Inner gantry

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8916843
  • Patent Number
    8,916,843
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 25, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 23, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system includes a patient support and an outer gantry on which an accelerator is mounted to enable the accelerator to move through a range of positions around a patient on the patient support. The accelerator is configured to produce a proton or ion beam having an energy level sufficient to reach a target in the patient. An inner gantry includes an aperture for directing the proton or ion beam towards the target.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This patent application describes an inner gantry for use with a particle beam therapy system.


BACKGROUND

The design of a proton or ion radiation therapy system for a clinical environment should take account of overall size, cost, and complexity. Available space is usually limited in crowded clinical environments. Lower cost allows more systems to be deployed to reach a broader patient population. Less complexity reduces operating costs and makes the system more reliable for routine clinical use.


Other considerations may also bear on the design of such a therapy system. By configuring the system to apply the treatment to patients who are held in a stable, reproducible position (for example, lying supine on a flat table), the physician can more precisely relocate the intended target, relative to the patient's anatomy, at each treatment. Reliable reproduction of the patient's position for each treatment also can be aided using custom molds and braces fitted to the patient. With a patient in a stable, fixed position, the radiotherapy beam can be directed into the patient from a succession of angles, so that, over the course of the treatment, the radiation dose at the target is enhanced while the extraneous radiation dose is spread over non-target tissues.


Traditionally, an isocentric gantry is rotated around the supine patient to direct the radiation beam along successive paths that lie at a range of angles in a common vertical plane toward a single point (called an isocenter) within the patient. By rotating the table on which the patient lies around a vertical axis, the beam can be directed into the patient along different paths. Other techniques have been used to vary the position of the radiation source around the patient, including robotic manipulation.


SUMMARY

In general, this patent application describes a system comprising a patient support and an outer gantry on which an accelerator is mounted. The outer gantry enables the accelerator to move through a range of positions around a patient on the patient support. The accelerator is configured to produce a proton or ion beam having an energy level sufficient to reach a target in the patient. An inner gantry comprises an aperture for directing the proton or ion beam towards the target. The system described above may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.


The inner gantry may comprise an applicator for holding the aperture. The applicator may be movable along the inner gantry. The applicator may be configured to move the aperture relative to the patient. For example, the applicator may be configured to move the aperture towards, or away from, the patient.


The inner gantry may comprise a track along which the applicator is configured to move. A cover may be movable relative to the track. The cover may be for preventing objects from falling into a vault below the patient support.


A processing device may be programmed to control movement of the outer gantry and/or the inner gantry. The processing device may be configured to control movement of the outer gantry and/or the inner gantry to substantially align the proton or ion beam with the aperture. The aperture may be configured to substantially collimate the proton or ion beam. The system may comprise a patient support that is movable relative to the inner gantry and/or the outer gantry.


In general, this patent application also describes a system comprising a patient support and a gantry on which a particle beam accelerator is mounted. The particle beam accelerator is for directing a particle beam towards the patient support. The gantry is movable to positions above and below the patient support. An aperture is located between the particle beam accelerator and the patient support. The aperture is for modifying the particle beam. The system described above may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.


The system may comprise an apparatus to hold the aperture. The apparatus may be movable relative to the patient support. The apparatus may comprise a robotic arm that is computer controlled to position the aperture relative to the patient support. The apparatus may comprise a stand, which is manually positionable, to hold the aperture.


The particle beam accelerator may be a synchrocyclotron. The system may comprise a second gantry that includes an applicator to hold the aperture. The second gantry may be controlled to substantially align the aperture with the particle beam.


In general, this patent application also describes a system comprising a patient support, a first gantry that is angularly movable relative to the patient support, and a particle accelerator that is mounted on the first gantry. The particle accelerator is configured to provide a particle beam directly towards the patient support. A second gantry is positioned relative to the patient support. The second gantry is substantially C-shaped. The system described above may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.


The second gantry may comprise a track, an aperture, and an applicator. The applicator may be movable along the track so that the aperture is substantially aligned with the particle beam. The aperture may alter the particle beam before the particle beam reaches a patient on the patient support.


The system may comprise a computer to control the first gantry and the second gantry. The first gantry may be movable so that the particle accelerator is in a position above the patient support to a position below the patient support. The second gantry may comprise a cover to protect the particle accelerator when the particle accelerator is in the position below the patient support. The inner gantry may comprise a device to alter a size and/or shape of the particle beam. The device for altering the particle beam may be movable relative to the synchrocyclotron.


Any of the foregoing features may be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.


The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Further features, aspects, and advantages will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a therapy system.



FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view of components of a synchrocyclotron.



FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 are cross-sectional views of a synchrocyclotron.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a synchrocyclotron.



FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a reverse bobbin and windings.



FIG. 8 is a cross sectional view of a cable-in-channel composite conductor.



FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of an ion source.



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a dee plate and a dummy dee.



FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a vault.



FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a treatment room with a vault.



FIG. 13 shows a profile of one-half of a symmetrical profile of a pole face and a pole piece.



FIG. 14 shows a patient positioned within an inner gantry in a treatment room.



FIG. 15 is a perspective view showing both the outer and inner gantries positioned to apply a proton or ion beam from above the patient.



FIG. 16 shows the shape of a particle beam provided by an accelerator.



FIG. 17 is a perspective view showing both the outer and inner gantries positioned to apply a proton or ion beam from above below the patient.



FIG. 18 shows components of the inner gantry.



FIG. 19 shows a robotic arm used to perform functions of the inner gantry.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As shown in FIG. 1, a charged particle radiation therapy system 500 includes a beam-producing particle accelerator 502 having a weight and size small enough to permit it to be mounted on a rotating gantry 504 with its output directed straight (that is, essentially directly) from the accelerator housing toward a patient 506.


In some implementations, the steel gantry has two legs 508, 510 mounted for rotation on two respective bearings 512, 514 that lie on opposite sides of the patient. The accelerator is supported by a steel truss 516 that is long enough to span a treatment area 518 in which the patient lies (e.g., twice as long as a tall person, to permit the person to be rotated fully within the space with any desired target area of the patient remaining in the line of the beam) and is attached stably at both ends to the rotating legs of the gantry.


In some examples, the rotation of the gantry is limited to a range 520 of less than 360 degrees, e.g., about 180 degrees, to permit a floor 522 to extend from a wall of the vault 524 that houses the therapy system into the patient treatment area. The limited rotation range of the gantry also reduces the required thickness of some of the walls (which never directly receive the beam, e.g., wall 530), which provide radiation shielding of people outside the treatment area. A range of 180 degrees of gantry rotation is enough to cover all treatment approach angles, but providing a larger range of travel can be useful. For example the range of rotation may be between 180 and 330 degrees and still provide clearance for the therapy floor space.


The horizontal rotational axis 532 of the gantry is located nominally one meter above the floor where the patient and therapist interact with the therapy system. This floor is positioned about 3 meters above the bottom floor of the therapy system shielded vault. The accelerator can swing under the raised floor for delivery of treatment beams from below the rotational axis. The patient couch moves and rotates in a substantially horizontal plane parallel to the rotational axis of the gantry. The couch can rotate through a range 534 of about 270 degrees in the horizontal plane with this configuration. This combination of gantry and patient rotational ranges and degrees of freedom allow the therapist to select virtually any approach angle for the beam. If needed, the patient can be placed on the couch in the opposite orientation and then all possible angles can be used.


In some implementations, the accelerator uses a synchrocyclotron configuration having a very high magnetic field superconducting electromagnetic structure. Because the bend radius of a charged particle of a given kinetic energy is reduced in direct proportion to an increase in the magnetic field applied to it, the very high magnetic field superconducting magnetic structure permits the accelerator to be made smaller and lighter. The synchrocyclotron uses a magnetic field that is uniform in rotation angle and falls off in strength with increasing radius. Such a field shape can be achieved regardless of the magnitude of the magnetic field, so in theory there is no upper limit to the magnetic field strength (and therefore the resulting particle energy at a fixed radius) that can be used in a synchrocyclotron.


Certain superconducting materials begin to lose their superconducting properties in the presence of very high magnetic fields. High performance superconducting wire windings are used to allow very high magnetic fields to be achieved.


Superconducting materials typically need to be cooled to low temperatures for their superconducting properties to be realized. In some examples described here, cryo-coolers are used to bring the superconducting coil windings to temperatures near absolute zero. Using cryo-coolers can reduce complexity and cost.


The synchrocyclotron is supported on the gantry so that the beam is generated directly in line with the patient. The gantry permits rotation of the cyclotron about a horizontal rotational axis that contains a point (isocenter 540) within, or near, the patient. The split truss that is parallel to the rotational axis, supports the cyclotron on both sides.


Because the rotational range of the gantry is limited, a patient support area can be accommodated in a wide area around the isocenter. Because the floor can be extended broadly around the isocenter, a patient support table can be positioned to move relative to and to rotate about a vertical axis 542 through the isocenter so that, by a combination of gantry rotation and table motion and rotation, any angle of beam direction into any part of the patient can be achieved. The two gantry arms are separated by more than twice the height of a tall patient, allowing the couch with patient to rotate and translate in a horizontal plane above the raised floor.


Limiting the gantry rotation angle allows for a reduction in the thickness of at least one of the walls surrounding the treatment room. Thick walls, typically constructed of concrete, provide radiation protection to individuals outside the treatment room. A wall downstream of a stopping proton beam may be about twice as thick as a wall at the opposite end of the room to provide an equivalent level of protection. Limiting the range of gantry rotation enables the treatment room to be sited below earth grade on three sides, while allowing an occupied area adjacent to the thinnest wall reducing the cost of constructing the treatment room.


In the example implementation shown in FIG. 1, the superconducting synchrocyclotron 502 operates with a peak magnetic field in a pole gap of the synchrocyclotron of 8.8 Tesla. The synchrocyclotron produces a beam of protons having an energy of 250 MeV. In other implementations the field strength could be in the range of 6 to 20 Tesla and the proton energy could be in the range of 150 to 300 MeV


The radiation therapy system described in this example is used for proton radiation therapy, but the same principles and details can be applied in analogous systems for use in heavy ion (ion) treatment systems.


As shown in FIGS. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, an example synchrocyclotron 10 (502 in FIG. 1) includes a magnet system 12 that contains an ion source 90, a radiofrequency drive system 91, and a beam extraction system 38. The magnetic field established by the magnet system has a shape appropriate to maintain focus of a contained proton beam using a combination of a split pair of annular superconducting coils 40, 42 and a pair of shaped ferromagnetic (e.g., low carbon steel) pole faces 44, 46.


The two superconducting magnet coils are centered on a common axis 47 and are spaced apart along the axis. As shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, the coils are formed by of Nb3Sn-based superconducting 0.6 mm diameter strands 48 (that initially comprise a niobium-tin core surrounded by a copper sheath) deployed in a Rutherford cable-in-channel conductor geometry. After six individual strands are laid in a copper channel 50, they are heated to cause a reaction that forms the final (brittle) material of the winding. After the material has been reacted, the wires are soldered into the copper channel (outer dimensions 3.02×1.96 mm and inner dimensions 2.05×1.27 mm) and covered with insulation 52 (in this example, a woven fiberglass material). The copper channel containing the wires 53 is then wound in a coil having a rectangular cross-section of 6.0 cm×15.25 cm, having 30 layers and 47 turns per layer. The wound coil is then vacuum impregnated with an epoxy compound 54. The finished coils are mounted on an annular stainless steel reverse bobbin 56. A heater blanket 55 is held against the inner face of the bobbin and the windings to protect the assembly in the event of a magnet quench. In an alternate version, the superconducting coil may be formed of 0.8 mm diameter Nb3Sn based strands. These strands can be deployed in a 4 strand cable, heat treated to form the superconducting matrix and soldered into a copper channel of outer dimension 3.19 by 2.57 mm. The integrated cable in channel conductor can be insulated with overlapped woven fiberglass tape and then wound into coils of 49 turns and 26 layers deep with a rectangular cross section of 79.79 mm by 180.5 mm and inner radius of 374.65 mm. The wound coil is then vacuum impregnated with an epoxy compound. The entire coil can then be covered with copper sheets to provide thermal conductivity and mechanical stability and then contained in an additional layer of epoxy. The precompression of the coil can be provided by heating the stainless steel reverse bobbin and fitting the coils within the reverse bobbin. The reverse bobbin inner diameter is chosen so that when the entire mass is cooled to 4 K, the reverse bobbin stays in contact with the coil and provides some compression. Heating the stainless steel reverse bobbin to approximately 50 degrees C. and fitting coils at room temperature (20 degrees C.) can achieve this.


The geometry of the coil is maintained by mounting the coils in a “reverse” rectangular bobbin 56 and incorporating a pre-compression stainless steel bladder 58 between each coil and an inner face 57 of the bobbin to exert a restorative force 60 that works against the distorting force produced when the coils are energized. The bladder is pre-compressed after the coils and the heater blanket are assembled on the bobbin, by injecting epoxy into the bladder and allowing it to harden. The precompression force of the bladder is set to minimize the strain in the brittle Nb3Sn superconducting matrix through all phases of cool-down and magnet energizing.


As shown in FIG. 5, the coil position is maintained relative to the magnet yoke and cryostat using a set of warm-to-cold support straps 402, 404, 406. Supporting the cold mass with thin straps reduces the heat leakage imparted to the cold mass by the rigid support system. The straps are arranged to withstand the varying gravitational force on the coil as the magnet rotates on board the gantry. They withstand the combined effects of gravity and the large de-centering force realized by the coil when it is perturbed from a perfectly symmetric position relative to the magnet yoke. Additionally the links act to reduce dynamic forces imparted on the coil as the gantry accelerates and decelerates when its position is changed. Each warm-to-cold support includes 3 S2 fiberglass links. Two links 410, 412 are supported across pins between the warm yoke and an intermediate temperature (50-70 K), and one link 408 is supported across the intermediate temperature pin and a pin attached to the cold mass. Each link is 10.2 cm long (pin center to pin center) and is 20 mm wide. The link thickness is 1.59 mm. Each pin is made of stainless steel and is 47.7 mm in diameter.


Referring to FIG. 3, the field strength profile as a function of radius is determined largely by choice of coil geometry; the pole faces 44, 46 of the permeable yoke material can be contoured to fine tune the shape of the magnetic field to ensure that the particle beam remains focused during acceleration.


The superconducting coils are maintained at temperatures near absolute zero (e.g., about 4 degrees Kelvin) by enclosing the coil assembly (the coils and the bobbin) inside an evacuated annular aluminum or stainless steel cryostatic chamber 70 that provides a free space around the coil structure, except at a limited set of support points 71, 73. In an alternate version (FIG. 4) the outer wall of the cryostat may be made of low carbon steel to provide an additional return flux path for the magnetic field. The temperature near absolute zero is achieved and maintained using two Gifford-McMahon cryo-coolers 72, 74 that are arranged at different positions on the coil assembly. Each cryo-cooler has a cold end 76 in contact with the coil assembly. The cryo-cooler heads 78 are supplied with compressed Helium from a compressor 80. Two other Gifford-McMahon cryo-coolers 77, 79 are arranged to cool high temperature (e.g., 60-80 degrees Kelvin) leads 81 that supply current to the superconducting windings.


The coil assembly and cryostatic chambers are mounted within and fully enclosed by two halves 81, 83 of a pillbox-shaped magnet yoke 82. In this example, the inner diameter of the coil assembly is about 140 cm. The iron yoke 82 provides a path for the return magnetic field flux 84 and magnetically shields the volume 86 between the pole faces 44, 46 to prevent external magnetic influences from perturbing the shape of the magnetic field within that volume. The yoke also serves to decrease the stray magnetic field in the vicinity of the accelerator.


As shown in FIGS. 3 and 9, the synchrocyclotron includes an ion source 90 of a Penning ion gauge geometry located near the geometric center 92 of the magnet structure 82. The ion source may be as described below, or the ion source may be of the type described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,662, entitled “Interrupted Particle Source” , the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Ion source 90 is fed from a supply 99 of hydrogen through a gas line 101 and tube 194 that delivers gaseous hydrogen. Electric cables 94 carry an electric current from a current source 95 to stimulate electron discharge from cathodes 192, 190 that are aligned with the magnetic field, 200.


In this example, the discharged electrons ionize the gas exiting through a small hole from tube 194 to create a supply of positive ions (protons) for acceleration by one semicircular (dee-shaped) radio-frequency plate 100 that spans half of the space enclosed by the magnet structure and one dummy dee plate 102. In the case of an interrupted ion source, all (or a substantial part) of the tube containing plasma is removed at the acceleration region, thereby allowing ions to be more rapidly accelerated in a relatively high magnetic field.


As shown in FIG. 10, the dee plate 100 is a hollow metal structure that has two semicircular surfaces 103, 105 that enclose a space 107 in which the protons are accelerated during half of their rotation around the space enclosed by the magnet structure. A duct 109 opening into the space 107 extends through the yoke to an external location from which a vacuum pump 111 can be attached to evacuate the space 107 and the rest of the space within a vacuum chamber 119 in which the acceleration takes place. The dummy dee 102 comprises a rectangular metal ring that is spaced near to the exposed rim of the dee plate. The dummy dee is grounded to the vacuum chamber and magnet yoke. The dee plate 100 is driven by a radio-frequency signal that is applied at the end of a radio-frequency transmission line to impart an electric field in the space 107. The radio frequency electric field is made to vary in time as the accelerated particle beam increases in distance from the geometric center. Examples of radio frequency waveform generators that are useful for this purpose are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/187,633, titled “A Programmable Radio Frequency Waveform Generator for a Synchrocyclotron,” filed Jul. 21, 2005, and in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/590,089, same title, filed on Jul. 21, 2004, both of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. The radio frequency electric field may be controlled in the manner described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,359, entitled “Matching A Resonant Frequency Of A Resonant Cavity To A Frequency Of An Input Voltage” (Attorney Docket No. 17970-011001), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.


For the beam emerging from the centrally located ion source to clear the ion source structure as it begins to spiral outward, a large voltage difference is required across the radio frequency plates. 20,000 Volts is applied across the radio frequency plates. In some versions from 8,000 to 20,000 Volts may be applied across the radio frequency plates. To reduce the power required to drive this large voltage, the magnet structure is arranged to reduce the capacitance between the radio frequency plates and ground. This is done by forming holes with sufficient clearance from the radio frequency structures through the outer yoke and the cryostat housing and making sufficient space between the magnet pole faces.


The high voltage alternating potential that drives the dee plate has a frequency that is swept downward during the accelerating cycle to account for the increasing relativistic mass of the protons and the decreasing magnetic field. The dummy dee does not require a hollow semi-cylindrical structure as it is at ground potential along with the vacuum chamber walls. Other plate arrangements could be used such as more than one pair of accelerating electrodes driven with different electrical phases or multiples of the fundamental frequency. The RF structure can be tuned to keep the Q high during the required frequency sweep by using, for example, a rotating capacitor having intermeshing rotating and stationary blades. During each meshing of the blades, the capacitance increases, thus lowering the resonant frequency of the RF structure. The blades can be shaped to create a precise frequency sweep required. A drive motor for the rotating condenser can be phase locked to the RF generator for precise control. One bunch of particles is accelerated during each meshing of the blades of the rotating condenser.


The vacuum chamber 119 in which the acceleration occurs is a generally cylindrical container that is thinner in the center and thicker at the rim. The vacuum chamber encloses the RF plates and the ion source and is evacuated by the vacuum pump 111. Maintaining a high vacuum insures that accelerating ions are not lost to collisions with gas molecules and enables the RF voltage to be kept at a higher level without arcing to ground.


Protons traverse a generally spiral path beginning at the ion source. In half of each loop of the spiral path, the protons gain energy as they pass through the RF electric field in space 107. As the ions gain energy, the radius of the central orbit of each successive loop of their spiral path is larger than the prior loop until the loop radius reaches the maximum radius of the pole face. At that location a magnetic and electric field perturbation directs ions into an area where the magnetic field rapidly decreases, and the ions depart the area of the high magnetic field and are directed through an evacuated tube 38 to exit the yoke of the cyclotron. The ions exiting the cyclotron will tend to disperse as they enter the area of markedly decreased magnetic field that exists in the room around the cyclotron. Beam shaping elements 107, 109 in the extraction channel 38 redirect the ions so that they stay in a straight beam of limited spatial extent.


The magnetic field within the pole gap needs to have certain properties to maintain the beam within the evacuated chamber as it accelerates. The magnetic field index n, which is shown below,

n=−(r/B)dB/dr,

should be kept positive to maintain this “weak” focusing. Here r is the radius of the beam and B is the magnetic field. Additionally the field index needs to be maintained below 0.2, because at this value the periodicity of radial oscillations and vertical oscillations of the beam coincide in a vr=2 vz resonance. The betatron frequencies are defined by vr=(1-n)1/2 and vz=n1/2. The ferromagnetic pole face is designed to shape the magnetic field generated by the coils so that the field index n is maintained positive and less than 0.2 in the smallest diameter consistent with a 250 MeV beam in the given magnetic field.


As the beam exits the extraction channel it is passed through a beam formation system 125 (FIG. 5) that can be programmably controlled to create a desired combination of scattering angle and range modulation for the beam. Examples of beam forming systems useful for that purpose are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/949,734, titled “A Programmable Particle Scatterer for Radiation Therapy Beam Formation”, filed Sep. 24, 2004, and U.S. Provisional Application No.60/590,088, filed Jul. 21, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Beam formation system 125 may be used in conjunction with an inner gantry 601, which is described below, to direct a beam to the patient.


During operation, the plates absorb energy from the applied radio frequency field as a result of conductive resistance along the surfaces of the plates. This energy appears as heat and is removed from the plates using water cooling lines 108 that release the heat in a heat exchanger 113 (FIG. 3).


Stray magnetic fields exiting from the cyclotron are limited by both the pillbox magnet yoke (which also serves as a shield) and a separate magnetic shield 114. The separate magnetic shield includes of a layer 117 of ferromagnetic material (e.g., steel or iron) that encloses the pillbox yoke, separated by a space 116. This configuration that includes a sandwich of a yoke, a space, and a shield achieves adequate shielding for a given leakage magnetic field at lower weight.


As mentioned, the gantry allows the synchrocyclotron to be rotated about the horizontal rotational axis 532. The truss structure 516 has two generally parallel spans 580, 582. The synchrocyclotron is cradled between the spans about midway between the legs. The gantry is balanced for rotation about the bearings using counterweights 122, 124 mounted on ends of the legs opposite the truss.


The gantry is driven to rotate by an electric motor mounted to one of the gantry legs and connected to the bearing housings by drive gears and belts or chains. The rotational position of the gantry is derived from signals provided by shaft angle encoders incorporated into the gantry drive motors and the drive gears.


At the location at which the ion beam exits the cyclotron, the beam formation system 125 acts on the ion beam to give it properties suitable for patient treatment. For example, the beam may be spread and its depth of penetration varied to provide uniform radiation across a given target volume. The beam formation system can include passive scattering elements as well as active scanning elements.


All of the active systems of the synchrocyclotron (the current driven superconducting coils, the RF-driven plates, the vacuum pumps for the vacuum acceleration chamber and for the superconducting coil cooling chamber, the current driven ion source, the hydrogen gas source, and the RF plate coolers, for example), are controlled by appropriate synchrocyclotron control electronics (not shown), which may include, e.g., a computer programmed with appropriate programs to effect control.


The control of the gantry, the patient support, the active beam shaping elements, and the synchrocyclotron to perform a therapy session is achieved by appropriate therapy control electronics (not shown).


As shown in FIGS. 1, 11, and 12, the gantry bearings are supported by the walls of a cyclotron vault 524. The gantry enables the cyclotron to be swung through a range 520 of 180 degrees (or more) including positions above, to the side of, and below the patient. The vault is tall enough to clear the gantry at the top and bottom extremes of its motion. A maze 146 sided by walls 148, 150 provides an entry and exit route for therapists and patients. Because at least one wall 152 is never in line with the proton beam directly from the cyclotron, it can be made relatively thin and still perform its shielding function. The other three side walls 154, 156, 150/148 of the room, which may need to be more heavily shielded, can be buried within an earthen hill (not shown). The required thickness of walls 154, 156, and 158 can be reduced, because the earth can itself provide some of the needed shielding.


Referring to FIGS. 12 and 13, for safety and aesthetic reasons, a therapy room 160 may be constructed within the vault. The therapy room is cantilevered from walls 154, 156, 150 and the base 162 of the containing room into the space between the gantry legs in a manner that clears the swinging gantry and also maximizes the extent of the floor space 164 of the therapy room. Periodic servicing of the accelerator can be accomplished in the space below the raised floor. When the accelerator is rotated to the down position on the gantry, full access to the accelerator is possible in a space separate from the treatment area. Power supplies, cooling equipment, vacuum pumps and other support equipment can be located under the raised floor in this separate space.


Within the treatment room, the patient support 170 can be mounted in a variety of ways that permit the support to be raised and lowered and the patient to be rotated and moved to a variety of positions and orientations.


In system 602 of FIG. 14, a beam-producing particle accelerator, in this case synchrocyclotron 604, is mounted on rotating gantry 605. Rotating gantry 605 is of the type described herein, and can angularly rotate around patient support 606. This feature enables synchrocyclotron 604 to provide a particle beam directly to the patient from various angles. For example, as in FIG. 14, if synchrocyclotron 604 is above patient support 606, the particle beam may be directed downwards toward the patient. Alternatively, if synchrocyclotron 604 is below patient support 606, the particle beam may be directed upwards toward the patient. The particle beam is applied directly to the patient in the sense that an intermediary beam routing mechanism is not required. A routing mechanism, in this context, is different from a shaping or sizing mechanism in that a shaping or sizing mechanism does not re-route the beam, but rather sizes and/or shapes the beam while maintaining the same general trajectory of the beam.


Referring also to FIG. 15, an inner gantry 601 may be included system 602. In this example, inner gantry 601 is roughly C-shaped, as shown. Inner gantry 601 includes an applicator 610. Applicator 610 is mounted in a manner that permits applicator 610 to move along the surface 611 of inner gantry 601 relative to patient support 606 (which is a different type of support than that depicted in FIG. 12). This enables the applicator to be positioned anywhere within, e.g., a half-circle around the patient, e.g., anywhere above, alongside, or below the patient 607. Applicator 610 may alter the particle beam provided by synchrocyclotron 604. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 16, the particle beam 611 provided by the beam shaping system of synchrocyclotron 604 may diverge the further the particle beam gets from the output of synchrocyclotron 604. Applicator 610 may receive the particle beam from the output of synchrocyclotron 604 and alter characteristics of the particle beam. For example, applicator 610 may include an aperture and/or other beam-focusing mechanisms to substantially collimate the particle beam. As a result, the particle beam can be more precisely applied to a target in the patient. For example, the particle beam can be sized and/or shaped to treat tumors of specific sizes and/or shapes. In this regard, applicator 610 is not limited to collimating the particle beam. For example, applicator 610 may reduce the size of the particle beam while also collimating the beam. The applicator may be a multi-leaf collimator for sizing and/or shaping the particle beam. Applicator 610 may also simply allow the particle beam to pass without alteration. Applicator 610 may be computer controlled to affect the size and/or shape of the beam, as desired.


Applicator 610 and synchrocyclotron 604 may move relative to patient support 606 (and thus the patient) and relative to one another. For example, movement of applicator 610 may substantially coincide with rotation of gantry 605, or one may follow the other, so that the output of synchrocyclotron 604 aligns to the input of applicator 610. FIGS. 15 and 17 illustrate movement of gantry 605 and movement of applicator 610 along inner gantry 601. More specifically, FIG. 17 shows a case where gantry 605 is rotated such that synchrocyclotron 604 is in a vault below patient support 606. In FIG. 17, synchrocyclotron 604 is below the floor 612 of the treatment room, which floor may be made of concrete. Therefore, synchrocyclotron 604 is not visible in FIG. 17. In this case, applicator 610 is moved along inner gantry 601 so that applicator 610 aligns to the output of synchrocyclotron 604. Because synchrocyclotron 604 is not shown in FIG. 17, this alignment is not visible. Nevertheless, a particle beam output from synchrocyclotron 604 passes through cover 614 of inner gantry 601 and a corresponding hole in the floor (not shown) and is thereafter is received by applicator 610. Applicator 610 performs any alteration on the particle beam, and passes the particle beam to patient 607.


Gantry 605 (and thus synchrocyclotron 604) is rotatable relative to the patient in the directions of arrow 615. Applicator 610 is movable along inner gantry 601 in the directions of arrow 616. FIG. 15 shows the locations of synchrocyclotron 604 and applicator 610 after the movements depicted by arrows 615 and 616, respectively. In FIG. 15, both synchrocyclotron 604 and applicator 610 are above patient support 606 (and thus above patient 607). In this configuration, synchrocyclotron 604 directs its particle beam downward, toward the patient. Applicator 610 receives the particle beam, alters (e.g., collimates) the particle beam, and passes the resulting particle beam to the patient.


Patient support 606 is movable relative to inner gantry 601, thereby enabling the patient to be moved such that a top part 621 of inner gantry 601 is above the patient, and such that a bottom part 622 of inner gantry 601 is below the patient. Movement of patient support 606, along with movement of gantry 605 and applicator 610, enables relatively precise targeting of tumors and/or other treatment areas on the patient.



FIG. 18 shows an example construction of inner gantry 601. In this example, inner gantry includes a structural weldment 617, a precision linear bearing rail 618 (e.g., a THK rail), cover 614, and applicator 610 that includes an extension drive 619, and a theta drive 620. Inner gantry 601 may include features in addition to those show, substitutions for the features that are shown, or both.


Structural weldment 617 may be constructed of any rigid material, such as metal, plastic, or the like, which is capable of supporting the weight of applicator 610. In this example, structural weldment 617 is substantially C-shaped (thereby defining the shape of inner gantry 601). It is noted, however, that structural weldment 617 may have other shapes. For example, it may be elongated or compressed. Basically, structural weldment may have any shape that enables relatively unobstructed, continuous travel of applicator 610 between positions that are above and below the patient.


Structural weldment 617 includes one or more bearing rails 618. The number of rails that may be used depends upon the connection required to applicator 610. Applicator 610 moves along bearing rail 618 between a top part 621 of structural weldment 617 and a bottom part 622 of structural weldment 617. The movement may be continuous or in discrete increments and may be stopped at any point along bearing rail 618 in order to obtain a desired position of applicator 610 relative to the position of the patient.


Cover 614 covers what would otherwise be an open hole to the area below floor 612 (see FIG. 17). The hole and cover allow a particle beam to pass from the synchrocyclotron to the applicator. Cover 614, however, prevents objects and/or other material from falling through that hole and possibly damaging sensitive equipment, such as the synchrocyclotron. Cover 614 may assist in, or control, movement of applicator 610 along bearing rail 618. That is, cover 614 may roll along a path between the top part 621 and the bottom part 622 of structural weldment 617. Cover 614 may roll-up at its ends 624 and/or 625, as shown in FIG. 18.


Applicator 610 includes extension drive 619 and theta drive 620. Extension drive 619 moves aperture 625 towards, and away from, the patent, e.g., along arrow 626. By virtue of this movement, extension drive may modify the projection of the aperture 625 on the patient. For example, the size of the aperture may be increased or decreased. The shape of the aperture may be altered as well, e.g., between a circular shape, an oval shape, a polygonal shape, etc. Theta drive 620 moves applicator 610 along rail 618 between top part 621 and bottom part 622 of structural weldment 617. Cover 614 may travel along with applicator 610.


All or part of extension drive 619 and theta drive 620 may be computer-controlled. For example, extension drive 619 and/or theta drive 620 may be controlled by the same hardware and/or software that is used to control gantry 605.


System 602 is not limited to use with inner gantry 601. Any other mechanism may be used to provide an aperture to size and/or shape (e.g., collimate) a particle beam provided by synchrocyclotron 604. For example, referring to FIG. 19, a robotic arm 626 may be used to position an aperture 625 between synchrocyclotron 604 and the patient. The robotic arm may move the aperture in three dimensions (e.g., XYZ Cartesian coordinates) relative to the patent. The robotic arm may be controlled by the same hardware and/or software that is used to control gantry 605. Additionally, the aperture itself may be controlled so that its size and/or shape is modified. As described above, the size of the aperture may be increased or decreased. The shape of the aperture may be altered as well, e.g., between a circular shape, an oval shape, a polygonal shape, etc.


An aperture, such as those described above, may be positioned and/or controlled manually. For example, a stand (not shown) may be used to hold the aperture. The aperture may be sized and/or shaped and placed on the stand. Both the stand and the aperture may be positioned relative to the patent and in line with the particle beam provided by the synchrocyclotron. Any mechanism to hold the aperture may be used. In some implementations, the aperture and/or device used to hold the aperture may be mounted to the synchrocyclotron itself


The inner gantry is advantageous in that it reduces the precision with which the outer gantry must rotate. For example, the inner gantry allows sub-millimeter beam positioning. Because of the additional precision added by the inner gantry, the outer gantry need not provide sub-millimeter precision, but rather its precision may be at, or greater than, a millimeter. The outer gantry also need not be as large as would otherwise be required in order to obtain high levels of precision.


Additional information concerning the design of the particle accelerator described herein can be found in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/760,788, entitled “High-Field Superconducting Synchrocyclotron” and filed Jan. 20, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/463,402, entitled “Magnet Structure For Particle Acceleration” and filed Aug. 9, 2006; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/850,565, entitled “Cryogenic Vacuum Break Pneumatic Thermal Coupler” and filed Oct. 10, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.


Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. Elements of different implementations, including features incorporated herein by reference, may be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a patient support for holding a patient;a particle accelerator;an outer gantry that is movable around the patent support, the particle accelerator being mounted on the outer gantry and outputting a proton or ion beam; andan inner gantry comprising a track and an applicator mounted to the track, the applicator comprising an aperture for directing the proton or ion beam towards a target in the patient, the gantry being configured to move the applicator along the track through a range of positions around the patient so as to position the proton or ion beam at sub-millimeter precision.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the applicator is configured to move the aperture towards, or away from, the patient.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the inner gantry comprises a track along which the applicator is configured to move.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the inner gantry is configured to move the applicator along the track in a continuous manner.
  • 5. The system of claim 3, wherein the inner gantry is configured to move the applicator along the track in discrete movements.
  • 6. The system of claim 3, wherein the inner gantry comprises a cover that is movable relative to the track, the cover for covering an opening in a vault to prevent objects from falling into the vault below the patient support.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a processing device programmed to control movement of the outer gantry and the inner gantry.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the processing device is configured to control movement of the outer gantry and the inner gantry to substantially align the proton or ion beam with the aperture.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the aperture is configured to substantially collimate the proton or ion beam.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the patient support is movable relative to the inner gantry and the outer gantry.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the track comprises a rail; and wherein the applicator comprises: an extension drive to move the aperture towards, or away from, a patient on the patient support; anda theta drive to move the applicator along different positions of the rail.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the aperture is configured to change a cross-sectional shape of the particle beam.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the applicator comprises a multi-leaf collimator configured to size and/or to shape the particle beam or to allow the particle beam to pass without alteration.
  • 14. A system comprising: a synchrocyclotron to produce a proton or ion beam using a particle source that is interrupted, the particle source comprising a tube containing plasma from which particles for the proton or ion beam are extracted, the tube being interrupted such that all of the tube is removed at an acceleration region where the particles are extracted from the plasma;a first gantry on which an synchrocyclotron is mounted to enable the synchrocyclotron to move through a range of positions around a patient, the range of positions defining a volume, the first gantry being movable at a first precision; anda second gantry configured to move an apparatus around the patient within the volume, the apparatus being configured to pass the particle beam to the patient, the apparatus being movable at a second precision that is more precise than the first precision.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the apparatus comprises an applicator and an aperture, the applicator being configured to move the aperture towards, or away from, the patient.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the second gantry comprises a track along which the applicator is configured to move.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the second gantry is configured to move the applicator along the track in a continuous manner.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the second gantry is configured to move the applicator along the track in discrete movements.
  • 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the second gantry comprises a cover that is movable relative to the track, the cover for covering an opening in a vault through which the first gantry passes to prevent objects from falling into the vault below the patient support.
  • 20. The system of claim 14, further comprising: a processing device programmed to control movement of the first gantry and the second gantry.
  • 21. The system of claim 20, wherein the apparatus comprises an applicator and an aperture, the applicator being configured to move the aperture towards, or away from, the patient; and wherein the processing device is configured to control movement of the first gantry and the second gantry to substantially align the proton or ion beam with the aperture.
  • 22. The system of claim 21, wherein the aperture is configured to substantially collimate the proton or ion beam.
  • 23. The system of claim 14, further comprising a patient support for holding the patient, the patient support being movable relative to the first gantry and the second gantry.
  • 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the apparatus comprises an applicator and an aperture, the applicator being configured to move the aperture towards, or away from, the patient; wherein the second gantry comprises a track; andwherein the applicator comprises: an extension drive to move the aperture towards, or away from, a patient on the patient support; anda theta drive to move the applicator along different positions of the track.
  • 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the aperture is configured to change a cross-sectional shape of the particle beam.
  • 26. The system of claim 24, wherein the applicator comprises a multi-leaf collimator configured to size and/or to shape the particle beam or to allow the particle beam to pass without alteration.
  • 27. A system comprising: a patient support for holding a patient; anda gantry comprising a C-shaped track and an applicator mounted to the C-shaped track, the applicator comprising an aperture to pass a proton or ion beam to a target in the patient, the gantry being configured to move the applicator along the C-shaped track through a range of positions around the patient, including above and below the patient, and to position the proton or ion beam at sub-millimeter precision.
  • 28. The system of claim 27, wherein the gantry comprises an inner gantry; and wherein the system further comprises: a particle accelerator to generate the proton or ion beam; andan outer gantry holding the particle accelerator, the outer gantry being configured to position the proton or ion beam at millimeter-level precision or greater than millimeter-level precision.
  • 29. The system of claim 28, wherein the applicator is configured to move the aperture towards, or away from, the patient.
  • 30. The system of claim 28, wherein the inner gantry is configured to move the applicator along the track in a continuous manner.
  • 31. The system of claim 28, wherein the inner gantry is configured to move the applicator along the track in discrete movements.
  • 32. The system of claim 28, wherein the inner gantry comprises a cover that is movable relative to the track, the cover for covering an opening in a vault to prevent objects from falling into the vault below the patient support.
  • 33. The system of claim 28, further comprising: a processing device programmed to control movement of the outer gantry and the inner gantry.
  • 34. The system of claim 33, wherein the processing device is configured to control movement of the outer gantry and the inner gantry to substantially align the proton or ion beam with the aperture.
  • 35. The system of claim 27, wherein the aperture is configured to substantially collimate the proton or ion beam.
  • 36. The system of claim 27, wherein the patient support is movable relative to the gantry, movement of the patient support being computer -controlled.
  • 37. The system of claim 27, wherein the applicator comprises: an extension drive to move the aperture towards, or away from, a patient on the patient support; anda theta drive to move the applicator along different positions of the gantry.
  • 38. The system of claim 37, wherein the aperture is configured to change a cross-sectional shape of the particle beam.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,103, entitled “Inner Gantry” and filed on Nov. 20, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,344,340 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/601,056, entitled “Charged Particle Radiation Therapy” and filed on Nov. 17, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,311 and therefore this application also entitled to the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/738,404, entitled “Charged Particle Radiation Therapy” and filed on Nov. 18, 2005. This application is also entitled to the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/991,454, entitled “Inner Gantry” and filed on Nov. 30, 2007. The contents of U.S. patent application Nos. 12/275,103, 11/601,056, and of U.S. Provisional Applications Nos. 60/991,454 and 60/738,404, are hereby incorporated by reference into this application as if set forth herein in full.

US Referenced Citations (315)
Number Name Date Kind
2280606 Van et al. Apr 1942 A
2492324 Salisbury Dec 1949 A
2615129 McMillan Oct 1952 A
2659000 Salisbury Nov 1953 A
3175131 Burleigh et al. Mar 1965 A
3582650 Avery Jun 1971 A
3679899 Dimeff Jul 1972 A
3689847 Verster Sep 1972 A
3757118 Hodge et al. Sep 1973 A
3868522 Bigham et al. Feb 1975 A
3886367 Castle, Jr. May 1975 A
3925676 Bigham et al. Dec 1975 A
2958327 Marancik et al. May 1976 A
3955089 McIntyre et al. May 1976 A
4038622 Purcell Jul 1977 A
4047068 Ress et al. Sep 1977 A
4112306 Nunan Sep 1978 A
4139777 Rautenbach Feb 1979 A
4197510 Szu Apr 1980 A
4220866 Taumann et al. Sep 1980 A
4230129 LeVeen Oct 1980 A
4256966 Heinz Mar 1981 A
4336505 Meyer Jun 1982 A
4345210 Tran Aug 1982 A
4353033 Karasawa Oct 1982 A
4425506 Brown et al. Jan 1984 A
4490616 Cipollina et al. Dec 1984 A
4507614 Prono et al. Mar 1985 A
4507616 Blosser et al. Mar 1985 A
4589126 Augustsson et al. May 1986 A
4598208 Brunelli et al. Jul 1986 A
4628523 Heflin Dec 1986 A
4633125 Blosser et al. Dec 1986 A
4641057 Blosser et al. Feb 1987 A
4641104 Blosser et al. Feb 1987 A
4651007 Perusek et al. Mar 1987 A
4680565 Jahnke Jul 1987 A
4705955 Mileikowsky Nov 1987 A
4710722 Jahnke Dec 1987 A
4726046 Nunan Feb 1988 A
4734653 Jahnke Mar 1988 A
4737727 Yamada et al. Apr 1988 A
4739173 Blosser et al. Apr 1988 A
4745367 Dustmann et al. May 1988 A
4754147 Maughan et al. Jun 1988 A
4769623 Marsing et al. Sep 1988 A
4771208 Jongen et al. Sep 1988 A
4783634 Yamamoto et al. Nov 1988 A
4808941 Marsing Feb 1989 A
4812658 Koehler Mar 1989 A
4843333 Marsing et al. Jun 1989 A
4865284 Gosis et al. Sep 1989 A
4868843 Nunan Sep 1989 A
4868844 Nunan Sep 1989 A
4870287 Cole et al. Sep 1989 A
4880985 Jones Nov 1989 A
4894541 Ono Jan 1990 A
4902993 Krevet Feb 1990 A
4904949 Wilson Feb 1990 A
4905267 Miller et al. Feb 1990 A
4917344 Prechter et al. Apr 1990 A
4943781 Wilson et al. Jul 1990 A
4987309 Klasen et al. Jan 1991 A
4992744 Fujita et al. Feb 1991 A
4996496 Kitamura et al. Feb 1991 A
5017789 Young et al. May 1991 A
5017882 Finlan May 1991 A
5036290 Sonobe et al. Jul 1991 A
5039057 Prechter et al. Aug 1991 A
5039867 Nishihara et al. Aug 1991 A
5072123 Johnsen Dec 1991 A
5111042 Sullivan et al. May 1992 A
5111173 Matsuda et al. May 1992 A
5117194 Nakanishi et al. May 1992 A
5117212 Yamamoto et al. May 1992 A
5117829 Miller et al. Jun 1992 A
5148032 Hernandez Sep 1992 A
5166531 Huntzinger Nov 1992 A
5189687 Bova et al. Feb 1993 A
5240218 Dye Aug 1993 A
5260579 Yasuda et al. Nov 1993 A
5260581 Lesyna et al. Nov 1993 A
5278533 Kawaguchi Jan 1994 A
5317164 Kurokawa May 1994 A
5336891 Crewe Aug 1994 A
5341104 Anton et al. Aug 1994 A
5349198 Takanaka Sep 1994 A
5365742 Boffito et al. Nov 1994 A
5374913 Pissantezky et al. Dec 1994 A
5382914 Hamm et al. Jan 1995 A
5405235 Lebre et al. Apr 1995 A
5440133 Moyers et al. Aug 1995 A
5461773 Kawaguchi Oct 1995 A
5463291 Carroll et al. Oct 1995 A
5511549 Legg et al. Apr 1996 A
5521469 Laisne May 1996 A
5561697 Takafuji et al. Oct 1996 A
5585642 Britton et al. Dec 1996 A
5633747 Nikoonahad May 1997 A
5668371 Deasy et al. Sep 1997 A
5726448 Smith et al. Mar 1998 A
5751781 Brown et al. May 1998 A
5778047 Mansfield et al. Jul 1998 A
5811944 Sampayan et al. Sep 1998 A
5818058 Nakanishi et al. Oct 1998 A
5821705 Caporaso et al. Oct 1998 A
5825845 Blair et al. Oct 1998 A
5851182 Sahadevan Dec 1998 A
5866912 Slater et al. Feb 1999 A
5874811 Finlan et al. Feb 1999 A
5895926 Britton et al. Apr 1999 A
5920601 Nigg et al. Jul 1999 A
5929458 Nemezawa et al. Jul 1999 A
5993373 Nonaka et al. Nov 1999 A
6034377 Pu Mar 2000 A
6057655 Jongen May 2000 A
6061426 Linders et al. May 2000 A
6064807 Arai et al. May 2000 A
6094760 Nonaka et al. Aug 2000 A
6140021 Nakasuji et al. Oct 2000 A
6265837 Akiyama et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268610 Pu Jul 2001 B1
6279579 Riaziat et al. Aug 2001 B1
6316776 Hiramoto et al. Nov 2001 B1
6380545 Yan Apr 2002 B1
6407505 Bertsche Jun 2002 B1
6433336 Jongen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433349 Akiyama et al. Aug 2002 B2
6441569 Janzow Aug 2002 B1
6476403 Dolinskii et al. Nov 2002 B1
6501981 Schweikard et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519316 Collins Feb 2003 B1
6621889 Mostafavi Sep 2003 B1
6646383 Bertsche et al. Nov 2003 B2
6683318 Haberer et al. Jan 2004 B1
6683426 Kleeven Jan 2004 B1
6693283 Eickhoff et al. Feb 2004 B2
6710362 Kraft et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713773 Lyons et al. Mar 2004 B1
6717162 Jongen Apr 2004 B1
6769806 Moyers Aug 2004 B2
6774383 Norimine et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777700 Yanagisawa et al. Aug 2004 B2
6800866 Amemiya et al. Oct 2004 B2
6803591 Muramatsu et al. Oct 2004 B2
6814694 Pedroni Nov 2004 B1
6853703 Svatos et al. Feb 2005 B2
6865254 Nafstadius Mar 2005 B2
6891177 Kraft et al. May 2005 B1
6897451 Kaercher et al. May 2005 B2
6953943 Yanagisawa et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965116 Wagner et al. Nov 2005 B1
6969194 Nafstadius Nov 2005 B1
6984835 Harada Jan 2006 B2
6993112 Hesse Jan 2006 B2
7008105 Amann et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014361 Ein-Gal Mar 2006 B1
7026636 Yanagisawa et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041479 Swartz et al. May 2006 B2
7045781 Adamec et al. May 2006 B2
7053389 Yanagisawa et al. May 2006 B2
7091478 Haberer Aug 2006 B2
7135678 Wang et al. Nov 2006 B2
7138771 Bechthold et al. Nov 2006 B2
7154108 Tadokoro et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162005 Bjorkholm Jan 2007 B2
7173265 Miller et al. Feb 2007 B2
7208748 Sliski et al. Apr 2007 B2
7247869 Tadokoro et al. Jul 2007 B2
7274018 Adamec et al. Sep 2007 B2
7295649 Johnsen Nov 2007 B2
7297967 Yanagisawa et al. Nov 2007 B2
7318805 Schweikard et al. Jan 2008 B2
7319336 Baur et al. Jan 2008 B2
7348557 Armit Mar 2008 B2
7348579 Pedroni Mar 2008 B2
7355189 Yanagisawa et al. Apr 2008 B2
7453076 Welch et al. Nov 2008 B2
7468506 Rogers et al. Dec 2008 B2
7473913 Hermann et al. Jan 2009 B2
7525104 Harada Apr 2009 B2
7541905 Antaya Jun 2009 B2
7554096 Ward et al. Jun 2009 B2
7554097 Ward et al. Jun 2009 B2
7557358 Ward et al. Jul 2009 B2
7557359 Ward et al. Jul 2009 B2
7557360 Ward et al. Jul 2009 B2
7557361 Ward et al. Jul 2009 B2
7579603 Birgy et al. Aug 2009 B2
7582866 Furuhashi et al. Sep 2009 B2
7582885 Katagiri et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598497 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7629598 Harada Dec 2009 B2
7656258 Antaya et al. Feb 2010 B1
7659528 Uematsu Feb 2010 B2
7692166 Muraki et al. Apr 2010 B2
7696847 Antaya Apr 2010 B2
7728311 Gall Jun 2010 B2
7759642 Nir Jul 2010 B2
7770231 Prater et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786451 Ward et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786452 Ward et al. Aug 2010 B2
7807982 Nishiuchi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7816657 Hansmann et al. Oct 2010 B2
7834334 Grozinger et al. Nov 2010 B2
7834336 Boeh et al. Nov 2010 B2
7848488 Mansfield Dec 2010 B2
7857756 Warren et al. Dec 2010 B2
7894574 Nord et al. Feb 2011 B1
7914734 Livingston Mar 2011 B2
7919765 Timmer Apr 2011 B2
7943913 Balakin May 2011 B2
7950587 Henson et al. May 2011 B2
7977648 Westerly et al. Jul 2011 B2
7982198 Nishiuchi et al. Jul 2011 B2
7986768 Nord et al. Jul 2011 B2
7990524 Jureller et al. Aug 2011 B2
8009804 Siljamaki et al. Aug 2011 B2
8041006 Boyden et al. Oct 2011 B2
8053508 Korkut et al. Nov 2011 B2
8053745 Moore Nov 2011 B2
8053746 Timmer et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067748 Balakin Nov 2011 B2
8085899 Nord et al. Dec 2011 B2
8089054 Balakin Jan 2012 B2
8093564 Balakin Jan 2012 B2
8093568 Mackie et al. Jan 2012 B2
8129699 Balakin Mar 2012 B2
8144832 Balakin Mar 2012 B2
8153989 Tachikawa et al. Apr 2012 B2
8173981 Trbojevic May 2012 B2
8188688 Balakin May 2012 B2
8198607 Balakin Jun 2012 B2
8227768 Smick et al. Jul 2012 B2
8232536 Harada Jul 2012 B2
8288742 Balakin Oct 2012 B2
8294127 Tachibana Oct 2012 B2
8304725 Komuro et al. Nov 2012 B2
8304750 Preikszas et al. Nov 2012 B2
8309941 Balakin Nov 2012 B2
8330132 Guertin et al. Dec 2012 B2
8334520 Otaka et al. Dec 2012 B2
8335397 Takane et al. Dec 2012 B2
8344340 Gall et al. Jan 2013 B2
8350214 Otaki et al. Jan 2013 B2
8368038 Balakin Feb 2013 B2
8373143 Balakin Feb 2013 B2
8373145 Balakin Feb 2013 B2
8378299 Frosien Feb 2013 B2
8378321 Balakin Feb 2013 B2
8382943 Clark Feb 2013 B2
8399866 Balakin Mar 2013 B2
8405042 Honda et al. Mar 2013 B2
8405056 Amaldi et al. Mar 2013 B2
8415643 Balakin Apr 2013 B2
8416918 Nord et al. Apr 2013 B2
8421041 Balakin Apr 2013 B2
8426833 Trbojevic Apr 2013 B2
8436323 Iseki et al. May 2013 B2
8440987 Stephani et al. May 2013 B2
8445872 Behrens et al. May 2013 B2
8466441 Iwata et al. Jun 2013 B2
8472583 Star-Lack et al. Jun 2013 B2
8483357 Siljamaki et al. Jul 2013 B2
8487278 Balakin Jul 2013 B2
8552406 Phaneuf et al. Oct 2013 B2
8552408 Hanawa et al. Oct 2013 B2
8569717 Balakin Oct 2013 B2
8581215 Balakin Nov 2013 B2
8581523 Gall et al. Nov 2013 B2
8653314 Pelati et al. Feb 2014 B2
8653473 Yajima Feb 2014 B2
20030048080 Amemiya et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030125622 Schweikard et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152197 Moyers Aug 2003 A1
20030163015 Yanagisawa et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030183779 Norimine et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040000650 Yanagisawa et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040056212 Yanagisawa et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040061077 Muramatsu et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040061078 Muramatsu et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040098445 Baumann et al. May 2004 A1
20040111134 Muramatsu et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040118081 Reimoser et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040149934 Yanagisawa et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040173763 Moriyama et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174958 Moriyama et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040183033 Moriyama et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040183035 Yanagisawa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040200982 Moriyama et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040200983 Fujimaki et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040213381 Harada Oct 2004 A1
20040227104 Matsuda et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232356 Norimine et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240626 Moyers Dec 2004 A1
20050058245 Ein-Gal Mar 2005 A1
20050089141 Brown Apr 2005 A1
20050161618 Pedroni Jul 2005 A1
20050228255 Saracen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234327 Saracen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050247890 Norimine et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060067468 Rietzel Mar 2006 A1
20070001128 Sliski et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070023699 Yamashita et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070029510 Hermann et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070051904 Kaiser et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070114945 Mattaboni et al. May 2007 A1
20070171015 Antaya Jul 2007 A1
20070181519 Khoshnevis Aug 2007 A1
20070284548 Kaiser et al. Dec 2007 A1
20100192303 Miller et al. Aug 2010 A1
20110220809 Yajima et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120126140 Gall et al. May 2012 A1
20130237425 Leigh et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140097920 Goldie et al. Apr 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (154)
Number Date Country
2629333 May 2007 CA
1537657 Oct 2004 CN
101932361 Dec 2010 CN
101933405 Dec 2010 CN
101933406 Dec 2010 CN
101061759 May 2011 CN
103252024 Aug 2013 CN
ZL200780102281.X Sep 2013 CN
2753397 Jun 1978 DE
31 48 100 Jun 1983 DE
35 30 446 Aug 1984 DE
41 01 094 May 1992 DE
4411171 Oct 1995 DE
0 194 728 Sep 1986 EP
0 277 521 Aug 1988 EP
0 208 163 Jan 1989 EP
0 222 786 Jul 1990 EP
0 221 987 Jan 1991 EP
0 499 253 Aug 1992 EP
0 306 966 Apr 1995 EP
0 388 123 May 1995 EP
0 465 597 May 1997 EP
0 911 064 Jun 1998 EP
0 864 337 Sep 1998 EP
0 776 595 Dec 1998 EP
1 069 809 Jan 2001 EP
1 153 398 Apr 2001 EP
1 153 398 Apr 2001 EP
1 294 445 Mar 2003 EP
1 348 465 Oct 2003 EP
1 358 908 Nov 2003 EP
1 371 390 Dec 2003 EP
1 402 923 Mar 2004 EP
0 911 064 Jun 2004 EP
1 430 932 Jun 2004 EP
1 454 653 Sep 2004 EP
1 454 654 Sep 2004 EP
1 454 655 Sep 2004 EP
1 454 655 Sep 2004 EP
1 454 656 Sep 2004 EP
1 454 657 Sep 2004 EP
1 477 206 Nov 2004 EP
1 738 798 Jan 2007 EP
1 826 778 Aug 2007 EP
1 949 404 Jul 2008 EP
2183753 Jul 2008 EP
2394498 Feb 2010 EP
2232961 Sep 2010 EP
2232962 Sep 2010 EP
2227295 May 2011 EP
1 605 742 Jun 2011 EP
1 605 742 Jun 2011 EP
2363170 Sep 2011 EP
2363171 Sep 2011 EP
2389978 Nov 2011 EP
2389979 Nov 2011 EP
2389980 Nov 2011 EP
2389981 Nov 2011 EP
2389982 Nov 2011 EP
2389983 Nov 2011 EP
2581110 Apr 2013 EP
2591821 May 2013 EP
2363171 Sep 2013 EP
2363170 Jan 2014 EP
2 560 421 Aug 1985 FR
2911843 Aug 2008 FR
0 957 342 May 1964 GB
2 015 821 Sep 1979 GB
2 361 523 Oct 2001 GB
1184404 Jan 2014 HK
43-23267 Oct 1968 JP
S47-028762 Mar 1972 JP
U48-108098 Dec 1973 JP
57-162527 Oct 1982 JP
58-141000 Aug 1983 JP
61-80800 Apr 1986 JP
62-150804 Jul 1987 JP
62-186500 Aug 1987 JP
10-071213 Mar 1988 JP
63-149344 Jun 1988 JP
63-218200 Sep 1988 JP
63-226899 Sep 1988 JP
64-89621 Apr 1989 JP
01-276797 Nov 1989 JP
01-302700 Dec 1989 JP
4-94198 Mar 1992 JP
04-128717 Apr 1992 JP
04-129768 Apr 1992 JP
04-273409 Sep 1992 JP
04-337300 Nov 1992 JP
05-341352 Dec 1993 JP
06-233831 Aug 1994 JP
06-036893 Oct 1994 JP
7-503669 Apr 1995 JP
07-260939 Oct 1995 JP
07-263196 Oct 1995 JP
08-173890 Jul 1996 JP
08-264298 Oct 1996 JP
09-162585 Jun 1997 JP
11-47287 Feb 1999 JP
11-102800 Apr 1999 JP
11-243295 Sep 1999 JP
2000-294399 Oct 2000 JP
2001-6900 Jan 2001 JP
2001-129103 May 2001 JP
2002-164686 Jun 2002 JP
2002-263090 Sep 2002 JP
2003-517755 May 2003 JP
2003-215299 Jul 2003 JP
05-046928 Mar 2008 JP
2008-507826 Mar 2008 JP
2009-515671 Apr 2009 JP
2009-516905 Apr 2009 JP
2010-536131 May 2010 JP
2011-505191 Feb 2011 JP
2011-505670 Feb 2011 JP
2011-507151 Mar 2011 JP
5221669 Mar 2013 JP
2013-106980 Jun 2013 JP
2013-106981 Jun 2013 JP
300137 Nov 1969 SU
569 635 Aug 1977 SU
200930160 Jul 2009 TW
200934682 Aug 2009 TW
200939908 Sep 2009 TW
200940120 Oct 2009 TW
WO 8607229 Dec 1986 WO
WO 9012413 Oct 1990 WO
WO 9203028 Feb 1992 WO
WO 9302536 Feb 1993 WO
WO 9817342 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9939385 Aug 1999 WO
WO 0040064 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0049624 Aug 2000 WO
WO 01026230 Apr 2001 WO
WO 01126569 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0207817 Jan 2002 WO
WO03018132 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03039212 May 2003 WO
WO 03092812 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004026401 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004101070 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2006-012467 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2007061937 May 2007 WO
WO2007061937 May 2007 WO
WO 2007084701 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007130164 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2007145906 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2008030911 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008081480 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009048745 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009070173 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009070588 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009073480 Jun 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (246)
Entry
Non-Final Office Action with English translation from Japanese Patent Office 2010-536131, Jun. 4, 2013 (10 pages).
File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,581,523 (downloaded Nov. 14, 2013).
Tilly, et al., “Development and verification of the pulsed scanned proton beam at The Svedberg Laboratory in Uppsala”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Phys. Med. Biol. 52, pp. 2741-2454, 2007.
Livingston, M. S., et. al. “A Capillary Ion Source for the Cyclotron” Review Science Instruments, vol. 10:63, pp. 63-67, (Feb. 1939).
English Translation of Notification of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Application No. 2010-536130 dated Jun. 4, 2013.
Examination Report from European Application No. 11177601.9 dated Jun. 27, 2013 (6 pages).
Response to Examination Report from European Application No. 06838033.6 dated Jan. 7, 2014 (17 pages).
Response to Examination Report from European Application No. 11177602.7 dated Oct. 3, 2013 (7 pages).
Response to Examination Report from European Application No. 11177607.6 dated Jan. 7, 2014 (15 pages).
Office action mailed Mar. 3, 2014 from Japanese application No. 2013-45084 (5 pages).
Office action mailed Mar. 3, 2014 from Japanese application No. 2013-45085 (5 pages).
Voluntary Amendment filed Nov. 27, 2013 in Chinese application No. 201310049231.7 (16 pages).
Canadian Office action from corresponding Canadian Application No. 2707012 issued May 1, 2014 (6 pages).
“Beam Delivery and Properties,” Journal of the ICRU, 2007, 7(2):20 pages.
“510(k) Summary: Ion Beam Applications S.A.”, FDA, Jul. 12, 2001, 5 pages.
“510(k) Summary: Optivus Proton Beam Therapy System”, Jul. 21, 2000, 5 pages.
“An Accelerated Collaboration Meets with Beaming Success,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Apr. 12, 2006, S&TR, Livermore, California, pp. 1-3, http://www.llnl.gov/str/Apri106/Caporaso.html.
“CPAC Highlights Its Proton Therapy Program at ESTRO Annual Meeting”, TomoTherapy Incorporated, Sep. 18, 2008, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1-2.
“Indiana's mega-million proton therapy cancer center welcomes its first patients” [online] Press release, Health & Medicine Week, 2004, retrieved from NewsRx.com, Mar. 1, 2004, pp. 119-120.
“LLNL, UC Davis Team Up to Fight Cancer,”Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Apr. 28, 2006, SF-06-04-02, Livermore, California, pp. 1-4.
“Patent Assignee Search 'Paul Scherrer Institute,” Library Services at Fish & Richardson P.C., Mar. 20, 2007, 40 pages.
“Patent Prior Art Search for ‘Proton Therapy System’,” Library Services at Fish & Richardson P.C., Mar. 20, 2007, 46 pages.
“Superconducting Cyclotron Contract” awarded by Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland, http://www.accel.de/News/superconducting—cyclotron—contract.htm, Jan. 2009, 1 page.
“The Davis 76-Inch Isochronous Cyclotron”, Beam on: Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, University of California, 2009, 1 page.
“The K100 Neutron-therapy Cyclotron,” National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University (NSCL), retrieved from: http://www.nscl.msu.edu/tech/accelerators/k100, Feb. 2005, 1 page.
“The K250 Proton therapy Cyclotron,” National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University (NSCL), retrieved from: http://www.nscl.msu.edu/tech/accelerators/k250.html , Feb. 2005, 2 pages.
18th Japan Conference on Radiation and Radioisotopes [Japanese], Nov. 25-27, 1987, 9 pages.
Abrosimov et al., “1000MeV Proton Beam Therapy facility at Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Synchrocyclotron,” Medical Radiology (Moscow) 32, 10 (1987) revised in Journal of Physics, Conference Series 41, 2006, pp. 424-432, Institute of Physics Publishing Limited.
Adachi et al., “A 150MeV FFAG Synchrotron with “Return-Yoke Free” Magent,” Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, 2001, 3 pages.
Ageyev et al., “The IHEP Accelerating and Storage Complex (UNK) Status Report,” 11th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators, 1980, pp. 60-70.
Agosteo et al., “Maze Design of a gantry room for proton therapy, ”Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, 1996, Section A, 382, pp. 573-582.
Alexeev et al., “R4 Design of Superconducting Magents for Proton Synchrotrons,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, 1974, pp. 531-533.
Allardyce et al., “Performance and Prospects of the Reconstructed CERN 600 MeV Synchrocyclotron,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science USA, Jun. 1977, ns-24:(3)1631-1633.
Alonso, “Magnetically Scanned Ion Beams for Radiation Therapy,” Accelerator & Fusion Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Oct. 1988, 13 pages.
Amaldi et al., “The Italian project for a hadrontherapy centre” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 1995, 360, pp. 297-301.
Amaldi, “Overview of the world landscape of Hadrontherapy and the projects of the TERA foundation,” Physica Medica, An International journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology, Jul. 1998, vol. XIV, Supplement 1, 6th Workshop on Heavy Charged Particles in Biology and Medicine, Instituto Scientific Europeo (ISE), Sep. 29-Oct. 1, 1977, Baveno, pp. 76-85.
Anferov et al., “Status of the Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute,” Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, 2003, pp. 699-701.
Anferov et al., “The Indiana University Midwest Proton Radiation Institute,” Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference, 2001, Chicago, pp. 645-647.
Appun, “Various problems of magnet fabrication for high-energy accelerators,” Journal for All Engineers Interested in the Nuclear Field, 1967, pp. 10-16 (1967) [Lang.: German], English bibliographic information (http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti—id=4442292).
Arduini et al. “Physical specifications of clinical proton beams from a synchrotron,” Med. Phys, Jun. 23, 1996 (6): 939-951.
Badano et al., “Proton-Ion Medical Machine Study (PIMMS) Part I,” PIMMS, Jan. 1999, 238 pages.
Beeckman et al., “Preliminary design of a reduced cost proton therapy facility using a compact, high field isochronous cyclotron,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Reasearch B56/57, 1991, pp. 1201-1204.
Bellomo et al., “The Superconducting Cyclotron Program at Michigan State University,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Sep. 1980, 25(7):767.
Benedikt and Carli, “Matching to Gantries for Medical Synchrotrons” IEEE Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, 1997, pp. 1379-1381.
Bieth et al., “A Very Compact Protontherapy Facility Based on an Extensive Use of High Temperature Superconductors (HTS)” Cyclotrons and their Applications 1998, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Caen, Jun. 14-19, 1998, pp. 669-672.
Bigham, “Magnetic Trim Rods for Superconducting Cyclotrons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods (North-Holland Publishing Co.), 1975, 141:223-228.
Bimbot, “First Studies of the Extemal Beam from the Orsay S.C. 200 MeV,” Institut de Physique Nucleaire, BP 1, Orsay, France, IEEE, 1979, pp. 1923-1926.
Blackmore et al., “Operation of the Triumf Proton Therapy Facility,” IEEE Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conferenc, May 12-16, 19973:3831-3833.
Bloch, “The Midwest Proton Therapy Center,” Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Int'l. Conf., Part Two, Nov. 1996, pp. 1253-1255.
Blosser et al., “Problems and Accomplishments of Superconducting Cyclotrons,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, Cyclotrons and Their Applications, Oct. 1995, pp. 674-684.
Blosser et al., “Superconducting Cyclotrons”, Seventh International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Aug. 19-22, 1975, pp. 584-594.
Blosser et al., “Progress toward an experiment to study the effect of RF grounding in an internal ion source on axial oscillations of the beam in a cyclotron,” National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, Report MSUCL-760, CP600, Cyclotrons and their Applications 2011, Sixteenth International Conference, 2001, pp. 274-276.
Blosser et al., “A Compact Superconducting Cyclotron for the Production of High Intensity Protons,” Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, May 12-16, 1997, 1:1054-1056.
Blosser et al., “Advances in Superconducting Cyclotrons at Michigan State University,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Oct. 1986, pp. 157-167, Tokyo.
Blosser et al., “Characteristics of a 400 (Q2/A) MeV Super-Conducting Heavy-Ion Cyclotron,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Oct. 1974, p. 1026.
Blosser et al., “Medical Accelerator Projects at Michigan State Univ.” IEEE Proceedings of the 1989 Particle Accelerator Conference, Mar. 20-23, 1989, 2:742-746.
Blosser et al., “Superconducting Cyclotron for Medical Application”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Mar. 1989, 25(2): 1746-1754.
Blosser, “Application of Superconductivity in Cyclotron Construction,” Ninth International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Sep. 1981, pp. 147-157.
Blosser, “Applications of Superconducting Cyclotrons,” Twelfth International Conference on Cyclotrons and Their Applications, May 8-12, 1989, pp. 137-144.
Blosser, “Future Cyclotrons,” AIP, The Sixth International Cyclotron Conference, 1972, pp. 16-32.
Blosser, “Medical Cyclotrons,” Physics Today, Special Issue Physical Review Centenary, Oct. 1993, pp. 70-73.
Blosser, “Preliminary Design Study Exploring Building Features Required for a Proton Therapy Facility for the Ontario Cancer Institute”, Mar. 1991, MSUCL-760a, 53 pages.
Blosser, “Progress on the Coupled Superconducting Cyclotron Project,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Apr. 1981, 26(4):558.
Blosser, “Synchrocyclotron Improvement Programs,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science USA, Jun. 1969, 16(3):Part I, pp. 405-414.
Blosser, “The Michigan State University Superconducting Cyclotron Program,” Nuclear Science, Apr. 1979, NS-26(2):2040-2047.
Blosser, H., Present and Future Superconducting Cyclotrons, Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Feb. 1987, 32(2):171 Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, D.C.
Blosser, H.G., “Superconducting Cyclotrons at Michigan State University”, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, 1987, vol. B 24/25, part II, pp. 752-756.
Botha et al., “A New Multidisciplinary Separated-Sector Cyclotron Facility,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1977, NS-24(3):1118-1120.
Chichili et al., “Fabrication of Nb3Sn Shell-Type Coils with Pre-Preg Ceramic Insulation,” American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, AIP USA, No. 711, (XP-002436709, ISSN: 0094-243X), 2004, pp. 450-457.
Chong et al., Radiology Clinic North American 7, 3319, 1969, 27 pages.
Chu et al., “Performance Specifications for Proton Medical Facility,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Mar. 1993, 128 pages.
Chu et al., “Instrumentation for Treatment of Cancer Using Proton and Light-ion Beams,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Aug. 1993, 64 (8):2055-2122.
Chu, “Instrumentation in Medical Systems,” Accelerator and Fusion Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, May 1995, 9 pages.
Cole et al., “Design and Application of a Proton Therapy Accelerator,” Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, IEEE, 1985, 5 pages.
Collins, et al., “The Indiana University Proton Therapy System,” Proceedings of EPAC 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006, 3 pages.
Conradi et al., “Proposed New Facilities for Proton Therapy at iThemba Labs,” Proceedings of EPAC, 2002, pp. 560-562.
C/E Source of Ions for Use in Sychro-Cyclotrons Search, Jan. 31, 2005, 9 pages.
Source Search “Cites of U.S. And Foreign Patents/Published applications in the name of Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha and Containing the Keywords (Proton and Synchrocyclotron),” Jan. 2005, 8 pages.
Cosgrove et aI., “Microdosimetric Studies on the Orsay Proton Synchrocyclotron at 73 and 200 MeV,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1997, 70(1-4):493-496.
Coupland, “High-field (5 T) pulsed superconducting dipole magnet,” Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, Jul. 1974, 121(7):771-778.
Coutrakon et al. “Proton Synchrotrons for Cancer Therapy,” Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry—Sixteenth International Conf., American Institute of Physics, Nov. 1-5, 2000, vol. 576, pp. 861-864.
Coutrakon et al., “A prototype beam delivery system for the proton medical accelerator at Loma Linda,” Medical Physics, Nov./Dec. 1991, 18(6):1093-1099.
Cuttone, “Applications of a Particle Accelerators in Medical Physics,” Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, V.S. Sofia, 44 Cantania, Italy, Jan. 2010, 17 pages.
Dahl P, “Superconducting Magnet System,” American Institute of Physics, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1987-1988, 2: 1329-1376.
Dialog Search, Jan. 31, 2005, 17 pages.
Dugan et al., “Tevatron Status” IEEE, Particle Accelerator Conference, Accelerator Science & Technology, 1989, pp. 426-430.
Eickhoff et al., “The Proposed Accelerator Facility for Light Ion Cancer Therapy in Heidelberg,” Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference, New York, 1999, pp. 2513-2515.
Enchevich et al., “Minimizing Phase Losses in the 680 MeV Synchrocyclotron by Correcting the Accelerating Voltage Amplitude,” Atomnaya Energiya, 1969, 26:(3):315-316.
Endo et al., “Compact Proton and Carbon Ion Synchrotrons for Radiation Therapy,” Proceedings of EPAC 2002, Paris France, 2002, pp. 2733-2735.
Flanz et al., “Treating Patients with the NPTC Accelerator Based Proton Treatment Facility,” Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, 2003, pp. 690-693.
Flanz et al., “Large Medical Gantries,” Particle Accelerator Conference, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1995, pp. 1-5.
Flanz et al., “Operation of a Cyclotron Based Proton Therapy Facility”, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, pp. 1-4, retrieved from Internet in 2009.
Flanz et al., “The Northeast Proton Therapy Center at Massachusetts General Hospital,” Fifth Workshop on Heavy Charge Particles in Biology and Medicine, GSI, Darmstadt, Aug. 1995, 11 pages.
Flood and Frazier, “The Wide-Band Driven RF System for the Berkeley 88-Inch Cyclotron,” American Institute of Physics, Conference Proceedings., No. 9, 1972, 459-466.
Foster and Kashikhin, “Superconducting Superferric Dipole Magent with Cold Iron Core for the VLHC,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Mar. 2002, 12(1):111-115.
Friesel et al., “Design and Construction Progress on the IUCF Midwest Proton Radiation Institute,” Proceedings of EPAC 2002, 2002, pp. 2736-2738.
Fukumoto et al., “A Proton Therapy Facility Plan” Cyclotrons and their Applications, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 6-10, 1992, pp. 258-261.
Fukumoto, “Cyclotron Versus Synchrotron for Proton Beam Therapy,” KEK Prepr., No. 95-122, pp. 533-536, Oct. 1995.
Goto et al., “Progress on the Sector Magnets for the Riken SRC,” American Institute of Physics, CP600, Cyclotrons and Their Applications 2001, Sixteenth International Conference, 2001, pp. 319-323.
Graffman et al., “Design Studies for a 200 MeV Proton Clinic for Radiotherapy,” AIP Conference Proceedings: Cyclotrons—1972, 1972, No. 9, pp. 603-615.
Graffman et al., Acta Radiol. Therapy Phys. Biol. 1970, 9, 1 (1970).
Graffman, et. al. “Proton radiotherapy with the Uppsala cyclotron. Experience and plans” Strahlentherapie, 1985, 161(12):764-770.
Hede, “Research Groups Promoting Proton Therapy “Lite,”” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Dec. 6, 2006, 98(23):1682-1684.
Heinz, “Superconducting Pulsed Magnetic Systems for High-Energy Synchrotrons,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, May 24-26, 1972, pp. 55-63.
Hentschel et al., “Plans for the German National Neutron Therapy Centre with a Hospital-Based 70 MeV Proton Cyclotron at University Hospital Essen/Germany,” Cyclotrons and their Applications, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Caen, Franco, Jun. 14-19, 1998, pp. 21-23.
Hepburn et al., “Superconducting Cyclotron Neutron Source for Therapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 3 complete, 1977, pp. 387-391.
Hirabayashi, “Development of Superconducting Magnets for Beam Lines and Accelerator at KEK,” IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, Jan. 1981, Mag-17(1):728-731.
Ishibashi and McInturff, “Winding Design Study of Superconducting 10 T Dipoles for a Synchrotron,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, May 1983, MAG-19(3):1364-1367.
Ishibashi and McInturff, “Stress Analysis of Superconducting 10T Magnets for Synchrotron,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, May 11-14, 1982, pp. 513-516.
Jahnke et al., “First Superconducting Prototype Magnets for a Compact Synchrotron Radiation Source in Operation,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Mar. 1988, 24(2):1230-1232.
Jones and Dershem, “Synchrotron Radiation from Proton in a 20 TEV, 10 TESLA Superconducting Super Collide,r” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerator, Aug. 11-16, 1983, pp. 138-140.
Jones and Mills, “The South African National Accelerator Centre: Particle Therapy and Isotope Production Programmes,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Apr.-Jun. 1998, 51(4-6):571-578.
Jones et al., “Status Report of the NAC Particle Therapy Programme,” Stralentherapie and Onkologie, vol. 175, Suppl. II, Jun. 1999, pp. 30-32.
Jones, “Progress with the 200 MeV Cyclotron Facility at the National Accelerator Centre,” Commission of the European Communities Radiation Protection Proceedings, Fifth Symposium on Neutron Dosimetry, Sep. 17-21, 1984, vol. II, pp. 989-998.
Jones, “Present Status and Future Trends of Heavy Particle Radiotherapy,” Cyclotrons and their Applications 1998, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Jun. 14-19, 1998, pp. 13-20.
Jongen et al., “Development of a Low-cost Compact Cyclotron System for Proton Therapy,” National Institute of Radiol. Sci, 1991, No. 81, pp. 189-200.
Jongen et al., “Progress report on the IBA-SHI small cyclotron for cancer therapy” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B, vol. 79, issue 1-4, 1993, pp. 885-889.
Jongen et al., “The proton therapy system for the NPTC: Equipment Description and progress report,” Nuclear Instruments and methods in physics research, 1996, Section B, 113(1): 522-525.
Jongen et al., “The proton therapy system for MGH's NPTC: equipment description and progress report,” Bulletin du Cancer/Radiotherapie, Proceedings of the meeting of the European Heavy Particle Therapy Group, 1996, 83(Suppl. 1):219-222.
Kanai et al., “Three-dimensional Beam Scanning for Proton Therapy,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physic Research, Sep. 1, 1983, The Netherlands, 214(23):491-496.
Karlin et al., “Medical Radiology” (Moscow), 1983, 28, 13.
Karlin et al., “The State and Prospects in the Development of the Medical Proton Tract on the Synchrocyclotron in Gatchina,” Med. Radiol., Moscow, 28(3):28-32 (Mar. 1983)(German with English Abstract on end of p. 32).
Kats and Druzhinin, “Comparison of Methods for Irradiation Prone Patients,” Atomic Energy, Feb. 2003, 94(2):120-123.
Kats and Onosovskii, “A Simple, Compact, Flat System for the Irradiation of a Lying Patient with a Proton Beam from Different Directions,” Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 1996, 39(1): 132-134.
Kats and Onosovskii, “A Planar Magnetooptical System for the Irradiation of a Lying Patient with a Proton Beam from Various Directions,” Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 1996, 39(1):127-131.
Khoroshkov et al.,“Moscow Hospital-Based Proton Therapy Facility Design,” Am. Journal Clinical Oncology: CCT, Apr. 1994, 17(2):109-114.
Kim and Blosser, “Optimized Magnet for a 250 MeV Proton Radiotherapy Cyclotron,” Cyclotrons and Their Applications 2001, May 2001, Sixteenth International Conference, pp. 345-347.
Kim and Yun, “A Light-Ion Superconducting Cyclotron System for Multi-Disciplinary Users,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Sep. 2003, 43(3):325-331.
Kim et al., “Construction of 8T Magnet Test Stand for Cyclotron Studies,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Mar. 1993, 3(1):266-268.
Kim et al., “Design Study of a Superconducting Cyclotron for Heavy Ion Therapy,” Cyclotrons and Their Applications 2001, Sixteenth International Conference, May 13-17, 2001, pp. 324-326.
Kim et al., “Trim Coil System for the Riken Cyclotron Ring Cyclotron,” Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, IEEE, Dec. 1981, vol. 3, pp. 214-235 or 3422-3424, 1998.
Kim, “An Eight Tesla Superconducting Magnet for Cyclotron Studies,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 1994, 138 pages.
Kimstrand, “Beam Modelling for Treatment Planning of Scanned Proton Beams,” Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 330, Uppsala Universitet, 2008, 58 pages.
Kishida and Yano, “Beam Transport System for the RIKEN SSC (II),” Scientific Papers of the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Dec. 1981, 75(4):214-235.
Koehler et al., “Range Modulators for Protons and Heavy Ions,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 1975, vol. 131, pp. 437-440.
Koto and Tsujii, “Future of Particle Therapy,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Clinics, 2001, 47(1):95-98 [Lang.: Japanese], English abstract (http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200206/000020020601A0511453.php).
Kraft et al., “Hadrontherapy in Oncology,” U. Amaldi and Lamson, editors Elsevier Science, 1994, 390 pages.
Krevet et al., “Design of a Strongly Curved Superconducting Bending Magnet for a Compact Synchrotron Light Source,” Advance in Cryogenic Engineering, 1988, vol. 33, pp. 25-32.
Laisne et aI., “The Orsay 200 MeV Synchrocyclotron,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Apr. 1979, NS-26(2):1919-1922.
Larsson et al., Nature, 958, 182:1222.
Larsson, “Biomedical Program for the Converted 200-MeV Synchrocyclotron at the Gustaf Werner Institute,” Radiation Research, 1985, 104: S310-S318.
Lawrence et al., “Heavy particles in acromegaly and Cushing's Disease,” in Endocrine and Norendocrine Hormone Producing Tumors (Year Book Medical Chicago, 1973, pp. 29-61.
Lawrence et al., “Successful Treatment of Acromegaly: Metabolic and Clinical Studies in 145 Patients,” The Journal of Clinical Endrocrinology and Metabolism, Aug. 1970, 31(2), 21 pages.
Lawrence et al., “Treatment of Pituitary Tumors,” (Excerpta medica, Amsterdam/American Elsevier, New York, 1973, pp. 253-262.
Lawrence, Cancer, 1957, 10:795.
Lecroy et al., “Viewing Probe for High Voltage Pulses,” Review of Scientific Instruments USA, Dec. 1960, 31(12):1354.
Lin et al., “Principles and 10 Year Experience of the Beam Monitor System at the PSI Scanned Proton Therapy Facility”, Center for Proton Radiation Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland, 2007, 21 pages.
Linfoot et al., “Acromegaly,” in Hormonal Proteins and Peptides, edited by C.H. Li, 1975, pp. 191-246.
Literature Author and Keyword Search, Feb. 14, 2005, 44 pages.
Literature Keyword Search, Jan. 24, 2005, 98 pages.
Literature Search and Keyword Search for Synchrocyclotron, Jan. 25, 2005, 68 pages.
Literature Search by Company Name/Component Source, Jan. 24, 2005, 111 pages.
Literature Search, Jan. 26, 2005, 36 pages.
Livingston et al., “A capillary ion source for the cyclotron,” Review Science Instruments, Feb. 1939, 10:63.
Mandrillon, “High Energy Medical Accelerators,” EPAC 90, 2nd European Particle Accelerator Conference, Jun. 12-16, 1990, 2:54-58.
Marchand et aI., “IBA Proton Pencil Beam Scanning: an Innovative Solution for Cancer Treatment,” Proceedings of EPAC 2000, Vienna, Austria, 3 pages.
Marti et al., “High Intensity Operation of a Superconducting Cyclotron,” Proceedings of the 14the International Conference, Cyclotrons and Their Applications, Oct. 1995, pp. 45-48 (Oct. 1995).
Martin, “Operational Experience with Superconducting Synchrotron Magnets” Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Mar. 16-19, 1987, vol. 3 of 3:1379-1382.
Meote et al., “ETOILE Hadrontherapy Project, Review of Design Studies” Proceedings of EPAC 2002, 2002, pp. 2745-2747.
Miyamoto et al., “Development of the Proton Therapy System,” The Hitachi Hyoron, 79(10):775-779 (1997) [Lang: Japanese], English abstract (http://www.hitachi.com/rev/1998/revfeb98/rev4706.htm).
Montelius et al., “The Narrow Proton Beam Therapy Unit at the Svedberg Laboratory in Uppsala,” ACTA Oncologica, 1991, 30:739-745.
Moser et al., “Nonlinear Beam Optics with Real Fields in Compact Storage Rings,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research/Section B, B30, Feb. 1988, No. 1, pp. 105-109.
Moyers et aI., “A Continuously Variable Thickness Scatterer for Proton Beams Using Self-compensating Dual Linear Wedges” Lorna Linda University Medical Center, Dept. of Radiation Medicine, Lorna Linda, CA, Nov. 2, 1992, 21 pages.
