Insertable block tile for interconnecting to a device embedded in an integrated circuit

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6772405
  • Patent Number
    6,772,405
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 13, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 3, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
Method and apparatus for an insertable block tile is described. More particularly, a reserved area in an integrated circuit layout is removed, and terminated conductive line information is extracted from a layout database affected by the removal. The terminated conductive line information is used to create extensions or pins of the conductive lines terminated, as well as to identify signals associated with those terminated conductive lines. These physical or layout names and coordinates are mapped and then translated to logic names and coordinates for placement and routing to create the insertable block tile.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to method and apparatus for forming and insertable block tile, and more particularly to placement and routing of signals to and from a core embedded in a programmable logic device.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Programmable logic devices exist as a well-known type of integrated circuit that may be programmed by a user to perform specific logic functions. There are different types of programmable logic devices, such as programmable logic arrays (PLAs) and complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs). One type of programmable logic device, called a field programmable gate array (FPGA), is very popular because of a superior combination of capacity, flexibility and cost. An FPGA typically includes an array of configurable logic blocks (CLBs) surrounded by a ring of programmable input/output blocks (IOBs). The CLBs and IOBs are interconnected by a programmable interconnect structure. The CLBs, IOBs, and programmable interconnect structure are conventionally programmed by learning a stream of configuration data (bit stream) into internal configuration memory cells, conventionally block random access memory (RAM) to define how the CLBs, IOBs, and programmable interconnect structure are configured.




Accordingly, when embedding a core, sometimes referred to as an embedded core, into an existing FPGA design, a portion of the FPGA layout is exchanged for layout of the embedded core. This is sometimes referred to as creating a “hole” in the “fabric” of the FPGA for insertion of an embedded core.




Once a portion of an FPGA is removed for an embedded core, signal lines, which may be thought of as conductive or metal lines, of the FPGA are abruptly terminated. Accordingly, for connecting an embedded core block to an FPGA, an area at the interface between the remaining part of the FPGA and the embedded core is reserved for interconnectivity. A layout engineer manually adjusts a layout working within this reserved operational interface area, i.e., namely creating FPGA-to-FPGA, FPGA-to-embedded core and embedded core-to-FPGA connections. This manual process is time consuming, especially in view of having to manually connect conductive lines in a limited space, which time intensive nature is exacerbated by having to search for metal levels.




Accordingly, it would be desirable and useful to provide method and apparatus for forming an insertable block tile for an embedded core into an existing integrated circuit layout that significantly reduces layout design time as compared to manual routing, as described above. More particularly, it would be desirable and useful if such method and apparatus could be integrated with place and route (P&R) tools.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An aspect of the present invention is a method for providing an insertable block tile for an integrated circuit having a region reserved for an embedded device. A physical layout database is provided for the integrated circuit. The region reserved is applied to the physical layout database. A portion of the physical layout database is removed in response to the region reserved. Terminated conductive line information is extracted from the physical layout database in response to the portion of the physical layout database removed. Layout names and associated coordinate information is identified for the terminated conductive line information extracted. The layout names are converted to schematic names. Logic names are mapped to the schematic names. The associated coordinate information is associated with the logic names to provide logic coordinate information.




An aspect of the present invention is an integrated circuit having an embedded core, where the embedded core is coupled to programmable logic to provide the integrated circuit. An input/output perimeter about the embedded core comprises a plurality of pins formed as extensions of conductive lines, whereby the pins are in integral alignment with the conductive lines for interconnecting the embedded core to the programmable logic.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




So that the manner in which the above recited features, advantages and objects of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.




It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the present invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.





FIG. 1

is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an integrated circuit comprising programmable logic and an embedded core region in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of the embedded core region of

FIG. 1

in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram of

FIG. 2

with translated coordinates for an embedded core domain.





FIG. 4

is a process flow diagram of an embedded block tile process in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a table diagram of an exemplary portion of a looked-up table in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a table diagram of an exemplary portion of a schematic name to logic name mapping table in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.





FIG. 7

is a process flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a place and route process in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is a block diagram of a computer system in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a more thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without one or more of these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in order to avoid obscuring the present invention.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, there is shown a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an integrated circuit


10


comprising programmable logic


11


and embedded core region


12


, including glue logic, if any, in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. Pluralities of interconnect conductive lines


15


and


16


are shown as terminating at embedded core region


12


. Accordingly, it should be appreciated that a portion of programmable logic circuit, such as an FPGA,


11


is removed for providing a space for an embedded core, as well as glue logic. Notably, conductive lines


15


and


16


may be formed at different elevations or layers with respect to a substrate, as is well known. However, it should be understood that an embedded core, including any glue logic, need not necessarily be coupled to each metal layer of programmable logic circuit


11


, and thus pluralities of lines


15


and


16


may represent selected metal layers. In this manner, not all conductive lines, such as metal lines, extending over embedded core region


12


need to be terminated at interface


17


.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, there is shown a block diagram of embedded core region


12


of

FIG. 1

in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. Reserved interconnect area


13


between interface boundary


17


and a reserved interconnect area boundary lines


14


A through


14


D is shown. Metal layer extensions


18


are extensions of conductive lines terminated at boundary


17


, as described above with respect to FIG.


1


. With continuing reference to FIG.


2


and renewed reference to

FIG. 1

, conductive line extensions


18


are cross sectionally equivalent to conductive lines


15


and


16


from which they extend; however the degree or the length to which conductive line extensions


18


extend into embedded core region


12


is determined by a layout designer engineer, as indicated by dashed lines


14


A,


14


B,


14


C and


14


D. Moreover, it should be appreciated that dashed lines


14


A,


14


B,


14


C and


14


D, do not need to be uniform with respect to the extent to which each extends into embedded core region


12


. In other words, conductive line extensions


18


do not need to have uniform lengths, though for purposes of clarity of explanation it will be assumed that conductive line extensions


18


do have uniform lengths. It should be noted that input/output pins at the perimeter of the embedded core can be formed as conductive line extensions. Thus, conductive line extensions


18


may be referred to as pins


18


.




For integrated circuit


10


, an initial starting point at a corner may be (0,0). Thus, a corner of boundary


17


may have a coordinate (a,b) within a domain of integrated circuit


10


. Pins


18


may be positioned according to a coordinate (x


1


,y


1


). Notably, pins


18


have a cross-sectional width, and thus placement may take into account this dimension. For placement and routing (P&R) for creating an embedded block tile, coordinates for embedded core region


12


are translated. This reduces the area for which a P&R tool needs address, and thus further facilitates placement of embedded block tile into an existing layout of programmable logic circuit


11


having a reserved region


12


without need of manual pin interconnect.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, there is shown a block diagram of

FIG. 2

with translated coordinates for an embedded core domain. For example, coordinates (a,b) are translated to coordinates (0,0). Additionally, coordinates (x


1


, y


1


) are translated to (x


1


′,y


1


′). While one set of coordinates for a pin are described, it should be appreciated that multiple sets of coordinates for multiple pins may be used. It should be appreciated that extensions or pins


18


form a ring, more particularly an input/output (I/O) ring of abutting ports at a programmable logic circuit/embedded block boundary


17


. This I/O ring may be used as physical pin information within a P&R database. An automated router may be used to route all embedded primary I/O to these physical pins


18


. As is explained in more detail, an embedded block tile is created which may be directly placed into an existing layout, such as a layout for programmable logic device


11


, without addition of any manual interconnect by a layout design engineer.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, there is shown a process flow diagram of an embedded block tile process


100


in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. At step


101


, a physical layout database for an integrated circuit


100


, prior to removal of circuitry in embedded core region


12


, is obtained. Conventionally, a physical layout database is a binary file, sometimes referred to as a “GDS” file. At step


102


, a removal region, namely embedded core region


12


, is defined. This includes an area as well as a height, and thus metal interconnect layers are identified by whether they extend over and/or into such an embedded-core region


12


. However, other metal layers may be above this height, so they will not be terminated at boundary


17


in order for P&R to an embedded core, including any glue logic for coupling such an embedded core to programmable logic circuit


11


. Notably, if available, a physical layout database may be used prior to conversion to a binary file, and accordingly conversion from a binary file to a text file may therefore be avoided.




At step


103


, those metal layers selected at step


102


as encroaching into embedded core region


12


based on coordinate locations and elevation are extracted. Thus, a list of terminated conductive lines is obtained, at least as a binary version of information. This list may be parsed at step


104


into respective conductive layers. For example, information for metal layer


3


,


4


, and


5


may be parsed into separate bins. These are merely examples of metal layers and lower and higher or different metal layers may be used.




At step


105


, extensions for each of such metal layers for terminated signals are created. These extensions correspond to pins


18


, which may later be used for interconnectivity with an embedded core, including any accompanying glue logic. As cross-sectional area of a metal line is the same for an extension as it is for the original metal line from which it is extended, extensions


18


may be automatically done with a P&R tool. It should be appreciated that as a matter of course all terminated lines may be extended a determined amount. However, as mentioned above, the length of such extensions or the extent to which they extend into embedded core region


12


is a designer's choice. Moreover, as layout coordinate information is associated with physical or layout signal names, creating extensions of such metal lines may be done using the coordinate system of integrated circuit


11


as opposed to having to transpose or shift coordinates for embedded core region


12


.




Though all terminated signal lines may be extended, does not mean that all such terminated signal lines are used for interconnecting to an embedded device, embedded core and glue logic. Recall that these terminations are from a pre-existing layout of an integrated circuit device, such as a programmable logic device, designed without an embedded core. Thus, some terminated lines may be from FPGA-to-FPGA, for example, and not from FPGA-to-embedded core and vice versa.




At step


106


, physical names and location coordinate information for each of the terminated lines identified at step


103


is obtained. In other words, binary information for the terminated lines is converted to a textual version thereof. Thus, a list of terminated signals at embedded core region


12


may be obtained for affected metal layers. Notably, this list includes physical or layout name and coordinate information for each of the terminated signals. A look-up table of schematic names as associated with physical names is accessed at step


107


, and each physical signal name obtained is mapped to a schematic name using such a look-up table, thereby obtaining the associated schematic name for each of the physical names and coordinates identified.




It is important to realize, especially for programmable logic circuits, blocks which are repeated in a design, for example configurable logic locks, may use the same signal names over and over. However, though the same signal names are used, they represent different signals, as multiple configuration logic blocks exist on a programmable logic device. Accordingly, signal name and location are needed. At step


108


, schematic names identified at step


106


are converted to logical names using a mapping table or other convention. Such logical names are according to a convention for a P&R tool, and such logical names are associated with coordinates obtained.




In order to describe mapping, an example is used.

FIG. 5

is a table diagram of an exemplary portion of a looked-up table


112


in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. By way of example, suppose from table


112


at step


106


data at metal layer


3


for a data input signal, namely, din_L


03


<


31


> signal, was identified at coordinates (x


1


,y


1


), namely, item


113


in table


112


. Such a layout name and coordinates therefore would be associated via a lookup table with a schematic name for such a data input signal, namely data_in <


31


> signal or item


114


from table


112


.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, there is shown a table diagram of an exemplary portion of a schematic name to logic name mapping table


115


in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. Continuing the above example with respect to

FIG. 5

, data_in <


31


> signal, namely item


114


, is converted to a logic name, for example input_signalA<


31


> or item


116


of mapping table


115


.




With continuing reference to FIG.


6


and renewed reference to

FIGS. 4 and 5

, conversion from schematic name to logic name is done at step


108


. At step


109


coordinates are converted using association between logic name and coordinates to layout name and coordinates owing to common association with a schematic name. So, continuing the above example, coordinates (x


1


,y


1


) from an integrated circuit domain are mapped to coordinates to (x


1


′,y


1


′) of a reserved embedded core region domain. Continuing the example of having an origin at location (a,b), (x


1


′,y


1


′) would equal ((x


1


−a),(y


1


−b)). Thus, embedded core region


12


signals to be interconnected are mapped to an embedded core domain, for example having a (0,0) point of reference, as indicated in

FIG. 3

, instead of (a, b).




After each of the signals terminated for embedded core region


12


for the selected layers is identified by schematic name and converted over to logic name and coordinates for an embedded core region domain, a list of all these signals and their respective coordinates may be created as a data exchange format (DEF) file at step


110


. Such a file may be provided to a P&R tool at step


111


.




Referring to

FIG. 7

, there is shown a process flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a P&R process


120


in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. At step


121


architectural or “floor” planning for placement of circuitry blocks, including an embedded core and standard cells, is done for embedded core region


12


. At step


112


, I/O placement is done. I/O placement comprises obtaining the above-mentioned list of logical names and coordinates, from example as a DEF file. At step


123


placement of a cell is done, namely, placement of the planned layout of embedded core and glue logic with I/O locations. I/O locations are locations for pins


18


.




At step


124


routing for an embedded core and glue logic, including routing to and from I/O pins using a DEF file obtained from step


111


, is done by a P&R tool. At step


125


layout routing done at step


124


is converted from text to a binary version, namely, a binary database or tapeout database. At step


126


, the database obtained at step


101


less a removed portion at step


102


is merged with GDS out from step


125


. Such a merger may include transformation of coordinates from an embedded core domain to a domain for integrated circuit


110


.




Accordingly, it should be appreciated that by creating metal extensions, locations for connecting to metal lines are provided. Next, an insertable block tile is created, as signal name and location information from a layout database may be determined for terminated lines, which signal name and location information may be used for interconnect (programmable logic device to/from embedded core device) and intraconnect (programmable logic device to programmable logic device) routing. Thus, because pins using the coordinate system of the integrated circuit are used as starting points for placement and routing, an block tile which may be inserted back into the integrated circuit layout has been created thereby avoiding at least a significant amount of manual layout work.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, there is shown a block diagram of a computer system


130


in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. Processor


131


is coupled to memory


132


, and I/O interface


133


. I/O interface


133


may be coupled to memory


132


as is known for direct memory addressing. Memory


132


may comprise all or a portion of processes


100


and/or


120


from time to time. Computer system


130


may be programmed with a P&R tool.




Embodiments of the present invention may be implemented as program products for use with a computer system


130


. The program(s) of the program product defines functions of the embodiments and can be contained on a variety of signal/bearing media, which include, but are not limited to: (i) information permanently stored on non-writable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices within a computer such as CD-ROM disks readable by a CD-ROM drive); (ii) alterable information stored on writable storage media (e.g., floppy disks within a diskette drive or hard-disk drive); or (iii) information conveyed to a computer by a communications medium, such as through a computer or telephone network, including wireless communications. The latter embodiment specifically includes information downloaded from the Internet and other networks. Such signal-bearing media, when carrying computer-readable instructions that direct the functions of the present invention, represent embodiments of the present invention.




Although various embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail herein, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings. Claims listing steps do not imply any order of the steps unless such order is expressly indicated.




All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.



Claims
  • 1. A method for providing an insertable block tile for an integrated circuit having a region reserved for an embedded device, comprising:providing a physical layout database for the integrated circuit; applying the region reserved to the physical layout database; removing a portion of the physical layout database in response to the region reserved; extracting terminated conductive line information from the physical layout database in response to the portion of the physical layout database removed; identifying layout names and associated coordinate information for the terminated conductive line information extracted; converting the layout names to schematic names; mapping logic names to the schematic names; and associating the associated coordinate information with the logic names to provide logic coordinate information.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of associating comprises converting the associated coordinate information from a domain of the integrated circuit to a domain of the region reserved.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of extracting terminated conductive line information is limited to an interface area between the integrated circuit and the portion of the physical layout database removed.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of extracting the terminated conductive line information comprises limiting extraction to affected conductive layers.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 further comprising creating extended metal portions in response to the terminated conductive line information and the conductive layers.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 further providing the block tile to an input/output placement portion of a place and route tool.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 further comprising routing the integrated circuit for connectivity with the blocked tile to provide another physical layout database.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 further comprising merging the physical layout database with the other physical layout database.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of identifying comprises converting a portion of a binary file of the physical layout database to a text version thereof.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising providing the logic names and the logic coordinate information as a data exchange format file.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the integrated circuit is a programmable logic device.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 wherein the programmable logic device is a field programmable gate array, and wherein the embedded device is a microprocessor core and glue logic.
  • 13. An integrated circuit having an embedded core interconnected thereto by a method comprising:providing a physical layout database for the integrated circuit; defining a portion of the physical layout database to be removed; extracting terminated conductive line information from the physical layout database in response to the portion of the physical layout database removed; identifying signal layout name and associated coordinate information for at least a portion of the terminated conductive line information extracted; mapping the signal layout name and associated coordinate information to a schematic name; assigning a logic name to the schematic name; converting the associated coordinates from a domain of the integrated circuit to that of the removed portion of the integrated circuit; and linking the logic name to the associated coordinates converted.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 further comprising laying out extended metal portions in response to the terminated conductive line information.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the step of identifying comprises converting a portion of a binary file of the physical layout database to a text version thereof.
  • 16. The method of claim 13 further comprising providing the logic name and the associated coordinates converted as part of a data exchange format file.
  • 17. A signal-bearing medium containing a program which, when executed by a processor in response to removal of a portion of a layout database for an integrated circuit, causes execution of a method comprising:extracting terminated conductive line information from the layout database responsive to the portion of the layout database removed; laying out extensions of conductive lines in response to the terminated conductive line information; identifying layout name and coordinate information responsive to the terminated conductive line information extracted; mapping the layout name and coordinate information to a schematic name; and assigning a logic name to the schematic name.
  • 18. The signal-bearing medium of claim 17 wherein the method further comprises the step of converting the coordinate information from the integrated circuit domain to a domain of the portion of the integrated circuit removed.
  • 19. The method of claim 17 wherein the step of identifying comprises converting a portion of a binary file of the layout database to a text version thereof.
US Referenced Citations (85)
Number Name Date Kind
4758985 Carter Jul 1988 A
4855669 Mahoney Aug 1989 A
5072418 Boutaud et al. Dec 1991 A
5142625 Nakai Aug 1992 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5274570 Izumi et al. Dec 1993 A
5311114 Sambamurthy et al. May 1994 A
5339262 Rostoker et al. Aug 1994 A
5347181 Ashby et al. Sep 1994 A
5361373 Gilson Nov 1994 A
5457410 Ting Oct 1995 A
5473267 Stansfield Dec 1995 A
5500943 Ho et al. Mar 1996 A
5504738 Sambamurthy et al. Apr 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5543640 Sutherland et al. Aug 1996 A
5550782 Cliff et al. Aug 1996 A
5552722 Kean Sep 1996 A
5574930 Halverson, Jr. et al. Nov 1996 A
5574942 Colwell et al. Nov 1996 A
5581745 Muraoka et al. Dec 1996 A
5600845 Gilson Feb 1997 A
5652904 Trimberger Jul 1997 A
5671355 Collins Sep 1997 A
5705938 Kean Jan 1998 A
5732250 Bates et al. Mar 1998 A
5737631 Trimberger Apr 1998 A
5740404 Baji Apr 1998 A
5742179 Sasaki Apr 1998 A
5742180 DeHon et al. Apr 1998 A
5748979 Trimberger May 1998 A
5752035 Trimberger May 1998 A
5760607 Leeds et al. Jun 1998 A
5809517 Shimura Sep 1998 A
5835405 Tsui et al. Nov 1998 A
5874834 New Feb 1999 A
5889788 Pressly et al. Mar 1999 A
5892961 Trimberger Apr 1999 A
5898705 Graef Apr 1999 A
5914616 Young et al. Jun 1999 A
5914902 Lawrence et al. Jun 1999 A
5933023 Young Aug 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
6011407 New Jan 2000 A
6020755 Andrews et al. Feb 2000 A
6026481 New et al. Feb 2000 A
6096091 Hartmann Aug 2000 A
6154051 Nguyen et al. Nov 2000 A
6163166 Bielby et al. Dec 2000 A
6172990 Deb et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178541 Joly et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181163 Agrawal et al. Jan 2001 B1
6211697 Lien et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242945 New Jun 2001 B1
6272451 Mason et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279045 Muthujumaraswathy et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282627 Wong et al. Aug 2001 B1
6301696 Lien et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311147 Tuan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6343207 Hessel et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353331 Shimanek Mar 2002 B1
6356987 Aulas Mar 2002 B1
6389558 Herrmann et al. May 2002 B1
6434735 Watkins Aug 2002 B1
6438729 Ho Aug 2002 B1
6460172 Insenser Farre et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467009 Winegarden et al. Oct 2002 B1
6483342 Britton et al. Nov 2002 B2
6507942 Calderone et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510548 Squires Jan 2003 B1
6518787 Allegrucci et al. Feb 2003 B1
6519753 Ang Feb 2003 B1
6522167 Ansari et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532572 Tetelbaum Mar 2003 B1
6539508 Patrie et al. Mar 2003 B1
6541991 Horncheck et al. Apr 2003 B1
6578174 Zizzo Jun 2003 B2
6587995 Duboc et al. Jul 2003 B1
6588006 Watkins Jul 2003 B1
6601227 Trimberger Jul 2003 B1
6604228 Patel et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611951 Tetelbaum et al. Aug 2003 B1
20010049813 Chan et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020052053 Ono et al. May 2002 A1
20030062922 Douglass et al. Apr 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0315275 Oct 1989 EP
0 905 906 Mar 1999 EP
1 235 351 Aug 2002 EP
WO 93 25968 Dec 1993 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (34)
Entry
Sayfe Kiaei et al., “VLSI Design of Dynamically Reconfigurable Array Processor-Drap,” IEEE, Feb. 1989, pp. 2484-2488, V3.6, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Vason P. Srini, “Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) Implementation of Digital Systems: An Alternative to Asic,” IEEE, May 1991, pp. 309-314, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
G. Maki et al., “A Reconfigurable Data Path Processor,” IEEE, Aug. 1991, pp. 18-4.1 to 18-4.4, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Jacob Davidson, “FPGA Implementation of Reconfigurable Microprocessor,” IEEE, Mar. 1993, pp. 3.2.1-3.2.4, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Christian Iseli et al., “Beyond Superscaler Using FPGA's,” IEEE, Apr. 1993, pp. 486-490, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
P.C. French et al., “A Self-Reconfiguring Processor,”; IEEE, Jul. 1993, pp. 50-59, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Christian Iseli et al., “Spyder: A Reconfigurable VLIW Processor Using FPGA's,” IEEE, Jul. 1993, pp. 17-24, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Michael J. Wirthlin et al., “The Nano Processor: A Low Resource Reconfigurable Processor,” IEEE, Feb. 1994, pp. 23-30, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
William S. Carter, “The Future of Programmable Logic and Its Impact on Digital System Design,” Apr. 1994, IEEE, pp. 10-16, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Andre' Dehon, “DPGA-Coupled Microprocessors: Commodity ICs for the Early 21st Century,”IEEE, Feb. 1994, pp. 31-39, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Osama T. Albaharna, “Area & Time Limitations of FPGA-Based Virtual Hardware,” IEEE, Apr. 1994, pp. 184-189, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” 1994, Revised 1995, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA. 95124.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” 1994, Revised 1995, pp. 2-109 to 2-117, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA. 95124.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” 1994, Revised 1995, pp. 2-9 to 2-18; 2-187 to 2-199, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA. 95124.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” 1994, Revised 1995, pp. 2-107 to 2-108, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA. 95124.
Christian Iseli et al., “AC++Compiler for FPGA Custom Execution Units Synthesis,” 1995, pp. 173-179, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
International Business Machines, “PowerPC 405 Embedded Processor Core User Manual,” 1996, 5th Ed., pp. 1-1 to X-16, International Business Machines, 1580 Rout 52, Bldg. 504, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533-6531.
Yamin Li et al., “Aizup-A Pipelined Processor Design & Implementation on Xilinx FPGA Chip,” IEEE, Sep. 1996, pp. 98-106, 98-106, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Ralph D. Wittig et al., Onechip: An FPGA Processor with Reconfigurable Logic, Apr. 17, 1996, pp. 126-135, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” Jan. 27, 1999, Ch. 3, pp. 3-1 to 3-50, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA 95124.
William B. Andrew et al., “A Field Programmable System Chip Which Combines FPGA & ASIC Circuitry,” IEEE, May 16, 1999, pp. 183-186, IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5997.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” 2000, Ch. 3 pp. 3-1 to 3-117, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA 95124.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Programmable Logic Data Book,” 2000, Ch 3, pp. 3-7 to 3-17; 3-76 to 3-87, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA. 95124.
International Business Machines, “Processor Local Bus” Architecture Specifications, 32-Bit Implementation, Apr. 2000, First Edition, V2.9, pp. 1-76, IBM Corporation, Department H83A, P.O. Box 12195, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Xilinx, Inc., Virtex II Platform FPGA Handbook, Dec. 6, 2000, v1.1, pp. 33-75, Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA. 95124.
Cary D. Snyder et al., “Xilinx's A-to-Z System Platform,” Cahners Microprocessor Report, Feb. 26, 2001, pp. 1-5, Microdesign Resources, www.MDRonline.com, 408-328-3900.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/858,732, Schulz, filed May 15, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/861,112, Dao et al., filed May 18, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/917,304, Douglass et al., filed Jul. 27, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/968,446, Douglass et al., filed Sep. 28, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/991,410, Herron et al., filed Nov. 16, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/991,412, Herron et al., filed Nov. 16, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/001,871, Douglass et al., filed Nov. 19, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/043,769, Schulz, filed Jan. 9, 2002.