The present invention relates to switching circuits, and more specifically, to in-line measurement of the transistor bandwidth.
Performance targeting for complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and bulk technologies is currently facilitated through a logic performance benchmarking methodology that assesses the impact of process elements and step-up plans on inverter delay. The inverter delay is determined by measuring the oscillation frequency of a ring oscillator circuit typically composed of 100 CMOS inverter stages. This approach facilitates the rapid in-line measurement (i.e., measurement during fabrication) of inverter delay used to guide the design of experiments and to obtain data of statistical significance, thereby allowing for decisions that drive the technology performance (measured as inverter delay) to a desired target. Any process element or structural change in the device is presumed to impact the effective resistance or capacitance of components of the measured inverter delay. It is desirable to optimize both delay components to realize the targeted technology performance.
While such an approach is well-suited to logic technology development, there are enough distinctions for high-speed analog and radio frequency (RF) designs such that a logic step-up plan can be neutral or even detrimental to the performance of analog transistors as well as logic transistors intended for use in analog applications. Distinctions in the transistor architecture may be exemplified by the fact that many analog transistors are designed at gate lengths and contacted poly-silicon pitches (CPP) that are necessarily larger than those of logic transistors. Such differences can translate into varying responses to commonly applied performance elements such as nitride stress liners. From a circuit design perspective, the transistors used in analog applications routinely operate in a regime where the drain-to-source voltage (VDS) is compressed to between one half to one third of the supply voltage (VDD). Thus, benchmarking circuits are needed that specifically address the needs of analog designers.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a method of measuring transistor bandwidth of a device under test in-line and on-wafer includes disposing a measurement circuit on a chip within a wafer, the measurement circuit including a ring oscillator generating an oscillation frequency for transition through the device under test on the wafer; and obtaining an amplitude based on the measurement circuit for the corresponding oscillation frequency.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a method of measuring transistor bandwidth of a device under test in-line and on-wafer includes applying digital inputs to a decoder to enable corresponding select lines; driving a ring oscillator with the select lines to generate a corresponding frequency output; and obtaining amplitude from the device under test based on the frequency output.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, an apparatus to measure transistor bandwidth of a device under test in-line and on-wafer includes a decoder including digital input lines and output select lines disposed on a chip within a wafer that includes the device under test; a ring oscillator configured to be driven by the select lines and to generate a frequency output; and a peak and valley detector configured to receive an output from the device under test based on the frequency output of the ring oscillator and to measure amplitude as a peak-to-valley value.
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with the advantages and the features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The forgoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
As noted above, logic performance benchmarking by assessing the impact of process elements and step-up plans on inverter delay is not well suited for high-speed analog and RF designs. This issue may be addressed through the on-wafer implementation of ring oscillators sharing a similar architecture as many analog designs and by using analog specific transistors in those ring oscillators. An example of such architecture is current-mode logic (CML). Although a CML chain is specifically discussed herein for purposes of explanation and clarity, the embodiments of the invention described herein are not limited to a CML chain. In alternate embodiments, any switching circuit may be considered as the device under test (DUT). In a CML stage, there are three or more stacks of devices that each operate within a voltage range that is significantly less than the supply voltage. As a result, through the concatenation of these stages into a ring, a delay metric analogous to the inverter delay may be obtained via a rapid in-line measurement.
However, a characteristic of greater interest to product designers than inverter delay is the self-gain of a transistor at a specific frequency—the bandwidth. Despite a small inverter delay, which is favorable, circuit performance may be compromised when there is insufficient signal amplitude. A delay metric lacks information about amplitude, which is lost in the CML to CMOS conversion process. The amplitude can be obtained through the addition of peak and valley detectors on the output of the CML ring oscillator prior to CMOS conversion. However, the detectors would only provide amplitude at a particular frequency but not over a range of frequencies as desired. Currently, one way that this information gap is addressed is through rigorous off-line measurement and tracking of transistor parameters known to influence bandwidth. Specifically, the maximum oscillation frequency, peak cutoff frequency, and trans-conductance are measured and tracked. This approach cannot provide the volume of data required to help guide process decisions and, therefore, is often relegated to use during the model development cycle to assure a strong correlation between the simulated model performance and data obtained from hardware measurement.
