Intraocular lenses for presbyopia treatment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11523897
  • Patent Number
    11,523,897
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 21, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 13, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
Apparatuses, systems and methods for providing improved ophthalmic lenses, particularly intraocular lenses (IOLs), include features for reducing dysphotopsia effects, such as haloes and glare. Exemplary ophthalmic lenses may include a central zone with a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space. A middle zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set. A peripheral zone includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series on the peripheral zone.
Description
BACKGROUND

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to diffractive ophthalmic lenses, and particular embodiments provide methods, devices, and systems for mitigating or treating vision conditions such as presbyopia, often by determining a desired multifocal power profile and selecting a geometry of the diffractive profile that results in a diffractive lens shape according to the desired power profile and to various parameters of the patient's eye. Embodiments also relate to vision treatment techniques and in particular embodiments, to ophthalmic lenses such as, for example, contact lenses, corneal inlays or onlays, or intraocular lenses (IOLs) including, for example, phakic IOLs and piggyback IOLs (i.e. IOLs implanted in an eye already having an IOL).


Presbyopia is a condition that affects the accommodation properties of the eye. As objects move closer to a young, properly functioning eye, the effects of ciliary muscle contraction and zonular relaxation allow the lens of the eye to change shape, and thus increase its optical power and ability to focus at near distances. This accommodation can allow the eye to focus and refocus between near and far objects.


Presbyopia normally develops as a person ages, and is associated with a natural progressive loss of accommodation. The presbyopic eye often loses the ability to rapidly and easily refocus on objects at varying distances. The effects of presbyopia usually become noticeable after the age of 45 years. By the age of 65 years, the crystalline lens has often lost almost all elastic properties and has only limited ability to change shape.


Along with reductions in accommodation of the eye, age may also induce clouding of the lens due to the formation of a cataract. A cataract may form in the hard central nucleus of the lens, in the softer peripheral cortical portion of the lens, or at the back of the lens. Cataracts can be treated by the replacement of the cloudy natural lens with an artificial lens. An artificial lens replaces the natural lens in the eye, with the artificial lens often being referred to as an intraocular lens or “IOL”.


Multifocal IOLs may, for example, rely on a diffractive optical surface to direct portions of the light energy toward differing focal distances, thereby allowing the patient to clearly see both near and far objects. Multifocal ophthalmic lenses (including contact lenses or the like) have also been proposed for treatment of presbyopia without removal of the natural crystalline lens. Diffractive optical surfaces, either monofocal or multifocal, may also be configured to provide reduced chromatic aberration.


Diffractive monofocal and multifocal lenses can make use of a material having a given refractive index and a surface curvature which provide a refractive power. Diffractive lenses have a diffractive profile which confers the lens with a diffractive power that contributes to the overall optical power of the lens. The diffractive profile is typically characterized by a number of diffractive zones. When used for ophthalmic lenses these diffractive zones are typically annular lens zones, or echelettes, spaced about the optical axis of the lens. Each echelette may be defined by an optical zone, a transition zone between the optical zone and an optical zone of an adjacent echelette, and echelette geometry. The echelette geometry includes an inner and outer diameter and a shape or slope of the optical zone, a height or step height, and a shape of the transition zone. The surface area or diameter of the echelettes largely determines the diffractive power(s) of the lens and the step height of the transition between echelettes largely determines the light distribution between the different add powers. Together, these echelettes form a diffractive profile.


A multifocal diffractive profile of the lens may be used to mitigate presbyopia by providing two or more optical powers; for example, one for near vision and one for far vision. The lenses may also take the form of an intraocular lens placed within the capsular bag of the eye, replacing the original lens, or placed in front of the natural crystalline lens. The lenses may be in the form of a contact lens, most commonly a bifocal contact lens, or in any other form mentioned herein.


Multifocal (e.g. diffractive) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are intended to provide a patient with improved vision at different distances, such as near, intermediate and far. The near vision may generally correspond to vision provided when objects are at a distance of equal or less than 1.5 feet from a subject eye. Intermediate vision may generally correspond to vision for objects at a distance between about 1½ feet and about 5-6 feet from a subject eye. Far vision may generally correspond to vision for objects at any distance greater than about 5-6 feet from a subject eye. Such characterizations of near, intermediate, and far vision correspond to those addressed in Morlock R, Wirth R J, Tally S R, Garufis C, Heichel C W D, Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ): Development and Validation. Am J Ophthalmology 2017; 178:101-114.


Since multifocal IOLs provide multiple focal lengths, the focused image on the retina originating from the focal length that corresponds to the particular viewing distance is overlapping with unfocused images originating from the other focal lengths. This can create visual artifacts for the patient. Furthermore, conventional approaches typically provide for near and far vision, but achieve unsatisfactory visual performance at intermediate distances. Relatedly, increasing the number of focal lengths in an IOL can exacerbate the aforementioned visual artifacts. Therefore, multifocal conventional ophthalmic approaches may fail to adequately improve visual performance at intermediate distances.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Embodiments herein described include an ophthalmic lens with a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis, and a diffractive profile imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface. The diffractive profile may include a central zone, a peripheral zone, and a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone. The central zone may include a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The middle zone may include a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set. The peripheral zone may include a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone.


Embodiments herein described include an ophthalmic lens including a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis. A diffractive profile is imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface. The diffractive profile includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated to form a first repeated set. The diffractive profile includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set being adjacent the first repeated set, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set. The diffractive profile includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set being adjacent the second set, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated to form a second repeated set.


Embodiments herein described include an ophthalmic lens including a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis. A diffractive profile is imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface. The diffractive profile includes a central zone and a peripheral zone. The central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The peripheral zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set, the second set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone.


Embodiments herein described also include manufacturing systems for making an ophthalmic lens. Such manufacturing system can include an input that accepts an ophthalmic lens prescription for a patient eye. A first module is configured to generate a diffractive profile based on the ophthalmic lens prescription. The diffractive profile includes a central zone, a peripheral zone, and a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone. The central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around an optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The middle zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set. The peripheral zone includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone. The manufacturing system includes a manufacturing assembly that fabricates the ophthalmic lens based on the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described also include manufacturing systems for making an ophthalmic lens. Such manufacturing system can include an input that accepts an ophthalmic lens prescription for a patient eye. A first module is configured to generate a diffractive profile based on the ophthalmic lens prescription. The diffractive profile includes a central zone and a peripheral zone. The central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around an optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The peripheral zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set, the second set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone. The manufacturing system includes a manufacturing assembly that fabricates the ophthalmic lens based on the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described also include methods of designing an intraocular lens. Such methods can include defining a diffractive profile and generating a diffractive lens surface based on the diffractive profile. The diffractive profile may include a central zone, a peripheral zone, and a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone. The central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The middle zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set. The peripheral zone includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone.


Embodiments herein described also include methods of designing an intraocular lens. Such methods can include defining a diffractive profile and generating a diffractive lens surface based on the diffractive profile. The diffractive profile may include a central zone and a peripheral zone. The central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around an optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The peripheral zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set, the second set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A illustrates a cross-sectional view of an eye with an implanted multifocal refractive intraocular lens;



FIG. 1B illustrates a cross-sectional view of an eye having an implanted multifocal diffractive intraocular lens;



FIG. 2A illustrates a front view of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens;



FIG. 2B illustrates a cross-sectional view of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens;



FIGS. 3A and 3B are graphical representations of a portion of the diffractive profile of a conventional diffractive multifocal lens;



FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an eye having an implanted multifocal diffractive intraocular lens having a far, a near, and an intermediate focal length;



FIG. 5 is a graphical representation illustrating a lens profile for a diffractive lens according to certain embodiments of this disclosure;



FIG. 6 is a graphical representation illustrating a lens profile for a diffractive lens according to certain embodiments of this disclosure;



FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram illustrating a system for generating a diffractive lens surface, in accordance with embodiments;



FIG. 8 illustrates an example process for generating a diffractive lens surface; and



FIG. 9 illustrates an example computing environment for facilitating the systems and processes of FIGS. 7 and 8.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Contemporary Lens Shapes and Diffractive Profiles



FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, illustrate multifocal IOL lens geometries, aspects of which are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014-0168602 A1 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011-0149236 A1, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.



FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an eye E fit with a multifocal IOL 11. As shown, multifocal IOL 11 may, for example, comprise a bifocal IOL. Multifocal IOL 11 receives light from at least a portion of cornea 12 at the front of eye E and is generally centered about the optical axis of eye E. For ease of reference and clarity, FIGS. 1A and 1B do not disclose the refractive properties of other parts of the eye, such as the corneal surfaces. Only the refractive and/or diffractive properties of the multifocal IOL 11 are illustrated.


Each major face of lens 11, including the anterior (front) surface and posterior (back) surface, generally has a refractive profile, e.g. biconvex, plano-convex, plano-concave, meniscus, etc. The two surfaces together, in relation to the properties of the surrounding aqueous humor, cornea, and other optical components of the overall optical system, define the effects of the lens 11 on the imaging performance by eye E. Conventional, monofocal IOLs have a refractive power based on the refractive index of the material from which the lens is made, and also on the curvature or shape of the front and rear surfaces or faces of the lens.


Multifocal lenses may optionally also make special use of the refractive properties of the lens. Such lenses generally include different powers in different regions of the lens so as to mitigate the effects of presbyopia. For example, as shown in FIG. 1A, a perimeter region of refractive multifocal lens 11 may have a power which is suitable for viewing at far viewing distances. The same refractive multifocal lens 11 may also include an inner region having a higher surface curvature and a generally higher overall power (sometimes referred to as a positive add power) suitable for viewing at near distances.


Rather than relying entirely on the refractive properties of the lens, multifocal diffractive IOLs or contact lenses can also have a diffractive power, as illustrated by the IOL 18 shown in FIG. 1B. The diffractive power can, for example, comprise positive or negative power, and that diffractive power may be a significant (or even the primary) contributor to the overall optical power of the lens. The diffractive power is conferred by a plurality of concentric diffractive zones which form a diffractive profile. The diffractive profile may either be imposed on the anterior face or posterior face or both.


The diffractive profile of a diffractive multifocal lens directs incoming light into a number of diffraction orders. As light enters from the front of the eye, the multifocal lens 18 directs light to form a far field focus 15a on retina for viewing distant objects and a near field focus 15b for viewing objects close to the eye. Depending on the distance from the source of light 13, the focus on retina 16 may be the near field focus 15b instead. Typically, far field focus 15a is associated with 0th diffractive order and near field focus 15b is associated with the 1st diffractive order, although other orders may be used as well as seen in embodiments below.


Bifocal ophthalmic lens 18 typically distributes the majority of light energy into two viewing orders, often with the goal of splitting imaging light energy between the 2 viewing orders about evenly (50%:50%), one viewing order corresponding to far vision and one viewing order corresponding to near vision, although typically, some fraction goes to non-viewing orders.


Corrective optics may be provided by phakic IOLs, which can be used to treat patients while leaving the natural lens in place. Phakic IOLs may be angle supported, iris supported, or sulcus supported. The phakic IOL can be placed over the natural crystalline lens or piggy-backed over another IOL. It is also envisioned that the present disclosure may be applied to inlays, onlays, accommodating IOLs, spectacles, and even laser vision correction.



FIGS. 2A and 2B show aspects of a conventional diffractive multifocal lens 20. Multifocal lens 20 may have certain optical properties that are generally similar to those of multifocal IOLs 11, 18 described above. Multifocal lens 20 has an anterior lens face 21 and a posterior lens face 22 disposed about optical axis 24.


When fitted onto the eye of a subject or patient, the optical axis of lens 20 is generally aligned with the optical axis of eye E. The curvature of lens 20 gives lens 20 an anterior refractive profile and a posterior refractive profile. Although a diffractive profile may also be imposed on either anterior face 21 and posterior face 22 or both, FIG. 2B shows posterior face 22 with a diffractive profile. The diffractive profile is characterized by a plurality of annular diffractive zones or echelettes 23 spaced about optical axis 24. While analytical optics theory generally assumes an infinite number of echelettes, a standard multifocal diffractive IOL typically has at least 9 echelettes, and may have over 30 echelettes. For the sake of clarity, FIG. 2B shows only 4 echelettes. Typically, an IOL is biconvex, or possibly plano-convex, or convex-concave, although an IOL could be plano-plano, or other refractive surface combinations.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are graphical representations of a portion of a typical diffractive profile of a multifocal lens. While the graph shows only 3 echelettes, typical diffractive lenses extend to at least 9 echelettes to over 32 echelettes. In FIG. 3A, the height 32 of the surface relief profile (from a plane perpendicular to the light rays) of each point on the echelette surface is plotted against the square of the radial distance (r2 or ρ) from the optical axis of the lens (referred to as r-squared space). In multifocal lenses, each echelette 23 may have a diameter or distance from the optical axis which is often proportional to √n, n being the number of the echelette 23 as counted from optical axis 24. Each echelette has a characteristic optical zone 30 and transition zone 31. Optical zone 30 typically has a shape or downward slope that is parabolic as shown in FIG. 3B. The slope of each echelette in r-squared space (shown in FIG. 3A), however, is the same. As for the typical diffractive multifocal lens, as shown here, all echelettes have the same surface area. The area of echelettes 23 determines the diffractive power of lens 20, and, as area and radii are correlated, the diffractive power is also related to the radii of the echelletes. The physical offset of the trailing edge of each echelette to the leading edge of the adjacent echelette is the step height. An exemplary step height between adjacent echelettes is marked as reference number 33 in FIG. 3A. The step heights remain the same in r-squared space (FIG. 3A) and in linear space (FIG. 3B). The step offset is the height offset of the transition zone from the underlying base curve. An exemplary step offset is marked as reference number 526 in FIG. 5.


Conventional multifocal diffractive lenses typically provide for near and far vision, neglecting visual performance at intermediate distances. It is possible to produce a lens having a far focal length, an intermediate focal length and a near focal length by having repeated sets of two echelettes that focus light to different focal lengths. This can help to improve the visual performance at intermediate distances. However, as the number of optical zones increases, the risk of visual artifacts also increases. For example, in a trifocal diffractive lens having near, intermediate, and far focal lengths, light from the near focal length may be visible, albeit out of focus, to a user looking at an object in the intermediate or far distance.



FIG. 4 shows a diffractive multifocal IOL 30 having a third, intermediate focal length 15c. The addition of the third, intermediate focal length 15c can increase the performance of the IOL 30 for users by providing improved visual acuity at the intermediate distances, i.e. for viewing objects in the range of about 1.5 feet to about 5-6 feet from the eye. The diffractive profile of the diffractive multifocal IOL 30 may be configured to possess additional focal lengths beyond the near focal length and far focal lengths described above.



FIG. 5 shows a graphical representation illustrating an embodiment of a diffractive profile 500. The diffractive profile 500 may result in a lens having at least two foci, and may include a lens having at least three foci (a trifocal lens). The foci may include a near, a far, and an intermediate focus.


The diffractive profile 500, in the form of a sag profile, is shown extending outward from an optical axis 502. The diffractive zones, or echelettes, are shown extending radially outward from the optical axis 502, and would be arranged around the optical axis 502 (the other half of the diffractive profile 500 is not shown). The diffractive profile 500 is shown relative to the Y axis 504, which represents the height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 500. The height is shown in units of micrometers, and may represent the distance from the base curve of the lens. In other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized.


The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 500 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 506 from the optical axis 502. The radius is shown in units of millimeters, although in other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized. The diffractive profile 500 may extend outward from the optical axis 502 for a radius of 3.0 millimeters (diameter of 6.0 millimeters), although in other embodiments the diffractive profile 500 may extend for a lesser or greater radius.


The diffractive profile 500 includes three sets 508, 510, 512 of diffractive zones or echelettes. The three sets 508, 510, 512 include a first set 508 positioned at a central zone 514 of the lens. The first set 508 may be repeated once on the central zone 514 (to form two first sets 508 on the central zone). The second set 510 is positioned at a middle zone 516 of the lens. The third set 512 is positioned at a peripheral zone 518 of the lens. The third set 512 may be repeated in series on the peripheral zone 518.


The first set 508 is adjacent the optical axis 502. The first set 508 includes two diffractive zones or echelettes 520a, 522a. The echelettes 520a, 522a are connected by a transition zone 524a having a step height and a step offset (marked with reference number 526). Each of the echelettes 520a, 522a of the first set may be configured to have a different profile than each other.


The first set 508 has a profile defined by the shape or slope of the echelettes 520a, 522a, and the step height and step offsets (as discussed previously) at the transition zone 524a, and the height of the first echelette 520a at the optical axis 502, and the height of the trailing end of second echelette 522a at the transition zone 528. The first echelette 520a of the first set 508 has a negative slope extending from its leading end to its trailing edge or end at the transition zone 524a. The trailing end has a height corresponding to the step offset at the transition zone 524a. The leading end of the second echelette 522a is separated from the trailing end of the first echelette 520a by the step height corresponding to the transition zone 524a.


The second echelette 522a extends from its leading end to the trailing end at transition zone 528 and has a negative slope. The slope of the second echelette 522a may be different than the slope of the first echelette 520a.


The profiles of each of the echelettes 520a, 522a, are different from each other. The different profiles are due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of each echelette 520a, 522a. In r-squared space (discussed previously), the profiles of the echelettes 520a, 522a, are different from each other, due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of each echelette 520a, 522a.


The first set 508 may be disposed twice in series on the central zone 514. The first set 508 may be repeated to form a repeated set 530 on the central zone 514. The other first set may include echelettes 520b, 522b, and transition zone 524b. The first set 508 may connect to the other first set at transition zone 528. The other first set may have the same profile at the first set 508 in r-squared space.


Using the scaling shown in FIG. 5, the repeated first set 530, and the central zone 514, may end at the radial distance of about 1.1 millimeters.


The second set 510 may be adjacent the repeated first set 530. The second set 510 includes two diffractive zones or echelettes 532, 534. The echelettes 532, 534 may be connected by a transition zone 536 having a step height and step offset. The second set 510 may occur once on the middle zone 516 (and the optical surface overall), and thus may not be repeated on the middle zone 516. The second set 510 may connect to the repeated first set 530 via the transition zone 538.


The second set 510 has a profile defined by the shape or slope of the echelettes 532, 534, and the step height and step offsets (as discussed previously) at the transition zones 536, 538, and the height of the trailing end of second echelette 534 at the transition zone 540. The first echelette 532 of the second set 510 has a negative slope extending from its leading end to its trailing edge or end at the transition zone 536. The trailing end has a height corresponding to the step offset at the transition zone 536. The leading end of the second echelette 534 is separated from the trailing end of the first echelette 532 by the step height corresponding to the transition zone 536.


The second echelette 534 extends from its leading end to the trailing end at transition zone 540 and has a negative slope. The slope of the second echelette 534 may be different than the slope of the first echelette 532.


The profiles of each of the echelettes 532, 534, are different from each other. The different profiles are due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of each echelette 532, 534. In r-squared space (discussed previously), the profiles of the echelettes 532, 534, are different from each other, due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of each echelette 532, 534.


The profile of the second set 510 is different than the profile of the first set 508. The different profiles are due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of the echelettes within the respective set 508, 510. In r-squared space, the profile of the second set 510 is different than the profile of the first set 508 due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of the echelettes within the respective set 508, 510.


Using the scaling shown in FIG. 5, the second set 510, and the central zone 516, may end at the radial distance of about 1.25 millimeters.


The third set 512 may be adjacent the second set 510. The third set 512 includes two diffractive zones or echelettes 542a, 544a.


The echelettes 542a, 544a may be connected by a transition zone 546a having a step height and step offset. The third set 512 may connect to the second set 510 via the transition zone 540.


The third set 512 has a profile defined by the shape or slope of the echelettes 542a, 544a, and the step height and step offsets (as discussed previously) at the transition zones 540, 546a, and the height of the trailing end of second echelette 544a at the transition zone 548. The first echelette 542a of the third set 512 has a negative slope extending from its leading end to its trailing edge or end at the transition zone 546a. The trailing end has a height corresponding to the step offset at the transition zone 546a. The leading end of the second echelette 544a is separated from the trailing end of the first echelette 542a by the step height corresponding to the transition zone 546a.


The second echelette 544a extends from its leading end to the trailing end at transition zone 548 and has a negative slope. The slope of the second echelette 544a may be different than the slope of the first echelette 542a.


The profiles of each of the echelettes 542a, 544a are different from each other. The different profiles are due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of each echelette 542a, 544a. In r-squared space (discussed previously), the profiles of the echelettes 542a, 544a, are different from each other, due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of each echelette 542a, 544a.


The profile of the third set 512 is different than the profile of the first set 508 and the profile of the second set 510. The different profiles are due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of the echelettes within the respective set 508, 510, 512. In r-squared space, the profile of the third set 512 is different than the profile of the first set 508 and the second set 510 due to the differing step heights, step offsets, and slopes of the echelettes within the respective set 508, 510, 512. Notably, the third set 512 includes step offsets that are greater than either the first set 508 or the second set 510.


The third set 512 may be repeated in series on the peripheral zone 518. The third set 512 may be repeated multiple times in series on the peripheral zone 518. The third set 512 may be repeated to form a repeated set 550 on the peripheral zone 518. An adjacent third set may include echelettes 542b, 544b, and transition zone 546b. The adjacent third set may connect to the third set 512 at transition zone 548. The adjacent third set may have the same profile as the third set 512 in r-squared space. The third sets may be repeated to form twelve sets, as shown in FIG. 5, and in other embodiments may be repeated a greater or lesser number of times.


Using the scaling shown in FIG. 5, the repeated third set 550, and the peripheral zone 518, may end at the radial distance of about 3 millimeters.


The first set 508 repeats in series once. The optical characteristics of the repeated first set may be defined by at least three diffractive orders corresponding to at least three diffractive powers. The repeated first set may produce three diffractive orders that are useful for a patient's vision, corresponding to three diffractive powers that are useful for a patient's vision. The diffractive orders may include a 0th order and orders 1st through 4th. The orders 2nd through 4th may be useful for a patient's vision. The 0th and 1st orders may be hyperopic (beyond far).


The repeated first set may distribute light to three diffractive orders, with the following light distribution of incident light to each of the three diffractive orders, and the diffractive power shown in Table 1 below:













TABLE 1







Diffractive order
Diffractive power
Light distribution









2nd
4.0 D (Far)
36%



3rd
6.0 D (2 D add)
23%



4th
8.0 D (4 D add)
26%










The repeated first set may result in a light distribution with more than 20% of incident light distribution toward a first diffractive power, and more than 20% of incident light distribution towards a second diffractive power. The first diffractive power may be between about 1.75 and 2.25 diopter, and the second diffractive power may be between about 3.75 and 4.25 diopter. The first diffractive power may correspond to a 3rd diffractive order and the second diffractive power may correspond to a 4th diffractive order.


In one embodiment, the first set 508 may be repeated at least once on the central zone 514.


The second set 510 does not repeat. If the second set 510 were to repeat, then the optical characteristics may be defined by at least three diffractive orders corresponding to at least three diffractive powers. The repeated second set 510 may produce three diffractive orders that are useful for a patient's vision, corresponding to three diffractive powers that are useful for a patient's vision. The diffractive orders may include a 0th order and orders 1st through 4th. The orders 2nd through 4th may be useful for a patient's vision. The 0th and 1st orders may be hyperopic (beyond far).


If the second set 510 were to repeat, the repeated second set 510 may distribute light to three diffractive orders, with the following light distribution of incident light to each of the three diffractive orders, and the diffractive power shown in Table 2 below:













TABLE 2







Diffractive order
Diffractive power
Light distribution









2nd
4 D (Far)
41%



3rd
6 D (2 D add)
15%



4th
8 D (4 D addd)
28%










In one embodiment, the second set 510 may be repeated at least once.


The third set 512 repeats to form a repeated set. The optical characteristics of the repeated third set may be defined by at least three diffractive orders corresponding to at least three diffractive powers. The repeated third set may produce three diffractive orders that are useful for a patient's vision, corresponding to three diffractive powers that are useful for a patient's vision. The diffractive orders may include a 0th order and orders 1st through 4th. The orders 2nd through 4th may be useful for a patient's vision. The 0th and 1st orders may be hyperopic (beyond far).


The repeated third set may distribute light to three diffractive orders, with the following light distribution of incident light to each of the three diffractive orders, and the diffractive power shown in Table 3 below:













TABLE 3







Diffractive order
Diffractive power
Light distribution




















2nd
4 D (Far)
88%



3rd
6 D (2 D add)
1%



4th
8 D (4 D add)
4%










The repeated third set may be configured to result in a light distribution with less than 2% of incident light distribution toward a first diffractive power, and less than 5% of incident light distribution toward a second diffractive power. The first diffractive power may be between about 1.75 and 2.25 diopter, and the second diffractive power may be between about 3.75 and 4.25 diopter. The first diffractive power may correspond to a 3rd diffractive order, and the second diffractive power may correspond to a 4th diffractive order.


In one embodiment, the third set 512 may be repeated at least once on the peripheral zone 518.


The diffractive powers and light distributions listed in each of Tables 1, 2, and 3 may vary to an amount that is “about” the listed amount. In other embodiments, the diffractive orders, powers and light distributions, listed in each of Tables 1, 2, and 3 may be varied as desired.


The add power listed in Tables 1-3 corresponds to 4 diopter of near add power and 2 diopter of intermediate add power. As such, the “Far” power by itself constitutes 4 diopter of diffractive power. This feature may provide improved correction of chromatic aberration for distance.


The diffractive powers of the lens may vary, depending on the desired performance of the design. The diffractive powers as listed in Tables 1-3 are intended for a design that provides adequate visual performance over the entire range of vision from far to intermediate distances and near. Lower diffractive powers may be beneficial if the desired performance is to emphasize good far and intermediate vision, while vision at near distances may be slightly reduced. Such lens design may have a second diffractive add power of 0.58 D, a third diffractive add power of 1.17 D and a fourth diffractive add power of 1.75 D. Some embodiments have diffractive add powers in-between these and those in Tables 1-3.


The combination of the repeating first set 508, non-repeating second set 510, and the repeated third set 512, may result in a diffractive profile producing at least two foci, and at least three foci, for the patient.


In one embodiment, the diffractive profile 500 may be positioned on a surface of a lens that is opposite an aspheric surface. The aspheric surface on the opposite side of the lens may be designed to reduce corneal spherical aberration of the patient.


In one embodiment, one or both optical surfaces may be aspherical, or include a refractive surface designed to extend the depth of focus, or create multifocality.


In one embodiment, a refractive zone on one or both optical surfaces may be utilized that may be the same size or different in size as one of the diffractive zones. The refractive zone includes a refractive surface designed to extend the depth of focus, or create multifocality.



FIG. 6 shows a graphical representation illustrating an embodiment of a diffractive profile 600. The diffractive profile 600 may result in a lens having at least two foci, and may include a lens having at least three foci (a trifocal lens). The foci may include a near, a far, and an intermediate focus.


The diffractive profile 600 is configured similarly as the diffractive profile 500 shown in FIG. 5. However, the diffractive profile 600 includes a second set 610 of echelettes in a middle zone 616 that has a profile in r-squared space that is substantially identical to the profile of a first set 608 of echelettes in r-squared space.


Similar to the diffractive profile 500 shown in FIG. 5, the diffractive profile 600 is shown extending outward from an optical axis 602. The diffractive profile 600 is shown relative to the Y axis 604, which represents the height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 600, and is shown in units of micrometers, and may represent the distance from the base curve of the lens.


The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 600 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 606 from the optical axis 602.


The diffractive profile 600 includes three sets 608, 610, 612 of diffractive zones or echelettes. The three sets include a first set 608 positioned at a central zone 614 of the lens. The second set 610 is positioned at a middle zone 616 of the lens. The third set 612 is positioned at a peripheral zone 618 of the lens. The third set 612 may be repeated in series on the peripheral zone 618.


The first set 608 may include two diffractive zones or echelettes 620a, 622a, which may be connected by transition zone 624a. The reference number 626 represents the step offset at the transition zone 624a. The profile of the first set 608 may be the same as the profile of the first set 508 shown in FIG. 5. In addition, similar to the first set 508 shown in FIG. 5, the first set 608 may be repeated on the central zone once (to form two first sets 608 on the central zone). The repeated sets may form a repeated first set 630. The properties of the first set 608 and the repeated first set may be the same as the properties of the first set 508 and the repeated first set shown in FIG. 5. The other first set may include echelettes 620b, 622b, which may be connected by transition zone 624b. The other first set may connect to the first set 608 with transition zone 628. The first set 608 may be repeated at least once on the central zone 614.


The second set 610 may include two diffractive zones or echelettes 632, 634, which may be connected by transition zone 636. The second set 610 may be adjacent the repeated first set 608 and may be connected to the repeated first set 608 with a transition zone 638. The profile of the second set 610 in r-squared space is substantially identical to the profile of a first set 608 of echelettes in r-squared space. The step height and offset at transition zone 636 may be substantially identical to the step height and offset at transition zone 624a, and the slopes of the echelettes 632, 634 may be substantially identical to those of the echelettes 620a, 622a. In one embodiment, the second set 610 may not be repeated. In one embodiment, the second set 610 may be repeated at least once.


The third set 612 may include two diffractive zones or echelettes 642a, 644a, which may be connected by a transition zone 646a. The third set 612 may be adjacent the second set 610 and may be connected to the second set 610 with transition zone 640.


The profile of the third set 612 may be same as the profile of the third set 512 shown in FIG. 5. In addition, similar to the third set 512 shown in FIG. 5, the third set 612 may be repeated on the peripheral zone. The repeated sets may form a repeated third set 650. The properties of the third set 612 and the repeated third set may be the same as the properties of the third set 512 and the repeated third set shown in FIG. 5. One such repeated third set may include echelettes 642b, 644b, which may be connected by transition zone 646b. The third set may connect to the other third set 612 with transition zone 648. The third set 612 may be repeated at least once on the peripheral zone 618.


In one embodiment, the second set 610 may be excluded, such that only echelettes on a central zone and echelettes on a peripheral zone may be utilized in a diffractive profile. The echelettes on the central zone may be adjacent the echelettes on the peripheral zone.


In one embodiment, a diffractive profile may be configured such that the second set of echelettes in the middle zone has a profile that is the same as the second set 510 of echelettes shown in FIG. 5, and a first set of echelettes in a central zone has a profile in r-squared space that is substantially identical to the profile in r-squared space as the second set 510 of echelettes shown in FIG. 5.


The diffractive profiles disclosed herein may produce at least two foci, and at least three foci, for the patient.


The embodiments of diffractive profiles disclosed herein may be positioned on a surface of a lens that is opposite an aspheric surface. The aspheric surface on the opposite side of the lens may be designed to reduce corneal spherical aberration of the patient.


The embodiments of diffractive profiles disclosed herein may be utilized with one or both surfaces of the lens that may be aspherical, or include a refractive surface designed to extend the depth of focus, or create multifocality.


The embodiments of diffractive profiles disclosed herein may be utilized with a refractive zone on one or both surfaces of the lens, that may be the same size or different in size as one of the diffractive zones. The refractive zone includes a refractive surface designed to extend the depth of focus, or create multifocality.


Any of the embodiments of lens profiles discussed herein may be apodized to produce a desired result. The apodization may result in the step heights and step offsets of the repeated sets being varied according to the apodization. The sets, however, are still considered to be repeating sets over the optic of the lens.


Systems and Methods for Determining Lens Shape:



FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram illustrating a system 700 for generating an ophthalmic lens based on a user input.


The system 700 includes a user input module 702 configured to receive user input defining aspects of the user and of a lens. The input may accept an ophthalmic lens prescription for a patient eye. Aspects of a lens may include a multifocal lens prescription, anatomical dimensions like a pupil size performance, and lens dimensions, among other attributes. A multifocal lens prescription can include, for example, a preferred optical power or optical power profile for correcting far vision and an optical power or optical power profile for near vision. In some cases, a multifocal lens prescription can further include an optical power or optical power profile for correcting intermediate vision at two, or in some cases more than two intermediate foci, which may fall between the optical powers or ranges of optical powers described above. A pupil size performance can include a pupil radius of a patient and the visual field to be optimized. These parameters can also be related to patient's life style or profession, so that the design incorporates patient's visual needs as a function of the pupil size. Lens dimensions can include a preferred radius of the total lens, and may further include preferred thickness, or a preferred curvature of one or the other of the anterior surface and posterior surface of the lens.


A multizonal diffractive surface modeling module 704 can receive information about the desired lens from the user input module 702, and can determine aspects of a multizonal lens. For example, the modeling module 704 can determine the shape of one or more echelettes of the diffractive profile of a diffractive multifocal lens, including the positioning, width, step height, and curvature needed to fulfill the multifocal prescription for each subset of the echelettes, as well as the positioning of each subset of echelettes. The multizonal diffractive surface modeling module 704 can further determine the shapes of transition steps between echelettes. For example, transition steps may be smoothed or rounded to help mitigate optical aberrations caused by light passing through an abrupt transition. Such transition zone smoothing, which may be referred to as a low scatter profile, can provide for reductions in dysphotopsia by reducing the errant concentration of incident light behind the lens by the transition zones. By way of further example, echelette ordering, echelette offsets, and echelette boundaries may be adjusted to adjust the step heights between some adjacent echelettes. The generated diffractive profile may be any of the diffractive profiles disclosed in this application.


The multizonal diffractive surface modeling module 704 can be configured to generate performance criteria 712, e.g. via modeling optical properties in a virtual environment. Performance criteria can include the match of the optical power profile of the multizonal lens with the desired optical power profile based on the extended range of vision prescription. The performance criteria can also include the severity of diffractive aberrations caused by lens surface. In some cases, the multizonal surface modeling module 704 can provide a lens surface to a lens fabrication module 708 for facilitating the production of a physical lens, which can be tested via a lens testing module 710 for empirically determining the performance criteria 712, so as to identify optical aberrations and imperfections not readily discerned via virtual modeling, and to permit iteration. The lens fabrication module may comprise a manufacturing assembly that may fabricate the ophthalmic lens based on the diffractive profile.


A refractive surface modeling module 706 can receive information from the user input 702 and multizonal surface modeling modules 704 in order to determine refractive aspects of the lens. For example, provided with a multifocal prescription and a set of add powers that can be generated by a diffractive profile, the refractive surface modeling module 706 can provide a refractive geometry configured to provide a base power which, when combined with the diffractive surface, meets the requirements of the multifocal lens prescription. The refractive surface modeling module 706 can also generate performance criteria 712, and can contribute to providing a lens surface to a lens fabrication module 708 for facilitating the production of the physical lens.



FIG. 8 is an example process 800 for generating a diffractive lens surface, in accordance with embodiments. The process 800 may be implemented in conjunction with, for example, the system 700 shown in FIG. 7. Some or all of the process 800 (or any other processes described herein, or variations, and/or combinations thereof) may be performed under the control of one or more computer systems configured with executable instructions and may be implemented as code (e.g., executable instructions, one or more computer programs, or one or more applications) executing collectively on one or more processors, by hardware or combinations thereof. The code may be stored on a computer-readable storage medium, for example, in the form of a computer program comprising a plurality of instructions executable by one or more processors. The computer-readable storage medium may be non-transitory.


The process 800 may include a method of designing an intraocular lens and may include receiving an input of an ophthalmic lens prescription, which may be a multifocal lens prescription (act 802). The input can include, e.g., a desired optical power profile for correcting impaired distance vision, a desired optical power profile for correcting impaired intermediate distance vision, a desired optical power profile for accommodating near vision, and any suitable combination of the above. Based on a desired optical power profile, a diffractive profile can be defined and generated including a central zone, a peripheral zone, and a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone. The generated diffractive profile may include a central zone including a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated once in series on the central zone (act 804). The generated diffractive profile may include a middle zone including a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set (act 806). The generated diffractive profile may include a peripheral zone including a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series on the peripheral zone (act 808).


In one embodiment, the diffractive profile may be generated and utilized that includes a central zone and a peripheral zone. The central zone may include a first set of two echelettes arranged around an optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone. The peripheral zone may include a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set, the second set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone.


In one embodiment, the diffractive profile may include a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone. The middle zone may include a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is substantially identical to the profile of the first set (in the central zone).


The diffractive lens profile of the multizonal diffractive lens surface may be used in combination with a known refractive base power. To that end, a refractive lens surface may be generated having a base power that, in combination with the diffractive lens surface, meets the multifocal lens prescription (act 810). A total lens surface can be generated based on both the refractive lens surface and the diffractive lens surface (act 812). The refractive lens surface can include a refractive lens curvature on the anterior surface of the lens, the posterior surface of the lens, or both. Instructions can be generated to fabricate an intraocular lens based on the generated total lens surface (act 814). A manufacturing assembly may fabricate the ophthalmic lens based on the instructions. The methods herein are not limited to the examples of diffractive profiles discussed here, and may extend to any of the diffractive lens profiles and ophthalmic lenses disclosed in this application.


Computational Methods:



FIG. 9 is a simplified block diagram of an exemplary computing environment 900 that may be used by systems for generating the diffractive profiles and ophthalmic lenses of the present disclosure. Computer system 922 typically includes at least one processor 952 which may communicate with a number of peripheral devices via a bus subsystem 954. These peripheral devices may include a storage subsystem 956 comprising a memory subsystem 958 and a file storage subsystem 960, user interface input devices 962, user interface output devices 964, and a network interface subsystem 966. Network interface subsystem 966 provides an interface to outside networks 968 and/or other devices, such as the lens fabrication module 708 or lens testing module 710 of FIG. 7.


User interface input devices 962 may include a keyboard, pointing devices such as a mouse, trackball, touch pad, or graphics tablet, a scanner, foot pedals, a joystick, a touchscreen incorporated into the display, audio input devices such as voice recognition systems, microphones, and other types of input devices. User input devices 962 will often be used to download a computer executable code from a tangible storage media embodying any of the methods of the present disclosure. In general, use of the term “input device” is intended to include a variety of conventional and proprietary devices and ways to input information into computer system 922.


User interface output devices 964 may include a display subsystem, a printer, a fax machine, or non-visual displays such as audio output devices. The display subsystem may be a cathode ray tube (CRT), a flat-panel device such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), a projection device, or the like. The display subsystem may also provide a non-visual display such as via audio output devices. In general, use of the term “output device” is intended to include a variety of conventional and proprietary devices and ways to output information from computer system 922 to a user.


Storage subsystem 956 can store the basic programming and data constructs that provide the functionality of the various embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, a database and modules implementing the functionality of the methods of the present disclosure, as described herein, may be stored in storage subsystem 956. These software modules are generally executed by processor 952. In a distributed environment, the software modules may be stored on a plurality of computer systems and executed by processors of the plurality of computer systems. Storage subsystem 956 typically comprises memory subsystem 958 and file storage subsystem 960. Memory subsystem 958 typically includes a number of memories including a main random access memory (RAM) 970 for storage of instructions and data during program execution and/or a read only member (ROM) 982.


Various computational methods discussed above, e.g. with respect to generating a multizonal lens surface, may be performed in conjunction with or using a computer or other processor having hardware, software, and/or firmware. The various method steps may be performed by modules, and the modules may comprise any of a wide variety of digital and/or analog data processing hardware and/or software arranged to perform the method steps described herein. The modules optionally comprising data processing hardware adapted to perform one or more of these steps by having appropriate machine programming code associated therewith, the modules for two or more steps (or portions of two or more steps) being integrated into a single processor board or separated into different processor boards in any of a wide variety of integrated and/or distributed processing architectures. These methods and systems will often employ a tangible media embodying machine-readable code with instructions for performing the method steps described above. Suitable tangible media may comprise a memory (including a volatile memory and/or a non-volatile memory), a storage media (such as a magnetic recording on a floppy disk, a hard disk, a tape, or the like; on an optical memory such as a CD, a CD-R/W, a CD-ROM, a DVD, or the like; or any other digital or analog storage media), or the like.

Claims
  • 1. An ophthalmic lens, comprising: a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis; anda diffractive profile imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface, the diffractive profile including a central zone, a peripheral zone, and a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone, wherein:the central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone;the middle zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set; andthe peripheral zone includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone,wherein at least one of the two echelettes of the second set has a different profile in r-squared space than at least one of the two echelettes in each of the first and third sets.
  • 2. The lens of claim 1, wherein each of the two echelettes of the first set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
  • 3. The lens of claim 2, wherein each of the two echelettes of the second set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
  • 4. The lens of claim 3, wherein each of the two echelettes of the third set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
  • 5. The lens of claim 1, wherein the first set being repeated in series on the central zone forms a repeated set that is configured to result in a light distribution with more than 20% of incident light distribution toward a first diffractive power, and more than 20% of incident light distribution toward a second diffractive power.
  • 6. The lens of claim 5, wherein the first diffractive power is between about 1.75 and 2.25 diopter, and the second diffractive power is between about 3.75 and 4.25 diopter.
  • 7. The lens of claim 6, wherein the first diffractive power corresponds to a 3rd diffractive order, and the second diffractive power corresponds to a 4th diffractive order.
  • 8. The lens of claim 1, wherein the third set being repeated in series on the peripheral zone forms a repeated set that is configured to result in a light distribution with less than 2% of incident light distribution toward a first diffractive power, and less than 5% of incident light distribution toward a second diffractive power.
  • 9. The lens of claim 8, wherein the first diffractive power is between about 1.75 and 2.25 diopter, and the second diffractive power is between about 3.75 and 4.25 diopter.
  • 10. The lens of claim 9, wherein the first diffractive power corresponds to a 3rd diffractive order, and the second diffractive power corresponds to a 4th diffractive order.
  • 11. An ophthalmic lens, comprising: a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis; anda diffractive profile imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface, the diffractive profile including a central zone, a peripheral zone, and a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone, wherein:the central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone;the middle zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set; andthe peripheral zone includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone,wherein the second set of the middle zone is repeated at least once.
  • 12. An ophthalmic lens, comprising: a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis; anda diffractive profile imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface, the diffractive profile including: a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated to form a first repeated set;a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set being adjacent the first repeated set, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set; anda third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set being adjacent the second set, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated to form a second repeated set,wherein at least one of the two echelettes of the second set has a different profile in r-squared space than at least one of the two echelettes in each of the first and third sets.
  • 13. The lens of claim 12, wherein each of the two echelettes of the first set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
  • 14. The lens of claim 12, wherein each of the two echelettes of the second set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
  • 15. The lens of claim 12, wherein each of the two echelettes of the third set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
  • 16. The lens of claim 12, wherein the first set is repeated once to form the first repeated set.
  • 17. The lens of claim 12, wherein the first repeated set is configured to result in a light distribution with more than 20% of incident light distribution toward a first diffractive power, and more than 20% of incident light distribution toward a second diffractive power.
  • 18. The lens of claim 17, wherein the first diffractive power is between about 1.75 and 2.25 diopter, and the second diffractive power is between about 3.75 and 4.25 diopter.
  • 19. The lens of claim 18, wherein the first diffractive power corresponds to a 3rd diffractive order, and the second diffractive power corresponds to a 4th diffractive order.
  • 20. An ophthalmic lens, comprising: a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis; anda diffractive profile imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface, the diffractive profile including: a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated to form a first repeated set;a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set being adjacent the first repeated set, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set; anda third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set being adjacent the second set, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set and the profile of the second set, the third set being repeated to form a second repeated set,wherein the second set is repeated.
  • 21. An ophthalmic lens, comprising: a first surface and a second surface disposed about an optical axis; anda diffractive profile imposed on one of the first surface or the second surface, the diffractive profile including a central zone and a peripheral zone, wherein:the central zone includes a first set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the first set having a profile in r-squared space, the first set being repeated in series at least once on the central zone; andthe peripheral zone includes a second set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the second set having a profile in r-squared space that is different than the profile of the first set, the second set being repeated in series at least once on the peripheral zone,wherein each of the two echelettes of the second set has a different profile in r-squared space than each of the two echelettes of the first set.
  • 22. The lens of claim 21, wherein the diffractive profile includes a middle zone positioned between the central zone and the peripheral zone, and the middle zone includes a third set of two echelettes arranged around the optical axis, the third set having a profile in r-squared space that is substantially identical to the profile of the first set.
  • 23. The lens of claim 21, wherein each of the two echelettes of the first set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space, and each of the two echelettes of the second set have a different profile than each other in r-squared space.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/524,128, filed Jun. 23, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (426)
Number Name Date Kind
3367734 Karl et al. Feb 1968 A
3722986 Tagnon Mar 1973 A
4210391 Cohen Jul 1980 A
4338005 Cohen Jul 1982 A
4340283 Cohen Jul 1982 A
4460275 Spriggs Jul 1984 A
4504892 Zulfilar Mar 1985 A
4504982 Burk Mar 1985 A
4580883 Shinohara Apr 1986 A
4606626 Shinohara Aug 1986 A
4637697 Freeman Jan 1987 A
4640593 Shinohara Feb 1987 A
4641934 Freeman Feb 1987 A
4642112 Freeman Feb 1987 A
4655565 Freeman Apr 1987 A
4710193 Volk Dec 1987 A
4762408 Shinohara Aug 1988 A
4778462 Grendahl Oct 1988 A
4795462 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4798608 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4798609 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4856234 Goins Aug 1989 A
4856889 Guilino et al. Aug 1989 A
4881804 Cohen Nov 1989 A
4881805 Cohen Nov 1989 A
4898461 Portney Feb 1990 A
4932970 Portney Jun 1990 A
4936666 Futhey Jun 1990 A
4957506 Mercier Sep 1990 A
4978211 Cornu et al. Dec 1990 A
4995714 Cohen Feb 1991 A
4995715 Cohen Feb 1991 A
5016977 Baude et al. May 1991 A
5017000 Cohen May 1991 A
5019098 Mercier May 1991 A
5050981 Roffman Sep 1991 A
5054905 Cohen Oct 1991 A
5056908 Cohen Oct 1991 A
5061058 Guilino et al. Oct 1991 A
5066301 Wiley Nov 1991 A
5076684 Simpson et al. Dec 1991 A
5089023 Swanson Feb 1992 A
5089024 Christie et al. Feb 1992 A
5096285 Silberman Mar 1992 A
5100226 Freeman Mar 1992 A
5104212 Taboury et al. Apr 1992 A
5112351 Christie et al. May 1992 A
5114220 Baude et al. May 1992 A
5116111 Simpson et al. May 1992 A
5117306 Cohen May 1992 A
5120120 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5121979 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5121980 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5129718 Futhey et al. Jul 1992 A
5144483 Cohen Sep 1992 A
5148205 Guilino et al. Sep 1992 A
5161057 Johnson Nov 1992 A
5173723 Volk et al. Dec 1992 A
5178636 Silberman Jan 1993 A
5191366 Kashiwagi Mar 1993 A
5220359 Roffman Jun 1993 A
5225858 Portney Jul 1993 A
5229797 Futhey et al. Jul 1993 A
5236970 Christ et al. Aug 1993 A
5257132 Ceglio et al. Oct 1993 A
5260727 Oksman et al. Nov 1993 A
5322649 Rheinish et al. Jun 1994 A
5344447 Swanson Sep 1994 A
5349394 Freeman et al. Sep 1994 A
5349471 Morris et al. Sep 1994 A
5381190 Rehse et al. Jan 1995 A
5384606 Koch et al. Jan 1995 A
5408281 Zhang Apr 1995 A
5443506 Garabet Aug 1995 A
5443507 Jacobi Aug 1995 A
5444106 Zhou et al. Aug 1995 A
5446508 Kitchen Aug 1995 A
5448312 Roffman et al. Sep 1995 A
5485228 Roffman et al. Jan 1996 A
5581405 Meyers et al. Dec 1996 A
5589982 Faklis et al. Dec 1996 A
5629800 Hamblen May 1997 A
5652638 Roffman et al. Jul 1997 A
5674284 Chang et al. Oct 1997 A
5682223 Menezes et al. Oct 1997 A
5683457 Gupta et al. Nov 1997 A
5684560 Roffman et al. Nov 1997 A
5684595 Kato et al. Nov 1997 A
5699142 Lee et al. Dec 1997 A
5715031 Roffman et al. Feb 1998 A
5715091 Meyers Feb 1998 A
5724258 Roffman Mar 1998 A
5728156 Gupta et al. Mar 1998 A
5748282 Freeman May 1998 A
5760871 Kosoburd et al. Jun 1998 A
5777719 Williams et al. Jul 1998 A
5796462 Roffman et al. Aug 1998 A
5800532 Lieberman Sep 1998 A
5805260 Roffman et al. Sep 1998 A
5822091 Baker Oct 1998 A
5838496 Maruyama et al. Nov 1998 A
5847802 Menezes et al. Dec 1998 A
5888122 Gupta et al. Mar 1999 A
5895422 Hauber Apr 1999 A
5895610 Chang et al. Apr 1999 A
5929969 Roffman Jul 1999 A
5968094 Werblin et al. Oct 1999 A
5968095 Norrby Oct 1999 A
5982543 Fiala Nov 1999 A
6007747 Blake et al. Dec 1999 A
6019472 Koester et al. Feb 2000 A
6050687 Bille et al. Apr 2000 A
6070980 Obara et al. Jun 2000 A
6082856 Dunn et al. Jul 2000 A
6086204 Magnante Jul 2000 A
6089711 Blankenbecler et al. Jul 2000 A
6095651 Williams et al. Aug 2000 A
6120148 Fiala et al. Sep 2000 A
6126283 Wen et al. Oct 2000 A
6126286 Portney Oct 2000 A
6139145 Israel Oct 2000 A
6142625 Sawano et al. Nov 2000 A
6145987 Baude et al. Nov 2000 A
6154323 Kamo Nov 2000 A
6199986 Williams et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210005 Portney Apr 2001 B1
6215096 Von Wallfeld et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224211 Gordon May 2001 B1
6231603 Lang et al. May 2001 B1
6270220 Keren Aug 2001 B1
6271915 Frey et al. Aug 2001 B1
6325510 Golub et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338559 Williams et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353503 Spitzer et al. Mar 2002 B1
6413276 Werblin Jul 2002 B1
6429972 Ota et al. Aug 2002 B1
6439720 Graves et al. Aug 2002 B1
6457826 Lett Oct 2002 B1
6462874 Soskind Oct 2002 B1
6464355 Gil Oct 2002 B1
6474814 Griffin Nov 2002 B1
6488708 Sarfarazi Dec 2002 B2
6491721 Freeman et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497483 Frey et al. Dec 2002 B2
6511180 Guirao et al. Jan 2003 B2
6520638 Roffman et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527389 Portney Mar 2003 B2
6533416 Fermigier et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536899 Fiala Mar 2003 B1
6537317 Steinert et al. Mar 2003 B1
6547391 Ross, III et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547822 Lang Apr 2003 B1
6554425 Roffman et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554859 Lang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557992 Dwyer et al. May 2003 B1
6576012 Lang Jun 2003 B2
6582076 Roffman et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585375 Donitzky et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609673 Johnson Aug 2003 B1
6609793 Norrby et al. Aug 2003 B2
6616275 Dick et al. Sep 2003 B1
6655802 Zimmermann et al. Dec 2003 B2
6685315 De Feb 2004 B1
6705729 Piers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709103 Roffman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6755524 Rubinstein et al. Jun 2004 B2
6791754 Ogawa Sep 2004 B2
6802605 Cox et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808262 Chapoy et al. Oct 2004 B2
6818158 Pham et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827444 Williams et al. Dec 2004 B2
6830332 Piers et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835204 Stork et al. Dec 2004 B1
6846326 Zadno-Azizi et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848790 Dick et al. Feb 2005 B1
6851803 Wooley et al. Feb 2005 B2
6884261 Zadno-Azizi et al. Apr 2005 B2
6923539 Simpson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6923540 Ye et al. Aug 2005 B2
6951391 Morris et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957891 Fiala Oct 2005 B2
6972032 Aharoni et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986578 Jones Jan 2006 B2
7025456 Morris et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036931 Lindacher et al. May 2006 B2
7048759 Bogaert et al. May 2006 B2
7048760 Cumming May 2006 B2
7061693 Zalevsky Jun 2006 B2
7073906 Portney Jul 2006 B1
7093938 Morris et al. Aug 2006 B2
7111938 Andino et al. Sep 2006 B2
7137702 Piers et al. Nov 2006 B2
7156516 Morris et al. Jan 2007 B2
7159983 Menezes et al. Jan 2007 B2
7188949 Bandhauer et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198640 Nguyen Apr 2007 B2
7217375 Lai May 2007 B2
7221513 Cho et al. May 2007 B2
7232218 Morris et al. Jun 2007 B2
7287852 Fiala Oct 2007 B2
7293873 Dai et al. Nov 2007 B2
7365917 Zalevsky Apr 2008 B2
7377640 Piers et al. May 2008 B2
7377641 Piers et al. May 2008 B2
7441894 Zhang et al. Oct 2008 B2
7455404 Bandhauer et al. Nov 2008 B2
7475986 Dai et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481532 Hong et al. Jan 2009 B2
7543937 Piers et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572007 Simpson Aug 2009 B2
7604350 Dursteler et al. Oct 2009 B2
7615073 Deacon et al. Nov 2009 B2
7654667 Blum et al. Feb 2010 B2
7670371 Piers et al. Mar 2010 B2
7677725 Piers et al. Mar 2010 B2
7717558 Hong et al. May 2010 B2
7753521 Wooley et al. Jul 2010 B2
7871162 Weeber Jan 2011 B2
7883207 Iyer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896916 Piers et al. Mar 2011 B2
7922326 Bandhauer et al. Apr 2011 B2
7984990 Bandhauer et al. Jul 2011 B2
7998198 Angelopoulos et al. Aug 2011 B2
8128222 Portney Mar 2012 B2
8157374 Bandhauer et al. Apr 2012 B2
8192022 Zalevsky Jun 2012 B2
8197063 Iyer et al. Jun 2012 B2
8216307 Schaper, Jr. Jul 2012 B2
8231219 Weeber Jul 2012 B2
8231673 Sacharoff et al. Jul 2012 B2
8235525 Lesage et al. Aug 2012 B2
8240850 Apter et al. Aug 2012 B2
8262728 Zhang et al. Sep 2012 B2
8292953 Weeber et al. Oct 2012 B2
8382281 Weeber Feb 2013 B2
8388137 Dreher et al. Mar 2013 B2
8430508 Weeber Apr 2013 B2
8444267 Weeber et al. May 2013 B2
8480228 Weeber Jul 2013 B2
8500805 Kobayashi et al. Aug 2013 B2
8506075 Bandhauer et al. Aug 2013 B2
8529623 Piers et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556416 Lawu Oct 2013 B2
8556417 Das et al. Oct 2013 B2
8573775 Weeber Nov 2013 B2
8619362 Portney Dec 2013 B2
8636796 Houbrechts et al. Jan 2014 B2
8652205 Hong et al. Feb 2014 B2
8678583 Cohen Mar 2014 B2
8709079 Zhang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8734511 Weeber et al. May 2014 B2
8740978 Weeber et al. Jun 2014 B2
8747466 Weeber et al. Jun 2014 B2
8755117 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771348 Zhao Jul 2014 B2
8827446 Iyer et al. Sep 2014 B2
8906089 Piers et al. Dec 2014 B2
9069185 Zhao Jun 2015 B2
9078745 Zhang et al. Jul 2015 B2
9122074 Piers et al. Sep 2015 B2
9164201 Fermigier et al. Oct 2015 B2
9223148 Fiala et al. Dec 2015 B2
9304329 Zhao Apr 2016 B2
9310624 Argal et al. Apr 2016 B2
9320594 Schwiegerling Apr 2016 B2
9329309 Van May 2016 B2
9335563 Weeber May 2016 B2
9335564 Choi et al. May 2016 B2
9370416 Argal et al. Jun 2016 B2
9518864 Grossinger et al. Dec 2016 B2
9563070 Ando et al. Feb 2017 B2
9622856 Weeber et al. Apr 2017 B2
9869580 Grossinger et al. Jan 2018 B2
9925041 Gerlach et al. Mar 2018 B2
9931200 Van Der Mooren Apr 2018 B2
10698234 Zhao Jun 2020 B2
20010018612 Carson et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020082690 Sarbadhikari Jun 2002 A1
20020093701 Zhang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020105617 Norrby et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118337 Perrott et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020122153 Piers et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030014107 Reynard Jan 2003 A1
20030063254 Piers et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076478 Cox Apr 2003 A1
20030169491 Bender et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030171808 Phillips Sep 2003 A1
20040021824 Ye et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040080710 Wooley et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040085515 Roffman et al. May 2004 A1
20040088050 Norrby et al. May 2004 A1
20040106992 Lang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111153 Woods et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138746 Aharoni et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150789 Jones Aug 2004 A1
20040156014 Piers et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169820 Dai et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189981 Ross et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040230299 Simpson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040246440 Andino et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040252274 Morris et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050057720 Morris et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050096226 Stock et al. May 2005 A1
20050099589 Ishak May 2005 A1
20050128432 Altmann Jun 2005 A1
20050203619 Altmann Sep 2005 A1
20050259222 Kelch et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050264757 Morris et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267575 Nguyen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004446 Aharoni et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009816 Fang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030938 Altmann Feb 2006 A1
20060034003 Zalevsky Feb 2006 A1
20060055883 Morris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060066808 Blum et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060098162 Bandhauer et al. May 2006 A1
20060098163 Bandhauer et al. May 2006 A1
20060109421 Ye et al. May 2006 A1
20060116763 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060116764 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060139570 Blum et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060176572 Fiala Aug 2006 A1
20060238702 Glick et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244904 Hong et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060244905 Piers et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070002444 Piers et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070052920 Stewart et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070129803 Cumming et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070171362 Simpson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070182924 Hong et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070236769 Zalevsky Oct 2007 A1
20070258143 Portney Nov 2007 A1
20070268451 Raghuprasad Nov 2007 A1
20070282438 Hong et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080030677 Simpson Feb 2008 A1
20080147185 Hong et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161913 Brady et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161914 Brady et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080269891 Hong et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080273169 Blum et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300679 Altmann Dec 2008 A1
20090062911 Bogaert Mar 2009 A1
20090088840 Simpson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090164008 Hong et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187242 Weeber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090210054 Weeber et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234448 Weeber et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240328 Treushnikov et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090295295 Shannon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323020 Zhao et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100014049 Bandhauer et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016961 Hong et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057202 Bogaert Mar 2010 A1
20100087921 Simpson Apr 2010 A1
20100097569 Weeber Apr 2010 A1
20100100177 Zhao Apr 2010 A1
20100131060 Simpson et al. May 2010 A1
20100161048 Schaper, Jr. Jun 2010 A1
20100161051 Hong Jun 2010 A1
20100274233 Dick et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100281021 Weeber et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100312336 Hong Dec 2010 A1
20100321635 Apter et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110022170 Simpson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110098811 Hong et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110109874 Piers et al. May 2011 A1
20110125261 Portney May 2011 A1
20110149236 Weeber Jun 2011 A1
20110166652 Bogaert et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110267693 Kobayashi et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110270390 Kobayashi Nov 2011 A1
20110270596 Weeber Nov 2011 A1
20110292335 Schwiegerling Dec 2011 A1
20110313522 Hayes Dec 2011 A1
20110313523 Hayes Dec 2011 A1
20110313525 Cumming Dec 2011 A1
20110317124 Weeber et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110317126 Weeber Dec 2011 A1
20120029630 Piers et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059464 Zhao Mar 2012 A1
20120140166 Zhao Jun 2012 A1
20120143326 Canovas et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154740 Bradley et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165932 Argal et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170121 Okada et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120283825 Houbrechts et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120320335 Weeber et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323321 Simonov et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130035760 Portney Feb 2013 A1
20130046381 Zalevsky et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060330 Weeber et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130107202 Liang May 2013 A1
20130201445 Das Aug 2013 A1
20140172088 Carson Jun 2014 A1
20150022775 Ando Jan 2015 A1
20150029460 Bradley et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150094807 Piers et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150359625 Argal et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160216535 Zhao Jul 2016 A1
20160220350 Gerlach Aug 2016 A1
20160220352 Choi et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160320633 Weeber Nov 2016 A1
20160334640 De, Jr. et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160341978 Schwiegerling Nov 2016 A1
20170172088 May Jun 2017 A1
20170209259 Choi et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170216020 Weeber et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170219846 Ando Aug 2017 A1
20170227789 Ando et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170239038 Choi et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170245985 Canovas Vidal Aug 2017 A1
20170245986 Canovas et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170245987 Canovas et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170252151 Mackool Sep 2017 A1
20180092739 Pagnoulle et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180132996 Tiwari et al. May 2018 A1
20180147050 Choi et al. May 2018 A1
20180147052 Hong et al. May 2018 A1
20180275428 Ando Sep 2018 A1
20180373060 Knox et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190004335 Weeber Jan 2019 A1
20190224000 Choi et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190254810 Tiwari et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190307557 De Carvalho et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190314148 Liu Oct 2019 A1
20200038172 Hussain et al. Feb 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (142)
Number Date Country
2005230194 Dec 2010 AU
2501217 Apr 2004 CA
2507659 Jun 2004 CA
2590085 Jun 2006 CA
1951340 Apr 2007 CN
101181171 Apr 2011 CN
102665611 Sep 2012 CN
69715830 Aug 2003 DE
335731 Oct 1989 EP
342895 Nov 1989 EP
0343067 Nov 1989 EP
355230 Feb 1990 EP
0369561 May 1990 EP
375291 Jun 1990 EP
0393639 Oct 1990 EP
412751 Feb 1991 EP
0457553 Nov 1991 EP
470811 Feb 1992 EP
0537643 Apr 1993 EP
605841 Jul 1994 EP
0316162 Oct 1995 EP
355230 Oct 1995 EP
681198 Nov 1995 EP
0537643 Mar 1997 EP
0926531 Jun 1999 EP
949529 Oct 1999 EP
1376203 Jan 2004 EP
1424049 Jun 2004 EP
1862148 Dec 2007 EP
1310267 Jan 2008 EP
1891912 Feb 2008 EP
2043558 Apr 2009 EP
2045648 Apr 2009 EP
1402308 May 2009 EP
1424049 Jun 2009 EP
2103279 Sep 2009 EP
2113226 Nov 2009 EP
2365379 Sep 2011 EP
2377493 Oct 2011 EP
2378319 Oct 2011 EP
2290411 May 2012 EP
2363097 Sep 2012 EP
2812882 Dec 2014 EP
2813881 Dec 2014 EP
2349093 Oct 2015 EP
3150170 Dec 2017 EP
2527908 Mar 2019 EP
1215851 Feb 1990 IT
1154119 Jun 1989 JP
2028615 Jan 1990 JP
2079815 Mar 1990 JP
2137814 May 1990 JP
2249631 Oct 1990 JP
3011315 Jan 1991 JP
2000511299 Aug 2000 JP
2003532157 Oct 2003 JP
2010158315 Jul 2010 JP
2013101323 May 2013 JP
101154066 Jun 2012 KR
2011154235 Jul 2013 RU
2011154238 Jul 2013 RU
9002963 Mar 1990 WO
9222264 Dec 1992 WO
9303409 Feb 1993 WO
9413225 Jun 1994 WO
9417435 Aug 1994 WO
9724639 Jul 1997 WO
9744689 Nov 1997 WO
9831299 Jul 1998 WO
9907309 Feb 1999 WO
9923526 May 1999 WO
0019906 Apr 2000 WO
0076426 Dec 2000 WO
0121061 Mar 2001 WO
0163344 Aug 2001 WO
0182839 Nov 2001 WO
0189424 Nov 2001 WO
0221194 Mar 2002 WO
0234158 May 2002 WO
02084381 Oct 2002 WO
02088830 Nov 2002 WO
03009053 Jan 2003 WO
2004013680 Feb 2004 WO
2004034129 Apr 2004 WO
2004049979 Jun 2004 WO
2004090611 Oct 2004 WO
2004096014 Nov 2004 WO
2004113959 Dec 2004 WO
05019906 Mar 2005 WO
06025726 Mar 2006 WO
2006047698 May 2006 WO
06060477 Jun 2006 WO
2006060480 Jun 2006 WO
2006067255 Jun 2006 WO
2007092948 Aug 2007 WO
2007133384 Nov 2007 WO
2008045847 Apr 2008 WO
2008150982 Dec 2008 WO
2009017403 Feb 2009 WO
2009027438 Mar 2009 WO
2009043985 Apr 2009 WO
2009058755 May 2009 WO
2009076670 Jun 2009 WO
2009130610 Oct 2009 WO
2009148454 Dec 2009 WO
2010046356 Apr 2010 WO
2010054255 May 2010 WO
2010059764 May 2010 WO
2010079528 Jul 2010 WO
2010093975 Aug 2010 WO
2010100523 Sep 2010 WO
2010104530 Sep 2010 WO
2010144315 Dec 2010 WO
2011024125 Mar 2011 WO
2011055228 May 2011 WO
2011075641 Jun 2011 WO
2011075668 Jun 2011 WO
2012004746 Jan 2012 WO
2012031211 Mar 2012 WO
2012070313 May 2012 WO
2012078763 Jun 2012 WO
2012085917 Jun 2012 WO
2012122411 Sep 2012 WO
2012140389 Oct 2012 WO
2013018379 Feb 2013 WO
2013028992 Feb 2013 WO
2013093916 Jun 2013 WO
2013114209 Aug 2013 WO
2013116133 Aug 2013 WO
2013118177 Aug 2013 WO
2013118499 Aug 2013 WO
2014008343 Jan 2014 WO
2014033543 Mar 2014 WO
2014091528 Jun 2014 WO
2014111831 Jul 2014 WO
2014189049 Nov 2014 WO
2017137841 Aug 2017 WO
2017149403 Sep 2017 WO
2018093873 May 2018 WO
2018150236 Aug 2018 WO
2019130030 Jul 2019 WO
2020115104 Jun 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (69)
Entry
Morlock, R., et al., “Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ): Development and Validation,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, Jun. 2017, vol. 178, pp. 101-114.
Albert D.M., “(Book Review) Intraocular Lenses: Evolution, Designs, Complications, and Pathology, by David Apple et al.,” Archieves of Opthalmology, 1990, vol. 108, pp. 650.
Alfonso J.F., et al., “Prospective Study of the Acri.LISA Bifocal Intraocular Lens,” Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery, Nov. 2007, vol. 33 (11), pp. 1930-1935.
Alvarez S. L. et al., “Spectral threshold: measurement and clinical applications,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1983, 67, 504-507.
Apple D.J., et al., Eds., “Intraocular Lenses: Evolution, Designs, Complications and Pathology,” in: New Concepts in Intraocular Lens Implantation, Williams & Wilkins publisher, Jan. 1989, vol. 22 (36), pp. 205-221.
Apple D.J., et al., Eds., “Intraocular Lenses: Evolution, Designs, Complications and Pathology,” in: New Concepts in Intraocular Lens Implantation, Williams & Wilkins publisher, Jan. 1989, vol. 36 (1), pp. 21-36.
Artal P., et al., “Contributions of the Cornea and the Lens to the Aberrations of the Human Eye,” Optics Letters, 1998, vol. 23 (21), pp. 1713-1715.
Atchinson D.A., “Design of Aspheric Intraocular Lens,” Ophthamic & Physiological Optics, 1991, vol. 11 (2), pp. 137-146.
Atchinson D.A., et al., “Optical Design of Intraocular Lenses. II. Off-Axis performance,” Optometry & Vision Science, 1989, vol. 66 (9), pp. 579-590.
Atchinson D.A., et al., “Third-Order Aberrations of Pseudophakic Eyes,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics , 1989, vol. 9, pp. 205-211.
Atchinson D.A., “Optical Design of Intraocular Lenses. I. On-Axis Performance,” American Academy of Optometry, 1989, vol. 66 (8), pp. 492-506.
Atchinson D.A., “Optical design of intraocular lenses III. On-Axis Performance in the Presence of Lens Displacement,” American Academy of Optometry, 1989, vol. 66 (10), pp. 671-681.
Atchinson, “Refractive errors induced by displacement of intraocular lenses within the pseudophakic eye,” Optometry & Vision Science, 1989, 66 (3), 146-152.
Bonnet R., et al., “New Method Of Topographical Ophthalmometry—Its Theoretical and Clinical Applications,” American Journal of Optometry, 1962, vol. 39 (5), pp. 227-251.
Bradley A. et al., “Achromatizing the Human Eye” Optometry & Vision Science, 1991, vol. 68 (8), pp. 608-616.
Buralli D.A., et al., “Optical Performance of Holographic Kinoforms,” Applied Optics, Mar. 1989, vol. 28 (5), pp. 976-983.
Canovas C., et al., “Hybrid Adaptive-Optics Visual Simulator,” Optical Letters, Jan. 15, 2010, vol. 35 (2), pp. 196-198.
Cohen A.L., “Diffractive Bifocal Lens Design,” Optometry and Vision Science, Jun. 1993, vol. 70 (6), pp. 461-468.
Cohen A.L., “Practical Design of a Bifocal Hologram Contact Lens or Intraocular Lens,” Applied Optics, Jul. 1, 1992, vol. 31 (19), pp. 3750-3754.
Diffractive Lenses for Extended Depth of Focus and Presbyopic Correction, Presentation from Wavefront Congress held on Feb. 15, 2008, Rochester, New York.
Doskolovich L.L., et al., “Special Diffractive Lenses,” Lens and Optical Systems Design, Apr. 1992, vol. 1780, pp. 393-402.
Dwyer W. O. et al., “Racial Differences In Color Vision: Do They Exist”, American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 1975, 52, 224-229.
El Hage S.G., et al., “Contribution of the Crystalline Lens to the Spherical Aberration of the Eye,” 1973, vol. 63 (2), pp. 205-211.
Futhey J.A., “Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens,” SPIE, 1989, vol. 1052, pp. 142-148.
Geun Y., et al., “Visual Performance after Correcting the Monchromatic and Chromatic Aberrations of the Eye,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2002, vol. 19 (2), pp. 266-275.
Glasser A. et al., “Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age,” Vision Res, 1998, 38 (2), 209-229.
Greivenkamp J.E., et al., “Visual Acuity Modeling Using Optical Raytracing of Schematic Eyes,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995, vol. 120 (2), pp. 227-240.
Griswold Scott et al., “Scotopic Spectral Sensitivity of Phakic and Aphakic Observers Extending into the Near Ultraviolet,” Vision res, 1992, 32 (9), 1739-1743.
Guirao A., et al., “Corneal Wave Aberration from Videokeratography: Accuracy and Limitations of the Procedure,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2000, vol. 17 (6), pp. 955-965.
IOVS, 1999, 40 (4), S535.
Kiely et al., “The mean shape of the human cornea,” Optica ACTA, 1982, 29 (8), 1027-1040.
Kokoschka S., et al., “Influence of Field Size on the Spectral Sensitivity of the Eye in the Photopic and Mesopic Range,” American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 1985, vol. 62 (2), pp. 119-126.
Liang J, et al., “Objective Measurement of Wave Aberrations of The Human Eye With The Use of a Hartmann-Shack Wave-Front Sensor,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1994, vol. 11 (7), pp. 1949-1957.
Lindsay R., et al., “Descriptors of Corneal Shape,” Optometry and Vision Science, 1998, vol. 75 (2), pp. 156-158.
Liou H.L., et al., “Anatomically Accurate, Finite Model Eye for Optical Modeling,” Journal of Optical Society of America, Aug. 1997, vol. 14 (8), pp. 1684-1695.
Lotmar, “Theoretical eye model with aspherics,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971, 61 (11), 1522-1529.
Malacara D., et al., “Wavefront Fitting With Discrete Orthogonal Polynomials In a Unit Radius Circle,” Optical Engineering, 1990, vol. 29 (6), pp. 672-675.
Mandell R.B., et al., “Mathematical Model of the Corneal Contour,” 1965, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 183-197.
Marcos S., et al., “A New Approach to the Study of Ocular Chromatic Aberrations,” Vision Research, 1999, vol. 39 (26), pp. 4309-4323.
Marsack J.D., et al., “Metrics of Optical Quality Derived from Wave Aberrations Predict Visual Performance,” Journal of Vision, Apr. 2004, vol. 4 (4), pp. 322-328.
Monsoriu J.A., et al., “Devil's Lenses,” Optics Express, Oct. 17, 2007, vol. 15 (21), pp. 13858-13864.
Mordi J.A., et al., “Influence of Age of Chromatic Aberration of the Human Eye,” American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 1985, vol. 62 (12), pp. 864-869.
Navarro R., et al., “Accommodation-Dependent Model of the Human Eye with Aspherics,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, Aug. 1985, vol. 2 (8), pp. 1273-1281.
Norrby S., et al., “Model Eyes for Evaluation of Intraocular Lenses,” Applied Optics, Sep. 7, 2007, vol. 46 (26), pp. 6595-6605.
“Optical Design,” Military Standardization Handbook, 1962, Chapter 4, U.S. Department of Defense MIL-HDBK-141, Apr. 1-4, 2019.
Oshika T., et al., “Changes in Corneal Wavefront Aberrations with Aging,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1999, vol. 40 (7), pp. 1351-1355.
Patel S., et al., “Shape and Radius of Posterior Corneal Surface,” Refractive and Corneal Surgery, 1993, vol. 9 (3), pp. 173-181.
Piers P.A., et al., “Eye Models for the Prediction of Contrast Vision in Patients with New Intraocular Lens Designs,” Optics Letters, Apr. 1, 2004, vol. 29 (7), pp. 733-735.
Piers P.A., et al., “Theoretical Comparison of Aberration-Correcting Customized and Aspheric Intraocular Lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Apr. 2007, vol. 23 (4), pp. 374-384.
Said et al., “The Variation with Age of the Spectral Transmissivity of the Living Human Crystalline Lens,” Gerontologia, 1959, 213-231.
Schwiegerling et al., “Representation of videokeratoscopic height data with Zemike polynomials,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1995, 12 (10), 2105-2113.
Seitz B., et al, “Comeal Topography,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmolgy, 1997, vol. 8 (4), pp. 8-24.
Siedlecki D., et al., “Radial Gradient index Intraocular Lens: a Theoretical Model,” Journal of Modern Optics, Feb. 20-Mar. 10, 2008, vol. 55 (4-5), pp. 639-647.
Smith G. et al., “The spherical aberration of the crystalline lens of the human eye,” Vision Res., 2001, 41 (2), 235-243.
Smith Kinney, “Sensitivity of the eye to spectral radiation at scotopic and mesopic intensity levels,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1955, 45 (7), 507-514.
Terwee T., et al., “Visualization of the Retinal Image in an Eye Model With Spherical and Aspheric, Diffractive, and Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Mar. 2008, vol. 24 (3), pp. 223-232.
Thibos L. N. et al., “The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans,” Applied Optics, 1992, 31 (19), 3594-3600.
Thibos L. N. et al., “Theork and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration,” Vision Res, 1988, 30 (1), 33-49.
Townsley, “New Knowledge of the corneal contour,” Contacto, 1970, pp. 38-43.
Van Den Berg T.J., “Analysis of Intraocular Straylight, Especially in Relation to Age,” Optometry and Vision Science, Feb. 1995, vol. 72 (2), pp. 52-59.
Van Meeteren A., “Calculations on the Optical Modulation Transfer Function of the Human Eye for White Light,” Optica Acta, May 1974, vol. 21 (5), pp. 395-412.
Verriest G., “The Spectral Curve of Relative Luminous Efficiency in Different Age Groups of Aphakic Eyes,” Mod Probl Ophthalmol., 1974, 13, 314-317.
Villegas E.A., et al., “Correlation between Optical and Psychophy, Sical Parameters as a Function of Defocus,” Optometry and Vision Science, Jan. 1, 2002, vol. 79 (1), pp. 60-67.
Wang J.Y., et al, “Wave-Front Interpretation With Zernike Polynomials,” Applied Optics, 1980, vol. 19 (9), pp. 1510-1518.
International Search Report and written opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2018/066780, dated Oct. 1, 2018, 14 pages.
Castignoles F., et al., “Comparison of the Efficiency, MTF and Chromatic Properties of Four Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens Designs,” Optics Express, Mar. 2010, vol. 18 (5), pp. 5245-5256.
Sokolowski M., et al. “Hybrid Heptafocal Intraocular Lenses,” Optica Applicata, Dec. 2015, vol. 45 (3), pp. 285-298.
Guillon M., et al., “Corneal Topography: A Clinical Model,” Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 1986, vol. 6 (1), pp. 47-56.
Smith G., et al., “The spherical aberration of intra-ocular lenses,” Department of Optometry, 1988, vol. 8 (3), pp. 287-294.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180368972 A1 Dec 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62524128 Jun 2017 US