1. Field of the Invention
The general field of the invention relates to a unique electromagnetic building block which can be used for radiating and non-radiating electromagnetic devices. Embodiments of the invention relate generally to antenna structures and, more particularly, to antenna structure having a radiating element integrated to a waveguide, and to antenna having an array of radiating elements integrated to a waveguide.
2. Related Arts
Various antennas are known in the art for receiving and transmitting electromagnetic radiation. Physically, an antenna consists of a radiating element made of conductors that generate radiating electromagnetic field in response to an applied electric and the associated magnetic field. The process is bi-directional, i.e., when placed in an electromagnetic field, the field will induce an alternating current in the antenna and a voltage would be generated between the antenna's terminals. The feed line, or transmission line, conveys the signal between the antenna and the transceiver. The feed line may include antenna coupling networks and/or waveguides. An antenna array refers to two or more antennas coupled to a common source or load so as to produce a directional radiation pattern. The spatial relationship between individual antennas contributes to the directivity of the antenna.
While the antenna disclosed herein is generic and maybe applicable to a multitude of applications, one particular application that can immensely benefit from the subject antenna is the reception of satellite television (Direct Broadcast Satellite, or “DBS”), both in a stationary and mobile setting. Fixed DBS, reception is accomplished with a directional antenna aimed at a geostationary satellite. In mobile DBS, the antenna is situated on a moving vehicle (earth bound, marine, or airborne). In such a situation, as the vehicle moves, the antenna needs to be continuously aimed at the satellite. Various mechanisms are used to cause the antenna to track the satellite during motion, such as a motorized mechanism and/or use of phase-shift antenna arrays. Further general information about mobile DBS can be found in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,529,706, which is incorporated herein by reference.
One known two-dimensional beam steering antenna uses a phased array design, in which each element of the array has a phase shifter and amplifier connected thereto. A typical array design for planar arrays uses either micro-strip technology or slotted waveguide technology (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,579,019). With micro-strip technology, antenna efficiency greatly diminishes as the size of the antenna increases. With slotted waveguide technology, the systems incorporate complex components and bends, and very narrow slots, the dimensions and geometry of all of which have to be tightly controlled during the manufacturing process. The phase shifters and amplifiers are used to provide two-dimensional, hemispherical coverage. However, phase shifters are costly and, particularly if the phased array incorporates many elements, the overall antenna cost can be quite high. Also, phase shifters require separate, complex control circuitry, which translates into unreasonable cost and system complexity.
A technology similar to DBS, called GBS (Global Broadcast Service) uses commercial-off-the-shelf technologies to provide wideband data and real-time video via satellite to a diverse user community associated with the US Government. The GBS system developed by the Space Technology Branch of Communication-Electronics Command's Space and Terrestrial Communications Directorate uses a slotted waveguide antenna with a mechanized tracking system. While that antenna is said to have a low profile—extending to a height of “only” 14 inches without the radome (radar dome)—its size may be acceptable for military applications, but not acceptable for consumer applications, e.g., for private automobiles. For consumer applications the antenna should be of such a low profile as not to degrade the aesthetic appearance of the vehicle and not to significantly increase its drag coefficient.
Current mobile systems are expensive and complex. In practical consumer products, size and cost are major factors, and providing a substantial reduction of size and cost is difficult. In addition to the cost, the phase shifters of known systems inherently add loss to the respective systems (e.g., 3 dB losses or more), thus requiring a substantial increase in antenna size in order to compensate for the loss. In a particular case, such as a DBS antenna system, the size might reach 4 feet by 4 feet, which is impractical for consumer applications.
As can be understood from the above discussion, in order to develop a mobile DBS or GBS system for consumers, at least the following issues must be addressed: increased efficiency of signal collection, reduction in size, and reduction in price. Current antenna systems are relatively too large for commercial use, have problems with collection efficiency, and are priced in the thousands, or even tens of thousands of dollars, thereby being way beyond the reach of the average consumer. In general, the efficiency discussed herein refers to the antenna's efficiency of collecting the radio-frequency signal the antenna receives into an electrical signal. This issue is generic to any antenna system, and the solutions provided herein address this issue for any antenna system used for any application, whether stationary or mobile.
The following summary of the invention is provided in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects and features of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention, and as such it is not intended to particularly identify key or critical elements of the invention, or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented below.
