Nano-fabrication includes the fabrication of very small structures that have features on the order of 100 nanometers or smaller. One application in which nano-fabrication has had a sizeable impact is in the processing of integrated circuits. The semiconductor processing industry continues to strive for larger production yields while increasing the circuits per unit area formed on a substrate, therefore nano-fabrication becomes increasingly important. Nano-fabrication provides greater process control while allowing continued reduction of the minimum feature dimensions of the structures formed. Other areas of development in which nano-fabrication has been employed include biotechnology, optical technology, mechanical systems, and the like.
An exemplary nano-fabrication technique in use today is commonly referred to as imprint lithography. Exemplary imprint lithography processes are described in detail in numerous publications, such as U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0065976, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0065252, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,194, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
An imprint lithography technique disclosed in each of the aforementioned U.S. patent publications and patent includes formation of a relief pattern in a formable (polymerizable) layer and transferring a pattern corresponding to the relief pattern into an underlying substrate. The substrate may be coupled to a motion stage to obtain a desired positioning to facilitate the patterning process. The patterning process uses a template spaced apart from the substrate and a formable liquid applied between the template and the substrate. The formable liquid is solidified to form a rigid layer that has a pattern conforming to a shape of the surface of the template that contacts the formable liquid. After solidification, the template is separated from the rigid layer such that the template and the substrate are spaced apart. The substrate and the solidified layer are then subjected to additional processes to transfer a relief image into the substrate that corresponds to the pattern in the solidified layer.
So that the present invention may be understood in more detail, a description of embodiments of the invention is provided with reference to the embodiments illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of the invention, and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the scope.
Referring to the figures, and particularly to
Substrate 12 and substrate chuck 14 may be further supported by stage 16. Stage 16 may provide motion along the x, y, and z axes. Stage 16, substrate 12, and substrate chuck 14 may also be positioned on a base (not shown).
Spaced-apart from substrate 12 is template 18. Template 18 may include mesa 20 extending therefrom towards substrate 12, mesa 20 having a patterning surface 22 thereon. Further, mesa 20 may be referred to as mold 20. Alternatively, template 18 may be formed without mesa 20.
Template 18 and/or mold 20 may be formed from such materials including, but not limited to, fused-silica, quartz, silicon, organic polymers, siloxane polymers, borosilicate glass, fluorocarbon polymers, metal, hardened sapphire, and/or the like. As illustrated, patterning surface 22 comprises features defined by a plurality of spaced-apart recesses 24 and/or protrusions 26, though embodiments of the present invention are not limited to such configurations. Patterning surface 22 may define any original pattern that forms the basis of a pattern to be formed on substrate 12.
Template 18 may be coupled to chuck 28. Chuck 28 may be configured as, but not limited to, vacuum, pin-type, groove-type, electrostatic, electromagnetic, and/or other similar chuck types. Exemplary chucks are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,087, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. Further, chuck 28 may be coupled to imprint head 30 such that chuck 28 and/or imprint head 30 may be configured to facilitate movement of template 18.
System 10 may further comprise fluid dispense system 32. Fluid dispense system 32 may be used to deposit polymerizable material 34 on substrate 12. Polymerizable material 34 may be positioned upon substrate 12 using techniques such as drop dispense, spin-coating, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), thin film deposition, thick film deposition, and/or the like. Polymerizable material 34 may be disposed upon substrate 12 before and/or after a desired volume is defined between mold 20 and substrate 12 depending on design considerations. Polymerizable material 34 may comprise a monomer mixture as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,157,036 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0187339, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Referring to
Either imprint head 30, stage 16, or both vary a distance between mold 20 and substrate 12 to define a desired volume therebetween that is filled by polymerizable material 34. For example, imprint head 30 may apply a force to template 18 such that mold 20 contacts polymerizable material 34. After the desired volume is filled with polymerizable material 34, source 38 produces energy 40, e.g., ultraviolet radiation, causing polymerizable material 34 to solidify and/or cross-link conforming to a shape of surface 44 of substrate 12 and patterning surface 22, defining patterned layer 46 on substrate 12. Patterned layer 46 may comprise a residual layer 48 and a plurality of features shown as protrusions 50 and recessions 52, with protrusions 50 having a thickness t1 and residual layer having a thickness t2.
The above-mentioned system and process may be further employed in imprint lithography processes and systems referred to in U.S. Pat. No. 6,932,934, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0124566, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0188381, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0211754, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
In another embodiment, the above-mentioned system and process may be employed using techniques including, but not limited to, photolithography (e.g., various wavelengths including G line, I line, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm and 13.2-13.4 nm), contact lithography, e-beam lithography, x-ray lithography, ion-beam lithography, atomic lithography, and the like.
Currently, within the art, treatment of template 18 with surfactant molecules is provided as a diluted spray-on surfactant/solvent solution. In using the diluted spray-on surfactant/solvent solution, it is generally difficult to obtain precise distribution of the surfactant molecules on the templates.
Referring to
To provide surfactant liquid 60 to template 18, imprint fluid 58 may be deposited on substrate 12. Imprint fluid 58 may include, but is not limited to, polymerizable material 34 and surfactant liquid 60. Polymerizable material 34 may be formed from several different families of bulk materials. For example, polymerizable material 34 may be fabricated from bulk materials including, but not limited to, vinyl ethers, methacrylates, epoxies, thiol-enes and acrylates, and/or the like. Bulk materials are described in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,307,118, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Once imprint fluid 58 is deposited on substrate 12, generally the surfactant liquid 60 may migrate to the gas/liquid interface. As such, by positioning template 18 in contact with imprint fluid 58 as shown in
Generally, after treatment with surfactant liquid 60, surface 62 of template 18 may be defined by the surfactant rich region SRR and/or the surfactant depleted region SDR as illustrated in
Distribution of surfactant liquid 60 on template 18 may provide the contact angle θSRR at the surfactant rich region SRR and the contact angle θSDR at the surfactant depleted region SDR to be θSRR>θSDR; θSRR<θSDR; and/or θSRR≈θSDR. Generally, the contact angle θSRR at the surfactant rich region SRR and the contact angle θSDR at the surfactant depleted region SDR may be less than approximately 55°.
Further, the composition of surfactant liquid 60 may provide for different contact angles; surfactant liquid 60 may be selected to provide an approximate contact angle θSRR at the surfactant rich regions SRR and an approximate contact angle θSDR at the surfactant depleted regions SDR. As such, selection of surfactant liquid 60 may provide θSRR>θSDR, θSRR<θSDR, and/or θSRR≈θSDR, depending on the design considerations of an application.
Exemplary surfactant (e.g., surfactant liquids 60) may include surfactant components such as fluoro-aliphatic polymeric esters, fluorosurfactants of polyoxyethylene, fluorosurfactants of polyalkyl ether, fluoroalkyl polyethers, and/or the like. Exemplary surfactant components are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,403,122, U.S. Pat. No. 3,787,351, U.S. Pat. No. 4,803,145, U.S. Pat. No. 4,835,084, U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,008, U.S. Pat. No. 5,380,644, U.S. Pat. No. 5,747,234, U.S. Pat. No. 6,664,354, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0175736, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Exemplary commercially available surfactant components include, but are not limited to, ZONYL® FSO, ZONYL® FSO-100, ZONYL® FSN-100, and ZONYL® FS-300, manufactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company having an office located in Wilmington, Del.; FC-4432, FC-4430, and FC-430, manufactured by 3M having an office located in Maplewood, Minn.; MASURF® FS425, MASURF® FS1700, MASURF® FS2000, MASURF® FS1239, manufactured by Mason Chemical Company having an office located in Arlington Heights, Ill.; Lodyne S-107B, Lodyne S-220N, manufactured by Ciba-Geigy Corporation having an office located in Basel, Switzerland; Unidyne NS1602, Unidyne NS1603, Unidyne NS1606a, manufactured by Daikin having an office located in Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan; MegaFace R-08 manufactured by Dainippon Ink & Chemical having an office located in Nihonbaski, Chuo, Japan.
Selection of surfactant (e.g., surfactant liquid 60) may be provided through contact angle analysis. Contact angle analysis may include simulated testing of the contact angles on simulated surfactant rich regions SRRSIM and/or simulated surfactant depleted regions SDRSIM.
Referring to
Testing substrate 72 may be cleaned, baked dry, and stored in a nitrogen box. As illustrated in
Referring to
The contact angle of imprint fluid 58 on testing substrate 72 may be measured at multiple locations on testing substrate 72. For example, the contact angle of imprint fluid 58 may be measured at several locations (e.g., seven locations) using goniometer 70. The contact angles at multiple locations may be averaged to provide the magnitude of the contact angle θR-SIM on the simulated surfactant rich regions SRRSIM.
Referring to
Similar to testing substrate 72 in
Referring to
The contact angle of imprint fluid 58 on testing substrate 72a may be measured at multiple locations on testing substrate 72a. For example, the contact angle of imprint fluid 58 may be measured at several locations (e.g., seven locations) by goniometer 70. The contact angles at multiple locations may be averaged to provide the magnitude of the contact angle θD-SIM on the simulated surfactant depleted regions SDRSIM.
Variations of surfactant liquid 60 within imprint fluid 58 deposited on testing substrate 72a may provide control over the contact angles within the simulated surfactant rich regions SRRSIM and/or the simulated surfactant depleted regions SDRSIM leading to control over the surfactant rich regions SRR and the surfactant depleted regions SDR during imprinting. For example, imprint fluid 58 formed of surfactant liquid 60 having approximately 0.17% FC4432 and 0.33% FC4430 and polymerizable material 34 may provide for θR-SIM of approximately 20° and θD-SIM of approximately 22° such that θR-SIM≈θD-SIM. In another example, imprint fluid 58 formed of surfactant liquid 60 having approximately 0.5% R-08 and polymerizable material 34 may provide for θR-SIM of approximately 15° and θD-SIM of approximately 22° such that θR-SIM<θD-SIM. In another example, imprint fluid 58 formed of surfactant liquid 60 having approximately 0.5% FS2000 and polymerizable material 34 may provide for θR-SIM of approximately 18° and θD-SIM of approximately 10° such that θR-SIM>θD-SIM.
Controlling Contact Angle to Provide Suitable Wetting Characteristics
In a step 302, multiple surfactant solutions 74 and/or multiple surfactant liquids 60 may be provided. In a step 304, the contact angle θR-SIM in the simulated surfactant rich regions SRRSIM on testing substrate 72 rinsed with surfactant solution 74 may be determined for each surfactant liquid 60. Alternatively, the contact angle θR-SIM may be determined by a reference document (e.g., a database) from prior testing using surfactant liquid 60 and surfactant solution 74. In a step 306, the contact angle θD-SIM in the simulated surfactant depleted region SDRSIM on testing substrate 72a rinsed in solvent 78 may be determined for each surfactant liquid 60. Alternatively, the contact angle θD-SIM may be determined by a reference document (e.g., database) from prior testing using surfactant liquid 60 and solvent 78. In a step 308, surfactant liquid 60 suitable for imprinting may be determined. For example, surfactant liquid 60 that provides θSRR>θSDR may be selected. In a step 310, imprint material 58 formed of polymerizable material 34 and surfactant liquid 60 may be deposited on substrate 12. It should be noted that surfactant liquid 60 may be applied directly to template 18 and need not be directly added to polymerizable material 34 prior to contact of template 18 with polymerizable material 34. Generally, surfactant liquid 60 in imprint fluid 58 may migrate towards the gas/liquid interface. In a step 312, template 18 may contact imprint fluid 58 providing at least a portion of surfactant liquid 60 on surface 62 of template 18 to form at least one surfactant rich region SRR and at least one surfactant depleted region SDR. The approximate contact angle θSRR provided within at least one surfactant rich region SRR during imprinting may be less than, greater than, or substantially similar to the approximate contact angle θSDR within at least one surfactant depleted region SDR during imprinting. In a step 314, polymerizable material 34 may be solidified to provide patterned layer 46.
Drop Pattern Shifting Applications Using Contact Angle Analysis
As illustrated in
Drop shifting may even out surfactant distribution on template 18. For example,
During imprinting of multiple substrates 12, drop shift patterning may be used successively or sporadically. For example, a first drop pattern may be used to imprint followed by one or more drop shifted patterns. Alternatively, a first drop pattern may be used multiple times prior to one or more drop shifted patterns being used. In a similar fashion, a first drop pattern may be used once followed by multiple uses of one or more drop shifted patterns.
Further, by reducing the contact angle θSDR of the surfactant depleted region SDR as compared to the contact angle θSRR of the surfactant rich region SRR such that θSRR>θSDR, the lower contact angle θSDR of the surfactant depleted region SDR may provide additional driving force for polymerizable material 34 to wet and fill the surfactant depleted region SDR.
In a step 410, imprint material 58 formed of polymerizable material 34 and surfactant liquid 60 may be dispensed on substrate 12 in a first pattern. Generally, surfactant liquid 60 in imprint fluid 58 may migrate towards the gas/liquid interface. In a step 412, template 18 may contact imprint fluid 58. In a step 414, imprint fluid 58 may be solidified to provide first patterned layer 46. In a step 416, template 18 may be separated from first patterned layer 46 with template 18 having the surfactant rich regions SRR and the surfactant depleted regions SDR upon removal.
