1. Field of Art
This description generally relates to surgical robotics, and particularly to an instrument-mounted tension sensing design that may be used in conjunction with a medical robotics platform for a number of surgical procedures. More particularly, the field of the invention pertains to instrument-mounted tension sensing mechanisms that detect tension in actuation tendons, such as those used to operate robotically-controlled tools to perform diagnostic and therapeutic surgical procedures.
2. Description of the Related Art
Use of robotic technologies presents a number of advantages over traditional, manual surgery procedures. In particular, robotic surgeries often allow for greater precision, control, and access. Robotically-controlled technologies, however, sometimes create engineering challenges that require creative engineering workarounds. In the case of robotically-controlled tools, the use of actuation tendons to operate robotic laparoscopic tools and catheters gives rise to control problems that often requires very precise monitoring of the actuation tendons. Over the lifespan of an actuation tendon, the tendon may stretch and deform, and over time exhibit greater non-linearity with respect to instrument tip displacement relative to the tension applied to the tendon. Accordingly, within a robotically-controlled instrument, there is a need to measure the tension applied to the actuation tendon to provide feedback to the control robotic controller. Accordingly, there is a need for an instrument-mounted tension sensing mechanism.
In general, the present invention provides for a medical device comprising an elongated instrument, an elongated member coupled to the distal end of the elongated instrument, configured to actuate the distal end of the elongated instrument in response to tension in the elongated member, and a base located at the proximal end of the elongated instrument, the base comprising redirect surface that redirects the elongated member, wherein the first redirect surface is coupled to a lever element that is configured to exert a reactive force on a sensor in response to tension in the elongated member.
In one aspect, the first redirect surface is low friction. In one aspect, the first redirect surface comprises a first rotatable body. In one aspect, the base further comprises a second rotatable body, wherein the elongated member is threaded around the second rotatable body. In one aspect, rotational motion of the second rotatable body is configured to cause tension in the elongated member. In one aspect, the second rotatable body comprises splines that receive rotational motion through a sterile interface from the robotic drive mechanism. In one aspect, the second rotatable body is a male connector. In one aspect, the second rotatable body is a female connector.
In another aspect, the lever element is constrained by a pivot point on a first location of the lever element and the sensor on a second location of the lever element. In one aspect, the pivot point of the lever element is offset from the axis of the first rotatable body.
In another aspect, the ratio of the tension in the elongated member to the reactive force on the sensor is fixed. In one aspect, the lever element is configured to distribute the tension in the elongated member between the pivot point and the sensor. In one aspect, the elongated instrument is flexible. In one aspect, the elongated instrument is a catheter. In one aspect, the elongated instrument is rigid. In one aspect, the base is configured to interface with a robotic drive mechanism. In one aspect, the elongated member is at least one of a wire, cable, and a tendon. In one aspect, the sensor is at least one of a load cell, a piezoresistive device, a piezoelectric device, and a strain gauge.
Reference will now be made in detail to several embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying figures. It is noted that wherever practicable similar or like reference numbers may be used in the figures and may indicate similar or like functionality. The figures depict embodiments of the described system (or method) for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following description that alternative embodiments of the structures and methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles described herein.
Although certain preferred embodiments and examples are disclosed below, inventive subject matter extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses, and to modifications and equivalents thereof. Thus, the scope of the claims appended hereto is not limited by any of the particular embodiments described below. For example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations of the method or process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. Various operations may be described as multiple discrete operations in turn, in a manner that may be helpful in understanding certain embodiments; however, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are order dependent. Additionally, the structures, systems, and/or devices described herein may be embodied as integrated components or as separate components.
To guarantee control fidelity, it may be important to monitor the tendon tension when robotically-controlling endoscopic and laparoscopic tools that use tendon-like members, such as a catheter, endoscope, laparoscopic grasper, or forceps. While there are a number of approaches to monitoring tendon tension, direct measurement in the instrument provides a number of practical advantages, including simplifying the instrument-driver interface, and reduce friction and inefficiencies in transmission through the interface. Accordingly, the present invention provides a sensing apparatus that may be mounted within the instrument.
In addition to the actuating rotatable bodies, and related cavities for additional rotatable bodies, the present embodiment contemplates redirecting surfaces, represented as rotatable (body) pulleys 108 and 109 in instrument 101, to measure tension in tendons 106 and 107 respectively. To measure tension, tendons 106 and 107 may be wound around rotatable bodies 108 and 109 in addition to rotatable bodies 102 and 103.
