The present invention relates to an improved method for feeding a yarn or thread to a processing machine, such as a textile machine or a machine operating on metal wires, in accordance with the introduction to the main claim. The invention also relates to a device for implementing said method in accordance with the corresponding independent claim.
With particular but non-limiting reference to the textile field, it has long been known that the quality of a textile article is intrinsically related to the method of feeding the yarn and in particular to its feed tension and feed velocity or the quantity fed (absorbed yarn length). In consideration of this fact, various technological solutions are known in the state of the art for the various types of machines (small, medium, large-diameter circular machines, straight bar machines, etc.) aimed at improving the quality of the final product.
For example, constant velocity yarn feeders are known which withdraw the yarn from a spool and deposit it on a drum rotated at constant velocity by a belt connected to a transmission shaft which rotates a cylinder of the textile machine. This type of feeder ensures a yarn quantity (absorbed yarn length) which remains constant with time, however this solution has presented numerous problems such as the obtaining of the necessary synchronization between the rotational velocity of said drum and the machine absorption rate, as the velocity ratio determines the yarn tension. To find the correct velocity ratio and hence the correct tension involves very lengthy adjustment times before starting production. Moreover the device which implements said known method presents other limits related to the thermal expansion of the stitch forming members (for example from machine cold to machine hot) which result in a variation in their travel, with consequent variation in the yarn fed quantity. Any wear of the mechanical parts of these members (needles, sinkers and cams) results in further variations in the yarn quantities absorbed by each position, with consequent formation of defects (barring) in the fabric.
A limit of this known solution is that the feed velocity (absorbed yarn length) of each yarn is constant and hence the yarns cannot be fed in a discontinuous application (jacquard) in which the yarn consumption varies on the basis of the pattern. In addition, this solution is unable to compensate any extra tensions in the yarn withdrawn from the spool, which cause yarn breakage and tension increase on the stitch forming members, resulting in defective articles and/or in the worst case the breakage of needles.
Another limit of these feed members is determined by the fact that to feed a constant yarn quantity via a feed belt and feed wheels which rotate at the same velocity assumes that the fed yarns are without elasticity, which in fact is untrue as each yarn undergoes elongation on the basis of the tension to which it is subjected. Hence different yarn tensions at the entry to constant quantity yarn feed members in reality result in different yarn quantities being fed to the textile machine.
A different yarn feed method uses constant tension yarn feeders, these being devices able to operate without any synchronization with the machine and able to maintain the tension constant during the process as the absorption rate and the spool unwinding tension vary.
The use of these feeders has in fact simplified interfacing with the machine, in addition to solving the problem of tension jerks originating from the spool (compensated by the device itself) and the problem of feeding a yarn withdrawn discontinuously by the machine (jacquard application).
However, even though these devices ensure that the tension of a yarn leaving them is constant and of the set value, the yarn tension in proximity to the needles which form the stitch varies from the set tension as it is also determined by the inevitable yarn passages through the yarn guides (ceramic or metal) positioned between the feed device and said needles.
These passages determine different friction for each position (each feeder) and hence a different yarn tension in proximity to the needles for each machine feed. This tension difference creates a different absorbed yarn length, this length being less the greater the yarn tension in proximity to the needles, with consequent production of barred fabric.
Hence although these known devices are able to maintain constant tension, they are unable to maintain an always constant fed yarn quantity (absorbed yarn length), which in certain cases is a fundamental point in ensuring the final product quality.
Moreover if said constant tension feeders are used with elastic yarns, the problem of the yarn quantity (absorbed yarn length) fed to the machine increases considerably because even if the yarn is fed at constant tension, the feed velocity varies on the basis of the spool tension and the tension resulting from friction on the deviator yarn guide (this friction is particularly to high because of the intrinsic characteristics of the yarn) positioned between the feeder and the stitch formation members.
