The present disclosure is related to LiDAR systems and, in particular, to a homodyne LiDAR system and method with pulse-code modulation (PCM) transmission, which can be used in an automotive or other motor vehicle application.
LiDAR is commonly referred to as an acronym for light detection and ranging, in the sense that LiDAR is commonly considered an optical analog to radar. In general, there are two types of LiDAR systems, namely, incoherent LiDAR and coherent LiDAR. Incoherent LiDAR, also commonly referred to as direct detection or direct energy detection LiDAR, primarily uses an amplitude measurement in light returns, while coherent LiDAR is better suited for phase-sensitive measurements or other more sophisticated transmitter waveform modulation techniques. Coherent systems generally use optical heterodyne or homodyne detection, which, being more sensitive than direct detection, allows them to operate at a much lower power and provide greater measurement accuracy and resolution.
According to a first aspect, a LiDAR system is provided. The LiDAR system includes an optical source for generating a continuous wave (CW) optical signal; a control processor for generating a pulse-position modulation (PPM) signal; an amplitude modulation (AM) modulator for receiving the CW optical signal and the PPM signal and generating therefrom a pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal; a transmitter for transmitting the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal through a transmit optical element into a region; a receive optical element for receiving reflected versions of the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal reflected from at least one target object in the region; a first optical detector for receiving the CW optical signal from the optical source and a received version of the reflected versions of the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal, and generating therefrom a first baseband signal; and a signal processor for receiving the first baseband signal and processing the first baseband signal to generate an indication related to the object.
In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR system is a homodyne LiDAR system. In other exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR system is a heterodyne LiDAR system.
In some exemplary embodiments, the first optical detector comprises a first mixer for generating the first baseband signal.
In some exemplary embodiments, the system further comprises a second optical detector for receiving the CW optical signal from the optical source and a received version of the reflected versions of the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal, and generating therefrom a second baseband signal. In some exemplary embodiments, the second optical detector comprises a second mixer for generating the second baseband signal. In some exemplary embodiments, the first and second baseband signals are in quadrature. In some exemplary embodiments, the first optical detector generates an in-phase-channel voltage signal, and the second optical detector generates a quadrature-channel voltage signal. In some exemplary embodiments, at least one of the first and second optical detectors comprises a phase shifter for introducing a phase difference between the first and second baseband signals.
In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR system further comprises a first low-pass filter for filtering the in-phase-channel voltage signal to generate a filtered in-phase-channel voltage signal and a second low-pass filter for filtering the quadrature-channel voltage signal to generate a filtered quadrature-channel voltage signal. In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR system further comprises a first analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for converting the in-phase-channel voltage signal to a digital in-phase-channel voltage signal and a second ADC for converting the quadrature-channel voltage signal to a digital quadrature-channel voltage signal.
In some exemplary embodiments, the signal processor receives the first baseband signal and the second baseband signal and processes the first and second baseband signals to generate the indication related to the object. In some exemplary embodiments, the processor, in processing the first and second baseband signals to generate the indication related to the object, performs Doppler processing. In some exemplary embodiments, the processor, in processing the first and second baseband signals to generate the indication related to the object, performs correlation processing.
According to another aspect, a LiDAR method is provided. The LiDAR method includes: generating a continuous wave (CW) optical signal; generating a pulse-position modulation (PPM) signal; generating a pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal from the CW optical signal and the PPM signal; transmitting the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal though a transmit optical element into a region; receiving reflected versions of the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal reflected from at least one object in the region; mixing the CW optical signal from the optical source and the reflected versions of the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal to generate therefrom a first baseband signal; and processing the first baseband signal to generate an indication related to the object.
In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method is a homodyne LiDAR method. In other exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method is a heterodyne LiDAR method.
In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method further comprises mixing the CW optical signal from the optical source and the reflected versions of the pulse-position amplitude-modulated optical signal to generate therefrom a second baseband signal and processing the first and second baseband signals to generate the indication related to the object. In some exemplary embodiments, the first and second baseband signals are in quadrature. In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method further comprises performing optical detection to generate an in-phase-channel voltage signal from the first baseband signal and a quadrature-channel voltage signal from the second baseband signal. In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method further comprises performing phase shifting to introduce a phase difference between the first and second baseband signals.
In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method further comprises low-pass filtering the in-phase-channel voltage signal to generate a filtered in-phase-channel voltage signal and low-pass filtering the quadrature-channel voltage signal to generate a filtered quadrature-channel voltage signal. In some exemplary embodiments, the LiDAR method further comprises converting the in-phase-channel voltage signal to a digital in-phase-channel voltage signal and converting the quadrature-channel voltage signal to a digital quadrature-channel voltage signal.
In some exemplary embodiments, processing the first and second baseband signals to generate the indication related to the object comprises performing Doppler processing on the digital in-phase-channel voltage signal and the digital quadrature-channel voltage signal.
In some exemplary embodiments, processing the first and second baseband signals to generate the indication related to the object comprises performing correlation processing on the digital in-phase-channel voltage signal and the digital quadrature-channel voltage signal.
The present disclosure is further described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of embodiments of the present disclosure, in which like reference numerals represent similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
According to the present disclosure, a PCM LiDAR transceiver can utilize a variety of codes and code lengths to address the operational environment. The technique of non-coherent pulse compression (NCPC) is expanded to application in a coherent, i.e., homodyne, LiDAR architecture. According to the present disclosure, the PCM homodyne LiDAR transceiver is described in conjunction with data acquisition for range and Doppler measurement techniques. Signal processing gain is achieved via code length and correlation receiver techniques. Also, PCM LiDAR using NCPC requires only amplitude modulation (AM) pulse modulation for implementation and enables the signal processing gain benefits realized by the embodiments of the present disclosure. Furthermore, a significant advantage of the PCM homodyne LiDAR system architecture and the use of NCPC according to the present disclosure is the reduction of the laser transmitter spectral quality required for coherent pulse compression using direct FM or PM modulation.
Unlike a direct detection LiDAR transceiver, a homodyne LiDAR transceiver according to the present disclosure utilizes frequency translation or mixing as the first stage of the receiver to transfer the return signal from a bandpass signal at carrier frequency fo to a baseband signal for signal processing and measurement data extraction. It should be noted that NCPC is also applicable to direct detection LiDAR, but without the ability to determine Doppler frequency. To a moderate extent, the homodyne LiDAR transceiver of the disclosure increases the complexity of the system architecture; however, the receiver detection sensitivity is significantly improved, which reduces the transmit power, extends the operational range and increases range measurement accuracy.
According to exemplary embodiments, some transmit modulation waveforms require an additional level of complexity, which requires extension of the laser coherence time, also referred to as coherence length, which is the time over which a propagating wave (especially a laser or maser beam) may be considered coherent. That is, it is the time interval within which its phase is, on average, predictable. Specifically, the linear frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) waveform requires a highly linear change in frequency versus time as well as precise frequency deviation to insure range measurement accuracy and resolution. In addition, laser frequency-modulated noise and modulation bandwidth limitations further reduce the available signal-to-noise ratio and thereby degrade range measurement performance. An example of the level of complexity required to achieve linear frequency modulation and reduce laser phase noise to acceptable levels is the utilization of an electro-optical phase-locked loop (PLL). However, due to cost, complexity and operational environmental conditions, implementation of an electro-optical PLL is not compatible with automotive equipment requirements. It is noted that the PCM homodyne LiDAR of the present disclosure can be limited by the laser coherence time or length.
Non-coherent pulse compression (NCPC) waveforms for direct detection LiDAR systems, offer the opportunity to achieve comparable range measurement capability to linear FMCW, and do not require the spectral quality and FM modulation parameters of linear FMCW coherent LiDAR transceivers. According to the present disclosure, NCPC is implemented within coherent LiDAR transceivers, in particular, homodyne LiDAR transceivers. It is noted that the NCPC technique is also applicable to heterodyne LiDAR transceivers, although the present disclosure emphasizes application of the technique to homodyne LiDAR transceivers. The PCM homodyne LiDAR transceiver of the disclosure is described herein in conjunction with data acquisition for range and Doppler measurement. Signal processing gain is achieved via code length and correlation receiver techniques.
Pulse compression is a term which describes frequency modulation (FM) or phase modulation (PM) within the transmit pulse of radar systems for the purpose of increasing the transmit signal spectrum, thereby improving the range measurement resolution. In addition, pulse compression allows a wider pulse to be utilized for the purpose of increasing the average transmit power while maintaining range measurement resolution. The two most common techniques for pulse compression implementation are linear frequency modulation (LFM) and coded binary phase shift keying (BPSK).
Pulse compression is a signal processing technique commonly used by radar, sonar and echography to increase the range resolution as well as the signal-to-noise ratio. Pulse compression is achieved by transmitting a pulse, within which a parameter, i.e., amplitude, frequency or phase, of the transmitted pulsed signal, is subject to intra-pulse modulation and, upon receive correlation, a narrower pulse is produced. A quantitative measurement term for pulse compression implementation is the pulse compression ratio (PCR), which is defined as the increase in range resolution over the un-modulated pulse and is often expressed as the time-bandwidth product. The pulse compression ratio, or PCR, may be mathematically defined by the equation:
PCR=τw·Btx
where, τw is the modulated pulse width,
and, Btx is the spectral width of the modulated pulse.
For the linear FM waveform, the pulse compression ratio may be written:
PCRLFM=T·
F
where, T is the pulse width,
and, F is the frequency deviation.
Although the term “coherent” is not typically specifically employed in the description of pulse compression, it is clear that a coherent signal must be utilized to perform the de-chirp function in the case of the LFM waveform, and phase demodulation in the case of the BPSK waveform. The “non-coherent” as used herein means that a coherent de-chirp or demodulation signal is not required to perform the pulse compression function. Pulse compression is achieved via correlation/convolution within the receiver using a stored replica of the modulation code. Pulse compression, as performed within the receiver, may be implemented using analog or digital methods. In either case, a “sliding” correlator is used to perform a range bin search of the return signal. The range bin search includes multiplication of the received signal by discrete or continuous time increments of the modulation code, followed by integration, i.e., summation, of the multiplied signal components.
According to the present disclosure, the NCPC technique is implemented in a different format than “coherent” pulse compression and utilizes amplitude modulation (AM) pulse modulation as opposed to frequency modulation (FM) or phase modulation (PM). Notwithstanding the implementation method, the NCPC technique achieves similar performance advantages as the classical method and eliminates the complexities related to modulation, spectral quality within the transmitter, and significantly, coherent architectures within the receiver.
In the in-phase channel, I-Ch detector 106 performs optical detection with an optical detector and homodyne conversion by mixing with a mixer the received optical signal via optical line 128 with the received optical signal from optical splitter 114 on line 126 at frequency f0 to generate an in-phase voltage signal, VI-Ch, and outputs signal VI-Ch to in-phase channel low-noise amplifier (LNA) 132. LNA 132 amplifies the signal and applies the amplified signal to low-pass filter (LPF) 132, which filters the amplified signal using a low-pass cut-off frequency fLPF=1/τb, where τb_is defined as the bit chip time, i.e., the pulse width. The resulting filtered signal is applied to DSP and control system 110, which processes the received signal according to the present disclosure. LPF 132 reduces the noise bandwidth, but allows the signal energy to pass, thereby improving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
Similarly, in the quadrature channel, Q-Ch detector 108 performs optical detection with an optical detector and homodyne conversion by mixing with a mixer the received optical signal via optical line 128 with the received optical signal from optical splitter 114 on line 126 at frequency f0 to generate a quadrature voltage signal, VQ-Ch, and outputs signal VQ-Ch to quadrature channel low-noise amplifier (LNA) 136. LNA 136 amplifies the signal and applies the amplified signal to low-pass filter (LPF) 138, which filters the amplified signal using a low-pass cut-off frequency fLPF=1/τb. The resulting filtered signal is applied to DSP and control system 110, which processes the received signal according to the present disclosure. One or both of optical detectors 106, 108 includes an optical phase shifter which phase shifts one or both of the received optical signal on line 128 to provide the necessary phase shift to develop the in-phase and quadrature channel signals VI-Ch and VQ-Ch. DSP and control system 110 also provides an input/output interface 162, for interfacing with external elements, such as control systems, processing systems, user input/output systems, and other such systems.
The optical signal used to illuminate target objects, such as target object 104, in region 105 being observed by the LiDAR system using LiDAR transceiver 100, is transmitted into region 105 via transmit optical element or transmit optics 160, which can include one or more lenses and/or other optical elements used in such transceivers 100. The optical signal being transmitted is amplitude modulated by amplitude modulator 116, which applies a pulse-position amplitude modulation to the optical signal received on optical line 124 from optical signal splitter 114, under the control of one or more control signals generated by DSP and control module 110. According to the present disclosure, in some exemplary embodiments, pulse-position modulation is used to encode the transmitted signal with a code, which in some exemplary embodiments can be a 13-bit pseudo-Barker code, as illustrated in
According to exemplary embodiments, the quadrature detection precedes analog-to-digital conversion. The quadrature detector recovers the pulse modulation envelope associated with the low-frequency pulse modulation. The data samples are subsequently processed via spectral resolution or other means of each range bin data set. The spectral resolution approach used reduces the detection bandwidth and effectively integrates the energy of the range bin sample set.
Continuing to refer to
Continuing to refer to
where, R is the range to the object, λ0 is the operating wavelength
and α is an attenuation factor due to transmission and reflection losses.
It is recognized that:
R=R0+v·t
where R0 is the static range and v is the normal component of closing velocity. Upon substitution and arrangement of the constituent terms, one may write:
(Static two—way transmission phase)
The I-Ch and Q-Ch voltages represent a pulsed signal with amplitude proportional to object range and frequency in accordance object normal component of Doppler velocity. Subsequent analog signal processing encompasses amplification (130, 136) and low-pass filtering (132, 138) in accordance with the pulse width (τb) and resolution and sampling rate of ADCs 134, 140.
where c is the speed of light, and τb is the pulse width.
With reference to
An exemplary illustration of the structural and operational parameters of one approach to range processing for the PCM homodyne LiDAR transceiver, according to the present disclosure. Table 1 summarizes the conditions and parameters for the range processing operational exemplary illustration. In the exemplary illustration, a length 13, pseudo-Barker transmit waveform will be utilized as described in detail above.
As noted above,
PGdB=10·Log(n)=11.1 dB
With regard to correlation techniques discussed herein, the continuous and discrete state evaluations of the correlation function are mathematically defined by the correlation integral as set forth below. Specifically, the continuous state correlation equation (integral) is given by:
and the discrete state correlation equation (summation) is given by:
The ‘i’ index of ‘y’ produces a displacement of one increment in each sequential term of the summation. The bar over the ‘x’ term indicates the complex conjugate.
Doppler signal processing according to the present disclosure will now be described in detail. Unlike the direct detection NCPC LiDAR transceiver, which is not capable of Doppler detection, the NCPC homodyne LiDAR transceiver of the present disclosure is capable of Doppler detection.
The diagrams of
It is noted that several side-lobes of the spectral analysis are significant in value when compared to the peak value. The high side-lobe levels are the direct result of code position sampling with no signal content. Side-lobe level reduction may be achieved via implementation of a data smoothing approach as demonstrated in the diagrams of
Doppler processing will now be further described by means of description of a Doppler processing example. Table 2 lists parameter values for the Doppler processing example. If the bit width (τb) is 10 nsec, the sample rate is 100 MSPS and the code length is Tcode=Ndata·τb; or 0.62 μsec. Note that there are approximately two cycles of the Doppler signal contained within the code length. Table 2 includes a parametric summary of the Doppler frequency/velocity calculation.
From the parametric data of Table 2 and the spectral analysis of
Table 3 represents a summary of parametric values for the PCM homodyne transceiver of the present disclosure consistent with a typical road vehicle application.
It is noted that the present disclosure describes one or more LiDAR systems installed in an automobile. It will be understood that the embodiments of LiDAR systems of the disclosure are applicable to any kind of vehicle, e.g., bus, train, etc. Also, the scanning LiDAR systems of the present disclosure need not be associated with any kind of vehicle.
Whereas many alterations and modifications of the disclosure will become apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art after having read the foregoing description, it is to be understood that the particular embodiments shown and described by way of illustration are in no way intended to be considered limiting. Further, the subject matter has been described with reference to particular embodiments, but variations within the spirit and scope of the disclosure will occur to those skilled in the art. It is noted that the foregoing examples have been provided merely for the purpose of explanation and are in no way to be construed as limiting of the present disclosure.
While the present inventive concept has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present inventive concept as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3712985 | Swarner et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3898656 | Jensen | Aug 1975 | A |
4125864 | Aughton | Nov 1978 | A |
4184154 | Albanese et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4362361 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4439766 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4765715 | Matsudaira et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4957362 | Peterson | Sep 1990 | A |
5200606 | Krasutsky et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210586 | Grage et al. | May 1993 | A |
5274379 | Carbonneau et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5428215 | Dubois et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5604695 | Cantin et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5793491 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5889490 | Wachter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5966226 | Gerber | Oct 1999 | A |
6078395 | Jourdain et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6122222 | Hossack | Sep 2000 | A |
6292285 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6384770 | De Gouy | May 2002 | B1 |
6437854 | Hahlweg | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6556282 | Jamieson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559932 | Halmos | May 2003 | B1 |
7202941 | Munro | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227116 | Gleckler | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7272271 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7440084 | Kane | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7483600 | Achiam et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489865 | Varshneya et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7544945 | Tan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7570347 | Ruff et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7675610 | Redman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7832762 | Breed | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8044999 | Mullen et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050863 | Trepagnier et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8134637 | Rossbach et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8223215 | Oggier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8363511 | Frank et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8508723 | Chang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8629975 | Dierking et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8742325 | Droz et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8836761 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836922 | Pennecot et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8879050 | Ko | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9007569 | Amzajerdian et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9063549 | Pennecot et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9086273 | Gruver et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9090213 | Lawlor et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9097646 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9140792 | Zeng | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9157790 | Shpunt et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9267787 | Shpunt et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9285477 | Smith et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9575162 | Owechko | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9618742 | Droz et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9651417 | Shpunt et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9658322 | Lewis | May 2017 | B2 |
9696427 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9711493 | Lin | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9753351 | Eldada | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9823351 | Haslim et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9857472 | Mheen et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9869754 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
10018725 | Liu | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10018726 | Hall et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10024655 | Raguin et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10078133 | Dussan | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10088557 | Yeun | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10148060 | Hong et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10175360 | Zweigle et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10183541 | Van Den Bossche et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10411524 | Widmer et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10416292 | de Mersseman et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10473767 | Xiang et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10473784 | Puglia | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10473943 | Hughes | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10557923 | Watnik et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10558044 | Pan | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10564268 | Turbide et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10578724 | Droz et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10678117 | Shin et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10775508 | Rezk et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
20010052872 | Hahlweg | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030043363 | Jamieson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040028418 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031906 | Glecker | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040135992 | Munro | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155249 | Narui et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050219506 | Okuda et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060221250 | Rossbach et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060232052 | Breed | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239312 | Kewitsch et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070140613 | Achiam et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070181810 | Tan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211786 | Shattil | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219720 | Trepagnier et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080088499 | Bonthron et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095121 | Shattil | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100510 | Bonthron | May 2008 | A1 |
20080219584 | Mullen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246944 | Redman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090002680 | Ruff et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010644 | Varshneya et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090190007 | Oggier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090251361 | Bensley | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100027602 | Abshire | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100128109 | Banks | May 2010 | A1 |
20100157280 | Kusevic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182874 | Frank et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120075422 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120182540 | Suzuki | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120206712 | Chang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236379 | da Silva et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120310516 | Zeng | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120310519 | Lawlor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130088726 | Goyal et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093584 | Schumacher | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120760 | Raguin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130166113 | Dakin | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130206967 | Shpunt et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207970 | Shpunt et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222786 | Hanson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250276 | Chang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140036252 | Amzajerdian et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049609 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140152975 | Ko | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168631 | Haslim et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140233942 | Kanter | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140313519 | Shpunt et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150009485 | Mheen et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150055117 | Pennecot et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150234308 | Lim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150260843 | Lewis | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150301162 | Kim | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150371074 | Lin | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150378011 | Owechko | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160047895 | Dussan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047896 | Dussan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047903 | Dussan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160138944 | Lee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160178749 | Lin et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160200161 | Van Den Bossche et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160245902 | Watnik et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160280229 | Kasahara | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291160 | Zweigle et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160357187 | Ansari | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160363669 | Liu | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380488 | Widmer et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170023678 | Pink et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170090013 | Paradie et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170102457 | Li | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170199273 | Morikawa et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219696 | Hayakawa et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170269215 | Hall et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170270381 | Itoh et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170285346 | Pan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170307736 | Donovan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170307737 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170329010 | Warke | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170329011 | Warke | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180052378 | Shin et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180113193 | Huemer | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180128903 | Chang | May 2018 | A1 |
20180143309 | Pennecot et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180180718 | Lin | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180224529 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180241477 | Turbide et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180284237 | Campbell | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284282 | Hong et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180306913 | Bartels | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180341009 | Niclass et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180364334 | Xiang et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180372870 | Puglia | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190101644 | DeMersseman et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190129009 | Eichenholz et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190139951 | T'ng et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190146060 | Qiu et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190195990 | Shand | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190235064 | Droz et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200081129 | de Mersseman | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200088847 | DeMersseman et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200341120 | Ahn | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200341121 | Ahn | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
509180 | Jan 2016 | AT |
19757840 | Sep 1999 | DE |
102004033944 | Feb 2006 | DE |
102006031114 | Jul 2008 | DE |
102008045387 | Mar 2010 | DE |
102014218957 | Mar 2016 | DE |
102015217908 | Mar 2017 | DE |
0112188 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0578129 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2696166 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2824418 | Jan 2015 | EP |
3203259 | Aug 2017 | EP |
3457080 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3578129 | Dec 2019 | EP |
3147685 | Jan 2020 | EP |
1994019705 | Sep 1994 | WO |
2008008970 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2015014556 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2016072483 | May 2016 | WO |
2016097409 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016204139 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2019050643 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019099166 | May 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/064474, dated Apr. 1, 2021. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/057676, dated Jan. 23, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/052849, dated May 6, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/046800, dated Nov. 25, 2019. |
Kasturi et al., UAV-Bome LiDAR with MEMS Mirror Based Scanning Capability; SPIE Defense and Commercial Sensing Conference 2016, Baltimore, MD; 10 pages, 2016. |
Internet URL: https://www.continental-automotive.com/en-gl/Passenger-Cars/Chassis-Safety/Advanced-Driver-Assistance-Systems/Cameras [retrieved on Dec. 20, 2018]. |
Internet URL: https://www.continental-automotive.com/en-gl/Passenger-Cars/Chassis-Safety/Advanced-Driver-Assistance-Systems/Cameras/Multi-Function-Camera-with-Lidar [retrieved on Dec. 20, 2018]. |
Hi-Res 3d Flash LIDAR will Supplement Continental's Existing Portfolio for Automated Driving [online], Press Release, \larch 3, 2016, [retrieved on Dec. 20, 2018]. Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://www.continental-corporation.com/en/press/press-releases/hi-res-3d-flash-lidar-will-supplement-continental-s-existing-portfolio-for-automated-driving-15758. |
A milestone for laser sensors in self-driving cars [online], Trade Press, Jul. 11, 2016, [retrieved on Dec. 19, 2018]. Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://www.osram.com/os/press/press-releases/a_milestone_for_lasersensors_in_self-driving_carsjsp. |
Hewlett-Packard Application Note 77-4, Swept-Frequency Group Delay Measurements, Hewlett-Packard Co., September, 7 pages, 1968. |
Kravitz et al., High-Resolution Low-Sidelobe Laser Ranging Based on Incoherent Pulse Compression, IEEE Jhotonic,s Technology Letters, vol. 24, No. 23, pp. 2119-2121, 2012. |
Journet et al., A Low-Cost Laser Range Finder Based on an FMCW-like Method, IEEE Transactions on nstrumentation and Measurement, vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 840-843, 2000. |
Campbell et al., Advanced Sine Wave Modulation of Continuous Wave Laser System for Atmospheric CO2 Differential Absorption Measurements; NASA Langley Research Center, 32 pages, 2018. |
Levanon et al., Non-coherent Pulse Compression-Aperiodic and Periodic Waveforms; The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 9 pages, 2015. |
Peer et al., Compression Waveforms for Non-Coherent Radar, Tel Aviv University, 6 pages, 2018. |
Li, Time-of-Flight Camera-An Introduction, Technical White Paper, SLOA190B, Texas Instruments, 10 pages, 2014. |
Pierrottet et al., Linear FMCW Laser Radar for Precision Range and Vector Velocity Measurements, Coherent Applications, Inc., NASA Langley Research Center, 9 pages, 2018. |
Kahn, Modulation and Detection Techniques for Optical Communication Systems, Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, 3 pages, 2006. |
Niclass et al., Development of Automotive LIDAR, Electronics and Communications in Japan, vol. 98, No. 5, 6 pages, 2015. |
Su et al., 2-D FFT and Time-Frequency Analysis Techniques for Multi-Target Recognition of FMCW Radar Signal, Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference 2011, pp. 1390-1393. |
Wojtkiewicz et al., Two-Dimensional Signal Processing in FMCW Radars, Instytut Podstaw Elektroniki Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa, 6 pages, 2018. |
Winkler, Range Doppler Detection for Automotive FMCW Radars, Proceedings of the 4th European Radar Conference, Munich Germany, 4 pages, 2007. |
Li et al., Investigation of Beam Steering Performances in Rotation Risley-Prism Scanner, Optics Express, vol. 24, No. 12, 11 pages, 2016. |
THORLABS Application Note, Risley Prism Scanner, 33 pages, 2018. |
Simpson et al., Intensity-Modulated, Stepped Frequency CW Lidar for Distributed Aerosol and Hard Target Measurements, Applied Optics, vol. 44, No. 33, pp. 7210-7217, 2005. |
Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY 2001, pp. 45-48. |
Wang et al., Range-Doppler image processing in linear FMCW Radar and FPGA Based Real-Time Implementation, Journal of Communication and Computer, vol. 6, No. 4, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/057727 dated Jan. 28, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/052837 dated Jan. 24, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/033263 dated Aug. 29, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/048869 dated Nov. 8, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/051281 dated Nov. 22, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/054992 dated Dec. 11, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/049038 dated Dec. 12, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/033265 dated Sep. 1, 2017,. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/033271 dated Sep. 1, 2017. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for International Application No. PCT/US2018/052849 dated Mar. 8, 2019. |
http://www.advancedscientificconcepts.com/products/overview.html. |
Roncat, Andreas, The Geometry of Airborne Laser Scanning in a Kinematical Framework, Oct. 19, 2016, www.researchgate.net/profile/Andreas_Roncat/publication/310843362_The_Geometry_of Airborne_LaserScanningin_a_Kinematical_Frameworldinks/5839add708ae3a74b49ea03b1The-Geometry-of-Airbome-Laser-Scanning-in-a-Kinematical-Framework.pdf. |
Church et al., “Evaluation of a steerable 3D laser scanner using a double Risley prism pair,” SPIE Paper. |
Luhmann, “A historical review on panorama photogrammetry,” http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228766550. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/039760, dated Sep. 18, 2020. |
Communication from EP Application No. 18773034.6 dated Sep. 13, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210124050 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |