Integrated circuit cell library for multiple patterning

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10074640
  • Patent Number
    10,074,640
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 25, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 11, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
A method is disclosed for defining a multiple patterned cell layout for use in an integrated circuit design. A layout is defined for a level of a cell in accordance with a dynamic array architecture so as to include a number of layout features. The number of layout features are linear-shaped and commonly oriented. The layout is split into a number of sub-layouts for the level of the cell. Each of the number of layout features in the layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts. Also, the layout is split such that each sub-layout is independently fabricatable. The sub-layouts for the level of the cell are stored on a computer readable medium.
Description
BACKGROUND

In modern semiconductor fabrication, optical lithography is used to pattern layout features onto a semiconductor wafer. Current step-and-repeat optical lithography systems and step-scan-and-repeat optical lithography systems use illumination sources with wavelengths of 365 nanometers (nm) (Hg Mine), 248 nm (KrF B-X excimer laser), and 193 nm (ArF B-X excimer laser). Historically, it has been possible to use illumination wavelengths larger than the layout feature sizes to be patterned. However, as layout feature sizes continue to decrease without a corresponding decrease in available illumination wavelength, the difference between the smallest wavelength and smallest layout feature size has become too large for successful lithographic rendering of the features. For example, lithographers are having great difficulty patterning 65 nm layout feature sizes with the 193 nm illumination source. Moreover, layout feature sizes are expected to continue to decrease from 65 nm to 45 nm, and on to 32 nm.


Lithographers use the following formula from Lord Rayleigh to estimate the optical system capability: resolution (half-pitch)=k1λ/NA, where k1 is a fitting variable roughly corresponding to a process window, λ is the illumination wavelength, and NA is the numerical aperture of the lithographic system. When the wavelength λ was larger than the half-pitch, typical values for k1 were over 0.50. Because the feature size has been decreasing by a factor of 0.7 for each technology node, the value of k1 has been steadily decreasing for each technology node, while the wavelength λ has been constant, and the NA has been increasing by only 1.1 to 1.2 per technology node step. Additionally, for a NA greater than about 0.93, immersion systems are needed in which water replaces air as the medium between the final lens and the photoresist on the wafer. These immersion systems are expected to support a NA up to about 1.35, with no clear, cost-effective solution thereafter.


In view of the foregoing, a solution is needed to enable patterning of nano-scale feature sizes without having to further decrease illumination wavelength λ and/or further increase numerical aperture NA.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a method is disclosed for defining a multiple patterned cell layout for use in an integrated circuit design. The method includes an operation for defining a layout for a level of a cell. The layout is defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture to include a number of layout features. The number of layout features are linear-shaped and commonly oriented. The method also includes an operation for splitting the layout into a number of sub-layouts for the level of the cell, such that each of the number of layout features in the layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts. The layout is split such that each sub-layout is independently fabricatable. The method further includes an operation for storing the number of sub-layouts for the level of the cell on a computer readable medium.


In another embodiment, a method is disclosed for creating a cell library for multiple patterning of a chip layout. The method includes an operation for defining a cell to include a number of levels having a respective linear layout defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture. The dynamic array architecture is defined by layout features that are linear-shaped and commonly oriented. The cell represents an abstraction of a logic function and encapsulates lower-level integrated circuit layouts for implementing the logic function. For one or more select levels of the cell, the method includes an operation for splitting the respective linear layout into a number of sub-layouts, such that each of the number of layout features in the respective linear layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts, and such that each sub-layout is independently fabricatable. The method further includes an operation for storing a definition of the cell in a cell library on a computer readable medium. The definition of the cell includes the number of sub-layouts associated with each of the select levels of the cell.


In another embodiment, a method is disclosed for designing an integrated circuit for fabrication. In the method, a plurality of cells are placed together on a chip layout to satisfy a netlist of the integrated circuit. The plurality of cells are selected from a cell library for multiple patterning of the chip layout. Each of the plurality of cells includes a common level having a respective linear layout defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture. The dynamic array architecture is defined by layout features that are linear-shaped and commonly oriented. Each linear layout is split into a number of sub-layouts, such that each layout feature in each linear layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts. Layout features allocated to a given sub-layout form a consistent pattern within the common level of a given cell. The plurality of cells are placed together such that the consistent pattern of layout features, as formed by the given sub-layout within the common level, extends in an uninterrupted manner across the plurality of cells. The extension of the consistent pattern of layout features formed by the given sub-layout across the plurality of cells defines a portion of a chip-wide mask layout for the common level. The method also includes an operation for storing the chip-wide mask layout for the common level on a computer readable medium.


In another embodiment, a set of masks for fabricating a common level of a semiconductor chip is disclosed. The set of masks includes a first mask having an area defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture to include a first number of linear layout features. The first number of linear layout features are commonly oriented. Also, each of the first number of linear layout features is devoid of a substantial change in traversal direction across the first mask. The first number of linear layout features form a first sub-layout that defines a first portion of one or more cells. Each of the one or more cells represents an abstraction of a logic function and encapsulates lower-level integrated circuit layouts for implementing the logic function. The set of masks also includes a second mask having an area defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture to include a second number of linear layout features. The second number of linear layout features are commonly oriented with the first number of linear layout features. Also, each of the second number of linear layout features is devoid of a substantial change in traversal direction across the second mask. The area of the second mask defined in accordance with the regular architecture is to be aligned with the area of the first mask defined in accordance with the regular architecture. The second number of linear layout features form a second sub-layout which defines a second portion of the one or more cells.


Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration showing an exemplary layout for a level of a cell defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2A is an illustration showing a splitting of the layout of FIG. 1 into two sub-layouts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2B is an illustration showing the first sub-layout as defined in the layout splitting of FIG. 2A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2C is an illustration showing the second sub-layout as defined in the layout splitting of FIG. 2A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2D is an illustration showing the splitting of the layout of FIG. 2A into three sub-layouts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is an illustration showing a PCT processed version of the sub-layout of FIG. 2C, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 4A-4C are illustrations showing possible sub-layout sequences for a layout that is split into three sub-layouts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5A is an illustration showing a gate level layout and metal 2 level layout for a cell, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 5B-5E are illustrations showing different variants of the cell of FIG. 5A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5F-5G are illustrations showing placement of cell variants next to each other such that the sub-layout patterns for multiple levels extend across the cell boundaries, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6A is an illustration showing a non-segmented layout of a level of a cell, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6B is an illustration showing a first non-segmented sub-layout including the linear-shaped layout features designated by the label A in FIG. 6A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6C is an illustration showing a second non-segmented sub-layout including the linear-shaped layout features designated by the label B in FIG. 6A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6D is an illustration showing a layout to be used for cutting the linear-shaped features as fabricated by the first and second non-segmented sub-layouts of FIGS. 6B and 6C, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6E is an illustration showing the level of the cell following the line cutting by the layout of FIG. 6D, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7 is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for defining a multiple patterned cell layout for use in an integrated circuit design, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8 is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for creating a cell library for multiple patterning of a chip layout, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 9 is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for designing an integrated circuit for fabrication, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


One technique for resolving nano-scale layout features without further decreasing the illumination wavelength and without further increasing the numerical aperture NA is to utilize multiple patterning. More specifically, in multiple patterning, a given layout is split into two or more sub-layouts that are each exposed separately over the same area of the chip in the optical lithography process. Although the individual feature sizes in each of the sub-layouts may be small, i.e., nano-scale, a spacing between adjacent layout features in a given sub-layout is sufficiently large to enable resolution of the small layout features.


It should be appreciated that multiple patterning can be quite difficult in traditional random logic patterns and associated cell libraries because of their two-dimensionally varying nature, i.e., with layout features having bends and forks. Additionally, there can be complex issues associated with splitting of two-dimensionally varying patterns, such as phase shifting conflicts. However, use of a cell library defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture enables straightforward splitting of a layout into multiple sub-layouts to be used for lithographic exposure.


A cell, as referenced herein, represents an abstraction of a logic function, and encapsulates lower-level integrated circuit layouts for implementing the logic function. It should be understood that a given logic function can be represented by multiple cell variations, wherein the cell variations may be differentiated by feature size, performance, and process compensation technique (PCT) processing. For example, multiple cell variations for a given logic function may be differentiated by power consumption, signal timing, current leakage, chip area, OPC, RET, etc. Additionally, multiple cell variations may be differentiated by sub-layout sequence combination, as described herein. It should also be understood that each cell description includes the layouts for the cell in each level of a chip, as required to implement the logic function of the cell. More specifically, a cell description includes layouts for the cell in each level of the chip extending from the substrate level up through a particular interconnect level.


The dynamic array architecture represents a semiconductor device design paradigm in which linear-shaped layout features are defined along a regular-spaced virtual grate (or regular-spaced virtual grid) in a number of levels of a cell, i.e., in a number of levels of a semiconductor chip. The virtual grate is defined by a set of equally spaced, parallel virtual lines extending across a given level in a given chip area. The virtual grid is defined by a first set of equally spaced, parallel virtual lines extending across a given level in a given chip area in a first direction, and by a second set of equally spaced, parallel virtual lines extending across the given level in the given chip area in a second direction, where the second direction is perpendicular to the first direction. In one embodiment, the virtual grate of a given level is oriented to be substantially perpendicular to the virtual grate of an adjacent level. However, in other embodiments, the virtual grate of a given level is oriented to be either perpendicular or parallel to the virtual grate of an adjacent level.


In one embodiment, each linear-shaped layout feature of a given level is substantially centered upon one of the virtual lines of the virtual grate associated with the given level. A linear-shaped layout feature is considered to be substantially centered upon a particular line of a virtual grate when a deviation in alignment between of the centerline of the linear-shaped layout feature and the particular line of the virtual grate is sufficiently small so as to not reduce a manufacturing process window from what would be achievable with a true alignment between of the centerline of the linear-shaped layout feature and the line of the virtual grate.


In one embodiment, the above-mentioned manufacturing process window is defined by a lithographic domain of focus and exposure that yields an acceptable fidelity of the layout feature. In one embodiment, the fidelity of a layout feature is defined by a characteristic dimension of the layout feature. Also, it should be understood that the centerline of a given linear-shaped layout feature is defined as a virtual line that passes through the cross-sectional centroid of the linear-shaped layout feature at all points along its length, wherein the cross-sectional centroid of the linear-shaped layout feature at any given point along its length is the centroid of its vertical cross-section area at the given point.


In another embodiment, some linear-shaped layout features in a given level may not be centered upon a virtual line of the virtual grate associated with the given level. However, in this embodiment, the linear-shaped layout features remain parallel to the virtual lines of the virtual grate, and hence parallel to the other linear-shaped layout features in the given level. Therefore, it should be understood that the various linear-shaped layout features defined in a layout of a given level are oriented to extend across the given level in a parallel manner.


Also, in the dynamic array architecture, each linear-shaped layout feature is defined to be devoid of a substantial change in direction along its length. The lack of substantial change in direction of a linear-shaped layout feature is considered relative to the line of the virtual grate along which the linear-shaped layout feature is defined. In one embodiment, a substantial change in direction of a linear-shaped layout feature exists when the width of the linear-shaped layout feature at any point thereon changes by more than 50% of the nominal width of the linear-shaped layout feature along its entire length. In another embodiment, a substantial change in direction of a linear-shaped layout feature exists when the width of the linear-shaped layout feature changes from any first location on the linear-shaped layout feature to any second location on the linear-shaped layout feature by more that 50% of the linear-shaped layout feature width at the first location. Therefore, it should be appreciated that the dynamic array architecture specifically avoids the use of non-linear-shaped layout features, wherein a non-linear-shaped layout feature includes one or more bends within a plane of the associated level.


In the dynamic array architecture, variations in a vertical cross-section shape of an as-fabricated linear-shaped layout feature can be tolerated to an extent, so long as the variation in the vertical cross-section shape is predictable from a manufacturing perspective and does not adversely impact the manufacture of the given linear-shaped layout feature or its neighboring layout features. In this regard, the vertical cross-section shape corresponds to a cut of the as-fabricated linear-shaped layout feature in a plane perpendicular to the centerline of the linear-shaped layout feature. It should be appreciated that variation in the vertical cross-section of an as-fabricated linear-shaped layout feature along its length can correspond to a variation in width along its length. Therefore, the dynamic array architecture also accommodates variation in the width of an as-fabricated linear-shaped layout feature along its length, so long as the width variation is predictable from a manufacturing perspective and does not adversely impact the manufacture of the linear-shaped layout feature or its neighboring layout features.


Additionally, different linear-shaped layout features within a given level can be designed to have the same width or different widths. Also, the widths of a number of linear-shaped layout features defined along adjacent lines of a given virtual grate can be designed such that the number of linear-shaped layout features contact each other so as to form a single linear-shaped layout feature having a width equal to the sum of the widths of the number of linear-shaped layout features.


Within a given level defined according to the dynamic array architecture, proximate ends of adjacent, co-aligned linear-shaped layout features may be separated from each other by a substantially uniform gap. More specifically, adjacent ends of linear-shaped layout features defined along a common line of a virtual grate are separated by an end gap, and such end gaps within the level associated with the virtual grate may be defined to span a substantially uniform distance. Additionally, in one embodiment, a size of the end gaps is minimized within a manufacturing process capability so as to optimize filling of a given level with linear-shaped layout features.


Also, in the dynamic array architecture, a level can be defined to have any number of virtual grate lines occupied by any number of linear-shaped layout features. In one example, a given level can be defined such that all lines of its virtual grate are occupied by at least one linear-shaped layout feature. In another example, a given level can be defined such that some lines of its virtual grate are occupied by at least one linear-shaped layout feature, and other lines of its virtual grate are vacant, i.e., not occupied by any linear-shaped layout features. Furthermore, in a given level, any number of successively adjacent virtual grate lines can be left vacant. Also, the occupancy versus vacancy of virtual grate lines by linear-shaped layout features in a given level may be defined according to a pattern or repeating pattern across the given level.


Additionally, within the dynamic array architecture, vias and contacts are defined to interconnect a number of the linear-shaped layout features in various levels so as to form a number of functional electronic devices, e.g., transistors, and electronic circuits. Layout features for the vias and contacts can be aligned to virtual grid, wherein a specification of this virtual grid is a function of the specifications of the virtual grates associated with the various levels to which the vias and contacts will connect. Thus, a number of the linear-shaped layout features in various levels form functional components of an electronic circuit. Additionally, some of the linear-shaped layout features within various levels may be non-functional with respect to an electronic circuit, but are manufactured nonetheless so as to reinforce manufacturing of neighboring linear-shaped layout features. It should be understood that the dynamic array architecture is defined to enable accurate prediction of semiconductor device manufacturability with a high probability.


In view of the foregoing, it should be understood that the dynamic array architecture is defined by placement of linear-shaped layout features on a regular-spaced grate (or regular-spaced grid) in a number of levels of a cell, such that the linear-shaped layout features in a given level of the cell are oriented to be substantially parallel with each other in their traversal direction across the cell. Also, in the dynamic array architecture, prior to PCT processing, each linear-shaped layout feature is defined to be devoid of a substantial change in direction relative to its traversal direction across the cell. Further description of the dynamic array architecture as referenced herein can be found in each of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/683,402; 12/013,342; 12/013,356; and Ser. No. 12/013,366, which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.



FIG. 1 is an illustration showing an exemplary layout for a level of a cell 101 defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. A number of linear-shaped layout features 105 are placed along virtual lines 103 of a virtual grate associated with the level of the cell 101. The virtual grate is defined by a pitch 107 representing a perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines 103. In this exemplary embodiment, each of the linear-shaped layout features 105 is defined to have a width 109. It should be understood, however, that in other embodiments various linear-shaped layout features in a given level of a cell may be defined to have a number of different widths.


For purposes of description, it should be considered that the pitch 107 of the virtual grate, the width 109 of the linear-shaped features 105, and the occupancy of the virtual grate by the linear-shaped layout features 105, combine such that the layout of the level of the cell 101 is outside a fabrication capability of a given semiconductor fabrication process. Therefore, to facilitate fabrication of the level of the cell 101, the layout can be split into a number of sub-layouts, such that each of the number of linear-shaped layout features 105 in the layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts, and such that each sub-layout is independently fabricatable within the fabrication capability of the given semiconductor fabrication process.


In one embodiment, a layout including linear-shaped layout features defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture is split by allocating sidewardly adjacent layout features to different sub-layouts. It should be understood that allocation of sidewardly adjacent layout features to different sub-layouts can be applied with any number of sub-layouts. For example, in the case of double patterning in which two sub-layouts are used, every other layout feature in the layout for the level of the cell is allocated to a common sub-layout. In this case, identification of every other layout feature is made in accordance with a direction perpendicular to a traversal direction of the layout features across the cell.



FIG. 2A is an illustration showing a splitting of the layout of FIG. 1 into two sub-layouts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, FIG. 2A is an example of double-patterning. A first sub-layout in FIG. 2A includes the layout features 105A. A second sub-layout in FIG. 2A includes the layout features 105B. Therefore, the layout is split such that sidewardly adjacent layout features are allocated to different sub-layouts. More specifically, every other sidewardly adjacent layout feature is allocated to a common sub-layout. Additionally, it should be understood that when multiple linear-shaped layout features are placed in a co-aligned manner on a common virtual grate line, e.g., virtual grate line 103, each of the multiple linear-shaped layout features is allocated to the same sub-layout. In other words, each layout feature on a given virtual grate line is allocated to the same sub-layout.



FIG. 2B is an illustration showing the first sub-layout as defined in the layout splitting of FIG. 2A. FIG. 2C is an illustration showing the second sub-layout as defined in the layout splitting of FIG. 2A. It should be understood that each of the first and second sub-layouts of FIGS. 2B and 2C are to fabricated separately on the chip. In the sub-layout of FIG. 2B, adjacent linear-shaped layout features 105A are separated by a distance 111. Similarly, in the sub-layout of FIG. 2C, adjacent linear-shaped layout features 105B are also separated by the distance 111. If the distance 111 is sufficiently large such that each of the first and second sub-layouts is independently fabricatable within the fabrication capability of a given semiconductor fabrication process, then use of two sub-layouts is adequate. However, if the distance 111 is not sufficiently large to enable independent fabrication of the first and second sub-layouts, the layout of FIG. 2A could be split into more than two sub-layouts.



FIG. 2D is an illustration showing the splitting of the layout of FIG. 2A into three sub-layouts. A first sub-layout in FIG. 2D includes the layout features 105A. A second sub-layout in FIG. 2D includes the layout features 105B. A third sub-layout in FIG. 2D includes the layout features 105C. It should be appreciated that the distance 115 between adjacent layout features in each of the three sub-layouts of FIG. 2D is larger than the distance 111 in the two sub-layouts of FIGS. 2B and 2C. Therefore, each of the three sub-layouts having the layout feature separation distance 115 should be more likely to fall within the fabrication capability of a given semiconductor fabrication process, as compared to the two sub-layouts having the layout feature separation distance 111. Thus, by splitting the layout of a given level of a cell into multiple sub-layouts, it is possible to resolve smaller layout feature sizes.


It should be understood that a given layout can be split into essentially any number of sub-layouts, wherein each sub-layout for the given level of the cell is to be fabricated separately. Also, in various embodiments, a layout for a given level of a cell can be split into a number of sub-layouts based on layout feature function, layout feature location, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, layout features sharing a common electrical function can be allocated to a common sub-layout. For example, layout features for active region contacts can be commonly allocated to one sub-layout, and layout features for gate contacts can be commonly allocated to another sub-layout. Also, in one embodiment, layout features for vias can be allocated to sub-layouts in accordance with alternating rows and/or columns of the virtual grid upon which the via layout features are placed.


Once a given layout is split into multiple sub-layouts, each of the sub-layouts can be process compensation technique (PCT) processed separately, as each of the sub-layouts will be exposed separately during the lithography process. As used herein, a process compensation technique (PCT) refers to essentially any processing or adjustment of an integrated circuit (IC) layout for the purpose of improving or ensuring successful fabrication of the features defined by the IC layout. Examples of various PCTs include optical proximity correction (OPC), resolution enhancement techniques (RET), etch proximity compensation, gap fill compensation (e.g., use of dielectric or metal to fill gaps), chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) compensation, among others. It should be understood that the term PCT processing, as used herein, refers to any existing or future form of IC layout processing used to improve or ensure successful fabrication of features defined by the IC layout.



FIG. 3 is an illustration showing a PCT processed version of the sub-layout of FIG. 2C, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. A number of OPC shapes 117 are placed at various ends of the linear-shaped layout features 105B as part of the PCT processing of the sub-layout. In performing the PCT processing on a given sub-layout, a lithographic buffer region (“litho-buffer” hereafter) 119 is defined around the cell 101 to simulate a chip environment in which the sub-layout for the level of the cell 101 may be placed and fabricated. Generally speaking, a litho-buffer associated with a given sub-layout for a cell level is defined to include a number of features that simulate the neighborhood in which the sub-layout for the cell level will be placed during fabrication on the chip. The size of the litho-buffer for a given cell level is defined by the outward extent of the litho-buffer from the cell. For example, in FIG. 3, the litho-buffer 119 extends outward from the cell 101 to a boundary 121. The size of the litho-buffer for a given cell level is set such that the litho-buffer covers an area capable of lithographically influencing fabrication of the sub-layout in the given cell level.


In one embodiment, a litho-buffer for a cell level defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture can be defined by surrounding the cell level with duplicate instantiations of itself. However, in another embodiment, the litho-buffer for the cell level defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture can be defined in a more generalized manner to include a “blanket” of linear features which approximate those present in the cell level. For example, the blanket of linear features can be defined to include a number of linear features placed according to an extension of the virtual grate/virtual grid utilized within the cell level, and according to an extension of the sub-layout of the cell level. Additionally, in the dynamic array architecture, it should be appreciated that PCT corrections may be primarily intended to maintain the line width of each linear-shaped layout feature in critical regions. Therefore, the PCT corrections can be relatively simple, such as one-dimensional corrections similar to those provided by the OPC shapes 117 in FIG. 3. Further description of PCT processing of a given level of a cell can be found in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/033,807, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.


For each layout that is split into a number of sub-layouts, a particular sub-layout sequence can be specified. The sub-layout sequence is defined by allocating an edge layout feature of the layout to a particular sub-layout and by allocating sidewardly adjacent layout features, relative to a direction extending across the layout away from the edge layout feature, according to a fixed ordering of the number of sub-layouts. Because each sub-layout sequence is based on allocation of an edge layout feature to a particular sub-layout, the number of possible sub-layout sequences is equal to the number of sub-layouts into which the layout is split.



FIGS. 4A-4C are illustrations showing possible sub-layout sequences for a layout that is split into three sub-layouts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In each of FIGS. 4A-4C, the three sub-layouts are designed by the letters A, B, and C, respectively. Also, in each of FIGS. 4A-4C, the fixed ordering of the number of sub-layouts is specified as A-B-C. Therefore, FIG. 4A shows a first sub-layout sequence in which the left edge layout feature 401 is allocated to sub-layout A, and the fixed ordering of sub-layouts (A-B-C) is applied to sidewardly adjacent features based on the allocation of the left edge layout feature 401 to sub-layout A. FIG. 4B shows a second sub-layout sequence in which the left edge layout feature 401 is allocated to sub-layout B, and the fixed ordering of sub-layouts (A-B-C) is applied to sidewardly adjacent features based on the allocation of the left edge layout feature 401 to sub-layout B. FIG. 4C shows a third sub-layout sequence in which the left edge layout feature 401 is allocated to sub-layout C, and the fixed ordering of sub-layouts (A-B-C) is applied to sidewardly adjacent features based on the allocation of the left edge layout feature 401 to sub-layout C.


A number of variants of a cell can be generated by specifying different combinations of sub-layout sequences across the various levels of the cell. For example, FIG. 5A is an illustration showing a gate level layout and metal 2 level layout for a cell 501, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. For ease of illustration, gate level layout features 503 and metal 2 level layout features 505 are abbreviated in their traversal direction across the cell 501 to avoid obscuring each other. However, it should be understood that each gate level feature 503 and each metal 2 level feature 505 extends across the cell 501, as indicated by arrows 507.


In the present example, the gate level layout is split into two sub-layouts. Similarly, the metal 2 level layout is split into two sub-layouts. For ease of description, it is assumed that no other levels of the cell 501 are split into sub-layouts. FIGS. 5B-5E are illustrations showing different variants of the cell 501. The gate level layout is split into two sub-layouts identified as 503A and 503B, respectively. The metal 2 level layout is split into two sub-layouts identified as 505A and 505B, respectively. Because the gate level layout is split into two sub-layouts, there are two possible sub-layout sequences for the gate level, i.e., 503A-503B, and 503B-503A. Also, because the metal 2 level layout is split into two sub-layouts, there are two possible sub-layout sequences for the metal 2 level layout, i.e., 505A-505B, and 505B-505A. Therefore, in considering the combination of sub-layout sequences across the levels of the cell 501, four variants of the cell 501 can be generated based on unique sub-layout sequence combinations.



FIG. 5A shows a cell variant 501A in which the combination of sub-layout sequences applied across the levels of the cell 501 is defined by 503A-503B for the gate level and 505A-505B for the metal 2 level. FIG. 5B shows a cell variant 501B in which the combination of sub-layout sequences applied across the levels of the cell 501 is defined by 503B-503A for the gate level and 505A-505B for the metal 2 level. FIG. 5C shows a cell variant 501C in which the combination of sub-layout sequences applied across the levels of the cell 501 is defined by 503A-503B for the gate level and 505B-505A for the metal 2 level. FIG. 5D shows a cell variant 501D in which the combination of sub-layout sequences applied across the levels of the cell 501 is defined by 503B-503A for the gate level and 505B-505A for the metal 2 level.


Because a chip-wide mask is used to fabricate a conglomeration of cells, a given sub-layout pattern should extend across cell boundaries. Therefore, a cell variant having an appropriate sub-layout sequence in each level thereof should be placed next to another cell when the chip-wide layout is placed and routed, such that the sub-layout pattern for a given level extends across cell boundaries. For example, FIG. 5F is an illustration showing placement of cell variant 501B next to cell variant 501A such that the sub-layout patterns for the gate level and the metal 2 level extend across the cell boundaries. Also, FIG. 5G is an illustration showing placement of cell variant 501D next to cell variant 501C such that the sub-layout patterns for the gate level and the metal 2 level extend across the cell boundaries.


The splitting of various layouts of a cell into multiple sub-layouts can be built into the cell library. Through use of the dynamic array architecture, it is possible to split a layout of a given cell level into multiple sub-layouts as the cell library is being created. Also, each variant of a given cell can be stored in the cell library, wherein each cell variant corresponds to a unique combination of sub-layout sequences applied across the levels of the given cell. Thus, during placing and routing of the chip, appropriate cell variants can be selected from the cell library for placement on the chip to ensure that chip-level layout patterns are maintained across the chip. In one embodiment, a router used to place and route the chip is defined to understand how the various layouts for each level of the chip are split, thereby enabling placement of cells such that sub-layouts for a given level align and extend across cell boundaries.


In one embodiment, chip-wide layout splitting of a given level is accomplished by placing appropriate cell variants during the chip place and route process, without considering the chip-wide layout as a whole. In another embodiment, chip-wide layout splitting of a given level can be performed following the chip place and route process. It should be appreciated that in this embodiment, definition of the various cells in accordance with the dynamic array architecture serves to significantly improve the ease by which the chip-wide layout can be split. Each chip-wide sub-layout for a given level is defined on a respective mask. The masks for the various sub-layouts of each level of the chip are stored as layout data files to be sent to the mask fabrication facility. The layout data files can be formatted as GDS II (Graphic Data System) database files, OASIS (Open Artwork System Interchange Standard) database files, or any other type of date file format that can be understood by the mask fabrication facility.


In another embodiment, multiple patterning can be used to implement a line cutting technique for segmentation of a layout defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture. FIG. 6A is an illustration showing a non-segmented layout of a level of a cell 601, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In the non-segmented layout, each linear-shaped layout feature is defined to extend continuously across the layout, including across cell boundaries. The non-segmented layout can be split into a number of sub-layouts. In the example of FIG. 6A, the non-segmented layout is split into two sub-layouts designated by labels A and B, respectively. FIG. 6B is an illustration showing a first non-segmented sub-layout including the linear-shaped layout features designated by the label A. FIG. 6C is an illustration showing a second non-segmented sub-layout including the linear-shaped layout features designated by the label B. Each of the first and second non-segmented sub-layouts are fabricated separately on the same level of the chip.



FIG. 6D is an illustration showing a layout to be used for cutting the linear-shaped features as fabricated by the first and second non-segmented sub-layouts of FIGS. 6B and 6C. The layout of FIG. 6D includes layout features 609-1 and 609-2 for line cutting at the cell 601 boundary. Also, layout features 609-3 through 609-6 are provided for segmentation of linear features within the cell 601. The layout of FIG. 6D is defined to cut the linear-shaped features as fabricated by the first and second non-segmented sub-layouts of FIGS. 6B and 6C, so as to enable electrical connectivity necessary for the logic function of the cell 601. FIG. 6E is an illustration showing the level of the cell 601 following the line cutting by the layout of FIG. 6D.


In one embodiment, a set of masks are generated for fabricating a common level of a semiconductor chip in accordance with the line cutting technique illustrated by FIGS. 6A-6E. The set of masks includes a first mask having an area defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture to include a first number of linear layout features defined to extend continuously across the area of the first mask. The first number of linear layout features are commonly oriented. Also, each of the first number of linear layout features is devoid of a substantial change in traversal direction across the first mask. The first number of linear layout features form a first sub-layout, wherein the first sub-layout defines a first portion of one or more cells.


The set of masks also includes a second mask having an area defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture to include a second number of linear layout features defined to extend continuously across the area of the second mask. The second number of linear layout features are commonly oriented with the first number of linear layout features of the first mask. Each of the second number of linear layout features is devoid of a substantial change in traversal direction across the second mask. The area of the second mask defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture is to be aligned with the area of the first mask defined in accordance with the dynamic array architecture, thereby causing the second number of linear layout features to be interleaved with the first number of linear layout features. The second number of linear layout features form a second sub-layout, wherein the second sub-layout defines a second portion of the one or more cells.


The set of masks also includes a third mask having an area defined to include a third number of linear layout features. The third number of linear layout features are oriented to be substantially perpendicular to both the first and second number of linear layout features, when the area of the third mask is aligned with the areas of the first and second masks. The third number of linear layout features are defined to provide for cutting of a portion of the first and second number of linear layout features, so as to segment the first and second number of linear layout features to enable electrical connectivity necessary for the logic function of each of the one or more cells. It should be understood that enumeration of the above-mentioned masks as “first,” “second,” and “third” is provided for purposes of mask differentiation and is not intended to convey an absolute number of a given mask.


Also, in another embodiment, the non-segmented layout of FIG. 6A can be formed using a self-aligned double patterning (SADP) process, in lieu of using the separate sub-layout masks of FIGS. 6B and 6C. In this embodiment, the cutting layout, i.e., cut mask, of FIG. 6D can be used to cut the non-segmented layout features formed using the SADP process, so as to yield the layout shown in FIG. 6E. Also, it should be appreciated that the SADP process in this embodiment can be extended to a self-aligned quadruple patterning (SAQP) process, and beyond.


In one embodiment, multiple patterning, as described herein, is performed by separately loading different sub-layouts for a given level into a stepper. In this embodiment, alignment between the layout features of the different sub-layouts should be performed accurately to ensure proper spacing between layout features in the given level. In another embodiment, multiple patterning is performed using a double exposure technique in which multiple sub-layouts can be exposed on a wafer with a single alignment of the wafer to the scanner optical column. In one embodiment, the double exposure technique can be performed with each of multiple sub-layouts on a respective mask. In another embodiment, if the chip size allows, the double exposure technique can be performed with each of the multiple sub-layouts on the same mask, with an offset between the sub-layouts.


Moreover, it should be appreciated that use of the dynamic array architecture assists with alignment of sub-layouts when fabricating a given level of the chip. For example, in one embodiment, alignment in the direction along the length of the linear-shaped layout features may be more relaxed relative to alignment in the perpendicular direction extending between layout features. Also, given the parallelism of the linear-shaped layout features in a given level, proper rotational alignment of the sub-layouts for the given level may be more easily identified.



FIG. 7 is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for defining a multiple patterned cell layout for use in an integrated circuit design, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 701 for defining a layout for a level of a cell, wherein the layout is defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture to include a number of layout features. The number of layout features are linear-shaped and commonly oriented. The method also includes an operation 703 for splitting the layout into a number of sub-layouts for the level of the cell, such that each of the number of layout features in the layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts, and such that each sub-layout is independently fabricatable.


In one embodiment, a size of the layout features and a spacing between adjacent layout features in the layout for the level of the cell, prior to the splitting of operation 703, are outside a fabrication capability of a given semiconductor fabrication process. However, the size of the layout features and a spacing between adjacent layout features in each sub-layout for the level of the cell, after the splitting of operation 703, are within the fabrication capability of the given semiconductor fabrication process.


In one embodiment, sidewardly adjacent layout features in the layout for the level of the cell are allocated to different sub-layouts. In one embodiment, layout features sharing a common electrical function in the layout for the level of the cell are allocated to a common sub-layout. In one embodiment, layout features for active region contacts are commonly allocated to one sub-layout, and layout features for gate contacts are commonly allocated to another sub-layout. In one embodiment, every other layout feature in the layout for the level of the cell is allocated to a common sub-layout, wherein an identification of every other layout feature is made in accordance with a direction perpendicular to a traversal direction of the layout features across the cell.


The method further includes an operation 705 for storing the number of sub-layouts for the level of the cell on a computer readable medium. It should be understood that each sub-layout for the level of the cell is to be fabricated separately within a common area of a chip. Additionally, operations 701-705 are repeated for a number of levels of the cell.


In one embodiment, the method can also include an operation for defining a sub-layout sequence for the level of the cell by allocating an edge layout feature of the level of the cell to a particular sub-layout, and by allocating sidewardly adjacent layout features (relative to a direction extending across the level of the cell away from the edge layout feature) according to a fixed ordering of the number of sub-layouts for the level of the cell. In this embodiment, the method can further include an operation for generating a number of variants of the cell, wherein each variant of the cell is defined by a unique combination of sub-layout sequences applied across levels of the cell. Each variant of the cell can be stored in a cell library on a computer readable medium.


Additionally, in one embodiment of the method, PCT processing can be performed on each sub-layout to generate a PCT processed version each sub-layout. The PCT processed version of each sub-layout can be stored in a cell library on a computer readable medium. In this embodiment, the PCT processing is performed on a given sub-layout by defining a lithographic buffer region around the given sub-layout. The lithographic buffer region is defined to include a number of features that simulate a neighborhood of the given sub-layout around the cell when placed on a chip.



FIG. 8 is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for creating a cell library for multiple patterning of a chip layout, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 801 for defining a cell to include a number of levels having a respective linear layout defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture. The method also includes an operation 803 in which, for one or more select levels of the cell, the respective linear layout is split into a number of sub-layouts, such that each of the number of layout features in the respective linear layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts, and such that each sub-layout is independently fabricatable. The method further includes an operation 805 for storing a definition of the cell in a cell library on a computer readable medium. The definition of the cell includes the number of sub-layouts associated with each of the select levels of the cell.


In one embodiment, the method of FIG. 8 further includes an operation for generating a number of variants of the cell. Each variant of the cell is defined by a unique combination of sub-layout sequences applied across the select levels of the cell. A sub-layout sequence for a given level of the cell is defined by allocating an edge layout feature of the given level of the cell to a particular sub-layout, and by allocating sidewardly adjacent layout features (relative to a direction extending across the given level of the cell away from the edge layout feature) according to a fixed ordering of the number of sub-layouts for the given level of the cell. In this embodiment, each variant of the cell is stored in the cell library on the computer readable medium.


Also, in one embodiment, the method of FIG. 8 can include an operation for PCT processing each sub-layout to generate a PCT processed version of each sub-layout. In this embodiment, the PCT processed version of each sub-layout is stored in the cell library on the computer readable medium. Additionally, in one embodiment, prior to being split into the number of sub-layouts in operation 803, each linear layout is outside a fabrication capability of a given semiconductor fabrication process. However, in this embodiment, after splitting of the linear layout in operation 803, each of the number of sub-layouts is within the fabrication capability of the given semiconductor fabrication process.



FIG. 9 is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for designing an integrated circuit for fabrication, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 901 for placing a plurality of cells together on a chip layout to satisfy a netlist of the integrated circuit. In operation 901, the plurality of cells are selected from a cell library for multiple patterning of the chip layout. Each of the plurality of cells includes a common level having a respective linear layout defined in accordance with a dynamic array architecture. Also, each linear layout is split into a number of sub-layouts, such that each layout feature in each linear layout is allocated to any one of the number of sub-layouts, and such that layout features allocated to a given sub-layout form a consistent pattern within the common level of a given cell.


Also, the plurality of cells are placed together in operation 901 such that the consistent pattern of layout features formed by the given sub-layout within the common level extends in an uninterrupted manner across the plurality of cells. Moreover, the extension of the consistent pattern of layout features formed by the given sub-layout across the plurality of cells defines a portion of a chip-wide mask layout for the common level. Additionally, each sub-layout is defined on a separate chip-wide mask layout for the common level, wherein each chip-wide mask layout is to be independently fabricated in a co-aligned manner on the common level. The method further includes an operation 903 for storing the chip-wide mask layout for the common level on a computer readable medium.


The invention described herein can be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can be thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion. Additionally, a graphical user interface (GUI) implemented as computer readable code on a computer readable medium can be developed to provide a user interface for performing any embodiment of the present invention.


While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor chip, comprising: a gate electrode level including a plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction, the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a fixed pitch such that a distance as measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the fixed pitch,wherein the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures includes a first set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a first sub-layout and a second set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a second sub-layout, the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures interleaved with the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures such that each linear-shaped conductive structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from at least one adjacently located linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures by the fixed pitch as measured in the second direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines,wherein each of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures has a respective total length as measured in the first direction along its first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerline, and wherein the total length of each linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is equal,wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a first mask, and wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a second mask different from the first mask, and wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured separately from the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures.
  • 2. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 1, wherein the integer multiple of the fixed pitch is equal to the fixed pitch multiplied by a whole number selected from a set of whole numbers including zero.
  • 3. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 2, wherein some of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially co-aligned such that the distance as measured in the second direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines is substantially equal to zero.
  • 4. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 1, wherein a spacing between at least one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures and an adjacent one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is outside a fabrication capability of a semiconductor fabrication process.
  • 5. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 1, wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures correspond to a first plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures, and wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures correspond to a second plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures, andwherein the fixed pitch of the gate electrode level corresponds to a first pitch, andwherein the semiconductor chip further comprises a first interconnect level including a third plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in the first direction, the third plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a second pitch such that a distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the third plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the second pitch,the first interconnect level including a fourth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in the first direction, the fourth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a third pitch such that a distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the fourth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the third pitch.
  • 6. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 5, wherein at least one of the second and third pitches is equal to the first pitch.
  • 7. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 5, wherein at least one of the second and third pitches is equal to the first pitch multiplied by a ratio of integers.
  • 8. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 1, wherein some linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are co-aligned such that the distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines is equal to zero, and wherein adjacently positioned co-aligned linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated from each other by a uniform end-to-end spacing as measured in the first direction.
  • 9. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 1, wherein the total length of each linear-shaped conductive structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is equal.
  • 10. A semiconductor chip, comprising: a gate electrode level including a plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction, the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a fixed pitch such that a distance as measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the fixed pitch,wherein the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structure includes a first set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a first sub-layout and a second set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a second sub-layout, the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures interleaved with the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures such that each linear-shaped conductive structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from at least one adjacently located linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures by the fixed pitch as measured between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines,wherein the total length of each linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is equal to a first total length, and wherein the total length of each linear-shaped conductive structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is equal to a second total length, and wherein the first total length is different than the second total length,wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a first mask, and wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a second mask different from the first mask, and wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured separately from the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures.
  • 11. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 10, wherein some linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are co-aligned such that the distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines is equal to zero, and wherein adjacently positioned co-aligned linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated from each other by a uniform end-to-end spacing as measured in the first direction.
  • 12. A semiconductor chip, comprising: a gate electrode level including a plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction, the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a fixed pitch such that a distance as measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the fixed pitch,wherein the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structure includes a first set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a first sub-layout and a second set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a second sub-layout and a third set of linear-shaped conductive structures corresponding to a third sub-layout,the first, second, and third sets of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in a sequential manner in the second direction, wherein each linear-shaped conductive structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is positioned between at least one adjacently located linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures and at least one adjacently located linear-shaped conductive structure of the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures, and wherein each linear-shaped conductive structure of the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures is positioned between at least one adjacently located linear-shaped conductive structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures and at least one adjacently located linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures,wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a first mask, and wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a second mask different from the first mask, and wherein the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured using a third mask different from both the first mask and the second mask, andwherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured separately from both the second and third sets of linear-shaped conductive structures, and wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured separately from both the first and third sets of linear-shaped conductive structures, and wherein the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures is manufactured separately from both the first and second sets of linear-shaped conductive structures.
  • 13. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 12, wherein the integer multiple of the fixed pitch is equal to the fixed pitch multiplied by a whole number selected from a set of whole numbers including zero.
  • 14. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 13, wherein some of plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially co-aligned such that the distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines is substantially equal to zero.
  • 15. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 12, wherein a spacing between at least one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures and an adjacent one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is outside a fabrication capability of a semiconductor fabrication process.
  • 16. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 15, wherein a spacing between at least one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures and an adjacent one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures is outside a fabrication capability of a semiconductor fabrication process.
  • 17. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 16, wherein a spacing between at least one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures and an adjacent one of the linear-shaped conductive structures of the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures is outside a fabrication capability of a semiconductor fabrication process.
  • 18. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 12, wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures correspond to a first plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures, and wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures correspond to a second plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures, andwherein the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures correspond to a third plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures, andwherein the fixed pitch of the gate electrode level corresponds to a first pitch, andwherein the semiconductor chip further comprises a first interconnect level including a fourth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in the first direction, the fourth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a second pitch such that a distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the fourth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the second pitch,the first interconnect level including a fifth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures defined to extend lengthwise in the first direction, the fifth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in accordance with a third pitch such that a distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines of any two of the fifth plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is substantially equal to an integer multiple of the third pitch.
  • 19. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 18, wherein at least one of the second and third pitches is equal to the first pitch.
  • 20. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 18, wherein at least one of the second and third pitches is equal to the first pitch multiplied by a ratio of integers.
  • 21. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 12, wherein each of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures has a total length as measured in the first direction along its first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerline, and wherein the total length of each linear-shaped conductive structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is equal.
  • 22. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 21, wherein the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures includes linear-shaped conductive structures of different total length.
  • 23. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 22, wherein the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures includes linear-shaped conductive structures of different total length.
  • 24. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 12, wherein some linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are co-aligned such that the distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines is equal to zero, and wherein adjacently positioned co-aligned linear-shaped conductive structures of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated from each other by a uniform end-to-end spacing as measured in the first direction.
  • 25. A semiconductor chip as recited in claim 24, wherein some linear-shaped conductive structures of the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures are co-aligned such that the distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction between their first-direction-oriented-lengthwise-centerlines is equal to zero, and wherein adjacently positioned co-aligned linear-shaped conductive structures of the third set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated from each other by the uniform end-to-end spacing as measured in the first direction.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/195,600, filed on Mar. 3, 2014, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,633,987, on Apr. 25, 2017, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/041,584, filed on Mar. 3, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,667,443, on Mar. 4, 2014, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/892,982, filed Mar. 5, 2007. The disclosures of the above-identified patent applications and patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/683,402, filed on Mar. 7, 2007, and entitled “Dynamic Array Architecture.” This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/013,342, filed on Jan. 11, 2008, and entitled “Semiconductor Device with Dynamic Array Section.” This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/013,356, filed on Jan. 11, 2008, and entitled “Methods for Designing Semiconductor Device with Dynamic Array Section.” This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/013,366, filed on Jan. 11, 2008, and entitled “Methods for Defining Dynamic Array Section with Manufacturing Assurance Halo and Apparatus Implementing the Same.” This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/033,807, filed on Feb. 19, 2008, and entitled “Integrated Circuit Cell Library with Cell-Level Process Compensation Technique (PCT) Application and Associated Methods.” The disclosures of the above-identified patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (893)
Number Name Date Kind
3521242 Katz Jul 1970 A
4069493 Bobenrieth Jan 1978 A
4197555 Uehara et al. Apr 1980 A
4417161 Uya Nov 1983 A
4424460 Best Jan 1984 A
4575648 Lee Mar 1986 A
4602270 Finegold Jul 1986 A
4613940 Shenton et al. Sep 1986 A
4627152 DeHond Dec 1986 A
4657628 Holloway et al. Apr 1987 A
4682202 Tanizawa Jul 1987 A
4745084 Rowson et al. May 1988 A
4780753 Shinichi et al. Oct 1988 A
4801986 Chang et al. Jan 1989 A
4804636 Groover, III Feb 1989 A
4812688 Chu et al. Mar 1989 A
4884115 Michel et al. Nov 1989 A
4890148 Ikeda Dec 1989 A
4928160 Crafts May 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
5005068 Ikeda Apr 1991 A
5047979 Leung Sep 1991 A
5068603 Mahoney Nov 1991 A
5079614 Khatakhotan Jan 1992 A
5097422 Corbin et al. Mar 1992 A
5117277 Yuyama et al. May 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5208765 Turnbull May 1993 A
5224057 Igarashi Jun 1993 A
5242770 Chen et al. Sep 1993 A
5268319 Harari Dec 1993 A
5298774 Ueda et al. Mar 1994 A
5313426 Sakuma et al. May 1994 A
5338963 Klaasen Aug 1994 A
5351197 Upton et al. Sep 1994 A
5359226 DeJong Oct 1994 A
5365454 Nakagawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5367187 Yuen Nov 1994 A
5378649 Huang Jan 1995 A
5396128 Dunning et al. Mar 1995 A
5420447 Waggoner May 1995 A
5461577 Shaw et al. Oct 1995 A
5471403 Fujimaga Nov 1995 A
5486717 Kokubo Jan 1996 A
5497334 Russell et al. Mar 1996 A
5497337 Ponnapalli et al. Mar 1996 A
5526307 Lin et al. Jun 1996 A
5536955 Ali Jul 1996 A
5545904 Orbach Aug 1996 A
5581098 Chang Dec 1996 A
5581202 Yano et al. Dec 1996 A
5591995 Shaw Jan 1997 A
5612893 Hao et al. Mar 1997 A
5636002 Garofalo Jun 1997 A
5656861 Godinho et al. Aug 1997 A
5682323 Pasch et al. Oct 1997 A
5684311 Shaw Nov 1997 A
5684733 Wu et al. Nov 1997 A
5698873 Colwell et al. Dec 1997 A
5705301 Garza et al. Jan 1998 A
5723883 Gheewalla Mar 1998 A
5723908 Fuchida et al. Mar 1998 A
5740068 Liebmann et al. Apr 1998 A
5745374 Matsumoto Apr 1998 A
5754826 Gamal May 1998 A
5764533 deDood Jun 1998 A
5774367 Reyes et al. Jun 1998 A
5780909 Hayashi Jul 1998 A
5789776 Lancaster et al. Aug 1998 A
5790417 Chao et al. Aug 1998 A
5796128 Tran et al. Aug 1998 A
5796624 Sridhar et al. Aug 1998 A
5798298 Yang et al. Aug 1998 A
5814844 Nagata et al. Sep 1998 A
5825203 Kusunoki et al. Oct 1998 A
5834851 Ikeda et al. Nov 1998 A
5838594 Kojima Nov 1998 A
5841663 Sharma et al. Nov 1998 A
5847421 Yamaguchi Dec 1998 A
5850362 Sakuma et al. Dec 1998 A
5852562 Shinomiya et al. Dec 1998 A
5858580 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5898194 Gheewala Apr 1999 A
5900340 Reich et al. May 1999 A
5905287 Hirata May 1999 A
5908827 Sirna Jun 1999 A
5915199 Hsu Jun 1999 A
5917207 Colwell et al. Jun 1999 A
5920486 Beahm et al. Jul 1999 A
5923059 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5923060 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5929469 Mimoto Jul 1999 A
5930163 Hara et al. Jul 1999 A
5935763 Caterer et al. Aug 1999 A
5949101 Aritome Sep 1999 A
5973369 Hayashi Oct 1999 A
5973507 Yamazaki Oct 1999 A
5977305 Wigler et al. Nov 1999 A
5977574 Schmitt et al. Nov 1999 A
5984510 Ali Nov 1999 A
5998879 Iwaki et al. Dec 1999 A
6009251 Ho et al. Dec 1999 A
6026223 Scepanovic et al. Feb 2000 A
6026225 Iwasaki Feb 2000 A
6037613 Mariyama Mar 2000 A
6037617 Kumagai Mar 2000 A
6040991 Ellis-Monaghan Mar 2000 A
6044007 Capodieci Mar 2000 A
6054872 Fudanuki et al. Apr 2000 A
6063132 DeCamp et al. May 2000 A
6077310 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2000 A
6080206 Tadokoro et al. Jun 2000 A
6084255 Ueda Jul 2000 A
6084437 Sako Jul 2000 A
6091845 Pierrat et al. Jul 2000 A
6099584 Arnold et al. Aug 2000 A
6100025 Wigler et al. Aug 2000 A
6114071 Chen et al. Sep 2000 A
6144227 Sato Nov 2000 A
6159839 Jeng et al. Dec 2000 A
6166415 Sakemi et al. Dec 2000 A
6166560 Ogura et al. Dec 2000 A
6174742 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182272 Andreev et al. Jan 2001 B1
6194104 Hsu Feb 2001 B1
6194252 Yamaguchi Feb 2001 B1
6194912 Or-Bach Feb 2001 B1
6209123 Maziasz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230299 McSherry et al. May 2001 B1
6232173 Hsu et al. May 2001 B1
6240542 Kapur May 2001 B1
6249902 Igusa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255600 Schaper Jul 2001 B1
6255845 Wong et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262487 Igarashi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269472 Garza et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275973 Wein Aug 2001 B1
6282696 Garza et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291276 Gonzalez Sep 2001 B1
6295224 Chan Sep 2001 B1
6297668 Schober Oct 2001 B1
6297674 Kono et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303252 Lin Oct 2001 B1
6323117 Noguchi Nov 2001 B1
6331733 Or-Bach et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331791 Huang Dec 2001 B1
6335250 Egi Jan 2002 B1
6338972 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347062 Nii et al. Feb 2002 B2
6356112 Tran et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359804 Kuriyama et al. Mar 2002 B2
6370679 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378110 Ho Apr 2002 B1
6380592 Tooher et al. Apr 2002 B2
6388296 Hsu May 2002 B1
6393601 Tanaka et al. May 2002 B1
6399972 Masuda et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400183 Yamashita et al. Jun 2002 B2
6408427 Cong et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415421 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B2
6416907 Winder et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417549 Oh Jul 2002 B1
6421820 Mansfield et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425112 Bula et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425117 Pasch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426269 Haffner Jul 2002 B1
6436805 Trivedi Aug 2002 B1
6445049 Iranmanesh Sep 2002 B1
6445065 Gheewala et al. Sep 2002 B1
6467072 Yang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469328 Yanai et al. Oct 2002 B2
6470489 Chang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476493 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2002 B2
6477695 Gandhi Nov 2002 B1
6480032 Aksamit Nov 2002 B1
6480989 Chan et al. Nov 2002 B2
6492066 Capodieci et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496965 van Ginneken et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504186 Kanamoto et al. Jan 2003 B2
6505327 Lin Jan 2003 B2
6505328 van Ginneken et al. Jan 2003 B1
6507941 Leung et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509952 Govil Jan 2003 B1
6514849 Hui et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516459 Sahouria Feb 2003 B1
6523156 Cirit Feb 2003 B2
6525350 Kinoshita et al. Feb 2003 B1
6536028 Katsioulas et al. Mar 2003 B1
6543039 Watanabe Apr 2003 B1
6553544 Tanaka et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553559 Liebmann et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553562 Capodieci et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566720 Aldrich May 2003 B2
6570234 Gardner May 2003 B1
6571140 Wewalaarachchi May 2003 B1
6571379 Takayama May 2003 B2
6574786 Pohlenz et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578190 Ferguson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583041 Capodieci Jun 2003 B1
6588005 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590289 Shively Jul 2003 B2
6591207 Naya et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609235 Ramaswamy et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610607 Armbrust et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617621 Gheewala et al. Sep 2003 B1
6620561 Winder et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621132 Onishi Sep 2003 B2
6624459 Dachtera Sep 2003 B1
6627960 Nii Sep 2003 B2
6632741 Clevenger et al. Oct 2003 B1
6633182 Pileggi et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635935 Makino Oct 2003 B2
6642744 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643831 Chang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650014 Kariyazaki Nov 2003 B2
6661041 Keeth Dec 2003 B2
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664587 Guterman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673638 Bendik et al. Jan 2004 B1
6675361 Crafts Jan 2004 B1
6677649 Minami et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687895 Zhang Feb 2004 B2
6690206 Rikino et al. Feb 2004 B2
6691297 Misaka et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700405 Hirairi Mar 2004 B1
6703170 Pindo Mar 2004 B1
6709880 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714903 Chu et al. Mar 2004 B1
6732334 Nakatsuka May 2004 B2
6732338 Crouse et al. May 2004 B2
6732344 Sakamoto et al. May 2004 B2
6734506 Oyamatsu May 2004 B2
6737199 Hsieh May 2004 B1
6737318 Murata et al. May 2004 B2
6737347 Houston et al. May 2004 B1
6745372 Cote et al. Jun 2004 B2
6745380 Bodendorf et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749972 Yu Jun 2004 B2
6750555 Satomi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760269 Nakase et al. Jul 2004 B2
6765245 Bansal Jul 2004 B2
6777138 Pierrat et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777146 Samuels Aug 2004 B1
6787823 Shibutani Sep 2004 B2
6789244 Dasasathyan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6789246 Mohan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792591 Shi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792593 Takashima et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794677 Tamaki et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794914 Sani et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795332 Yamaoka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795358 Tanaka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795952 Stine et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795953 Bakarian et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800883 Furuya et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806180 Cho Oct 2004 B2
6807663 Cote et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809399 Ikeda et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812574 Tomita et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818389 Fritze et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818929 Tsutsumi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819136 Or-Bach Nov 2004 B2
6820248 Gan Nov 2004 B1
6826738 Cadouri Nov 2004 B2
6834375 Stine et al. Dec 2004 B1
6835991 Pell, III Dec 2004 B2
6841880 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850854 Naya et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854096 Eaton et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854100 Chuang et al. Feb 2005 B1
6867073 Enquist Mar 2005 B1
6871338 Yamauchi Mar 2005 B2
6872990 Kang Mar 2005 B1
6877144 Rittman et al. Apr 2005 B1
6879511 Dufourt Apr 2005 B2
6881523 Smith Apr 2005 B2
6884712 Yelehanka et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885045 Hidaka Apr 2005 B2
6889370 Kerzman et al. May 2005 B1
6897517 Houdt et al. May 2005 B2
6897536 Nomura et al. May 2005 B2
6898770 Boluki et al. May 2005 B2
6904582 Rittman et al. Jun 2005 B1
6918104 Pierrat et al. Jul 2005 B2
6920079 Shibayama Jul 2005 B2
6921982 Joshi et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922354 Ishikura et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924560 Wang et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928635 Pramanik et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931617 Sanie et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953956 Or-Bach et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954918 Houston Oct 2005 B2
6957402 Templeton et al. Oct 2005 B2
6968527 Pierrat Nov 2005 B2
6974978 Possley Dec 2005 B1
6977856 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978436 Cote et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978437 Rittman et al. Dec 2005 B1
6980211 Lin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6992394 Park Jan 2006 B2
6992925 Peng Jan 2006 B2
6993741 Liebmann et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994939 Ghandehari et al. Feb 2006 B1
6998722 Madurawe Feb 2006 B2
7003068 Kushner et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009862 Higeta et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016214 Kawamata Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028285 Cote et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041568 Goldbach et al. May 2006 B2
7052972 Sandhu et al. May 2006 B2
7053424 Ono May 2006 B2
7063920 Baba-Ali Jun 2006 B2
7064068 Chou et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065731 Jacques et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079413 Tsukamoto et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079989 Wimer Jul 2006 B2
7093208 Williams et al. Aug 2006 B2
7093228 Andreev et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103870 Misaka et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105871 Or-Bach et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107551 de Dood et al. Sep 2006 B1
7115343 Gordon et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115920 Bernstein et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120882 Kotani et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124386 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126837 Banachowicz et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132203 Pierrat Nov 2006 B2
7137092 Maeda Nov 2006 B2
7141853 Campbell et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143380 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 B1
7149999 Kahng et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152215 Smith et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155685 Mori et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155689 Pierrat et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159197 Falbo et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174520 White et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175940 Laidig et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176508 Joshi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177215 Tanaka et al. Feb 2007 B2
7183611 Bhattacharyya Feb 2007 B2
7185294 Zhang Feb 2007 B2
7188322 Cohn et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194712 Wu Mar 2007 B2
7200835 Zhang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205191 Kobayashi Apr 2007 B2
7208794 Hofmann et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214579 Widdershoven et al. May 2007 B2
7219326 Reed et al. May 2007 B2
7221031 Ryoo May 2007 B2
7225423 Bhattacharya et al. May 2007 B2
7227183 Donze et al. Jun 2007 B2
7228510 Ono Jun 2007 B2
7231628 Pack et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235424 Chen et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243316 White et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252909 Shin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7257017 Liaw Aug 2007 B2
7264990 Rueckes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266787 Hughes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7269803 Khakzadi et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278118 Pileggi et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279727 Ikoma et al. Oct 2007 B2
7287320 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294534 Iwaki Nov 2007 B2
7302651 Allen et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308669 Buehler et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312003 Cote et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312144 Cho Dec 2007 B2
7315994 Aller et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327591 Sadra et al. Feb 2008 B2
7329938 Kinoshita Feb 2008 B2
7329953 Tu Feb 2008 B2
7335966 Ihme et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337421 Kamat Feb 2008 B2
7338896 Vanhaelemeersch et al. Mar 2008 B2
7345511 Morgenshtein Mar 2008 B2
7345909 Chang et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346885 Semmler Mar 2008 B2
7350183 Cui et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353492 Gupta et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358131 Bhattacharyya Apr 2008 B2
7360179 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360198 Rana et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366997 Rahmat et al. Apr 2008 B1
7367008 White et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376931 Kokubun May 2008 B2
7383521 Smith et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397260 Chanda et al. Jul 2008 B2
7400627 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402848 Chang et al. Jul 2008 B2
7404154 Venkatraman et al. Jul 2008 B1
7404173 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411252 Anderson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421678 Barnes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7423298 Mariyama et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424694 Ikeda Sep 2008 B2
7424695 Tamura et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424696 Vogel et al. Sep 2008 B2
7426710 Zhang et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432562 Bhattacharyya Oct 2008 B2
7434185 Dooling et al. Oct 2008 B2
7441211 Gupta et al. Oct 2008 B1
7442630 Kelberlau et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444609 Charlebois et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446352 Becker et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449371 Kemerling et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458045 Cote et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459792 Chen Dec 2008 B2
7465973 Chang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466607 Hollis et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469396 Hayashi et al. Dec 2008 B2
7480880 Visweswariah et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480891 Sezginer Jan 2009 B2
7484197 Allen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7485934 Liaw Feb 2009 B2
7487475 Kriplani et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492013 Correale, Jr. Feb 2009 B2
7500211 Komaki Mar 2009 B2
7502275 Nii et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503026 Ichiryu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504184 Hung et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506300 Sezginer et al. Mar 2009 B2
7508238 Yamagami Mar 2009 B2
7509621 Melvin, III Mar 2009 B2
7509622 Sinha et al. Mar 2009 B2
7512017 Chang Mar 2009 B2
7512921 Shibuya Mar 2009 B2
7514355 Katase Apr 2009 B2
7514959 Or-Bach et al. Apr 2009 B2
7523429 Kroyan et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527900 Zhou et al. May 2009 B2
7535751 Huang May 2009 B2
7538368 Yano May 2009 B2
7543262 Wang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563701 Chang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564134 Yang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7568174 Sezginer et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569309 Walter et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569310 Wallace et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569894 Suzuki Aug 2009 B2
7575973 Mokhlesi et al. Aug 2009 B2
7592676 Nakanishi Sep 2009 B2
7598541 Okamoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7598558 Hashimoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614030 Hsu Nov 2009 B2
7625790 Yang Dec 2009 B2
7632610 Wallace et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640522 Gupta et al. Dec 2009 B2
7646651 Lee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7647574 Haruki Jan 2010 B2
7653884 Furnish et al. Jan 2010 B2
7665051 Ludwig et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700466 Booth et al. Apr 2010 B2
7712056 White et al. May 2010 B2
7739627 Chew et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749662 Matthew et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755110 Gliese et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770144 Dellinger Aug 2010 B2
7781847 Yang Aug 2010 B2
7791109 Wann et al. Sep 2010 B2
7802219 Tomar et al. Sep 2010 B2
7816740 Houston Oct 2010 B2
7825437 Pillarisetty et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842975 Becker et al. Nov 2010 B2
7873929 Kahng et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882456 Zach Feb 2011 B2
7888705 Becker et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898040 Nawaz Mar 2011 B2
7906801 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908578 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910958 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910959 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917877 Singh et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917879 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7923266 Thijs et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923337 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923757 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7926001 Pierrat Apr 2011 B2
7932544 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932545 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7934184 Zhang Apr 2011 B2
7939443 Fox et al. May 2011 B2
7943966 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7943967 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948012 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948013 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7952119 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7956421 Becker Jun 2011 B2
7958465 Lu et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962867 White et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962878 Melzner Jun 2011 B2
7962879 Tang et al. Jun 2011 B2
7964267 Lyons et al. Jun 2011 B1
7971160 Osawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989847 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7989848 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7992122 Burstein et al. Aug 2011 B1
7994583 Inaba Aug 2011 B2
8004042 Yang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8022441 Becker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8030689 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035133 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8044437 Venkatraman et al. Oct 2011 B1
8058671 Becker et al. Nov 2011 B2
8058690 Chang Nov 2011 B2
8072003 Becker et al. Dec 2011 B2
8072053 Li Dec 2011 B2
8088679 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088680 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088681 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088682 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089098 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089099 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089100 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089101 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089102 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089103 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089104 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8101975 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8110854 Becker et al. Feb 2012 B2
8129750 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129751 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129752 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129754 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129755 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129756 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129757 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129819 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8130529 Tanaka Mar 2012 B2
8134183 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134184 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134185 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134186 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8138525 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8161427 Morgenshtein et al. Apr 2012 B2
8178905 Toubou May 2012 B2
8178909 Venkatraman et al. May 2012 B2
8198656 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8207053 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214778 Quandt et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217428 Becker et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225239 Reed et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225261 Hong et al. Jul 2012 B2
8245180 Smayling et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247846 Becker Aug 2012 B2
8253172 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8253173 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258547 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258548 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258549 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258550 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258551 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258552 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258581 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264007 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264008 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264009 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264044 Becker Sep 2012 B2
8274099 Becker Sep 2012 B2
8283701 Becker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8294212 Wang et al. Oct 2012 B2
8316327 Herold Nov 2012 B2
8356268 Becker et al. Jan 2013 B2
8363455 Rennie et al. Jan 2013 B2
8378407 Audzeyeu et al. Feb 2013 B2
8395224 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8402397 Robles et al. Mar 2013 B2
8405163 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8422274 Tomita et al. Apr 2013 B2
8436400 Becker et al. May 2013 B2
8453094 Kornachuk et al. May 2013 B2
8575706 Becker et al. Nov 2013 B2
8667443 Smayling Mar 2014 B2
8701071 Kornachuk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8735995 Becker et al. May 2014 B2
8756551 Becker et al. Jun 2014 B2
8836045 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839162 Amundson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839175 Smayling et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847329 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8863063 Becker et al. Oct 2014 B2
8946781 Becker Feb 2015 B2
9006841 Kumar Apr 2015 B2
9035359 Becker May 2015 B2
9202779 Kornachuk et al. Dec 2015 B2
9269423 Sever Feb 2016 B2
9336344 Smayling May 2016 B2
9425272 Becker Aug 2016 B2
9425273 Becker Aug 2016 B2
9443947 Becker Sep 2016 B2
9613844 Or-Bach Apr 2017 B2
9633987 Smayling Apr 2017 B2
20010049813 Chan et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003270 Makino Jan 2002 A1
20020015899 Chen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024049 Nii Feb 2002 A1
20020030510 Kono et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020063582 Rikino May 2002 A1
20020068423 Park et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079516 Lim Jun 2002 A1
20020079927 Katoh et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020149392 Cho Oct 2002 A1
20020166107 Capodieci et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194575 Allen et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030042930 Pileggi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046653 Liu Mar 2003 A1
20030061592 Agrawal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088839 Watanabe May 2003 A1
20030088842 Cirit May 2003 A1
20030090924 Nii May 2003 A1
20030103176 Abe Jun 2003 A1
20030106037 Moniwa et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030117168 Uneme et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124847 Houston et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030125917 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030126569 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030128565 Tomita Jul 2003 A1
20030145288 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145299 Fried et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030177465 MacLean et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185076 Worley Oct 2003 A1
20030203287 Miyagawa Oct 2003 A1
20030229868 White et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229875 Smith et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029372 Jang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049754 Liao et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063038 Shin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040115539 Broeke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040139412 Ito et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145028 Matsumoto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153979 Chang Aug 2004 A1
20040161878 Or-Bach et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040164360 Nishida et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169201 Hidaka Sep 2004 A1
20040194050 Hwang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196705 Ishikura et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229135 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232444 Shimizu Nov 2004 A1
20040243966 Dellinger Dec 2004 A1
20040262640 Suga Dec 2004 A1
20050001271 Kobayashi Jan 2005 A1
20050009312 Butt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050009344 Hwang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050012157 Cho et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050044522 Maeda Feb 2005 A1
20050055828 Wang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050076320 Maeda Apr 2005 A1
20050087806 Hokazono Apr 2005 A1
20050093147 Tu May 2005 A1
20050101112 Rueckes et al. May 2005 A1
20050110130 Kitabayashi et al. May 2005 A1
20050135134 Yen Jun 2005 A1
20050136340 Baselmans et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138598 Kokubun Jun 2005 A1
20050156200 Kinoshita Jul 2005 A1
20050185325 Hur Aug 2005 A1
20050189604 Gupta et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189614 Ihme et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196685 Wang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205894 Sumikawa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050212018 Schoellkopf et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050224982 Kemerling et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050229130 Wu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251771 Robles Nov 2005 A1
20050264320 Chung et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050264324 Nakazato Dec 2005 A1
20050266621 Kim Dec 2005 A1
20050268256 Tsai et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050274983 Hayashi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278673 Kawachi Dec 2005 A1
20050280031 Yano Dec 2005 A1
20060036976 Cohn Feb 2006 A1
20060038234 Liaw Feb 2006 A1
20060063334 Donze et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070018 Semmler Mar 2006 A1
20060084261 Iwaki Apr 2006 A1
20060091550 Shimazaki et al. May 2006 A1
20060095872 McElvain May 2006 A1
20060101370 Cui et al. May 2006 A1
20060112355 Pileggi et al. May 2006 A1
20060113533 Tamaki et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060113567 Ohmori et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060120143 Liaw Jun 2006 A1
20060121715 Chang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123376 Vogel et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125024 Ishigaki Jun 2006 A1
20060131609 Kinoshita et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136848 Ichiryu Jun 2006 A1
20060146638 Chang et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060151810 Ohshige Jul 2006 A1
20060158270 Gibet et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060170108 Hiroi Aug 2006 A1
20060177744 Bodendorf et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181310 Rhee Aug 2006 A1
20060195809 Cohn et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195810 Morton Aug 2006 A1
20060197557 Chung Sep 2006 A1
20060203530 Venkatraman Sep 2006 A1
20060206854 Barnes et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060223302 Chang et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060248495 Sezginer Nov 2006 A1
20060261417 Suzuki Nov 2006 A1
20060277521 Chen Dec 2006 A1
20060289861 Correale, Jr. Dec 2006 A1
20070001304 Liaw Jan 2007 A1
20070002617 Houston Jan 2007 A1
20070004147 Toubou Jan 2007 A1
20070007574 Ohsawa Jan 2007 A1
20070038973 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070074145 Tanaka Mar 2007 A1
20070094634 Seizginer et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101305 Smith et al. May 2007 A1
20070105023 Zhou et al. May 2007 A1
20070106971 Lien et al. May 2007 A1
20070113216 Zhang May 2007 A1
20070172770 Witters et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070186196 Tanaka Aug 2007 A1
20070196958 Bhattacharya et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070204253 Murakawa Aug 2007 A1
20070209029 Ivonin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070210391 Becker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234252 Visweswariah et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070234262 Uedi et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070241810 Onda Oct 2007 A1
20070251771 Huang Nov 2007 A1
20070256039 White Nov 2007 A1
20070257277 Takeda et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264758 Correale Nov 2007 A1
20070274140 Joshi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277129 Allen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288882 Kniffin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070290361 Chen Dec 2007 A1
20070294652 Bowen Dec 2007 A1
20070297249 Chang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070300202 Uchida Dec 2007 A1
20080001176 Gopalakrishnan Jan 2008 A1
20080005712 Charlebois et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021689 Yamashita et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080022247 Kojima et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046846 Chew et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080073717 Ha Mar 2008 A1
20080081472 Tanaka Apr 2008 A1
20080082952 O'Brien Apr 2008 A1
20080086712 Fujimoto Apr 2008 A1
20080097641 Miyashita et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098334 Pileggi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098341 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099795 Bernstein et al. May 2008 A1
20080127000 Majumder et al. May 2008 A1
20080127029 Graur et al. May 2008 A1
20080134128 Blatchford et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080144361 Wong Jun 2008 A1
20080148216 Chan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163141 Scheffer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168406 Rahmat et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169868 Toubou Jul 2008 A1
20080211028 Suzuki Sep 2008 A1
20080216207 Tsai Sep 2008 A1
20080244494 McCullen Oct 2008 A1
20080251779 Kakoschke et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080265290 Nielsen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080276105 Hoberman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080283910 Dreeskornfeld et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285331 Torok et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308848 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080308880 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080315258 Masuda et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090014811 Becker et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024974 Yamada Jan 2009 A1
20090031261 Smith et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032898 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090032967 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090037864 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044163 Wang Feb 2009 A1
20090057780 Wong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090075485 Ban et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077524 Nagamura Mar 2009 A1
20090085067 Hayashi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090087991 Yatsuda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090101940 Barrows et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106714 Culp et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090155990 Yanagidaira et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090181314 Shyu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187871 Cork Jul 2009 A1
20090206443 Juengling Aug 2009 A1
20090224408 Fox Sep 2009 A1
20090228853 Hong et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228857 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235215 Lavin et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090273100 Aton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090280582 Thijs et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090283921 Wang Nov 2009 A1
20090302372 Chang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319977 Saxena et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100001321 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006897 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006898 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006899 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006900 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006901 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006902 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006903 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006947 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006948 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006950 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006951 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011327 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011328 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011329 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011330 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011331 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011332 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011333 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012981 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012982 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012983 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012984 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012985 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017766 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017767 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017768 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017769 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017770 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017771 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017772 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019280 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019281 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019282 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019283 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019284 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019285 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019286 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019287 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019288 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019308 Chan et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023906 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023907 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023908 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023911 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025731 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025732 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025733 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025734 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025735 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025736 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032722 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032723 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032724 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032726 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037194 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037195 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100096671 Becker et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100115484 Frederick May 2010 A1
20100203689 Bernstein et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100224943 Kawasaki Sep 2010 A1
20100229140 Werner et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232212 Anderson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100252865 Van Der Zanden Oct 2010 A1
20100252896 Smayling Oct 2010 A1
20100264468 Xu Oct 2010 A1
20100270681 Bird et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287518 Becker Nov 2010 A1
20100301482 Schultz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014786 Sezginer Jan 2011 A1
20110016909 Mirza et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110108890 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110108891 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110154281 Zach Jun 2011 A1
20110207298 Anderson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110260253 Inaba Oct 2011 A1
20110298025 Haensch et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110317477 Liaw Dec 2011 A1
20120012932 Perng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120118854 Smayling May 2012 A1
20120131528 Chen May 2012 A1
20120273841 Quandt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299065 Shimizu Nov 2012 A1
20130065389 Kagawa Mar 2013 A1
20130097574 Balabanov et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130162293 Lija Jun 2013 A1
20130200465 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130200469 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207198 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207199 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130254732 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140197543 Kornachuk et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150249041 Becker et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150270218 Becker et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160079159 Kornachuk et al. Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (91)
Number Date Country
0102644 Jul 1989 EP
0788166 Aug 1997 EP
1394858 Mar 2004 EP
1670062 Jun 2006 EP
1833091 Aug 2007 EP
1730777 Sep 2007 EP
2251901 Nov 2010 EP
2860920 Apr 2005 FR
58-182242 Oct 1983 JP
58-215827 Dec 1983 JP
61-182244 Aug 1986 JP
S61-202451 Sep 1986 JP
S62-047148 Feb 1987 JP
S63-310136 Dec 1988 JP
H01284115 Nov 1989 JP
03-165061 Jul 1991 JP
H05152937 Jun 1993 JP
H05211437 Aug 1993 JP
H05218362 Aug 1993 JP
H07-153927 Jun 1995 JP
2684980 Jul 1995 JP
1995-302706 Nov 1995 JP
09-282349 Oct 1997 JP
1997-09289251 Nov 1997 JP
10-116911 May 1998 JP
1999-045948 Feb 1999 JP
2000-164811 Jun 2000 JP
2001-068558 Mar 2001 JP
2001-168707 Jun 2001 JP
2001-306641 Nov 2001 JP
2002-026125 Jan 2002 JP
2002-026296 Jan 2002 JP
2002-184870 Jun 2002 JP
2001-056463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-258463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-289703 Oct 2002 JP
2001-272228 Mar 2003 JP
2003-100872 Apr 2003 JP
2003-264231 Sep 2003 JP
2004-013920 Jan 2004 JP
2004-200300 Jul 2004 JP
2004-241529 Aug 2004 JP
2004-342757 Dec 2004 JP
2005-020008 Jan 2005 JP
2003-359375 May 2005 JP
2005-123537 May 2005 JP
2005-135971 May 2005 JP
2005-149265 Jun 2005 JP
2005-183793 Jul 2005 JP
2005-203447 Jul 2005 JP
2005-268610 Sep 2005 JP
2006-073696 Mar 2006 JP
2005-114752 Oct 2006 JP
2006-303022 Nov 2006 JP
2007-012855 Jan 2007 JP
2007-013060 Jan 2007 JP
2007-043049 Feb 2007 JP
2007-141971 Jun 2007 JP
2011-515841 May 2011 JP
10-0417093 Jun 1997 KR
10-1998-087485 Dec 1998 KR
1998-0084215 Dec 1998 KR
10-1999-0057943 Jul 1999 KR
2000-0005660 Jan 2000 KR
10-2000-0028830 May 2000 KR
10-2002-0034313 May 2002 KR
10-2002-0070777 Sep 2002 KR
2003-0022006 Mar 2003 KR
2004-0005609 Jan 2004 KR
10-2005-0030347 Mar 2005 KR
2005-0037965 Apr 2005 KR
2006-0108233 Oct 2006 KR
10-2007-0077162 Jul 2007 KR
386288 Apr 2000 TW
200423404 Nov 2004 TW
200426632 Dec 2004 TW
200534132 Oct 2005 TW
200620017 Jun 2006 TW
200630838 Sep 2006 TW
200709309 Mar 2007 TW
200709565 Mar 2007 TW
200811704 Mar 2008 TW
200947567 Nov 2009 TW
WO 2005104356 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006014849 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006052738 May 2006 WO
WO 2006090445 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2007014053 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007063990 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2007103587 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2009054936 Apr 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (204)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/625,342, Pileggi et al., filed May 25, 2006.
Acar, et al., “A Linear-Centric Simulation Framework for Parametric Fluctuations”, 2002, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University USA, pp. 1-8, Jan. 28, 2002.
Amazawa, et al., “Fully Planarized Four-Level Interconnection with Stacked VLAS Using CMP of Selective CVD-A1 and Insulator and its Application to Quarter Micron Gate Array LSIs”, 1995, IEEE, Japan, pp. 473-476, Dec. 10, 1995.
Axelrad et al. “Efficient Full-Chip Yield Analysis Methodology for OPC-Corrected VLSI Design”, 2000, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 20, 2000.
Balasinski et al. “Impact of Subwavelength CD Tolerance on Device Performance”, 2002, SPIE vol. 4692, Jul. 11, 2002.
Burkhardt, et al., “Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for Back-End-Of-Line Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 26, 2007.
Capetti, et al., “Sub k1=0.25 Lithography with Double Patterning Technique for 45nm Technology Node Flash Memory Devices at λ=193nm”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 27, 2007.
Capodieci, L., et al., “Toward a Methodology for Manufacturability-Driven Design Rule Exploration,” DAC 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, San Diego, CA.
Chandra, et al., “An Interconnect Channel Design Methodology for High Performance Integrated Circuits”, 2004, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004.
Cheng, et al., “Feasibility Study of Splitting Pitch Technology on 45nm Contact Patterning with 0.93 NA”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Chow, et al., “The Design of a SRAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Array—Part II: Circuit Design and Layout”, 1999, IEEE, vol. 7 # 3 pp. 321-330, Sep. 1, 1999.
Clark et al. “Managing Standby and Active Mode Leakage Power in Deep Sub-Micron Design”, Aug. 9, 2004, ACM.
Cobb et al. “Using OPC to Optimize for Image Slope and Improve Process Window”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5130, Apr. 16, 2003.
Devgan “Leakage Issues in IC Design: Part 3”, 2003, ICCAD, Nov. 9, 2003.
DeVor, et al., “Statistical Quality Design and Control”, 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 264-267, Jan. 3, 1992.
Dictionary.com, “channel,” in Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Source location: HarperCollins Publishers. Sep. 3, 2009.
Dusa, et al. “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
El-Gamal, “Fast, Cheap and Under Control: The Next Implementation Fabric”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 354-355.
Firedberg, et al., “Modeling Within-Field Gate Length Spatial Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization,” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5756, pp. 178-188, Feb. 27, 2005.
Frankel, “Quantum State Control Interference Lithography and Trim Double Patterning for 32-16nm Lithography”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 27, 2007.
Garg, et al. “Lithography Driven Layout Design”, 2005, IEEE VLSI Design 2005, Jan. 3, 2005.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology Trends: Resource and Manufacturability Implications for the Implementation of Physical Designs” Apr. 1, 2001, ACM.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design” Jun. 18, 2001, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Enhanced Resist and Etch CD Control by Design Perturbation”, Oct. 4, 2006, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “A Practical Transistor-Level Dual Threshold Voltage Assignment Methodology”, 2005, Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 21, 2005.
Gupta et al. “Detailed Placement for Improved Depth of Focus and CD Control”, 2005, ACM, Jan. 18, 2005.
Gupta et al. “Joining the Design and Mask Flows for Better and Cheaper Masks”, Oct. 14, 2004, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “Manufacturing-Aware Physical Design”, ICCAD 2003, Nov. 9, 2003.
Gupta et al. “Selective Gate-Length Biasing for Cost-Effective Runtime Leakage Control”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Wafer Topography-Aware Optical Proximity Correction for Better DOF Margin and CD Control”, Apr. 13, 2005, SPIE.
Gupta, Puneet, et al., “Manufacturing-aware Design Methodology for Assist Feature Correctness,” SPIE vol. 5756, May 13, 2005.
Ha et al., “Reduction in the Mask Error Factor by Optimizing the Diffraction Order of a Scattering Bar in Lithography,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 46, No. 5, May 5, 2005, pp. 1213-1217.
Hakko, et al., “Extension of the 2D-TCC Technique to Optimize Mask Pattern Layouts,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 7028, 11 pages, Apr. 16, 2008.
Halpin et al., “Detailed Placement with Net Length Constraints,” Publication Year 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications, pp. 22-27, Jun. 30, 2003.
Hayashida, et al., “Manufacturable Local Interconnect technology Fully Compatible with Titanium Salicide Process”, Jun. 11, 1991, VMIC Conference.
Heng, et al., “A VLSI Artwork Legalization Technique Base on a New Criterion of Minimum Layout Perturbation”, Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Physical Design, pp. 116-121, Apr. 14, 1997.
Heng, et al., “Toward Through-Process Layout Quality Metrics”, Mar. 3, 2005, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Hu, et al., “Synthesis and Placement Flow for Gain-Based Programmable Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 6, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 197-203.
Hur et al., “Mongrel: Hybrid Techniques for Standard Cell Placement,” Publication Year 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, ICCAD-2000, pp. 165-170, Nov. 5, 2000.
Hutton, et al., “A Methodology for FPGA to Structured-ASIC Synthesis and Verification”, 2006, EDAA, pp. 64-69, Mar. 6, 2006.
Intel Core Microarchitecture White Paper “Introducing the 45 nm Next-Generation Intel Core Microarchitecture,” Intel Corporation, 2007 (best available publication date).
Jayakumar, et al., “A Metal and VIA Maskset Programmable VLSI Design Methodology using PLAs”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 590-594, Nov. 7, 2004.
Jhaveri, T. et al., Maximization of Layout Printability/Manufacturability by Extreme Layout Regularity, Proc. of the SPIE vol. 6156, Feb. 19, 2006.
Kang, S.M., Metal-Metal Matrix (M3) for High-Speed MOS VLSI Layout, IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. CAD-6, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1987.
Kawashima, et al., “Mask Optimization for Arbitrary Patterns with 2D-TCC Resolution Enhancement Technique,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6924, 12 pages, Feb. 24, 2008.
Kheterpal, et al., “Design Methodology for IC Manufacturability Based on Regular Logic-Bricks”, DAC, Jun. 13, 2005, IEEE/AMC, vol. 6520.
Kheterpal, et al., “Routing Architecture Exploration for Regular Fabrics”, Dac, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 204-207.
Kim, et al., “Double Exposure Using 193nm Negative Tone Photoresist”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Kim, et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Koorapaty, et al., “Exploring Logic Block Granularity for Regular Fabrics”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004.
Koorapaty, et al., “Heterogeneous Logic Block Architectures for Via-Patterned Programmable Fabric”, 13th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Sep. 1, 2003, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2778, pp. 426-436.
Koorapaty, et al., “Modular, Fabric-Specific Synthesis for Programmable Architectures”, 12th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL_2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)), Sep. 2, 2002, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2438 pp. 132-141.
Kuh et al., “Recent Advances in VLSI Layout,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 237-263, Feb. 1, 1990.
Lavin et al. “Backend DAC Flows for “Restrictive Design Rules””, 2004, IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004.
Li, et al., “A Linear-Centric Modeling Approach to Harmonic Balance Analysis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Mar. 4, 2002.
Li, et al., “Nonlinear Distortion Analysis Via Linear-Centric Models”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 897-903, Jan. 21, 2003.
Liebmann et al., “Integrating DfM Components into a Cohesive Design-to-Silicon Solution,” Proc. SPIE 5756, Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III, Feb. 27, 2005.
Liebmann et al., “Optimizing Style Options for Sub-Resolution Assist Features,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, Feb. 25, 2001, pp. 141-152.
Liebmann, et al., “High-Performance Circuit Design for the RET-Enabled 65nm Technology Node”, Feb. 26, 2004, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 5379 pp. 20-29.
Liebmann, L. W., Layout Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques: Impediment or Opportunity?, International Symposium on Physical Design, Apr. 6, 2003.
Liu et al., “Double Patterning with Multilayer Hard Mask Shrinkage for Sub 0.25 k1 Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, Feb. 25, 2007.
Mansfield et al., “Lithographic Comparison of Assist Feature Design Strategies,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4000, Feb. 27, 2000, pp. 63-76.
Miller, “Manufacturing-Aware Design Helps Boost IC Yield”, Sep. 9, 2004, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47102054.
Mishra, P., et al., “FinFET Circuit Design,” Nanoelectronic Circuit Design, pp. 23-54, Dec. 21, 2010.
Mo, et al., “Checkerboard: A Regular Structure and its Synthesis, International Workshop on Logic and Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, California, pp. 1-7, Jun. 1, 2003.
Mo, et al., “PLA-Based Regular Structures and Their Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, IEEE, pp. 723-729, Jun. 1, 2003.
Mo, et al., “Regular Fabrics in Deep Sub-Micron Integrated-Circuit Design”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Entire Book, Jun. 1, 2002.
Moore, Samuel K., “Intel 45-nanometer Penryn Processors Arrive,” Nov. 13, 2007, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/intel-45nanometer-penryn-processors-arrive.
Mutoh et al. “1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS”, 1995, IEEE, Aug. 1, 1995.
Op de Beek, et al., “Manufacturability issues with Double Patterning for 50nm half pitch damascene applications, using RELACS® shrink and corresponding OPC”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Or-Bach, “Programmable Circuit Fabrics”, Sep. 18, 2001, e-ASIC, pp. 1-36.
Otten, et al., “Planning for Performance”, DAC 1998, ACM Inc., pp. 122-127, Jun. 15, 1998.
Pack et al. “Physical & Timing Verification of Subwavelength-Scale Designs—Part I: Lithography Impact on MOSFETs”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5042, Feb. 23, 2003.
Pandini, et al., “Congestion-Aware Logic Synthesis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-8, Mar. 4, 2002.
Pandini, et al., “Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Wiring Congestion During Technology Mapping”, ISPD Apr. 7, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 131-136.
Patel, et al., “An Architectural Exploration of via Patterned Gate Arrays, ISPD 2003”, Apr. 6, 2003, pp. 184-189.
Pham, D., et al., “FINFET Device Junction Formation Challenges,” 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology, pp. 73-77, Aug. 1, 2006.
Pileggi, et al., “Exploring Regular Fabrics to Optimize the Performance-Cost Trade-Offs, Proceedings of the 40th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2003”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 782-787.
Poonawala, et al., “ILT for Double Exposure Lithography with Conventional and Novel Materials”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Qian et al. “Advanced Physical Models for Mask Data Verification and Impacts on Physical Layout Synthesis” 2003 IEEE, Mar. 24, 2003.
Ran, et al., “An Integrated Design Flow for a Via-Configurable Gate Array”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 582-589, Nov. 7, 2004.
Ran, et al., “Designing a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Proceedings of the IEEE, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 423-426.
Ran, et al., “On Designing Via-Configurable Cell Blocks for Regular Fabrics” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, s 198-203.
Ran, et al., “The Magic of a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) Oct. 11, 2004.
Ran, et al., “Via-Configurable Routing Architectures and Fast Design Mappability Estimation for Regular Fabrics”, 2005, IEEE, pp. 25-32, Sep. 1, 2006.
Reis, et al., “Physical Design Methodologies for Performance Predictability and Manufacturability”, Apr. 14, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 390-397.
Robertson, et al., “The Modeling of Double Patterning Lithographic Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Rosenbluth, et al., “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape,” 2001 Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, pp. 486-502, Feb. 25, 2001.
Rovner, “Design for Manufacturability in Via Programmable Gate Arrays”, May 1, 2003, Graduate School of Carnegie Mellon University.
Sengupta, “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1998, Thesis for Rice University, pp. 1-101, Nov. 1, 1998.
Sengupta, et al., “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1996, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 2726; pp. 244-252, Mar. 10, 1996.
Sherlekar, “Design Considerations for Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 18, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 97-102.
Shi et al., “Understanding the Forbidden Pitch and Assist Feature Placement,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4562, pp. 968-979, Mar. 11, 2002.
Smayling et al., “APF Pitch Halving for 22 nm Logic Cells Using Gridded Design Rules,” Proceedings of SPIE, USA, vol. 6925, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 69251E-1-69251E-7.
Socha, et al., “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO),” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5853, pp. 180-193, Apr. 13, 2005.
Sreedhar et al. “Statistical Yield Modeling for Sub-Wavelength Lithography”, 2008 IEEE, Oct. 28, 2008.
Stapper, “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns”, Jul. 1, 1984, IBM, vol. 28 # 4, pp. 461-475.
Taylor, et al., “Enabling Energy Efficiency in Via-Patterned Gate Array Devices”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 874-877.
Tian et al. “Model-Based Dummy Feature Placement for Oxide Chemical_Mechanical Polishing Manufacturability” IEEE, vol. 20, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2001.
Tong, et al., “Regular Logic Fabrics for a Via Patterned Gate Array (VPGA), Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 21, 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 53-56.
Vanleenhove, et al., “A Litho-Only Approach to Double Patterning”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Wang, et al., “Performance Optimization for Gridded-Layout Standard Cells”, vol. 5567 SPIE, Sep. 13, 2004.
Wang, J. et al., Standard Cell Layout with Regular Contact Placement, IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Mfg., vol. 17, No. 3, Aug. 9, 2004.
Webb, Clair, “45nm Design for Manufacturing,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 02, Jun. 17, 2008, ISSN 1535-864X, pp. 121-130.
Webb, Clair, “Layout Rule Trends and Affect upon CPU Design”, vol. 6156 SPIE, Feb. 19, 2006.
Wenren, et al., “The Improvement of Photolithographic Fidelity of Two-dimensional Structures Though Double Exposure Method”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Wilcox, et al., “Design for Manufacturability: A Key to Semiconductor Manufacturing Excellence”, 1998 IEEE, pp. 308-313, Sep. 23, 1998.
Wong, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability: Containing and Accounting for Variabilities in Integrated Circuit Creation,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 27, 2007, vol. 6(3), 2 pages.
Wu, et al., “A Study of Process Window Capabilities for Two-dimensional Structures under Double Exposure Condition”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Xiong, et al., “The Constrained Via Minimization Problem for PCB and VLSI Design”, 1988 ACM Press/IEEE, pp. 573-578, Jun. 12, 1998.
Yamamaoto, et al., “New Double Exposure Technique without Alternating Phase Shift Mask”, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Yamazoe, et al., “Resolution Enhancement by Aerial Image Approximation with 2D-TCC,” 2007 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6730, 12 pages, Sep. 17, 2007.
Yang, et al., “Interconnection Driven VLSI Module Placement Based on Quadratic Programming and Considering Congestion Using LFF Principles”, 2004 IEEE, pp. 1243-1247, Jun. 27, 2004.
Yao, et al., “Multilevel Routing With Redundant Via Insertion”, Oct. 23, 2006, IEEE, pp. 1148-1152.
Yu, et al., “True Process Variation Aware Optical Proximity Correction with Variational Lithography Modeling and Model Calibration,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 11, 2007, vol. 6(3), 16 pages.
Zheng, et al. “Modeling and Analysis of Regular Symmetrically Structured Power/Ground Distribution Networks”, DAC, Jun. 10, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 395-398.
Zhu, et al., “A Stochastic Integral Equation Method for Modeling the Rough Surface Effect on Interconnect Capacitance”, 2004 IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004.
Zhu, et al., “A Study of Double Exposure Process Design with Balanced Performance Parameters for Line/Space Applications”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Zuchowski, et al., “A Hybrid ASIC and FPGA Architecture”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 187-194, Nov. 10, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “A Comprehensive Layout Methodology and Layout-Specific Circuit Analyses for Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” Mar. 21, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “Layout-Specific Circuit Evaluation in 3-D Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2003.
Aubusson, Russel, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Memory,” Apr. 1, 1979.
Bachtold, “Logic Circuits with Carbon,” Nov. 9, 2001.
Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Nov. 1, 2004.
Baldi et al., “A Scalable Single Poly EEPROM Cell for Embedded Memory Applications,” pp. 1-4, Fig. 1, Sep. 1, 1997.
Cao, Ke, “Design for Manufacturing (DFM) in Submicron VLSI Design,” Aug. 1, 2007.
Capodieci, Luigi, “From Optical Proximity Correction to Lithography-Driven Physical Design (1996-2006): 10 years of Resolution Enhancement Technology and the roadmap enablers for the next decade,” Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615401, Mar. 20, 2006.
Chang, Leland et al., “Stable SRAM Cell Design for the 32 nm Node and Beyond,” Jun. 16, 2005.
Cheung, Peter, “Layout Design,” Apr. 4, 2004.
Chinnery, David, “Closing the Gap Between ASIC & Custom: Tools and Techniques for High-Performance ASIC Design,” Jun. 30, 2002.
Chou, Dyiann et al., “Line End Optimization through Optical Proximity Correction (OPC): A Case Study,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Clein, Dan, “CMOS IC Layout: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools,” Dec. 22, 1999.
Cowell, “Exploiting Non-Uniform Access Time,” Jul. 1, 2003.
Das, Shamik, “Design Automation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2004.
Dehaene, W. et al., “Technology-Aware Design of SRAM Memory Circuits,” Mar. 1, 2007.
Deng, Liang et al., “Coupling-aware Dummy Metal Insertion for Lithography,” p. 1, col. 2, Jan. 23, 2007.
Devoivre et al., “Validated 90nm CMOS Technology Platform with Low-k Copper Interconnects for Advanced System-on-Chip (SoC),” Jul. 12, 2002.
Enbody, R. J., “Near-Optimal n-Layer Channel Routing,” Jun. 29, 1986.
Ferretti, Marcos et al., “High Performance Asynchronous ASIC Back-End Design Flow Using Single-Track Full-Buffer Standard Cells,” Apr. 23, 2004.
Garg, Manish et al., “Litho-driven Layouts for Reducing Performance Variability,” p. 2, Figs. 2b-2c, May 23, 2005.
Greenway, Robert et al., “32nm 1-D Regular Pitch SRAM Bitcell Design for Interference-Assisted Lithography,” Oct. 6, 2008.
Gupta et al., “Modeling Edge Placement Error Distribution in Standard Cell Library,” Feb. 23, 2006.
Grad, Johannes et al., “A standard cell library for student projects,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Jun. 2, 2003.
Hartono, Roy et al., “Active Device Generation for Automatic Analog Layout Retargeting Tool,” May 13, 2004.
Hartono, Roy et al., “IPRAIL—Intellectual Property Reuse-based Analog IC Layout Automation,” Mar. 17, 2003.
Hastings, Alan, “The Art of Analog Layout (2nd Edition),” Jul. 4, 2005.
Hurat et al., “A Genuine Design Manufacturability Check for Designers,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Institute of Microelectronic Systems, “Digital Subsystem Design,” Oct. 13, 2006.
Ishida, M. et al., “A Novel 6T-SRAM Cell Technology Designed with Rectangular Patterns Scalable beyond 0.18 pm Generation and Desirable for Ultra High Speed Operation,” IEDM 1998, Dec. 6, 1998.
Jakusovszky, “Linear IC Parasitic Element Simulation Methodology,” Oct. 1, 1993.
Jangkrajarng, Nuttorn et al., “Template-Based Parasitic-Aware Optimization and Retargeting of Analog and RF Integrated Circuit Layouts,” Nov. 5, 2006.
Kahng, Andrew B., “Design Optimizations DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial, part V),” Jul. 24, 2006.
Kang, Sung-Mo et al., “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design,” Oct. 29, 2002.
Kottoor, Mathew Francis, “Development of a Standard Cell Library based on Deep Sub-Micron SCMOS Design Rules using Open Source Software (MS Thesis),” Aug. 1, 2005.
Kubicki, “Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage (available at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1468/4),” Sep. 9, 2004.
Kuhn, Kelin J., “Reducing Variation in Advanced Logic Technologies: Approaches to Process and Design for Manufacturability of Nanoscale CMOS,” p. 27, Dec. 12, 2007.
Kurokawa, Atsushi et al., “Dummy Filling Methods for Reducing Interconnect Capacitance and Number of Fills, Proc. of ISQED,” pp. 586-591, Mar. 21, 2005.
Lavin, Mark, “Open Access Requirements from RDR Design Flows,” Nov. 11, 2004.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “Layout Methodology Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques,” pp. 5-6, Apr. 6, 2003.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” Sep. 1, 2001.
Lin, Chung-Wei et al., “Recent Research and Emerging Challenges in Physical Design for Manufacturability/Reliability,” Jan. 26, 2007.
McCullen, Kevin W., “Layout Techniques for Phase Correct and Gridded Wiring,” pp. 13, 17, Fig. 5, Dec. 1, 2006.
MOSIS, “Design Rules MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) (Revision 8.00),” Oct. 4, 2004.
MOSIS, “MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) Design Rules (Revision 7.2),” Jan. 1, 1995.
Muta et al., “Manufacturability-Aware Design of Standard Cells,” pp. 2686-2690, Figs. 3, 12, Dec. 1, 2007.
Na, Kee-Yeol et al., “A Novel Single Polysilicon EEPROM Cell With a Polyfinger Capacitor,” Nov. 30, 2007.
Pan et al., “Redundant Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005.
Park, Tae Hong, “Characterization and Modeling of Pattern Dependencies in Copper Interconnects for Integrated Circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, May 24, 2002.
Patel, Chetan, “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays (CMU Master's Project),” May 1, 2003.
Pease, R. Fabian et al., “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” IEEE 2008, vol. 96, Issue 2, Jan. 16, 2008.
Serrano, Diego Emilio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Facultad De Ingenieria, Departamento De Electronica, “Diseño De Multiplicador 4 X 8 en VLSI, Introduction al VLSI,” 2006 (best available publication date).
Pramanik, “Impact of layout on variability of devices for sub 90nm technologies,” 2004 (best available publication date).
Pramanik, Dipankar et al., “Lithography-driven layout of logic cells for 65-nm node (SPIE Proceedings vol. 5042),” Jul. 10, 2003.
Roy et al., “Extending Aggressive Low-K1 Design Rule Requirements for 90 and 65 Nm Nodes Via Simultaneous Optimization of Numerical Aperture, Illumination and Optical Proximity Correction,” J.Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(2), 023003, Apr. 26, 2005.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Layout Basics: A Practical Guide,” Chapter 3, Nov. 5, 2001.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Mask Design: Essential Layout Techniques,” May 24, 2002.
Scheffer, “Physical CAD Changes to Incorporate Design for Lithography and Manufacturability,” Feb. 4, 2004.
Smayling, Michael C., “Part 3: Test Structures, Test Chips, In-Line Metrology & Inspection,” Jul. 24, 2006.
Spence, Chris, “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis: How OPC is changing IC Design, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX,” May 6, 2005.
Subramaniam, Anupama R., “Design Rule Optimization of Regular layout for Leakage Reduction in Nanoscale Design,” pp. 474-478, Mar. 24, 2008.
Tang, C. W. et al., “A compact large signal model of LDMOS,” Solid-State Electronics 46(2002) 2111-2115, May 17, 2002.
Taylor, Brian et al., “Exact Combinatorial Optimization Methods for Physical Design of Regular Logic Bricks,” Jun. 8, 2007.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Dummy Feature Placement for Chemical-Mechanical Uniformity in a Shallow Trench Isolation Process,” IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-71, Jan. 1, 2002.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Proximity Dummy Feature Placement and Selective Via Sizing for Process Uniformity in a Trench-First-Via-Last Dual-Inlaid Metal Process,” Proc. of IITC, pp. 48-50, Jun. 6, 2001.
Torres, J. A. et al., “RET Compliant Cell Generation for sub-130nm Processes,” SPIE vol. 4692, Mar. 6, 2002.
Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” Chapters 2, 3, 5, and Part 3, Jul. 30, 2001.
Uyemura, John, “Chip Design for Submicron VLSI: CMOS Layout and Simulation,” Chapters 2-5, 7-9, Feb. 8, 2005.
Verhaegen et al., “Litho Enhancements for 45nm-nod MuGFETs,” Aug. 1, 2005.
Wong, Ban P., “Bridging the Gap between Dreams and Nano-Scale Reality (DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial),” Jul. 28, 2006.
Wang, Dunwei et al., “Complementary Symmetry Silicon Nanowire Logic: Power-Efficient Inverters with Gain,” Aug. 17, 2006.
Wang, Jun et al., “Effects of grid-placed contacts on circuit performance,” pp. 135-139, Figs. 2, 4-8, Feb. 28, 2003.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with regularly placed contacts and gates (SPIE vol. 5379),” Feb. 22, 2004.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with resolution-enhancement-technique-driven regularly placed contacts and gates,” J. Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(1), 013001, Mar. 16, 2005.
Watson, Bruce, “Challenges and Automata Applications in Chip-Design Software,” pp. 38-40, Jul. 16, 2007.
Weste, Neil et al., “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 3rd Edition,” May 21, 2004.
Wingerden, Johannes van, “Experimental verification of improved printability for litho-driven designs,” Mar. 14, 2005.
Wong, Alfred K., “Microlithography: Trends, Challenges, Solutions and Their Impact on Design,” Micro IEEE vol. 23, Issue 2, Apr. 29, 2003.
Xu, Gang, “Redundant-Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” Proceedings of ASP-DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005.
Yang, Jie, “Manufacturability Aware Design,” pp. 93, 102, Fig. 5.2, Jan. 16, 2008.
Yongshun, Wang et al., “Static Induction Devices with Planar Type Buried Gate,” Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2004.
Zobrist, George (editor), “Progress in Computer Aided VLSI Design: Implementations (Ch. 5),” Ablex Publishing Corporation, Feb. 1, 1990.
Petley, Graham, “VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Library Design,” from website www.vlsitechnology.org, Jan. 11, 2005.
Liebmann, Lars, et al., “Layout Optimization at the Pinnacle of Optical Lithography,” Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 8, 2003.
Kawasaki, H., et al., “Challenges and Solutions of FinFET Integration in an SRAM Cell and a Logic Circuit for 22 nm node and beyond,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2009 IEEE International, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 7, 2009, pp. 1-4.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170229441 A1 Aug 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60892982 Mar 2007 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14195600 Mar 2014 US
Child 15497103 US
Parent 12041584 Mar 2008 US
Child 14195600 US