According to aspects of the invention, there is provided a novel radiating element which provide high conversion efficiency, while being small, simple, and inexpensive to manufacture.
According to aspects of the invention, there is provided a novel antenna having a radiating element which provides high conversion efficiency, while being small, simple and inexpensive to manufacture.
According to aspects of the invention, there is provided a novel antenna having an array of radiating elements which provide high conversion efficiency, while being small, simple, and inexpensive to manufacture.
According to yet other aspects of the invention, the coupling of the wave energy between the waveguide and the radiating element is done without any intervening elements. Notably, the method of transmission is implemented by generating from a transmission port a planar electromagnetic wave at a face of a cavity; propagating the wave inside the cavity in a propagation direction; coupling energy from the propagating wave onto a radiating element by redirecting at least part of the wave to propagate along the radiating element in a direction orthogonal to the propagation direction; and radiating the wave energy from the radiating element. The coupling elements, and hence the propagation direction, may be designed at any angle from 0-90°, and therefore may be at other angles than orthogonal. The method of receiving the radiation energy is completely symmetrical in the reverse order. That is, the method proceeds by coupling wave energy onto the radiating element; propagating the wave along the radiating element in a propagation direction; coupling energy from the propagating wave onto a cavity by redirecting the wave to propagate along the cavity in a direction orthogonal to the propagation direction; and collecting the wave energy at a receiving port. Utilizing this innovative energy coupling method one may construct an array antenna without the need for a waveguide network as was done in the prior art.
According to certain embodiments, there is provided an antenna system which improves upon current antenna systems. The antenna systems of example embodiments described herein include inventive aspects with respect to (without limitation) an antenna structure, low noise blocking (provided by a down-converter and signal amplifier), an antenna receiver, and a location and mobile platform sensing system.
According to aspect of the invention, an antenna is provided comprising: a waveguide and at least one radiating element extending from a surface of the waveguide, the element comprising a sidewall forming a distal opening spaced apart from the surface of the waveguide. The radiating element may comprise an extruded portion having a proximal end and a distal end, and further comprising at least one wall portion extending from the proximal end to the distal end, and wherein the extruded portion forms a tube having openings at the proximal end and the distal end. The radiating element may assume a polygonal cross section, a curved cross section, a trapezoidal cross section, a square cross section, a rectangular cross section, a cross-shaped cross section, or other cross section shapes (such as a rectangular cross section with a centrally located ridge). The radiating element may be tubular, cylindrical, conical, etc. The element may have a first portion and a second portion, the first portion comprising at least one wall perpendicular to the surface of the waveguide, the second portion comprising at least one wall non-perpendicular to the surface of the waveguide. The radiating element may comprise a perpendicular portion and a flared portion. The waveguide may comprise at least one end opening and wherein the waveguide is adapted to receive an excitation wave at least one of the end openings. The antenna may further comprise a wave source. The side wall of the radiating element may form a cylindrical cross section and further comprise at least two slots formed therein. The side wall of the radiating element may comprise a conical shape. The waveguide may comprise a polygon cross section. The waveguide may comprise a circular cross section.
According to other aspects of the invention, a method of manufacturing an antenna comprises forming a waveguide having at least one opening and a plurality of apertures, forming a plurality of radiating elements, each radiating element coupled to the waveguide over a corresponding one of the plurality of apertures.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, exemplify the embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain and illustrate principles of the invention. The drawings are intended to illustrate major features of the exemplary embodiments in a diagrammatic manner. The drawings are not intended to depict every feature of actual embodiments nor relative dimensions of the depicted elements, and are not drawn to scale.
Various embodiments of the invention are generally directed to radiating elements and antenna structures and systems incorporating the radiating element. The various embodiments described herein may be used, for example, in connection with stationary and/or mobile platforms. Of course, the various antennas and techniques described herein may have other applications not specifically mentioned herein. Mobile applications may include, for example, mobile DBS or VSAT integrated into land, sea, or airborne vehicles. The various techniques may also be used for two-way communication and/or other receive-only applications.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a radiating element is disclosed, which is used in single or in an array to form an antenna. The radiating structure may take on various shapes, selected according to the particular purpose and application in which the antenna will be used. The shape of the radiating element or the array of elements can be designed so as to control the phase and amplitude of the signal, and the shape and directionality of the radiating/receiving beam. Further, the shape can be used to change the gain of the antenna. The disclosed radiating elements are easy to manufacture and require relatively loose manufacturing tolerances; however, they provide high gain and wide bandwidth. According to various embodiments disclosed, linear or circular polarization can be designed into the radiating element. Further, by various feeding mechanisms, the directionality of the antenna may be steered, thereby enabling it to track a satellite from a moving platform, or to be used with multiple satellites or targets, depending on the application, by enabling multi-beam operation.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an antenna structure is provided. The antenna structure may be generally described as a planar-fed, open waveguide antenna. The antenna may use a single radiating element or an array of elements structured as a linear array, a two-dimensional array, a circular array, etc. The antenna uses a unique open wave extension as a radiating element of the array. The extension radiating element is constructed so that it couples the wave energy directly from the wave guide.
The element may be extruded from the top of a multi-mode waveguide, and may be fed using a planar wave excitation into a closed common planar waveguide section. The element(s) may be extruded from one side of the planar waveguide. The radiating elements may have any of a number of geometric shapes including, without limitation, a cross, a rectangle, a cone, a cylinder, or other shapes.
For clearer understanding, the waveguide is shown superimposed over Cartesian coordinates, wherein the wave energy within the waveguide propagates in the Y-direction, while the energy emanating from or received by the radiating element 105 propagates generally in the Z-direction. The height of the waveguide hw is generally defined by the frequency and may be set between 0.1 λ and 0.5 λ. For best results the height of the waveguide hw is generally set in the range 0.33 λ to 0.25 λ. The width of the waveguide Ww may be chosen independently of the frequency, and is generally selected in consideration of the physical size limitations and gain requirements. Increasing width would lead to increased gain, but for some applications size considerations may dictate reducing the total size of the antenna, which would require limiting the width. The length of the waveguide Lw is also chosen independently of the frequency, and is also selected based on size and gain considerations. However, in embodiments where the backside 125 is close, it serves as a cavity boundary, and the length Ly from the cavity boundary 125 to the center of the element 105 should be chosen in relation to the frequency. That is, where the backside 125 is closed, if some part of the propagating wave 120 continues to propagate passed the element 105, the remainder would be reflected from the backside 125. Therefore, the length Ly should be set so as to ensure that the reflection is in phase with the propagating wave.
Attention is now turned to the design of the radiating element 105. In this particular embodiment the radiating element is in a cone shape, but other shapes may be used, as will be described later with respect to other embodiments. The radiating element is physically coupled directly to the waveguide, over an aperture 140 in the waveguide. The aperture 140 serves as the coupling aperture for coupling the wave energy between the waveguide and the radiating element. The upper opening, 145, of the radiating element is referred to herein as the radiating aperture. The height he of the radiating element 105 effects the phase of the energy that hits the upper surface 130 of the waveguide 110. The height is generally set to approximately 0.25 λ0 in order to have the reflected wave in phase. The lower radius r of the radiating element affects the coupling efficiency and the total area πr2 defines the gain of the antenna. On the other hand, the angle θ (and correspondingly radius R) defines the beam's shape and may be 90° or less. As angle θ is made to be less than 90°, i.e., R>r, the beam's shape narrows, thereby providing more directionality to the antenna 100.
In
Using the inventive principles, transmission of wave energy is implemented by the following steps: generating from a transmission port a planar electromagnetic wave at a face of a waveguide cavity; propagating the wave inside the cavity in a propagation direction; coupling energy from the propagating wave onto a radiating element by redirecting at least part of the wave to propagate along the radiating element in a direction orthogonal (or other angle) to the propagation direction; and radiating the wave energy from the radiating element to free space. The method of receiving the radiation energy is completely symmetrical in the reverse order. That is, the method proceeds by coupling wave energy onto the radiating element; propagating the wave along the radiating element in a propagation direction; coupling energy from the propagating wave onto a cavity by redirecting the wave to propagate along the cavity in a direction orthogonal to the propagation direction; and collecting the wave energy at a receiving port.
The antenna of the embodiments of
On the other hand, the embodiment of
According to one feature of the invention, wide band capabilities may be provided by a wideband XPD (cross polar discrimination), circular polarization element. One difficulty in generating a circular polarization wave is the need for a complicated feed network using hybrids, or feeding the element from two orthogonal points. Another possibility is using corner-fed or slot elements. Current technology using these methods negatively impacts the bandwidth needed for good cross-polarization performance, as well as the cost and complexity of the system. Alternate solutions usually applied in waveguide antennas (e.g., horns) require the use of an external polarizer (e.g., metallic or dielectric) integrated into the cavity. In the past, this has been implemented in single-horn antennas only. Thus, there is a need for a robust wideband circular polarization generator element, which can be built in into large array antennas, while maintaining easy installation and integration of the polarization element in the manufacturing process of the antenna.
In generating the slots, one should take into account the following. The thickness of the slot should be sufficiently large so as to cause the perturbation in the wave. It is recommended to be in the order of 0.05-0.1 λ. The size of the slots and the area A delimited between them (marked with broken lines) should be such that the effective dielectric constant generated is higher than that of the remaining area of the radiating element, so that the component Vy propagates at a slower rate than the component Vx, to thereby provide a circularly polarized wave of Vx+jVy. Alternatively, one may achieve the increased dielectric constant by other means to obtain similar results. For example,
The circularly-polarizing radiating element of the above embodiments may also be constructed of any other shape. For example,
Some advantages of this feature may include, without limitation: (1) an integrated polarizer; (2) cross polar discrimination (XPD) greater than 30 dB; (3) adaptability to a relatively flat antenna; (4) very low cost; (5) simple control; (6) wideband operation; and (6) the ability to be excited to generate simultaneous dual polarization. Some adaptations of this feature include, without limitation: (1) a technology platform for any planar antenna needing a circular polarization wideband field; (2) DBS fixed and mobile antennas; (3) VSAT antenna systems; and (4) fixed point-to-point and point-to-multipoint links.
The selection of spacing Sp between the elements enables introducing a tilt to the radiating beam. That is, if the spacing is chosen at about 0.9-1.0λ, then the beam direction is at boresight. However, the beam can be tilted by changing the spacing between the elements. For example, if the beam is to be scanned between 20° and 70° by using a scanning feed, it is beneficial to induce a static tilt of 45° by having the spacing set to about 0.5λ, so that the active scan of the feed is limited to 25° of each side of center. Moreover, by implementing such a tilt, the loss due to the scan is reduced. That is, the effective tilt angle can be larger than the tilt in the x and y components, according to the relationship θ0=Sqrt(θx2+θy2).
As can be understood from the embodiments of
The example of the rectangular cone array antenna 1200 shown in
Each of sources 1204 and 1206 is constructed of a pin source 1224 and 1226 and a curved reflector 1234 and 1236. The curve of the reflectors is designed to provide the required planar wave to propagate into the cavity of the waveguide. Focusing reflectors 1254 and 1256 are provided to focus the transmission from the pins 1204 and 1206 towards the curved reflectors 1234 and 1236.
The embodiments described above use a rectilinear waveguide base. However, as noted above, other shapes may be used. For example, according to a feature of the invention, a circular array antenna can be constructed using a circular waveguide base and radiating elements of any of the shapes disclosed herein. The circular array antenna may also be characterized as a “flat reflector antenna.” To date, high antenna efficiency has not been provided in a 2-D structure. High efficiencies can presently only be achieved in offset reflector antennas (which are 3-D structures). The 3-D structures are bulky and also only provide limited beam scanning capabilities. Other technologies such as phased arrays or 2-D mechanical scanning antennas are typically large and expensive, and have low reliability.
The circular array antenna described herein provides a low-cost, easily manufactured antenna, which enables built-in scanning capabilities over a wide range of scanning angles. Accordingly, a circular cavity waveguide antenna is provided having high aperture efficiency by enabling propagation of electromagnetic energy through air within the antenna elements (the cross sections of which can be cones, crosses, rectangles, other polygons, etc.). The elements are situated and arranged on the constant phase curves of the propagating wave. In the case of a cylindrical cavity reflector, the elements are arranged on pseudo arcs. By controlling the cavity back wall cross-section function (parabolic shape or other), the curves can transform to straight lines, thus providing the realization of a rectangular grid arrangement. The structure may be fed by a cylindrical pin (e.g., monopole type) source that generates a cylindrical wave. For one example the cones couple the energy at each point along the constant phase curves, and by carefully controlling the cone radii and height, one can control the amount of energy coupled, changing both the phase and amplitude of the field at the aperture of the cone. Similar mechanism can be applied to any shape of element.
According to a feature of the invention, the various array antennas can enable beam scanning. For example, in order to scan the beam of a circular waveguide the source can be placed in different angular locations along the circumference of the circular cavity, thus creating a phase distribution along previously constant phase curves. At each curve there will be a linear phase distribution in both the X and Y directions, which in turn will tilt the beam in the Theta and Phi directions. This achieves an efficient thin, low-cost, built-in scanning antenna array. Arranging a set of feeds located on an arc enables a multi-beam antenna configuration, which simplifies beam scanning without the-need for typical phase shifters.
Some advantages of this aspect of the invention may include, without limitation: (1) a 2-D structure which is flat and thin; (2) extremely low cost and low mechanical tolerances fit for mass production; (3) built-in reflector and feed arrangement, which enables wide-beam scanning without the need for expensive phase shifters or complicated feeding networks; (4) scalable to any frequency; (5) can work in multi-frequency operation such as two-way or one-way applications; (6) can accommodate high-power applications. Some associated applications may include, without limitation: (1) one-way DBS mobile or fixed antenna system; (2) two-way mobile IP antenna system (3) mobile, fixed, and/or military SATCOM applications; (4) point-to-point or point-to-multipoint high frequency (up to approximately 100 GHz) band systems; (5) antennas for cellular base stations; (6) radar systems.
According to a method of construction of the antennas and arrays of the various embodiments described herein, a rectangular metal waveguide is used as the base for the antenna. The radiating element(s) may be formed by extrusion on a side of the waveguide. Each radiating element may be open at its top to provide the radiating aperture and at the bottom to provide the coupling aperture, while the sides of the element comprise metal extruded from the waveguide. Energy traveling within the waveguide is radiated through the element and outwardly from the element through the open top of the element. This method of manufacture is simple compared with other antennas and the size and shape of the element(s) can he controlled to achieve the desired antenna characteristics such as gain, polarization, and radiation pattern requirements.
According to another method, the entire waveguide-radiating element(s) structure is made of plastic using any conventional plastic fabrication technique, and is then coated with metal. In this way a simple manufacturing technique provides an inexpensive and light antenna.
An advantage of the array design is the relatively high efficiency (up to about 80-90% efficiency in certain situations) of the resulting antenna. The waves propagate through free space and the extruded elements do not require great precision in the manufacturing process. Thus the antenna costs are relatively low. Unlike prior art structures, the radiating elements of the subject invention need not be resonant thus their dimensions and tolerances may be relaxed. Also, the open waveguide elements allow for wide bandwidth and the antenna may be adapted to a wide range of frequencies. The resulting antenna may be particularly well-suited for high-frequency operation. Further, the resulting antenna has the capability for an end-fire design, thus enabling a very efficient performance for low-elevation beam peaks.
A number of wave sources may be incorporated into any of the embodiments of the inventive antenna. For example, a linear phased array micro-strip antenna may be incorporated. In this manner, the phase of the planar wave exciting the radiating array can be controlled, and thus the main beam orientation of the antenna may be changed accordingly. In another example, a linear passive switched Butler matrix array antenna may he incorporated. In this manner, a passive linear phased array may be constructed using Butler matrix technology. The different beams may be generated by switching between different inputs to the Butler matrix. In another example a planar waveguide reflector antenna may he used. This feed may have multi-feed points arranged about the focal point of the planar reflector to control the beam scan of the antenna. The multi-feed points can be arranged to correspond to the satellites selected for reception in a stationary or mobile DBS system. According to this example, the reflector may have a parabolic curve design to provide a cavity confined structure. In each of these cases, one-dimensional beam steering is achieved (e.g., elevation) while the other dimension (e.g., azimuth beam steering) is realized by rotation of the antenna, if required.
The various antenna designs described herein may also incorporate a number of scanning technologies. For instance, an antenna system may be integrated into a mobile platform such as an automobile. Because the platform is moving and existing satellite systems are fixed with respect to the earth (geostationary), the receiving antenna should be able to track a signal coming from a satellite. Thus, a beam steering mechanism is preferably built into the system. Preferably, the beam steering element allows coverage over a two-dimensional, hemispherical space. Several configurations may he used. In one configuration, a one-dimensional electrical scan (e.g., phased array or switched feeds) coupled with mechanical rotation may be used. In one embodiment, the walls of a plurality of radiating elements may be mechanically rotated (e.g., by a motor) over a range of angles defined by the element wall in relation to the non-extruded surface of the waveguide. The rotation may be achieved for a range of angles to achieve a 360 degree azimuth range and an elevation range of from about 20-70 degrees. In another configuration, a two-dimensional lens scan may be incorporated. In this configuration, the antenna array may be designed to radiate at a fixed angle and a lens may be situated to interfere with the radiation. In one embodiment the lens is situated outwardly from the radiating elements. The lens has a saw-tooth configuration. By moving the lens back and forth along a direction parallel with the central axis of the waveguide, one may achieve a linear phase distribution along that direction. Thus, a radiated beam may be steered in a certain direction by controlling the movement of the lens. Superimposition of another lens orthogonal to the first may allow two-dimensional scanning. According to an alternative, one may use an irregularly shaped lens (which provides the equivalent of the movement of the two separate lenses) and then rotate the irregular lens to achieve two-dimensional scanning.
Some advantages of the invention may include, without limitation: (1) a two-dimensional structure which is flat and thin; (2) potential for extremely low cost and low mechanical tolerances fit for mass production; (3) built-in reflector and feed arrangement, which enables wide beam scanning without the need for expensive phase shifters or complicated feeding networks; (4) scalable to any frequency; (5) capability for multi-frequency operation in both two-way or one-way applications; (6) ability to accommodate high-power applications because of the simple low-loss structure with the absence of small dimension gaps. Some associated applications may include, without limitation: (1) one-way DBS mobile or fixed antenna system; (2) two-way mobile IP antenna system (3) mobile, fixed, and/or military SATCOM applications; (4) point-to-point or point-to-multipoint high frequency (up to approximately 100 GHz) band systems; (5) antennas for cellular base stations; (6) radar systems.
Finally, it should be understood that processes and techniques described herein are not inherently related to any particular apparatus and may be implemented by any suitable combination of components. Further, various types of general purpose devices may be used in accordance with the teachings described herein. It may also prove advantageous to construct specialized apparatus to perform the method steps described herein. The present invention has been described in relation to particular examples, which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many different combinations of hardware, software, and firmware will be suitable for practicing the present invention. For example, the described software may be implemented in a wide variety of programming or scripting languages, such as Assembler, C/C++, perl, shell, PHP, Java, HFSS, CST, EEKO, etc.
The present invention has been described in relation to particular examples, which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many different combinations of hardware, software, and firmware will be suitable for practicing the present invention. Moreover, other implementations of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
This Application is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. Application, Ser. No. 60/808,187, filed May 24, 2006; U.S. Application, Ser. No. 60/859,667, filed Nov. 17, 2006; U.S. Application, Ser. No. 60/859,799, filed Nov. 17, 2006; and U.S. Application, Ser. No. 60/890,456, filed Feb. 16, 2007, the disclosure of all of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3109174 | Plummer | Oct 1963 | A |
3205498 | Child | Sep 1965 | A |
3818490 | Leahy | Jun 1974 | A |
3942180 | Rannou et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4195270 | Rainwater | Mar 1980 | A |
4644343 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4760404 | Ramsey | Jul 1988 | A |
4783665 | Lier et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4825219 | Ajioka | Apr 1989 | A |
4916458 | Goto | Apr 1990 | A |
5210543 | Kurtz | May 1993 | A |
5355142 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5467101 | Josefsson | Nov 1995 | A |
5541612 | Josefsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5557291 | Chu et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5579019 | Uematsu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5638079 | Kastner et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5793334 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5943023 | Sanford | Aug 1999 | A |
6008770 | Sugawara | Dec 1999 | A |
6124832 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6310583 | Saunders | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6529706 | Mitchell | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563398 | Wu | May 2003 | B1 |
6794950 | du Toit et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6879298 | Zarro et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6894654 | Lynch | May 2005 | B2 |
20030038745 | Lalezari et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030122724 | Shelley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040246069 | Yoneda et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050146478 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174290 | Huang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060055605 | Peled et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070273599 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60808187 | May 2006 | US | |
60859667 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60859799 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60890456 | Feb 2007 | US |