KIT FOR EARLY SCREENING OF LIVER CELL CANCER AND PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOF

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20220145399
  • Publication Number
    20220145399
  • Date Filed
    September 17, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Published
    May 12, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
The present invention provides a kit for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising a gene marker detection reagent and a protein marker detection reagent. The invention also provides a preparation method and application of the kit. The kit comprising specific gene markers and protein markers of the present invention has been demonstrated to be effective in achieving early screening of HCC in community populations, particularly in prospective studies.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention belongs to the medical field, and relates to a kit for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma, and more specifically to a kit for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma of AFP-negative subjects, and a preparation method and application.


BACKGROUND ART

Liver cancer includes two major histopathological types, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), of which HCC accounts for about 85-90%. Currently, there is no effective treatment for advanced HCC. Therefore, it is recommended that cirrhosis patients at high risk of HCC be screened. (Omata M, et al. (2017) Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int 11(4):317-370; Marrero J A, et al. (2018) Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology.). In China, according to the guidelines of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), early screening for HCC has been conducted in a number of cohorts, recommending that individuals with liver cirrhosis and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive be monitored for HCC every 6 months, including ultrasound (US) and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) detecting (Omata M, et al. (2017), ibid.). In previous studies, early detection and early treatment with this model significantly improved the overall survival rate of liver cancer (Singal A G, Pillai A, & Tiro J (2014) Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. PLoS medicine 11(4):e1001624.), but the accurate detection of HCC requires experienced experts, which limits its wide application in all HBsAg positive individuals. In addition, the biannual screening was also associated with follow-up appointments and anxiety. At present, most HCC cases in China are diagnosed based on clinical symptoms rather than by HCC screening, and are at an advanced stage at the time of hospital diagnosis.


In recent studies, liquid biopsies based on gene changes in cell free DNA (cfDNA) have shown good results in early detection of cancer (Bettegowda C, et al. (2014) Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Science translational medicine 6(224):224ra224; Chaudhuri A A, et al. (2017) Early Detection of Molecular Residual Disease in Localized Lung Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling. Cancer discovery 7(12):1394-1403.). Combining genes with protein markers may further improve the sensitivity and specificity of detection and may screen multiple tumor types in one assay (Springer S, et al. (2015) A Combination of Molecular Markers and Clinical Features Improve the Classification of Pancreatic Cysts. Gastroenterology; Cohen J D, et al. (2018) Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science 359(6378):926-930; Cohen J D, et al. (2017) Combined circulating tumor DNA and protein biomarker-based liquid biopsy for the earlier detection of pancreatic cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(38):10202-10207.). However, these studies were primarily directed to HCC inpatients and healthy people without HBV infection (Cohen J D, et al. (2018), ibid). In high risk groups of chronic HBV infection, the performance of liquid biopsy tests may be affected, because some precancerous lesions, such as cirrhosis, may also have driver mutations common in HCC. Analysis of hepatitis, cirrhosis and non-cancerous liver nodules may be necessary to draw a baseline to accurately identify HCC by imaging or histological clinical validation.


The common causes of liver dysfunction are infection (e.g., hepatitis B virus infection), obesity, alcohol abuse, aflatoxin exposure, dyslipidemia, etc., and liver disease patients are at a higher risk for liver cancer. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) are all protein markers of liver cancer. Researches have shown that the combined measurement of AFP and DCP can improve the sensitivity of predicting liver cancer and distinguish early liver cancer from decompensated cirrhosis. However, AFP, DCP and SCCA were negative in many early liver cancers.


Tumors or other cells release DNA molecules into the blood, which form cell free DNA fragments (cfDNA) after degradation. The detection of cfDNA has great potential in guiding tumor targeting drugs, monitoring efficacy and early screening of cancer. About 90% of liver cancer patients in China have hepatitis B virus infection background, and hepatitis B virus-related liver cancer has almost no KRAS, BRAF and other hotspot mutations.


As previously described, a separate protein marker such as AFP has been used in the past as an early screening indicator for HCC. Chun et al., 2015 (Chun S, Rhie S Y, Ki C S, Kim J E, & Park H D (2015) Evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein as a screening marker for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis prevalent areas. Annals of hepatology 14(6):882-888.) reported the use of a single alpha-fetoprotein as a screening marker, but the effect was not satisfactory, with a positive predictive value of about 1-2%.


Recently, attempts have been made for HCC early screening by combining gene changes with protein markers. Joshua D. Cohen et al., 2018 (Cohen J D, Li L, Wang Y, et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6378): eaar3247.) reported early screening of pan-cancerous species, including HCC, using gene mutation binding protein markers, but which did not use gene changes such as TERT and various forms thereof and/or HBV fusions in relation to HCC. And this study was only a retrospective study of inpatients and healthy people who had been diagnosed as HCC, but not a prospective study of patients without HCC symptoms, therefore was not able to predict the occurrence of HCC and give a positive predictive value.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Traditionally, gene changes or protein markers have each been used alone in cancer early screening. Early screening for cancer by using a combination of gene changes and protein markers has also been attempted. Liquid biopsies that bind cell free DNA (cfDNA) and proteins have shown potential in early cancer detection in a variety of tissue types. However, most of these studies are retrospective, with individuals previously diagnosed with cancer as cases and healthy individuals as controls. Even for a few prospective studies, the markers used in the prior art are poorly predictive of hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, the present invention develops a liquid biopsy assay called hepatocellular carcinoma screening (HCC screening), combines specific gene markers with protein markers, and demonstrates its application value in early HCC detection of chronic HBV infection in a multicenter community population. Verification results show that the method robustly distinguishes HCC individuals from non-HCC individuals, with 85% sensitivity and 93% specificity. The inventors further conducted a prospective study to apply this assay to 331 individuals with normal liver ultrasonography and serum AFP levels. 24 positive cases were identified and 4 cases were confirmed to develop HCC after 6-8 months of clinical follow-up. During the same time range of follow-up, 307 test-negative individuals were not diagnosed with HCC. The assay showed 100% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 17% positive predictive value in the validation set. The positive predictive value (PPV) of 17% was significantly higher than that previously obtained by AFP horizontal screening alone, (Chun S, Rhie S Y, Ki C S, Kim J E, & Park H D (2015) Evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein as a screening marker for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis prevalent areas. Annals of hepatology 14(6):882-888.) and higher than that obtained by using specific gene markers and specific protein markers in the invention, respectively.


The kit comprising a specific gene marker and a protein marker of the present invention has been shown to be effective in achieving early screening of HCC in a non-specific population, and thus can be used for early screening of HCC in a non-specific population, and more preferably for early screening of HCC in AFP negative subjects.


It is noteworthy that the kit of the present invention is used for prospective early HCC prediction, and each of the 4 cases of HCC is diagnosed in the early stage (<3 cm), which provides a good basis for follow-up treatment. The inventors' research evidence suggests that the joint detection of cfDNA changes and protein markers is a feasible method to identify early HCC from asymptomatic community groups with unknown HCC status.


Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides a kit for early screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising a gene marker detection reagent and a protein marker detection reagent.


The kit may further comprise a data processing system for converting the information of the gene marker and/or the protein marker into a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the person to be detected, and for predicting whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the person to be detected.


In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for early screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising:


(1) detecting gene markers and protein markers of a subject by using gene marker detection reagents and protein marker detection reagents; and (2) calculating the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score by using the detection results of the gene markers and the protein markers and comparing with a threshold value.


According to the method, the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score and the threshold value are obtained through a liver cancer prediction model; the method for constructing the prediction model of liver cancer comprises the following steps:


constructing a training set, wherein the training set consists of a plurality of liver cancer patients and a plurality of patients at high risk of liver cancer;


taking gene markers and protein markers of a training set as characteristics, converting detection results into characteristic scores, constructing a liver cancer prediction model by using a penalty logistic regression algorithm, and calculating a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score;


and obtaining a ROC curve of sensitivity and specificity of the penalty logistic regression model according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score and the sample grouping information, and determining a cut-off value according to the ROC curve, wherein the cut-off value serves as a threshold value for distinguishing liver cancer patients from patients at high risk of liver cancer.


In yet another aspect, the invention provides the use of gene marker detection reagents and protein marker detection reagents for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma.


In yet another aspect, the invention provides the use of gene marker detection reagents and protein marker detection reagents in the preparation of a kit for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma.


The invention aims to perform early liver cancer screening.


The invention firstly protects a liver cancer early screening kit, which can include detection reagents of liver cancer mutant gene, a DCP detection reagent and an AFP detection reagent.


The “detection reagents for the liver cancer mutant gene” can be used for detecting the mutation type and/or the mutation reads and/or the gene copy number variation of the liver cancer mutant gene in the cfDNA.


The “liver cancer mutant gene” may be a TP53 gene and/or a TERT gene and/or an AXIN1 gene and/or a CTNNB1 gene.


The DCP detection reagent can be used for detecting the DCP content in plasma.


The AFP detection reagent can be used for detecting AFP content in plasma.


The kit may also include a detection reagent for whether HBV is integrated with the gene and/or a cfDNA detection reagent.


The “detection reagent for whether the HBV is integrated with the gene” can be used for detecting whether an integration sites of HBV sequence and human genome exits in cfDNA.


The “cfDNA detection reagent” can be used to detect the concentration of cfDNA and/or the percentage of different insert fragment lengths of cfDNA to the cfDNA content.


The kit of any of the above may further comprise a data processing system; the data processing system is used for converting liver cancer gene variation information (i.e. information about 11 gene mutation characteristics), DCP content (DCP content in plasma), AFP content (AFP content in plasma), whether HBV is integrated with genes, cfDNA information and clinical information of a subject into a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score (i.e. an HCCscreen score value) of the subject; and for predicting whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the person to be detected.


The invention also protects the application of the detection reagents of the liver cancer mutant gene, the DCP detection reagent, the AFP detection reagent, the detection reagent of whether the HBV is integrated with the gene or not and the cfDNA detection reagent, which can be at least one of A1)-A4):


A1) predicting whether a person to be detected is a liver cancer patient;


A2) preparing a kit for predicting whether a person to be detected is a liver cancer patient;


A3) predicting liver cancer;


A4) preparing a kit for predicting liver cancer.


The invention also protects the application of the detection reagents of the liver cancer mutant gene, the DCP detection reagent, the AFP detection reagent, the detection reagent of whether the HBV is integrated with the gene or not, the cfDNA detection reagent and the data processing system, which can be at least one of A1)-A4):


A1) predicting whether a person to be detected is a liver cancer patient;


A2) preparing a kit for predicting whether a person to be detected is a liver cancer patient;


A3) predicting liver cancer;


A4) preparing a kit for predicting liver cancer.


The invention also protects the age, sex, the content of DCP in the blood plasma, the content of AFP in the blood plasma of the person to be detected and “the mutation type, mutation reads, gene copy number variation of a liver cancer mutant gene, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, the concentration of the cfDNA and the percentage of different insert fragment lengths of cfDNA to the cfDNA content of the person to be detected” as a marker application, which can be at least one of A1)-A4):


A1) predicting whether a person to be detected is a liver cancer patient;


A2) preparing a kit for predicting whether a person to be detected is a liver cancer patient;


A3) predicting liver cancer;


A4) preparing a kit for predicting liver cancer.


The invention also provides a method for predicting liver cancer, which can comprise the following steps of: detecting the content of DCP and AFP in the blood plasma of a person to be detected; detecting the mutation type, mutation reads, gene copy number variation of liver cancer mutant genes, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, the concentration of the cfDNA and the percentage of different insert fragment lengths of cfDNA to the cfDNA content of the person to be detected; recording the age and sex of a person to be detected; converting the information of the person to be detected into a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score (i.e. an HCCscreen score value), and predicting whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score.


“Predicting whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score” comprises determining a diagnosis threshold value through a working characteristic curve (ROC curve), comparing the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the person to be detected with the size of the diagnosis threshold value, and finishing the liver cancer prediction of the person to be detected.


The HCCscreen score of the person to be detected can be calculated by a liver cancer prediction model. The liver cancer prediction model is a penalty logistic regression model developed according to the characteristic scores and grouping information of each patient in the training set. The training set consists of a plurality of liver cancer patients (constituting a liver cancer group) and a plurality of liver cancer high-risk patients (constituting a liver cancer high-risk group). In one embodiment of the present invention, the training set consists of 65 liver cancer patients and 70 high-risk liver cancer patients.


Whether the HBV is integrated with the gene or not can be as follows: the extent to which HBV is integrated with a gene, whether HBV is integrated with a TERT gene and/or whether HBV is integrated with a non-TERT gene (e.g., APOBEC4, FBX010, FUT8, WDR7, SLC7A10, GUSBP4).


Information of the liver cancer mutant gene of any one of the above includes information of the mutation type and/or mutation reads and/or gene copy number variation of the liver cancer mutant gene.


The cfDNA information described above may include cfDNA concentration and/or the percentage of different insert fragment lengths of cfDNA to the cfDNA content. The percentage of cfDNA content of different insertion fragment length of the cfDNA can be specifically as follows: interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment length less than 90 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 90-140 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 141-200 bp and interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment greater than 200 bp. Interval percentage refers to the percentage of all cfDNA content.


The clinical information of any of the above may include age and/or sex.


The detection reagents of the liver cancer mutant gene comprise a reagent for extracting cfDNA (such as a MagMAX™ Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit), a reagent for constructing a cfDNA library (such as a KAPA Hyper Prep kit), and a reagent for performing hybridization capture of a target region (such as a sureselect XT target capture kit).


The DCP detection reagent can be a reagent for detecting the content of DCP in plasma. Specifically: separating plasma and detecting DCP by American Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR chemiluminescence immuno-analyzer.


The AFP detection reagent may be a reagent for detecting AFP content in plasma. Specifically: separating plasma and detecting AFP by American Abbott IMx analyzer.


The detection reagent for whether or not the HBV is integrated with the gene may include a reagent for extracting cfDNA (e.g., MagMAX™ Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit).


The cfDNA detection reagent includes a reagent for extracting cfDNA (e.g., MagMAX™ Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit).


In the above, the characteristics of the detection (kit detection) can be specifically 20 characteristics in the embodiment as follows:


I. The characteristics used by the “detection reagents for the liver cancer mutant gene” can specifically be 11 characteristics in the embodiment, which are a TP53 gene non-R249S mutation, a TERT gene mutation, an AXIN1 gene mutation, a CTNNB1 gene mutation, a TP53 R249S hot spot mutation, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5 and a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 6 (i.e. 11 gene mutation characteristics), respectively. The specific steps are as follows:


1. Extracting cfDNA of blood sample to be detected.


2. Taking the cfDNA of the blood sample to be detected, and constructing a library by using a KAPA Hyper Prep kit to obtain the cfDNA library of the blood sample to be detected.


3. Taking a cfDNA library of the blood sample to be detected, performing hybridization capture of target region by using a sureselect XT target capture kit, and sequencing on an Illumina platform. Obtaining a detection result (including mutant gene and mutation frequency) of the liver cancer mutant gene in the cfDNA of the blood sample to be detected.


4. Annotating and scoring of gene mutation results


Annotating the detection result of the liver cancer mutant gene in the cfDNA: annotation score for mutation reads support frequency.


5 Taking a cfDNA library of a blood sample to be detected, performing low-depth whole genome sequencing, and then performing CNV detection and cfDNA fragment length detection on sequencing data.


6. Feature extraction of gene copy number variation detection results


The CNV detection results are processed as follows: principal component analysis (PCA) dimensionality reduction is performed on the CNV signals (the sex chromosomes were deleted to rule out the effect of gender on CNV signal) at each chromosome arm level, with the cumulative ratio (cumulative proportion) ≥95% as the threshold, the first six principal components (CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 6) are selected as CNV related characteristics, the CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 6) are as CNV characteristics for subsequent calculation, and the corresponding principal component score of each CNV characteristic is the characteristic score of the characteristic.


7. Detecting cfDNA fragment length


The low-depth whole genome sequencing data can be used to analyze the four characteristics in the examples, which can be interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment length less than 90 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 90-140 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 141-200 bp and interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment greater than 200 bp, respectively.


II. The characteristics used by the “cfDNA detection reagent” for detection specifically be the concentration of cfDNA. The cfDNA concentration values were taken as characteristic scores after log 2 transformation.


III. The characteristics used by the “DCP detection reagent” may be specifically one characteristics in the examples, that is, the DCP content in plasma.


IV. The characteristics used by the “AFP detection reagent” can be specifically one characteristics in the examples, that is, the AFP content in plasma.


V. The characteristics used by the “whether the HBV is integrated with the gene or not” can be specifically two characteristics in the example, namely the situation of integration variation of the HBV and whether the HBV is integrated with the TERT or not (i.e. two gene mutation characteristics).


In the above, mutation site integration and scoring: for each gene mutation, giving an annotation score according to the mutation reads support frequency; the mutation site scores are then accumulated into different ROI (Region Of Interest) intervals (i.e., obtaining characteristic scores). The interval includes four genes (TP53, CTNNB1, TERT and AXIN1) and a TP53 R249S hotspot mutation site region. The calculation formula is as follows:







R





O





I

=


log

2






i
=
1

n




adj_scor

e

i







Where n is the number of mutations overlapping the ROI and adj_score is the reads support frequency of the mutation.


In the above, the structural variation result characteristic extraction steps are as follows:


(1) Detecting the characteristic score of HBV integration variation in each sample: for each integration mutation detected, it was divided into three grades A, B and C according to the reads support credibility (the number of integrated reads ≥10, grade A; 10>the number of integrated reads >6, grade B; the rest was grade C, as shown in column 3 of Table 7), and the corresponding scores were 1, 0.8 and 0.3 respectively, and then summed up to obtain the characteristic score of HBV integration variation.


(2) Detecting the score of the HBV and TERT integration variation characteristic of each sample: TERT integration occurs, and the characteristic score of TERT integration variation is 1 (without considering reads support credibility rating); TERT integration did not occur, and the characteristic score of TERT integration variation was 0.


In the above, the related characteristic extraction steps of the cell free DNA length are as follows: calculating the percentage of the length of the cfDNA fragment in four intervals (<90 bp, 90-140 bp, 141-200 bp and >200 bp), taking the characteristics as prediction variables, the percentage of the length of the cfDNA fragment in the four intervals is a characteristic score.


In the above, the related characteristic extraction of the protein marker comprises the following steps of:


Dividing actual measured values of AFP into five numerical levels from low to high according to threshold values (13, 20, 200, 400): 0, 5, 8, 20 and 30, dividing actual measured values of the DCP into three numerical levels from low to high according to threshold values (40 and 60): 0, 2, 5 as characteristic scores of two protein markers.


In addition, two characteristics can be extracted according to clinical and experimental correlation characteristics, and the clinical characteristics include age and gender of patients, and also have a certain correlation with case phenotype. Wherein, the characteristic value of the age is the actual age value of the sample; The characteristic score of male is 1, and that of female is 0.


The characteristics may include the following 22 characteristics: 13 gene mutation characteristics, 2 protein markers, 5 cfDNA physical characteristics and the basic information composition of 2 blood sample. The 13 gene mutations characteristics are a TP53 gene non-R249S mutation, a TERT gene mutation, an AXIN1 gene mutation, a CTNNB1 gene mutation, a TP53 R249S hot spot mutation, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5 and a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 6, HBV integrated variation, whether HBV and TERT integrated variation, respectively. The two protein markers were AFP and DCP, respectively. The five physical characteristics of cfDNA were as follows interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment length less than 90 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 90-140 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 141-200 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment greater than 200 bp and the concentration of cfDNA respectively concentration. The basic information of 2 blood sample is sex and age, respectively.


Early detection of cancer is the most effective way to reduce cancer-induced death. In recent studies, cfDNA and/or protein-based liquid biopsies have shown promise in early detection of cancer in a variety of tissue types (Cohen J D, et al. (2018), ibid), but have not demonstrated good predictive results for HCC, nor have they demonstrated efficacy in identifying early liver cancer and high-risk populations. In this study, the inventors developed and tested a liquid biopsy assay. In the selection of biomarkers, we focus on frequently changing genetic biomarkers with clear carcinogenic mechanisms, such as TERT promoter mutations, and protein markers with definite diagnostic value, such as DCP (Lok A S, et al. (2010) Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin and alpha-fetoprotein as biomarkers for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 138(2):493-502.). The present invention comprises a limited number of candidate biomarkers specifically associated with HCC, and to avoid over-fitting effects when studying a large number of candidate biomarkers in a limited number of tumor/normal cases, we incorporate a small number of candidate biomarkers specifically associated with HCC. By using research tools for retrospective and/or prospective studies to verify a particular combination of gene markers and protein markers selected according to the present invention, it has been found that this particular combination achieves superior results in both retrospective and prospective verification.


Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides a kit for the early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in AFP negative subjects, comprising gene marker detection reagents and a DCP detection reagent.


The kit may further comprise a data processing system for converting the information of the gene markers and/or the protein markers into a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the person to be detected, and for predicting whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the person to be detected.


The gene marker detection reagents of any one of the above may comprise one or more, preferably three or four, selected from: TP53 detection reagent, CTNNB1 detection reagent, AXIN1 detection reagent, TERT detection reagent.


The gene marker detection reagents of any one of the above may further comprise a detection reagent for whether HBV is integrated with a gene.


The protein marker detection reagents of any one of the above may comprise one or more selected from: AFP detection reagent and DCP detection reagent.


The kit of the present invention can be used for early screening of HCC in non-specific populations, as well as for early screening of HCC in specific populations such as AFP negative subjects. Since AFP is a common test indicator in routine physical examinations such as blood tests, it is likely that the subject's AFP status (negative or positive) is known. Thus, in some embodiments, the kit of the present invention is an HCC early screen for a particular population, such as AFP negative subjects, wherein the kit does not include an AFP detection reagent. Similarly, in some embodiments, the kit of the present invention is an HCC early screen for a particular population, such as DCP negative subjects, wherein the kit does not include an DCP detection reagent. Similarly, in some embodiments, the kit of the present invention is an HCC early screen for a particular population such as AFP and DCP negative subjects, wherein the kit does not include an AFP detection reagent and a DCP detection reagent. Thus in some embodiments, the present invention provides a kit for the early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in AFP negative subjects comprising a gene marker detection reagent and a protein marker detection reagent, preferably wherein the protein marker detection reagent comprises a DCP detection reagent. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a kit for screening hepatocellular carcinoma in a DCP negative subject comprising a gene marker detection reagent and a protein marker detection reagent, preferably wherein the protein marker detection reagent comprises an AFP detection reagent. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a kit for the early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in AFP and DCP negative subjects comprising a gene marker detection reagent. The gene marker detection reagents according to the present invention can detect the presence and/or type of gene markers, including mutant types and mutant reads.


Gene marker detection reagents according to the present invention also include CNV detection reagents in some embodiments. The CNV detection reagent is typically used to detect CNV at the whole genome level, but in some embodiments may also be used to detect at local levels, such as CNV of genes. In some embodiments, a kit of the invention comprises a CNV detection reagent for detecting global CNV levels. In some embodiments, a kit of the invention comprises a CNV detection reagent for detecting local CNV levels. In some embodiments, a kit of the invention comprises a CNV detection reagent for detecting CNV level of a TERT gene. The use of CNV detection reagents may further improve the sensitivity and specificity of HCC screening. In some embodiments, the CNV detection result may be converted to CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5, and/or CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 6.


As used herein, the term “gene marker detection reagents” are detection reagents for detecting gene markers, including those well known to those skilled in the art and described herein. Accordingly, the terms “TP53 detection reagent”, “CTNNB1 detection reagent”, “AXIN1 detection reagent” and “TERT detection reagent” are detection reagents for detecting the respective specified gene markers, including those well known to those skilled in the art and described herein. TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 and TERT are well known to those skilled in the art as common gene markers in the art, such as TERT promoter mutations. In some embodiments, the full length of TP53 is detected. In some embodiments, one or more exons of TP53 are detected. The invention is characterized in some aspects by detecting the full length of TP53, rather than detecting only one or more exons of TP53.


Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that a gene of the present invention, when used as a gene marker, utilizes at least one or more nucleotide differences between all or a portion of the sequence obtained by sequencing and its corresponding wild-type sequence, and is not necessarily limited to a particular site. The TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 and TERT genes, when used as gene markers, may differ in length from their corresponding wild-type sequences by at least one or more nucleotides. The TP53 gene, when used as a gene marker, may also differ in its particular hotspot (e.g., R249S) from its corresponding wild-type sequence by at least one or more nucleotides. The TERT gene, when used as a gene marker, may also differ in its particular hotspot (e.g., chr5:1295228C>T or chr5:1295250C>T) from its corresponding wild-type sequence by at least one or more nucleotides.


Gene marker detection reagents according to the present invention also include HBV integration detection reagents in some embodiments. As used herein, the term “HBV integration detection reagent” is an agent used to detect whether HBV is integrated into the genome. In some embodiments, HBV integration in the genome may include HBV integration near TERT in the genome, e.g., within 1.5 kb upstream of TERT, and HBV integration elsewhere in the genome.


In some embodiments, the subject's gene marker is detected from the subject's cfDNA. In general, when gene markers are detected by using the gene marker detection reagents described herein, the use process or detection process includes cfDNA extraction and detection, from which information related to the cfDNA is known, including, for example, cfDNA concentration and/or the percentage of different insert fragment lengths of cfDNA to the cfDNA content and/or cfDNA length detection reagents. Thus, in some embodiments, the “gene marker detection reagent” and its hyponyms described herein may also function as a cfDNA detection reagent and thus be used interchangeably with the “cfDNA detection reagent”. In other embodiments, the kit of the invention further comprises a cfDNA detection reagent.


As used herein, the term “protein marker detection reagent” is a detection reagent for detecting protein markers, including those well known to those skilled in the art and described herein. Accordingly, the terms “AFP detection reagent” and “DCP detection reagent” are detection reagents for detecting the respective specified protein markers, including those well known to those skilled in the art and described herein. AFP and DCP are well known to those skilled in the art as common protein markers in the art.


In some embodiments, the subject's protein marker is detected from the subject's blood or a component thereof, such as serum or plasma. In some embodiments, the kit further comprises a blood collection set.


The kit of the present invention may also include or be used in conjunction with a data processing system, which may be included in a computer, for example. The data processing system is used for processing detection results of the gene marker detection reagent and/or the protein marker detection reagent according to the present invention. In some embodiments, the data processing system uses the detection results of the gene markers and protein markers to calculate a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score. In some embodiments, the data processing system compares the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score to a threshold. In some embodiments, the data processing system is used to estimate and/or verify and/or predict HCC, preferably by comparing the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score to a threshold.


Using this HCC screening, the present invention finds it possible to identify early HCC individuals and distinguish them from non-HCC individuals with chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis. The assay showed 85% sensitivity and 93% specificity in the diagnosis of HCC in individuals with elevated liver nodules and/or serum AFP detected by ultrasound. More importantly, performance was also maintained in the AFP/US negative validation set with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 94%, respectively. Current sensitivity is based on a limited number of HCC cases. If additional HCC cases are identified, this may vary with long term follow-up or dynamic CT/MRI examination of all individuals. In this case, determination of sensitivity and specificity based on follow-up time requires prospective and large-scale clinical trials. However, 17% of the current positive predictive value (PPV) in the validation set was significantly higher than previously obtained with AFP level screening alone (Chun S, Rhie S Y, Ki C S, Kim J E, & Park H D (2015) Evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein as a screening marker for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis prevalent areas. Annals of hepatology 14(6):882-888.).


Accordingly, in another aspect, the present invention provides a method for early screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising:


(1) detecting gene markers and protein markers of a subject; and


(2) calculating the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score by using the detection results of the gene markers and the protein markers and comparing with a threshold value.


PPV can be further improved if a second HCC screening is provided for cases that are positive in the first test. High PPV is very helpful for clinical routine use because it reduces unnecessary anxiety and follow-up in non-HCC individuals.


Accordingly, in another aspect, the present invention provides a method for early screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising:


(1) detecting gene markers and protein markers of a subject;


(2) calculating the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score by using the detection results of the gene markers and the protein markers and comparing with a threshold value; and


(3) if the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score is above the threshold, steps (1) and (2) are repeated one or more times for the subject after a period of time.


In one embodiment, the subject's gene marker is detected from the subject's cfDNA. That is, the method includes extracting cfDNA from the subject.


In one embodiment, the subject's protein marker is detected from the subject's blood. That is, the method includes withdrawing blood, preferably serum or plasma, from the subject.


As used herein, the term “a period of time” may be one day, two days, three days, four days, five days, six days, one week, two weeks, three weeks, one month, two months, three months, four months, five months, six months, seven months, eight months, nine months, ten months, eleven months, one year, and is not limited thereto.


In some embodiments, the threshold for comparing with the calculated hepatocellular carcinoma screening score is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, or 1.0. In a preferred embodiment, the threshold is 0.4. In a preferred embodiment, the threshold is 0.5.


In yet another aspect, the invention provides the use of gene marker detection reagents and protein marker detection reagents for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma.


In yet another aspect, the invention provides the use of gene marker detection reagents and protein marker detection reagents in the preparation of a kit for early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all definitions of the characteristics, parameters, effects, etc. described in the description of the kit herein can be appropriately combined with any other aspects of the method or use of the present invention.


Tumor size is an important clinical parameter in diagnosis, affecting the survival of HCC patients. Unlike protein or RNA-based biomarkers, tumor cells typically contain only one copy of mutant DNA in most cases. One fundamental problem with early detection screening based on cfDNA is whether the early tumor releases enough copies of mutant DNA to be detected in circulation. Of all identified HCC cases screened by HCC in this study, 85% and 68% of cases were <5 cm and <3 cm, respectively. HCC tumors <5 cm are early stage and suitable for curative surgery. Patients with tumors <3 cm may have even better results, emphasizing the value of HCC screening to reduce HCC morbidity and mortality. In the validation set, the present invention identified 4 HCC, 2-3 cm in size, from the AFP/US negative population. These results clearly show that the sensitivity of HCC screening is promising for early HCC detection.


The ideal tumor screening method should have high sensitivity and specificity, and it should also be easy to perform in clinical practice. The present HCC screening assay detects mutations in the coding region and translocation/HBV integration with unknown breakpoints at a cost <150. In addition, the liquid biopsy assay can be centralized and standardized and requires minimal expertise and equipment in local hospitals/clinics. In general, the method is very suitable as a routine test for HCC screening in high-risk populations.


Evidence provided by the present study indicates that cfDNA mutation and protein marker based screening in high-risk populations is effective in identifying HCC patients. It is non-invasive and can detect early and late stage tumors. More importantly, since somatic mutations in driver genes are common in the development of most cancers, this strategy can be modified for early screening of other tumor types or multiple tumor types from single-tube blood.


The kit of the invention may also contain additional therapeutic agents. The method of the invention may further comprise administering an additional therapeutic agent. In one embodiment, the additional therapeutic agent is a cancer (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma) therapeutic agent known in the art.


Where a series of numerical values is recited herein, it is to be understood that any recited numerical value may be the upper or lower limit of the numerical range. It is also to be understood that the invention encompasses all such numerical ranges, i.e., a range having a combination of an upper numerical limit and a lower numerical limit, wherein each numerical value of the upper and lower numerical limits may be any numerical value recited in the present invention. The scope of the invention provided should be understood to include all values within that range. For example, 1-10 should be understood to include all of the values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and as the case may be, fractional values. Ranges expressed as “up to” a certain value (e.g., up to 5) are to be understood as all values (including the upper limit of the range), e.g., 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and as the case may be, fractional values. Up to one week or within one week is understood to include 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 days. Similarly, a range defined by “at least” should be understood to include the lower values provided and all higher values.


Unless otherwise indicated, all percentages are weight/weight.


As used herein, “about” is understood to include within three standard deviations of the mean or within standard tolerances in a particular field. In certain embodiments, about is understood to be a variation of no more than 0.5. “About” modifies all recited values thereafter. For example, “about 1, 2, 3” means “about 1”, “about 2”, “about 3”.


The articles “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or more (i.e., at least one) of the grammatical objects of the article. For example, “an element” refers to one element or more than one elements.


The term “comprise” is used herein to refer to the phrase “including, but not limited to”, and is used interchangeably therewith.


Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the term “or” is used inclusively in the present invention to refer to the term “and/or” and is used interchangeably therewith.


The term “such as” is used herein to refer to the phrase “such as, but not limited to”, and is used interchangeably therewith.


It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the technical characteristics described above in the various embodiments may be used alone or in combination with the technical solutions of the various aspects of the invention.


Some embodiments of the invention are illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.


The early liver cancer screening markers are mostly protein or gene methylation information. The present invention reports a novel hepatocellular carcinoma screening (HCC screening) method based on the detection of both serum protein markers and changes in cfDNA, and demonstrates its utility in early HCC detection in multicenter community populations with chronic HBV infection. The inventors of the present invention firstly confirmed that gene mutation information of cfDNA in plasma can be used for early HCC prediction through a large number of experiments. According to the invention, a liver cancer prediction model is adopted to score a person to be detected, and whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not is predicted through a score value, so that the combination of the gene marker and the protein marker disclosed by the invention, which can effectively perform HCC early screening, is verified. Therefore, the detection of cfDNA for early screening, disease tracking, efficacy evaluation, prognosis prediction of liver cancer has important clinical significance.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a study design protocol. This includes population recruitment, training of HCC screening models, and validation in sampled AFP/US negative individuals.



FIG. 2 is a detailed study design protocol.



FIG. 3 is a design of gene profiling of cfDNA in an HCC screening assay.



FIGS. 4A-4G shows the performance of HCC screening in the training set and validation set. Wherein, FIG. 4A is the contribution of HCC screening scores and cfDNA and protein biomarkers in the training set and in the diagnostic model; FIG. 4B is a binary result of a training centralized diagnosis model; FIG. 4C is an ROC curve of a diagnosis model for HCC screening in a training set; FIG. 4D is HCC screening performance of the diagnosis model in the validation set; FIG. 4E is the follow-up and diagnosis of HCC positive cases in the validation set; FIG. 4F is a binary result of the diagnosis model the validation set; FIG. 4G is dynamic CT imaging of 4 HCC cases detected by HCC screening in AFP/US negative individuals.



FIGS. 5A-5B is a representation of different training sets. Wherein FIG. 5A is a ROC curve of an HCC screening diagnosis model in a training set using a healthy individual without HBV infection as a control; FIG. 5B was trained with HCC and non-HCC individuals (left) and with HCC and healthy individuals (right).



FIG. 6 is a ROC curve of a liver cancer prediction model.



FIG. 7 is a graph comparing scores of different group models.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following examples facilitate a better understanding of the invention but do not limit it.


The experimental procedures in the following examples, if not specified, are conventional.


The test materials used in the following examples, unless otherwise specified, were purchased from conventional biochemical reagent stores.


The quantitative experiments in the following examples were set up in triplicate and the results averaged.


In the following embodiments, all liver cancer patients, high-risk liver cancer patients and healthy volunteers have informed consent to the content of this study.


MagMAX™ Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit is a product of Thermo Fisher. The KAPA Hyper Prep kit is a product of KAPA. The sureselect XT target capture kit is a product of Agilent.


In the following examples, the basic information of some liver cancer patients, liver cancer high-risk patients and healthy volunteers is detailed in Table 1.













TABLE 1





Number
Sex
Age
Diagnosis (CT)
Tumor Size







HCCscreen01
Male
48
liver cancer
1.9 cm × 2.7 cm


HCCscreen02
Male
56
liver cancer
8 cm


HCCscreen03
Male
75
liver cancer
3 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm


HCCscreen04
Male
58
liver cancer
5.0 cm × 3.0 cm


HCCscreen05
Female
53
liver cancer



HCCscreen06
Male
63
liver cancer
4.1 cm × 3.2 cm


HCCscreen07
Male
39
liver cancer
2.3 cm × 2 cm × 1.8 cm


HCCscreen08
Male
42
liver cancer
3.8 cm × 3.5 cm


HCCscreen09
Male
56
liver cancer
2.3 cm × 2.6 cm


HCCscreen10
Female
68
liver cancer
4.7 cm × 4.2 cm


HCCscreen11
Male
53
liver cancer
2.1 cm × 1.2 cm


HCCscreen12
Male
69
liver cancer
1.2 cm × 1.4 cm


HCCscreen13
Male
69
liver cancer



HCCscreen14
Male
60
liver cancer
3.2 cm × 2.6 cm


HCCscreen15
Male
54
liver cancer
3.0 cm × 2.5 cm


HCCscreen16
Male
62
liver cancer
3.6 cm × 3.8 cm and 1.4 cm × 1.8 cm


HCCscreen17
Male
69
liver cancer
3.1 cm × 2.2 cm


HCCscreen18
Male
68
liver cancer
Multiple, maximum 4.5 cm × 3.0 cm


HCCscreen19
Male
55
liver cancer



HCCscreen20
Female
70
liver cancer
4.9 cm × 4.4 cm


HCCscreen21
Male
50
liver cancer
Multiple, maximum 8.0 cm × 6.5 cm,






recurrence after treatment


HCCscreen22
Male
70
liver cancer
Multiple, maximum 14.7 cm × 13.0 cm


HCCscreen23
Male
41
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen24
Male
46
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen25
Female
60
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen26
Male
54
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen27
Female
56
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen28
Male
56
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen29
Male
38
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen30
Male
54
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen31
Female
64
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen32
Female
55
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen33
Female
52
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen34
Female
53
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen35
Female
44
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen36
Female
55
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen37
Female
51
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen38
Female
57
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen39
Female
66
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen40
Male
54
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen41
Male
43
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen42
Male
38
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen43
Male
48
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen44
Male
45
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen45
Male
47
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen46
Male
43
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen47
Female
47
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen48
Female
63
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen49
Female
55
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen50
Male
34
High risk for liver cancer



HCCscreen51
Male
32
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen52
Male
32
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen53
Male
34
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen54
Male
36
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen55
Male
28
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen56
Female
24
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen57
Male
32
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen58
Female
29
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen59
Female
32
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen60
Male
39
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen61
Male
30
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen62
Female
22
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen63
Male
29
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen64
Female
36
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen65
Female
33
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen66
Male
28
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen67
Female
24
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen68
Male
35
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen69
Female
42
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen70
Male
35
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen71
Female
20
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen72
Female
46
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen73
Male
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen74
Male
37
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen75
Male
30
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen76
Male
28
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen77
Female
33
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen78
Female
23
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen79
Female
29
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen80
Female
37
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen81
Female
31
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen82
Female
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen83
Male
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen84
Male
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen85
Female
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen86
Male
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen87
Female
27
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen88
Female
26
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen89
Male
25
Healthy volunteer



HCCscreen90
Female
24
Healthy volunteer






Note:


“—”indicates that no tumor was recorded or detected; Tumor size is tumor volume, tumor maximum diameter, or tumor maximum cross-sectional area.






Statement of Ethics


Based on the early HCC screening program for community groups, the inventors established a community-based cohort study (CCOP-LC cohort; China Clinical Registration, ChiCTR-EOC-17012835) on high-risk groups for liver cancer in 2017. The study protocol (NCC201709011) was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.


Overview of Early HCC Screening Programs in Community Populations


Early HCC screening is based on the “Technical Plan for early diagnosis and early treatment of Cancer” issued by the Chinese expert Committee for early Detection and early treatment of Cancer of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of the Ministry of Health (Shia Y C, Beever J E, Lewin H A, & Schook L B (1991) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms at the porcine t complex polypeptide 1 (TCP1) locus. Anim Genet 22(2):194.). A population-based cancer registry and demographic department were established at all screening centres (Chen W, et al. (2018) Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014. Chinese journal of cancer research=Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu 30(1):1-12.). Briefly, HBsAg positive “healthy” individuals between the ages of 35 and 69 were invited to participate in early HCC screening. All participants underwent serum AFP concentration determination and ultrasound examination (US; Aloka ProSound SSD-4000; Shanghai, China), as well as other standard biochemical tests (Table 2). Based on serum AFP levels and liver nodule detection, individuals were designated as AFP/US positive, suspected, or negative. An “AFP/US positive” individual has any of the following: 1) regardless of the nodules detected by ultrasound, the level of serum AFP >400 ng/mL; 2) regardless of the concentration of serum AFP, the nodules detected by ultrasound ≥2 cm; 3) the nodules detected by ultrasound ≥1 cm, and the serum AFP ≥200 ng/ml. An “AFP/US suspected” individual has any of the following: 1) serum AFP level≥20 ng/ml regardless of hepatic nodules detected by ultrasound; 2) nodules detected by ultrasound ≥1 cm. An “AFP/US negative” individual is defined as having serum AFP levels <20 ng/mL and no ultrasound-detected hepatic nodules. AFP/US positive individuals were transferred to a senior hospital (Chinese tertiary hospital) for diagnosis, such as liver cancer patients identified by dynamic CT or dynamic MRI, and receive relevant treatment based on clinical practice guidelines (FIG. 1) (Omata M, et al. (2017) Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int 11(4):317-370.). Undiagnosed individuals were invited to return within 2 months for dynamic CT/MRI examination. The suspected individuals of AFP/US were recommended to undergo a second round of serum AFP quantitative examination and ultrasound examination within 2-3 months.









TABLE 2







General information for participants of AFP/US screening and liquid biopsy analysis










HCC
Participant in liquid biopsy analysis











screening
AFP/US positive & suspected
Sampled AFP/US negative













participants
% (number)
P-value
% (number)
P-value
















Total
3793
176
N/A
331
N/A















Demographic data




















Age (median, age)
50
54
N/A
52
N/A















Sex, Male %
51.73%
(1962)
68.75%
(121)
<0.001
53.47%
(177)
0.483


Previous screening, % (number)


Once in a year
24.17%
(917)
15.91%
(28)
<0.001
41.69%
(138)
<0.001


Once in the past 2-3 years
35.36%
(1341)
18.75%
(33)

53.17%
(176)


None in the past 5 years
40.47%
(1535)
65.34%
(115)

5.13%
(17)


Ultrasound shows hardening


% (number)
11.13%
(422)
54.98%
(95)
<0.001
11.18%
(37)
0.883


Albumin, g/L












Mean ± SD
46.92 ± 4.81 
43.38 ± 5.05 

47.19 ± 3.46 
















≤35, % (number)
1.00%
(38)
7.39%
(13)
<0.001
0.60%
(2)
0.768


ALT (IU/mL), % (number)












Mean ± SD
33.41 ± 34.75
55.47 ± 50.56

36.26 ± 43.45
















    <45
83.28%
(3159)
57.95%
(102)
<0.001
78.85%
(261)
0.033


    ≥45
16.72%
(634)
42.05%
(74)

21.15%
(70)


AFP (ng/mL)












Mean ± SD
 34.34 ± 666.10
 676.52 ± 3030.51

4.38 ± 4.23
















    <20
97.07%
(3682)
36.93%
(65)
<0.001
100%
(331)
<0.001














    ≥20
2.93%
(111)
63.07%
(111)

0
















HBV-DNA (IU/mL), % (number)*




















Median with quartile
2.40E+02 (<30, 2.53E+03)
3.44E+03 (1.31E+02, 6.20E+05)

8.25E+01 (<30, 3.25E+03)
















   <100
39.88%
(1298)
23.12%
(40)
<0.001
51.66%
(171)
<0.001


100-999 999
51.49%
(1676)
54.34%
(94)

39.58%
(131)


 ≥1 000 000
8.63%
(281)
22.54%
(39)

8.76%
(29)





*Total 3255 participants were assessed for HBV-DNA concentration.



For all HCC screening participants, Chi-square tests were used in addition to the P value with marker.




Fisher's exact tests were performed and compared to all HCC screening participants.







Participants and Research Design


Participants in the current study were obtained from CCOP-LC cohorts of individuals evaluated by four screening centers in Jiangsu and Anhui, China (FIG. 1). During AFP/US screening (considering baseline, performed between Oct. 7, 2017 and Jan. 31, 2018), the inventors collected peripheral blood (5 mL in EDTA coated tubes) which was centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min within 2 h after collection to separate plasma and blood cells. All samples were stored at −80° C. In most cases, 0.5 mL of plasma was used to determine protein markers and 2 mL of plasma was used for cfDNA extraction.


176 AFP/US positive/suspected cases were further analyzed in the HCC screening assay. Participants with reliable diagnosis were selected as the training set in this study based on the results of diagnosis in follow-up examinations. To verify the inventors' findings, the present invention samples 331 participants from AFP/US negative individuals who are similar in age to AFP/US positive/suspected patients in the HCC screening assay. 331 individuals were followed up from May 20 to Jul. 17, 2018 (6-8 months after baseline blood drawing) by dynamic CT/MRI, AFP/ultrasound or telephone interview. CT/MRI images were independently evaluated by two radiologists from the National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing. During this period, the present invention provides additional AFP/US testing for individuals who are AFP/US negative at baseline and have not undergone HCC screening testing. Some of them did not select additional AFP/US examinations and their liver cancer results (ICD-10 Code C22) before Jun. 30, 2018 were obtained from a population-based cancer registry at the screening center (FIG. 1). Of the 3617 AFP/US negative individuals, 1612 (44.6%) participants were able to follow-up from May 20 to Jul. 17, 2018, i.e. 6-8 months after baseline screening. Of these, 87 participants received dynamic CT/MRI, 1120 received AFP/US, and 68 were interviewed by telephone. The liver cancer results of 337 participants were obtained from the local population-based cancer registry (FIG. 2). The HCC status of the other 2005 participants was not available until Jun. 30, 2018 (FIG. 2).


70 healthy controls were obtained from a population undergoing an annual physical examination and reporting no HBV infection. When donating blood, all were confirmed to be HBsAg negative.


Determination of Serum DCP Concentration


According to the manufacturer's instructions (Abbott Laboratories; Chicago, Ill., USA), serum DCP levels were determined by using a commercial kit in an Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR Chemiluminescence Immuno-analyzer (CLIA).


Spectrum Analysis of cfDNA Changes


The inventors designed experiments to sequence cfDNA for spectral analysis: 1) coding regions of TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 and a promoter region of TERT (Table 3); 2) integration of HBV. Briefly, cfDNA fragments were first linked to adaptors with random DNA bar code (FIG. 3). The linked constructs were amplified by 10 reaction cycles to produce a whole genome library containing hundreds of redundant constructs with unique DNA bar codes that recognize each original cfDNA fragment. The amplified library was sufficient for 5-10 independent sequencing analyses. The target region was amplified together with the DNA bar code in 9 cycles of PCR using target-specific primers (TS primer 1) and primers matching the ligand sequence (Perera B P & Kim J (2016) Next-generation sequencing-based 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends for alternative promoters. Analytical biochemistry 494:82-84; Zheng Z, et al. (2014) Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing. Nature medicine 20(12):1479-1484.) (FIG. 3). A second round of 15 cycles of PCR was performed using a pair of nested primers (TS Primer 2) matching the linker and target region to further enrich the target region and add the Illumina sequencing linker (FIG. 3). Effective enrichment was observed in this PCR-based assay, >80% of the reads mapped to a small target region of <10 Kb. Using this assay, the present invention can cover target regions >100,000 times, 3 Gb sequencing data, enabling 20×redundant sequencing of 5,000 copies of the original cfDNA. Where a DNA bar code is linked to the original cfDNA molecule, redundant reads from the original cfDNA molecule can be tracked to minimize calling errors inherent in PCR amplification and parallel mutation sequencing (Kinde I, Wu J, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler K W, & Vogelstein B (2011) Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(23):9530-9535; Chaudhuri A A, et al. (2017) Early Detection of Molecular Residual Disease in Localized Lung Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling. Cancer discovery 7(12):1394-1403.). The present invention examined 11 mutations detected in this assay by digital PCR and verified all of these mutations with a mutation score of 0.03-0.16%.









TABLE 3







HCC screening characteristics and


coefficient characteristics thereof









Classification of characteristics
characteristics
Coefficient












cfDNA
TP53 other than R249S
2.02



TP53 R249S
0.21



TERT
1.37



SV_TERT
0.70



CTNNB1
1.20



AXIN1
0.01



Integration of HBV
0.82



Concentration of cfDNA
−0.27


Protein
AFP
0.21



DCP
1.59


Clinical information
Sex
0.66



Age
1.69



(intercept)
−2.68









Penalty logistic regression: λ=0.14; a=0.


Data Processing and Mutation Detection


Sequencing reads are processed to extract tags and remove sequence adaptors. Trimmatomatic (v0.36) was then used to remove residual linkers and low quality regions. The ‘bwa (v0.7.10) mem’ with default parameters (Li H & Durbin R (2010) Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26(5):589-595.) was used to map the clean reads to the hg19 and HBV genomes. Samtools mpileup (Li H, et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078-2079.) was used to identify candidate mutations consisting of SNP and INDEL in the target region of interest. To ensure accuracy, reads with the same tag and start and end coordinates are grouped into a Unique Identifier family (UID family). A UID family containing at least two reads and at least 80% of the reads of the same type is defined as an Effective Unique Identifier family (EUID family) Each mutation frequency is calculated by dividing the number of alternative EUID families by the sum of the alternatives and the references. Mutations were further examined manually in IGV. Candidate variants were annotated with Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) (Wang J, et al. (2011) CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution. Nat Methods 8(8):652-654). HBV integration was identified by using Crest (McLaren W, et al. (2016) The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome biology 17(1):122.) and requires at least 4 soft-clip reads supports.


Model Construction


1. Feature Mapping and Data Preprocessing


1) Mutation Notes and Scores:


The mutation frequency (the fraction of reads supporting candidate mutations) is highly proportional to the total amount of circulating tumor DNA in the blood and tumor size. Thus, the present invention annotates all input mutations with their reads supporting frequency.


2) Decomposition of Mutations


Multiple gene characteristics are extracted by decomposing the mutation into gene levels or focal regions. For each region of interest (ROI), the ROI score is obtained by calculation.







R





O





I

=


log

2






i
=
1

n




adj_scor

e

i







Where n is the number of mutations overlapping the ROI and adj_score is the reads support frequency of the mutation.


3) Proteins and Experimental Markers


Two protein markers DCP and AFP were used in the model of the present invention because they have been shown in previous studies to be very strong indicators of HCC diagnosis (Chen H, et al. (2018) Direct comparison of five serum biomarkers in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer management and research 10:1947-1958.). These values are ranked into a plurality of numerical categories. The cfDNA concentrations are also included in the list of model characteristics of the present invention.


4) Clinical Information as Characteristics


The age and sex of the patient also comprised of part of the predictor of the present invention, as it has been demonstrated that the likelihood of HCC diagnosis is somewhat related to the age and sex of the individual.


2. Characteristics Selection


The RandomForest is used for screening useful variables from candidate characteristics; the inventors applied backward variables subtraction by minimizing unbiased out-of-bag error estimation, eliminating one characteristic per run. The protein, gene markers, and clinical information are then optimized to construct the final characteristics of the binary classifier. In the training of HCC compared to healthy individuals, only ctDNA SNP/indel mutations and protein markers were used. HBV-TERT fusion or other HBV integration is not included because the healthy group has no HBV infection.


3. Model and Parameter Optimization


The penalty logistic regression model was constructed from a training set of 135 samples containing 65 HCC cases and 70 non-HCC cases. Model performance was evaluated on both the training and validation data sets by area under the curve (AUC) statistics. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were also determined by using an optimized cut-off value of 0.4. The Youden index is used for optimization of this cut-off value. In order to perform cluster analysis of gene, protein and CNV levels respectively, the cross-validation coefficient of each characteristic using penalty logic regression is also given. The model is started in the R package ‘glmnet’ (R version 3.5.1), and the penalty parameter a is optimized in the training data set by 10-fold cross validation, and the optimized value is 0.


Statistical Analysis


The present invention uses a penalty logistic regression model with ctDNA mutations, protein biomarker levels, and clinical characteristics as variables. The inventors defined HCC cases and non-HCC cases with dynamic CT/MRI and/or histology in AFP/US positive and AFP/US suspected individuals (FIG. 1). The sensitivity and specificity of HCC screening assays were calculated by LOOCV (Leave-One-Out Cross Validation) with 100 iterations on training data sets of 65 HCC cases and 70 non-HCC cases.


Example 1. Clinical Parameters of Baseline Participants in Four Screening Centers and Follow-Up of Results of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Community individuals (n=72720) were screened by the blood hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test in four screening centers and then questionnaires were conducted. HBsAg positive individuals (n=3793) were invited to participate in AFP/US screening. Of these HBsAg positive individuals, 176 had relevant AFP/US results (designated AFP/US positive/suspected group), while the remaining HBsAg positive patients constituted the AFP/US negative group (n=3617) (FIG. 1 and Table 3). To determine their HCC status, it is recommended that all AFP/US positive/suspected individuals undergo dynamic CT/MRI testing within 2 months of the first screening. Patients with reliable diagnosis of HCC status were included in the training set of this study, and baseline AFP/US blood samples obtained from these individuals were subjected to HCC screening tests (FIG. 1).


Of the 3617 AFP/US negative individuals, approximately 60% had been subjected to AFP/US screening prior to baseline screening in this study (FIG. 2 and Table 3). To reduce anxiety and non-compliance during follow-up procedures, the present invention primarily selects individuals who have undergone AFP/US screening in the past 1-3 years as a validation set (n=331). Based on sex, the proportion of cirrhosis detected by US and serum albumin levels, the distribution of sampled AFP/US negative participants was similar to all HBsAg positive participants (FIG. 2 and Table 3). The present invention performs HCC liquid biopsy testing (HCC screening) on blood samples collected from a validation set at baseline AFP/US screening and HCC status was followed up 6-8 months after baseline screening. The present invention also screened 70 healthy individuals without HBV infection for HCC.


Example 2. Selection and Detection of HCC Markers Using HCC Screening

The invention uses two types of biomarkers to develop an HCC screening assay: 1) Gene alterations that are very common in HCC and can be detected in cfDNA; And 2) serum protein markers-alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (DCP). In previous cancer genome studies, most HBV-related HCC carried at least one mutation in the following gene/position: TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 or TERT promoter (Totoki Y, et al. (2014) Trans-ancestry mutational landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma genomes. Nature genetics 46(12):1267-1273; Zhang W, et al. (2017) Genetic Features of Aflatoxin-associated Hepatocellular Carcinomas. Gastroenterology.). The present invention also contemplates HBV integration breakpoints as potential biomarkers for HCC. Since the HBV integration site should be unique in each individual cell, detection of multiple copies (>2) of a particular integration site from plasma (2-3 ml) may indicate clonal expansion of a single cell carrying HBV integration. Only in this case will the resulting tumor release multiple copies of the same genomic DNA into the blood. The present invention contemplates assays that can profile gene changes in parallel. The extracted cfDNA is linked to a custom linker with a DNA bar code and then amplified to generate a whole genome library. Using a method similar to rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), the inventors used multiple primers covering the coding regions of TP53, CTNNB1 and AXIN1, the promoter region of TERT and HBV sequences to enrich targets with point mutations and HBV integration (FIG. 3) (Chaudhuri A A, et al. (2017) Early Detection of Molecular Residual Disease in Localized Lung Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling. Cancer discovery 7(12):1394-1403; Waltari E, et al. (2018) 5′ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends and Illumina MiSeq Reveals B Cell Receptor Features in Healthy Adults, Adults With Chronic HIV-1 Infection, Cord Blood, and Humanized Mice. Frontiers in immunology 9:628.). Secondary sequenced reads can be traced to the original cfDNA molecule by DNA bar codes, thereby filtering false positive single nucleotide variations (SNV) from sequencing/amplification errors (Kinde I, Wu J, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler K W, & Vogelstein B (2011) Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(23):9530-9535.).


Based on previous findings by the inventors and reports from other hospitalized patients affected by HCC, cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis, the combination of serum protein levels of AFP and DCP showed significant sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between early HCC and decompensated cirrhosis (Chen H, et al. (2018) Direct comparison of five serum biomarkers in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer management and research 10:1947-1958.). Thus, the present invention combines these two serum protein markers with changes in cfDNA to investigate whether such liquid biopsy-based assays (including AFP, DCP and cfDNA) can effectively screen early HCC.


Example 3. Consistency of Clinical Diagnosis with HCC Screening Assays

To determine its utility in HCC detection, the present invention performs HCC screening in individuals known to be diagnosed with HCC or who have been excluded (non-HCC). 65 HCC cases and 70 non-HCC cases were obtained from AFP/US positive/suspected individuals. The HCC positive or HCC negative status is based on dynamic CT/MRI imaging and histological confirmation. These 135 cases were used as training sets and HCC screening results were compared with clinical diagnosis. To establish a classifier that integrates different types of biomarkers in an assay, the present invention first collapses different types of cfDNA mutations into regions of interest (ROI) scores for each gene or locus. The ROI score is a weighted sum of the destruction effect and frequency of each point mutation within the ROI. In addition to the ROI score of the SNV/indel mutation in the gene, the present invention adds two structural variant characteristics (HBV integration and other HBV integration in the TERT promoter region), one experimental characteristic (cfDNA concentration), two protein markers (AFP and DCP), and two clinical characteristics (age and sex) as final characteristics for constructing a diagnostic classifier to predict HCC status (Table 2). with these markers, the HCC screening model distinguished HCC cases from non-HCC cases by using a penalty logistic regression algorithm (FIG. 4A). This assay was found to have 85% sensitivity and 93% specificity in HCC diagnosis (area under the curve=0.928) (FIG. 4B and FIG. 4C) by 100 repeated leave-one-out cross validation of training data sets including 65 HCC cases and 70 non-HCC cases. The HCC screening score cut-off value was 0.4 for the highest Youden index score (FIG. 5B and Table 4). Both cfDNA and protein markers contribute significantly to HCC recognition (FIG. 4C and Table 5).









TABLE 4







Features and HCC Screening Scores


















AFP
DCP
Integration of
HCC screening


Set
ID
Sex
Age
(ng/ml)
(mAU/ml)
HBV
score

















Training-HCC
RG871NM1
Male
68
14.86
231.11
13
1.00


Training-HCC
RG898NM1
Male
62
1811.25
304.45
7
0.99


Training-HCC
RH443NM1
Male
66
3442.19
2624.6
2
0.99


Training-HCC
RG872NM1
Male
65
2.99
487.02
11
0.98


Training-HCC
RG895NM1
Male
69
3338.52
>30000
5
0.98


Training-HCC
RH390NM1
Male
52
20000
27118.7
11
0.97


Training-HCC
RG876NM1
Male
63
23.93
242.5
9
0.97


Training-HCC
RG869NM1
Male
68
26.22
188.95
9
0.97


Training-HCC
RH455NM1
Female
70
87.07
1123.06
2
0.97


Training-HCC
RH377NM1
Male
71
88.89
198.35
1
0.96


Training-HCC
RG883NM1
Male
65
3284.6
>30000
6
0.96


Training-HCC
RH421NM1
Male
49
24.43
78.54
13
0.96


Training-HCC
RH397NM1
Female
66
4260.1
213.25
4
0.96


Training-HCC
RG878NM1
Male
55
7.66
423.93
0
0.95


Training-HCC
RH419NM1
Male
48
96.91
4250.46
2
0.95


Training-HCC
RH897NM1
Male
59
4.27
1871.1
6
0.95


Training-HCC
RG881NM1
Male
50
14.48
2464.26
7
0.94


Training-HCC
RH414NM1
Male
51
23.17
470.61
0
0.93


Training-HCC
RH385NM1
Male
66
7537.75
1606.41
3
0.93


Training-HCC
RH398NM1
Male
68
138.38
94.12
2
0.92


Training-HCC
RG873NM1
Male
70
199.35
342.12
1
0.91


Training-HCC
RH373NM1
Male
44
20000
1175.16
6
0.89


Training-HCC
RG774NM1
Male
56
97.09
98
5
0.89


Training-HCC
RG868NM1
Male
46
1.12
65.95
5
0.89


Training-HCC
RH380NM1
Male
67
24.59
416.13
1
0.88


Training-HCC
RG776NM1
Male
75
12
265
0
0.87


Training-HCC
RG888NM1
Male
60
1.92
72.66
0
0.86


Training-HCC
RG897NM1
Male
69
6.55
20.84
9
0.85


Training-HCC
RG796NM1
Male
58
238.7
38.59
5
0.83


Training-HCC
RH394NM1
Female
53
19031
1555.36
2
0.82


Training-HCC
RH903NM1
Male
64
4.31
7994.33
2
0.82


Training-HCC
RH440NM1
Male
54
104.28
509.12
2
0.81


Training-HCC
RG892NM1
Male
54
1.71
81.47
1
0.78


Training-HCC
RG886NM1
Female
70
130.95
148.62
3
0.78


Training-HCC
RH369NM1
Male
61
461.02
267.58
0
0.77


Training-HCC
RG904NM1
Male
56
1843.39
23.06
4
0.76


Training-HCC
RH900NM1
Male
49
3.28
15.11
0
0.75


Training-HCC
RH898NM1
Male
49
4.28
422.37
3
0.75


Training-HCC
RH137NM1
Male
53
5.83
140.5
0
0.75


Training-HCC
RG785NM1
Female
53
1210
22.71
0
0.74


Training-HCC
RH462NM1
Male
70
24.08
14.46
16
0.71


Training-HCC
RG804NM1
Male
59
132.2
205.77
0
0.71


Training-HCC
RH381NM1
Male
55
22.28
229.71
3
0.69


Training-HCC
RG905NM1
Female
68
2.3
180.03
1
0.69


Training-HCC
RG773NM1
Male
48
6.5
178
6
0.69


Training-HCC
RH441NM1
Male
48
20000
1237.34
1
0.66


Training-HCC
RH891NM1
Female
42
11.22
17.18
7
0.62


Training-HCC
RG790NM1
Male
49
36.48
2393.86
0
0.62


Training-HCC
RH905NM1
Male
58
2.4
55.1
1
0.56


Training-HCC
RG870NM1
Female
68
125.99
21.59
1
0.50


Training-HCC
RG901NM1
Male
63
5.37
19.14
2
0.50


Training-HCC
RH425NM1
Male
50
18.23
16.43
1
0.47


Training-HCC
RH382NM1
Male
55
28.76
27.55
1
0.43


Training-HCC
RG903NM1
Male
42
1380.46
50.14
1
0.43


Training-HCC
RH402NM1
Male
64
327.55
25.13
3
0.41


Training-HCC
RH906NM1
Male
52
3.07
18.19
0
0.34


Training-HCC
RH379NM1
Female
71
115.29
21.29
0
0.34


Training-HCC
RG894NM1
Male
69
1.79
11.39
0
0.34


Training-HCC
RG879NM1
Female
66
2.4
7.14
0
0.28


Training-HCC
RG902NM1
Male
39
2136.1
18.58
2
0.27


Training-HCC
RH422NM1
Male
51
111.46
26.58
0
0.26


Training-HCC
RG896NM1
Male
53
2.06
12.87
1
0.25


Training-HCC
RH460NM1
Male
42
34.58
21.39
0
0.21


Training-HCC
RH889NM1
Female
67
4.05
19.77
0
0.21


Training-HCC
RG781NM1
Female
48
177.7
30.57
0
0.14


Training-non-HCC
RH393NM1
Female
64
24.03
167.25
0
0.70


Training-non-HCC
RH430NM1
Male
56
27.87
36.33
3
0.58


Training-non-HCC
RG792NM1
Female
54
76.34
17.69
22
0.44


Training-non-HCC
RH878NM1
Male
62
8.62
25.51
0
0.42


Training-non-HCC
RH915NM1
Male
63
2.71
18.55
0
0.41


Training-non-HCC
RH450NM1
Male
70
106.36
32.14
0
0.38


Training-non-HCC
RH438NM1
Male
49
31.52
12.16
5
0.37


Training-non-HCC
RH459NM1
Male
63
209.03
16.17
0
0.37


Training-non-HCC
RH383NM1
Male
53
21.06
27.22
0
0.37


Training-non-HCC
RH395NM1
Female
68
321.84
16.02
4
0.37


Training-non-HCC
RH418NM1
Male
46
58.25
18.99
4
0.37


Training-non-HCC
RH428NM1
Male
58
449.17
17.67
0
0.35


Training-non-HCC
RH431NM1
Male
63
40.04
16.79
0
0.34


Training-non-HCC
RH879NM1
Male
67
2.32
14.99
0
0.34


Training-non-HCC
RH400NM1
Male
44
66.32
21.11
1
0.33


Training-non-HCC
RH883NM1
Male
66
2.74
10.49
1
0.32


Training-non-HCC
RG801NM1
Male
56
37.33
21.09
5
0.32


Training-non-HCC
RH408NM1
Female
61
23.47
20.16
1
0.32


Training-non-HCC
RH378NM1
Female
66
57.89
15.14
1
0.30


Training-non-HCC
RH409NM1
Male
38
770.97
23.32
8
0.29


Training-non-HCC
RH371NM1
Male
54
24.7
25.07
1
0.29


Training-non-HCC
RG794NM1
Male
54
28.34
39.51
3
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RG805NM1
Female
55
119.9
21.06
1
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RH452NM1
Male
38
42.01
8.26
0
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RH461NM1
Male
53
55.83
10.49
0
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RH415NM1
Male
54
97.82
11.48
0
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RG795NM1
Male
54
108.3
39.45
0
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RH406NM1
Male
53
25.16
25.04
0
0.28


Training-non-HCC
RH437NM1
Female
57
48.16
12.82
0
0.27


Training-non-HCC
RH882NM1
Male
56
3.61
11.99
0
0.26


Training-non-HCC
RH423NM1
Male
47
32.66
24.85
2
0.26


Training-non-HCC
RH413NM1
Male
48
21.85
19.83
1
0.25


Training-non-HCC
RH884NM1
Female
45
2.45
23.35
3
0.25


Training-non-HCC
RG787NM1
Male
46
21.27
27.75
2
0.24


Training-non-HCC
RH420NM1
Male
45
43.84
17.12
2
0.24


Training-non-HCC
RH376NM1
Male
39
242
25.74
0
0.24


Training-non-HCC
RH445NM1
Male
43
107.99
27.52
3
0.23


Training-non-HCC
RH881NM1
Male
50
2.67
11.29
0
0.23


Training-non-HCC
RG780NM1
Male
41
117.1
26.67
2
0.22


Training-non-HCC
RH910NM1
Female
52
4.12
17.02
2
0.22


Training-non-HCC
RH372NM1
Male
44
141.16
20.53
0
0.22


Training-non-HCC
RH399NM1
Male
43
35.87
21.34
1
0.22


Training-non-HCC
RH151NM1
Male
47
11.14
30.64
0
0.21


Training-non-HCC
RH885NM1
Female
54
9.31
25.36
0
0.21


Training-non-HCC
RG803NM1
Female
64
32.24
33.92
0
0.21


Training-non-HCC
RH411NM1
Female
62
31.42
25.63
0
0.20


Training-non-HCC
RH367NM1
Female
63
22.6
28.38
0
0.20


Training-non-HCC
RH433NM1
Female
62
77.56
26.57
0
0.20


Training-non-HCC
RG778NM1
Male
38
33.02
27.5
0
0.20


Training-non-HCC
RG877NM1
Female
66
4.33
14.69
0
0.19


Training-non-HCC
RH449NM1
Male
37
48.7
21.58
0
0.19


Training-non-HCC
RG788NM1
Female
60
49.62
13.24
3
0.19


Training-non-HCC
RH902NM1
Female
66
1.79
18.04
0
0.19


Training-non-HCC
RG797NM1
Female
56
31.64
15.49
4
0.19


Training-non-HCC
RH370NM1
Male
34
25.2
33.21
0
0.18


Training-non-HCC
RH429NM1
Female
53
249.1
14.35
0
0.17


Training-non-HCC
RG900NM1
Female
53
4.81
9.19
5
0.17


Training-non-HCC
RH446NM1
Female
47
28.96
19.74
6
0.16


Training-non-HCC
RH368NM1
Female
55
95.88
17.92
0
0.16


Training-non-HCC
RH908NM1
Female
54
3.92
29.51
0
0.16


Training-non-HCC
RG891NM1
Female
57
7.78
17.99
0
0.16


Training-non-HCC
RG890NM1
Female
51
309.58
11.02
0
0.16


Training-non-HCC
RG889NM1
Female
55
2.7
11.44
0
0.15


Training-non-HCC
RH465NM1
Female
49
35.12
14.32
0
0.15


Training-non-HCC
RH914NM1
Female
53
1.81
20.43
0
0.14


Training-non-HCC
RH451NM1
Female
47
130.72
28.01
0
0.14


Training-non-HCC
RG893NM1
Female
52
1.86
10.37
1
0.14


Training-non-HCC
RH464NM1
Female
48
24.27
10.28
0
0.13


Training-non-HCC
RG887NM1
Female
44
1
18.34
0
0.12


Training-non-HCC
RH916NM1
Female
40
1.38
33.04
0
0.11


Training-health
HN45NM1
Male
56
5.4
29.38
0
0.35


Training-health
HN36NM1
Male
56
3.16
26.88
0
0.27


Training-health
HN67NM1
Male
52
1.3
14.96
0
0.25


Training-health
HN60NM1
Male
52
3.29
23.62
0
0.25


Training-health
HN39NM1
Male
41
3.38
38.05
0
0.25


Training-health
HN50NM1
Male
49
3.14
24.09
0
0.24


Training-health
HN56NM1
Male
49
5.17
23.56
0
0.24


Training-health
HN57NM1
Male
48
1.85
28.18
0
0.23


Training-health
HN62NM1
Male
46
2.3
30.67
0
0.22


Training-health
HN53NM1
Male
34
1.7
27.57
0
0.21


Training-health
HN69NM1
Male
42
3.86
20.15
0
0.20


Training-health
HN61NM1
Male
41
4.21
18.98
0
0.19


Training-health
HN06NM1
Male
40
3.12
17.63
0
0.19


Training-health
HN65NM1
Female
48
1.77
16.01
0
0.18


Training-health
HN52NM1
Male
39
1.3
20.81
0
0.18


Training-health
HN58NM1
Male
39
1.94
28.07
0
0.18


Training-health
HN10NM1
Male
35
1.72
20.63
0
0.17


Training-health
HN02NM1
Male
34
2.7
31.31
0
0.17


Training-health
HN32NM1
Male
33
4.24
25.02
0
0.16


Training-health
HN01NM1
Male
32
2.55
25.95
0
0.16


Training-health
HN04NM1
Male
32
2.42
25.03
0
0.16


Training-health
HN07NM1
Male
30
1.04
25.33
0
0.15


Training-health
HN35NM1
Male
30
3.82
32.02
0
0.15


Training-health
HN48NM1
Male
30
3.21
26.9
0
0.15


Training-health
HN08NM1
Male
29
1.29
22.82
0
0.15


Training-health
HN33NM1
Male
29
3.82
29.22
0
0.15


Training-health
HN03NM1
Male
28
3.27
34.29
0
0.14


Training-health
HN09NM1
Male
28
2.5
22.13
0
0.14


Training-health
HN11NM1
Male
28
2.11
26.1
0
0.14


Training-health
HN34NM1
Male
27
1.97
21.85
0
0.14


Training-health
HN19NM1
Male
27
3.65
31.3
0
0.14


Training-health
HN43NM1
Female
49
1.56
21.16
0
0.14


Training-health
HN51NM1
Male
27
1.89
21.67
0
0.13


Training-health
HN15NM1
Male
26
2.77
23.78
0
0.13


Training-health
HN16NM1
Male
26
6.55
30.78
0
0.13


Training-health
HN66NM1
Female
48
3.83
25.49
0
0.13


Training-health
HN18NM1
Male
25
2.86
38.26
0
0.13


Training-health
HN49NM1
Female
37
2.82
16.24
0
0.13


Training-health
HN59NM1
Female
47
2.43
15.18
0
0.13


Training-health
HN68NM1
Male
24
1.33
18.75
0
0.13


Training-health
HN54NM1
Male
24
2.85
20.71
0
0.13


Training-health
HN21NM1
Male
23
1.01
37.04
0
0.12


Training-health
HN37NM1
Female
36
2.22
31.52
0
0.12


Training-health
HN40NM1
Female
44
1.7
23.68
0
0.12


Training-health
HN63NM1
Female
44
4.41
27.13
0
0.12


Training-health
HN64NM1
Female
40
1.26
28.33
0
0.11


Training-health
HN46NM1
Female
38
2.27
17.91
0
0.10


Training-health
HN13NM1
Female
37
5.47
25.68
0
0.10


Training-health
HN44NM1
Female
37
5.09
25.52
0
0.10


Training-health
HN23NM1
Female
36
5.35
17.69
0
0.10


Training-health
HN31NM1
Female
36
3.02
19.51
0
0.10


Training-health
HN70NM1
Female
36
1
15.49
0
0.10


Training-health
HN55NM1
Female
33
2.18
25.54
0
0.09


Training-health
HN20NM1
Female
32
2.73
13.98
0
0.09


Training-health
HN14NM1
Female
31
2.21
17.95
0
0.09


Training-health
HN25NM1
Female
31
1.76
18.58
0
0.09


Training-health
HN41NM1
Female
31
2.79
22.96
0
0.08


Training-health
HN05NM1
Female
29
3.09
28.6
0
0.08


Training-health
HN12NM1
Female
29
2.65
32.78
0
0.08


Training-health
HN47NM1
Female
29
1.34
19.03
0
0.08


Training-health
HN28NM1
Female
28
2.06
22.86
0
0.08


Training-health
HN42NM1
Female
28
2.97
20.15
0
0.08


Training-health
HN38NM1
Female
28
1.81
19.03
0
0.08


Training-health
HN17NM1
Female
27
2.76
24.36
0
0.08


Training-health
HN26NM1
Female
27
1.84
19.49
0
0.08


Training-health
HN27NM1
Female
26
1.11
17.59
0
0.07


Training-health
HN24NM1
Female
25
2.18
15.06
0
0.07


Training-health
HN29NM1
Female
25
1.85
14.85
0
0.07


Training-health
HN30NM1
Female
24
1.52
15.8
0
0.07


Training-health
HN22NM1
Female
22
1.6
28.4
0
0.07


Verification
RH585NM1
Male
58
8.33
85.46
0
0.91


Verification
RH391NM1
Male
62
14.96
87.41
0
0.84


Verification
RH206NM1
Male
58
16.47
64.76
4
0.82


Verification
RH134NM1
Male
60
12.14
32.99
11
0.67


Verification
RH245NM1
Male
49
2.75
1355.1
0
0.62


Verification
RH165NM1
Male
66
2.85
25.22
2
0.59


Verification
RH291NM1
Female
53
1.87
18.91
0
0.59


Verification
RH256NM1
Male
50
2.13
37.02
0
0.56


Verification
RH283NM1
Female
62
1.68
67.64
0
0.53


Verification
RH127NM1
Male
63
3.34
19.79
8
0.53


Verification
RH476NM1
Male
59
8.5
22.8
0
0.51


Verification
RH567NM1
Male
54
1.74
23.63
0
0.48


Verification
RG874NM1
Male
68
3.91
11.96
0
0.48


Verification
RH147NM1
Male
43
3.27
21.22
18
0.48


Verification
RH547NM1
Male
54
3.87
14.2
1
0.47


Verification
RH384NM1
Male
55
19.17
55.04
2
0.45


Verification
RH227NM1
Male
59
3.94
32.95
0
0.44


Verification
RH520NM1
Male
54
1.49
22.75
0
0.44


Verification
RH602NM1
Male
57
4.82
23.11
0
0.43


Verification
RG899NM1
Male
61
2.75
19.39
2
0.43


Verification
RH507NM1
Male
57
4.09
46.58
0
0.42


Verification
RH232NM1
Male
59
2.1
25.92
0
0.42


Verification
RH524NM1
Male
57
2.75
25.81
0
0.41


Verification
RH285NM1
Male
47
3.53
26.02
2
0.41


Verification
RH270NM1
Male
61
3.41
21.81
0
0.40


Verification
RH132NM1
Male
52
13.81
34.88
5
0.39


Verification
RH531NM1
Male
56
3.55
26.95
0
0.39


Verification
RH561NM1
Male
59
4.05
19.86
0
0.39


Verification
RH538NM1
Female
62
1.43
22.28
3
0.39


Verification
RH887NM1
Male
58
2.58
22.53
2
0.39


Verification
RH604NM1
Male
54
7.63
41.19
0
0.39


Verification
RH513NM1
Male
57
1.9
28.39
0
0.39


Verification
RH544NM1
Male
57
3.5
14.87
0
0.39


Verification
RH563NM1
Male
56
2.78
28.56
0
0.39


Verification
RH504NM1
Male
58
3.78
23.16
0
0.39


Verification
RH189NM1
Male
56
2.2
32.17
0
0.38


Verification
RH288NM1
Male
53
3.81
34.37
0
0.38


Verification
RH601NM1
Female
64
4.4
19.05
0
0.38


Verification
RH608NM1
Male
54
1.11
12.72
0
0.37


Verification
RH257NM1
Female
63
3.2
41.77
0
0.37


Verification
RH244NM1
Male
48
1.95
40.55
0
0.37


Verification
RH374NM1
Male
68
15.66
20.99
0
0.37


Verification
RH170NM1
Male
53
2.1
16.61
16
0.37


Verification
RH584NM1
Female
62
3.77
14.21
0
0.37


Verification
RH212NM1
Male
55
3.86
18.97
0
0.37


Verification
RH577NM1
Male
56
1.54
23.59
0
0.36


Verification
RH609NM1
Male
54
2.64
23.19
0
0.35


Verification
RH210NM1
Male
54
15.6
25.06
0
0.35


Verification
RH214NM1
Male
55
5
24.69
0
0.35


Verification
RH123NM1
Male
54
1.78
17.32
0
0.35


Verification
RH233NM1
Male
48
2.67
17
0
0.34


Verification
RH282NM1
Male
50
3.57
31.48
0
0.34


Verification
RH253NM1
Male
48
1.79
27.35
0
0.34


Verification
RH403NM1
Male
52
14.97
20.07
0
0.34


Verification
RH135NM1
Male
55
9.62
25.77
0
0.34


Verification
RH592NM1
Female
56
2.29
13.82
0
0.33


Verification
RH261NM1
Male
49
3.3
26.75
0
0.33


Verification
RH157NM1
Male
46
3.09
35.34
0
0.33


Verification
RH129NM1
Male
66
2.96
22.73
0
0.32


Verification
RH306NM1
Male
52
2.15
27.13
0
0.32


Verification
RH293NM1
Male
52
2.32
21.19
0
0.32


Verification
RH434NM1
Male
53
18.44
35.66
5
0.32


Verification
RH236NM1
Male
63
2.46
18.37
0
0.32


Verification
RH139NM1
Male
49
8.84
23.1
0
0.32


Verification
RH510NM1
Male
41
2.37
18.66
0
0.32


Verification
RH466NM1
Male
65
13.37
19.55
0
0.32


Verification
RH458NM1
Male
42
15.11
23.07
0
0.31


Verification
RH128NM1
Male
57
2.28
19.71
6
0.31


Verification
RH228NM1
Male
63
2.08
30.01
0
0.31


Verification
RH581NM1
Male
62
1.71
16.49
1
0.31


Verification
RH179NM1
Male
49
3.27
28.17
0
0.31


Verification
RH225NM1
Female
53
2.81
18.37
0
0.31


Verification
RH298NM1
Male
63
1.36
22.73
0
0.31


Verification
RH535NM1
Female
64
6.3
16.74
0
0.31


Verification
RH478NM1
Male
61
1.42
27.88
0
0.30


Verification
RH426NM1
Male
55
13.56
20.14
2
0.30


Verification
RH124NM1
Male
62
2.32
24.98
0
0.30


Verification
RH187NM1
Male
60
4.16
21.32
0
0.30


Verification
RH500NM1
Male
57
1.57
12.08
3
0.30


Verification
RH281NM1
Male
62
2.56
34.31
0
0.30


Verification
RH292NM1
Female
56
1.46
16.66
0
0.30


Verification
RH184NM1
Female
67
2.18
16.44
0
0.29


Verification
RH198NM1
Male
36
3.6
49.08
0
0.29


Verification
RH260NM1
Male
57
0.93
24.25
2
0.29


Verification
RH553NM1
Male
59
2.11
29.62
0
0.29


Verification
RH502NM1
Male
58
0.86
26.96
0
0.29


Verification
RH487NM1
Male
58
2.51
17.97
0
0.28


Verification
RH582NM1
Male
57
1.66
17.91
0
0.28


Verification
RH501NM1
Male
41
1.99
19.34
0
0.28


Verification
RH595NM1
Male
58
7.43
25.61
0
0.28


Verification
RH251NM1
Male
36
2.11
36.96
0
0.28


Verification
RH493NM1
Male
56
2.68
29.62
0
0.28


Verification
RH541NM1
Male
57
4.07
22.73
1
0.28


Verification
RH508NM1
Male
56
2.74
30.58
0
0.28


Verification
RH559NM1
Male
56
2.07
21.98
0
0.28


Verification
RH412NM1
Male
54
14.51
24.03
0
0.28


Verification
RH591NM1
Female
64
2.22
9.31
0
0.27


Verification
RH560NM1
Male
57
2.5
22.89
0
0.27


Verification
RH479NM1
Male
59
3.14
22.15
1
0.27


Verification
RH568NM1
Male
54
3.5
20.76
0
0.27


Verification
RH183NM1
Male
54
2.43
23.34
0
0.27


Verification
RH424NM1
Male
56
14.78
27.02
0
0.27


Verification
RH558NM1
Female
60
2.79
21.8
0
0.27


Verification
RH477NM1
Female
61
3.49
34.14
0
0.27


Verification
RH580NM1
Male
56
1.51
21.19
0
0.27


Verification
RH204NM1
Male
56
14.65
19.02
0
0.27


Verification
RH295NM1
Male
55
2.91
33.45
0
0.27


Verification
RH188NM1
Male
55
2.55
28.05
0
0.27


Verification
RH517NM1
Female
64
2.4
23.99
0
0.27


Verification
RH498NM1
Female
63
1.7
15.47
0
0.27


Verification
RH482NM1
Female
55
4.99
16.62
0
0.27


Verification
RH484NM1
Female
64
3.91
21.48
0
0.27


Verification
RH209NM1
Female
53
15.92
17.11
1
0.27


Verification
RH186NM1
Male
53
3.98
35.35
1
0.26


Verification
RH199NM1
Male
50
5.9
29.01
3
0.26


Verification
RH396NM1
Male
52
15.63
22.92
2
0.26


Verification
RH427NM1
Male
54
16.9
17.53
0
0.26


Verification
RH489NM1
Female
61
1.41
17.89
0
0.26


Verification
RH201NM1
Male
52
17.18
32.22
2
0.26


Verification
RH155NM1
Male
57
3.17
31.42
0
0.26


Verification
RH272NM1
Male
54
4.52
26.86
0
0.26


Verification
RH410NM1
Male
53
13.61
15.96
0
0.26


Verification
RH607NM1
Male
54
0.96
13.53
0
0.26


Verification
RH548NM1
Male
54
3.54
28.14
0
0.26


Verification
RH554NM1
Female
63
2.45
22.75
0
0.26


Verification
RH180NM1
Male
55
2.88
28.71
0
0.26


Verification
RH596NM1
Male
54
2.06
14.69
0
0.26


Verification
RH161NM1
Female
59
3.82
32.86
1
0.26


Verification
RH221NM1
Male
53
1.98
23.59
0
0.26


Verification
RH525NM1
Male
36
4.23
33.85
0
0.26


Verification
RH238NM1
Male
52
4.3
23.39
0
0.26


Verification
RH527NM1
Male
54
2.96
24.11
0
0.26


Verification
RH203NM1
Female
54
13.44
19.52
4
0.26


Verification
RH193NM1
Male
52
2.05
21.45
0
0.26


Verification
RH435NM1
Male
50
17.08
26.45
0
0.25


Verification
RH598NM1
Male
54
5.77
18.02
0
0.25


Verification
RH250NM1
Male
52
3.49
27.66
0
0.25


Verification
RH213NM1
Female
62
5.38
23.02
0
0.25


Verification
RH528NM1
Female
62
2.95
15.87
0
0.25


Verification
RH138NM1
Male
54
7.85
20.37
0
0.25


Verification
RH237NM1
Male
53
3.01
39.92
0
0.25


Verification
RH605NM1
Male
54
4.44
22.49
0
0.25


Verification
RH141NM1
Male
53
2.16
16.93
0
0.25


Verification
RH587NM1
Female
62
4.44
17.1
0
0.25


Verification
RH401NM1
Male
50
13.26
24.1
0
0.25


Verification
RH488NM1
Male
52
2.32
30.18
0
0.25


Verification
RH556NM1
Female
61
3.18
22.32
0
0.25


Verification
RH255NM1
Male
51
2.75
27.84
0
0.25


Verification
RH223NM1
Male
52
3.88
29.91
0
0.25


Verification
RH264NM1
Male
51
6.13
21.66
0
0.25


Verification
RH505NM1
Female
60
3.6
24.54
0
0.25


Verification
RH509NM1
Male
54
8.07
26.43
0
0.25


Verification
RH146NM1
Male
51
3.46
20.43
0
0.25


Verification
RH130NM1
Male
52
2.65
22.66
0
0.24


Verification
RH144NM1
Male
53
5.08
12.67
0
0.24


Verification
RH162NM1
Male
50
3.8
24.03
1
0.24


Verification
RH181NM1
Male
50
1.87
16.01
0
0.24


Verification
RH594NM1
Female
55
2.98
10.76
0
0.24


Verification
RH530NM1
Male
49
1.52
30.57
0
0.24


Verification
RH590NM1
Female
55
1.5
18.13
2
0.24


Verification
RH432NM1
Female
55
15.87
15.73
2
0.24


Verification
RH242NM1
Male
49
3.23
29.49
0
0.24


Verification
RH491NM1
Male
49
1.96
23.8
0
0.24


Verification
RH533NM1
Male
49
3.3
29.42
0
0.24


Verification
RH439NM1
Male
51
19.17
18.41
0
0.24


Verification
RH231NM1
Male
48
2.1
30.67
0
0.24


Verification
RH499NM1
Male
49
3.39
23.15
0
0.24


Verification
RH514NM1
Male
36
2.26
28.7
14
0.24


Verification
RH526NM1
Male
49
2.08
19.73
0
0.23


Verification
RH555NM1
Female
53
2.69
21.57
1
0.23


Verification
RH588NM1
Female
55
1.61
20.94
0
0.23


Verification
RH131NM1
Male
50
2.93
23.61
0
0.23


Verification
RH222NM1
Female
58
2.88
26.78
0
0.23


Verification
RH200NM1
Male
46
1.81
27.14
0
0.23


Verification
RH254NM1
Female
54
1.66
22.02
1
0.23


Verification
RH243NM1
Male
47
4.07
26.27
1
0.23


Verification
RH274NM1
Male
47
1.52
19.41
0
0.22


Verification
RH536NM1
Female
53
2.11
28.92
0
0.22


Verification
RH125NM1
Male
33
3.93
17.06
1
0.22


Verification
RH278NM1
Male
48
3.1
22.88
0
0.22


Verification
RH166NM1
Male
48
4.47
22.97
0
0.22


Verification
RH543NM1
Female
55
2.36
15.04
1
0.22


Verification
RH271NM1
Male
47
0.98
34.09
0
0.22


Verification
RH185NM1
Male
46
2.15
29.04
0
0.22


Verification
RH490NM1
Female
54
1.9
19.2
2
0.22


Verification
RH516NM1
Female
55
5.17
22.27
2
0.22


Verification
RH405NM1
Female
65
17.53
15.92
0
0.22


Verification
RH294NM1
Male
46
3.24
32.01
0
0.22


Verification
RH494NM1
Female
54
2.37
17.81
0
0.21


Verification
RH136NM1
Male
36
12.68
28.69
7
0.21


Verification
RH252NM1
Male
43
3.27
25.93
0
0.21


Verification
RH297NM1
Female
54
3.62
32.87
0
0.21


Verification
RH407NM1
Male
42
13.64
15.6
1
0.21


Verification
RH191NM1
Male
38
4.22
24.95
6
0.21


Verification
RH886NM1
Male
44
3.45
21.43
0
0.21


Verification
RH284NM1
Male
44
3.92
31.48
0
0.21


Verification
RH149NM1
Male
43
8.65
31.79
1
0.21


Verification
RH133NM1
Male
44
1.61
26.58
0
0.20


Verification
RH557NM1
Male
41
2.91
26.01
1
0.20


Verification
RH164NM1
Female
51
2.41
28.09
0
0.20


Verification
RH126NM1
Female
53
3.09
20.78
0
0.20


Verification
RH515NM1
Male
41
2.15
26.53
0
0.20


Verification
RH229NM1
Male
42
4.07
32.05
0
0.20


Verification
RH269NM1
Female
65
2.22
25.13
0
0.20


Verification
RH266NM1
Female
50
3.11
23.83
0
0.20


Verification
RH296NM1
Male
41
1.27
32.69
0
0.20


Verification
RH503NM1
Female
61
1.41
17.82
3
0.20


Verification
RH569NM1
Female
64
2.38
21.4
0
0.20


Verification
RH153NM1
Male
42
3.16
32.1
0
0.19


Verification
RH589NM1
Male
38
2.92
20.92
1
0.19


Verification
RH258NM1
Female
48
3.29
24.33
0
0.19


Verification
RH579NM1
Female
64
4.56
16.66
0
0.19


Verification
RH599NM1
Female
64
1.26
12
0
0.19


Verification
RH143NM1
Male
39
3.54
22.75
2
0.19


Verification
RH475NM1
Male
38
4.4
37.77
0
0.19


Verification
RH522NM1
Female
64
1.76
18.42
0
0.19


Verification
RH549NM1
Female
60
1.76
18.12
1
0.19


Verification
RH575NM1
Female
63
2.42
20.98
1
0.19


Verification
RH305NM1
Female
64
1.75
20.89
0
0.19


Verification
RH468NM1
Female
63
2.78
20.5
0
0.19


Verification
RH436NM1
Male
38
16.36
19.13
0
0.18


Verification
RH194NM1
Male
40
2.33
27.23
0
0.18


Verification
RH140NM1
Male
40
5.3
19.03
0
0.18


Verification
RH546NM1
Male
38
5.64
24.16
0
0.18


Verification
RH154NM1
Female
52
1.76
18.6
0
0.18


Verification
RH606NM1
Male
38
2.83
22.97
0
0.18


Verification
RH551NM1
Male
36
1.78
23.58
0
0.18


Verification
RH570NM1
Female
62
3.45
19.93
0
0.18


Verification
RH392NM1
Female
56
19.98
18.75
0
0.18


Verification
RH265NM1
Male
38
4.26
33.54
0
0.18


Verification
RH597NM1
Male
36
7.3
25.73
0
0.18


Verification
RH496NM1
Male
38
1.27
22.8
0
0.18


Verification
RH262NM1
Female
62
1.37
27.32
0
0.18


Verification
RH603NM1
Male
36
1.82
18.81
0
0.18


Verification
RH472NM1
Female
60
1.97
17.64
0
0.17


Verification
RH521NM1
Male
36
1.6
28.7
0
0.17


Verification
RH246NM1
Female
60
4.59
29.63
0
0.17


Verification
RH299NM1
Male
36
2.9
31.31
1
0.17


Verification
RH552NM1
Female
60
1.42
15.27
0
0.17


Verification
RH148NM1
Male
35
3.6
23.41
1
0.17


Verification
RH218NM1
Female
59
2.16
16.93
0
0.17


Verification
RH196NM1
Female
59
4.78
22.83
0
0.17


Verification
RH216NM1
Female
59
2.52
26.61
0
0.17


Verification
RH480NM1
Female
55
1.62
23.12
1
0.17


Verification
RH217NM1
Female
58
6.52
24.03
0
0.16


Verification
RH247NM1
Female
57
3.92
23.54
0
0.16


Verification
RH234NM1
Female
54
3.12
17.35
1
0.16


Verification
RH366NM1
Female
53
13.99
17.71
2
0.16


Verification
RH519NM1
Female
56
1.64
17.45
0
0.16


Verification
RH593NM1
Female
56
2.86
16.52
1
0.16


Verification
RH289NM1
Female
57
3.59
25.28
0
0.16


Verification
RH562NM1
Female
55
2.08
15.23
0
0.16


Verification
RH273NM1
Female
56
2.4
20.84
0
0.16


Verification
RH182NM1
Female
56
3.69
21.44
0
0.16


Verification
RH248NM1
Female
56
2.25
19.02
0
0.16


Verification
RH301NM1
Female
57
1.75
20.74
0
0.16


Verification
RH518NM1
Female
54
2.83
14.04
1
0.16


Verification
RH571NM1
Female
56
1.53
16.8
0
0.16


Verification
RH208NM1
Female
56
15.29
26.95
0
0.16


Verification
RH572NM1
Female
56
2.65
21.36
0
0.16


Verification
RH287NM1
Female
58
1.46
25.61
0
0.16


Verification
RH532NM1
Female
56
0.81
23.2
0
0.16


Verification
RH539NM1
Female
55
2.26
16.71
0
0.16


Verification
RH565NM1
Female
56
1.6
19.47
0
0.16


Verification
RH537NM1
Female
55
2.13
15.97
0
0.16


Verification
RH417NM1
Female
53
15.07
18.15
0
0.16


Verification
RH578NM1
Female
55
1.28
13.94
0
0.16


Verification
RH241NM1
Female
54
1.88
23.32
0
0.15


Verification
RH249NM1
Female
53
1.13
15.42
1
0.15


Verification
RH279NM1
Female
39
5.33
21.11
0
0.15


Verification
RH512NM1
Female
54
1.06
17.58
0
0.15


Verification
RH240NM1
Female
55
3
18.34
0
0.15


Verification
RH574NM1
Female
55
5.21
13.02
0
0.15


Verification
RH576NM1
Female
55
4.48
19.62
0
0.15


Verification
RH226NM1
Female
54
3.08
20.57
0
0.15


Verification
RH583NM1
Female
55
1.69
25.96
0
0.15


Verification
RH276NM1
Female
54
1.38
27.72
0
0.15


Verification
RH267NM1
Female
52
1.99
26.19
1
0.15


Verification
RH230NM1
Female
52
3.21
29.43
1
0.15


Verification
RH545NM1
Female
54
2.73
22.64
0
0.15


Verification
RH215NM1
Female
55
3.27
17.81
0
0.15


Verification
RH207NM1
Female
53
14.22
17.78
1
0.15


Verification
RH275NM1
Female
52
1.38
19.49
0
0.15


Verification
RH534NM1
Female
53
2.76
14.37
0
0.15


Verification
RH485NM1
Female
53
2.2
27.14
0
0.15


Verification
RH483NM1
Female
54
3.25
19.87
0
0.15


Verification
RH495NM1
Female
53
2.67
15.79
0
0.15


Verification
RH474NM1
Female
53
1.75
12.4
0
0.15


Verification
RH529NM1
Female
53
2.56
8.1
0
0.15


Verification
RH268NM1
Female
55
2.07
25.48
0
0.15


Verification
RH471NM1
Female
54
2.16
17.71
0
0.15


Verification
RH550NM1
Female
53
2.27
19.35
0
0.15


Verification
RH304NM1
Female
54
1.52
25.4
0
0.14


Verification
RH235NM1
Female
53
4.36
12.99
0
0.14


Verification
RH190NM1
Female
55
4.32
32.9
0
0.14


Verification
RH168NM1
Female
45
6.75
15.35
4
0.14


Verification
RH307NM1
Female
52
2.63
28.23
0
0.14


Verification
RH470NM1
Female
53
2.37
18.46
0
0.14


Verification
RH263NM1
Female
52
1.69
21.26
0
0.14


Verification
RH277NM1
Female
51
1.6
26.39
0
0.14


Verification
RH302NM1
Female
52
1.31
23.82
0
0.14


Verification
RH220NM1
Female
53
1.7
30.17
0
0.14


Verification
RH300NM1
Female
52
1.68
22.56
0
0.14


Verification
RH160NM1
Female
47
2.78
23.67
1
0.13


Verification
RH167NM1
Female
48
3.51
12.67
0
0.12


Verification
RH159NM1
Female
46
1.66
16.96
1
0.12


Verification
RH303NM1
Female
46
3.2
20.53
0
0.12


Verification
RH286NM1
Female
47
4.07
25.63
0
0.12


Verification
RH197NM1
Female
41
1.47
22.41
0
0.11


Verification
RH205NM1
Female
40
15.39
24.66
0
0.11


Verification
RH150NM1
Female
44
3.23
26.22
0
0.11


Verification
RH169NM1
Female
42
2.28
24.44
0
0.11


Verification
RH202NM1
Female
38
15.31
20.12
0
0.11


Verification
RH195NM1
Female
42
2.15
25.92
0
0.11


Verification
RH239NM1
Female
40
0.79
12.75
0
0.10


Verification
RH573NM1
Female
38
4.85
22.26
0
0.10


Verification
RH290NM1
Female
39
3.11
23.66
0
0.10


Verification
RH542NM1
Female
38
5.96
13.98
0
0.10


Verification
RH492NM1
Female
38
1.93
14.9
0
0.10


Verification
RH511NM1
Female
30
1.35
16.76
4
0.10


Verification
RH219NM1
Female
38
2.69
16.22
0
0.10


Verification
RH158NM1
Female
37
2.72
20.02
1
0.10


Verification
RH259NM1
Female
36
2.71
29.6
0
0.10


Verification
RH224NM1
Female
25
2.19
19.47
0
0.09


Verification
RH600NM1
Female
33
17.02
11.83
0
0.09


Verification
RH586NM1
Female
32
3.5
20.84
0
0.09


Verification
RH473NM1
Female
32
1.53
28.35
1
0.08


Verification
RH566NM1
Female
29
2.06
23.29
0
0.08


Verification
RH211NM1
Female
29
5.32
18.37
0
0.08


Verification
RH497NM1
Female
30
1.82
23.8
0
0.08


Verification
RH192NM1
Female
27
3.46
18.49
0
0.08
















TABLE 5







Mutation information




















Chro-
Start
End
Mutant_

























Sample_
Gene_
mo-
posi-
posi-
classifi-
Mutant_


Protein_
Tumor_
Tumor_



ID
name
some
tion
tion
cation
type
Ref
Alt
change
depth
frequency
Grade*






















RG869NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266097
41266097
Missense_
SNPyr
G
T
p.Asp32Tyr
15482
0.14094
T







mutant












RG876NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266097
41266097
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Asp32Asn
10552
0.02104
T







mutant












RG895NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266098
41266098
Missense_
SNP
A
G
p.Asp32Gly
16286
0.06981
T







mutant












RG898NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266098
41266098
Missense_
SNP
A
C
p.Asp32Ala
12768
0.00368
T







mutant












RH455NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266098
41266098
Missense_
SNP
A
C
p.Asp32Ala
27189
0.00614
T







mutant












RH903NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266098
41266098
Missense_
SNP
A
G
p.Asp32Gly
18374
0.10977
T







mutant












RH29INM1
CTNNB1
3
41266098
41266099
Frame
INS

CTCTG
p.Thr40Leu
7021
0.00057
S







shift_


GAATC
fsTer14










mutant


CATTC














TGGTG









RG878NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266101
41266101
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Ser33Phe
14749
0.00183
T







mutant












RG892NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266101
41266101
Missense_
SNP
C
G
p.Ser33Cys
13683
0.00132
T







mutant












RH443NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266101
41266101
Missense_
SNP
C
G
p.Ser33Cys
7430
0.09273
T







mutant












RH897NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266101
41266101
Missense_
SNP
C
G
p.Ser33Cys
12413
0.00161
T







mutant












RG898NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266103
41266103
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Gly34Arg
12790
0.00719
T







mutant












RH443NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266103
41266103
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Gly34Arg
7462
0.00161
T







mutant












RH897NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266104
41266104
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Gly34Glu
12421
0.00177
T







mutant












RH455NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266107
41266107
Missense_
SNP
T
G
p.Ile35Ser
25818
0.0024
T







mutant












RG878NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266112
41266112
Missense_
SNP
T
G
p.Ser37Ala
14741
0.00224
T







mutant












RH891NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266112
41266112
Missense_
SNP
T
G
p.Ser37Ala
9288
0.04339
T







mutant












RH385NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266118
41266118
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Ala39Thr
23624
0.00063
T







mutant












RH377NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266124
41266124
Missense_
SNP
A
G
p.Thr41Ala
8948
0.00257
T







mutant












RH897NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266124
41266124
Missense_
SNP
A
G
p.Thr41Ala
12499
0.07609
T







mutant












RG886NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266137
41266137
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Ser45Phe
15325
0.00548
T







mutant












RH393NM1
CTNNB1
3
41266188
41266188
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Val62Asp
6129
0.00196
T







mutant












RG774NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5383
0.00985
T







gene_














mutatnt












RG785NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

3910
0.1243
T







gene_














mutant












RG796NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

4015
0.02441
T







gene_














mutant












RG869NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5323
0.19218
T







gene_














mutatnt












RG895NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

7720
0.00687
T







gene_














mutant












RG898NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

4848
0.03032
T







gene_














mutant












RH337NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

6437
0.03387
T







gene_














mutatnt












RH414NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5393
0.01558
T







gene_














mutant












RH419NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5450
0.00991
T







gene_














mutant












RH443NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

2793
0.09273
T







gene_














mutatnt












RH900NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

3078
0.05458
T







gene_














mutant












RG870NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

9595
0.00125
T







gene_














mutant












RG871NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

6380
0.00188
T







gene_














mutatnt












RG874NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

2935
0.00136
S







gene_














mutant












RG878NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

7791
0.00539
T







gene_














mutant












RH314NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

2338
0.00257
S







gene_














mutatnt












RH137NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5818
0.00103
S







gene_














mutant












RH227NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

1886
0.00212
S







gene_














mutant












RH767NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

3387
0.00118
S







gene_














mutant












RH397NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

2539
0.0067
T







gene_














mutant












RH398NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

1979
0.00303
S







gene_














mutant












RH421NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

4764
0.01721
T







gene_














mutant












RH905NM1
TERT
5
1295228
1295228
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5136
0.00136
S







gene_














mutant












RH455NM1
TERT
5
1295250
1295250
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

2542
0.03029
T







gene_














mutant












RG872NM1
TERT
5
1295250
1295250
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

5786
0.00069
S







gene_














mutant












RH397NM1
TERT
5
1295250
1295250
Upstream_
SNP
G
T

2463
0.00162
S







gene_














mutant












RH878NM1
TERT
5
1295250
1295250
Upstream_
SNP
G
A

9659
0.00145
T







gene_














mutant












RH390NM1
AXIN1
16
347141
347141
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu624
25046
0.00104
T







gained



Ter








RH240NM1
AXIN1
16
347213
347213
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Va1600
1804
0.0061
T







mutant



Met








RH204NM1
AXIN1
16
347883
347883
inframe-
DEL
GTGGT

p.His538_
5822
0.00052
S







deletion

GGACG

His541del












TGTG










RH436NM1
AXIN1
16
347892
347892
inframe-
DEL
GTG

p.His538del
10162
0.00059
S







deletion












RH471NM1
AXIN1
16
347892
347894
inframe-
DEL
GTG

p.His538del
6743
0.00104
S







deletion












RH526NM1
AXIN1
16
347924
347924
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Glv528
8043
0.00124
T







mutant



Ser








RH393NM1
AXIN1
16
347992
347992
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Ala505
6645
0.00181
T







mutant



Val








RH878NM1
AXIN1
16
348100
348100
Frame
DEL
CT

p.Ser469
8295
0.00084
S







shift_



HisfsTer










mutant



121








RH397NM1
AXIN1
16
348113
348113
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu465
10014
0.02676
T







gained



Ter








RH882NM1
AXIN1
16
348131
348131
Missense_
SNP
G
T
p.Leu459Ile
8915
0.00112
T







mutant












RH196NM1
AXIN1
16
348182
348182
Missense_
SNP
G
T
p.Pro442Thr
7668
0.0013
T







mutant












RH147NM1
AXIN1
16
348217
348231
inframe-
DEL
CCTGA

p.Asp426_
7573
0.00053
S







deletion

CGATG

Gly430del












GATCG










RG790NM1
AXIN1
16
348230
348230
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Asp426
9229
0.0013
T







mutant



Asn








RH289NM1
AXIN1
16
348230
348320
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Asp426
5106
0.00196
T







mutant



Asn








RH544NM1
AXIN1
16
348241
348241
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Glv422
1995
0.5198
T







mutant



Asp








RH385NM1
AXIN1
16
396164
396164
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu288
10142
0.00552
T







gained



Ter








RH464NM1
AXIN1
16
396303
396303
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Leu241
4894
0.00204
T







mutant



Phe








RG904NM1
AXIN1
16
396567
396579
Frame
DEL
ATTGT

p.Ilel49
2710
0.00148
S







shift_

TATCA

MetfsTer16










mutant

AGA










RH455NM1
AXIN1
16
396589
396589
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Argl46
23251
0.00099
T







mutant



Gln








RH390NM1
AXIN1
16
396590
396590
stop_
SNP
G
A
p.Argl46
24009
0.16215
T







gained



Ter








RH479NM1
AXIN1
16
396671
396671
Missense_
SNP
A
C
p.Phe119
4564
0.00219
T







mutant



Val








RH394NM1
AXIN1
16
396740
396740
stop_
SNP
G
A
p.Gln96Ter
6063
0.04519
T







gained












RH285NM1
AXIN1
16
396799
396799
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Ala76Val
5638
0.00177
T







mutant












RH490NM1
TP53
17
7572941
7572948
Frame
DEL
GCCCTT

p.Glu388
15405
0.00052
T







shift_

CT

Ter










mutant












RG879NM1
TP53
17
7572973
7572973
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg379
7895
0.00127
T







mutant



His








RG905NM1
TP53
17
7572973
7572973
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg379
9475
0.00116
T







mutant



His








RH291NM1
TP53
17
7572973
7572973
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg379
4685
0.00256
T







mutant



His








RH455NM1
TP53
17
7572973
7572973
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg379
4991
0.002
T







mutant



His








RH476NM1
TP53
17
7572973
7572973
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg379
6230
0.00257
T







mutant



His








RH906NM1
TP53
17
7572973
7572973
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg379
6614
0.00151
T







mutant



His








RH393NM1
TP53
17
7572974
7572974
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Arg379
7234
0.00166
T







mutant



Cys








RH884NM1
TP53
17
7573944
7573944
Frame
DEL
C

p.Ser362
8458
0.0013
T







shift_



AlafsTer8










mutant












RH538NM1
TP53
17
7573946
7573946
Missense_
SNP
C
G
p.Gly36l
14281
0.00329
T







mutant



Arg








RH224NM1
TP53
17
7573975
7573975
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Lys351
9886
0.00101
T







mutant



Met








RH292NM1
TP53
17
7573992
7573993
Frame
DEL
AT

p.Asn345
13985
0.00057
T







shift_



ArgfsTer36










mutant












RH528NM1
TP53
17
7574012
7574012
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Glu339
10347
0.00106
T







mutant



Lys








RG883NM1
TP53
17
7574024
7574026
Splice_
DEL
GCCCA


11423
0.03589
T







receptor_

CGGAT












mutant

CTGCA














GCAAC














AGA










RG878NM1
TP53
17
7574030
7574030
Frame
DEL
G

p.Arg333
13047
0.00376
T







shift_



ValfsTerl2










mutant












RH288NM1
TP53
17
7574030
7574030
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Arg333
3538
0.00283
T







mutant



Cys








RH225NM1
TP53
17
7574032
7574032
Missense_
SNP
A
T
p.Ile332Asn
12577
0.00119
T







mutant












RH233NM1
TP53
17
7576897
7576898
Frame
DEL
GG

p.Gln317
2531
0.00237
T







shift_



AlafsTerl9










mutant












RH425NM1
TP53
17
7576909
7576909
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Ser313Cys
10333
0.00116
T







mutant












RH520NM1
TP53
17
7576909
7576909
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Ser313Cys
9468
0.00106
T







mutant












RH608NM1
TP53
17
7577021
7577021
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg306
6632
0.00181
T







mutant



Gln








RH440NM1
TP53
17
7577046
7577046
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu298
27867
0.0084
T







gained



Ter








RH391NM1
TP53
17
7577046
7577046
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Glu298
9238
0.0013
T







mutant



Lys








RH170NM1
TP53
17
7577061
7577061
Missense_
SNP
C
G
p.Gly293
5419
0.59125
T







mutant



Arg








RH455NM1
TP53
17
7577105
7577105
Missense_
SNP
G
T
p.Pro278
10238
0.00107
T







mutant



His








RH891NM1
TP53
17
7577120
7577120
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg273
5439
0.06803
T







mutant



Leu








RH602NM1
TP53
17
7577124
7577124
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val272
2726
0.01101
T







mutant



Met








RH567NM1
TP53
17
7577127
7577127
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu271
9377
0.00149
T







gained



Ter








RG805NM1
TP53
17
7577130
7577130
Missense_
SNP
A
G
p.Phe270
2370
0.00506
T







mutant



Leu








RH256NM1
TP53
17
7577138
7577138
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg267
6643
0.00151
T







mutant



Gln








RH482NM1
TP53
17
7577157
7577157
Splice_
SNP
T
A

23254
0.0258
T







receptor_














mutant












RH390NM1
TP53
17
7577498
7577498
Splice_
SNP
C
A

17162
0.123
T







receptor_














mutant












RH419NM1
TP53
17
7577498
7577498
Splice_
SNP
C
A

12474
0.0364
T







receptor_














mutant












RH517NM1
TP53
17
7577512
7577513
Frame
DEL
GT

p.Leu257
6982
0.00086
T







shift_



GlyfsTer6










mutant












RH543NM1
TP53
17
7577512
7577513
Frame
DEL
GT

p.Lcu257
9582
0.00063
T







shift_



GlyfsTer6










mutant












RH592NM1
TP53
17
7577512
7577513
Frame
DEL
GT

p.Leu257
9177
0.00087
T







shift_



GlyfsTer6










mutant












RH285NM1
TP53
17
7577513
7577517
Frame
DEL
TGTGA

p.Ile255
5420
0.00129
T







shift_



TrfsTer7










mutant












RH554NM1
TP53
17
7577521
7577521
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Ile254Phe
15857
0.00107
T







mutant












RH489NM1
TP53
17
7577533
7577533
Missense_
DNP
GC
AA
p.ArgPro


T







mutant



249SerSer








RG792NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
2930
0.00239
T







mutant



Ser








RG796NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
3809
0.6905
T







mutant



Ser








RG868NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11902
0.00202
T







mutant



Ser








RG871NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
16130
0.00087
T







mutant



Ser








RG872NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13678
0.1471
T







mutant



Ser








RG873NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
24
0.41667
T







mutant



Ser








RG881NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12881
0.12173
T







mutant



Ser








RG898NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11673
0.11642
T







mutant



Ser








RG904NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7355
0.00761
T







mutant



Ser








RH127NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13235
0.00159
T







mutant



Ser








RH147NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6822
0.00191
T







mutant



Ser








RH161NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12989
0.00269
T







mutant



Ser








RH165NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13453
0.00164
T







mutant



Ser








RH184NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12568
0.00064
S







mutant



Ser








RH189NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6244
0.00096
S







mutant



Ser








RH206NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7731
0.00414
T







mutant



Ser








RH209NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13992
0.00522
T







mutant



Ser








RH225NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
14626
0.00137
T







mutant



Ser








RH254NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7519
0.0008
S







mutant



Ser








RH297NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8745
0.00183
T







mutant



Ser








RH382NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6799
0.00088
S







mutant



Ser








RH390NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
19293
0.00218
T







mutant



Ser








RH394NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
20891
0.24029
T







mutant



Ser








RH400NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
18462
0.00179
T







mutant



Ser








RH408NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
5540
0.00487
T







mutant



Ser








RH414NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11987
0.02553
T







mutant



Ser








RH421NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
15021
0.03322
T







mutant



Ser








RH425NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11484
0.00192
T







mutant



Ser








RH437NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13230
0.00121
T







mutant



Ser








RH458NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13197
0.00174
T







mutant



Ser








RH462NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
20608
0.00558
T







mutant



Ser








RH477NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
17912
0.00167
T







mutant



Ser








RH524NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6466
0.00325
T







mutant



Ser








RH536NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10568
0.00076
T







mutant



Ser








RH538NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13225
0.00227
T







mutant



Ser








RH555NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
18797
0.0009
T







mutant



Ser








RH555NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
14168
0.00113
T







mutant



Ser








RH563NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7361
0.00163
T







mutant



Ser








RH585NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8974
0.001
S







mutant



Ser








RH588NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
9004
0.00056
S







mutant



Ser








RH590NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10106
0.00119
T







mutant



Ser








RH885NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
14022
0.00107
T







mutant



Ser








RH910NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
19048
0.00121
T







mutant



Ser








RH776NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
3236
0.00216
S







mutant



Ser








RH126NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10958
0.00064
S







mutant



Ser








RH134NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7769
0.00051
S







mutant



Ser








RH135NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
15182
0.00059
S







mutant



Ser








RH139NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10639
0.00132
T







mutant



Ser








RH164NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12422
0.00089
S







mutant



Ser








RH179NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10474
0.00057
S







mutant



Ser








RH210NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10764
0.00056
S







mutant



Ser








RH217NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
14319
0.00112
T







mutant



Ser








RH213NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
9069
0.00066
S







mutant



Ser








RH214NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7381
0.00054
S







mutant



Ser








RH222NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7241
0.00055
S







mutant



Ser








RH232NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
4309
0.00162
S







mutant



Ser








RH258NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
5106
0.00118
S







mutant



Ser








RH266NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7249
0.00083
S







mutant



Ser








RH270NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8245
0.00073
S







mutant



Ser








RH282NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
4035
0.00099
S







mutant



Ser








RH285NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
5717
0.00052
S







mutant



Ser








RH291NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8306
0.00072
S







mutant



Ser








RH293NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7117
0.00056
S







mutant



Ser








RH306NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8901
0.00067
S







mutant



Ser








RH377NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
9732
0.00062
S







mutant



Ser








RH378NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
25942
0.00054
S







mutant



Ser








RH383NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11353
0.0007
S







mutant



Ser








RH391NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7490
0.00053
S







mutant



Ser








RH403NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
16461
0.00067
S







mutant



Ser








RH418NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10085
0.00099
S







mutant



Ser








RH432NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
22124
0.0005
S







mutant



Ser








RH438NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12114
0.00157
T







mutant



Ser








RH476NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13744
0.00073
S







mutant



Ser








RH484NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
16634
0.00078
S







mutant



Ser








RH494NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12254
0.00065
S







mutant



Ser








RH498NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
13967
0.001
T







mutant



Ser








RH516NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
16660
0.00072
S







mutant



Ser








RH520NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11725
0.00051
S







mutant



Ser








RH525NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
5044
0.00119
S







mutant



Ser








RH544NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
4331
0.00092
S







mutant



Ser








RH547NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
G
p.Arg249
7950
0.0005
S







mutant



Ser








RH556NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7393
0.00054
S







mutant



Ser








RH567NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
9371
0.00107
T







mutant



Ser








RH577NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8006
0.0005
S







mutant



Ser








RH584NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
8223
0.00073
S







mutant



Ser








RH587NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
15256
0.00079
S







mutant



Ser








RH591NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6472
0.00062
S







mutant



Ser








RH592NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
9781
0.00153
T







mutant



Ser








RH594NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
4762
0.00168
S







mutant



Ser








RH601NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
11149
0.0009
S







mutant



Ser








RH889NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
12370
0.00129
T







mutant



Ser








RH915NM1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10781
0.00074
S







mutant



Ser








RH535NM1
TP53
17
7577539
7577539
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Arg248
14917
0.00469
T







mutant



Trp








RH547NM1
TP53
17
7577539
7577539
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Arg248
7941
0.00201
T







mutant



Trp








RH397NM1
TP53
17
7577545
7577545
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Met246
11578
0.241
T







mutant



Leu








RH165NM1
TP53
17
7577548
7577548
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Gly245
23427
0.00107
T







mutant



Ser








RH395NM1
TP53
17
7577556
7577556
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Cys242
19634
0.00148
T







mutant



Tyr








RH253NM1
TP53
17
7577559
7577559
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Ser241
6521
0.00184
T







mutant



Phe








RH430NM1
TP53
17
7577559
7577559
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Ser241
33409
0.00054
T







mutant



Phe








RH513NM1
TP53
17
7577562
7577562
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Ser240
8502
0.00141
T







mutant



Ile








RH154NM1
TP53
17
7577574
7577574
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Tyr236
12368
0.00113
T







mutant



Phe








RH251NM1
TP53
17
7577576
7577578
inframe_
DEL
GTT

p.Asn235
1930
0.00363
S







deletion



del








RH871NM1
TP53
17
7577580
7577580
Missense_
SNP
T
C
p.Tyr234
17951
0.01382
T







mutant



Cys








RH292NM1
TP53
17
7577591
7577591
Frame
DEL
G

p.Thr231
9011
0.00133
T







shift_



rofsTer16










mutant












RH125NM1
TP53
17
7577605
7577605
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Gly226
10295
0.00107
T







mutant



Cys








RH203NM1
TP53
17
7578190
7578190
Missense_
SNP
T
C
p.Tyr220
14947
0.00167
T







mutant



Cys








RH601NM1
TP53
17
7578190
7578190
Missense_
SNP
T
C
p.Tyr220
8908
0.00135
T







mutant



Cys








RH876NM1
TP53
17
7578203
7578203
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Val216
9888
0.02164
T







mutant



Leu








RH132NM1
TP53
17
7578203
7578203
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val216
11507
0.00235
T







mutant



Met








RH157NM1
TP53
17
7578203
7578203
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val216
8730
0.0047
T







mutant



Met








RH897NM1
TP53
17
7578211
7578211
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg213
12348
0.13233
T







mutant



Leu








RH887NM1
TP53
17
7578212
7578212
stop_
SNP
G
A
p.Arg213
8479
0.0013
T







gained



Ter








RH385NM1
TP53
17
7578249
7578250
Frame
SNP

T
p.Asn200
19036
0.13259
T







shift_



LysfsTer9










mutant












RH279NM1
TP53
17
7578275
7578275
inframe_
DEL
GAG

p.Pro191
4678
0.00128
S







deletion



del








RH419NM1
TP53
17
7578275
7578277
inframe_
DEL
GAG

p.Pro191
9472
0.00063
S







deletion



del








RH505NM1
TP53
17
7578389
7578389
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Arg181
11519
0.00234
T







mutant



Cys








RH398NM1
TP53
17
7578392
7578392
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu180
8482
0.00236
T







gained



Ter








RG888NM1
TP53
17
7578395
7578395
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Hisl79
9505
0.0041
T







mutant



Tyr








RH584NM1
TP53
17
7578401
7578401
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Pro177
8925
0.00157
T







mutant



Ser








RH501NM1
TP53
17
7578404
7578404
Missense_
SNP
A
T
p.Cys176
8920
0.00112
T







mutant



Ser








RH510NM1
TP53
17
7578406
7578406
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg175
8880
0.00439
T







mutant



His








RH531NM1
TP53
17
7578406
7578406
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Argl75
13146
0.00198
T







mutant



His








RH291NM1
TP53
17
7578406
7578406
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Argl75
9654
0.00104
T







mutant



His








RH585NM1
TP53
17
7578415
7578415
Missense_
SNP
A
C
p.VaL172
9844
0.01199
T







mutant



Gly








RH380NM1
TP53
17
7578457
7578457
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg158
14377
0.02379
T







mutant



His








RG785NM1
TP53
17
7578461
7578461
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Val157
195
0.18974
T







mutant



Phe








RG868NM1
TP53
17
7578461
7578461
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Val157
13247
0.03616
T







mutant



Phe








RH443NM1
TP53
17
7578461
7578461
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Val157
8078
0.24016
T







mutant



Phe








RH257NM1
TP53
17
7578461
7578461
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val157
20862
0.00096
T







mutant



Ile








RH884NM1
TP53
17
7578461
7578461
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val157
8403
0.00119
T







mutant



Ile








RH609NM1
TP53
17
7578473
7578474
Frame
DEL
GC

p.Pro153
6235
0.00096
S







shift_



ArgfsTer27










mutant












RG871NM1
TP53
17
7578475
7578475
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Pro152
16849
0.00142
T







mutant



Leu








RH256NM1
TP53
17
7578475
7578475
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Pro152
9341
0.00214
T







mutant



Leu








RH900NM1
TP53
17
7578479
7578479
Missense_
SNP
G
T
p.Prol51
9799
0.09327
T







mutant



Thr








RG888NM1
TP53
17
7578491
7578491
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val147
7539
0.00172
T







mutant



Ile








RH261NM1
TP53
17
7578491
7578492
Frame
DEL
CC

p.Trpl46
5257
0.00114
S







shift_



CysfsTer2










mutant












RH561NM1
TP53
17
7578503
7578503
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Val143
7723
0.00142
T







mutant



Met








RH379NM1
TP53
17
7578518
7578518
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Ala138
7529
0.00133
T







mutant



Thr








RG878NM1
TP53
17
7578538
7578538
Missense_
SNP
T
A
p.Asn131
10345
0.00203
T







mutant



Ile








RG892NM1
TP53
17
7579329
7579329
Missense_
SNP
T
C
p.Lysl20
9102
0.00132
T







mutant



Glu








RG452NM1
TP53
17
7579340
7579340
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Serll6
12029
0.00116
T







mutant



Phe








RG886NM1
TP53
17
7579358
7579358
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Arg110
10193
0.00108
T







mutant



His








RH123NM1
TP53
17
7579363
7579371
inframe_
DEL
ACCGT

p.Serl06_
4671
0.00128
S







deletion

AGCT

Glyl08del








RH291NM1
TP53
17
7879395
7879395
Missense_
SNP
G
A
p.Pro98
3686
0.00461
T







mutant



Ser








RG899NM1
TP53
17
7579401
7579401
Missense_
DEL
A
C
p.Ser96Ala
4181
0.00239
T







mutant












RH504NM1
TP53
17
7579414
7579414
Frame
SNP
C

p.Trp91C
10839
0.0012
T







shift_



ysfsTer32










mutant












RG898NM1
TP53
17
7579473
7579473
Missense_
SNP
G
C
p.Pro72Ala
8312
0.5409
T







mutant












RH585NM1
TP53
17
7579479
7579482
Frame
DEL
CAGC

p.Ala69
7638
0.00079
S







shift_



LeufsTer53










mutant












RH589NM1
TP53
17
7579482
7579482
Missense_
SNP
C
T
p.Ala69Thr
2773
0.49189
T







mutant












RH256NM1
TP53
17
9579482
9579483
Frame
DEL
CC

p.Glu68A
6245
0.00096
S







shift_



spfsTer80










mutant












RG871NM1
TP53
17
7579536
7579536
stop_
SNP
C
A
p.Glu51Ter
10547
0.00114
T







gained












RG870NM1
TP53
17
7579722
7579722
Splice_
SNP
C
G

14884
0.0043
T







receptor_














mutant












RK137NX1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6726
0.00059
S







mutant



Ser








RK139NX1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
10385
0.00077
S







mutant



Ser








RG145NX1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6670
0.0009
S







mutant



Ser








RK149NX1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
7490
0.0008
S







mutant



Ser








RK155NX1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
6279
0.00064
S







mutant



Ser








RK170NX1
TP53
17
7577534
7577534
Missense_
SNP
C
A
p.Arg249
5786
0.00138
S







mutant



Ser





*t represents a true mutation; S represents a suspected mutation.






Example 4. Predictive Value of Early HCC of AFP/US Negative Individuals by HCC Screening Assay

The invention further tests whether HCC screening can detect HCC from AFP/US negative and HBsAg positive individuals without clinical symptoms. 331 AFP/US negative individuals were tested with HCC screening and 24 positive cases (referred to as HCC screening positive) were identified based on the algorithm from the training set (FIG. 4D).


24 HCC screening positive individuals were followed up for 6-8 months to obtain clinical results of HCC. Of these individuals, 17 were examined by dynamic CT, 4 by AFP/US and 3 by telephone interview. 4 of the 24 screened HCC positive individuals were eventually diagnosed as HCC, with a positive predictive value of HCC detection being 17% (FIG. 4E). In addition, a group of HCC screening negative participants (n=70) agreed to have a dynamic CT test at 6-8 months, and no one was diagnosed with HCC. The present invention also tracked 172 HCC screening negative participants by AFP/US 6-8 months after baseline AFP/US screening and no HCC cases were diagnosed. Of the 65 participants followed up by telephone interviews, no HCC patients were found (FIG. 2). Overall, no HCC cases were found in these HCC screening negative cases. Taken together, the HCC screening assay produced a positive predictive value of 17%, a sensitivity of 100% (4/4), and a specificity of 94% (307/327) in AFP/US negative individuals (FIG. 4F). All 4 HCC patients identified had tumor sizes <3 cm when diagnosed by dynamic CT (FIG. 4G), and these 4 patients had no cirrhosis based on US results at baseline.


The present invention provides AFP/US examinations within 6-8 months after baseline testing to 944 participants who were AFP/US-negative at baseline and who did not have an HCC screening test. Four HCC cases were detected and further confirmed (0.4%, 4/944). Cancer registration records showed that no liver cancer results were identified in these 337 participants before Jun. 30, 2018 (ICD-10 Code C22), who were AFP/US negative in baseline screening and did not undergo HCC screening or any further AFP/US screening (FIG. 2).


6-8 months after the first blood sampling at baseline, 13 of the 24 HCC screening positive cases underwent a second blood drawing to repeat the HCC screening assay. One of the HCC cases continued to be positive and the score was higher than 6 months ago. Another case of HCC that had been surgically resected prior to the second blood drawing showed negative HCC screening consistent with this condition. Of the 11 HCC screening positive non-HCC cases, 7 (64%) were negative in the second HCC screening test, although two of the screening results were close to the threshold (0.40). The remaining 4 non-HCC cases were still positive in the second HCC screening (FIG. 4E). These results indicate that the positive predictive value can be further improved by repeating the test at the second time point. These cases are currently followed up to further validate the assay.


Example 5. Training a Liquid Biopsy Assay with Healthy Individuals

The HCC screening assay shows strong HCC recognition ability in high-risk populations. Previous studies have predicted that sensitivity and specificity may be lower in such high-risk populations than in cancer patients compared to healthy individuals without HBV infection or other risk factors. In order to test this hypothesis, in the invention HCC screening was performed on 70 healthy individuals without HBV infection (HBsAg negative), and these data was used to replace 70 HBsAg positive non-HCC cases in the training set. Through analysis of cfDNA and protein markers, the HCC screening assay effectively recognized HCC cases from healthy individuals with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100% (FIG. 5A). However, the algorithm derived from this training set (HCC and healthy individuals) does not perform well in HBsAg positive non-HCC cases. According to this algorithm, most non-HCC cases are classified as positive, while HCC and non-HCC cases are highly overlapping (FIG. 5B). In addition, validation sets do not perform well. Although all four HCC cases were positive in the test, many of the HBsAg (+) individuals were classified as positive, resulting in specificity and positive predictive values of only 58% and 2.8%, respectively (FIG. 5B). On the other hand, the algorithm derived from the case of HCC and non-HCC correctly classified all healthy individuals (100%) as negative, except for their performance in the HBsAg positive validation set (FIG. 5B).


Example 6. Liquid Biopsy Assay Further Including CNV

I. Obtaining a Blood Sample


Blood samples from patients with liver cancer were provided from 65 patients with liver cancer who had been clinically identified as liver cancer.


The blood samples of patients with high risk of liver cancer were provided by 70 patients with high risk of liver cancer who were identified as high risk of liver cancer by the methods provided in the literature (Omata, M., et al., Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int, 2017.11(4):p. 317-370.).


Healthy human blood samples were provided by 100 healthy volunteers.


II. Detection of liver cancer mutation genes in cfDNA of blood samples to be detected and CNV detection


The blood samples to be detected are 65 liver cancer patient blood samples, 70 liver cancer high-risk patient blood samples and 100 healthy person blood samples.


1. The cfDNA of blood samples to be detected was extracted by MagMAX™ Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit respectively.


2. After completing step 1, liquid phase hybridization capture technique was used to detect the mutation information of liver cancer gene in cfDNA of blood sample to be detected, such as the mutation information of TP53 gene, AXIN1 gene, CTNNB1 gene, promoter of TERT gene, B-type HBV and C-type HBV. The specific steps are as follows:


(1) Taking the cfDNA of the blood sample to be detected) and constructing a library by using a KAPA Hyper Prep kit to obtain the cfDNA library of the blood sample to be detected.


(2) After completing step (1), taking a cfDNA library of the blood sample to be detected, performing hybridization capture of target region by using a sureselect XT target capture kit, and sequencing on an Illumina platform with a sequencing depth of 20000×. The versions, chromosomes, start positions, stop positions and coverage areas of the genes or viruses detected are detailed in Table 6.














TABLE 6





Gene or virus
Version
Chromosome
Start position
Stop-position
Coverage area




















TP53 gene
HG19
17
7572927
7579884
TP53 gene exon full length


AXIN1 gene
HG19
16
338122
397000
AXIN1 gene exon full length


CTNNB1 gene
HG19
3
41265560
41281237
CTNNB1 gene exon full length


TERT gene
HG19
5
1295228
1295250
Positions 228 and 250 of the TERT gene promoter


Hepatitis B virus type C
AF533983
1
1
3215
Full length of type C HBV genome


Type B HBV
AB602818
1
1
3215
Full length of type B HBV genome









The detection results of liver cancer mutant genes in cfDNA of some blood samples to be detected are shown in columns 2 and 4 of Table 7.












TABLE 7





Number
Mutant gene mutation frequency
HBV integration score
HBV integration gene







HCCscreen01

B
KLF4; BUB1; HMHB1; F13B; LRFN2


HCCscreen02
TERT|1.2%; TP53|3.7%
A
PKDCC; SNTG1; AFF4


HCCscreen03
TP53|0.2%




HCCscreen04
TERT|1.1%; TP53|8.4%
A
GLP2R; ZNF438; HMGXB3; FGB; COL23A1


HCCscreen05
TERT|19%; TP53|21%; AXIN1|1.5%;





CTNNB1|1%


HCCscreen06

B
TERT; RAPGEF2; FSTL5


HCCscreen07

A
COL22A1; LRRC31; SAMD7


HCCscreen08
CTNNB1|0.3%
B
SEPT7P2


HCCscreen09
TP53|1.2%; AXIN1|0.2%
A
KMT2B; TERT; MTRNR2L1; SLC26A7; RUNX1T1


HCCscreen10
TP53|0.1%
B
LOC100288788; IQSEC3


HCCscreen11

C
PBX1; LMX1A


HCCscreen12





HCCscreen13
TERT|1.6%; CTNNB1|6.7%
A
SAMD11; TERT; LINC01511; LOC10192; LOC102467213


HCCscreen14
TP53|0.3%




HCCscreen15
TP53|0.1%; CTNNB1|0.1%
C
CWH43


HCCscreen16
TERT|3%; CTNNB1|0.9%
A
TERT; LINC01242; NFATC2; CPA6


HCCscreen17
TP53|12.8
A
TERT; ELAC2; DHX15


HCCscreen18
TERT|15%; CTNNB1|15.4%
C
APOBEC4; FBX010; FUT8; WDR7; SLC7A10; GUSBP4


HCCscreen19
TERT|0.5%; TP53|0.3; CTNNB1|0.2%




HCCscreen20
TP53|0.1%; CTNNB1|0.7%
A
RAB9BP1; NLGN1; HTR2A


HCCscreen21
TP53|1%; AXIN1|0.2%
A
TERT; FRG2B; LOC100506; AADAT


HCCscreen22
TP53|32%; CTNNB1|0.7%
B
LINC00871


HCCscreen23
CTNNB1|0.1%
A
LINC00273; LOC100294362


HCCscreen24

B
MARCH1; GLP2R


HCCscreen25

B
CCDC60; PLXDC2; CCDC173


HCCscreen26

B
SUGCT; EGLLN3; PCBP3


HCCscreen27

B
ADAMTSL1; LOC101929; NMNAT2; FGF12


HCCscreen28

B
PTGER1; SLC39A11; ABHD4; LOC100507


HCCscreen29





HCCscreen30





HCCscreen31





HCCscreen32
TP53|0.5%
B
KIF26B


HCCscreen33

C
TUNAR


HCCscreen34

A
CC2D2A; DCAF8L1; MGAT4C; RAD23B; RASA2


HCCscreen35





HCCscreen36





HCCscreen37





HCCscreen38





HCCscreen39





HCCscreen40

C
C11ORF63


HCCscreen41

C
SYT10; UTR3


HCCscreen42

A
SYNDIC1; AK4; TPM3; LINC01021


HCCscreen43

C
LOC728637


HCCscreen44

C
PRKAA1; RND219


HCCscreen45

B
NEDD4; TET2


HCCscreen46

B
YWHAZ; SNX16; FRG2B


HCCscreen47

B
ZNF716; TMTC2; PDE4DIP; KIF16B


HCCscreen48





HCCscreen49





HCCscreen50





HCCscreen51





HCCscreen52
TP53|0.13%; AXIN1|0.27%




HCCscreen53





HCCscreen54





HCCscreen55





HCCscreen56





HCCscreen57





HCCscreen58





HCCscreen59





HCCscreen60





HCCscreen61





HCCscreen62





HCCscreen63





HCCscreen64





HCCscreen65





HCCscreen66





HCCscreen67





HCCscreen68
TERT|0.06%




HCCscreen69
AXIN|0.13%




HCCscreen70





HCCscreen71





HCCscreen72





HCCscreen73





HCCscreen74





HCCscreen75





HCCscreen76





HCCscreen77





HCCscreen78





HCCscreen79





HCCscreen80





HCCscreen81





HCCscreen82





HCCscreen83





HCCscreen84





HCCscreen85





HCCscreen86





HCCscreen87





HCCscreen88





HCCscreen89





HCCscreen90








Note:


“—” indicates that no mutation was detected and “—” indicates that no integration was detected.






3. Taking the cfDNA library of the blood sample to be detected prepared in the step 2 (1), performing low-depth whole genome sequencing, and then performing CNV detection on sequencing data (about 3G).


III. Detecting the AFP Content in the Plasma


The blood samples to be detected are 65 liver cancer patient blood samples, 70 liver cancer high-risk patient blood samples and 100 healthy person blood samples.


1 Taking a blood sample to be detected, uniformly mixing in a blood collection tube upside down for 10 times, centrifuging for 10 min at 4° C. and 2000 g, then transferring the upper-layer plasma to a centrifuge tube (the specification is 1.5 mL), centrifuging for 10 min at 4° C. and 16000 g, and collecting the supernatant (i.e. plasma).


2. After completing the step 1, taking the plasma and detecting AFP by American Abbott IMx analyzer.


The results of the determination of AFP content in plasma of some of the blood samples to be detected are shown in column 2, Table 8.














TABLE 8





Number
AFP(ng/mL)
DCP(mAU/mL)
Number
AFP(ng/mL)
DCP(mAU/mL)




















HCCscreen01
6.5
178
HCCscreen46
107.99
27.52


HCCscreen02
97.09
98
HCCscreen47
28.96
19.74


HCCscreen03
12
265
HCCscreen48
22.6
28.38


HCCscreen04
238.7
38.59
HCCscreen49
95.88
17.92


HCCscreen05
1210
22.71
HCCscreen50
25.2
33.21


HCCscreen06
5.37
19.14
HCCscreen51
2.55
25.95


HCCscreen07
2136.1
18.58
HCCscreen52
1.24
22.73


HCCscreen08
1380.46
50.14
HCCscreen53
2.7
31.31


HCCscreen09
1843.39
23.06
HCCscreen54
4.51
20.76


HCCscreen10
2.3
180.03
HCCscreen55
3.27
34.29


HCCscreen11
2.06
12.87
HCCscreen56
1.67
16.64


HCCscreen12
1.79
11.39
HCCscreen57
2.42
25.03


HCCscreen13
3338.52
>30000
HCCscreen58
3.09
28.6


HCCscreen14
1.92
72.66
HCCscreen59
4.87
19.58


HCCscreen15
1.71
81.47
HCCscreen60
3.12
17.63


HCCscreen16
1811.25
304.45
HCCscreen61
1.04
25.33


HCCscreen17
6.55
20.84
HCCscreen62
0.973
21.49


HCCscreen18
26.22
188.95
HCCscreen63
1.29
22.82


HCCscreen19
7.66
423.93
HCCscreen64
2
15.77


HCCscreen20
130.95
148.62
HCCscreen65
2.05
18.97


HCCscreen21
14.48
2464.26
HCCscreen66
2.5
22.13


HCCscreen22
199.35
342.12
HCCscreen67
1.04
37.64


HCCscreen23
117.1
26.67
HCCscreen68




HCCscreen24
21.27
27.75
HCCscreen69




HCCscreen25
49.62
13.24
HCCscreen70

20.63


HCCscreen26
28.34
39.51
HCCscreen71
1.49
26.29


HCCscreen27
31.64
15.49
HCCscreen72
1.54
15.4


HCCscreen28
37.33
21.09
HCCscreen73
2.29
19.8


HCCscreen29
33.02
27.5
HCCscreen74
4.02
14.7


HCCscreen30
108.3
39.45
HCCscreen75
1.45
29.64


HCCscreen31
32.24
33.92
HCCscreen76
2.11
26.1


HCCscreen32
119.9
21.06
HCCscreen77
4.52
15.12


HCCscreen33
1.86
10.37
HCCscreen78
3.69
18.49


HCCscreen34
4.81
9.19
HCCscreen79
2.65
32.78


HCCscreen35
1
18.34
HCCscreen80
5.47
25.68


HCCscreen36
2.7
11.44
HCCscreen81
2.21
17.95


HCCscreen37
309.58
11.02
HCCscreen82
2.33
21.52


HCCscreen38
7.78
17.99
HCCscreen83
2.41
27.08


HCCscreen39
4.33
14.69
HCCscreen84
2.77
23.78


HCCscreen40
24.7
25.07
HCCscreen85
3.6
17.76


HCCscreen41
35.87
21.34
HCCscreen86
6.55
30.78


HCCscreen42
770.97
23.32
HCCscreen87
2.76
24.36


HCCscreen43
21.85
19.83
HCCscreen88
3.12
35.14


HCCscreen44
43.84
17.12
HCCscreen89
2.86
38.26


HCCscreen45
32.66
24.85
HCCscreen90
3.46
22.29









IV. Detecting the DCP Content in the Plasma

The blood samples to be detected are 65 liver cancer patient blood samples, 70 liver cancer high-risk patient blood samples and 100 healthy person blood samples.


1 Taking a blood sample to be detected, uniformly mixing in a blood collection tube upside down for 10 times, centrifuging for 10 min at 4° C. and 2000 g, then transferring the upper-layer plasma to a centrifuge tube (the specification is 1.5 mL), centrifuging for 10 min at 4° C. and 16000 g, and collecting the supernatant (i.e. plasma).


2. After completing the step 1, taking the plasma and detecting the content of DCP by American Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR chemiluminescence immuno-analyzer.


The results of the determination of DCP content in plasma of some of the blood samples to be detected are shown in column 3, Table 8.


V. Data Processing and Obtaining 22 Characteristic Scores


1. Annotating and Scoring of Gene Mutation Results


Annotating the detection result of the liver cancer mutant gene in the cfDNA in step II: annotation score for mutation reads support frequency. Mutation reads support reflects to a large extent the percentage of differentiated cells in the tissue and is therefore an important phenotypically relevant factor.


2. Mutation Site Integration and Scoring


For each gene mutation, giving an annotation score according to the mutation reads support frequency; the mutation site scores are then accumulated into different ROI (Region Of Interest) intervals (i.e., obtaining characteristic scores). The interval includes four genes (TP53, CTNNB1, TERT and AXIN1) and a TP53 R249S hotspot mutation site region. The calculation formula is as follows:






R





O





I


=

log

2





i
=
1

n




adj_scor

e

i








Where n is the number of mutations overlapping the ROI and adj_score is the reads support frequency of the mutation.


3. The Structural Variation Result Characteristic Extraction


(1) Detecting the score of the HBV and TERT integration variation characteristic of each sample: TERT integration occurs, and the characteristic score of TERT integration variation is 1; TERT integration did not occur, and the characteristic score of TERT integration variation was 0.


(2) Detecting the characteristic score of HBV integration variation in each sample: for each integration mutation detected, it was divided into three grades A, B and C according to the reads support credibility (the number of integrated reads ≥10, grade A; 10>the number of integrated reads >6, grade B; 10>Integrated reads >6, Grade B; the rest was grade C, as shown in column 3 of Table 7), and the corresponding scores were 1, 0.8 and 0.3 respectively, and then summed up to obtain the characteristic score of HBV integration variation.


4. Feature Extraction of Gene Copy Number Variation Detection Results


The CNV detection results in step II are processed as follows: dimensionality reduction is performed on the 44 CNV signals (the sex chromosomes were deleted to rule out the effect of gender on CNV signal) score at each chromosome arm level, the first six principal components (CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 6) were selected as CNV-related characteristics by R2 value, the R2 values of CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 1, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 2, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 3, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 4, CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 5 and CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 6 are characteristic scores.


5. Extraction of Cell Free DNA Length Related Characteristic


The inventors of the present invention calculated the percentage of the length of the cfDNA fragment in four intervals (<90 bp, 90-140 bp, 141-200 bp and >200 bp), taking the characteristics as prediction variables, the percentage of the length of the cfDNA fragment in the four intervals is a characteristic score.


6. The Related Characteristic Extraction of the Protein Marker


Dividing actual measured values of AFP into five numerical levels from low to high according to threshold values (13, 20, 200, 400): 0, 5, 8, 20 and 30, dividing actual measured values of the DCP into three numerical levels from low to high according to threshold values (40 and 60): 0, 2, 5 as characteristic scores of two protein markers.


7. Extraction of Clinic and Experiment Related Characteristic


Clinical characteristics including patient age, sex, and cfDNA concentration (cfDNA content/plasma volume) were also correlated with case phenotype and were included in the model. Wherein, the cfDNA concentration values were taken as characteristic scores after log 2; the characteristic value of the age is the actual age value of the sample; The characteristic score of male is 1, and that of female is 0.


In summary, 22 characteristics are composed of 13 gene mutation characteristics, 2 protein markers, 5 cfDNA physical characteristics and the basic information composition of 2 blood sample. The 13 gene mutations characteristics are a TP53 gene mutation, a TERT gene mutation, an AXIN1 gene mutation, a CTNNB1 gene mutation, a TP53 R249S hot spot region, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 1, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 2, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 3, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 4, a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristic 5 and a CNV dimensionality reduction characteristics 6, HBV and TERT integrated variation, HBV and non-TERT integrated variation, respectively. The two protein markers were AFP and DCP, respectively. The five physical characteristics of cfDNA were as follows interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment length less than 90 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 90-140 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment 141-200 bp, interval percentage of cell free DNA fragment greater than 200 bp and the concentration of cfDNA respectively concentration. The basic information of 2 blood sample is sex and age, respectively.


VI. Predicting Liver Cancer


1. Obtaining characteristic scores of 22 characteristics of persons to be detected according to the method in the steps I to V;


2. Taking the characteristic score obtained in the step 1 as a parameter, the training set data of 135 samples including 65 HCC cases and 70 liver cancer high-risk patients were modeled by using the penalty logistic regression algorithm, and the HCCscreen score was calculated. In order to perform cluster analysis of gene, protein and CNV levels respectively, the cross-validation coefficient of each characteristic using penalty logic regression is also given. The model is started in the R package ‘glmnet’ (R version 3.5.1), and the penalty parameter a is optimized in the training data set by 10-fold cross validation, and the optimized value is 0. The ROC curve (receiver operating characteristic curve) is then plotted by the HCC Screen score and sample grouping (cancerous or non-cancerous) information. The HCCScreen score corresponding to the maximum Youden's index was taken as the threshold. In this model, 0.4 was chosen as the best cut-off value for the model.


When HCC Screen >0.4, it was interpreted as liver cancer, otherwise it was interpreted as non-liver cancer.


VII. Verifying the Validity of the Liver Cancer Prediction Model


Taking the liver cancer group (composed of 65 patients with liver cancer), the liver cancer high-risk group (composed of 70 patients with high risk of liver cancer) and the healthy group (composed of 100 healthy volunteers) as samples, the validity of the prognosis method of the prediction model of the liver cancer in step VII was verified.


The results are shown in FIG. 7. The results show that the liver cancer prediction model can predict whether the persons to be detected are liver cancer patients or not.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS

The inventors of the present invention firstly confirmed that gene mutation information of cfDNA in plasma can be used for early HCC prediction through a large number of experiments. According to the invention, a liver cancer prediction model is adopted to score a person to be detected, and whether the person to be detected is a liver cancer patient or not is predicted through a score value, so that the effective HCC early screening effect of the combination of the gene marker and the protein marker disclosed by the invention can be verified. Therefore, the detection of cfDNA for early screening, disease tracking, efficacy evaluation, prognosis prediction of liver cancer has important clinical significance.

Claims
  • 1-19. (canceled)
  • 20. A kit for early screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising gene marker detection reagents and/or protein marker detection reagents.
  • 21. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the kit is used for the early screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in AFP negative subjects, and the kit comprising gene marker detection reagents and a DCP detection reagent.
  • 22. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the kit further comprises a data processing system, the data processing system is used to convert the information of gene markers and/or protein markers into the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the test subject, and to predict the test subject according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the test subject if the test subject is a liver cancer patient.
  • 23. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the kit further comprises a data processing system, and the data processing system is used to convert the test subject's liver cancer gene mutation information, DCP content, AFP content, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, cfDNA information and clinical information into the test subject's hepatocellular carcinoma screening score, and to predict the test subject according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the test subject if the person is a liver cancer patient.
  • 24. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the kit further comprises a data processing system, and the data processing system is used to convert the information of the test subject into hepatocellular carcinoma screening scores, and predict whether the test subject is a liver cancer patient based on the hepatocellular carcinoma screening scores, and the information of the test subject comprising the test subject's mutation type, mutation reads, gene copy number variation, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, cfDNA concentration, the percentage of cfDNA content of different insert lengths in the liver cancer mutation gene in the cfDNA of the test subject, the age and gender of the test subject.
  • 25. A method for early screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, comprising: (1) detecting gene markers and protein markers of a subject by using gene marker detection reagents and protein marker detection reagents; and(2) calculating the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score by using the detection results of the gene markers and the protein markers and comparing with a threshold value.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score and the threshold value are obtained through a liver cancer prediction model; the method for constructing the prediction model of liver cancer includes:constructing a training set, wherein the training set consists of a plurality of liver cancer patients and a plurality of patients at high risk of liver cancer;taking gene markers and protein markers of a training set as characteristics, converting detection results into characteristic scores, constructing a liver cancer prediction model by using a penalty logistic regression algorithm, and calculating a hepatocellular carcinoma screening score;and obtaining a ROC curve of sensitivity and specificity of the penalty logistic regression model according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score and the sample grouping information, and determining a cut-off value according to the ROC curve, wherein the cut-off value serves as a threshold value for distinguishing liver cancer patients from patients at high risk of liver cancer.
  • 27. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the gene marker detection reagents may include one or more selected from the following, preferably three or four: TP53 detection reagent, CTNNB1 detection reagent, AXIN1 detection reagent, TERT detection reagent.
  • 28. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the protein marker detection reagents may include one or more selected from: AFP detection reagent and DCP detection reagent.
  • 29. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the gene marker detection reagents further comprises an HBV integration detection reagent.
  • 30. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the gene marker detection reagents further comprises a CNV detection reagent.
  • 31. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the gene marker detection reagents further comprises a detection reagent for whether HBV is integrated with the gene.
  • 32. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the gene marker detection reagents further comprises detection reagents for cfDNA concentration and/or cfDNA length.
  • 33. The kit according to claim 20, wherein the kit further comprises detection reagents of a liver cancer mutant genes, DCP detection reagents and AFP detection reagents.
  • 34. The kit according to claim 33, wherein the kit further comprises a detection reagent for whether HBV is integrated with a gene and/or a cfDNA detection reagent.
  • 35. The method according to claim 25, wherein the method further comprising testing subject's liver cancer gene mutation information, DCP content, AFP content, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, cfDNA information and clinical information;converting the test subject's liver cancer gene mutation information, DCP content, AFP content, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, cfDNA information and clinical information into the test subject's hepatocellular carcinoma screening score;predicting the test subject according to the hepatocellular carcinoma screening score of the test subject if the person is a liver cancer patient.
  • 36. The method according to claim 25, wherein the method of predicting liver cancer includes the following steps: detect the mutation type, mutation reads, gene copy number variation, whether HBV is integrated with the gene, cfDNA concentration and the percentage of cfDNA content of different insert lengths in the liver cancer mutation gene in the cfDNA of the test subject; record the age and gender of the test subject; convert the above information of the test subject into hepatocellular carcinoma screening scores, and predict whether the test subject is a liver cancer patient based on the hepatocellular carcinoma screening scores.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
201910179499.X Mar 2019 CN national
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a U.S. National Phase of International Application Number PCT/CN2019/106064 filed Sep. 17, 2019 and claims priority to Chinese Application Number 201910179499.X filed Mar. 11, 2019.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/CN2019/106064 9/17/2019 WO 00