Embodiments of the invention relate to the field of latches; and more specifically, to latch assemblies for coupling actuators to surgical instruments.
Minimally invasive medical techniques have been used to reduce the amount of extraneous tissue which may be damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and deleterious side effects. Traditional forms of minimally invasive surgery include endoscopy. One of the more common forms of endoscopy is laparoscopy, which is minimally invasive inspection or surgery within the abdominal cavity. In traditional laparoscopic surgery, a patient's abdominal cavity is insufflated with gas, and cannula sleeves are passed through small (approximately 12 mm) incisions in the musculature of the patient's abdomen to provide entry ports through which laparoscopic surgical instruments can be passed in a sealed fashion.
The laparoscopic surgical instruments generally include a laparoscope for viewing the surgical field and surgical instruments having end effectors. Typical surgical tools include clamps, graspers, scissors, staplers, and needle holders, for example. The surgical instruments are similar to those used in conventional (open) surgery, except that the end effector of each surgical instrument is separated from its handle by an approximately 30 cm. long extension tube, for example, so as to permit the operator to introduce the end effector to the surgical site and to control movement of the end effector relative to the surgical site from outside a patient's body.
In order to provide improved control of the working tools, it may be desirable to control the instrument with teleoperated actuators. The surgeon may operate controls on a console to indirectly manipulate the instrument that is connected to the teleoperated actuators. The instrument is detachably coupled to the teleoperated actuators so that the instrument can be separately sterilized and selected for use as needed instrument for the surgical procedure to be performed. The instrument may be changed during the course of a surgery.
Performing surgery with teleoperated surgical instruments creates new challenges. One challenge is the need to maintain the region adjacent the patient in a sterile condition. However, the motors, sensors, encoders and electrical connections that are necessary to control the surgical instruments typically cannot be sterilized using conventional methods, e.g., steam, heat and pressure or chemicals, because they would be damaged or destroyed in the sterilization process.
Another challenge with teleoperated surgery systems is that a surgeon will typically employ a large number of different surgical instruments during a procedure. Since the number of instrument holders are limited due to space constraints and cost, many of these surgical instruments will be attached and detached from the same instrument holder a number of times during an operation. In laparoscopic procedures, for example, the number of entry ports into the patient's abdomen is generally limited during the operation because of space constraints as well as a desire to avoid unnecessary incisions in the patient. Thus, a number of different surgical instruments will typically be introduced through the same trocar sleeve during the operation. Likewise, in open surgery, there is typically not enough room around the surgical site to position more than one or two surgical manipulators, and so the surgeon's assistant will be compelled to frequently remove instruments from the teleoperated actuated manipulator and exchange them with other surgical tools.
It would be desirable to provide an easier and more effective way to engage and disengage a surgical instrument and a teleoperated actuator drive while preventing contamination of the teleoperated actuator and allowing quick and reliable attachment of a succession of surgical instruments that maintains a sterile area around the surgical instrument.
The invention may best be understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrate embodiments of the invention by way of example and not limitation. In the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures, and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and mechanical compositional, structural, electrical, and operational changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the embodiments of the present invention is defined only by the claims of the issued patent.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Spatially relative terms, such as “beneath”, “below”, “lower”, “above”, “upper”, and the like may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element's or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “above” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “below” can encompass both an orientation of above and below. The device may be otherwise oriented (e.g., rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising” specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The term “object” generally refers to a component or group of components. For example, an object may refer to either a pocket or a boss of a disk within the specification or claims. Throughout the specification and claims, the terms “object,” “component,” “portion,” “part” and “piece” are used interchangeably.
The terms “instrument” and “surgical instrument” are used herein to describe a medical device configured to be inserted into a patient's body and used to carry out surgical or diagnostic procedures. The instrument includes an end effector. The end effector may be a surgical tool associated with one or more surgical tasks, such as a forceps, a needle driver, a shears, a bipolar cauterizer, a tissue stabilizer or retractor, a clip applier, an anastomosis device, an imaging device (e.g., an endoscope or ultrasound probe), and the like. Some instruments used with embodiments of the invention further provide an articulated support (sometimes referred to as a “wrist”) for the surgical tool so that the position and orientation of the surgical tool can be manipulated with one or more mechanical degrees of freedom in relation to the instrument's shaft. Further, many surgical end effectors include a functional mechanical degree of freedom, such as jaws that open or close, or a knife that translates along a path. Surgical instruments may also contain stored (e.g., on a semiconductor memory inside the instrument) information that may be permanent or may be updatable by the surgical system. Accordingly, the system may provide for either one-way or two-way information communication between the instrument and one or more system components.
The terms “or” and “and/or” as used herein are to be interpreted as inclusive or meaning any one or any combination. Therefore, “A, B or C” or “A, B and/or C” mean “any of the following: A; B; C; A and B; A and C; B and C; A, B and C.” An exception to this definition will occur only when a combination of elements, functions, steps or acts are in some way inherently mutually exclusive.
Each setup joint supports one or more instrument manipulators 112. Each instrument manipulator 112 includes an instrument carriage 130 that supports a surgical instrument 120 for operating at a surgical site within the patient's body 122. Each instrument manipulator 112 may be provided in a variety of forms that allow the associated surgical instrument to move with one or more mechanical degrees of freedom (e.g., all six Cartesian degrees of freedom, five or fewer Cartesian degrees of freedom, etc.). Typically, mechanical or control constraints restrict each instrument manipulator 112 to move its associated surgical instrument around a center of motion on the surgical instrument that stays stationary with reference to the patient, and this center of motion is typically located to be at the position where the surgical instrument enters the body.
The term “surgical instrument” is used herein to describe a medical device configured to be inserted into a patient's body and used to carry out surgical or diagnostic procedures. The surgical instrument typically includes an end effector associated with one or more surgical tasks, such as a forceps, a needle driver, a shears, a bipolar cauterizer, a tissue stabilizer or retractor, a clip applier, an anastomosis device, an imaging device (e.g., an endoscope or ultrasound probe), and the like. Some surgical instruments used with embodiments of the invention further provide an articulated support (sometimes referred to as a “wrist”) for the end effector so that the position and orientation of the end effector can be manipulated with one or more mechanical degrees of freedom in relation to the instrument's shaft. Further, many surgical end effectors include a functional mechanical degree of freedom, such as jaws that open or close, or a knife that translates along a path. Surgical instruments may also contain stored (e.g., on a semiconductor memory inside the instrument) information that may be permanent or may be updatable by the surgical system. Accordingly, the system may provide for either one-way or two-way information communication between the instrument and one or more system components.
A functional teleoperated surgical system will generally include a vision system portion (not shown) that enables the operator to view the surgical site from outside the patient's body 122. The vision system typically includes a surgical instrument that has a video-image-capture function (a camera instrument 128) and one or more video displays for displaying the captured images. In some surgical system configurations, the camera instrument 128 includes optics that transfer the images from the distal end of the camera instrument 128 to one or more imaging sensors (e.g., CCD or CMOS sensors) outside of the patient's body 122. Alternatively, the imaging sensor(s) may be positioned at the distal end of the camera instrument 128, and the signals produced by the sensor(s) may be transmitted along a lead or wirelessly for processing and display on the video display. An illustrative video display is the stereoscopic display on the surgeon's console in surgical systems commercialized by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif.
A functional teleoperated surgical system will further include a control system portion (not shown) for controlling the movement of the surgical instruments 120 while the instruments are inside the patient. The control system portion may be at a single location in the surgical system, or it may be distributed at two or more locations in the system (e.g., control system portion components may be in the system's patient-side portion 100, in a dedicated system control console, or in a separate equipment rack). The teleoperated master/slave control may be done in a variety of ways, depending on the degree of control desired, the size of the surgical assembly being controlled, and other factors. In some embodiments, the control system portion includes one or more manually-operated input devices, such as a joystick, exoskeletal glove, a powered and gravity-compensated manipulator, or the like. These input devices control teleoperated motors which, in turn, control the movement of the surgical instrument.
The forces generated by the teleoperated motors are transferred via drivetrain mechanisms, which transmit the forces from the teleoperated motors to the surgical instrument 120. In some telesurgical embodiments, the input devices that control the manipulator(s) may be provided at a location remote from the patient, either inside or outside the room in which the patient is placed. The input signals from the input devices are then transmitted to the control system portion. Persons familiar with telemanipulative, teleoperative, and telepresence surgery will know of such systems and their components, such as the da Vinci® Surgical System commercialized by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and the Zeus® Surgical System originally manufactured by Computer Motion, Inc., and various illustrative components of such systems.
As shown, both the surgical instrument 120 and an optional entry guide 124 (e.g., a cannula in the patient's abdomen) are removably coupled to the distal end of an instrument manipulator 112, with the surgical instrument 120 inserted through the entry guide 124. Teleoperated actuators in the instrument manipulator 112 move the surgical instrument 120 as a whole. The instrument manipulator 112 further includes an instrument carriage 130. The surgical instrument 120 is detachably connected to the instrument carriage 130. The teleoperated actuators housed in the instrument carriage 130 provide a number of controller motions which the surgical instrument 120 translates into a variety of movements of the end effector on the surgical instrument. Thus the teleoperated actuators in the instrument carriage 130 move only one or more components of the surgical instrument 120 rather than the instrument as a whole. Inputs to control either the instrument as a whole or the instrument's components are such that the input provided by a surgeon to the control system portion (a “master” command) is translated into a corresponding action by the surgical instrument (a “slave” response).
Surgical instruments that are used with the invention may control their end effectors (surgical tools) with a plurality of rods and/or flexible cables. Rods, which may be in the form of tubes, may be combined with cables to provide a “push/pull” control of the end effector with the cables providing flexible sections as required. A typical elongate tube 210 for a surgical instrument 120 is small, perhaps five to eight millimeters in diameter, roughly the diameter of a large soda straw. The diminutive scale of the mechanisms in the surgical instrument 120 creates unique mechanical conditions and issues with the construction of these mechanisms that are unlike those found in similar mechanisms constructed at a larger scale, because forces and strengths of materials do not scale at the same rate as the size of the mechanisms. The cables must fit within the elongate tube 210 and be able to bend as they pass through the wrist joint 252.
In order to provide a sterile operation area while using a functional teleoperated surgical system, it is preferred that a barrier be placed between the actuating portion of the teleoperated surgical system and the surgical instruments in the sterile surgical field. Therefore, a sterile component, such as an instrument sterile adapter (ISA), is placed between the surgical instrument 120 and the teleoperated controls in the instrument carriage 130. The placement of an instrument sterile adapter between the surgical instrument 120 and the instrument carriage 130 includes the benefit of ensuring a sterile coupling point for the surgical instrument 120 and the instrument carriage 130. This permits removal of surgical instruments from the instrument carriage 130 and exchange with other surgical instruments during the course of a surgery.
Referring to
As can be seen in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It should be appreciated that when both the proximal control mechanism 240 of the surgical instrument 120 and the control surface 805 of the instrument carriage are attached to the instrument sterile adapter 310, the presence of the proximal control mechanism 240 constitutes a locking mechanism for the attachment of the instrument sterile adapter 310 to the instrument carriage 130. Inward movement of the instrument latch arms 405 is prevented by the attached proximal control mechanism 240. In turn, upward movement of the connecting members 425 away from the control surface is prevented by the constrained instrument latch arms 405. As a result, outward movement of carriage latch arms 410 becomes difficult. The carriage latch arms 410 may be short and of a greater thickness to further increase the difficulty of disengaging the carriage latch arms when the proximal control mechanism 240 is attached to the instrument sterile adapter 310. Because carriage latch arms 410 are prevented from being bent outward by the proximal control mechanism 240, the instrument sterile adapter 310 is locked to the attached control surface 805.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Since it is necessary to provide a mechanism for applying an outward force on the instrument latch arm 405 to release the proximal control mechanism from the instrument sterile adapter and allow removal of the surgical instrument, it is desirable to provide a backup mechanism for applying an outward force on the instrument latch arm in case the primary mechanism is unavailable for any reason.
Referring to
Referring further to
Each of the release channels 1105 provides a passage to an opening 1110 in the proximal control mechanism 240 through which an instrument latch arm 405 enters to engage the second locking surface on the proximal control mechanism. Each of the release channels 1105 is shaped such that one may insert a release tool 1205 through the channel. An end portion of the release tool 1205 engages the inward side of the instrument latch arm 405. The release tool 1205 is used as a lever to pry outward the instrument latch arm 405 and release it from the corresponding second locking surfaces 810, with a section 1305 of the channel wall acting as the fulcrum.
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention is not limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/121,351 filed Aug. 24, 2016, which is a national stage application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/US2015/020876 filed Mar. 17, 2015, which claims a right of priority to the following earlier filed applications: U.S. 61/954,497 17 Mar. 2014 (17-03-2014)U.S. 61/954,502 17 Mar. 2014 (17-03-2014)U.S. 61/954,557 17 Mar. 2014 (17-03-2014)U.S. 61/954,571 17 Mar. 2014 (17-03-2014)U.S. 61/954,595 17 Mar. 2014 (17-03-2014)U.S. 62/019,318 30 Jun. 2014 (30-06-2014)U.S. 62/103,991 15 Jan. 2015 (15-01-2015)U.S. 62/104,306 16 Jan. 2015 (16-01-2015)Each of these applications is specifically incorporated herein by reference to the greatest extent permitted.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4542272 | Hubbard et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
5214573 | Roza | May 1993 | A |
5679423 | Shah | Oct 1997 | A |
5803086 | Scholz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6471172 | Lemke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7096870 | Lamprich et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7125403 | Julian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7758569 | Brock | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7947050 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7963913 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8220468 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8506555 | Ruiz et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529582 | Devengenzo et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555892 | Traub | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8998930 | Orban, III | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9687312 | Dachs, II et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9839487 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10022193 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10045828 | Dachs, II et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10213268 | Dachs, II et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10278784 | Dachs, II | May 2019 | B2 |
10363109 | Dachs, II et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10420622 | Dachs et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10485621 | Morrissette et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10537400 | Dachs, II et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10543051 | Schena et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10595836 | Smaby et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10610320 | Dachs, II et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10639119 | Dachs, II et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
20020032452 | Tierney et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020111635 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030216723 | Shinmura et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040049205 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050240178 | Morley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244217 | Burke et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060235436 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060260622 | Wooley et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070142971 | Schena et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080103491 | Omori et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140088 | Orban, III | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100163057 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100170519 | Romo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175701 | Reis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234857 | Itkowitz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110015650 | Choi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110084113 | Bedi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110118754 | Dachs, II et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110213383 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110277776 | McGrogan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288560 | Shohat et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110290854 | Timm et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110290855 | Moore et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295270 | Giordano et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313477 | McLean et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120197094 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239060 | Orban, III et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120247489 | Orban, III et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120292367 | Morgan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130110129 | Reid et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130211397 | Parihar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211401 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130274062 | Arai et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274657 | Zirps et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130325034 | Schena et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331858 | Devengenzo et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001234 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066944 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069437 | Reis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150223832 | Swaney et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160184037 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160354173 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361049 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361124 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361129 | Morrissette et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361131 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160367328 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170172549 | Smaby et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180168752 | Scheib et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180344419 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190183596 | Dachs, II | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190254766 | Dachs, II | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190274767 | Schena et al. | Sep 2019 | A2 |
20190380803 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200069389 | Morrissette et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200155130 | Smaby et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101297267 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101443162 | May 2009 | CN |
102630154 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102012008535 | Oct 2013 | DE |
102012013242 | Jan 2014 | DE |
1862123 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2259744 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2538326 | Nov 2016 | GB |
H0666326 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2001187067 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2012210294 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013034859 | Feb 2013 | JP |
20110032444 | Mar 2011 | KR |
20110036452 | Apr 2011 | KR |
20110095795 | Aug 2011 | KR |
20130080638 | Jul 2013 | KR |
20130120316 | Nov 2013 | KR |
WO-2007075864 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007095637 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007126443 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2009151205 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010126128 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2011037394 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011143016 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2013018931 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2013181536 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO-2014035803 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2015023730 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015142824 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15765493.0, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15765779.2, dated Jul. 18, 2017, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15766019.2, dated Oct. 20, 2017, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 19181058.9 dated Aug. 22, 2019, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15764089.7, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15764268.7, dated Nov. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15764610.0, dated Nov. 23, 2017, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15764745.4, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15764881.7, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15764940.1, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20882, dated May 29, 2015, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20886, dated Jun. 4, 2015, 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20888, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/21020, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/21111, dated May 21, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20880, dated Jul. 14, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20884, dated Jun. 12, 2015, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20876, dated Jun. 12, 2015, 17 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US15/20885, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 7 pages. |
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20159147.6, dated Jun. 16, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19201778.8, dated Nov. 27, 2019, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20154204.0, dated May 7, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20154737.9, dated Apr. 17, 2020, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20161337.9, dated May 7, 2020, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190365494 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62104306 | Jan 2015 | US | |
62103991 | Jan 2015 | US | |
62019318 | Jun 2014 | US | |
61954595 | Mar 2014 | US | |
61954571 | Mar 2014 | US | |
61954557 | Mar 2014 | US | |
61954502 | Mar 2014 | US | |
61954497 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15121351 | US | |
Child | 16543826 | US |