The invention relates to a kit for a counter-current swimming pool for swimming pools, wherein water is pumped in across the entire horizontal extent of a boundary wall of a swimming pool and discharged across the entire horizontal extent of the opposite boundary wall, wherein the counter-current swimming pool has a cover plate which bounds the swim space of the swimming pool downwards, with boundary walls extending from the cover plate to the swimming pool floor and defining flow channels, wherein axial feed units, e.g., propellers, are provided in the region between the boundary walls, and wherein the cover plate, when viewed in the flow direction, terminates both at the front end and at the rear end with a spacing to the adjacent swimming pool wall by forming a gap for pumping water in and discharging water.
A number of swimming pools employing counter-current swimming pools are known in the art.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,731,554 A discloses a swimming pool which includes a counterflow system, wherein an intermediate bottom or a collection tube is provided which is spaced from the front wall and rear wall, and wherein one or more propellers or the like producing a water current are arranged between the bottom and the floor. These propellers are driven by a motor which is arranged outside the intermediate bottom and which drives the propellers via a shaft.
In another conventional embodiment, one boundary wall has openings for inflow of water into the swimming pool. The openings are arranged next to one another horizontally and are connected at the backside of the swimming pool wall by a distribution channel, with a pump forcing water into the distribution channel, with the water being suctioned off at the opposite side of the swimming pool via a collection system. Disadvantageously, such arrangement requires considerable space to be set aside for both the distribution channel and the collection channel at opposite ends of the swimming pool as well as for the pump, which makes it very difficult to install a counter-current swimming pool, in particular in small swimming pools.
Moreover, the counter-current system must already be taken into consideration during the planning stage, because the walls of the swimming pool must be configured accordingly and the aforementioned additional space must be provided.
It is an object of the invention to provide a system of the afore-described type, which can be effectively deployed in small swimming pools and which can later be installed in existing pools.
The object is solved by the invention in that the kit is designed as a self-contained separate unit, wherein the drive systems for the axial feed unit are also arranged in the region between the pool floor and the cover plate.
With this approach, the outside dimensions of the swimming pool need not be enlarged and substantially laminar flow is attained inside the swimming space in the pool, i.e., substantially the same flow conditions exist across the entire width of the swimming pool.
Advantageously, all axial feed units may be separated from one another with respect to the flow characteristics by parallel or substantially parallel separation walls. With this approach, a defined flow is also obtained below the cover plate, so that the individual axial feed units do not interfere with one another. In addition, by forming separate flow channels, the feed units may be controlled separately for obtaining a laminar flow. To obtain a substantially uniform flow in the swimming region, deflection units may be provided at least in the region of the gap where water is pumped in, for deflecting the water flow without creating turbulence. In addition, the gaps between the end faces of the cover plate and the interior wall surface of the swimming pool may be covered with grates having a low flow resistance, which may affect the flow not at all or only slightly and may also prevent a swimmer from slipping off the cover plate. For a particularly simple adaptation to existing swimming pools, the kit may be made from several modules. In addition, sensors may be provided for controlling the power of the axial feed units, so that the flow velocity is automatically adjusted to match the swimming ability of the swimmer. In particular for athletes and the like and for rehabilitation exercises, the sensors may be provided for monitoring the position of a swimmer. A safety switch or touch strap can be implemented as a disconnect at the “foot end.”
The drawings show an exemplary embodiment of the system of the invention.
The swimming pool is designated in general with the reference symbol 1, with inserts 2 and 3 arranged in the swimming pool 1. In this exemplary embodiment, two modular inserts are arranged side by side; however, a one-piece insert covering the entire width of the swimming pool could also be selected. In addition, in the present example, each insert is divided into two sections in the flow direction of the water, consisting of a part 2 and another part 2′, and 3 and 3′, respectively, wherein both parts of each insert 2, 3 each have their own cover plate 4 and 5, from which mutually parallel or essentially parallel boundary walls 6 and 8, which extend to the pool bottom, are provided, as well as separation walls 7 and 9, which are likewise provided in the sections 2 and 2′, and 3 and 3′, respectively. The channels defined by the boundary walls 6 and 8 and the separation walls 7 and 9, respectively, below the cover plates 4, 5 include axial feed units 10, which propel the water in the direction indicated by arrows P and R. As indicated in the present example, the axial feed units 10 can be implemented as conventional ship propulsion systems driven by electric motors, i.e., the axial feed units are equipped with a watertight electric motor operating at 12 or 24 V and connected to a conventional ship propeller.
In the illustrated exemplary embodiment, the boundary and separation walls are disposed along the entire length of the respective inserts 2, 2′ and 3, 3′. However, particularly the separation walls 7 and 9 are important in the region of the axial feed units 10, so that a particular propeller does not adversely affect the flow of the other propellers. Advantageously, the separation walls 7 and 9 also support the cover plates 4, 5 and thereby enhance the rigidity of the bottom.
Deflection units 11, 12 are provided at the end 14 of the cover plates 4, 5 downstream of the axial feed units 10 for an essentially vortex-free deflection of the water flow. Alternatively, only the indicated deflection angle 13 could be provided (not shown), which may be adequate for smaller systems with reduced water flow. The incoming and outgoing water flow can also be guided across split deflection units for improving the laminar flow.
Gaps 16 and 17, through which the water circulates, are arranged between a corresponding wall of the swimming pool and, on one hand, the end 14 of the cover plates 4, 5 located downstream of the axial feed units 10 in the flow direction and, on the other hand, the end edge 15 provided for suction. For safety reasons, each of these gaps is covered by a respective grate 18 and 19, which is designed to have a low flow resistance so as not to impede the flow and to also ensure an essentially laminar flow across the entire width in the region of the swimmer.
As indicated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 76/2005 | Jan 2005 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AT2006/000020 | 1/17/2006 | WO | 00 | 7/17/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/076755 | 7/27/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1731554 | Wheeler | Oct 1929 | A |
2035835 | Raber | Mar 1936 | A |
2822183 | Montgomery | Feb 1958 | A |
4170799 | Ratelband | Oct 1979 | A |
4197815 | Brazelton | Apr 1980 | A |
4429867 | Barber | Feb 1984 | A |
4845787 | Lior | Jul 1989 | A |
4903352 | Murakami | Feb 1990 | A |
4907304 | Davidson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5005228 | Mermelstein | Apr 1991 | A |
5044021 | Murdock | Sep 1991 | A |
5207729 | Hatanaka | May 1993 | A |
5246345 | Adams, Jr. | Sep 1993 | A |
5271106 | McClish et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273399 | Ojeda | Dec 1993 | A |
5315720 | Lior | May 1994 | A |
5367719 | Mermelstein | Nov 1994 | A |
5494465 | Jenkins | Feb 1996 | A |
5758369 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791955 | Rinck | Aug 1998 | A |
6154140 | Thorpe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6190220 | Borrelli | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6315911 | Radsky | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6860057 | Petaja-Suvanto | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7086994 | Turak et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7330123 | Grahn et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7403135 | Kaski et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7526820 | Murdock et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7614094 | Wolfe | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7846072 | Bellerive | Dec 2010 | B1 |
20020046817 | Last | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020191815 | Meniere et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030077389 | Jones | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050170936 | Quinn | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20080127405 | Hof | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148470 | Ferriss et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
311618 | Nov 1973 | AT |
2237800 | Feb 1974 | DE |
8311105 | Nov 1990 | DE |
20005487 | Aug 2000 | DE |
2822183 | Sep 2002 | FR |
935054 | Aug 1963 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080127405 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |