Light-emitting semiconductor devices may be arranged in various configurations, such as arrays, for lighting applications. These applications generally have associated parameters (e.g., a photoreaction may entail provision of one or more levels of radiant power, at one or more wavelengths, applied over one or more periods of time). In these applications, the light emitting semiconductor devices generally are employed to provide radiant output and otherwise operate in accordance with various, desired characteristics, e.g., temperature, spectral distribution and radiant power. At the same time, the light emitting semiconductor devices typically have certain operating specifications, which specifications generally are associated with the light emitting semiconductor devices' fabrication and, among other things, are directed to preclude destruction and/or forestall degradation of the devices. These specifications generally include operating temperatures and applied, electrical power.
Arrays of light emitting semiconductor devices have been constructed which provide for monitoring selected of the array's characteristics. Providing such monitoring enables verification of the array's proper operation and, in turn, determination as to whether the array is operating in any way other than properly. An array may be operating improperly with respect to either/both the application's parameters or/and the array's specifications.
Monitoring also supports control of an array's operation. Control, in turn, may be employed to enable and/or enhance the array's proper operation and/or performance of the application. Monitoring the array's operating temperature and radiant output supports control of the array, directly or indirectly, including through adjustment(s) in applied power and cooling (such as through a systemic cooling system). This control may be employed to enable and/or enhance balance between the array's radiant output and its operating temperature, so as, e.g., to preclude heating the array beyond its specifications.
Using control of the array in enabling/enhancing performance of an application may be illustrated via example. In this example, an array is used that is understood to include light emitting diodes (LEDs). Moreover, the application is understood to require provision, in sequence, of light in the red, then green and then blue spectra, at three respective energy levels, while maintaining a select temperature range relating to the work piece. In performing this application, control may again be directed to the array's applied power and to cooling, e.g., by a systemic cooling system. The control is again responsive to the monitoring of the array's operating temperature and radiant output. With this monitoring, the system is enabled to sense the energy applied to the work piece for the first wavelength, compare that energy to the respective energy level, while continually monitoring the temperature. If the temperature approaches its maximum, control may be employed to increase cooling, to decrease the radiant power, or both, while continuing to gauge the applied energy. Once the energy level for the first wavelength is reached, control powers off the LEDs associated with the first wavelength and powers on the LEDs associated with the next sequential wavelength, and so on.
Conventional approaches for monitoring and controlling an array typically propose to mount detectors around the array's perimeter or otherwise proximate to, but separate from the array. In doing so, the detectors detect radiant output or temperature associated with the whole, or relatively large portions of, the array. Moreover, responsive to such detection, the array generally is controlled as a whole, or in relatively large portions. Also, conventional industry approaches may use various detectors, alone or in combination: in some cases, only photo detectors are used; in other cases, only temperature sensors are used; in still other cases, both photo detectors and temperature sensors are used and, in still other cases, some other combination of detectors is used.
An example of conventional monitoring and control of a LED array is found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,148, to Hochstein, entitled Transformer Tap Switching Power Supply For LED Traffic Signal (the “'148 Patent”). The '148 Patent, generally, proposes to monitor and control a traffic signal's LED array using a single LED light detector, together with a controller, wherein the LED light detector is disposed proximate to the array (but not part of the array) so as to measure the luminous output of (i) one or more of the array's LEDs or (ii) a so-called “sample” LED which is not part of the array, but performs similarly. Responsive to that measurement, the '148 Patent proposes that the controller provide for selection from among a plurality of taps of a transformer, thereby adjusting the voltage applied to the LED array as a whole and maintaining the luminous output of the traffic signal's LED array. The '148 Patent also proposes (a) provision of a measurement device for measuring the temperature of the LED array generally, (b) selection of a tap responsive to such measurement and (c) associated adjustment of the voltage applied to the LED array as a whole.
Another example of conventional monitoring and control of a LED array is found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,683,421, to Kennedy et al., entitled Addressable Semiconductor Array Light Source For Localized Radiation Delivery (the “'421 Patent”), the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if recited in full herein, for all purposes. The '421 Patent proposes to monitor and control a photoreaction device that includes a LED array, a photo sensor and a temperature sensor. The photo sensor is proposed to preferably comprise semiconductor photodiodes that provide continuous monitoring of the light energy delivered to a work piece, so that irradiation may be controlled.
In one embodiment of the '421 Patent, the LED array is proposed to have an associated output window positioned above the LED array. The output window is proposed to be selected so that a small percentage of the LED array's light energy (typically less than 10%) is internally reflected within the window. This internally reflected light is proposed to be measured by the photo sensor. Not only is this reflected light measured, it is expressly specified that this configuration minimizes or prevents light energy reflected from the work piece or from external sources from being detected by the photo sensor. In order to measure the internally reflected light, the photo sensor is proposed to be positioned and configured for that function, e.g., using a series of photo sensors positioned around the perimeter of the output window. Moreover, it is expressly specified that this measurement using the series of photo sensors will detect changes in average optical power.
This embodiment has disadvantages. As an example, only average optical power is detected. That is, the window captures the internally reflected light from the entire array, which captured light is provided to the sensors. Accordingly, the sensors cannot determine where the LED array's radiant output may be improper and, as such, cannot make adjustments except across the entire array. As well, by seeking to minimize or prevent detection of light energy reflected from the work piece or from external sources, control based on such light energy is precluded.
In another embodiment, the '421 Patent proposes to employ optical fibers between columns of LEDs in the array. The '421 Patent proposes that these fibers, preferably, will be made of material which is able to receive sidewall light emissions from the LEDs of the adjacent column of the LED array. The '421 Patent further proposes that, as to each fiber, the received sidewall light emissions are directed through internal reflection toward a respective photo sensor, the photo sensor being positioned at the perimeter of the array, disposed at the end of the fiber. Apparently, as in the previous embodiment, each photo sensor will measure such light, detecting changes in average optical power.
This embodiment has disadvantages. Again, only an average optical power is detected. Average optical power is again understood in that each fiber captures internally reflected light from the plurality of LEDs disposed across an entire dimension of the array, which captured light is provided to the respective sensor. The respective sensor cannot determine where the LED array's radiant output may be improper across the implicated dimension and, as such, cannot make adjustments except across the entire set of LEDs associated with that fiber. In addition, because the fibers are disposed among the LEDs, in the plane of the array (i.e., so as to capture sidewall light emissions), use of the fibers precludes or degrades use of optics that, desirably, collect and collimate all or substantially all of the radiant output of each LED (such optics include, e.g., a grid of reflectors as proposed by the '421 Patent or a plurality of micro-reflectors in which individual LEDs are mounted, preferably on a one-to-one basis). As well, by detecting only sidewall light emissions, control based on detecting other light energy associated with the array is precluded.
In yet another embodiment, the '421 Patent proposes to position about a LED array a temperature sensor and a plurality of photo detectors. However, the '421 Patent omits to describe the disposition of the temperature sensor or the photo detectors relative to the plane of the LED array. It may be inferred that, as in the embodiment set forth above, the photo detectors are positioned above the array in association with a light guide, e.g., an output window. This inference follows as the '421 Patent expressly specifies that the LED die are arranged in a shape approximating a “filled square”, which arrangement would leave no space for the temperature sensor or the photo detectors in the plane of the LED array.
This embodiment has disadvantages. With photo detectors positioned in association with the output window, disadvantages include those set out above respecting other embodiments using light guide(s) to collect detected output radiation. On the other hand, if a sensor or photo detector were placed in the LED array's plane, the sensor or detector would be disposed between the rows and columns of the LED array, contemplating having substantial space between the LEDs of the array. Such space generally is not desirable (i.e., typically, it is desirable to employ densely-packed LED arrays, wherein space between rows and columns of LEDs typically is insufficient to accept interposition of a semiconductor device, such as conventionally-sized sensor or detector).
In still another embodiment, the '421 Patent proposes to group the LEDs of the array into alternating rows, such that the odd rows would form one group and the even rows would form a second group. The '421 Patent further proposes that the odd rows would be energized as a group to emit light energy, including sidewall light emissions, and that the even rows would function, as a group, as a photo sensor (i.e., by generating a current proportional to the intensity of the impinging sidewall light emissions from the one group of odd rows). The '421 Patent further proposes that the respective functions of the odd and even rows may be switched, so that the odd rows operate as the detecting group, while the even rows operate as the emitting group.
This embodiment has disadvantages. Again, average optical power is detected. Average optical power is again understood in that the detecting LEDs, as a group, detect the sidewall light emissions from the emitting group, which emitting group includes all the LEDs of all non-detecting rows of the entire array. The detecting group of LEDs cannot determine where the LED array's radiant output may be improper across any one or more rows of the emitting group and, as such, cannot make adjustments except for the entire group of emitting LEDs. As well, by detecting only sidewall light emissions, control based on detecting other light energy associated with the array is precluded. In addition, because of the potential for relatively substantial reduction of radiant output, it is generally not desirable to use any entire row in the LED array solely to detect, let alone using half of all rows of the LED array for detection.
Accordingly, there is a need for apparatus, systems and methods that employ detectors to monitor selected characteristics of a light emitting semiconductor devices, such as LED arrays. In addition, there is a need for such apparatus, systems and methods that so monitor, while minimizing or eliminating impact on the radiant output that otherwise might result from provision of detectors and related devices and/or structure. Moreover, there is a need for such apparatus, systems and methods that respond to variations and improvements in the light emitting semiconductor devices, including, as examples, where each LED of an LED array is mounted in a respective micro-reflector that collects and collimates the mounted LED's light and/or where the LED array is a dense array. Moreover, there is a need for such apparatus, systems and methods that respond to the applications employing such light emitting semiconductor devices, including, as examples in use of an LED array, by characterizing the LED array's operating characteristics specific to the application and/or by providing for control of the LEDs so as to enable or enhance performance of the application. Generally, there is also a need for apparatus, systems and methods that employ detectors to monitor and enable control of selected characteristics of light emitting semiconductor devices, such as LED arrays and, in doing so, avoid entirely or substantially the disadvantages associated with conventional approaches.
The present invention provides an optical device that utilizes at least one semiconductor device to measure selected operational characteristics of the optical device such as the radiant output of the array and the temperature of the array.
In one embodiment, one or more detector diodes are positioned within the array to measure the radiant output and/or the heat at one or more selected locations within the array. The detector diodes operate in different modes to measure radiant output and temperature so that in a first mode the detector diodes are selected to measure radiant output and in a second mode the detector diodes are selected to measure temperature.
The present invention provides an optical system that includes an array of semiconductor devices for performing an operation in which the semiconductor devices have multiple characteristics associated with performing the operation. At least one detector is located within the array to selectively monitor multiple characteristics of the semiconductor devices and is configured to generate a signal corresponding to the selected characteristic. A controller is configured to control the semiconductor devices in response to the signal from the detector.
The present invention further provides an optical system having an array of semiconductor devices for performing an operation in which the semiconductor devices having multiple characteristics associated with performing the operation where at least one of the multiple characteristics is concentrated at an area of the array. At least one detector is located within the array at the area of the array to selectively monitor multiple characteristics of the semiconductor devices. The detector is configured to generate a signal corresponding to the selected characteristic. A controller is configured to control the semiconductor devices in response to the signal from the detector.
The present invention further provides an optical system having an array of semiconductor devices for performing an operation and at least one thermal diode located within the array to monitor heat generated by the semiconductor devices. A controller is configured to control the semiconductor devices in response to the signal from the at least one thermal diode.
The present invention further provides a method of controlling an optical system by providing an array of semiconductor devices for performing an operation, the semiconductor devices having multiple characteristics associated with performing the operation, providing at least one detector located within the array to selectively monitor multiple characteristics of the semiconductor devices, the detector configured to generate a signal corresponding to the selected characteristic and providing a controller configured to control the semiconductor devices in response to the signal from the detector.
The present invention further provides an optical system that includes an array of semiconductor devices wherein the array includes one or more semiconductor devices that are electrically coupled to act as a detector.
Utilizing detector diodes in the array to measure optical power and temperature has several advantages. One advantage is that the duty cycle and variance in the radiant intensity of the emitting array is substantially unaffected. Furthermore, since only a few diodes in the array are chosen for power monitoring there is virtually no reduction or loss of total radiant flux. Power monitoring and temperature sensing can be accomplished by providing the appropriate electronic circuitry to variably bias the proper diodes with additional circuitry to monitor the photocurrent. Therefore, using some of the diodes as photodetectors and temperature sensors provides a very efficient means of power monitoring and temperature sensing. In addition, locating detector diodes within the array provides an ideal location for monitoring power and temperature.
These and other embodiments are described in more detail in the following detailed descriptions and the figures.
The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive list of embodiments and features of the present invention. Persons skilled in the art are capable of appreciating other embodiments and features from the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings.
Representative embodiments of the present invention are shown in
The light emitting subsystem 12 preferably comprises a plurality of semiconductor devices 19. Selected of the plurality of semiconductor devices 19 are implemented to provide radiant output 24. The radiant output 24 is directed to a work piece 26. Returned radiation 28 may be directed back to the light emitting system 12 from the work piece 26 (e.g., via reflection of the radiant output 24).
The radiant output 24 preferably is directed to the work piece 26 via coupling optics 30. The coupling optics 30, if used, may be variously implemented. As an example, the coupling optics may include one or more layers, materials or other structure interposed between the semiconductor devices 19 providing radiant output 24 and the work piece 26. As an example, the coupling optics 30 may include a micro-lens array to enhance collection, condensing, collimation or otherwise the quality or effective quantity of the radiant output 24. As another example, the coupling optics 30 may include a micro-reflector array. In employing such micro-reflector array, each semiconductor device providing radiant output 24 preferably is disposed in a respective micro-reflector, on a one-to-one basis. Use of micro-lens and of micro-reflector arrays so as to enhance radiant output is shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/084,488, filed Mar. 18, 2005, entitled “MICRO-REFLECTORS ON A SUBSTRATE FOR HIGH-DENSITY LED ARRAY”, which application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/554,628, filed Mar. 18, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if recited in full herein for all purposes.
Preferably, each of the layers, materials or other structure have a selected index of refraction. By properly selecting each index of refraction, reflection at interfaces between layers, materials and other structure in the path of the radiant output 24 (and/or returned radiation 28) may be selectively controlled. As an example, by controlling differences in such indexes at a selected interface disposed between the semiconductor devices to the work piece 26, reflection at that interfaces may reduced, toward being eliminated or, at least, minimized, so as to enhance the transmission of radiant output at that interface for ultimate delivery to the work piece 26. Control of indexes of refraction so as to enhance radiant output is shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/083,525, filed Mar. 18, 2005, entitled “DIRECT COOLING OF LEDS”, which application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/554,632, filed Mar. 18, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if recited in full herein for all purposes.
The coupling optics 30 may be employed for various purposes. Example purposes include, among others, to protect the semiconductor devices 19, to retain cooling fluid associated with the cooling subsystem 18, to collect, condense and/or collimate the radiant output 24, to collect, direct or reject returned radiation 28, or for other purposes, alone or in combination. Generally, however, it is preferred to employ coupling optics 30 so as to enhance the effective quality or quantity of the radiant output 24, particularly as delivered to the work piece 26.
Selected of the plurality of semiconductor devices 19 preferably are coupled to the controller 14 via coupling electronics 22, so as to provide data to the controller 14. As described further below, the controller is preferably also implemented to control such data-providing semiconductor devices, e.g., via the coupling electronics 22.
The controller 14 preferably is also connected to, and is implemented to control, each of the power source 16 and the cooling subsystem 18. Moreover, the controller 14 preferably receives data from respective such source 16 and subsystem 18.
In addition to the power source 16, cooling subsystem 18 and light emitting subsystem 12, the controller 14 may also be connected to, and implemented to control, further elements 32, 34. Element 32, as shown, is internal of the photoreactive system 10. Element 34, as shown, is external of the photoreactive system 10, but is understood to be associated with the work piece 26 (e.g., handling, cooling or other external equipment) or to be otherwise related to the photoreaction the system 10 supports.
The data received by the controller 14 from one or more of the power source 16, the cooling subsystem 18, the light emitting subsystem 12, and/or elements 32, 34, may be of various types. As an example the data may be representative of one or more characteristics associated with coupled semiconductor devices 19, respectively. As another example, the data may be representative of one or more characteristics associated with the respective component 12, 16, 18, 32, 34 providing the data. As still another example, the data may be representative of one or more characteristics associated with the work piece 26 (e.g., representative of the radiant outputs energy or spectral component(s) directed to the work piece). Moreover, the data may be representative of some combination of these characteristics.
The controller 14, in receipt of any such data, preferably is implemented to respond to that data. Preferably, responsive to such data from any such component, the controller 14 is implemented to control one or more of the power source 16, cooling subsystem 18, light emitting subsystem 12 (including one or more such coupled semiconductor devices), and/or the elements 32, 34. As an example, responsive to data from the light emitting subsystem indicating that the light energy is insufficient at one or more points associated with the work piece, the controller 14 may be implemented to either (a) increase the power source's supply of power to one or more of the semiconductor devices, (b) increase cooling of the light emitting subsystem via the cooling subsystem 18 (i.e., certain light emitting devices, if cooled, provide greater radiant output), (c) increase the time during which the power is supplied to such devices, or (d) a combination of the above.
The cooling subsystem 18 is implemented to manage the thermal behavior of the light emitting subsystem 12. That is, generally, the cooling subsystem 18 provides for cooling of such subsystem 12 and, more specifically, the semiconductor devices 19. The cooling subsystem 18 may also be implemented to cool the work piece 26 and/or the space between the piece 26 and the photoreactive system 10 (e.g., particularly, the light emitting subsystem 12). Cooling systems providing thermal management in photoreactive systems generally and as to light emitting semiconductor devices in particular are shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/083,525, filed Mar. 18, 2005, as previously described above.
The photoreactive system 10 may be used for various applications. Examples include, without limitation, curing applications ranging from ink printing to the fabrication of DVDs and lithography. Generally, the applications in which the photoreactive system 10 is employed have associated parameters. That is, an application may contemplate parameters as follows: provision of one or more levels of radiant power, at one or more wavelengths, applied over one or more periods of time. In order to properly accomplish the photoreaction associated with the application, optical power may need to be delivered at or near the work piece at or above a one or more predetermined levels (and/or for a certain time, times or range of times).
In order to follow an intended application's parameters, the semiconductor devices 19 providing radiant output 24 generally are to operated in accordance with various characteristics associated with the application's parameters, e.g., temperature, spectral distribution and radiant power. At the same time, the semiconductor devices 19 typically have certain operating specifications, which specifications generally are associated with the semiconductor devices' fabrication and, among other things, should be followed in order to preclude destruction and/or forestall degradation of the devices. Other components of the system 10 also typically have associated operating specifications. These specifications generally include ranges (e.g., maximum and minimum) for operating temperatures and applied, electrical power.
Accordingly, the photoreactive system 10 supports monitoring of the application's parameters. In addition, the photoreactive system 10 preferably provides for monitoring of the semiconductor devices 19, including as to respective characteristics and specifications. Moreover, the photoreactive system 10 preferably also provides for monitoring of the selected other components of the system 10, including as to respective characteristics and specifications.
Providing such monitoring enables verification of the system's proper operation and, in turn, determination as to whether the system 10 is operating in any way other than properly. The system 10 may be operating improperly with respect to either/both the application's parameters, any components characteristics associated with such parameters and/or any component's respective operating specifications. The provision of monitoring is contemplated above, with respect to the descriptions of data provided to the controller 14 by one or more of the system's components.
Monitoring also supports control of the system's operation. Generally, control is implemented via the controller 14 receiving and being responsive to data from one or more system components. This control, as described above, may be implemented directly (i.e., by controlling a component through control signals directed to the component, based on data respecting that components operation) or indirectly (i.e., by controlling a component's operation through control signals directed to adjust operation of other components). In the example set forth above, the semiconductor device's radiant output is adjusted indirectly through control signals directed to the power source 16 that adjust power applied to the light emitting subsystem 12 and/or through control signals directed to the cooling subsystem 18 that adjust cooling applied to the light emitting subsystem 12.
Control preferably is employed to enable and/or enhance the system's proper operation and/or performance of the application. In a more specific example, control may also be employed to enable and/or enhance balance between the array's radiant output and its operating temperature, so as, e.g., to preclude heating the array beyond its specifications while also directing radiant energy to the work piece 26 sufficient to properly complete the photoreaction(s) of the application.
Generally, it is recognized that some applications may require relatively high radiant power, so that sufficient radiant energy may be delivered to the work piece 26 to properly perform the application. Accordingly, it is desirable to implement a light emitting subsystem 12 that is able to output relatively high powered, radiant output. To do so, the subsystem 12 may be implemented using an array of light emitting semiconductor devices 19. In particular, the subsystem 12 may be implemented using a high-density, light emitting diode (LED) array. One such high-density LED array is shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/984,589, filed Nov. 8, 2004, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. Although LED arrays may be used and are described in detail herein, it is understood that the semiconductor devices 19, and array(s) 20 of same, may be implemented using other light emitting technologies without departing from the principles of the invention, which technologies include, without limitation, organic LEDs, laser diodes, other semiconductor lasers.
Referring specifically to
As is also further described below, it is contemplated that, based on coupling electronics, selected of the semiconductor devices in the array may be either/both multifunction devices and/or multimode devices, where (a) multifunction devices are capable of detecting more than one characteristic (e.g., either radiant output, temperature, magnetic fields, vibration, pressure, acceleration, and other mechanical forces or deformations) and is switched among these detection functions in accordance with the application parameters or other determinative factors and (b) multimode devices are capable of emission, detection and some other mode (e.g., off) and are switched among modes in accordance with the application parameters or other determinative factors.
Although
In addition, the set of detectors 36 may be defined based on characterization of the specific application using the photoreactive system 10. Characterization is generally known in engineering. Characterization may be variously achieved, including via experience (e.g., running trials and studying/testing the results at selected steps throughout the application), modeling (e.g., computerized emulation, etc.), theoretical analysis (e.g., hitting the books), and otherwise, alone or in selected combinations. Characterization may be performed statically or dynamically, including during production runs of the application.
Characterization, in defining the set of detectors 36 and otherwise the implementation and use of the photoreactive system 10, is preferably used to identify sensitivities relating to the specific application. The identified sensitivities may arise at various steps or times in the application, and may be directed to various components of the system 10 and, in turn, to various parts of the components. Typically, sensitivities may be expected relating to the work piece 26 and/or the array 20. With respect to the work piece 26, for example, the sensitivities may be hot spots, areas of over or under exposure, or other areas of the work piece subject to photoreaction, each of which area will tend to be vulnerable to improper processing unless detected and controlled. With respect to the array 20, for example, the sensitivities may be a hot spot that will tend to cause either improper processing (e.g., inadequate radiant output due to heating) or result in damage to the array (e.g., by operating outside the semiconductor devices' specifications), unless detected and controlled. However, knowing the sensitivities enables implementing a responsively defined set of detectors 36 (e.g., to detect the characteristic at or proximate the area of sensitivity), with proper control following straightforwardly from detection.
Characterization, in defining the set of detectors 36 and otherwise the implementation and use of the photoreactive system 10, may also be used to identify relation(s) between the radiant power detected by detectors 36 and the radiant power called for by the application. Generally, in order to monitor the far-field illumination pattern (or, in other words, the radiant output delivered to the surface of the work piece 26 undergoing the photoreaction), the detectors 36 detect the illumination received back from the work piece 26, i.e., returned radiation 28. By comparing the returned radiation 28 to the radiant output of the array 20, a relationship is found that may be monitored during production so as to control the photoreactive system 10 and, thereby, enable or enhance the proper performance of the application. The returned radiation can also be monitored to observe chemical reactions in the target materials (e.g., monitoring at least one characteristic of the reacting material). This could be achieved by placing more than one different type of light emitting semiconductor into the array in order to detect a range of wavelengths. It is understood that, although one relationship may be found, plural relationships may be found, which relationships may apply variously across the surface of the work piece 26 and/or around and among the array 20, in which case, each such relationship is respectively monitored detector-by-detector and used to control the application via the controller 14. It is also understood that, although returned radiation 28 is described here, other forms of radiation may also be detected and, if so, will generally be factored into and, preferably, negated from the identification of the relationship(s); these other forms of radiation include sidewall light emissions (which are minimized or eliminated through use of coupling optics 30, as described above) and light from external sources (which typically will be minimized or eliminated through proper optical shielding of the work piece and system 10 during production).
With reference to
With a set of detectors 36 defined and implemented (including, e.g., to detect temperature and radiant output at various locations around and within the array 20), data responsive to the detection(s) is contemplated to be gathered and provided to the controller 14. As previously discussed, this data may indicate that light energy is insufficient at one or more points associated with the work piece 26 and the controller 14 may be implemented to, among other options, increase the power source's supply of power to one or more of the semiconductor devices 19. Further to this, in an example embodiment, selected semiconductor devices 19 are related to one or more respective detector(s) 36, so that when an improper characteristic is found (e.g., insufficient radiant power or heat) in connection with these selected semiconductor devices 19, the controller 14 can control specific part(s) of the system 10 specifically to correct the improper characteristic locally to the devices 19. More specifically, if the selected semiconductor devices (e.g., LEDs) are determined to have insufficient radiant output, the controller 14 may direct the power source 16 to increase power to these particular devices 19 so as to be specifically responsive to and to correct the improper characteristic in these devices 19. While such specific control is contemplated, it is also contemplated to combine such specific control with more general, systemic control (e.g., to increase general cooling in balance with a general increase in power to all devices 19); this may be particularly advantageous when characterization indicates that the improper characteristic of system's component(s) (e.g., selected semiconductor devices) is typically tied to other problems, whether current or upcoming and which can be precluded by proper control.
Referring to
In a typical embodiment in accordance with the array and detectors of
In another embodiment, the LEDs of the array 20 are connected to a power supply having a circuit that monitors the photovoltaic current and applies a variable forward bias potential to LEDs while sensing the current. The photovoltaic current and the forward bias potential can be calibrated to an external standard for the radiant output. The detector diodes are connected to circuitry that allows them to be separately addressed either through a separate module or through circuitry integrated into the power supply. That is, the detector diodes are physically incorporated in the array but are removed from the electronic circuitry that drives the other LEDs with forward current. The detector diodes are instead electrically connected to a different circuit that applies to them a reverse electrical bias. In this reverse-biased condition, the detector diode is no longer a light-emitting diode, but a light-detecting (photodetector) diode.
Detector diode 41 is mounted on the same substrate as LEDs 40. It is an integral part of the array 20 (e.g., if the array 20 is a dense array, the diode 41 has dimensions consistent with the other diodes of the array so as to maintain density). Although the diode 41 is an integral part of the array 20, it is contemplated that the diode 41 may be a LED or any other diode appropriate for detection of the characteristic (e.g., a silicon diode).
The light emitting diodes 40 are powered by a power source 16. More specifically, the power source 16 is implemented as a constant current programmable power supply outputting a current (I). The power source 16 is controlled by a controller 14. Here, the controller 14 is implemented to have a user-set adjustment mechanism 46 (e.g., a variable resistor, which may be set to provide a desired radiant output level) and an input from coupling electronics 22 (e.g., an operational amplifier 42).
The operational amplifier 42 is configured to measure the photocurrent of the detector diode 41. More specifically, the operational amplifier 42 is configured as a trans-impedance (current-to-voltage converter) amplifier. The amplifier's non-inverting input (+) is grounded. The amplifier's inverting input (−) is coupled to the diode 41, as well as to a feedback resistor (Rf). As such, the inverting input is a virtual ground.
In this embodiment, the photocurrent from the diode 41 is driven into the virtual ground. Therefore, diode 41 is operated in a photovoltaic mode, rather than a reverse-biased mode. With this configuration, a substantially high degree of output linearity is maintained.
Accordingly, the output potential from operational amplifier 42 is:
Vo=−I Rf
where Vo is the output voltage of operational amplifier 42, I is the photocurrent, and Rf is the feedback resistor. The feedback resistor here sets gain. Generally, the output voltage Vo is proportional to the photocurrent from the diode 41, which photocurrent will have some relationship(s) with the radiant output of the array 20 and, therein, some relationship(s) to the radiant output delivered to the work piece 26.
The controller 14 is implemented so as to enable comparison of Vo to a desired set voltage in order to control the power source 16. The power source 16, implemented as a constant current power supply, thereby has its output current adjusted, which adjustment is generally made to maintain a desired radiant output from (or desired temperature for) the emitting array 20.
Notwithstanding the specifics of this depicted embodiment, a number of other embodiments may also be employed. As an example, separate circuits could be used for measuring a plurality of separate detectors 41. As another example, rather than using detector diode(s) in the photovoltaic mode and measuring using a trans-impedance amplifier, it is understood that the detector diodes may be reverse biased and measurements may be taken of the voltage across a bias resistor in order to determine the photocurrent and, accordingly, control the system 10.
As another example, while the depicted embodiment uses a single, array-centric detector diode in and surrounding by a linear array of emitting diodes, it is also understood that any number of detector diodes may be used and that a plurality of detector diodes may be used that are not necessarily adjacent to each other and which may not be array centric. Indeed, all detector diodes may be around the periphery of the array. As well, the detector diodes may be distributed in and throughout the emitting array in order to measure a desired average photocurrent or average temperature. It is also understood that a plurality of detector diodes may be used, together with a plurality of measurement circuits or a single measurement circuit with a switch multiplexer in order to measure particular areas of the emitting array.
The evaluation indicates several desirable aspects. It requires no additional hardware, e.g., no additional photo detectors or mounting equipment. It enables distribution of light sensor detector diodes (photodiodes) throughout the array, thus providing distributed performance measures over the life of the device. Furthermore, it provides radiant output monitoring integral with the array. As well, it has no moving parts, and the detector diodes generally do not interfere with the radiant output. Also, it provides a means of configuring the RX product to give a specified dose of UV radiation.
Of course, this evaluation method contemplates that the detector diodes are physically wired into the circuit board differently than the emitting LEDs. In that way, the detector diodes can be biased in reverse at a constant voltage. Also, additional circuitry is used to sense the photocurrent and store the information, but such circuitry is anticipated for any such monitoring effort. In addition, if the emitting LEDs are mounted in a reflector cup, as is desirable, the emitting LEDs will be optically shielded from the detector diodes (except for reflections off a window and off the work piece 26), which generally is indicated by reduced photocurrents.
Another embodiment of the invention includes one or more multi-use devices. Multi-use devices are understood to be either multimode or multifunction, or both. Devices that are multifunction are able to be configured so as to detect from among a plurality of characteristics, such as, for example, radiant output, temperature, magnetic fields, or vibration. Multifunction devices preferably are dynamically configurable. Multifunction devices are switched among these detection functions in accordance width the application parameters or other determinative factors. Devices that are multimode are capable of, for example, emission, detection and other modes (e.g., off). Multimode devices preferably are dynamically switchable. Multimode devices are switched among modes in accordance with the application parameters or other determinative factors.
One example of a multifunction device is shown and described in
Detector diode 102 measures radiant output as discussed above and utilizes the forward bias potential dependence on temperature to measure the thermal performance of the system. Detector diode 102 is an integral part of array 100 and may be used not only as detector diode but also to produce the radiant intensity of the system. Detector diode 102 is addressed separately by the power supply from the illuminating LEDs. Detector diode 102 is periodically polled by a CPU or controller. The temperature data is retained in a data archival system to monitor the temperature and adjust the power to array 100 accordingly.
In the embodiment of
Diodes 102 used for detection are connected to a circuit 110 for operation in either one of two modes. In a first mode (mode 1), detector diodes 102 measure radiant output from emitting diodes or the LEDs. In a second mode (mode 2), the detector diodes 102 measure temperature. Operational amplifier (A1) is used for both mode 1 and mode 2. Switches S1 and S2 are employed to switch between modes. Although
In mode 1, operational amplifier (A1) is configured as a trans-impedance (current-to-voltage) amplifier with the photocurrent from the detector diodes 102 driven into a virtual ground to maintain the highest degree of output linearity. In mode 1, switch (S2) is closed in order to short out input resistor (Ri) and switch (S1) is opened to prevent voltage (V) from imposing a current into the detecting diodes. The output from operational amplifier (A1) is:
Vo=−I Rf
where (Vo) is the output voltage of operational amplifier (A1), (I) is the detected photocurrent, and (Rf) is the feedback resistor from operational amplifier (A1) output to inverting output. The non-inverting input is grounded so that detector diodes 102 see virtual ground at the inverting input terminal of operational amplifier (A1). The controller compares output voltage (Vo) to a desired set voltage to command programmable power supply 106 to change its output current, e.g., to maintain the desired emitting array output level.
In mode 2, a current from voltage (V) is used with resistor (R) to provide a forward bias for detector diodes 102. In mode 2, switch (S1) is closed and switch (S2) is open. Operational amplifier (A1) is configured as an inverting amplifier and the output will be:
Vo=−Vf(Rf/Ri)
where (Vo) is the output from operational amplifier (A1), (Vf) is the forward voltage of detector diodes 102 (which is a function of diode temperature), (Rf) is the feedback resistor from operational amplifier (A1) output to the non-inverting input of operational amplifier (A1), and (Ri) is the input resistor from detector diodes 102 to the non-inverting input of operational amplifier (A1). In mode 2, the output voltage (Vo) will be a function of temperature of array 100. For example, if detector diodes 102 are silicon, (Vf) is approximately 0.600 volts at 25 degrees C. as determined by the diode equation:
I=Isat[(exp qV/kt)−1)]
and would change approximately −1.8 mV/degree C. In the embodiment of
The measured value of temperature may be used by controller 108 to limit the power supply current in order not to exceed a desired temperature level that might be harmful to array 100. Controller 108 may also activate fans or other cooling means (such as seen at 18 in
In the event that there is interaction between the modes 1 and 2, i.e., that illumination of the detector diodes varies the output of the temperature measurement function, the controller can apply a pre-determined algorithm to subtract off the error produced by the photocurrent during the temperature measurement function. Alternatively, the controller can use other diodes to sense the temperature and determine the photovoltaic current concurrently with the temperature.
Although
Persons skilled in the art will recognize that many modifications and variations are possible in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts and actions which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention and that such modifications and variations do not depart from the spirit and scope of the teachings and claims contained therein.
This invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/558,205, entitled LED Array With Dual-Use LEDs For Both Illumination And Optical Detection, filed on Mar. 30, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and set forth in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3586959 | Eccles et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3936686 | Moore | Feb 1976 | A |
4011575 | Groves | Mar 1977 | A |
4435732 | Hyatt | Mar 1984 | A |
4529949 | de Wit et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4530040 | Petterson | Jul 1985 | A |
4544642 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4595289 | Feldman et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4680644 | Shirato et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4684801 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4734714 | Takasu et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5003357 | Kim et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5150623 | Woods | Sep 1992 | A |
5195102 | McLean et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5296724 | Ogata et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5311353 | Crawford | May 1994 | A |
5397867 | Demeo | Mar 1995 | A |
5418384 | Yamana et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424544 | Shelton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5436710 | Uchiyama | Jul 1995 | A |
5490049 | Montalan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5522225 | Eskandari | Jun 1996 | A |
5554849 | Gates | Sep 1996 | A |
5555038 | Conway | Sep 1996 | A |
5623510 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632551 | Roney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5660461 | Ignatius et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670780 | Lewis | Sep 1997 | A |
5698866 | Doiron et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705788 | Beyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715270 | Zediker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719589 | Norman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5806965 | Deese | Sep 1998 | A |
5857767 | Hochstein | Jan 1999 | A |
5877899 | Stern et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892579 | Elyasaf et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910706 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6033087 | Shozo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058012 | Cooper et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077073 | Jacob | Jun 2000 | A |
6088185 | Ratliff et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6118383 | Hegyi | Sep 2000 | A |
6141040 | Toh | Oct 2000 | A |
6155699 | Miller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160354 | Ruvinskiy et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163036 | Taninaka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6200134 | Kovac et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6291839 | Lester | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318886 | Stopa et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319425 | Tasaki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340868 | Lys et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366017 | Antoniadis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367950 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373635 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375340 | Biebl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419384 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420199 | Coman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455930 | Palanisamy et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459919 | Lys et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6498355 | Harrah et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525335 | Krames et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534791 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536923 | Merz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547249 | Collins, III et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554451 | Keuper | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561640 | Young | May 2003 | B1 |
6561808 | Neuberger | May 2003 | B2 |
6573536 | Dry | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577332 | Osawa et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578989 | Osumi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6607286 | West et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6630689 | Bhat et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6683421 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686581 | Verhoeckx et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708501 | Ghoshal et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713862 | Palanisamy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720859 | Mazzochette | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6796698 | Sommers et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798152 | Rooke et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800500 | Coman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815724 | Dry | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822991 | Collins, III et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826059 | Bockle et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831303 | Dry | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836081 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857767 | Matsui et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6930870 | Nobe et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6992335 | Ohkawa | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995348 | Bradley et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009165 | Hehemann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7042341 | McMahon | May 2006 | B2 |
7071493 | Owen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20010002120 | Bessendorf et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010030782 | Trezza | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046652 | Ostler et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020053589 | Owen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020142808 | Abbasi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020187454 | Melikechi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038943 | Almarzouk et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030122749 | Booth et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030230765 | Dry | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000677 | Dry | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011457 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040026721 | Dry | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041521 | Mandler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090794 | Ollett et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113549 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119084 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134603 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135159 | Siegel | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141326 | Dry | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166249 | Siegel | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201988 | Allen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206970 | Martin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040238111 | Siegel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247484 | Yerazunis | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018179 | Bevis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050152146 | Owen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050218468 | Owen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231713 | Owen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253252 | Owen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285129 | Jackson, III et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060216865 | Owen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0935145 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1158761 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1469529 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2224374 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2396331 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2399162 | Sep 2004 | GB |
404204333 | Nov 1990 | JP |
2003268042 | Sep 2003 | JP |
9716679 | May 1997 | WO |
0037904 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0102846 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0206723 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0226270 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO02069839 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO03060928 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO03096387 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004009318 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004011848 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004038759 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004078477 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2005041632 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005043598 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005043954 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005091392 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005094390 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005100961 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO20050101535 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2006072071 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050230600 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60558205 | Mar 2004 | US |