Yarn feed devices known as accumulation feeders are also known, said devices being able to withdraw the yarn from a usual bobbin and accumulate it on a drum from which it is withdrawn by the textile machine. Tensioning means cooperating with the drum from which the yarn is unwound determine the tension at which the yarn is withdrawn.
Although these devices ensure yarn withdrawal at controlled tension, they do not ensure true tension constancy as the wear of the tensioning means and the tension at which the yarn is withdrawn from the bobbin affect the tension at the device exit, with consequent possible barring of the fabric produced.
As a compromise solution between the two feed types (“constant tension” and “constant velocity”) the applicant has proposed a method and device by which the yarn is fed at constant tension and controlled absorbed yarn length.
According to this method, which uses constant tension feeders, the device is able to modify the set-point tension of said feeders in order to provide a uniform feed velocity (absorbed yarn length) to a plurality of yarns fed by said feeders at a self-learnt or predetermined value. This system is hence able to ensure a feed at constant tension and controlled absorbed yarn length, and by acting on the feed tension is able to compensate the variable friction deriving from contact between the yarn and the yarn guide members which is inevitably present between the feeder exit and the stitch forming members of the machine, to hence maintain a constant tension and yarn quantity (absorbed yarn length) of the yarn fed to the machine.
However although this system operates correctly and solves the problem for rigid (or low elasticity) yarns, it is unable to operate validly with elastic yarns.
A further limit of this system is the necessary synchronization of the device with the machine operative state: in this respect, as a minimum, a synchronization signal is required, to which the device responds by verifying the difference in terms of absorbed yarn length between the amount fed and its set-point value in order to decide how to modify the operating tension for the purpose of aligning consumptions with a self-learnt or set value.
It is hence evident that in the current state of the art, there does not exist a single solution able to completely solve the problems of feeding one or more yarns (whether rigid or elastic) to a textile machine, comprising the advantages of a constant tension feed for applications with discontinuous absorption (jacquard) and the advantages of constant velocity feed for applications with continuous absorption (jersey).
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a yarn feeding method and device able to combine the advantages of constant tension feed with those of constant velocity feed (absorbed yarn length), hence overcoming all the limits of the previously described known solutions.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a yarn feeding method and device able to operate both by withdrawing the yarn directly from the spool (feed by over end takeoff, the method used for rigid or slightly elastic yarns), or by rotating the spool (feed by rolling takeoff, the method used for elastic yarns).
Another object of the present invention is to provide a yarn feeding method able to operate without any synchronization with the machine.
These and other objects which will be apparent to the expert of the art are attained by a method and device in accordance with the accompanying claims.
The present invention will be better understood from the accompanying drawings, which are provided by way of non-limiting example and in which:
With reference to
The device under examination comprises a body 1 carrying a rotary member or wheel 2 (operated in known manner by its own electrical actuator, not shown) acting on a yarn F unwinding from a bobbin 3. Before reaching the wheel 2 the yarn F passes through an entry yarn guide 4, for example of ceramic, and is then wound for one or two turns onto said wheel. From this latter the yarn F arrives, in its movement towards the processing machine, which in the example is a textile machine 9, at a sensor member 6 which measures its tension (for example a load cell), and from there it reaches an exit yarn guide 7 (for example of ceramic).
The rotation of the wheel 2 is controlled by a control member or unit 10 to which the member or load cell 6 measuring the yarn tension is also connected.
As the yarn F is constrained by three mechanical members (i.e. the entry yarn guide 4, the wheel 2 and the exit yarn guide 7), the angle that the yarn assumes (triangulation) on the sensor member or load cell 6 is constant as the stages in the feed of the yarn F to the machine 9 vary; this enables this member or cell 6 to measure the yarn tension during these stages with absolute precision.
In this respect, as the device (or yarn feeder) under examination is not synchronized (or not necessarily synchronized) with the textile machine, any yarn requirement by this latter results in an increase in the tension of the yarn (withdrawn by the machine on leaving the device), which is measured by the sensor member or cell 6. This increase is processed by the control member or unit 10 which intervenes on the rotary member or wheel 2 to vary its velocity in order to maintain the tension constant. The device hence operates as a classical closed loop control system, well known to the expert of the art.
With reference to
The device 200 comprises a body 1 supporting a rotary member or wheel 2 (also of cylindrical shape) with which a bobbin 3 is in contact, from which the yarn F unwinds. The bobbin 3 is drawn onto an idle shaft 201 supported by the body 1 and is always in contact with the wheel 3. For this purpose a spring (not shown) or equivalent elastic pulling element acts on the shaft 201 and tends to pull it towards the wheel 2; hence whatever the quantity of yarn F on the bobbin 3, this is always in contact with the wheel or rotary member 2.
The body 1 supports, projecting from it, a tension sensor member or load cell 6, in proximity to which there is an exit yarn guide 7. A further entry yarn guide (not visible in the figure) directs the yarn F onto the wheel 2 where it can form a fraction of a turn or several turns. The sensor or cell 6 and the wheel 2 are connected to a control unit 5.
As in the case of
As in the case of
The flow diagram of
In a first stage of the method (block 301), the device 100 or 200 is in the start-up stage during which initialization takes place of all operating variables stored in a memory of the unit 5, preferably of microprocessor type. On termination of this stage the procedure automatically passes to the block 302. In this stage, tension control is activated followed by direct automatic passage to the stage of block 303. In this, the actuator of the member 5 is controlled by the control unit 10 to maintain the tension of the yarn F equal to a constant value by increasing its velocity (and that of the corresponding member 5) if the tension read by the sensor member 6 is higher than a set is value or reducing its velocity if the read tension is lower than the set value, using for example a known PID algorithm.
During this stage, the feeder device 100 or 200 is hence able to commence feeding the yarn F as soon as the machine 9 starts to require it (sensed by the device as an increase in the tension measured by the sensor member 6 relative to its set-point value) and to halt the feed as soon as this requirement ceases (sensed by a decrease in the measured tension relative to its set-point value). All this is achieved completely automatically without the need for any synchronization with the machine. During this stage the yarn feed velocity is also measured by the sensor 11, which could be at least one Hall sensor or encoder, possibly integrated into the actuator associated with the rotary member 5.
In this stage a tension check is carried out (block 304). The device unit 5 continues to monitor the tension read by the member 6 to check whether this lies within a possibly programmed range (for example ±5% of the set-point tension) for a predetermined time (also possibly programmable). If the tension lies outside this range, the unit 5 continues to operate in the yarn constant tension control mode of operation by automatically returning to block 303. If however the “tension within range” condition is verified (measured tension within the desired range), the procedure automatically passes to block 305 after memorizing the feed velocity value (possibly filtered or mediated) at that instant, which becomes the set-point velocity. In this stage the unit 10 activates velocity control and passes directly to block 306 in which the actuator of the member 5, controlled by this control unit 10 to maintain the velocity of the member 5 constant, makes it equal to the self-taught value. The control unit 10 then closes its PID loop no longer on the basis of the tension but on the basis of the actuator velocity. During this control the unit 5 also measures the yarn tension and performs the operation represented by block 307.
In the stage represented by this block, the control unit 5 continues to monitor the read tension to verify whether this lies within a possibly programmed range (for example ±5% of the set-point tension) for a predetermined time is (possibly programmable). If the tension lies within this range, the unit 5 continues to operate in the constant feed velocity control mode of operation by automatically returning to block 306. If however the condition is verified in which the tension lies outside the range, the procedure automatically returns to block 302.
It is hence evident that if this method is implemented by each of the previously described constant tension yarn feeders 100, 200, they achieve the advantages of the two feed modes (constant tension and constant velocity), being able to pass completely independently from one operating mode to the other without any synchronization with the machine, thus being able to always feed the yarn under the best possible condition.
The method described in relation to
In a first variant, the control unit 10, during constant velocity yarn feed, is able to monitor the tension not only to verify that this continues to remain within a predetermined range, but also to verify its mean variation to check whether it remains equal to the set tension and if necessary act on the velocity set-point to achieve this equality. The unit 10 is able to halt the machine 9 if the mean tension continues to deviate from the set value with time, notwithstanding a predetermined number of tension correction attempts obtained by acting on the member 2. This could in fact be caused by an accumulation of dirt in the machine yarn guide or by a loss of mechanical calibration of the members provided for stitch formation in the textile machine.
During constant velocity yarn feed, the control unit is able to monitor the variation in the instantaneous tension and determine whether this changes suddenly with time, with consequent sensing that the textile machine yarn withdrawal is not continuous but discontinuous (jacquard application). In that case even if the tension is within the range of predetermined values, the unit 10 automatically passes to the constant tension feed mode for the yarn F, which ensures greater quality in the case of discontinuous applications.
During constant tension yarn feed, the control unit 10 is not only able to monitor the tension variation to verify whether it is or is not within a predetermined range, but is able simultaneously to verify the velocity variation of the wheel 2. If this velocity is not constant but varies suddenly with time, this means that the textile machine yarn withdrawal is not continuous but discontinuous (jacquard application). In that case the unit may decide not to pass to the constant velocity yarn feed mode even though the tension is within the range, to ensure greater quality.
During constant velocity yarn feed, the control unit can have as its reference set-point not the value self-learnt at the moment of passage from the constant tension mode to the constant velocity mode, but instead a predetermined and/or programmed and/or calculated value (for example the mean of the velocity of one or more devices) in order to make the absorbed yarn lengths of several similar devices operating on corresponding yarns fed to the same machine 9 uniform at the same value, for example for the purpose of causing all those feeders which cooperate with the same yarn type or which carry out the same type of production to operate at the same velocity. In order to achieve this objective, the devices could operate in a configuration of MASTER-SLAVE type in which, for each type of yarn or production, only one of the devices is MASTER (MASTER—1, MASTER—2, MASTER_n, and all the others are SLAVE (SLAVE—1, SLAVE—2, SLAVE_n); hence in this case the MASTER would determine the feed velocity of all associated slave devices.
In this manner a system can be defined for feeding a plurality of yarns to a textile machine, each yarn F being fed by an aforesaid feed device in accordance with the previously described method, in which the value of the yarn length absorbed by said devices is made uniform for at least part of these latter at the same value; these devices operate in master-slave configuration in which for each yarn type or production type only one of these devices is master while the others are slaves, said master device determining the feed velocity of all the associated slave devices. All the associated devices operate on yarns of the same type, with all the associated devices carrying out the same type of production.
This expedient further increases product quality without requiring any synchronization with the machine; in this respect by constantly monitoring the yarn tension and the pulley velocity, the unit 5 can ensure yarn feed even in the case in which for example the indicated set-point is in fact mistaken, imagining for example having programmed a velocity value double that required; the unit 5, on measuring the tension, realizes that this is outside the range and automatically passes to the constant tension mode, possibly indicating the irregularity to a supervision unit or halting the machine.
The unit 5 could also use different ranges (in percentage terms) and/or different filters, and could use for example an average measured tension value rather than the instantaneous value to decide when this is within or outside the range to verify the variation in the controlled tension value in relation to the predetermined value range in order to accelerate or decelerate passage from one operating mode to the other, to optimize the process.
Passage from one operating mode to the other could be entirely handled by the textile machine. In that case, the control device could be totally integrated into the electronic system controlling the machine (or if external to this electronic system it could communicate with it via a communication bus, for example) which, knowing the type of manufacture under way, can hence directly pass to the device the operating mode (constant tension or constant velocity), and also possibly the velocity at which the device has to feed the yarn to the machine.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2010A 000887 | May 2010 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB11/01072 | 5/17/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/10/2012 |