Embodiments of the invention described herein use the CML stage to measure the transistor gain (CML signal amplitude) as a function of frequency in an in-line fashion. As detailed below, CML signals of increasing frequency are provided to a chain of CML stages and the amplitude of a stage within the chain is measured. As the frequency of the signal into the chain increases, the amplitude that each CML stage can support is reduced in a manner determined by the bandwidth of the switching transistor. Because the method is in-line, a large volume of statistically relevant data may be collected. In addition, a Bode plot may be interpolated from the measured data to provide information regarding the low-frequency or dc-gain, −3 dB frequency, and 0 dB frequency. In addition, correlation between the measured bandwidth circuit figures-of-merit and transistor parameters may be extracted. When versions of the bandwidth measurement circuit are incorporated into the kerf region of a chip or embedded within product IP, the metrics may be correlated to product IP performance on a chip-by-chip basis.
The decoder 110 and ring oscillator 120 together comprise the frequency generation portion of the bandwidth measurement circuit 100. The decoder 110 includes a series of select lines 115 that are inputs to the ring oscillator 120. Digital inputs are asserted to the decoder 110 to enable the select lines 115. The ring oscillator 120, which is a variable stage ring oscillator in the embodiment shown by
Once the ring frequency of interest (ring oscillator signal 125 or 131) is output (141) from the multiplexor 140, it may be converted from a full CMOS swing (0 to power supply voltage, VDD) to a partial CML swing by the CMOS-CML converter 150, as is typically done in analog product designs. The output of the CMOS-CML converter (155) then transitions through CML stages of the CML chain 160 until it is output (165) to the peak and valley detector 170. The peak and valley detector 170 includes a full rail differential buffer 172 whose output is tied to the gate of a long-channel p-type field effect transistor (PFET) 174. The source of the PFET 174 is tied to VDD and the drain of the PFET 174 is connected to ground through a capacitor 176. The drain of the PFET 174 is also tied to the peak output node 175a and to the non-inverting input of the buffer 172 while the signal 165 is fed to the inverting input of the buffer 172. Once the non-inverting input is greater than the inverting input (165), the output signal from the buffer 172 to the gate of the PFET 174 is high. This ensures that the PFET 174 stays off and the peak voltage (at 175a) is read as the voltage stored in the capacitor 176. If the inverting input (the signal 175) rises past the non-inverting input, the output of the buffer 172 will begin to fall, turning the PFET 174 on and allowing charge to flow from the supply into the capacitor 176, thereby increasing the peak output node 175a. At the same time, the voltage on the non-inverting input increases, thereby eventually sending the buffer 172 output back high and turning the PFET 174 off. The determination of the valley of the swing (at 175b) is analogous to determining the peak (at 175a), except that the valley gets lower because the gate on a n-type FET (NFET) 173 connected from the valley output (175b) to ground is turned on when the inverting input of the differential buffer 172′ falls below that of the non-inverting input. The charge is stored in a capacitor 176′ connected across the terminals of the NFET 173 (across the valley output (175b) to ground). The amplitude of the CML signal can then be calculated as the peak-to-valley (peak-valley) value.
In one or more embodiments, the inverter stages of the ring oscillator 120 may be unloaded for faster oscillation or loaded by a metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) to reduce the oscillation frequency. For example, at the 22 nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology node, a three-stage unloaded ring may demonstrate a 47 GHz oscillation frequency while a 457-stage MOSCAP loaded ring may provide a 225 MHz oscillation frequency. In order to replicate the Bode plot (as in
In one embodiment, on a 1×25 set of pads, a bandwidth measurement circuit (circuit 100) may be created with a decoder 110 (5 pads), a ring oscillator 120 (3 pads), 6 sets of CML chains 160 featuring different transistor types within (12 pads), peak and valley outputs 175a, 175b (2 pads), frequency 141, common VDD, and substrate taps. The bandwidth measurement circuits according to the present embodiment may be placed in the kerf areas of the wafer 105. In an alternate embodiment, the macro (circuit 100) may be embedded in the actual product IP as discussed with reference to
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.
The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated
The flow diagram depicted herein is just one example. There may be many variations to this diagram or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention has been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.