National Cancer Institute Funding (Senate-Sep. 21, 1992) (www.thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r102:S21SE2-712 (2 pages).
Nicholson, “Applications of Proton Beam Therapy,” Journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, May/Jun. 1996, 67(5): 439-441.
Nolen et al., “The Integrated Cryogenic—Superconducting Beam Transport System Planned for MSU,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators, Aug. 1983, pp. 549-551.
Norimine et al., “A Design of a Rotating Gantry with Easy Steering for Proton Therapy,” Proceedings of EPAC 2002, 2002, pp. 2751-2753.
Ogino, Takashi, “Heavy Charged Particle Radiotherapy-Proton Beam”, Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Dec. 2003, 7 pages.
Okumura et al., “Overview and Future Prospect of Proton Radiotherapy,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Clinics, 1997, 43(2):209-214 [Lang.: Japanese].
Okumura et al., “Proton Radiotherapy” Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy, 1993, 10. 20(14):2149-2155[Lang.: Japanese].
Outstanding from Search Reports, “Accelerator of Polarized Portons at Fermilab,” 2005, 20 pages.
Paganetti et al., “Proton Beam Radiotherapy—The State of the Art,” Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, ISBN 3-540-00321-5, Oct. 2005, 36 pages.
Palmer and Tollestrup, “Superconducting Magnet Technology for Accelerators,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 1984, vol. 34, pp. 247-284.
Patent Assignee and Keyword Searches for Synchrocyclotron, Jan. 25, 2005, 78 pages.
Pavlovic, “Beam-optics study of the gantry beam delivery system for light-ion cancer therapy,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, Nov. 1997, 399(2):439-454(16).
Pedroni and Enge, “Beam optics design of compact gantry for proton therapy” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, May 1995, 33(3):271-277.
Pedroni and Jermann, . “SGSMP: Bulletin Mar. 2002 Proscan Project, Progress Report on the PROSCAN Project of PSI” [online] retrieved from www.sgsmp.ch/protA23.htm, Mar. 2002, 5 pages.
Pedroni et al., “A Novel Gantry for Proton Therapy at the Paul Scherrer Institute,” Cycloctrons and Their Applications 2001: Sixteenth International Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2001, 600:13-17.
Pedroni et al., “The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: Conceptual design and practical realization,” Medical Physics, Jan. 1995, 22(1):37-53.
Pedroni, “Accelerators for Charged Particle Therapy: Performance Criteria from the User Point of View,” Cyclotrons and their Applications, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Jul. 6-10, 1992, pp. 226-233.
Pedroni, “Latest Developments in Proton Therapy” Proceedings of EPAC 2000, 2000, pp. 240-244.
Pedroni, “Status of Proton Therapy: results and future trends,” Paul Scherrer Institute, Division of Radiation Medicine, 1994, 5 pages.
Peggs et al., “A Survey of Hadron Therapy Accelerator Technologies,” Particle Accelerator Conference, Jun. 25-29, 2007, 7 pages.
Potts et al., “MPWP6-Therapy III: Treatment Aids and Techniques” Medical Physics, Sep./Oct. 1988, 15(5):798.
Pourrahimi et al., “Powder Metallurgy Processed Nb3Sn(Ta) Wire for High Field NMR magnets,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Jun. 1995, 5(2):1603-1606.
Prieels et al., “The IBA State-of-the-Art Proton Therapy System, Performances and Recent Results,” Application of Accelerators in Research and industry—Sixteenth Int'l. Conf., American Institute of Physics, Nov. 1-5, 2000, 576:857-860.
Rabin et al., “Compact Designs for Comprehensive Proton Beam Clinical Facilities,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Apr. 1989, Section B, vol. 40-41, Part II, pp. 1335-1339.
Research & Development Magazine, “Proton Therapy Center Nearing Completion,” Aug. 1999, 41(9):2 pages, (www.rdmag.com).
Resmini, “Design Characteristics of the K=800 Superconducting Cyclotron at M.S.U.,” Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, vol. NS-26, No. 2, Apr. 1979, 8 pages.
RetroSearch “Berkeley 88-Inch Cyclotron ‘RF’ or ‘Frequency Control’,” Jan. 21, 2005, 36 pages.
RetroSearch “Berkeley 88-Inch Cyclotron,” Jan. 24, 2005, 170 pages.
RetroSearch “Bernard Gottschalk, Cyclotron, Beams, Compensated Upstream Modulator, Compensated Scatter,” Jan. 21, 2005, 20 pages.
RetroSearch “Cyclotron with ‘RF’ or ‘Frequency Control’,” Jan. 21, 2005, 49 pages.
RetroSearch Gottschalk, Bernard, Harvard Cyclotron Wheel, Jan. 21, 2005, 20 pages.
RetroSearch “Loma Linda University Beam Compensation,” Jan. 21, 2005, 60 pages.
RetroSearch “Loma Linda University, Beam Compensation Foil Wedge,” Jan. 21, 2005, 15 pages.
Revised Patent Keyword Search, Jan. 25, 2005, 88 pages.
Rifuggiato et, al., “Status Report of the LNS Superconducting Cyclotron” Nukleonika, 2003, 48: S131-S134, Supplement 2.
Rode, “Tevatron Cryogenic System,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on High-energy Accelerators, Fermilab, Aug. 11-16, 1983, pp. 529-535.
Salzburger et al., “Superconducting Synchrotron Magnets Supraleitende Synchrotronmagnete,” Siemens A.G., Erlangen (West Germany). Abteilung Technische Physik, Report No. BMFT-FB-T-75-25, Oct. 1975, p. 147, Journal Announcement: GRAI7619; STAR1415, Subm-Sponsored by Bundesmin. Fuer Forsch. U. Technol. In German; English Summary.
Schillo et al,. “Compact Superconducting 250 MeV Proton Cyclotron for the PSI Proscan Proton Therapy Project,” Cyclotrons and Their Applications 2001, Sixteenth International Conference, 2001, pp. 37-39.
Schneider et al., “Nevis Synchrocyclotron Conversion Program—RF System,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science USA, Jun. 1969, ns 16 (3): 430-433.
Schneider et al., “Superconducting Cyclotrons,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. MAG-11, No. 2, Mar. 1975, New York, pp. 443-446.
Schreuder et al., “The Non-orthogonal Fixed Beam Arrangement for the Second Proton Therapy Facility at the National Accelerator Centre,” Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, American Institute of Physics, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, Nov. 1998, Part Two, pp. 963-966.
Schreuder, “Recent Developments in Superconducting Cyclotrons,” Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, May 1-5, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 317-321.
Schubert and Blosser, “Conceptual Design of a High Field Ultra-Compact Cyclotron for Nuclear Physics Research,” Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, May 12-16, 1997, vol. 1, 3 pages 1060-1062.
Schubert, “Extending the Feasibility Boundary of the Isochronous Cyclotron,” Dissertation submitted to Michigan State University, 1997, Abstract http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhDT . . . 147S.
Shelaev et al., “Design Features of a Model Superconducting Synchrotron of JINR,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on High-energy Accelerators, Aug. 11-16, 1983, pp. 416-418.
Shintomi et. Al, “Technology and Materials for the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) Project,” [Lang.: Japanese], The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan 00211575, 78(8): 1305-1313, 1992, http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110001493249/en/.
Sisterson, “World Wide Proton Therapy Experience in 1997,” The American Insitute of Physics, Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, Part Two, Nov. 1998, pp. 959-962.
Sisterson, “Clinical use of proton and ion beams from a world-wide perspective,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B, 1989, 40-41:1350-1353.
Slater et al., “Developing a Clinical Proton Accelerator Facility: Consortium-Assisted Technology Transfer,” Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference: Accelerator Science and Technology, vol. 1, May 6-9, 1991, pp. 532-536.
Slater et al., “Development of a Hospital-Based Proton Beam Treatment Center,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Apr. 1988, 14(4):761-775.
Smith et al., “The Northeast Proton Therapy Center at Massachusetts General Hospital” Journal of Brachytherapy International, Jan. 1997, pp. 137-139.
Snyder and Marti, “Central region design studies for a proposed 250 MeV proton cyclotron,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 1995, vol. 355, pp. 618-623.
Soga, “Progress of Particle Therapy in Japan,” Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, American Institute of Physics, Sixteenth International Conference, Nov. 2000, pp. 869-872.
Spiller et al., “The GSI Synchrotron Facility Proposal for Acceleration of High Intensity Ion and Proton Beams” Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, May 12-16, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 589-591.
Stanford et al., “Method of Temperature Control in Microwave Ferroelectric Measurements,” Sperry Microwave Electronics Company, Clearwater, Florida, Sep. 19, 1960, 1 page.
Tadashi et al., “Large superconducting super collider (SSC) in the planning and materials technology,” 1992, 78(8):1305-1313, The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan 00211575.
Takada, “Conceptual Design of a Proton Rotating Gantry for Cancer Therapy,” Japanese Journal of Medical Physics, 1995, 15(4):270-284.
Takayama et al., “Compact Cyclotron for Proton Therapy,” Proceedings of the 8thSymposium on Accelerator Science and Technology, Japan, Nov. 25-27, 1991, pp. 380-382.
Teng, “The Fermilab Tevatron,” Coral Gables 1981, Proceedings, Gauge Theories, Massive Neutrinos, and Proton Decay, 1981, pp. 43-62.
The Journal of Practical Pharmacy, 1995, 46(1):97-103 [Japanese].
Tilly et al., “Development and verification of the pulsed scanned proton beam at The Svedberg Laboratory in Uppsala,” Phys. Med. BioI, 2007, 52:2741-2754.
Tobias et al., Cancer Research,1958, 18, 121 (1958).
Tom, “The Use of Compact Cyclotrons for Producing Fast Neutrons for Therapy in a Rotatable Isocentric Gantry,” IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, Apr. 1979, 26(2):2294-2298.
Toyoda, “Proton Therapy System”, Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd., 2000, 5 pages.
Trinks et al , “The Tritron: A Superconducting Separated-Orbit Cyclotron,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 1986, vol. 244, pp. 273-282.
Tsuji, “The Future and Progress of Proton Beam Radiotherapy,” Journal of Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 1994, 6(2):63-76.
UC Davis School of Medicine, “Unlikely Partners Turn Military Defense into Cancer Offense”, Current Issue Summer 2008, Sacramento, California, pp. 1-2.
Umegaki et al., “Development of an Advanced Proton Beam Therapy System for Cancer Treatment” Hitachi Hyoron, 2003, 85(9):605-608 [Lang.: Japanese], English abstract, http://www.hitachi.com/ICSFiles/afieldfile/2004/06/01/r2003—04—104.pdf or http://www.hitachi.com/rev/archive/2003/2005649—12606.html (full text) [Hitachi, 52(4), Dec. 2003].
Umezawa et al., “Beam Commissioning of the new Proton Therapy System for University of Tsukuba,” Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference, vol. 1, Jun. 18-22, 2001, pp. 648-650.
van Steenbergen, “Superconducting Synchroton Development at BNL,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators CERN 1971, 1971, pp. 196-198.
van Steenbergen, “The CMS, a Cold Magnet Synchrotron to Upgrade the Proton Energy Range of the BNL Facility,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Jun. 1971, 18(3):694-698.
Vandeplassche et al., “235 MeV Cyclotron for MGH's Northeast Proton Therapy Center (NPTC): Present Status,” EPAC 96, Fifth European Partical Accelerator Conference, vol. 3, Jun. 10-14, 1996, pp. 2650-2652.
Vorobiev et al., “Concepts of a Compact Achromatic Proton Gantry with a Wide Scanning Field”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A., 1998, 406(2):307-310.
Vrenken et al., “A Design of a Compact Gantry for Proton Therapy with 2D-Scanning,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 1999, 426(2):618-624.
Wikipedia, “Cyclotron” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotron (originally visited Oct. 6, 2005, revisited Jan. 28, 2009), 7pages.
Wikipedia, “Synchrotron” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchrotron (originally visited Oct. 6, 2005, revisited Jan. 28, 2009), 7 pages.
Worldwide Patent Assignee Search, Jan. 24, 2005, 224 pages.
Worldwide Patent Keyword Search, Jan. 24, 2005, 94 pages.
Wu, “Conceptual Design and Orbit Dynamics in a 250 MeV Superconducting Synchrocyclotron,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 1990, 172 pages.
York et al., “Present Status and Future Possibilities at NSCL-MSU,” EPAC 94, Fourth European Particle Accelerator Conference, pp. 554-556, Jun. 1994.
York et al., “The NSCL Coupled Cyclotron Project—Overview and Status,”Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Jun. 1998, pp. 687-691.
Yudelev et al., “Hospital Based Superconducting Cyclotron for Neutron Therapy: Medical Physics Perspective,” Cyclotrons and their applications 2001, 16th International Conference. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, vol. 600, May 13-17, 2001, pp. 40-43.
Zherbin et al., “Proton Beam Therapy at the Leningrad Synchrocyclotron (Clinicomethodological Aspects and Therapeutic Results)”, Aug. 1987, 32(8):17-22, (German with English abstract on pp. 21-22).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130053616 A1 Feb 2013 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60738404 Nov 2005 US
60991454 Nov 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12275103 Nov 2008 US
Child 13532530 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11601056 Nov 2006 US
Child 12275103 US