Injectable monophase hydrogels

Abstract
An injectable monophase hydrogel is provided that is made of a reaction mixture of hyaluronic acids having different molecular weights.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to:

    • a novel process for the crosslinking of at least one polymer selected from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof;
    • a process for the preparation of an injectable monophase hydrogel of at least one such polymer; and
    • the crosslinked polymers and injectable monophase hydrogels respectively obtainable by each of said processes.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

The hydrogels in question, based on said crosslinked polymers, have numerous outlets, especially as filling materials in plastic, cosmetic and dental surgery, in ophthalmology, in orthopedics, etc., as products for preventing tissue adhesions, in general surgery, in urology, etc. Said hydrogels are particularly suitable for repairing vocal cords. The outlets indicated above for products of this type, without implying any limitation, are familiar to those skilled in the art.


The invention is the result of a genuine effort to optimize the operation of crosslinking the polymers in question with a view to obtaining injectable monophase hydrogels that are of particular value in respect of the following compromise: on the one hand mechanical properties and remanence, and on the other hand injectability (with acceptable injection forces and injection needle diameters).


It is pointed out here that the term “injectable” employed in the present text, with reference to both the hydrogels of the prior art and the hydrogels of the invention, denotes manual injectability by means of syringes equipped with conventional needles (having a diameter of between 0.1 and 0.5 mm). Within the framework of the present invention, it is possible in particular to formulate hydrogels that can be injected through hypodermic needles of 30 G½, 27 G½, 26 G½ and 25 G.


According to the prior art, hydrogels, especially injectable hydrogels, have already been prepared from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof—especially hyaluronic acid salts—having a zero, low or high degree of crosslinking.


With reference to the specific problem of injectability, biphase compositions have been proposed whose continuous phase, in particular, is based on such hydrogels. The continuous phase serves as a plasticizer, injection vehicle for a disperse phase. This disperse phase is more or less solid and more or less differentiated from the continuous phase. Thus:

    • the biphase compositions described in patent application EP-A-0 466 300 consist of two bioabsorbable phases—continuous and disperse—and take the form of slurries. Said two phases are advantageously prepared from fibers of Hylan (natural hyaluronic acid chemically modified in situ in order to facilitate its extraction from the tissues);
    • the biphase compositions described in patent application WO-A-96 337 51 also have two bioabsorbable phases with a better separation, the disperse phase consisting of insoluble fragments of a highly crosslinked polymer hydrogel (selected from hyaluronic acid and its salts);
    • the biphase compositions described in patent application WO-A-00 014 28 contain a non-bioabsorbable disperse phase (particles of at least one hydrogel of a (co)polymer obtained by the polymerization and crosslinking of acrylic acid and/or methacrylic acid and/or at least one derivative of said acids) suspended in an aqueous solution of a crosslinked or non-crosslinked polymer selected from proteins, polysaccharides and derivatives thereof.


These biphase systems are not fully satisfactory insofar as they are associated with justifiable fears of uneven flow during injection and particularly after injection, a more rapid disappearance of the continuous phase (having a zero or low degree of crosslinking) and hence an at least partial loss of the desired effect, especially filling effect.


Monophase hydrogels, developed from the same types of polymers, were therefore also proposed in parallel.


In patent applications WO-A-98 356 39 and WO-A-98 356 40, the product in question is not an injectable hydrogel but a product of solid consistency. Said patent applications in fact describe ocular implants used to temporarily fill a surgically created void. The hydrogel developed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,716,154 is proposed as a substitute for the vitreous body. The polymer in question (sodium hyaluronate) has a very low degree of crosslinking in order to obtain an injectable hydrogel. The monophase hydrogel described in patent application WO-A-02 057 53 is laden with an antiseptic that is effective in protecting it from free radicals after implantation. Patent application WO-A-02 063 50 describes a process capable of generating this type of hydrogel that is very homogeneous throughout.


All these monophase hydrogels were obtained from high-molecular weight polymers crosslinked using an effective and non-excessive amount of at least one crosslinking agent, in an aqueous solvent.


In the light of this prior art, the inventors wished to improve the efficacy of crosslinking of the polymer in question, especially in order to improve the degradation resistance (remanence) of the implanted hydrogel while at the same time preserving the possibility of injecting said hydrogel under acceptable conditions.


To improve the crosslinking efficacy, the inventors initially considered using more crosslinking agent. This approach was quickly discarded on the grounds that it inescapably causes denaturation of the polymer in question and chemical contamination of the crosslinked product obtained.


Said inventors then considered increasing the concentration of polymer in the reaction mixture. In the same way, this second approach had to be discarded, a priori, because of the polymers conventionally used hitherto, namely high-molecular weight polymers. Thus sodium hyaluronate is always used with high molecular weights (Mw≥106 Da, ≈2·106 Da, 3·106 Da) at concentrations close to the maximum concentration, which is about 105-110 mg/g. Using it at a higher concentration is difficult (the viscosity of the reaction mixture becomes too high) and inescapably causes problems of solubility, poor homogeneity, etc.


Concentrating the reaction medium, on the other hand, is found to be possible with low-molecular weight polymers (sodium hyaluronate of molecular weight 300,000 Da, having an intrinsic viscosity of 600 ml/g (those skilled in the art are perfectly familiar with the relationship between these two parameters: molecular weight (M) and intrinsic viscosity (η), which is given by the Mark-Houwink formula: M=k ηα, the values of k and α depending on the nature of the polymer in question), can be concentrated from 110 to 200 mg/g). Unfortunately the crosslinked polymer obtained generates an inhomogeneous, injectable biphase hydrogel under these conditions.


In such a context, the inventors surprisingly established that associating low-molecular weight polymer(s) with high-molecular weight polymer(s) affords an excellent compromise, namely the possibility of generating, for a non-excessive degree of crosslinking (equivalent to that of the prior art), an injectable monophase hydrogel which has improved mechanical and remanence properties. This low-molecular weight/high-molecular weight association makes it possible to obtain a hydrogel that more than satisfies the following specifications:

    • monophase;
    • better mechanical properties and remanence than the equivalent products of the prior art;
    • unaffected or even improved injectability that is still possible with conventional injection forces using conventional injection devices.


The key factor of the crosslinking process of the invention therefore lies in the concentration of the reactants (which is greater than that of the reaction mixtures of the prior art due to the use of low-molecular weight polymer(s)), although the crosslinking of said concentrated reactants is “governed” by the use of high-molecular weight polymer(s), which guarantee the homogeneity of the crosslinked product obtained and then of the hydrogel obtained.


According to its first subject, the present invention therefore relates to a process for the crosslinking of at least one polymer selected from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof, which is carried out in an aqueous solvent by the action of an effective and non-excessive amount of at least one crosslinking agent, said process being improved in that it is carried out on a mixture containing at least one low-molecular weight polymer and at least one high-molecular weight polymer.


Said mixture of course contains said low-molecular weight polymer(s) in a sufficient amount to guarantee a relatively high concentration of polymer(s) in the reaction medium, and said high-molecular weight polymer(s) in a sufficient amount to guarantee that said crosslinked polymer obtained has a homogeneous consistency.


The crosslinking process of the invention is a process for the crosslinking of polymers selected from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof. The polymer(s) in question can therefore be natural or synthetic. Examples of natural polymers are hyaluronic acid and its salts, other glycosaminoglycans such as chondroitin sulfates, keratan sulfate, heparin and heparan sulfate, alginic acid and its biologically acceptable salts, starch, amylose, dextran, xanthan, pullulan, etc. Examples of synthetic derivatives of natural polysaccharides are carboxy cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, alkyl celluloses such as hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), oxidized starch, etc.


The process of the invention is suitable for the crosslinking of any one of these polymers insofar as said polymer is used with low and high molecular weights.


The process of the invention is suitable for the crosslinking of mixtures of such polymers, said mixtures containing at least one low-molecular weight polymer and at least one high-molecular weight polymer.


The terms “low” and “high” applied to the molecular weights in question obviously cannot be defined more precisely at this stage of the description of the invention since they depend on the mixture in question and the nature of the polymer(s) present. Likewise, it is not generally possible to indicate the relative proportions in which the polymer(s) present is(are) used. However, those skilled in the art have a perfect understanding of the spirit of the invention, which is to concentrate the reaction medium containing the low-molecular weight polymer(s), but to introduce at least one high-molecular weight polymer to moderate and control the crosslinking in question. The aim is to obtain a coherent crosslinked product that is the precursor of a monophase hydrogel. It is desirable to avoid the formation of lumps that may be coherent when crosslinking has ended, but capable of losing their coherence when the injectable hydrogel is prepared.


The above explanations are given a posteriori. The result obtained was in no way predictable.


Within the framework of one advantageous variant, the reaction medium contains a single polymer which is used with at least two differentiated molecular weights, at least one being low and at least one being high. Within the framework of this advantageous variant, the same polymer is preferably used with a single low molecular weight and a single high molecular weight.


The polymer in question is advantageously a hyaluronic acid salt. It is very advantageously selected from the sodium salt, the potassium salt and mixtures thereof. It preferably consists of the sodium salt (NaHA).


In the context of the crosslinking of this type of polymer, those skilled in the art understand that said crosslinking is carried out in a basic aqueous solvent. In general, said crosslinking is obviously carried out under pH conditions that favor the dissolution of the polymer in question.


In the context of the crosslinking of this type of polymer (hyaluronic acid salt(s)), in one preferred variant of carrying out the crosslinking, the reaction mixture contains:

    • at least one hyaluronic acid salt of low molecular weight m, where m≤9.9·105 Da, advantageously 104 Da≤m≤9.9·105 Da; and
    • at least one hyaluronic acid salt of high molecular weight M, where M≥106 Da, advantageously 106 Da≤M≤108 Da and very advantageously 1.1·106 Da≤M≤5·106 Da,


said low-molecular weight and high-molecular weight salts advantageously being of the same nature and very advantageously consisting of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA).


In such a context, said reaction mixture advantageously has an intrinsic viscosity of less than 1900 ml/g, i.e. Σωii]0<1900 ml/g, where ωi is the mass fraction of polymer fraction i, having an intrinsic viscosity [ηi]0, in the reaction mixture. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the intrinsic viscosity parameter and are aware of the laws of additivity of said parameter.


The condition stated above makes it possible to obtain a monophase hydrogel that is optimized in respect of its remanence and injectability properties. It fixes the relative proportions of the salts of low molecular weight (m) and high molecular weight (M).


In the context referred to here (NaHA of molecular weights m and M), the reaction mixture advantageously contains more than 50% by weight, very advantageously more than 70% by weight, of at least one hyaluronic acid salt of low molecular weight m, and hence, logically, advantageously less than 50% by weight, very advantageously less than 30% by weight, of at least one hyaluronic acid salt of high molecular weight M.


In general, to obtain the expected effect, there is at least 5% by weight of at least one hyaluronic acid salt of high molecular weight M in the reaction mixture.


The crosslinking process of the invention is advantageously carried out with the sodium salt of hyaluronic acid used with one low molecular weight m and one high molecular weight M, said parameters then very advantageously being as follows: m≈3·105 Da and M≈3·106 Da.


Any agent known for crosslinking polysaccharides and derivatives thereof via its hydroxyl groups can be used as the crosslinking agent with all types of polymer, said crosslinking agent being at least bifunctional in order to ensure crosslinking, an epoxy compound or derivatives thereof being used in particular.


It is recommended to use bifunctional crosslinking agents, by themselves or in a mixture. It is particularly recommended to use epichlorohydrin, divinyl sulfone, 1,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)butane (or 1,4-bisglycidoxybutane or 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE)), 1,2-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)ethylene, 1-(2,3-epoxypropyl)-2,3-epoxycyclohexane, and aldehydes such as formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and crotonaldehyde, taken by themselves or in a mixture. It is very particularly recommended to use 1,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)butane (BDDE).


Those skilled in the art will know how to determine the effective and non-excessive amount of crosslinking agent(s) to use. It is recommended to use an effective and non-excessive amount such that the degree of crosslinking (τ), defined by the following ratio:







τ
=



Total





number





of





reactive





groups





in





said





crosslinking





agent


Total





number





of





disaccharide





units





in





the





polymer





molecules


×
100


,





is theoretically between 0.5 and 70%, advantageously between 4 and 50%.


The crosslinking process of the invention is novel by virtue of the forms in which the polymers in question are used. In other respects it is carried out in conventional manner with at least one crosslinking agent. It is noted that said crosslinking agent is generally reacted with the dissolved polymer(s), but reacting it with said polymer(s) during hydration, by the process described in WO-A-02 06 350, is in no way ruled out.


The crosslinked product obtained after carrying out the crosslinking process of the invention is generally formulated for generating the desired injectable monophase hydrogel. If necessary, it is neutralized beforehand. It has been seen that the hyaluronic acid salts are actually crosslinked in a basic medium. The formulation is carried out in a solution buffered to a pH compatible with the human body (since the hydrogel in question is generally intended for injection into the human body), said pH being between 6.5 and 7.5, advantageously between 7 and 7.4 and very advantageously between 7.1 and 7.3. The crosslinked polymer is in equilibrium in said solution. It also acquires an osmolarity compatible with that of the human body. Surprisingly, after this formulation step, the diluted crosslinked polymers of the invention are monophase hydrogels.


In one preferred variant of carrying out the invention, an injectable hydrogel of the invention is prepared by crosslinking a mixture of at least one polymer consisting of hyaluronic acid salt(s) (see above), neutralizing the crosslinked product obtained, and then formulating it into a solution buffered to a pH of between 7.1 and 7.3, at a concentration of between 10 and 40 mg/g, advantageously of between 20 and 30 mg/g.


The process for the preparation of the injectable monophase hydrogel from the crosslinked polymer (obtained by the crosslinking process constituting the first subject of the present invention) constitutes the second subject of the present invention.


We now come to the third and fourth subjects, which respectively consist of the crosslinked polymer obtainable after carrying out the crosslinking process (first subject), and the injectable monophase hydrogel obtainable by the formulation (second subject) of said crosslinked polymer, as stated above.


Said polymer and hydrogel advantageously contain low-molecular weight sodium hyaluronate and high-molecular weight sodium hyaluronate, the proportion of said low-molecular weight sodium hyaluronate very advantageously being more than 50% by weight.


The structure of the injectable monophase hydrogel—fourth subject of the present invention—is novel. Its consistency is resistant to degradation. This resistance of the hydrogel is far greater than that of the equivalent products of the prior art.


Those skilled in the art are aware that one of the methods of estimating the consistency of a hydrogel, especially of this type, is to measure the following parameter:







tan
·
delta

=



G



G



=


f


(

stressing





frequency

)


.






The hydrogels of the invention have the outlets indicated in the introduction of the present text. They are found to be particularly efficient for these purposes.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawing:


The FIGURE shows the curve tan·delta=f (stressing frequency) for each of the four hydrogels prepared according to Examples 1 to 4.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

It is now proposed to illustrate the invention in its various features by means of the Examples below. More precisely:

    • Example 1 illustrates the prior art (crosslinking of a polymer of high molecular weight);
    • Example 2 illustrates the remarks made in the introduction of the present text (crosslinking of the same polymer of low molecular weight); and
    • Examples 3 and 4 illustrate the invention (crosslinking of the same polymer of low and high molecular weight, used in different relative amounts).


These are preceded by a description of a few methods of measurement used to characterize the products in question.


Measurement of the Intrinsic Viscosity

The intrinsic viscosity of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) (in ml/g) is determined according to the European Pharmacopeia for NaHA (2.2.9) using a capillary viscometer of the Ubbelohde type.


Measurement of the Ejection Force
No Specific Standard for this Test

The injectability of the gel based on NaHA is determined by measuring the force (in Newtons, N) required to eject the gel contained in a standard syringe, through a needle of 27 G½, at a rate of 12.5 mm/min. The tests were performed on a Verstatet® tensile device marketed by Mecmesin.


Measurement of the Remanence

The consistency of the gel is characterized at 25° C. by rheological measurement of the moduli of elasticity (G′) and viscosity (G″) as a function of the frequency (from 0.05 to 10 Hz), in the constant deformation domains, using a controlled stress rheometer (Carrimed CSL 500 from TA Instruments) and a cone-and-plate geometry of 4 cm 2°. This rheometer is checked and calibrated regularly. Degradation of the crosslinked gel results in a change in its consistency, which is measured by the increase in the parameter tangent delta (tan·delta=G″/G′) as a function of time, at a frequency of 1 Hz. The gels are degraded by being heated to a temperature of 93° C. The time after which tan·delta reaches a value of 0.65 (corresponding to a degraded gel state) is measured at this temperature. A remanence index of 1 (corresponding to said time) was arbitrarily set for the gel of Example 1. The remanence index values indicated for the other gels are relative values.


Appearance of the Hydrogel Monophase

Microscopic appearance: no apparent liquid phase—fine fragmentation of the gel into facets


Macroscopic appearance: soft and free-flowing


Biphase

Microscopic appearance: gel fragments bathed in a low-viscosity liquid medium


Macroscopic appearance: “purée” that fragments very easily—no cohesion of the gel and no free-flowing appearance


Example 1: High-Molecular Weight Fibers

3.5 g of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) fibers of intrinsic viscosity 2800 ml/g and moisture content 8.7% are weighed out and 25.6 g of 0.25 N NaOH are added. Hydration of the fibers takes 2 h with regular manual homogenization using a spatula. 0.96 g of a solution of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) diluted to ⅕ in 0.25 N sodium hydroxide solution is added to the reaction medium, this being followed by mechanical homogenization for 15 min before immersion in a thermostatically controlled bath at 50° C.±1° C.


R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=6%; [NaHA]i=105 mg/g


The reaction takes 2 h. The crosslinked product is neutralized to pH 7.2 in a phosphate buffer solution and then dialyzed. The concentration of the resulting hydrogel is then adjusted ([NaHA]f=26 mg/g) and the hydrogel is mechanically homogenized before being packed into syringes and sterilized in an autoclave by means of moist heat.


Injection force after sterilization: 25 N


Remanence index of the hydrogel: 1.0


Monophase hydrogel


Example 2: Low-Molecular Weight Fibers

1.56 g of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) fibers of intrinsic viscosity 600 ml/g and moisture content 5.5% are weighed out and 7.15 g of 0.25 N NaOH are added. Hydration of the fibers takes 2 h with regular manual homogenization using a spatula. 0.31 g of a solution of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) diluted to ⅕ in 0.25 N sodium hydroxide solution is added to the reaction medium, this being followed by mechanical homogenization for 15 min before immersion in a thermostatically controlled bath at 50° C.±1° C.


R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=6.8%; [NaHA]i=174 mg/g


The reaction takes 2 h. The crosslinked product is neutralized to pH 7.2 in a phosphate solution and then dialyzed. The concentration of the resulting hydrogel is then adjusted ([NaHA]f=26 mg/g) and the hydrogel is mechanically homogenized before being packed into syringes and sterilized in an autoclave.


Injection force after sterilization: 24 N


Remanence index of the hydrogel: 6.0


Biphase hydrogel


Example 3: Mixture of Fibers

0.763 g of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) fibers of intrinsic viscosity 600 ml/g and moisture content 5.5% and 0.237 g of sodium hyaluronate fibers of intrinsic viscosity 2800 ml/g and moisture content 9.3% are weighed out. Proportions by weight in the mixture: 600/2800:77/23 (w/w).


The procedure remains identical to that of Example 2.


R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=7%; [NaHA]i=140 mg/g; [NaHA]f=26 mg/g


Injection force after sterilization: 15 N


Remanence index of the hydrogel: 3.6


Monophase hydrogel


Example 4: Mixture of Fibers

The experiment of Example 3 is repeated, modifying the proportions by weight. Proportions by weight in the mixture: 600/2800:90/10 (w/w).


The procedure is identical to that of Example 2.


R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=6.5%; [NaHA]i=140 mg/g; [NaHA]f=26 mg/g


Injection force after sterilization: 14 N


Remanence index of the hydrogel: 7.7


Monophase hydrogel


Said Examples are summarized in the Table below.









TABLE







[NaHA]0 = concentration of NaHA in the reaction medium at t0


[NaHA]f = concentration of NaHA in the final hydrogel after reaction and dilution with a sufficient amount of phosphate buffer








G′: modulus of elasticity of the final hydrogel (Pa · s)
Carrimed CSL 500 rheometer


G″: modulus of viscosity of the final hydrogel (Pa · s)


Tan.delta = G″/G′







ηint.: intrinsic viscosity of the NaHA fiber/Ubbelohde viscometer


F: ejection force of the gel in N through a 27 G½ needle/100 N dynamometer






















[NaHA]f







ηint. (ml/g)


in final



% = proportion by weight in
R =
[NaHA]0
gel

G′, G″, tan.delta
Fap ster


no
mixture
mBDDE/mNaHA
mg/g
mg/g
Appearance*
(1 Hz)
27 G½
Remanence index





1
(100%) 2800
  6%
105
26
M
143/65/0.40
25
1


2
(100%) 600 
6.8%
174
26
B
1300/100/0.08
24
6


3
(77%) 600 + (23%) 2800
7
140
26
M
262/27/0.10
15
3.6


4
(90%) 600 + (10%) 2800
6.5
140
26
M
571/41/0.07
14
7.7





*M = monophase B = biphase






The attached Figure shows the following curve:


Tan·delta=f (stressing frequency) for each of the four hydrogels prepared according to Examples 1 to 4.


The rheological behavior of the hydrogels of the invention (Examples 3 and 4) is different from that of the hydrogel of the prior art (Example 1).


Furthermore, the hydrogels of the invention are monophase and thus very different from the hydrogel of Example 2 (biphase).

Claims
  • 1. An injectable composition comprising a hyaluronic acid gel, the hyaluronic acid gel comprising: about 5% by weight to about 50% by weight of a first hyaluronic acid having a molecular weight of about 3×106 Da; andabout 50% by weight to about 95% by weight of a second hyaluronic acid having a molecular weight of about 3×105 Da;wherein the hyaluronic acid gel is crosslinked via covalent bonding between a bifunctional crosslinker and hydroxyl moieties of the first and second hyaluronic acids; and further wherein the hyaluronic acid gel has a Tan δ 1 Hz in the range of about 0.07 to about 0.12.
  • 2. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the hyaluronic acid gel comprises about 5% by weight to about 30% by weight of the first hyaluronic acid.
  • 3. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the hyaluronic acid gel comprises about 70% by weight to about 95% by weight of the second hyaluronic acid.
  • 4. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the bifunctional crosslinker is selected from the group consisting of bifunctional crosslinking agents epichlorohydrin, divinyl sulfone, 1,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)butane, 1,4-bisglycidoxybutane, 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE)), 1,2-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)ethylene, 1-(2,3-epoxypropyl)-2,3-epoxycyclohexane, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, and crotonaldehyde.
  • 5. The injectable composition of claim 4, wherein the bifunctional crosslinker is (BDDE).
  • 6. The injectable composition of claim 1 having a concentration of hyaluronic acid gel of between 10 and 40 mg/g.
  • 7. The injectable composition of claim 1 having a concentration of hyaluronic acid gel of between 20 and 30 mg/g.
  • 8. The injectable composition of claim 1 having a concentration of hyaluronic acid gel of 26 mg/g.
  • 9. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the first hyaluronic acid has a first intrinsic viscosity and the second hyaluronic acid has a second intrinsic viscosity different from the first intrinsic viscosity.
  • 10. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein hyaluronic acid gel comprises the first hyaluronic acid and the second hyaluronic acid in a weight ratio of 10:90, respectively.
  • 11. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the hyaluronic gel is homogenized.
  • 12. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the injectable composition is sterilized.
  • 13. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the injectable composition further comprises an aqueous solution buffered to a pH of between 6.5 and 7.5.
  • 14. The injectable composition of claim 13, wherein the aqueous solution is a phosphate buffer.
  • 15. The injectable composition of claim 14, wherein the aqueous solution is buffered to a pH of between 7.1 and 7.3.
  • 16. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the hyaluronic gel is a monophase hyaluronic acid hydrogel.
  • 17. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the injectable composition has an injectability of about 12 to about 17 Newtons as measured in a standard syringe having a needle of 27 G½, at a rate of 12.5 mm/min.
  • 18. The injectable composition of claim 1, wherein the hyaluronic acid gel has a degree of crosslinking from about 0.5% to about 70%.
  • 19. The injectable composition of claim 18, wherein the degree of crosslinking is between about 4% and about 50%.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
03 0444 Apr 2003 FR national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/209,561, filed Jul. 13, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/535,220, filed Nov. 6, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/024,916, filed Sep. 12, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,062,130, issued Jun. 23, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/566,767, filed Aug. 3, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,563,532, issued Oct. 22, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/782,488, filed May 18, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,338,388, issued Dec. 25, 2012, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/552,309, filed Oct. 7, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,741,476, issued Jun. 22, 2010, which is a U.S. National Phase Application of PCT No. PCT/FR04/00870, filed Apr. 8, 2004, which claims priority from French patent application No. 030444, filed Apr. 10, 2003, the entire disclosure of each of these applications being incorporated herein by this specific reference.

US Referenced Citations (167)
Number Name Date Kind
2128827 Killian Aug 1938 A
3548056 Eigen et al. Dec 1970 A
3763009 Suzuki et al. Oct 1973 A
3949073 Daniels et al. Apr 1976 A
4060081 Yannas et al. Nov 1977 A
4140537 Luck et al. Feb 1979 A
4233360 Luck et al. Nov 1980 A
4273705 Kato Jun 1981 A
4279812 Cioca Jul 1981 A
4424208 Wallace et al. Jan 1984 A
4501306 Chu et al. Feb 1985 A
4582640 Smestad et al. Apr 1986 A
4582865 Balazs et al. Apr 1986 A
4605691 Balazs et al. Aug 1986 A
4636524 Balazs et al. Jan 1987 A
4642117 Nguyen et al. Feb 1987 A
4713448 Balazs et al. Dec 1987 A
4716154 Malson et al. Dec 1987 A
4772419 Malson et al. Sep 1988 A
4803075 Wallace et al. Feb 1989 A
4886787 De Belder et al. Dec 1989 A
4896787 Delamour et al. Jan 1990 A
5009013 Wiklund Apr 1991 A
5087446 Suzuki et al. Feb 1992 A
5091171 Yu et al. Feb 1992 A
5143724 Leshchiner Sep 1992 A
5246698 Leshchiner et al. Sep 1993 A
5314874 Miyata et al. May 1994 A
5328955 Rhee et al. Jul 1994 A
5356883 Kuo et al. Oct 1994 A
5399351 Leshchiner et al. Mar 1995 A
5428024 Chu et al. Jun 1995 A
5492936 Francese et al. Feb 1996 A
5531716 Luzio et al. Jul 1996 A
5565519 Rhee et al. Oct 1996 A
5571503 Mausner Nov 1996 A
5614587 Rhee et al. Mar 1997 A
5616568 Pouyani et al. Apr 1997 A
5616611 Yamamoto et al. Apr 1997 A
5616689 Shenoy et al. Apr 1997 A
5633001 Agerup May 1997 A
5643464 Rhee et al. Jul 1997 A
5676964 Della Valle et al. Oct 1997 A
5823671 Mitchell et al. Oct 1998 A
5824333 Scopelianos et al. Oct 1998 A
5827529 Ono et al. Oct 1998 A
5827937 Agerup Oct 1998 A
5843907 Sakai et al. Dec 1998 A
5880107 Buenter Mar 1999 A
5886042 Yu et al. Mar 1999 A
5935164 Iverson Aug 1999 A
5980930 Fenton et al. Nov 1999 A
6013679 Kuo et al. Jan 2000 A
6066325 Wallace et al. May 2000 A
6224857 Romeo et al. May 2001 B1
6335035 Drizen et al. Jan 2002 B1
6372494 Naughton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383218 Sourdille et al. May 2002 B1
6383219 Telandro et al. May 2002 B1
6418934 Chin Jul 2002 B1
6521223 Calias et al. Feb 2003 B1
6544503 Vanderhoff et al. Apr 2003 B1
6586493 Massia et al. Jul 2003 B1
6627620 Nielsen Sep 2003 B1
6630486 Royer Oct 2003 B1
6685963 Taupin et al. Feb 2004 B1
6716251 Asius et al. Apr 2004 B1
6734298 Barbucci et al. May 2004 B1
6767924 Yu et al. Jul 2004 B2
6767928 Murphy et al. Jul 2004 B1
6852255 Yang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6893466 Trieu May 2005 B2
6903199 Moon et al. Jun 2005 B2
6921819 Piron et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924273 Pierce Aug 2005 B2
6939562 Spiro et al. Sep 2005 B2
6979440 Shefer et al. Dec 2005 B2
7119062 Alvis et al. Oct 2006 B1
7166570 Hunter et al. Jan 2007 B2
7192984 Berg et al. Mar 2007 B2
7196180 Aeschlimann et al. Mar 2007 B2
7314636 Caseres et al. Jan 2008 B2
7491709 Carey Feb 2009 B2
7741476 Lebreton Jun 2010 B2
7902171 Reinmuller et al. Mar 2011 B2
8124120 Sadozai et al. Feb 2012 B2
20020102311 Gustavsson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020160109 Yeo et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030031638 Joshi et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030093157 Casares et al. May 2003 A1
20030119985 Sehl et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030148995 Piron et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040032056 Vang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040101959 Marko et al. May 2004 A1
20040127698 Tsai et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040127699 Zhao et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040199241 Gravett et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040265389 Yui et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050101582 Lyons et al. May 2005 A1
20050136122 Sadozai et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142152 Leshchiner et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050181007 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186261 Avelar et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186673 Geistlich et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050226936 Agerup Oct 2005 A1
20050271729 Wang Dec 2005 A1
20050287180 Chen Dec 2005 A1
20060040894 Hunter et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060095137 Chung et al. May 2006 A1
20060122147 Wohlrab et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060141049 Lyons Jun 2006 A1
20060147483 Chaouk et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060189516 Yang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060194758 Lebreton et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060246137 Hermitte et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257488 Hubbard Nov 2006 A1
20060286769 Tsuchiya et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070026070 Vonwiller et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070066816 Tsai et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070077292 Pinsky Apr 2007 A1
20070203095 Sadozai et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070212385 David Sep 2007 A1
20070224247 Chudzik et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070224278 Lyons et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070298005 Thibault Dec 2007 A1
20080044476 Lyons et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080057091 Abdellaoui et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080089918 Lebreton Apr 2008 A1
20080188416 Bernstein Aug 2008 A1
20080193538 Kitazono et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080200430 Bitterman et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080207794 Wright et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080241252 Lyons et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268051 Hughes et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080274946 Giampapa Nov 2008 A1
20080279806 Cho Nov 2008 A1
20090018102 Moutet et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022808 Champion et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028817 Niklason et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036403 Stroumpoulis et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090042834 Karageozian et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090093755 Schroeder et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090110671 Miyata et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090110736 Boutros Apr 2009 A1
20090143331 Stoumpoulis et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090143348 Tezel et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090148527 Robinson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155314 Tezel et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155362 Longin et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169615 Pinsky Jul 2009 A1
20090263447 Asius et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090291986 Pappas et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090297632 Waugh Dec 2009 A1
20100004198 Stroumpoulis et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100028437 Lebreton Feb 2010 A1
20100035838 Herber et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100041788 Voigts et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100098764 Stroumpoulis et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098794 Armand Apr 2010 A1
20100099623 Schroeder et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111919 Abuzaina et al. May 2010 A1
20100136070 Dobak et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100226988 Lebreton Sep 2010 A1
20100255068 Stroumpoulis et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100316683 Piron et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110034684 Yokokawa et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110118206 Lebreton May 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (75)
Number Date Country
949965 Jun 1974 CA
273823 Jul 1988 EP
416250 Mar 1991 EP
416846 Mar 1991 EP
1247522 Oct 2002 EP
1398131 Mar 2004 EP
1419792 May 2004 EP
1532991 May 2005 EP
1726299 Nov 2006 EP
2236523 Jun 2010 EP
2733427 Oct 1996 FR
2759576 Aug 1999 FR
2759577 Aug 1999 FR
2780730 Jan 2000 FR
2920000 Feb 2009 FR
2924615 Jun 2009 FR
S 55-0153711 Nov 1980 JP
H 7-163655 Jun 1995 JP
2007-063177 Mar 2007 JP
WO 86000079 Jan 1986 WO
WO 86000912 Feb 1986 WO
WO 92000105 Jan 1992 WO
WO 92020349 Nov 1992 WO
WO 96033751 Oct 1993 WO
WO 94001468 Jan 1994 WO
WO 94002517 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9409795 May 1994 WO
WO 97004012 Jun 1997 WO
WO 98035639 Aug 1998 WO
WO 98035640 Aug 1998 WO
WO 00001428 Jan 2000 WO
WO 01079342 Oct 2001 WO
WO 02005753 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02006350 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02009792 Feb 2002 WO
WO 03007782 Jan 2003 WO
WO 02017713 Mar 2003 WO
WO 2004020473 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004022603 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004073759 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004092223 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005040224 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005067994 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005074913 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005112888 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006023645 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2006067608 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007018124 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007070617 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2007077399 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007128923 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008034176 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008068297 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2008072230 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2008077172 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2008098019 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008139122 Nov 2008 WO
WO 2008148967 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2008157608 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009024719 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009026158 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009028764 Mar 2009 WO
WO 2009034559 Mar 2009 WO
WO 2009073437 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2010003797 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010015900 Feb 2010 WO
WO 2010027471 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010028025 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010029344 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010038771 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010051641 May 2010 WO
WO 2010052430 May 2010 WO
WO 2010053918 May 2010 WO
WO 2010061005 Jun 2010 WO
WO 2013040242 Mar 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (109)
Entry
Adams, “An Analysis of Clinical Studies of the Use of Crosslinked Hyaluronan, Hylan, in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis,” The Journal of Rheumatology, 1993, 16-18, 20 (39).
Aesthetic Buyers Guide, Juvederm Raises Standards, 2007, 1, 4-7; www.miinews.com.
Albano et al., “Hydroxyethyl Radicals in Ethanol Hepatotoxicity,” Frontiers in Bioscience, 1999, 533-540, 4.
Allemann, “Hyaluronic Acid Gel (Juvederm) Preparations in the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles and Folds,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2008, 629-634, 3 (4).
Antunes et al., “Efficacy of Intrarectal Lidocaine Hydrochloride Gel for Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy,” Clinical Urology, 2004, 380-383, 30.
Atanassoff et al., “The Effect of Intradermal Administration of Lidocaine and Morphine on the Response to Thermal Stimulation,” Anesth Analg, 1997, 1340-1343, 84.
Baumann et al.,“Comparison of Smooth-Gel Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers with Cross-linked Bovine Collagen: A Multicenter, Double-Masked, Randomized, Within-Subject Study,” Dermatologic Surgery, 2007, S128-135, 33 (2).
Beasley et al., “Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Comprehensive Review,” Facial Plastic Surgery, 2009, 86-94, 25 (2).
Beer, “Dermal Fillers and Combinations of Fillers for Facial Rejuvenation,” Dermatologic Clin, 2009, 427-432, 27 (4).
Belda et al., “Hyaluronic Acid Combined With Mannitol to Improve Protection Against Free-Radical Endothelial Damage: Experimental Model,” J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 1213-1218, 31.
Bircher et al., “Delayed-type Hypersensitivity to Subcutaneous Lidocaine With Tolerance to Articaine: Confirmation by In Vivo and In Vitro Tests,” Contact Dermatitis, 1996, 387-389, 34.
Bluel et al., “Evaluation of Reconstituted Collagen Tape as a Model for Chemically Modified Soft Tissues,” Biomat. Med. Dev. Art. Org., 1981, 37-46, 9 (1).
Buck, “Injectable Fillers for Facial Rejuvenation: A Review,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009, 11-18, 62.
Capozzi et al., “Distant Migration of Silicone Gel From a Ruptured Breast Implant,” Silicone Gel Migration, 1978, 302-3, 62 (2).
Carlin, et al., “Effect of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Xanthine Oxidase and Xanthine Oxidase Induced Depolymerization of Hyaluronic Acid,” Agents and Actions, 1985, 377-384, 16 (5).
Carruthers et al., “The Science and Art of Dermal Fillers for Soft-Tissue Augmentation,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 2009, 335-350, 8 (4).
Champion et al., “Role of Target Geometry in Phagocytosis,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2006, 4930-4934, 103 (13).
Chee, “Estimation of Molecular Weight Averages from Intrinsic Viscosity,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1985, 1359-1360, vol. 30, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chin et al., “Allergic Hypersensitivity to Lidocaine Hydrochloride,” International Society of Tropical Dermatology, 1980, 147-148.
Chvapil, “Collagen Sponge: Theory and Practice of Medical Applications,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1977, 721-741, 11.
Clark et al., “The Influence of Triamcinolone Acetonide on Joint Stiffness in the Rat,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, 1409-1414, 53A (7).
Cohen et al., “Organization and Adhesive Properties of the Hyaluronan Pericellular Coat of Chondrocytes and Epithelial Cells,” Biophysical Journal, 2003, 1996-2005, 85.
Cui et al., “The Comparison of Physicochemical Properties of Four Cross-linked Sodium Hyaluronate Gels With Different Cross-linking Agents,” Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 1506-1512, 396-398.
Decision from the Opposition Division for European Patent No. EP-B-2 289 945, dated Jun. 30, 2017.
Decision T1250/10-3.3.03 de la Chambre de Recourse 3.3.03 dated Nov. 5, 2012.
Declaration of Dr. Sebastien Pierre to the EPO in the matter of European Patent: 2289945, Proprietor: Allergan Industrie, dated Jul. 7, 2016.
Deland, “Intrathecal Toxicity Studies with Benzyl Alcohol,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1973, 153-6, 25, Academic Press, Inc.
Desai et al., “Molecular Weight of Heparin Using 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy,” J Pharm Sci., 1995, 212-5, 84 (2).
EP 2289945 Counterstatements, Dec. 21, 2015, EP.
EP 2289945 Notification of Opposition, Dec. 16, 2015, EP.
European Pharmacopoeia 5th Ed., Main vol. 5.0, 2005 with Supplements 5.1 and 5.2, Sodium Hyaluronate.
Eyre et al., “Collagen Cross-Links,” Top Curr Chem, 2005, 207-229, 247, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Falcone et al., “Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Comparison of Rheological Properties,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2008, 264-271, 87 (1).
Falcone et al., “Temporary Polysaccharide Dermal Fillers: A Model for Persistence Based on Physical Properties”, Dermatologic Surgery, 2009, 1238-1243, 35 (8).
Farley et al., “Diluting Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in Balanced Salt Solution Reduces the Pain of Intradermal Injection,” Regional Anesthesia, 1994, 48-51, 19 (1).
Frati et al.,“Degradation of Hyaluronic Acid by Photosensitized Riboflavin In Vitro. Modulation of the Effect by Transition Metals, Radical Quenchers, and Metal Chelators,” Free Radical Biology Medicine, 1996, 1139-1144, 22 (7).
Fujinaga et al., “Reproductive and Teratogenic Effects of Lidocaine in Sprague-Dawley Rats,” Anesthesiology, 1986, 626-632, 65.
Gammaitoni et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Continuously Applied Lidocaine Patches 5%,” Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2002, 2215-2220, 59.
Ginshicel Mh, Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose, Retrieved on Nov. 12, 2008 http://www.ginshicel.cn/MHPC.html, 2007, p. 1-3, 2 (3).
Gold, “Use of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for the Treatment of the Aging Face,” Clin. Interventions Aging, 2007, 369-376, 2 (3).
Goldberg, “Breakthroughs in US dermal fillers for facial soft-tissue augmentation,” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 2009, 240-247, 11, Informa UK Ltd.
Gomis et al., “Effects of Different Molecular Weight Elastoviscous Hyaluronan Solutions on Articular Nociceptive Afferents,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, Jan. 2004, 314-326, 50(1).
Graefe et al., “Sensitive and Specific Photometric Determination of Mannitol,” Clin Chem Lab Med, 2003, 1049-1055, 41 (8).
Grecomoro et al., “Intra-articular treatment with sodium hyaluronate in gonarthrosis: a controlled clinical trial versus placebo,” Pharmatherapeutica, 1987, 137-141, 5 (2).
Grillo et al., “Thermal Reconstitution of Collagen From Solution and the Response to Its Heterologous Implantation,” JSR, 1962, 69-82, 2 (1).
Harding et al., “Molecular Weight Determination of Polysaccharides,” Advances in Carbohydrate Analysis, 1991, 63-144, vol. 1, JAI Press Ltd.
Hassan et al., “Effects of Adjuvants to Local Anaesthetics on Their Duration. III. Experimental Studies of Hyaluronic Acid,” Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., 1985, 1, 29 (4).
Hayashibara, “AA2G,” Sep. 23, 2007, Retrieved on Jan. 17, 2012, http://web.archive.org/web/20070923072010/http://www.hayashibara-intl.com-/cosmetics/aa2g.html.
Helliwell, “Use of an objective measure of articular stiffness to record changes in finger joints after intra-articular injection of corticosteroid,” Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, 1997, 71-73, 56.
Hertzberger-Ten et al., “Intra-articular steroids in pauciarticular juvenile chronic arthritis, type 1,” European Journal of Pediatrics, 1991, 170-172, 150.
Hetherington et al., “Potential for Patient Harm from Intrathecal Administration of Preserved Solutions,” Med J Aust., 2000, 1, 173(3).
Hurst, “Adhesive Arachnoiditis and Vascular Blockage Caused by Detergents and Other Chemical Irritants: An Experimental Study,” J Path. Bact., 1955, 167, 70.
Intramed (PTY) LTD, Intramed Mannitol 20% m/v Infusion, Package Insert, Jan. 1979, 4 pages, 12-214/8-94, ZA.
Jones et al., “Intra-articular hyaluronic acid compared to intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide in inflammatory knee osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1995, 269-273, 3.
Kablik et al., “Comparative Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers,” Dermatology Surgery, 2009, 302-312, 35.
Klein, “Skin Filling Collagen and Other Injectables of the Skin,” Fundamentals of Cosmetic Surgery, 2001, 491-508, 3 (19).
Kogan et al., “Hyaluronic Acid: A Biopolymer with Versatile Physico-Chemical and Biological Properties,” Handbook of Polymer Research: Monomers, Oligomers, Polymers and Composites, 2007, 415-416, Chapter 31, Nova Science Publilshers, Inc.
Kopp et al., “The Short-term Effect of Intra-articular Injections of Sodium Hyaluronate and Corticosteroid on Temporomandibular Joint Pain and Dysfunction,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1985, 429-435, 43.
Kulicke et al., “Visco-Elastic Properties of Sodium Hyaluronate Solutions,” Institute for Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, 2008, 585-587, DE.
Laeschke, “Biocompatibility of Microparticles Into Soft Tissue Fillers,” Semin Cutan Med Surg, 2004, 214-217, 23.
Lamar et al., “Antifibrosis Effect of Novel Gels in Anterior Ciliary Sclerotomy (ACS),” 2002, 1 Page, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Levy et al., “Lidocaine Hypersensitivity After Subconjunctival Injection”, Can J Ophthalmol, 2006, 204-206, 41.
Lindvall et al., “Influence of Various Compounds on the Degradation of Hyaluronic Acid by a Myeloperoxidase System”, Chemico-Biological Interactions, 1994, 1-12, 90.
Lupo, “Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Facial Rejuvenation,” Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 2006, 122-126, 25.
Mackley et al., “Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity to Lidocaine,” Arch Dermatol, 2003, 343-346, 139.
Mancinelli et al., “Intramuscular High-dose Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Asthma,” West J Med, 1997, 322-329, 167 (5).
Matsumoto et al., “Reducing the Discomfort of Lidocaine Administration Through pH Buffering,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1994, 171-175, 5 (1).
Mccarty et al., “Inflammatory Reaction after Intrasynovial Injection of Microcrystalline Adrenocorticosteroid Esters,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1964, 359-367, 7 (4).
Mccleland et al., “Evaluation of Artecoll Polymethylmethacrylate Implant for Soft-Tissue Augmentation: Biocompatibility and Chemical Characterization,” Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 1997, 1466-1474, 100 (6).
Mcpherson et al., “Development and Biochemical Characterization of Injectable Collagen,” Journal of Dermatol Surg Oncol, 1988, 13-20, 14 (Suppl 1) 7.
Millay et al., “Vasoconstrictors in Facial Plastic Surgery,” Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 1991, 160-163, 117.
Orvisky et al., “High-molecular-weight Hyaluronan—a Valuable Tool in Testing the Antioxidative Activity of Amphiphilic Drugs Stobadine and Vinpocetine,” Journal of Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 1997, 419-424, 16.
Osmitrol (generic name Mannitol), Official FDA Information, side effects and uses, http://www.drugs.com/pro/osmitrol.html, 2010, 10 Pages.
Park et al., “Biological Characterization of EDC-Crosslinked Collagen-Hyaluronic Acid Matrix in Dermal Tissue Restoration,” Biomaterials, 2003, 1631-1641, 24.
Park et al., “Characterization of Porous Collagen/Hyaluronic Acid Scaffold Modified by 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)Carbodiimide Cross-Linking,” Biomaterials, 2002, 1205-1212, 23.
Powell, “Stability of Lidocaine in Aqueous Solution: Effect of Temperature, pH, Buffer, and Metal Ions on Amide Hydrolysis,” Pharmaceutical Research, 1987, 42-45, 4 (1).
Prestwich, “Evaluating Drug Efficacy and Toxicology in Three Dimensions: Using Synthetic Extracellular Matrices in Drug Discovery,” Accounts of Chemical Research, Jan. 2008, 139-148, 41(1).
R&D Curriculum Vitae of Sebastien Pierre, Ph.D., Research Manager, Sr.
Rehakova et al., “Properties of Collagen and Hyaluronic Acid Composite Materials and Their Modification by Chemical Crosslinking,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1996, 369-372, 30, US.
Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1980, 16th Edition, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pennsylvania.
Response to Summons to attend Oral Proceedings under Rule 115(1) EPC dated Nov. 10, 2016, Opposition against EP 2289945 Proprietor: Allergan Idustrie Opponent: Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA, dated Apr. 26, 2017.
Rosenblatt. et al., “Chain Rigidity and Diffusional Release in Biopolymer Gels,” Controlled Release Society, 1993, 264-265, 20.
Rosenblatt et al., “The Effect of Collagen Fiber Size Distribution on the Release Rate of Proteins From Collagen Matrices by Diffusion,” J Controlled Release, 1989, 195-203, 9.
Sannino et al., “Crosslinking of Cellulose Derivatives and Hyaluronic Acid With Water-Soluble Carbodiimide,” Polymer, 2005, 11206-11212, 46.
Schilling et al., Is Human Height Bimodal, The American Statistician, 2002, 223-229, 56 (3), US.
Sculptra® (injectable poly-L-lactic acid) Directions for Use, Product Insert, Jul. 2004, 12 Pages, Dermik Laboratories.
Segura et al., “Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels: A Strategy to Functionalize and Pattern,” Biomaterials, 2005, 359-371, 26 (4).
Selvi et al., “Arthritis Induced by Corticosteroid Crystals,” The Journal of Rheumatology, 2004, 622, 31 (3).
Serban et al., “Modular Extracellular Matrices: Solutions for the Puzzle,” Methods, 2008, 93-98, 45 (1).
Shu et al, “Synthesis and evaluation of injectable, in situ crosslinkable synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2006, 902-912, 79A.
Silver et al., “Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid and Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in Solution: Evaluation of Coating Ability,” Journal of Applied Biomaterials, 1994, 89-98, 5.
Skardal et al., “Bioprinting Vessel-Like Constructs Using Hyaluronan Hydrogels Crosslinked With Tetrahedral Polyethylene Glycol Tetracrylates,” Biomaterials, 2010, 6173-6181, 31.
Smith et al., “Five Percent Lidocaine Cream Applied Simultaneously to the Skin and Mucosa of the Lips Creates Excellent Anesthesia for Filler Injections,” Dermatol Surg, 2005, 1635-1637, 31.
Stanford Chemicals Company, Certificate of Analysis, Sodium Hyaluronate.
Tezel et al., “The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers,” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 2008, 35-42, 10.
Visiol, TRB Chemedica Ophthalmic Line, Product Info, May 2014, p. 1-2, Geneva, CH.
Visiol, Viscoelstic Gel for Use in Ocular Surgery, http://www.trbchemedica.com/index.php/option=com_content&tas, 2010, 1 Page.
Wagner, “The Mark-Houwink-Sakurada Equation for the Viscosity of Linear Polyethylene,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1985, 611-617, vol. 14, No. 2.
Wahl, “European Evaluation of a New Hyaluronic Acid Filler Incorporating Lidocaine,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2008, 298-303, 7.
Waraszkiewicz et al., “Stability-Indicating High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine Injectable Solutions,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1981, 1215-1218, 70 (11).
Weidmann, “New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Subdermal and Long-lasting Volume Restoration of the Face,” European Dermatology, 2009, 65-68.
Xia et al., “Comparison of Effects of Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Buffered Lidocaine, Diphenhydramine, and Normal Saline After Intradermal Injection,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2002, 339-343, 14.
Yeom et al., “Effect of Cross-Linking Reagents for Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Dermal Fillers on Tissue Augmentation and Regeneration,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2010, 240-247, 21, American Chemical Society.
Yui et al., “Inflammation Responsive Degradation of Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gels,” Journal of Controlled Release, 1992, 105-116, 26.
Yui et al., “Photo-Responsive Degradation of Heterogeneous Hydrogels Comprising Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid and Lipid Microspheres for Temporal Drug Delivery,” Journal of Controlled Release, 1993, 141-145, 26.
Yun et al., “Hyaluronan Microspheres for Sustained Gene Delivery and Site-Specific Targeting,” Biomaterials, 2004, 147-157, 25, US.
Zheng et al., “In Situ Crosslinkable Hyaluronan Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, 2004, 1339-1348, 25.
Zulian et al., “Triamcinolone Acetonide and Hexacetonide Intra-Articular Treatment of Symmetrical Joints in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Double-Blind Trial,” Rheumatology, 2004, 1288-1291, 43.
Transmittal of Third Party Observations to Applicant from European Application No. 14200048.8, dated Jan. 13, 2020, 104 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190022130 A1 Jan 2019 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10552309 US
Child 12782488 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 15209561 Jul 2016 US
Child 16137447 US
Parent 14535220 Nov 2014 US
Child 15209561 US
Parent 14024916 Sep 2013 US
Child 14535220 US
Parent 13566767 Aug 2012 US
Child 14024916 US
Parent 12782488 May 2010 US
Child 13566767 US