This invention pertains generally to the field of using portable media, such as a secure memory card, with digital appliances, such as a telephone handset, and more particularly to techniques for transferring instructions between a digital appliance and a portable media in communication therewith.
Digital appliances, such as notebook or laptop computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), or mobile phones, are commonly used with portable media, such as memory cards or USB drives. In some cases, secure data is stored on these portable media. The application responsible for securely transferring this data between the hosting appliance and the media often uses instructions that have a specific structure. As part of the transfer process, the host may cache the instruction; but as the host's operating system may unaware of the instruction's structure, and because the host's cache structure may not be compatible with the instruction's structure, the instruction, along with any associated data, may not be successfully transferred.
According to a one aspect, techniques are presented for sending an application instruction from a hosting digital appliance to a portable medium, where the instruction is structured as one or more units whose size is a first size, or number of bytes. After flushing the contents of a cache, the instruction is written to the cache, where the cache is structured as logical blocks having a size that is a second size that is larger (in terms of number of bytes) than the first size. In writing the instruction (having a command part and, possibly, a data part), the start of the instruction is aligned with one of the logical block boundaries in the cache and the instruction is padded out with dummy data so that it fills an integral number of the cache blocks.
According to another aspect, when a response from a portable device to an instruction is received at a hosting digital appliance, the cache is similarly flushed prior to receiving the response. The response is then stored to align with a logical block boundary of the cache.
Various aspects, advantages, features and embodiments of the present invention are included in the following description of exemplary examples thereof, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. All patents, patent applications, articles, other publications, documents and things referenced herein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference in their entirety for all purposes. To the extent of any inconsistency or conflict in the definition or use of terms between any of the incorporated publications, documents or things and the present application, those of the present application shall prevail.
The various aspects and features of the present invention may be better understood by examining the following figures, in which:
When transferring content between a portable medium, such as a memory card, and a hosting digital appliance, such as mobile telephone handset, a host's operation system will often use a caching mechanism for the content. This cache will typically have a structure where it is logically broken up into a number of blocks of a particular size. The content being transferred, whether data or an instruction (a command and maybe some associated data), may also be structured in a specific way as one or more sections of a certain size. When the content is structure in units of one size (for example, as 512 Byte sectors) and the cache is structured in units of another size (for example, in 2 KB blocks), the caching mechanism may clash with the content's structural requirements.
This is particularly true with dealing with secure content and secure portable storage media, such as that marketed under the TrustedFlash name. In such cases, the more basic levels of a host's operating system that handle transfers between the host and the portable medium will see the instruction as just so much data, being unaware of any embedded commands in the instruction, and store it as such in cache. Examples of such instructions and their use are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,237,046, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/899,260, and, particularly, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/298,349 and 11/299,186. Under such arrangements, the host's operating system may treat the instruction as data to be written to a particular address on the medium; but, when received on the medium, this instruction will be interpreted as, for example, a write command to store data at different address on the medium. If the host then tries to issue a read command for this data, the address as seen by the host's operating system will not correspond to the actual address as interpreted on the medium; and as the host may then rely what is thinks is cached copy of the data, it will incorrectly use this cached data.
The techniques described here are widely applicable, both for portable media, such as memory cards, that are primarily used with a hosting digital appliance, and also digital. appliances which themselves include non-volatile memory, such as embedded flash. Example of such digital appliances include desktop, notebook or laptop tablet computers, personal digital assistants (PDAS), mobile phone handsets, a variety of media players such as MP3 players, DVD players, gaming consoles, digital recording devices such as digital cameras, and others. Suitable portable media are available from SanDisk Corporation, the assignee hereof, which include those sold under trademarks TrustedFlash, CompactFlash (CF), Multi-Media Card (MMC), Secure Digital (SD), MicroSD and Memory Stick PRO. These memory cards are removably connectable with digital appliances through mating connectors that are different thr most cards. Flash drives, sold as those sold under the Cruzer trademark, contain a plug according to the Universal Serial Bus (USB) standard, so can be plugged directly into any digital appliance having a USB receptacle. TrustedHash cards and other secure cards (SIM, SMMC, SD, etc) allow secure storage of the both licenses and associated content. Also the following discussion will often refer to non-volatile memory as flash, the techniques given here are not so limited and more generally apply to other non-volatile memory structures (such as described in US patent application Ser. No. 10/841,379, published as US Patent Application Publication number 2005/0251617. for example), for both portable devices and embedded memories. Although the teachings given here are not so limited, when reference is made to a particular embodiment flit purposes of discussion, the following will often refer to the concrete example of a mobile telephone handset used with a memory card, such as that of the TrustedFlash variety, having instructions whose structure is based on a sector.
To circumvent such possible difficulties with the host caching, firmware associated with the secure transfer can be changed to be aware of the running time command size; the associated application toolkit needs to be integrated with the applications; instructions sent from the application to the platform operation system (OS), including write and read commands, start with a cache block size aligned sector; and that the write, read buffer size should be cache block size aligned.
Technically, to allow fast spread out of secure content media to users of digital appliances, integration for these platforms with the corresponding secure content toolkit is important. Due to the special requirements of most secure content technology and code size consideration, the corresponding application toolkit usually needs to be integrated into the operating system (OS) of a handset or other hosting device, so that the applications can call the application programming interfaces (APIs) provided by the toolkit to access the media. However, for certain standardized or open platforms, say Linux and WIPI, this solution can be complicated to implement since it is not easy to have the needed platform modifications to support secure content media.
To overcome this limitation, every platform will provide a way for applications to access generic IO device; in case of a TrustedFlash card, this is the SD IO device. With this assumption, the applications can use the provided IO access to communicate with the secure content media card by integrating the corresponding toolkit into the applications. This can be used for any platforms, especially being good for those unmodified platforms, as long as the IO device is accessible for applications. The major difficulty of this solution is to deal with the caching mechanism, which is used most likely for every platform. The following section describes the nature of this caching mechanism, and the conflicts between its buffered IO and the earlier versions of secure content transfer firmware.
Problem of Buffered IO with Current Secure Transfer Firmware
As noted, many command and data transfer processes rely upon a particular structure for instructions. For example, current TrustedFlash firmware is defined to communicate with the handset or other host through sector (512 Bytes) based instructions. The number of sectors for each instruction is predefined. This can cause a major IO problem for buffered IO only platforms. Due to the hosting platform's caching mechanism, the instructions sent to TrustedFlash firmware on the media may not be sector based, so that the TrustedFlash communication channel is broken. For example, a TrustedFlash CREATE ACR command is a one-sector write instruction. When an application sends a one-sector write to the platform OS, this write command may be changed to a write command with multiple sectors, and the starting write location may be changed as well, after this command reaches the secure transfer firmware on the media.
A common scenario for write command is the following:
In practice, some platforms support direct IO, while others only provide buffered IO. In addition, the caching algorithms may be different from platform to platform. Therefore, a generic solution is quite preferable for integration with secure transfer application's toolkit. The following discussion present such an integrated solution, based on the example for TrustedFlash, that works whether the host platform uses direct IO or buffered IO. This is presented below as including four components: the structure of system integration; the modification of firmware; and the methods of solving caching for write and for read.
Integrating Secure Transfer Toolkit into Applications
Since a platform remains the same, for the applications to access the secure content card, the corresponding toolkit will need to integrate into the host's applications so that they can call the toolkit APIs to send, say, TrustedFlash commands to the TrustedFlash cards. Briefly, the toolkit provides full package of APIs for applications to access the secure media. This package offers many functions related with secure system, such as system operation, account operation, storage operation, and digital rights management (DRM) operation.
The applications will directly call the toolkit's APIs, and then the toolkit will talk to the corresponding secure medium by using the device operation methods provided by the platform OS. For example, in Linux, this methods are open( ), read( ), write( ), and close( ). According to each individual platform, this glue layer between toolkit and the platform is implemented in the Platform I/O Device Operation.
The Modification of Secure Firmware
As discussed above, the instructions used in secure data protocols are often based on units of a particular number of bits. For example, the TrustedFlash instructions for communicating between a host and the TrustedFlash firmware on media are sector-based. The number of sectors for each instruction is predefined during the firmware loading.
As shown in
In order to make the media firmware understood the commands from platforms with buffered IO, the current firmware preferably knows the dynamical command size of each commands. To do so, one field can be introduced to add into the command block to specify the total size of current sending command. For example, in the table of
When a platform OS is using buffered IO, the behaviors for both read and write may be changed as described below. The following two sections describe the way to deal with the caching on write, when an instruction is sent to the medium, and read, when a response is returned. Briefly, this process is illustrated in
Method of Direct Write Command for Buffered IO
The secure transfer firmware is the agent inside the media (e.g., TrustedFlash) card to handle the commands. The secure transfer commands from the host are preferably sent to the card immediately. Therefore, if the platform OS does not send a write command to the card, but puts the data into the buffer instead, the medium will have no way to get the command and respond to it. In addition, for instructions structured with the command block required to be in a specific locations, as with the TrustedFlash command block that must be the first sector of the whole command, the sequence of the write command must follow the appropriate (e.g. TrustedFlash) protocol; any extra reads or writes in the command sequence before command completion, including get command status, will cause problems to firmware, so that the command will not succeed. Below is the method to solve these problems one by one.
The method of forcing the OS to flush write command is the following:
Generally, when a card is inserted to the host, the host will initialize and mount the media/card. To access the contents of the media, it will open the media. It is considered as “logical” open. Related data, table, cache, and so on are established. After that, you can browse the directories, or open “file” for read/write operation. By “closing” the media, all cache contents, tables or data are cleared or invalidated. For example, the Linux operating system includes an open( ) command and a close( ) command. The close( ) command closes a file descriptor of the media so that it no longer refers to any file and may be used. Any record locks held on the file descriptor it was associated with, and owned with the process are removed. To logically reopen the device, a call to open( ) will create a new open file description. (These are described further in the Linux programmers manual.)
The other problem is the potential change of write location, write buffer size, and command sequence. To avoid these, the toolkit will send to the medium a command in the following way:
The flow chart of
The instruction is then placed in the flushed cache at block 705. As shown in
Returning to
Methods to Deal with Caching for IO Read
After receiving an instruction form the host, the medium may need to respond to the host, such as with a status or with data in response to a read request. Because of caching, whenever the application send a read command, the OS may just go to the cache to read it back if the related location data is in the cache. Therefore, the actual firmware response is not returned back to the application.
To deal with this problem, cache bypass can be used in the following way:
At 803, the cache is flushed as at 703, with a close and then open or, if available, with a command to flush the cache. As the cache is now emptied, this prevents the operating system from just returning cached material instead of the actual response from the medium. At 805, the alignment is checked to see that when the received response is placed in the cache, it will be aligned with the logical block structure of the cache. Finally, the read command is sent to the platform's operating system.
Once these preparations have been made, the driver can then send the read instruction to the medium, which will then return the response. As noted, this may include actual secure user data (that, data as seen be the secure transfer system) or a non-data response, such as a status. The response is then cached aligned with the logical block boundaries of the cache. Padding, which secure transfer application would then ignore, may also be added to fill out an integral number of cache blocks.
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Consequently, various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4634807 | Chorley et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4992931 | Hirasawa | Feb 1991 | A |
5450489 | Ostrover et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5530235 | Stefik et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5581743 | Burton et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5689702 | Bulusu | Nov 1997 | A |
5715403 | Stefik | Feb 1998 | A |
5847698 | Reavey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5887269 | Brunts et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897663 | Stancil | Apr 1999 | A |
5956034 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982891 | Ginter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991399 | Graunke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009525 | Horstmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6055314 | Spies et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073226 | Cutshall et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6191712 | Still | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240506 | Miller | May 2001 | B1 |
6247097 | Sinharoy | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6314409 | Schneck et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6317809 | Kulakowski et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317812 | Stai | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363437 | Sassi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6385677 | Yao | May 2002 | B1 |
6418421 | Hurtado et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438638 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460116 | Mahalingaiah | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502146 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529949 | Getsin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546193 | Um et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550011 | Sims, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6611358 | Narayanaswamy | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6738614 | Blankenship et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738905 | Kravitz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742109 | Sokolov et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745267 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757749 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6813725 | Hanes et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824051 | Reddy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6876984 | Tadayon et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886036 | Santamaki et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6907585 | Kohno | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922725 | Lamming et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6944600 | Stefik et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6973445 | Tadayon et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974076 | Siegel | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983367 | Go et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7023572 | Tuli | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7068381 | Tuli | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7068387 | Ahne et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7237046 | Paley et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20010013021 | Saito | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020099955 | Peled et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112172 | Simmons | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152172 | Hars et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162009 | Shmueli et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184156 | Tadayon et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185533 | Shieh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196364 | Hendricks | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018582 | Yaacovi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030093598 | Park | May 2003 | A1 |
20030167236 | Stefik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030225765 | Frieden et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233501 | Ma et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040035939 | Lin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039932 | Elazar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064612 | Pinto et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093509 | Elazar et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040137664 | Elazar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193744 | Paley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205453 | Mortensen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210433 | Elazar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050004875 | Kontio et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015549 | Dierks et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050042930 | Harkabi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044330 | Elazar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061873 | Pirillo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138551 | Elazar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149450 | Stefik et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195635 | Conley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230483 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230484 | Cuellar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251617 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289072 | Sabharwal | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010500 | Elazar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060080535 | Elazar et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084287 | Miller et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136656 | Conley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060294289 | Ashmore | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070070842 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070186032 | Sinclair et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214326 | Oka et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080065552 | Elazar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065911 | Elazar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080209109 | Lasser | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19820479 | Dec 1999 | DE |
1209574 | May 2002 | EP |
1304665 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 376 309 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2367925 | Apr 2002 | GB |
200715797 | Apr 2007 | TW |
WO 9842098 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 0169354 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0169354 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0169354 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0193000 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004031935 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086363 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006057991 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005116819 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006110213 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007076214 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086168 mailed Mar. 16, 2009, 15 pages. |
Kim et al., Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications, New York, New York: ACM Press, 1989, ISBN 0-201-14410-7, pp. 4-5. |
Comer, et al., “Operating System Design,” Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989, pp. 308-309. |
“Sandisk BookLocker aka FlashCP DRM/Based USB Stick,” Cohn Dunstan & Flauzon, Internet Article, Jun. 29, 2005, 1 page. |
“BookLocker,” SanDisk, Internet Article, Feb. 6, 2005, XP002484733, 1 page. |
“Sandisk Frees Students from Heavy Backpacks,” Press Release (Online), Jun. 28, 2005, 1 page. |
“Sandisk Introduces Ultra II SD Plus, a Dual-Purpose SD Memory Card with Built-In USB Connectivity,” Press Release (Online), Feb. 19, 2005, XP002484735, 1 page. |
PCT International Search Report mailed Mar. 19, 2004, International Application No. PCT/US03/25921, 4 pages. |
Humer, Caroline, “Students Set to Hit the Latest E-Books,” http://msnbc.com/id/4846005/, Apr. 27, 2004, 5 pages. |
SanDisk Secure Content Solutions, Inc., “BookLocker™ Secure Digital Books,” Product Description, 2005, 4 pages. |
Edited by Bill Cope and Robin Freeman, “Digital Rights Management and Content Development: Technology Drivers Across the Book Production Chain, from Creator to Consumer,” RMIT University, 2001, whole book (pp. v.-166). |
Lesley Ellen Harris, “Digital Property Currency of the 21st Century,” published McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd, 1998, whole book (pp. vi-230). |
National Research Council, “The Digital Dilemma, Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure,” National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 2000, whole book (pp. v-340). |
Lawrence Lessig, “The Future of Ideas,” Random House 2001, whole book (pp. vii-352). |
Carol Risher, “Technological Protection Measures (Anti-Circumvention Devices) and Their Relation to Exceptions to Copyright in the Electronic Environment,” http://www.ipa-uie.org/events/bookfairs/fbf2000/crisher.html, Oct. 20, 2000, 6 pages. |
Mike Godwin, “A Cop in Every Computer,” IP Worldwide, http://www.law.com, Jan. 14, 2002, 5 pages. |
Mark Walter et al., “DRM: ‘Down-Right Messy’ and Getting Worse,” The Seybold Report, Analyzing Publishing Technologies, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 5-15. |
Renato Iannella, “Digital Rights Management (DRM) Architectures,” D-Lib Magazine, vol. 7, No. 6, Jun. 2001, 10 pages. |
Joshua Duhl et al., “Understanding DRM Systems—An IDC Whitepaper,” www.idc.com, pp. 1-25. |
Patricia Evans, “DRM: Is the Road to Adoption Fraught With Potholes?” The Seybold Report, vol. 1, No. 14, Oct. 22, 2001, pp. 1-3. |
Richard Eoin Nash, “A Tale of Two E-media Hosts,” http://www.hostingtech.com/sp/02—06—sp—tale—print.html, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-3. |
Dennis Fowler, “Digital Rights (and Wrongs),” NW, Jun. 2002, pp. 26-31. |
Bill Pearson, Technical Marketing Engineer, “Digital Transmission Content Protection,” presented Jun. 16, 1999 at Intel Corporation, pp. 1-25. |
Jaehong Park et al., “Towards Usage Control Models: Beyond Traditional Access Control,” SACMAT'02, Jun. 3-4, 2002, Monterey, CA, pp. 57-64. |
Ingemar J. Cox, “Watermarking and Digital Rights Management,” NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ, Mar. 20, 2001, pp. 1-14. |
Eric Knorr, “Content Rights and Wrongs,” http://Techupdate.zdnet.com, Dec. 4, 2001, pp. 1-2. Tech Update, Dec. 4, 2001, pp. 1-2. |
Mark Stamp, “Digital Rights Management: The Technology Behind the Hype (Draft),” Jun. 6, 2002, pp. 1-15. |
Bill Trippe, “XrML and Emerging Models of Content Development and Distribution,” The Gilbane Report, Apr. 23, 2002, pp. 1-16. |
Mark Walter, “Authentica, Alchemedia Apply DRM to Corporate Intellectual Property,” The Seybold Report, vol. 1, No. 12, Sep. 17, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
Nic Garnett, “Digital Rights Management, Copyright, and Napster,” Jun. 2001, pp. 1-5. |
Nic Garnett and Tomas Sander, “Fair Use by Design—Session 3: What DRM can and cannot do and what it is or isn't doing today,” 12th Conference on Computers, Freedom & Privacy, San Francisco, Apr. 16-19, 2002, 6 pages. |
Joshua Duhl, “Sony Licenses InterTrust's DRM: What Does It Mean?” IDCFlash, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-4. |
Dr. John Manferdelli, “Digital Rights Management(”DRM“)” Unified DRM Group, Microsoft Corporation, Symposium on Embeded Security, 2001, pp. 1-26. |
Martha Nalebuff, “Publisher's Dilemma,” Unified DRM Core at Microsoft Corporation, Seybold, Apr. 10, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
Amy Carroll et al., “Microsoft Palladium: A Business Overview,” Microsoft Content Security Business Unit, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-9. |
Gordon Lyon, “The Internet Marketplace and DRM,” Convergent Information Systems Division, NIST, Jul. 12, 2001, pp. 1-12. |
Michael Calvert, “Content Management—Timetable for Digital Rights Management,” InSide Gartner This Week, No. 2, Jul. 18, 2001, pp. 1-3. |
Kim Zwollo, “Digital Document Delivery and Digital Rights Management,” IOS Press, 2001, pp. 9-11. |
Olin Sibert, “Digital Rights Management: The Future Is Secure Hardware,” Electronic Design, vol. 48, il0, May 15, 2000, p. 56. |
Info-Tech Advisor Newsletter, “Digital Rights Management 101,” Jun. 26, 2001, pp. 1-2. |
“Fair Usage Definition Called Key to Digital Rights Management,” Communications Daily, v 22, i25, Feb. 6, 2002, pp. 1-2. |
“Lack of DRM Standards Impeding Broadband Demand,” Audio Week, v. 13, i51, Dec. 24, 2001, pp. 1-2. |
Linden deCarmo, Media Alert—New Digital Rights Technologies Protect Content Creators' Interests, but What About Users' Rights? PC Magazine, Jun. 26, 2001, pp. 1-5, 80. |
Harvey Ardman, “Will DRM Make Digital Publishing More Profitable?” Seybold Seminars, Boston, Apr. 2001, pp. 1-2. |
Susan Marks, “Staking Out Digital Rights; Digital Rights Management Software Addresses the Thorny E-Comm Problem of Sharing Content While Protecting Intellectual Property,” Network World, Feb. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, 70. |
Robert Bolick, “Pricing Digital Content,” Professional Book Group, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Mar. 11, 2001, pp. 1-8. |
Yuval Levin, “Talking to ourselves,” Liberzine.com, Sep. 6, 2000, pp. 1-3. |
Clifford Lynch, “The Battle to Define the Future of the Book in the Digital World,” First Monday, May 2001, pp. 1-49. |
Richard Stallman, “The Right to Read,” GNU Project—Free Software Foundation (FSF), Feb. 1997, pp. 1-5. |
“The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998,” (DMCA) Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860, Dec. 1998, pp. 1-18. |
“Doesn't Everybody Do It?—Internet Piracy Attitudes and Behaviors,” A report on a survey conducted by SIIA and KPMG—Fall 2001, pp. 1-32. |
“IIPA 2000-2001 Estimated Trade Losses Due to Copyright Piracy,” International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), Apr. 30, 2002, pp. 1-2. |
Ipsos-NPD, “Briefing: The Online Book Marketplace,” May 2001, 33 pages. |
Terje Hillesund, “Will E-books Change the World?” First Monday, Sep. 14, 2001, pp. 1-21. |
George Alexander et al., “The Road Ahead: Problems Facing the Publishing Industry Today,” The Seybold Report, Apr. 22, 2002, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 3-9. |
John Markoff, “Fears of Misuse of Encryption System Are Voiced,” New York Times, Jun. 20, 2002, pp. 1-3. |
“Trusted Computing Platform Alliance (TCPA),” TCPA Design Philosophies and Concepts, Version 1.0, Copyright 2000 Compaq Computer Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, IBM Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Jan. 25, 2001, V. 1.0 25, pp. 1-30. |
Joshua Piven, “Tech vs. Tinseltown,” Computer Technology Review, Los Angeles, May 2002, pp. 1-4. |
“The Need for a Rights Language,” Technical White Paper, Version 1.0, ContentGuard 2001, pp. 1-12. |
“Extensible Rights Markup Language (XrML) 2.0 Specification,” Part 1-Part V, ContentGuard, Nov. 20, 2001, 154 pages. |
“Digital Rights Management for Ebooks: Publisher Requirements,” Version 1.0, Association of American Publishers (AAP), Nov. 27, 2000, pp. 1-66. |
USB Implementers Forum, “Universal Serial Bus Mass Storage Class, UFI Command Specification,” Revision 1.0, Dec. 14, 1998, pp. 1-53. |
EPO/ISA, “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration”, mailed in related PCT/US2004/024166 on Jul. 25, 2005, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Substantive Examination,” mailed in corresponding European Patent Application No. 04 779 294.0 on Aug. 9, 2006, 5 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 08 859 004.7 dated Feb. 6, 2012, 4 pages. |
Taiwan Office Action for Application No. 097148609 dated Feb. 18, 2014, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090157971 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |