This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/380,869, filed on Sep. 8, 2010; and to U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/006,507, filed on Jan. 14, 2011; which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/296,555 filed on Jan. 20, 2010, to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/351,347 filed on Jun. 4, 2010 and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/355,279 filed on Jun. 16, 2010. The present application also claims priority to U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/006,468, filed on Jan. 14, 2011; which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/296,555 filed on Jan. 20, 2010, to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/351,347 filed on Jun. 4, 2010 and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/355,279 filed on Jun. 16, 2010. The present application also claims priority to U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/006,524, filed on Jan. 14, 2011; which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/296,555, filed on Jan. 20, 2012; the entire contents of each which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to coordinate measurement devices, for example, laser scanners, laser trackers, and total stations, and more particularly to laser scanners and laser trackers having one or more relatively small projectors integrated therewith or added thereto by, e.g., mounting thereon, for projecting visual information in the form of images and/or data (e.g., CAD data or scanned point cloud data) onto various surfaces. The projected visual information may, for example, be of a type such as to provide guidance to an operator, such as written instructions, highlighted points to be measured, indicated areas where data are to be taken, and real time feedback on the quality of the data.
A laser scanner is one type of coordinate measurement device typically used for non-contact optical scanning of many different types of relatively large closed or open spaces or objects, for example, interior spaces of buildings, industrial installations and tunnels, or exterior shapes of planes, automobiles or boats. Laser scanners can be used for many different purposes, including industrial applications and accident reconstruction. A laser scanner optically scans and measures the environment around the laser scanner by emitting a rotating laser beam and detecting the laser beam as it is reflected back from the various objects in its path. Laser scanners typically collect a variety of data points with respect to the environment, including distance information for each object in its surrounding environment, a grey scale value (i.e., a measure of the intensity of light) for each distance measurement value, and coordinates (e.g., x, y, and z) for each distance measurement value. This scan data is collected, stored and sent to a processor that is typically remote from the laser scanner, where the data is processed to generate a three dimensional (3D) scanned image of the scanned environment with measurements. In order to generate the 3D scanned image, at least four values (x, y, z coordinates and grey scale value) are collected for each scanned data point.
Many contemporary laser scanners also include a camera mounted on the laser scanner for gathering digital images of the environment and for presenting the digital images to an operator of the laser scanner. The images can be oriented together with the scanned data to provide a more realistic image of the object being scanned. By viewing the images, the operator of the scanner can determine the field of view of the scanned data, and can adjust the settings on the laser scanner if the field of view needs adjusting. In addition, the digital images may be transmitted to the processor to add color to the 3D scanned image. In order to generate a 3D color scanned image, at least six values (x, y, z coordinates; and red value, green value, blue value or “RGB”) are collected for each data point. Examples of laser scanners are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,193,690 to Ossig et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 7,430,068 to Becker et al.; and U.S. Published Patent Application No. US2010/0134596 to Becker; each being incorporated by reference herein.
Another type of coordinate measurement device is a laser tracker, which measures the 3D coordinates of a certain point by sending a laser beam to the point, where the laser beam is typically intercepted by a retroreflector target. The laser tracker finds the coordinates of the point by measuring the distance and the two angles to the target. The distance is measured with a distance-measuring device such as an absolute distance meter (ADM) or an interferometer. The angles are measured with an angle-measuring device such as an angular encoder. A gimbaled beam-steering mechanism within the instrument directs the laser beam to the point of interest. The retroreflector may be moved manually by hand, or automatically, over the surface of the object. The laser tracker follows the movement of the retroreflector to measure the coordinates of the object. Exemplary laser trackers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,790,651 to Brown et al., incorporated by reference herein; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,714,339 to Lau et al. The total station, which is most often used in surveying applications, may be used to measure the coordinates of diffusely scattering or retroreflective targets. The total station is closely related to both the laser tracker and the scanner.
A common type of retroreflector target is the spherically mounted retroreflector (SMR), which comprises a cube-corner retroreflector embedded within a metal sphere. The cube-corner retroreflector comprises three mutually perpendicular mirrors. The apex of the cube corner, which is the common point of intersection of the three mirrors, is located at the center of the sphere. It is common practice to place the spherical surface of the SMR in contact with an object under test and then move the SMR over the surface of the object being measured. Because of this placement of the cube corner within the sphere, the perpendicular distance from the apex of the cube corner to the surface of the object under test remains constant despite rotation of the SMR. Consequently, the 3D coordinates of the object's surface can be found by having a tracker follow the 3D coordinates of an SMR moved over the surface. It is possible to place a glass window on the top of the SMR to prevent dust or dirt from contaminating the glass surfaces. An example of such a glass surface is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,388,654 to Raab et al., incorporated by reference herein.
A gimbal mechanism within the laser tracker may be used to direct a laser beam from the tracker to the SMR. Part of the light retroreflected by the SMR enters the laser tracker and passes onto a position detector. The position of the light that hits the position detector is used by a tracker control system to adjust the rotation angles of the mechanical azimuth and zenith axes of the laser tracker to keep the laser beam centered on the SMR. In this way, the tracker is able to follow (track) the SMR as it is moved.
Angular encoders attached to the mechanical azimuth and zenith axes of the tracker may measure the azimuth and zenith angles of the laser beam (with respect to the tracker frame of reference). The one distance measurement and two angle measurements performed by the laser tracker are sufficient to completely specify the three-dimensional location of the SMR.
As mentioned, two types of distance meters may be found in laser trackers: interferometers and absolute distance meters (ADMs). In the laser tracker, an interferometer (if present) may determine the distance from a starting point to a finishing point by counting the number of increments of known length (usually the half-wavelength of the laser light) that pass as a retroreflector target is moved between the two points. If the beam is broken during the measurement, the number of counts cannot be accurately known, causing the distance information to be lost. By comparison, the ADM in a laser tracker determines the absolute distance to a retroreflector target without regard to beam breaks, which also allows switching between targets. Because of this, the ADM is said to be capable of “point-and-shoot” measurement. Initially, absolute distance meters were only able to measure stationary targets and for this reason were always used together with an interferometer. However, some modern absolute distance meters can make rapid measurements, thereby eliminating the need for an interferometer. Such an ADM is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,446 to Bridges et al., incorporated by reference herein. The distances measured by interferometers and absolute distance meters are dependent on the speed of light through air. Since the speed of light varies with air temperature, barometric pressure, and air humidity, it is common practice to measure these quantities with sensors and to correct the speed of light in air to obtain more accurate distance readings. The distances measured by total stations and scanners also depend on the speed of light in air.
In its tracking mode, the laser tracker automatically follows movements of the SMR when the SMR is in the capture range of the tracker. If the laser beam is broken, tracking will stop. The beam may be broken by any of several means: (1) an obstruction between the instrument and SMR; (2) rapid movements of the SMR that are too fast for the instrument to follow; or (3) the direction of the SMR being turned beyond the acceptance angle of the SMR. By default, following the beam break, the beam may remain fixed at the point of the beam break, at the last commanded position, or may go to a reference (“home”) position. It may be necessary for an operator to visually search for the tracking beam and place the SMR in the beam in order to lock the instrument onto the SMR and continue tracking.
Some laser trackers include one or more cameras. A camera axis may be coaxial with the measurement beam or offset from the measurement beam by a fixed distance or angle. A camera may be used to provide a wide field of view to locate retroreflectors. A modulated light source placed near the camera optical axis may illuminate retroreflectors, thereby making them easier to identify. In this case, the retroreflectors flash in phase with the illumination, whereas background objects do not. One application for such a camera is to detect multiple retroreflectors in the field of view and measure each retroreflector in an automated sequence. Exemplary systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,166,809 to Pettersen et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,800,758 to Bridges et al., incorporated by reference herein.
Some laser trackers have the ability to measure with six degrees of freedom (DOF), which may include three coordinates, such as x, y, and z, and three rotations, such as pitch, roll, and yaw. Several systems based on laser trackers are available or have been proposed for measuring six degrees of freedom. Exemplary systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,800,758 to Bridges et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,788 to Pettersen et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,230,689 to Lau.
It is desirable to provide a laser scanner or a laser tracker with one or more projectors, with each projector projecting visual information in the form of images and/or data (e.g., CAD data or scanned point cloud data) onto various surfaces. The projected visual information may, for example, be of a type such as to provide guidance to an operator, such as written instructions, highlighted points to be measured, indicated areas where data are to be taken, and real time feedback on the quality of the data.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a laser scanner includes a light source that emits a light beam within an environment, and a data capture component that captures the light beam reflected back to the laser scanner from the environment. The laser scanner also includes a projector integrated within a body of the laser scanner or mounted to the body of the laser scanner at a predetermined location, the projector being operable to project visible information onto an object located within the environment, the projected visible information being indicative of images, data or information, the projected visible information being at least one of design intent information, information acquired by the laser scanner, or guidance to an operator.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a laser tracker includes a light source that emits a light beam towards a target located within an environment, and a data capture component that captures the light beam reflected back to the laser scanner from the target located within the environment. The laser tracker also includes a projector integrated within a body of the laser tracker or mounted to the body of the laser tracker at a predetermined location, the projector being operable to project visible information onto an object located within the environment, the projected visible information being indicative of images, data or information, the projected visible information being at least one of design intent information, information acquired by the laser tracker, or guidance to an operator.
Referring now to the drawings, exemplary embodiments are shown which should not be construed to be limiting regarding the entire scope of the disclosure, and wherein the elements are numbered alike in several FIGURES:
Referring to
Various embodiments of the present invention include the integration or addition of such a relatively small image or data projector into equipment generally used for 3D measurement or metrology, including but not limited to, a laser scanner, laser tracker, white light scanner or similar type technological device or instrument. In embodiments of the present invention, the projector may be integrated within the laser scanner 12 or laser tracker, and the projected images, data or other information are controlled using data or information from the measurement equipment 12 itself, data or information previously captured by the measurement equipment 12, or data or information from some other source. As described in detail hereinafter, the projected images or data provide visualization of various types of information that is useful during a measurement session, or the projected images or data can assist in visualization of data previously taken by the equipment 12. The projected visual information may, for example, be of a type such as to provide guidance to an operator, such as written instructions, highlighted points to be measured, indicated areas where data are to be taken, and real time feedback on the quality of the data. This visual information provided to the operator may, for example, be in the form of visual cues, text or some other visual form of information.
Further, the projector may comprise one or more commercially available galvanometers or polygon scanners rather than one of the types of projectors mentioned herein above, for example, a miniature, ultraminiature, or pico-projector which might be based, for example, on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology, liquid crystal display (LCD) or liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) technology. For example, typically two galvanometers or two polygon scanners are used with associated mirrors to project the desired image, data, or information, in a desired pattern in two dimensions onto the surface of interest. In the case of a laser scanner 12, the galvanometer mirrors project the images or other information onto the rotating mirror where they are reflected off of towards the object of interest. The rotation of the main mirror in the laser scanner 12 and the rotation of the galvanometer mirror also in the laser scanner 12 creating the image or other projected information would be synchronized. As such, the laser scanner creates the images in the same way that images are generated for laser light shows. In the case of a laser tracker (discussed in more detail hereinafter), the galvanometer mirrors would project the images or other information directly onto the target of interest. The size of the pattern projected by a projector disposed on the tracker may be expanded by moving the tracker head to cover a relatively large area while, at the same time, dynamically changing the pattern from the projector to produce the desired image over a relatively large region of space. This way, the head of the laser tracker acts like a galvanometer mirror. When used, the galvanometers or polygon scanners may provide a relatively more powerful, brighter and more efficient laser beam for image or data projection purposes as compared to the light from a pico projector.
In many cases, it is advantageous to provide a focusing mechanism to make the projected image as sharp as possible on the surface of the object to which the two-dimensional pattern is projected. The focusing mechanism will generally include a mechanical actuator for moving one or more lenses.
With MEMS, LCD, LCOS, and other types of pico-projectors, it is common today to provide color projection patterns. Color may be used advantageously in providing information about an object.
Laser scanners and laser trackers frequently employ optics, sensors, mirrors, and/or laser sources mounted to motors and/or gimbals such that the scanner or tracker instrument or device 12 can automatically scan a large area or object or track a movable target (e.g., a retroreflector) within the working volume of the device 12 without the need to manually aim or move the sensor modules of the device 12.
Referring to
Thus, in some embodiments, the computer or processor associated with the laser scanner 12 may be required to perform some mathematical calculations to correctly locate the image or data from the projector 14 onto the rotating scanning mirror 16. These calculations should be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. That is, the projected image or data is compensated for to account for the rotation of the mirror 16 so that the image or data is not distorted or smeared. For example, the image projected by the projector 14 onto the mirror 16 may be changed dynamically to provide an image that is stationary on a projection surface (e.g., a wall). The mirror 16 typically is made to rotate, in part, for laser safety reasons. In alternative embodiments, the laser that provides the laser beam to the rotating scanning mirror 16 for metrology purposes may be turned off, the mirror 16 may be held in a stationary position, and then the projector 14 may provide the relatively weaker light that comprises the image or data to the mirror 16. In these embodiments, no mathematical corrections for the now stationary mirror 16 are typically needed. In some cases, the size of the image projected onto the reflective surface of the mirror 16 is adjusted according to the distance from the scanner to the projection surface. This would be the case, for example, if the projector were to emit a diverging pattern of light and if the image on the projection surface were intended to have a fixed size. In this case, the distance measuring capability of the scanner may provide the information needed to enable the projector 14 to correctly size the projected image.
The image, data or other information projected from the projector 14 onto the surface of interest may have its timing controlled such that the image, data or other information may be mechanically or electronically strobed to coincide with certain angles of the rotating scanning mirror 16. Also, the laser beam used by the scanner 12 for metrology purposes may be provided in a mutually exclusive manner (e.g., multiplexed) with respect to the image, data or other information provided from the projector 14. That is, the laser beam and the projected light pattern or data may not be “on” (i.e., projected) at the same time, as that condition may not be necessary. Alternatively, the laser beam and the projected light pattern may be on at the same time. Typically, the projecting mode of the laser scanner 12, according to embodiments of the present invention, is not tied to or dependent upon the scanning mode of the scanner 12.
Referring to
The position and orientation of a 3D metrology device such as a 3D laser scanner 12 or laser tracker relative to an object, part or structure to be measured may be established by identification of reference points or part or object features using known techniques. Once the coordinate system has been established, both the 3D metrology device (e.g., the laser scanner) 12 and the projector 14 can be synchronized and controlled with a relatively high degree of precision by an external computer connected to the device 12 as part of the device 12, or an on-board computer as part of the device 12 that can process the device position and control the orientation of the device optics. This allows the projected image to be shaped, scaled and controlled to match the surface onto which it projected, and it allows the image to update as the direction of the projector 14 changes such that it is always synchronized and locked to the environment.
Various implementations or usages of a projector 14 integrated within, or mounted to, a computer controlled 3D measurement device such as a laser scanner 12 according to embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, projecting data, text, instructions, images or guidance in the form of, for example, visual cues or text or other forms of information on the surface of a part to be measured. They may also include providing a projected overlay of previously scanned/measured data or CAD data showing design intent for visualization of changes to a part or parameters. For 3D scanned data this may include: (1) comparison of a car body before and after an accident or before and after repair; (2) comparison of the CAD design of a planned equipment installation compared to the actual completed installation; (3) visualization of a proposed change to a part, equipment set-up, assembly line, wall, or building; (4) visualization of a part design compared to a drawing as a method of inspection; (5) visualization of hidden features (
To further extend the usefulness of the controlled projected image, multiple projectors 14 may be incorporated into a single device such as a laser scanner 12. This allows for a potential increase in the range of image coverage, ultimately to 360 degrees around the scanning device, with the possible exception of relatively small areas blocked by the laser scanner itself (e.g., at the location where the scanner head 10 attaches to the tripod).
In other embodiments of the present invention, synchronized images may be generated by multiple projectors 14 mounted independently of the laser scanner 12 or laser tracker, for example, on gimbaled computer controlled mounts or in fixed positions measured and known to the laser scanner 12 or tracker. In these embodiments, each projector 14 may be controlled by the laser scanner 12 or tracker, or by a computer attached to the laser scanner 12 or tracker and used to establish the coordinate system of the area. These embodiments may provide for relatively broader simultaneous coverage by the projected images while also supporting image projection in areas that might otherwise be blocked by equipment or features, including by the laser scanner 12 itself. Images projected by this array of projectors 14 can then be managed and controlled by the central computer or laser scanner 12 or other metrology device such that the projected images or data or other information is scaled, sized and properly aligned to the objects in the environment. For example, the projector 14 projects images, data or other information that is related to the direction and/or orientation that the laser scanner 14 is currently pointed to. As an example, the movement of a person or other object may be tracked by the laser scanner 14 and then images or data may be projected by the laser scanner 12 with the projector 14 according to the position and/or orientation of that person or object.
Embodiments of the present invention may be applied to any computer controlled aiming system that can establish a baseline coordinate system on a part or in an environment such that projected images can be aligned with the surface onto which they are projected. Other embodiments of the present invention may be utilized for entertainment purposes and may comprise, for example, projecting a movie on the surrounding walls of a room. For example, if a moving object (e.g., a person) can be tracked within a stationary environment, then the projected images within the environment can be automatically adjusted as a function of, for example, the person's movement, actions, or head orientation. This involves console gaming and virtual reality technologies. However, the 3D space reconstruction is different than the 2D gaming technologies. As an example, a system may have a laser scanner or tracker detect and follow a person walking around building, all the while projecting information on the wall that a person looks at. The projector cannot cover 360 degrees of space, but it can selectively project where someone is looking at, which gives the perception of projection over 3D space.
Referring to
The projection of hidden features according to embodiments of the present invention may come about, for example, by first scanning a building such as a home using a laser scanner 12 during various construction phases (e.g., framing, wiring, plumbing, HVAC, etc.) to obtain scanned point cloud data of various structural details of the building. After completion of certain phases of the scanning to collect images and data, the laser scanner 12 with the projector 14 may then be used to project various “real” images and/or data obtained from the scanning process onto the walls, ceiling, floors, etc. Alternatively, CAD design “intent” data of the various surfaces of the building may be projected onto the surfaces. Regardless of whether real or intended images and/or data are projected, the projection of the hidden features onto these surfaces may assist someone in carrying out tasks, such as, for example, drilling a hole in a precise location of a stud behind a wall. These embodiments of the present invention allow a user of the laser scanner 12 with the projector 14 to identify the precise location of these objects or features such that no harm is caused to other objects or that no time is wasted trying to locate these hidden objects or features.
Similar to the embodiments illustrated in
Besides displaying hidden components, for example, in a construction area or in an engineering device, the projector may display regions as they would appear following attachment. For example, before the wall surface 26 was in place in
Referring now to
The laser beam 46 may comprise one or more laser wavelengths. For the sake of clarity and simplicity, a steering mechanism of the type shown in
In the laser tracker 30, one or more cameras 50 and light sources 52 are located on the payload 40. The light sources 52 illuminate the one or more retroreflector targets 48. The light sources 52 may be LEDs electrically driven to repetitively emit pulsed light. Each camera 50 may comprise a photosensitive array and a lens placed in front of the photosensitive array. The photosensitive array may be a CMOS or CCD array. The lens may have a relatively wide field of view, for example, thirty or forty degrees. The purpose of the lens is to form an image on the photosensitive array of objects within the field of view of the lens. Each light source 52 is placed near a camera 50 so that light from the light source 52 is reflected off each retroreflector target 48 onto the camera 50. In this way, retroreflector images are readily distinguished from the background on the photosensitive array as their image spots are brighter than background objects and are pulsed. In an embodiment, there are two cameras 50 and two light sources 52 placed symmetrically about the line of the laser beam 46. By using two cameras 50 in this way, the principle of triangulation can be used to find the three-dimensional coordinates of any SMR 48 within the field of view of the camera 50. In addition, the three-dimensional coordinates of the SMR 48 can be monitored as the SMR 48 is moved from point to point. A use of two cameras for this purpose is described in U.S. Published Patent Application No. US20100128259 to Bridges.
Other arrangements of one or more cameras 50 and light sources 52 are possible. For example, a light source 52 and a camera 50 can be coaxial or nearly coaxial with the laser beams 46 emitted by the tracker 30. In this case, it may be necessary to use optical filtering or similar methods to avoid saturating the photosensitive array of the camera 50 with the laser beam 46 from the tracker 30.
Another possible arrangement is to use a single camera 50 located on the payload or base 40 of the tracker 30. A single camera 50, if located off the optical axis of the laser tracker 30, provides information about the two angles that define the direction to the retroreflector 48 but not the distance to the retroreflector 48. In many cases, this information may be sufficient. If the 3D coordinates of the retroreflector 48 are needed when using a single camera 50, one possibility is to rotate the tracker 30 in the azimuth direction by 180 degrees and then to flip the zenith axis 42 to point back at the retroreflector 48. In this way, the target 48 can be viewed from two different directions and the 3D position of the retroreflector 48 can be found using triangulation.
Another possibility is to switch between measuring and imaging of the target 48. An example of such a method is described in international application WO 03/062744 to Bridges et al. Other camera arrangements are possible and can be used with the methods described herein.
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In the embodiments illustrated in
In another embodiment, the projector is offset from the optical axis that carries the laser beams 82 and 86. By moving the projector from the optical axis, the optical system that carries the light beam 82 may be made more compact and the distance from the projector to the region outside the tracker made smaller, thereby enabling creation of two-dimensional patterns having larger divergence angles. In this embodiment, it is not necessary to provide an independent axis for zenith (horizontal axis) rotation.
In the various embodiments of the present invention described hereinabove with respect to the laser tracker 30 of
While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1535312 | Hosking | Apr 1925 | A |
1918813 | Kinzy | Jul 1933 | A |
2316573 | Egy | Apr 1940 | A |
2333243 | Glab | Nov 1943 | A |
2702683 | Green et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
2748926 | Leahy | Jun 1956 | A |
2983367 | Paramater et al. | Jun 1958 | A |
2924495 | Haines | Sep 1958 | A |
2966257 | Littlejohn | Nov 1959 | A |
3066790 | Armbruster | Dec 1962 | A |
3458167 | Cooley, Jr. | Jul 1969 | A |
4138045 | Baker | Feb 1979 | A |
4340008 | Mendelson | Jul 1982 | A |
4379461 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4424899 | Rosenberg | Jan 1984 | A |
4430796 | Nakagawa | Feb 1984 | A |
4457625 | Greenleaf et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4506448 | Topping et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4537233 | Vroonland et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4606696 | Slocum | Aug 1986 | A |
4659280 | Akeel | Apr 1987 | A |
4663852 | Guarini | May 1987 | A |
4664588 | Newell et al. | May 1987 | A |
4676002 | Slocum | Jun 1987 | A |
4714339 | Lau et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4751950 | Bock | Jun 1988 | A |
4790651 | Brown et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4816822 | Vache et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4882806 | Davis | Nov 1989 | A |
4954952 | Ubhayakar et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4982841 | Goedecke | Jan 1991 | A |
4996909 | Vache et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5025966 | Potter | Jun 1991 | A |
5027951 | Johnson | Jul 1991 | A |
5189797 | Granger | Mar 1993 | A |
5205111 | Johnson | Apr 1993 | A |
5211476 | Coudroy | May 1993 | A |
5213240 | Dietz et al. | May 1993 | A |
5219423 | Kamaya | Jun 1993 | A |
5239855 | Schleifer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5289264 | Steinbichler | Feb 1994 | A |
5319445 | Fitts | Jun 1994 | A |
5332315 | Baker et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5372250 | Johnson | Dec 1994 | A |
5373346 | Hocker | Dec 1994 | A |
5402582 | Raab | Apr 1995 | A |
5412880 | Raab | May 1995 | A |
5430384 | Hocker | Jul 1995 | A |
5455670 | Payne et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5455993 | Link et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5510977 | Raab | Apr 1996 | A |
5528505 | Granger et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535524 | Carrier et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5611147 | Raab | Mar 1997 | A |
5623416 | Hocker, III | Apr 1997 | A |
5682508 | Hocker, III | Oct 1997 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5752112 | Paddock et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754449 | Hoshal et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768792 | Raab | Jun 1998 | A |
5829148 | Eaton | Nov 1998 | A |
5832416 | Anderson | Nov 1998 | A |
5887122 | Terawaki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5926782 | Raab | Jul 1999 | A |
5956857 | Raab | Sep 1999 | A |
5973788 | Pettersen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978748 | Raab | Nov 1999 | A |
5983936 | Schwieterman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996790 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5997779 | Potter | Dec 1999 | A |
D423534 | Raab et al. | Apr 2000 | S |
6050615 | Weinhold | Apr 2000 | A |
6060889 | Hocker | May 2000 | A |
6067116 | Yamano et al. | May 2000 | A |
6125337 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131299 | Raab et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151789 | Raab et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163294 | Talbot | Dec 2000 | A |
6166504 | Iida et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166809 | Pettersen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166811 | Long et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6219928 | Raab et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D441632 | Raab et al. | May 2001 | S |
6240651 | Schroeder et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253458 | Raab et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282195 | Miller et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298569 | Raab et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339410 | Milner et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366831 | Raab | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408252 | De Smet | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418774 | Brogårdh et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438856 | Kaczynski | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442419 | Chu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470584 | Stoodley | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477784 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6519860 | Bieg et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
D472824 | Raab et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6547397 | Kaufman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6598306 | Eaton | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611346 | Granger | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611617 | Crampton | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612044 | Raab et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621065 | Fukumoto et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626339 | Gates et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633051 | Holloway et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6668466 | Bieg et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
D491210 | Raab et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6764185 | Beardsley et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6789327 | Roth et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6820346 | Raab et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822749 | Christoph | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826664 | Hocker, III et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6868359 | Raab | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879933 | Steffey et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892465 | Raab et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895347 | Dorny et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901673 | Cobb et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6904691 | Raab et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920697 | Raab et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925722 | Raab et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931745 | Granger | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935748 | Kaufman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6948255 | Russell | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6965843 | Raab et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7003892 | Eaton et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006084 | Buss et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7024032 | Kidd et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032321 | Raab et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040136 | Forss et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051447 | Kikuchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7106421 | Matsuura et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117107 | Dorny et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120092 | del Prado Pavon et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152456 | Eaton | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174651 | Raab et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184047 | Crampton | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191541 | Weekers et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7193690 | Ossig et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196509 | Teng | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199872 | Van Cranenbroeck | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230689 | Lau | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242590 | Yeap et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249421 | MacManus et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269910 | Raab et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285793 | Husted | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296979 | Raab et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306339 | Kaufman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312862 | Zumbrunn et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313264 | Crampton | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319512 | Ohtomo et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337344 | Barman et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348822 | Baer | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352446 | Bridges et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360648 | Blaschke | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7372558 | Kaufman et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7372581 | Raab et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383638 | Granger | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388654 | Raab et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389870 | Slappay | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395606 | Crampton | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430068 | Becker et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447931 | Rischar et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7449876 | Pleasant et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454265 | Marsh | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463368 | Morden et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7508971 | Vaccaro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7525276 | Eaton | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7545517 | Rueb et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546689 | Ferrari et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552644 | Haase et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561598 | Stratton et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564250 | Hocker | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578069 | Eaton | Aug 2009 | B2 |
D599226 | Gerent et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
7589595 | Cutler | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591077 | Pettersson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591078 | Crampton | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602873 | Eidson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7604207 | Hasloecher et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610175 | Eidson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614157 | Granger | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624510 | Ferrari | Dec 2009 | B2 |
D607350 | Cooduvalli et al. | Jan 2010 | S |
7656751 | Rischar et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693325 | Pulla et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7701592 | Saint Clair et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712224 | Hicks | May 2010 | B2 |
7721396 | Fleischman | May 2010 | B2 |
7735234 | Briggs et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743524 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752003 | MacManus | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765707 | Tomelleri | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769559 | Reichert | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774949 | Ferrari | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779548 | Ferrari | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779553 | Jordil et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800758 | Bridges et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7804602 | Raab | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805851 | Pettersson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7805854 | Eaton | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809518 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
RE42055 | Raab et al. | Jan 2011 | E |
RE42082 | Raab et al. | Feb 2011 | E |
7881896 | Atwell et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7903261 | Saint Clair et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908757 | Ferrari | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8052857 | Townsend | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065861 | Caputo | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082673 | Desforges et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8099877 | Champ | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8123350 | Cannell et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010004269 | Shibata et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020032541 | Raab et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087233 | Raab | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128790 | Woodmansee | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020170192 | Steffey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033104 | Gooche | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053037 | Blaesing-Bangert et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030125901 | Steffey et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142631 | Silvester | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167647 | Raab et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172536 | Raab et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172537 | Raab et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208919 | Raab et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030221326 | Raab et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022416 | Lemelson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040166 | Raab et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040103547 | Raab et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111908 | Raab et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040139265 | Hocker, III et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162700 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040259533 | Nixon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016008 | Raab et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028393 | Raab et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085940 | Griggs et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050115092 | Raab et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144799 | Raab et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151963 | Pulla et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166413 | Crampton | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188557 | Raab et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050259271 | Christoph | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276466 | Vaccaro et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283989 | Pettersson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060016086 | Raab et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017720 | Li | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026851 | Raab et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028203 | Kawashima et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053647 | Raab et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056459 | Stratton et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056559 | Pleasant et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059270 | Pleasant et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060096108 | Raab et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123649 | Muller | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129349 | Raab et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060169050 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060169608 | Carnevali | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060282574 | Zotov et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287769 | Yanagita et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291970 | Granger | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030841 | Lee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043526 | De Jonge et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050774 | Eldson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055806 | Stratton et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058162 | Granger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097382 | Granger | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105238 | Mandl et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142970 | Burbank et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147265 | Eidson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147435 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147562 | Eidson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153297 | Lau | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070163134 | Eaton | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176648 | Baer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070177016 | Wu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183459 | Eidson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185682 | Eidson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217169 | Yeap et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217170 | Yeap et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070221522 | Yamada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223477 | Eidson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070248122 | Hamilton | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256311 | Ferrari | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257660 | Pleasant et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258378 | Hamilton | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282564 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294045 | Atwell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080046221 | Stathis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052936 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066583 | Lott | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068103 | Cutler | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080562 | Burch et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098272 | Fairbanks et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080148585 | Raab et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154538 | Stathis | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179206 | Feinstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183065 | Goldbach | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196260 | Pettersson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204699 | Benz et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216552 | Ibach et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228331 | McNerney et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232269 | Tatman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235969 | Jordil et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080235970 | Crampton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240321 | Narus et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080245452 | Law et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246943 | Kaufman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252671 | Cannell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256814 | Pettersson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257023 | Jordil et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263411 | Baney et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271332 | Jordil et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282564 | Pettersson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295349 | Uhl et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080298254 | Eidson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309460 | Jefferson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000136 | Crampton | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016475 | Rischar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031575 | Tomelleri | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046140 | Lashmet et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046895 | Pettersson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049704 | Styles et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083985 | Ferrari | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089004 | Vook et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089078 | Bursey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089233 | Gach et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089623 | Neering et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109797 | Eidson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113183 | Barford et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113229 | Cataldo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122805 | Epps et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125196 | Velazquez et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139105 | Granger | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157419 | Bursey | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165317 | Little | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177435 | Heininen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177438 | Raab | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187373 | Atwell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241360 | Tait et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249634 | Pettersson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265946 | Jordil et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100040742 | Dijkhuis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057392 | York | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078866 | Pettersson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095542 | Ferrari | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122920 | Butter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123892 | Miller et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128259 | Bridges et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134596 | Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148013 | Bhotika et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100208062 | Pettersson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100277747 | Rueb et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281705 | Verdi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286941 | Merlot | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312524 | Siercks et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318319 | Maierhofer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325907 | Tait | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007305 | Bridges et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110007326 | Daxauer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013199 | Siercks et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019155 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110023578 | Grasser | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043515 | Stathis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110094908 | Trieu | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107611 | Desforges et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107612 | Ferrari et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107613 | Tait | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107614 | Champ | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111849 | Sprague et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112786 | Desforges et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110164114 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173827 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173828 | York | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178755 | York | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178762 | York | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178764 | York | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178765 | Atwell et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192043 | Ferrari | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110273568 | Lagassey | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120181194 | McEwan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120210678 | Alcouloumre et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120260611 | Jones | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130025143 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025144 | Briggs et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130062243 | Chang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2508896 | Sep 2002 | CN |
2665668 | Dec 2004 | CN |
3245060 | Jul 1983 | DE |
4410775 | Oct 1995 | DE |
29622033 | Feb 1997 | DE |
19543763 | May 1997 | DE |
19820307 | Nov 1999 | DE |
10026357 | Jan 2002 | DE |
202005000983 | Apr 2005 | DE |
102004015668 | Sep 2005 | DE |
19720049 | Jan 2006 | DE |
10114126 | Aug 2006 | DE |
102004010083 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102005060967 | Jun 2007 | DE |
102006023902 | Nov 2007 | DE |
102006035292 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102008039838 | Mar 2010 | DE |
102005036929 | Jun 2010 | DE |
102008062763 | Jul 2010 | DE |
102009001894 | Sep 2010 | DE |
0546784 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0730210 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0614517 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1160539 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1189124 | Mar 2002 | EP |
0767357 | May 2002 | EP |
1361414 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1468791 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1669713 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1734425 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1429109 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1764579 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1878543 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1967930 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2023077 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2060530 | May 2009 | EP |
2068067 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2108917 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2400261 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2935043 | Feb 2010 | FR |
894320 | Apr 1962 | GB |
2255648 | Nov 1992 | GB |
2341203 | Mar 2000 | GB |
2420241 | May 2006 | GB |
2452033 | Feb 2009 | GB |
5581525 | Jun 1955 | JP |
5827264 | Feb 1983 | JP |
06313710 | Nov 1994 | JP |
6313710 | Nov 1994 | JP |
7210586 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2003194526 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004257927 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005517908 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006241833 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006301991 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2009524057 | Jun 2009 | JP |
9208568 | May 1992 | WO |
9808050 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9910706 | Mar 1999 | WO |
0014474 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0033149 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0034733 | Jun 2000 | WO |
02101323 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2004096502 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005072917 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005075875 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005100908 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006051264 | May 2006 | WO |
2007002319 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007028941 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007125081 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007144906 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008027588 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008047171 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008064276 | May 2008 | WO |
2008066896 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008075170 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008157061 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009001165 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009016185 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009083452 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009127526 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009130169 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009149740 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010040742 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010092131 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010108089 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010148525 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011000435 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011000955 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011057130 | May 2011 | WO |
2012038446 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
German Office Action and English Language summary for DE 112011100292.0 filed Jul. 3, 2012, based on PCT Application US2011/021252 filed Jan. 14, 2011. |
German Patent Application No. 11 2011 100 291.2 dated Dec. 20, 2012. |
Japanese Office Action and English Language summary for JP2012-550042 filed Jul. 20, 2012; based on International Application No. PCT/US2011/021249 filed Jan. 14, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action and English Language summary for JP2012-550044 filed Jul. 20, 2012; based on International Application No. PCT/US2011/021252 filed Jan. 14, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action and English Language summary for JP2012-550043 filed Jul. 20, 2012; based on International Application No. PCT/US2011/021250 filed Jan. 14, 2011. |
Examination Report for German Application No. 11 2011 100 193.2 Report dated Dec. 20, 2012; based on PCT/US2011/021249. |
Faro Product Catalog; Faro Arm; 68 pages; Faro Technologies Inc. 2009; printed Aug. 3, 2009. |
Romer Measuring Arms; Portable CMMs for the shop floor; 20 pages; Hexagon Metrology, Inc. (2009) http//us. ROMER.com. |
Dylan, Craig R., High Precision Makes the Massive Bay Bridge Project Work. Suspended in MidAir—Cover Story—Point of Beginning, Jan. 1, 2010, [online] http://www.pobonline.com/Articles/Cover—Story/BNP—GUID—9-5-2006—A—10000000000 . . . [Retreived Jan. 25, 2010]. |
Franklin, Paul F., What IEEE 1588 Means for Your Next T&M System Design, Keithley Instruments, Inc., [on-line] Oct. 19, 2010, http://www.eetimes.com/General/DisplayPrintViewContent?contentItemId=4209746, [Retrieved Oct. 21, 2010]. |
HYDROpro Navigation, Hydropgraphic Survey Software, Trimble, www.trimble.com, Copyright 1997-2003. |
Trimble—Trimble SPS630, SPS730 and SPS930 Universal Total Stations, [on-line] http://www.trimble.com/sps630—730—930.shtml (1 of 4), [Retreived Jan. 26, 2010 8:50:29AM]. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021253 mailed Mar. 22, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021253; Date of Completion May 9, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021274; Date of Completion Apr. 12, 2012. |
International Search Report of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2013/022186; Date of Mailing: May 29, 2013. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2013/022186; Date of Mailing: May 29, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021246 International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021249 International filing date Jan. 14 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021250 International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021252 International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021247 International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021259. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021262. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021263. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021264. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021270. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021272. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021273. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021276. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021278. International filing date Jan. 14, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/021794. International filing date Jan. 20, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/020625; International Filing Date of Jan. 10, 2011. Date of Issuance Jul. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021247 mailed Aug. 26, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021247 mailed Aug. 26, 2011. |
Information on Electro-Optical Information Systems; EOIS 3D Mini-Moire C.M.M. Sensor for Non-Contact Measuring & Surface Mapping; Direct Dimensions, Jun. 1995. |
ABB Flexible Automation AB: Product Manual IRB 6400R M99, On-Line Manual, Sep. 13, 2006, XP000002657684, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://pergatory.mit.edu/kinematiccouplings/case—studies/ABB—Robotics/general/6400R%20Product%20Manual.pdf [retrieved on Aug. 26, 2011]. |
Anonymous : So wird's gemacht: Mit T-DSL and Windows XP Home Edition gemeinsam ins Internet (Teil 3) Internet Citation, Jul. 2003, XP002364586, Retrieved from Internet: URL:http://support.microsfot.com/kb/814538/DE/ [retrieved on Jan. 26, 2006]. |
Cho, et al., Implementation of a Precision Time Protocol over Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks, IEEE, 2008. |
Cooklev, et al., An Implementation of IEEE 1588 Over IEEE 802.11b for Syncrhonization of Wireless Local Area Network Nodes, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 56, No. 5, Oct. 2007. |
Hart, A., “Kinematic Coupling Interchangeability”, Precision Engineering, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2004, pp. 1-15, XP55005507, ISSN: 0141-6359, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00071-0. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021246 mailed Apr. 12, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021248 mailed Sep. 19, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021249 mailed Apr. 21, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021250 mailed Apr. 18, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021252 mailed Apr. 27, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021253 mailed Sep. 26, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021259 mailed May 25, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021262 mailed May 11, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021263 mailed May 4, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021264 mailed May 31, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/020270; Date of Mailing May 2, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021272 mailed Apr. 7, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/020273; Date of Mailing Apr. 20, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/020274; Date of Mailing May 6, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/020276; Date of Mailing May 17, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021278 mailed May 25, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/020625; Date of Mailing Feb. 25, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021794 mailed Sep. 23, 2011. |
Jasperneite, et al., Enhancements to the Time Synchronization Standard IEEE-1588 for a System of Cascaded Bridges, IEEE, 2004. |
Romer “Romer Absolute Arm Product Brochure” (2010); Hexagon Metrology; www.hexagonmetrology.com; Hexagon AB 2010. |
Romer “Romer Absolute Arm Maximum Performance Portable Measurement” (Printed Oct. 2010); Hexagon Metrology, Inc. http://us:ROMER.com; Hexagon Metrology, Inc 2010. |
Sauter, et al., Towards New Hybrid Networks for Industrial Automation, IEEE, 2009. |
Spada, et al., IEEE 1588 Lowers Integration Costs in Continuous Flow Automated Production Lines, XP-002498255, ARC Insights, Insight # 2003-33MD&H, Aug. 20, 2003. |
Willoughby, P., “Elastically Averaged Precisoin Alignment”, In: “Doctoral Thesis”, Jun. 1, 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, XP55005620, abstract 1.1 Motivation, Chapter 3, Chapter 6. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021246 mailed Apr. 12, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021248 mailed Sep. 19, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021249 mailed Apr. 21, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021250 mailed Apr. 18, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021252 mailed Apr. 27, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021253 mailed Sep. 26, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021259 mailed May 25, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021262 mailed May 11, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021263 mailed May 4, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021264 mailed May 31, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021270 mailed May 2, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021272 mailed Apr. 7, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021273 mailed Apr. 20, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021274 mailed May 6, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021276 mailed May 6, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021278 mailed May 25, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/020625: Filed Jan. 10, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021794 mailed Sep. 23, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/US2011/050787; mailing date Nov. 3, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application PCT/US2011/050787; mailing date Nov. 3, 2011. |
GoMeasure3D—Your source for all things measurement, Baces 3D 100 Series Portable CMM from GoMeasure3D, [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2011], http://www.gomeasure3d.com/baces100.html. |
It is Alive in the Lab, Autodesk University, Fun with the Immersion MicroScribe Laser Scanner, [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2011], http://labs.blogs.com/its—alive—in—the—lab/2007/11/fun-with-the-im.html. |
Ghost 3D Systems, Authorized MicroScribe Solutions, FAQs—MicroScribe 3D Laser, MicroScan Tools, & related info, [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2011], http://microscribe.ghost3d.com/gt—microscan-3d—faqs.htm,. |
Electro-Optical Information Systems, “The Handy Handheld Digitizer” [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2011], http://vidibotics.com/htm/handy.htm. |
Kreon Laser Scanners, Getting the Best in Cutting Edge 3D Digitizing Technology, B3-D MCAD Consulting/Sales [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2011], http://www.b3-d.com/Kreon.html. |
MicroScan 3D User Guide, RSI GmbH, 3D Systems & Software, Oberursel, Germany, email: info@rsi-gmbh.de, Copyright RSI Roland Seifert Imaging GmbH 2008. |
Laser Reverse Engineering with Microscribe, [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2011], http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VRz—2aEJ4E&feature=PlayList&p=F63ABF74F30DC81B&playnext=1&playnext—from=PL&index=1. |
Examination Report under Section 18(3); Report dated Oct. 31, 2012; Application No. GB1210309.9. |
Examination Report under Section 18(3); Report dated Nov. 1, 2012; Application No. GB1210311.5. |
Examination Report under Section 18(3); Report dated Nov. 6, 2012; Application No. GB1210306.5. |
Mg Lee; “Compact 3D LIDAR based on optically coupled horizontal and vertical Scanning mechanism for the autonomous navigation of robots” (13 pages) vol. 8037; downloaded from http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on Jul. 2, 2013. |
Examination Report for German Application No. 11 2011 100 290.4 Report dated Jul. 16, 2013; based on PCT/US2011/021247. |
P Ben-Tzvi, et al “Extraction of 3D Images Using Pitch-Actuated 2D Laser Range Finder for Robotic Vision” (6 pages) BNSDOCID <XP 31840390A—1—>. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2013/040309 mailed Jul. 15, 2013. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2013/040321 mailed Jul. 15, 2013. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US/2013/041826 filed May 20, 2013; mailed Jul. 29, 2013. |
Yk Cho, et al. “Light-weight 3D LADAR System for Construction Robotic Operations” (pp. 237-244); 26th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2009). |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/040309 mailed Jul. 15, 2013. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US/2013/041826 filed May 20, 2013; mailed Jul. 29, 2013. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/040321 mailed Jul. 15, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120057174 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61380869 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61296555 | Jan 2010 | US | |
61351347 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61355279 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61296555 | Jan 2010 | US | |
61351347 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61355279 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61296555 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13006507 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13227504 | US | |
Parent | 13006468 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13006507 | US | |
Parent | 13006524 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13006468 | US |