The present invention relates generally to the field of processors, and more particularly to the independent mapping of threads over parallel slices in a processor core.
Register files are a means of memory storage within a central processing unit of a computing device and may be used for storing architectural state information, among other information and data. The architectural state information may include instructions, operands, and addresses. Each register file may store the architectural state and future state information for one or more threads, or sequence of programmed instructions.
In some processors, the register file is a centralized component of the execution units, and is able to supply all of the register file data to its connected execution units in both single thread (ST) and simultaneous multi-threading (SMT) modes. In these processors, if the register file gets too large, a second level of storage may often be added.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a processor core is provided, the processor core comprising: a plurality of dispatch queues, wherein the plurality of dispatch queues are configured to receive instructions associated with a plurality of threads; an even plurality of parallel execution slices, wherein each of the even plurality of execution slices includes a register file; and a routing network configured to direct an output of the plurality of dispatch queues to the even plurality of parallel execution slice, wherein the even plurality of execution slices are configured to independently execute a plurality of threads.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided, the method comprising: receiving, from a dispatch queue, a first number of threads; allocating, by a network, the received first number of threads to a first even plurality of parallel execution slices; executing the first number of threads on the first even plurality of parallel execution slices; writing results of the execution of the first number of threads to a set of register files associated with the first even plurality of parallel execution slices; receiving, from the dispatch queue, a second number of threads; allocating, by the network, the received second number of threads to a second even plurality of parallel execution slices; executing the second number of threads on the second even plurality of execution slices; and writing results of the execution of the second number of threads to a set of register files associated with the second even plurality of parallel execution slices.
In some processors, such as processors having a multi-slice processor architecture, many execution slices are connected in parallel making a centralized register file more difficult to implement. The number of ports and entries needed for a centralized register file is extensive, leading to a large amount of wires to send to the distributed execution slices. Embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for mapping the architected state of one or more threads to a set of distributed physical register files to enable independent execution of one or more threads in a multiple slice processor.
The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the Figures.
In this exemplary embodiment, processor core environment 100 includes two clusters: cluster 102, containing four processor slices (slices 106A-D); and cluster 104 containing four processor slices (slices 106E-H). In other embodiments, processor core environment 100 may contain any number of clusters (a grouping of processor slices) which support the functionality of processor core environment 100. In this exemplary embodiment, each slice 106A-H is a 64 bit processor slice, and two slices (a “superslice”) are the smallest unit which maintains the minimum functionality of the processor core. In other embodiments, any number of processor slices which maintain the minimum functionality of the processor core may be implemented.
Each slice 106A-H contains ES (execution slices) 108A-H and LS (load store) slices 114A-H, respectively. Each slice 106A-H receives instructions from dispatch queue 125 via dispatch routing network 120. Dispatch queue 125 may be one or more dispatch queues which receive multiple instruction streams and store the instruction streams until the control logic of the processor core instructs the instruction streams to be sent to execution slices 108A-H, via dispatch routing network 120. Execution slices 108A-H perform sequencing and execution of logical, mathematical, and other operations as needed to perform the execution of instruction streams. The execution results are sent to each of execution slices 108A-H by write back bus 130. Execution slices 108A-H are coupled to load store slices 114A-H and results of execution by load store slices 114A-H are sent to each of execution slices 108A-H by write back bus 130. Write back bus 130 may have a dedicated bus for each execution result of each of execution slices 108A-H next to the dedicated bus of each of load store slices 114A-H, or the bus may be shared between execution slices 108A-H and load store slices 114A-H, which requires arbitration to prevent result write collisions at write back bus 130. Load store slices 114A-H perform operations to maintain cache consistency. Each of load store slices 114A-H are coupled by load store routing network 140, which provides conversion transfers for execution of SIMD instructions, processing of instructions with data width greater than the width of one of load store slices 114A-H, and other operations requiring translation or realignment of data between load store slices 114A-H.
Execution slices 108A-H each contain history buffers 110A-H and register files 112A-H, respectively. History buffers 110A-H are used for recovery, and provide restore capabilities for register targets of instructions executed by execution slices 108A-H. Register files 112A-H are physical processor registers which store the architected states and future states for instruction streams. In this exemplary embodiment, the architected state when mapping two instruction threads to two processor slices is 96 total registers per thread.
In step 202, the resources of a processor core receive a number of instruction sequences (threads). In this exemplary embodiment, the received number of threads to map on the processor core is a factor external to the processor core, decided by the software running on the processor and the environment in which the software is running. In this exemplary embodiment, the software determines whether one, two, four, or eight threads are mapped to the physical register files 112A-H. The software determination to map one number of threads is not more likely to occur than any other supportable number of threads to map. In other embodiments, the software may decide to map any number of threads that may be supported by the microarchitecture and resources of the processor core.
In step 204, the received number of threads are allocated to one or more processor slices 106A-H, within the processor core. In this exemplary embodiment, the threads are allocated to the slices of a processor core dependent on the number of threads received and the available resources (depicted in detail in
In step 206, each allocated thread is executed and the results of execution are written to the physical register files to which the thread is allocated. In this exemplary embodiment, a thread is executed on one processor slice by sending load instructions to load store slices 114A-H. The load data results of the load execution are written to write back bus 130, so that the results of the execution are seen by each register file on each execution slice. The execution results are then written to each register file on the processor slices to which the thread is also mapped (depicted further in
In step 208, the resources of the processor core determine whether the software program requests to add an additional thread. For example, an event such as an interrupt may occur, causing the software to request an additional thread or threads to be added. If an additional thread or threads are added, then, in step 210, the resources of the processor core allocate register file entries for the newly added thread(s) (as in step 204) and initialize or restore new register file entries for the added thread(s). For example, if the program is running a single thread (ST) and the software decides to add a second thread (SMT2), then the second thread is allocated to a predetermined set of register file entries. New register file entries may be created for the added thread, or may be restored from previous register file entries stored in the memory, for the newly added second thread to proceed with execution in SMT2 mode.
If, in step 208, the resources of the processor core determine that a thread has not been added, then, in step 212, the resources of the processor core determine whether an existing thread is removed. For example, the software may decide to put one or more of the threads into a ‘power save’ mode, causing the one or more threads to go dormant after saving the architectural state. If, in step 212, the resources of the processor core determine that a thread has been removed by the software program, then, in step 214, the processor core allocates register file entries for the new, reduced number of threads, and the data of the remaining threads is copied to the newly freed register file entries. For example, if two threads are running, (one thread is mapped to register files 112A-D on slices 106A-D and the second thread is mapped to register files 112E-H on slices 106E-H) and the software decides that one thread should be removed, then one thread remains and the architected state of the remaining thread is mapped to each register file 112A-H on slices 106A-H. If, in step 212, the resources of the processor core determine that a thread has not been removed by the software program, then the operational steps end and the execution may begin, or continue, on the newly added thread(s). In other embodiments, the adding and deletion of threads may be combined into a single step in which the removed thread space is directly allocated to an added thread by combining steps 208, 210, 212, and 214.
Accordingly, by performing the operational steps of
As depicted in
Accordingly, by implementing the dual register file structure depicted in
The programs described herein are identified based upon the application for which they are implemented in a specific embodiment of the invention. However, it should be appreciated that any particular program nomenclature herein is used merely for convenience and thus, the invention should not be limited to use solely in any specific application identified and/or implied by such nomenclature.
The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.
The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device, such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer, or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiment, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
The present Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/869,305, filed on Sep. 29, 2015 and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20160092276 on Mar. 31, 2016, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/501,152 filed on Sep. 30, 2014 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,720,696 on Aug. 1, 2017. The present Application claims priority to both of the above-referenced U.S. Patent Applications under 35 U.S.C. § 120. The disclosures of the above-referenced parent U.S. Patent Applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4858113 | Saccardi | Aug 1989 | A |
5055999 | Frank et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5095424 | Woffinden et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5471593 | Branigin | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5553305 | Gregor et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5630149 | Bluhm | May 1997 | A |
5680597 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5822602 | Thusoo | Oct 1998 | A |
6026478 | Dowling | Feb 2000 | A |
6044448 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6073215 | Snyder | Jun 2000 | A |
6073231 | Bluhm et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092175 | Levy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112019 | Chamdani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119203 | Snyder et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138230 | Hervin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145054 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170051 | Dowling | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212544 | Borkenhagen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237081 | Le et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6311261 | Chamdani et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336183 | Le et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356918 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381676 | Aglietti et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6425073 | Roussel et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6463524 | Delaney et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487578 | Ranganathan | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6549930 | Chrysos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564315 | Keller et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6728866 | Kahle et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732236 | Favor | May 2004 | B2 |
6847578 | Ranganathan | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868491 | Moore | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6883107 | Rodgers et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6944744 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948051 | Rivers et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954846 | Leibholz et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978459 | Dennis et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7020763 | Saulsbury et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024543 | Grisenthwaite et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7086053 | Long et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093105 | Webb, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100028 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114163 | Hardin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124160 | Saulsbury et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155600 | Burky et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191320 | Hooker et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7263624 | Marchand et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7290261 | Burky et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302527 | Barrick et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7386704 | Schulz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395419 | Gonion | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7398374 | Delano | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7469318 | Chung et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478198 | Latorre et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478225 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7490220 | Balasubramonian et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512724 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7565652 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7600096 | Parthasarathy et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669035 | Young et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669036 | Brown et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694112 | Barowski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707390 | Ozer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7721069 | Ramchandran et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7793278 | Du et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7836317 | Marchand et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7889204 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890735 | Tran | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7926023 | Okawa et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7975134 | Gonion | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987344 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8041928 | Burky et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046566 | Abernathy et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8074224 | Nordquist et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8099556 | Ghosh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103852 | Bishop et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108656 | Katragadda et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135942 | Abernathy et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140832 | Mejdrich et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8141088 | Morishita et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166282 | Madriles et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8219783 | Hara | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8250341 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8335892 | Minkin et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8386751 | Ramchandran et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8412914 | Gonion | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464025 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489791 | Byrne et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8555039 | Rychlik | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8578140 | Yokoi | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8656401 | Venkataramanan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8683182 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8700877 | Shebanow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713263 | Bryant | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8732438 | Caprioli et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8850121 | Ashcraft et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8966232 | Tran | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8984264 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9223709 | O'Bleness et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9262174 | Fetterman et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9519484 | Stark | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9665372 | Eisen et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9672043 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9690585 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9690586 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9720696 | Chu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9740486 | Boersma et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9760375 | Boersma et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20020194251 | Richter et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030120882 | Granston et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040111594 | Feiste et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040216101 | Burky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050138290 | Hammarlund et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060095710 | Pires Dos Reis Moreira | May 2006 | A1 |
20070022277 | Iwamura et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080133885 | Glew | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090037698 | Nguyen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090113182 | Abernathy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100100685 | Kurosawa et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110161616 | Tarjan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120110271 | Boersma et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120246450 | Abdallah | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140215189 | Airaud et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140244239 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150134935 | Blasco | May 2015 | A1 |
20160092276 | Chu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103715 | Sethia et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160202986 | Ayub et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202988 | Ayub et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202989 | Eisen et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202990 | Brownscheidle et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202991 | Eisen et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202992 | Brownscheidle et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170168837 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101021778 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101676865 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101876892 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102004719 | Apr 2011 | CN |
H11252179 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2006114036 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007172610 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2013521557 | Aug 2015 | JP |
Entry |
---|
“Method and system for Implementing “Register Threads” in a Simultaneously-Multithreaded (SMT) Processor Core”, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, Authors et al.: Disclosed Anonymously, IP.com No. IPCOM000199825D, IP.com Electronic Publication: Sep. 17, 2010, pp. 1-4, <http:ip.com/IPCOM/000199825>. |
Gebhart et al., “A Hierarchical Thread Scheduler and Register File for Energy-Efficient Throughput Processors”, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 30, No. 2, Article 8, Publication date: Apr. 2012, pp. 8:1-8:38, © 2012 ACM, <http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2166879.2166882>. |
List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related, 3 pages. |
Pechanek, et al., “ManArray Processor Interconnection Network: An Introduction”, Euro-Par' 99 Parallel Processing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5th International Euro-Par Conference, Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1999 Proceedings, pp. 761-765, vol. 1685, Spring Berlin Heidelberg, Toulouse, France. |
Pechanek, et al., “The ManArray Embedded Processor Architecture”,Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference, IEEE Computer Society, Sep. 5-7, 2000, pp. 348-355, vol. 1, Maastricht. |
Czajkowski, et al., “Resource Management for Extensible Internet Servers”, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGOPS European Workshop on Support for Composing Distributed Applications, Sep. 1998, pp. 33-39, ACM, Portugal. |
Bridges, et al., “A CPU Utilization Limit for Massively Parallel MIMD Computers”, Fourth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computing, Oct. 19-21, 1992, pp. 83-92, IEEE, VA, US. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,152 dated Sep. 30, 2016, 20 pages. (pp. 1-20 in pdf). |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,152 dated Mar. 24, 2017, 10 pages. (pp. 1-10 in pdf). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/896,305 dated May 18, 2017, 24 pages. (pp. 1-24 in pdf). |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/869,305 dated Sep. 8, 2017, 13 pages. (pp. 1-13 in pdf). |
Partial Translation of Office Action for JP Application 2017-530696 Teruyama, “Instruction window buffers with issued instruction buffers,” Toshiba technology bulletin, pp. 25-28, vol. 20(14), published No. 2002-0600, Toshiba Corp., Mar. 18, 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180067746 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14869305 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 15805267 | US | |
Parent | 14501152 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14869305 | US |