In a very long instruction word (VLIW) central processing unit (CPU), instructions are grouped into execute packets including multiple instructions. The instructions within the packet can be of variable sizes. An iterative scheme can be used to identify and decode each separate instruction. Each instruction may include a size portion and an operational code (opcode) portion. A decoding scheme may iterate through each instruction to determine its size in order to determine the size of the opcode portion to be decoded. The entire opcode portion is then decoded to determine what type of instruction it is and where it is to be routed for further processing. After decoding the instruction, the next instruction is located and examined in a similar manner to decode its opcode portion.
In accordance with one aspect, a processor includes a core that is configured to perform a decode operation on a multi-instruction packet including multiple instructions. The decode operation includes receiving the multi-instruction packet that includes a first instruction that includes a primary portion at a fixed first location and a secondary portion and a second instruction that includes a primary portion at a fixed second location between the primary portion of the first instruction and the secondary portion of the first instruction. The decode operation also includes accessing the primary portion of the first instruction, decoding an operational code (opcode) portion of the primary portion of the first instruction, and accessing the primary portion of the second instruction. The decode operation also includes decoding an opcode portion of the primary portion of the second instruction, creating a first instruction packet comprising the primary portion of the first instruction and the secondary portion of the first instruction, and creating a second instruction packet comprising the primary portion of the second instruction. The decode operation further includes dispatching the first instruction packet to a first functional unit and dispatching the second instruction packet to a second functional unit distinct from the first functional unit.
In accordance with another aspect, a method implemented on a processor core includes receiving a first multi-instruction packet that includes a primary portion of a first instruction at a fixed first location, a primary portion of a second instruction at a fixed second location that follows the fixed first location, and a secondary portion of the first instruction that follows the primary portion of the second instruction. The method also includes decoding an operational code (opcode) portion of a primary portion of a first instruction in a first multi-instruction packet, the primary portion of the first instruction located at a fixed first location within the first multi-instruction packet. The method also includes decoding an operational code (“opcode”) portion of the primary portion of the first instruction, decoding an opcode portion of the primary portion of the second instruction, and accessing the secondary portion of the first instruction. The method further includes creating a first instruction packet comprising the primary and secondary portions of the first instruction and respectively dispatching the first instruction packet and the second instruction to distinct functional units.
In the drawings:
Decoder 106 includes decode logic 116 that decodes each instruction packet as described herein. Following the decode, a dispatch unit 118 sends each instruction to its designated functional unit for carrying out the instruction. In one example, processor 100 operates as a very long instruction word (VLIW) processor capable of operating on plural instructions in corresponding functional units simultaneously. Preferably, a compiler organizes instructions in multi-instruction packets that are executed together. Instruction dispatch unit 118 directs each instruction to its target functional unit 108. In an example, instruction dispatch unit 118 may operate on plural instructions in parallel such as having at least a portion of each instruction processed simultaneously. The number of such parallel instructions may be set by the number of instructions within the multi-instruction packet. A packet size calculation unit 120 keeps track of each instruction packet transferred from the instruction buffer 104.
Referring to
As stated above, the first 13 bits of the opcode portions 206, 306, 406 of the instructions 200, 300, 400 form the primary portions 208, 308, 408 together with the respective link portions 202, 302, 402 and size portions 204, 304, 404. These first 13 bits include instructions for which a reduction in the amount of time needed to identify, decode, and send the bits on for further processing leads to an increase in CPU speed and performance That is, the quicker the 13 bits can be identified, decoded, and processed, the faster the CPU can operate. Any remaining bits of the instruction in the secondary portion do not need to be decoded as part of the decoding process in order to determine where the instruction needs to be routed (e.g., to a particular functional unit 108). Instead, the secondary portion information can be provided to the respective functional unit for carrying out the instruction without spending time decoding the secondary portion. In this manner, the processor 100 avoids decoding the secondary portion when decoding the instructions 200, 300, 400 to determine where to dispatch the instructions 200, 300, 400.
Since for the first, 48-bit instruction 502 there exists an additional 32 bits of operational code in the secondary portion 510, the decoder 106 knows that additional opcode bits for instruction 502 are to be found in the multi-instruction packet 500. However, acquisition of this additional opcode is deferred until after all primary segments have been decoded so that processing time can be reduced, thus increasing CPU speed and performance.
At step 612, technique 600 determines whether additional instructions follow the recently decoded instruction in the current instruction packet based at least in part on the link portion of the recently decoded instruction. In the example illustrated in
In the example illustrated in
Since the third instruction 506 follows the second instruction 504, the link portion L1 of the second instruction 504 will indicate that at least one additional instruction follows the second instruction 504. Accordingly, the technique 600 returns (614) again to step 604 to decode the third instruction 506 following the steps outlined above in steps 604-610.
Following the decoding of the third instruction 506, the determination (at step 612) whether additional instructions follow will indicate that the third instruction 506 was the last instruction. Accordingly, technique 600 moves 616 to step 618 to create a complete instruction packet for each instruction 502, 504, 506. In the case of instructions 502, 504, their primary and secondary portions are joined. That is, based on the decoded size portion 204, 304, 404, technique 600 can determine the length of any secondary portion 310, 410 to be joined with their respective primary portions 308, 408. At step 620, the generated instruction packets are sent to the appropriate functional units 108 by, for example, the dispatch unit 118 (
Multi-instruction packets such as those described herein include instructions that are to be carried out in parallel or substantially simultaneously. The size of the instruction buffer 104 (
Additional timing savings can be accomplished by ensuring that the placement or ordering of the instructions in each multi-instruction packet is by size. For example, encoding each packet such that the instruction sizes follow a largest-to-smallest size can reduce decoding time. A table of example packet encoding is shown below.
For each instruction in Table 1, an example of the ordering of instructions (I0 up to I7) in various instruction packets (P1-P10) occupying all bits of a 128-bit instruction buffer is shown according to an example. When ensuring that the order of the possible instructions (I0-I7) in each packet is largest-to-smallest, it is possible to reduce CPU decoding time based on encountering a 16-bit instruction in a particular packet. For example, in instruction packet P2 of Table 1, a first 16-bit instruction is encountered at instruction I2. Since the instructions are in length order of largest-to-smallest, the decoding technique 600 can know that any subsequent instructions in the same instruction packet are also 16 bits and, therefore, does not need to decode the size portion of any subsequent instruction. Accordingly, for instruction packet P2, the decoding of instruction I3 can skip the decoding of its size. Similarly, instruction packets P4-P5 and P7-P10 can forgo decoding of the size of the instructions after the first 16-bit instruction is identified.
While instruction packets (P1-P10) in Table 1 illustrate using all 128-bits (or all bits of the instruction buffer 104), other instruction packets not using all 128 bits may be transferred from the instruction buffer. For example, an instruction packet may include a 48-bit instruction followed by three 16-bit instructions. The packet encoding scheme above, however, also works for these packets not using all 128 bits. That is, after a 16-bit instruction is found, the decoding of each subsequent instruction can skip decoding the instruction's size.
The foregoing description of various preferred embodiments of the invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The example embodiments, as described above, were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5586277 | Brown | Dec 1996 | A |
5758116 | Lee | May 1998 | A |
10318293 | Anderson | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20140223142 | Kageyama et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20160048394 | Vorbach et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170300334 | Kharitov et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180143832 | Nield | May 2018 | A1 |
20190155605 | Bui et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2022/011525 dated Apr. 7, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220214880 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |