Inter-carrier messaging service providing phone number only experience

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8483729
  • Patent Number
    8,483,729
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 27, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 9, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A phone number only messaging experience provided in an Inter-Carrier Messaging System service. Subscriber to subscriber digital messages containing user data are routed between carrier's networks using an Inter-Carrier messaging module with appropriate MIN/carrier/carrier routing look-up capabilities. Digital messages containing user data (e.g., short messages, email, etc.) may be sent to a subscriber in another carrier's network addressed only with a phone number. If the recipient is outside of the sender's carrier network, the Inter-Carrier messaging module of the Inter-Carrier service provider (ICSP) determines the appropriate carrier for the recipient, appends appropriate syntax to the digital message containing user data to allow internet protocol (IP) or other standardized communication techniques between message service centers of the two carriers, and routes the digital message containing user data to the destination carrier. The recipient in the other carrier's network may reply back to the ICSP's sender using only the subscriber's directory number.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates generally to wireless carriers, Internet service providers (ISPs), and information content delivery services/providers. More particularly, it relates to digital messaging services provided between different carriers and/or between subscribers in different air interface standards.


2. Background of Related Art


We are now in what is called the information age. More than ever, the exchange of information, and the ability to do the same, has become an important technical necessity of modern society. With the introduction and now wide usage of the Internet, and the advances in telecommunications, a variety of means for exchanging information have proliferated to bring a great number of people together through the exchange of information.


In the early 1990s, as a result of the growing popularity of digital wireless technology, a standard for digital wireless networks was introduced in Europe. That standard, now known as the global standard for mobiles (GSM), included a service called short messaging service (SMS). One way in which information is exchanged is through short messages. A short message is typically a textual message, e.g., a paging message, e-mail or a voice mail message passed to and/or from various types of communication devices, e.g., cellular telephone handsets, telephones or computers with appropriate modems.


An SMS allows transmission of short messages, typically up to 160 characters, to and from communication devices, e.g., cellular telephone handsets, telephones or computers with appropriate modems. In North America, the SMS is currently implemented on digital wireless/mobile networks, such as a PCS network based on the GSM standard, code division multiple access (CDMA) and/or time division multiple access (TDMA) methods. Short message services are gaining in popularity, particularly in the United States.


Short message services are advantageous over text based paging services because of the capability of bi-directional communication. Such bi-directional communication allows, for example, notification to the originating device of the success or failure of the short message delivery.


Each SMS network typically includes a Short Message Service Center (SMSC) which acts as a store-and-forward mechanism providing guaranteed delivery of short messages to a subscriber, even if the subscriber is inactive when the message was transmitted, by delivering the short messages once the subscriber becomes active. Delivery of all short messages is guaranteed regardless of whether or not the intended subscriber is “on-line” because the transmitted short message is stored within the one SMSC assigned to each intended subscriber, and delivered to the intended subscriber from their assigned SMSC when the subscriber becomes available.


A variety of services have been introduced using SMS networks including, for example, integrated electronic mail and fax, integrated paging, interactive banking, and information services such as stock quotes and airline schedule delivery.


In operation, an SMSC receives a short message from any source intended to be delivered to a particular subscriber. When the intended subscriber is not available because, for example, it is turned off or is outside of the service area of the SMS network, the attempt to deliver the short message at that time will fail. In this case, the short message will be retained in the SMSC assigned to that intended subscriber for a later delivery attempt. Thereafter, when the subscriber finally becomes available, e.g., is turned on or has moved into the service area of the SMS network, the relevant portions of the network (e.g., the mobile servicing center (MSC) and the home location register (HLR)) notify the SMSC to initiate delivery of the stored (i.e., previously failed) short messages.



FIG. 9 shows a general example of a short message exchange network. In particular, in FIG. 9, a text message is communicated between a first communication device (i.e., sender 806) and a second communication device (i.e., recipient 804). The sender 806 accesses a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet or the Public Telephone Switching Network (PTSN). The short message from the sender 806 via gateway 805 is delivered to the recipient 804 via, e.g., a gateway 802 and a local area network (LAN) and/or wireless network 803.


Although the recipient 804 is shown as being a mobile phone handset, the recipient 804 may comprise, e.g., a computer device connected either through the LAN 803 or via a direct modem connection to the WAN (e.g., PTSN or the Internet) 801.


An example of a wireless short message exchange network is described in co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,208,870, entitled “SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE NOTIFICATION IN MULTIPLE SERVICE CENTER SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE NETWORK”, the entirety of which is explicitly incorporated herein by reference.


An SMSC is a core short messaging router, which connects to the SS7 public network. An SMSC provides phone-to-phone two-way messaging within that carrier's network, either mobile originated or mobile terminated. To provide the ability for the SMSC to communicate over the web, a Wireless Internet Gateway (WIG) is added to the carrier's network. While an SMSC does have a direct Internet Protocol (IP) interface (i.e., Short Message Peer-to-Peer (SMPP)), a WIG acts as a multi-protocol router by typically adding, e.g., six or more additional carrier-class interfaces. A WIG provides an IP based door into a carrier's network.


SMPP is typically used to provide direct communications between SMSCs. Other direct communication links used between SMSCs include CDMP, which is MOTOROLA™ proprietary, and OIS, another proprietary protocol.


A suitable and appropriate WIG is shown and described in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/630,762, entitled “Wireless Internet Gateway”, filed Aug. 2, 2000, the entirety of which is explicitly incorporated herein by reference.


A well known example of a system which delivers short messages is an electronic mail system, commonly referred to as e-mail. E-mail enables a sender to exchange information with a recipient from their respective communication devices, e.g., typically two remotely located computer devices.


Mobile devices such as wireless phones provide limited e-mail services. Wireless phones are designed to accept phone numbers quite easily, but are somewhat cumbersome when required to accept an alphanumeric e-mail address. When communicating between phone on different networks, subscribers must address messages to an e-mail address when communicating from phone-to-phone within the same network, only the phone number is required. Thus, text messages between wireless phones is generally limited in the United States to between subscribers within a common carrier's wireless network.


With current systems, Inter-Carrier e-mail messaging (i.e., between different carrier networks) from wireless devices requires input of a complete e-mail address. In particular, for a subscriber of a first carrier (“Carrier A”) to send a message to a subscriber of another carrier (“Carrier B”), the subscriber of Carrier A must know and input a full e-mail address of the destination device.


Exemplary full e-mail addresses typically comprise a phone number, the “@” sign, and then a unique domain name used specifically for SMS messaging. An exemplary full e-mail address is 4105551234@mobile.myportal.xyzwireless.net. A phone number only experience can be provided to the subscriber of Carrier A only when sending an SMS message (e.g., e-mail) to a subscriber of the same Carrier A.


As an example, mobile terminated short messaging is currently available through web-page based services. For instance, VERIZON WIRELESS™ currently maintains a web page “msg.myvzw.com” for use only by VERIZON WIRELESS™ customers. Using this web page based approach, a user inserts a phone number of a known Verizon customer, types in a body of the desired message, and clicks on an enter key. However, this technique is available for mobile termination (not mobile originated) short messages only. Moreover, the sender must by default know to go to the Verizon web page, and thus have advance knowledge of the particular carrier servicing a particular phone number.


Mobile originated short messaging is also available, but is cumbersome to the user and does not provide a phone number only experience. In particular, to send a mobile originated short message, the sender must enter a phone number in their wireless phone, but the subscriber's network will be capable of sending an associated short message only to other subscriber's within the same carrier's network. To send the short message to a subscriber serviced by another carrier's network, the subscriber must enter a complete alphanumeric e-mail address via their mobile phone (e.g., 4105551212@mobile.att.net). As discussed, entry of a lengthy list of alphanumeric characters via an alphanumeric keypad on a mobile phone is cumbersome at best, particularly since several letters are represented on any particular key, and some letters in the alphabet are not represented at all on the alphanumeric keypad.


Unfortunately, using this mobile originated technique, a sender must know beforehand: (1) Whether or not the subscriber is in fact on another network (thereby requiring a full e-mail address instead of just a phone number for in-carrier subscribers); and (2) The exact format address syntax of a phone number on the recipient's network (e.g., “©mobile.att.net”.


Most carriers in other parts of the world enjoy common technologies with adjacent carriers. For instance, most carriers in Europe have a wireless network conforming to the GSM standards. Accordingly, interconnection between SMSC's from different carriers is simple and straight forward because they all use the same air interface (i.e., GSM). Thus, native SMS Inter-Carrier messaging may be accomplished through direct carrier-to-carrier interconnections. Accordingly, there is no technical barrier to interconnectivity, and a phone number only experience may be provided to these GSM system subscribers using native SMS Inter-Carrier messaging which is accomplished through direct carrier-to-carrier interconnections.


Unfortunately, the interconnection of like air interface technologies (such as GSM) is not generally an option in the US. In the US, each major US carrier has deployed a different, competing air interface technology (e.g., CDMA, TDMA, GSM, I-DEN (a spin-off of GSM, Motorola™ proprietary), Reflex (paging networks), etc.) There are approximately ten (10) different air interface technology protocols currently in use in the United States. While this technology dispersion allows carriers to differentiate their service offers from one another, the US consumer suffers inconvenience because of the lack of standardization and/or interoperability across networks.


Not only is the variety of air interface technologies an integration challenge in the United States (many carriers espouse the superiority of their particular air interface technology over those provided by competitors), but roaming agreements for voice and SMS traffic must be reached by all potential recipients of a short message. In Europe, roaming agreements between European countries are routinely established because of the commonality of the air interface technologies (and lack of ‘technical superiority’ claims by competitors).


Practically speaking, most people remember or note down the mobile phone number of desired people to call. However, most people have no knowledge of the exact carrier with which those desired people to call are serviced by. Without remembering the identity of the person's carrier, a subscriber has great difficulty in determining a full e-mail address for that person. Without changing US society to remember not only phone numbers of others but also which carrier each of the others are with, e-mail messaging between subscribers of different carriers will find adoption to be slow.


There is a need for providing subscribers of wireless carriers in the United States a phone number only experience, to facilitate and ensure the adoption and popularity of SMS messaging in general, and e-mail messaging in particular, in a mobile environment.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, in a message distribution center, a phone number only experience is provided by a database associating subscriber MIN numbers with servicing carriers, and a database associating carriers with routing syntax. An inter-carrier messaging module receives a digital message containing user data addressed with only a MIN number, performs a lookup in the database associating subscriber MIN numbers and in the database associating carriers with routing syntax, and adds routing syntax determined from the lookup to the MIN number.


A method of providing a phone number only experience to a subscriber in accordance with another aspect of the present invention comprises receiving an initial digital message containing user data addressed to a MIN only, and associating a carrier providing service to the MIN. A new digital message containing user data is formulated including a body of the initial digital message containing user data and newly addressed to the MIN with a syntax associated with the carrier providing service to the MIN. The new digital message containing user data is routed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description with reference to the drawings, in which:



FIGS. 1 and 2 depict a Message Distribution Center (MDC) including an Inter-Carrier Messaging module including a MIN/Carrier Database and a Carrier Routing Table to provide a subscriber with “phone number only” short messaging capabilities, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows exemplary interconnections between the MDC including an Inter-Carrier messaging module, and other carrier's networks using TCP/IP protocols, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 4 shows exemplary entries in an exemplary Mobile ID Number (MIN)/Carrier Database shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIG. 5 shows exemplary entries in an exemplary Carrier Routing Table shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIG. 6 depicts a phone number only experience for a subscriber of Carrier 1 to send a short message to a subscriber of another Carrier (e.g., which does not subscribe to the Service Bureau including the Inter-carrier Messaging Module), in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 7 depicts a phone number only experience for a subscriber of Carrier 1 to receive a short message from a subscriber of another Carrier (e.g., which does not subscribe to the Service Bureau including the Inter-carrier Messaging Module), in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 8 is an exemplary detailed “call flow” representing an IP-based Inter-Carrier Short Message Service message transaction via a Message Distribution Center Inter-Carrier Messaging Service, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 9 shows a general example of a short message exchange network.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides a phone number only messaging experience to subscribing customers using native SMS Inter-Carrier Messaging, i.e., “phone number only” messaging, as opposed to e-mail-based messaging.


An Inter-Carrier Short Messaging System (IC-SMS) service in accordance with the principles of the present invention allows short messages to be sent between networks of different technologies using only a phone number. Subscriber to subscriber messages are routed between carrier's networks by a service bureau or similar function provided by the use of an Inter-Carrier messaging module with appropriate MIN/carrier/carrier routing look-up capabilities.


In operation, a subscriber of the service providing an Inter-Carrier messaging module may send a mobile originated (MO) short message, addressed only with a phone number, to a subscriber in another carrier's network. If in-network, the message is routed in SMSC. If not in-network, the message is sent to the ICM module. The service's Inter-Carrier messaging module determines that the destination address of the message is not a subscriber in the sender's same network. The Inter-Carrier messaging module of the Inter-Carrier service provider (ICSP) determines the appropriate carrier for the recipient, appends the appropriate syntax to the short message to allow internet protocol (IP) or other standardized communication techniques between SMSCs of the two carriers, and routes the short message to the destination carrier. Once received, the destination carrier's network delivers the message to the final destination.


Furthermore, the present invention preferably allows the recipient in the other carrier's network to reply back to the ICSP's sender back to the sender using only the subscriber's directory number. This assists in the provision of a phone number only experience by the ICSP's subscriber.


The Inter-Carrier messaging module may store an instance of the expectation of a reply from the recipient (e.g., for a given period of time) to allow phone number only reply's, but it is preferred that the Inter-carrier messaging module simply recognize the intended recipient of a reply as being within the network of the ICSP, and effectively strip off any email syntax from the telephone number before forwarding the reply short message back to the original sender.


A Message Distribution Center (MDC) including an Inter-Carrier messaging module in accordance with the principles of the present invention empowers message providers (e.g., carriers, enterprises, web developers, content providers, etc.) with a single point of entry for the transaction of SMS messaging to a wide array of wireless networks.


The MDC including the Inter-Carrier messaging module preferably includes a carrier-grade Wireless Internet Gateway (WIG) such as the one shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/630,762, filed Aug. 2, 2000 by Richard Smith, the entirety of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference) in a hosted environment (e.g., a service bureau).


An MDC Inter-Carrier SMS Service in accordance with the principles of the present invention provides a short message clearinghouse providing subscribers with a capability that will enhance their communications freedom through seamless, simple SMS messaging to other subscribers, regardless of the destination network.


An Inter-Carrier Messaging Service in accordance with the principles of the present invention is a value-added service of the MDC that allows carriers to offer their subscribers a “phone number only” messaging experience regardless of the destination network. The MDC Inter-Carrier Messaging Service provides protocol translation and messaging routing service for all SMS messages terminating to addresses outside the sender's network. Additionally, the service may extend preferably the phone number only experience to mobile terminated messages that are a result of a “reply” to a short message originated by a subscriber in the network, as well as short messages originating from other carriers/operators participating in the MDC Inter-Carrier Messaging Service.



FIGS. 1 and 2 depict a Message Distribution Center (MDC) including an Inter-Carrier Messaging module including a MIN/Carrier Database and a Carrier Routing Table to provide a subscriber with “phone number only” short messaging capabilities, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the MDC acts as a clearinghouse for message transactions between carrier networks.


Communication between a carrier's network and the MDC may be through the Short Message Peer to Peer (SMPP) protocol. The MDC preferably fully supports SMPP 3.3 and 3.4 as well as other SMSC interface protocols such as CDMP (Motorola proprietary), OIS (Sema proprietary), SNPP (paging operators) and WCTP (paging operators).


In FIG. 1, an MDC 200 includes an Inter-Carrier messaging module 100, MIN/Carrier database 110, and Carrier Routing Table 120, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The Inter-Carrier messaging module 100 enables phone number only short messaging between a subscriber's carrier 1 250 which subscribes to (or owns/maintains) the Inter-Carrier service provider (ICSP) providing the Inter-Carrier messaging module 100, and subscribers 220, 230, 240 of other carrier's networks 260, 270, 280, respectively.



FIG. 2 shows exemplary communication protocols between the subscriber's carrier 1 250, using e.g., SMPP, and a recipient's carrier 3 260, using e.g., SMPP, OIS, CDMP, WCTP, SMTP, and/or HTTP. The subscriber's carrier 1 250 includes an SMSC 251, MSC 252, and BS 253. Carrier 3 260 includes a Wireless Internet Gateway 271 providing access (e.g., IP protocol access) to an SMSC 272, MSC 273, and base station BS 274.


With respect to interoperability, at the heart of the Message Distribution Center 200 is the carrier-proven technology of a Wireless Internet Gateway (WIG) such as that shown and described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/630,762.


The Wireless Internet Gateway passes text messages between the Internet (via HTTP, SMTP, and other common Internet protocols) and a carrier's Short Message Service Center (SMSC). The WIG is currently operational in many carrier networks worldwide interoperating with SMSCs that support SMPP, CDMP, and/or OIS protocols.



FIG. 3 shows exemplary interconnections between the MDC including an Inter-Carrier messaging module, and other carrier's networks using TCP/IP protocols, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 3, one communication method between the MDC 200 and a carrier is via SMPP or RMI, as depicted by Carrier 1, which includes a Wireless Internet Gateway 1010, SMSC 1012, STP 1014, and MSC 1016. This communication technique does not require a carrier agreement between the sending carrier and the receiving carrier, and is very fast to market.


Alternatively, as depicted by carrier 2 in FIG. 3, an SMPP, CDMP, OIS or RMI protocol communication path may be used between the MDC 200 and the Wireless Internet Gateway 1110 of the other carrier. In such a case, the Wireless Internet Gateway 1110 would use SMPP, CDMP or OIS protocol communications with the SMSC 1112 of that carrier 2. The SMSCs 1012, 1112, STPs 1014, 1114, and MSCs 1016, 1116 utilize SS7 protocols. This second type carrier network supports 1-way SMS, is capable of providing a 2-way SMS, and no protocol conversion is required.


The Message Distribution Center 200 is a store and forward messaging platform. The disclosed MDC 200 utilizes a store and forward approach to assure message delivery, complete message tracking, and maximum billing flexibility.


Most SMS service providers currently operate using open SMTP or HTTP gateways. The MDC 200 preferably provides inside-the-network connectivity with all the major domestic carriers and as many tier 2 and 3 carriers as is feasible.


Where inside-the-network connections are unavailable, it is preferred that open SMTP and HTTP gateway connections to carriers be used.


Preferably, the MDC 200 supports message routing to Tier 2, Tier 3 and paging operators.


Custom control methods may be implemented to enable the MDC 200 to restrict incoming and outgoing messages to other carrier networks. These methods would allow the MDC 200 to turn incoming and/or outgoing messaging “off” on a carrier by carrier basis. Specific bounce rules and error messages, as well as related reporting requirements, may be defined by the operator of the MDC 200.


In addition to the above, one or more categories of “anti-spam” functionality may be defined to allow the MDC 200 to control the flow of particular unsolicited messages, either from a single source (e-mail address) or a single domain (e.g. msn.com). The MDC 200 can restrict messages based on the following criteria a) number of allowable messages sent to a MIN in a given period of time b) number of messages sent from a particular source, including e-mail address or IP number, and c) messages with a particular subject field (e.g. “I LOVE YOU”).


In the disclosed embodiments, seven different interface methods are provided by which SMS messages can be transmitted to wireless and paging carriers including SMTP, HTTP, Win Socket connection, XML Remote Procedure Calls, SMPP and WCTP.


SMTP (Simple Mail Transport Protocol)


For developers interested in transmitting text messages using the SMTP e-mail protocol, this capability may be provided in an easy to use format. Simplicity is the benefit of this access method. Functionality, however, is limited. This method does not allow developers to take full advantage of the Application Programming Interface (API)'s capability to track a message's status or set expiration time. For more advanced capabilities, developers must utilize one of the other interface methods.


HTTP (Hypertext Transport Protocol)


Messages can also be distributed to wireless devices by submitting various parameters for the MIN, text message, login, password, etc. to a URL. Messages can be transmitted using Secure Socket Layer (SSL) for secure transmission to the MDC. Responses to HTTP posts can be returned in either standard Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) or Extensible Markup Language (XML) for easier data manipulation.


Win Socket Command Line


Developers may choose to interface with the MDC through a robust Win Socket Command Line interface that provides them with complete access to the full power of the MDC's API via a Telnet session.


XML-RPC (Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calls)


XML programmers will be familiar with the XML Remote Procedure Call (XML-RPC) interface to the API. The XML-RPC interface may be imbedded within an application and messages may be “posted” using the XML-RPC specifications.


SMPP-Short Message Peer-to-Peer


The Short Message Peer to Peer protocol is an open industry standard messaging protocol designed to simplify integration of data applications with wireless mobile networks. The protocol is widely deployed in the mobile telecommunications industry. Currently, the MDC supports limited SMPP functionality with complete support for SMPP 3.4 scheduled for release in Q3 2001.


SNPP-Simple Network Paging Protocol


The Simple Network Page Protocol is a paging industry standard messaging protocol designed to simplify integration of data applications with paging networks. The protocol is widely deployed within the paging industry.


WCTP-Wireless Communications Transfer Protocol


The Wireless Communications Transfer Protocol (WCTP) is specifically aimed at creating an easy means of passing alphanumeric and binary messages to and from wireline systems and two-way capable wireless devices. Although introduced through the paging industry, WCTP is directly applicable for messaging to and from most other wireless technologies including PCS, GSM, and cellular.


Preferably, the MDC supports Deliver_SM and Submit_SM operations for SMPP specification versions 3.4 and 3.3, and similar operations in future versions of SMPP, e.g., SMPP version 5.0.


The MDC's current production capacity is 80 to 100 messages/second. At the core of the MDC's architecture is a Wireless Internet Gateway (WIG). The WIG is a highly scalable and available carrier grade product. Preferably, the WIG architecture allows the addition of additional WIGs (as well as other network components) to increase capacity on an as-needed basis. Usage capacity may be monitored and additional capacity may be added on an as needed basis.


Statistics used to determine latency times for the MDC include the entire time period from when a message is first received by the MDC until the time the MDC receives an acknowledgement that the carrier has received the message. Given that assumption, the minimum latency of the disclosed MDC is under one second, and the average latency is approximately 2.5 seconds. The maximum latency of the MDC is essentially irrelevant because the longest latencies typically occur in situations where the destination carrier's gateway is unavailable for a period due to problems with the carrier network. In this situation, the MDC continues to retry sending the message until the message expires (a configurable parameter) or until the carrier's gateway becomes available.


Multiple carrier-class Network Operating Centers (NOCs) may be maintained throughout the country, connected via redundant T-1s and having mirrored applications and servers at each location.


The primary components of the MDC's application software functions include protocol stacks and other interface methods that accept messages from outside sources. Supported input protocols and access methods include SMPP, SMTP, HTTP, WCTP, XML-RPC, and a proprietary command line interface accessible via a TelNet session. Other components include message provider validation and message tracking and billing functions, MIN destination validation functions; message queuing functions, message routing to destination carriers based upon MIN ranges, and outgoing message transmission to destination carriers (including message throttling based upon destination carrier's specifications).


It is preferred that most software be written in Java language, enabling portability and reuse across numerous operating environments. The software design is also preferably modular, to take advantage of Remote Method Invocation (RMI). RMI enables various components to be distributed across servers increasing system performance by spreading processing power across different physical servers. Furthermore, it is preferred that the software be object oriented and multi-threaded. A suitable database engine may be that commercially available from ORACLE™, to provide strong performance, high availability, and scalability.



FIG. 4 shows exemplary entries in an exemplary Mobile ID Number (MIN)/Carrier Database 110 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.


In particular, as depicted in FIG. 4, a first entry 310 includes an association between the MIN (i.e., phone number) 410-555-1212, and its carrier, AT&T™. The second entry 320 indicates that the phone number 410-123-4567 is serviced by Verizon™, and the third entry 330 indicates that a fourth MIN 212-654-3210 is serviced by Sprint™.


Preferably, the entries in the MIN/Carrier database may encompass a great majority of all MINs. For instance, in the preferred embodiment, the MIN/Carrier database 110 is filled with information from the FCC mandated Local Exchange Registry (LER) which currently includes approximately 85% of the MINs in use in the United States. Of course, those MINs may be augmented as necessary or desired with MINs not otherwise in the LER, within the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 5 shows exemplary entries in an exemplary Carrier Routing Table 120 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 5, a first entry 488 indicates that communication between the Inter-Carrier service provider (ICSP) and the carrier “AT&T” is by SMTP protocol (i.e., e-mail), and that the phone number only short messages received for delivery to AT&T should be appended with the syntax “@mobile.att.net”. A second entry 489 indicates that communication between the ICSP and the carrier “Verizon” is by SMTP protocol, and that short messages send with phone number only should be appended with the syntax “@mobile.myportal.xyzwireless.net”.


The exemplary carrier routing table 120 shown in FIG. 5 may be extended to include a country of the carrier, allowing inclusion of necessary syntax (e.g., a country code appended to an email address), use of particular communication links, etc.


The advantages of a phone number only short messaging experience in accordance with the principles of the present invention can be readily appreciated when considering the alternatives (presuming that the sender knows the particular carrier associated with a recipient's phone number) of manual entry of the syntaxes such as “@mobile.myportal.xyzwireless.net”.



FIG. 6 depicts a phone number only experience for a subscriber 210 of Carrier 1 250 to send a short message to a subscriber 500 of a different Carrier 2 270 (e.g., which does not subscribe to the ICSP (i.e., Service Bureau) including the Inter-carrier Messaging Module). In particular, as shown in FIG. 6, the subscriber 210 need only send a short message using the simple phone number 410-555-1234 of subscriber 500, with the Inter-Carrier messaging module 100 automatically determining the carrier provider servicing subscriber 500, the method of communication between the Inter-Carrier messaging module 100 of the MDC 200 and the carrier 2 270, and then adding (e.g., appending) the appropriate syntax to the phone number to actually address the short message to “410-555-1234”.


In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the short message sent by subscriber 210 to subscriber 555 is preferably sent with the sender's address in phone number only form, to facilitate the reply of a phone number only short message back to the original subscriber 210. However, the present invention preferably accommodates reply short messages (and/or new short messages) to a subscriber 210 using the full, formal SMTP address such as “443-994-9854@mdc.carrier-1.net”.


While the embodiments of the present invention relate to the addition of syntax to the end of a phone number (i.e., appending the syntax), the present invention relates equally to the addition of a prefix to the phone number, the insertion of syntax information within the phone number, and/or to the addition of suffix information at the end of the phone number.



FIG. 7 depicts a phone number only experience for a subscriber 210 of Carrier 1 250 to receive a short message from a subscriber 500 of another Carrier 2 270, e.g., which does not subscribe to the ICSP or Service Bureau including the Inter-carrier Messaging Module 100 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, subscriber 500 sends a short message addressed to 4439949854@mdc.carrier-1.net. This would conventionally arrive at the subscriber's mobile phone 210 indicating a source using more than simply a phone number, which violates the preferred embodiments of the present invention wherein a clean phone number only experience is desired.


To provide a phone number only experience in accordance with the present embodiment, the short message to subscriber 210 is routed through the Inter-Carrier messaging module 100, where the syntax in the source address of the short message is stripped down preferably to only the phone number. In this way, the subscriber 210 sees a short message which appears to them to have been sent by “4105551234”.


In operation, with reference to FIG. 1, Carrier 1 250 receives a short message from a subscriber 210 with a destination address of a phone number only (i.e., MIN). The SMSC of the Carrier 250 reviews the intended destination of the short message. If the Carrier 250 does not recognize the phone number as being another subscriber of the Carrier 250, then the Carrier 250 dumps the short message with the phone number to the Inter-Carrier Messaging Module 100 of the MDC 200 over, e.g., an SMPP communication pathway.


The Inter-Carrier Messaging Module 100 accesses the MIN/Carrier database 110 to perform a MIN database lookup, which returns with the name of the carrier (e.g., Verizon) providing service to that phone number.


Thereafter, the Inter-Carrier Messaging Module 100 accesses the Carrier Routing Table 120 to determine how the MDC 200 communicates with the particular carrier returned from the MIN/Carrier database lookup (e.g., SMTP). Moreover, the Carrier Routing Table 120 also preferably returns the appropriate syntax to add to the phone number to properly route the short message (e.g., “@msg.myvzw.com”)


With the appropriate syntax now in hand, the Inter-Carrier Messaging Module 100 assembles a new short message, including the phone number with syntax added (e.g., 4107033375@msg.myvzw.com), the body of the short message, the originator address, and optional parameters such as priority, expiration, etc.


Inclusion of the source address (i.e., phone number) provides the recipient with the ability to reply to the received short message. The source address could include the full address of the source, including both the phone number and the appropriate syntax, but this would result in a possible reply short message which would violate the desired phone number only experience for subscribers of certain carriers. Therefore, preferably, the source address in the originally sent short message is added such that any reply short message would be forced back through the MDC 200 including the Inter-Carrier Messaging Module, which would recognize the phone number of the new recipient, and would forward the short message with the syntax stripped off.


For instance, the source address of the original short message can be set at the phone number of the subscriber 210, together with the syntax of the MDC 200 (e.g., 4439110002@mdc.att.net). The Inter-Carrier Messaging Module 100 would copy the body of the reply short message coming from the non-subscribing carrier (i.e., with syntax included in the destination address), apply the optional parameters, perform another MIN table lookup, and routing table lookup, thus formulating a new short message, and deliver the reply short message back to the subscriber 210 of the customer carrier 250.



FIG. 8 is an exemplary detailed “call flow” representing an IP-based Inter-Carrier Short Message Service message transaction via a Message Distribution Center Inter-Carrier Messaging Service, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


Step 700: Subscriber A originates a message to Subscriber B from their 2-way Messaging Device. The message is addressed to Subscriber B's phone number (i.e., to the subscriber's Mobile Identification Number (MIN) only.


Step 702: Carrier A's network elements identify non-Carrier


A addresses and forwards them to the MDC via, e.g., SMPP, CDMP, S, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) (i.e., the web), SMTP (i.e., e-mail), Wireless Communications Transport Protocol (WCTP) (i.e., paging networks), Simple Network Paging Protocol (SNPP), XML-RPC or TCP/IP socket API.


Step 704, or 706 or 708: As the MDC receives the message from Carrier A, it first determines the destination carrier (Carrier B) as well as the protocol supported by Carrier B. Then the MDC appends the MDC/Carrier A domain (mdc.carrier-a.net in the diagram) to Subscriber A's phone number and routes the message accordingly.


Step 710: Carrier B's wireless Internet gateway routes the message to carrier B's own SMSC.


Step 720: SMSC of Carrier B delivers message to subscriber B's 2-way messaging device via appropriate air interface (e.g., over an SS7 link).


Step 730: Subscriber B replies to the message. The message is routed to Carrier B's SMSC via appropriate air interface (e.g., over an SS7 link).


Step 740, 760 and 780: Depending upon the type of relationship enjoyed with the Carrier B, messages are either transported directly from Carrier B's SMSC to the MDC using SMPP (or other protocol) OR they are directed to Carrier B's Internet gateway using SMPP (or other protocol) and then onto the MDC using SMTP or HTTP.


Step 782: The MDC receives a mobile originated message from Carrier B replying to the original message. The MDC routes the message to Carrier A's network.


Step 784: Carrier A's network receives the message and forwards it to Subscriber A's 2-Way Messaging Device.


Another function of the call flow shown in FIG. 8 is that it allows for delivery receipt notification between Carrier A's devices and Carrier B's devices which support delivery receipts.


Through the Message Linking feature, the MDC 200 determines the length of message supported by Carrier B and, if necessary, breaks lengthy messages into multiple linked messages.


The present invention allows 2-way pagers with querty keyboards to send short messages using phone number only addressing to any mobile phone (or to any other pager).


The phone number only capabilities of an Inter-Carrier Messaging Module and associated databases in accordance with the principles of the present invention has the capability to bridge non-SMS messaging devices, e.g., ReFlex and Mobitex pagers.


The present invention provides multiple benefits. For instance, simple “phone number only” SMS messaging across major carrier networks will add significantly to the continued adoption of SMS messaging particularly in the United States. Additionally, carriers can structure their pricing plans to recognize additional revenue from Inter-Carrier messages through the control and management of Inter-Carrier Messaging in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


Moreover, the present invention provides SMS traffic management and control, and a potential additional revenue stream for a carrier from international messaging.


The invention has particular use with respect to cellular and PCS carriers, and paging network operators (e.g., Verizon Wireless, AT&T Wireless, Sprint PCS, VoiceStream, SkyTel, etc.) in North America as well as other markets served by operators employing disparate air interface technologies.


While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for processing a digital message packet addressed with a phone number only, comprising the steps of: receiving from a first carrier an initial digital message packet addressed to a phone number only;associating a different carrier providing service to said phone number;formulating a new digital message packet including a body of said initial digital message packet and newly addressed to said phone number with a syntax associated with said different carrier providing service to a device ID associated with said phone number; androuting said new digital message packet.
  • 2. The method for processing a digital message packet addressed with a phone number only according to claim 1, wherein: said phone number only addressed digital message packet is received at, and said new digital message packet is routed from, a service bureau.
  • 3. The method for processing a digital message packet addressed with a phone number only according to claim 1, wherein: said phone number with said added syntax associated with said carrier providing service to said device ID associated with said phone number forms a routable address.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/929,730, entitled “Inter-Carrier Messaging Service Providing Phone Number Only Experience,” filed on Feb. 11, 2012; which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/073,262, entitled “Inter-Carrier Messaging Service Providing Phone Number Only Experience,” filed on Mar. 3, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,890,127, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/359,586, entitled “Inter-Carrier Messaging Service Providing Phone Number Only Experience,” filed on Feb. 23, 2006, (now abandoned), which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/130,256, entitled “Inter-Carrier Digital Message with User Data Payload Service Providing Phone Number Only Experience,” (as amended) filed on May 17, 2005, (now abandoned), which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/720,343, filed on Nov. 25, 2003, entitled “Inter-Carrier Short Messaging Service Providing Phone Number Only Experience,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,985,748, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/985,032, filed on Nov. 1, 2001, entitled “Inter-Carrier Short Messaging Service Providing Phone Number Only Experience”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,658,260, which in turn claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/316,973, filed Sep. 5, 2001, entitled “Internet Protocol (IP) Based Inter-Carrier Messaging Service”, the entirety of all of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (483)
Number Name Date Kind
1103073 O'Connel Jul 1914 A
3920908 Krauss Nov 1975 A
4310726 Asmuth Jan 1982 A
4399330 Kuenzel Aug 1983 A
4494119 Wimbush Jan 1985 A
4651156 Martinez Mar 1987 A
4680785 Akiyama Jul 1987 A
4706275 Kamil Nov 1987 A
4725719 Oncken Feb 1988 A
4756020 Fodale Jul 1988 A
4776000 Parienti Oct 1988 A
4776003 Harris Oct 1988 A
4776037 Rozanski, Jr. Oct 1988 A
4831647 D'Avello et al. May 1989 A
4852149 Zwick Jul 1989 A
4852155 Barraud Jul 1989 A
4860341 D'Avello Aug 1989 A
4891638 Davis Jan 1990 A
4891650 Sheffer Jan 1990 A
4901340 Parker Feb 1990 A
4935956 Hellwarth Jun 1990 A
4952928 Carroll et al. Aug 1990 A
5003585 Richer Mar 1991 A
5014206 Scribner et al. May 1991 A
5043736 Darnell et al. Aug 1991 A
5046088 Margulies Sep 1991 A
5055851 Sheffer Oct 1991 A
5063588 Patsiokas Nov 1991 A
5068656 Sutherland Nov 1991 A
5068891 Marshall Nov 1991 A
5070329 Jasinaki Dec 1991 A
5081667 Drori et al. Jan 1992 A
5103449 Jolissaint Apr 1992 A
5119104 Heller Jun 1992 A
5127040 D'Avello Jun 1992 A
5128938 Borras Jul 1992 A
5138648 Palomeque Aug 1992 A
5138650 Stahl Aug 1992 A
5144283 Arens et al. Sep 1992 A
5144649 Zicker Sep 1992 A
5150113 Bluthgen Sep 1992 A
5159625 Zicker Oct 1992 A
5161180 Chavous Nov 1992 A
5177478 Wagai et al. Jan 1993 A
5187710 Chau Feb 1993 A
5193215 Olmer Mar 1993 A
5208756 Song May 1993 A
5214789 George May 1993 A
5216703 Roy Jun 1993 A
5218367 Sheffer et al. Jun 1993 A
5220593 Zicker Jun 1993 A
5223844 Mansell et al. Jun 1993 A
5233642 Renton Aug 1993 A
5235630 Moody et al. Aug 1993 A
5239570 Koster et al. Aug 1993 A
5243645 Bissell et al. Sep 1993 A
5265155 Castro Nov 1993 A
5265630 Hartman Nov 1993 A
5266944 Carroll et al. Nov 1993 A
5274802 Altine Dec 1993 A
5276444 McNair Jan 1994 A
5289527 Tiedemann et al. Feb 1994 A
5291543 Freese Mar 1994 A
5293642 Lo Mar 1994 A
5297189 Chabernaud Mar 1994 A
5299132 Wortham Mar 1994 A
5301223 Amadon Apr 1994 A
5301234 Mazziotto Apr 1994 A
5309501 Kozik May 1994 A
5311572 Friedes May 1994 A
5319774 Ainsworth Jun 1994 A
5321735 Breeden Jun 1994 A
5325302 Izidon et al. Jun 1994 A
5325418 McGregor Jun 1994 A
5327144 Stilp Jul 1994 A
5329578 Brennan Jul 1994 A
5334974 Simms et al. Aug 1994 A
5339352 Armstrong Aug 1994 A
5341410 Aron Aug 1994 A
5341414 Popke Aug 1994 A
5343493 Karimullah Aug 1994 A
5345227 Fascenda et al. Sep 1994 A
5347568 Moody et al. Sep 1994 A
5349696 Matai Sep 1994 A
5351235 Lahtinen Sep 1994 A
5353328 Jokimies et al. Oct 1994 A
5353335 D'Urso Oct 1994 A
5359182 Schilling Oct 1994 A
5359642 Castro Oct 1994 A
5359643 Gammino Oct 1994 A
5361212 Class et al. Nov 1994 A
5363425 Mufti et al. Nov 1994 A
5369699 Page Nov 1994 A
5374936 Feng Dec 1994 A
5379031 Mondrosch et al. Jan 1995 A
5379451 Nakagoshi et al. Jan 1995 A
5381338 Wysocki et al. Jan 1995 A
5384825 Dillard Jan 1995 A
5387993 Heller et al. Feb 1995 A
5388147 Grimes Feb 1995 A
5390339 Bruckert et al. Feb 1995 A
5394158 Chia Feb 1995 A
5396227 Carroll et al. Mar 1995 A
5396545 Nair Mar 1995 A
5396558 Ishiguro Mar 1995 A
5398190 Wortham Mar 1995 A
5404580 Simpson Apr 1995 A
5406614 Hara Apr 1995 A
5408513 Buschi, Jr. Apr 1995 A
5408682 Ranner Apr 1995 A
5412726 Nevoux May 1995 A
5418537 Bird May 1995 A
5423076 Westergren et al. Jun 1995 A
5430759 Yokev Jul 1995 A
5432841 Rimer Jul 1995 A
5434789 Fraker et al. Jul 1995 A
5438615 Moen Aug 1995 A
5440621 Castro Aug 1995 A
5454024 Lebowitz Sep 1995 A
5457737 Wen Oct 1995 A
5461390 Hoshen Oct 1995 A
5464401 Thompson Nov 1995 A
5465289 Kennedy, Jr. Nov 1995 A
5465401 Thompson Nov 1995 A
5469497 Pierce et al. Nov 1995 A
5470233 Fuchterman et al. Nov 1995 A
5479149 Pike Dec 1995 A
5479408 Will Dec 1995 A
5479482 Grimes Dec 1995 A
5485161 Vaughn Jan 1996 A
5485163 Singer et al. Jan 1996 A
5485505 Norman Jan 1996 A
5488563 Chazelle et al. Jan 1996 A
5494091 Freeman Feb 1996 A
5497149 Fast Mar 1996 A
5502761 Duncan Mar 1996 A
5506893 Buscher Apr 1996 A
5508931 Snider Apr 1996 A
5509056 Ericsson Apr 1996 A
5513243 Kage Apr 1996 A
5515287 Hakoyama et al. May 1996 A
5517555 Amadon May 1996 A
5517559 Hayashi May 1996 A
5519403 Bickley et al. May 1996 A
5532690 Hertel Jul 1996 A
5535434 Siddoway et al. Jul 1996 A
5539398 Hall et al. Jul 1996 A
5543776 L'Esperance et al. Aug 1996 A
5550897 Seiderman Aug 1996 A
5552772 Janky et al. Sep 1996 A
5553434 Tamura Sep 1996 A
5555286 Tendler Sep 1996 A
5555446 Jasinski Sep 1996 A
5568119 Schipper et al. Oct 1996 A
5570416 Kroll Oct 1996 A
5574648 Pilley Nov 1996 A
5577100 McGregor Nov 1996 A
5579372 Om Nov 1996 A
5579376 Kennedy et al. Nov 1996 A
5583918 Nakagawa Dec 1996 A
5586175 Hogan Dec 1996 A
5588009 Will Dec 1996 A
5592535 Klotz Jan 1997 A
5596734 Ferra Jan 1997 A
5604486 Lauro et al. Feb 1997 A
5606313 Allen et al. Feb 1997 A
5606595 Ejzak Feb 1997 A
5606850 Nakamura Mar 1997 A
5610815 Gudat Mar 1997 A
5610972 Emery Mar 1997 A
5614890 Fox Mar 1997 A
5615116 Gudat et al. Mar 1997 A
5621727 Vaudreuil Apr 1997 A
5621793 Bednarek et al. Apr 1997 A
5625669 McGregor Apr 1997 A
5628045 Salin May 1997 A
5628051 Salin May 1997 A
5628600 Pasquini May 1997 A
5633912 Tsoi May 1997 A
5640447 Fonseca Jun 1997 A
5652888 Burgess Jul 1997 A
5673306 Amadon et al. Sep 1997 A
5682600 Salin Oct 1997 A
5687216 Svensson Nov 1997 A
5692037 Friend Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5722067 Fougnies Feb 1998 A
5732346 Lazaridis Mar 1998 A
5740534 Ayerst et al. Apr 1998 A
5742668 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5758088 Bezaire May 1998 A
5761618 Lynch et al. Jun 1998 A
5767795 Schaphorst Jun 1998 A
5768509 Gunluk Jun 1998 A
5774533 Patel Jun 1998 A
5778313 Fougnies Jul 1998 A
5787357 Salin Jul 1998 A
5790636 Marshall Aug 1998 A
5793859 Matthews Aug 1998 A
5794142 Vanttila et al. Aug 1998 A
5796734 Izawa et al. Aug 1998 A
5797091 Clise et al. Aug 1998 A
5797094 Houde Aug 1998 A
5797096 Lupien et al. Aug 1998 A
5802492 DeLorme et al. Sep 1998 A
5815816 Isumi Sep 1998 A
5822700 Hult et al. Oct 1998 A
5826185 Wise Oct 1998 A
5828740 Khuc et al. Oct 1998 A
5845293 Veghte Dec 1998 A
5848134 Sekiguchi et al. Dec 1998 A
5850599 Seiderman Dec 1998 A
5854975 Fougnies Dec 1998 A
5857201 Wright, Jr. Jan 1999 A
5867495 Elliott et al. Feb 1999 A
5867688 Simmon Feb 1999 A
5884323 Hawkins Mar 1999 A
5887249 Schmid Mar 1999 A
5905736 Ronen et al. May 1999 A
5915222 Olsson Jun 1999 A
5920821 Seazholtz et al. Jul 1999 A
5920822 Houde Jul 1999 A
5930701 Skog Jul 1999 A
5940756 Sibecas et al. Aug 1999 A
5943399 Bannister et al. Aug 1999 A
5946629 Sawyer et al. Aug 1999 A
5946630 Willars et al. Aug 1999 A
5949326 Wicks et al. Sep 1999 A
5950130 Coursey Sep 1999 A
5953398 Hill Sep 1999 A
5959543 LaPorta et al. Sep 1999 A
5960074 Clark Sep 1999 A
5966663 Gleason Oct 1999 A
5974054 Couts et al. Oct 1999 A
5974238 Chase, Jr. Oct 1999 A
5978685 Laiho Nov 1999 A
5983095 Cameron Nov 1999 A
5987323 Huotari Nov 1999 A
5999811 Molne Dec 1999 A
6000000 Hawkins Dec 1999 A
6003040 Mital Dec 1999 A
6011976 Michaels et al. Jan 2000 A
6014429 LaPorta et al. Jan 2000 A
6018657 Kennedy, III et al. Jan 2000 A
6021333 Anderson Feb 2000 A
6034621 Kaufman Mar 2000 A
6035025 Hanson Mar 2000 A
6041045 Alterman Mar 2000 A
6044381 Boothby Mar 2000 A
6049710 Nilsson Apr 2000 A
6055442 Dietrich Apr 2000 A
6058300 Hanson May 2000 A
6064875 Morgan May 2000 A
6070067 Nguyen et al. May 2000 A
6075982 Donovan et al. Jun 2000 A
6078583 Takahara Jun 2000 A
6081508 West et al. Jun 2000 A
6085099 Ritter et al. Jul 2000 A
6085100 Tarnanen Jul 2000 A
6087956 Helferich Jul 2000 A
6094574 Vance et al. Jul 2000 A
6101378 Barabash et al. Aug 2000 A
6118448 McMillan et al. Sep 2000 A
6122503 Daly Sep 2000 A
6122520 Want et al. Sep 2000 A
6125281 Wells et al. Sep 2000 A
6128482 Nixon et al. Oct 2000 A
6128653 del Val et al. Oct 2000 A
6138158 Boyle et al. Oct 2000 A
6139177 Venkatraman Oct 2000 A
6144653 Persson et al. Nov 2000 A
6148197 Bridges et al. Nov 2000 A
6148198 Anderson et al. Nov 2000 A
6149353 Nilsson Nov 2000 A
6157831 Lamb Dec 2000 A
6157846 Manning et al. Dec 2000 A
6169891 Gorham et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173181 Losh Jan 2001 B1
6173438 Kodosky et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175743 Alperovich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178331 Holmes et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181935 Gossman Jan 2001 B1
6185602 Bayrakeri Feb 2001 B1
6188752 Lesley Feb 2001 B1
6189031 Badger et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192241 Yu Feb 2001 B1
6195543 Granberg Feb 2001 B1
6195651 Handel et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198431 Gibson Mar 2001 B1
6199045 Giniger et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205330 Winbladh Mar 2001 B1
6205448 Kruglikov Mar 2001 B1
6208854 Roberts et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208870 Lorello Mar 2001 B1
6212548 DeSimone et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216008 Lee Apr 2001 B1
6223042 Raffel Apr 2001 B1
6226529 Bruno et al. May 2001 B1
6230009 Holmes May 2001 B1
6233331 Slutsman May 2001 B1
6240293 Koster May 2001 B1
6240296 Yu May 2001 B1
6243444 O'Neal Jun 2001 B1
6243832 Eckes et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246879 Segura Jun 2001 B1
6247135 Feague Jun 2001 B1
6249680 Wax et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249744 Morita Jun 2001 B1
6253061 Helferich Jun 2001 B1
6263212 Ross et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263372 Hogan et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266614 Alumbaugh et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289373 Dezonno Sep 2001 B1
6292669 Meuronen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301338 Makela Oct 2001 B1
6304898 Shiigi Oct 2001 B1
6311055 Boltz Oct 2001 B1
6314108 Ramasubramani et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317594 Gossman Nov 2001 B1
6317831 King Nov 2001 B1
6321257 Kotola et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324544 Alam Nov 2001 B1
6327479 Mikkola Dec 2001 B1
6330079 Dugan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330600 Matchefts et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330618 Hawkins Dec 2001 B1
6335968 Malik Jan 2002 B1
6353614 Borella et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356630 Cai Mar 2002 B1
6366663 Bauer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366961 Subbiah et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370373 Gerth et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370390 Salin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377669 Walker et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389421 Hawkins May 2002 B1
6389455 Fuisz May 2002 B1
6393014 Daly et al. May 2002 B1
6393269 Hartmaier May 2002 B1
6393434 Huang May 2002 B1
6393461 Okada May 2002 B1
6396913 Perkins, III May 2002 B1
6397054 Hoirup et al. May 2002 B1
6397055 McHenry May 2002 B1
6400942 Hansson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408177 Parikh Jun 2002 B1
6424706 Katz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424841 Gustafsson Jul 2002 B1
6442570 Wu Aug 2002 B1
6442589 Takahashi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446112 Bunney Sep 2002 B1
6456852 Bar Sep 2002 B2
6459776 Aktas et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459892 Burgan Oct 2002 B2
6463145 O'Neal et al. Oct 2002 B1
6483907 Wong Nov 2002 B1
6484196 Maurille Nov 2002 B1
6487560 La Rue Nov 2002 B1
6493558 Bernhart et al. Dec 2002 B1
6499053 Marquette et al. Dec 2002 B1
6502086 Pratt Dec 2002 B2
6505046 Baker Jan 2003 B1
6512930 Sandegren Jan 2003 B2
6529593 Nelson Mar 2003 B2
6529732 Vainiomaki Mar 2003 B1
6535746 Yu Mar 2003 B1
6538561 Angus Mar 2003 B2
6549937 Auerbach et al. Apr 2003 B1
6553375 Huang Apr 2003 B1
6560456 Lohtia et al. May 2003 B1
6560655 Grambihler May 2003 B1
6564249 Shiigi May 2003 B2
6564261 Gudjonsson et al. May 2003 B1
6587688 Chambers Jul 2003 B1
6587691 Granstam et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590970 Cai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591304 Sitaraman et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594693 Borwankar Jul 2003 B1
6633910 Rajan Oct 2003 B1
6636733 Helferich Oct 2003 B1
6654786 Fox et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658260 Knotts Dec 2003 B2
6662015 Furlong Dec 2003 B2
6667688 Menard et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671356 Lewis Dec 2003 B2
6678720 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2004 B1
6701521 McLlroy et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711154 O'Neal Mar 2004 B1
6711411 Ruffini Mar 2004 B1
6718178 Sladek et al. Apr 2004 B1
6718425 Pajakowski Apr 2004 B1
6725268 Jackel et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728353 Espejo et al. Apr 2004 B1
6744854 Koepke et al. Jun 2004 B2
6744858 Ryan et al. Jun 2004 B1
6748555 Teegan et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751211 Chack Jun 2004 B1
6757708 Craig et al. Jun 2004 B1
6763373 Shiigi Jul 2004 B2
6771742 McCalmont et al. Aug 2004 B2
6771971 Smith Aug 2004 B2
6775356 Salvucci et al. Aug 2004 B2
6779022 Horstmann et al. Aug 2004 B1
6785659 Landsman Aug 2004 B1
6801603 Arev Oct 2004 B1
6839562 Smith Jan 2005 B2
6856804 Ciotta Feb 2005 B1
6856808 Comer Feb 2005 B1
6856809 Fostick Feb 2005 B2
6870909 Gross et al. Mar 2005 B2
6886017 Jackson et al. Apr 2005 B1
6922565 Rhodes et al. Jul 2005 B2
6956832 Muhonen et al. Oct 2005 B1
6961330 Cattan et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970869 Slaughter et al. Nov 2005 B1
6980670 Hoffman et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985748 Knotts Jan 2006 B2
6993325 Waesterlid Jan 2006 B1
7003560 Mullen et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010603 Martin Mar 2006 B2
7058036 Yu et al. Jun 2006 B1
7072984 Polonsky et al. Jul 2006 B1
7100195 Underwood Aug 2006 B1
7116972 Zhang et al. Oct 2006 B1
7154901 Chava Dec 2006 B2
7171190 Ye Jan 2007 B2
7209950 Bennett et al. Apr 2007 B2
7430425 Knotts Sep 2008 B2
20010003202 Mache et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010006897 Kang Jul 2001 A1
20010029455 Chin et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010031641 Ung Oct 2001 A1
20010032267 Collison Oct 2001 A1
20010034224 McDowell et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010040949 Blonder Nov 2001 A1
20010041579 Smith et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010042107 Palm Nov 2001 A1
20020007398 Mendiola et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007421 Dixon Jan 2002 A1
20020026513 Hoglund et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029189 Titus et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020052968 Bonefas et al. May 2002 A1
20020069069 Kanevsky et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091775 Morehead et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103762 Lopez Aug 2002 A1
20020108091 Flanagin et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112007 Wood et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112014 Bennett et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116263 Gouge et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118800 Martinez et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020119793 Hronek et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133568 Smith Sep 2002 A1
20020165000 Fok Nov 2002 A1
20020168986 Lau et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173308 Dorenbosch et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174194 Mooney et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178222 O'Hara et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020198999 Smith Dec 2002 A1
20030021781 Anderson et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030037288 Helgren Feb 2003 A1
20030055912 Martin et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069874 Hertzog Apr 2003 A1
20030172121 Evans Sep 2003 A1
20030204791 Helgren et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040103431 Davenport May 2004 A1
20040171396 Carey et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040185883 Rukman Sep 2004 A1
20040199614 Shenfield Oct 2004 A1
20040203900 Cedervall et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236710 Clary Nov 2004 A1
20040242202 Torvinen Dec 2004 A1
20040259531 Wood Dec 2004 A1
20050020287 Pohutsky Jan 2005 A1
20050044535 Coppert Feb 2005 A1
20050048948 Holland Mar 2005 A1
20050076084 Loughmiller Apr 2005 A1
20050078660 Wood Apr 2005 A1
20050135569 Dickinson Jun 2005 A1
20050141522 Kadar et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050176406 Carpenter Aug 2005 A1
20050186974 Cai Aug 2005 A1
20050277432 Viana et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060053197 Yoshimura Mar 2006 A1
20060116138 Simsek et al. Jun 2006 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120320828 A1 Dec 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60316973 Sep 2001 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 12929730 Feb 2011 US
Child 13560170 US
Parent 12073262 Mar 2008 US
Child 12929730 US
Parent 11359586 Feb 2006 US
Child 12073262 US
Parent 11130256 May 2005 US
Child 11359586 US
Parent 10720343 Nov 2003 US
Child 11130256 US
Parent 09985032 Nov 2001 US
Child 10720343 US