1. Field of Invention
Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to an insertion device used commonly for subcutaneously puncturing a site in a patient to insert a soft cannula that forms part of an infusion set for subcutaneous delivery of a fluid, drug or other infusant by means of an external infusion system. More particularly, embodiments of the invention relate to an insertion device capable of being disposed of without the risks of causing unintended harmful injuries to persons.
2. Description of Related Art
Insertion devices are generally used in the field of subcutaneous infusion sets. These infusion sets are used for delivering a fluid, medication or other infusant, for example, insulin, to a subcutaneous site in a patient. Such an infusion set is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,520,938 and 6,056,718, which are herein incorporated by reference. Another example is described in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/003,225, entitled Medication Infusion Set, filed on Dec. 3, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference. These devices commonly include a delivery tube connected to an infusion pump or other fluid or medication delivering device. Such an infusion set may include a base portion with a cannula deposited in the skin of a patient, and an adhesive patch at the base of the cannula housing to hold the cannula in place. The cannula is inserted into the skin of a patient, with the aid of an insertion device, to facilitate the subcutaneous transfer of an infusant. The possibility of disconnecting the infusion set from other parts of the infusion system is provided in order to improve the user comfort.
The use of a cannula further improves patient comfort. The cannula is generally more flexible than a rigid needle and allows the user to perform activities with much less pain or discomfort. While this allows for increased mobility, there remain disadvantages to patients for other reasons. To insert the cannula in place, an insertion device, commonly including a needle, is used and then discarded after attaching the cannula to the infusion site. Therefore, upon withdrawal of an insertion device from the base, there are potential risks of unintended harm from the sharp end to the user or others.
Because of the risk of harm during or after disposal of the insertion device, it is helpful if the insertion device can be quickly and securely covered. And because each insertion device may travel to numerous locations during the disposal process, and be handled by many different people, it is advantageous if the coverage withstands the entire process and remains secured after it reaches its final disposal location. Therefore, it would be useful to provide an insertion device with a way in which the needle can be covered quickly and securely after use and the insertion device discarded without the danger of causing unintended harmful injuries to persons.
While some insertion devices in the art provide ways to cover the exposed needle, there are disadvantages. In general, known insertion devices involve separate pieces that require the user to fit the pieces together. The cumbersome assembling process takes additional time and space. Moreover, the assembling process itself presents additional dangers of suffering needle pricks. Other known insertion devices, while not requiring assembly of separate pieces, involve complicated maneuvering to cover and secure the needle. A known insertion device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,355,021. The insertion device comprises a needle and hub. The hub includes a pivotable shield that can be manipulated to cover the needle as well as interlock the entire insertion device.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, an insertion device has been developed that can be used in connection with an external infusion system. The insertion device includes a needle at one end adapted for facilitating a subcutaneous puncture and a hub at the opposite end. The hub includes a handle part and a guard part and further includes a locking mechanism engaged by the interaction of the guard part and the handle part. The interaction of the guard part and the handle part facilitate a position wherein the rigid needle is covered by the guard part.
The insertion device may be used in conjunction with an infusion device that has a cannula. The insertion device allows quick and easy placement of the cannula of an infusion set through the skin of the user at an infusion site to provide a subcutaneous path for an infusant. An adhesive patch may be included at the base of the cannula housing to hold the placement of the cannula. After the placement of the cannula and infusion set, the insertion device is removed and the infusant may be delivered.
Embodiments of the invention may include a hub removably attachable to the base of a cannula housing of an infusion set. In an unlocked position, the hub contains a needle housing from which a needle extends through the base. The needle may be subcutaneously insertable into the infusion site for subcutaneously positioning the cannula. Embodiments of the invention include a guard part attached to the hub for covering the needle after use. The hub of the invention or the parts of the hub may be made out of a flexible material, such as polypropylene, although it may also be made out of a non-flexible material, such as polycarbonate, if preferred. Alternatively, the hub of the invention or the parts of the hub may be made out of any suitable flexible or non-flexible materials such as polyethylene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, resins, polymers, ceramics, composites, or the like.
In one embodiment there is provided a hub removably attachable to the base of a cannula housing of an infusion set, including a handle part extending from one side of the hub. A guard part, in an unlocked position, is attached along the handle part and may be slid along ledges on the inside of the guard part to move in towards the needle. The guard part moves into the needle, causing the needle to bend into a needle recess formed as the guard part and the handle part are slid together. Once the guard part slides over the needle and in towards the opposite end, the locked position of the guard part with the handle part is achieved and the needle is covered. The locked position may be temporary or permanent. Finger grips comprised of textured ridges on one end of the guard part and a finger scoop positioned on the side of the handle part may be added to improve the user's grip and effectuate handling.
According to an embodiment, the hub and guard part form a needle recess in which the needle may be housed after use. This may be achieved by a guard part with a pocketed cross-section of any shape. The cross-section may include an open space in the middle, or in proximity to the middle, surrounded by the pocket walls of the handle part, except an opening on one side, forming a needle recess along the guard part for the needle to enter. The guard part that fits over the needle recess may facilitate pushing the needle so that it is directed into the needle recess. There may be a positive stop further included as a structure at one end of the hub which provides a limit on how far the guard part moves. As the guard part moves into and over the needle, the guard part continues to move along the handle part until it reaches the structure and the surface of the structure contacts part of the hub. At this point the guard part reaches the positive stop. Additional stops included as part of the guard part may also limit how far the guard part moves.
The guard part and the handle part engage a locking mechanism when the handle part and the guard part are slid with respect to one another. The locking mechanism may be engaged temporarily or permanently. The locks may include detents on either side of one end of the guard part that fit into corresponding catches on the inner sides of the handle part. The detents can fit into the catches when the guard part is pushed in towards the needle and slid along the needle recess of the handle part. In the locked position, the detents fit into the corresponding catches and hold the guard part and the handle part in a locked position in which the needle is secured inside the needle recess. As another alternative, the needle may be secured within the guard part and the hub by alternative locking structures to catches and detents, such as hooks, barbs, or other connecting pieces.
In the embodiment, other safety features may be included. For example, a needle notch can be placed inside the hub on the end wherein the needle tip is directed by the guard part. The needle notch includes a block that keeps the needle tip in place. The needle notch further ensures that there cannot be unintended contact with the needle tip.
In another embodiment of the invention, a hub removably attachable to the base of a cannula housing of an infusion set may include a handle part and a guard part, with a collapse part on one side of the hub and a guard part on the opposite side. The collapse part is attached to a push block within the hub. The collapse part is an area on the hub that can flex and collapse inwards when pressure is added. The collapse part may be composed of any suitable material that will allow it to be flexed without fracturing. The opposing walls of the collapse part are biased to improve the wall collapse when pressure is applied. This inward collapse of the walls facilitate the pressure of the collapse part on the push block. The collapse part causes the push block to flex in towards the needle housing, where the needle resides, pushing the needle so that it bends up into the guard part. The guard part may be extended to receive and cover the needle, with the guard part having a needle recess on its underside wherein the needle is received. Catches may be positioned on opposing sides of the inside of the hub to lock the needle within the guard part. When the walls collapse inward, the catches connect and hold the walls in the collapsed position. The needle, which is pushed into the needle recess, is held and secured inside the guard part in that position. The catches prevent the needle from leaving the guard part once it is pushed into the needle recess of the guard. This locked position may be temporary or permanent. As another alternative, the needle may be secured within the guard part by alternative locking structures to catches, such as hooks, barbs, or other connecting pieces. Finger grips comprised of textured ridges on the sides of the handle part may improve the user's grip and effectuate handling.
In yet another embodiment, the hub may include a handle part and a guard part slidably attached so that the guard part may be movable in relation to the handle part, with the guard part being able to slide over the needle when grasped and pulled in that direction. As the guard part is pulled over the needle, the needle can be retracted inside the guard part so that the needle is covered to avoid unintended injuries. Once the needle is within the guard, the handle part and the guard part are secured to one another by a locking mechanism. Detents on the outer sides of the handle part and catches on the inner sides of the guard part may be used to lock the handle part and the guard part. The guard part is pulled over the needle until the detents and catches correspond and interlock. In the locked position, the needle is secured within the guard part. This position may be temporary or permanent. As another alternative to this embodiment, the insertion device may have alternative locking structures to catches and detents, such as hooks, barbs, or other connecting pieces. The hub may be conveniently configured as a single piece so the transition to cover the needle comprises one sliding motion within one piece. To effectuate the handling of the insertion device, the guard part may be used along with the handle part to facilitate the covering of the needle.
These features provide a simple construction that reliably functions to prevent the risk or danger of unintended injuries after the use and disposal of the insertion device in an efficient and uncomplicated manner. Some embodiments may be conveniently configured so that the insertion device is a single piece, with the guard part and the handle part movably attached together, but not separable. The configuration may help avoid the complications of assembling multiple pieces.
A detailed description of embodiments of the invention will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like numerals designate corresponding parts in the figures.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof and which illustrate several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural and operational changes may be made without departure from the scope of the present invention.
In
In
In
In the unlocked position, as shown in
In
In
In
The invention provides a ready to use insertion device, which may be molded from a suitable material that is flexible, such as polypropylene. However, the device may also be made out of a non-flexible material such as polycarbonate. Alternatively, the device may be made out of any suitable flexible or non-flexible materials such as polyethylene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, resins, polymers, ceramics, composites, or the like. An infusion device assembly shown in
An alternative embodiment of the invention is shown schematically in
In
In
In
In
The top view of the insertion device 119 can be seen in
In
In
In
In
While the description above refers to particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that many modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof. The accompanying claims are intended to cover such modifications as would fall within the true scope and spirit of the present invention.
The presently disclosed embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning of and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/480,300, filed Jun. 8, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,545,443, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/050,101, filed Feb. 3, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,704,229.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4433072 | Pusineri et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4494950 | Fischell | Jan 1985 | A |
4562751 | Nason et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4671288 | Gough | Jun 1987 | A |
4678408 | Nason et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685903 | Cable et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4723947 | Konopka | Feb 1988 | A |
4731726 | Allen, III | Mar 1988 | A |
4755173 | Konopka et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4781798 | Gough | Nov 1988 | A |
4832696 | Luther et al. | May 1989 | A |
4871351 | Feingold | Oct 1989 | A |
5080653 | Voss et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5097122 | Colman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101814 | Palti | Apr 1992 | A |
5108819 | Heller et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5165407 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5257980 | Van Antwerp et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262035 | Gregg et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262305 | Heller et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5264104 | Gregg et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5264105 | Gregg et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5284140 | Allen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5299571 | Mastrototaro | Apr 1994 | A |
5320725 | Gregg et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322063 | Allen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5356786 | Heller et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370622 | Livingston et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5371687 | Holmes, II et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376070 | Purvis et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390671 | Lord et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391250 | Cheney, II et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403700 | Heller et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411647 | Johnson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5482473 | Lord et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497772 | Schulman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522803 | Teissen-Simony | Jun 1996 | A |
5543326 | Heller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545143 | Fischell | Aug 1996 | A |
5545152 | Funderburk et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569186 | Lord et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584813 | Livingston et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586553 | Halili et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593852 | Heller et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5660163 | Schulman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665065 | Colman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665222 | Heller et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672160 | Osterlind et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5750926 | Schulman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5779665 | Mastrototaro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791344 | Schulman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5891093 | Dysarz | Apr 1999 | A |
5904708 | Goedeke | May 1999 | A |
5917346 | Gord et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5954643 | Van Antwerp et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957892 | Thorne | Sep 1999 | A |
5965380 | Heller et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968011 | Larsen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972199 | Heller et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997507 | Dysarz | Dec 1999 | A |
5999848 | Gord et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999849 | Gord et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017328 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6043437 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056718 | Funderburk et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074371 | Fischell | Jun 2000 | A |
6081736 | Colvin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083710 | Heller et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086575 | Mejslov | Jul 2000 | A |
6088608 | Schulman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103033 | Say et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119028 | Schulman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120676 | Heller et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121009 | Heller et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123690 | Mejslov | Sep 2000 | A |
6134461 | Say et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143164 | Heller et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162611 | Heller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175752 | Say et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6234999 | Wemmert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259937 | Schulman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302866 | Marggi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329161 | Heller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355021 | Nielsen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6472122 | Schulman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484046 | Say et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488663 | Steg | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503381 | Gotoh et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514718 | Heller et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6554798 | Mann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558320 | Causey, III et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560741 | Gerety et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565509 | Say et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579690 | Bonnecaze et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591125 | Buse et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592745 | Feldman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605200 | Mao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605201 | Mao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607658 | Heller et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616819 | Liamos et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618934 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623501 | Heller et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654625 | Say et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671554 | Gibson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676816 | Mao et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685674 | Douglas et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689265 | Heller et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6733471 | Ericson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736797 | Larsen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6746582 | Heller et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749740 | Liamos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6809653 | Mann et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6881551 | Heller et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893545 | Gotoh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916159 | Rush et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6932894 | Mao et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942518 | Liamos et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7500965 | Menzi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7704229 | Moberg | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8070722 | Moberg et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8545443 | Moberg | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20020082665 | Haller et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020161288 | Shin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030060781 | Mogensen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078560 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083624 | Smith et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088166 | Say et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030152823 | Heller et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030168338 | Gao et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176183 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176842 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181867 | Bressler et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188427 | Say et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199744 | Buse et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220552 | Reghabi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040061232 | Shah et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040061234 | Shah et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064133 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064156 | Shah et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074785 | Holker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093167 | Braig et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102740 | Meloul | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111017 | Say et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050214585 | Li et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1201261 | May 2002 | EP |
1338295 | Aug 2003 | EP |
10201852 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO 9637246 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 02058537 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Reach et al., “Experience with an implantable glucose sensor as a prerequisite of an artificial beta cell,” Biomed. Biochim. Acta, 1984, pp. 577-584, vol. 5. |
Abel et al., “A Method for Evaluating in vivo the Functional Characteristics of Glucose Sensors,” Biosensors, 1986, pp. 211-220, vol. 2. |
Boguslavsky et al., “Applications of redox polymers in biosensors,” Solid State Ionics, 1993, pp. 189-197, vol. 60. |
Geise et al., “Electropolymerized 1,3-diaminobenzene for the construction of a 1-1′-dimethylferrocene mediated glucose biosensor,”Analytica Chim. Acta.,1993, pp. 467-473, v18. |
Gernet et al., “A planar glucose enzyme electrode,” Sensors and Actuators, 1989, pp. 537-540, vol. 17, Elsevier Sequoia, Netherlands. |
Gernet et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of a Planar Electrochemical Cell and Its Applications as a Glucose Sensor,” Sensors and Actuators, 1989, pp. 49-70, vol. 18. |
Gorton et al., “Amperometric glucose senosrs based on immobilized glucose-oxidizing enzymes and chemically modified electrodes,” Analytica Chim Acta., 1991, pp. 43-54, v. 249. |
Gorton et al., “Amperometric biosensors based on an apparent direct electron transfer between electrodes and immobilized peroxidases,” Analyst, 1992, pp. 1235-1241, vol. 117. |
Gough et al., “Two-Dimensional Enzyme Electrode Sensor for Glucose,” Analytical Chemistry, 1985, pp. 2351-2357, vol. 57. |
Gregg et al., “Redox polymer films containing enzymes,” J. Phys. Chem., 1991, pp. 5970-5975. |
Gregg et al., “Cross-Linked Redox Gels Containing Glucose Oxidase for Amperometric Biosensor Applications,” Anal. Chem., 1990, pp. 258-263, vol. 62. |
Heller et al., “Electrical Wiring of Redox Enzymes,” Accounts of Chemical Research, 1990, pp. 128-134, vol. 23, No. 5. |
Johnson et al., “In vivo evaluation of an electroenzymatic glucose sensor implanted in subcutaneous tissue,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1992, pp. 709-714, vol. 7. |
Jonsson et al., “An Electrochemical Sensor for Hydrogen Peroxide Based on Peroxidase Adsorbed on a Spectrographic Graphite Electrode,” Electroanalysts, 1989, pp. 465-468, v.1. |
Kanapieniene et al., “Miniature glucose biosensor with extended linearity,” Sensors and Actuators, 1992, pp. 37-40, vol. B, No. 10. |
Kawamori et al., “Perfect Normalization of Excessive Glucagon Responses to Intravenous Arginine in Human Diabetes Mellitus With . . . ,” Diabetes, 1980, pp. 762-765, vol. 29. |
Kimura et al., “An immobilized Enzyme Membrane Fabrication Method using an Ink Jet Nozzle,” Biosensors, 1988, pp. 41-52, vol. 4. |
Koudelka et al., “In-vivio Behaviour of Hypodermically Implanted Microfabricated Glucose Sensors,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1991, pp. 31-36, vol. 6. |
Mastrototaro et al., “An electroenzymatic glucose sensor fabricated on a flexible substrate,” Sensors and Actuators, 1991, pp. 139-144, vol. 5. |
Mastrototaro et al., “An Electroenzymatic Sensor Capable of 72 Hour Continuous Monitoring of Subcutaneous Glucose,” 14th Int'l Diabetes Federation Congress, 1991. |
McKean et al., “A Telemetry-Instrumentation System for Chronically Implanted Glucose and Oxygen Sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Eng., 1988, pp. 526-532, vol. 35, No. 7. |
Monroe, “Novel implantable glucose sensors,” ACL, 1989, pp. 8-16. |
Morff et al., “Microfabrication of Reproducible, Economical, Electroenzymatic Glucose Sensors,” Annual Int'l Conf. IEEE Eng. in Med. and Bio. Soc., 1990, pp. 483-484, v.12, n.2. |
Nakamato et al., “A Lift-Off Method for Patterning Enzyme-Immobilized Membranes in Multi-Biosensors,” Sensors and Actuators, 1988, pp. 165-172, vol. 13. |
Nishida et al., “Clinical applications of the wearable artificial endocrine pancreas with the newly designed . . . ,” Path. and Treat. of NIDDM . . . , 1994, p. 353-358, No. 1057. |
Shichiri et al., “An artificial endocrine pancrease—problems awaiting solutions for long term clinical applications of . . . ,” Frontiers Med. Biol. Eng., 1991, pp. 283-292, v.3. |
Shichiri et al., “Artificial Endocrine Pancreas with Needle-Type Glucose Sensor,” The Lancet, 1982, pp. 1129-1131, vol. 2 (8308). |
Shichiri et al., “Telemetry Glucose Monitoring Device with Needle-Type Glucose Sensor,” Diabetes Care, May-Jun. 1986, pp. 298-301, vol. 9, No. 3. |
Shichiri et al., “Normalization of the Paradoxic Secretion of Glucagen in Diabetics Who Were Controlled by the Artificial Beta Cell,” Diabetes, 1979, pp. 272-275, vol. 28. |
Shichiri et al., “Closed-Loop Glycemic Control with a Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas,” Diabetes, 1984, pp. 1200-1202, vol. 33. |
Shichiri et al., “In Vivo Characteristics of Needle-Type Glucose Sensor,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, 1988, pp. 17-20, vol. 20. |
Shichiri et al., “A Needle-Type Glucose Sensor,” Life Support Systems: The Journal of the European Society for Artificial Organs, 1984, pp. 7-9, vol. 2, supplement 1. |
Shichiri et al., “The Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas with a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor,” Acta Pediatr, Jpn, 1984, pp. 358-370, vol. 26. |
Shichiri et al., “Glycaemic Control in Pancreatectomized Dogs with a Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas,” Diabetologica, 1983, pp. 179-184, vol. 24. |
Shichiri et al., “Membrane design for extending the long-life of an implantable glucose sensor,” Diab. Nutr. Metab., 1989, pp. 309-313, vol. 2. |
Shinkai et al., “Molecular Recognition of Mono- and Di-Saccharides by Phenylboronic Acids in Solvent Extraction and as a Monolayer,” J. Chem. Soc., 1991, pp. 1039-1041. |
Tamiya et al., “Micro Glucose Sensors Using Electron Mediators Immobilized on a Polypyrrole-Modified Electrode,” Sensors and Actuators, 1989, pp. 297-307, v.18. |
Tsukagoshi et al,, “Specific Complexation with Mono- and Disaccharides That Can Be Detected by Circular Dichroism,” J. Org. Chem., 1991, pp. 4089-4091, vol. 56. |
Urban et al., “Minaturized multi-enzyme biosensors integrated with pH sensors on flexible polymer carriers . . . ,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1992, pp. 733-739, vol. 7. |
Urban et al., “Miniaturized thin-film biosensors using covalently immobilized glucose oxidase,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1991, pp. 555-562, vol. 6. |
Velho et al., “In vivo calibration of a subcutaneous glucose sensor for determination of subcutaneous glucose kinetics,” Diab. Nutr. Metab., 1988 pp. 227-233, v.3. |
Yokoyama et al., “Integrated Biosensor for Glucose and Galactose,” Analytica Chimica Acta., 1989, pp. 137-142, vol. 218. |
Nishida et al., “Development of a ferrocene-mediated needle-type glucose sensor . . . ,” Medical Process Through Technology, 1995, pp. 91-103, vol. 21. |
Koudelka et al., “Planar Amperometric Enzyme-Based Glucose Microelectrode,” Sensors and Actuators, 1989, pp. 157-165, vol. 18. |
Yamasaki et al., “Direct measurement of whole blood glucose by a needle-type sensor,” Clinica Chimica Acta., 1989, pp. 93-98, vol. 93. |
Sternberg et al., “Study and Development of Multilayer Needle-type Enzyme-based Glucose Microsensors,” Biosensors, 1988, pp. 27-40, vol. 4. |
Shaw et al., “In vitro testing of a simply constructed, highly stable glucose sensor suitable for implantation . . . ,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1991, pp. 401-406, vol. 6. |
Poitout et al., “A glucose monitoring system for on line estimation in man of blood glucose concentration using a miniaturized . . . ,” Diabetologia, 1993, pp. 658-663, vol. 36. |
Hashigushi et al., “Development of a Miniaturized Glucose Monitoring System by Combining a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor . . . ,” Diabetes Care, 1994, pp. 387-389, v.17, n. 5. |
Jobst et al., “Thin-Film Microbiosensors for Glucose-Lactate Monitoring,” Anal. Chem., 1996, p. 3173-79, vol. 68. |
Shults et al., “A Telemetry-Instrumentation System for Monitoring Multiple Subcutaneously Implanted Glucose Sensors,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., 1994, pp. 937-942, v41, n.10. |
Wang et al., “Needle-Type Dual Microsensor for the Simultaneous Monitoring of Glucose and Insulin,” Anal. Chem., 2001, pp. 844-847, vol. 73. |
Moussey et al., “Performance of Subcutaneously Implanted Needle-Type Glucose Sensors Employing a Novel Trilayer Coating,” Anal. Chem., 1993, 2072-77, vol. 65. |
Bindra et al., “Design and in Vitro Studies of a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor for Subcutaneous Monitoring,” Anal. Chem., 1991, pp. 1692-1696, vol. 63. |
PCT International Search Report , Jun. 9, 2006 (PCT/US2006/000971). |
European Search Report, Application No. 09152013.0-1526, dated Mar. 18, 2010 (8-pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130345635 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12480300 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 14011612 | US | |
Parent | 11050101 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 12480300 | US |