Various dispensing systems have been developed for dispensing a flowable product by means of manual actuation. The flowable product may be any one of a variety of health and beauty aid products or any one of a variety of home, kitchen and bath cleaning products. The type of manual actuation depends primarily on the construction of the dispensing system. Aerosols and similar pressurized containers are usually manually actuated by depressing a button. Dispensing systems employing a plunger construction are usually manually actuated by (downwardly) depressing an upwardly-extending actuator stem or post, often fitted with an ergonomic actuator. Also typical of such plunger constructions is the dispensing of the product out through the ergonomic actuator. This is similar to how an aerosol mist is dispensed out through an opening in the button which is depressed. This is also similar to how a spray mist would be dispensed. A flowable product may be dispensed as a mist, a spray, a liquid, a gel or a foam. While this listing may not be exhaustive, it does include the more common flowable product forms, compositions and consistencies.
The dispensing system constructions mentioned above each involve some type of direct manual manipulation of the dispensing mechanism. Even if one simply removes a threaded cap and pours out a portion of the product, there is still direct manual manipulation of the threaded cap. An alternative way of dispensing a flowable product is to provide a pliable container for the product and apply a manual squeezing force on the outer wall of the container in order to increase the interior pressure. This increased interior pressure forces a portion of whatever product is in the container to be dispensed through a dispensing outlet. While there is direct manual manipulation of the container wall, it is the interior pressure and the flow of air and product which actuate the dispensing structure and open any internal valves.
This general type or style of squeeze dispenser may be used to dispense product as a liquid or may be used to dispense the product as a foam composition or consistency which is an aerated mixture of liquid and air. The focus of the present disclosure, as shown by the exemplary embodiment, is directed to an inverted squeeze foamer. Two (2) species of the inverted squeeze foamer are disclosed herein as exemplary embodiments. One (1) species employs a duckbill valve for managing the flow of liquid product. The other species employs a metering valve for managing the flow of liquid product.
The disclosed foam-dispensing system uses a pliable container (i.e. a squeeze bottle) for containing and storage of a liquid product. While the viscosity of the liquid product may vary based in part on its temperature, the use of “liquid” herein refers to alcohol-based products and other flowable products whose room temperature viscosity (μ) is preferably in the range of approximately between 1.0 centipoise and 150 centipoise. This range allows the selected liquid product to flow, to mix and to be dispensed with a foam consistency by way of the disclosed foam-dispensing system.
The term “system”, as used herein, refers to the combination of the container, the product which is placed in the container and the dispensing mechanism which is attached to the container. The “system” is also referred to as a “squeeze foamer”, due to the use of a squeezing force on the pliable wall of the container. One approach for attachment of the dispensing mechanism to the container is to provide a threaded neck on the container and threadedly connect the dispensing mechanism. A dip tube is typically extended into the product so as to be able to draw product into the dispensing mechanism. The dispensing mechanism is referred to herein as a “foamer”. The referenced viscosity range for the product encompasses a number of different liquid products such as liquid soap, shaving cream, cleaning preparations, and hygiene products, to name simply a few of the possibilities.
One consideration in the design and construction of a foamer of the type generally discussed above is its cost and this relates in part to the number of component parts and the material expense for those component parts. Another consideration is the quality of the foam which is produced and dispensed. The produced foam needs to have some degree of fluidity to be easily dispensed. However, too much product in the mixture with air may result in a foam which is too runny and will not remain where it is applied. Too much air in the mixture can affect the fluidity of the foam and may cause the foam to be too dry. Controlling the volumetric ratio of liquid product and air is important in controlling the quality of the foam which is dispensed. A still further consideration is the reliability of the foamer construction. Included as part of this consideration is the integrity of any interior valves and their sealing effectiveness. A still further consideration is the ease of assembly. This may relate in part to the number of component parts, but also relates to the construction of those component parts and their manner of assembly and interfit with one another.
A still further consideration is the range of products which the foamer can accommodate. This degree of accommodation depends in part on the product viscosity and in part on the design of the component parts. The focus here is on the dimensions, sizes, lengths, etc. which influence the flow of liquid product and air and on the specific style of valving as represented by the two (2) species. With these considerations in mind, the disclosed embodiment provides an efficient and reliable structure which produces and dispenses an acceptable foam consistency for the product. The limited number of component parts assemble easily without the need for any bonding, ultrasonic welding or the use of threaded fasteners. The air flow for mixing with liquid product comes from the air within the container and the valving for the liquid product includes a duckbill valve in one embodiment and a metering valve in another embodiment. Use of the phrase “foam aeration” describes the process of pushing an air and liquid product mixture through a mesh screen. This mixture may be the two (2) constituents as initially mixed or may be the two (2) constituents after a first pass through a coarse mesh.
For the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates. One embodiment of the invention is shown in great detail, although it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that some features that are not relevant to the present invention may not be shown for the sake of clarity.
Referring to
The exemplary embodiment, as illustrated herein, is described as being an “inverted” squeeze foamer. In order to properly orient the disclosed inverted squeeze foamer, its normal, not in use condition is with the base of the container resting on a shelf, countertop or similar substantially horizontal surface. However, since the top cap 28 which is adjacent the dispensing end 30 has a substantially planar lower edge 32, the inverted squeeze foamer 20 can be set, when not in use, on edge 32. This inverted, at rest condition is illustrated in
Referring now to
These component parts 28, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46 and 48 are assembled together without using any adhesives, bonding agents, threaded fasteners or the use of ultrasonic welding. An axial, sliding relationship between cap 28 and closure 34 defines, in part, dispensing end 30. By pulling axially on cap 28, in a direction which is outwardly or upwardly, a foam flow opening between cap 28 and closure 34 is created allowing generated foam to be dispensed as the pliable container 22 is squeezed.
Mesh insert 40 is received in part by housing 36 and in part by closure 34. Portions of housing 36 are received by closure 34. Closure 34 is constructed and arranged to assemble to the neck of the container 22. The duckbill valve 44 assembles into duckbill valve holder 46 and this combination is received by housing 36. The duckbill valve holder 46 includes a dip tube sleeve 50 which receives the dip tube 48 with an interference fit. The diaphragm 38 is positioned above the duckbill holder 46 and includes an upper annular wall which received a lower annular wall of the housing 36. The gasket 42 is positioned so as to help seal the threaded assembly closure 34 with the neck of the container. Gasket 42 is preferably a square cut annular gasket, but alternatively could be an O-ring.
Briefly, the manual squeezing of the container 22 so as to draw generally opposing portions of the pliable sidewall 54 closer together (see
With continued reference to
The closure 34 includes a lower, generally cylindrical skirt 58 which is internally threaded for threaded connection to the threaded neck 60 of container 22. The exemplary embodiment shows internal threads on the skirt 58 and there are cooperating external threads on the neck 60. However, it is contemplated that this form of threaded engagement could be reversed. Alternatively, the foamer 26 and container 22 could be securely assembled together, into a leak-free combination, by means of a snap-fit combination or an interference fit. Techniques such as the use of ultrasonic welding or the use of adhesives are not suitable since as a practical matter they can only be employed after the container is filled with liquid product.
Cap 28, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
Inwardly directed rib 72 is an abutment stop for the relative movement between cap 28 and closure 34. Closure 34 includes a radially outwardly-extending rib 74 which slides against the interior annular surface 76 of cap 28. Annular lip 78 abuts against ledge 80 when cap 28 and closure 34 are “closed”. This abutment between lip 78 and ledge 80 closes off any foam flow openings or separation, effectively sealing closed the foamer 26. In the “open” condition of
Closure 34, as separate component part, is illustrated in
The valving structure of diaphragm 38 helps to control when and how make-up air is drawn into container 22 after a portion of liquid product 24 is dispensed with a foam consistency. Briefly, internal pressure due to squeezing of the pliable container sidewall 54 causes an inner edge portion of the diaphragm 38 to push open for delivering air in order to mix with the liquid product. When the squeezing force on the sidewall of the container is removed, the container tries to return to its original shape. This in turn creates a suction force and an outer edge portion or portions of the diaphragm 38 pull away from its valve seat (part of housing 36) and air is sucked into the container via openings 88. Additional details of this described air flow are provided later in conjunction with a description of other component parts.
Housing 36, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
Lower wall portion 102 is generally cylindrical and defines two (2) annular recessed grooves 104a and 104b which function as snap-fit detents in cooperation with raised annular ribs 106a and 106b (annular bumps) on the outer surface of outer wall 108 of duckbill holder 46 for a snap-fit assembly between these two (2) component parts (see
Interior sleeve 114 which is integral with shelf 98 is generally cylindrical and generally concentric with outer wall 90. Sleeve 114 includes an upper portion 116 axially above shelf 98 and a lower portion 118 axially below shelf 98. Upper portion 116 includes three (3) small raised (radially inwardly) annular ribs 120a, 120b and 120c for an interference fit with the outer cylindrical wall 121 of mesh insert 40. The lower surface or edge 122 of mesh insert 40 abuts up against upper surface 124 of mix portion 126. The interior space or volume defined by mix portion 126 allows initial mixing of the air flow and the portion of liquid product 24 being withdrawn from container 22. Lower portion 118 receives the upper (tapered) tip 128 of duckbill valve 44 (see
The raised annular ribs 130a and 130b on the outer surface of upper portion 116 are used to facilitate and secure the interference fit of the axially upper end of portion 116 into stem 85 of closure 34. The raised annular ribs 132a and 132b on the outer surface of lower portion 118 are used to facilitate and secure the snap-fit assembly of lower portion 118 into the upper end 134 of the generally cylindrical body 136 of diaphragm 38. The inner surface 138 defines a pair of raised annular ribs 140a and 140b which are constructed and arranged to cooperate with ribs 132a and 132b for the snap-fit (snap-over) assembly.
Disclosed herein are several snap-fit and/or interference fit assemblies between two (2) component parts or at least between portions of the two (2) component parts. Typically these component part portions are generally cylindrical and include or define some type of assembly structure. Described thus far are raised annular ribs, usually a plurality, and recessed annular grooves or what would be described as detents in a more functional sense.
It is to be understood that virtually any assembly technique or combination may be used for virtually any portion of the exemplary embodiments. These options include the following. One option is to provide one (1) or more raised annular ribs on one (1) part and one (1) or more recessed annular grooves on the other part. The snap-fit of the ribs into the grooves, similar to a ball and detent, helps to secure the assembly of these two (2) component parts. This assembly technique may be used with closely sized parts which may also provide a sliding fit or even an interference fit in addition to the rib-groove interfit.
Another option is to provide only the one (1) or more raised annular ribs on one of the parts. The mating part simply provides a closely sized and similarly shaped surface which creates an interference fit or perhaps a close sliding fit relative to the raised annular ribs. When an interference fit exists, this interference fit actually anchors the two (2) parts together. With plastic parts, and depending on the degree of interference, the ribs may actually “indent” into the other part thereby adding a type of interlock to the assembly.
A still further option is to provide one (1) or more raised annular ribs on each part. This arrangement has the rib or ribs on one part snapping over one or more of the ribs on the other part. There is dimensional interference based in the diameter sizes of the ribs requiring axial force for the snap-together or snap-over assembly of the two (2) component parts.
Diaphragm 38, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
Mesh insert 40, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment two (2) mesh screens are provided and these two (2) mesh screens 152 and 154 are incorporated into mesh insert 40. Alternatively, additional mesh screens can be used or the foamer could include a single mesh screen. Further, in addition to or in lieu of insert 40, the mesh screens can be integrated into other component parts of the foamer, such as into closure 34 and/or housing 36. This integration may be an integrally molded combination or a snap-in assembly of the mesh screen into the other part or a press-in or interference fit assembly. In the exemplary embodiment mesh screens 152 and 154 are installed into the hollow interior of the mesh insert body. Alternatively, each mesh screen 152 and 154 may be bonded to their corresponding end faces of the mesh insert body.
Duckbill valve 40, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
Duckbill valve holder 46, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
As a brief recap, referring to the inverted, ready-to-dispense orientation of
This manual squeezing force creates an internal pressure within container 22 and this pressure causes two (2) flows. One (1) flow is of the liquid product 24 into duckbill valve 44 and the other flow is of air through dip tube 48. These two (2) flows mix in the vicinity of mix portion 126 and this mixture is then forced or pushed through the mesh insert 40. The air-liquid product mixture undergoes a first foam aeration step as it is pushed through coarse mesh screen 152 and then undergoes a second foam aeration step as the coarse foam is pushed through the fine mesh screen 154. The foam exiting from the mesh insert 40 is then dispensed.
When the squeezing force on the container is released, the pliable nature of the container sidewall causes that sidewall to try and return to its original state or prior status. As the sidewall expands, a suction force is created internally as well as through dip tube 48 which thereby opens the air valve which is provided by the combination of edge portion 112 and ledge 110. This allows a flow of make-up air to enter the container and this flow of make-up air continues until the internal pressure within container 22 is restored or returned to substantially atmospheric pressure. Once a generally atmospheric pressure is restored to the interior container 22, the diaphragm seals closed back to its starting or at rest condition. In terms of the make-up air back into the container, the vent flow rate is between approximately 0.01 liters per minute and 0.10 liters per minute at a differential pressure of 40 mbar (0.58 psi).
One feature of the present disclosure and of the illustrated exemplary embodiments is the ability to easily assemble the component parts into the final foamer 26 construction. The same is true for the second embodiment of foamer 200 which is described herein. This ease of assembly feature begins with the snap-fit or interference fit (these variations and their interchangeable aspects have been explained) assembly of four (4) component parts into a first subassembly. This first subassembly provides the assembly of the housing 36, the mesh insert 40, the diaphragm 38 and gasket 42. The second subassembly provides the assembly of the duckbill valve 44 and holder 46. The third subassembly puts the first two (2) subassemblies together in combination with the top cap 28. The final assembly step is to insert the dip tube 48 into sleeve 50 thereby converting the third subassembly into the final foamer construction. These assembly and subassembly steps in the sequence described above are applicable to both the first embodiment and the second embodiment. As noted, foamer 200 represents the second embodiment and the only relevant or applicable difference between foamer 26 and foamer 200 is the elimination of duckbill valve 44 and holder 46 from foamer 26 and replacement with a metering valve 202 and a different style of holder 204 as part of foamer 200. Except for these differences, the two (2) foamers 26 and 200 are essentially the same in all other important aspects.
Referring to
Metering valve 202, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
Metering valve holder 204, as a separate component part, is illustrated in
With continued reference to drawing
Stem 220 defines a generally cylindrical bore 228 which is constructed and arranged to receive post 208 with a closely sized interference fit. With post 208 fully inserted into bore 228, flange 210 becomes preloaded into a curved form resting on the upper inside edge 230 of post 214. When there is a flow of liquid product 24 due to the internal pressure which is generated by a squeezing force on the container, some portion or portions of the outer edge of flange 210 are forced off of or out of contact with edge 230. In turn, this creates a flow opening (or openings) for the liquid product which is forced into inlet 227 to pass into the vicinity of mix portion 126 of housing 36.
In terms of the two foamer constructions disclosed herein, referring to foamers 26 and 200, the control and management of the volumetric flows, flow rates, ratios and proportions determine some of the characteristics of the foam which is dispensed. The mesh insert also plays a part, but the liquid-air mix ratio is critical and is independent of the number and style of mesh screens. Another relevant factor is the valve-opening pressure level for the duckbill valve 44 and for the metering valve 202. Comparatively speaking, the duckbill valve 44 opens in response to a lower liquid flow force or pressure than that required to deflect the edges of the metering valve 202. As such, with essentially all other factor or variables being the same, the foam dispensed from squeeze foamer 20 will have a higher moisture content than the foam dispensed from squeeze foamer 206. The foam from the squeeze foamer 206 will be less dense.
During testing and experimentation with the air liquid flows and mix ratios, foamer 26 with the duckbill valve 44 has produced a foam which has a density of 0.078 grams per cubic centimeter. The foam density or “consistency” will be understood from this representative number which also relates to a liquid percentage and relates to the mix ratio which can be calculated on a volumetric basis. This representative foam density will also be understood in relative terms noting that the density of water is approximately 1.0 grams per cubic centimeter. By changing the structural details of duckbill valve 44, changes which could include the material, a density range for the foam being dispensed by foamer 26 is from approximately 0.03 grams per cubic centimeter to approximately 0.25 grams per cubic centimeter. In contrast, foamer 200 with the metering valve 202 is constructed and arranged to dispense a “lighter” foam, due to more air and less liquid. The designed density of the foam being dispensed ranges from approximately 0.012 grams per cubic centimeter to approximately 0.05 grams per cubic centimeter.
In the exemplary embodiments all of the component parts of foamers 26 and 200 with the exception of the dip tube, are unitary, single-piece molded component parts which are fabricated out of a suitable thermoforming or thermosetting plastic. The preferred material for the mesh insert is nylon and the preferred material for the dip tube is polyethylene.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes, equivalents, and modifications that come within the spirit of the inventions defined by following claims are desired to be protected. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference and set forth in its entirety herein.
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/US2013/054889 filed Aug. 14, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/695,525 filed Aug. 31, 2012, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3176883 | Davis, Jr. | Apr 1965 | A |
3622049 | Thompson | Nov 1971 | A |
3709437 | Wright | Jan 1973 | A |
3937364 | Wright | Feb 1976 | A |
3985271 | Gardner | Oct 1976 | A |
4118152 | Bron | Oct 1978 | A |
4147306 | Bennett | Apr 1979 | A |
4184615 | Wright | Jan 1980 | A |
4274594 | Ito | Jun 1981 | A |
4360130 | Nishimura | Nov 1982 | A |
4364718 | Beun | Dec 1982 | A |
4396152 | Abplanalp | Aug 1983 | A |
4589573 | Tada | May 1986 | A |
4673109 | Cassia | Jun 1987 | A |
4730751 | Mackles et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4880161 | Wright | Nov 1989 | A |
5037006 | Kock | Aug 1991 | A |
5165577 | Ophardt | Nov 1992 | A |
5186364 | Laszlo | Feb 1993 | A |
5219102 | Wright | Jun 1993 | A |
5271530 | Uehira | Dec 1993 | A |
5282552 | Ophardt | Feb 1994 | A |
5337929 | van der Heijden | Aug 1994 | A |
5373970 | Ophardt | Dec 1994 | A |
5431309 | Ophardt | Jul 1995 | A |
5443569 | Uehira | Aug 1995 | A |
5445288 | Banks | Aug 1995 | A |
5467898 | Hori | Nov 1995 | A |
5489044 | Ophardt | Feb 1996 | A |
5518147 | Peterson | May 1996 | A |
5570819 | Uehira | Nov 1996 | A |
5664703 | Reifenberger | Sep 1997 | A |
5676277 | Ophardt | Oct 1997 | A |
5975360 | Ophardt | Nov 1999 | A |
6082586 | Banks | Jul 2000 | A |
6343724 | Ophardt | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394315 | Banks | May 2002 | B1 |
6398133 | Schultz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402054 | Prueter | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409050 | Ophardt | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6516976 | Lewis | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533145 | Lewis | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536685 | Bennett | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540117 | Powling | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6540157 | Ophardt | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543651 | Lewis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575334 | Lewis | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575335 | Lewis | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6601736 | Ophardt | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604693 | Santagiuliana | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6868990 | Cater et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6951295 | Gaus et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7464839 | Heukamp | Dec 2008 | B2 |
8020732 | van der Heijden | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8042710 | van der Heijden | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056769 | van der Heijden | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8187339 | Velazquez et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8430107 | Huang | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9220377 | Fitzpatrick | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20020153389 | Creaghan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20080314931 | van der Heijden | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100126523 | Fujinuma | May 2010 | A1 |
20100193547 | Laidler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120074171 | Quinlan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140008394 | Hofte | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140061247 | Arminak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1407916 | Apr 2003 | CN |
101596509 | Dec 2009 | CN |
0 950 434 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0163093 | Nov 1998 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/054889, dated Dec. 19, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140061247 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61695525 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2013/054889 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14036403 | US |