The disclosure is directed to devices, systems, and methods related to monitoring and controlling an infrastructure such as, but not limited to, the supply and use of commercial, industrial or residential water, gas and/or electric utilities, and, in particular, to devices, methods, and systems for monitoring and controlling a municipality and alerting a user to potential faults and actions required.
Municipalities administer and/or outsource numerous utility and safety systems within each municipality. Such systems are usually complex infrastructures and include but are not limited to water distribution, gas distribution, electricity distribution, waste management, traffic control, fire departments, police departments, and emergency response departments. Each of these systems needs to be monitored for use (authorized or unauthorized), faults, tampering, events, interruptions or blockages, leaks, contamination, and/or other issues.
To obtain an understanding of the state of any one system, or for ordinary use, billing or repair purposes, personnel must typically be sent into the municipality to check for problems within the system manually. This process is slow, is labor-intensive, and can lead to overlooked problems. Furthermore, preferred aspects of the system may be evaluated irregularly or infrequently, thereby allowing a problem to go unchecked for long periods of time. By way of example, a leak in a water main may cost a water company a significant amount of money in lost water, energy usage, and chemical treatment, particularly if the leak is not discovered for a relatively long period of time. Furthermore, a leak can lead to underground structural erosion. Interference with a system may go unnoticed unless it is reported to a central location.
Another problem and disadvantage associated with current systems is the lack of property rights sufficient to maintain a network of monitors and device controllers capable of creating a transmission infrastructure that can adapt to multiple monitors and controllers and form an information network for providing information about the system to the utility monitoring the network. For example, some networks require that new poles or towers be erected for placement of the communication devices. Municipalities may have to rent space on a utility company's poles for placement of such devices.
Furthermore, an issue in one system may cause an issue in another system. For example, a fire reported to the fire department may require the gas company to turn off gas flow to the vicinity of the fire and may require the water company to redirect water or additional water pressure to the vicinity. However, many current systems are not interoperable.
It is, therefore, desirable to have a single system that can monitor different aspects of at least one municipality system continuously and communicate with several entities at the same time.
The disclosed methods, systems, and devices overcome the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and systems and provides new systems and methods of monitoring municipality infrastructure.
One embodiment is directed to an infrastructure monitoring system. The system includes an operations center and two or more communications devices communicatively coupled to the operations center. At least one communications device of the plurality of communications devices is coupled to a component of the infrastructure, and at least two communications devices are monitoring devices. The first monitoring device monitors a first aspect or location of the infrastructure and the second monitoring device monitors a second aspect or location of the infrastructure.
In one embodiment each monitoring device includes at least one sensor sensing at least one condition within the infrastructure, at least one data storage device storing data sensed by the at least one sensor, at least one transceiver device adapted to transmit and receive data, and at least one processor communicatively coupled to at least one sensor, data storage device, and transceiver device.
In one embodiment, the operations center and the plurality of communications devices are wirelessly communicatively coupled. At least one communications device is an output device. The output device includes a transceiver device adapted to receive or to transmit data, at least one output port, and a processor communicatively coupled to at least one of the transceiver device and at least one output port.
In one embodiment, the operations center and at least one output device are wirelessly communicatively coupled. Each communications device is adapted to receive transmissions for a second communications device and to retransmit the transmission to the second communications device. Each communications device is adapted to receive transmissions for the operations center and to retransmit the transmission to the operations center.
In one embodiment, at least one output device is coupled to at least one of an actuator control device, an alarm, a Radio-Frequency Identification device and a tamper prevention device.
In one embodiment, a monitoring device and an output device are contained within the same unit. The monitoring device and the output device share at least one of a power source, a transceiver device, and a processor.
The infrastructure can be at least one of a water distribution system, an electricity distribution system, a gas distribution system, a traffic control system, and an emergency response system. The system can monitor for at least one of use of gas, use of water, use of electricity, tampering, leaks, GPS location, proximity, tilt, smoke, temperature, rust, corrosion, fluid flow, pressure, water quality, air quality, contamination, radiation, pH, infrastructure status, and motion.
In one embodiment, the system produces an alert when at least one monitoring device registers an event. In one embodiment, at least one monitoring device is coupled to a visual or acoustical device. The operations center may include multiple operations centers. Each operations center is uniquely located. The operations center can monitor a plurality of infrastructures concurrently.
The plurality of infrastructures are selected from the group consisting of water systems, electrical systems, gas systems, emergency response systems, traffic control systems, and combinations thereof. A component of the infrastructure is one of a fire hydrant, a utility meter, a manhole cover, a utility pole, a valve, a pipe, a traffic light, water tower, water tank, valve box, valve box cover, meter box, meter box cover, and a smoke detector. In various embodiments where the component of the infrastructure is a fire hydrant, the communications device coupled to the fire hydrant is a repeater. At least one portion of the fire hydrant can be comprised of a material that does not interfere with the communications of the communications device. Moreover, the communications device coupled to the fire hydrant may be positioned within one of a nozzle cap, a pumper nozzle, a hose nozzle, a fire truck hookup, and a bonnet.
Another embodiment is directed to another infrastructure monitoring system. The system includes an operations center and a plurality of communications devices communicatively coupled to the operations center. At least one communications device of the plurality of communications devices is coupled to a fire hydrant, a valve, a valve box, a valve box cover, a meter, a meter box, a meter box cover, a water tower, a water tank, a pumper nozzle, a hose nozzle, or a manhole cover.
In one embodiment, the communications device coupled to the fire hydrant is one of a monitoring device, an output device, and a repeater. At least one portion of the fire hydrant is comprised of a material that does not interfere with the communications. In one embodiment, the communications device coupled to the fire hydrant is positioned within one of the nozzle cap, the pumper nozzle, the hose nozzle, the fire truck hookup, and the bonnet.
Another embodiment is directed to a fire hydrant. The fire hydrant includes a bonnet and a communications device coupled to the bonnet. The communications device is an element of an infrastructure monitoring system.
Other embodiments and advantages are set forth in part in the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from this description, or may be learned from practice.
The figures shown and described in greater detail are provided by way of example only.
As embodied and broadly described herein, the disclosures herein provide exemplary embodiments of the disclosed systems, methods, and devices. Features may be embodied in various and alternative forms. Therefore, there is no intent that specific structural and functional details should be limiting, but rather the intention is that they provide a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure.
A problem in the art capable of being solved by the embodiments disclosed is monitoring and maintaining an infrastructure. It has been discovered that monitoring devices with one or two way communication abilities can be used to detect faults in the municipality's systems and provide on-demand, real time, or near real time device status, maintenance, and control over the systems.
A network of monitoring devices is capable of providing a system administrator with a full picture of the current state of the system. The network includes an array of different monitoring devices each capable of sensing at least one condition. The monitoring devices may be capable of sending data to and of receiving data from at least one operations center. Communication from the remote monitoring device may be directed to a central monitoring facility, to one of a number of regional monitoring centers, to a user, and/or to a research facility. Furthermore, the system includes at least one control device. Each control device is adapted to control a different aspect of the system. The control devices may be part of the monitoring devices or may be separate units. Communication is over the Internet, but may be over a private network, a local area network, or a wide area network. The communication involves a wireless component, such as from the remote monitoring device and/or control device to a regional monitoring facility or to distributed monitors. Also, the communications are secured or encrypted such that the communications system cannot be monitored by another unknown party. Access to the system is granted through user names and passwords, although additional and/or alternate encryption methods can be employed.
One embodiment is directed to water infrastructure systems. In such systems, monitoring devices can be located throughout the system, for example, as attachments to component parts, for feedback to a network that can provide real-time information to the utility operating the network. The network operators can use the information transmitted to activate controlling devices on the network, or to dispatch repair or other services as directed by the information provided by the network. For example, if water pressure monitors on a water meter indicate a variance between locations, a water leak can be reported using the network, and controlling devices can divert water. Pressure meters can be attached to fire hydrants to monitor and report pressure losses throughout the system, providing real-time information to benefit the users of the fire hydrants (fire departments who need to be assured of adequate pressure), the users of the system (water consumers who will be affected by lower pressure), and the operators of the system (who suffer asset loss as a result of lack of real-time information about losses).
Each monitoring device 110 monitors at least one aspect of the infrastructure. The monitored aspect can be one or more of the components of the infrastructure (e.g. pipe conditions, valve conditions, fire hydrant conditions, service line conditions, meter conditions, power line conditions, and battery conditions), commodity conditions (e.g. fluid or gas flow, fluid or gas pressure, fluid or gas temperature, and fluid or gas contaminants), or combinations thereof. Additionally, each monitoring device 110 can be self monitoring. For example the monitoring devices 110 determine if there is a loss of communication, low battery levels, and/or internal damage (e.g. short circuits due to water damage). Additionally, each monitoring device 110 can be structurally stable (e.g. fixed to a valve, pipe, utility pole, a hydrant, a valve box, a valve box cover, a meter, a meter box, a meter box cover, a water tower, a water tank, a pumper nozzle, a hose nozzle, or an manhole cover) or movable (e.g. allowed to move with or within the flow of water or gas in the pipes).
For example, a monitoring device 110 or 111 can be coupled to a fire hydrant 405, a seen in
In another embodiment, a monitoring device 110 or control device 111 is positioned within a nozzle cap 600 of a fire hydrant. A fire hydrant nozzle cap 600 is a device attached to an outlet nozzle and covers a nozzle opening. The nozzle cap 600 is furnished with a nut 605 or other device to permit the application of force to firmly attach the nozzle cap 600 to or to remove it from the outlet nozzle.
Nozzle hydrant threading 625 is provided as a connection means between the nozzle cap 600 and the fire hydrant. The nozzle cap 600 also includes enclosure threading 630 as a connection means for the enclosure 610 to connect to the nozzle cap 600. The enclosure 610 also includes connection threading 640 designed to mate with the enclosure threading 630. An antenna 650 is shown.
Each node in the network 115 detects errors in transmissions. Error detection can use cyclic redundancy codes using a table based on a defined polynomial or another method of error detection. In alternative embodiments, transmissions can be rerouted if the primary route is blocked or otherwise unavailable. Furthermore, devices 110 and 111 can confirm receipt of a message, e.g. via a hand shake protocol. In instances where confirmation is not received, the message can be resent along the same route or rerouted.
