The present invention relates to an in-plane piezoresistive detection sensor.
The field of the invention is in particular that of micro/nanosensors, accelerometers and inertial sensors.
The sensor is called in-plane, when the sensitive axis of displacement of the seismic or movable mass is located in a plane parallel to the substrate, as opposed to an out-of-plane sensor wherein the seismic mass is displaced along a direction perpendicular to the substrate.
There are NEMS (microelectromechanical systems) or NEMS (nanoelectromechanical systems) accelerometers comprising a suspended seismic mass provided with fingers, said fingers being interdigitated with fingers carried by a fixed part. The variation in capacitance between the fingers is measured and enables displacement of the mass to be determined and the acceleration of the mass to be acceded.
It is attempted to reduce the size of these systems, but by reducing the dimensions, the sensitivity of the systems also tends to be reduced. Indeed, the structure tends to be “relatively stiffened” with respect to the inertial forces.
There is also an accelerometer of the type comprising a seismic mass for being displaced under the effect of external forces, suspended by a beam forming a rotational axis for the mass and one or more piezoresistive gauges capable of detecting the displacement of the seismic mass. Such an accelerometer is known from document US 2007/0084041 and the article <<Single-mask SOI fabrication process for linear and angular piezoresistive accelerometers with on-chip reference resistors>>—Jesper Eklund, E.; Shkel, A. M.—Sensors, 2005 IEEE—30 Oct.-3 Nov. 2005 Page(s): 656-659.
The accelerometer described in these documents comprise a seismic mass suspended by a beam defining a hinge and two piezoresistive gauges provided on either side of the beam and parallel to the same. This accelerometer is for measuring accelerations in the plane of the structure and orthogonal to the beam.
On the one hand, this accelerometer has a low sensitivity.
On the other hand, this accelerometer is very sensitive to transverse accelerations, i.e. directed parallel to the axis of the beam, since the sensitive axis of piezoresistive gauges is parallel to this transverse direction.
Consequently, one object of the present invention is to provide a device with an enhanced piezoresistive detection in the sensitivity plane, while offering a reduced sensitivity to transverse displacements.
The object previously set out is achieved by an in-plane piezoresistive detection device, comprising a seismic mass suspended by at least one beam also forming a pivot connection of an axis orthogonal to the plane of the device, the mass being displaceable in the plane about this axis, and at least one piezoresistive gauge. The gauge(s) has (have) a thickness reduced with respect to that of the seismic mass, the axis connecting the pivot connection axis and the centre of gravity of the seismic mass is perpendicular to the direction of the accelerations to be measured and the axis of the gauge is perpendicular to the axis connecting the pivot connection axis and the centre of gravity of the seismic mass.
The reduced thickness of the piezoresistive gauge enables stresses to be concentrated, increasing its sensitivity. Furthermore, since the piezoresistive gauge has a very low flexion sensitivity, the particular arrangement of the gauge gives the device a very low sensitivity to transverse displacements. This very low sensitivity to transverse accelerations is even enhanced by the particular configuration of the rotational axis of the seismic mass and the centre of gravity of the seismic mass.
The subject-matter of present invention is then mainly an in-plane MEMS or NEMS detection device for measuring displacements directed along a direction comprising a seismic mass suspended with respect to a substrate, said seismic mass being pivotable about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the substrate, at least one piezoresistive strain gauge suspended between the seismic mass and the substrate, and mechanically and electrically directly connected to the seismic mass on the one hand and to an embedding pad anchored to the substrate on the other hand, the seismic mass being in turn suspended with respect to the substrate by at least one beam, said at least one beam being connected to the substrate at an area distinct from that by which the gauge is connected to the substrate, wherein said piezoresistive gauge has a thickness lower than that of the seismic mass, and wherein the axis of the piezoresistive gauge is orthogonal to the plane containing the pivot axis and the centre of gravity of the seismic mass and said plane being orthogonal to the direction of the displacements to be measured, i.e. the axis of the gauge is parallel to the direction of the accelerations to be detected.
Particularly advantageously, the mechanical connection between the piezoresistive gauge, and the seismic mass is located on or as close as possible to the plane containing the centre of gravity and the pivot axis.
For example, the seismic mass comprises a recess receiving the end of the gauge for being connected to the seismic mass, said end of the gauge being connected to the bottom of the recess, the bottom of the recess being located in or as close as possible to the plane containing the centre of gravity and the pivot axis.
Advantageously, the seismic mass can be provided to comprise an in-plane tapered area at its connection with the piezoresistive gauge.
The thickness of the seismic mass and that of the piezoresistive gauge are advantageously between a few tens μm and a few hundred μm.
The plane containing the pivot axis and the centre of gravity advantageously forms a plane of symmetry for means for suspending the seismic mass.
For example, the means maintaining the seismic mass suspended and carrying the rotational axis of the mass comprise at least one beam having a thickness equal to or higher than that of the piezoresistive gauge and lower than that of the seismic mass.
In one advantageous example, the at least one beam of the means maintaining the seismic mass suspending and carrying the rotational axis of the mass is substantially provided in the plane containing the centre of gravity, parallel to the plane of the substrate.
In another exemplary embodiment, the means maintaining the seismic mass suspended and carrying the rotational axis of the mass comprise at least one beam having a thickness equal to the thickness of the seismic mass.
Said means maintaining the seismic mass suspended and carrying the rotational axis of the mass can comprise two beams of substantially the same length anchored to the substrate at two distinct points and anchored to the seismic mass at a point through which the pivot axis passes.
The in-plane MEMS or NEMS detection device according to the invention can advantageously comprise two piezoresistive gauges mounted as a differential symmetrically with respect to said plane. The mounting of both piezoresistive gauges mounted as a differential is associated with a Wheatstone half-bridge mounting.
Another subject-matter of the present invention is also a method for making the in-plane MEMS or NEMS detection device according to the present invention, this method comprising:
The first thin area can be made by forming a portion of a second sacrificial layer within a layer of semi-conducting material, and etching this portion and a first sacrificial layer.
Forming a portion of a second sacrificial area within a layer of the semi-conducting material can comprise:
In one exemplary embodiment, making the second layer of semi-conducting material is achieved by epitaxial growth.
In another exemplary embodiment, the second layer of semi-conducting material is a polycrystalline semi-conductor.
Forming a third area, called hinge area, with a thickness can occur between forming the first area and forming the second area.
For example, the first area and the third area are obtained by etching steps independent from each other. Etching the third area can be performed before etching the first and second areas, for example through DRIE.
The present invention will be better understood using the description which follows and the appended drawings wherein:
In
The piezoresistive gauge detection device D1 comprises a seismic mass 2 for being moved under the effect of an external strain, for example under the effect of an acceleration in the case of an accelerometer. The accelerations parallel to a direction Y1 are to be measured.
The seismic mass 2 is suspended above a substrate 7 by means of a beam 4 connected to an embedding pad 6, fixed to the substrate 7. The beam 4 keeps the seismic mass substantially parallel to the substrate 7.
The device D1 also comprises a piezoresistive strain gauge 8, of the type suspended beam between the seismic mass 2, having an axis Y and a second embedding pad 12. The axis Y of the gauge 8 extends in the direction of the greatest dimension of the gauge 8.
The beam 4 has a longitudinal axis X. The beam 4 forms a hinge 11 or pivot connection with an axis Z perpendicular to the plane of the substrate, about which the seismic mass will pivot under the effect of the acceleration. The plane of the substrate will be designated XY.
The axis X and the axis Z define a plane of symmetry of the beam, perpendicular to the plane of the substrate, more generally means for suspending and hinging the mass on the substrate. The centre of gravity G of the seismic mass 2 is contained in said plane XZ. The device is directed such that the plane containing the axis Z and the centre of gravity G is perpendicular to the direction Y1.
According to the present invention, the gauge 8 has an axis Y parallel to the direction Y1 and perpendicular to the plane containing the axis Z of the pivot connection 11 and the centre of gravity G.
The operation of a piezoresistive strain gauge will be reminded below. When the gauge is deformed along its axis, and its length varies, its electric resistance also varies, and by measuring this variation in resistance, the displacement of the seismic mass can be deduced and the external acceleration determined. The variation in the electric resistance is measured by flowing an electric current in the gauge 8.
Consequently, due to the orientation of the gauge 8 according to the present invention, the device D1 is not very sensitive to the transverse displacements, i.e. the displacements along the direction orthogonal to the direction Y1, because they apply to the gauge 8, a flexion strain, to which the gauge 8 is not very sensitive.
Furthermore, the device is also not very sensitive to temperature, because in the case of an expansion of the beam, the temperature also applies a flexion strain to the gauge 8, to which it is not sensitive.
Besides, as can be seen in the cross-section view of
The hinge beam 4 has a thickness E3, in the example represented, it is equal to E1, however it could be equal to E2 or between E2 and E1.
The reduction in thickness of the gauge 8, and thus in its cross-section, enables the stresses it undergoes due to the displacement of the seismic mass 2 to be concentrated, in a reduced cross-section, which results in increasing the sensitivity of the detection device D1.
Due to the manufacturing method, the face of the gauge 8 facing the substrate 7 is located in the same plane as the face of the seismic mass 2 facing the substrate 7.
Means (not shown) for applying a constant tension to the gauge, and for measuring a variation in the current flowing in the gauge and processing the current direction measurements are associated with the device D1.
In the example represented, the current flows between the embedding pad 12 of the gauge and the embedding pad 6 of the beam 4, via the gauge 8 and the hinge.
In one alternative, the use of a gauge formed by two serially electrically connected strands can be provided, the current measured flowing in one direction in the first contact strand towards the ground, and then in the second strand from the ground to the pad 12.
The configuration according to the present invention has the advantage of offering the lever effect, the axis connecting the pivot axis Z and the centre of gravity G acting as the lever, the latter pivoting about the pivot axis Z. The strain applied to the centre of gravity G is amplified by the lever effect at the anchoring of the gauge 8 on the seismic mass 2. Consequently, even a low acceleration can be detected.
The operation of this detection device will be now be explained.
The device D1 is provided within an environment the acceleration of which is desired to be measured, for example is attached to an object the acceleration of which is desired to be measured. The orientation of the gauge 8 is such that the axis Y of the piezoresistive gauge 8 is parallel to the direction of the acceleration to be measured.
When the environment experiences such an acceleration, the seismic mass 2 is moved about the axis Z, in the direction of the arrow F1 or in the direction of the arrow F2. This displacement of the seismic mass 2 applies stresses on the piezoresistive gauge 8, either tensile stresses if the displacement is in the direction F1, or compressive stresses if the displacement is in the direction F2.
These stresses applied to the gauge 8 cause a variation in the electric resistance of the gauge, which is then measured via the variation in the current flowing in the gauge. This variation in resistance enables the amplitude of the displacement of the seismic mass 2 to be determined and the value of the acceleration applied to the environment to be deduced therefrom.
In
The operation of the device D2 is identical to that of the device D1.
In
In this embodiment, the end of the strain gauge 8 integral with the seismic mass 102 is connected thereto on the axis X passing through the pivot axis Z and the centre of gravity G of the seismic mass 102.
This configuration has the advantage that all or almost all the stress intensity applied by the displacement of the seismic mass 102 takes part in the deformation along the axis Y of the strain gauge 8. Indeed, when the anchoring of the gauge 8 is shifted with respect to the axis passing through the pivot connection and the centre of gravity G, as is the case in the first embodiment, part of the deformation stress exerts a flexion strain combined to a compressive or tensile strain on the gauge, wherein this flexion strain takes no or little part in the variation in the electric resistance of the piezoresistive gauge 8.
In the example represented in
A seismic mass comprising such a recess but the bottom of which is not aligned with the axis X does not depart from the scope of the present invention, but enables the connection between the gauge and the mass of the axis X to be closer.
In
The seismic mass 202 comprises, in this example, a first parallelepiped part 18 with a greater width, a second trapezoidal part 20 the large base of which is common to a side of the first part and a third part 22 connected to the pivot means on the one hand and to the strain gauge 8 on the other hand. The movable mass 202 has substantially a symmetry with respect to the axis X.
The third part 22 is also parallelepiped shaped, it has a smaller width identical to the small base of the second part, comprising a recess 24 to enable the gauge to be connected to a seismic mass in a place located on or as close as possible to the axis X. The depth of the recess 24 is reduced with respect to that of the recess 14 of the device D3 of
The seismic mass 202 is generally monolithic, the division into three parts aims at simplifying the description, and is not necessarily representative of the industrial implementation.
This tapered shape of the seismic mass 202 at the connection between the seismic mass 202 and the gauge 8 enables a short piezoresistive gauge 8 to be implemented. Indeed, by releasing the area of connection of the gauge 8 to the seismic mass, it is possible to bring the anchoring pad 12 closer to that area and thereby to implement a shorter gauge. Implementing a short gauge enables a gauge with a reduced electric resistance to be available and thereby the measurement noise to be decreased.
The pivot connection with the axis Z is made, as for the device D2, by two beams tilted towards each other.
