Patent Application
20120020449
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for treatment and delivery of therapeutic radiation and, in particular, relates to a system and method for additional continuous arc rotation/shift of a couch (C-ARC) in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery of therapeutic radiation, as well as simultaneous kV cone-beam imaging for real-time treatment verification and adaptation.
2. Discussion of Related Art
There are a number of known systems and method for treatment and delivery of therapeutic radiation. One of these is known as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). 3D-CRT involves three-dimensional imaging, accurate radiation dose calculation, computer optimized treatment planning, and computer controlled treatment delivery. In particular, 3D-CRT uses computers and special imaging techniques such as CT, MR or PET scans to show the size, shape and location of a tumor as well as surrounding organs. The therapeutic radiation beams are then precisely tailored to the size and shape of the tumor with multileaf collimators or custom fabricated field-shaping blocks. The precise application of the therapeutic radiation beams results in nearby normal tissue receiving less radiation and so the normal tissue is able to heal more quickly after a therapeutic radiation session. The more normal tissue is shielded from receiving the therapeutic radiation allows for the amount of the radiation actually delivered to the tumor to be increased and so the chances of successfully treating the tumor increase. An example of 3D-CRT is described in the publication, Takahashi, S., “Conformation radiotherapy: rotation techniques as applied to radiography and radiotherapy of cancer,” Acta Radiol 1965, Suppl. 242.
Another system and method for treatment planning and delivery of therapeutic radiation is known as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, or IMRT. IMRT is a specialized form of 3D-CRT that allows radiation to be modulated, thus more exactly shaped to fit the tumor. In particular, IMRT involves breaking up the therapeutic radiation beams into many “beamlets.” The intensities of each beamlet are then adjusted individually. Such adjustment of intensities allows for the radiation received by healthy tissue near a tumor to be further reduced when compared with 3D-CRT. An example of IMRT is described in the publication, Brahme, A., et al., “Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy,” Phys Med Biol Vol. 27, No. 10, 1982, pp. 1221-29.
A third system for treatment and delivery of therapeutic radiation is known as intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and later volumetric-modulated arc therapy, also known as VMAT. VMAT addresses several of the disadvantages of IMRT, namely, increased treatment time by requiring a larger number of beam directions and the use of increased monitor units (MU). VMAT addresses these disadvantages by allowing continuous gantry/collimator rotation, leaf motion, and dose rate adjustment for treatment plan optimization where dose is delivered during a single gantry arc of up to 360 degrees. The VMAT technique is similar to tomotherapy in that a full 360 degree range of beam directions are available for optimization, but is fundamentally different from IMRT in that the entire dose volume is delivered in a single source rotation. An example of VMAT is described in: 1) Yu, C. X., “Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy,” Phys Med Biol Vol. 40, 1995, pp. 1435-1449., 2) Yu, C. X., et al., “Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy,” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Vol. 53, 2002, pp. 453-463 and 3) Otto, K., “Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc,” Med Phys Vol. 35, 2008, pp. 310-317.
VMAT involves, in part, using multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf motion and dose rate adjustment to modulate beam output intensity. In addition, VMAT delivers the modulated beam intensity output by rotating the gantry and collimator of a linac through one or more complete or partial arcs with the therapeutic radiation continuously on so that treatment times are reduced. During rotation of the gantry, a number of parameters can be dynamically varied, such as: i) the MLC aperture shape, ii) the fluence-output rate (“dose rate”), iii) the gantry rotation speed and iv) the MLC orientation. Being able to vary the parameters i)-iv) allows VMAT to reduce the need to use as many arcs, delivering fewer monitor units (MU) in a shorter time while providing dosimetry comparable to IMRT. While VMAT can take advantage of the above-mentioned four available variable parameters, it must do so while respecting the physical constraints of the linac and MLC—such as the maximum gantry speed, maximum leaf speed, the MLC orientation constraints and the available subdivisions of fluence-output rate.
Without dynamically controlling all machine parameters, specifically the orientations between machine and patient, during treatment delivery, current VMAT technology is limited for certain treatment sites. In the case of breast cancer treatment, it has been shown that VMAT applied to treat left-sided breast cancers with internal mammary node irradiation resulted in an increase in the volume of lungs, heart and contralateral breast receiving low dose (5 Gy) irradiation compared to modified wide tangents. By definition, due to its configuration, VMAT used for breast irradiation contains beams directed towards the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast.
Another disadvantage of VMAT systems is that they do not integrate simultaneous kV imaging. Accordingly, such VMAT systems are not capable of real-time treatment verification
One aspect of the present invention regards a system for radiotherapy that includes a couch upon which a patient being treated by the system sits, the couch having continuous arc rotation and shift for delivery accelerated irradiation to the patient.
A second aspect of the present invention regards a radiation therapy system that includes a radiation source that moves about an object and directs a beam of radiation towards the object. The radiation therapy system further includes 1) a multi-leaf collimator having a plurality of movable leafs that define an aperture through which the beam is directed from the radiation source to the object and 2) a table upon which the object is positioned, the table being translationally and rotationally movable. The radiation therapy system further includes a computer in communication with the radiation source, the multi-leaf collimator and the table, wherein the computer simultaneously controls one or more of the following parameters of the radiation source, the multi-leaf collimator and the table: table motion, radiation source motion, fluence output rate, multi-leaf collimator orientation and shape of the aperture.
A third aspect of the present invention regards a method of providing radiation that includes directing a beam of radiation towards an object, defining an aperture through which the beam is directed to the object and positioning a table upon which the object lies. The method further including simultaneously controlling one or more of the following parameters: table motion, beam motion, fluence output rate, aperture orientation and shape of the aperture.
A fourth aspect of the present invention regards a radiation therapy system that includes a radiation source that moves about an object and directs a beam of therapeutic radiation towards the object and an imaging source that moves about the object and directs a beam of imaging radiation towards the object. The system further includes a table upon which the object is positioned, the table being translationally and rotationally movable. The system also includes 1) a first imager for receiving radiation passing through the object that was generated by the therapeutic radiation source and for forming a first image information therefrom and 2) a second imager for receiving radiation passing through the object that was generated by the imaging source and for forming a second image information therefrom, wherein the first image information and the second image information are formed simultaneously. The system additionally includes a computer in communication with the radiation source, the table, the first imager and the second imager, wherein the computer simultaneously controls motion of the table and one or more of the following parameters of the radiation source in a real-time manner based on the first image information and the second image information: radiation source motion and fluence output rate.
A fifth aspect of the present invention regards a method of providing radiation that includes directing a beam of therapeutic radiation towards an object and directing a beam of imaging radiation towards the object. The method includes positioning an object upon a table that is translationally and rotationally movable. The method also includes forming first image information of the object based on the beam of therapeutic radiation passing through the object and forming second image information of the object based on the beam of imaging radiation passing through the object, wherein the first image information and the second image information are formed simultaneously. The method further including simultaneously controlling movement of the table and one or more of the following parameters of the beam of therapeutic radiation in a real-time manner based on the first image information and the second image information: beam of therapeutic radiation motion and fluence output rate.
One or more aspects of the present invention provide the advantage of prescribing fewer monitor units and using fewer control points.
One or more aspects of the present invention provide for reducing irradiation in breast treatment to all OARs: breasts, lungs, and heart without compromising target coverage.
One or more aspects of the present invention decrease the risk of toxicity and secondary malignancy.
As shown in
The system 102 is retrofitted onto an existing or new radiation therapy system 112 that includes a separate radiation therapy source, such as the medical linear source 104, which operates at a power level to allow for treatment of a target volume in an object, such as a human patient. The medical linear source 104 generates a beam of x-rays or particles, such as photons, protons or electrons, which have an energy ranging from 4 MeV to 25 MeV. Indeed, the medical linear source 104 could be replaced with other radiation sources used for therapeutic treatment of patients without departing from the spirit of the present invention. The radiation therapy system 112 further includes a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) 113 that is movable as a unit and includes leafs that are movable so as to define an aperture for the therapy beam to pass through on to the patient. The radiation therapy system 112 may also include an imager (not shown) that is aligned with the medical linear source 104 with the patient interposed therebetween.
For support of the patient and for aiding in the application of the therapeutic radiation beam, a computer-controlled treatment table 114 is provided. The table 114 is controlled by a computer, such as computer 116 schematically shown in
The system 100 of
While the table 114 is moving, the aperture shape and the orientation of the MLC 113 can be dynamically varied. In addition, the fluence-output rate (“dose rate”) and gantry rotation speed and consequently speed of rotation of the radiation source 104 can be varied. Control of the table motion, the gantry motion, fluence-output rate, MLC orientation and shape of the MLC is performed by computer 116. The software used to control the computer 116 can be similar to software used in VMAT, wherein the software for C-ARC is such that clinically acceptable dosimetry is generated while avoiding any collision between the table 114, gantry 110 and its attachments, and the patient. With the above description of the system 100 in mind, a possible process for operation of the system 100 is described herein with respect to the flow chart of
After the virtual plan is computed, the patient can now be treated with radiation in accordance with the plan. With that said, it should be kept in mind that the virtual plan assumes that the tumor will be positioned at the same spatial position when it was imaged per process 210. When the patient is placed on the table 114 per process 230, the spatial position of the tumor can be fine tuned per process 240 to be the same when it was imaged per process 210 in one of two manners. One manner for fine tuning the spatial position is to have the technician reposition the patient until he or she visualizes that a skin marker on the patient is in the same position that it was when the image was taken per process 210. A second manner of fine tuning is to take a three-dimensional image of the tumor using computed tomography system 102 and adjust the position of the patient so that the tumor shown in the fine tuning image will be repositioned to coincide with the position of the tumor determined per process 210. Once the patient has been repositioned per process 240, the virtual plan of process 220 is then applied to the tumor per process 250.
Note that besides the fine tuning process mentioned previously, the treatment using the C-ARC plan can be performed in a real-time manner as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,842,502 and 7,471,765, wherein real-time imaging of the tumor is performed during the radiation treatment and the real-time images of the tumor are used by computer 116 to control the table motion, the gantry motion, fluence output rate, MLC orientation and shape of the MLC.
An example of the above described real-time C-ARC treatment is schematically shown in
Examples of kV and MV portal images formed by the kV cone beam and MV imagers described above and at various gantry rotational positions are shown in
With the above description of the C-ARC treatment plan, a comparison with other known treatment plans illustrates the advantages of the present invention. In the case of treatment of tumors in the breast via accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), the gantry 110 remains stationary at tangent angles while the table 114 rotates through one medial and one lateral arc, wherein the medial and lateral arcs are defined with respect to the orientation of the breast of the patient.
In the case of when the breast in question has been previously treated by a 3D-CRT plan, the beam arrangement of the 3D-CRT plan can be used to guide C-ARC planning, as it is deemed to have provided clinically acceptable dosimetry while avoiding any collision between the table, gantry, and the patient. The table positions from the 3D-CRT plan are taken as the limits of the table arcs. Similarly, the gantry position for each arc is chosen to be the same as that in the 3D-CRT plan. Optimization and dose calculation is done with control points positioned at 10° intervals along the arcs. Such breast treatment Maintains the benefits of the standard tangent beam arrangement of APBI treated with 3D-CRT. C-ARC is a natural extension of the innovation of VMAT to the realm of breast radiotherapy, in which the standard tangent beam geometry minimizes dose outside the target. This is shown in
In the comparison to follow, it regards patients previously treated with APBI via 3D-CRT and three additional and subsequent plans were generated for each patient: 1) a C-ARC plan, 2) an IMRT plan, and 3) a VMAT plan. The DVH parameters used for evaluation were taken largely from the normal tissue constraints of the NSABP-B39/RTOG 0413 protocol for breast therapy and are listed in Table 1 below:
Table 1 above lists the mean values for the normal tissue doses of the C-ARC, IMRT, and VMAT plans, all of which are compared to the original 3D-CRT plan. All three treatment planning modalities significantly decrease the volume of normal ipsilateral breast tissue V50%, reducing this value by 7.8% on average (See
C-ARC and VMAT plans are also compared. These two planning modalities produce comparable reductions in the volume of ipsilateral breast receiving 50% and 100% of the prescribed dose, as well as the ipsilateral lung receiving 30% of the prescribed dose. However, VMAT plans result in significantly larger ipsilateral lung volumes receiving 5 Gy (10.4% vs. 7.8%, p=0.008) and heart volumes receiving 192.5 cGy (7.7% vs. 5.5%, p=0.021).
In addition to reducing the dose to the ipsilateral breast, C-ARC plans decrease dose to the lung and heart. C-ARC and IMRT provided the greatest reductions in ipsilateral lung irradiation as measured by V5 Gy due to their lack of en face geometry. C-ARC and IMRT plans also produced significant reductions in low dose irradiation of the heart.
Due to a lack of wedges, the C-ARC, IMRT, and VMAT plans all reduced the number of monitor units prescribed in comparison to the 3D-CRT plans, with C-ARC plans providing the greatest reduction. C-ARC plans also used the smallest number of control points, thereby minimizing leakage radiation.
As shown in Table 1, C-ARC plans produce a significant reduction in ipsilateral breast irradiation without increasing dose to the lungs, heart, and contralateral breast. VMAT plans are also able to reduce radiation dose to the ipsilateral breast, but this can come more often at the expense of increased dose elsewhere.
A natural extension of VMAT, C-ARC will allow for treatment with improved conformality, decreased delivery of monitor units, and anticipated shorter treatment times. The complexity of C-ARC is not significantly greater than that of existing arc therapy from the point of view of the treatment planner and operator. In order for this innovation to take place it will be necessary to link couch rotation control to dose rate and multileaf collimator motion. Minor modification of VMAT planning software will also be required to incorporate couch arcs.
In the case of APBI C-ARC therapy, the gantry 110 is stationary while the table 114 moves. There are instances where C-ARC therapy can involve simultaneous movement of the table 114 and the gantry 110. An example of this is when partial brain radiation therapy is employed. Movement of the table 114 and gantry 110 allows for the amount of therapeutic radiation applied to the healthy areas involving the optic chlasm, optic nerve and brain stem. Indeed, when compared with IMRT, C-ARC therapy employs reduced mean and maximum dosages for the optic chlasm, optic nerve and brain stem when compared with IMRT
From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can readily ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and/or modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions.
Applicants claim, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), the benefit of priority of the filing date of Jan. 5, 2010 of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/335,314, filed on the aforementioned date, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61335314 | Jan 2010 | US |