In various embodiments, each monitoring device 110 and each control device 111 is assigned a unique identifier. The unique identifier can be related to the devices' geographical locations, street addresses, order of installation, or any other method of identifying the devices 110,111. Furthermore, different types of devices 110 and 111 can have unique identifiers that include keys that are unique to that type of device. For example, the identifier for all water meters may begin with a WM, while the identifier for all leak detectors may begin with an LD. Each communication to and from a monitoring device 110 and control device 111 may include the unique identifier so that the message is received by the correct monitoring device 110 or control device 111, or so that operations center 105 can determine from where the message was sent.
Each monitoring device 110 and each control device 111 can be retrofitted to an existing system 100 or device 110,111, can be coupled to a new system 100 or device 110,111, or can be integrated into a new system 100 or device 110,111. For example, the system 100 can be connected to, work with, or work independently of a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) network. In one embodiment, each monitoring device 110 and each control device 111 has a set of adapters to facilitate coupling the monitoring device 110 or control device 111 to a new or existing system 100 or device 110,111.
In one embodiment, system 100 is divided into sectors with each sector having at least one monitoring device 110 and/or at least one control device 111. Each sector can communicate directly with operations center 105 or each sector can have at least one intermediary communications device that is in communication with the monitoring device 110 and/or control device 111 and operations center 105. In one embodiment, the sectors are divided up by geographical location. For example, all of the devices in one neighborhood can be in a single sector and there is one sector for each neighborhood. In one embodiment, one intermediary communications device can service multiple sectors.
In alternative embodiments, each monitoring device 110 and/or control device 111 can communicate with adjacent monitoring devices 110 and/or control devices 111. In such embodiments, each monitoring device 110 and/or control device 111 can act as a transceiver or relay by receiving messages intended for another device 110,111 or for the operations center 105 and forwarding the message. In embodiments where the system 100 is divided into sectors, monitoring devices 110 and control devices 111 can communicate only within their sector. In other embodiments, monitoring device 110 and control device 111 can communicate with devices 110,111 in other sectors. Each monitoring device 110, control device 111, and/or the operations center 105 may be able to determine if a transmitted message was received by the intended device 110,111 and, if not, may be able to reroute the message until the message is properly received. Additionally, relay devices can be implemented in the system to further extend the range of communications. For example, relay devices can be placed on utility poles, on municipal buildings, within fire hydrants, and/or under manhole covers. In alternative embodiments, devices 110 and 111 communicate over a mesh network. In the mesh network, devices 110 and 111 can communicate with other devices 110 and 111 within the mesh network. Operations center 105 can set specified communications pathways derived from routing tables.
Operations center 105 can be located at a municipality office, a private or public company, a fire station, a police station, or any other entity that monitors operations center 105. In other embodiments, operations center 105 can be remotely hosted and accessible by the Internet. In such embodiments, operations center 105 can take advantage of cloud computing (e.g. a network of remotely hosted computers, servers, and data storage devices). Compared to non-remotely hosted computer networks, cloud computing can increase ease of use, increase access, increase security, decrease costs, be custom tailored, and provide an unrestricted expansion of storage space. Additionally, in various embodiments, there is a plurality of operations centers 105. One or more operations centers 105 can be located at different entities and each operations center 105 can monitor a different aspect of system 100. For example, in embodiments where one monitoring device 110 monitors water usage and another monitors gas leaks, the water usage aspect can be monitored by a water utility company and the gas leaks can be monitored by the gas utility company and/or the fire department. In some embodiments, there are redundant operations centers 105, where at least two operations centers 105 monitor the same aspect of system 100. Operations center 105 can send transmissions to update the firmware of devices 110 and 111.
Each monitoring device unit 200 may collect data and/or transmit data continuously, at specific intervals, or randomly. In embodiments where the monitoring device unit 200 collects and transmits data in a non-continuous configuration, monitoring device unit 200 may turn off or reduce power consumption during the non-data collecting periods to save energy. Processor 205 is coupled to a power source 235. Power source 235 can be a unit capable of powering processor 205 and devices attached to processor 205. For example, power source 235 can be a battery, solar panel array, wind turbine, water turbine, electrical lines, or combinations thereof. In preferred embodiments, there is also a backup power source, such as a battery. The power may derive from the operation of the system 100.
In one embodiment, processor 205 is coupled to at least one sensor 215 that monitors at least one condition associated with the monitoring device. Sensors 215 can determine the status of a device. Sensors 215 can be directly wired to processor 205 or can use wireless communication to send and receive signals from processor 205. Sensors 215 can be positioned within the monitoring device or be external to the monitoring device. In alternative embodiments, sensors 215 are positioned remote from the monitoring device. For example a sensor can be positioned in a fire hydrant, on a nearby building, or on a utility pole. In the embodiments in which sensors 215 and processor 205 communicate wirelessly, the same communications protocol can be used in the sensor/processor communication as in the processor/operations center communication, or different communications protocols can be used in the sensor/processor communication from in the processor/control center communication. For example, the sensor/processor communications can use RF protocols while the processor/control center communications can be over a wired network.
In one embodiment, sensor 215 is a use monitor. In such embodiment, the use monitor records the amount of water, gas, electricity, or other commodity that is used by a customer over a specified period of time. The use monitor can continuously record the amount of the commodity used or the use monitor can provide a signal to processor 205 that the commodity is in use. Processor 205 can transmit a signal to the operations control to alert the operations center 105 that the monitoring device 110 is being used and/or how much of the commodity is flowing through the sensor 215. The operations center 105 can request a reading from the use monitor on demand. The processor 205 or the operations center 105 can determine based on the use, if there is unauthorized use of the commodity. Upon detection of unauthorized use, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alarm that there is unauthorized use. For example, in embodiments where the use monitor is coupled to a fire hydrant 405, if the use monitor indicates that the fire hydrant 405 is in use, however no fire is reported, the operations center 105 can disseminate an alert that there is potential misuse of the fire hydrant 405.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a tamper sensor. The tamper sensor can be a motion detector, a contact sensor, a rotation sensor, a touch sensor, a proximity sensor, a biofeedback sensor, a temperature sensor, a capacitance sensor, a resistance sensor, or any other sensor that is able to detect the presence of an object. The tamper sensor can send a message to processor 205 when the tamper sensor detects an event. The processor 205 will then evaluate the event to determine if a device being monitored is being tampered with or will relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. The monitored device can be a fire hydrant, utility meter, valve, manhole cover, pump, or any other device that may be tampered with. Upon detection of a tamper event, at least one of processor 205 and the operations center 105 can generate an alarm that the device is being tampered with. The monitoring device may activate a tamper prevention device (described below). The operations center 105 will send a transmission to processor 205 telling processor 205 to disregard messages from the tamper sensor for a predetermined period of time or until another message is received from the operations center 105 telling processor 205 to resume monitoring for tamper events. For example, if a fire department needs to use a fire hydrant, the operations center 105 will send a message to processor 205 to temporarily disregard any tamper events. Once the fire department is finished using the fire hydrant the operations center 105 will send a message to processor 205 to start monitoring for tamper events again.
In some embodiments at least two of sensors 215 are leak detectors. Each leak detector can include an in-pipe leak detector and/or an exterior leak detector. In gas applications, the leak detectors are vapor sensors. While in liquid applications, the leak detectors use acoustic monitoring to determine presence and location of a leak. The energy generated from a leak is transmitted within a pipe through the commodity as well as through the pipe wall. Each leak detector can detect the vibrations made by the leak in the commodity or the pipe wall, joint or service line. To determine the location of a leak, at least two detectors must detect the same leak. Based on the velocity of the sound traveling along the pipe (V), the distance between the two detectors (D) and the delay between the times each detector detects the sound (T), the location of the leak (L) can be determined by the following equation:
L=(D−(V×T))/2
When using the above equation, the typical velocity of sound in water is about 1500 m/s while the typical speed of sound through an iron pipe is 5100 m/s. The velocity can be measured empirically. For example, if the leak is exactly midway between the two detectors the sound would reach both detectors at the same time. Each detector may monitor continuously or at predetermined periods of time. The leak detectors can send a message to processor 205 when the leak detectors detect an event. The processor 205 can then evaluate the event to determine if there is a leak and how severe the leak is or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of a leak event, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is a leak if the leak is determined to be severe enough to warrant attention.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a smoke detector. The smoke detector can be a photoelectric detector, an ionization detector, or any other device that can detect the presence of smoke. The smoke detector can be located within the monitoring device or exterior to the monitoring device. The smoke detector monitors continuously for smoke. The smoke detector can send a message to processor 205 when the smoke detector detects an event. The processor 205 can then evaluate the event to determine if there is smoke or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of smoke, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is smoke.
In some embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a temperature sensor. The temperature sensor can be a contact sensor (e.g. thermocouples, thermistors, liquid-in-glass thermometers, resistance temperature detectors, filled system thermometers, bimetallic thermometers, semiconductor temperature sensors, and phase change indicators) or a non-contact sensor (e.g. radiation thermometers, thermal imagers, ratio thermometers, optical pyrometers, and fiber optic thermometers). The temperature sensor can be located within the monitoring device or exterior to the monitoring device. In one embodiment, the temperature sensor monitors continuously for the temperature to rise above or drop below a predetermined threshold. The temperature sensor can send a message to processor 205 when the temperature sensor detects a temperature beyond the thresholds. The processor 205 can then evaluate the event to determine if there the temperature is a problem (such as freezing pipes or fire) or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of undesirable temperatures, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is an undesirable temperature condition.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a rust and/or corrosion sensor. The corrosion sensor can detect rust and/or corrosion using any method known in the art, including but not limited to liquid penetration inspection, magnetic particle inspection, radiographic inspection, visual inspection, eddy current inspection, ultrasonic inspection, and thermographic inspection. The corrosion sensor can send a message to processor 205 when the corrosion sensor detects a rust or corrosion beyond a threshold value. The processor 205 can then evaluate the rust or corrosion to determine if there is a problem or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of undesirable rust or corrosion, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is an undesirable amount of rust or corrosion.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a fluid flow sensor. The fluid flow sensor can be used either in gas systems or liquid systems. The fluid flow sensor can detect direction of the flow, turbidity of the flow, velocity of the flow, density of the flow, viscosity of the flow, and/or any other aspect of the flow. The fluid flow sensor may be a velocimeter, a laser-based interferometer, a vane, a rotary potentiometer, a Hall effect sensor, a device to measure heat transfer caused by the flowing fluid, or any other device know in the art to measure the flow of fluid. The fluid flow sensor can send a message to processor 205 when the fluid flow sensor detects a flow anomaly. The processor 205 can then evaluate the event to determine if the anomaly is a problem or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of an anomaly, at least one of processor 205 and the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is an anomaly.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a pressure sensor. In one embodiment, the pressure sensor is positioned within the flow of fluid or area in which the pressure is being sensed. For example, the pressure sensor can be positioned at the base of a fire hydrant and in the water to determine the water pressure within water system, in a pipe to determine gas or water pressure within a gas or water system, or in a room to determine air pressure within the room. The pressure sensor can be a piezoresistive strain gauge, a capacitive gauge, an electromagnetic gauge, a piezoelectric device, or any other device know in the art to measure pressure. The pressure sensor can send a message to processor 205 when the pressure sensor detects a pressure anomaly. The processor 205 can then evaluate the event to determine if the anomaly is a problem or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of an anomaly, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is an anomaly.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a water quality monitor. The water quality monitor can monitor a single aspect of water flowing through the system 100 or multiple aspects of the water. For example, the water quality monitor can monitor one or more of the water's bacteria levels, pharmaceutical levels, alkalinity, chlorine and/or chloramine levels, hardness, pH levels, peroxide content, iron levels, nitrate levels, nitrite levels, arsenic levels, pollution levels, oxygen levels, biomass levels, and/or any of the other contaminants regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In embodiments where there are multiple monitoring devices, all the devices can monitor the same aspects, each device can monitor a different aspect, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the water quality monitors test the water continuously, however, in alternative embodiments, the water quality monitors test the water at predetermined time intervals (e.g. once a hour, once a day, once a week, etc.). Each water quality monitor relays data to processor 205. Processor 205 can store the data on data storage unit 230 or transmit the data to the operations center 105. Either processor 205 or the operations center 105 can monitor the data received from the water quality monitors to determine if there is a change in the levels of the contaminants or if the levels of the contaminants rise above a threshold level. Upon detection of unsafe contamination levels, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is contamination in the water system.
In the embodiments where at least two monitoring devices are monitoring the same aspect of the water, the operations center 105 can determine if there is a change in the aspect of the water from the location of one monitoring device to the location of the other. If there is a change, the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is a change in the water system and output the approximate location of the change in the water system.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is an air quality monitor. The air quality monitor can monitor a single aspect of the air or multiple aspects of the air. Furthermore, the air quality monitor can monitor the air within a facility or ambient air. For example, the air quality monitor can monitor one or more of the air's benzene levels, carbon disulfide levels, urethane levels, formaldehyde levels, phosphorus levels, naphthalene levels, parathion levels, quinoline levels, trifluralin levels, and/or any of the other contaminants whose acceptable levels have been set by the Environmental Protection Agency. In embodiments where there are multiple monitoring devices, all the devices can monitor the same aspects or each device can monitor a different aspect, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the air quality monitors test the air continuously, however, in preferred embodiments, the air quality monitors test the air at predetermined time intervals (e.g. once a hour, once a day, once a week, etc.). Each air quality monitor relays data to processor 205. Processor 205 can store the data on data storage unit 230 or transmit the data to the operations center 105. Either processor 205 or the operations center 105 can monitor the data received from the air quality monitors to determine if there is a change in the levels of the contaminants or if the levels of the contaminants rise above a threshold level. Upon detection of unsafe contamination levels, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is contamination in the air.
In the embodiments where at least two monitoring devices are monitoring the same aspect of the air, the operations center 105 can determine if there is a change in the aspect of the air from the location of one monitoring device to the location of the other. If there is a change, the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is a change in the air and output the approximate location of the change in the aspect of the air. Furthermore, in embodiments where there is a time stamp associated with each reading, the operations center 105 can determine the approximate direction and speed at which the contaminant is moving.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a radiation detector. The radiation detector can distinguish between natural sources of radiation and artificial sources of radiation or can distinguish between normal levels of radiation and abnormal levels of radiation. The radiation detector detects ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation consists of subatomic particles or electromagnetic waves that are energetic enough to detach electrons from atoms or molecules, ionizing them. Examples of ionizing particles are energetic alpha particles, beta particles, and neutrons. The ability of an electromagnetic wave (photons) to ionize an atom or molecule depends on its frequency. Radiation on the short-wavelength end of the electromagnetic spectrum—high frequency ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays—is ionizing. The radiation detector is one of a dosimeter, a Geiger counters, or a scintillation counters. Dosimeters measure an absolute dose received over a period of time. Ion-chamber dosimeters resemble pens, and can be clipped to one's clothing. Film-badge dosimeters enclose a piece of photographic film, which will become exposed as radiation passes through it. Ion-chamber dosimeters must be periodically recharged, and the result logged. Film-badge dosimeters must be developed as photographic emulsion so the exposures can be counted and logged; once developed, they are discarded. Another type of dosimeter is the TLD (Thermoluminescent Dosimeter). These dosimeters contain crystals that emit visible light when heated, in direct proportion to their total radiation exposure. Like ion-chamber dosimeters, TLDs can be re-used after they have been ‘read’. Geiger counters and scintillation counters measure the dose rate of ionizing radiation directly. Preferably, the radiation detector is a solid-state device.
Upon detecting radiation, the radiation detector can relay the detection to processor 205. Processor 205 can save the detection on data storage unit 230 or transmit a message regarding the detection to the operations center 105. Processor 205 or the operations center 105 can evaluate the detection and act in accordance with the purpose of the radiation detector. For example, if the radiation detector detects radiation over a threshold level, processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there are unsafe radiation levels.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a motion detector. The motion detector can be a radar-based motion detector, a photo-sensor motion detector, a passive infrared motion detector, a magnetic motion detector, a pressure sensitive motion detector, or any other device capable of detecting the motion of objects. The motion detector can be used, for example, to count the number of cars passing through an intersection to control a traffic light, for tamper prevention as described above, for security purposes, and/or to control street lights. The motion detector can be placed within the monitoring device or exterior to the monitoring device. Upon detecting motion, the motion detector can relay the detection to processor 205. Processor 205 can save the detection on data storage unit 230 or transmit a message regarding the detection to the operations center 105. Processor 205 or the operations center 105 can evaluate the detection and act in accordance with the purpose of the motion detector. For example, if the motion detector detects a predetermined number of vehicles have passed the monitoring device, processor 205 or the operations center 105 can cause a traffic light to switch from green to red. As a second example, if the motion detector detects a motion after a predetermined time, e.g. after sunset, processor 205 or the operations center 105 can cause the street lights near the monitoring device to illuminate for a predetermined period of time.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a tiltmeter. The tiltmeter can be a pendulum, a water tube, a bubble-level meter, and/or a MEMS electronic meter. The tiltmeter can be located on devices within the system, such as, but not limited to, pipes, fire hydrants, meters, valves, utility poles, manhole covers, and light posts. The tiltmeter can send a message to processor 205 when the sensor detects a tilt beyond a threshold value. The processor 205 can then evaluate the tilt to determine if there is a problem or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of undesirable tilt, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is an undesirable tilt. For example, if a utility pole is struck by a car, the tiltmeter will indicate that the utility pole is tilting at an undesirable level and the operations center 105 can alert the municipality to send out a repair crew to assess the situation and repair the utility pole.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a proximity sensor. The proximity sensor can use electromagnetic technology, electrostatic technology, infrared technology, or a touch switch. The proximity sensor can detect if devices are properly closed or if devices are improperly touching. The proximity sensor can send a message to processor 205 when the proximity sensor detects proximity beyond a threshold value. The processor 205 can then evaluate the proximity to determine if there is a problem or can relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation. Upon detection of undesirable proximity, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that there is an undesirable proximity. For example, if a valve is improperly closed, the proximity sensor will indicate that the valve is not closed and processor 205 can alert the municipality to take proper actions to close the valve.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a visual or audio device. The device can be an infrared camera, a video camera, a still camera, a digital camera, a film camera, a mobile vision device, a microphone, a vibration detector, combinations thereof, or any other device capable of acquiring an image or sound. In one embodiment, the device is a digital video camera that takes video images continuously. In another embodiment, the device is a digital still camera that takes still images at regular intervals or upon command from processor 205. In alternative embodiments, the device can be a traffic camera and take a picture when instructed to by processor 205, for example upon determination that a vehicle is running a red light. In other embodiments, the device is used to perform visual inspections of the system infrastructure. For example, the field of view of the device can include a device within the system that is apt to corrode and the camera can provide an easy method to visually inspect any degradation of the device. The device can send image data to processor 205 where the data is stored on data storage unit 230 or is transmitted to the operations center 105. In various embodiments, image or sound data is streamed continuously from the device to processor 205 and from processor 205 to the operations center 105. The data stream can either be live or delayed. The device can be located on the monitoring device, near the monitoring device, or within the monitoring device with a portion of the device extending outside the monitoring device or with a hole in the monitoring device through which the device can obtain images or sounds. In some embodiments, the device is positioned on an actuator. The actuator can move to reposition the field of view of the device. The actuator can move upon demand from processor 205 or can move autonomously. In the embodiments where the actuator moves autonomously, the movement can be continuous or sporadic.
In various embodiments, at least one sensor 215 is a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. In one embodiment, the GPS receiver is located on devices within the system 100, such as, but not limited to, pipes, fire hydrants, meters, valves, utility poles, manhole covers, and light posts. The GPS receiver can send a message to processor 205 indicating GPS location. The processor 205 can then relay the message to the operations center 105 for evaluation, conformation, and documenting. Upon detection of unexpected GPS location, at least one of processor 205 or the operations center 105 can generate an alert that the GPS receiver has moved, possibly indicating that the device has been dislodged, tampered with, or stolen. Additionally, the GPS location can be used, for example, by emergency responders to locate fire hydrants, or repair crews to determine the location of a buried device. In such embodiments, the operations center 105 can disseminate information to the emergency responders or repair crews to easily locate the device. The dissemination can occur by any method, including but not limited to, verbally, over a telecommunications network (e.g. to a smart phone or portable computer), or over a shortwave radio. In embodiments where the monitoring device is moving with the flow of fluid, the sensor can provide updated locations of the monitoring device to track, for example, the flow or contamination levels within the flow.
Other possible sensors 215 connected to monitoring device unit 200 can include, but are not limited to, flow rate meters, backflow meters, system status monitors, and power level monitors.
In various embodiments, processor 305 is coupled to a data storage unit 330 that may be a database in some embodiments. Data storage unit 330 may store instructions for processor 305 of how to control output devices 340. In various embodiments, processor 305 is coupled to a power source 335. Power source 335 can be any device capable of powering processor 305 and any devices attached to processor 305. For example, power source 335 can be a battery, solar panel array, wind turbine, water turbine, electrical lines, or combinations thereof. In various embodiments, there is also a backup power source, such as a battery.
In various embodiments, at least one output device 340 is an actuator control device. The actuator control device can control any type of actuator, including but not limited to, a tamper prevention device, a locking device, a camera motion device, a fire hydrant nut opening device, or a valve. The actuator control device can control the actuator autonomously or upon demand from processor 305. For example, upon receiving a signal that a particular event has been sensed, processor 305 may send a command to the actuator control device to act in a particular manner. Likewise, in some embodiments the control signal may come from the operations center 105. The actuator can be mechanical, electrical, or a combination thereof
In various embodiments, at least one output device 340 is an alarm. The alarm can be a visual alarm, an audible alarm, a tactile (i.e. vibration) alarm, or a combination thereof. The alarm can be located within the monitoring device, exterior to the monitoring device, at the operations center 105, remote from the system, or any other location sufficient to alert. Furthermore, there can be more than one alarm at different locations. For example, in the embodiments where there is a smoke detector, there can be an audible alarm located within the fire detector to alert people around the monitoring device of a potential fire, there can be an audible alarm at the fire station to alert the fire department of the potential fire, and there can be a visual alarm at the gas utility company to indicate that the flow gas in the vicinity of the potential fire should be shut off. In various embodiments the alarm is controlled by the processor 305, while in other embodiments the alarm is controlled by the operations center 105. In various embodiments, the alarm has an on/off switch controllable locally.
In various embodiments, at least one output device 340 is a tamper prevention device. The tamper prevention device can be a mechanical lock, an alarm, a light, an electrical shock generator, a retaining device, an electrical lock, or any other device capable of preventing tampering. The tamper prevention device may merely deter tampering or may incapacitate a person who is trying to tamper with the device, depending on the level of security. In some embodiments the tamper prevention device is controlled by the processor 305, while in other embodiments the tamper prevention device is controlled by the operations center 105.
In various embodiments, at least one output device 340 is a Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) device. The RFID device can broadcast information about the device to which it is attached. For example, the RFID device may broadcast manufacturer information, location information, last service date, device information (e.g. make, model, and/or year), current status (e.g. a valve can broadcast if it is open or closed), etc. In some embodiments the RFID device is updateable by the processor 305 or by the operations center 105. The RFID device can be either an active (e.g. battery powered) or passive (e.g. require an external source to provoke signal transmission) device.
A system of the disclosure is monitoring a water distribution infrastructure. The system is used to automatically control the water pressure within the system. Such a system includes a number of water meters disbursed throughout the infrastructure relaying real time use information to a control center. Upon a determination by the operations center that there is low usage of the system (e.g. at night) based on information received by a predetermined number of the water meters, the operations center causes pumps supplying pressure within the system to reduce or cease pumping. Thereby cutting down on the electricity used by the pumps while maintaining enough pressure throughout the infrastructure to satisfy any water needs. The determination to reduce or cease pumping can be also based on information received from pressure sensors disbursed throughout the infrastructure. For example, if the pressure within the infrastructure exceeds a threshold value, the operations center causes the pumps to reduce or cease pumping.
In another example, the system is used to assist in maintaining the infrastructure. Water pipes and valves are often buried underground making it difficult to locate, assess the status of the devices, and repair them if necessary. Using an example of the above described system, each device is equipped with a monitoring the device. The monitoring device, for example, may monitor for corrosion using a corrosion monitor, geographical location using a GPS receiver, and leaks using a leak detector. Upon detection of corrosion and/or a leak, the monitoring device sends a message to the operations center where the information is analyzed. The operations center is able to make a determination if the corrosion and/or leak is severe enough to warrant fixing, if the corrosion and/or leak should be watched to determine if it worsens, or if the corrosion and/or leak can be ignored. The operations center will also alert a person of the situation for further assessment.
If it is determined that the corrosion and/or leak should be fixed, the operations center disseminates information to a repair crew and redirects water flow away from the device. Such information can include location of the device, based on data received the GPS receiver, problem associated with the device, device information (e.g. make, model, and/or year), etc. The monitoring device can also be equipped with a RFID transmitter, which transmits at least some of the above information. The repair crew receives the information on a smart phone, a portable computer, or other device capable of receiving such information. Upon completion of the repair, the operations center updates the system to indicate a new last repaired date for the device.
In another Example, the system is monitored by several entities within a municipality at the same time. For example, a fire department, a gas utility, a water utility, an electric utility, and traffic control center all monitor the system concurrently. Upon detection of smoke by a monitoring device, the control center alerts each entity of a potential fire. The location of the potential fire is determined by cross-referencing the ID number of the monitoring device with a lookup table or based on information received from a GPS receiver. The fire department uses the location information to send out emergency response personnel to the vicinity of the potential fire. The gas utility uses the location information to divert or shut off gas flow to the vicinity of the potential fire. The water utility uses the location information to divert water to or increase water pressure in the vicinity of the potential fire as well as determines if any fire hydrants in the vicinity of the potential fire are potentially damaged (e.g. are tilted at an unusual angle, are receiving no or little water pressure, or have been tampered with) based on information received from monitoring devices attached to the fire hydrants. The location of the fire hydrants is determined by cross-referencing the ID number of the monitoring device with a lookup table or based on information received from a GPS receiver. The water utility automatically alerts the fire department as to which fire hydrants to use. The water utility also disables any tamper prevention devices associated with the fire hydrants. The electric utility receives a signal that additional pressure may be needed within the water system and provides an increased electrical load to the water pumps. Additionally, the traffic control center adjusts traffic lights en route from the fire station to the vicinity of the potential fire to assist the fire trucks in arriving quickly and safely.
In another example, the system is used to monitor contamination of the fluid flowing through the system. The system includes pressure sensors, leak detectors and contamination detectors. Leaks within the system can cause a pressure drop throughout the system which can lead to contaminants being drawn into the system. For example, if a pipe is under water and the pressure inside the pipe drops below the pressure outside the pipe, the exterior water will flow into the pipe. Therefore, the system has several monitoring devices to check for such potential or actual contamination. The pressure sensors will indicate if the pressure within the system drops below a threshold level at which contaminants can be drawn into the system. The leak detectors will indicate that there is a leak through which contaminants can enter the system. While the contamination detectors will indicate if there is contamination within the system, indicating a possible breach of the infrastructure of the system.
Other embodiments and uses of the disclosed systems, methods, and devices will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice disclosed herein. All references cited herein, including all publications, U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, are specifically and entirely incorporated by reference. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only with the true scope and spirit of the disclosure indicated by the following claims. Furthermore, the term “comprising of” includes the terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” All examples illustrate possible embodiments but should not be viewed as limiting the scope of the disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/355,468 filed Jun. 16, 2010, both of which are hereby specifically incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
691904 | Hallbergh | Jan 1902 | A |
1165429 | Mass | Dec 1915 | A |
1738094 | Caldwell | Dec 1929 | A |
1788618 | Cover | Jan 1931 | A |
1808209 | Earl | Jun 1931 | A |
1808212 | Earl | Jun 1931 | A |
2171173 | Coyer | Aug 1939 | A |
2302529 | Cornell et al. | Nov 1942 | A |
3254528 | Michael | Jun 1966 | A |
3254660 | Ray | Jun 1966 | A |
3592967 | Harris | Jul 1971 | A |
3593957 | Dolter et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3612922 | Furnival | Oct 1971 | A |
3653261 | Feldman | Apr 1972 | A |
3672233 | Hjermstad | Jun 1972 | A |
3673856 | Panigati | Jul 1972 | A |
3705385 | Batz | Dec 1972 | A |
3731534 | Painley et al. | May 1973 | A |
3795144 | Marchesi | Mar 1974 | A |
3815129 | Sweany | Jun 1974 | A |
4056970 | Sollish | Nov 1977 | A |
4083229 | Anway | Apr 1978 | A |
4093997 | Germer | Jun 1978 | A |
4120031 | Kincheloe et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4126338 | Coel | Nov 1978 | A |
4291375 | Wolf | Sep 1981 | A |
4333028 | Panton | Jun 1982 | A |
4388690 | Lumsden | Jun 1983 | A |
4414633 | Churchill | Nov 1983 | A |
4431873 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4442492 | Karlsson et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4462249 | Adams | Jul 1984 | A |
4465970 | DiMassimo et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4467236 | Kolm et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4516213 | Gidden | May 1985 | A |
4542469 | Brandberry et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4543817 | Sugiyama | Oct 1985 | A |
4591988 | Klima et al. | May 1986 | A |
4707852 | Jahr et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4727900 | Dooling et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4778204 | Berger | Oct 1988 | A |
4792946 | Mayo | Dec 1988 | A |
4803632 | Frew et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4833618 | Verma et al. | May 1989 | A |
4844396 | Norton | Jul 1989 | A |
4868566 | Strobel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4881070 | Burrowes et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4901751 | Story et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4930358 | Motegi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940976 | Gastouniotis et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953403 | Springer | Sep 1990 | A |
4967996 | Sonoda et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984498 | Fishman | Jan 1991 | A |
4989830 | Ratnik | Feb 1991 | A |
5038614 | Bseisu et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5052215 | Lewis | Oct 1991 | A |
5056107 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5075792 | Brown et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078006 | Maresca et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5079715 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085082 | Cantor et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5090234 | Maresca et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5117676 | Chang | Jun 1992 | A |
5118464 | Richardson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121344 | Laage et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5163314 | Maresca et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165280 | Sternberg et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5170657 | Maresca et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174155 | Sugimoto | Dec 1992 | A |
5187973 | Kunze et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5189904 | Maresca et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201226 | John et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203202 | Spencer | Apr 1993 | A |
5205173 | Allen | Apr 1993 | A |
5209125 | Kalinoski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5218859 | Stenstrom et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5239575 | White et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243862 | Latimer | Sep 1993 | A |
5251480 | Brunson, IV et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5254944 | Holmes et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261275 | Davis | Nov 1993 | A |
5267587 | Brown | Dec 1993 | A |
5272646 | Farmer | Dec 1993 | A |
5279160 | Koch | Jan 1994 | A |
5287884 | Cohen | Feb 1994 | A |
5298894 | Cerny et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303592 | Livingston | Apr 1994 | A |
5319956 | Bogle et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333501 | Okada et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335547 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343737 | Baumoel | Sep 1994 | A |
5349568 | Kupperman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351655 | Nuspl | Oct 1994 | A |
5361636 | Farstad et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367911 | Jewell et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381136 | Powers et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5385049 | Hunt et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5396800 | Drinon et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5408883 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416724 | Savic | May 1995 | A |
5434911 | Gray et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437481 | Spears et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5438329 | Gastounioulis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451938 | Brennan, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459459 | Lee | Oct 1995 | A |
5461906 | Bogle et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5481259 | Bane | Jan 1996 | A |
5493287 | Bane | Feb 1996 | A |
5509567 | Lindahl | Apr 1996 | A |
5519184 | Umlas | May 1996 | A |
5519387 | Besier et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525898 | Lee et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526691 | Latimer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531099 | Russo | Jul 1996 | A |
5548530 | Baumoel | Aug 1996 | A |
5553094 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581037 | Kwun et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590179 | Shincovich et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591912 | Spisak et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594740 | LaDue | Jan 1997 | A |
5594776 | Dent | Jan 1997 | A |
5602327 | Torizuka et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611948 | Hawkins | Mar 1997 | A |
5617084 | Sears | Apr 1997 | A |
5619423 | Scrantz | Apr 1997 | A |
5623203 | Hosohara et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631554 | Briese et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633467 | Paulson | May 1997 | A |
5639958 | Lange | Jun 1997 | A |
5654692 | Baxter, Jr. et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5655299 | Lindahl | Aug 1997 | A |
5655561 | Wendel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666655 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673252 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5686828 | Peterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5708195 | Kurisu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708211 | Jepson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714931 | Petite | Feb 1998 | A |
