The present application is a National Stage Application of PCT International Application No. PCT/DE2012/200063 (filed on Sep. 17, 2012), under 35 U.S.C. §371, which claims priority to German Patent Application Nos. DE 10 2011 116 010.1 (filed on Oct. 17, 2011) and DE 10 2011 116 542.1 (filed on Oct. 21, 2011), which are each hereby incorporated by reference in their complete respective entireties.
The present invention relates to a method for making a linear or strip-like weakening in a flat and preferably flexible decorative material and in particular a method for making a linear or strip-like weakening in a piece of leather or a synthetic skin.
Various widely used methods for producing a linear or strip-like material weakening in decorative materials by means of laser light beams are known. The factor common to these methods is that a decorative material is machined with a high-energy laser light beam from the reverse side, which is subsequently hidden, additional measures being taken to prevent the machining penetrating to the visible side of the decorative material. Such a widely used method is disclosed, for example, by the official publication U.S. Pat. No. 7,297,897 A and U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,124 B1.
Further methods for producing a weakening with the least possible marking on the decorative surface and, in particular, machining techniques that can be applied thereto, are disclosed by the publications DE 199 44 371 A1, EP 1 745 989 A2 and DE 102 41 715 A1.
Despite careful application, with the widely known methods the weakening produced can cause marking on the visible side under unfavorable environmental conditions, which is viewed as an aesthetic disadvantage of the product.
Against this background, the invention has the object of specifying a method for laser weakening of decorative materials and in particular leather and synthetic skins which delivers an improved visual appearance of the visible side.
In order to achieve this object, the invention proposes two different methods having the features respectively specified herein.
Expedient refinements and developments of the methods according to the invention are specified in the dependent sub-claims.
A commonly preferred implementation of the two methods according to the invention will be explained below with reference to the appended schematically simplified sketches, in which:
In accordance with the schematic representations in
The discrete hole pattern illustrated in
Likewise, in the widely used methods, in the situation described the side of the point of action 2 of the laser light beam 3 is opposite the intended visible side of the decorative material 1. This corresponds to machining from the reverse side. In addition, the holes 11 are preferably formed as blind holes, in order to avoid any impairment to the appearance of the visible side of the decorative material. In the case of a pulsed laser light source, the depth of the blind holes 11 can to some extent be realized repeatedly accurately by a predefined number of laser light pulses of predefined energy acting on the decorative material 1 in one position. Nevertheless, during the progress of the machining, repeated adaptation of the input of energy is recommended. This is achieved by the production of intermittent reference holes 13. Here, the actual machining depth is determined from the light intensity of the laser light beam 3 emerging through the residual material thickness at the base of the hole 11, and the number of pulses and/or the pulse energy provided for the machining is/are re-defined in order to achieve a target machining depth. As a result of this regular re-calibration of the machining, it is possible to compensate for density, reflectance and thickness variations of the decorative material 1 along the machining line. This is a considerable advantage in particular when machining leather.
The difference of the method according to the invention from the widely used weakening methods can primarily be inferred with a glance at
As a result of the alignment of the supporting edges 9, 10 in relation to the direction of incidence of the laser light beam 3, the central fiber of the decorative material 1, located in the section plane and indicated by the oblique line, is clearly set at an angle transversely with respect to the machining direction A. The direction of incidence of the laser light beam 3 on this central fiber is therefore not perpendicular, as in the widely used methods, but differs considerably from the 90° angle. As a result, the weakening introduced into the decorative material 1 along the beam direction of the laser light beam 3 is asymmetrical in relation to the central plane predefined by the centre lines of the visible holes 11. On the left-hand side of this central plane, the weakening is accordingly formed smaller than on the right-hand side. The reason for this is that the holes running obliquely move further away from the left-hand side area with increasing depth. The weakening depth profile that can be determined perpendicular to the surface of the decorative material 1 accordingly differs on the left-hand and right-hand side of the weakening line 4. As a result of the different weakening depth profile, the result under tensile loading is a transverse stress component running perpendicular to the surface of the decorative material 1, which counteracts any visible deformation on the surface.
As an alternative to the preferred implementation described previously, the methods according to the invention explained therein can also be realized in a device having mechanical machining tools. This is illustrated schematically by
As a result of the narrow angle between cutting wheel 14 and central fiber of the decorative material, a curved cut 15 running into the depth of the material toward one side of the weakening line results. The contour of said cut is represented by the enlarged partial sectional view in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 116 010 | Oct 2011 | DE | national |
10 2011 116 542 | Oct 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2012/200063 | 9/17/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/056707 | 4/25/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3419706 | Lohrmann | Dec 1968 | A |
6294124 | Bauer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6337461 | Yasuda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
7297897 | Nicholas et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20030127836 | Baudouin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040183280 | Batchelder et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050104337 | Merrifield et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070207233 | Bauer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090049799 | Pastrana Rojas | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090302579 | Lippert | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100206859 | Nakai | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19910141 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19944371 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10241715 | Mar 2004 | DE |
1745989 | Jan 2007 | EP |
2001315608 | Nov 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150108691 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |