Lenticular lens sheet for projection screen

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6545813
  • Patent Number
    6,545,813
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 2, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 8, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A lenticular screen component of a rear projection display screen has lenticular elements formed on a viewer surface. Identical lenticular elements cover the entire lenticular screen component and are repeated horizontally at a constant displacement. A given lenticular element includes a pair of reflective side portions and a refractive tip portion interposed between the side portions. One of the pair of side portions forms a sloped region at a joint between the one side portion and a side portion of an adjacent lenticular element. The sloped region is at an angle in a range between 5 and 15 degrees with respect to the first axis. The one side portion is covered with a reflective coating in at least a region of the one side portion that includes the joint. The pair of reflective side portions reflects light rays incoming from a projector towards the refractive tip portion for refracting the reflected light rays via a surface of the refractive tip portion facing a viewer. Each refracted light ray is refracted by a convex surface of the refractive tip portion.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to a projection screen of a display device.




A rear projection television includes, for example, a projection type cathode ray tube (CRT) in which an image is formed. The formed image is projected via a projection lens on a rear projection screen. The rear projection screen provides a surface on which a final image is displayed for viewing. The rear projection screen redirects a diverging cone of light from the projection lens into a limited range of directions encompassing the locations of intended viewers, thereby providing a gain in image brightness. The rear projection screen also reduces reflections of ambient light that lower the contrast of the displayed image.




Rear projection screens generally include a Fresnel lens component for directing the light and a separate, lenticular lens component for producing the angular spreading of the light. The Fresnel screen component functions as a single large field lens that collects light from the projector and redirects the light so that it reaches the lenticular screen component approximately collimated. Therefore, the focal length of the Fresnel lens is determined by the requirement for collimated light and the optical distance to the projector. The Fresnel screen component can be formed from a sheet of clear optical material and is placed in contact with the projector side of the separate lenticular screen component.




Rear projection screens can be classified by the primary way that is used to spread the light after it has been redirected by the Fresnel lens component. The three categories are diffusive, refractive, and reflective/refractive. Diffusive structures consist of random patterns of small surface features and/or lightscattering particles distributed in the volume of the light-spreading lenticular lens. Refractive structures are formed of small lens like surface features that are carefully specified, and/or replicated in one or two dimensions at a well-defined pitch. Such lenticular arrays introduce a periodic spatial sampling of the projected image that can, disadvantageously, form moire beats with the projected pixels or with the Fresnel lens structure.




A typical lenticular screen component of a rear projection display has lenticular elements formed on a viewer surface. Identical lenticular elements cover the entire lenticular screen component and are repeated horizontally at a constant displacement. The lenticular elements vary in height only in a horizontal direction across the screen; there is no variation along the vertical direction through any given horizontal location. A given lenticle or lenticular element linearly spans the entire height of the lenticular screen component, without variation, from the top edge to the bottom edge. A given lenticular element has a pair of reflective sides and a lens section between the sides. The lenticular element changes the light direction by a combination of reflection and refraction. Reflectance occurs primarily at the sides of the lenticular elements that are reflective. Refraction takes place at the lens section where the light exits toward the viewer.




A lenticular lens component of a projection screen, embodying an inventive feature, includes lenticular elements. Each lenticular element extends in a vertical or a height direction and repeats in a horizontal or a width direction to form a plane defining a first axis normal to the plane. The given lenticular element includes a pair of reflective side portions and a refractive tip portion interposed between the side portions. One of the pair of side portions forms at a joint between the one side portion and a side portion of an adjacent lenticular element a sloped region at an angle in a range between 5 and 15 degrees with respect to the first axis. The one side portion is covered with a reflective coating in at least a region of the one side portion that includes the joint. The pair of reflective side portions reflects light rays incoming from a projector towards the refractive tip portion for refracting the reflected light rays via a surface of the refractive tip portion facing a viewer. Each refracted light ray is refracted by a convex surface of the refractive tip portion.




A trapping structure for ambient light is provided between the lenticular elements. Scattering structures are provided on the projector side surface (and/or within the interior of the volume).




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A lenticular lens of a projection screen, embodying an inventive feature, includes a plurality of lenticular elements. Each lenticular element extends in a first direction and repeated in a second direction to form a plane defining a first axis normal to the plane. A given lenticular element includes a refractive tip portion and a pair of reflective side portions. The side portions have the refractive tip portion interposed between a pair of end edges thereof, respectively. At least one of the pair of side portions has a joining edge in common with a side portion of an adjacent lenticular element and has a sloped region that includes the common joining edge. The sloped region forms an angle smaller than 15 degrees with respect to the first axis. The one side portion is covered with a reflective coating at least in the sloped region that includes the common joining edge. The pair of reflective side portions reflect light rays incoming from a projector towards the refractive tip portion for refracting the reflected light rays via a surface of the refractive tip portion facing a viewer. Each refracted light ray from the tip portion is refracted by a convex surface.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates a rear projection screen, embodying an inventive feature, that includes a Fresnel screen component and a lenticular screen component;





FIG. 2



a


illustrates in a simplified manner light paths within a lenticular element of the lenticular screen component of

FIG. 1

;





FIGS. 2



b


and


2




c


illustrate in a simplified manner the structure and operation of the lenticular element of

FIG. 2



a


and an adjacent lenticular element; and





FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


illustrate in a simplified manner the structure and operation of a second embodiment of the lenticular element of the lenticular screen component of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROFFERED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

illustrates a rear projection screen


200


that includes a conventional Fresnel screen component


98


having a side


98




a


facing a projector that includes, for example, a CRT, not shown. A lenticular screen component


99


, embodying an inventive feature, has a base surface


101


that may be relatively flat facing a side


98


of Fresnel screen component


98


. An opposite surface


101


′ of lenticular screen component


99


faces a viewer. An axis Z is normal or perpendicular both to surface


101


and to the average surface of opposite surface


101


′. Lenticular screen component


99


may be formed of a polymer material. Projected image light rays are applied via Fresnel lens component


98


of

FIG. 1

at approximately normal incidence to surface


101


of lenticular screen component


99


.





FIG. 2



a


illustrates in a simplified manner light paths within a lensiet or lenticular element


100


, embodying an inventive feature, of lenticular screen component


99


of FIG.


1


.

FIGS. 2



b


and


2




c


illustrate in a simplified manner the structure and operation of lenticular elements


100


of

FIG. 2



a


and an adjacent lenticular element


100


″. Similar symbols and numerals in

FIGS. 1

,


2




a


,


2




b


and


2




c


indicate similar items or functions.




Each lenticular element, such as, for example, lenticular element


100


of

FIG. 2



b


extends in a vertical or height direction V and repeated in a horizontal or width direction H of

FIG. 1

at a constant displacement W


1


of

FIG. 2



b


or


3




a


. Constant displacement W


1


is called the pitch of lenticular screen component


99


of FIG.


1


. For comparison purposes, a pitch of Fresnel screen component


98


, that is similarly defined, is preferably less than 75% of the pitch of lenticular screen component


99


.




Lenticular element


100


, for example, of

FIG. 2



b


, includes a pair of reflective sides


104


and


105


. An angle φ is formed between side


104


and a side


105




a


of an adjacent lenticular element


100


″. A lens tip section


103


having a continuously curved convex outward shape is interposed between reflective sides


104


and


105


, at the tips of the lenticular profile, between an end edge


142


and an end edge


141


, respectively. Tip section


103


has a width W


2


. A distance between an end edge


141




a


of a side


105




a


of an adjacent lenticular element


100


″ and end edge


142


of lenticular element


100


has a value equal to the difference W


1


−W


2


.




A first portion of the incoming rays from the projector, not shown, denoted by a ray bundle B in

FIG. 2



a


, intercepts tip section


103


mainly directly and to a smaller extent indirectly as a result of reflection. The rays of ray bundle B are refracted upon exiting lenticular screen component


99


, and spread horizontally into a corresponding angular ray fan B′ that is symmetrical about normal axis Z. An angular extent of ray fan B′ is determined by a range of surface slopes associated with the specific curvature of the surface of tip section


103


. An angle β provides a measure of the angle at which the angular density of the refractive rays falls to approximately one-half the density at the center of ray fan B′.




A second portion of the incoming rays, denoted by a ray bundle A, is reflected by reflective left side


104


of lenticular screen component


99


. These rays are horizontally deviated by angle φ, where φ is an included angle between side


104


and a side


105




a


of adjacent lenticular element


100


″ at the point of reflection. When the deflected rays reach tip section


103


between reflective side


104


and a reflective side


105


, some rays exit lenticular element


100


, and some are prevented from exiting by total internal reflection in the lens region, not shown. Those rays that exit form a ray fan A′, centered around an axis, not shown, at a clockwise angle of +φ relative to normal axis Z. The density of rays in fan A′ typically changes from maximum to one-half its maximum value over an angle comparable in the magnitude to angle β in fan B′.




A reflective coating


120


of

FIG. 2



b


for reflecting ray bundle A of

FIG. 2



a


is placed between edge


140


and edge


142


of side


104


of

FIG. 2



b


. Reflective coating


120


is preferably applied in a thin conformal coating. Coating


120


can be a reflective metal, for example, silver, aluminum or chromium. Alternatively, the required reflectivity can be achieved by total internal reflection. Because of the steepness of sides


104


and


105


of lenticular elements


100


, total internal reflection will occur if sides


104


and


105


of lenticular element


100


are coated with at least one optical wavelength thickness of a low index material.




An index of refraction, n


c


, of low index coating


120


preferably satisfies the condition n


c


<n·sin(theta) where n is the refractive index of lenticular element


100


. Theta is an angle of side


104


, for example, relative to plane


101


lenticular screen component


99


, minus the characteristic spreading angle of scattering structure


150


, referred to later on. Theta has a value that is close to 90−φ/2.




A third portion of the incoming rays, not shown, enters element


100


at its base surface


101


in a similar manner and reaches side


105


of lenticular element


100


. In the third portion of the incoming rays, not shown, a ray at a given distance to the right of normal axis Z of lenticular element


100


, is a mirror image of the ray in bundle A at the same distance to the left of normal axis Z. Thus, a third fan of rays, not shown, exits lenticular element


100


with a leftward angular displacement of φ. Rays in the third fan of rays, not shown, form a mirror image of those in ray fan A′, both in position and angle.




Angled or sloped sides


104


and


105


, for example, of lenticular element


100


of

FIG. 2



b


extend a height H


1


from joint edge


140


, where sides


104


and


105




a


are joined. Angled sides


104


and


105


are capped by continuously curved tip section


103


having the width W


2


. Sides


104


and


105


of lenticular element


100


can be either straight or curved.




A light path of a ray


110


is incident at a left edge


140


of base surface


101


of

FIG. 2



a


in a direction parallel to screen normal axis Z of

FIG. 2



c


. Edge ray


110


is reflected from sloping side


104


of lenticular element


100


at an angle equal to φ with respect to screen normal axis Z, where φ is the included angle between adjacent sides


104


and


105


. Reflected edge ray


110




a


, preferably, reaches tip section


103


, located above dotted horizontal line in

FIG. 2



c


, at extreme right hand edge


141


of curved tip section


103


. This geometrical relationship is expressed mathematically by:






Hi=(W


1


+W


2


)/2 tan(φ)  (1-1)






When a first condition, expressed by equation 1-1, is satisfied, all the rays at lenslet base surface


101


of

FIG. 2



a


, that are parallel to screen normal axis Z and directed toward sloping left side


104


, will be, advantageously, reflected. Advantageously, such reflected rays would reach to all positions along the width direction of curved tip section


103


. Incident rays that are parallel to screen normal axis Z represent the average direction of rays that have traversed Fresnel lens component


98


of

FIG. 1 and a

diffusing structure


150


of lenticular screen


99


.




In carrying out an inventive feature, side portions


104


, for example, has joining edge


140


in common with side portion


105




a


of adjacent lenticular element


100


″ and is sloped, at least in a region that includes common joining edge


140


to form angle


130


. Angle


130


is in a range between 5 and 15 degrees. The range of angle


130


is equal to one-half of angular range φ, defining the slope. The region that includes joining edge


140


is covered with a corresponding portion of a reflecting coating


120


. Advantageously, edge ray


110


of

FIG. 2



c


would reach tip section


103


. On the other hand, a ray, not shown, that is slightly to the left of ray


110


, would be reflected to reach the corresponding tip section


103


of the adjacent lenticular element, not shown in

FIG. 2



c


. Thereby, efficient reflective coating


120


is obtained.




Preferably, the slope of reflective side


104


at all points between edges


140


and


142


should lie within angular range


130


, between approximately 5 degrees and approximately 15 degrees. If angular range


130


defining the slope (at any point) of side


104


, for example, were too large, too much of the light from the projector would have experienced multiple reflections and, disadvantageously, would not have escaped through lens section


103


. On the other hand, if angular range


130


were too small, then it would have been difficult to fabricate the structure. This is so because plastic molding processes require a relief angle in order that the plastic can be removed from the mold.




Height H


1


of side


104


or


105


of

FIG. 2



b


plus a height H


2


of convex lens tip section


103


together determine a total height of lenticular elements


100


. The aspect ratio of lenticular element


100


is defined as a ratio between the total height and the pitch of lenticular elements


100


.




A length of side


104


or


105


is preferably selected to be sufficient for the reflective light to span the entire width of lens section


103


, but not so large that significant amount of light undergoes a second reflection from the opposite side. This condition, in conjunction with the aforementioned requirement that angular range


130


be between approximately 5 degrees and approximately 15 degrees, requires a rather large aspect ratio in a range from approximately 1.5 to approximately 3.0.




Angles between screen normal axis Z and each of normal axes to the surface of curved tip section


103


, such as a normal axis


155


, span a range of angles ±α. Positive angles α are measured clockwise from screen normal axis Z. The radius of curvature of tip section


103


need not be constant.




A second condition for the preferred geometry relates to the magnitude of angle α at edge


141


of lens tip section


103


of

FIG. 2



b


. Angular range ±α across convex tip section


103


is made greater than approximately 30 degrees that is, advantageously, large enough to provide adequate light spreading in the horizontal direction.




Geometrical considerations dictate that an angle


141




b


, formed between a tangent


141




a


at edge


141


and side


105


, is equal to 90 degrees +α+φ/2. The value of a is greater than 30 degrees, as explained before. The value of angle α/2, that is equal to angular range


130


, lies between 5 and 15 degrees, as explained before. Thus, the value of angle


141




a


is larger than (90 degrees +30 degrees+5 degrees=125 degrees).




Reflected edge ray


110




a


of

FIG. 2



c


, reflected from edge


140


of side


104


, intercepts at edge


141


of lens section


103


. In order that reflected edge ray


110




a


be refracted most sharply to the left by curved tip section


103


, the relative angle |φ−α| between ray


110




a


and corresponding normal


155


, preferably should be as close as possible to the critical angle for the lens medium. This can be expressed mathematically as:






α+φsin


−1


(1/n),  (1-2)






where n is the refractive index of the lens medium. A Lenticular element


100


that meets the above mentioned first and second conditions will spread normally incident light, advantageously, over the largest range of angles.




A consequence of equation 1-1 is that for values of ratio H


1


/W


1


larger than about 3/2, tip width W


2


is approximately one-third of total lenslet width W


1


. This means that approximately one-third of the incident light flux is reflected from left side


104


before proceeding to curved tip section


103


, one-third reaches tip section


103


directly without reflection, and the remaining third is reflected from right side


105


. Thus three fans of output rays are formed with approximately equal levels of light flux. Fan of rays A′ of

FIG. 2



a


reflected from left side


104


will exit lens section


103


with a rightward angular bias. The fan of rays, not shown, reflected from right side


105


will have a leftward angular bias. The fan of non-reflected rays B′ will be symmetrically redistributed about screen normal axis Z. Taken together, the three fan of rays provide, advantageously, a continuous distribution of luminance that monotonically decreases with increasing horizontal angle from screen normal axis Z.




In carrying out an inventive feature, coating


120


of

FIG. 2



b


is applied at least at a boundary or joint region that includes base edge


140


, between side


104


of lenticular element


100


and side


105




a


of lenticular element


100


″.




Thereby, advantageously, ray


110


of

FIG. 2



c


will contribute to the refracted light from lens section


103


. However, it may be desirable to apply coating


120


to all portions of lenticular element


100


surface, exclusive of tip section


103


, that are not used for the refractive spreading of light.




The refraction action of tip section


103


is made by a surface that is convex everywhere between sides


104


and


105


of lenticular element


100


.




Thereby, each ray reflected from side


104


or


105


intercepts the convex surface of tip section


103


. The refraction action of the convex surface of tip section


103


causes the light intensity to be, advantageously, more uniform at each viewing angle than if any portion of the surface of tip section


103


were not convex.




A light trapping structure located at a region


121


is preferably formed on top of coating


120


of sides


104


and


105


of lenticular element


100


, on surface


101


′ facing the viewer. Light trapping structure


121


is formed by a light absorbing material that is conformally coated on the viewer side of the reflective coating on sides


104


and


105


of lenticular element


100


. Because of the presence of reflective coating


120


, advantageously, neither the absorptivity nor the index of refraction of this absorbing material affects the transmission of projected light through lenticular element


100


.




The absorption efficiency is particularly high because the aforementioned use of preferred range of side angle


130


produces a deep, concave upward surface on which the material can be coated. Ambient light that reaches the light trapping from the viewer side will typically experience several partial reflections, with significant loss of intensity at each reflection, before returning toward the viewing space. Thus, light trapping structure at region


121


absorbs ambient light efficiently.




Absorption efficiency is also high because the percentage of the area of the viewer side surface occupied by the light trap is high, typically 40% to 60%. In comparison, screens that use a black matrix stripe (matrix coatings are approximately planer, partially absorbing coatings) reflect the ambient light back to the viewer after only one reflection. Therefore, the blackness of coating on light trapping structure at region


121


is not as critical as with conventional screens with black matrix coatings. This is so because of the occurrence of multiple surface encounters. Advantageously, light trapping structure at region


121


also reduces the ambient light reflection to the viewer more efficiently than conventional screens that use a tinted absorbing material in the plastic.




In carrying out another inventive feature, scattering structure


150


introduces a controlled angular distribution to light passing through lenticular screen component


99


. A preferred location of scattering structure


150


is on surface


101


facing the projector, not shown. Scattering structure


150


on surface


101


includes a shallow relief modulation, either random or in a pattern. Alternatively, minute scattering structures


150


could be incorporated in the bulk of lenticular component


99


, or surface and bulk effects can be combined.




Scattering structure


150


, in the absence of lenticular element


100


on exit surface


101


′, preferably, should be capable of diffusing light from the projector, not shown, that arrives normal to the screen through angles of approximately 8 degrees to approximately 12 degrees from screen axis Z. The diffused light distribution typically exhibits circular symmetry about axis Z, with substantially equal intensity at all azimuthal angles, and at least diffuses light in the vertical direction.




Scattering structure


150


serves three distinct functions. Firstly, it provides sufficient angular spreading of the projected light away from screen axis Z in vertical direction V, so that the viewed image will not exhibit a localized “hot spot”. Secondly, scattering structure


150


improves contrast by dispersing internal reflections from surface


101


of the projector side of the ambient light that enters viewing side


101


′ of lenticular screen component


99


. Thirdly, scattering structure


150


suppresses moire artifacts caused by periodic sampling of the incident light pattern by the periodic lenticular elements, such as lenticular element


100


, on viewing surface


101


′ of lenticular screen component


99


.




All of the incident light passes through scattering structure


150


before exiting lenticular element


100


. One effect of the scattering is a horizontal deflection in a direction H of

FIG. 1

of the collimated incoming rays into a distribution whose density drops by approximately to one-half within an angular deflection defined as ±δ, not shown.




The relatively small horizontal deflections from scattering structure


150


typically produce negligible changes to the distribution of horizontal deflections occurring further in the light path of lenticular element


100


. Stray light that is not on a first pass from the projector to lenticular screen component will typically enter lenticular element


100


at angles larger than ±δ, and exceed the acceptance angle for eventual interception by tip section


103


. The stray light is eventually absorbed after multiple reflections at side


104


or


105


of lenticular element


100


, or is reflected back to base surface


101


of lenticular element


100


.




In carrying out an inventive feature, lenticular screen component


99


has a balance of side angle


130


, refractive strength of tip section


103


, and scattering strength of scattering structure


150


such that the following three conditions are simultaneously satisfied: 2β≅φ; 3β=horizontal viewing angle requirement; δ=vertical viewing angle requirement. In addition, the thickness of lenticular screen component


99


is selected such that light dispersed by scattering structure


150


suppresses the moire beat pattern of light that is due to the sampling of lenticular screen component


99


and Fresnel screen component


98


. The useful range of thickness for lenticular screen component


99


is approximately 5 to 10 times the constant displacement having the value W


1


between, for example, adjacent lenticular elements


100


and


100


″, referred to as the pitch of lenticular screen component


99


. In addition, the pitch of lenticular screen component


99


is selected to be less than approximately one-half the resolution requirement of the projection system.




Advantageously, lenticular screen component


99


provides wide viewing space in horizontal direction H (e.g., greater than ±45 degrees), and narrow viewing space in a vertical direction V (e.g., ±8 to ±12 degrees). In addition, the resulting image is relatively free of moire artifacts.





FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


illustrate in a simplified manner the structure and operation of a second embodiment of a lenticular element


111


analogous to lenticular element


100


of

FIG. 2



a


or


2




b


. In

FIG. 3



b


an adjacent lenticular element


111


″ that is analogous to lenticular element


100


″ of

FIG. 2



b


is also shown. Similar symbols and numerals in

FIGS. 1

,


2




a


,


2




b


,


2




c


,


3




a


and


3




b


indicate similar items or functions.




In

FIG. 3



b


, a double lens tip section


103


has a curved tip surface formed from a pair of portions


103




a


and


103




b


that are displaced laterally and symmetrically about a center axis Z′ of the lenslets. Similar to the arrangement of

FIG. 2



b


, the width of lenticular element


111


at its base is W


1


, while the total curved tip section occupies a width W


2


. Included angle φ is measured between the facing sides


104


′ and


105


′ of adjacent lenticular elements


111


and


111


″.




Assume that the same geometrical restrictions defined by equations 1-1 and 1-2 are imposed on the embodiment in

FIG. 3



a


, and that portions


103




a


and


103




b


were formed as half-scale replicas of tip section


103


in

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


. Therefore, the distribution of the output ray directions would have been the same as in the arrangement of

FIGS. 2



a


and


2




b


, because the angular distribution of surface normals


155


′ encountered at tip section


103


in

FIG. 3



b


would be the same.




However, it may be desirable to have a reflected edge ray


111




a


in

FIG. 3



a


reach tip section


103


′ at a center point


156


of the lenticular element


111


on normal axis Z′. From this condition, the following expression is derived:






H


1


=W


1


/2 tan(φ)  (2-1)






In the arrangement of

FIG. 3



a


, incident rays, such as ray


111




b


, that are parallel to screen normal axis Z′ and reflect from side


104


′ or


105


′ of lenticular element


111


, will span the full width of only a corresponding one of portions


103




a


and


103




b


. Thus, reflected ray


111


a span the full width of only portion


103




a


. The maximum angle a of surface normals


155


′ in lens section


103


′ of

FIG. 3



b


is related to angle φ between sloping sides


104


′ and


105


′ in the same manner expressed before in equation 1-2.




The introduction of double-lobed tip section


103


′ of

FIG. 3



a


has three, advantageous consequences:




1. In cases where a larger portion of the output flux in the central fan of rays, such as the ray fan, not shown, that is analogous to ray fan B of

FIG. 2



a


is desirable, the arrangement of

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


provides design flexibility.




2. For a given value of angle φ between adjacent sides


104


′ and


105


′ of

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


, the ratio H


1


/W


1


is somewhat reduced in comparison to that in the arrangement of

FIGS. 2



a


and


2




b


. Equivalently, for a given ratio H


1


/W


1


, angle φ between adjacent sides


104


′ and


105


′ of

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


can, be reduced. The resulting ratio W


2


/W


1


in the arrangement of

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


is closer to the value 1/2 then to the value 1/3, obtained in the arrangement of

FIGS. 2



a


-


2




c.






3. For viewing positions near screen normal Z′ located at a center of lenticular screen component


99


of

FIG. 1

, where the light distribution is dominated by rays that have not been reflected from sloping sides


104


′ and


105


′ of

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


, each lenticular element, such as lenticular element


111


, forms a pair of closely spaced samples of the projected image at a lateral separation of W


2


/2. An advantageous consequence of this double sampling by lenticular element


111


is the cancellation of any potential moire beat from a collinear periodic pattern of pitch W


2


. The arrangement of

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


enables the design of a rear projection screen system where the ratio of the lenticular and Fresnel pitches is 2:1.



Claims
  • 1. A lenticular lens of a projection screen, comprising:a plurality of lenticular elements, each extending in a first direction and repeated in a second direction to form a plane defining a first axis normal to said plane, a given lenticular element including: a refractive tip portion; and a pair of reflective side portions having said refractive tip portion interposed between a pair of end edges thereof, respectively, at least one of said pair of side portions has a joining edge in common with a side portion of an adjacent lenticular element and has a sloped region that includes said common joining edge forming an angle smaller than 15 degrees with respect to said first axis, said one side portion being covered with a reflective coating at least in said sloped region that includes said common joining edge, said one side portion having also a joining edge in common with a corresponding one of said end edges of said tip portion and forming an angle larger than 125 degree with respect to a tangent to said tip portion at said common edge of said tip and said one side portions, said pair of reflective side portions reflecting light rays incoming from a projector towards said refractive tip portion for refracting said reflected light rays via a surface of aid refractive tip portion facing a viewer such that each refracted light ray from said tip portion is refracted by a convex surface.
  • 2. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, wherein said convex surface defines a range of angles having an absolute value greater than 30 degrees between said first axis and each axis normal to said convex surface.
  • 3. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, wherein said convex surface of said refractive tip portion is formed by a plurality of surface portions, each of said plurality of surface portions defining a range of angles having an absolute value greater than 30 degrees between said first axis and a corresponding axis normal to said each surface portion.
  • 4. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, wherein said reflective coating comprises a thin conformal reflective coating.
  • 5. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, wherein said reflective coating covers a surface of said side portion facing the viewer.
  • 6. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, further comprising a light trapping structure made of a light absorbing material that is approximately conformally coated on a viewer side of said reflective coating facing a viewer.
  • 7. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, wherein said reflective coating has at least one optical wavelength thickness of a low index material.
  • 8. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, further comprising a light scattering structure provided on a surface of said lenticular element facing the projector side and being capable of spreading in a vertical direction collimated light from the projector 8 to 12 degrees off an axis of the collimated light.
  • 9. A lenticular lens according to claim 1, further comprising a light scattering structure provided in a bulk of said lenticular lens and being capable of spreading in a vertical direction collimated light from the projector 8 to 12 degrees off an axis of the collimated light.
  • 10. A lenticular lens of a projection screen, comprising:a plurality of lenticular elements, each extending in a first direction and repeated in a second direction to form a plane defining a first axis normal to said plane, a given lenticular element including: a refractive tip portion for refracting light rays incoming from a direction of a projector; and a pair of side portions having said refractive tip portion interposed between a pair of end edges thereof, respectively, at least one of said pair of side portions has a joining edge in common with a side portion of an adjacent lenticular element and has a slope region forming an angle smaller than 15 degrees with respect to said first axis covered with a light absorbing conformal coating for absorbing light rays incoming from a direction of a viewer, said one side portion, having also a joining edge in common with a corresponding one of said end edges of said tip portion and forming an angle larger than 125 degree with respect to a tangent to said tip portion at said common edge of said tip and said one side portions the tip portion at the common edge of tip and the one side portions.
  • 11. A lenticular lens according to claim 10 wherein a portion of said light rays incoming from the direction of the viewer is absorbed in said light absorbing conformal coating via multiple reflection paths.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §365 of International Application PCT/US00/16927 filed Jun. 20, 2000, which was published in accordance with PCT Article 21(2) on Jan. 11, 2001 in English, and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/142,285, filed Jul. 2, 1999.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US00/16927 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO01/02882 1/11/2001 WO A
US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
4418986 Yata et al. Dec 1983 A
4468092 Inoue et al. Aug 1984 A
4469402 Yata et al. Sep 1984 A
4561720 Clausen et al. Dec 1985 A
4767186 Bradley, Jr. et al. Aug 1988 A
4927233 Nakanishi et al. May 1990 A
5428476 Jensen et al. Jun 1995 A
6097539 Clausen Aug 2000 A
6304378 Clausen Oct 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
361 918 Apr 1990 EP
97 35228 Sep 1997 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/142285 Jul 1999 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US00/16927 Jun 2000 US
Child 09/786580 US