Pulley 108 is coupled to a lever element 111, which is configured to exert a reactive force in response to tension in tendon 106. The resulting reactive force from tension in tendon 106 may be resolved through contact between lever 111, constrained by a pivot point such as pivot axis 112, and sensor 113. While the instrument 101 contemplates the pivot axis 112 and sensor 113 positioned at opposite ends of the level element 111, they may be positioned at a number of positions along the lever element in other embodiments. The relative position of the sensor and pivot point may provide for a known, fixed ratio between the tension and the reactive force on the sensor. Identical structural relationships exist with respect to pulley 109, lever element 114, pivot axis 115, and sensor 116.
In some embodiments, the sensors 113 and 116 may be force sensors, piezoelectric sensors, piezoresistive sensors, or load cells to measure the reactive force exerted by levers 111 and 114 respectively. In some embodiments, it may be desirable for the sensors to be low cost, particularly if the instrument is intended to be recyclable or disposable.
In some embodiments, such as instrument 101, the pivot point may be offset from the axis of the corresponding rotatable body, e.g., the axis of pulley 108 relative to the pivot axis 112 in instrument 101. As shown in instrument 101, while the pivot point may be a pivot axis 112, which reduces friction resulting from any bending moments, the pivot point may be non-axial element in other embodiments, such as a flexure.
Tension on tendon 106 may be the consequence of a number factors, including rotation of pulley 108 or external pressure on the elongated member in which tendon 106 resides. Regardless of its source, when wound around pulley 108, tension on tendon 106 may be imparted equally around pulley 108. As the pulley 108 is operatively coupled to lever 111, the resulting reactive force may be transmitted through the lever 111 and measured based on the force exerted on sensor 113. The positioning of the lever 111, in contact with sensor 113, allows measurement of the reactive force from the tension in tendon 106.
Offsetting the axis of the pivot point such as pivot axis 112 at fixed distance from the axis of pulley 108 allows the force from lever 111 to be smaller or larger in magnitude based on the length of the lever and the fixed offset. Using these measurements, combined with the measured force at the sensor 113, the tension in tendon 106 may be calculated. Allowing for differences in the magnitude of the lever force based on the length of the lever may be useful to bring the measured force within the range and tolerances of the sensor. This may be particularly useful for inexpensive sensors designed for a specific range of forces. Identical operational relationships exist with respect to pulley 109, lever element 114, pivot axis 115, and sensor 116.
Among other advantages, this method of direct measurement of the tendon tension bypasses the complexity and efficiency losses that may be associated with measuring force further down the drivetrain.
Consistent with previously disclosed embodiments, each lever in instrument 201 may be configured to provide reactive force to a corresponding sensor, such as sensor 217, which is configured to detect force exerted by lever 209 in response to tension on pulley 205. Similarly, sensor 218 is configured to detect force exerted by lever 211 in response to tension on pulley 207. Additional sensors are similarly situated relative to levers 210 and 212.
Consistent with previously disclosed embodiments, each lever in instrument 201 may be configured to provide reactive force to a corresponding sensor, such as sensor 217, which is configured to detect force exerted by lever 209 in response to tension on pulley 205. Similarly, sensor 218 is configured to detect force exerted by lever 211 in response to tension on pulley 207.
Given the known relationships between the location of the pulley 302, lever 304, and sensor 306, the tension in tendon 301 may be determined based on the measurement of force at sensor 306. Mathematically, the statistics equilibrium may be expressed as:
ΣMPivot=0=(l1+r)FTension+(l1−r)FTension−l2FSense (Equation 1)
where ΣMPivot represents the sum of moments of lever 304 about the pivot axis 305, FTension represents the tension force on the tendon 301, l1 represents the distance from the pulley axis 303 pivot axis 305, l2 represents the distance from pivot axis 305 to the point where the lever element 304 contacts the force sensor 306, r represents the radius of the pulley 302, and FSense represents the force on the sensor 306.
With some algebraic manipulation, the expression may be reduced to determine the specific relationship between FTension and FSense:
where l1 and l2 are fixed constants based on the physical arrangement of the pulley 302, lever 304, and sensor 306. This mathematical relationship may also be applied with respect to the previously disclosed embodiments.
The takeoff angle of the tendons is the angle at which the tendon comes off the pulley relative to the lever. The takeoff angle of the tendons in the example of
The present invention also contemplates other embodiments where the takeoff angle differs for different tendons.
The aforementioned embodiments of the present invention may be designed to interface with an instrument drive mechanism and robotics platform such as those disclosed in the aforementioned patent applications that are incorporated by reference. For example, the embodiments in
For purposes of comparing various embodiments, certain aspects and advantages of these embodiments are described. Not necessarily all such aspects or advantages are achieved by any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, various embodiments may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may also be taught or suggested herein.
Elements or components shown with any embodiment herein are exemplary for the specific embodiment and may be used on or in combination with other embodiments disclosed herein. While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. The invention is not limited, however, to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, covers all modifications, equivalents and alternatives thereof.
This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/184,741 filed Jun. 25, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/523,760, filed Oct. 24, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/019,816, filed Jul. 1, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/037,520, filed Aug. 14, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/057,936, filed Sep. 30, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/140,344, filed Mar. 30, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4141245 | Brandstetter | Feb 1979 | A |
4241884 | Lynch | Dec 1980 | A |
4351493 | Sonnek | Sep 1982 | A |
4530471 | Inoue | Jul 1985 | A |
4597388 | Koziol et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4905673 | Pimiskern | Mar 1990 | A |
5425735 | Rosen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5472406 | De La Torre et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5572999 | Funda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5662590 | De La Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5695500 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6033371 | Torre et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6326616 | Andrien et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6398792 | O'Connor | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406486 | De La Torre et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6554793 | Pauker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6638246 | Naimark et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6736784 | Menne et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6763259 | Hauger et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7087061 | Chernenko et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7344528 | Tu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7351193 | Forman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7725214 | Diolaiti | May 2010 | B2 |
7883475 | Dupont et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7967799 | Boukhny | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8049873 | Hauger et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8224484 | Swarup et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8414564 | Goldshleger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8518024 | Williams et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9226796 | Bowling et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20040030349 | Boukhny | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040257021 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050070844 | Chow et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050222714 | Nihei et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070032906 | Sutherland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070135733 | Soukup et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135763 | Musbach et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070299427 | Yeung et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080065109 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097293 | Chin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114341 | Thyzel | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177285 | Brock et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187101 | Gertner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228104 | Uber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231221 | Ogawa | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262301 | Gibbons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090171271 | Webster et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248041 | Williams et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248043 | Tierney et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264878 | Carmel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268015 | Scott et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287354 | Choi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312768 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326322 | Diolaiti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036294 | Mantell et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073150 | Olson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100256812 | Tsusaka et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110009779 | Romano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015648 | Alvarez | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028887 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040404 | Diolaiti et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046441 | Wiltshire et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110106102 | Balicki et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110306836 | Ohline et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120138586 | Webster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120283747 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130144116 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130317519 | Romo | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325030 | Hourtash et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012276 | Alvarez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140135985 | Coste-Maniere et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140276594 | Tanner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296870 | Stern et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379000 | Romo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150025539 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104284 | Riedel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119637 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150148600 | Ashinuma | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164595 | Bogusky et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164596 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150342695 | He et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004020465 | Sep 2005 | DE |
2392435 | Dec 2011 | EP |
H09224951 | Sep 1997 | JP |
WO 2013179600 | Dec 2013 | JP |
WO 9214411 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 03096871 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004105849 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2011161218 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Balicki, et al. Single fiber optical coherence tomography microsurgical instruments for computer and robot-assisted retinal surgery. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. MICCAI 2009. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. 108-115. |
Effect of microsecond pulse length and tip shape on explosive.bubble formation of2.78 iLtm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 iLtm Er:YAG laser. Paper 8221-12, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8221 (Monday Jan. 23, 2013). |
Ehlers, et al. Integration of a spectral domain optical coherence tomography system into a surgical microscope for intraoperative imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52.6. 2011; 3153-3159. |
European search report and search opinion dated Jul. 2, 2015 for EP Application No. 12856685.8. |
Hubschman. Robotic Eye Surgery: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Computer Science and Systems Biology. 2012. |
International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 29, 2013 for PCT/US2012/069540. |
International search report and written opinion dated Nov. 7, 2014 for PCT Application No. US2014/041990. |
International search report dated Jun. 16, 2014 for PCT/US2014/022424. |
International search report and written opinion dated Jan. 27, 2015 for PCT Application No. US2014/062284. |
Office action dated Jun. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,769. |
Office action dated May 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/711,440. |
Office action dated Jun. 11, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/158,548. |
Office action dated Oct. 7, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/711,440. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US15/53306, Feb. 4, 2016, 19 pages. |
Stoyanov. Surgical vision. Annals ofBiomedical Engineering40.2. 2012; 332-345. Published I 0/20/2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/019,816, filed Jul. 1, 2014, Inventors Enrique Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/037,520, filed Aug. 14, 2014, Inventor Alan Yu. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/057,936, filed Sep. 30, 2014, Inventors Enrique Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/140,344, filed Mar. 30, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,082, filed Dec. 19, 2014, Inventors Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/583,021, filed Dec. 24, 2014, Inventors Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,373, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Inventors Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,387, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Inventors Bogusky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,403, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Inventors Yu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,429, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Inventors Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/196,953, filed Mar. 4, 2014, Inventors Jeffery B. Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,610, filed Mar. 7, 2014, Inventor Enrique Romo. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,871, filed Jun. 11, 2014, Inventors Jeffery B. Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,871, filed Aug. 12, 2014, Inventors Jeffery B. Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,095, filed Sep. 5, 2014, Inventors Enrique Romo et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160374766 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62184741 | Jun 2015 | US |