It is to be noted that the third part 22 to which the gauge is connected is made such that it has a rigidity higher than that of the pivot connection Z in order for the seismic mass 202 to pivot about the axis Z and not about an axis perpendicular to the substrate and located at the third part 22.
In the examples described above, the hinge beam(s) has (have) a thickness equal to that of the seismic mass, this has the advantage offering a device not very sensitive to transverse accelerations and with a simplified implementation, since the hinge is made at the same time as the mass.
In
This thinning of the hinge enables the sensitivity of the device to be further increased.
In a particular advantageous example represented in
In
The gauges are symmetrically provided with respect to the axis X. The seismic mass 202 comprises a third part 322 provided with two recesses 324, 324′ symmetric with respect to the axis, such that both gauges 308, 308′ are connected to the seismic mass 202 as close as possible to the axis X. The axes of both gauges 308, 308′ are orthogonal to the plane containing the rotational axis Z and the centre of gravity G.
The dimensions of the third part 32 are selected such that its rigidity is higher than that of the pivot connection about the axis Z.
This differential mounting enables to get rid of the effect of variations in temperature.
In
The resistance of the gauge 408′ is designated R+dR and the resistance of the gauge 408 is designated R−dR. Indeed, the resistances of both gauges 408, 408′ oppositely vary.
A voltage Ve is applied and a voltage Vs is measured between the point A and the point B which is herein located on the pad 6 for anchoring the beams forming the pivot connection about the axis Z, which is at the same potential as the connection point of both gauges 408, 408′.
The other resistances have a value R.
By applying the Milman theorem, it is obtained
It is deduced therefrom
From this measurement of variation in resistance due to the displacement of the seismic mass 202, the acceleration undergone by the device can be deduced.
A Wheatstone bridge mounting can also be made, in this case, preferably, two movable masses each associated with two differential mounted piezoresistive gauges are used.
This mounting enables the sensitivity of the detection device according to the present invention to be further increased.
In the examples represented, the mass is solid, however it can also be recessed. Besides, depending on the manufacturing methods, ports can be made to release the mass.
Thanks to the present invention, by reducing the cross-section of the piezoresistive gauge(s), a significant gain on the sensitivity of the piezoresistive detection device can be achieved.
Besides, making the seismic mass and the piezoresistive gauge with different thicknesses enables them to be decoupled and thus separately optimized.
Furthermore, by positioning the beam for suspending the seismic mass and the piezoresistive gauge at right angles, the transverse sensitivity of the accelerometer is strongly limited.
Besides, the advantage of an amplification of the stress applied to the gauge by a lever effect is obtained.
Furthermore, with the connecting area of the piezoresistive gauge on or as close as possible to the axis connecting the pivot axis and the centre of gravity, the stress due to the displacement is fully or almost fully axial.
Advantageously, the distance between the connecting area and the axis connecting the pivot axis and the centre of gravity is in the order of one μm. By way of example, in the case of a mass with a 300 μm length, a 200 μm width and a 15 μm thickness, and a gauge with a 4 μm length, a 0.15 μm thickness and a 0.25 μm width, this distance is in the order of 2 μm.
Several exemplary embodiments of methods for making a piezoresistive detection device according to the present invention will now be described.
In
First, there is a SOI (silicon on insulator) substrate comprising for example a silicon layer 26, a silicon oxide layer (buried oxide) 28 with a 1 μm thickness, and a silicon layer 30, for example with a 0.3 thickness on the layer 28. The layer 28 forms a sacrificial layer. The stack could also be made by transferring the Si layer 30 onto the stack of layers 26 and 28, or a deposition of this layer 30 could be performed onto the layer 28. Preferably, the layer 30 is of single crystal silicon.
A photolithography is then made, followed by an etching of the silicon layer 30 to define the piezoresistive gauge 8 and define the contact area with the substrate. The etching is stopped on the SiO2 layer (
During a following step represented in
Then, a photolithography is performed for bounding a portion 32.1 of the layer 32 covering the piezoresistive gauge. An etching of the layer 32 is then performed, suppressing the same except at the portion 32.1. The SiO2 in the contact area with the substrate is also etched. A stripping can be performed to suppress the etching and mask residues.
During a following step represented in
During a following step represented in
During a following step represented in
During a following step represented in
Then a stripping is performed to suppress the etching residues.
During a following step represented in
In
First, there is a SOI (silicon on insulator) substrate comprising for example a silicon layer 126, a silicon oxide layer (buried oxide) 128 with a 1 μm thickness, and a silicon layer 130, for example with a 0.15 μm thickness on the layer 128. Advantageously, the layer 130 is of single crystal Si.
Then, a photolithography is performed, followed by an etching of the silicon layer 130 to define the piezoresistive gauge 8 and to define the contact area with the substrate. The etching is stopped on the SiO2 layer (
During a following step represented in
Then, a photolithography is performed for bounding a portion 132.1 of the layer 132 covering the piezoresistive gauge. An etching of the layer 132 is then performed, suppressing the same except at the portion 132.1. The SiO2 in the contact area with the substrate is also etched. A stripping can be performed to suppress the etching and mask residues.
During a following step represented in
During a following step represented in
During a following step represented in
During a following step represented in
A stripping is then performed to suppress the etching residues.
During a following step represented in
With the exemplary methods described above, one or more beams is (are) obtained defining the pivot connection the thickness of which is equal to that of the seismic mass. In the
In step 10F, a photolithography is performed for enabling the polycrystalline silicon layer 134 to be partially removed on a depth p lower than the total depth h of the layer 134 in order to define the pivot connection 11. The removal of this portion of the layer 134 is achieved for example by DRIE (Deep Reactive Ion Etching) on a depth of about 5 μm. It is for example an etching over time.
During a following step represented in
In
In this example of implementation, the strain gauge 8 is connected to the anchoring pad 12 by a suspended arm 42 in turn anchored onto the anchoring pad 12. The anchoring pad 12 is located close to the anchored pad 6 of the seismic mass 2.
The suspended arm 42 offers a high rigidity in the direction of the acceleration to be measured, i.e. in the direction of the axis Y.
This close arrangement of the anchoring pad of the gauge 8 and the anchoring pad 6 of the seismic mass 2 enables the differential expansions between both anchorings 2, 12 to be restricted and thereby the accelerometer drift to be restricted as a function of the external mechanical stresses and temperature.
The suspended arm 42 is made at the same time as the seismic mass 2. The holes visible in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09 57462 | Oct 2009 | FR | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/503,146, filed on Apr. 20, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference, and which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP10/65780, filed on Oct. 20, 2010. This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Patent Application No. 0957462, filed in France on Oct. 23, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3209601 | Stiles | Oct 1965 | A |
4809552 | Johnson | Mar 1989 | A |
6145380 | MacGugan | Nov 2000 | A |
8156807 | Robert | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20060201251 | Sato et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070084041 | Eklund et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070222011 | Robert | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090139342 | Robert et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
62-124777 | Jun 1987 | JP |
4-361165 | Dec 1992 | JP |
07-049280 | Feb 1995 | JP |
9-505396 | May 1997 | JP |
2007-316056 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009-2953 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-133862 | Jun 2009 | JP |
WO 9215018 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9513545 | May 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued Feb. 10, 2011 in Application No. PCT/JP2010/065780. |
M. Aikele, et al., “Resonant accelerometer with self-test”, Sensors and Actuators A vol. 92, 2001, pp. 161-167. |
Office Action issued Apr. 7, 2014 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-534681 (with English translation). |
Japanese Office Action issued Dec. 22, 2014, in Patent Application No. 2012-534681 with English translation. |
French Preliminary Search Report issued Jun. 3, 2010, in Patent Application No. 0957462 (with English Translation of Category of Cited Documents). |
E. Jesper Eklund, et al., “Single-Mask SOI Fabrication Process for Linear and Angular Piezoresistive Accelerometers with On-Chip Reference Resistors”, A.M. Sensors, Oct. 30-Nov. 3, 2005, pp. 656-659. |
E. Jesper Eklund, et al., “Single-mask fabrication of high-G piezoresistive accelerometers with extended temperature range”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 17, 2007, pp. 730-736. |
Samaun, Kensall D. Wise, et al., “An IC Piezoresistive Pressure Sensor for Biomedical Instrumentation”, J. Solid-State Circuts Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, vol. XIV, Feb. 1971, 19 pages. |
Lynn Michelle Roylance, et al., “A Batch-Fabricated Silicon Accelerometer”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. Ed. 26, No. 12, Dec. 1979, pp. 1911-1917. |
Thomas Lisec, et al., “Surface Micromachined Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors with Step-Type Bent and Flat Membrane Structures”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43, No. 9, Sep. 1996, pp. 1547-1552. |
Aaron Partridge, et al., “A High-Performance Planar Piezoresistive Accelerometer”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 9, No. 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 58-66. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150355221 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13503146 | US | |
Child | 14831527 | US |