In a step 418, imprint material 58 formed of polymerizable material 34 and surfactant liquid 60 may be dispensed in a second drop pattern on second substrate 12. The second drop pattern may be substantially similar to the first drop pattern and shifted a position x and/or a position y such that at least one drop location contacts at least one surfactant depleted region SDR of template 18. In a step 420, template 18 may contact imprint fluid 58. In a step 422, imprint fluid 58 may be solidified to provide second patterned layer 46. The second patterned layer 46 may have limited or no voids.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/244,428, filed on Oct. 5, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,837,921. This application also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/014,574 filed on Dec. 18, 2007 now abandoned, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The United States government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstance to require the patent owner to license other on reasonable terms as provided by the terms of 70NANB4H3012 awarded by National Institute of Standards (NIST) ATP Award.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3403122 | Sherman et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3787351 | Olson | Jan 1974 | A |
3810874 | Mitsch et al. | May 1974 | A |
4303761 | Apotheker | Dec 1981 | A |
4512848 | Deckman et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4585829 | Kuo et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4614667 | Larson et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617238 | Crivello et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4731155 | Napoli et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4803145 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4826943 | Ito et al. | May 1989 | A |
4835084 | Nair et al. | May 1989 | A |
4845008 | Nishioka et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4931351 | McColgin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5028366 | Harakal et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5169494 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5298556 | Stephens | Mar 1994 | A |
5331020 | Brown et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5369722 | Heming et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380644 | Yonkoski et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389696 | Dempsey et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5397669 | Rao | Mar 1995 | A |
5425848 | Haisma et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5462700 | Beeson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5542978 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569691 | Guggenberger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5594042 | Glover et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601641 | Stephens | Feb 1997 | A |
5629095 | Bujanowski et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629128 | Shirakawa et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631314 | Wakiya et al. | May 1997 | A |
5747234 | Wexler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5837314 | Beaton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849209 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849222 | Jen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861467 | Bujanowski et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5969063 | Parker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6054034 | Soane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6093455 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6142811 | Lin | Nov 2000 | A |
6146811 | Kim et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169139 | van Cleeff | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204343 | Barucha et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6276273 | Aurenty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309580 | Chou | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334960 | Willson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6372838 | Rao et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375870 | Visovsky et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391217 | Schaffer et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6447919 | Brown et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468642 | Bray et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475704 | Iwasaki et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482742 | Chou | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503914 | Benish et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517995 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518189 | Chou | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544594 | Linford et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565776 | Li et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580172 | Mancini et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6646662 | Nebashi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649272 | Moore et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664306 | Gaddam et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664354 | Savu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6696220 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713238 | Chou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719915 | Willson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721529 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737489 | Linert et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6774183 | Palumbo et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776094 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790905 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802870 | Chang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809356 | Chou | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828244 | Chou | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830819 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6873087 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6932934 | Choi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936194 | Watts | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957608 | Hubert | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7037574 | Paranjpe et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7157036 | Choi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7307118 | Xu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309225 | McMackin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7365103 | Willson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7837921 | Xu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010044075 | Nishimura et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055727 | Kubota et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020042027 | Chou et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072009 | Kim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084553 | Nun et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020115002 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126189 | Gloster | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132482 | Chou | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135099 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146642 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167117 | Chou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030034329 | Chou | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080471 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080472 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030166814 | Sparrowe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030235787 | Watts et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040036201 | Chou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046271 | Watts | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046288 | Chou | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065252 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040065976 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040110856 | Young et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116548 | Willson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118809 | Chou et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124566 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131718 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137734 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156108 | Chou et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168613 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040170770 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188381 | Sreenivasan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192041 | Jeong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197843 | Chou et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211754 | Sreenivasan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040256764 | Choi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050098534 | Sreenivasan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050160934 | Xu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187339 | Xu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192421 | Xu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236739 | Willson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060035029 | Xu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036051 | Xu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060062867 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062922 | Xu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076717 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077374 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060081557 | Xu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108710 | Xu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060145398 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060279024 | Choi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070017631 | Xu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021520 | Xu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070141271 | Xu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070212494 | Xu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070272825 | Xu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080000373 | Fetrucci et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080110557 | Xu | May 2008 | A1 |
20090136654 | Xu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090272875 | Xu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100109195 | Xu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1342736 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1491356 | Dec 2004 | EP |
20050722972 | Feb 2005 | EP |
02-24848 | Jan 1990 | JP |
02-92603 | Apr 1990 | JP |
WO 9905724 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0021689 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0046035 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0054107 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0147003 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO02069040 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO03073164 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004061526 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2005000552 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005072120 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005082992 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2007133235 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090136654 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61014574 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11244428 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 12336821 | US |