1. Field of Invention
The invention relates to an integration scheme for metal gap fill with a Fixed Abrasive CMP (chemical mechanical polishing feature (FAP) to enable polishing of the topography only of an oxide or metal layer, when modifying the exposed surface of a semiconductor wafer.
2. Description of the Related Art
In a process integration scheme for preparing a semiconductor wafer, the wafer typically undergoes many processing steps, and these processing steps include deposition, patterning, and etching steps. Typically, at each step during the manufacturing process, it is useful to attain a predetermined level of uniformity and/or planarization. Further, it is also useful to minimize any surface defects in the wafer, such as scratches and pits, since these surface defects will affect the performance of the ultimate patterned semiconductor wafer.
One well known method for reducing surface irregularities during the manufacture of semiconductor wafers is to treat the wafer surface with a slurry that contains a plurality of loose abrasive particles using a polishing pad.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,407 disclose a method of modifying an exposed surface of a semiconductor wafer comprising:
A method of modifying a processed semiconductor wafer containing topographical features is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,794. The method entails:
U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,702 B2 disclose a method for chemical-mechanical-polishing (CMP) to selectively remove a first material over a second material, wherein said first material and said second material form part of a substrate assembly. The method comprises:
A method of modifying a surface of a semiconductor wafer is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,234,875 B1, and comprises:
In the integration schemes of existing methods for reducing surface irregularities in manufacturing semiconductor wafers, there is a need for: process simplification and cost reduction;
One object of the present invention is to provide, in an integration scheme for metal gap fill when making semiconductor wafers, process simplification and cost reduction.
Another object of the present invention is to provide, in an integration scheme for metal gap fill during semiconductor wafer manufacturing, an improvement of process uniformity.
A further object of the present invention is to provide, in an integration scheme for metal gap fill during manufacture of a semiconductor wafer, prevention of metal line damage due to CMP.
An object further still of the present invention is to provide, in an integration scheme for metal gap fill during manufacture of a semiconductor wafer, means for elimination of CMP “send aheads”.
In general, the invention integration scheme for metal gap fill using fixed abrasive CMP is accomplished by: filling gaps between metal lines on a semiconductor chip with a high density plasma (HDP); lowering the overfill of the HDP process using FAP to less than 50 nm above the metal lines that remain between the roofs by virtue of the fact that the FAP process polishes only the typography and affects an automatic stop when the wafer is planarized. After the polishing process using FAP, a silane oxide of desired thickness may be deposited as a cap.
Generally speaking, it is known that the fixed abrasive CMP process (FAP) makes it possible to polish only the topography of an oxide or metal layer, and that the process stops automatically when the topography is removed. The FAP process is characterized by the advantages of: improved uniformity; neglegible dishing and pattern erosion and an increased process window—all of which makes endpoint detection unnecessary.
In the case of borophosphosilicate glass (BPSG) polish the FAP process is further characterized by the benefits of a high selectivity between nitride and oxide (especially for the Obsidian tool) since the nitride above the gate conductor will not be eroded and this will increase the process window in terms of shorts for the CB etch. Furthermore, FAP will not dish in the oxide spacers, thereby avoiding topological problems.
In the case of a ILD polish using the FAP process, the benefits for ILD polish is that, high aspect ratio metal or Al lines are filled with HDP and capped with a silane oxide layer. The dielectric is then polished back to the desired ILD thickness. However, this integration scheme has certain disadvantages in terms of uniformity. As a result the thickness, non-uniformity can affect e.g. the CL Al fill, which is very critical to the aspect ratio of the CL via.
On the other hand, the high density plasma-fixed abrasives CMP (FAP)-silane integration scheme for the inter metal dielectrics of the invention process, is an integration scheme wherein the gaps between the metal lines are filled with HDP. The overfill of the HDP process is then lowered so that only less than 50 nm above the metal or Al lines remains between the roofs. The invention FAP process polishes only the topography with an automatic stop, when the wafer is planarized. This leads to a reduced polishing time during FAP. The remaining oxide thickness on top of the Al lines is less than 50 nm. After this polish process, a silane oxide of the desired thickness is then deposited.
In the context of the invention, a high density plasma (HDP) is one which fills entirely the volume it is in and is characterized by an average ionization density that is greater than 1011 cm−3. A predetermined endpoint on the wafer sufficiently close above the metal interconnect lines, yet far enough away from the lines to prevent damage to the lines is above 50 nm, and preferably less than 50 nm. A fixed abrasive polishing pad is one made from abrasive particles fixedly dispersed in a suspension medium and used in conjunction with planarizing solutions that do not contain an abrasive.
The advantages of the invention process integration scheme for HDP metal gap fill followed by fixed abrasive CMP provides: improved uniformity of the ILD thickness to avoid high flyers in contact resistance of CL chains; prevention of metal line damage during oxide CMP over polish; cost reduction with throughput improvement [inclusive of reduced HDP thickness (reduced deposition time), shorter CMP time and reduced site deposition time].
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5692950 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5795495 | Meikle | Aug 1998 | A |
5850105 | Dawson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5897426 | Somekh | Apr 1999 | A |
5958794 | Bruxvoort et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6007407 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034418 | Matsuura | Mar 2000 | A |
6037278 | Koyanagi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6232171 | Mei | May 2001 | B1 |
6232231 | Sethuraman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234875 | Pendergrass, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6310375 | Schrems | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325702 | Robinson | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6350692 | Economikos et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6435942 | Jin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6653242 | Sun et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656842 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20020074311 | Funkenbusch | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030029212 | Im | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030176151 | Tam et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 068 928 | Jan 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040248399 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |