Patent Grant
8657854
This invention relates generally to methods and apparatus for attaching soft tissue to bone, and more particularly to anchors and methods for securing connective tissue, such as ligaments or tendons, to bone. The invention has particular application to arthroscopic surgical techniques for reattaching the rotator cuff to the humeral head, in order to repair the rotator cuff.
It is an increasingly common problem for tendons and other soft, connective tissues to tear or to detach from associated bone. One such type of tear or detachment is a “rotator cuff” tear, wherein the supraspinatus tendon separates from the humerus, causing pain and loss of ability to elevate and externally rotate the arm. Complete separation can occur if the shoulder is subjected to gross trauma, but typically, the tear begins as a small lesion, especially in older patients.
To repair a torn rotator cuff, the typical course today is to do so surgically, through a large incision. This approach is presently taken in almost 99% of rotator cuff repair cases. There are two types of open surgical approaches for repair of the rotator cuff, one known as the “classic open” and the other as the “mini-open”. The classic open approach requires a large incision and complete detachment of the deltoid muscle from the acromion to facilitate exposure. The cuff is debrided to ensure suture attachment to viable tissue and to create a reasonable edge approximation. In addition, the humeral head is abraded or notched at the proposed soft tissue to bone reattachment point, as healing is enhanced on a raw bone surface. A series of small diameter holes, referred to as “transosseous tunnels”, are “punched” through the bone laterally from the abraded or notched surface to a point on the outside surface of the greater tuberosity, commonly a distance of 2 to 3 cm. Finally, the cuff is sutured and secured to the bone by pulling the suture ends through the transosseous tunnels and tying them together using the bone between two successive tunnels as a bridge, after which the deltoid muscle must be surgically reattached to the acromion. Because of this maneuver, the deltoid requires postoperative protection, thus retarding rehabilitation and possibly resulting in residual weakness. Complete rehabilitation takes approximately 9 to 12 months.
The mini-open technique, which represents the current growing trend and the majority of all surgical repair procedures, differs from the classic approach by gaining access through a smaller incision and splitting rather than detaching the deltoid. Additionally, this procedure is typically performed in conjunction with arthroscopic acromial decompression. Once the deltoid is split, it is retracted to expose the rotator cuff tear. As before, the cuff is debrided, the humeral head is abraded, and the so-called “transosseous tunnels”, are “punched” through the bone or suture anchors are inserted. Following the suturing of the rotator cuff to the humeral head, the split deltoid is surgically repaired.
Although the above described surgical techniques are the current standard of care for rotator cuff repair, they are associated with a great deal of patient discomfort and a lengthy recovery time, ranging from at least four months to one year or more. It is the above described manipulation of the deltoid muscle together with the large skin incision that causes the majority of patient discomfort and an increased recovery time.
Less invasive arthroscopic techniques are beginning to be developed in an effort to address the shortcomings of open surgical repair. Working through small trocar portals that minimize disruption of the deltoid muscle, a few surgeons have been able to reattach the rotator cuff using various bone anchor and suture configurations. The rotator cuff is sutured intracorporeally and an anchor is driven into bone at a location appropriate for repair. Rather than thread the suture through transosseous tunnels which are difficult or impossible to create arthroscopically using current techniques, the repair is completed by tying the cuff down against bone using the anchor and suture. Early results of less invasive techniques are encouraging, with a substantial reduction in both patient recovery time and discomfort.
Unfortunately, the skill level required to facilitate an entirely arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is inordinately high. Intracorporeal suturing is clumsy and time consuming, and only the simplest stitch patterns can be utilized. Extracorporeal knot tying is somewhat less difficult, but the tightness of the knots is difficult to judge, and the tension cannot later be adjusted. Also, because of the use of bone anchors to provide a suture fixation point in the bone, the knots that secure the soft tissues to the anchor by necessity leave the knot bundle on top of the soft tissues. In the case of rotator cuff repair, this means that the knot bundle is left in the shoulder capsule where it can be felt by the patient postoperatively when the patient exercises the shoulder joint. So, knots tied arthroscopically are difficult to achieve, impossible to adjust, and are located in less than optimal areas of the shoulder. Suture tension is also impossible to measure and adjust once the knot has been fixed. Consequently, because of the technical difficulty of the procedure, presently less than 1% of all rotator cuff procedures is of the arthroscopic type, and is considered investigational in nature.
Another significant difficulty with current arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques is shortcomings related to currently available suture anchors. Suture eyelets in bone anchors available today, which like the eye of a needle are threaded with the thread or suture, are small in radius, and can cause the suture to fail at the eyelet when the anchor is placed under high tensile loads.
There are various bone anchor designs available for use by an orthopedic surgeon for attachment of soft tissues to bone. The basic commonality between the designs is that they create an attachment point in the bone for a suture that may then be passed through the soft tissues and tied, thereby immobilizing the soft tissue. This attachment point may be accomplished by different means. Screws are known for creating such attachments, but suffer from a number of disadvantages, including their tendency to loosen over time, requiring a second procedure to later remove them, and their requirement for a relatively flat attachment geometry.
Another approach is to utilize the difference in density in the cortical bone (the tough, dense outer layer of bone) and the cancellous bone (the less dense, airy and somewhat vascular interior of the bone). There is a clear demarcation between the cortical bone and cancellous bone, where the cortical bone presents a kind of hard shell over the less dense cancellous bone. The aspect ratio of the anchor is such that it typically has a longer axis and a shorter axis and usually is pre-threaded with a suture. These designs use a hole in the cortical bone through which an anchor is inserted. The hole is drilled such that the shorter axis of the anchor will fit through the diameter of the hole, with the longer axis of the anchor being parallel to the axis of the drilled hole. After deployment in to the cancellous bone, the anchor is rotated 90° so that the long axis is aligned perpendicularly to the axis of the hole. The suture is pulled, and the anchor is seated up against the inside surface of the cortical layer of bone. Due to the mismatch in the dimensions of the long axis of the anchor and the hole diameter, the anchor cannot be retracted proximally from the hole, thus providing resistance to pull-out. These anchors still suffer from the aforementioned problem of eyelet design that stresses the sutures.
Still other prior art approaches have attempted to use a “pop rivet” approach. This type of design requires a hole in the cortical bone into which a split shaft is inserted. The split shaft is hollow, and has a tapered plug leading into its inner lumen. The tapered plug is extended out through the top of the shaft, and when the plug is retracted into the inner lumen, the tapered portion causes the split shaft to be flared outwardly, ostensibly locking the device into the bone.
Other methods of securing soft tissue to bone are known in the prior art, but are not presently considered to be feasible for shoulder repair procedures, because of physicians' reluctance to leave anything but a suture in the capsule area of the shoulder. The reason for this is that staples, tacks, and the like could possibly fall out and cause injury during movement. As a result of this constraint, the attachment point often must be located at a less than ideal position. Also, the tacks or staples require a substantial hole in the soft tissue, and make it difficult for the surgeon to precisely locate the soft tissue relative to the bone.
As previously discussed, any of the anchor points for sutures mentioned above require that a length of suture be passed through an eyelet fashioned in the anchor and then looped through the soft tissues and tied down to complete the securement. Much skill is required, however, to both place the sutures in the soft tissues, and to tie knots while working through a trocar under endoscopic visualization.
There have been attempts to solve some of the problems that exist in current anchor designs. One such approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,308 to Pierce. In this patent, there is disclosed a suture anchor that incorporates a proximal and distal wedge component having inclined mating faces. The distal wedge component has two suture thread holes at its base through which a length of suture may be threaded. The assembly may be placed in a drilled hole in the bone, and when tension is placed on the suture, the distal wedge block is caused to ride up against the proximal wedge block, expanding the projected area within the drilled hole, and locking the anchor into the bone. This approach is a useful method for creating an anchor point for the suture, but does not in any way address the problem of tying knots in the suture to fix the soft tissue to the bone.
The problem of placing sutures in soft tissues and tying knots in an endoscopic environment is well known, and there have been attempts to address the problem and to simplify the process of suture fixation. One such approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,383,905 to Golds et al. The patent describes a device for securing a suture loop about bodily tissue that includes a bead member having a longitudinal bore and an anchor member adapted to be slidably inserted within the bore of the bead member. The anchor member includes at least two axial compressible sections which define a passageway to receive two end portions of a suture loop. The axial sections collapse radially inwardly upon insertion of the anchor member within the bore of the bead member to securely wedge the suture end portions received within the passageway.
Although the Golds et al. patent approach utilizes a wedge-shaped member to lock the sutures in place, the suture legs are passing through the bore of the bead only one time, in a proximal to distal direction, and are locked by the collapsing of the wedge, which creates an interference on the longitudinal bore of the anchor member. Also, no provision is made in this design for attachment of sutures to bone. The design is primarily suited for locking a suture loop, such as is used for ligation or approximation of soft tissues.
An approach that includes bone attachment is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,584,835 to Greenfield. In this patent, a two part device for attaching soft tissue to bone is shown. A bone anchor portion is screwed into a hole in the bone, and is disposed to accept a plug that has been adapted to receive sutures. In one embodiment, the suture plug is configured so that when it is forced into its receptacle in the bone anchor portion, sutures that have been passed through an eyelet in the plug are trapped by friction between the wall of the anchor portion and the body of the plug portion.
Although there is some merit to this approach for eliminating the need for knots in the attachment of sutures to bone, a problem with being able to properly set the tension in the sutures exists. The user is required to pull on the sutures until appropriate tension is achieved, and then to set the plug portion into the bone anchor portion. This action increases the tension in the sutures, and may garrot the soft tissues or increase the tension in the sutures beyond the tensile strength of the material, breaking the sutures. In addition, the minimal surface area provided by this anchor design for pinching or locking the sutures in place will abrade or damage the suture such that the suture's ability to resist load will be greatly compromised.
A disclosure that incorporates bone attachment and eliminates knot tying is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,397 to Goble et al. One embodiment, in particular, is shown in FIG. 23 of that patent and includes a bone anchor that has a threaded body with an inner cavity. The cavity is open to one end of the threaded body, and joins two lumens that run out to the other end of the threaded body. Within the cavity is disposed a gear, journaled on an axle. A length of suture is threaded through one lumen, around the gear, and out through the other lumen. A ball is disposed within the cavity to ride against a tapered race and ostensibly lock the suture in place. What is not clear from the patent disclosure is how the force D shown as the tension in the suture would lock the ball into the race. Although this embodiment purports to be a self-locking anchor adapted for use in blind holes for fixing sutures into bone, the construct shown is complicated, and does not appear to be adequate to reliably fixate the suture.
What is needed, therefore, is a new approach for repairing the rotator cuff or fixing other soft tissues to bone, wherein suture tension can be adjusted and possibly measured, the suture anchor resides completely below the cortical bone surface, there is no requirement for the surgeon to tie a knot to attach the suture to the bone anchor, and wherein the procedure associated with the new approach is better for the patient, saves time, is uncomplicated to use, and easily taught to practitioners having skill in the art.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a knotless suture anchor apparatus for anchoring a length of suture with respect to a body cavity comprises an anchor body having an anchoring structure for fixing the anchor body within a body cavity, and a suture locking plug. The anchor body has proximal and distal ends, and a lumen opening at the proximal end. A suture return member (such as a pulley) fixed with respect to the anchor body is provided such that a length of suture may be introduced into the lumen from the proximal end, looped around it, and passed out of lumen through the proximal end. The suture locking plug is movable within the lumen from a first position to a second position. The suture locking plug and lumen cooperate such that the suture locking plug does not interfere with axial movement of the length of suture in the first position and interferes with axial movement of the length of suture in the second position, preferably by compressing the length of suture against the anchor body.
In one aspect of the present invention, at least one of the anchor body, and the plug includes a flexing section, or member, that serves to accommodate and secure sutures having different diameters. In another aspect, an intermediate deforming member, or coating is present between the anchor body and the plug to provide additional conformity and to prevent axial movement of the suture without causing damage to the suture.
In a preferred embodiment, the anchor body is generally tubular and the lumen opens at the distal end as well as at the proximal end. The distal end of the anchor body may be discontinuous at one side thereof wherein a slot extends in a proximal direction from the discontinuity to a slot end. The suture locking plug includes a proximal section that fits within the lumen and a distal stop extending radially outward into the slot that interferes with the anchor body at the end of the slot and limits proximal movement of the plug with respect thereto. An actuation rod may be removably attached to the proximal end of the suture locking plug and project out of the proximal end of the anchor body so as to be usable to displace the locking plug within the lumen. The actuation rod may include a point of tensile weakness permitting the rod to be detached from the locking plug.
The suture pulley may be formed in a sidewall of lumen. For example, where the anchor body is tubular, the suture pulley is desirably, but not necessarily, disposed at a distal end of the tubular body. In a preferred embodiment, the lumen opens at the distal end of the tubular body and a pulley comprises a rod at the open distal end transverse to the lumen axis. The rod may rotate with respect to the anchor body, or may be fixed. Instead of a rod, the pulley may comprise a bridge formed between two spaced apertures at the distal end of the tubular body.
In another aspect of the present invention, a knotless suture anchor apparatus for anchoring a length of suture with respect thereto includes an anchor body and a suture locking plug. The anchor body has proximal and distal ends and a lumen open at the proximal end. A suture pulley fixed with expect to the anchor body permits a length of suture to be introduced into the lumen from the proximal end, looped around the pulley, and passed out of lumen through the proximal end. The suture locking plug is movable within the lumen from a first position which does not interfere with axial movement of the length of suture to a second position that compresses the length of suture against the anchor body and interferes with axial movement of the length of suture.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a knotless suture anchor apparatus for anchoring a length of suture with respect to a body cavity comprises an anchor body having an anchoring structure for fixing the anchor body within a body cavity. The anchor body has proximal and distal ends, and a lumen opening at both the proximal and distal ends, the lumen having a diameter that permits a length of suture to be passed therethrough. A suture locking plug comprises a shaft axially displaceable within the lumen from a first position which does not interfere with axial movement of the length of suture to a second position that interferes with axial movement of the length of suture. A stop is provided that positively interferes with proximal movement of the suture locking plug with respect to the anchor body.
The present invention also provides a method of securing soft tissue with respect to a body cavity without knots. The method includes passing a length of suture through soft tissue so that a loop of suture material is embedded in the soft tissue resulting in two free ends. An anchor body having an open proximal end and a lumen is provided, wherein a pulley is fixed with respect to the anchor body. The two free ends of length of suture are passed into lumen of the anchor body through the open proximal end and looped around pulley. The two free ends are extended out of lumen through the open proximal end. The anchor body is fixed with respect to a body cavity, and the loop of suture material is tightened by pulling one or both of the two free ends of the length of suture. Finally, the two free ends of the length of suture are fastened with respect to the anchor body without knots.
In the described method, the soft tissue may be a tendon and the body cavity may be formed in bone. In a particular preferred operation, the tendon is the rotator cuff tendon, and the bone is the humerus. The step of fixing the anchor body with respect to the body cavity may include forming a body cavity, passing the anchor body therein, and radially extending anchoring structure on the anchor body. In a preferred embodiment, the anchoring structure is provided on a proximal end of the anchor body and interferes with the cortical layer of the bone to prevent proximal removal of the anchor body from the cavity. The method may include providing a suture locking plug movable within the lumen from a first position which does not interfere with axial movement of the two free ends of the length of suture to a second position that compresses the two free ends of the length of suture against the lumen and interferes with axial movement thereof. The proximal actuation rod that extends out of the lumen from the proximal end of the anchor body may be coupled to the suture locking plug, wherein the method includes displacing the actuation rod in the proximal direction with respect to the anchor body, and desirably severing the actuation rod from the suture locking plug after the step of fastening.
Now, it is to be understood that the above described invention is particularly suited to locking sutures that have been passed through soft tissues and are to be anchored to bone. For example, some currently preferred methods are discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/616,802, entitled Method & Apparatus for Attaching Connective Tissues to Bone Using a Suture Anchoring Device, filed on Jul. 14, 2000. The referenced application is commonly assigned with the present application, and is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Other prior art anchors, such as screws, moly bolts, and pop rivets may be adapted for use with the present invention as well.
The invention, together with additional features and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying illustrative drawing.
The present invention provides an improved knotless suture anchor apparatus for anchoring a length of suture with respect to a body cavity. In the exemplary embodiment described herein, the apparatus is used to anchor a length of suture to a bone structure, specifically the humeral bone of the human shoulder. The length of suture is desirably looped through soft tissue, such as a rotator cuff tendon, to approximate and fix the soft tissue with respect to the body cavity (e.g., bone structure). It should be understood, however, that the suture anchor apparatus may be utilized to secure a length of suture to body cavities other than in a bone structure, and may even be used to anchor the suture outside of a body cavity, merely to a predetermined location within the body. In this regard, the preferred apparatus includes an anchor body within which the length of suture may be anchored without knots. If the anchor body is to be implanted within the body cavity, structure on its exterior may also be provided for securing the anchor body therein. In a preferred embodiment, the anchor body is positioned within a pre-formed cylindrical cavity within a bone structure, and a bone anchor deployed from the exterior of the anchor body to hold it within the cavity.
As mentioned, the present invention is particularly well-suited for repairing rotator cuff injuries by re-attaching the rotator cuff tendon to the outside of the humeral head. The invention permits minimally invasive surgeries on such injuries and greatly facilitates rapid and secure fixation of the rotator cuff tendon to the humeral head. It should be understood that the same principles described herein apply to the repair of other injuries in which soft tissue is to be re-attached to a bone structure.
FIGS. 1A-1BA and 2A-2D are cross-sectional views through the left shoulder of a human as viewed from the front and illustrate the use of an exemplary suture anchor system 20 for repairing a rotator cuff tendon injury. The rotator cuff tendon 22 is shown in its natural positioned overlying the bulbous humeral head 24 of the humerus bone 26. In rotator cuff injuries, the tendon 22 partially or completely separates from its attachment point to the humeral head 24, which point of attachment is typically located along an angled shelf, the greater tuberosity 28. In minimally invasive surgeries to repair the rotator cuff injury, the surgeon threads one or more sutures through the rotator cuff tendon 22 and anchors them to the greater tuberosity 28. The suture anchor system 20 of the present invention facilitates this latter step of anchoring the sutures to the greater tuberosity 28.
With reference first to
After establishing one or more direct conduits to the humeral head 24, the surgeon passes a length of suture through the soft tissue of the rotator cuff tendon 22 so that a loop 32 of suture material is embedded therein, as seen in
The exemplary system 20 as illustrated is particularly suitable for anchoring a suture to a body cavity, specifically the humeral head 24 as shown. When anchoring sutures to such a bone structure, a conventional technique is to first form a blind hole or cavity 40 through the cortical layer 42 and into the soft cancellous matter 44, as seen in
The suture anchor 46 performs two functions: anchoring itself within the body cavity and anchoring the sutures therein. In the illustrated embodiment, the former function is accomplished, e.g., using an expandable anchoring structure 48 located on the proximal end of the suture anchor 46. The anchoring structure 48 functions like a toggle bolt used in ceiling fixtures, and specifically expands to a larger dimension in the cavity 40 beyond the hard cortical bone 42. In this manner, the suture anchor 46 is prevented from being removed from the cavity 40 once the anchoring structure 48 is deployed. The present invention illustrates a particular anchoring structure 48, although any similar expedient will work. For example, a different toggle-like anchoring structure may be used such as shown in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/616,802, filed Jul. 14, 2000, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference. Alternatively, an anchoring structure that expands into contact with the cancellous matter 44 may be used. In short, the present invention is not considered to be limited by the particular anchoring structure.
The second function of the suture anchor 46 is the anchoring or fixation of the suture with respect to the suture anchor itself, without the use of knots. Desirably, the particular manner of anchoring the suture with respect to the suture anchor 46 permits easy adjustment of the length of suture between the suture anchor and the loop 32 formed in the soft tissue. This adjustment allows the surgeon to establish the proper tension in the length of suture for effective repair of the soft tissue; reattachment of the rotator cuff tendon 22 in the illustrated embodiment. In this regard,
In this embodiment of the present invention, the suture anchor 46 is defined by a generally tubular anchor body 54 and an inner deployment tube 56 fits closely within a proximal end and is fastened therein. The exemplary suture anchor 46 is shown and described in greater detail below with respect to
The various described components of the suture anchor system 20 are relatively axially movable to deploy the suture anchor 46. Various means are known to relatively displace concentric tubes a predetermined distance and/or with a predetermined displacement force. For example, the concentric tubes may extend out of the trocar 30 to an actuation device in the form of concentric syringe bodies/finger tabs. Alternatively, the concentric tubes may be attached to relatively movable parts in a gun-type handle, and actuated by triggers or other such levers. It is to be understood therefore that the present invention is not limited by the particular actuation device on its proximal end, and no further description in this regard will be provided.
A more complete understanding of the exemplary suture anchor 46 will be helpful prior to a detailed description of the structure and function of the concentric tubes to deploy the system. In this regard,
The anchor body 54 has the anchoring structure 48 on its proximal end and a suture pulley 70 disposed in proximity to its distal end. The aforementioned suture loop 32 is schematically illustrated out of the soft tissue for clarity, and it should be understood that this suture loop 32 is embedded in the soft tissue in actual use of the system. The free ends 34a, 34b of the length of suture pass through an angled toggle ring 72 of the anchoring structure 48 and into an open proximal end 74 of the lumen 66 formed within the tubular anchor body 54. The angled toggle ring 72 attaches to the proximal end 74 via a pair of plastically deformable struts 76. Both the toggle ring 72 and struts 76 are initially formed as a projection of the tubular anchor body 54. After continuing in the distal direction through the lumen of the anchor body 54, the free ends 34a, 34b wrap around the suture pulley 70 and traverse the lumen in the proximal direction to emerge from the angled toggle ring 72 as shown.
As best seen in
Prior to a more exhaustive description of the function of the locking plug 62 to perform the second function of the suture anchor 46 (i.e., anchoring the length of suture with respect to the suture body 54), use of the concentric tubes to deploy the anchoring structure 48 will be explained. With reference again to
After positioning the delivery tube 50 in proximity with the preformed body cavity 40 as seen in
Using a depth measurement, or visualization technique, the surgeon insures that the suture anchor 46, and in particular the anchoring structure 48, has been inserted past the hard outer layer of cortical bone 42. The anchoring structure is then expanded as seen in
After the anchoring structure 48 is deployed, further pulling on the deployment tube 56 detaches it from the suture anchor 46. Specifically, the aforementioned welded tab 80 severs at a predetermined pulling force. The die tube 58 remains in place in its fixed position, and provides a reaction force against the suture anchor 46. The deployment tube 56 is then pulled free and retracted out of the way, as indicated in
Now with specific reference to
In one embodiment, the pulley 70 comprises a pin oriented transversely to the axis of the suture anchor 46 and located along a sidewall thereof. As seen best in
The step of tensioning the length of suture is seen in
Once the surgeon has established proper tension on the suture, the suture is anchored with suspect to the anchor body 54. This is done by displacing the suture locking plug 62 in a proximal direction so that it is forced into the lumen 66. The plug 62 includes a generally cylindrical shaft 102 with a bullet-shaped proximal nose 104 to help prevent its catching on the distal mouth 78 of the anchor body 54. Proximal displacement of the actuation rod 64 from outside the body causes proximal movement of the attached plug 62.
Proximal displacement of the locking plug 62 within the anchor body 54 is desirably limited by a positive stop. In the illustrated embodiment, a stop flange 110 projects outwardly from the cylindrical shaft 102 at its distal end. The stop flange 110 slides within an axial slot 112 at the distal end of the anchor body 54 that terminates at a slot end 114. Although not shown in the figures, proximal movement of the locking plug 62 is ultimately restricted by contact between the stop flange 110 and the slot end 114. Of course, other configurations that provide a positive stop to proximal movement of the locking plug 62 are contemplated. For example, rather than dimensioning the locking plug 62 to be larger than the lumen 66 of the anchor body 54 (as exhibited by the stop flange 110), a stop surface may project inwardly from the lumen 66 to interfere with movement of the plug 62.
One advantage provided by the present invention is the ability to tighten a suture loop embedded within soft tissue to a predetermined tension, and then locked to the suture within a suture anchor without even slightly altering that tension. As best seen in
In a further example, as seen in
Once the suture locking plug 62 has been positively stopped, the actuation rod 64 may be detached therefrom. As seen in the figures, the actuation rod 64 extends within a through bore in the cylindrical shaft 102 and includes a frangible point 120 in that bore. The segment of the actuation rod distal from this frangible point 120 is secured within the bore in a conventional manner, such as with crimping indicated at 122 in
As mentioned above, the exemplary structure for locking sutures relative to a body cavity may be utilized in a variety of anatomical environments. For instance,
With reference to
Similar to the embodiments described above, suture locking plug 240 is actuated or deployed to compress suture 250 against the anchor body 210. In one embodiment, the plug 240 has a smaller outer diameter than the inner diameter of the lumen of the anchor body 210. The gap between the members may range from about 0 to 0.025 inches and more preferably from about 0.011 to 0.013 inches. As such, the suture is locked due to compression.
A wide variety of deformable sections may be incorporated into the anchor body 210 to accommodate and secure the suture. For example, the deformable section may have a thin wall relative to other areas of the anchor body. The deformable section may be made of less rigid material than other areas of the anchor body. The deformable anchor may comprise slits, springs, zigzag members, ribs, and other geometries to accommodate and secure a wide variety of suture sizes and types. Also, depending on the deformation design, plastic or elastic deformation may occur. Indeed, resilient, or flexible materials and designs may be incorporated into the present invention.
Likewise, the plug member may incorporate a deformable section to accommodate the suture size range. Additionally, one or both structures may incorporate a deformable section to accommodate and secure the suture.
An exemplary material for the anchor body is stainless steel. However, a wide variety of materials may be suitable. The anchor body may be made of a number of types of metals and plastic including but not limited to stainless steel, titanium, peek, polycarbonate, polysulfone, polyester, polyethylene, bio-absorbable plastics, bio-active materials, and combinations thereof.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the plug and anchor body are made of different materials such that at least one of the components deforms under pressure of the other component. For example, the anchor wall may be made of a less rigid material than the plug or vice versa.
Additionally, the plug and anchor body may be made of a rigid material and an intermediate, deformable material, or flexible material may be associated with, or applied to either component to supply an interface which will flex or deform to accommodate sutures of different diameters. If applied to a metal anchor body, this intermediate deformable (or flexible) member may be, e.g., a polymer tube that is attached to the ID of the anchor body. If applied to a metal plug, this intermediate deformable (or flexible) member may be, e.g., a polymer sleeve or coating that is attached to the OD of the plug. This intermediate component may also have a similar hardness to that of the suture. The intermediate component serves to allow conformity and flexibility within the locking structure to accommodate different suture sizes. Also, instead of providing an intermediate conforming component, a spring mechanism may be inserted into either the rigid plug or anchor body that allows the pertinent rigid surfaces to flex and accommodate various suture diameters.
The anchoring structure 280 may be deployed or activated by an instrument as shown in
After the anchor has been actuated to affix it in a bone passage, one or both ends of the suture are tensioned to approximate the tissue to the bone. That is, the tissue is moved into a desired location. An instrument to facilitate this tissue approximation and method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,780,198.
The instrument is actuated again to move suture locking plug 240 into a second locked position, thereby compressing a suture between the anchor body and the plug. The instrument is actuated again to detach the suture plug from the instrument. In the embodiment shown in
It is also to be appreciated that the above described bone anchor incorporating a deformable section may be adjusted to provide a predetermined spring load on a suture in the suture lock thus controlling the attachment characteristics of the suture-tissue construct to the anchor. Obtaining a predetermined spring load may be accomplished by varying spring constants and preloads through the choice of materials, spring geometries, and spring configurations. Such design considerations may expand beyond the range of common spring design to include the design of deformable section in the material's plastically deforming body or envelope.
In another embodiment illustrated in
The radial protrusion of the plug in its various embodiments preferably performs one or more functions including, for example, stopping the axial movement of the plug within the lumen in the proximal direction; and compressing and locking the suture against the wall in the lumen, thereby securing the suture in the lumen without the need to tie the suture with a knot.
The radial protrusion (in cooperation with a matching feature in the wall of the lumen as illustrated in
In compressing and locking the suture against the wall in the lumen as illustrated in
In one embodiment the plug as illustrated in
In one embodiment the plug is provided with an actuation member (730) for use in inserting the plug into the lumen and for axially moving the plug in the lumen from the first position to the second position as illustrated in
In one embodiment a suture pulley member (716) fixed with respect to the lumen is provided for reversing the path of the suture in the lumen at the distal end such that the suture can exit the lumen at the proximal end. In an embodiment wherein the body member is in the form of a tubular body as illustrated in
In another embodiment as illustrated for example in
In various embodiments the components of the present suture lock can be made from a material suitable for implant in the body. Examples of such materials include plastics, a polyaryletheketone and stainless steel.
In a further embodiment the present suture anchor can be used to anchor soft tissue in a body cavity using a suture without tying a knot, in a method that includes the steps of: (i) suturing the soft tissue such that at least one free end of the suture is available; (ii) passing the free end of the suture into the lumen through the open proximal end, looping the free end around the pulley, and extending the free end out of the lumen through the open proximal end; (iii) embedding the suture-anchor with respect to a body cavity; (iv) tensioning the suture by pulling on the free end; and (v) compressing the suture against a radial protrusion on a movable suture-locking plug member within the lumen, thereby securing the suture without tying a knot on the suture.
In this procedure, the soft tissue may be a tendon and the body cavity may be formed in bone. In a particular preferred procedure, the tendon is the rotator cuff tendon, and the bone is the humerus. The step of fixing the anchor body with respect to the body cavity may include forming a body cavity, passing the anchor body therein, and radially extending anchoring structure on the anchor body. In a preferred embodiment, the anchoring structure is provided on a proximal end of the anchor body and interferes with the cortical layer of the bone to prevent proximal removal of the anchor body from the cavity. The method may include providing a suture-locking plug movable within the lumen from a first position which does not interfere with axial movement of the two free ends of the length of suture to a second position that compresses the two free ends of the length of suture against the lumen and interferes with axial movement. The proximal actuation rod that extends out of the lumen from the proximal end of the anchor body may be coupled to the suture-locking plug, wherein the method includes displacing the actuation rod in the proximal direction with respect to the anchor body, and desirably severing the actuation rod from the suture-locking plug after the step of fastening.
Accordingly, although an exemplary embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that all the terms used herein are descriptive rather than limiting, and that many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular, it is noted that the procedures, while oriented toward the arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff, are applicable to the repair of any body location wherein it is desired to attach or reattach soft tissue to bone, particularly using an arthroscopic procedure.
All patents and patent applications mentioned above, including U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/781,793; 11/143,132; and 60/799,116, are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This application is the U.S. National Stage of International patent application Ser. No. PCT/US2006/021125 filed Jun. 1, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/799,116 filed May 8, 2006. PCT/US2006/021125 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/143,132 filed Jun. 1, 2005, which is a continuation-in-part of 09/781,793 filed Feb. 12, 2001, now U.S. Patent No. 7,083,638.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2006/021125 | 6/1/2006 | WO | 00 | 5/28/2008 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2006/130693 | 12/7/2006 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 918570 | Mather | Apr 1909 | A |
| 1153053 | Forster | Sep 1915 | A |
| 1565041 | Arneu | Dec 1925 | A |
| 2269963 | Wrapler | Jan 1942 | A |
| 2485531 | Dzus et al. | Oct 1949 | A |
| 2600395 | Domoj et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
| 3143916 | Rice | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3942407 | Mortensen | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3946740 | Bassett | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3994521 | Van Gompel | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4047533 | Perciaccante et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4109658 | Hughes | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4186921 | Fox | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4210148 | Stivala | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4274324 | Giannuzzi | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4301551 | Dore et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4319428 | Fox | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4345601 | Fukuda | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4373530 | Kilejian | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4384389 | Sato | May 1983 | A |
| 4409974 | Freedland | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4456270 | Zettl et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4467478 | Jurgutis | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4483023 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4493323 | Albright et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4580936 | Francis et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4590928 | Hunt et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4597776 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4605414 | Czajka | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4621640 | Mulhollan et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4635637 | Schreiber | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4657461 | Smith | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4672957 | Hourahane | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4680835 | Horng | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4712542 | Daniel et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4721103 | Freedland | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4731084 | Dunn et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4738255 | Goble et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
| 4750492 | Jacobs | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4772286 | Goble et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4779616 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4792336 | Hlavacek et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4809408 | Abrahamson | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4823780 | Odensten et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4828439 | Giannuzzi | May 1989 | A |
| 4834755 | Silvestrini et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4851005 | Hunt et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4870957 | Goble et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4917700 | Aikins | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4926860 | Stice et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4935027 | Yoon | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4946377 | Kovach | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4946467 | Ohi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4946468 | Li | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957498 | Caspari | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4962929 | Melton, Jr. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4968315 | Gatturna | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4981149 | Yoon et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4987665 | Dumican | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5002550 | Li | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5019093 | Kaplan et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5037422 | Hayhurst | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5046513 | Gatturna | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5059201 | Asnis | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062344 | Gerker | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5147166 | Harker | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5195542 | Gazielly et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5203787 | Noblitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| RE34293 | Goble et al. | Jun 1993 | E |
| 5217495 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5219359 | McQuilkin et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224946 | Hayhurst | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5258016 | DiPoto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5259846 | Granger et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263984 | Li | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5275176 | Chandler | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5304184 | Hathaway et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306290 | Martins et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5318575 | Chesterfield et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324308 | Pierce | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5326205 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330442 | Green | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330468 | Burkhart | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330488 | Goldrath | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336240 | Metzler | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5354298 | Lee et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364407 | Poll | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5376118 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5383905 | Gold et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5405352 | Weston | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405359 | Pierce | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5411523 | Goble | May 1995 | A |
| 5413579 | Tom Du Toit | May 1995 | A |
| 5417691 | Hayhurst | May 1995 | A |
| 5417699 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417712 | Whittaker et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5431666 | Sauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5441508 | Gazielly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445167 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450860 | O'Connor | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5454823 | Richardson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464427 | Curtis et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470335 | DuToit | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472452 | Trott | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480403 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486197 | Le et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5499991 | Garman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501683 | Trott | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501695 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5505735 | Li | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514159 | Matula et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522820 | Caspari et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527322 | Klein et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527343 | Bonutti | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5531763 | Mastri et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5531792 | Huene | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534012 | Bonutti | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540703 | Barker, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545180 | Le et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549617 | Green et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549630 | Bonutti | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553360 | Lucas et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569305 | Bonutti | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569306 | Thal | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571104 | Li | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5571120 | Yoon | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573540 | Yoon | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573542 | Stevens | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573548 | Nazre et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575801 | Habermeyer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584839 | Gieringer | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584860 | Goble et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584862 | Bonutti | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591207 | Coleman | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593189 | Little | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601558 | Torrie et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609597 | Lehrer | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5611801 | Songer | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613974 | Andreas et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618290 | Toy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5626614 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
| 5630824 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
| 5632748 | Beck, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5645589 | Li | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5647874 | Hayhurst | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649940 | Hart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658313 | Thal | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5665110 | Chervitz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5665112 | Thal | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5667528 | Colligan | Sep 1997 | A |
| D385352 | Bales et al. | Oct 1997 | S |
| 5681333 | Burkhart et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681351 | Jamiolkowski | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683417 | Cooper | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5683418 | Luscombe et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5683419 | Thal | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690649 | Li | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693060 | Martin | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5697950 | Fucci et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702397 | Goble et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702398 | Tarabishy | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707362 | Yoon | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5707394 | Miller et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5720765 | Thal | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725529 | Nicholson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728136 | Thal | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733307 | Dinsdale | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5741281 | Martin | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5766250 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782863 | Bartlett | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782864 | Lizardi | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782865 | Grotz | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5791899 | Sachdeva | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792152 | Klein et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797927 | Yoon | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797963 | McDevitt | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5810848 | Hayhurst | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810854 | Beach | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814052 | Nakao et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814056 | Prosst et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814071 | McDevitt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814072 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5843111 | Vijfvinkel | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849004 | Bramlet | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5860978 | McDevitt | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5860991 | Klein et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5860992 | Daniel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868789 | Huebner | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879372 | Bartlett | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5882340 | Yoon | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5885294 | Pedlick et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891168 | Thal | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5893850 | Cachia | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902311 | Andreas et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904692 | Steckel et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5911721 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5921994 | Andreas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935107 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935129 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941900 | Bonutti | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941901 | Egan | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944724 | Lizardi | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944739 | Zlock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947982 | Duran | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948000 | Larsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948001 | Larsen | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948002 | Bonutti | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957953 | DiPoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957968 | Belden et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961530 | Moore et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5961538 | Pedlick et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968044 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980559 | Bonutti | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984933 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993459 | Larsen | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001104 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6001109 | Kontos | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007566 | Wenstrom | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007567 | Bonutti | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010525 | Bonutti et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6013083 | Bennett | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017346 | Grotz | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6022360 | Reimels et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6022373 | Li | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024758 | Thal | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033430 | Bonutti | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6036699 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045571 | Hill et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045572 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045573 | Wenstrom et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045574 | Thal | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051006 | Shluzas et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056773 | Bonutti | May 2000 | A |
| 6066146 | Carroll et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6068648 | Cole et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6083243 | Pokropinski et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086608 | Elk et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096051 | Kortenbach et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6102934 | Li | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117160 | Bonutti | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117161 | Li | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6143004 | Davis et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146386 | Blackman | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146406 | Shluzas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6149669 | Li | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156039 | Thal | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6156056 | Kearns et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159235 | Kim | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162537 | Martin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171317 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6200329 | Fung et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206895 | Levison | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217592 | Freda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221107 | Steiner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6228096 | Marchand | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241736 | Sater | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6267766 | Burkhart | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6280474 | Cassidy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293961 | Schwartz | Sep 2001 | B2 |
| 6296659 | Foerster | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315781 | Reinhardt | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319252 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319269 | Li | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319271 | Schwartz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328758 | Tornier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6355053 | Li | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6409743 | Fenton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6432123 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6436109 | Kontes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6451030 | Li et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6464713 | Bonutti | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6468293 | Bonutti et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6471715 | Weiss | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475230 | Bonutti et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6491714 | Bennett | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6517542 | Papay et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520980 | Foerster | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524317 | Ritchart et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6527794 | McDevitt et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540770 | Tornier et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6569187 | Bonutti et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6575987 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582453 | Tran et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585730 | Foerster | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6635073 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6638279 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6645227 | Fallin et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648903 | Pierson, III | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652561 | Tran | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6656183 | Colleran et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6660008 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660023 | McDevitt et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6679896 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682549 | Bartlett | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6689154 | Bartlett | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6692516 | West et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6716234 | Grafton et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6736829 | Li et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6770076 | Foerster | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6780198 | Gregoire et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6855157 | Foerster et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860887 | Frankie | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6939379 | Sklar | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6972027 | Fallin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7029490 | Grafton et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7083638 | Foerster | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7087064 | Hyde | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7090690 | Foerster et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104999 | Overaker | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7150750 | Damarati | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7150757 | Fallin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7247164 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7285124 | Foerster | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7329272 | Burkhart et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7556640 | Foerster | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7588587 | Barbieri et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7615061 | White et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7637926 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7674274 | Foerster et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7682374 | Foerster | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7695494 | Foerster | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 20030167062 | Gambale | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195563 | Foerster | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195564 | Tran et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040138706 | Abrams et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236336 | Foerster et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050033364 | Gregoire et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080455 | Schmieding et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090827 | Gedebou | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277986 | Foerster | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004364 | Green et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079904 | Thal | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161159 | Dreyfuss et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271060 | Gordon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271105 | Foerster | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293710 | Foerster | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070142838 | Jordan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015594 | Ritchart et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051836 | Foerster et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319478 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090069823 | Foerster et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222040 | Foerster et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222041 | Foerster et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3509417 | Sep 1986 | DE |
| 196 28 909 | Jan 1998 | DE |
| 0 535 906 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0 571 686 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 0 611557 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 1 072 234 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1 072 237 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 2777442 | Oct 1999 | FR |
| 2777447 | Oct 1999 | FR |
| 2286468 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 8-52154 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 8910096 | Nov 1989 | WO |
| 9106247 | May 1991 | WO |
| 9506439 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| 9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| 9617544 | Jun 1996 | WO |
| 9720522 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| 9953843 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 0221997 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 03049620 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2004082724 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US06/20657 7pgs, Mailed Oct. 2, 2007. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US06/21125 6pgs, Mailed May 22, 2008. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US01/21905 3pgs, Mailed Jan. 22, 2002. |
| PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US01/21905 3pgs, Oct. 17, 2003. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US01/17689 3pgs, Mailed Dec. 19, 2001. |
| PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US01/17689 15pgs, Feb. 9, 2003. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US02/17493 1pg, Mailed Mar. 27, 2003. |
| PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US02/17493 4pgs, Sep. 8, 2003. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US02/41018 2pgs, Mailed Jun. 5, 2003. |
| PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US02/41018 3pgs, Feb. 22, 2004. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US02/04231 1pg, Mailed Aug. 14, 2002. |
| PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US02/04231 3pgs, Nov. 13, 2002. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US03/35695 1pg, Mailed Feb. 14, 2005. |
| PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US03/35695 4pgs, Dec. 21, 2005. |
| EP Partial European Search Report for EP02742470 3pgs, Apr. 13, 2004. |
| EP Supplementary European Search Report for EP02742470 5pgs, Jul. 30, 2004. |
| UK Search Report for GB 0816111.9 3pgs, Dec. 16, 2008. |
| EP Extended Search Report for EP09162639 4pgs, Oct. 28, 2009. |
| EP Supplementary European Search Report for EP02792506 3pgs, Mar. 24, 2010. |
| European Search Report for EP 02734649 3pgs, Jan. 22, 2009. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100191283 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60799116 | May 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11143132 | Jun 2005 | US |
| Child | 11916135 | US | |
| Parent | 09781793 | Feb 2001 | US |
| Child | 11143132 | US |
