1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to interactive voice response (“IVR”) systems, and more particularly to maintaining the IVR system specification, which includes both the data for the various state definitions as well as documentation for the IVR system.
2. Description of Related Art
Interactive Voice Response (“IVR”) systems allow a consumer to use a telephone keypad or voice commands to receive self service with a company's contact center without assistance from a contact center agent. For example, a customer of a credit card company may call its toll-free number, type or say her account number and a PIN, and hear information about her current balance, available credit, and next payment due date. By enabling customers to help themselves, IVR systems enable a contact center to handle more customers at one time than the available contact center agents could handle directly.
While IVR systems provide useful contact center functionality, they are not simple for a company to design, build, and maintain. IVR systems often have complicated, web-like, structures of content and numerous user touch-points. There are often different owners (including business and IT personnel) within a company for the various types of content needed to operate an IVR system. These business owners use differing techniques for documenting and maintaining their piece of the system. For example, the system test team may keep the scripts necessary for system and regression testing in one or more spreadsheets. The marketing team may use Visio or another graphical application to visually show the design flow for the customer experience when using the IVR system. A business analyst may maintain a word processing document to capture the details for each step or menu concerning payments. Other groups, with overlapping responsibilities, may use other forms of documentation.
The complicated interconnections within the IVR system, the supporting specifications for the system and the fact that the system is owned by a wide-spread group of business owners makes changing the system difficult. Even a small change to the IVR system requires multiple contacts to the business owners, who then are entrusted to each update their own documents to reflect the change. When changes are made to the system, its complicated nature makes it difficult to closely track the changes over time. The IVR administrator may try to manually compile a document of changes made to the IVR system between two versions. However, this manual process is inconvenient, time consuming, and ripe for mistakes.
What is needed is a system for centralizing the IVR system specification for an IVR system that is usually stored in several different applications, such as word processor, a spreadsheet application and a graphical application. What is a needed is a system that enables a change in the IVR system (whether it be a change to some state definition data or a change to IVR system documentation) to be entered once and yet reflected throughout the data and documentation for the system. Finally, what is needed is a system for tracking changes that can easily and accurately report modifications made to the IVR system specification for a specific time period or between two specified versions.
According to one aspect of the invention, a method and system for designing an IVR system receives IVR system specification data from one or more computer users, which is then stored in a database. The IVR system specification data may be either state definition data or IVR system documentation data. A design specification report can be generated based on the stored state definition data and IVR system documentation. The system may also receive and store state definition design changes or IVR system documentation changes for the IVR system so that a subsequently run report reflects the design or documentation changes.
According to another aspect of the invention, the design specification report may correspond to a chosen period of time or it may correspond to chosen version of the IVR system.
According to another aspect of the invention, the design specification report may provide one or more of the following: a summary of the definition for a state within the IVR system, a listing of the previous states that lead to the current state, prompts for the state, inputs for the state, a listing of decision outcomes, key performance indicator triggers for the state, global commands that are active in the state, business units for which the state is applicable, a sample dialogues listing, test scripts listing for testing the IVR system, a change history listing for the IVR system, a design flow diagram for the IVR system, or pseudo-code listing for a portion of the IVR system.
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
In one embodiment, the invention can be implemented as a series of users using computers 205 to access an IVR designer application 210 (either locally or over a network) that stores IVR system specification data in an IVR design database 215. The IVR design database 215 includes state definition data 220 and IVR system documentation data 225.
The invention offers several advantages over prior methods of maintaining IVR system specification data. In one real life implementation, the invention reduces design time by 10-15%. It enables faster turnaround on updates for business reviews and improves documentation accuracy by 300%. The test script creation phase is reduced by 40-50% and initial code generation time is reduced by 10%.
As one skilled in the art will recognize, the IVR designer application 210 can be developed using one of many types of databases and database interfaces. For example, the ACCESS database program developed by MICROSOFT can be used. In another embodiment, an ORACLE database may be accessed via a GUI that is custom-built using JAVA. One skilled in the art will recognize that there are many approaches to take to build the present invention.
In an embodiment using MICROSOFT ACCESS,
The module to which the state is associated is also chosen 420. The module is a logical grouping of states, such as “main menu” or “payment”. The screen also includes a prompt section 425 lists details for the prompts that are present in the state. For example, the prompts may be stored as WAV files that are played to the customer.
The decisions section 430 lists the decision rules that the IVR implements for the current state. The type of the state (see element 415) dictates the type of decisions that are available. For a decision-style state, the decisions 430 show conditions that cause movement to other states in the system. The decisions section 430 for an audio state lists which of the pre-recorded prompts are played. If the state is a call to the database, the decisions 430 are what action to take based on the results of the database query.
The inputs section 435 details the keypad entries or voice commands, if any, that are available in the current state. In
The key performance indicators (KPIs) section 440 documents the KPIs that are captured based on data from the present state.
The next section lists the available global commands 445. Global commands are those commands that are widely available in the IVR system. For example, “main menu”, “help” and “operator” may be global commands. While these commands are widespread, they are not available everywhere. For example, in the middle of a transaction, the IVR may not accept a command to jump to the main menu. The global commands section 445 of
The technical activities section 450 lists technical information about the state. The notes section 455 allows users to keep track of notes for the state. These sections 450 and 445 may include a high level summary of what the state accomplishes. One of these sections may document which web services are used in connection with the state. One skilled in the art will recognize that other types of data may be stored here.
The previous states section 460 shows, based on the inputs and decisions, which states can cause a customer to enter the current state. This is important to know in order to fully understand how and why the state is being presented to the customer.
The screen of
In some embodiments, the user may choose a beginning and ending version. The IVR designer application 210 generates the report 310 showing only those changes that were introduced between the beginning and ending versions of the IVR system. In other embodiments, the user may choose a beginning and ending date. The report 310 can be run to show changes introduced between these specific beginning and ending dates. The report in
As has been discussed above, the design specification report 310 in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5758323 | Case | May 1998 | A |
5771276 | Wolf | Jun 1998 | A |
5878423 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6014428 | Wolf | Jan 2000 | A |
6035272 | Nishimura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6101470 | Eide et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6366883 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6456699 | Burg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6629087 | Benson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6697796 | Kermani | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6728682 | Fasciano | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6823054 | Suhm et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6834100 | Reynolds | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6862568 | Case | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891932 | Bhargava et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6950798 | Beutnagel et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6990450 | Case et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003719 | Rosenoff et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7039585 | Wilmot et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7039588 | Okutani et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055146 | Durr et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7103158 | Plan | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107536 | Dowling | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7280968 | Blass | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7623632 | Bushey et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020072900 | Keough et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020184002 | Galli | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014407 | Blatter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030187656 | Goose et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216923 | Gilmore et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040199494 | Bhatt | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070192113 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |