The present invention generally relates to processes and systems for cooling or liquefying gases and, more particularly, to an improved mixed refrigerant system and method for cooling or liquefying gases.
Natural gas, which is primarily methane, and other gases, are liquefied under pressure for storage and transport. The reduction in volume that results from liquefaction permits containers of more practical and economical design to be used. Liquefaction is typically accomplished by chilling the gas through indirect heat exchange by one or more refrigeration cycles. Such refrigeration cycles are costly both in terms equipment cost and operation due to the complexity of the required equipment and the required efficiency of performance of the refrigerant. There is a need, therefore, for gas cooling and liquefaction systems having improved refrigeration efficiency and reduced operating costs with reduced complexity.
Liquefaction of natural gas requires cooling of the natural gas stream to approximately −160° C. to −170° C. and then letting down the pressure to approximately ambient.
A refrigeration process is necessary to supply the cooling for liquefying natural gas, and the most efficient processes will have heating curves which closely approach the cooling curves in
Cascaded, multilevel, pure component cycles were initially used with refrigerants such as propylene, ethylene, methane, and nitrogen. With enough levels, such cycles can generate a net heating curve which approximates the cooling curves shown in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,066 to Manley describes a cascaded, multilevel, mixed refrigerant process as applied to the similar refrigeration demands for ethylene recovery which eliminates the thermodynamic inefficiencies of the cascaded multilevel pure component process. This is because the refrigerants vaporize at rising temperatures following the gas cooling curve and the liquid refrigerant is subcooled before flashing thus reducing thermodynamic irreversibility. In addition, the mechanical complexity is somewhat less because only two different refrigerant cycles are required instead of the three or four required for the pure refrigerant processes. U.S. U.S. Pat. No. 4,525,185 to Newton; U.S. Pat. No. 4,545,795 to Liu et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,063 to Paradowski et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,619 to Fischer et al. all show variations on this theme applied to natural gas liquefaction as do U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2007/0227185 to Stone et al. and 2007/0283718 to Hulsey et al.
The cascaded, multilevel, mixed refrigerant process is the most efficient known, but a simpler, efficient process which can be more easily operated is desirable for most plants.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,033,735 to Swenson describes a single mixed refrigerant process which requires only one compressor for the refrigeration process and which further reduces the mechanical complexity. However, for primarily two reasons, the process consumes somewhat more power than the cascaded, multilevel, mixed refrigerant process discussed above.
First, it is difficult, if not impossible, to find a single mixed refrigerant composition which will generate a net heating curve closely following the typical natural gas cooling curves shown in
Second, for the single mixed refrigerant process, all of the components in the refrigerant are carried to the lowest temperature level even though the higher boiling components only provide refrigeration at the warmer end of the refrigerated portion of the process. This requires energy to cool and reheat these components which are “inert” at the lower temperatures. This is not the case with either the cascaded, multilevel, pure component refrigeration process or the cascaded, multilevel, mixed refrigerant process.
To mitigate this second inefficiency and also address the first, numerous solutions have been developed which separate a heavier fraction from a single mixed refrigerant, use the heavier fraction at the higher temperature levels of refrigeration, and then recombine it with the lighter fraction for subsequent compression. U.S. Pat. No. 2,041,725 to Podbielniak describes one way of doing this which incorporates several phase separation stages at below ambient temperatures. U.S. Pat. No. 3,364,685 to Perret; U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,972 to Sarsten, U.S. Pat. No. 4,274,849 to Garner et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,901,533 to Fan et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,644,931 to Ueno et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,813,250 to Ueno et al; U.S. Pat. No. 6,065,305 to Arman et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,531 to Roberts et al. and U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0205366 to Schmidt also show variations on this theme. When carefully designed they can improve energy efficiency even though the recombining of streams not at equilibrium is thermodynamically inefficient. This is because the light and heavy fractions are separated at high pressure and then recombined at low pressure so they may be compressed together in the single compressor. Whenever streams are separated at equilibrium, separately processed and then recombined at non-equilibrium conditions, a thermodynamic loss occurs which ultimately increases power consumption. Therefore the number of such separations should be minimized. All of these processes use simple vapor/liquid equilibrium at various places in the refrigeration process to separate a heavier fraction from a lighter one.
Simple one stage vapor/liquid equilibrium separation, however, doesn't concentrate the fractions as much as may be accomplished using multiple equilibrium stages with reflux. Greater concentration allows greater precision in isolating a composition which will provide refrigeration over a specific range of temperatures. This enhances the process ability to follow the S-shaped cooling curves in
As illustrated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0227185 to Stone et al., it is known to remove partially vaporized refrigeration streams from the refrigerated portion of the process. Stone et al. does this for mechanical reasons (not thermodynamic) and in the context of a cascaded, multilevel, mixed refrigerant process requiring two, separate, mixed refrigerants. In addition, the partially vaporized refrigeration streams are completely vaporized upon recombination with their previously separated vapor fractions immediately prior to compression.
In accordance with the invention, and as explained in greater detail below, simple equilibrium separation of a heavy fraction is sufficient to significantly improve the mixed refrigerant process efficiency if that heavy fraction isn't entirely vaporized as it leaves the primary heat exchanger of the process. This means that some liquid refrigerant will be present at the compressor suction and must beforehand be separated and pumped to a higher pressure. When the liquid refrigerant is mixed with the vaporized lighter fraction of the refrigerant, the compressor suction gas is greatly cooled and the required compressor power is further reduced. Equilibrium separation of the heavy fraction during an intermediate stage also reduces the load on the second or higher stage compressor(s), resulting in improved process efficiency. Heavy components of the refrigerant are also kept out of the cold end of the process, reducing the possibility of refrigerant freezing.
Furthermore, use of the heavy fraction in an independent pre-cool refrigeration loop results in near closure of heating/cooling curves at the warm end of the heat exchanger, giving a more efficient use of the refrigeration. This is best illustrated in
A process flow diagram and schematic illustrating an embodiment of the system and method of the invention is provided in
As illustrated in
The system of
The removal of heat is accomplished in the heat exchanger using a single mixed refrigerant and the remaining portion of the system illustrated in
With reference to the upper right portion of
Streams 18 and 24 are combined and equilibrated in interstage drum 22 which results in separated intermediate pressure vapor stream 28 exiting the vapor outlet of the drum 22 and intermediate pressure liquid stream 32 exiting the liquid outlet of the drum. Intermediate pressure liquid stream 32, which is warm and a heavy fraction, exits the liquid side of drum 22 and enters pre-cool liquid passage 33 of heat exchanger 6 and is subcooled by heat exchange with the various cooling streams, described below, also passing through the heat exchanger. The resulting stream 34 exits the heat exchanger and is flashed through expansion valve 36. As an alternative to the expansion valve 36, another type of expansion device could be used, including, but not limited to, a turbine or an orifice. The resulting stream 38 reenters the heat exchanger 6 to provide additional refrigeration via pre-cool refrigeration passage 39. Stream 42 exits the warm end 7 of the heat exchanger as a two-phase mixture with a significant liquid fraction.
Intermediate pressure vapor stream 28 travels from the vapor outlet of drum 22 to second or last stage compressor 44 where it is compressed to a high pressure. Stream 46 exits the compressor 44 and travels through second or last stage after-cooler 48 where it is cooled. The resulting stream 52 contains both vapor and liquid phases which are separated in accumulator drum 54. While an accumulator drum 54 is illustrated, alternative separation devices may be used, including, but not limited to, another type of vessel, a cyclonic separator, a distillation unit, a coalescing separator or mesh or vane type mist eliminator. High pressure vapor refrigerant stream 56 exits the vapor outlet of drum 54 and travels to the warm side of the heat exchanger 6. High pressure liquid refrigerant stream 58 exists the liquid outlet of drum 54 and also travels to the warm end of the heat exchanger 6. It should be noted that first stage compressor 11 and first stage after-cooler 16 make up a first compression and cooling cycle while last stage compressor 44 and last stage after-cooler 48 make up a last compression and cooling cycle. It should also be noted, however, that each cooling cycle stage could alternatively features multiple compressors and/or after-coolers.
Warm, high pressure, vapor refrigerant stream 56 is cooled, condensed and subcooled as it travels through high pressure vapor passage 59 of the heat exchanger 6. As a result, stream 62 exits the cold end of the heat exchanger 6. Stream 62 is flashed through expansion valve 64 and re-enters the heat exchanger as stream 66 to provide refrigeration as stream 67 traveling through primary refrigeration passage 65. As an alternative to the expansion valve 64, another type of expansion device could be used, including, but not limited to, a turbine or an orifice.
Warm, high pressure liquid refrigerant stream 58 enters the heat exchanger 6 and is subcooled in high pressure liquid passage 69. The resulting stream 68 exits the heat exchanger and is flashed through expansion valve 72. As an alternative to the expansion valve 72, another type of expansion device could be used, including, but not limited to, a turbine or an orifice. The resulting stream 74 re-enters the heat exchanger 6 where it joins and is combined with stream 67 in primary refrigeration passage 65 to provide additional refrigeration as stream 76 and exit the warm end of the heat exchanger 6 as a superheated vapor stream 78.
Superheated vapor stream 78 and stream 42 which, as noted above, is a two-phase mixture with a significant liquid fraction, enter low pressure suction drum 82 through vapor and mixed phase inlets, respectively, and are combined and equilibrated in the low pressure suction drum. While a suction drum 82 is illustrated, alternative separation devices may be used, including, but not limited to, another type of vessel, a cyclonic separator, a distillation unit, a coalescing separator or mesh or vane type mist eliminator. As a result, a low pressure vapor refrigerant stream 12 exits the vapor outlet of drum 82. As stated above, the stream 12 travels to the inlet of the first stage compressor 11. The blending of mixed phase stream 42 with stream 78, which includes a vapor of greatly different composition, in the suction drum 82 at the suction inlet of the compressor 11 creates a partial flash cooling effect that lowers the temperature of the vapor stream traveling to the compressor, and thus the compressor itself, and thus reduces the power required to operate it.
A low pressure liquid refrigerant stream 84, which has also been lowered in temperature by the flash cooling effect of mixing, exits the liquid outlet of drum 82 and is pumped to intermediate pressure by pump 26. As described above, the outlet stream 24 from the pump travels to the interstage drum 22.
As a result, in accordance with the invention, a pre-cool refrigerant loop, which includes streams 32, 34, 38 and 42, enters the warm side of the heat exchanger 6 and exits with a significant liquid fraction. The partially liquid stream 42 is combined with spent refrigerant vapor from stream 78 for equilibration and separation in suction drum 82, compression of the resultant vapor in compressor 11 and pumping of the resulting liquid by pump 26. The equilibrium in suction drum 82 reduces the temperature of the stream entering the compressor 11, by both heat and mass transfer, thus reducing the power usage by the compressor.
Composite heating and cooling curves for the process in
It should be noted that the embodiment described above is for a representative natural gas feed at supercritical pressure. The optimal refrigerant composition and operating conditions will change when liquefying other, less pure, natural gases at different pressures. The advantage of the process remains, however, because of its thermodynamic efficiency.
A process flow diagram and schematic illustrating a second embodiment of the system and method of the invention is provided in
A process flow diagram and schematic illustrating a third embodiment of the system and method of the invention is provided in
A first stage compressor 131 receives the low pressure vapor refrigerant stream 126 and compresses it to an intermediate pressure. The compressed stream 132 then travels to a first stage after-cooler 134 where it is cooled. Meanwhile, liquid from the liquid outlet of return separator drum 120 travels as return liquid stream 136 to pump 138, and the resulting stream 142 then joins stream 132 upstream from the first stage after-cooler 134.
The intermediate pressure mixed phase refrigerant stream 144 leaving first stage after-cooler 134 travels to interstage drum 146. While an interstage drum 146 is illustrated, alternative separation devices may be used, including, but not limited to, another type of vessel, a cyclonic separator, a distillation unit, a coalescing separator or mesh or vane type mist eliminator. A separated intermediate pressure vapor stream 28 exits the vapor outlet of the interstage drum 146 and an intermediate pressure liquid stream 32 exits the liquid outlet of the drum. Intermediate pressure vapor stream 28 travels to second stage compressor 44, while intermediate pressure liquid stream 32, which is a warm and heavy fraction, travels to the heat exchanger 6, as described above with respect to the embodiment of
In a fourth embodiment of the system and method of the invention, illustrated in
Each one of the pre-cooling systems 202, 204 or 206 could be incorporated into or rely on heat exchanger 6 for operation or could include a chiller that may be, for example, a second multi-stream heat exchanger. In addition, two or all three of the pre-cooling systems 202, 204 and/or 206 could be incorporated into a single multi-stream heat exchanger. While any pre-cooling system known in the art could be used, the pre-cooling systems of
In addition to being provided with a pre-cooling system 202, the system of
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of prior application Ser. No. 15/227,235, filed Aug. 3, 2016, which is a divisional application of prior application Ser. No. 12/726,142, filed Mar. 17, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2041725 | Podbielniak | Jul 1934 | A |
3364685 | Perret | Jan 1968 | A |
4033735 | Swenson | Jul 1977 | A |
4057972 | Sarsten | Nov 1977 | A |
4274849 | Garier et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4525185 | Newton | Jun 1985 | A |
4545795 | Liu et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4586942 | Gauthier | May 1986 | A |
4689063 | Paradowski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4856942 | Bernadic et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4901533 | Fan et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5644931 | Ueno | Jul 1997 | A |
5718126 | Capron et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5746066 | Manley | May 1998 | A |
5813250 | Ueno et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5950450 | Bowen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6041619 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065305 | Arman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6250105 | Kimble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6334334 | Stockmann et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347531 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
20070227185 | Stone et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070283718 | Hulsey et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090205366 | Schmidt | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090241593 | Jager et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110219819 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226008 | Gushanas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19612173 | May 1997 | DE |
19937623 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10209799 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10194530 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102010011052 | Sep 2011 | DE |
102011104725 | Dec 2012 | DE |
008823 | Mar 1980 | EP |
0644996 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0768502 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0975923 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1016842 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1092930 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1092931 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1118827 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1144928 | Oct 2001 | EP |
2399091 | Dec 2001 | EP |
0990108 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1248935 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1137902 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1273860 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1306632 | May 2003 | EP |
1309973 | May 2003 | EP |
1352209 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1397629 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1092932 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1092933 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1304535 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1455152 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1323994 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1281033 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1668300 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1774234 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1709923 | May 2007 | EP |
1812760 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1864062 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1881283 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1929227 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1946026 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2005056 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2052197 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2074364 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2092257 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2110630 | Oct 2009 | EP |
1456589 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2165138 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2185877 | May 2010 | EP |
2199716 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2212402 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2229566 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2251625 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2366085 | Sep 2011 | EP |
1613910 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2547972 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2550496 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2562501 | Feb 2013 | EP |
1613909 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2600088 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2764972 | Dec 1998 | FR |
2841330 | Dec 2003 | FR |
28885673 | Nov 2006 | FR |
2891900 | Apr 2007 | FR |
1122860 | Aug 1968 | GB |
2326465 | Dec 1998 | GB |
278711 | Jul 2012 | GB |
H8-159652 | Jun 1996 | JP |
H9-113129 | May 1997 | JP |
2002-0508055 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-0532674 | Oct 2002 | JP |
WO 9424500 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO 9848227 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0036350 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0139200 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 01044735 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0229337 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02050483 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02101307 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03074955 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2005028976 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2006007278 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006009610 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006047098 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006094675 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006120127 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007021351 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007042662 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007120782 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008006867 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008020044 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008034875 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008074718 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009007435 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009050178 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009029142 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009061777 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009-085937 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010058277 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010096305 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010133482 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011115760 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011117655 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2012023752 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2012075266 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012112692 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012167007 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2013055305 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013081979 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013087570 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 20130875571 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2014116363 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2011/027162 dated Mar. 3, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2014/031135 dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
Office Action issued in Mexican Application No. MX/a/2012/010726 dated Mar. 12, 2015. |
Supplementary European Search Report issued in EP11756720 dated Jun. 1, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170051968 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12726142 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 15227235 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15227235 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 15345957 | US |