5746344 | Syler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748104 | Argyroudis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751797 | Saadeh | May 1998 | A |
5754101 | Tsunetomi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760306 | Wyatt, III et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767790 | Jovellana | Jun 1998 | A |
5787358 | Takahashi | Jul 1998 | A |
5789720 | LaGally et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798457 | Paulson | Aug 1998 | A |
5801643 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815086 | Ivie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838633 | Sinha | Nov 1998 | A |
5852658 | Knight et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866820 | Camplin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877703 | Bloss et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892163 | Johnson | Apr 1999 | A |
5892441 | Woolley et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
5907100 | Cook | May 1999 | A |
5907491 | Canada et al. | May 1999 | A |
5924051 | Provost et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926103 | Petite | Jul 1999 | A |
5926531 | Petite | Jul 1999 | A |
5940009 | Loy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963146 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963557 | Eng | Oct 1999 | A |
5965818 | Wang | Oct 1999 | A |
5970434 | Brophy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971011 | Price | Oct 1999 | A |
5974862 | Lander et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979863 | Lousberg | Nov 1999 | A |
5986573 | Franklin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987990 | Worthington et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994892 | Turino et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996608 | Hunter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000277 | Smith | Dec 1999 | A |
6000288 | Kwun et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003376 | Burns et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006212 | Schleich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023986 | Smith et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028522 | Petite | Feb 2000 | A |
6028855 | Hirsch | Feb 2000 | A |
6031455 | Grube et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031466 | Leshets et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035717 | Carodiskey | Mar 2000 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058374 | Guthrie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060994 | Chen | May 2000 | A |
6069571 | Tell | May 2000 | A |
6076407 | Levesque et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081204 | Lavoie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082193 | Paulson | Jul 2000 | A |
6115677 | Perthold et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125703 | MacLauchlan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6127823 | Atherton | Oct 2000 | A |
6138512 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138514 | Iwamoto et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150955 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152173 | Makowan | Nov 2000 | A |
6163276 | Irving et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164137 | Hancock et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170334 | Paulson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172616 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175380 | Van Den Bosch | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178816 | Katzman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192352 | Alouani et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195018 | Ragle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208266 | Lyons et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218953 | Petite | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233327 | Petite | May 2001 | B1 |
6243657 | Tuck et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246677 | Nap et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267000 | Harper et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276213 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288641 | Casais | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296066 | Terry | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317051 | Cohen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333975 | Brunn et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363788 | Gorman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373399 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389881 | Yang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392538 | Shere | May 2002 | B1 |
6401525 | Jamieson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404343 | Andou et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405047 | Moon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424270 | Ali | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426027 | Scarborough et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430268 | Petite | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442999 | Baumoel | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453247 | Hunaidi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456197 | Lauritsen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470749 | Han et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470903 | Reyman | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6493377 | Schilling et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6512463 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6528957 | Luchaco | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530263 | Chana | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536469 | Dilger et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538577 | Ehrke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560543 | Wolfe et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561032 | Hunaidi | May 2003 | B1 |
6564159 | Lavoie et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567006 | Lander et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568416 | Tucker et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6577961 | Hubbard et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578422 | Lam et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581458 | Hathaway et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595038 | Williams et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6618578 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618709 | Sneeringer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624628 | Kwun et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624750 | Marman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628207 | Hemminger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628764 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633781 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647762 | Roy | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651503 | Bazarov et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653945 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657552 | Belski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666095 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667709 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675071 | Griffin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6677861 | Henry et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6701956 | Berger | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707762 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710600 | Kopecki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710721 | Holowick | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725705 | Huebler et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734674 | Struse | May 2004 | B1 |
6745136 | Lam et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747557 | Petite et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751560 | Tingley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772636 | Lam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772637 | Bazarov et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772638 | Matney et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781369 | Paulson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782751 | Linares et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789427 | Batzinger et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791318 | Paulson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798352 | Holowick | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799466 | Chinn | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813949 | Masaniello et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6813950 | Glascock et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816072 | Zoratti | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820016 | Brown et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822742 | Kalayeh et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6836737 | Petite et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843131 | Graff et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847300 | Yee et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848303 | Oeder et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6848313 | Krieg et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6851319 | Ziola et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6880567 | Klaver et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889703 | Bond | May 2005 | B2 |
6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904818 | Harthorn et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912472 | Mizushina | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914533 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914893 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920792 | Flora et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931445 | Davis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931931 | Graff et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935178 | Prause | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945113 | Siverling et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946972 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952970 | Furmidge et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954701 | Wolfe | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954814 | Leach | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957157 | Lander | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6968727 | Kwun et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972677 | Coulthard | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978210 | Suter et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978832 | Gardner et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980079 | Shintani et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982651 | Fischer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008239 | Ju | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7009530 | Zigdon et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012546 | Zigdon et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7042368 | Patterson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051577 | Komninos | May 2006 | B2 |
7053767 | Petite et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054271 | Brownrigg | May 2006 | B2 |
7061924 | Durrant et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072945 | Nieminen | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7079810 | Petite et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080557 | Adnan | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088239 | Basinger et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089125 | Sonderegger | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099781 | Heidl et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103511 | Petite | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111516 | Bazarov et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111817 | Teti et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117051 | Landry et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123628 | Hwang | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124184 | Chung et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137550 | Petite | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7140253 | Merki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142107 | Kates | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143645 | Benson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7143659 | Stout et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171854 | Nagashima et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228726 | Kates | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231331 | Davis | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234355 | Dewangan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240574 | Sapelnikov | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248179 | Smit | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248181 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250874 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255007 | Messer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7256704 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261002 | Gysling et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7263073 | Petite et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266992 | Shamout et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267014 | Winter | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272635 | Longtin et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7274996 | Lapinski | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284433 | Ales et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292143 | Drake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7293461 | Girndt | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7295128 | Petite | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299697 | Siddu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301456 | Han | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304587 | Boaz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310877 | Cao et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315257 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328618 | Hunaidi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331215 | Bond | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7342504 | Crane et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346030 | Cornwall | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349766 | Rodgers | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353280 | Chiles et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356444 | Blemel | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356614 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360462 | Nozaki et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363031 | Aisa | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7373808 | Zanker et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380466 | Deeg | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7383721 | Parsons et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385524 | Orlosky | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392709 | Eckert | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397907 | Petite | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405391 | Ogisu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412882 | Lazar et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412890 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7414395 | Gao et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417557 | Osterloh et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423985 | Hill | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7424527 | Petite | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426879 | Nozaki et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443313 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444401 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7453373 | Cumeralto et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
D583692 | Ball et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
7458267 | McCoy | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468661 | Petite et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475596 | Hunaidi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478108 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480501 | Petite | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7493817 | Germata | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7523666 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526539 | Hsu | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7526944 | Sabata et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530270 | Nozaki et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7533693 | Colton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7543500 | Litzenberg et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549439 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554345 | Vokey | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564540 | Paulson | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7587942 | Smith et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590496 | Blemel | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596458 | Lander | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7604216 | Gebler | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607351 | Allison et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623427 | Jann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647829 | Junker et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650425 | Davis | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650790 | Wright | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657403 | Stripf et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668670 | Lander | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671480 | Pitchford et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680625 | Trowbridge et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690258 | Minagi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7690393 | Nagle et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694564 | Brignac et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694934 | Irwin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7696940 | MacDonald | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7697492 | Petite | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711217 | Takahashi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739378 | Petite | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740024 | Brodeur et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746246 | Salser | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751989 | Owens et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7752309 | Keyghobad et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756086 | Petite | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760703 | Kubler et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775422 | Winter et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783738 | Keyghobad et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792946 | Keyghobad et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806382 | Palumbo et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7810378 | Hunaidi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817063 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825793 | Spillman et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7843379 | Menzer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854165 | Ball | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7870080 | Budike, Jr. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880641 | Parris et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7962101 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7980317 | Preta et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8014791 | Guigne et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8047072 | Ball | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8109131 | Winter | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140667 | Keyghobad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8249042 | Sparr et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8281654 | Ball | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8300626 | Thubert et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319508 | Vokey | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8351409 | Albert et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8391177 | Picard | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407333 | Keyghobad | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8549131 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8660134 | Splitz | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674830 | Lanham et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8823509 | Hyland | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8833390 | Ball et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855569 | Splitz | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8931337 | Renoud | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8931505 | Hyland et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9202362 | Hyland | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9291520 | Fleury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9593999 | Fleury | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9772250 | Richarz et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010010032 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010013488 | Fukunaga et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024163 | Petite | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010045129 | Williams et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048030 | Sharood et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013679 | Petite | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019725 | Petite | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031101 | Petite | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020043549 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051546 | Bizjak | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062392 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067717 | Raschke et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073183 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089802 | Beckwith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020124633 | Yang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130768 | Che et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020159434 | Gosior et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159584 | Sindalovsky et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169643 | Petite et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190956 | Klein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009515 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018733 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018776 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034900 | Han | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036810 | Petite | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046377 | Daum et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074109 | Jeong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076241 | Middleton | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093484 | Petite | May 2003 | A1 |
20030107485 | Zoratti | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174070 | Garrod et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040010561 | Kim et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054747 | Breh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040129312 | Cuzzo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139210 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158333 | Ha et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183687 | Petite et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050005680 | Anderson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067022 | Istre | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072214 | Cooper | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078631 | Cornwall | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084418 | Hill et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096753 | Arling et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104747 | Silic et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050121880 | Santangelo | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159823 | Hayes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190784 | Stine | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195768 | Petite et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195775 | Petite et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201379 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201397 | Petite | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203647 | Landry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246295 | Cameron | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251367 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279169 | Lander | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012491 | Mahowald | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028355 | Patterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041655 | Holloway et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046664 | Paradiso et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098576 | Brownrigg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060158347 | Roche et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174707 | Zhang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181414 | Bandy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201550 | Blyth et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218266 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060273896 | Kates | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283251 | Hunaidi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284784 | Smith et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070051187 | McDearmon | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059986 | Rockwell | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063866 | Webb | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091825 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070113618 | Yokoi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130317 | Lander | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070284293 | Pitchford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293221 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298779 | Wolman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080030319 | McKenna et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043637 | Rahman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061769 | Junk et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078567 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084260 | Swartzentruber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086560 | Monier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095403 | Benhammou | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109090 | Esmaili et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149180 | Parris et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150750 | Parris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169910 | Greene et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186898 | Petite | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189056 | Heidl et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195329 | Prince et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240078 | Thubert | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281534 | Hurley | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291054 | Groft | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307623 | Furukawa | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314122 | Hunaidi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090044628 | Lotscher | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058676 | Orlosky | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066524 | Yukawa et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068947 | Petite | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090121860 | Kimmel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133887 | Garcia et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153357 | Bushman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182099 | Noro et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090188313 | Ball | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090214941 | Buck et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090215424 | Petite | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243840 | Petite et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255346 | Hendey et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271045 | Savelle et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278293 | Yoshinaka et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287838 | Keyghobad et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090301571 | Ruhs | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309755 | Williamson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322453 | Kawaguchi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017465 | Brownrigg et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100039984 | Brownrigg | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060479 | Salter | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077234 | Das | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100156632 | Hyland et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194582 | Petite | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100250054 | Petite | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265909 | Petite et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290201 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295672 | Hyland et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312881 | Davis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329232 | Tubb et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018762 | Walley et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030482 | Meeusen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044276 | Albert et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110063172 | Podduturi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079402 | Darby et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110108136 | Margalit et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140909 | Olson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110308638 | Hyland et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120007743 | Solomon | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120007744 | Pal | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120068476 | Bradfield | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068477 | Bradfield | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106518 | Albert et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169560 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120271686 | Silverman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296580 | Barkay | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305084 | Ball | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130036796 | Fleury | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041601 | Dintakurti et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049968 | Fleury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083722 | Bhargava et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094537 | Hui et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107772 | Splitz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109319 | Splitz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145826 | Richarz et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130181848 | Picard | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130214883 | Yano | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130321231 | Flores-Cuadras | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20160001114 | Hyland | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160013565 | Ortiz | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018283 | Fleury | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170121949 | Fleury | May 2017 | A1 |
20170237158 | Gibson | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237165 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009308949 | May 2010 | AU |
2010249499 | May 2015 | AU |
2011265675 | May 2015 | AU |
2014259545 | Nov 2015 | AU |
2154433 | Jan 1997 | CA |
2476119 | Feb 2005 | CA |
2397174 | Aug 2008 | CA |
2650174 | Jul 2012 | CA |
2634739 | Jun 2015 | CA |
DE 19757581 | Jul 1998 | CH |
1185838 | Jun 1998 | CN |
4211038 | Oct 1993 | DE |
0711986 | May 1996 | EP |
1052492 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1077370 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1077371 | Feb 2001 | EP |
2439990 | May 1980 | FR |
2250820 | Jun 1992 | GB |
2269900 | Feb 1994 | GB |
2305333 | Apr 1997 | GB |
2367362 | Apr 2002 | GB |
2421311 | Jun 2006 | GB |
59170739 | Sep 1984 | JP |
60111132 | Jun 1985 | JP |
62-295674 | Dec 1987 | JP |
05-253316 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06-223279 | Aug 1994 | JP |
6300606 | Oct 1994 | JP |
07231363 | Oct 1994 | JP |
07-116285 | May 1995 | JP |
08250777 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H10-2744 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H102744 | Jan 1998 | JP |
11-046254 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11201859 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11210028 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000131179 | May 2000 | JP |
2000285356 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002206965 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002310840 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002352361 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2005315663 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005321935 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006062414 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006062716 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006285645 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007047139 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008198044 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2010068017 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2012507090 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2012527706 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013528732 | Jul 2013 | JP |
H5654124 | Nov 2014 | JP |
9810299 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9810394 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9850771 | Nov 1998 | WO |
0151904 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2008087911 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009057214 | May 2009 | WO |
2010051287 | May 2010 | WO |
2010135587 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011021039 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011058561 | May 2011 | WO |
2011159403 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012000088 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012153147 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013025526 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2014016625 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2017139029 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017139030 | Aug 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ball, Marty Scott, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,240, filed Jan. 20, 2009, dated Aug. 9, 2010, 10 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/356,240, filed Jan. 20, 2009, dated Dec. 1, 2010; 1 pg. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Metwr With Metal Threads under U.S. Appl. No. 12/356,240, filed Jan. 20, 2009; 17 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010, dated Oct. 12, 2011; 1 pg. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010, dated May 2, 2011; 11 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010, dated Aug. 10, 2011; 5 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Meter With Metal Threads under U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010; 15 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, dated May 7, 2012; 10 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, dated Sep. 19, 2012; 1 pg. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Miscellaneous Communication to Applicant for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, dated Jun. 14, 2012; 4 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, dated Feb. 17, 2012; 5 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, dated Aug. 23, 2012; 9 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Meter With Metal Threads; under U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011; 14 pgs. |
Ball; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, dated Nov. 15, 2011, 7 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/646,892, filed Oct. 8, 2012, dated Jun. 7, 2013; 10 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/646,892, filed Oct. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 17, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Non-Metallic Enclusure With Metal Threads, U.S. Appl. No. 13/646,892, filed Oct. 8, 2012, 14 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Nov. 11, 2015, 1 pg. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Oct. 13, 2015, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method having U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,725, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 28 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott, Office Action from Canadian Intellectual Property Office for U.S. Pat. No. 2,650,174, filed Jan. 19, 2009, dated Sep. 8, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott, Office Action from Canadian Intellectual Property Office for U.S. Pat. No. 2,650,174, filed Jan. 19, 2009, dated Dec. 7, 2010; 2 pages. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Canadian Office Action for U.S. Pat. No. 2,777,585, filed Jan. 19, 2009, dated Oct. 21, 2013, 2 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination report for serial No. 2015202223, filed May 20, 2010, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2014-234642, filed May 5, 2011, dated Nov. 4, 2015,9 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Meter, under U.S. Appl. No. 61/022,088, filed Jan. 18, 2008, 10 pgs. |
McCraven, Jeremy; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, dated Dec. 8, 2015, 18 pgs. |
McCraven, Jeremy; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Mechanical Stop for Actuator and Orifice, U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, 40 pgs. |
Dukes, Brent; International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/US15/44140, filed Aug. 7, 2015, dated Dec. 30, 2015, 15 pgs. |
Article entitled, “GF Piping Systems' New Metal-to-Plastic Transition Fittings Provide Strong, Leak-Proof Seals”, Nov. 13, 2007, pp. 1-6; http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/536342. |
Brochure entitled, “DoubleSafe tm Transition Fillings from GF Piping Systems” Georg Fischer Piping Systems; date unknown when published: accessed on Oct. 1, 2008; pp. 1-2 http://www.us.piping.georgefischer.com/go/F017C7DA19993E1D340739AFBC4B677E?action=GF—Docu. |
Brochure entitled, “Polyrac and Polyfast”, date unknown when published; accessed on Jun. 1, 2009; pp. 1-8; http://www.cn.piping.georgfischer.com/doc/doc—download.cfm?B81010EAD60EB5F06E54F6B04231161F. |
Brochure entitled, “Section 1, Schedule 80 PVC Piping System,” Mar. 27, 2006, pp. 1.1-1.32; http://web.archive.org/web/20060816045129/http://www.gfpiping.com/downloads/vinyls/01-Sch80PVC.pdf. |
Brochure entitled, “Section 2, Schedule 80 CPVC Piping System,” Mar. 27, 2006, pp. 2.1-2.28; http://web.archive.org/web/20060816045129/http://www.gfpiping.com/downloads/vinyls/02-Sch80CPVC.pdf. |
Brochure entitled, “The World Needs Solutions, We Have Them!,” date unknown when published' accessed on Oct. 1, 2008; pp. 1-12; http://www.plasticsystems.co.nz/booklets/Civil%20Infrastructure/+GF+%20Utilities%20Brochure.pdf. |
Brochure entitled, “Transition Fittings, Strong and Reliable Metal-to-Plastic Transitions”, BR-2-0305; date unknown when published; accessed on Oct. 1, 2008; pp. 1-2 http://plascowelding.com/pdf2007/PVC&CPVCPipeandFittings/Thermoplastic-Fittings/PVC&CPVC-Metal. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Canadian Office Action for serial No. 2,741,843, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Dec. 8, 2015, 5 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, dated Dec. 23, 2014, 1 pg. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Apr. 16, 2015, 47 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/00609, filed May 25, 2012, dated Mar. 19, 2015, 3 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Extended European Search Report for serial No. 12844451.0, filed Jan. 20, 2012, dated Apr. 21, 2015, 8 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/00609, filed May 25, 2012, dated May 26, 2015, 5 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Examination Report for serial No. 2014259545, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Jun. 10, 2015; 2 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2014-234642, filed May 5, 2011, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 9 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Jul. 27, 2015, 19 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, 29 pgs. |
Dukes, Brent; PCT Application entitled: Dunamic Ruoting in a Mesh Network having serial No. PCT/US15/44140, filed Aug. 7, 2015, 41 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2012-512048, filed May 20, 2010, dated Oct. 22, 2013, 51 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Decision of Rejection for Japanese serial No. 2012-512048, filed May 20, 2010, dated Apr. 22, 2014, 10 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/015236, filed Dec. 19, 2012, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/015236, filed Dec. 19, 2012, dated Oct. 3, 2013, 8 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/015236, filed Dec. 19, 2012, dated Dec. 3, 2013, received by foreign associate on Jan. 9, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Hyland; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US2011/035374, filed May 5, 2011, dated Sep. 13, 2011; 7 pgs. |
Hyland; PCT Application Entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having serial No. PCT/US11/35374, filed May 5, 2011, 28 pgs. |
Hyland; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US2011/035374, filed May 5, 2011, dated Dec. 19, 2012; 5 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination Report for serial No. 2011265675, filed Jan. 21, 2012, dated Oct. 1, 2014, 3 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2013515338, filed Jan. 30, 2012, dated Jun. 10, 2014, 8 pgs. |
Hyland; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Water Supply Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method, having U.S. Appl. No. 61/108,770, filed Oct. 27, 2008, 11 pgs. |
Hyland; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Water Supply Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method, having U.S. Appl. No. 61/180,600, filed May 22, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Hyland; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods, having U.S. Appl. No. 61/355,468, filed Jun. 16, 2010; 31 pgs. |
Splitz, David. E.; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Systems and Methods for Time-Based Hailing of Radio Frequency Devices assigned U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, 51 pages. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, dated Jun. 18, 2013, 67 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, dated Oct. 9, 2013, 16 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, dated Feb. 5, 2014, 1 pg. |
Splitz, David E.; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Systems and Methods for Dynamic Squelching in Radio Frequency Devices assigned U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011; 50 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, dated Sep. 16, 2013, 57 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, dated Mar. 5, 2014, 18 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, dated May 23, 2014, 41 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, dated Sep. 17, 2014, 1 pg. |
Splitz, David Edwin; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Systems and Methods for Recovering an Out-of-Service Node in a Hierarchical Network, U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,081, filed Sep. 18, 2014, 51 pgs. |
Dukes, Brent; U.S. Application entitled: Dynamic Routing in a Mesh Network, having U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,050, filed Sep. 2, 2014, 42 pgs. |
Splitz, David; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US11/58260, filed Oct. 28, 2011, dated Feb. 7, 2012, 8 pgs. |
Splitz, David; PCT Application entitled: Systems and Methods for Time-Based Hailing of Radio Frequency having serial No. PCT/US11/058260, filed Oct. 28, 2011, 51 pgs. |
Splitz, David; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US11/58260, filed Oct. 28, 2011, dated May 8, 2014, 7 pgs. |
Splitz, David; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US12/22060, filed Jan. 20, 2012, dated Mar. 29, 2012, 8 pgs. |
Splitz, David; PCT Application entitled: Systems and Methods for Dynamic Squelching in Radio Frequency Devices having serial No. PCT/US12/022060, filed Jan. 20, 2012, 50 pgs. |
Splitz, David; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US12/22060, filed Jan. 20, 2012, dated May 8, 2014, 6 pgs. |
Splitz, David Edwin; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Automatic Discovery of Nodes in a Mesh Network, U.S. Appl. No. 61/779,892, filed Mar. 13, 2013; 110 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, dated Aug. 27, 2014, 1 pg. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, dated Mar. 11, 2014, 75 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 29 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, dated Aug. 12, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Valve Meter Assembly and Method under U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011; 56 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Valve Meter Assembly and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 14/451,896, filed Aug. 5, 2014; 56 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Applicant Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Feb. 18, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Dec. 17, 2013, 54 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Apr. 10, 2013, 80 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Sep. 22, 2014, 49 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Oct. 18, 2012; 44 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 43 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Sep. 6, 2013; 53 pgs. |
Hyland; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method, having U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, 30 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated Feb. 11, 2014; 44 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated May 29, 2013, 71 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated Aug. 13, 2014. 1 pg. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated Sep. 10, 2012, 35 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated Sep. 24, 2013; 37 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated Apr. 23, 2014, 20 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, dated Aug. 1, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Hyland; U.S. Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods, having U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, 32 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods, having U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,452, filed Aug. 4, 2014, 32 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Requirement for Restriction/ Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Feb. 9, 2006; 11 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452, filed Oct. 1, 2008 dated Jun. 16, 2010; 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, dated Feb. 29, 2012; 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, dated Mar. 21, 2011; 9 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, dated Oct. 4, 2010; 13 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2006, dated Sep. 7, 2011; 6 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, dated Nov. 2, 2011; 17 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009; 33 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Aug. 18, 2010; 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-final office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Dec. 23, 2009; 17 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009, dated Aug. 2, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957, filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Aug. 4, 2010; 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957, filed Jun. 24, 2009; 33 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012, dated Mar. 6, 2013, 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 23, 2012; dated May 25, 2012; 17 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012, dated Jul. 27, 2012; 11 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012; dated Nov. 1, 2012; 18 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012; dated Aug. 2, 2012; 7 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002, dated Oct. 8, 2008; 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak, Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, dated Sep. 11, 2013, 1 pg. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, dated Dec. 13, 2012; 39 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, dated Mar. 21, 2013, 22 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, dated Jul. 9, 2013, 21 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, 35 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012; 34 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E., Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, dated Jul. 31, 2013; 57 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, dated Feb. 20, 2014; 29 pgs. |
Vonroll Hydro—Hydrojournal, pp. 1-16, May 2008. |
English Translation: Vonroll Hydro—Hyrdojournal, Technology with a Future for Shut-off Systems—p. 4, VonRoll Hydro (shop) GmbH—New Concepts for Apprentice Training—p. 12, May 2008. |
Von Roll Hydro—Hydrojournal, pp. 1-16, Nov. 2008. |
English Translation: Von Roll Hydro—Hyrdojournal,VonRoll Hydroalert—Provides a Warning in the Event of Any Tampering with the Water Supply, p. 3, Nov. 2008. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Examiner Interview Summary Record for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Feb. 5, 2008; 2 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Oct. 26, 2007; 35 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Requirement for Restriction/ Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Feb. 27, 2006; 17 pages. |
Keyghobad,Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; 40 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated May 18, 2006; 13 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection or U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Jun. 6, 2007; 32 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Certificate of Correction for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Mar. 31, 2009; 1 page. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; dated Jul. 14, 2008; 4 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452; filed Oct. 1, 2008; dated Mar. 22, 2010; 8 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Examiner Interview Summary Record for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452; filed Oct. 1, 2008; dated Dec. 7, 2009; 3 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452; filed Oct. 1, 2008; dated Sep. 14, 2009; 12 pages. |
Keyghobad,Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452; filed Oct. 1, 2008; dated May 1, 2009; 5 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliancesl under U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452; filed Oct. 1, 2008; 33 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925; filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Jul. 19, 2010; 8 pages. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925; filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Jun. 28, 2010; 10 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925; filed Jun. 24, 2009; 33 pgs. |
Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957; filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Jun. 24, 2010; 10 pgs. |
Keyghobad,Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957; filed Jun. 24, 2009; dated Dec. 23, 2009; 17 pgs. |
Young et al. “Real-Time Intranet-Controlled Virtual Instrument Multiple-Circuit Power Monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Jun. 2000. vol. 49, No. 3, p. 570. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?. |
De Almeida et al. “Advanced Monitoring Technologies for the Evaluation of Demand-Side Management Programs,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Aug. 1994. vol. 9, No. 3. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?arnumber=336086. |
Dolezilek. “Microprocessor Based Relay Information Improves the Power System,” Rural Electric Power Conference, May 1999. p. B5/1-B5/9. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?arnumber=768685. |
Gehami et al. “Electronic Control System I Salient Feature in Substation,” Transmission & Distrubition, Mar. 1991. vol. 43, No. 3, p. 48. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011 —ProQuest]. |
Horlent. “New Metering and Reading Techniques Based on a Modular Design Concept,” 10th International Conference on Electricity Distribution, May 1989. vol. 5, p. 455-459. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011—IEEExplore]. |
“In Brief,” Land Mobile Radio News, Jan. 16, 1998. vol. 52, No. 3, p. 1. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011—ProQuest] http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=25435781&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=31810&RQT=309&VName%20=PQD. |
“Landis & Gyr Utilities: Service Partnership Helps Utilities Use Available Resources More Effectively,” www.landisgyr.com/utilities/e/fr—press1—e.htm (archived Feb. 6, 1998) http://web.archive.org/web/19980206060801/http://www.landisgyr.com/utilities. |
Tamarkin. “Automated Meter Reading”, Sep.-Oct. 1992, vol. 50, No. 5/ [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://www.usclcorp.com/news/Automatic—Power—reading.pdf. |
ANSI; “Protocol Specification for ANSI Type 2 Optical Port”, American National Standard, ANSI C.12.18/2006, 11 pgs. |
Federal Communications Commission; “Understanding the FCC Regulations for Low-Power, Non-Licensed Transmitters”, Office of Engineering and Technology; Oct. 1993; 34 pgs. |
Semtech; “TN1200.4, Calculating Radiated Power and Field Strength for Conducted Power Measurements”, Semtech Corporation, Camarillo, CA, 2007, 9 pgs. |
RFM; “HX 2000 Datasheet: 916.5 MHz: Hybrid Transmitter”, RF Monolithics, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, 1998; 2 pgs. |
General Electric; “GEH-5081 kV Meter Product Manual”, Nov. 1997, 137 pgs. |
General Electric; “kV RSX—RS232/RS485 Communications Options: Instructions Manual”; Mar. 1999, 33 pgs. |
Orfield; “Badger® ORION® System Helps Lemmon, South Dakota Reduce Read Time, Billing Cycles”, Badger Connect Publication, 2004, 2 pgs. |
AMCO; “Pit Water-Meter Transponder (PWT)”; AMCO Automated Systems, LLC; PDB-14611; Sep. 2002; 2 pgs. |
AMCO; “Short-Range Programmer (SRP) VRT”; AMCO Automated Systems, LLC; PDB-14555.1; Sep. 2002; 2 pgs. |
AMCO; Remote Water-Meter Transponder (RWT); AMCO Automated Systems, LLC; PDB-14610; Sep. 2002; 2 pgs. |
Article entitled: “Remote Meter Reading”, http://www.meter.co.uk/RMR.html; accessed on Jul. 30, 2012, 2 pgs. |
Article entitled: “Datamatic, Badger Connect for AMR Solutions”, http://www.datamatic.com/badger—partnership.html; accessed on Jul. 27, 2012, 1 pg. |
Patterson, Tim; Request for Ex Parte Reexamination under U.S. Appl. No. 90/012,468, filed Sep. 6, 2012; 52 pgs. |
Patterson, Tim; Request for Ex Parte Reexamination under U.S. Appl. No. 90/012,449, filed Aug. 23, 2012; 51 pgs. |
Trace; “Pit Water-Meter Transponder”; User Guide; Jan. 2003 16 pgs. |
Hyland; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems and Methods under U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011; 28 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 29 pgs. |
Antenna. Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2014 [retrieved on Jun. 1, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/antenna>. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, dated Sep. 11, 2014, 11 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, dated Nov. 25, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Hyland; PCT Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method having serial No. PCT/US09/62247, filed Oct. 27, 2009, 30 pgs. |
Hyland; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US2009/062247, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated May 3, 2011, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report for serial No. PCT/US2009/062247, filed on Oct. 27, 2009, dated Dec. 18, 2009, 2 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory;Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/004330, filed Apr. 25, 2011, dated Mar. 21, 2013, 7 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/004330, filed Apr. 25, 2011, dated Jul. 18, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/004330, filed Apr. 25, 2011, dated Oct. 3, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Hyland; European Search Report for serial No. EP09824079.9, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated May 8, 2012; 38 pages. |
Hyland, Gregory; Australian Patent Examination Report for serial No. 2009308949, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Nov. 12, 2013, 3 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.;Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2011-533427, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 15 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2011-533427, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Feb. 4, 2014, 50 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Decision of Rejection for Japanese serial No. 2011-533427, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Sep. 16, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Hyland; PCT Appplication entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having serial No. PCT/US2010/035666, filed May 20, 2010; 31 pgs. |
Hyland; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US2010/035666, filed May 20, 2010, dated Jul. 16, 2010, 7 pgs. |
Hyland; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US2010/035666, filed May 20, 2010, dated Nov. 22, 2011, 6 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, dated Oct. 8, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/A/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, dated May 9, 2013, 8 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/A/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, dated Sep. 3, 2013, 10 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Final Office Action for serial No. MX/A/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, dated Jan. 9, 2014, 9 pgs. |
European Search Report for serial No. EP2433440, filed Nov. 18, 2011, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination report for serial No. 2010249499, filed Nov. 17, 2011, dated Jun. 16, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination report for serial No. 2010249499, filed Nov. 17, 2011, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/451,896, filed Aug. 5, 2014, dated Mar. 18, 2016, 98 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,452, filed Aug. 4, 2014, dated Feb. 17, 2016, 98 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, dated Mar. 4, 2016, 94 pgs. |
Hyland; European Examination Report for serial No. EP09824079.9, filed Oct. 27, 2009, dated Nov. 13, 2015; 6 pgs. |
McCraven, Jeremy; Applicant Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, dated Jan. 12, 2016, 3 pgs. |
Article entitled: “OET Exhibits List”, https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application—id=194044&fcc—id=; Feb. 20, 2001, 2 pgs. |
Fleury Jr., Leo W.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Nov. 5, 2014, 30 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jul. 9, 2014, 3 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, dated Aug. 19, 2016; 20 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Mar. 12, 2014; 19 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Mar. 2, 2016, 1 pg. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 12, 2013; 37 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 9 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated May 12, 2015, 9 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,790, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 11 pgs. |
Ortiz, Jorge Isaac; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Nozzle Cap Multi-Band Antenna Assembly having U.S. Appl. No. 15/043,057, filed Feb. 12, 2016, 44 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Oct. 20, 2014, 17 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 8, 2016, 36 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Nov. 6, 2013, 39 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 10, 2015, 20 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jun. 4, 2014, 24 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 15 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 27, 2013; 5 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Mar. 8, 2016, 27 pgs. |
Chou, et al.; Article entitled: “Non-invasive Acceleration-based Methodology for Damage Detection and Assessment of Water Distribution System”, Mar. 2010, 17 pgs. |
Dintakurti, Ganapathi Deva Varma; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,794, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated May 17, 2016, 48 pgs. |
Dintakurti, Ganapathi Deva Varma; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,794, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jan. 16, 2015, 60 pgs. |
Fleury Jr, Leo W.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 23, 2013; 35 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jun. 18, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 9, 2015, 3 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Apr. 23, 2014, 19 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated May 22, 2015, 28 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Oct. 21, 2014, 37 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Mar. 1, 2016, 42 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Sep. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 21, 2016, 18 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Examination Report for serial No. 2015202550, filed May 5, 2011, dated Aug. 12, 2016, 4 pgs. |
Fleury, Leo W.; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US12/50390 filed Aug. 10, 2012, dated Feb. 18, 2014, 14 pgs. |
Fleury, Leo W.; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US12/50390 filed Aug. 10, 2012, dated Dec. 17, 2012, 18 pgs. |
Gibson, Daryl Lee; U.S Patent Application entitled: Nozzle Cap Multi-band Antenna Assembly, having U.S. Appl. No. 15/255,795, filed Sep. 2, 2016, 65 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/000347, filed May 5, 2011, dated Aug. 31, 2016, 4 pgs. |
Fleury Jr., Leo W.; European Search Report for serial No. 12823594, filed Aug. 10, 2012, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 11 pgs. |
Fleury, Leo W., U.S. Provisional Patent Application Entitled: Hydrant Leak Detector Communication Device, System, and Method under U.S. Appl. No. 61/523,274, filed Aug. 12, 2011; 35 pgs. |
Hunaidi, Osama; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 11/766,288, filed Jun. 21, 2007, dated Sep. 22, 2010, 1 pg. |
Hunaidi, Osama; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/766,288, filed Jun. 21, 2007, dated Jan. 20, 2010, 50 pgs. |
Hunaidi, Osama; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/766,288, filed Jun. 21, 2007, dated Jun. 24, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Non-Patent Literature Murata (entitled “Piezoelectric Sounds Components”), accessed at http://web.archive.org/web/20030806141815/http://www.murata.com/catalog/p37e17.pdf, archived on Aug. 6, 2003. |
Non-Patent Literature NerdKits, accessed at http://web.archive.org/web/20090510051850/http://www.nerdkits.com/videos/sound—meter/, archived on May 10, 2009. |
Non-Patent Literature Bimorph (entitled “Bimorph actuators”), accessed at http://web.archive.org/web/20080122050424/http://www.elpapiezo.ru/eng/curve—e.shtml, archived on Jan. 22, 2008. |
Gibson, Daryl Lee; U.S. Provisional Application entitled: Nozzle Cap Multi-Band Antenna Assembly having U.S. Appl. No. 62/294,973, filed Feb. 12, 2016, 54 pgs. |
Fleury, et al.; Supplemental European Search Report for application No. 12823594.2, filed Aug. 20, 2012, dated Feb. 18, 2015, 6 pgs. |
J. A. Gallego-Juarez, G. Rodriguez-Corral and L. Gaete-Garreton, An ultrasonic transducer for high power applications in gases, Nov. 1978, Ultrasonics, published by IPC Business Press, p. 267-271. |
Non-Patent Literature “Radiodetection Water Leak Detection Products”, 2008, Radiodetection Ltd.—SPX Corporation. |
Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/451,896; filed Aug. 5, 2014, dated May 12, 2016; 15 pages. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/000347, filed May 5, 2011, dated May 30, 2016, 4 pgs. |
Dukes, Brent; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,050, filed Sep. 2, 2014, dated May 19, 2016, 119 pgs. |
McCraven, Jeremy; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 86 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Feb. 14, 2017; 8 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Feb. 22, 2017; 1 page. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/000347, filed May 5, 2011, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 5 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Examination Report for serial No. 2015202550, filed May 5, 2011, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 52 pgs. |
Dintakurti, Ganapathi Deva Varma; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,794, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Nov. 8, 2016, 31 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W..; Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Oct. 24, 2016, 13 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Extended European Search Report for serial No. 11796120.1, filed May 5, 2011, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 8 pgs. |
Fleury, Jr., Leo W.; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,795, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Nov. 22, 2016; 8 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, dated Jun. 7, 2017, 25 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jun. 13, 2017, 31 pgs. |
Dintakurti, Ganapathi Deva Varma; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,794, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Mar. 16, 2017, 30 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E..; Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,766,850, filed May 5, 2011, dated Mar. 13, 2017, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Examination Report for Serial No. 2015202550, filed May 5, 2011, dated May 16, 2017, 5 pgs. |
Fleury Jr., Leo W.; European Search Report for Serial No. 12823594, filed Aug. 10, 2012, dated May 10, 2017, 4 pgs. |
Hunaidi, Osama; Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/482,317, filed Jan. 14, 2000, dated Dec. 17, 2001, 6 pgs. |
Hunaidi, Osama; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/482,317, filed Jan. 14, 2000, dated May 13, 2002, 4 pgs. |
Peter, Russo Anthony; European Search Report for Patent Application No. EP95307807, filed Nov. 1, 1995, dated Jul. 22, 1998, 5 pgs. |
Ortiz, Jorge; International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US16/67689, filed Dec. 20, 2016, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 9 pgs. |
Gibson, Daryl Lee; International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/067692, filed Dec. 20, 2016, dated Mar. 2, 2017,10 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, dated Sep. 6, 2017, 12 pgs. |
Fleury, Leo; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,070, filed Sep. 30, 2015, dated Jun. 21, 2017, 88 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Aug. 29, 2017, 6 pgs. |
Richarz, Werner Guenther; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,792, filed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Sep. 6, 2017, 1 pg. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Examination Report for U.S. Appl. No. 2015202550, filed May 5, 2011, dated Jul. 5, 2017, 4 pgs. |
Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150082868 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61355468 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13101235 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14557754 | US |