Field
Embodiments of the disclosure relate generally to the field of structural systems for aircraft and more particularly to spars having offset webs to accommodate fittings or other structural limitations within low profile chord designs.
Background
Widespread use of composite structural systems with their associated high strength in aircraft has allowed tailoring of very thin cross-sections in aerodynamic surfaces with spars and other structure having reduced depth. However, in many cases, structural fittings, attachment limitations or other requirements are difficult to fit within the thin sections. In actuated surfaces with high loading, excessive moment arms may be required if fittings are placed in a standard structural arrangement within the thin sections. In addition it usually advantageous to locate the spar as close to the hinge line as possible. This creates challenges when attempting to locate fittings and maintain adequate space for joints.
It is therefore desirable to provide a structural design for spars used in such thin structures which allows more room to bolt the highly loaded actuator fittings or otherwise accommodate structural requirements without compromising the actuator fitting joint, compromising the repair capability, moving the spar within the design or otherwise aggravating hinge offsets and hinge loads, or segmenting the spar.
Exemplary embodiments provide an aerodynamic structure incorporated in an aircraft aerodynamic control surface. A spar extends along the entire or at least a portion of the control surface in a direction and the spar includes a plurality of bends along spanwise direction of the control surface.
The embodiments disclosed provide a method wherein a determination is made of additional space requirements for actuator fittings or other structural or operational requirements. Chordwise offset of a spar kick corresponding to the additional space requirement is established and a profile for the web in the spar with appropriate inflection points, or break points, to accomplish the necessary kick is established.
The features and advantages of embodiments disclosed herein will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
For purposes of description herein, span refers to length of the aerodynamic control surface, chord refers to width of the control surface from a leading to a trailing edge and depth refers to the thickness of the control surface at a particular combination of span and chord. In description of placement of elements terms of spanwise or chordwise location may be employed. An exemplary embodiment of an aircraft control surface employs a spar composed of a conventional C-Channel which has a “kick” (bends) at several locations allowing the chordwise offset of the spar web to be optimized or alternatively, allows optimization of the chordwise placement of the spar along the entire span of the spar. The embodiments described herein may be specifically employed in rudder or elevator applications and will be described with respect to a rudder application. The rudder spar incorporates a web that bends in the forward and aft direction, relative to an installed orientation, or installation orientation, on an aircraft, at one or more spanwise locations to provide increased space at the areas of connection to actuators that control the movable rudder control surfaces. This structural arrangement allows the spar to be placed in the optimal position at each hinge or actuator fitting for the entire span of the spar.
Referring to the drawings,
Details of the spar 16 are shown in
The angular relationships of the 5 regions (angles have been exaggerated for clarity) can be seen in the side view of
The first kick, spar second region 52, is shown in detail in
The second kick, the spar fourth region 58, is shown in detail in
An interchangeable embodiment provides a fitting 26a-26k coupled to the web 32 without a rib 14a-14f sandwiching the web 32, or alternatively, a rib 14a-14f coupled to the web 32 without a fitting 26a-26k sandwiching the web 32, each of which by themselves structurally supports a bend in the spar 16.
Similarly as shown in
The embodiment disclosed for a kicked spar allows integration of fittings or other structural requirements that would otherwise require relocating of the spar or other structural modification. A method for implementation of a kicked spar is shown in
Examples of the disclosure may be described in the context of an aircraft manufacturing and service method 700 as shown in
Each of the processes of method 700 may be performed or carried out by a system integrator, a third party, and/or an operator (e.g., a customer). For the purposes of this description, a system integrator may include without limitation any number of aircraft manufacturers and major-system subcontractors; a third party may include without limitation any number of venders, subcontractors, and suppliers; and an operator may be an airline, leasing company, military entity, service organization, and so on.
As shown in
Apparatus and methods embodied herein may be employed during any one or more of the stages of the production and service method 700. For example, components or subassemblies corresponding to production process 708 may be fabricated or manufactured in a manner similar to components or subassemblies produced while the aircraft 802 is in service. Also, one or more aspects of the apparatus, method, or a combination thereof may be utilized during the production stages 708 and 710, for example, by substantially expediting assembly of or reducing the cost of an aircraft 802. Similarly, one or more of apparatus embodiments, method embodiments, or a combination thereof may be utilized while the aircraft 802 is in service, for example and without limitation, to maintenance and service 716.
The examples described herein provide structure for aircraft control surfaces such as rudders and elevators. An aircraft 802 employing the embodiments provides enhanced operation by allowing the additional chordwise space for actuators or other requirements while maintaining the spar 16 closer to the hingeline coupling the control surface, the rudder or elevator in the described embodiments, to the associated vertical or horizontal stabilizer. In operation of the aircraft a hinge line actuator is actuated for movement of a control surface wherein the control surface incorporates a spar having a web with at least one kick bending at inflection points to provide a region having additional chordwise offset from a forward edge of the control surface to accommodate the hinge line actuator as defined for the presently described embodiments. The movement of the control surface is employed for aerodynamic control by inducing yaw or pitch for the described embodiments of a rudder or elevator.
Having now described various embodiments in detail as required by the patent statutes, those skilled in the art will recognize modifications and substitutions to the specific embodiments disclosed herein. Such modifications are within the scope and intent of the present disclosure as defined in the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/058134 | 9/29/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/053259 | 4/7/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2861758 | Howard | Nov 1958 | A |
2927469 | Czerwinski | Mar 1960 | A |
3109614 | Steidl | Nov 1963 | A |
4479620 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
5098043 | Arena | Mar 1992 | A |
20010017336 | Hirahara et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024603 | Stone et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020100840 | Billinger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20060226291 | Law | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090289147 | Lavaud et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20140001309 | Tieys et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103832576 | Jun 2014 | CN |
105366035 | Mar 2016 | CN |
1915291 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2955107 | Dec 2015 | EP |
129687 | Jul 1919 | GB |
05286496 | Feb 1993 | JP |
2000506815 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000043796 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2014125064 | Jul 2014 | JP |
1997034733 | Sep 1997 | WO |
2013005206 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013078646 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14903033.0, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US14/58134, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Search Report,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US14/58134, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 2 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-512924, dated Jul. 13, 2018, 9 pages. |
Structural Design of Aircraft (First Edition), Tsuruo Torikai, Shinji Kuse, Japan Airlines Technical Association, Feb. 22, 1992, p. 158-163 and 194. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; “First Office Action and Search Report”; dated Nov. 1, 2018 in connection with Chinese Application No. 2014800819139; 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170217563 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |