As is known in the art, optical systems can detect light incident on a sensor. LIDAR systems, for example, transmit laser pulses that can be reflected by targets to generate signal return. In some environments, such as a cluster of autonomous vehicles, LiDAR systems may transmit signals of the same wavelength, which may result in signal from a different vehicle being received as signal return from vehicle that did not transmit the signal. That is, a first vehicle may transmit a signal that can be received, directly or by reflection, by a second vehicle that incorrectly interprets the signal as return from its transmitted signal, which may result in unsafe conditions.
Example embodiments of the disclosure provide methods and apparatus for LiDAR systems, such as automotive LiDAR, with interference prevention, such as interference from other LiDAR systems. In embodiments, a splitter, such as a diffraction grating, and an optical receiver to direct signals to a detector, such as a two-dimensional (2D) pixel array, for wavelength coding. In embodiments, time coding, instead of, or in combination with, wavelength coding can be performed. Time coding can include circuitry to modulate and demodulate the received signal. In some embodiments, comparator arrays and thresholds can be used to create a digital bit at each pixel.
In one aspect, a method comprises: illuminating, by a first LiDAR system, a field of view (FOV) with pulses of transmitted light having different wavelengths at different regions in the FOV; focusing incoming light with a lens of the first LiDAR system; diffracting the focused light from the lens with a diffraction optical element to generate signals having the different wavelengths to respective regions of a detector array, wherein each pixel position in the array corresponds to one of the different wavelengths and to a spatial location in the FOV; and processing data from the pixel array to discriminate any of the incoming light coming from systems other than the first LiDAR system.
In one aspect, a method can further include one or more of the following features: the different regions of the FOV comprise different elevation angles for a slice of the FOV, the pixel array comprises a w by p two-dimensional array, wherein w is a wavelength index and p is a position index, the diffraction optical element comprises a diffraction grating, the diffraction optical element comprises a wavelength selective switch, a wavelength coding for the transmitted light includes wavelength and time, which corresponds to a range, masking pixels in the pixel array for which signal return is not expected based on the wavelength of the transmitted light for a given time, receiving light on the pixel array from an interferer, a wavelength coding for the transmitted light includes wavelength and time, and further including modifying the wavelength coding after detecting the interferer, a first one of the different wavelengths comprises 1550 nm, the pulses have a single wavelength, the pulses contain multiple wavelengths, employing multiple lasers to generate the different wavelengths, modulating the transmitted light with amplitude and/or frequency modulation, and/or generating a fault upon failing to receive an expected light at a given position in the pixel array.
In another aspect, a system comprises: a first LiDAR system configured to illuminate a field of view (FOV) with pulses of transmitted light having different wavelengths at different regions in the FOV; a lens to focus incoming light into the first LiDAR system; a diffraction optical element to diffract the focused light from the lens to generate signals having the different wavelengths to respective regions of a detector array, wherein each pixel position in the array corresponds to one of the different wavelengths and to a spatial location in the FOV; and a processor to process data from the pixel array to discriminate any of the incoming light coming from systems other than the first LiDAR system.
A system can further include one or more of the following features: the different regions of the FOV comprise different elevation angles for a slice of the FOV, the pixel array comprises a w by p two-dimensional array, wherein w is a wavelength index and p is a position index, the diffraction optical element comprises a diffraction grating, the diffraction optical element comprises a wavelength selective switch, a wavelength coding for the transmitted light includes wavelength and time, which corresponds to a range, the first LiDAR system is configured to mask pixels in the pixel array for which signal return is not expected based on the wavelength of the transmitted light for a given time, received light on the pixel array is from an interferer, a wavelength coding for the transmitted light includes wavelength and time, and the first LiDAR system is configured to modify the wavelength coding after detecting the interferer, a first one of the different wavelengths comprises 1550 nm, the pulses have a single wavelength, the pulses contain multiple wavelengths, multiple lasers to generate the different wavelengths, the first LiDAR system is configured to modulate the transmitted light with amplitude and/or frequency modulation, and/or the first LiDAR system is configured to generate a fault upon failing to receive an expected light at a given position in the pixel array.
The foregoing features of this disclosure, as well as the disclosure itself, may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:
Prior to describing example embodiments of the disclosure some information is provided. Laser ranging systems can include laser radar (ladar), light-detection and ranging (lidar), and rangefinding systems, which are generic terms for the same class of instrument that uses light to measure the distance to objects in a scene. This concept is similar to radar, except optical signals are used instead of radio waves. Similar to radar, a laser ranging and imaging system emits a pulse toward a particular location and measures the return echoes to extract the range.
As used herein, the term “light” refers to electromagnetic radiation spanning the ultraviolet, visible, and infrared wavebands, of any wavelength between 100 nm and 3,000 nm.
Laser ranging systems generally work by emitting a laser pulse and recording the time it takes for the laser pulse to travel to a target, reflect, and return to a photoreceiver. The laser ranging instrument records the time of the outgoing pulse—either from a trigger or from calculations that use measurements of the scatter from the outgoing laser light—and then records the time that a laser pulse returns. The difference between these two times is the time of flight to and from the target. Using the speed of light, the round-trip time of the pulses is used to calculate the distance to the target.
Lidar systems may scan the beam across a target area to measure the distance to multiple points across the field of view, producing a full three-dimensional range profile of the surroundings. More advanced flash lidar cameras, for example, contain an array of detector elements, each able to record the time of flight to objects in their field of view.
When using light pulses to create images, the emitted pulse may intercept multiple objects, at different orientations, as the pulse traverses a 3D volume of space. The echoed laser-pulse waveform contains a temporal and amplitude imprint of the scene. By sampling the light echoes, a record of the interactions of the emitted pulse is extracted with the intercepted objects of the scene, allowing an accurate multi-dimensional image to be created. To simplify signal processing and reduce data storage, laser ranging and imaging can be dedicated to discrete-return systems, which record only the time of flight (TOF) of the first, or a few, individual target returns to obtain angle-angle-range images. In a discrete-return system, each recorded return corresponds, in principle, to an individual laser reflection (i.e., an echo from one particular reflecting surface, for example, a tree, pole or building). By recording just a few individual ranges, discrete-return systems simplify signal processing and reduce data storage, but they do so at the expense of lost target and scene reflectivity data. Because laser-pulse energy has significant associated costs and drives system size and weight, recording the TOF and pulse amplitude of more than one laser pulse return per transmitted pulse, to obtain angle-angle-range-intensity images, increases the amount of captured information per unit of pulse energy. All other things equal, capturing the full pulse return waveform offers significant advantages, such that the maximum data is extracted from the investment in average laser power. In full-waveform systems, each backscattered laser pulse received by the system is digitized at a high sampling rate (e.g., 500 MHz to 1.5 GHZ). This process generates digitized waveforms (amplitude versus time) that may be processed to achieve higher-fidelity 3D images.
Of the various laser ranging instruments available, those with single-element photoreceivers generally obtain range data along a single range vector, at a fixed pointing angle. This type of instrument—which is, for example, commonly used by golfers and hunters—cither obtains the range (R) to one or more targets along a single pointing angle or obtains the range and reflected pulse intensity (I) of one or more objects along a single pointing angle, resulting in the collection of pulse range-intensity data, (R,I)i, where i indicates the number of pulse returns captured for each outgoing laser pulse.
More generally, laser ranging instruments can collect ranging data over a portion of the solid angles of a sphere, defined by two angular coordinates (e.g., azimuth and elevation), which can be calibrated to three-dimensional (3D) rectilinear cartesian coordinate grids; these systems are generally referred to as 3D lidar and ladar instruments. The terms “lidar” and “ladar” are often used synonymously and, for the purposes of this discussion, the terms “3D lidar,” “scanned lidar,” or “lidar” are used to refer to these systems without loss of generality. 3D lidar instruments obtain three-dimensional (e.g., angle, angle, range) data sets. Conceptually, this would be equivalent to using a rangefinder and scanning it across a scene, capturing the range of objects in the scene to create a multi-dimensional image. When only the range is captured from the return laser pulses, these instruments obtain a 3D data set (e.g., angle, angle, range)n, where the index n is used to reflect that a series of range-resolved laser pulse returns can be collected, not just the first reflection.
Some 3D lidar instruments are also capable of collecting the intensity of the reflected pulse returns generated by the objects located at the resolved (angle, angle, range) objects in the scene. When both the range and intensity are recorded, a multi-dimensional data set [e.g., angle, angle, (range-intensity)] is obtained. This is analogous to a video camera in which, for each instantaneous field of view (FOV), each effective camera pixel captures both the color and intensity of the scene observed through the lens. However, 3D lidar systems, instead capture the range to the object and the reflected pulse intensity.
Lidar systems can include different types of lasers, including those operating at different wavelengths, including those that are not visible (e.g., those operating at a wavelength of 840 nm or 905 nm), and in the near-infrared (e.g., those operating at a wavelength of 1064 nm or 1550 nm), and the thermal infrared including those operating at wavelengths known as the “eyesafe” spectral region (i.e., generally those operating at a wavelength beyond 1300-nm), where ocular damage is less likely to occur. Lidar transmitters are generally invisible to the human eye. However, when the wavelength of the laser is close to the range of sensitivity of the human eye—roughly 350 nm to 730 nm—the energy of the laser pulse and/or the average power of the laser must be lowered such that the laser operates at a wavelength to which the human eye is not sensitive. Thus, a laser operating at, for example, 1550 nm, can-without causing ocular damage-generally have 200 times to 1 million times more laser pulse energy than a laser operating at 840 nm or 905 nm.
It is understood that while example embodiments of the disclosure are shown and described in conjunction with LiDAR systems, it is understood that any suitable wavelengths and wavelength schemes can be used to meet the needs of a particular application.
One challenge for a lidar system is detecting poorly reflective objects at long distance, which requires transmitting a laser pulse with enough energy that the return signal-reflected from the distant target—is of sufficient magnitude to be detected. To determine the minimum required laser transmission power, several factors must be considered. For instance, the magnitude of the pulse returns scattering from the diffuse objects in a scene is proportional to their range and the intensity of the return pulses generally scales with distance according to 1/R{circumflex over ( )}4 for small objects and 1/R{circumflex over ( )}2 for larger objects; yet, for highly-specularly reflecting objects (i.e., those objects that are not diffusively-scattering objects), the collimated laser beams can be directly reflected back, largely unattenuated. This means that-if the laser pulse is transmitted, then reflected from a target 1 meter away—it is possible that the full energy (J) from the laser pulse will be reflected into the photoreceiver; but-if the laser pulse is transmitted, then reflected from a target 333 meters away—it is possible that the return will have a pulse with energy approximately 10{circumflex over ( )}12 weaker than the transmitted energy. To provide an indication of the magnitude of this scale, the 12 orders of magnitude (10{circumflex over ( )}12) is roughly the equivalent of: the number of inches from the earth to the sun, 10× the number of seconds that have elapsed since Cleopatra was born, or the ratio of the luminous output from a phosphorescent watch dial, one hour in the dark, to the luminous output of the solar disk at noon.
In many cases of lidar systems highly-sensitive photoreceivers are used to increase the system sensitivity to reduce the amount of laser pulse energy that is needed to reach poorly reflective targets at the longest distances required, and to maintain eyesafe operation. Some variants of these detectors include those that incorporate photodiodes, and/or offer gain, such as avalanche photodiodes (APDs) or single-photon avalanche detectors (SPADs). These variants can be configured as single-element detectors, segmented-detectors, linear detector arrays, or area detector arrays. Using highly sensitive detectors such as APDs or SPADs reduces the amount of laser pulse energy required for long-distance ranging to poorly reflective targets. The technological challenge of these photodetectors is that they must also be able to accommodate the incredibly large dynamic range of signal amplitudes.
As dictated by the properties of the optics, the focus of a laser return changes as a function of range; as a result, near objects are often out of focus. Furthermore, also as dictated by the properties of the optics, the location and size of the “blur”—i.e., the spatial extent of the optical signal-changes as a function of range, much like in a standard camera. These challenges are commonly addressed by using large detectors, segmented detectors, or multi-element detectors to capture all of the light or just a portion of the light over the full-distance range of objects. It is generally advisable to design the optics such that reflections from close objects are blurred, so that a portion of the optical energy does not reach the detector or is spread between multiple detectors. This design strategy reduces the dynamic range requirements of the detector and prevents the detector from damage.
Acquisition of the lidar imagery can include, for example, a 3D lidar system embedded in the front of car, where the 3D lidar system, includes a laser transmitter with any necessary optics, a single-element photoreceiver with any necessary dedicated or shared optics, and an optical scanner used to scan (“paint”) the laser over the scene. Generating a full-frame 3D lidar range image—where the field of view is 20 degrees by 60 degrees and the angular resolution is 0.1 degrees (10 samples per degree)—requires emitting 120,000 pulses [(20*10*60*10)=120,000)]. When update rates of 30 frames per second are required, such as is required for automotive lidar, roughly 3.6 million pulses per second must be generated and their returns captured.
There are many ways to combine and configure the elements of the lidar system-including considerations for the laser pulse energy, beam divergence, detector array size and array format (single element, linear, 2D array), and scanner to obtain a 3D image. If higher power lasers are deployed, pixelated detector arrays can be used, in which case the divergence of the laser would be mapped to a wider field of view relative to that of the detector array, and the laser pulse energy would need to be increased to match the proportionally larger field of view. For examplecompared to the 3D lidar above—to obtain same-resolution 3D lidar images 30 times per second, a 120,000-element detector array (e.g., 200×600 elements) could be used with a laser that has pulse energy that is 120,000 times greater. The advantage of this “flash lidar” system is that it does not require an optical scanner; the disadvantages are that the larger laser results in a larger, heavier system that consumes more power, and that it is possible that the required higher pulse energy of the laser will be capable of causing ocular damage. The maximum average laser power and maximum pulse energy are limited by the requirement for the system to be eyesafe.
As noted above, while many lidar system operate by recording only the laser time of flight and using that data to obtain the distance to the first target return (closest) target, some lidar systems are capable of capturing both the range and intensity of one or multiple target returns created from each laser pulse. For example, for a lidar system that is capable of recording multiple laser pulse returns, the system can detect and record the range and intensity of multiple returns from a single transmitted pulse. In such a multi-pulse lidar system, the range and intensity of a return pulse from a from a closer-by object can be recorded, as well as the range and intensity of later reflection(s) of that pulse-one(s) that moved past the closer-by object and later reflected off of more-distant object(s). Similarly, if glint from the sun reflecting from dust in the air or another laser pulse is detected and mistakenly recorded, a multi-pulse lidar system allows for the return from the actual targets in the field of view to still be obtained.
The amplitude of the pulse return is primarily dependent on the specular and diffuse reflectivity of the target, the size of the target, and the orientation of the target. Laser returns from close, highly-reflective objects, are many orders of magnitude greater in intensity than the intensity of returns from distant targets. Many lidar systems require highly sensitive photodetectors, for example avalanche photodiodes (APDs), which along with their CMOS amplification circuits. So that distant, poorly-reflective targets may be detected, the photoreceiver components are optimized for high conversion gain. Largely because of their high sensitivity, these detectors may be damaged by very intense laser pulse returns.
For example, if an automotive equipped with a front-end lidar system were to pull up behind another car at a stoplight, the reflection off of the license plate may be significant-perhaps 10{circumflex over ( )}12 higher than the pulse returns from targets at the distance limits of the lidar system. When a bright laser pulse is incident on the photoreceiver, the large current flow through the photodetector can damage the detector, or the large currents from the photodetector can cause the voltage to exceed the rated limits of the CMOS electronic amplification circuits, causing damage. For this reason, it is generally advisable to design the optics such that the reflections from close objects are blurred, so that a portion of the optical energy does not reach the detector or is spread between multiple detectors.
However, capturing the intensity of pulses over a larger dynamic range associated with laser ranging may be challenging because the signals are too large to capture directly. One can infer the intensity by using a recording of a bit-modulated output obtained using serial-bit encoding obtained from one or more voltage threshold levels. This technique is often referred to as time-over-threshold (TOT) recording or, when multiple-thresholds are used, multiple time-over-threshold (MTOT) recording.
A data processing and calibration circuit may be inserted between the memories 112 and the readout 114 which may perform any number of data correction or mapping functions. For example, the circuit may compare timing return information to timing reference information and convert timing return information into specific range information. Additionally, the circuit may correct for static or dynamic errors using calibration and correction algorithms. Other possible functions include noise reduction based on multi-return data or spatial correlation or objection detection. A possible mapping function may be to reshape the data into point-cloud data or to include additional probability data of correct measurement values based on additionally collected information from the sensor.
In the illustrated embodiment, a fan beam is transmitted, which may be vertical in elevation, at a given azimuth angle. The system can scan a volume with sequential fan beams at a given azimuth spacing. First and second targets T1, T2 at a respective ranges can be detected for a given azimuth angle for some range of elevation.
Signal return is generated by the transmitted light being reflected by a target in the FOV. The signal return has a wavelength corresponding to the wavelength of the transmitted pulse. The angle of the signal return corresponds to the respective elevation angle θex of the target that generates the signal return. That is, a laser pulse hits a target that reflects light that follows the same path back to the scanner 302 as the transmitted pulse. As described more fully below, the location of the signal return on a detector array corresponds to the elevation angle of the target in the FOV slice.
It is understood that Doppler and other effects may change the frequency of the signal return. It is understood that any practical number of wavelengths, pulses, spacing, resolution, etc., can be used to meet the needs of a particular application.
In the illustrated embodiment, incoming light 402 for a slice may contain multiple wavelengths since signal return is generated by one or more targets reflecting different ones of the transmitted wavelength signals at different times. In one embodiment, light is centered at 1550 nm with other wavelengths of 1525 and 1575 nm. The output of the diffraction optical element 406 focuses different wavelength light on different rows (w1, w2, w3) of the w×p linear array 410. Based on the wavelength transmission schedule over each slice, a LiDAR system can discriminate signals from other LiDAR systems, which can be considered as interferers that may also emit light at the same wavelengths. In embodiments, each vehicle can have a different coding to reduce or eliminate interfering system signals and increase safety.
It is understood that any practical number of wavelengths can be used to achieve coding schemes to meet the needs of a particular embodiment. In addition, it is understood that the detector array can have any practical length by width dimensions to effect any practical coding scheme.
In embodiments, coding may dynamically change over time such that during one time period the light is expected on certain pixels of the detector array and at a second time period light is expected on different pixels of the detector array, and so on.
Since the LiDAR system knows, expects, or is programmed when it may receive a certain wavelength in some period of time, which may correspond to a range for LiDAR system, based on what signals were transmitted, the receipt of a signal having a different wavelength in that period of time indicates that the signal was generated by some other system. That is, transmission wavelength coding can be used to discriminate signals from other LiDAR systems.
In one embodiment shown in
In an example embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, composite laser pulses can be transmitted having multiple wavelengths. Signal return from a target in a LiDAR FOV may contain the multiple wavelengths, each of which can be directed to a particular region of the array. By transmitting pulses having multiple wavelengths, the ability of a LiDAR system discriminate signals from other emitters is enhanced.
In some embodiments, the laser module 602 includes a separate laser for each wavelength. In other embodiments, the laser module includes at least one laser for which an output is modulated to generate a multi-wavelength signal from a single laser.
The receive path includes a lens 650, a diffraction optical element 652 such as a diffraction grating, prism, lens, and/or any combination of these elements, and a detector array 654. As described above, and shown below, the diffraction optical element 652 directs the different wavelength signals to different regions of the detector array.
In the illustrated embodiment, the return for array position p1 and p2 contains first and second wavelengths λ0, λ1. Positions p5 and p6 contain all three wavelengths λ0, λ1, λ2. As can be seen, any array position can receive signal return with any combination of the three wavelengths.
As shown in
It is understood that any practical number of wavelengths can be contained in a transmit pulse as part of a coding scheme to meet the needs of a particular application. It is further understood that the wavelength composition can be configured based on various parameters. For example, the number of wavelength components and/or coding changes can be increased upon detection of an interferer.
In some embodiments, a vehicle LiDAR system has a unique fixed wavelength coding scheme. In an embodiment, a receiver may receive energy emitted by a vehicle LiDAR system and identify the vehicle based on the unique wavelength coding scheme. In some embodiments, the wavelength coding scheme changes, such as at defined intervals, randomly, and/or by received instruction. In some embodiments, the vehicle changes wavelength coding scheme each time the vehicle is started. In an embodiment a flag or indicator may be output form the LiDAR system to a vehicle controller or vehicle computer and the LiDAR system wavelengths may be reset by the control computer, for example during a time when the engine turns off, as say during a stop sign or red light.
In some embodiments, a vehicle detects an interferer and dynamically changes the wavelength coding scheme. In an embodiment, the vehicle detects a particular interfering wavelength and modifies the wavelength coding scheme to avoid use of the particular interfering wavelength. It is understood that wavelength coding can change in wavelength, elevation angle, number of pulses at the same wavelength, etc., and change randomly or by some predetermined scheme.
In some embodiments, a LiDAR system emits light having frequency and/or amplitude modulation, or other data encoding. An embodiment having multiple types of encoding enables a larger wavelength spacing, such as 1525, 1550, 1575 nm carrier wavelengths with smaller frequency or wavelength changes around those carrier frequencies. Some embodiments can have two types of encoding, or heterogeneous encoding, such as for more demanding ASIL requirements, where ASIL refers to Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) risk classification scheme defined by the ISO 26262-Functional Safety for Road Vehicles standard. In embodiments, if an expected level of energy is not received by selected pixels, a fault can be flagged to meet the ASIL requirements, for example.
It is understood a variety of components can be used to meet the needs of a particular application. For example, the optical element 406 of
Example embodiments of the disclosure provide LiDAR systems that improve performance and mitigate interference in noisy environments. In some embodiments, detection thresholds for pixels may be set based on noise levels. Individual pixels in the detector array can be coded to require less circuitry for ensuring that the received laser energy was originated by the same lidar system.
Processing may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of the two. Processing may be implemented in computer programs executed on programmable computers/machines that each includes a processor, a storage medium or other article of manufacture that is readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and one or more output devices. Program code may be applied to data entered using an input device to perform processing and to generate output information.
The system can perform processing, at least in part, via a computer program product, (e.g., in a machine-readable storage device), for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus (e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers). Each such program may be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the programs may be implemented in assembly or machine language. The language may be a compiled or an interpreted language and it may be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network. A computer program may be stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., solid-state memory, flash, MRAM, CD-ROM, hard disk, or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer.
Processing may also be implemented as a machine-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where upon execution, instructions in the computer program cause the computer to operate.
Processing may be performed by one or more programmable embedded processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions of the system. All or part of the system may be implemented as special purpose logic circuitry (e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit)).
Having described exemplary embodiments of the disclosure, it will now become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating their concepts may also be used. The embodiments contained herein should not be limited to disclosed embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Various elements, which are described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination. Other embodiments not specifically described herein are also within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6760145 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778728 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6894823 | Taylor et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6989921 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015780 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7160753 | Williams, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7432537 | Huntington | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7504053 | Alekel | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7764719 | Munroe et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7782911 | Munroe et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7852549 | Alekel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885298 | Munroe | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7994421 | Williams et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8207484 | Williams | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8319307 | Williams | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8570372 | Russell | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8597544 | Alekel | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630036 | Munroe | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630320 | Munroe et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8730564 | Alekel | May 2014 | B2 |
8743453 | Alekel et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760499 | Russell | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8766682 | Williams | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8853639 | Williams, Jr. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9121762 | Williams et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9197233 | Gaalema et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9269845 | Williams et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9368933 | Nijjar et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9397469 | Nijjar et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9447299 | Schut et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9451554 | Singh et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9466745 | Williams et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9553216 | Williams et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9591238 | Lee et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9693035 | Williams et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9759602 | Williams | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9804264 | Villeneuve et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810775 | Welford et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9810777 | Williams et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9810786 | Welford et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9812838 | Villeneuve et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9823353 | Eichenholz et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9835490 | Williams et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9841495 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9843157 | Williams | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9847441 | Huntington | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9857468 | Eichenholz et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9869754 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9874635 | Eichenholz et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9897687 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9905992 | Welford et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9923331 | Williams | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941433 | Williams et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9958545 | Eichenholz et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9989629 | LaChapelle | Jun 2018 | B1 |
9995622 | Williams | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10003168 | Villeneuve | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10007001 | LaChapelle et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10012732 | Eichenholz et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10061019 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10088559 | Weed et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10094925 | LaChapelle | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10114111 | Russell et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10121813 | Eichenholz et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10139478 | Gaalema et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10169678 | Sachdeva et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10169680 | Sachdeva et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10175345 | Rhee et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10175697 | Sachdeva et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10191155 | Curatu | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10209359 | Russell et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10211592 | Villeneuve et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10211593 | Lingvay et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10217889 | Dhulla et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10218144 | Munroe et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10241198 | LaChapelle et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10254388 | LaChapelle et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10254762 | McWhirter et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10267898 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10267899 | Weed et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10267918 | LaChapelle et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10275689 | Sachdeva et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10295668 | LaChapelle et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10310058 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10324170 | Engberg, Jr. et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10324185 | McWhirter et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10338199 | McWhirter et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10338223 | Englard et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10340651 | Drummer et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10345437 | Russell et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10345447 | Hicks | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10348051 | Shah et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10386489 | Albelo et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10394243 | Ramezani et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10401480 | Gaalema et al. | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10401481 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10418776 | Welford et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10445599 | Hicks | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10451716 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10473788 | Englard et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10481605 | Maila et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10488496 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10491885 | Hicks | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10502831 | Eichenholz | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10503172 | Englard et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10509127 | Englard et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10514462 | Englard et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10520602 | Villeneuve et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10523884 | Lee et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10535191 | Sachdeva et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10539665 | Danziger et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10545240 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10551485 | Maheshwari et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10551501 | LaChapelle | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10557939 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10557940 | Eichenholz et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10571567 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10571570 | Paulsen et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10571574 | Yavid | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10578720 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10591600 | Villeneuve et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10591601 | Hicks et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10606270 | Englard et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10627495 | Gaalema et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10627512 | Hicks | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10627516 | Eichenholz | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10627521 | Englard et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636285 | Haas et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10641874 | Campbell et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10663564 | LaChapelle | May 2020 | B2 |
10663585 | McWhirter | May 2020 | B2 |
10677897 | LaChapelle et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10677900 | Russell et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10684360 | Campbell | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10761195 | Donovan | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10914839 | Hartmann | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11156716 | Yavid | Oct 2021 | B1 |
11252359 | Huntington et al. | Feb 2022 | B1 |
11556000 | Goldman et al. | Jan 2023 | B1 |
11581697 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11585910 | Lee et al. | Feb 2023 | B1 |
11600654 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11601733 | Cadugan | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11619914 | Myers et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
20180069367 | Villeneuve et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180284239 | LaChapelle et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284240 | LaChapelle et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284275 | LaChapelle | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284280 | Eichenholz et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190310368 | LaChapelle | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20210318439 | Yavid | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220291358 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220334000 | Judkins, III et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220337770 | Judkins, III et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220406830 | Cadugan et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230051974 | Myers et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230103088 | Goldman et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230143755 | Yavid | May 2023 | A1 |
20230194685 | Lee et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201422772 | Jun 2014 | TW |
WO 2021145906 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2022046401 | Mar 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bernstein et al., “Electromagnetically Actuated Mirror Arrays for Use in 3-D Optical Switching Applications;” Article in Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 13, No. 3; Jun. 2004; 10 Pages. |
Taylor et al., “A High Fill Factor Linear Mirror Array for a Wavelength Selective Switch;” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 14; Published Oct. 14, 2003; 6 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/330,555, filed Jun. 7, 2023, Dissanayake. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/184,242, filed Mar. 15, 2023, Munroe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/809,990, filed Jun. 30, 2022, Quirk et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/663,896, filed May 18, 2022, Cadugan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/660,221, filed Apr. 22, 2022, Filippini et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/659,035, filed Apr. 13, 2022, Cadugan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/659,033, filed Apr. 13, 2022, Cadugan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/656,981, filed Mar. 29, 2022, Myers et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/656,978, filed Mar. 29, 2022, Myers et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/656,977, filed Mar. 29, 2022, Myers et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/657,140, filed Mar. 20, 2022, Myers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/653,881, filed Mar. 8, 2022, Keuleyan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/651,250, filed Feb. 16, 2022, Marshall. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/648,702, filed Jan. 24, 2022, Lee et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/566,763, filed Dec. 31, 2021, Huntington et al. |