1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to semiconductor processing, and more particularly to a system to sense infrared radiation from a semiconductor chip and to methods of calibrating the same.
2. Description of the Related Art
Infrared thermal imaging is a common analysis technique used on semiconductor devices for failure analysis and design. In the past, typical thermal imaging of a functional device was done in an open air setup, that is, without any structures in the optical path of the detector. In such designs, air is used to cool the device undergoing testing. An open air setup is acceptable for parts that operate below certain power densities.
Some more recent designs of semiconductor devices exhibit much higher power densities. In some cases, more exotic cooling is required to keep the semiconductor device from failing due to thermal run away. Standard copper heat sinks used to cool the semiconductor devices in testing environments do not allow for optical access to the device itself. Yet optical access is required for thermal imaging.
One solution found in the industry for cooling a device with optical access is known as a diamond heat spreader. Since diamond is mostly transparent to the infrared spectrum, it is a good window material for thermal imaging. At the same time, the diamond can physically contact a device under test to spread and remove the heat during thermal imaging. In another conventional variant, a sealed fluid chamber is positioned on top of a semiconductor device. The fluid is infrared transparent and facilitates heat removal. The top of the chamber has a window made from an IR transparent material.
A difficulty with the conventional diamond spreader is the propensity for Newton's rings to degrade the infrared image of the semiconductor device. The Newton's rings appear due to inherent non-planarities in the upper surface of the semiconductor device and the lower surface of the diamond window. A difficulty with the conventional liquid setup is that the liquid and the upper window mask the actual count of photons emitted by the semiconductor chip. The liquid and the upper window both absorb and reflect percentages of any incident radiation, whether from the semiconductor chip, or in the case of the upper window, from both the semiconductor chip and the liquid. Without an accurate actual photon count from the semiconductor chip, a correct emissivity for the chip remains elusive.
The present invention is directed to overcoming or reducing the effects of one or more of the foregoing disadvantages.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a method is provided that includes determining a transmission of a transmissive window and a transmission of a transmissive fluid. In addition, an infrared emission of the transmissive window is determined along with an infrared emission of the transmissive fluid for at least one temperature. In a system that has an infrared sensor and an optical pathway to the infrared sensor, the transmissive window and the transmissive fluid are placed in the optical pathway. A semiconductor chip is placed in the optical pathway proximate the transmissive fluid. Radiation from the optical pathway is measured with the infrared sensor. An emissivity of the semiconductor chip is determined using the measured radiation and the determined transmissions and emissions of the transmissive window and the transmissive fluid.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method is provided that includes determining a transmission tw of a transmissive window and a transmission tf of a transmissive fluid. In addition, an infrared emission bw(T) of the transmissive window is determined along with an infrared emission bf(T) of the transmissive fluid for at least one temperature. In a system that has an infrared sensor and an optical pathway to the infrared sensor, the transmissive window and the transmissive fluid are placed in the optical pathway. A semiconductor chip is placed in the optical pathway proximate the transmissive fluid. A photon count MPC from the optical pathway is measured with the infrared sensor. An actual photon count APC from the semiconductor chip is determined according to:
MPC=twtfAPC+bw(T)+bf(T).
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is provided that includes an infrared sensor that has an optical pathway, a first member for holding a semiconductor chip in the optical pathway, and a second member for holding an infrared transmissive window in the optical pathway between the infrared sensor and the semiconductor chip. The transmissive window has a known transmission and a known emission at least one temperature. Either the first or the second member is operable to separate the transmissive window from the semiconductor by a preselected gap. A film of infrared transmissive fluid is in the gap for establishing fluid communication with the semiconductor chip and the transmissive window. The infrared transmissive fluid has a known transmission and a known emission at at least one temperature. A count of photons measured by the infrared sensor may be converted to a count of photons emitted by the semiconductor chip using the known transmissions and emissions of the transmissive window and the transmissive fluid.
The foregoing and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
In the drawings described below, reference numerals are generally repeated where identical elements appear in more than one figure. Turning now to the drawings, and in particular to
Attention is now turned to
The thermal plate 40 is provided with one or more internal chambers, one of which is shown and labeled 95 that are operable to provide a circulation of cooling or heating fluid 100 in the thermal plate 40. Note that in this view, the supply/return line 45 is visible. The window 55 extends downwardly to a central bore 105 that is slightly smaller in diameter than the window 55 itself. The thermal plate 40 has a lower projection 110 that extends downwardly and encompasses the bore 105. The thermal plate 40 may be fabricated from a variety of materials, such as copper, brass, aluminum, nickel, combinations or laminates of these or the like. A transmissive window 115 is coupled to the projection 110. The transmissive window 115 is advantageously fabricated from a material that is highly transmissive of infrared radiation 120 that will be picked up by the objective lens 60 and sensed and analyzed by the microscope 15 and computing device 30 depicted in
Note the locations of the dashed ovals 130 and 135. The portion of
Attention is now turned to
The behavior of the various infrared emissions and absorptions associated with the components in
An objective of the techniques disclosed herein is to measure a photon count with the microscope 15 (see
R=eσT4 (1)
where R is the radiance of the radiator, e is the emissivity of the radiator, σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature of the radiator in Celsius or Kelvins. The radiance R is normally expressed in units of W/cm2. However, any arbitrary unit may be used, such as total photon count, average photon count per sensor pixel or something else. The value of e varies with the composition and temperature of the radiator. Thus, it will be useful to obtain a data set to calibrate the lens 60 and the microscope 15 (see
The goal is to calibrate for the emission/absorbance characteristics of the components positioned in the pathway between the DUT 70 and the lens 60. As noted above, the presence of the components in the pathway between the DUT 70 and the lens 60 masks the actual photon count from the DUT 70 since the transmissive window 115 and the transmissive fluid both absorb and reflect some of the photons emitted by the DUT 70, both emit some photons themselves, and the transmissive window absorbs and reflects some of the photons emitted by the transmissive fluid 90. The relationship between the photon counts measured by the camera 15 and the actual photons emitted by the DUT 70 is given by:
MPC=twtfAPC+bw(T)+bf(T) (2)
where MPC is measured photon counts, tw is the transmission of the transmissive window 115, tf is the transmission of the transmissive fluid 90, APC is the actual photon counts, bd(T) is the emission of the transmissive window 115, bf(T) is the emission of the transmissive fluid 90, and T is the temperature. The transmission of a given film, either the transmissive window 115 or the transmissive fluid 90, is a measure of radiation reflected and absorbed by the film. Using the transmissive window 115 as an example, the transmission tw is given by:
tw=1−aw−rw (3)
where aw is the absorption by the transmissive window 115 and rw is the reflectance by the transmissive window 115. The parameters tw, aw and rw may be determined experimentally.
The quantities tw, tf, bd(T) and bf(T) may be determined experimentally as described below. Note from Equation 1 that the emissions bf(T) and bd(T) of the transmissive fluid 90 and the transmissive window 115 are functions of temperature T while the transmissions tw and tf of the transmissive window 115 and the transmissive fluid 90 are not dependent on temperature. Applicants have determined experimentally that the transmissions tw and tf for a transmissive window 115 composed of diamond and a transmissive fluid 90 composed of a Galden fluid are independent of temperature. The experiment to examine the impact of temperature on transmission involved sandwiching the transmissive window 115 and the fluid 90 between a radiation sensor, such as the camera 15 shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, photon counts are taken from an experimental setup that initially includes just a black body emissivity target. Thereafter, additional components that affect the actual photon count, e.g., the transmissive window 115 and the transmissive fluid 90, are added to basic setup and photon counts are measured after each component is added. The result is a data set for a given temperature.
The basic initial experimental setup is illustrated in
To obtain photon emission data for the target 165 alone, the heater stage 160 may be brought up to a first selected temperature to in-turn bring the plate 165 up to a first selected temperature. The temperature in the target 165 may be sensed via a thermocouple or other sensor (not shown) associated with the target 165. When the selected temperature is reached, the infrared radiation 180 emanating from the opening 170 may be picked up by the objective lens (shown broken in this and subsequent figures) 60 and the camera 15. The microscope 15 will determine a photon count for some selected period of time t. In this illustrative embodiment, the time t may be about 2.0 seconds. The foregoing steps may then be repeated at two or three or four additional temperatures to obtain a range of data of photon counts from the opening 170 as a function of four different temperatures.
As noted in conjunction with
The transmission of the transmissive window 115 tw, is given by:
tw=MPCwcold/MPCblackbody (4)
where MPCblackbody is the measured counts with just the black body target 165 in place and MPCwcold is the measured counts with the black body target 165 heated to some temperature and the transmissive window 115 cooled via the thermal plate 40 to below an emission threshold temperature for the window 115. An exemplary temperature may be about 15° C. To obtain values of MPCblackbody, experimental runs were performed with the basic setup shown in
To obtain values for MPCwcold, two measurement runs were performed with the basic setup shown in
The data from TABLES 1 and 2 may be combined in another table as follows:
The emission bw(T) due to the transmissive window 115 is given by:
bw(T)=MPCwhot−MPCwcold (5)
where MPCwhot is the measured photon count when the transmissive window 115 is heated to a given temperature above an emission threshold temperature. In this illustrative embodiment, a temperature exceeding an emission threshold temperature for the transmissive window 115 of about 80° C. was used. The transmissive window 115 is advantageously heated to a temperature appropriate for calibrating an emissivity. The data is summarized in the following table where the values for MCwhot are an average for three runs:
The determination of the transmission tf and the emission bf(T) due to the transmissive fluid 90 requires more complicated experimental setups than the setup depicted in
Note that the setups in
It will be necessary to first establish baseline photon counts for the dual transmissive windows 115 and 205 at cold and hot temperatures and without the transmissive fluid 90 in place. Using the setup depicted in
With data in hand for the measure photon count with the dual transmissive windows 115 and 205 but without the transmissive fluid 90, the calibration procedure is switched to the setup depicted in
It will be useful at this point to combine the data from TABLES 5, 6, 7 and 8 into TABLE 9 as follows:
A few qualitative observations may be made about the data in TABLE 9. First, the addition of the transmissive fluid 90 caused the photon counts to go down slightly. For example, at a temperature of 45° C., the photon counts decreased from 1129 without the fluid to 1054 with the fluid, a drop of 75 photons. At a temperature of 60.2° C., the photon counts decreased from 1813 to 1696, a difference of 117 photons. Qualitatively, the decrease in photon counts with the addition of the fluid 90 makes sense since the fluid 90 is absorbing some photons. However, the applicants have also discovered that the thickness of the transmissive fluid 90 can impact the measured counts in a counterintuitive way. If the thickness of the fluid 90 is dropped from about 120.0 microns to about 30.0 microns, the measured counts MCwfwcold with dual windows 115 and 205 and fluid 90 becomes larger than the measured counts MCwwcold with just two windows 115 and 205. Applicants believe the increase is due to the fluid 90 reducing the reflectance of the interface between the top transmissive window 115 and the fluid 90. Second, heating the transmissive fluid 90 produces more fluid emission as evidence by the larger counts with fluid MCwfwhot versus counts without fluid MCwwhot.
With the data from TABLE 9 in hand, the transmission tf and the emission bf(T) due to the transmissive fluid 90 may be calculated. The fluid transmission tf is given by:
tf=MCwfwcold/MCwwcold (6)
and the fluid emission bf(T) is given by:
bf(T)=MCwfwhot−(MCwwhot)(tf) (7)
Plugging the data from TABLE 9 into Equations 6 and 7 yields:
The quantities tw, tf, bw(T) and bf(T) set forth in TABLES 3, 4 and 10 satisfy Equation 2 and characterize the general transmission and emission characteristics of the transmissive window 115 and the transmissive fluid 90. The data and Equation 1 may be used to calibrate the photon measurement for an actual sample or DUT.
To calibrate an actual sample or DUT 70, the basic setup depicted in
Rpixel=APCpixel=epixelσT4 (8)
Rearranging Yields:
epixel=APCpixel/σT4 (9)
Still referring to
Referring again to
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5200023 | Gifford et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5302830 | Shivanandan | Apr 1994 | A |
5897378 | Eriguchi | Apr 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100012828 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |