The present invention relates to:
The hydrogels in question, based on said crosslinked polymers, have numerous outlets, especially as filling materials in plastic, cosmetic and dental surgery, in ophthalmology, in orthopedics, etc., as products for preventing tissue adhesions, in general surgery, in urology, etc. Said hydrogels are particularly suitable for repairing vocal cords. The outlets indicated above for products of this type, without implying any limitation, are familiar to those skilled in the art.
The invention is the result of a genuine effort to optimize the operation of crosslinking the polymers in question with a view to obtaining injectable monophase hydrogels that are of particular value in respect of the following compromise: on the one hand mechanical properties and remanence, and on the other hand injectability (with acceptable injection forces and injection needle diameters).
It is pointed out here that the term “injectable” employed in the present text, with reference to both the hydrogels of the prior art and the hydrogels of the invention, denotes manual injectability by means of syringes equipped with conventional needles (having a diameter of between 0.1 and 0.5 mm). Within the framework of the present invention, it is possible in particular to formulate hydrogels that can be injected through hypodermic needles of 30 G½, 27 G½, 26 G½ and 25 G.
According to the prior art, hydrogels, especially injectable hydrogels, have already been prepared from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof—especially hyaluronic acid salts—having a zero, low or high degree of crosslinking.
With reference to the specific problem of injectability, biphase compositions have been proposed whose continuous phase, in particular, is based on such hydrogels. The continuous phase serves as a plasticizer, injection vehicle for a disperse phase. This disperse phase is more or less solid and more or less differentiated from the continuous phase. Thus:
These biphase systems are not fully satisfactory insofar as they are associated with justifiable fears of uneven flow during injection and particularly after injection, a more rapid disappearance of the continuous phase (having a zero or low degree of crosslinking) and hence an at least partial loss of the desired effect, especially filling effect.
Monophase hydrogels, developed from the same types of polymers, were therefore also proposed in parallel.
In patent applications WO-A-98 356 39 and WO-A-98 356 40, the product in question is not an injectable hydrogel but a product of solid consistency. Said patent applications in fact describe ocular implants used to temporarily fill a surgically created void. The hydrogel developed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,716,154 is proposed as a substitute for the vitreous body. The polymer in question (sodium hyaluronate) has a very low degree of crosslinking in order to obtain an injectable hydrogel. The monophase hydrogel described in patent application WO-A-02 057 53 is laden with an antiseptic that is effective in protecting it from free radicals after implantation. Patent application WO-A-02 063 50 describes a process capable of generating this type of hydrogel that is very homogeneous throughout.
All these monophase hydrogels were obtained from high-molecular weight polymers crosslinked using an effective and non-excessive amount of at least one crosslinking agent, in an aqueous solvent.
In the light of this prior art, the inventors wished to improve the efficacy of crosslinking of the polymer in question, especially in order to improve the degradation resistance (remanence) of the implanted hydrogel while at the same time preserving the possibility of injecting said hydrogel under acceptable conditions.
To improve the crosslinking efficacy, the inventors initially considered using more crosslinking agent. This approach was quickly discarded on the grounds that it inescapably causes denaturation of the polymer in question and chemical contamination of the crosslinked product obtained.
Said inventors then considered increasing the concentration of polymer in the reaction mixture. In the same way, this second approach had to be discarded, a priori, because of the polymers conventionally used hitherto, namely high-molecular weight polymers. Thus sodium hyaluronate is always used with high molecular weights (Mw≥106 Da, ≈2·106 Da, 3·106 Da) at concentrations close to the maximum concentration, which is about 105-110 mg/g. Using it at a higher concentration is difficult (the viscosity of the reaction mixture becomes too high) and inescapably causes problems of solubility, poor homogeneity, etc.
Concentrating the reaction medium, on the other hand, is found to be possible with low-molecular weight polymers (sodium hyaluronate of molecular weight 300,000 Da, having an intrinsic viscosity of 600 ml/g (those skilled in the art are perfectly familiar with the relationship between these two parameters: molecular weight (M) and intrinsic viscosity (η), which is given by the Mark-Houwink formula: M=k ηα, the values of k and α depending on the nature of the polymer in question), can be concentrated from 110 to 200 mg/g). Unfortunately the crosslinked polymer obtained generates an inhomogeneous, injectable biphase hydrogel under these conditions.
In such a context, the inventors surprisingly established that associating low-molecular weight polymer(s) with high-molecular weight polymer(s) affords an excellent compromise, namely the possibility of generating, for a non-excessive degree of crosslinking (equivalent to that of the prior art), an injectable monophase hydrogel which has improved mechanical and remanence properties. This low-molecular weight/high-molecular weight association makes it possible to obtain a hydrogel that more than satisfies the following specifications:
The key factor of the crosslinking process of the invention therefore lies in the concentration of the reactants (which is greater than that of the reaction mixtures of the prior art due to the use of low-molecular weight polymer(s)), although the crosslinking of said concentrated reactants is “governed” by the use of high-molecular weight polymer(s), which guarantee the homogeneity of the crosslinked product obtained and then of the hydrogel obtained.
According to its first subject, the present invention therefore relates to a process for the crosslinking of at least one polymer selected from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof, which is carried out in an aqueous solvent by the action of an effective and non-excessive amount of at least one crosslinking agent, said process being improved in that it is carried out on a mixture containing at least one low-molecular weight polymer and at least one high-molecular weight polymer.
Said mixture of course contains said low-molecular weight polymer(s) in a sufficient amount to guarantee a relatively high concentration of polymer(s) in the reaction medium, and said high-molecular weight polymer(s) in a sufficient amount to guarantee that said crosslinked polymer obtained has a homogeneous consistency.
The crosslinking process of the invention is a process for the crosslinking of polymers selected from polysaccharides and derivatives thereof. The polymer(s) in question can therefore be natural or synthetic. Examples of natural polymers are hyaluronic acid and its salts, other glycosaminoglycans such as chondroitin sulfates, keratan sulfate, heparin and heparan sulfate, alginic acid and its biologically acceptable salts, starch, amylose, dextran, xanthan, pullulan, etc. Examples of synthetic derivatives of natural polysaccharides are carboxy cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, alkyl celluloses such as hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), oxidized starch, etc.
The process of the invention is suitable for the crosslinking of any one of these polymers insofar as said polymer is used with low and high molecular weights.
The process of the invention is suitable for the crosslinking of mixtures of such polymers, said mixtures containing at least one low-molecular weight polymer and at least one high-molecular weight polymer.
The terms “low” and “high” applied to the molecular weights in question obviously cannot be defined more precisely at this stage of the description of the invention since they depend on the mixture in question and the nature of the polymer(s) present. Likewise, it is not generally possible to indicate the relative proportions in which the polymer(s) present is(are) used. However, those skilled in the art have a perfect understanding of the spirit of the invention, which is to concentrate the reaction medium containing the low-molecular weight polymer(s), but to introduce at least one high-molecular weight polymer to moderate and control the crosslinking in question. The aim is to obtain a coherent crosslinked product that is the precursor of a monophase hydrogel. It is desirable to avoid the formation of lumps that may be coherent when crosslinking has ended, but capable of losing their coherence when the injectable hydrogel is prepared.
The above explanations are given a posteriori. The result obtained was in no way predictable.
Within the framework of one advantageous variant, the reaction medium contains a single polymer which is used with at least two differentiated molecular weights, at least one being low and at least one being high. Within the framework of this advantageous variant, the same polymer is preferably used with a single low molecular weight and a single high molecular weight.
The polymer in question is advantageously a hyaluronic acid salt. It is very advantageously selected from the sodium salt, the potassium salt and mixtures thereof. It preferably consists of the sodium salt (NaHA).
In the context of the crosslinking of this type of polymer, those skilled in the art understand that said crosslinking is carried out in a basic aqueous solvent. In general, said crosslinking is obviously carried out under pH conditions that favor the dissolution of the polymer in question.
In the context of the crosslinking of this type of polymer (hyaluronic acid salt(s)), in one preferred variant of carrying out the crosslinking, the reaction mixture contains:
said low-molecular weight and high-molecular weight salts advantageously being of the same nature and very advantageously consisting of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA).
In such a context, said reaction mixture advantageously has an intrinsic viscosity of less than 1900 ml/g, i.e. Σωi[ηi]0<1900 ml/g, where ωi is the mass fraction of polymer fraction i, having an intrinsic viscosity [ηi]0, in the reaction mixture. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the intrinsic viscosity parameter and are aware of the laws of additivity of said parameter.
The condition stated above makes it possible to obtain a monophase hydrogel that is optimized in respect of its remanence and injectability properties. It fixes the relative proportions of the salts of low molecular weight (m) and high molecular weight (M).
In the context referred to here (NaHA of molecular weights m and M), the reaction mixture advantageously contains more than 50% by weight, very advantageously more than 70% by weight, of at least one hyaluronic acid salt of low molecular weight m, and hence, logically, advantageously less than 50% by weight, very advantageously less than 30% by weight, of at least one hyaluronic acid salt of high molecular weight M.
In general, to obtain the expected effect, there is at least 5% by weight of at least one hyaluronic acid salt of high molecular weight M in the reaction mixture.
The crosslinking process of the invention is advantageously carried out with the sodium salt of hyaluronic acid used with one low molecular weight m and one high molecular weight M, said parameters then very advantageously being as follows: m≈3·105 Da and M≈3·106 Da.
Any agent known for crosslinking polysaccharides and derivatives thereof via its hydroxyl groups can be used as the crosslinking agent with all types of polymer, said crosslinking agent being at least bifunctional in order to ensure crosslinking, an epoxy compound or derivatives thereof being used in particular.
It is recommended to use bifunctional crosslinking agents, by themselves or in a mixture. It is particularly recommended to use epichlorohydrin, divinyl sulfone, 1,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)butane (or 1,4-bisglycidoxybutane or 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE)), 1,2-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)ethylene, 1-(2,3-epoxypropyl)-2,3-epoxycyclohexane, and aldehydes such as formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and crotonaldehyde, taken by themselves or in a mixture. It is very particularly recommended to use 1,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)butane (BDDE).
Those skilled in the art will know how to determine the effective and non-excessive amount of crosslinking agent(s) to use. It is recommended to use an effective and non-excessive amount such that the degree of crosslinking (τ), defined by the following ratio:
is theoretically between 0.5 and 70%, advantageously between 4 and 50%.
The crosslinking process of the invention is novel by virtue of the forms in which the polymers in question are used. In other respects it is carried out in conventional manner with at least one crosslinking agent. It is noted that said crosslinking agent is generally reacted with the dissolved polymer(s), but reacting it with said polymer(s) during hydration, by the process described in WO-A-02 06 350, is in no way ruled out.
The crosslinked product obtained after carrying out the crosslinking process of the invention is generally formulated for generating the desired injectable monophase hydrogel. If necessary, it is neutralized beforehand. It has been seen that the hyaluronic acid salts are actually crosslinked in a basic medium. The formulation is carried out in a solution buffered to a pH compatible with the human body (since the hydrogel in question is generally intended for injection into the human body), said pH being between 6.5 and 7.5, advantageously between 7 and 7.4 and very advantageously between 7.1 and 7.3. The crosslinked polymer is in equilibrium in said solution. It also acquires an osmolarity compatible with that of the human body. Surprisingly, after this formulation step, the diluted crosslinked polymers of the invention are monophase hydrogels.
In one preferred variant of carrying out the invention, an injectable hydrogel of the invention is prepared by crosslinking a mixture of at least one polymer consisting of hyaluronic acid salt(s) (see above), neutralizing the crosslinked product obtained, and then formulating it into a solution buffered to a pH of between 7.1 and 7.3, at a concentration of between 10 and 40 mg/g, advantageously of between 20 and 30 mg/g.
The process for the preparation of the injectable monophase hydrogel from the crosslinked polymer (obtained by the crosslinking process constituting the first subject of the present invention) constitutes the second subject of the present invention.
We now come to the third and fourth subjects, which respectively consist of the crosslinked polymer obtainable after carrying out the crosslinking process (first subject), and the injectable monophase hydrogel obtainable by the formulation (second subject) of said crosslinked polymer, as stated above.
Said polymer and hydrogel advantageously contain low-molecular weight sodium hyaluronate and high-molecular weight sodium hyaluronate, the proportion of said low-molecular weight sodium hyaluronate very advantageously being more than 50% by weight.
The structure of the injectable monophase hydrogel—fourth subject of the present invention—is novel. Its consistency is resistant to degradation. This resistance of the hydrogel is far greater than that of the equivalent products of the prior art.
Those skilled in the art are aware that one of the methods of estimating the consistency of a hydrogel, especially of this type, is to measure the following parameter:
The hydrogels of the invention have the outlets indicated in the introduction of the present text. They are found to be particularly efficient for these purposes.
In the drawing:
The FIGURE shows the curve tan·delta=f (stressing frequency) for each of the four hydrogels prepared according to Examples 1 to 4.
It is now proposed to illustrate the invention in its various features by means of the Examples below. More precisely:
These are preceded by a description of a few methods of measurement used to characterize the products in question.
The intrinsic viscosity of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) (in ml/g) is determined according to the European Pharmacopeia for NaHA (2.2.9) using a capillary viscometer of the Ubbelohde type.
The injectability of the gel based on NaHA is determined by measuring the force (in Newtons, N) required to eject the gel contained in a standard syringe, through a needle of 27 G½, at a rate of 12.5 mm/min. The tests were performed on a Verstatet® tensile device marketed by Mecmesin.
The consistency of the gel is characterized at 25° C. by rheological measurement of the moduli of elasticity (G′) and viscosity (G″) as a function of the frequency (from 0.05 to 10 Hz), in the constant deformation domains, using a controlled stress rheometer (Carrimed CSL 500 from TA Instruments) and a cone-and-plate geometry of 4 cm 2°. This rheometer is checked and calibrated regularly. Degradation of the crosslinked gel results in a change in its consistency, which is measured by the increase in the parameter tangent delta (tan·delta=G″/G′) as a function of time, at a frequency of 1 Hz. The gels are degraded by being heated to a temperature of 93° C. The time after which tan·delta reaches a value of 0.65 (corresponding to a degraded gel state) is measured at this temperature. A remanence index of 1 (corresponding to said time) was arbitrarily set for the gel of Example 1. The remanence index values indicated for the other gels are relative values.
Microscopic appearance: no apparent liquid phase—fine fragmentation of the gel into facets
Macroscopic appearance: soft and free-flowing
Microscopic appearance: gel fragments bathed in a low-viscosity liquid medium
Macroscopic appearance: “purée” that fragments very easily—no cohesion of the gel and no free-flowing appearance
3.5 g of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) fibers of intrinsic viscosity 2800 ml/g and moisture content 8.7% are weighed out and 25.6 g of 0.25 N NaOH are added. Hydration of the fibers takes 2 h with regular manual homogenization using a spatula. 0.96 g of a solution of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) diluted to ⅕ in 0.25 N sodium hydroxide solution is added to the reaction medium, this being followed by mechanical homogenization for 15 min before immersion in a thermostatically controlled bath at 50° C.±1° C.
R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=6%; [NaHA]i=105 mg/g
The reaction takes 2 h. The crosslinked product is neutralized to pH 7.2 in a phosphate buffer solution and then dialyzed. The concentration of the resulting hydrogel is then adjusted ([NaHA]f=26 mg/g) and the hydrogel is mechanically homogenized before being packed into syringes and sterilized in an autoclave by means of moist heat.
Injection force after sterilization: 25 N
Remanence index of the hydrogel: 1.0
Monophase hydrogel
1.56 g of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) fibers of intrinsic viscosity 600 ml/g and moisture content 5.5% are weighed out and 7.15 g of 0.25 N NaOH are added. Hydration of the fibers takes 2 h with regular manual homogenization using a spatula. 0.31 g of a solution of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) diluted to ⅕ in 0.25 N sodium hydroxide solution is added to the reaction medium, this being followed by mechanical homogenization for 15 min before immersion in a thermostatically controlled bath at 50° C.±1° C.
R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=6.8%; [NaHA]i=174 mg/g
The reaction takes 2 h. The crosslinked product is neutralized to pH 7.2 in a phosphate solution and then dialyzed. The concentration of the resulting hydrogel is then adjusted ([NaHA]f=26 mg/g) and the hydrogel is mechanically homogenized before being packed into syringes and sterilized in an autoclave.
Injection force after sterilization: 24 N
Remanence index of the hydrogel: 6.0
Biphase hydrogel
0.763 g of sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) fibers of intrinsic viscosity 600 ml/g and moisture content 5.5% and 0.237 g of sodium hyaluronate fibers of intrinsic viscosity 2800 ml/g and moisture content 9.3% are weighed out. Proportions by weight in the mixture: 600/2800:77/23 (w/w).
The procedure remains identical to that of Example 2.
R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=7%; [NaHA]i=140 mg/g; [NaHA]f=26 mg/g
Injection force after sterilization: 15 N
Remanence index of the hydrogel: 3.6
Monophase hydrogel
The experiment of Example 3 is repeated, modifying the proportions by weight. Proportions by weight in the mixture: 600/2800:90/10 (w/w).
The procedure is identical to that of Example 2.
R=[BDDE]0/[NaHA]0=6.5%; [NaHA]i=140 mg/g; [NaHA]f=26 mg/g
Injection force after sterilization: 14 N
Remanence index of the hydrogel: 7.7
Monophase hydrogel
Said Examples are summarized in the Table below.
The attached Figure shows the following curve:
Tan·delta=f (stressing frequency) for each of the four hydrogels prepared according to Examples 1 to 4.
The rheological behavior of the hydrogels of the invention (Examples 3 and 4) is different from that of the hydrogel of the prior art (Example 1).
Furthermore, the hydrogels of the invention are monophase and thus very different from the hydrogel of Example 2 (biphase).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03 0444 | Apr 2003 | FR | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/209,561, filed Jul. 13, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/535,220, filed Nov. 6, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/024,916, filed Sep. 12, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,062,130, issued Jun. 23, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/566,767, filed Aug. 3, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,563,532, issued Oct. 22, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/782,488, filed May 18, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,338,388, issued Dec. 25, 2012, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/552,309, filed Oct. 7, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,741,476, issued Jun. 22, 2010, which is a U.S. National Phase Application of PCT No. PCT/FR04/00870, filed Apr. 8, 2004, which claims priority from French patent application No. 030444, filed Apr. 10, 2003, the entire disclosure of each of these applications being incorporated herein by this specific reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2128827 | Killian | Aug 1938 | A |
3548056 | Eigen et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3763009 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3949073 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4060081 | Yannas et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4140537 | Luck et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4233360 | Luck et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4273705 | Kato | Jun 1981 | A |
4279812 | Cioca | Jul 1981 | A |
4424208 | Wallace et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4501306 | Chu et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4582640 | Smestad et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4582865 | Balazs et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4605691 | Balazs et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4636524 | Balazs et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642117 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4713448 | Balazs et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716154 | Malson et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4772419 | Malson et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4803075 | Wallace et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4886787 | De Belder et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4896787 | Delamour et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5009013 | Wiklund | Apr 1991 | A |
5087446 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091171 | Yu et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5143724 | Leshchiner | Sep 1992 | A |
5246698 | Leshchiner et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5314874 | Miyata et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328955 | Rhee et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5356883 | Kuo et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5399351 | Leshchiner et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5428024 | Chu et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5492936 | Francese et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5531716 | Luzio et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5565519 | Rhee et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571503 | Mausner | Nov 1996 | A |
5614587 | Rhee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616568 | Pouyani et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5616611 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5616689 | Shenoy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633001 | Agerup | May 1997 | A |
5643464 | Rhee et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5676964 | Della Valle et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5823671 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824333 | Scopelianos et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827529 | Ono et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827937 | Agerup | Oct 1998 | A |
5843907 | Sakai et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880107 | Buenter | Mar 1999 | A |
5886042 | Yu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5935164 | Iverson | Aug 1999 | A |
5980930 | Fenton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013679 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6066325 | Wallace et al. | May 2000 | A |
6224857 | Romeo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6335035 | Drizen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6372494 | Naughton et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383218 | Sourdille et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383219 | Telandro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418934 | Chin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6521223 | Calias et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544503 | Vanderhoff et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6586493 | Massia et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6627620 | Nielsen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630486 | Royer | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6685963 | Taupin et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6716251 | Asius et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734298 | Barbucci et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6767924 | Yu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767928 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6852255 | Yang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6893466 | Trieu | May 2005 | B2 |
6903199 | Moon et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921819 | Piron et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924273 | Pierce | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939562 | Spiro et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6979440 | Shefer et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7119062 | Alvis et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7166570 | Hunter et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192984 | Berg et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196180 | Aeschlimann et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7314636 | Caseres et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7491709 | Carey | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7741476 | Lebreton | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7902171 | Reinmuller et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8124120 | Sadozai et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20020102311 | Gustavsson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020160109 | Yeo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030031638 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093157 | Casares et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119985 | Sehl et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030148995 | Piron et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040032056 | Vang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040101959 | Marko et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127698 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127699 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199241 | Gravett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040265389 | Yui et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050101582 | Lyons et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136122 | Sadozai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142152 | Leshchiner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050181007 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186261 | Avelar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186673 | Geistlich et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050226936 | Agerup | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050271729 | Wang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287180 | Chen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040894 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060095137 | Chung et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122147 | Wohlrab et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141049 | Lyons | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147483 | Chaouk et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189516 | Yang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194758 | Lebreton et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060246137 | Hermitte et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257488 | Hubbard | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060286769 | Tsuchiya et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026070 | Vonwiller et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066816 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077292 | Pinsky | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070203095 | Sadozai et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212385 | David | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224247 | Chudzik et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224278 | Lyons et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070298005 | Thibault | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080044476 | Lyons et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057091 | Abdellaoui et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080089918 | Lebreton | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080188416 | Bernstein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193538 | Kitazono et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200430 | Bitterman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207794 | Wright et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080241252 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268051 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274946 | Giampapa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080279806 | Cho | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090018102 | Moutet et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022808 | Champion et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028817 | Niklason et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036403 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090042834 | Karageozian et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090093755 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110671 | Miyata et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110736 | Boutros | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090143331 | Stoumpoulis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090143348 | Tezel et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148527 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155314 | Tezel et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155362 | Longin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169615 | Pinsky | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090263447 | Asius et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090291986 | Pappas et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090297632 | Waugh | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004198 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028437 | Lebreton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100035838 | Herber et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041788 | Voigts et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100098764 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098794 | Armand | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099623 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111919 | Abuzaina et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100136070 | Dobak et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100226988 | Lebreton | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100255068 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100316683 | Piron et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110034684 | Yokokawa et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110118206 | Lebreton | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
949965 | Jun 1974 | CA |
273823 | Jul 1988 | EP |
416250 | Mar 1991 | EP |
416846 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1247522 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1398131 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1419792 | May 2004 | EP |
1532991 | May 2005 | EP |
1726299 | Nov 2006 | EP |
2236523 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2733427 | Oct 1996 | FR |
2759576 | Aug 1999 | FR |
2759577 | Aug 1999 | FR |
2780730 | Jan 2000 | FR |
2920000 | Feb 2009 | FR |
2924615 | Jun 2009 | FR |
S 55-0153711 | Nov 1980 | JP |
H 7-163655 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2007-063177 | Mar 2007 | JP |
WO 86000079 | Jan 1986 | WO |
WO 86000912 | Feb 1986 | WO |
WO 92000105 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 92020349 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 96033751 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 94001468 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO 94002517 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9409795 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 97004012 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 98035639 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 98035640 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 00001428 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 01079342 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02005753 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02006350 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02009792 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03007782 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 02017713 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2004020473 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004022603 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004073759 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092223 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005040224 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005067994 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074913 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005112888 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006023645 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006067608 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007018124 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070617 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007077399 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007128923 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008034176 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008068297 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008072230 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008077172 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098019 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008139122 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008148967 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2008157608 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009024719 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009026158 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009028764 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009034559 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009073437 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010003797 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010015900 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010027471 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010028025 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010029344 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010038771 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010051641 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010052430 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010053918 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010061005 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2013040242 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adams, “An Analysis of Clinical Studies of the Use of Crosslinked Hyaluronan, Hylan, in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis,” The Journal of Rheumatology, 1993, 16-18, 20 (39). |
Aesthetic Buyers Guide, Juvederm Raises Standards, 2007, 1, 4-7; www.miinews.com. |
Albano et al., “Hydroxyethyl Radicals in Ethanol Hepatotoxicity,” Frontiers in Bioscience, 1999, 533-540, 4. |
Allemann, “Hyaluronic Acid Gel (Juvederm) Preparations in the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles and Folds,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2008, 629-634, 3 (4). |
Antunes et al., “Efficacy of Intrarectal Lidocaine Hydrochloride Gel for Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy,” Clinical Urology, 2004, 380-383, 30. |
Atanassoff et al., “The Effect of Intradermal Administration of Lidocaine and Morphine on the Response to Thermal Stimulation,” Anesth Analg, 1997, 1340-1343, 84. |
Baumann et al.,“Comparison of Smooth-Gel Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers with Cross-linked Bovine Collagen: A Multicenter, Double-Masked, Randomized, Within-Subject Study,” Dermatologic Surgery, 2007, S128-135, 33 (2). |
Beasley et al., “Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Comprehensive Review,” Facial Plastic Surgery, 2009, 86-94, 25 (2). |
Beer, “Dermal Fillers and Combinations of Fillers for Facial Rejuvenation,” Dermatologic Clin, 2009, 427-432, 27 (4). |
Belda et al., “Hyaluronic Acid Combined With Mannitol to Improve Protection Against Free-Radical Endothelial Damage: Experimental Model,” J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 1213-1218, 31. |
Bircher et al., “Delayed-type Hypersensitivity to Subcutaneous Lidocaine With Tolerance to Articaine: Confirmation by In Vivo and In Vitro Tests,” Contact Dermatitis, 1996, 387-389, 34. |
Bluel et al., “Evaluation of Reconstituted Collagen Tape as a Model for Chemically Modified Soft Tissues,” Biomat. Med. Dev. Art. Org., 1981, 37-46, 9 (1). |
Buck, “Injectable Fillers for Facial Rejuvenation: A Review,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009, 11-18, 62. |
Capozzi et al., “Distant Migration of Silicone Gel From a Ruptured Breast Implant,” Silicone Gel Migration, 1978, 302-3, 62 (2). |
Carlin, et al., “Effect of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Xanthine Oxidase and Xanthine Oxidase Induced Depolymerization of Hyaluronic Acid,” Agents and Actions, 1985, 377-384, 16 (5). |
Carruthers et al., “The Science and Art of Dermal Fillers for Soft-Tissue Augmentation,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 2009, 335-350, 8 (4). |
Champion et al., “Role of Target Geometry in Phagocytosis,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2006, 4930-4934, 103 (13). |
Chee, “Estimation of Molecular Weight Averages from Intrinsic Viscosity,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1985, 1359-1360, vol. 30, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Chin et al., “Allergic Hypersensitivity to Lidocaine Hydrochloride,” International Society of Tropical Dermatology, 1980, 147-148. |
Chvapil, “Collagen Sponge: Theory and Practice of Medical Applications,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1977, 721-741, 11. |
Clark et al., “The Influence of Triamcinolone Acetonide on Joint Stiffness in the Rat,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, 1409-1414, 53A (7). |
Cohen et al., “Organization and Adhesive Properties of the Hyaluronan Pericellular Coat of Chondrocytes and Epithelial Cells,” Biophysical Journal, 2003, 1996-2005, 85. |
Cui et al., “The Comparison of Physicochemical Properties of Four Cross-linked Sodium Hyaluronate Gels With Different Cross-linking Agents,” Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 1506-1512, 396-398. |
Decision from the Opposition Division for European Patent No. EP-B-2 289 945, dated Jun. 30, 2017. |
Decision T1250/10-3.3.03 de la Chambre de Recourse 3.3.03 dated Nov. 5, 2012. |
Declaration of Dr. Sebastien Pierre to the EPO in the matter of European Patent: 2289945, Proprietor: Allergan Industrie, dated Jul. 7, 2016. |
Deland, “Intrathecal Toxicity Studies with Benzyl Alcohol,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1973, 153-6, 25, Academic Press, Inc. |
Desai et al., “Molecular Weight of Heparin Using 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy,” J Pharm Sci., 1995, 212-5, 84 (2). |
EP 2289945 Counterstatements, Dec. 21, 2015, EP. |
EP 2289945 Notification of Opposition, Dec. 16, 2015, EP. |
European Pharmacopoeia 5th Ed., Main vol. 5.0, 2005 with Supplements 5.1 and 5.2, Sodium Hyaluronate. |
Eyre et al., “Collagen Cross-Links,” Top Curr Chem, 2005, 207-229, 247, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. |
Falcone et al., “Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Comparison of Rheological Properties,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2008, 264-271, 87 (1). |
Falcone et al., “Temporary Polysaccharide Dermal Fillers: A Model for Persistence Based on Physical Properties”, Dermatologic Surgery, 2009, 1238-1243, 35 (8). |
Farley et al., “Diluting Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in Balanced Salt Solution Reduces the Pain of Intradermal Injection,” Regional Anesthesia, 1994, 48-51, 19 (1). |
Frati et al.,“Degradation of Hyaluronic Acid by Photosensitized Riboflavin In Vitro. Modulation of the Effect by Transition Metals, Radical Quenchers, and Metal Chelators,” Free Radical Biology Medicine, 1996, 1139-1144, 22 (7). |
Fujinaga et al., “Reproductive and Teratogenic Effects of Lidocaine in Sprague-Dawley Rats,” Anesthesiology, 1986, 626-632, 65. |
Gammaitoni et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Continuously Applied Lidocaine Patches 5%,” Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2002, 2215-2220, 59. |
Ginshicel Mh, Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose, Retrieved on Nov. 12, 2008 http://www.ginshicel.cn/MHPC.html, 2007, p. 1-3, 2 (3). |
Gold, “Use of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for the Treatment of the Aging Face,” Clin. Interventions Aging, 2007, 369-376, 2 (3). |
Goldberg, “Breakthroughs in US dermal fillers for facial soft-tissue augmentation,” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 2009, 240-247, 11, Informa UK Ltd. |
Gomis et al., “Effects of Different Molecular Weight Elastoviscous Hyaluronan Solutions on Articular Nociceptive Afferents,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, Jan. 2004, 314-326, 50(1). |
Graefe et al., “Sensitive and Specific Photometric Determination of Mannitol,” Clin Chem Lab Med, 2003, 1049-1055, 41 (8). |
Grecomoro et al., “Intra-articular treatment with sodium hyaluronate in gonarthrosis: a controlled clinical trial versus placebo,” Pharmatherapeutica, 1987, 137-141, 5 (2). |
Grillo et al., “Thermal Reconstitution of Collagen From Solution and the Response to Its Heterologous Implantation,” JSR, 1962, 69-82, 2 (1). |
Harding et al., “Molecular Weight Determination of Polysaccharides,” Advances in Carbohydrate Analysis, 1991, 63-144, vol. 1, JAI Press Ltd. |
Hassan et al., “Effects of Adjuvants to Local Anaesthetics on Their Duration. III. Experimental Studies of Hyaluronic Acid,” Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., 1985, 1, 29 (4). |
Hayashibara, “AA2G,” Sep. 23, 2007, Retrieved on Jan. 17, 2012, http://web.archive.org/web/20070923072010/http://www.hayashibara-intl.com-/cosmetics/aa2g.html. |
Helliwell, “Use of an objective measure of articular stiffness to record changes in finger joints after intra-articular injection of corticosteroid,” Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, 1997, 71-73, 56. |
Hertzberger-Ten et al., “Intra-articular steroids in pauciarticular juvenile chronic arthritis, type 1,” European Journal of Pediatrics, 1991, 170-172, 150. |
Hetherington et al., “Potential for Patient Harm from Intrathecal Administration of Preserved Solutions,” Med J Aust., 2000, 1, 173(3). |
Hurst, “Adhesive Arachnoiditis and Vascular Blockage Caused by Detergents and Other Chemical Irritants: An Experimental Study,” J Path. Bact., 1955, 167, 70. |
Intramed (PTY) LTD, Intramed Mannitol 20% m/v Infusion, Package Insert, Jan. 1979, 4 pages, 12-214/8-94, ZA. |
Jones et al., “Intra-articular hyaluronic acid compared to intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide in inflammatory knee osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1995, 269-273, 3. |
Kablik et al., “Comparative Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers,” Dermatology Surgery, 2009, 302-312, 35. |
Klein, “Skin Filling Collagen and Other Injectables of the Skin,” Fundamentals of Cosmetic Surgery, 2001, 491-508, 3 (19). |
Kogan et al., “Hyaluronic Acid: A Biopolymer with Versatile Physico-Chemical and Biological Properties,” Handbook of Polymer Research: Monomers, Oligomers, Polymers and Composites, 2007, 415-416, Chapter 31, Nova Science Publilshers, Inc. |
Kopp et al., “The Short-term Effect of Intra-articular Injections of Sodium Hyaluronate and Corticosteroid on Temporomandibular Joint Pain and Dysfunction,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1985, 429-435, 43. |
Kulicke et al., “Visco-Elastic Properties of Sodium Hyaluronate Solutions,” Institute for Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, 2008, 585-587, DE. |
Laeschke, “Biocompatibility of Microparticles Into Soft Tissue Fillers,” Semin Cutan Med Surg, 2004, 214-217, 23. |
Lamar et al., “Antifibrosis Effect of Novel Gels in Anterior Ciliary Sclerotomy (ACS),” 2002, 1 Page, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc. |
Levy et al., “Lidocaine Hypersensitivity After Subconjunctival Injection”, Can J Ophthalmol, 2006, 204-206, 41. |
Lindvall et al., “Influence of Various Compounds on the Degradation of Hyaluronic Acid by a Myeloperoxidase System”, Chemico-Biological Interactions, 1994, 1-12, 90. |
Lupo, “Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Facial Rejuvenation,” Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 2006, 122-126, 25. |
Mackley et al., “Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity to Lidocaine,” Arch Dermatol, 2003, 343-346, 139. |
Mancinelli et al., “Intramuscular High-dose Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Asthma,” West J Med, 1997, 322-329, 167 (5). |
Matsumoto et al., “Reducing the Discomfort of Lidocaine Administration Through pH Buffering,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1994, 171-175, 5 (1). |
Mccarty et al., “Inflammatory Reaction after Intrasynovial Injection of Microcrystalline Adrenocorticosteroid Esters,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1964, 359-367, 7 (4). |
Mccleland et al., “Evaluation of Artecoll Polymethylmethacrylate Implant for Soft-Tissue Augmentation: Biocompatibility and Chemical Characterization,” Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 1997, 1466-1474, 100 (6). |
Mcpherson et al., “Development and Biochemical Characterization of Injectable Collagen,” Journal of Dermatol Surg Oncol, 1988, 13-20, 14 (Suppl 1) 7. |
Millay et al., “Vasoconstrictors in Facial Plastic Surgery,” Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 1991, 160-163, 117. |
Orvisky et al., “High-molecular-weight Hyaluronan—a Valuable Tool in Testing the Antioxidative Activity of Amphiphilic Drugs Stobadine and Vinpocetine,” Journal of Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 1997, 419-424, 16. |
Osmitrol (generic name Mannitol), Official FDA Information, side effects and uses, http://www.drugs.com/pro/osmitrol.html, 2010, 10 Pages. |
Park et al., “Biological Characterization of EDC-Crosslinked Collagen-Hyaluronic Acid Matrix in Dermal Tissue Restoration,” Biomaterials, 2003, 1631-1641, 24. |
Park et al., “Characterization of Porous Collagen/Hyaluronic Acid Scaffold Modified by 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)Carbodiimide Cross-Linking,” Biomaterials, 2002, 1205-1212, 23. |
Powell, “Stability of Lidocaine in Aqueous Solution: Effect of Temperature, pH, Buffer, and Metal Ions on Amide Hydrolysis,” Pharmaceutical Research, 1987, 42-45, 4 (1). |
Prestwich, “Evaluating Drug Efficacy and Toxicology in Three Dimensions: Using Synthetic Extracellular Matrices in Drug Discovery,” Accounts of Chemical Research, Jan. 2008, 139-148, 41(1). |
R&D Curriculum Vitae of Sebastien Pierre, Ph.D., Research Manager, Sr. |
Rehakova et al., “Properties of Collagen and Hyaluronic Acid Composite Materials and Their Modification by Chemical Crosslinking,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1996, 369-372, 30, US. |
Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1980, 16th Edition, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pennsylvania. |
Response to Summons to attend Oral Proceedings under Rule 115(1) EPC dated Nov. 10, 2016, Opposition against EP 2289945 Proprietor: Allergan Idustrie Opponent: Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA, dated Apr. 26, 2017. |
Rosenblatt. et al., “Chain Rigidity and Diffusional Release in Biopolymer Gels,” Controlled Release Society, 1993, 264-265, 20. |
Rosenblatt et al., “The Effect of Collagen Fiber Size Distribution on the Release Rate of Proteins From Collagen Matrices by Diffusion,” J Controlled Release, 1989, 195-203, 9. |
Sannino et al., “Crosslinking of Cellulose Derivatives and Hyaluronic Acid With Water-Soluble Carbodiimide,” Polymer, 2005, 11206-11212, 46. |
Schilling et al., Is Human Height Bimodal, The American Statistician, 2002, 223-229, 56 (3), US. |
Sculptra® (injectable poly-L-lactic acid) Directions for Use, Product Insert, Jul. 2004, 12 Pages, Dermik Laboratories. |
Segura et al., “Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels: A Strategy to Functionalize and Pattern,” Biomaterials, 2005, 359-371, 26 (4). |
Selvi et al., “Arthritis Induced by Corticosteroid Crystals,” The Journal of Rheumatology, 2004, 622, 31 (3). |
Serban et al., “Modular Extracellular Matrices: Solutions for the Puzzle,” Methods, 2008, 93-98, 45 (1). |
Shu et al, “Synthesis and evaluation of injectable, in situ crosslinkable synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2006, 902-912, 79A. |
Silver et al., “Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid and Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in Solution: Evaluation of Coating Ability,” Journal of Applied Biomaterials, 1994, 89-98, 5. |
Skardal et al., “Bioprinting Vessel-Like Constructs Using Hyaluronan Hydrogels Crosslinked With Tetrahedral Polyethylene Glycol Tetracrylates,” Biomaterials, 2010, 6173-6181, 31. |
Smith et al., “Five Percent Lidocaine Cream Applied Simultaneously to the Skin and Mucosa of the Lips Creates Excellent Anesthesia for Filler Injections,” Dermatol Surg, 2005, 1635-1637, 31. |
Stanford Chemicals Company, Certificate of Analysis, Sodium Hyaluronate. |
Tezel et al., “The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers,” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 2008, 35-42, 10. |
Visiol, TRB Chemedica Ophthalmic Line, Product Info, May 2014, p. 1-2, Geneva, CH. |
Visiol, Viscoelstic Gel for Use in Ocular Surgery, http://www.trbchemedica.com/index.php/option=com_content&tas, 2010, 1 Page. |
Wagner, “The Mark-Houwink-Sakurada Equation for the Viscosity of Linear Polyethylene,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1985, 611-617, vol. 14, No. 2. |
Wahl, “European Evaluation of a New Hyaluronic Acid Filler Incorporating Lidocaine,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2008, 298-303, 7. |
Waraszkiewicz et al., “Stability-Indicating High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine Injectable Solutions,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1981, 1215-1218, 70 (11). |
Weidmann, “New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Subdermal and Long-lasting Volume Restoration of the Face,” European Dermatology, 2009, 65-68. |
Xia et al., “Comparison of Effects of Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Buffered Lidocaine, Diphenhydramine, and Normal Saline After Intradermal Injection,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2002, 339-343, 14. |
Yeom et al., “Effect of Cross-Linking Reagents for Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Dermal Fillers on Tissue Augmentation and Regeneration,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2010, 240-247, 21, American Chemical Society. |
Yui et al., “Inflammation Responsive Degradation of Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gels,” Journal of Controlled Release, 1992, 105-116, 26. |
Yui et al., “Photo-Responsive Degradation of Heterogeneous Hydrogels Comprising Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid and Lipid Microspheres for Temporal Drug Delivery,” Journal of Controlled Release, 1993, 141-145, 26. |
Yun et al., “Hyaluronan Microspheres for Sustained Gene Delivery and Site-Specific Targeting,” Biomaterials, 2004, 147-157, 25, US. |
Zheng et al., “In Situ Crosslinkable Hyaluronan Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, 2004, 1339-1348, 25. |
Zulian et al., “Triamcinolone Acetonide and Hexacetonide Intra-Articular Treatment of Symmetrical Joints in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Double-Blind Trial,” Rheumatology, 2004, 1288-1291, 43. |
Transmittal of Third Party Observations to Applicant from European Application No. 14200048.8, dated Jan. 13, 2020, 104 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190022130 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10552309 | US | |
Child | 12782488 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15209561 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 16137447 | US | |
Parent | 14535220 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15209561 | US | |
Parent | 14024916 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14535220 | US | |
Parent | 13566767 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14024916 | US | |
Parent | 12782488 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13566767 | US |