. 3, 2012 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl No. PCT/US12/25212, 34 pages (0810). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 15, 2008 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl No. PCT/US07/83261, 6 pages (0710). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2005 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl No. PCT/US04/26781, 4 pages (0410). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 16, 2015 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2015/010840 (1610). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 in Intl PCT Appl. No. PCT/US2012/025188 (0910). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2018 in Intl PCT Patent Appl. U.S. Appl. No. PCT/IB2017/055092 (1410). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2018 in Inti PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/IB2017/055093 (1710). |
International Search Report dated Jul. 17, 2003, PCT/US03/05145, 3 pages (0210). |
International Search Report dated Sep. 16, 2008, in Intl PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2005/029305, 4 pages (0310). |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2018 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/IB2018/053587 (1510). |
Kenny., Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Renal Function: the Venous Side of the Road, PulmCCM, Critical Care, Gi and Nutrition, Jul. 14, 2016, accessed on line on Mar. 27, 2017 at http://pulmccm.org/main/2016/critical-care-review/intra-abdominal-pressur-e-renal-function/. |
Kulkarni et al., “Lutembacher's syndrome,” J Cardiovasc Did Res., 3(2):179-181 (2012). |
Kurzyna et al., “Atrial Septostomy in Treatment of End-Stage Right Heart Failure in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension,” Chest, 131:977-983 (2007). |
McCausland, et al., Dialysate Sodium, Serum Sodium and Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis, 27(4):1613-1618 (2012). |
Medtronic Reveal LinqTM LNQ11, Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Clinician Manual, 98 pages (2015). |
Munoz, et al., Dialysate Sodium and Sodium Gradient in Maintenance Hemodialysis: a Neglected Sodium Restriction Approach? Nephrol Dial Transplant, 26(4):1281-1287 (2011). |
Nakayama, et al., Clinical Effect of Low Na Concentration Dialysate (120mEq/L) for CAPD Patients, Abstracts of the XIII Annual CAPD Conference, Peritoneal Dialysis International, 13(Supplement 1), (1993). |
Neragi-Miandoab., Malignant Pleural Effusion, Current and Evolving Approaches for its Diagnosis and Management, Lung Cancer 54:1-9(2006). |
Ortiz, et al., Long-Term Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure, Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, 19:77-80 (2003). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 19, 2014 in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/055104 (1310). |
Peters et al., “Self-fabricated fenestrated Amplatzer occluders for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in patients with left ventricular restriction: midterm results,” Clin Res Cardiol., 95:88-92 (2006). |
Puttagunta, et al., Peritoneal Dialysis for Heart Failure, Peritoneal Dialysis International, 35(6):645-649 (2015). |
Rao, et al., “First-in-Human Experience With Peritoneal Direct Sodium Removal Using a Zero-Sodium Solution,” A New Candidate Therapy For vol. Overload, Circulation, vol. 141, 2020, pp. 1043-1053. |
Rosenblit, et al., “Peritoneal-Urinary Drainage for Treatment of Refractory Ascites: A Pilot Study,” Nov./Dec. 1998, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 9(6):998-1005,(1998). |
Rosenblum, et al., Conceptual Considerations For Device-Based Therapy in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, Circulation: Heart Failure, 13(4):e006731 (Apr. 2020). |
Ross et al., “Interatrial Communication and Left Atrial Hypertension—A Cause of Continuous Murmur,” Circulation, 28:853-860 (1963). |
Ruhi, et al., Use of Peritoneal Ultrafiltration in the Elderly Refractory Congestive Heart Failure Patients, Int. Urol. and Nephrol., 44(3):963-969 (2012). |
Sandoval et al., “Graded Balloon Dilation Atrial Septostomy in Severe Primary Pulmonary Hypertension—A Therapeutic Alternative for Patients Nonresponsive to Vasodilator Treatment,” JACC, 32(2):297-304 (1998). |
Schubert, et al., Left ventricular Conditioning in the Elderly Patient to Prevent Congestive Heart Failure After Transcatheter Closure of the Atrial Septal Defect, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 64(3): 333-337 (2005). |
Second Written Opinion dated May 16, 2019 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/IB2018/053587 (1510). |
Smyth, Chris, Pump implant for Cancer Patients ‘is a Game-Changer’ for Thousands, the Times, Health News, Jan. 18, 2013 (p. 11). |
Sort, et al., Effect of Intravenous Albumin on Renal Impairment and Mortality in Patients with Cirrhosis and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, The New England Journal of Medicine, 341(6):403-409 (Aug. 5, 1999). |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Jun. 4, 2010 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP03719316.6, 3 pages (0230). |
Tan et al., The Evidence on the Effectiveness of Management for Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Systematic Review, European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 29, 2006 (pp. 829-838). |
Tomai et al., “Acute Left Ventricular Failure After Transcatheter Closure of a Secundum Atrial Septal Defect in a Patient With Coronary Artery Disease: A Critical Reappraisal,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 55:97-99 (2002). |
Toto R.D., “Leveraging the Peritoneal as a New Diuretic Strategy for Heart Failure,” Circulation, vol. 141,2020, pp. 1054-1056. |
Viaene et al., “Pulmonary oedema after percutaneous ASD-closure,” Acta Cardiol., 65(2):257-260 (2010). |
Warnes et al., “ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease—A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease),” JACC, 52(23):e143-e263 (2008). |
Warren, et al., Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions Using the Pleurx Catheter, Ann. Thrac. Sur. 85, 2008, (pp. 1049-1055). |
Webb et al., “Atrial Septal Defects in the Adult Recent Progress and Overview,” Circulation, 114:1645-1653 (2006). |
Wiedemann, H.R., “Earliest description by Johann Friedrich Meckel, Senior (1750) of what is known today as Lutembacher syndrome (1916),” Am J Med Genet., 53(1):59-64 (1994) (Abstract Only). |
www.medtronic.com/us-en/patients/treatments-therapies/fainting-heart-monit- or/reveal-linq-icm.html (May 2017) (Accessed Nov. 27, 2017). |
Zepeda-Orozco, et al., Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome, Pediatr. Nephrol, 27:2205-2211 (2012). |
Zhang et al., “Acute left ventricular failure after transcatheter closure of a secundum atrial septal defect in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,” Chin Med J., 124(4):618-621 (2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220168484 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62510652 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15985598 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 17174855 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17174855 | Feb 2021 | US |
Child | 17650183 | US |